{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":546,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":546,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"ab1775ad0da3","filters":{"venue":"Informal Logic"}},"results":[{"id":"W2132900127","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i1.2254","title":"The Disposition Toward Critical Thinking: Its Character, Measurement, and Relationship to Critical Thinking Skill","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":873,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Psychology; Disposition; Systematic process; Cognition; Convergent thinking; Character (mathematics); Curriculum; Process (computing); Cognitive skill; Empirical research; Epistemology; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Creative thinking; Creativity; Work in process; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08520723245864432,"gpt":0.361598972306245,"spread":0.2763917398476007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002676283,0.0001408044,0.0001278669,0.0000555086,0.00341286,0.0007122296,0.0003324452,0.0001427652,0.0005823693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00540927,0.0001070767,0.00005223574,0.0002489341,0.0003586469,0.0006916319,0.00006155232,0.0003349834,0.0004889166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001348432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002243386,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006205193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975963,0.0002032823,0.0003681116,0.0002084675,0.001063239,0.0005606145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981759,0.0009715986,0.00002637243,0.0001406742,0.0003521763,0.0003333376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002156666,0.0000450472,0.0009995165,0.00001539766,0.000005279598,0.000002430553,0.03595192,0.000001614305,0.000004039452,0.9528641,0.0004587304,0.009630343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002890329,0.0001686214,0.1469926,0.0002456928,0.00004583888,0.00001919321,0.0116701,0.00006918894,0.00006452038,0.5543476,0.2855056,0.0005819867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1444501,0.0008840364,0.004475462,0.4435267,0.00278762,0.001150048,0.00001415339,0.0006553755,0.4020565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870376,0.0001111225,0.001677561,0.009838609,0.0003073472,0.00004858416,0.000005109806,0.000008190168,0.0009658678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8425875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978846,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790829410","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i1.5068","title":"Fake News: A Definition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":456,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disinformation; Fake news; Phrase; Presentation (obstetrics); News media; Internet privacy; Advertising; Political science; Computer science; Social media; Law; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09240612773996595,"gpt":0.3392981935268757,"spread":0.2468920657869098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000299629,0.00005261495,0.00005529138,0.00006080501,0.0004089399,0.0001132873,0.000124338,0.00007225649,0.002503724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002985358,0.00004398885,0.00003041394,0.0001976504,0.0001929475,0.0009981754,0.00002107536,0.00005615164,0.004077581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002722493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001142288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003393751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006442751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992924,0.00002053878,0.0001578253,0.00004180488,0.0002351372,0.0002523447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996113,0.00002281033,0.00006591118,0.00008229858,0.00009994392,0.0001177265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002327152,0.00001617032,0.0004170045,0.000005233009,0.000004851916,9.063812e-7,0.06725179,0.000001942075,0.00001155633,0.8442639,0.02088138,0.06712206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002913541,0.0001726937,0.00745749,0.0000100318,0.0000037195,0.000003738698,0.01641498,0.00007046172,0.00008820226,0.009490287,0.965843,0.0001541073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08393072,0.00000596353,0.0005266307,0.0006850791,0.0002652212,0.00008542043,0.000002771651,0.0001150225,0.9143832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906673,0.0000343488,0.000727401,0.006237376,0.0003731145,0.000001245945,0.000008000316,0.000002148881,0.001949028],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9449615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984081,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576216411","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1040","title":"The Logic of Deep Disagreements","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02678810802545237,"gpt":0.2643453754008185,"spread":0.2375572673753661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002672328,0.00008542189,0.00008559402,0.00002612405,0.0001415948,0.00008369483,0.0009429583,0.00004213375,0.00001829623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003060704,0.00005035125,0.00003993489,0.0001465531,0.00007182421,0.0004618273,0.0002253804,0.0001003135,0.0001818624],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001227759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002564294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007993341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001234346,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99915,0.00001705673,0.0002627572,0.0001049948,0.0002128499,0.0002523655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999367,0.00005658111,0.00009852892,0.0003610901,0.00006503446,0.00005174472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005772004,0.00002784942,0.0002594954,0.000005032276,0.000008750137,0.000001168681,0.0003667933,0.002578771,0.0000761322,0.5883914,0.0002523924,0.4080265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005674844,0.0005330196,0.008057526,0.0000247199,0.000009974502,0.00003504147,0.000108499,0.8680259,0.002190863,0.08666319,0.03334443,0.0004393747],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006503168,0.0002363277,0.9444803,0.001576014,0.0001744195,0.00008046863,8.633366e-7,0.00008361571,0.04686481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798515,0.00003309769,0.01884395,0.0009730004,0.00005445219,0.000005800429,8.030162e-7,0.000001804166,0.0002355783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9733483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2337534,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522061514","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4725","title":"Errors of Reasoning, Naturalizing the Logic of Inference","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08521820864784566,"gpt":0.2969468926641764,"spread":0.2117286840163307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003690424,0.0001030263,0.0002003269,0.00004278756,0.0001247363,0.00001527733,0.000277154,0.0000700489,0.0003437124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002999637,0.00004606829,0.0001025494,0.00002968375,0.001012181,0.0002684517,0.00007647202,0.0001533818,0.00003600141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007840174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004202172,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001650541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002088757,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992058,0.00004331363,0.0003314023,0.000077039,0.0001544127,0.0001880834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989206,0.0003150192,0.0003076093,0.0002208256,0.0002119306,0.00002398537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001409942,0.00001286891,0.0007470712,0.00003950592,0.00001867784,5.896503e-7,0.01163035,0.000004120371,0.0002439321,0.984001,0.0001848128,0.003102969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002238592,0.002044947,0.02338693,0.00145326,0.0002327673,0.00002765373,0.03124103,0.0001788379,0.01887609,0.4747539,0.4443367,0.001229283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5392718,0.0006837124,0.0002499507,0.001213146,0.001009661,0.0002096653,0.00004734693,0.00006576547,0.4572489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964048,0.0000815242,0.0001214272,0.0005112411,0.0001188154,0.000004343683,0.000002539281,0.000004474838,0.002750842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5092471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3763409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098137601","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.432","title":"In Defense of the Objective Epistemic Approach to Argumentation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":153,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Fallacy; Subjectivism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07432956683130892,"gpt":0.2587859281955193,"spread":0.1844563613642104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000178429,0.00007633979,0.0001338393,0.00005807106,0.0001367171,0.000009601661,0.0001304775,0.00004286749,0.00002821436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000425464,0.00005040993,0.00006539878,0.00005419166,0.0002999055,0.0002032584,0.00004049152,0.0001512633,0.00003031013],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002445225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003526954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003221033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002411507,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99939,0.00004424888,0.0002364358,0.00007801343,0.0001122809,0.0001390305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996222,0.0000509485,0.00009841152,0.0001323508,0.00007473317,0.00002135772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003092835,0.0000709978,0.002194726,0.00003576297,0.00001202251,0.000001230148,0.1286229,0.000675933,0.0000272918,0.8679261,0.0002912023,0.0001108939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008481704,0.002785431,0.2914344,0.0003701207,0.000245039,0.0004251315,0.2155572,0.003381743,0.009444113,0.2779885,0.1868108,0.003075853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4906804,0.00003507755,0.0001468675,0.0001694389,0.0003754041,0.0002593436,0.000009329325,0.00001360885,0.5083106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995046,0.000008725886,0.0001098156,0.001491286,0.00009149886,0.00002180418,0.00000443084,0.000004100886,0.003222377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5899376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2055657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1671099834","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2907","title":"Deliberation versus Dispute: The Impact of Argumentative Discourse Goals on Learning and Reasoning in the Science Classroom","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Generalitat de Catalunya; Harvard University","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Deliberation; Argument (complex analysis); Task (project management); Intervention (counseling); Psychological intervention; Quality (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04630920845330529,"gpt":0.4266440509108719,"spread":0.3803348424575667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005651177,0.0000737003,0.0000735114,0.000046535,0.0002096372,0.00007411509,0.0001732698,0.00002923746,0.00003509841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001243715,0.00003471415,0.00002885561,0.0001799115,0.0002792343,0.0002522079,0.00001685737,0.0001751492,0.000008433548],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003775416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005812602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003571001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002133992,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993645,0.0000684507,0.0001524631,0.00009329568,0.0001360408,0.0001852612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994491,0.0002963671,0.0001077529,0.00009858568,0.00003072971,0.00001742008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001241399,0.0002528196,0.08913072,0.000006005239,0.00004764972,0.000008380522,0.05674167,0.01360169,0.0003132041,0.7879947,0.0007519085,0.04990986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003221356,0.001200174,0.9626873,0.00001106202,0.000004226928,0.000009220097,0.03370053,0.0001820885,0.00001995485,0.001773029,0.0000357153,0.00005460119],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9316622,0.00007204237,0.00001995791,0.0007820076,0.00009879469,0.0001185478,0.000001677547,0.000007080018,0.06723768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996698,0.00002108241,0.00006134211,0.0001314119,0.00003379634,0.000009898996,0.000005274424,0.000001328945,0.00006601658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8735566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1612381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146285180","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2903","title":"Argument