{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":546,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":546,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"ab1775ad0da3","filters":{"venue":"Informal Logic"}},"results":[{"id":"W2132900127","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i1.2254","title":"The Disposition Toward Critical Thinking: Its Character, Measurement, and Relationship to Critical Thinking Skill","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":873,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Psychology; Disposition; Systematic process; Cognition; Convergent thinking; Character (mathematics); Curriculum; Process (computing); Cognitive skill; Empirical research; Epistemology; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Creative thinking; Creativity; Work in process; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Peter A. Facione","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08520723245864432,"gpt":0.361598972306245,"spread":0.2763917398476007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004288019,0.0001477133,0.0001735643,0.00211366,0.0004153928,0.001423951,0.0002559137,0.0005594275,0.0009274689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06214621,0.0001673206,0.0001830919,0.001365362,0.002055784,0.001080965,0.00117581,0.001149058,0.0001752202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006221881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006882905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004122434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004722375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969966,0.001483511,0.0003530445,0.0002598117,0.0007693461,0.0001377134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9028104,0.06482083,0.02147955,0.003174111,0.004909045,0.002806056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001073336,0.0002569596,0.9485056,0.00007179612,0.00006114569,0.00006900398,0.002349482,0.0004456547,0.001964633,0.004423514,0.0002012069,0.04154372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008792674,0.00025821,0.9874212,0.00007108681,0.00001964389,0.0006498118,0.001521301,0.001664262,0.0009760983,0.006563706,0.0008261655,0.00001970154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882354,0.0006009057,0.003424132,0.0003779473,0.00002060699,0.00005205255,0.00004614865,0.0000229983,0.00721992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982297,0.0001447435,0.001401182,0.0000302998,0.00001163906,0.0000275509,0.00003096351,0.000003703814,0.0001201486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004288019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02267748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790829410","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i1.5068","title":"Fake News: A Definition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":456,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disinformation; Fake news; Phrase; Presentation (obstetrics); News media; Internet privacy; Advertising; Political science; Computer science; Social media; Law; Business","authors":[{"name":"Axel Gelfert","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09240612773996595,"gpt":0.3392981935268757,"spread":0.2468920657869098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007196223,0.001353255,0.001104064,0.008816575,0.00496153,0.01249666,0.00196489,0.007464376,0.003868843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02139278,0.0005231689,0.0006991296,0.006193721,0.03910267,0.01627257,0.005526659,0.006204652,0.001143271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004185737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002239952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009398101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000318156,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9874457,0.006435933,0.001026988,0.001110465,0.003296193,0.0006846861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683903,0.02051399,0.004318573,0.003301613,0.002809476,0.0006659953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001508257,0.00001616584,0.0004275152,0.0001502384,0.00000583517,0.0001336984,0.005509933,0.0001436546,0.000110136,0.9814667,0.003033133,0.008987876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002084515,0.00007775123,0.001138308,0.001003713,0.00002276412,0.001614142,0.005329481,0.001200661,0.0003654629,0.6903847,0.2987857,0.00005632278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05215516,0.1101646,0.2123125,0.1107247,0.004873889,0.0004301846,0.0007040829,0.0002522855,0.5083825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9048693,0.02919199,0.03428016,0.008487398,0.005345007,0.0009420477,0.00050472,0.0001533969,0.01622596],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01249666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03805768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576216411","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1040","title":"The Logic of Deep Disagreements","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Robert J. Fogelin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02678810802545237,"gpt":0.2643453754008185,"spread":0.2375572673753661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0147029,0.0007805389,0.001428633,0.002840313,0.004313914,0.0107103,0.002783662,0.005229298,0.00814698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05461609,0.001247387,0.001596899,0.003198464,0.0169306,0.02612402,0.006084252,0.00958547,0.0009878903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004424333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002094498,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002277239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001403019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.985077,0.008112829,0.0009175299,0.002109258,0.002834032,0.0009494139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95249,0.03658583,0.002545828,0.003773633,0.003516166,0.001088549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008981004,0.000004501829,0.00007749781,0.00001799929,0.000007009919,0.00001741132,0.0001998774,0.0004324151,0.00003683711,0.9970905,0.0005765432,0.00153042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000452185,8.311169e-7,0.00001415581,0.000005545377,0.000002313761,0.000006179298,0.00001953773,0.0009956759,0.00001655424,0.9983751,0.0005570373,0.000002582142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05941645,0.004004166,0.7453968,0.04943392,0.0005041101,0.0001228802,0.0008765904,0.0004538449,0.1397913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9202053,0.001371716,0.06321361,0.00356377,0.001088489,0.0002785377,0.000508107,0.000149421,0.009621055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0147029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0777573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522061514","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4725","title":"Errors of Reasoning, Naturalizing the Logic of Inference","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"James B. Freeman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08521820864784566,"gpt":0.2969468926641764,"spread":0.2117286840163307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04240375,0.001311674,0.001321868,0.00506597,0.005162292,0.01362666,0.004673347,0.005564787,0.005538888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1514981,0.001068877,0.001205101,0.002010026,0.06906512,0.03010536,0.006376549,0.008987666,0.0004928328],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00688726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007085561,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004646267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002678219,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9613963,0.02860898,0.001604668,0.003202065,0.004140422,0.001047624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7928737,0.1796877,0.005404299,0.01341685,0.007308886,0.001308513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002990109,0.00001163895,0.0002227053,0.00006515301,0.00001383244,0.0000495084,0.00242943,0.001030276,0.00006742383,0.9928315,0.0009742956,0.002274365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009682415,0.000002326837,0.00003844512,0.00002636975,0.000005182411,0.00001597867,0.0004230983,0.001187304,0.0001353676,0.9959725,0.00217912,0.000004557847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.06628631,0.004845509,0.7234849,0.08972953,0.001584485,0.0002704526,0.0003443662,0.0004017576,0.1130526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.914293,0.001224421,0.07549269,0.00271404,0.0009436638,0.0002668631,0.0001378834,0.0001937224,0.004733796],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04240375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2242551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098137601","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.432","title":"In Defense of the Objective Epistemic Approach to Argumentation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":153,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Fallacy; Subjectivism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"John Biro","is_ca":false},{"name":"Harvey Siegel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07432956683130892,"gpt":0.2587859281955193,"spread":0.1844563613642104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02495793,0.0008929124,0.001067414,0.003107225,0.00457175,0.01123141,0.003269671,0.007885734,0.004924155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02988308,0.0005697466,0.001757909,0.001873409,0.02435474,0.01533357,0.008016862,0.0111576,0.001176683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003946756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003956349,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00106461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001341453,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9735231,0.01474784,0.001372913,0.002214115,0.007209064,0.000932918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736007,0.01536121,0.002586891,0.00398999,0.003514602,0.0009465622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003601251,0.000004010709,0.00006093407,0.00002515566,0.000006505537,0.0000112413,0.0002938625,0.0001923822,0.00002308871,0.9976643,0.0002885571,0.001426204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001040555,0.00001020745,0.00007940823,0.0001032651,0.00001033999,0.0000460162,0.0001808268,0.001001129,0.00009118631,0.9817446,0.01671522,0.000007474043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01533736,0.003164307,0.6289083,0.0526822,0.001295621,0.0001200643,0.0001203914,0.0001688218,0.298203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8498746,0.0028623,0.1051333,0.01311001,0.002686388,0.0005965494,0.0001405375,0.0002469004,0.02534939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02495793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1319917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1671099834","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2907","title":"Deliberation versus Dispute: The Impact of Argumentative Discourse Goals on Learning and Reasoning in the Science Classroom","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Generalitat de Catalunya; Harvard University","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Deliberation; Argument (complex analysis); Task (project management); Intervention (counseling); Psychological intervention; Quality (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Mark Felton","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mercè García-Milà","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sandra Gilabert","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04630920845330529,"gpt":0.4266440509108719,"spread":0.3803348424575667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02287328,0.0006287298,0.0007523954,0.001723605,0.002078505,0.009766774,0.001477756,0.002568828,0.003696529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1924013,0.0006050438,0.0007397097,0.001062831,0.00900851,0.008127646,0.008036209,0.005849619,0.0004012247],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001753086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002189893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007841323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005968732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9660244,0.02379919,0.001233464,0.001803404,0.005786875,0.001352671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6505126,0.3175195,0.01735482,0.005333812,0.003771108,0.005508258],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008446991,0.01521042,0.1379036,0.002340829,0.0006888242,0.0009687562,0.3047573,0.01020705,0.02932672,0.1475581,0.002623443,0.339968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00285391,0.006497928,0.3144128,0.001741696,0.001208808,0.001004858,0.1236313,0.03432333,0.02517137,0.472112,0.01649305,0.0005489204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9795401,0.000362275,0.003047768,0.001035769,0.00002541745,0.00007652645,0.00001703774,0.00003339257,0.01586176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99696,0.0001530226,0.002123375,0.0001147743,0.00001268411,0.0001049519,0.0000210201,0.00003104526,0.0004790791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02287328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1209669,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146285180","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2903","title":"Argument