{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":4,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"b00f39ec6927","filters":{"venue":"Indian Journal of Legal Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W4416993015","doi":"10.65393/elwy7299","title":"PUBLIC LEGAL EDUCATION: A KEY TO JUSTICE FOR ALL","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Legal Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Key (lock); Bridge (graph theory); Legal research; Legal profession; Public policy","authors":[{"name":"VANSHITA MALHOTRA","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09832075091890358,"gpt":0.4556871435625759,"spread":0.3573663926436723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006241791,0.0003047444,0.0007886706,0.0007913777,0.0008724348,0.001630402,0.001235359,0.0001794951,0.001660188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02266776,0.0002930331,0.0005239761,0.004129629,0.0001731031,0.00378896,0.00006138642,0.001209319,0.0002259401],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006365847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0416384,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003258286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003215931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953637,0.0007720909,0.002134944,0.000332952,0.000772057,0.000624259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910625,0.001056564,0.001808714,0.000417755,0.004856308,0.0007981386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002592199,0.0004042169,0.0000188896,0.002298675,0.0001565169,0.000009513214,0.003053732,6.669943e-7,0.000004581202,0.341179,0.5193048,0.1335435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002873475,0.0002128578,0.00005996466,0.007784153,0.001100727,0.000136373,0.00375612,8.520051e-7,0.000007033902,0.001428338,0.9849613,0.0002648801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001994642,0.1106263,0.0009802864,0.7462012,0.01170785,0.001362756,0.00002105407,0.00001037138,0.1288907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2545468,0.1756945,0.01391195,0.4437518,0.00961601,0.0003379724,0.00002947787,0.00007470096,0.1020367],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4656566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416991948","doi":"10.65393/ofkc4097","title":"GENDER DISCRIMINATION IN INDIAN LAW: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF LEGAL PROTECTIONS FOR MEN","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Legal Review","topic":"International Human Rights and Reproductive Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Harm; Domestic violence; Gender inequality; Gender discrimination; Economic Justice; Gender equality; Criminal justice","authors":[{"name":"AVNI BHATIA","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04295046396589832,"gpt":0.4022160536511549,"spread":0.3592655896852566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003705922,0.0002232374,0.001106048,0.001230768,0.000443211,0.0001695064,0.0005428588,0.0001533232,0.0004265663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015033,0.000170741,0.001040027,0.002085698,0.0007950301,0.001034531,0.00004240493,0.0005797632,0.000002967654],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004499775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001236169,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00120769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004393294,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959843,0.0006805812,0.001831968,0.0003498815,0.0007775227,0.0003757321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966398,0.0003714628,0.0009437922,0.000226638,0.001660011,0.0001582359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006424636,0.0004281627,0.000141199,0.002455785,0.00137654,0.00008302815,0.005495734,0.00004397204,0.00002201175,0.9832469,0.0006618381,0.00598062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00180714,0.0010963,0.01137473,0.03049968,0.01295031,0.0001338315,0.007591481,0.0002011368,0.0005419072,0.09942912,0.8334794,0.0008949325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05921677,0.3545029,0.01446265,0.2637588,0.00983106,0.01262471,0.0007550178,0.00003690214,0.2848112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885408,0.008350178,0.0003175601,0.000535743,0.0004290176,0.00004523223,0.000006448619,0.0000111661,0.00176388],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.929324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6962615,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118160689","doi":"10.65393/qcpr1945","title":"PATENT LINKAGE: NEXUS BETWEEN INNOVATION, ACCESS, AND REGULATORY AUTHORITY","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Legal Review","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Discretion; Patent infringement; Linkage (software); Incentive; Generic drug; Biosimilar; Premise; Pharmaceutical industry","authors":[{"name":"S. RENUKA","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.126082477794947,"gpt":0.3632457093283946,"spread":0.2371632315334476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004485046,0.0003677792,0.001854397,0.001047269,0.0002142419,0.0005468798,0.0008631281,0.0002700222,0.0004669542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001066596,0.0004082676,0.0003735151,0.001542306,0.0002178078,0.001265979,0.0002878566,0.001318389,0.00008061532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003231372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007584207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002943051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003228454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994611,0.0001240005,0.004251786,0.0004250472,0.00008581468,0.0005023989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955403,0.000192717,0.003089561,0.0004338271,0.0003557877,0.0003878334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004312523,0.0001954863,0.1109358,0.01188681,0.001128815,0.0001432053,0.0002194763,0.00001283995,0.000002226092,0.5540546,0.04104926,0.2803284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009202093,0.0001160372,0.06360267,0.00573111,0.0002129464,0.00006522409,0.000006601574,0.00004817532,0.00002116455,0.05810414,0.8708012,0.0003705893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0939615,0.8112371,0.0005546017,0.07293612,0.00274201,0.0007122635,0.0003735007,0.000009303007,0.01747362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6502569,0.3369635,0.00009879763,0.01134384,0.0007510286,0.000004763249,0.000006587174,0.0000238856,0.0005507433],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8297518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998369,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7151977261","doi":"10.65393/ijlrv6i467","title":"A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON EXPERT OPINION UNDER EVIDENCE LAWS : INDIA AND DEVLOPED COUNTRY","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Legal Review","topic":"International Environmental Law and Policies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expert opinion; Statutory law; Gatekeeping; Judicial opinion; Accreditation; Scientific evidence; Perspective (graphical); Expert elicitation","authors":[{"name":"SHUBHAM KUMAR","is_ca":false},{"name":"Deo Narayan Singh","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05447021032477979,"gpt":0.3710399465694518,"spread":0.3165697362446721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001287493,0.0003869278,0.000737018,0.0001225936,0.0001850584,0.000323517,0.0004792721,0.00008161384,0.002025111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006472671,0.0002937385,0.0002001165,0.0003234161,0.0004176853,0.001239076,0.0001737583,0.000763645,0.0006445607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005818475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001554628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001524468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003187206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966481,0.0004123586,0.001081871,0.000377439,0.001148063,0.0003322186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985958,0.0004004634,0.0004492692,0.000215896,0.00002378208,0.0003148197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002565362,0.01166476,0.02851512,0.0180977,0.008327343,0.02070424,0.2073482,0.001757066,0.006689169,0.1227433,0.1962286,0.3753592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005031375,0.003366638,0.03995371,0.05417333,0.0001771157,0.0018398,0.001988655,0.00003022768,0.0002287125,0.000154096,0.8970394,0.0005451686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1488731,0.8298686,0.00003370082,0.007062514,0.002145738,0.001300387,0.000070484,0.00001122832,0.01063425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7614457,0.2344579,0.00003921769,0.003140548,0.0003125448,0.00001020632,0.000001406144,0.00001904179,0.0005734416],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7008108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999515,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}