Content and Argument Source: An Exploration","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; University of Warwick","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Bayesian probability; Content (measure theory); Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08683420969472098,"gpt":0.2725883723733077,"spread":0.1857541626785867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002422157,0.0001008824,0.0001000615,0.00006110109,0.0001144639,0.0001935559,0.000184652,0.00004434063,0.000008910611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008124331,0.00007901982,0.00002467538,0.0000726384,0.00001000317,0.002382678,0.00004702429,0.00005364826,0.00005042688],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002787353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000123378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002287436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004953466,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991633,0.00002504752,0.0002534858,0.0001626343,0.0002151469,0.0001803656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999516,0.000008378165,0.0001105517,0.0002238862,0.00004461777,0.00009656908],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000434886,0.0003608946,0.003382993,0.00003704984,0.00002412535,0.00001438462,0.01398149,0.003630352,0.006179595,0.3323365,0.0005663559,0.6394427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00402491,0.004511418,0.2928046,0.0001058735,0.00002301483,0.0001019109,0.001691968,0.6204742,0.0113881,0.009082079,0.05449706,0.001294848],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3298155,0.00008865666,0.6663399,0.0010606,0.0002719982,0.0003571095,8.014111e-7,0.0001650006,0.001900359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943856,0.00002268277,0.003970731,0.00129787,0.00006042474,0.00001246064,0.00000842618,0.00000185937,0.0002399266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6645701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3222334,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130107788","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i2.2241","title":"Abductive, presumptive and plausible arguments","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Abductive reasoning; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Set (abstract data type); Deductive reasoning; Informal logic; Computer science; Philosophy; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0291067013769463,"gpt":0.2560387679357436,"spread":0.2269320665587974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001234769,0.0000801112,0.00008149009,0.00005939556,0.00009628496,0.00009322318,0.0001979909,0.00004127357,0.0000348894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001186272,0.00006399496,0.0000191984,0.000112962,0.00001722832,0.001157156,0.0001306751,0.0000556075,0.0001390207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001568787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001339439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005153338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008706088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993675,0.00001442591,0.0001519912,0.0001407716,0.0001479195,0.000177371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996786,0.00001885384,0.00007728799,0.0001332402,0.00003322246,0.00005885575],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007730223,0.0001874137,0.234592,0.0000773141,0.00008435419,0.00005264955,0.006583136,0.001142934,0.001411833,0.702143,0.002497576,0.05115054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002333345,0.0005250967,0.757908,0.0000687199,0.0000125487,0.0002708611,0.000220752,0.1446091,0.001618762,0.009320143,0.0823857,0.0007269605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6045858,0.0001795641,0.3536617,0.0002638848,0.0005859184,0.0004762631,0.000003577542,0.0002180415,0.04002522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884319,0.00004026678,0.009936102,0.0002928486,0.00005240453,0.00001318245,0.000002108225,0.000002398209,0.001228835],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6928228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2609639,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141098873","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i1.465","title":"Argument Has No Function","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Pragmatics; Dissent; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Function (biology); Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04477042791859612,"gpt":0.2692838126201691,"spread":0.224513384701573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001030815,0.00009786635,0.00009715974,0.00006148867,0.0001553664,0.00001958911,0.00007809421,0.0000974425,0.007324249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001853207,0.00007675168,0.0000678296,0.00009112498,0.00006290023,0.000196233,0.00002010518,0.0001221275,0.0160036],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001468782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001793146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007623153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005721911,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993007,0.00002330237,0.0001865131,0.000116405,0.0001377449,0.0002353518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996279,0.00001711547,0.00006266962,0.0001716038,0.00006676105,0.000053896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004116993,0.001938019,0.03270047,0.0001235515,0.0008439245,0.001115962,0.03994518,0.00008548505,0.002441852,0.2235231,0.3149687,0.3781968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002508344,0.001474942,0.2511011,0.00001196466,0.0000730043,0.0004852079,0.001577316,0.00005377449,0.0004580584,0.003018066,0.7387398,0.0004983546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3382447,0.0001758961,0.001435554,0.00006520745,0.001512678,0.0001367235,0.000005170495,0.0001307383,0.6582933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817433,0.00001511345,0.0001185155,0.002661834,0.0003297971,0.00004125628,0.00005469342,0.000006616189,0.01502889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6434985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516495875","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i3.3032","title":"Philosophy, Adversarial Argumentation, and Embattled Reason","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Metaphor; Adversarial system; Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Epistemology; Narrative; Philosophy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02219804767307742,"gpt":0.3097081608687018,"spread":0.2875101131956244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003358948,0.00006307241,0.00008522545,0.00002793349,0.0006023225,0.00002985067,0.00009244215,0.0001085994,0.0002137506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001912233,0.0000549602,0.00002320305,0.00006640628,0.0004678192,0.0002182464,0.00004292656,0.0001382953,0.00008873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007434058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005060146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001905684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007145294,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994654,0.00002813612,0.0001171033,0.00008988824,0.0001192949,0.0001801684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997045,0.00007503408,0.00005068121,0.00006843833,0.00004114242,0.00006015535],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006260062,0.00002375916,0.03318501,0.00001159466,0.00002841532,0.000006585819,0.02499849,9.838869e-7,0.0000585924,0.9340138,0.001829612,0.005780561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002519644,0.000419409,0.3021093,0.00001686443,0.00007161731,0.00003476831,0.01997364,0.00003293604,0.0003358203,0.2216002,0.4521714,0.0007143212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2864736,0.00006798219,0.00002385979,0.003772479,0.001279245,0.0001457763,0.000004217031,0.00006921995,0.7081637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974054,0.00004684164,0.0003625379,0.0005809492,0.0003614483,0.000008926004,0.00000440974,0.000001938394,0.001227623],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7124135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4632639,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499385902","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i3.2246","title":"Classifying and Analyzing Analogies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Argument (complex analysis); A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Analogical reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Inductive reasoning; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.100031304500688,"gpt":0.4019632553116803,"spread":0.3019319508109922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004209795,0.00003932659,0.00004759532,0.00008319973,0.0005232221,0.0002247463,0.00007483994,0.0000444586,0.0003792466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005928067,0.00003492514,0.00001410168,0.0004336682,0.0001153496,0.001311563,0.00001978866,0.0001421265,0.00006490243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002069752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000159085,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007569636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007667493,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995334,0.00002944041,0.0001184744,0.0000551762,0.0001061639,0.0001573367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996408,0.0001200897,0.00006132632,0.00005529124,0.00007403439,0.00004851934],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008631921,0.0000196291,0.09010726,0.000004435116,0.00001116335,0.000003880927,0.01546069,0.00002071605,0.00002327912,0.8178113,0.002326508,0.07420254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006071199,0.00001184609,0.04285395,0.000003067192,0.00000469601,0.000004433477,0.01082116,0.00004628045,0.000003940967,0.003076592,0.9430425,0.00007081624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1121756,0.00008850744,0.0004400415,0.01744538,0.0002081834,0.00005587071,5.812883e-7,0.00008369049,0.8695021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946687,0.0002730816,0.0007461173,0.001617417,0.0001236284,0.000003891847,0.00000270591,0.000001550569,0.002562904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.940716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4152485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1615233463","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i3.2843","title":"Argumentation in Discourse: A Socio-discursive Approach to Arguments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Logos Bible Software; Rhetorical question; Linguistics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03834399691533259,"gpt":0.3009816324172429,"spread":0.2626376355019103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001260375,0.0001310182,0.0001647612,0.000174033,0.0001541291,0.0001932494,0.0001480141,0.000031723,0.0004441939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000276808,0.0001004688,0.00007836951,0.00006421197,0.00005625097,0.0002873075,0.00002569515,0.0000922289,0.0002180904],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004271573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002427872,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001175347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009463378,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990863,0.00001163497,0.0002690311,0.0001448292,0.0002089732,0.0002792132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996496,0.000009617166,0.000075443,0.0001267481,0.00006046483,0.00007811056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002462443,0.0002381763,0.0004697703,0.000007149711,0.0000228597,0.000005328093,0.03387897,0.0007952065,0.000007056475,0.9595015,0.001513393,0.003535972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006913784,0.002634268,0.05208879,0.0002424823,0.0006256142,0.00001416679,0.3883049,0.0117864,0.0003634689,0.2487497,0.2844695,0.003806911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1198604,0.00004092493,0.0002883458,0.0008550085,0.0001815179,0.0002412334,0.0000240267,0.00003592906,0.8784726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931724,0.00000578849,0.0002913787,0.002213871,0.0004779933,0.00002001533,0.00009649273,0.000004821952,0.003717208],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8747554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4863611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150078957","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1043","title":"Treacherous Ascents: On Seeking Common Ground for Conflict Resolution","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generality; Common ground; Resolution (logic); Computer science; Conflict resolution; Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1351682587094321,"gpt":0.3132166242604163,"spread":0.1780483655509842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003431229,0.0001476451,0.0001997816,0.00006073714,0.0004081075,0.0001108431,0.0001397323,0.0001072348,0.0001099915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003813527,0.0001218455,0.0001194887,0.00001655436,0.0002218485,0.0003847086,0.00002462353,0.0002336737,0.0001855643],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005589204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002000582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001967702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001085751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991002,0.00003298638,0.00029278,0.0001269595,0.0001345183,0.0003125639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994027,0.0001458268,0.0001375553,0.0001747507,0.00009070165,0.00004848278],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001265233,0.0001117006,0.00008174331,0.00005985822,0.00003656891,0.000001330557,0.02176253,0.0001387069,0.00002151345,0.954147,0.002325429,0.02118711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007160184,0.0005017635,0.0004747068,0.00002876513,0.00003651925,0.000004129741,0.001559842,0.001174869,0.00005995159,0.003945518,0.9912995,0.0001984003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2487341,0.0004010625,0.0007902144,0.001891054,0.001468907,0.0006990461,0.00008670918,0.0002982211,0.7456307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843729,0.00002746016,0.0002018824,0.004916325,0.001594039,0.00003473321,0.00009198428,0.00001449978,0.008746237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4968717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608791421","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i3.1135","title":"The Epistemological Theory of Argument--How and Why?