{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":36,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":36,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"c80aaf31aa86","filters":{"venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity"}},"results":[{"id":"W1554365104","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v1i1.14","title":"Cheating among college and university students: A North American perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":444,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Perspective (graphical); Academic dishonesty; Higher education; Psychology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Medicine; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02158579628489146,"gpt":0.3815879098520392,"spread":0.3600021135671478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00121597,0.000111431,0.0001368246,0.0001874495,0.0008551145,0.000162449,0.0006590782,0.000126074,0.0002143095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001821977,0.0001150011,0.0001045009,0.0001924935,0.0005251397,0.0008815663,0.00006112066,0.001260497,0.0000137952],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001512234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007574816,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004953659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01366131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984267,0.0001766538,0.0002420449,0.0002075211,0.0007147496,0.0002322825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971334,0.00058017,0.0002605324,0.00005009923,0.001757758,0.0002180959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001621362,0.0003051661,0.4388012,0.000002247458,0.0002499034,0.000004695366,0.02331136,0.00001925346,0.000006724573,0.5111004,0.02059911,0.005437864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007938388,0.00007727975,0.4502371,0.00006215966,0.0000511138,0.00006907678,0.1511526,0.0002828168,0.00001600577,0.02142046,0.3755108,0.0003267442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.888991,0.0000602275,0.0008149538,0.1003587,0.001254683,0.0002100237,0.0001798056,0.00002253373,0.008108062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852631,0.0002036919,0.004177409,0.0007839311,0.003128844,0.000005036,0.0000173952,0.000007570772,0.006413025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4896799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.762333,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158855527","doi":"10.1007/s40979-021-00077-7","title":"Ungrading: why rating students undermines learning (and what to do instead)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Higher Education Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo","keywords":"Psychology; Mathematics education; Rating system; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06699258393408913,"gpt":0.5038929804987623,"spread":0.4369003965646732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001880583,0.0001412009,0.000153602,0.0001942876,0.00112469,0.004315649,0.0005571741,0.00009914251,0.00104116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01000934,0.0001491736,0.0001028224,0.0002799465,0.0001069456,0.00224962,0.000105277,0.0007244957,0.00005389042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005258317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001604542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002804431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004332213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974508,0.000448344,0.0004026077,0.0003152334,0.001110818,0.000272247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946525,0.001919666,0.0003089128,0.00007932714,0.00271025,0.0003293102],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001276812,0.001046542,0.5991418,0.00002671711,0.0005730718,0.00001963731,0.1004696,0.0002543791,0.0006759422,0.2054961,0.03640333,0.05576513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002960412,0.00003538409,0.0158474,0.0002165399,0.00002431441,0.0001154862,0.06999995,0.0000177329,0.0001162841,0.01243882,0.9006928,0.0001992832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7209265,0.001171371,0.001339743,0.2582167,0.01493165,0.0002408358,0.000005269308,0.00003664008,0.003131326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965339,0.001046626,0.007597919,0.00280102,0.00391306,0.00005529699,0.00003641452,0.00002353012,0.01918712],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8642895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387568087","doi":"10.1007/s40979-023-00144-1","title":"Postplagiarism: transdisciplinary ethics and integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Everyday life; Psychology; Scale (ratio); Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2789330394429113,"gpt":0.4748182622017014,"spread":0.1958852227587901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002621097,0.0001492953,0.0001724025,0.0006083615,0.0003467835,0.0001399661,0.0008132066,0.0002358271,0.00005002975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01145977,0.0001178459,0.00006754135,0.0006166612,0.001090256,0.0002384624,0.0001453309,0.00372761,0.000007674456],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006422963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003091771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003983179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001054813,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976844,0.0003533503,0.0006939647,0.0003490718,0.000687198,0.0002320265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934756,0.005644276,0.0002262713,0.0001509344,0.000446979,0.00005590617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001945266,0.0006142428,0.0007344404,0.00005964895,0.00002645488,0.00005916664,0.01338956,0.00002380357,0.07191634,0.9008101,0.001232062,0.01093971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001783053,0.0002122355,0.01292134,0.00009902837,0.00001167269,0.0004507154,0.003993328,0.001305835,0.01451907,0.9644752,0.001680269,0.0001529693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7733577,0.00002912745,0.005872617,0.2181003,0.00205357,0.0003152899,0.0001150615,0.00002668138,0.0001296277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955854,0.0003707425,0.0009198632,0.002639759,0.0002912716,0.00005519694,0.00002983411,0.00001252548,0.00009536159],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2222277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890784557","doi":"10.1007/s40979-018-0030-0","title":"Effectiveness of tutorials for promoting educational integrity: a synthesis paper","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Cheating; Academic integrity; Psychological intervention; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Medical education; Misconduct; Intervention (counseling); Academic achievement; Pedagogy; Medicine; Social psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04367702663746247,"gpt":0.4205006072596121,"spread":0.3768235806221496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01000176,0.0002324767,0.0003780075,0.0003261509,0.0009431287,0.0002370387,0.001171999,0.0006201745,0.00175536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03671377,0.0002160427,0.0004335032,0.0002196996,0.000650953,0.001085108,0.00005776222,0.001306656,0.00003694424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008866439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004178625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001319988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002350391,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965827,0.0006990369,0.0008397916,0.0003804024,0.001061443,0.0004365693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785208,0.01269022,0.0006474013,0.0001478706,0.007763244,0.0002304456],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009264963,0.000707671,0.003956334,0.0001402939,0.0005014469,3.85573e-7,0.006064281,0.000002500314,0.004593648,0.9441814,0.03148729,0.007438239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008256388,0.0002112754,0.008258171,0.001075897,0.0001497877,0.00006421227,0.00276112,0.0001227994,0.01473346,0.7533047,0.2180709,0.0004220777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5218893,0.0007333875,0.04316691,0.296418,0.1040785,0.00466009,0.002327201,0.0001290386,0.02659754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964341,0.0000836806,0.01342023,0.0005073521,0.01914341,0.0004649184,0.0001185063,0.00003142002,0.001889512],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4424516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884678906","doi":"10.1007/s40979-018-0028-7","title":"Strengthening the research agenda of educational integrity in Canada: a review of the research literature and call to action","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Research integrity; Political science; Educational research; Action (physics); Work (physics); Public