{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":81,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":81,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"04020041db82","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law"}},"results":[{"id":"W2161121277","doi":"10.1093/icon/mou048","title":"National constitutional courts in the European constitutional democracy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Democracy; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Constitutional economics; Law; Politics; Member states; Constitutional law; Order (exchange); Constitutional court; Liberal democracy; European union; Economics; Constitution","authors":[{"name":"Jan Komárek","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02855026275404619,"gpt":0.3201933514391287,"spread":0.2916430886850825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008683244,0.0001419719,0.0004053602,0.001245333,0.003305293,0.007991385,0.0007600703,0.00311598,0.002499436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01295939,0.0002118886,0.0003817637,0.001310049,0.01684218,0.006925724,0.005536677,0.004328628,0.00019337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004808267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005125552,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003504519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003784877,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9910253,0.004846121,0.0003345375,0.0009977279,0.001605629,0.001190592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944394,0.003228173,0.000430142,0.000747249,0.0007480994,0.0004070261],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002620063,0.000003527274,0.0001283806,0.000003798386,0.000001394592,0.0000214074,0.0005873708,0.0001168906,0.00002220956,0.9968712,0.0001974567,0.002043825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003002531,0.00003182752,0.001597205,0.0001612621,0.00001253182,0.0001359701,0.001855933,0.000835616,0.0003053858,0.9089206,0.08609404,0.00001959369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1609005,0.01085553,0.01818944,0.03603071,0.0004805253,0.00004415858,0.00004985318,0.00006400829,0.7733853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861036,0.001029187,0.001964303,0.002634575,0.0001349596,0.00003097386,0.0000187775,0.00001186503,0.008071794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008683244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04592198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028840259","doi":"10.1093/icon/moq002","title":"Proportionality: An assault on human rights?: A reply","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Human rights; Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Madhav Khosla","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04493501811351099,"gpt":0.3839571434318165,"spread":0.3390221253183056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01267963,0.000809531,0.001066254,0.001498184,0.006968734,0.007110725,0.004255135,0.03864143,0.008206995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03974376,0.0004980846,0.001407594,0.001961581,0.02247741,0.02206501,0.006138016,0.03924454,0.002930716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006175916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007764367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008165917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006963195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9888266,0.004551203,0.0005761213,0.002267136,0.00280467,0.0009742731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726317,0.0218222,0.0009646125,0.0008021265,0.002886655,0.0008927859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003039895,0.00002718544,0.0003535608,0.0001123661,0.0000126234,0.0003094639,0.003040452,0.0001414053,0.0001556886,0.4999539,0.484892,0.01097101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000488932,0.00004543677,0.0006789841,0.0004819731,0.00001604191,0.0005365519,0.008118038,0.0005804918,0.0004837644,0.3297372,0.659171,0.0001016347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004508994,0.001903047,0.0005048377,0.9907739,0.002803888,0.000003236077,0.00001882511,0.00001146615,0.00352988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02724313,0.004267035,0.0009547406,0.9459715,0.01312633,0.00003416326,0.00002304835,0.00005898447,0.008320981],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03864143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06705707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096428617","doi":"10.1093/icon/moi051","title":"Parliament and the Human Rights Act: Can the JCHR help facilitate a culture of rights?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Parliamentary sovereignty; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Fundamental rights; Political science; Law; Parliament; Linguistic rights; Bill of rights; Right to property; Convention; Legislation; Rights of Nature; State (computer science); Politics; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Janet