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Object (grammar); Function (biology); Principal (computer security); Argument map; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02587197003399448,"gpt":0.2343020442226691,"spread":0.2084300741886746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006035331,0.00006578722,0.00008581763,0.00002304551,0.0001255097,0.00008879717,0.0003139515,0.00004404331,0.000008901729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004582264,0.00003514716,0.00003206811,0.00006385408,0.00006345824,0.0004301057,0.0001326907,0.00005684274,0.00002023073],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009170083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009914673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003516278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004417328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993811,0.00005624552,0.0001812238,0.00008996645,0.0001418717,0.0001496408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994602,0.0001468944,0.0001201968,0.0002046394,0.00003160352,0.00003646284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001040327,0.00001794073,0.001463638,0.00001257614,0.000009254272,0.000001387973,0.000540742,0.00005971761,0.0002025111,0.8819291,0.0005201558,0.1152326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002581479,0.001149731,0.28722,0.00008671603,0.00002426326,0.0002967015,0.0008085716,0.1568606,0.008534622,0.04277423,0.4987832,0.000879877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3723733,0.001850724,0.5753285,0.01084391,0.0007850744,0.0007276952,0.000004276115,0.000216232,0.03787027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962846,0.00004037777,0.002487028,0.0005407425,0.00004615552,0.000006403845,5.68783e-7,0.000001270362,0.0005928303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8391549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.143326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166139333","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2153","title":"An Epistemological Approach to Argumentation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Persuasion; Epistemology; Interpersonal communication; Simple (philosophy); Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09099506718038776,"gpt":0.2969452559415837,"spread":0.205950188761196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002841517,0.0001367577,0.0001721485,0.0000669669,0.0002743743,0.0001308944,0.0002054765,0.00008758407,0.0001250227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002727299,0.0001037155,0.00006945375,0.00003618252,0.0002473532,0.0004765443,0.00003265622,0.0001893903,0.0003486833],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003457319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003059785,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001445888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007515585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991038,0.00003515831,0.00026269,0.0001696875,0.000152145,0.0002765603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994997,0.00002371409,0.00007218945,0.0001952213,0.00008984256,0.0001193424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002140207,0.0001479647,0.00008074466,0.00001815629,0.000009925688,0.000002860974,0.01633348,0.002416396,0.00003505843,0.9799878,0.00006810686,0.0008780818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005617182,0.008491385,0.02522796,0.00008429573,0.0001988143,0.0001855727,0.06437974,0.00179216,0.001699531,0.4415897,0.4476582,0.003075487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3180481,0.00003460232,0.0127355,0.0005210818,0.0007135696,0.0003851255,0.00001749768,0.0002263964,0.6673181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906493,0.000003751124,0.00234725,0.005163495,0.000446564,0.00003705982,0.0000772737,0.000008245161,0.001267097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6726011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4481735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506123608","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i3.2592","title":"Dialogue Games in Multi-Agent Systems","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Interface (matter); Human–computer interaction; Software; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Management science; Philosophy; Psychology; Engineering; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06039407464896068,"gpt":0.2725946541996599,"spread":0.2122005795506993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003692611,0.0001287631,0.0001698388,0.0001651742,0.00006108844,0.0001444249,0.0004635992,0.00007383248,0.00002370438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002570026,0.0001042588,0.00004939477,0.0003045668,0.00001514407,0.0008552714,0.000126122,0.0001018214,0.0003001999],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000455534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002793164,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007635042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008358114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988052,0.00004993938,0.0004114898,0.000191245,0.0002185862,0.0003236007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993914,0.00003569788,0.0001299785,0.0003233192,0.00004117873,0.00007847618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003863801,0.0006611582,0.625981,0.0002440064,0.00005891797,0.0004316087,0.01078003,0.05183841,0.0008395438,0.2430418,0.002296021,0.06378896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001459237,0.0001071558,0.3177379,0.00007905494,0.000003027797,0.00009432404,0.0002116002,0.6505648,0.0001334746,0.0001333602,0.02904483,0.0004311521],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2194572,0.000484761,0.7561195,0.000186815,0.002515267,0.0007214541,0.000004533894,0.000285097,0.02022529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968504,0.0000355552,0.002012674,0.0002078469,0.00007570277,0.00004109222,0.000006245098,0.000004072123,0.0007664643],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7773932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.425155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558336695","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2262","title":"Informal Logic: An Overview","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; sort; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy of logic; Sociology; Philosophy; Information retrieval; Argumentation theory","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1625553534970857,"gpt":0.3147098564452695,"spread":0.1521545029481838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000384381,0.0002394524,0.0003030803,0.00006933074,0.000444203,0.0002125893,0.000355985,0.0001539495,0.01386548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002255811,0.0001823943,0.0001587619,0.00004547105,0.0005026465,0.001668404,0.00005374282,0.0003951214,0.002757292],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001381245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006377568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002473007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006273055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998576,0.00004709206,0.0004714629,0.000163708,0.0002391257,0.0005026286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992114,0.00005330519,0.0001201373,0.0003550771,0.0001206655,0.0001394412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004021604,0.00006522682,0.00009597292,0.00007053348,0.00002399262,0.000009481725,0.02010686,0.00007044075,0.000002011445,0.9344297,0.001009942,0.04407563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003605754,0.0004602757,0.001128658,0.00001960759,0.00002552303,0.00001988965,0.001797981,0.0001319778,0.00001860974,0.02115932,0.9745502,0.0003274193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1101093,0.0006715176,0.00001124474,0.000300909,0.0006252015,0.0001883506,0.00004273434,0.0002322659,0.8878185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8904568,0.00127223,0.0004352156,0.02894338,0.002179519,0.00004437254,0.0002479941,0.0000347336,0.07638578],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9735402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980192,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564896744","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i2.4165","title":"Meta-argumentation, An Approach to Logic and Argumentation Theory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Informal logic; AND gate; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Algorithm; Logic gate","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0759385134830571,"gpt":0.2816316144718772,"spread":0.2056931009888202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00103336,0.0001369588,0.0001802198,0.0001144668,0.0001515005,0.0002273215,0.0003104442,0.00005299808,0.00002732468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003116404,0.00009944505,0.00004863577,0.0001726507,0.00001920032,0.001477281,0.00009445204,0.00005614312,0.00009881098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001855869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001081823,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002635385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003363321,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988537,0.0001496447,0.0003016316,0.00025666,0.0002391695,0.0001992277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993273,0.00005474381,0.0001362969,0.0002980638,0.00006124117,0.0001223556],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001163151,0.0000717138,0.0007241079,0.00002931271,0.00009127805,3.96856e-7,0.004167409,0.002073269,0.0004712057,0.970708,0.0001259275,0.02152578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003663269,0.002155847,0.2239424,0.00002455065,0.000656337,0.0001357475,0.001996942,0.6173763,0.005673802,0.126969,0.01539686,0.002008881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0407189,0.0000393763,0.9462802,0.0001530247,0.0001695996,0.0003548353,0.000001723863,0.0001162913,0.01216606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9363636,0.000003724112,0.06043069,0.002743137,0.00005812319,0.00007452795,0.00002468092,0.000004596634,0.0002968555],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8956448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4055251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515375584","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i2.3457","title":"Logic and Parables: Do These Narratives Provide Arguments?