relations; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Medicine; History; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3320215011370241,"gpt":0.5686972580840289,"spread":0.2366757569470049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02293491,0.000262422,0.0007154303,0.0006797324,0.0008960346,0.000175537,0.002840755,0.0006353482,0.0004630934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04046047,0.0001614513,0.0003952279,0.001584344,0.0008649003,0.0003288283,0.000333374,0.01015173,0.000007745125],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004293728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04272426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4252277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5277353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903163,0.003999397,0.001536364,0.0004327333,0.003196767,0.0005184683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759377,0.01314313,0.0008767908,0.0003342949,0.009503279,0.0002048185],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008120543,0.000278443,0.0007002048,0.009189255,0.0003680875,0.000001493723,0.009708596,9.859036e-7,0.000001863142,0.1678251,0.6490984,0.1627464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006835796,0.00002783526,0.0004066605,0.06953029,0.00004991955,0.00006972926,0.001888173,0.000003685381,0.000004015193,0.02164544,0.9061692,0.0001367334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005772864,0.8775184,0.000009175494,0.1128658,0.005101975,0.001460617,0.0006576926,0.000001974954,0.001807103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001915581,0.9900864,0.0003776076,0.0006169753,0.003552515,0.0002263695,0.0001109112,0.00002115153,0.003092488],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2570708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226520937","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00105-0","title":"New priorities for academic integrity: equity, diversity, inclusion, decolonization and Indigenization","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenization; Scholarship; Equity (law); Inclusion (mineral); Decolonization; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Social science; Law; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07299590899366233,"gpt":0.4307373877076325,"spread":0.3577414787139702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004397091,0.0001774976,0.0001995163,0.0004189822,0.008015049,0.0002694399,0.001410509,0.0004352092,0.001052269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004463096,0.0001966367,0.0001604966,0.0002608532,0.0001721145,0.001122626,0.002574037,0.003054339,0.000004663962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001764823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003932314,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002696287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007358727,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970061,0.0002904022,0.0005234901,0.0003196563,0.001482567,0.0003777404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995863,0.001468729,0.0004364011,0.00007994958,0.001869406,0.000282492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003064294,0.0001051715,0.03052045,0.00001541947,0.000143321,0.000001531537,0.03571483,0.00007054966,0.00006482976,0.7830201,0.1228946,0.02714282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006685202,0.00009927808,0.00360348,0.00003392161,0.00004752008,0.00008746046,0.005978766,0.0003215957,0.00005561965,0.6615596,0.3273179,0.0002262734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2200767,0.001909287,0.2255291,0.5075222,0.03616425,0.002790584,0.001306201,0.0001704145,0.004531265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9636251,0.0008480894,0.01243731,0.004414258,0.006496505,0.0001411097,0.0004548154,0.00003046962,0.01155238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7435484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376611400","doi":"10.1007/s40979-023-00130-7","title":"Faculty members’ use of artificial intelligence to grade student papers: a case of implications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Principle of legality; Field (mathematics); Discretion; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Mathematics education; Engineering; Political science; Law; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2369344825770243,"gpt":0.5090555197410058,"spread":0.2721210371639815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001871548,0.0001278585,0.0002024582,0.0004272113,0.0003917794,0.0001244348,0.0007506749,0.0002524965,0.0004782405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004771715,0.0001219833,0.0002453901,0.0005445746,0.0002378913,0.0004829093,0.0000825513,0.0007931855,0.00003489571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003333956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008602299,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003967347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002122809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978322,0.0001580718,0.0007720159,0.0002186592,0.0007532649,0.000265776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949694,0.001738707,0.0003880195,0.0001294379,0.002546507,0.0002279115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007001476,0.0003701398,0.002870387,0.000008590338,0.000185178,0.00001003991,0.02259952,0.000461013,0.0007776296,0.9410871,0.01960804,0.0119524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002206496,0.0002209879,0.02123514,0.0002982338,0.0001287089,0.0007200406,0.1039839,0.0006104343,0.004010038,0.5987996,0.269197,0.0005752203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.827856,0.00002632237,0.009500485,0.1531359,0.005494066,0.000728371,0.001687016,0.00004715173,0.001524728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896929,0.00007612512,0.007129916,0.0005382017,0.001138123,0.00006768112,0.0001348724,0.00001177927,0.001210356],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3422874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5997468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460491371","doi":"10.1007/s40979-016-0007-9","title":"A close encounter with ghost-writers: an initial exploration study on background, strategies and attitudes of independent essay providers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Trent University; Nottingham Trent University","keywords":"Cheating; Collusion; Public relations; The Internet; Focus group; Sociology; Psychology; Business; Marketing; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06262571433169108,"gpt":0.3767369157888557,"spread":0.3141112014571646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004609417,0.0001658073,0.0001496536,0.0002535104,0.00011945,0.0009637914,0.0008492108,0.00005336132,0.00005543598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004385883,0.0001027172,0.00005421432,0.00008372746,0.00008199755,0.008912929,0.00008032191,0.0002063795,0.000005097768],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008382884,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001005428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000264809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983374,0.0001181386,0.0003798038,0.0003288407,0.0006868562,0.0001488999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982247,0.0003445389,0.0002869531,0.0001927282,0.000838091,0.0001129978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002778637,0.009809243,0.1979983,0.00007913733,0.00112797,0.00004125433,0.02644807,0.0001046906,0.00223289,0.7036333,0.001110937,0.05463558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006178197,0.007632681,0.7320522,0.0008144155,0.00005539961,0.000458023,0.03272451,0.0007936755,0.002768843,0.2141788,0.001536906,0.0008063748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9564754,0.00002519875,0.02980055,0.0117731,0.001265919,0.0003199411,0.00003189234,0.00002105368,0.0002869108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946309,0.000007696765,0.004252576,0.0003401101,0.0005694244,0.00006033692,0.00001447275,0.000009999646,0.0001144985],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5340539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9293863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981460216","doi":"10.1007/s40979-019-0045-1","title":"Developing a university-wide academic integrity E-learning tutorial: a Canadian case","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Experiential learning; Mathematics education; Higher education; Learning development; Personal Integrity; Scientific integrity; Computer science; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering; Library science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0487292806891621,"gpt":0.3804978260216336,"spread":0.3317685453324715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003726864,0.00020735,0.0002293412,0.0006022705,0.001367946,0.0002702949,0.001134793,0.0009422592,0.001848761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006405445,0.000222394,0.0002401811,0.0003089091,0.0001829125,0.001258024,0.00006727789,0.007384703,0.0003068727],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004433066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01257548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1924005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07997347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973231,0.0004829348,0.0004590081,0.0003430102,0.0008081552,0.0005838056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944823,0.002108915,0.000317361,0.0001012689,0.002441966,0.0005482083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001209795,0.00003977433,0.04007867,0.00001001502,0.0001816273,0.0001391345,0.008011402,0.00003785346,0.00002590981,0.9147154,0.03378979,0.002849458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004284238,0.00002908999,0.001520368,0.0001433432,0.00002495913,0.001002127,0.01898354,0.0001673582,0.00002629563,0.05616974,0.9212057,0.0002990677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5994774,0.0002221034,0.006072449,0.310224,0.0430027,0.0009227995,0.0002402991,0.0001168519,0.03972144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627956,0.0003525315,0.005239343,0.002566225,0.005335107,0.000008896805,0.0001055065,0.00002433926,0.02357249],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8874159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990195677","doi":"10.1007/s40979-019-0047-z","title":"Are Canadian professors teaching the skills and knowledge students need to prevent plagiarism?