Content and Argument Source: An Exploration","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; University of Warwick","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Bayesian probability; Content (measure theory); Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Ulrike Hahn","is_ca":false},{"name":"Adam J. L. Harris","is_ca":false},{"name":"Adam Corner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08683420969472098,"gpt":0.2725883723733077,"spread":0.1857541626785867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02917792,0.001013972,0.001517951,0.007685473,0.002588665,0.01595326,0.002285086,0.003223151,0.01063654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1142982,0.001294208,0.001083734,0.006133474,0.009442354,0.02629893,0.006433797,0.003734339,0.001058196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003771716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003020233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008938432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007976887,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9785402,0.01540872,0.000676116,0.000933225,0.003940526,0.0005013521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.804561,0.1800598,0.004368464,0.00337696,0.006548567,0.001085293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004976292,0.0003094033,0.02281299,0.001155295,0.0001775757,0.001016696,0.03004821,0.001766528,0.001741408,0.8517827,0.001040459,0.08765111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001053171,0.0001576465,0.02028653,0.001404926,0.0001670879,0.00180684,0.01796419,0.01516425,0.001118239,0.9263799,0.0153819,0.00006309972],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4236661,0.02050525,0.2234232,0.02253458,0.0001507354,0.0005585372,0.0003953929,0.0002926041,0.3084736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738364,0.002980572,0.02037673,0.0002495782,0.00009879708,0.0001588075,0.0001013779,0.0001560796,0.002041722],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02917792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1543095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130107788","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i2.2241","title":"Abductive, presumptive and plausible arguments","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Abductive reasoning; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Set (abstract data type); Deductive reasoning; Informal logic; Computer science; Philosophy; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0291067013769463,"gpt":0.2560387679357436,"spread":0.2269320665587974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02830066,0.001466997,0.001351994,0.006844011,0.003963332,0.01651658,0.004504138,0.01008547,0.00502471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05258243,0.001253031,0.001554136,0.005665085,0.04141789,0.02996898,0.009752286,0.009194337,0.001161547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005374237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002672477,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001010814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001062457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9698033,0.01815172,0.002828974,0.002315914,0.006021355,0.0008785987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9619036,0.02644845,0.004101484,0.003919032,0.002423663,0.001203879],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008649957,0.000007148874,0.00006269025,0.0000600725,0.000003897023,0.00002158172,0.0005811196,0.0001919676,0.00002818373,0.9947713,0.0004304899,0.003832857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001096816,0.000007035802,0.00006389827,0.0000961334,0.000004667692,0.0000538428,0.0002814838,0.0005850861,0.00005921584,0.9876084,0.01122217,0.000007029156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02038367,0.04824193,0.6635404,0.06019135,0.001651339,0.0004283546,0.000377123,0.0002691085,0.2049167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6098823,0.01817396,0.3434586,0.005470709,0.002621833,0.001408329,0.0004272528,0.0001285828,0.01842848],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02830066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1496699,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141098873","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i1.465","title":"Argument Has No Function","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Pragmatics; Dissent; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Function (biology); Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Jean Goodwin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04477042791859612,"gpt":0.2692838126201691,"spread":0.224513384701573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01078397,0.0009788582,0.001182444,0.001852373,0.005231744,0.01422173,0.001555794,0.006539209,0.01278292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01671514,0.0007960928,0.00133162,0.0009974873,0.04528621,0.02806187,0.006247967,0.00616421,0.004619264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005087813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003105378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009505416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007912872,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880242,0.006941147,0.0005474071,0.001915125,0.001892353,0.0006797289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861332,0.007859705,0.0006925771,0.002733855,0.001882805,0.0006979182],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001149132,0.000004981093,0.00006227468,0.00003533137,0.000004033674,0.00001091635,0.000564635,0.00003511668,0.00005970888,0.9948166,0.001724832,0.002670027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001992258,0.00002524904,0.0000900768,0.00008913007,0.00001375254,0.00008189072,0.0003769298,0.000300011,0.0002774928,0.9095462,0.08916383,0.00001554338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.016836,0.007958042,0.2150459,0.09485871,0.003526635,0.00007992481,0.0001467301,0.0007879942,0.66076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8555623,0.002370736,0.05068607,0.01596644,0.001613391,0.0003631033,0.0001966051,0.0006936775,0.07254758],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01422173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05703175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516495875","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i3.3032","title":"Philosophy, Adversarial Argumentation, and Embattled Reason","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Metaphor; Adversarial system; Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Epistemology; Narrative; Philosophy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Phyllis Rooney","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02219804767307742,"gpt":0.3097081608687018,"spread":0.2875101131956244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01558754,0.0006285225,0.0005853229,0.002406911,0.00827737,0.01061788,0.001658437,0.00397821,0.006311344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0196008,0.0003259733,0.0005231879,0.002005028,0.07449447,0.01417971,0.01003912,0.006373177,0.0005108363],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006129903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00343997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001255264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001610182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9823074,0.01401081,0.000322494,0.0009989879,0.001502878,0.0008573538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9695498,0.02413886,0.00290349,0.001464262,0.000743438,0.001200239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001316053,0.00001064042,0.0004452079,0.00004354469,0.000004755181,0.00008294476,0.03482983,0.00007275302,0.00008416222,0.9601084,0.000902399,0.003402289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001256108,0.00002271318,0.0005960105,0.0002161334,0.000007143352,0.0002614501,0.03482839,0.000319106,0.0002768702,0.879483,0.08396267,0.00001393917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2618932,0.01271924,0.1039176,0.1077533,0.0009073878,0.00009386377,0.0001013469,0.0001190532,0.512495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859834,0.00113857,0.004153756,0.001759454,0.0001563708,0.0000520657,0.00001546249,0.00003976672,0.006701202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01558754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08243579,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499385902","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i3.2246","title":"Classifying and Analyzing Analogies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Argument (complex analysis); A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Analogical reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Inductive reasoning; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Bruce N. Waller","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.100031304500688,"gpt":0.4019632553116803,"spread":0.3019319508109922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006502014,0.0008901797,0.001158317,0.01436733,0.003742909,0.01268556,0.002651148,0.002770344,0.01274248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05424765,0.0006236563,0.001656236,0.00993178,0.0122404,0.01953292,0.006785782,0.003529781,0.001005942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00417898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002060473,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002745222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001688248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9860799,0.006099803,0.001218301,0.002257521,0.003749067,0.0005954795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725924,0.01740563,0.002158979,0.004474867,0.002738378,0.0006298146],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003417216,0.00004652797,0.003020928,0.0002083693,0.00005542311,0.0002250582,0.003480661,0.001846258,0.0004141282,0.9371469,0.001495356,0.0520263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001196984,0.00001709183,0.001234159,0.0001081664,0.00002494805,0.0001546163,0.001416881,0.005151516,0.0003440743,0.9703023,0.02121657,0.00001756999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1401754,0.007289327,0.6641144,0.006578893,0.0003468299,0.001040303,0.001292212,0.0009832298,0.1781795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6334085,0.002397201,0.3517977,0.0008037693,0.0003633023,0.0007593036,0.002296251,0.0002485579,0.007925466],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01436733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04262787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1615233463","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i3.2843","title":"Argumentation in Discourse: A Socio-discursive Approach to Arguments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Logos Bible Software; Rhetorical question; Linguistics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Ruth Amossy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03834399691533259,"gpt":0.3009816324172429,"spread":0.2626376355019103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01907673,0.00160141,0.001557668,0.01292067,0.00859251,0.02720442,0.004976505,0.008544052,0.005305965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01355959,0.0007855143,0.002049498,0.008538185,0.05985555,0.01887247,0.007358957,0.005910268,0.001219515],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01129444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005198511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002893694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002546755,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9725065,0.02257427,0.0007874256,0.001085851,0.002458825,0.0005870941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981662,0.01434184,0.001185203,0.001225555,0.001036718,0.0005486487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005991392,0.000007274115,0.00004522461,0.00008881103,0.00000816899,0.000077116,0.009141374,0.0002840942,0.000082048,0.9875732,0.0004419645,0.002244672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001302277,0.000008355808,0.00006245211,0.0001509045,0.000007219883,0.00009040356,0.003235918,0.001220572,0.0001432656,0.9550906,0.03996829,0.000008981598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01457185,0.02532942,0.6781872,0.03923881,0.001088121,0.0003716231,0.0002985042,0.0002546488,0.2406599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7264186,0.009633155,0.2340742,0.002908287,0.001967053,0.001081373,0.0002771544,0.0003426064,0.02329766],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02720442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1008886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150078957","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1043","title":"Treacherous Ascents: On Seeking Common Ground for Conflict Resolution","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generality; Common ground; Resolution (logic); Computer science; Conflict resolution; Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Christian K. Campolo","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1351682587094321,"gpt":0.3132166242604163,"spread":0.1780483655509842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03430935,0.0008328394,0.0009823855,0.003198694,0.008874257,0.01422543,0.004093336,0.007537999,0.008594281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08753565,0.0006760081,0.001384781,0.002131082,0.05668928,0.02809905,0.01782191,0.009331028,0.001704846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005402876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006523541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002928963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003237131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9712452,0.02082028,0.0009148901,0.002285923,0.002975829,0.001757872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9508256,0.03089749,0.003824004,0.007332951,0.004185689,0.002934361],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008660334,0.00004371404,0.0007650798,0.00004870662,0.00001673786,0.0002241013,0.01513335,0.001640319,0.0002314337,0.9580653,0.003624136,0.02012054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000186597,0.00001325126,0.000142745,0.00006466113,0.000006077651,0.00004463378,0.003550392,0.003096185,0.0002091354,0.9823418,0.0104982,0.00001415151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1205735,0.002120058,0.5288882,0.1162193,0.0006378668,0.0004170378,0.00008429061,0.000630839,0.230429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9196205,0.0006383522,0.06741767,0.002853495,0.0002443245,0.0001935414,0.00008103185,0.0001847219,0.008766401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03430935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1814474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608791421","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i3.1135","title":"The Epistemological Theory of Argument--How and Why?