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Point (geometry); Philosophy; Psychology; Medicine; Linguistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05793630623058993,"gpt":0.2567522117937274,"spread":0.1988159055631375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000158173,0.0001550024,0.0001579547,0.00004490394,0.0002554044,0.0001765375,0.0001060306,0.00004998441,0.0012333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003077981,0.00009870109,0.00005407506,0.00002509212,0.0003437078,0.001119142,0.00007504937,0.0001504757,0.0003350084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001116226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001010724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009758935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001356426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991939,0.00002194809,0.000205461,0.0001021481,0.0001312196,0.0003453324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995847,0.00006072344,0.00007902708,0.0001256457,0.00003132477,0.0001185215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002960834,0.00007241734,0.0004371861,0.00002561017,0.00001932401,0.00000188431,0.03419144,0.00000113791,0.000008415627,0.9626734,0.0004653557,0.0020742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002991799,0.0001903411,0.0007424125,0.00002205639,0.00001258005,0.000008456232,0.006157119,0.000009998015,0.0000428972,0.2304138,0.7618766,0.0002244948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1642391,0.001038983,0.0000199618,0.001071154,0.0003802277,0.0002220924,0.00001968542,0.00009425879,0.8329146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942551,0.00003181569,0.0001187064,0.001601051,0.000824767,0.00002641192,0.00000843612,0.000007059763,0.003126646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.830016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038220352","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i2.6328","title":"The Role of Trust in Argumentation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Credibility; Fake news; Authoritarianism; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Media studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0287753692382011,"gpt":0.3091463636701772,"spread":0.2803709944319761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009919863,0.00002110844,0.00003877762,0.000007769094,0.00009950127,0.00001374647,0.0000935953,0.00003082701,0.00003803999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002702184,0.00001540199,0.00001673531,0.0001188154,0.0001081304,0.00009199035,0.00001068192,0.00004559729,0.00002913516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001245181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006112752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007144802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025527,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996105,0.00002708331,0.000103235,0.00002127569,0.0001196259,0.0001182796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997858,0.00009872486,0.00003738066,0.00002158832,0.00001740716,0.00003906397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001665594,0.000007435863,0.1182934,0.00000382127,0.000003074045,5.636288e-7,0.1865865,0.0000123028,0.00009233475,0.6591508,0.0001030572,0.03573002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000323395,0.0001100963,0.02686513,0.000005116528,0.000005698777,1.070722e-7,0.3952162,0.0002473938,0.002215524,0.03883053,0.5360816,0.00009924028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8133096,0.00007717632,0.000003892009,0.002276746,0.000129216,0.00009278679,0.000001790252,0.00001306437,0.1840958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991244,0.00005047115,0.00002748442,0.0006215911,0.0001270924,0.000003981664,9.720798e-7,8.65486e-7,0.00004314451],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6203203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1080085,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1814822231","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i1.467","title":"Lightening up on the Ad Hominem","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Mistake; Epistemology; Philosophy; Dialectic; Face (sociological concept); Fallacy; Adversary; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Law; Political science; Computer science; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1065747294989697,"gpt":0.2263884740785365,"spread":0.1198137445795668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006196155,0.00009719084,0.00009074521,0.00002911901,0.0006006236,0.00005552617,0.0001554516,0.00002951428,0.001661558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003162899,0.00005006791,0.00008074591,0.00002423879,0.0002340599,0.0001809932,0.00003970669,0.0001788513,0.00142645],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007327685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001109517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006915674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001473257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994599,0.00001065878,0.0001441303,0.00007100361,0.0001380336,0.0001763314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996402,0.0001041412,0.00004500775,0.0001431499,0.00003009275,0.00003736044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002732156,0.00001707047,0.000009717248,0.000002566818,0.000008125422,0.00001127852,0.006251973,0.000004243896,0.000003838493,0.9824444,0.0099767,0.001242775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001737264,0.0001612864,0.0002920116,0.00001083368,0.000004870477,0.000012076,0.0004360159,0.00007539084,0.0001334191,0.0246012,0.9739777,0.0001215003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1049641,0.00004996458,0.000003926407,0.003510604,0.0005061156,0.00007626918,0.000007392065,0.00007777024,0.8908039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723585,0.00001321484,0.000008931068,0.004587033,0.0006981471,0.000009441325,0.000004586988,0.000005328071,0.02231487],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9640009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993511,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597725234","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i4.4203","title":"Critical Thinking Education and Debiasing (AILACT Essay Prize Winner 2013)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo; University of Windsor","keywords":"Debiasing; Situational ethics; Taxonomy (biology); Critical thinking; Epistemology; Confirmation bias; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Philosophy; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02358649599310291,"gpt":0.3352128984735683,"spread":0.3116264024804654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001171482,0.00008657361,0.00009919782,0.0000567068,0.00081256,0.0002944341,0.0001508635,0.0001019684,0.0003221445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001706221,0.0000758508,0.00002634821,0.0001223222,0.0002682402,0.0005682154,0.00004629208,0.0001535017,0.0001332572],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006426488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004645275,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001890113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006467429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99894,0.0001068208,0.0002006849,0.0001306016,0.0003141496,0.0003077544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992092,0.0003336869,0.00003480747,0.00009406893,0.0001508769,0.0001774067],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003047181,0.00005180178,0.003007527,0.00001805355,0.000002693402,2.157933e-7,0.02109824,0.000001039367,0.000006870911,0.9113804,0.001154704,0.06327538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001647364,0.00005055987,0.02426179,0.0001098372,0.0000166746,0.000009028749,0.01019523,0.0001465089,0.00003895726,0.3274786,0.6371892,0.0003388606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1568172,0.0002709814,0.007462854,0.04592776,0.002882732,0.0002828039,8.886445e-7,0.0002932678,0.7860615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974472,0.0000363391,0.01413375,0.009023285,0.0003635384,0.00001287838,0.00000442558,0.000005490704,0.001948327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8176548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6249636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1859359026","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i1.428","title":"A Normative Theory of Argument Strength","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Bayesian probability; Epistemology; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03442538884530714,"gpt":0.2359960906523058,"spread":0.2015707018069986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002097223,0.0000684385,0.0001026868,0.00006124389,0.00006841279,0.00001161139,0.0002835536,0.00003150388,0.00003524662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001995242,0.00005021873,0.00004417325,0.0001202204,0.0000299638,0.0006025044,0.00009082782,0.00004963009,0.0001003424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001406391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003098664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001499626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001271227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993246,0.00003360788,0.000251215,0.00007421301,0.0001876191,0.0001287768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995059,0.00004697842,0.0001582412,0.0002012035,0.00005108886,0.00003657079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000292295,0.0001777823,0.006726465,0.0000701856,0.00004773167,0.00001864824,0.02501567,0.0008890702,0.0004791451,0.930108,0.0009197918,0.03551828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005017323,0.002039326,0.6755363,0.0002086275,0.0000260772,0.0004180674,0.0018026,0.2011338,0.06653638,0.01791393,0.02785733,0.001510179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4921233,0.00008893145,0.4528973,0.00007440121,0.0003757834,0.0002721326,0.000005813372,0.0001135696,0.05404879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949942,0.00001401827,0.004534088,0.0001627529,0.00001971025,0.000006615144,0.000002371269,0.000001360091,0.0002648959],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9121941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.204786,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529854977","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3895","title":"Aggression, Politeness, and Abstract Adversaries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Politeness; Opposition (politics); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Linguistics; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0448599772650792,"gpt":0.3185384132817765,"spread":0.2736784360166973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002231714,0.000062763,0.0000755294,0.00002699999,0.0004332348,0.0001026091,0.0001144152,0.0001363294,0.0005420738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003800959,0.00004761056,0.00002466,0.00006461101,0.0006465593,0.0007794283,0.00004814121,0.0001566458,0.0003991468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001478164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008554346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003602033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006607769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992778,0.00001880435,0.0001272904,0.00006732593,0.0001839002,0.0003248302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994943,0.0001367235,0.00003920059,0.00006969531,0.00007128006,0.0001888126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003154729,0.000008491429,0.001519723,0.00001111729,0.000002995629,0.000001827143,0.002748558,0.00000129692,0.000005401914,0.9889325,0.0006015901,0.006163361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001302357,0.00002911332,0.07691991,0.00003615046,0.000004329846,0.000001922828,0.001863207,0.00001412235,0.00003082795,0.8191381,0.1016812,0.0001509164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1716759,0.000293745,0.000009228431,0.01332658,0.0002011885,0.0001337108,0.000005334582,0.0000943349,0.81426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958322,0.0001659464,0.00008088835,0.003172183,0.0002032768,0.000006297214,0.000002230388,0.000002174177,0.0005348203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8241563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5935328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501985841","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i3.2147","title":"Emotion, Argumentation and Informal Logic","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Informal logic; Argumentation theory; Dialogic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Focus (optics); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04404527886292283,"gpt":0.2799408283708684,"spread":0.2358955495079455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001428056,0.000139074,0.0001200568,0.00009435033,0.0004243314,0.000388289,0.0001871437,0.00004865538,0.0009805913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002103114,0.0001070794,0.00004043447,0.00003945911,0.0002949685,0.001755252,0.00009123969,0.0001392483,0.0003372565],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002394634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005118193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001960599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000365051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992059,0.00001464074,0.0003042407,0.00008811618,0.0001663575,0.0002207726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994671,0.0000230133,0.0001347684,0.0002211387,0.00009891452,0.00005505393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001218457,0.00002713935,0.0001727426,0.00002019938,0.00001364795,0.000002159015,0.03544681,0.0002330412,0.000009262653,0.9604098,0.0001428514,0.003510171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006955687,0.001506136,0.06571474,0.0001823291,0.0001453881,0.0002094458,0.3422223,0.0003358962,0.0008050945,0.2695073,0.3104858,0.00192989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4349554,0.0002219935,0.0003271637,0.0008941324,0.000222576,0.0002171122,0.00001900156,0.0001887262,0.5629539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959148,0.00007078853,0.0005270119,0.001634349,0.0001522242,0.00001928212,0.0001054324,0.000006948565,0.001569141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6909025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526910648","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1041","title":"Deep