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Redaction; Plagiarism detection; Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Art; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03032029235692155,"gpt":0.4251920824839843,"spread":0.3948717901270627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00452245,0.0001498704,0.0001580043,0.0002642573,0.001142774,0.0004745042,0.001299641,0.0003809362,0.000532757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00347059,0.0001149582,0.0001140902,0.0001082596,0.0001075416,0.0004681251,0.00009865456,0.002838541,0.000181382],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001045676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001885845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03655902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07593554,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978081,0.0004129714,0.0003511617,0.0002362246,0.0008148559,0.0003767028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970132,0.001133635,0.0002585498,0.0001081977,0.001052342,0.0004341203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006539012,0.0008155165,0.3158464,0.00001430108,0.0003571495,0.000003140553,0.06482175,0.00002992756,0.00003151079,0.3207644,0.2912825,0.005967983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002979595,0.00003147875,0.1464198,0.0002414754,0.00002454698,0.00004410068,0.0234891,0.00003962526,0.00003320493,0.03726271,0.7918854,0.0002306369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7607551,0.0001245239,0.0001240537,0.2201472,0.009751949,0.0007591879,0.00009783689,0.00001309091,0.008227075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666253,0.00004663971,0.0004833108,0.005204399,0.002525704,0.00005859723,0.00002042165,0.00001329524,0.02502237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5006029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3207425528","doi":"10.1007/s40979-021-00088-4","title":"International students’ knowledge and emotions related to academic integrity at Canadian postsecondary institutions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Red River College; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Cheating; Misconduct; Feeling; Psychology; Academic dishonesty; Higher education; Scientific misconduct; Medical education; Reading (process); Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06153495639984373,"gpt":0.4460394232579318,"spread":0.384504466858088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002676081,0.0002495979,0.0002482889,0.0006740853,0.001958782,0.0004854116,0.001492603,0.0008783847,0.004666427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007369325,0.0002687398,0.0002324969,0.0004038507,0.0003664078,0.001080489,0.0002987626,0.004535592,0.0003254893],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003874858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008950263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01808471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09538324,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968063,0.000361408,0.0007686942,0.0004936397,0.001029013,0.0005409181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935999,0.0008880399,0.0002187254,0.0001595891,0.004069236,0.001064519],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008053428,0.00027997,0.04253899,0.00000772889,0.0004681584,0.00003266105,0.01509235,0.00001898097,0.0002614575,0.7534776,0.1809075,0.006834015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005000175,0.00002488564,0.04257898,0.0001562634,0.00003817087,0.0007028966,0.004020147,0.00003189272,0.00008477377,0.06267375,0.8888875,0.0003006764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4437191,0.0007867889,0.0008046794,0.4381895,0.03016569,0.0005784546,0.001128525,0.00006530992,0.08456197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9322616,0.001638419,0.003571201,0.006156077,0.003491126,0.00008766642,0.000755463,0.0000297541,0.05200863],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.70798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180478483","doi":"10.1007/s40979-021-00078-6","title":"Assisting you to advance with ethics in research: an introduction to ethical governance and application procedures","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Health and Medical Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Corporate governance; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Research ethics; Ethical issues; Curriculum; Subject (documents); Public relations; Sociology; Law; Management; Engineering; Computer science; Library science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4907829008208932,"gpt":0.6651030609224939,"spread":0.1743201601016007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009901837,0.0001326634,0.0002137063,0.0002732666,0.0002788544,0.000222619,0.0003835532,0.0004324613,0.00007826107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1501877,0.000117116,0.00005043752,0.000563999,0.0002112112,0.000248232,0.0001463784,0.008430227,0.00001507749],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009381924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005209725,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001236609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00410232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958147,0.0002874422,0.0005593228,0.0006581414,0.002350996,0.0003293878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975939,0.008053432,0.0001547815,0.0003549579,0.01488341,0.0006144728],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00334963,0.001595126,0.04598476,0.0002986144,0.0001241282,0.00004185985,0.00294276,0.0004995505,0.01125544,0.9050226,0.008767902,0.02011765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001965829,0.001548564,0.441279,0.002023377,0.00002962968,0.002027141,0.002905249,0.0008867886,0.005419326,0.4347719,0.1067073,0.000435948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2249281,0.00009873079,0.01026331,0.7629939,0.0007863073,0.0004964118,0.00003033692,0.00001193605,0.0003909826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9051449,0.0002424307,0.07951764,0.007450862,0.004666063,0.0002952948,0.00008040668,0.00003051715,0.002571883],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7555431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938574,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991996678","doi":"10.1007/s40979-019-0046-0","title":"Interinstitutional perspectives on contract cheating: a qualitative narrative exploration from Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University; Bow Valley College; University of Calgary","funders":"Mount Royal University","keywords":"Cheating; Outsourcing; Work (physics); Narrative; Public relations; Political science; Psychological contract; Psychological intervention; Higher education; Business; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06651198758456238,"gpt":0.4375782442900802,"spread":0.3710662567055178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001661674,0.000197861,0.000223076,0.000153458,0.0006882523,0.0002564447,0.0006661376,0.0002902445,0.004074355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004648676,0.0001854544,0.0001720245,0.0001154024,0.0002115004,0.001287592,0.00002806132,0.001825333,0.00008270211],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002770538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006193744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3921825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1923046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970948,0.0004706208,0.0004908538,0.0003478006,0.001310064,0.0002858582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993723,0.00286427,0.0003887216,0.00009889074,0.002728614,0.0001964793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004575681,0.0002307776,0.001069521,0.000002529019,0.0002859687,0.000002529992,0.2729669,0.0001066703,0.0001744322,0.6977766,0.02605716,0.0008693676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009103065,0.0001260795,0.003304815,0.0002164773,0.00001934977,0.00001567933,0.6755131,0.000284769,0.0002880692,0.1477356,0.1712162,0.0003694745],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7852908,0.0001674353,0.003462797,0.1727436,0.01616678,0.0006091169,0.0007825266,0.00003133885,0.02074562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884201,0.00008111353,0.001663784,0.002051109,0.003944675,0.00006156309,0.0003072167,0.00001248559,0.00345792],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.550041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296472389","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00116-x","title":"Recommendations for a balanced approach to supporting academic integrity: perspectives from a survey of students, faculty, and tutors","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"Athabasca University","keywords":"Academic integrity; Cheating; Misconduct; Academic dishonesty; Context (archaeology); Research integrity; Medical education; Psychology; Scientific misconduct; Higher education; Data integrity; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Computer security; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1496258172592294,"gpt":0.4894700086381741,"spread":0.3398441913789446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006665877,0.0001642131,0.0002801853,0.0003061043,0.001103303,0.0001679495,0.001293209,0.0002484766,0.0004348543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009310689,0.0001685655,0.0001668771,0.0002638881,0.0001656482,0.0004699636,0.0002212731,0.002842922,0.000002249568],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008937101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001490517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0127718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005894418,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969563,0.0005285292,0.0007209242,0.0003756976,0.001102297,0.0003162003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943388,0.002468923,0.0005614846,0.00008827695,0.002315806,0.0002266749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001008142,0.001694495,0.2007093,0.00001852674,0.0008282685,5.590678e-7,0.1461433,0.00007894313,0.0002656204,0.4075378,0.2334776,0.008237368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002121889,0.0002703814,0.1816387,0.0001380357,0.0001084775,0.00005410661,0.2743201,0.0007734892,0.0001261666,0.1747428,0.365045,0.0006608571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8122433,0.0003679713,0.02192713,0.14428,0.006714214,0.00151883,0.01167098,0.00003776697,0.001239794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730871,0.0001309111,0.02021845,0.001213087,0.001358999,0.000389096,0.001632917,0.00001951088,0.001949952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.232795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109694751","doi":"10.1007/s40979-020-00062-6","title":"Exam cheating among Quebec’s preservice teachers: the influencing factors","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ; Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec; Université Laval; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Likert scale; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Scale (ratio); Multilevel model; Descriptive statistics; Survey research; Phenomenon; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Developmental psychology; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07375159827665845,"gpt":0.3921008257779774,"spread":0.3183492275013189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002196993,0.0001715177,0.0001601729,0.00008123663,0.001227404,0.0005962935,0.001601129,0.0003699029,0.001233443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009401386,0.000127111,0.00022911,0.0001940547,0.0002912111,0.001427821,0.00008727761,0.002977469,0.00003788968],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006488265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001517841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0342545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007311432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997489,0.0003627046,0.0004926925,0.0002433093,0.001070365,0.000341971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958022,0.001967623,0.0003658863,0.00009362956,0.001461906,0.0003087023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001257596,0.0001865306,0.2469726,0.00001931153,0.0005017032,0.000003633365,0.3465287,0.0002805664,0.0003707958,0.2390781,0.1606039,0.005328249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000534999,0.00005632744,0.1388996,0.0001873731,0.00007444791,0.00002191924,0.1539018,0.001096416,0.0004581262,0.05803424,0.6462558,0.0004789976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7158321,0.0001548899,0.001606511,0.2675318,0.004043148,0.0003445091,0.00005142148,0.00005057122,0.01038509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823496,0.00004963591,0.0007367657,0.005381774,0.007422033,0.00003298746,0.00004961195,0.000016323,0.003961265],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4856519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297199072","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00111-2","title":"Proactive learner empowerment: towards a transformative academic integrity approach for English language learners","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Scarborough","keywords":"Psychology; Mathematics education; Thematic analysis; Higher education; Pedagogy; Academic integrity; Sociology; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04923907067262269,"gpt":0.4019488676779118,"spread":0.3527097970052891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006048221,0.0002775502,0.0003131658,0.0003942804,0.00205185,0.0002379406,0.001656848,0.0005288158,0.001422399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004522658,0.0002697866,0.0005125377,0.0002920607,0.0003499337,0.001294113,0.0001116366,0.008479142,0.000008710235],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002348078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003499114,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00129682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006378683,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959579,0.000660161,0.0007015437,0.0004387489,0.001645887,0.0005957842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961233,0.001025511,0.0004622893,0.000120336,0.00198039,0.0002881653],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001542872,0.0009948907,0.0009436702,0.0000339265,0.0008085032,0.000002814686,0.4047009,0.0003603186,0.0001532321,0.4611961,0.1070678,0.02219491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001446191,0.0002262903,0.000339826,0.00003711426,0.00008735208,0.00008910532,0.3914139,0.001344268,0.0003615562,0.06389035,0.5402559,0.0005081755],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3241035,0.001963453,0.1767889,0.270606,0.05276723,0.008995719,0.007852443,0.00047694,0.1564458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628151,0.0002528749,0.01100704,0.002676781,0.006971222,0.001496283,0.001092502,0.00004700147,0.0136412],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6387116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389752195","doi":"10.1007/s40979-023-00147-y","title":"A model for preventing academic misconduct: evidence from a large-scale intervention","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Academic integrity; Commit; Intervention (counseling); Premise; Psychology; Discipline; Scale (ratio); Scientific misconduct; Medical education; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Social psychology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1686443114703947,"gpt":0.478034968894143,"spread":0.3093906574237484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00590123,0.0001767459,0.0002073781,0.0003019536,0.0009187352,0.000266098,0.001219319,0.0006017893,0.0005458228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009645618,0.0001772342,0.0004726653,0.0002257152,0.0001299756,0.001573538,0.00009677654,0.002078126,0.00009499247],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006086027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001200853,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009612659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009907794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972738,0.0002157229,0.0007137728,0.0003718438,0.0009218689,0.0005029867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946818,0.00270038,0.0004568129,0.0001111928,0.001836328,0.000213425],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008959515,0.0006448196,0.02055228,0.00008480845,0.0007246333,0.000003822425,0.09748862,0.00136388,0.00314561,0.2362349,0.6155577,0.02330298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009647543,0.00004630361,0.002878186,0.001049929,0.0000898557,0.00001695916,0.01478076,0.1487223,0.0003851598,0.7233541,0.1073328,0.0003788582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5649856,0.0008796572,0.2402857,0.172045,0.0178606,0.00125448,0.001638185,0.0001771303,0.0008737113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9286439,0.00105869,0.02069864,0.001510561,0.01064203,0.0004618498,0.0007273629,0.00004206061,0.03621493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5082249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216879224","doi":"10.1007/s40979-021-00090-w","title":"Student and faculty perceptions of, and experiences with, academic dishonesty at a medium-sized Canadian university","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"University of Lethbridge","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Cheating; Academic integrity; Honesty; Psychology; Perception; Witness; Dishonesty; Medical education; Educational attainment; Social psychology; Medicine; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03695373548075864,"gpt":0.3920271262043004,"spread":0.3550733907235417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007187136,0.00009575462,0.0001368072,0.0001345385,0.0008022249,0.00007665854,0.0003288512,0.0002712056,0.0007662274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000762938,0.00008586614,0.00005891704,0.0001168603,0.000528828,0.0004756685,0.00005795958,0.0009118185,0.000003092034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006044417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003872477,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02073495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1215798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987219,0.0001440295,0.000214692,0.0001919861,0.0005349174,0.0001924956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977061,0.0004613783,0.0001421422,0.00004638498,0.001303198,0.0003408456],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003044993,0.0002301363,0.4410917,0.00002031613,0.0004183994,0.00003870919,0.3145421,0.000006489268,0.0004024083,0.214196,0.02333444,0.005414801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007657705,0.00004999006,0.2967413,0.0001390332,0.00006249685,0.0005230591,0.5671257,0.00003384893,0.0002184782,0.007090445,0.1269932,0.0002565882],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9277032,0.0001802571,0.0001354128,0.06913302,0.0009588329,0.0001071781,0.0001974265,0.00000564277,0.001579016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928972,0.0006022551,0.001166041,0.0003720535,0.0005309487,0.000007537564,0.00007291905,0.000004526886,0.004346489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2525836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9857861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384469708","doi":"10.1007/s40979-023-00136-1","title":"Student