L. Hiebert","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01784821595907148,"gpt":0.2847544952510266,"spread":0.2669062792919552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04032283,0.000623653,0.0009297432,0.002072038,0.01249331,0.03148077,0.002412078,0.02615548,0.01291081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09880167,0.0006160828,0.0007474341,0.003464689,0.04028212,0.02457619,0.01041014,0.01986134,0.00355245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01039848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02446323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02767884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03380653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9448621,0.03508304,0.001750653,0.002664484,0.008950215,0.006689413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9103231,0.0663458,0.00602175,0.005484652,0.005420587,0.006404025],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002296488,0.00003041964,0.0004039756,0.00006226913,0.000006091673,0.0001191352,0.005489774,0.00008776665,0.00006976898,0.9269443,0.05121732,0.01554627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004870207,0.00005439106,0.002403761,0.0006419339,0.00002033287,0.0001468349,0.005760452,0.0003155089,0.0002291225,0.1953279,0.7949808,0.00007036948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005354651,0.0171058,0.002079278,0.8122728,0.004879059,0.00003753177,0.00003613022,0.00006013745,0.1581746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4334655,0.01701504,0.005622892,0.4041856,0.009793088,0.0002823815,0.0001189776,0.0002980524,0.1292184],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04032283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21325,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152266080","doi":"10.1093/icon/2.2.272","title":"Rule by emergency: Sri Lanka's postcolonial constitutional experience","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sri lanka; Political science; Law; History; Ancient history; South asia","authors":[{"name":"Radhika Coomaraswamy","is_ca":false},{"name":"C. d. l. Reyes","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01383465243170985,"gpt":0.3302740932783493,"spread":0.3164394408466395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00262048,0.0004319097,0.000697956,0.001054934,0.0247568,0.00991674,0.001877496,0.002817336,0.007842075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004374654,0.0006667096,0.0003330663,0.00185077,0.02240195,0.004527974,0.01240809,0.009342725,0.0006748478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01221246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008006595,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1092657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1865856,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955775,0.001509848,0.0001273,0.0002313948,0.0002738515,0.00228017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976599,0.0008780487,0.0004039512,0.0001424971,0.0001801326,0.0007352842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003148373,0.00003694932,0.003750807,0.00006972146,0.000009346671,0.00327114,0.9624795,0.00003395941,0.0003447407,0.02032809,0.004337227,0.005307007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008185333,0.00004139038,0.00958024,0.00008286414,0.000006430957,0.000573466,0.9368888,0.00002708159,0.00009226151,0.0006746235,0.05199809,0.00002654439],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9131433,0.002517383,0.0001319374,0.01732793,0.0001545383,0.00003942634,0.00008243693,0.00003533238,0.06656782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918258,0.0008158496,0.00002644766,0.001198816,0.00002574049,0.00001976148,0.00003538588,0.00001621855,0.006035909],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1092657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2172594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978172711","doi":"10.1093/icon/mot041","title":"Constitutional reengineering: Dialogue's migration from Canada to Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Business process reengineering; Status quo; Commonwealth; Charter; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Statutory law; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Business","authors":[{"name":"Scott Stephenson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02605797992616017,"gpt":0.2839040057802027,"spread":0.2578460258540425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006433873,0.0002890468,0.0003955351,0.001704246,0.03477931,0.009845625,0.00164715,0.003005892,0.004061048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01412439,0.000268972,0.0003828873,0.002768076,0.0181189,0.004059853,0.007704074,0.005971674,0.0001859903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1321129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1241309,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9586266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9615791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920917,0.002773237,0.0001467136,0.0008211987,0.001993576,0.00217352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919485,0.003669383,0.0004092901,0.0004588698,0.00217583,0.001338179],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004473299,0.00002859621,0.003216987,0.00009207844,0.00001307534,0.001315124,0.5880098,0.0004920092,0.00107599,0.3660665,0.007840702,0.0318043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001664702,0.00003947905,0.01843276,0.0002810615,0.0000285435,0.0004701809,0.3540171,0.001404232,0.001103399,0.02196494,0.6021032,0.000138592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6110739,0.004518284,0.004754439,0.04985541,0.0004689036,0.0001393409,0.0001418368,0.00008595213,0.3289619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763148,0.001001756,0.0009507057,0.003126443,0.00002760395,0.00003487533,0.00003643333,0.00003453875,0.01847286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1321129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9585508,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130896198","doi":"10.1093/icon/mor034","title":"The Nordic counternarrative: Democracy, human development, and judicial review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Globalization; Welfare state; Human rights; Judicial activism; Rule of law; Law and