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Object (grammar); Function (biology); Principal (computer security); Argument map; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Christoph Lumer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02587197003399448,"gpt":0.2343020442226691,"spread":0.2084300741886746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0120874,0.0009947773,0.001684305,0.002686175,0.003924292,0.01630295,0.002683257,0.006924987,0.00695314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01984688,0.0006439099,0.00151015,0.003251082,0.03468001,0.02230575,0.00451801,0.007330318,0.002934563],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003830956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004199415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001246291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009159519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9851344,0.01011699,0.0008136182,0.0009944011,0.002446715,0.0004940153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858512,0.01015333,0.0007493593,0.001744427,0.001094002,0.0004076969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004254072,0.000005107817,0.00005569696,0.0000922727,0.000009297349,0.00003144892,0.0005221957,0.0001531713,0.00002940226,0.9926172,0.001714358,0.004765605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005561983,0.000004226518,0.00002842819,0.0001277648,0.000004931112,0.00006366093,0.0002703205,0.0004212767,0.00005136398,0.9663666,0.03265003,0.000005723028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004857613,0.03285809,0.4787823,0.09255587,0.005043796,0.0001735549,0.0002299211,0.0002651496,0.3852338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6436035,0.0347087,0.231677,0.0275479,0.007775602,0.00135653,0.0005446271,0.0004730749,0.05231307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01630295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06392497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166139333","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2153","title":"An Epistemological Approach to Argumentation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Epistemology; Interpersonal communication; Simple (philosophy); Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Alvin I. Goldman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09099506718038776,"gpt":0.2969452559415837,"spread":0.205950188761196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0138523,0.001185652,0.001225165,0.004933819,0.007477852,0.0162109,0.003600001,0.00691682,0.00877088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01436513,0.000731018,0.001917679,0.003476785,0.04107076,0.01802354,0.007203153,0.008490846,0.002076606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007681262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006422963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001953508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001675865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9800524,0.01347309,0.001124007,0.001416938,0.003157842,0.0007758195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875964,0.007922227,0.0007617602,0.001499877,0.001587567,0.0006322589],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001353229,0.000003755956,0.00001354403,0.000023301,0.000002837549,0.00001408344,0.0003599463,0.00008051261,0.00001468691,0.9976631,0.0006009492,0.001221896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004487757,0.000002986188,0.00001228691,0.00004814769,0.000002144131,0.00002580035,0.000191919,0.0002703145,0.00002339961,0.9729424,0.02647305,0.000003158408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002923912,0.01214253,0.3840885,0.05829408,0.002240642,0.0002119829,0.000186632,0.0001947356,0.5397171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5482918,0.01253111,0.3269742,0.01297021,0.005227245,0.001494205,0.0003498516,0.0003034533,0.09185791],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0162109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07325882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506123608","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i3.2592","title":"Dialogue Games in Multi-Agent Systems","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Interface (matter); Human–computer interaction; Software; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Management science; Philosophy; Psychology; Engineering; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Peter McBurney","is_ca":false},{"name":"Simon Parsons","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06039407464896068,"gpt":0.2725946541996599,"spread":0.2122005795506993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002810327,0.001089641,0.001302066,0.001251018,0.001881341,0.005502877,0.001593513,0.002967753,0.004580541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005807979,0.0006569636,0.0007556775,0.001607524,0.006485402,0.007007279,0.002542529,0.003715325,0.0007635793],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003344709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001752934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002827843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001871177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963482,0.002020364,0.0002184021,0.0003481921,0.0007696714,0.0002951442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997309,0.001854759,0.0001886857,0.0001690704,0.0002373806,0.0002411616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000810544,0.00001173361,0.00004423879,0.00006688444,0.00000724973,0.00006949345,0.0002562307,0.004222788,0.00009922375,0.9905585,0.001078672,0.003576841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001580465,0.00001114673,0.0000429264,0.00003964338,0.000005595624,0.00004504805,0.00009651241,0.01032878,0.00007667968,0.9740752,0.01525345,0.000009231943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02507649,0.08084833,0.6787782,0.01469141,0.00156902,0.0004021246,0.0002370018,0.0003982132,0.1979993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8472937,0.02175809,0.1043322,0.001397547,0.001461236,0.0007551456,0.000218688,0.00009650325,0.02268677],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005502877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02426773,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558336695","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2262","title":"Informal Logic: An Overview","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; sort; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy of logic; Sociology; Philosophy; Information retrieval; Argumentation theory","authors":[{"name":"J. Anthony Blair","is_ca":true},{"name":"Ralph H. Johnson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1625553534970857,"gpt":0.3147098564452695,"spread":0.1521545029481838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006214554,0.0009749333,0.0009825719,0.007831542,0.003132061,0.007829423,0.001842475,0.00285736,0.007532786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006869098,0.0006916421,0.001187711,0.006856787,0.01112892,0.01780055,0.003899602,0.00421867,0.001896251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004619968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003754215,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00281149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001316072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942139,0.002929781,0.0004968457,0.000520634,0.001450296,0.0003885602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992708,0.005726642,0.0002907448,0.0004608583,0.0006297696,0.0001838756],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001042397,0.00001307122,0.0001546263,0.000464756,0.000008118035,0.00006571374,0.000641052,0.0004498059,0.00006925692,0.9669868,0.004885888,0.02625054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000741198,0.00001761068,0.0001728397,0.0006811603,0.000009756412,0.0002773896,0.0004503223,0.001043337,0.0001137101,0.7772407,0.2199679,0.00001787096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.006493606,0.3709013,0.3232702,0.02423983,0.002034912,0.0001825338,0.0003658193,0.000504712,0.2720071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3656676,0.4558652,0.1259983,0.01387341,0.008059173,0.0007807807,0.0008659462,0.0006223196,0.02826732],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007831542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0335204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564896744","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i2.4165","title":"Meta-argumentation, An Approach to Logic and Argumentation Theory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Informal logic; AND gate; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Algorithm; Logic gate","authors":[{"name":"J. Anthony Blair","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0759385134830571,"gpt":0.2816316144718772,"spread":0.2056931009888202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005495531,0.00149741,0.001489415,0.004082535,0.002753781,0.0121486,0.002271333,0.004000333,0.00686808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006789865,0.001197101,0.002160106,0.004874155,0.01686742,0.0167828,0.004046134,0.006437108,0.001974436],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005769566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003556757,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002627998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002764732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949474,0.002895999,0.0003387409,0.0006867765,0.0009237095,0.0002072555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958553,0.003007172,0.0003205185,0.0002983521,0.0003153523,0.0002032901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001968993,0.00001287345,0.00006144233,0.0002568527,0.00002788289,0.00007003603,0.0008804024,0.0008661936,0.0001305703,0.9702247,0.008827165,0.01862214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001495568,0.0000101254,0.00006242954,0.0002077257,0.00001017776,0.00008528998,0.000160434,0.001090979,0.00009996994,0.9280383,0.07021067,0.000008846737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.004038489,0.287662,0.4209939,0.0531881,0.003804233,0.000187325,0.0003665875,0.0005232671,0.2292361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3994613,0.1247912,0.3777095,0.008285445,0.008155827,0.001020377,0.0007767431,0.0006161396,0.07918352],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0121486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0418613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515375584","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i2.3457","title":"Logic and Parables: Do These Narratives Provide Arguments?