perceptions of academic misconduct amongst their peers during the rapid transition to remote instruction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Misconduct; Academic integrity; Psychology; Student engagement; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Perception; Medical education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04842813834164943,"gpt":0.4066139762051251,"spread":0.3581858378634756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027624,0.0001405997,0.0001570363,0.0003863666,0.0009966803,0.0001170418,0.0009652203,0.0003440066,0.0007964185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001341694,0.0001094686,0.0002549107,0.0004248789,0.0002723063,0.0006018184,0.00004679729,0.00202049,0.00006382772],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006012105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006346066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009174761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002427055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976906,0.000272517,0.0005449012,0.0002140604,0.00098613,0.0002918406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973707,0.0006584961,0.0002524664,0.0001075062,0.001441381,0.0001694356],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001112363,0.0005456278,0.02237132,0.00008545051,0.001337867,0.000007327373,0.4601494,0.003716867,0.03084749,0.2213878,0.1598959,0.09854253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001472764,0.0001595724,0.4181471,0.0005155852,0.0001057854,0.0002830803,0.2913782,0.0008653729,0.002840048,0.1162353,0.1673577,0.0006395226],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8604553,0.00004148728,0.001050767,0.1307303,0.005839335,0.0003672064,0.0001752328,0.00003626117,0.001304086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917189,0.0006317855,0.0005066494,0.0007379156,0.003741423,0.00003217331,0.00008294809,0.00001381544,0.00253442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3957758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8778138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408604286","doi":"10.1007/s40979-025-00187-6","title":"Global Trends in Education: Artificial Intelligence, Postplagiarism, and Future-focused Learning for 2025 and Beyond – 2024–2025 Werklund Distinguished Research Lecture","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05784685763756196,"gpt":0.4649566234764431,"spread":0.4071097658388811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004733687,0.0002127098,0.0002634493,0.0009141912,0.001323809,0.0007093382,0.0006303271,0.0007126194,0.0004828319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005892891,0.0002102877,0.0001376301,0.0008884337,0.0004801979,0.0004900146,0.0001012471,0.00282229,0.000004229641],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001008561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003231634,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001745911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003886932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971937,0.0004469762,0.0006551855,0.000470812,0.0007527725,0.0004805614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946007,0.002178304,0.0002082487,0.00009573007,0.002706219,0.0002108389],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002919466,0.0002077209,0.00862023,0.00001710783,0.00007924064,9.958594e-7,0.002827942,0.00001433538,0.000006449545,0.6547003,0.04728846,0.2859453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002022686,0.00005805188,0.008750122,0.0001135167,0.0000243559,0.00001906311,0.01182452,0.0004161374,0.00001780312,0.5811184,0.3972915,0.000164227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08804792,0.007837327,0.01848809,0.7380434,0.04433503,0.001559969,0.0003771817,0.00006585623,0.1012452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9313068,0.0019437,0.01164033,0.00272317,0.01645462,0.0003098591,0.0004013912,0.00002798809,0.03519217],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8432589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575509464","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v8i1.782","title":"How do faculty members respond to their students' discussions of academic misconduct and academic integrity?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Presentation (obstetrics); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Medical education; Academic institution; Qualitative research; Perception; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1208383388445477,"gpt":0.4745050081811505,"spread":0.3536666693366028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005779591,0.0002770496,0.000342074,0.000465105,0.0006486812,0.0002736402,0.001713743,0.0009703829,0.0004423293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008992124,0.0002092424,0.0002495077,0.0002907987,0.0004468409,0.002078391,0.0002198183,0.006248665,0.00001727821],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006035403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009073467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005419253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001125767,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963595,0.0004676881,0.0006987155,0.00032389,0.00155427,0.000595899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953944,0.001664582,0.0004942629,0.0001423439,0.001544228,0.0007601454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005001435,0.0004460916,0.1338076,0.00002591716,0.0004892313,0.000001155217,0.07862367,0.000006109121,0.003303706,0.6364174,0.1293059,0.01707299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007641133,0.00009776573,0.04876079,0.000496237,0.00009001646,0.0001534156,0.08476429,0.00001526206,0.001997887,0.1010922,0.7612087,0.0005592674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7774362,0.0008973732,0.001365317,0.2110824,0.006965908,0.0005246764,0.0005941868,0.0000241017,0.001109874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819081,0.0007300666,0.003095103,0.001430799,0.00467589,0.0000649025,0.00008372964,0.00002279849,0.00798865],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6319028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167255727","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v7i1.744","title":"YouTube: An international platform for sharing methods of cheating","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Popularity; Upload; Demographics; Psychology; Internet privacy; Multimedia; Computer science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2169353107345652,"gpt":0.5119126823771453,"spread":0.29497737164258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005774654,0.0001733265,0.0002348569,0.0003274945,0.0005415817,0.0001649544,0.001856411,0.0004461149,0.001617385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005926284,0.0001676804,0.0003215459,0.0001179198,0.0002323694,0.002055936,0.00007609266,0.001142368,0.000007050943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005103752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009410573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001847475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002373326,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977143,0.0001258913,0.0007842062,0.0003096476,0.0007237204,0.0003421769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943997,0.001100037,0.0005707235,0.000141365,0.003559146,0.0002289978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004025047,0.0004147503,0.01147527,0.00001301117,0.0003230231,6.64503e-7,0.02497253,0.000009705337,0.0005183166,0.9279303,0.002648778,0.03129116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001037763,0.0001987732,0.008490943,0.0001862964,0.0000798913,0.00008449289,0.01895519,0.002397096,0.004874895,0.7931787,0.1700858,0.00043007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.333401,0.0002932287,0.4377255,0.03142665,0.06399766,0.001863625,0.001091995,0.0001473414,0.130053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5961853,0.0001550612,0.3913023,0.0008466946,0.007448226,0.0001355537,0.0002526921,0.00003480076,0.003639295],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2627843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407607630","doi":"10.1007/s40979-025-00180-z","title":"Secondary school teachers’ perspectives on GenAI proliferation: generating advanced insights","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Child Development and Digital