{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":2,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"20962a271ba8","filters":{"venue":"International Commentary on Evidence"}},"results":[{"id":"W1899744659","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1126","title":"From Liberal Extremity to Safe Mainstream? The Comparative Controversies of Witness Preparation in the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Commentary on Evidence","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Cross-examination; Mainstream; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Element (criminal law); Divergence (linguistics); Expert witness; Professional conduct; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Sociology; History","authors":[{"name":"Sergey Vasiliev","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1192183064970631,"gpt":0.4512331557695005,"spread":0.3320148492724374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02295798,0.000173435,0.0006126769,0.00303223,0.01017058,0.01278711,0.001302597,0.004750005,0.005287633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03551348,0.000324938,0.0004303265,0.003846598,0.02008314,0.008204672,0.006475823,0.006987753,0.0003278498],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006655879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007117128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03568135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06700829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9855314,0.009287538,0.0006035551,0.0009738038,0.002129873,0.001473855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724289,0.02062751,0.001622142,0.001465286,0.00253536,0.001320865],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002283397,0.00008569602,0.004027585,0.0002307389,0.00004397186,0.0002067863,0.05787248,0.0001834887,0.000349934,0.8365375,0.009831269,0.09040213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001067011,0.0003251777,0.05200732,0.005230244,0.0001787869,0.0003820998,0.1641469,0.0003607557,0.002265932,0.3245317,0.4502913,0.0001730156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2790828,0.06319339,0.002913537,0.2493818,0.001695237,0.0000361673,0.0001891805,0.00003275172,0.4034752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704772,0.01027453,0.0004288386,0.01633372,0.0003434013,0.00003090693,0.00004880563,0.00002064059,0.002041915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03568135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1214148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035722625","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1027","title":"Finding Facts Fairly in Roberts and Zuckerman's Criminal Evidence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Commentary on Evidence","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Rationality; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Psychology; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Doctrine; Credibility; Philosophy of law; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"Christine Lesley Boyle","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1355118221094528,"gpt":0.4373198992100908,"spread":0.301808077100638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0150391,0.0006443405,0.001462508,0.007299816,0.004743333,0.01333366,0.002441291,0.006810108,0.003265935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04773856,0.001065754,0.0006547319,0.006750848,0.0236399,0.02296941,0.004021796,0.0083159,0.001204204],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004704606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008265033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007435798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01145457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864925,0.006214424,0.00136823,0.0009558689,0.004386652,0.0005823305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730036,0.02329438,0.00116986,0.0004712805,0.00177696,0.0002839651],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001713504,0.00001534968,0.000247159,0.0008737131,0.0000180219,0.0003521208,0.004178201,0.0002047083,0.00005822123,0.8810467,0.03836553,0.07462305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006706552,0.00002002904,0.0005376975,0.004468326,0.00001918824,0.0004300306,0.002128265,0.0001211307,0.000133726,0.310849,0.6812547,0.00003119278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003570967,0.7328554,0.02260944,0.1103843,0.00979818,0.000174363,0.00008325685,0.0000714704,0.1204526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09550643,0.7601917,0.02363324,0.05595073,0.01681101,0.0004867128,0.0001746133,0.0001761306,0.04706937],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0150391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07953531,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}