Disagreement, Rational Resolutions, and Critical Thinking","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Epistemology; Key (lock); Philosophy; Point (geometry); Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06903815881425727,"gpt":0.296677684418392,"spread":0.2276395256041347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002582428,0.00008545607,0.00009753905,0.00003794938,0.0006228587,0.0001354875,0.00008259968,0.00005174425,0.0006685593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001039082,0.00006949953,0.00004010655,0.00001211624,0.0005341748,0.0005631498,0.00005487085,0.0001813571,0.0001415631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001259998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002441393,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001996647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004373438,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993293,0.00002460681,0.000207031,0.00009144235,0.0001492025,0.0001984444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995894,0.0001503196,0.00003854087,0.00008791727,0.00008364698,0.00005015103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006735544,0.00002336327,0.0002175358,0.00001776514,0.000008806018,0.000001243564,0.01447212,0.0000256283,0.000002728111,0.9824997,0.0008912428,0.001833142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003449387,0.0001388294,0.001613511,0.00001893116,0.00003442188,0.00002252264,0.003467345,0.002292649,0.00001791574,0.1487831,0.8430215,0.000244388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05162849,0.001622614,0.005320087,0.0134826,0.001196729,0.0002544264,0.00004097893,0.0002076723,0.9262464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897295,0.0000377879,0.001626952,0.004709736,0.001133113,0.00001006378,0.00002884542,0.000004978353,0.002719071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.938101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7320256,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101053895","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i2.474","title":"Norms of Legitimate Dissensus","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Action (physics); Political philosophy; Inference; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05418168153881438,"gpt":0.3258298747255297,"spread":0.2716481931867153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000841499,0.00004822363,0.0001012869,0.00002896993,0.0002457045,0.000006922229,0.0001245684,0.00007262836,0.0001281949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002191599,0.00004020728,0.00005017187,0.0001311821,0.00046248,0.000155,0.00001880722,0.00006183205,0.0001096524],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001666047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001049112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001179121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000121492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993142,0.00001843056,0.000151242,0.00003889406,0.0002202204,0.0002569422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996279,0.0000891932,0.00006145374,0.0000654895,0.00006562473,0.00009033821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002336658,0.00005507983,0.1083675,0.00002596163,0.00001685201,0.00004149981,0.08958981,0.00001443305,0.0001001831,0.7948061,0.00210374,0.004855565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001324722,0.0004673688,0.2457035,0.00004256889,0.0000352676,0.00004680111,0.1093565,0.00006766887,0.004571747,0.02845196,0.6090616,0.0008702608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6514326,0.00002017326,0.000009744687,0.0001869332,0.0003012581,0.00006111393,0.000005203593,0.00003611719,0.3479469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984325,0.00007289485,0.0001799106,0.0001818174,0.0002345418,0.000003636985,0.000003041466,0.000002558644,0.0008891703],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7663541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1889785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1705572361","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i1.2132","title":"Bayesian Informal Logic and Fallacy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Fallacy; Inductive reasoning; Variety (cybernetics); Inference; Computer science; Bayesian inference; Bayesian probability; Epistemology; Statistical inference; Artificial intelligence; Deductive reasoning; Bayesian network; Causal inference; Machine learning; Bayesian statistics; Frequentist inference; Mathematics; Philosophy; Econometrics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02421553473010509,"gpt":0.2506493351318307,"spread":0.2264338004017256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002597242,0.0002237045,0.0001966706,0.0001265267,0.000208722,0.0003453939,0.0007390659,0.0001443872,0.0000196417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004020541,0.0001817668,0.00006080674,0.0002853867,0.0001047901,0.00183919,0.0004116486,0.0002754976,0.0002208749],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000264686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001458686,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007178405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001368432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985603,0.00001363894,0.0003693453,0.0002561898,0.0002699435,0.0005305571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991608,0.00002830408,0.0001028643,0.0004066584,0.00008012462,0.0002212549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001368594,0.00003779616,0.0005381159,0.00002962033,0.00001228514,0.00003943606,0.001350779,0.005218568,0.00006306659,0.929451,0.0000926912,0.06315288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00520278,0.002748105,0.0357003,0.0002235916,0.00003817863,0.001651544,0.0004180189,0.2893195,0.002225744,0.6402594,0.01925105,0.002961787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01924297,0.0001183753,0.9341195,0.001234654,0.0002082552,0.000128276,0.000002158623,0.0003543171,0.04459146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9423203,0.00004447917,0.05365954,0.003733284,0.00007482209,0.00001039134,0.000004123867,0.000005641593,0.0001474553],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9230773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7412235,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530082090","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i1.2152","title":"Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Argument map; Philosophy; Argumentation theory","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09082178350827413,"gpt":0.2956670442864488,"spread":0.2048452607781747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003881198,0.00007999842,0.0000979902,0.00003670373,0.0002298831,0.00008146161,0.00005755642,0.00004130085,0.0002882606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007297467,0.00006338458,0.00003203219,0.00001341746,0.0002828175,0.0002417107,0.00002748019,0.0001180729,0.0001233882],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002545932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006676576,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001265252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004970364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994247,0.00001889735,0.0001644532,0.00008123861,0.0001595721,0.0001511646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961,0.00003193485,0.00005972455,0.00009637266,0.0001611022,0.00004086785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005821135,0.00002477206,0.0001556748,0.0000190493,0.00001674331,0.000001050012,0.02185093,0.00009120577,0.000005889059,0.9741874,0.0001899368,0.003451566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001555654,0.0004430434,0.003115902,0.00002706063,0.0001025022,0.00001401024,0.004483911,0.00012051,0.0002908376,0.5724972,0.4170057,0.0003435965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3685081,0.0006486402,0.0001766928,0.001649352,0.001398025,0.0003605929,0.00001169161,0.00009115569,0.6271557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960964,0.0000462066,0.0001512814,0.001818056,0.0003933301,0.0000159372,0.00001347493,0.000004563281,0.001460801],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6275882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3156251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1616088548","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i3.2145","title":"The Effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instruction in Critical Thinking","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Test (biology); Mathematics education; Computer science; Section (typography); Class (philosophy); Computer-Assisted Instruction; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Operating system","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03466845958281332,"gpt":0.3510876795208581,"spread":0.3164192199380447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001791351,0.00004304452,0.00007240183,0.00003690432,0.0003812668,0.00005847566,0.0001452288,0.00005922613,0.0000138988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005426736,0.00003052977,0.00002651403,0.0002069946,0.0003126895,0.0001795891,0.00002966117,0.0001173648,0.00001338436],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001024875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002218904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001664426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991783,0.0001612619,0.0001800027,0.00005906031,0.0002457556,0.0001755517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991894,0.0006033905,0.0000239464,0.00005712586,0.00008874602,0.00003733751],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000180143,0.00003034005,0.002675577,0.00001643594,0.000002250767,8.960335e-7,0.004905842,0.00006108234,0.000005808269,0.9828597,0.000002094388,0.009421919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005239872,0.00006285113,0.4605924,0.0001646566,0.000003366421,0.000004500745,0.004000552,0.00001657807,0.0002294287,0.5306278,0.003663757,0.0001101885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9152058,0.00004142472,0.005517341,0.003608533,0.001757982,0.0002532645,5.682836e-7,0.00006772564,0.0735474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996464,0.00001066725,0.003153908,0.0002962853,0.00005298847,0.000009065804,0.000001094877,0.000001568758,0.00001047935],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4579168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2932435,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600870717","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i3.3534","title":"Argumentation in Theory and Practice: Gap or Equilibrium?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education, Philosophy, and Society","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Relation (database); Reflective equilibrium; Line (geometry); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1014263243171896,"gpt":0.3478714844568049,"spread":0.2464451601396153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000693732,0.00006404208,0.00006283962,0.00003162346,0.00009775128,0.00008357253,0.00004236119,0.00003013454,0.00121861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001693016,0.00004572266,0.00001807856,0.00002134947,0.000108664,0.001706569,0.00002105544,0.00007411341,0.00007162857],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001771495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002430978,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002956697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000294457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995114,0.00005839851,0.0001434881,0.00004775142,0.00007725677,0.0001616895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995196,0.0002854311,0.00005983212,0.00006368228,0.00003633507,0.00003508212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005119089,0.00005515459,0.001406432,0.00001872684,0.000006576402,2.442267e-7,0.1645648,8.169058e-7,0.000006509338,0.8325982,0.0005954804,0.0006958651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001117539,0.0003551091,0.02855807,0.00003539583,0.00005893701,0.00004138063,0.3674445,0.00003053458,0.00006658324,0.08632355,0.5154808,0.0004875846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5069705,0.0002703708,0.000006720774,0.0007495817,0.0005169392,0.000131209,0.000004356993,0.00003087745,0.4913194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928801,0.00004980036,0.0001281637,0.002752311,0.0006745395,0.00001450522,0.00001457927,0.000004343937,0.003481669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7462747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996944,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141509767","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i3.485","title":"Advances