Technology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02453162599865761,"gpt":0.3842915357516017,"spread":0.3597599097529441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004568865,0.0001370189,0.0001323236,0.0004010189,0.0008490845,0.0004710554,0.0005553514,0.0001418623,0.0005476566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003212649,0.0001279782,0.0001344606,0.0001997933,0.0001587611,0.0006213674,0.00004536738,0.0006678371,0.00003950014],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001065465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003040894,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003664935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002225846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986129,0.00007696314,0.0003604047,0.0002729575,0.0004719529,0.0002047908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979097,0.0003546846,0.0001614066,0.00009615743,0.0013618,0.0001161978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000983181,0.0003352295,0.003671597,0.000003802353,0.0001731115,0.000001815241,0.009941521,0.00002515517,0.000226185,0.915357,0.04583132,0.02433495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001407488,0.0001041082,0.01859971,0.000206365,0.00001836122,0.00002539392,0.03981201,0.0001081015,0.001014922,0.3692603,0.569059,0.0003842227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6814911,0.001139563,0.003425013,0.1259964,0.01023189,0.0006548694,0.00003158926,0.0001194251,0.1769101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9664425,0.0001694784,0.006189417,0.002136712,0.002259413,0.00009808256,0.00005512909,0.000009815176,0.02263941],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5460967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6530557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404232621","doi":"10.1007/s40979-024-00175-2","title":"Future-proofing integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology: prioritizing human rights, dignity, and equity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Equity (law); Human rights; Psychology; Political science; Business; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4877763892982634,"gpt":0.6122569691056695,"spread":0.1244805798074061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005541266,0.0001446388,0.0002401356,0.0004216214,0.0002320973,0.0003140147,0.0005468215,0.0003062732,0.00006064646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005832968,0.0001000845,0.0001279358,0.0002250884,0.0006301943,0.0002115946,0.0002596443,0.005024929,0.000003238044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002068434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000539686,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002494645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009503068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976419,0.0001345694,0.0007502098,0.0003306743,0.0009231934,0.0002194194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928493,0.005810121,0.0001172919,0.0001678469,0.0009607507,0.00009471771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001238418,0.0003433359,0.004279365,0.0002050676,0.00009008946,0.00007211808,0.0007599486,4.206121e-7,0.002137732,0.9704428,0.0003719979,0.02117332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001364829,0.0002418342,0.02320962,0.0007293805,0.00003270394,0.0007682919,0.0007541908,0.0003383458,0.0008646203,0.9692286,0.003602607,0.00009338869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8636504,0.001123915,0.003009729,0.1278519,0.002733765,0.0005159898,0.00004992017,0.00002444163,0.001039848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938769,0.0002949963,0.003409479,0.0003935379,0.001788421,0.00003342775,0.00002965616,0.00001195652,0.000161572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1302265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102671823","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v3i1.128","title":"An exploration of the role of Canadian academic libraries in promoting academic integrity","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Academic dishonesty; Academic library; Information literacy; Library science; Political science; Higher education; Exploratory research; Public relations; Medical education; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science; Law; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07851609246483005,"gpt":0.4058967228834379,"spread":0.3273806304186078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006877343,0.0001402612,0.0002012399,0.000927053,0.0003749756,0.00005924641,0.001640712,0.0008534858,0.0001815452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005478158,0.0001174179,0.0001580766,0.0006690481,0.000425784,0.003052378,0.00004480477,0.005230176,0.00000333697],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006780617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004661772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.106881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1195225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971948,0.000329626,0.0009730366,0.0001983142,0.0009201742,0.0003839997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964528,0.0009867611,0.0006524072,0.0001216164,0.001527969,0.0002584343],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001057209,0.0001136981,0.1423804,0.000008631147,0.00003719251,5.23858e-7,0.03503594,0.00002517313,0.002245882,0.8096107,0.0009390647,0.009497098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000297285,0.00004933066,0.05851195,0.0003749093,0.00001854391,0.00002203521,0.0384482,0.0002721421,0.01594702,0.8240028,0.06185476,0.0002010502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9165398,0.0005336578,0.00138865,0.06771444,0.005186982,0.0005942817,0.0001640143,0.00001549681,0.007862636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955822,0.0002667978,0.001686601,0.0004334862,0.001713679,0.00001528254,0.00003769268,0.00001156361,0.0002526852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08386847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285992815","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00107-y","title":"Academic integrity in upper year nursing students’ work-integrated settings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Workplace Violence and Bullying","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Academic integrity; Psychology; Work (physics); Scientific integrity; Courage; Personal Integrity; Academic dishonesty; Pedagogy; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Medicine; Political science; Cheating","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04632549582965874,"gpt":0.4382479156819162,"spread":0.3919224198522575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003912678,0.0001780592,0.0002024661,0.0005472385,0.0011387,0.0003407003,0.001699632,0.0001592364,0.002849576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001594961,0.000181436,0.0002133715,0.0006215991,0.0002089019,0.0005494347,0.0001276981,0.003692425,0.00004536935],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003149078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00208385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007302639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001228475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996461,0.0004497366,0.0006068333,0.0003342335,0.00167188,0.0004763559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979017,0.00068532,0.0003170167,0.0001063768,0.0008063636,0.0001832128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000476851,0.001070709,0.7998663,0.000004259679,0.0001002766,0.000009729719,0.01477661,0.0001387386,0.00008214059,0.06281286,0.10877,0.01189148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002057934,0.0001413787,0.1560991,0.001393702,0.00005071577,0.0001455165,0.1579693,0.0001314145,0.00009729627,0.1687634,0.5123361,0.0008141428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9043273,0.0002761918,0.0003591206,0.08172709,0.009959555,0.0004105777,0.00008005074,0.00004081863,0.002819258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886804,0.0001777124,0.001878803,0.001325607,0.00213008,0.0001603928,0.0001022709,0.00002289855,0.005521792],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6437672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114162843","doi":"10.1007/s40979-020-00066-2","title":"In memory of Tracey Bretag: a collection of tributes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05739798794568996,"gpt":0.4023185687896094,"spread":0.3449205808439195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00159978,0.00008245178,0.0002006647,0.0001928994,0.0001178139,0.00002813247,0.0005195689,0.000264997,0.001005623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005157966,0.00008168497,0.0001757118,0.0002770787,0.0001833003,0.0005304279,0.00002025178,0.001005163,0.000006026895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002564949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001439984,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001909382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003558152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983221,0.0001818206,0.0005844011,0.0001285027,0.0006354334,0.0001477055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969756,0.0009290029,0.0003895658,0.0000384386,0.001552843,0.0001145468],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001460317,0.0010173,0.02832487,0.00007519975,0.0003519523,0.000004846564,0.07147732,0.0002409789,0.005191462,0.6732722,0.2136955,0.004888004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004243693,0.0005935544,0.0377161,0.0005567778,0.0001106124,0.0001224707,0.04897049,0.002498521,0.0312947,0.4866729,0.386524,0.0006962101],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4966145,0.0004884297,0.005488419,0.4766924,0.007644366,0.0005511812,0.0003312756,0.00001652891,0.0121729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939343,0.0001736456,0.002095328,0.001071687,0.001579519,0.00001430609,0.000023373,0.000006200209,0.001101619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4973198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999076,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408083851","doi":"10.1007/s40979-025-00182-x","title":"Understanding