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Point (geometry); Philosophy; Psychology; Medicine; Linguistics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Trudy Govier","is_ca":true},{"name":"Lowell Ayers","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05793630623058993,"gpt":0.2567522117937274,"spread":0.1988159055631375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01020228,0.0007742207,0.0005163067,0.002763655,0.003348413,0.009779492,0.0014336,0.003488929,0.01045175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0367936,0.0004977161,0.0005320317,0.002726587,0.01802428,0.03255197,0.004919174,0.003401549,0.001430115],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003132381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001919778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001460428,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918174,0.006167358,0.0002452754,0.0004572748,0.0008596648,0.0004530893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9666504,0.02573542,0.002998545,0.002006434,0.001756082,0.0008531493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002330567,0.000009306107,0.0003468155,0.0000747621,0.00000491824,0.0001516385,0.01493436,0.00008662635,0.00009201184,0.9808764,0.0005912634,0.002808525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002499809,0.00002812311,0.0004928159,0.0003584288,0.00001820974,0.0002441446,0.03034165,0.001428096,0.0005263449,0.8712422,0.09527913,0.00001585533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1304093,0.006744235,0.2171425,0.0717965,0.001100042,0.0002456979,0.0006305499,0.0002369571,0.5716943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9543938,0.002016611,0.02566876,0.001428647,0.0002177847,0.0001667948,0.0001632408,0.0001150448,0.01582937],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01045175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05395544,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038220352","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i2.6328","title":"The Role of Trust in Argumentation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Credibility; Fake news; Authoritarianism; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Media studies","authors":[{"name":"Catarina Dutilh Novaes","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0287753692382011,"gpt":0.3091463636701772,"spread":0.2803709944319761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02721786,0.0008023687,0.001114537,0.003054469,0.006355161,0.01490455,0.001690456,0.00703647,0.005173797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07941768,0.0007389543,0.001147739,0.002005769,0.03252216,0.02275414,0.008268031,0.005286422,0.000897056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00530917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00336575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002451828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001065616,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9468548,0.04052538,0.002364165,0.003066333,0.005222895,0.001966464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.902567,0.07364359,0.008763359,0.007065824,0.005703096,0.002257021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002904562,0.00001391502,0.0004904196,0.0001244751,0.00002711073,0.0001347316,0.00483774,0.00092758,0.0001497216,0.9858937,0.0005411719,0.006830433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002673916,0.00002421162,0.0002710191,0.0001295041,0.0000253627,0.0001091362,0.0009598063,0.002512275,0.0001747444,0.9849167,0.01082945,0.00002104445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1122017,0.01131741,0.411278,0.08470865,0.001190296,0.0003004107,0.0001751663,0.0003015067,0.378527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811654,0.001174723,0.01341514,0.0007004964,0.0003134753,0.0001031582,0.00002455359,0.00003866338,0.003064292],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02721786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1439435,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1814822231","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i1.467","title":"Lightening up on the Ad Hominem","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Mistake; Epistemology; Philosophy; Dialectic; Face (sociological concept); Fallacy; Adversary; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Law; Political science; Computer science; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"John Woods","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1065747294989697,"gpt":0.2263884740785365,"spread":0.1198137445795668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003232976,0.0005259369,0.0004885163,0.001658178,0.00633074,0.007558239,0.0008318722,0.002835939,0.006933068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007308152,0.0002715155,0.0003908571,0.0008829807,0.05251466,0.009942359,0.006665755,0.007337896,0.001253656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003514151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002016587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001936013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002306063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967434,0.001543972,0.00009211583,0.0004977849,0.0008311736,0.0002915997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979011,0.0012131,0.000124153,0.0003593538,0.0002702459,0.0001319574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006933354,0.000003110147,0.00005797857,0.0000131845,9.781659e-7,0.00003796073,0.00379234,0.00001516265,0.00008792447,0.991583,0.001404679,0.002996808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000944478,0.00003700169,0.0003943497,0.0001699841,0.000006864811,0.000311378,0.008855965,0.0003066983,0.0004902763,0.7135196,0.27588,0.00001839612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03513277,0.004048639,0.02871811,0.04372594,0.003173022,0.00004588762,0.00005782496,0.0001516255,0.884946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9212787,0.001338023,0.006390721,0.008078317,0.001425679,0.00004684815,0.00002128228,0.0001133458,0.0613072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007558239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02549708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597725234","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i4.4203","title":"Critical Thinking Education and Debiasing (AILACT Essay Prize Winner 2013)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo; University of Windsor","keywords":"Debiasing; Situational ethics; Taxonomy (biology); Critical thinking; Epistemology; Confirmation bias; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Philosophy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Guillaume Beaulac","is_ca":false},{"name":"Tim Kenyon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02358649599310291,"gpt":0.3352128984735683,"spread":0.3116264024804654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002703362,0.000755267,0.0004848551,0.001481366,0.002708314,0.006036548,0.0007920767,0.002765908,0.03610742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055465,0.0002118417,0.0004945907,0.001365335,0.002487371,0.002810396,0.002712748,0.003299511,0.007950705],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006634648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00406938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006928753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01354092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987302,0.0003210244,0.00006810812,0.0001823355,0.0005280828,0.0001701306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978595,0.000521206,0.0001232572,0.0001160623,0.0007580759,0.0006218225],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000401478,0.0000842098,0.000293445,0.000156985,0.00001208861,0.00005335403,0.0002352544,0.0002676258,0.000196447,0.03821829,0.8197201,0.1407221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002334792,0.00005235008,0.003120763,0.0006145606,0.00001207333,0.0001400051,0.0005379231,0.0007281198,0.0003940282,0.08693083,0.9074186,0.00002726119],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.008059331,0.1290018,0.008395256,0.3103674,0.0975003,0.0001765083,0.000533139,0.0004593939,0.4455069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1075068,0.04582815,0.005987719,0.01712433,0.03399873,0.0002318788,0.0004003019,0.0003258959,0.7885962],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03610742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1207914,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1859359026","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.428","title":"A Normative Theory of Argument Strength","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Bayesian probability; Epistemology; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Ulrike Hahn","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mike Oaksford","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03442538884530714,"gpt":0.2359960906523058,"spread":0.2015707018069986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02990825,0.001185428,0.001256702,0.005705336,0.004310973,0.01174641,0.003379194,0.00615173,0.01353019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07051036,0.0009233587,0.001362378,0.002734412,0.02378509,0.02441429,0.0073598,0.007072714,0.002333939],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003727461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003085493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000763134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008469958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9714785,0.01432852,0.00169523,0.002518863,0.009112319,0.0008665338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9465854,0.03295007,0.003768788,0.006025114,0.009125791,0.001544841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002095681,0.000003614795,0.00004462108,0.00001629718,0.000003565527,0.000009451433,0.00009847952,0.0001652955,0.00002126889,0.9979197,0.0002827828,0.001432992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000524253,0.000003999699,0.00004060983,0.00002804929,0.000003473491,0.00002540276,0.00004924354,0.0007600661,0.00004174015,0.9941686,0.004870021,0.000003559225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01003877,0.00137817,0.5393821,0.02898801,0.0008969473,0.0001539421,0.0001549048,0.0002062512,0.418801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8217065,0.001546099,0.1488508,0.004947663,0.0021531,0.0009855798,0.0002471254,0.0002058191,0.01935735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02990825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1581718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529854977","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3895","title":"Aggression, Politeness, and Abstract Adversaries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Politeness; Opposition (politics); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Linguistics; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Hundleby","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0448599772650792,"gpt":0.3185384132817765,"spread":0.2736784360166973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005966696,0.0005602252,0.0004376478,0.001171943,0.003067844,0.009533687,0.0006260936,0.002223243,0.003215952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01318202,0.0002821564,0.0004828065,0.0007125014,0.02107164,0.004660617,0.006286597,0.003400523,0.0006057471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002280404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007919835,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006763135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005254987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9877781,0.009852951,0.0003061369,0.0005568932,0.001038374,0.0004675137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859723,0.009773966,0.001673569,0.001159372,0.0008766971,0.0005440441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003362149,0.0000258592,0.001474881,0.00004677935,0.0000189933,0.000141594,0.01007065,0.0004453897,0.0003038113,0.9806521,0.00111933,0.005666978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002273101,0.00003446348,0.001450175,0.0001409277,0.00002028252,0.000303516,0.005741884,0.00176084,0.0003611592,0.9531131,0.03702791,0.00002303028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2672487,0.00485716,0.06600513,0.02506135,0.0003808088,0.00006552368,0.00006874981,0.000164637,0.6361479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920414,0.0003822783,0.001712015,0.0006195056,0.00007408649,0.00002086871,0.00001770323,0.00002226369,0.005109962],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009533687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03155529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501985841","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i3.2147","title":"Emotion, Argumentation and Informal Logic","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Argumentation theory; Dialogic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Focus (optics); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Michael A. Gilbert","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04404527886292283,"gpt":0.2799408283708684,"spread":0.2358955495079455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004765234,0.0006657363,0.0004758067,0.002234575,0.002384488,0.009484132,0.0009148219,0.003725184,0.00388919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009085935,0.0001882323,0.0004838004,0.00158425,0.02052046,0.009104689,0.003315177,0.002818415,0.0007107462],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003296257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001326063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001199844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006135306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933898,0.004644301,0.0003181607,0.0004572044,0.0007897709,0.0004006505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913006,0.006516604,0.0008554567,0.0004403476,0.0005695207,0.0003175018],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001633797,0.00001114771,0.0002305061,0.00009792933,0.000007381051,0.00008888261,0.003969064,0.0003858608,0.0001163273,0.9856657,0.001277434,0.008133406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000117881,0.000008596496,0.0002007848,0.0001133903,0.000005366857,0.00008260458,0.001166474,0.0004738728,0.0000620489,0.971483,0.02638524,0.000006861225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08371302,0.09832225,0.1345885,0.08314946,0.001707193,0.000124481,0.0001698364,0.0003273337,0.5978979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9610027,0.01047537,0.01108667,0.002894278,0.001093692,0.0001347588,0.00007059877,0.00006567507,0.01317624],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009484132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02520126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526910648","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1041","title":"Deep