economics; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Politics; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05740053860351652,"gpt":0.3465605296792135,"spread":0.289159991075697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008373933,0.0002058072,0.0004840377,0.001771164,0.005837605,0.01462375,0.0009800787,0.004143463,0.004097418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01709127,0.0002622003,0.000243253,0.002008919,0.01577093,0.004907978,0.003351629,0.003148766,0.0002752348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01279819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02110717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0538295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08697365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925649,0.004614371,0.0002438617,0.0007126409,0.001038467,0.0008256954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833401,0.01203958,0.001734331,0.0005844494,0.001405259,0.0008962327],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003559757,0.00002440526,0.002546658,0.000154247,0.0000127965,0.000377325,0.006197652,0.0006220957,0.00006222665,0.9577145,0.01688466,0.01536774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004812714,0.00005605413,0.01576278,0.00213723,0.00003844762,0.0004465904,0.02175234,0.0009713651,0.0005496418,0.3612917,0.5968788,0.00006703819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09898482,0.1777458,0.00369837,0.1677552,0.003100595,0.00004160192,0.0001720698,0.00003749398,0.5484641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9401176,0.01904712,0.001097961,0.006798951,0.0006926827,0.00003319522,0.00004624947,0.00002504894,0.0321411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0538295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1070324,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294189301","doi":"10.1093/icon/mov056","title":"Support for international trade law: The US and the EU compared","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Political science; International trade; Law; International economics; Business; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Jappe Eckhardt","is_ca":true},{"name":"Manfred Elsig","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03184322099916594,"gpt":0.2706921182045,"spread":0.238848897205334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002667747,0.00008162294,0.000370206,0.001828136,0.0007887885,0.003044067,0.000344191,0.001015802,0.004884606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01150815,0.00007301764,0.0001924744,0.004468581,0.001719438,0.00226003,0.002023601,0.0009599819,0.0002742185],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007117738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006671568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006225515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008774695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972833,0.0008027297,0.0001955135,0.0002461393,0.0008155614,0.0006566219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934539,0.002719288,0.001698351,0.0005512094,0.0009959119,0.000581368],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008907848,0.0002832212,0.489251,0.0002297682,0.0003109539,0.001214648,0.02239618,0.001081111,0.001969516,0.3281701,0.01269204,0.1415107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005941713,0.0002508877,0.8356281,0.0005080269,0.0001237225,0.0007905423,0.04049427,0.0008527632,0.00113863,0.02144428,0.09865904,0.00005031315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9104074,0.002230215,0.0004556175,0.005408838,0.00006873622,0.0000116662,0.0002368977,0.000008792388,0.08117181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980428,0.0002679577,0.00008319465,0.0005541798,0.00001938865,0.000004250137,0.0001292568,0.000006112825,0.0008927646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006225515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01634061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520236492","doi":"10.1093/icon/mow047","title":"Substantive equality revisited: A reply to Sandra Fredman","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Catharine A. MacKinnon","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02566953463839095,"gpt":0.2908419402038372,"spread":0.2651724055654462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04294119,0.00115431,0.003304646,0.002289718,0.02414474,0.0205399,0.008145802,0.1128263,0.01012597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1320963,0.001842019,0.002251272,0.002620987,0.05096281,0.02920217,0.01318798,0.1292147,0.003628106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01798104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0271015,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04171455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05089788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9693367,0.01112701,0.001998174,0.006738544,0.006761586,0.004037897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8755732,0.1069986,0.002338669,0.002450014,0.008299096,0.004340515],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000337191,0.0000233978,0.0001903752,0.00007802319,0.00002883249,0.0003417092,0.005162891,0.0000849541,0.00008132556,0.1459546,0.8426816,0.005338631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114181,0.00002391631,0.0006029641,0.001079269,0.00006769936,0.0003209455,0.01066972,0.000232877,0.0003330106,0.1734505,0.8129288,0.0001761059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001952497,0.001568609,0.0001156078,0.9929345,0.003637083,0.000002164794,0.000007956465,0.000005030389,0.001533804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006023017,0.0008189986,0.0001280602,0.9835729,0.006843077,0.00001666533,0.000006459215,0.00003744385,0.002553399],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1128263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2270975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976663592","doi":"10.1093/icon/mou060","title":"An