PSE students’ reactions to the postplagiarism concept: a quantitative analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Mathematics education; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1483032860028032,"gpt":0.4923651865432522,"spread":0.3440619005404491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003733104,0.0001467597,0.000199463,0.000698612,0.001786656,0.0006705765,0.001512486,0.000317695,0.0007101329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006006537,0.0001166934,0.0003655014,0.001014852,0.0002597232,0.0005190516,0.00008588714,0.001960058,0.00005029746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001888547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001397813,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003503466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002862637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973949,0.0003963265,0.0005251018,0.0002609644,0.001119294,0.0003034744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944631,0.003046616,0.0002422743,0.0001360088,0.001937307,0.00017472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001015349,0.00014253,0.008941671,0.00000155492,0.001401244,9.317902e-7,0.01302383,0.0003537226,0.0000157709,0.8466681,0.1291332,0.0002158927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003578814,0.00004527367,0.01834927,0.0001093655,0.0004071408,0.00001261738,0.05883401,0.0003702081,0.000039873,0.341789,0.5794694,0.0002159645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02141759,0.000178549,0.3955162,0.555896,0.01333817,0.0005666776,0.0002585506,0.00003589541,0.01279242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9664913,0.0001373261,0.003514773,0.006806742,0.001533262,0.00007710449,0.00008301115,0.000008484417,0.02134802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9450737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995129,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4414397238","doi":"10.1007/s40979-025-00201-x","title":"Redefining assessment tasks to promote students’ creativity and integrity in the age of generative artificial intelligence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Higher Education Practises and Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Creativity; Temptation; Generative grammar; Task (project management); Inclusion (mineral); Creativity technique; Point (geometry)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1602714511035238,"gpt":0.5247919296444852,"spread":0.3645204785409614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004729287,0.0001177242,0.0001670957,0.0002871906,0.0004715523,0.0004508101,0.0007868723,0.00007600007,0.000194437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00240599,0.00009454456,0.00008434218,0.000332599,0.0001689237,0.0002879772,0.00008813428,0.0007728022,0.00000323712],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005533352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001202985,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001741049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002094216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997765,0.000495192,0.0005443759,0.0002259281,0.0007782237,0.0001912694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975322,0.001192642,0.000202274,0.000115319,0.0008822165,0.00007529832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009024158,0.001141239,0.04965977,0.00001031462,0.0001315782,0.00000262087,0.03177929,0.0000597419,0.0002189868,0.8858757,0.005636299,0.02539421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000249046,0.0001539702,0.3295538,0.0003042111,0.0000490587,0.00001105486,0.05939502,0.0001203986,0.0003524414,0.4794305,0.1301413,0.0002392709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7416853,0.0000987994,0.03354875,0.2094249,0.004865715,0.0008552611,0.00005500926,0.000009997986,0.009456228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827299,0.0001055099,0.01421148,0.001248224,0.0005463433,0.0001496147,0.00002699481,0.000004770081,0.0009772116],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4064452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4347172,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402339736","doi":"10.1007/s40979-024-00163-6","title":"Clues to fostering a program culture of academic integrity: findings from a multidimensional regression model","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Smith School of Business, Queen's University","keywords":"Regression analysis; Psychology; Academic integrity; Regression; Social psychology; Computer science; Machine learning; Psychoanalysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09444063427137273,"gpt":0.4713385927775645,"spread":0.3768979585061918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002131743,0.0002547684,0.0002923723,0.0004322345,0.000452179,0.0002807347,0.00103022,0.0008859677,0.0004246006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003601811,0.0002072793,0.0003610757,0.0002883339,0.000221525,0.001075278,0.000203088,0.004785932,0.00005538099],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000772571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002164111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001303945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001724593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968373,0.0001697497,0.0007615794,0.0004383373,0.001401636,0.0003914273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963439,0.001142142,0.0001972919,0.0001156623,0.001850831,0.0003501643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007782104,0.0005919862,0.002512827,0.00007124503,0.0006578031,0.00001491515,0.08915417,0.0003449377,0.01338468,0.5035304,0.3026273,0.08633152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005853031,0.0001961074,0.001193814,0.003792136,0.0001173419,0.0001023098,0.01084921,0.02724659,0.004089357,0.5466871,0.4045053,0.0006354332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7377259,0.003046328,0.0396816,0.1866077,0.02372586,0.001706543,0.001789122,0.0003005996,0.005416317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9042096,0.0006659799,0.08275018,0.001560374,0.004588281,0.0001672992,0.0002642792,0.00003619965,0.005757767],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1850473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975101,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415122066","doi":"10.1007/s40979-025-00202-w","title":"Reducing undergraduate students’ trust of commercial contract cheating websites with an academic support literacy intervention","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Reputation; Psychological intervention; Certification; Intervention (counseling); Literacy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03674219879460586,"gpt":0.4593670395512566,"spread":0.4226248407566507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003660022,0.0001838876,0.0002731331,0.0003953577,0.0006218147,0.0003297246,0.001241056,0.0004147657,0.0006949333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002301743,0.000166142,0.0002187835,0.0002425125,0.0002968376,0.001684051,0.0000632766,0.002408479,0.00001029349],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006415281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001524818,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002745984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005199934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971318,0.0003668788,0.0008759384,0.0002736903,0.001039531,0.0003121844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953767,0.001109401,0.0006374432,0.0001156852,0.002599101,0.0001616834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001572272,0.001494734,0.4094651,0.00006722139,0.000867965,0.000005011934,0.01659423,0.00007985427,0.0005560715,0.495124,0.01947472,0.05469887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005650784,0.0009679925,0.3798836,0.003902781,0.0004487833,0.0002244556,0.02285152,0.001631976,0.003376887,0.4051153,0.1749131,0.001032785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9239182,0.0001737128,0.009186697,0.05356849,0.005839723,0.0004528623,0.0001334455,0.00003422811,0.006692601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876866,0.0001663617,0.003193682,0.001012148,0.001899332,0.00003716392,0.0001832554,0.00001299629,0.005808455],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1554383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491625350","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v9i2.887","title":"Editorial Volume 9(2)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Environmental