Disagreement, Rational Resolutions, and Critical Thinking","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Epistemology; Key (lock); Philosophy; Point (geometry); Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Richard Feldman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06903815881425727,"gpt":0.296677684418392,"spread":0.2276395256041347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01895528,0.0008426757,0.000823357,0.003336547,0.008391651,0.01273025,0.002183366,0.008402225,0.003332818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02493778,0.0005557726,0.0008345414,0.002018223,0.0647928,0.01656156,0.008352693,0.009633916,0.0005268594],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008662991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002171729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00134915,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9747546,0.01765665,0.0007209195,0.001757913,0.0036549,0.001455067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791748,0.01578399,0.001681776,0.00131116,0.001415805,0.0006324942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008130141,0.000009044382,0.00005975392,0.00002760027,0.000006557333,0.00003933604,0.002772256,0.0002403747,0.00002998739,0.9937922,0.0009930858,0.002021689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009218529,0.000002012275,0.00001902555,0.00002445281,0.000001840164,0.000009050768,0.0005713348,0.0001917063,0.00003200756,0.9949455,0.004190345,0.00000360195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0817032,0.02253566,0.1791295,0.2262783,0.002623005,0.000264262,0.0001006607,0.0002477521,0.4871176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630291,0.002291233,0.02060546,0.005741248,0.0007643501,0.0002083722,0.00004081258,0.00006904745,0.007250333],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01895528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1002463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101053895","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i2.474","title":"Norms of Legitimate Dissensus","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Action (physics); Political philosophy; Inference; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Christian Erik J Kock","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05418168153881438,"gpt":0.3258298747255297,"spread":0.2716481931867153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06004617,0.0006098828,0.001480908,0.003007997,0.006923842,0.01291089,0.002755254,0.006104736,0.00538019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1245306,0.0006252528,0.001275544,0.002048279,0.04619068,0.0130553,0.01069865,0.007700077,0.001081946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006966325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005924194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00163156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001299195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8766525,0.06888295,0.007924462,0.01366397,0.02824089,0.004635211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8375238,0.111636,0.009193057,0.02061646,0.01815839,0.002872407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007099038,0.000006790657,0.0001731909,0.00001780849,0.000006014812,0.00002447106,0.001103589,0.0001926133,0.00004356708,0.9960374,0.0003930311,0.001994564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009288528,0.000005101113,0.00007824833,0.00002754408,0.000003151333,0.00002255784,0.0002624644,0.0004603736,0.00009252947,0.9939422,0.00508983,0.000006757084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05931979,0.001870248,0.3539219,0.05783088,0.0009781353,0.0003557396,0.0002473943,0.0003062193,0.5251697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9475223,0.0003510776,0.03867395,0.003049978,0.0005529555,0.0005936724,0.0001411434,0.0001197265,0.008995302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06004617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3175583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1705572361","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i1.2132","title":"Bayesian Informal Logic and Fallacy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Fallacy; Inductive reasoning; Variety (cybernetics); Inference; Computer science; Bayesian inference; Bayesian probability; Epistemology; Statistical inference; Artificial intelligence; Deductive reasoning; Bayesian network; Causal inference; Machine learning; Bayesian statistics; Frequentist inference; Mathematics; Philosophy; Econometrics; Statistics","authors":[{"name":"Kevin B. Korb","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02421553473010509,"gpt":0.2506493351318307,"spread":0.2264338004017256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01294412,0.0008917553,0.001276996,0.004882595,0.004026362,0.006936966,0.001976557,0.00407654,0.006757857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03564003,0.0006908884,0.00138164,0.00311606,0.01922436,0.01377558,0.004481355,0.00638596,0.001126691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005406992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002761311,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003069689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001781668,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9870936,0.007038412,0.0007691701,0.001461183,0.002973653,0.0006639114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742561,0.02003306,0.001657761,0.00151199,0.001965918,0.0005751688],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003806503,0.000004173512,0.00006356328,0.00002355211,0.000004202404,0.00002860645,0.000178956,0.0003058425,0.0000223384,0.9962558,0.0007024785,0.002406638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002460999,9.090306e-7,0.00001751615,0.00001254867,0.000001554042,0.00001163943,0.00001594759,0.0004835075,0.00001034383,0.9978458,0.001595814,0.000001897465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0319935,0.01284428,0.716218,0.05485366,0.0008830975,0.0001876089,0.0005296683,0.0007061446,0.181784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.801852,0.006523453,0.1658124,0.008272458,0.001814591,0.0005959428,0.0006150765,0.0002549619,0.01425919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01294412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06845587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530082090","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2152","title":"Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argument map; Philosophy; Argumentation theory","authors":[{"name":"Maurice A. Finocchiaro","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09082178350827413,"gpt":0.2956670442864488,"spread":0.2048452607781747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02127057,0.0007828537,0.0006674487,0.003586977,0.007339438,0.01681486,0.00155465,0.004136479,0.003919989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03103547,0.0003302635,0.0005193872,0.003418681,0.06145624,0.01554073,0.007511811,0.006923422,0.0004566671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02023339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008217229,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004733528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003838102,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9688793,0.02498182,0.0006358323,0.0009359294,0.003279671,0.001287389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789246,0.01709866,0.0007696031,0.0009108352,0.001828226,0.0004680335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004431718,0.000007163757,0.00003319695,0.0000273928,0.000001574338,0.00001306059,0.002657116,0.00008003415,0.0000217746,0.9945558,0.001089463,0.001509024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001117042,0.000007071942,0.00006383641,0.0001609705,0.000002368429,0.00001780649,0.004264661,0.0003336916,0.00009201012,0.9623417,0.03269976,0.000004981121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03855739,0.04257239,0.1031657,0.2385867,0.002172027,0.0004812958,0.00008622184,0.0001045613,0.5742737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9293072,0.00818599,0.01895622,0.01169814,0.0009376386,0.0009492958,0.00004897589,0.0001109451,0.02980563],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02127057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1468042,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1616088548","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i3.2145","title":"The Effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instruction in Critical Thinking","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Test (biology); Mathematics education; Computer science; Section (typography); Class (philosophy); Computer-Assisted Instruction; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Operating system","authors":[{"name":"David Hitchcock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03466845958281332,"gpt":0.3510876795208581,"spread":0.3164192199380447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001122445,0.000375751,0.0002147769,0.0004170215,0.0002183247,0.0004908092,0.0004465613,0.0004272148,0.001717421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01409273,0.0001623101,0.0001459325,0.0002917284,0.0003775474,0.0003123245,0.0003956826,0.000360049,0.0003664427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003023911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004463375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001027087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001339874,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986742,0.0006919081,0.00009040613,0.0001484069,0.0002905585,0.0001046047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923194,0.005093106,0.0006108988,0.0004046551,0.0006342754,0.0009376378],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01065863,0.02268083,0.06218022,0.000350219,0.0002125845,0.0002589655,0.002197888,0.002084614,0.02203235,0.0002663642,0.002953019,0.8741243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008308751,0.08346548,0.8347972,0.0002731465,0.0003817881,0.002219738,0.001806197,0.01244998,0.04084792,0.001718201,0.01353849,0.0001931533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984832,0.0001379413,0.0001489412,0.0000543603,0.000009346898,0.00002826349,0.00001057153,0.00003273695,0.001094587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980927,0.0001022015,0.001038209,0.00003956489,0.00001833657,0.00004083433,0.00005532603,0.000003925589,0.0006088049],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001717421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005936146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600870717","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i3.3534","title":"Argumentation in Theory and Practice: Gap or Equilibrium?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education, Philosophy, and Society","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Relation (database); Reflective equilibrium; Line (geometry); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Tone Kvernbekk","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1014263243171896,"gpt":0.3478714844568049,"spread":0.2464451601396153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08367187,0.001160404,0.003529909,0.008263555,0.008931317,0.03016253,0.004992703,0.01186859,0.00841357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1017276,0.00105315,0.002053754,0.006731028,0.06782983,0.06754324,0.0250492,0.01058872,0.001496204],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01128214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00836751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001410406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006068161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8646447,0.09788937,0.007363046,0.00796424,0.0170792,0.00505944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8479483,0.1166772,0.006954102,0.01162061,0.01312909,0.003670707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001586465,0.00001310873,0.0001781528,0.00005760177,0.00001358133,0.00003196252,0.002213618,0.0002147634,0.00002837151,0.994191,0.0002625839,0.002779307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001151292,0.000007891045,0.000036237,0.00006778839,0.000005140416,0.00002535204,0.001134851,0.0007212205,0.00004285464,0.9954202,0.002521922,0.0000050846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05947426,0.01134719,0.5694602,0.1428274,0.001683382,0.000288503,0.0001369834,0.0004322779,0.2143499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9584197,0.001246109,0.03420746,0.002624645,0.0004624413,0.000341756,0.00005816652,0.00009759451,0.002542111],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08367187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4425044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141509767","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i3.485","title":"Advances in the Theory of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"McMaster University; University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Dialectic; Informal logic; Foundation (evidence); Argument map; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"David