egalitarian defense of proportionality-based balancing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Normative; Pluralism (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Virtue; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"L. B. Tremblay","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03498108306966285,"gpt":0.3633691857699051,"spread":0.3283881027002423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01889184,0.0007607221,0.0009026538,0.001693547,0.004313936,0.007864051,0.003505642,0.005946966,0.00708024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0236171,0.0005597183,0.001279881,0.001195725,0.03619549,0.01392577,0.00823014,0.01042491,0.001514281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005145837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004917794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001997581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00128496,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9770314,0.009122941,0.0008404971,0.004350261,0.007118901,0.00153595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929522,0.002930119,0.0006993826,0.001749157,0.001337627,0.0003316529],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001900592,0.000001715134,0.00001363705,0.00000351443,0.000001401804,0.000004058159,0.0001135961,0.00007568416,0.00002116063,0.9989197,0.0002375777,0.0006061553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006692602,0.000005305322,0.00002361942,0.00001364516,0.000002579286,0.00001592867,0.00004721724,0.0004805906,0.0001129496,0.990504,0.008781883,0.000005635187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01628204,0.001367041,0.4239292,0.0470761,0.001166139,0.0001808524,0.0001113988,0.0002136151,0.5096736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8649884,0.0008560919,0.07073466,0.01871527,0.001353481,0.0009062635,0.00007744245,0.0002587641,0.04210956],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01889184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0999108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2681524666","doi":"10.1093/icon/mox007","title":"Federal arbiters as facilitators: Towards an integrated federal and judicial theory for diverse states","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Negotiation; Political science; Guardian; Supreme court; Federalism; Diversity (politics); Institution; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Robert Schertzer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02787163377166475,"gpt":0.3544824664681881,"spread":0.3266108326965234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02190516,0.0006754665,0.0009282093,0.004489292,0.01288891,0.01699276,0.00373734,0.008448051,0.004613722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02289519,0.0007288848,0.001241777,0.00185315,0.03153135,0.01788816,0.00888194,0.007327283,0.000578664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01567333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02442429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01661959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02419316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9791688,0.01303624,0.0005287223,0.001667531,0.002727788,0.002870896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824965,0.01101578,0.002115111,0.001422173,0.001586639,0.001363842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002659453,0.000007039021,0.0002140951,0.00001211199,0.000001732595,0.00003365564,0.002072487,0.0003135414,0.00003896178,0.9958155,0.0002237305,0.001264505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002963252,0.00004700071,0.000709451,0.0002859348,0.00003707992,0.00008825426,0.007232823,0.00501426,0.0003344245,0.9487528,0.03743564,0.00003269774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09313603,0.004679534,0.3437133,0.06794444,0.0005805322,0.0005376008,0.00006289246,0.0002635085,0.4890822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696316,0.0009078002,0.01744105,0.00183899,0.0002089653,0.000262527,0.00001822151,0.00003998326,0.009650806],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02190516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1158469,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137187785","doi":"10.1093/icon/mon004","title":"The role of dignity in equality law: Lessons from Canada and South Africa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Temptation; Underpinning; Value (mathematics); Law; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Rory O’Connell","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03387566459346647,"gpt":0.31228142075917,"spread":0.2784057561657036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008398968,0.0004458358,0.0009482151,0.002706581,0.0225526,0.01091106,0.002642588,0.004344589,0.008969435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02981147,0.0003092822,0.0004866192,0.004890789,0.02407072,0.006545333,0.006287467,0.007903095,0.0002438903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1347291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2545786,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9887419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956688,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943576,0.001223121,0.0001868566,0.0003565678,0.001315506,0.002560316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841496,0.007805019,0.