in the Theory of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"McMaster University; University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Dialectic; Informal logic; Foundation (evidence); Argument map; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03237957088350588,"gpt":0.300283617558408,"spread":0.2679040466749021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002507217,0.00003424584,0.00004682492,0.00003927096,0.00006389299,0.00001506307,0.0001227915,0.00001820802,0.000004074091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007455648,0.00002160151,0.0000113917,0.000091346,0.00005681358,0.0008639962,0.00002399513,0.00003776066,0.000004612389],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003807841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000108949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007501525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003890416,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995927,0.00004435038,0.0001413972,0.00005186029,0.0001022577,0.00006746058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997034,0.0001391219,0.00003725374,0.00008525512,0.00002326477,0.00001171578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003314283,0.00002356048,0.01015446,0.00001931208,7.548152e-7,0.000002213752,0.002701959,0.000064336,0.00007308502,0.9738968,0.00001108231,0.01304913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009847727,0.0004121317,0.8866677,0.0001056998,0.00000746764,0.0002330912,0.001747632,0.03675035,0.002015213,0.06383498,0.00693937,0.0003016314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.410899,0.001331702,0.575855,0.0005328105,0.0001959417,0.0002300113,0.000001826316,0.00003952104,0.0109142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963306,0.0001564477,0.003305725,0.0001755885,0.00001161484,0.000008558997,8.540372e-7,5.657366e-7,0.00001000491],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9100618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08808839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242009327","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i3.3034","title":"Argumentative Injustice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Injustice; Argumentative; Credibility; Identity (music); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Social psychology; Argumentation theory; Sociology; Psychology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Advertising","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00834268729701935,"gpt":0.2400165464366775,"spread":0.2316738591396582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000149565,0.00006915689,0.00005455457,0.00005419323,0.0001065104,0.0001132126,0.0003737559,0.00005153376,0.00008191959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004570796,0.00005639515,0.00002763915,0.0001827346,0.00002985911,0.0007808985,0.0001099963,0.0002227887,0.0008778292],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000610058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002798215,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002009126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000126206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994451,0.000008139095,0.0001133535,0.00010689,0.0001333181,0.0001931949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995998,0.00002596828,0.00004654065,0.0002146089,0.00004421942,0.00006889861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002227965,0.00006578702,0.0006268834,0.00001689154,0.00002044423,0.0000454462,0.004234367,0.00006073151,0.02511043,0.5882913,0.001233037,0.3802724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002818919,0.00220053,0.0567339,0.00003159467,0.00004065491,0.0009668674,0.0009652736,0.08258791,0.3303963,0.07012948,0.4510971,0.002031481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5438469,0.0000107734,0.2340653,0.0005260697,0.002644475,0.0002010375,0.000002080156,0.0005858929,0.2181174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660608,0.000002363011,0.03226014,0.001019791,0.00008013648,0.000008708353,0.000001410048,0.000002225099,0.000564391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5181618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999001,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519407843","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i1.4120","title":"Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01621196358449976,"gpt":0.234415912071538,"spread":0.2182039484870382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007919929,0.00005799621,0.0001018991,0.0000585265,0.00003415513,0.0000195816,0.0003745019,0.00003556388,0.00001785518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005382003,0.00003645147,0.00003058384,0.0003727652,0.00003048648,0.0002989427,0.00003497585,0.00005324319,0.000008686417],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000822985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001840965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003143677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001394571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992014,0.0001341197,0.0002937441,0.00007284643,0.0001902909,0.0001076184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993727,0.0001720066,0.0001858303,0.0002080499,0.00004832921,0.00001307668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003624827,0.0001133232,0.03311273,0.0001055909,0.00002019034,0.000001394896,0.01494691,0.001404478,0.003664185,0.9066176,0.0001579308,0.03981937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008447942,0.0003566706,0.9663246,0.00005988811,0.000006807301,0.00001163826,0.0007552181,0.02112375,0.004010206,0.004469256,0.001873502,0.0001637096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7832662,0.00005940107,0.181705,0.0002171271,0.000318563,0.0003779136,0.0000015718,0.00004743607,0.03400687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981889,0.000004748897,0.001480357,0.0002567399,0.00002193008,0.00000669729,0.000003130823,0.0000013563,0.00003615391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9332118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1486448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905359712","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i3.4286","title":"The Basic Slippery Slope Argument","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Slippery slope; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Scheme (mathematics); Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0481765815658069,"gpt":0.2552279230381733,"spread":0.2070513414723664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000588445,0.00007870833,0.00007032129,0.00002962911,0.000160307,0.000207567,0.0005451688,0.00003601709,0.000007955343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004319009,0.00004494545,0.0000372988,0.0001262689,0.00001856762,0.0006388795,0.0001773975,0.0000681555,0.0007425575],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003658351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005948759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000275577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001152222,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991434,0.00002986227,0.0002153439,0.0001048717,0.000282869,0.000223615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993616,0.00003986933,0.00008980036,0.000348026,0.00006706838,0.00009360335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003343778,0.00008853794,0.007870897,0.00002786144,0.00004236765,0.0000236277,0.006370864,0.00217424,0.0001750643,0.6662358,0.04601474,0.2709426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009370176,0.0002914074,0.02834412,0.00002001514,0.000004494165,0.00005211823,0.000339655,0.09701856,0.0007911199,0.002881683,0.8689782,0.0003416219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1993677,0.001362925,0.4475818,0.007573226,0.009815169,0.00131286,0.00000433798,0.0008083709,0.3321737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955522,0.00001628447,0.001705912,0.0008808588,0.0001269198,0.00002014649,0.000001973166,0.000002735096,0.001692944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8229634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9544322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098052878","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i1.3938","title":"In Defence of Virtue: The Legitimacy of Agent-Based Argument Appraisal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh; Florida Institute of Technology","keywords":"Virtue; Argumentation theory; Ambiguity; Argument (complex analysis); Fallacy; Epistemology; Legitimacy; Criticism; Philosophy; Epistemic virtue; Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05033415478823391,"gpt":0.2871719785788954,"spread":0.2368378237906615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005342911,0.00008889171,0.0001880255,0.00005236495,0.00006697954,0.00001706158,0.0002177606,0.00004168566,0.0001562192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001124673,0.0000568289,0.00008489016,0.00003034983,0.0006452851,0.000171371,0.00003774611,0.0001566903,0.00003005462],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000614676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004149179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002772955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002885826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992117,0.0000600049,0.0003457055,0.00007122272,0.0001585411,0.000152802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991728,0.0003295624,0.0001958733,0.0001984426,0.0000821444,0.00002116813],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002740694,0.00006360877,0.0006239799,0.00008896308,0.000009649456,6.473178e-7,0.006996478,0.0004571988,0.00007093606,0.9905099,0.0002369592,0.0009142667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003633361,0.002077618,0.01231049,0.0002394596,0.0001160342,0.00000621612,0.01207046,0.007061842,0.01115786,0.06910356,0.881431,0.0007920554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5824277,0.000117275,0.000934909,0.0009697456,0.001193616,0.0003107749,0.00003062246,0.00002939778,0.413986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980613,0.000004249503,0.00009952415,0.001268736,0.0001182204,0.00001212085,0.000006089949,0.000004140759,0.0004255897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9214063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.237758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106163222","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i3.3035","title":"The Authority of the Fallacies Approach to Argument Evaluation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Adversarial system; Epistemology; Informal logic; Adversary; Authoritarianism; Fallacy; Order (exchange); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04146375886973361,"gpt":0.3193228806160212,"spread":0.2778591217462875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001176318,0.00007204034,0.00007228063,0.00002474182,0.0001733077,0.00002907401,0.0002694507,0.00007881838,0.0002441351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001552897,0.00003423907,0.000065511,0.0001363713,0.00008017499,0.00006581913,0.00006097015,0.0001919489,0.0001456783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009755502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000275137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006222592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006323905,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991599,0.0000863358,0.0001966551,0.00008883222,0.0002984156,0.0001699007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993562,0.00005304681,0.00009380183,0.0003428963,0.0001227022,0.00003134941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002049113,0.000309832,0.004066618,0.00002426894,0.0001111986,4.994923e-7,0.02711718,0.00008381355,0.003045819,0.7248321,0.004949422,0.2352543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001623477,0.0004014098,0.8270697,0.00001241515,0.000206413,0.00005157074,0.01924385,0.001177911,0.005371121,0.03135528,0.1130586,0.0004282923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6026598,0.00004937812,0.0002641369,0.0002863984,0.001087603,0.0004377581,0.000005495845,0.00001756997,0.3951919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977251,0.000001581495,0.000193612,0.000439272,0.0001044815,0.000119021,0.00000750819,0.000003196818,0.001406176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8230031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2673108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135187704","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i2.2891","title":"A pragma-dialectical response to objectivist epistemic