Godden","is_ca":true},{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03237957088350588,"gpt":0.300283617558408,"spread":0.2679040466749021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01728402,0.001396775,0.001310234,0.005656892,0.003665094,0.01134245,0.002787242,0.006065997,0.008106408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02784263,0.0008647743,0.001561192,0.005297496,0.02956481,0.03173018,0.005679152,0.009867869,0.001542342],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007342792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003889687,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001681036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001122634,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880769,0.007292103,0.0007149213,0.001042433,0.002449216,0.0004244246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.954145,0.03698164,0.001707582,0.003937604,0.002475658,0.0007525184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003078653,0.00000544888,0.00003209303,0.00004825086,0.000001777095,0.000008613462,0.000466647,0.0002241,0.00001861021,0.994753,0.0003331253,0.004105133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005291094,0.00000543976,0.00002896651,0.00006960503,0.000002123266,0.00002014986,0.0001337594,0.0008650569,0.00003075026,0.9744012,0.0244326,0.000005112921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01268889,0.05801046,0.6564851,0.05479891,0.002071297,0.000144051,0.0001079513,0.0002011806,0.2154921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5910126,0.05194193,0.3171678,0.005219841,0.0067042,0.0006357243,0.0001969437,0.0002705611,0.02685037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01728402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09140772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242009327","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i3.3034","title":"Argumentative Injustice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Injustice; Argumentative; Credibility; Identity (music); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Social psychology; Argumentation theory; Sociology; Psychology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Advertising","authors":[{"name":"Patrick Bondy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00834268729701935,"gpt":0.2400165464366775,"spread":0.2316738591396582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01206402,0.0007064804,0.0005349643,0.002951781,0.003898687,0.005959173,0.001816873,0.00418814,0.004522439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06711571,0.000327294,0.000514452,0.001095571,0.01764211,0.007114123,0.007192586,0.007918214,0.0008956565],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001586445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009197429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006386014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005834477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9778412,0.01300932,0.001061644,0.001545557,0.0053984,0.001143885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92353,0.05039369,0.0112766,0.009128422,0.004334554,0.001336655],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006768957,0.0001208643,0.009599068,0.0003271887,0.0000657893,0.002591934,0.06838038,0.0004460832,0.001838983,0.8620259,0.006741992,0.04779419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003640768,0.0001367065,0.01171143,0.001509295,0.00009115251,0.01486077,0.04680645,0.00283338,0.006250107,0.6745824,0.24106,0.0001219275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2507992,0.007669619,0.1685724,0.05342922,0.001527659,0.0003294824,0.0001219931,0.0003829815,0.5171674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815091,0.0007498804,0.006030831,0.003580648,0.0002854536,0.0000858278,0.00003173833,0.00004500322,0.007681407],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01206402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06380141,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519407843","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i1.4120","title":"Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"David Hitchcock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01621196358449976,"gpt":0.234415912071538,"spread":0.2182039484870382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003191345,0.001654126,0.001826495,0.003389777,0.001861985,0.004666356,0.001019758,0.002612645,0.007639795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006224996,0.001183584,0.00114384,0.005720179,0.004214481,0.008643655,0.00219725,0.006148815,0.003297161],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003853494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002497028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005612771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00558674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985089,0.0006113196,0.00008788561,0.0003634524,0.0003427587,0.00008570658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939686,0.004521722,0.0001695292,0.0001438753,0.000874849,0.000321429],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009282461,0.00009543492,0.0003135304,0.001544166,0.00007190538,0.0001525114,0.001871296,0.001425421,0.00032657,0.1824699,0.6910269,0.1206096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003762499,0.00002851756,0.0007083496,0.002366894,0.00003880649,0.0002767956,0.0005518782,0.0007231839,0.0001889263,0.2053089,0.7897297,0.00004044861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.000594101,0.9180599,0.006907043,0.03952679,0.008673164,0.00001812872,0.00008743528,0.00004127508,0.0260921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03851632,0.8576037,0.01101485,0.0101986,0.03153152,0.0001151236,0.0003671074,0.0002017204,0.05045108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007639795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02795923,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905359712","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i3.4286","title":"The Basic Slippery Slope Argument","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Slippery slope; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Scheme (mathematics); Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0481765815658069,"gpt":0.2552279230381733,"spread":0.2070513414723664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003899311,0.0007109647,0.0006018393,0.002106584,0.001985966,0.003782921,0.001361084,0.003471435,0.007460961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01013654,0.0004892141,0.0008182761,0.001273059,0.006424887,0.009206621,0.004099166,0.002500962,0.001922647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001176158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001123007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005642207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004891087,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954502,0.00200209,0.0003426258,0.0005341017,0.001335037,0.0003360624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961498,0.001564375,0.000461895,0.0007339002,0.0008153906,0.0002747044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002578912,0.000007250779,0.0001853568,0.00008427836,0.000004866003,0.00007630337,0.0008545658,0.0004142857,0.0005206143,0.9864292,0.001233148,0.01016427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002428254,0.00005794202,0.0005074466,0.0002311657,0.00001373833,0.0004022986,0.0006133695,0.003332397,0.0006603862,0.9229154,0.07121771,0.00002373721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05091276,0.003472801,0.5666872,0.008361792,0.0004256692,0.0004661389,0.0004812671,0.0005357782,0.3686567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7904756,0.001766806,0.1852581,0.00101835,0.0002140786,0.0003675893,0.0002788025,0.0001080711,0.02051265],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007460961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02495939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098052878","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i1.3938","title":"In Defence of Virtue: The Legitimacy of Agent-Based Argument Appraisal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh; Florida Institute of Technology","keywords":"Virtue; Argumentation theory; Ambiguity; Argument (complex analysis); Fallacy; Epistemology; Legitimacy; Criticism; Philosophy; Epistemic virtue; Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Aberdein","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05033415478823391,"gpt":0.2871719785788954,"spread":0.2368378237906615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06227085,0.0007038842,0.001783305,0.006059943,0.004830079,0.01990853,0.003801539,0.01161951,0.01032161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2245024,0.0007692571,0.001229034,0.002416203,0.03950981,0.02437246,0.01018634,0.01033382,0.00174464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004453195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004253058,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009772801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009318619,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9436423,0.03793605,0.002452539,0.004259828,0.01035899,0.001350414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7696859,0.1841789,0.009642144,0.0199246,0.01393854,0.002629915],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002946677,0.00001029844,0.0003104697,0.00007693427,0.00001558603,0.00006893167,0.001999541,0.0002837293,0.0001089946,0.9882987,0.001619397,0.007178011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002785232,0.000008335001,0.0001339156,0.0001139657,0.000008342779,0.00005481349,0.0003011541,0.002309267,0.0001479112,0.9867098,0.01017337,0.00001129673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04461918,0.006129868,0.3472324,0.1320335,0.002761708,0.0002417564,0.0001243963,0.0004857954,0.4663714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9408834,0.0008125441,0.0457646,0.00291819,0.001252352,0.0002425675,0.00006065374,0.000173556,0.007892028],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06227085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3293236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106163222","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i3.3035","title":"The Authority of the Fallacies Approach to Argument Evaluation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Adversarial system; Epistemology; Informal logic; Adversary; Authoritarianism; Fallacy; Order (exchange); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Hundleby","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04146375886973361,"gpt":0.3193228806160212,"spread":0.2778591217462875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03282978,0.0008711191,0.001197521,0.007074362,0.004454411,0.01375791,0.003072161,0.00518013,0.006108171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08130733,0.000622728,0.001081913,0.002919659,0.05523838,0.02081766,0.007529105,0.009847889,0.001769869],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007996202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004947704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001303403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001262049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9403097,0.03917237,0.00225979,0.002883164,0.01426254,0.00111237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9382617,0.0420734,0.003123436,0.006245081,0.009036728,0.001259642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008526638,0.000007089016,0.0000685739,0.00003508657,0.000004232714,0.00001292657,0.0009374273,0.0001500989,0.00003024063,0.9922504,0.0009001825,0.005595138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001260577,0.00001156815,0.00005470808,0.00006444263,0.00000386222,0.00003525004,0.0002476441,0.000593002,0.0001038771,0.9872921,0.01157436,0.000006644854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01703589,0.008158021,0.4441006,0.05643569,0.001623071,0.000192524,0.00006701763,0.0003457974,0.4720414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8650357,0.003998768,0.09656807,0.005263477,0.002025238,0.0005886046,0.00006999655,0.000333811,0.02611637],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03282978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1736225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135187704","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i2.2891","title":"A pragma-dialectical response to objectivist epistemic challenges","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Objectivism; Epistemology; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Presupposition; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Bart Garssen","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jan Albert van