0004095819,0.0003081619,0.004372608,0.002955016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001478249,0.0001005124,0.01698084,0.0005746984,0.00004673394,0.002235869,0.1515882,0.0008014389,0.0002428746,0.645382,0.03296879,0.1489302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009948496,0.00009633424,0.05687471,0.006236782,0.0001535657,0.0007027664,0.465501,0.001273077,0.0006051775,0.2121311,0.256107,0.0002190449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2248473,0.03750007,0.001842521,0.3868146,0.0007150793,0.0002111519,0.0003642559,0.00002959588,0.3476755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579197,0.01466746,0.001184172,0.01089927,0.00007218044,0.00005816123,0.00006282704,0.00003347626,0.01510278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1347291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9775324,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121836781","doi":"10.1093/icon/mow012","title":"Bridging the transatlantic divide? The United States, the European Union, and the protection of privacy across borders","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"United States National Security Agency; European union; Political science; National security; Agency (philosophy); The Right to Privacy; State (computer science); Public administration; Law; Business; International trade; Sociology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"David Cole","is_ca":false},{"name":"Federico Fabbrini","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03032296662463221,"gpt":0.3167858972986219,"spread":0.2864629306739898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00525739,0.0003701923,0.0005321022,0.001089917,0.006518817,0.01389443,0.0009829876,0.009163395,0.007284041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005623707,0.0002577586,0.0005378588,0.001584886,0.01797224,0.02260819,0.007819424,0.007670991,0.0007061519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002733997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002918528,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006388636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007095747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961029,0.002260712,0.00009813518,0.0004382465,0.0004214879,0.0006784864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970105,0.001468631,0.000415131,0.0003779458,0.000281968,0.0004458555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001446355,0.00001188476,0.0004703627,0.00002505704,0.00000573269,0.00007493889,0.003897635,0.00006207416,0.00005572141,0.9800532,0.00366082,0.01166808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001593178,0.00005136224,0.00245906,0.001492796,0.00002602326,0.0002849616,0.02880449,0.0002904536,0.0003150774,0.656158,0.3100626,0.0000392636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07253615,0.09580263,0.007775963,0.4158947,0.002570099,0.0000183911,0.0000844555,0.00004712857,0.4052705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9089152,0.02120744,0.002882089,0.0521409,0.001021086,0.00005239413,0.00005391073,0.00003638509,0.01369059],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01389443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02780402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120511575","doi":"10.1093/icon/mom028","title":"Does the world need more Canada? The politics of the Canadian model in constitutional politics and political theory","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Constitutional amendment; Nationalism; Political science; Context (archaeology); Constitutional theory; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics","authors":[{"name":"Sujit Choudhry","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01261048046928373,"gpt":0.2915392276026237,"spread":0.27892874713334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00297202,0.0002998344,0.00056711,0.001382077,0.02259764,0.01283761,0.001370121,0.003692939,0.01299437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006593425,0.0002379958,0.0004000329,0.003049145,0.02053273,0.006903839,0.00269281,0.006050524,0.0007549404],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1010594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1121997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9782386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881683,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967854,0.0006304198,0.00004286923,0.0004138678,0.001012829,0.001114541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968148,0.0007654984,0.0001194534,0.0001774119,0.001100654,0.001022301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000122291,0.000004296861,0.0003473193,0.00001849832,0.000003312908,0.00004724657,0.001498371,0.00012289,0.00004101311,0.9665713,0.02741081,0.003922633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000456729,0.00001327522,0.003129728,0.0002909747,0.00003641955,0.00009059074,0.01080297,0.0008822468,0.0001599469,0.3111814,0.6732731,0.00009374519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01845881,0.01005814,0.002688651,0.5298929,0.001384421,0.00003005397,0.0004408101,0.00007691262,0.4369693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8201041,0.008995289,0.003573787,0.07374916,0.0005644929,0.00005143663,0.0002284996,0.0001253089,0.092608],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8989406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7332408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967582267","doi":"10.1093/icon/mou073","title":"A Scrap of Paper: Breaking and Making International Law during the Great War","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Scrap; Law; Political science; Metallurgy; Materials