{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":2,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"20962a271ba8","filters":{"venue":"International Commentary on Evidence"}},"results":[{"id":"W1899744659","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1126","title":"From Liberal Extremity to Safe Mainstream? The Comparative Controversies of Witness Preparation in the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Commentary on Evidence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Cross-examination; Mainstream; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Element (criminal law); Divergence (linguistics); Expert witness; Professional conduct; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Sociology; History","authors":[{"name":"Sergey Vasiliev","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1192183064970631,"gpt":0.4512331557695005,"spread":0.3320148492724374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001040872,0.00006595036,0.00007355424,0.00008940294,0.0002151022,0.00009508142,0.0004664154,0.00002105787,0.0003866049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007766334,0.00004463748,0.00002441248,0.0004073092,0.0001592929,0.001059083,0.0000340575,0.0001850785,0.00002859624],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000175534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007085444,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04196773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005796372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985003,0.0006172457,0.0002149483,0.000092483,0.0004548776,0.0001200994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942119,0.00528871,0.0001450895,0.0001406704,0.000178567,0.00003513184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005308583,0.0005983658,0.1061079,0.000002269534,0.0000749524,5.954417e-7,0.4433924,0.001226125,0.00008484928,0.07487898,0.3723984,0.0007042923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003269666,0.00008177505,0.1053458,0.0001445931,0.00002209458,6.636224e-7,0.1164478,0.0005436668,0.0003426713,0.004429238,0.7721711,0.0001435638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6038384,0.00003348215,0.0001594387,0.3903251,0.0005199766,0.0002644164,0.00003935619,0.000006725183,0.00481306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601749,0.00004672797,0.0001256803,0.03900747,0.0003385608,0.00003920772,0.0001009136,0.000001915892,0.0001645916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3997727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9644119,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035722625","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1027","title":"Finding Facts Fairly in Roberts and Zuckerman's Criminal Evidence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Commentary on Evidence","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Rationality; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Psychology; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Doctrine; Credibility; Philosophy of law; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"Christine Lesley Boyle","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1355118221094528,"gpt":0.4373198992100908,"spread":0.301808077100638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009899676,0.0001344211,0.0001282056,0.0002357339,0.000234968,0.0002090497,0.0006715016,0.00005516427,0.0004882547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001638341,0.0001388028,0.00003504285,0.0001937269,0.0001605949,0.001961589,0.0001631458,0.0002246366,0.000108459],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004226198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007388769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001290196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003929868,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980021,0.0001759115,0.0003021874,0.0003598683,0.0008956994,0.0002642701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973885,0.002134098,0.0001143823,0.0001483502,0.0001088111,0.0001058672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006742557,0.0004685969,0.280529,0.00007525374,0.00005895448,0.0002086845,0.03321266,0.001671569,0.0005725531,0.01908513,0.1028555,0.5605878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001147974,0.0004594676,0.3461282,0.01032805,0.0000540279,0.0000416542,0.006344674,0.002125502,0.00214812,0.007926,0.6220753,0.001221023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8228639,0.001325479,0.0002601078,0.1706694,0.0006364095,0.0002402327,0.000005830472,0.00006411976,0.003934489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835342,0.001129884,0.001111607,0.01337859,0.0003687784,0.0000156456,0.000002200852,0.000008463756,0.0004506942],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5593668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5660214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}