challenges","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Objectivism; Epistemology; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Presupposition; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06646282060450644,"gpt":0.2887768678374598,"spread":0.2223140472329533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001086997,0.0001976511,0.0002660083,0.0001308646,0.0003488014,0.0001324167,0.0002617927,0.0001600119,0.0006135736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007776647,0.0001608435,0.000117298,0.00004179983,0.0005245437,0.0003061356,0.00007358038,0.0006991657,0.001352664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002083819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001282218,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007777326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002067636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987103,0.0001148107,0.0003153596,0.000223059,0.0002079946,0.0004284736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986742,0.0005242458,0.00009087853,0.0003585729,0.0001822495,0.0001699156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004407838,0.00007140832,0.00003200702,0.00005049185,0.0000245995,0.00002822406,0.03961232,0.000002516397,0.001021313,0.9537746,0.0006034325,0.004338313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003671119,0.0006778044,0.001946098,0.00001972418,0.00002183216,0.00007706343,0.003732519,0.00001678516,0.0003042672,0.01893973,0.9735497,0.0003473878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4287353,0.0001250171,0.00004405139,0.009613239,0.002828051,0.0003099981,0.000020415,0.000215099,0.5581088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846948,0.00001803657,0.0002919929,0.002398069,0.001180554,0.00005197698,0.000004875983,0.00001831763,0.01134136],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9729462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549433436","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i2.4187","title":"Critical Thinking and Cognitive Bias","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debiasing; Hindsight bias; Metacognition; Critical thinking; Cognitive bias; Focus (optics); Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive skill; Cognitive psychology; Confirmation bias; Epistemology; Social psychology; Mathematics education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1383285710489191,"gpt":0.392739179971448,"spread":0.2544106089225289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009762492,0.00005219975,0.00006653356,0.00003333839,0.0003593519,0.0001611697,0.00008224457,0.00006302528,0.0001596881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003897501,0.00004459897,0.00001451375,0.0001020138,0.0003537508,0.0003412489,0.00004694222,0.0001060755,0.0001873073],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002429152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002771758,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009255651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003972166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992063,0.00005898563,0.0001189651,0.00007574348,0.0003165897,0.0002234131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991874,0.0003103974,0.00001555489,0.00003274454,0.0002147622,0.0002391593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006077695,0.0000192611,0.004965849,0.000004364881,0.00000333682,0.000003544398,0.05265678,2.172328e-7,1.831023e-7,0.9324146,0.0005610037,0.009364804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004474019,0.0001223618,0.01322668,0.00007813838,0.00002259065,0.00001238744,0.12668,0.00003146,0.00002763391,0.6604397,0.1985891,0.0003225459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1541985,0.0002116056,0.001065467,0.01430457,0.0007947095,0.0001368104,0.000001996427,0.0001576843,0.8291286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902142,0.00001420696,0.002204018,0.006626884,0.0001293368,0.000006953326,0.000002515891,0.000002291469,0.0007995813],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8360157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4665954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903834446","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i4.5029","title":"The Analysis of Implicit Premises within Children’s Argumentative Inferences","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Dialogical self; Conversation; Focus (optics); Psychology; Premises; Epistemology; Sociocultural evolution; Anonymity; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04082199326469757,"gpt":0.3103028636653924,"spread":0.2694808704006948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002089533,0.0001003613,0.0001645069,0.0001008594,0.0004753267,0.0002369447,0.0004522446,0.00002321016,0.001270875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004075835,0.00005426246,0.00008750931,0.0001236817,0.001005705,0.0004104072,0.0001039049,0.00008238048,0.00004682366],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009338752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004595244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006897616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005731382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992368,0.00003981012,0.0003309837,0.0000753941,0.0001666326,0.0001504304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990092,0.0001373282,0.0002855521,0.0003446103,0.0001986135,0.00002468074],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002380286,0.00002388001,0.006755718,0.000003168458,0.000708662,1.091613e-7,0.0942537,0.0000513365,0.00001370467,0.8962339,0.0002556817,0.001676364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009866877,0.001094072,0.487678,0.00006176787,0.002020967,0.000005708675,0.4356714,0.001171324,0.004074139,0.04176175,0.0245452,0.0009289858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6709446,0.0001377757,0.00001916881,0.0001113791,0.00007607042,0.0001130557,0.00005731357,0.0000383507,0.3285022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984143,0.00003454793,0.00006824006,0.0001874314,0.00008925195,0.00001877113,0.00004103308,0.000003261943,0.001143108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8544721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790117762","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i1.5067","title":"The Bullshit Doctrine: Fabrications, Lies, and Nonsense in the Age of Trump","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Doctrine; Nonsense; Collusion; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Democracy; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Economics; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03645614700779369,"gpt":0.3229511440454775,"spread":0.2864949970376838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001176361,0.00004611104,0.00005803545,0.00004323585,0.0004567768,0.0001103985,0.0002308563,0.00004118045,0.00006663045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004612864,0.0000240623,0.00001830597,0.000216368,0.0005099277,0.0002813505,0.00002897926,0.00007541751,0.00008127639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001215235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008302915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004666274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001193466,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992897,0.00006535398,0.0002135801,0.00003398658,0.0002168955,0.0001804841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994608,0.0002340611,0.00009055583,0.0001332008,0.00004903186,0.00003235844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006692453,0.00003652633,0.003024311,0.00001345096,0.000009599596,0.000002378601,0.2651135,0.000004997613,0.00002844578,0.6434739,0.01951064,0.06871527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002436483,0.0001071539,0.1087485,0.0000067115,0.00000365389,0.000005899999,0.03087413,0.00006231218,0.0000440274,0.001936826,0.8578911,0.00007601787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4182447,0.0001000503,0.00003778362,0.005140202,0.00009364294,0.0002441836,0.000004323429,0.00001905009,0.576116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968784,0.0002803603,0.00006571563,0.001782613,0.00006502323,0.000002113135,0.000002652444,9.947131e-7,0.0009220804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8383805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3513204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1708143966","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1045","title":"Knowing when Disagreements are Deep","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1274449032538061,"gpt":0.4776130059217621,"spread":0.3501681026679559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002807634,0.0001311678,0.0001774576,0.0000580552,0.001080517,0.00001612588,0.0003432435,0.000350273,0.005476894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005487272,0.0001033943,0.00004898223,0.0000971212,0.0001054641,0.001073602,0.0003141488,0.003251392,0.01127946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001320795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001118867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005288937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002966495,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978343,0.0003144759,0.0005834006,0.0001485091,0.0005119437,0.000607417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997088,0.001947065,0.0003041377,0.0003175335,0.0001394465,0.0002038465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003419589,0.0004360705,0.2067616,0.00115991,0.0001828713,0.0000854002,0.06302013,0.0004259647,0.0001086074,0.3599731,0.09797248,0.2695319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001083269,0.00007353105,0.02136017,0.0002340219,0.00002905237,0.000004588832,0.01153778,0.001273206,0.00001467916,0.02311294,0.9410077,0.0002690587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04496634,0.0002222399,0.003769529,0.014287,0.00128821,0.000540104,0.000004865666,0.000240103,0.9346816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9288455,0.00006280147,0.008187668,0.0529888,0.001172433,0.00007039568,0.00001509958,0.00001706577,0.008640281],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9260413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990482,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883212704","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i2.4849","title":"Teaching as Abductive Reasoning: The Role of Argumentation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Abductive reasoning; Epistemology; Humanities; Philosophy; Defeasible reasoning; Psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01933636039895794,"gpt":0.3443751495017162,"spread":0.3250387891027582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006911033,0.00003513394,0.00004095033,0.00002070391,0.0005124247,0.00003513503,0.0001394337,0.000030354,0.0003645323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004962186,0.00002401443,0.00001974094,0.0000817079,0.0002790759,0.0001924968,0.00002269262,0.00008038973,0.0001702883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003239411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001547763,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00100252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009659787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994312,0.00006227777,0.0001167563,0.00004809247,0.0002132957,0.0001283762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996746,0.0000833433,0.00005228558,0.00005894665,0.0000950695,0.00003582026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004047315,0.00001266582,0.001136354,9.897337e-7,0.000003865891,4.530669e-8,0.08554945,3.17221e-7,0.00003245026,0.8987423,0.00007240857,0.01444509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001011379,0.0001153029,0.008425317,0.00002635336,0.000009081896,0.000001730207,0.1743445,0.00002597488,0.00204564,0.4524359,0.3623587,0.0001103191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2394592,0.00002313279,0.0001507513,0.002552076,0.0002621233,0.00009914123,3.764069e-7,0.00003083067,0.7574224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950709,0.000006560941,0.001873551,0.001318939,0.0001944141,0.000006803771,0.000001530402,0.000001512865,0.001525793],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7558966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3991373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921887360","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i1.5116","title":"Argumentation As Critically Oriented Pedagogical Dialogue","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialogic; Argumentative; Critical thinking; Epistemology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05872043937979131,"gpt":0.3869222871635544,"spread":0.3282018477837631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004747535,0.00007518817,0.00009353193,0.0000439878,0.0002425182,0.00009283191,0.000152414,0.00009389497,0.00598535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006720587,0.00006516506,0.00004312632,0.0001731223,0.0001359306,0.0003220415,0.0000352359,0.0001305101,0.0058467],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000709146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002646498,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001172135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003459948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988443,0.0000627911,0.0002123831,0.0001240028,0.0004353008,0.0003212551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993881,0.0001332604,0.00002840776,0.00009010398,0.0001935622,0.0001665773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001067623,0.0000473358,0.004460655,0.00000587895,0.000003644126,0.000001885116,0.01174744,0.000001635103,0.00002186986,0.980907,0.0003212214,0.00247076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005450954,0.0002204615,0.0273942,0.00002872947,0.00001160713,0.000005056257,0.03480125,0.00002201364,0.0001752581,0.09695873,0.8394782,0.0003594189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3845904,0.000009811504,0.0004231322,0.00620676,0.000945684,0.0002243904,0.000001436305,0.0001190606,0.6074793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751768,0.00001683694,0.001672238,0.01208711,0.0001339194,0.00001816464,0.00002823138,0.000003707427,0.01086298],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8839483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949273,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1689471221","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2905","title":"What Constitutes Skilled Argumentation and How Does it Develop?