science","authors":[{"name":"Umut Özsu","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01175903130609452,"gpt":0.2920911400070267,"spread":0.2803321087009322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01355591,0.000818699,0.0006323828,0.002146461,0.02962046,0.02725093,0.002520778,0.01336752,0.01590132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05334862,0.0007156766,0.000739611,0.002131906,0.03699408,0.01744814,0.01112592,0.02150493,0.002460512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008544161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0141927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01776903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02570033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909784,0.003980733,0.0003481224,0.001049125,0.001567149,0.002076466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843571,0.008955712,0.001143212,0.001660033,0.001882249,0.002001873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001045732,0.00005574323,0.001150902,0.0001029828,0.00002594502,0.001157908,0.184066,0.0003936012,0.0005810306,0.644911,0.1244587,0.04299172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002209552,0.00006506874,0.001290665,0.0006147617,0.00002903706,0.0002060563,0.1477585,0.0002161436,0.0008620425,0.187882,0.6609911,0.00006254944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1010896,0.008644901,0.009695463,0.2950444,0.01854555,0.0001592044,0.0001642174,0.0002195155,0.5664372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7521623,0.003551765,0.00413894,0.04588623,0.002299329,0.0001317691,0.00009398252,0.0007996483,0.190936],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02962046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07169139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255395321","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz056","title":"Dialogic remedies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Constitutionalism; Judicial review; Legislature; Law; Declaration; Maturity (psychological); Political science; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02327899340654451,"gpt":0.3129759707294164,"spread":0.2896969773228719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0235301,0.0006755501,0.000949631,0.002073674,0.01005614,0.00944159,0.003320647,0.008856638,0.02484231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04378871,0.0005084085,0.001012738,0.001026598,0.02950851,0.01471654,0.01023706,0.01113905,0.001924339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009260556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01433063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003386285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004767777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9719908,0.01141323,0.001850346,0.004899142,0.007002295,0.002844293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711804,0.01523182,0.002220186,0.005402706,0.004465046,0.001499841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004658559,0.00001950664,0.00008366645,0.00002911772,0.000003897605,0.00004008726,0.0009281631,0.0001629102,0.00007661772,0.991527,0.002233658,0.004890782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004143675,0.00005891046,0.000286896,0.0002375539,0.00002403258,0.0001175034,0.00132492,0.001039043,0.0006373044,0.8253117,0.1708785,0.00004212329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01666654,0.002184831,0.08295734,0.05268775,0.001177235,0.0004893007,0.0001714746,0.0003790345,0.8432864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9024545,0.0008641768,0.020771,0.0105523,0.0007459228,0.0005166206,0.00009147534,0.0001080476,0.06389599],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02484231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1244406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148691272","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab019","title":"“It’s the political economy . . .!” A moment of truth for the eurozone and the EU","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European Monetary and Fiscal Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Garron Family Cancer Centre","keywords":"Transformative learning; Politics; Context (archaeology); Political economy; Economic and monetary union; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Economics; Law; Sociology; European union; International trade","authors":[{"name":"Marco Dani","is_ca":false},{"name":"Edoardo Chiti","is_ca":false},{"name":"Joana Mendes","is_ca":false},{"name":"Agustín José Menèndez","is_ca":false},{"name":"Harm Schepel","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michael Wilkinson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03262337803121635,"gpt":0.2433860391277403,"spread":0.2107626610965239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005295569,0.0002084023,0.0003047033,0.0006712736,0.003246008,0.009008161,0.0004939954,0.004820341,0.00368173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01128173,0.000153078,0.0002678215,0.0007453294,0.01918996,0.006596293,0.002186787,0.005107842,0.0004132655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003023406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001702887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004733908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003580311,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968157,0.002002507,0.0001095482,0.0002893145,0.0004238949,0.0003590809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974843,0.001476567,0.0002054931,0.0003428491,0.0003292456,0.0001614562],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001354679,0.000003588967,0.0001531637,0.00001137977,0.000002377312,0.00003432