{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":3,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"8fea5b6be457","filters":{"venue":"Indian Journal of Constitutional Law"}},"results":[{"id":"W1544802020","doi":"10.61238/ijcl.2009.03.1.09","title":"Judicial Review of the State’s Anti-Terrorism Activities: The Post 9/11 Experience and Normative Justifications for Judicial Review","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Terrorism; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Legislation; Judicial activism; Normative; Supreme court; Competence (human resources); Human rights; State (computer science); Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0206713600375977,"gpt":0.3301918417934683,"spread":0.3095204817558705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000902231,0.00009007783,0.0002450412,0.00003973074,0.001078345,0.000040722,0.0004047906,0.00003499292,0.0001182839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003452407,0.00005277921,0.0001701738,0.0000950671,0.002436219,0.0004202675,0.00001488718,0.0001626337,0.000002008909],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007128577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001035554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001149159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002688046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985113,0.0001756033,0.0005338092,0.00008446207,0.0005486024,0.0001462813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981653,0.0002485164,0.0006590056,0.00009654592,0.0007606732,0.0000699774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009605217,0.00003148455,0.00002517129,0.0001450352,0.00001995529,0.000003232359,0.002922992,0.000002298969,0.00001830474,0.9956551,0.0009659831,0.0002008774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079587,0.0002618715,0.004907317,0.03172349,0.0003474401,0.0003746144,0.001301006,0.00000319058,0.0004810425,0.32098,0.6384176,0.0004065207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4695744,0.07861784,0.003480207,0.3030378,0.007643316,0.006580202,0.001850648,0.00004983021,0.1291658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886853,0.003987155,0.00007372796,0.006720159,0.0003916295,0.000009266423,0.000004457887,0.000002040586,0.0001262921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.674675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8976352,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165390870","doi":"10.61238/ijcl.2021.10.1.03","title":"Proportionality and Burden of Proof: Constitutional Review in India","year":2021,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Supreme court; Burden of proof; Deference; Standard of review; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Skepticism","authors":[{"name":"Shruti Bedi","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02619840040560061,"gpt":0.3051970979898971,"spread":0.2789986975842965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002715433,0.0003394069,0.001177833,0.0002317161,0.0007684102,0.00006902573,0.0003543099,0.0002604925,0.001031847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001631316,0.0003276792,0.0003922379,0.001060277,0.03347198,0.0007894772,0.0001633965,0.000736086,0.00001518685],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003436092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01650025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004294932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003141318,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943861,0.0006090404,0.002313767,0.0003988339,0.001803252,0.0004890194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948019,0.000467055,0.001510094,0.0001590785,0.002670839,0.0003909861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008033359,0.0003493947,0.009598722,0.0005818394,0.0003191495,0.001420297,0.0007377316,0.00006234384,0.00006867514,0.9854798,0.0004120748,0.0008895804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00492618,0.0004530851,0.02412445,0.04153865,0.001015819,0.009106806,0.004897295,0.000006232785,0.0009825461,0.446501,0.4649555,0.001492494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03922297,0.5261626,0.0008415384,0.03685289,0.004244796,0.001681261,0.001184198,0.00001822246,0.3897916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729298,0.024627,0.0004319916,0.001123277,0.0007864872,0.00001052842,0.0000224236,0.000004657405,0.00006385773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9337068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165400790","doi":"10.61238/ijcl.2021.10.1.05","title":"Government Copyright in School Textbooks and the Fundamental Right to Education","year":2021,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Data Privacy and Cybersecurity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realisation; Government (linguistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); State (computer science); Right to education; Inequality; Digital divide; Pandemic","authors":[{"name":"Anupriya Dhonchak","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rahul Bajaj","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008646942087978218,"gpt":0.273284606827271,"spread":0.2646376647392928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001759368,0.0001604286,0.0003133643,0.00005858527,0.0009088117,0.0004058596,0.0004190885,0.0001092445,0.002377514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004594578,0.0001224421,0.0001339508,0.0002789341,0.004449443,0.0007769538,0.0001441185,0.0005464143,0.00008174983],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006673262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006030941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003487121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002358476,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971306,0.000564625,0.000716374,0.0002147648,0.001086102,0.0002875357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984316,0.0003038059,0.0003708417,0.0001689852,0.0002423236,0.0004824892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002387355,0.0002730267,0.002032031,0.00001182311,0.00007476415,0.0001958587,0.004096926,0.000005728414,0.00003044057,0.9878911,0.003970698,0.001178845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002520866,0.00006823601,0.001898766,0.0005605593,0.00007830553,0.0008564889,0.01100636,0.000002471785,0.0003495948,0.06443787,0.9179965,0.0002239678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3179197,0.008671205,0.0002304721,0.05834804,0.005932284,0.0008484626,0.0005435323,0.000006210587,0.6075001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938556,0.0003292121,0.0003246956,0.004259875,0.0006318946,0.000006280158,0.000005530403,0.000003357159,0.0005835533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9234533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996039,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}