Laar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06646282060450644,"gpt":0.2887768678374598,"spread":0.2223140472329533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07299986,0.001473025,0.002369296,0.004802288,0.01043465,0.01853144,0.006439683,0.02224965,0.006392378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09269166,0.001333942,0.002314899,0.003171514,0.08660644,0.03369321,0.01879774,0.03201991,0.001639607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01195573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006372951,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001092484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008606357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9188988,0.05672207,0.00298599,0.0061256,0.01319597,0.002071571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9209855,0.05647186,0.003504138,0.008519907,0.008549065,0.001969454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008144745,0.000008125581,0.00002044712,0.00002189249,0.000005315791,0.0000304148,0.001782602,0.0001193647,0.00006284202,0.9960769,0.001074444,0.0007895103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001361436,0.000003709302,0.00001269959,0.00002949445,0.000002052942,0.00002598085,0.0004337644,0.0004295976,0.00009162737,0.9908568,0.008094072,0.000006509817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01953387,0.003813136,0.3499095,0.5370809,0.002942545,0.0001694133,0.0001197931,0.0003661122,0.08606471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8035567,0.001680479,0.1277016,0.04277112,0.003751341,0.001198319,0.0001056591,0.0004593828,0.01877537],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07299986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3860648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549433436","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i2.4187","title":"Critical Thinking and Cognitive Bias","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debiasing; Hindsight bias; Metacognition; Critical thinking; Cognitive bias; Focus (optics); Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive skill; Cognitive psychology; Confirmation bias; Epistemology; Social psychology; Mathematics education","authors":[{"name":"Jeffrey Maynes","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1383285710489191,"gpt":0.392739179971448,"spread":0.2544106089225289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01168828,0.0004034054,0.000304862,0.002537847,0.00137702,0.00516344,0.0007039459,0.001880514,0.003353198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03916765,0.000178856,0.0002806,0.001082602,0.03137001,0.006132254,0.003874811,0.003612917,0.0002837689],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003678837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003206132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001114132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001057616,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9899133,0.006599371,0.000410477,0.0009835373,0.001577802,0.0005156039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.937426,0.05035937,0.005680142,0.002161251,0.002741398,0.001631783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002415689,0.00004443522,0.003988789,0.000179437,0.00002069477,0.0001250567,0.01084621,0.000363938,0.0003700753,0.9467833,0.001968066,0.03528583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001769697,0.00002899859,0.002192833,0.0002184048,0.000007788134,0.0001987262,0.002373934,0.0003482926,0.0004271145,0.9726387,0.02153198,0.00001558457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2208248,0.04105185,0.1379984,0.1348533,0.001899676,0.0003036992,0.00009242039,0.0002704065,0.4627055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681728,0.004684939,0.01529192,0.004835228,0.0005612651,0.0001549031,0.00001903567,0.00004285813,0.006237046],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01168828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06181425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903834446","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i4.5029","title":"The Analysis of Implicit Premises within Children’s Argumentative Inferences","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Dialogical self; Conversation; Focus (optics); Psychology; Premises; Epistemology; Sociocultural evolution; Anonymity; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Communication","authors":[{"name":"Sara Greco","is_ca":false},{"name":"Anne‐Nelly Perret‐Clermont","is_ca":false},{"name":"Antonio Iannaccone","is_ca":false},{"name":"Andrea Rocci","is_ca":false},{"name":"Josephine Convertini","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rebecca G. Schär","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04082199326469757,"gpt":0.3103028636653924,"spread":0.2694808704006948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008483293,0.0003641984,0.0003521843,0.001497355,0.0009309864,0.004132135,0.0009209873,0.001087558,0.003114983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04409119,0.0006275956,0.0004138971,0.001156256,0.003110781,0.005507492,0.003864189,0.002291594,0.000560882],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001138753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001027449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001360773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001443302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930855,0.003369031,0.0005018646,0.001097268,0.001602774,0.0003436072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9447976,0.04352223,0.004719275,0.003712378,0.002825693,0.0004228312],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005014201,0.0001685195,0.1314915,0.0007829996,0.00009876481,0.003710072,0.637089,0.001822154,0.04176219,0.07974024,0.001033262,0.1018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001068502,0.0005153879,0.3672857,0.00109899,0.0003416067,0.01074884,0.2982772,0.02243509,0.1051063,0.1088771,0.08489692,0.0003098016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9523754,0.0003979668,0.03653262,0.0003284089,0.00001921983,0.00006088821,0.0002333608,0.00009857774,0.009953631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854842,0.0001270454,0.01327274,0.0000272061,0.000005904924,0.00005374308,0.0001645594,0.0000504167,0.0008141657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008483293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04486448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790117762","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i1.5067","title":"The Bullshit Doctrine: Fabrications, Lies, and Nonsense in the Age of Trump","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Doctrine; Nonsense; Collusion; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Democracy; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Economics; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Lars J. Kristiansen","is_ca":false},{"name":"Bernd Kaussler","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03645614700779369,"gpt":0.3229511440454775,"spread":0.2864949970376838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0107741,0.0003944088,0.0003809653,0.001776722,0.01003123,0.0108418,0.0009449205,0.005215146,0.003029622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02625949,0.0003597171,0.0002565839,0.001113046,0.06009063,0.0160126,0.007292899,0.008444401,0.0004059966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00392525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002071377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002379484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002932571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926215,0.005135586,0.0001581389,0.0005259085,0.0009072191,0.0006516171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762921,0.01769078,0.003036343,0.001720752,0.0007582912,0.0005018484],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003697468,0.00001456311,0.001700807,0.00003736538,0.000005132336,0.0003511119,0.1667498,0.0001226132,0.000221566,0.8221582,0.001676157,0.006925633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003443589,0.0001266078,0.003854596,0.0007640452,0.00003182856,0.0009245288,0.1659352,0.001420822,0.001990621,0.6616318,0.163211,0.0000744326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.5695668,0.007679723,0.0199342,0.0869486,0.0007035011,0.0000483144,0.00005711267,0.0000916722,0.31497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950649,0.0004966541,0.0005597359,0.00137893,0.0001455587,0.00001118337,0.000004651637,0.00002252361,0.002315866],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0108418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0569796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1708143966","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1045","title":"Knowing when Disagreements are Deep","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"David M. Adams","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1274449032538061,"gpt":0.4776130059217621,"spread":0.3501681026679559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04106999,0.0005600103,0.001210027,0.003249722,0.007736091,0.01999982,0.002069511,0.01225019,0.01165958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1479929,0.0008540607,0.001195874,0.002035037,0.03038078,0.03652536,0.01657816,0.0147317,0.002415031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005384397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005878006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001493592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001350643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9316621,0.03944131,0.004673875,0.0061633,0.01198117,0.006078363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8911433,0.06809022,0.01476626,0.01117796,0.01046492,0.004357371],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001219191,0.00005477123,0.002870282,0.0002095131,0.00007335332,0.0007513594,0.08699608,0.0003764617,0.0009799724,0.8564824,0.0105464,0.04053748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002171658,0.00002198715,0.001087454,0.0002246243,0.00002578536,0.0001862474,0.02210556,0.0006056717,0.0005090753,0.9289227,0.0462294,0.00005972039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1275436,0.005237429,0.1304143,0.2636902,0.003299641,0.0003971095,0.0003499852,0.0005087476,0.468559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.963084,0.001077038,0.01267753,0.01164324,0.0007609264,0.0001693501,0.000153346,0.0001498557,0.01028471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04106999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2172015,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883212704","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i2.4849","title":"Teaching as Abductive Reasoning: The Role of Argumentation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Abductive reasoning; Epistemology; Humanities; Philosophy; Defeasible reasoning; Psychology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Chrysi Rapanta","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01933636039895794,"gpt":0.3443751495017162,"spread":0.3250387891027582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01488061,0.0009921107,0.000747797,0.002404803,0.002521724,0.01493286,0.002351356,0.004464909,0.005417362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02461605,0.0004604882,0.0008750716,0.002133883,0.014502,0.01154023,0.004911717,0.005199569,0.001380824],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004016249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004346258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001315368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009917383,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9716232,0.02109954,0.0009763514,0.001745121,0.003888604,0.0006671466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760717,0.01663234,0.001707047,0.002558159,0.00181095,0.001219719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000379504,0.0001061397,0.001012393,0.0005808505,0.00002840822,0.0002863457,0.01758906,0.001495755,0.001703469,0.8742818,0.00262017,0.1002577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004703849,0.0001046066,0.0008605085,0.001320434,0.00003411322,0.0007331358,0.007832901,0.006415326,0.002251621,0.7381321,0.2422134,0.00005486429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04504665,0.02850105,0.6202309,0.03644542,0.001773787,0.0004572028,0.0000882461,0.0009129962,0.2665438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7121922,0.01344714,0.2430494,0.003079404,0.000846313,0.0004183371,0.000135668,0.0002367905,0.02659482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01493286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07869714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921887360","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i1.5116","title":"Argumentation As Critically Oriented Pedagogical Dialogue","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialogic; Argumentative; Critical thinking; Epistemology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Chrysi Rapanta","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05872043937979131,"gpt":0.3869222871635544,"spread":0.3282018477837631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008603252,0.0009302199,0.0005229558,0.002934539,0.003103537,0.01416628,0.001305114,0.004564987,0.002649432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01197387,0.000353273,0.0006334637,0.001807283,0.03297036,0.01187971,0.006052236,0.003549224,0.0006341469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003810781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002570532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000529943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002991123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9779244,0.01800065,0.0006040687,0.0009608797,0.001888863,0.0006210972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878893,0.008934608,0.00103232,0.0008083924,0.000824876,0.0005105009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001007725,0.000008641654,0.00006987878,0.00008091636,0.000004736514,0.00008898424,0.01229147,0.0002696723,0.0003128815,0.9811072,0.0003942214,0.005361235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000266648,0.00003271167,0.0001360664,0.0002538097,0.00001037031,0.0002105845,0.00375384,0.001137496,0.000479302,0.9138781,0.08006474,0.00001639671],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06349239,0.02084638,0.2954577,0.02017458,0.001458377,0.000612732,0.00009627557,0.0003659682,0.5974957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9218014,0.004478148,0.05319976,0.001225191,0.000572997,0.0007125312,0.00006879969,0.0001047312,0.01783646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01416628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04549891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1689471221","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2905","title":"What Constitutes Skilled Argumentation and How Does it Develop?