,0.001045707,0.0001676041,0.00006666712,0.9824923,0.01153973,0.004469642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001613518,0.00003035953,0.001331692,0.0003295436,0.00001045157,0.0000964673,0.006191378,0.0004540735,0.000472382,0.6037865,0.3872546,0.00002643171],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.05280242,0.02022744,0.008716173,0.7100344,0.004741134,0.00001505777,0.0001091868,0.00008764301,0.2032666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282235,0.003610309,0.001554267,0.04692243,0.001934565,0.00002274631,0.0000440009,0.00004674661,0.01764154],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009008161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02800602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127507417","doi":"10.1093/icon/mor067","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights and the minister of justice: Weak-form review within a constitutional Charter of Rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Legislature; Judicial review; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Parliament","authors":[{"name":"Josie Kelly","is_ca":false},{"name":"Matthew Hennigar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0477624432080322,"gpt":0.3517338849698267,"spread":0.3039714417617945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01283809,0.0003475818,0.0007573348,0.003051894,0.004977091,0.006523754,0.001529309,0.003095586,0.002112856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03120202,0.000394119,0.0003423422,0.00577416,0.01379671,0.004023367,0.001781549,0.005695469,0.0003885423],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03654694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1204066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7192199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.788395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.984533,0.005338861,0.0006224519,0.001040354,0.007742681,0.0007225676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814267,0.008178542,0.0008795172,0.0007800329,0.008052348,0.000682894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000197832,0.00001147736,0.0004334661,0.001991106,0.00002474209,0.0001003159,0.001762127,0.0002834516,0.0001695148,0.734333,0.08095471,0.1799164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001667554,0.00001746938,0.001881166,0.004155077,0.00003693996,0.0001016472,0.0005949339,0.0001292,0.0001639136,0.03951647,0.953352,0.00003449672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002496063,0.7372657,0.004491991,0.1057329,0.002902914,0.0001337541,0.000106835,0.00004970799,0.14682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2443659,0.6480565,0.01077573,0.07057042,0.002213817,0.0002321164,0.0001757906,0.00005952874,0.02355012],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2807801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5648673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764092000","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz060","title":"Judging constitutional conventions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Constitutional law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Farrah Ahmed","is_ca":false},{"name":"Richard Albert","is_ca":false},{"name":"Adam Perry","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02260873641530093,"gpt":0.3207430179377241,"spread":0.2981342815224232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03810113,0.0004204377,0.000844615,0.004527149,0.00739873,0.01383422,0.002372665,0.006145549,0.005335471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09723601,0.0004788495,0.0005582075,0.002215555,0.05622953,0.01431029,0.006749541,0.007067298,0.0005338813],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006627104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007007345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009066456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009502641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9580575,0.02282997,0.002919018,0.00478424,0.008904309,0.002505017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.909977,0.05867348,0.005429063,0.01209987,0.01202214,0.001798428],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002361929,0.000002383357,0.0003267988,0.00001133669,0.000002612937,0.00002598907,0.002382922,0.0001590472,0.00008193588,0.994338,0.0005040325,0.002162608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001319842,0.00001865825,0.000878998,0.0001288579,0.00001248929,0.00006144326,0.003253996,0.001524408,0.0005796357,0.9549104,0.0385877,0.00003019725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1157314,0.001581108,0.166962,0.02340398,0.0007142317,0.0003848601,0.0002203659,0.0002259873,0.6907761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753268,0.0002843275,0.01732124,0.0008852765,0.0001603431,0.00009930827,0.00006066484,0.00005269034,0.005809294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03810113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2015004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963996696","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz057","title":"Is the Commonwealth’s approach to rights constitutionalism exportable?