{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":3,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"8fea5b6be457","filters":{"venue":"Indian Journal of Constitutional Law"}},"results":[{"id":"W1544802020","doi":"10.61238/ijcl.2009.03.1.09","title":"Judicial Review of the State’s Anti-Terrorism Activities: The Post 9/11 Experience and Normative Justifications for Judicial Review","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Terrorism; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Legislation; Judicial activism; Normative; Supreme court; Competence (human resources); Human rights; State (computer science); Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0206713600375977,"gpt":0.3301918417934683,"spread":0.3095204817558705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0634322,0.0002400878,0.0006747288,0.001975932,0.01774397,0.02082659,0.003247859,0.01535222,0.003410073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1674239,0.001118054,0.0006607468,0.001747927,0.02250091,0.00775407,0.006750679,0.01938841,0.0008120732],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01309234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0245599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02562444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04330837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.922072,0.03788041,0.004784667,0.007043132,0.01771148,0.01050833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7744242,0.1543912,0.02329393,0.01014132,0.02994045,0.007808811],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001670949,0.0004932811,0.02374017,0.0003963581,0.00008121939,0.00722529,0.1668356,0.001126403,0.00295892,0.6336761,0.08596145,0.0773382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001533471,0.000594529,0.05024541,0.001275278,0.00009348497,0.004217815,0.0613802,0.00156809,0.004559321,0.09517378,0.7801947,0.0005441359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4036795,0.01302849,0.009054952,0.2838507,0.002584575,0.0002729601,0.0001526725,0.0001451814,0.287231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492686,0.002698939,0.001102746,0.02920996,0.001680628,0.0001123041,0.00004592105,0.00006245416,0.01581829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0634322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3354656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165390870","doi":"10.61238/ijcl.2021.10.1.03","title":"Proportionality and Burden of Proof: Constitutional Review in India","year":2021,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Supreme court; Burden of proof; Deference; Standard of review; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Skepticism","authors":[{"name":"Shruti Bedi","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02619840040560061,"gpt":0.3051970979898971,"spread":0.2789986975842965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02619443,0.0001732185,0.0006076987,0.003649713,0.005895564,0.01497982,0.00172811,0.005315979,0.001853484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07468004,0.0006326965,0.0004997603,0.003969124,0.02012703,0.007123027,0.006513137,0.006711867,0.0002375764],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01334438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02134806,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01638036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0168981,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9628379,0.01779319,0.003200508,0.003207538,0.01088528,0.002075583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9138339,0.0691658,0.004065653,0.004339106,0.00721777,0.001377888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001472211,0.000007693192,0.0005786442,0.0001292942,0.00001328674,0.0002361389,0.00227325,0.0003791025,0.0002271541,0.9816036,0.003046783,0.01149018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005136681,0.00009763506,0.007086055,0.001038495,0.00009500415,0.001010721,0.003006025,0.002199923,0.001861704,0.6585606,0.3248164,0.0001761734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1527266,0.09754749,0.0428347,0.2206913,0.002774504,0.0004184521,0.0003205163,0.0001879494,0.4824984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587895,0.01141995,0.006062628,0.01214591,0.000943522,0.000137439,0.00004502948,0.00003617082,0.01041972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02619443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.138531,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165400790","doi":"10.61238/ijcl.2021.10.1.05","title":"Government Copyright in School Textbooks and the Fundamental Right to Education","year":2021,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Data Privacy and Cybersecurity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realisation; Government (linguistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); State (computer science); Right to education; Inequality; Digital divide; Pandemic","authors":[{"name":"Anupriya Dhonchak","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rahul Bajaj","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008646942087978218,"gpt":0.273284606827271,"spread":0.2646376647392928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004490914,0.0001715743,0.0003224445,0.001360723,0.004212451,0.01209287,0.001100356,0.005625441,0.01693051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02714202,0.0003240952,0.000327236,0.00190494,0.02425698,0.00823403,0.005171061,0.004865709,0.002070822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004172907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007040086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009226293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008640427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927468,0.002358007,0.000538104,0.0007779413,0.002624503,0.00095468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770572,0.01121342,0.003489467,0.004730695,0.002286813,0.001222385],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001220069,0.00002782209,0.001557357,0.00003978879,0.000003334593,0.0001273485,0.004157584,0.00008506775,0.0001415607,0.9746746,0.005501792,0.01367161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002481396,0.00006164858,0.0105635,0.0007962993,0.00002536788,0.0006046556,0.006337371,0.0003222545,0.001074476,0.5338335,0.446299,0.00005712784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08128741,0.005565186,0.005211474,0.08438892,0.0009060449,0.00005529126,0.0003064552,0.00009619214,0.822183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9319615,0.001805517,0.001250873,0.006507085,0.00052141,0.00003990153,0.0001098224,0.00004138887,0.05776243],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01693051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05663824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}