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Production (economics); Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Medical education; Applied psychology; Knowledge management; Economics; Medicine; Epistemology; Microeconomics","authors":[{"name":"Marion Goldstein","is_ca":false},{"name":"Amanda Crowell","is_ca":false},{"name":"Deanna Kuhn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02640016831424103,"gpt":0.3261415806413369,"spread":0.2997414123270958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009617384,0.0003465616,0.0004925463,0.003317958,0.0009500007,0.006910543,0.00104838,0.002329746,0.001791067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06164502,0.0004270731,0.0005006767,0.001669196,0.006759822,0.008180099,0.002579651,0.001610177,0.0004552087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001093172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001787699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001051091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008328164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918034,0.004301361,0.0005985173,0.001314658,0.001352195,0.0006298915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9233881,0.04514246,0.01740563,0.006115416,0.005490441,0.00245797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000164725,0.0005809963,0.3243417,0.001487925,0.0001738579,0.001839164,0.06154942,0.0007993199,0.006364981,0.1431952,0.002470212,0.4570324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004682117,0.0007314772,0.4328048,0.002275673,0.0002279532,0.01263938,0.03615192,0.005767229,0.006546021,0.4605249,0.04206894,0.0002149959],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8637109,0.01200926,0.04200208,0.01051762,0.0001923465,0.0001493094,0.0001285562,0.0002281324,0.07106183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907641,0.001391622,0.006933822,0.0002510651,0.00005547155,0.00003272513,0.00004985619,0.00002153781,0.0004997065],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009617384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05086219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607463045","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1042","title":"Revisiting Deep Disagreement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Resolution (logic); Philosophy; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; History; Artificial intelligence; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Dale Turner","is_ca":false},{"name":"Larry Wright","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01692881542857108,"gpt":0.2456781214877667,"spread":0.2287493060591956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01310349,0.0007068514,0.0009045195,0.003056272,0.005335678,0.011388,0.002486799,0.005335023,0.007015535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02199754,0.0005112577,0.001336554,0.002237494,0.02899137,0.02220612,0.01012387,0.009155212,0.001136973],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006998545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003155482,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002605219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002480937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9845195,0.009565313,0.0005724431,0.00153193,0.002811105,0.0009996985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851643,0.009195639,0.0009451791,0.00264989,0.001526843,0.0005181961],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005325304,0.000004458667,0.00007612866,0.00002277776,0.000003081168,0.00003093919,0.001615502,0.0001504952,0.00005750166,0.9952382,0.0004897813,0.002305705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006237025,0.000004046776,0.00005998852,0.00004664036,0.000003778721,0.00002208345,0.0005213327,0.0005678291,0.00005900483,0.983574,0.01513074,0.000004300423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06690376,0.008525915,0.3950745,0.07316737,0.001370196,0.0001363859,0.0002903067,0.0002877177,0.4542439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471835,0.001553659,0.03162812,0.004736147,0.0006310886,0.0001289589,0.0001249741,0.0001483026,0.01386522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01310349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06929874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567080196","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i3.4019","title":"Conductive Argument, An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Defeasible reasoning; Defeasible estate; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Fabio Paglieri","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.121533004838446,"gpt":0.3028597746975162,"spread":0.1813267698590702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003484207,0.0007705765,0.0006634943,0.001967392,0.001874742,0.009615617,0.002024322,0.003336665,0.009433611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01002642,0.0006734959,0.0005966995,0.001675853,0.01162958,0.01448606,0.003253191,0.004290098,0.002275667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002476963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002771619,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001416842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002412474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976025,0.001317125,0.0001127561,0.0003622924,0.0004860282,0.0001193499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996223,0.00262948,0.0001692494,0.0005791312,0.0002817998,0.0001173752],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001229647,0.000006339032,0.00004289635,0.00008641006,0.000007780325,0.00005904293,0.0007605362,0.0002716539,0.00008206654,0.9625089,0.0184818,0.01768027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005677195,0.00000367397,0.00005473492,0.0001775574,0.000003999033,0.00009428862,0.0002400405,0.0005808126,0.000132638,0.8495787,0.149122,0.000005819058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01008762,0.09444208,0.2080218,0.09495268,0.006522152,0.00009661525,0.0007387841,0.0005397468,0.5845985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5669198,0.06172584,0.1625875,0.01286616,0.00722548,0.0003298704,0.0009275121,0.001253389,0.1861645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009615617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03155851,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1702479143","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2282","title":"Johnson's Manifest Rationality A Pragmatic Theory of Argument","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Trudy Govier","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04956689732928102,"gpt":0.2604724410737302,"spread":0.2109055437444492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006505144,0.0009805985,0.0009413522,0.002402513,0.004111676,0.01309163,0.001777444,0.005241168,0.005995539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01085388,0.0006238335,0.001172401,0.002280101,0.03302226,0.01406695,0.00331134,0.006093737,0.002007373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008186648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006198806,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005737978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004364404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912379,0.004630818,0.0003828425,0.0009710426,0.002202835,0.0005744966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940426,0.003988362,0.0003547854,0.0007295635,0.0006799198,0.0002047091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002229534,0.000002181013,0.0000127582,0.0000138771,0.000001931193,0.00001139626,0.0001954764,0.0000973444,0.00001424677,0.9962,0.002314261,0.001134344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007196121,0.000003787221,0.00002347639,0.00003827348,0.000003398834,0.00002402214,0.0001283596,0.000337328,0.00004835546,0.9480733,0.05130659,0.000005787189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005895599,0.01437059,0.2097745,0.07778518,0.001845244,0.0001725133,0.0002914191,0.000327686,0.6895373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6834925,0.01383811,0.1028903,0.02479026,0.004403134,0.0008878452,0.0002571238,0.0005121324,0.1689285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01309163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05939859,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495983830","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i1.3656","title":"Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are Weak Arguments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Expert opinion; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Mathematics; Statistics; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Moti Mizrahi","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05857822156908858,"gpt":0.239257830865886,"spread":0.1806796092967974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05540997,0.001367684,0.001975302,0.005768048,0.003682113,0.01133287,0.003251564,0.01222849,0.01273063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2353681,0.001263878,0.001667258,0.002909187,0.0239944,0.02906229,0.006545249,0.01188624,0.003450021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003375634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002010696,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008014762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005164832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9472066,0.03020469,0.00283173,0.005091983,0.01260859,0.002056458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7224338,0.2266883,0.01263557,0.01210497,0.02345862,0.002678752],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005996772,0.00002117357,0.0006945353,0.0002931894,0.00007948502,0.0001859926,0.001156593,0.00056881,0.0001570705,0.9804052,0.006213247,0.0101648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004244825,0.00001135055,0.0001752071,0.0001623867,0.0000190206,0.00008555334,0.000241098,0.0009561831,0.0002055822,0.9837998,0.01428504,0.00001629254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03876057,0.01342874,0.4152032,0.2340353,0.006168049,0.0003679649,0.0004786583,0.0005060236,0.2910514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8145113,0.005464321,0.110286,0.04261891,0.00624925,0.0008550983,0.0005311725,0.0005857228,0.01889811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05540997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2930394,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978897034","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i3.5493","title":"Emotive Meaning in Political Argumentation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Emotive; Presupposition; Argumentation theory; Connotation; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Epistemology; Politics; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Psychotherapist; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Fabrizio Macagno","is_ca":false},{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02375319866932524,"gpt":0.2728871743126417,"spread":0.2491339756433165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005658676,0.000342138,0.0003050332,0.001812489,0.003707975,0.008057855,0.00072973,0.002219602,0.001751513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01609816,0.0002806768,0.0002452876,0.001538214,0.01960056,0.007789774,0.003685143,0.002306648,0.0002782622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002956728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001023756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001036619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009841243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909201,0.007800863,0.0001618707,0.0003085583,0.0005868003,0.0002217948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904119,0.00798899,0.0005804509,0.0002661396,0.0005765982,0.0001758975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004517885,0.00002464387,0.0004889839,0.0001345392,0.00001176894,0.0002201891,0.08238932,0.0003072114,0.0006428664,0.8999528,0.001990199,0.01379235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000329404,0.00004097803,0.002058652,0.0004046779,0.00001691057,0.000249848,0.04274437,0.002106606,0.0008839947,0.8372653,0.1141501,0.00004574736],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3795269,0.01750457,0.08492832,0.05908007,0.001490944,0.000136403,0.00009115577,0.0001388552,0.4571029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908461,0.001156376,0.003784741,0.0006575969,0.000175931,0.00005679497,0.00001438211,0.00003598167,0.003272109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008057855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0299263,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}