science; Thermodynamics; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02895376262512629,"gpt":0.3876490836946617,"spread":0.3586953210695354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001805334,0.0001266972,0.0001299985,0.0001660563,0.0007411738,0.000568716,0.0009954831,0.0005305486,0.009340189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004761181,0.0001183013,0.0002095961,0.0001008436,0.0002202933,0.001455979,0.00003797516,0.001924826,0.0009614548],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006022012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001525613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004476649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001532242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977593,0.0001639117,0.000396878,0.0001871961,0.001154583,0.000338087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945759,0.0007263395,0.0002144771,0.00008083935,0.004128517,0.0002739389],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000221269,0.00008593666,0.001830769,0.000001206726,0.00005520399,2.202033e-7,0.001464781,0.000002665265,0.00004941122,0.1727685,0.8199951,0.003724058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001895467,0.00001818753,0.001488985,0.00001847198,0.000007489216,0.00001618318,0.001615036,0.00005670067,0.00001956175,0.2310412,0.7654138,0.0001148084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.01653017,0.0001152409,0.004659511,0.3321672,0.6065262,0.0005345416,0.00009218165,0.00006082395,0.03931414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26103,0.0002226633,0.007261001,0.003720426,0.6665742,0.0001940472,0.0001243305,0.00002553277,0.06084777],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3284468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998164,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480649662","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v3i1.132","title":"Editorial July 2007","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Military, Security, and Education Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; Presentation (obstetrics); Publishing; Readability; Library science; Variety (cybernetics); Publication; Discipline; Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05172738835310694,"gpt":0.4427187076327691,"spread":0.3909913192796622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00383706,0.0001407478,0.0001468904,0.0002548571,0.001045472,0.0002333842,0.0006901082,0.0001639104,0.001461276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003985754,0.0001366767,0.0002216582,0.0001509384,0.0002707161,0.0004842334,0.00003844231,0.000580198,0.0001883229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007680379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00153907,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001233233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001124856,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975357,0.00008423578,0.0005103732,0.0002193276,0.001238347,0.0004120167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942284,0.001201138,0.000215538,0.00009819753,0.003947047,0.0003096314],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001072973,0.0002780856,0.002596888,0.000002749776,0.0000938775,6.172373e-7,0.005494812,0.000001003721,0.00001349742,0.1181756,0.8714586,0.00177703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002841343,0.0000265583,0.004773434,0.00002008912,0.00001372773,0.00001297151,0.005319962,0.000001545064,0.000027784,0.09050973,0.8988699,0.0001401599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.01161348,0.001112683,0.00306182,0.06531612,0.8477358,0.0003315029,0.00008898303,0.00005120654,0.07068843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2819621,0.0004568736,0.003536749,0.001501725,0.6896411,0.0000404009,0.00007565811,0.000020827,0.0227646],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2703486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994515,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117465603","doi":"10.1007/s40979-025-00211-9","title":"Beyond plagiarism: transforming pedagogy to help students write with sources","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Sheridan College","funders":"","keywords":"Unpacking; Key (lock); Teaching method; Professional writing; Work (physics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02564644105414007,"gpt":0.4361194060771312,"spread":0.4104729650229912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002508199,0.0002022298,0.0002277976,0.0005065741,0.001053851,0.0005741639,0.001527936,0.00047755,0.0006177583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001361363,0.0001765038,0.0001772706,0.0003072399,0.0002072433,0.0007448227,0.00006130696,0.002168237,0.00005102433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000717106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002458541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00183565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00206666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971924,0.0001716481,0.0005087355,0.0003134498,0.001386611,0.0004271458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963879,0.001007,0.0001757289,0.0001045003,0.002044006,0.0002808722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007373504,0.0005385054,0.05060187,0.00001823421,0.0006038361,0.000007983948,0.02449095,0.0001170003,0.0001478898,0.8178814,0.0848471,0.02000786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008810037,0.000113013,0.009865641,0.0003299697,0.00007520276,0.00006905365,0.02264236,0.00003630727,0.0005388162,0.1500271,0.8150868,0.000334694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4719009,0.0003898702,0.06853943,0.3988673,0.01312291,0.00100088,0.0002051702,0.00007020582,0.04590342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.943115,0.000195806,0.006838248,0.01009356,0.004008009,0.0001303023,0.00007481622,0.00002125253,0.03552302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7302397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9420031,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2916175080","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v8i1.780","title":"Editorial 8(1)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09329351313903278,"gpt":0.5109924127027974,"spread":0.4176988995637646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00234417,0.00008844306,0.00007916367,0.0001916154,0.0007986994,0.0005168287,0.0005058608,0.0001265372,0.003064219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00703675,0.00008655689,0.0001251987,0.0001837314,0.0001184789,0.002268522,0.00002070006,0.0007537833,0.0002323456],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006015339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002611545,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008423851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001237116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983041,0.0001368216,0.0003176886,0.0001002768,0.0008318116,0.0003093386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955481,0.0009325815,0.000231957,0.00008000158,0.00292854,0.000278836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002426873,0.0002407424,0.003739555,6.581499e-7,0.00003724763,3.058669e-8,0.003371634,6.386404e-7,0.00002177722,0.4052826,0.585736,0.001544923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001914169,0.000009629203,0.002260104,0.000008224685,0.00001169058,0.00001729935,0.002797653,0.000002074297,0.00002604521,0.03919022,0.9553838,0.0001017779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.005821249,0.0001201128,0.0013063,0.2563626,0.6760283,0.0001904409,0.00004080971,0.00003305058,0.06009717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.489902,0.00007265268,0.004598573,0.001767922,0.4911134,0.00006189828,0.0000698318,0.00001179479,0.01240188],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4840808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978471,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409262732","doi":"10.1007/s40979-025-00188-5","title":"Academic and clinical integrity: undergraduate nursing students’ perceptions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Qatar National Library","keywords":"Academic integrity; Perception; Psychology; Medical education; Nursing; Medicine; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08083098191398605,"gpt":0.5290195315625424,"spread":0.4481885496485564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004050715,0.0001884274,0.0002540969,0.000390113,0.001201692,0.0004531858,0.001235922,0.0008769616,0.0002863138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006052746,0.0001813113,0.0002788208,0.0002210468,0.0008222105,0.0008053877,0.00009146937,0.005838163,0.00003323982],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007752392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002201694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005741165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002398905,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969887,0.0005110017,0.0008321764,0.0003577934,0.0009432409,0.0003671084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957269,0.002261678,0.0002801261,0.000111503,0.001341365,0.0002783673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001143872,0.0004235196,0.1568408,0.000005635822,0.0002799038,0.0000013047,0.002532754,0.00000152801,0.0000322502,0.7218517,0.08952344,0.02839271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000767361,0.00004529341,0.1305092,0.0005992515,0.0001209597,0.00006172401,0.01093823,0.0001607182,0.00001697765,0.7037911,0.1527392,0.0002498874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3365362,0.0006937133,0.02361391,0.5894828,0.02577328,0.0005882121,0.000107551,0.00007380667,0.02313045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665076,0.004021557,0.004175405,0.004652479,0.004900411,0.00003738125,0.00006158947,0.00001448401,0.01562905],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6299714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}