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Production (economics); Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Medical education; Applied psychology; Knowledge management; Economics; Medicine; Epistemology; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02640016831424103,"gpt":0.3261415806413369,"spread":0.2997414123270958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003614419,0.00006334703,0.00007237862,0.00003964297,0.0003703275,0.0004602273,0.00008083195,0.00005608741,0.0001984443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002961216,0.00004565567,0.00001372036,0.0001298946,0.0001756675,0.001107615,0.00001354329,0.00005996111,0.00004531535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003616577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001752878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001161344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008932089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993926,0.00002808063,0.0001042541,0.0000827564,0.0002028527,0.0001894749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996598,0.00007080852,0.00003462907,0.00004235391,0.00009884631,0.0000935085],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004937353,0.00002471988,0.001371529,0.000005316054,0.000005533632,0.00000182618,0.03551811,6.448567e-7,0.000013289,0.8994768,0.001287142,0.06229019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000590967,0.00008618859,0.03782261,0.0001045303,0.00001514744,0.000006136721,0.1503814,0.00001286751,0.00058519,0.1539955,0.6559613,0.0004381794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3809658,0.0002703288,0.001040803,0.3808556,0.002969962,0.0005536193,0.00000186928,0.0002616312,0.2330804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750186,0.0006835769,0.005373569,0.01413992,0.00008052423,0.000007504025,0.000008646038,0.00000126093,0.004686429],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7454813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4437982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607463045","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i1.1042","title":"Revisiting Deep Disagreement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Resolution (logic); Philosophy; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; History; Artificial intelligence; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01692881542857108,"gpt":0.2456781214877667,"spread":0.2287493060591956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003084787,0.0001280993,0.0001277238,0.00005295733,0.0001607062,0.0001672654,0.0007155947,0.00005202195,0.0001286913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006070695,0.00009628224,0.00007547511,0.0001886698,0.00002932287,0.0009590659,0.0003675296,0.0001197259,0.001500846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004307038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000279173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004629715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006475484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998951,0.00001787637,0.000257733,0.0001810503,0.00020567,0.0003866967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993603,0.00004213671,0.00009461012,0.0003426847,0.00005548321,0.000104775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002842823,0.00002628379,0.001992737,0.00001588652,0.000008433712,0.00001004844,0.001780706,0.0003604073,0.000024557,0.3805024,0.0004445047,0.6148311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00107857,0.0002993747,0.03144316,0.0000674279,0.00001490049,0.0001531454,0.0001796411,0.231925,0.001206343,0.005694864,0.7270247,0.0009129344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01535662,0.0007656201,0.3893866,0.001096978,0.0003592416,0.0001657879,6.607848e-7,0.0004012259,0.5924672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669001,0.00002842554,0.02989059,0.001676177,0.0004645344,0.000009508421,0.000002615082,0.000003723674,0.001024371],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9515435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567080196","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i3.4019","title":"Conductive Argument, An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Defeasible reasoning; Defeasible estate; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.121533004838446,"gpt":0.3028597746975162,"spread":0.1813267698590702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001599418,0.0001057699,0.0001859353,0.00005010047,0.0001287912,0.00007092848,0.0001320208,0.0000650451,0.001199625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005431442,0.00008316991,0.00005615073,0.00002791478,0.0002949854,0.0008338487,0.00002859364,0.0001610833,0.0002609865],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001051666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000428024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005092258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008860218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993351,0.00003123466,0.0002255739,0.00009517544,0.0001113871,0.0002015655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992836,0.00004024344,0.0001538742,0.0001744734,0.0002910361,0.00005682217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001790211,0.00004921975,0.0008179258,0.00002673034,0.00002763815,7.078888e-7,0.01367042,0.00001447254,0.0003104544,0.9836811,0.0003958201,0.000987544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003172055,0.007461512,0.05281815,0.0002588274,0.0002716215,0.00003332341,0.07372656,0.001395591,0.007563737,0.4604982,0.3909156,0.001884898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6440428,0.0000795674,0.000009342345,0.00004807447,0.0002866489,0.0001379134,0.000006013126,0.00004065143,0.3553489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946244,0.0000140783,0.0004780443,0.000848753,0.0001634925,0.000007602622,0.00002494325,0.000006646429,0.003831993],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.523183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1702479143","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i3.2282","title":"Johnson's Manifest Rationality A Pragmatic Theory of Argument","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04956689732928102,"gpt":0.2604724410737302,"spread":0.2109055437444492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006081352,0.0001039759,0.0001783971,0.00003462276,0.0001554672,0.00003990221,0.0001342889,0.00005158198,0.008310243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003769429,0.00007896595,0.00009060516,0.00001925872,0.0003965203,0.0002865148,0.00001942874,0.0001401075,0.0003929061],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001161575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004661049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005447336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009897977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991609,0.00007868867,0.0003367794,0.00008399836,0.0001725488,0.0001670503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999424,0.0001486539,0.0001255709,0.0001738095,0.00009208967,0.00003584403],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003197011,0.00006931411,0.00007165915,0.00009081651,0.00003027621,0.000002020262,0.01137832,0.00003918019,0.000005508553,0.9834702,0.0004984065,0.004312349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005429356,0.0002873707,0.003361969,0.00004587974,0.0000588959,0.00001241997,0.002769449,0.0000942334,0.0001515348,0.3111946,0.6812201,0.0002606238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.189095,0.000146394,0.00006744318,0.0003274357,0.0002528077,0.0001874967,0.00004068882,0.00004772132,0.8098351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975481,0.00004913428,0.0001516454,0.001534463,0.0002574226,0.00001809277,0.00004138347,0.000005909735,0.02246091],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7873741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495983830","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i1.3656","title":"Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are Weak Arguments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Expert opinion; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Mathematics; Statistics; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05857822156908858,"gpt":0.239257830865886,"spread":0.1806796092967974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005357738,0.0001461746,0.0001389082,0.00007110012,0.0004802246,0.000247512,0.000334739,0.00004577241,0.01049619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001000567,0.0001156393,0.00006439923,0.00002289233,0.0002729047,0.001498108,0.00008176813,0.0001107628,0.003238322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003687655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001285925,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001295617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008478085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990491,0.0000112035,0.0002293588,0.0001659577,0.0002680088,0.0002763813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995073,0.00001681039,0.0001287062,0.0001889364,0.00005194629,0.0001062918],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000584553,0.000370715,0.00139992,0.00003348564,0.00008041904,0.000007794219,0.05306651,0.00002194484,0.0005727159,0.3867159,0.5421637,0.01550851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002421009,0.00009535164,0.001723849,0.0000306006,0.000001807497,8.150521e-7,0.00165853,0.00007319479,0.00004998044,0.01569548,0.9802352,0.0001931475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06823239,0.0005810433,0.00002216405,0.002141582,0.003191607,0.0002908861,0.00005483246,0.0001642853,0.9253212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808047,0.00006169039,0.0001416465,0.01417678,0.0009601244,0.00005866992,0.00004534735,0.000008355972,0.00374272],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9215785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978897034","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i3.5493","title":"Emotive Meaning in Political Argumentation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Emotive; Presupposition; Argumentation theory; Connotation; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Epistemology; Politics; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Psychotherapist; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02375319866932524,"gpt":0.2728871743126417,"spread":0.2491339756433165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009570697,0.00007412559,0.0001202264,0.00009782576,0.00005673058,0.0000719804,0.00007422925,0.00001674074,0.003845673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002319463,0.00005681703,0.00004416939,0.00002888289,0.00008542837,0.0004155666,0.00004487093,0.00007922481,0.0009586386],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003111873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009838418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002439228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006765247,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993775,0.00001185321,0.0001719486,0.00007742652,0.0001269536,0.0002342624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997915,0.00003306957,0.00003988174,0.00007823356,0.00003519881,0.00002212856],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005456376,0.00001400995,0.004612589,0.000007600628,0.00002026805,0.000003705059,0.02490042,0.00004267926,0.000002710642,0.9696844,0.00008768801,0.0006185173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002366151,0.0006399548,0.03790516,0.0001798714,0.000129778,0.000009548785,0.8053207,0.002152581,0.0003171175,0.07972711,0.0701946,0.001057369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2724166,0.0000207135,0.000005456599,0.0001175104,0.0001413911,0.00006411777,0.000003258133,0.00002160117,0.7272093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941245,0.000001779008,0.00004496669,0.0008847805,0.0001343592,0.000005434495,0.00001293605,0.00000381949,0.004787378],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8899572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998192,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}