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitutionalism; Normative; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Scott Stephenson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03137895835492188,"gpt":0.3186416818916306,"spread":0.2872627235367087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02268773,0.0002715025,0.0009403577,0.002231152,0.00487935,0.01241641,0.00189255,0.005471194,0.005933673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04254915,0.000356109,0.0007942243,0.001678406,0.05338304,0.01408786,0.008432077,0.009094439,0.0004469535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01098333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01100965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01271719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01113154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9814386,0.008576422,0.0007564836,0.002195898,0.004965247,0.002067311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9710586,0.01767226,0.001993458,0.004667867,0.003471601,0.001136192],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001842511,0.000002572998,0.00009091511,0.000003755518,0.000001351967,0.00001122384,0.0002865245,0.00005110567,0.00001242102,0.998674,0.0002270076,0.0006373587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001115676,0.00000968211,0.0004360561,0.00005168213,0.000006247449,0.00004053819,0.0005790131,0.0004623441,0.00006154896,0.9857987,0.01253526,0.000007757878],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0905005,0.001438106,0.02835334,0.1412165,0.0005823794,0.00005628367,0.00008584306,0.00005407784,0.737713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849479,0.0005080606,0.002168806,0.003647234,0.0003940358,0.00005880925,0.00002501914,0.00003007194,0.008220087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02268773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1199856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256635145","doi":"10.1093/icon/mov071","title":"Power-sharing in a re-united Cyprus: Centripetal coalitions vs. proportional sequential coalitions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Cyprus History, Politics, Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Centripetal force; Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Settlement (finance); Power sharing; Politics; Power (physics); Political economy; Political science; Ethnic group; Economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"John McGarry","is_ca":true},{"name":"Neophytos Loizides","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06842702563837852,"gpt":0.3683581926142206,"spread":0.2999311669758421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003344002,0.0002137872,0.0002528539,0.0008418161,0.00472904,0.004517227,0.000635366,0.001325169,0.004151703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003986087,0.000176907,0.0002417552,0.001077448,0.01368595,0.003447047,0.004662502,0.001273735,0.0003429119],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005750884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002768655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008050788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008611349,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970348,0.00152451,0.0001048208,0.0004786396,0.0002877629,0.0005694696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984906,0.0005838488,0.0003324184,0.0003374945,0.0001193128,0.0001363988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003081632,0.00001067932,0.001887651,0.00002185913,0.00000897107,0.0002807941,0.009587649,0.0008854513,0.0002396502,0.974379,0.0006450452,0.01202249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007751026,0.0002203848,0.04509202,0.000383129,0.00009278879,0.001438097,0.03276836,0.01255424,0.002830632,0.6602113,0.2442296,0.0001019672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4909387,0.001040397,0.02104411,0.003957956,0.000113822,0.00007832707,0.00003002794,0.00004683408,0.4827498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950482,0.0000767922,0.0006919964,0.0001116441,0.0000188854,0.00001325785,0.000004273964,0.000004542194,0.004030283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008050788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04172575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163025946","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab041","title":"Ely in the world: The global legacy of Democracy and Distrust forty years on","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Constitutionalism; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Politics; Sketch; Political science; Subject (documents); Sociology; Law; History","authors":[{"name":"Rosalind Dixon","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michaela Hailbronner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02208313572474602,"gpt":0.3365698722796519,"spread":0.3144867365549059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003729867,0.0002060172,0.0004239811,0.001540222,0.004842435,0.007538071,0.0003205586,0.001931942,0.005177907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004523261,0.0001716306,0.0001846486,0.00203331,0.01873142,0.007468338,0.004552104,0.004355278,0.0003661118],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00581448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002457298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009073655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01269636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980097,0.0009111855,0.00004249804,0.0003144328,0.0003186842,0.0004034777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996358,0.002197075,0.0003030866,0.0003780008,0.0004357298,0.0003280512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004073703,0.00002275454,0.002063822,0.00008881788,0.0000148418,0.0002458269,0.0303798,0.0003054437,0.00009858246,0.8866091,0.03194894,0.04818122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001203726,0.00002855951,0.004746899,0.0005953627,0.00001105162,0.0001678086,0.01450813,0.0002146959,0.0002145334,0.2309734,0.7484966,0.00003092021],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1252499,0.09545368,0.0025873,0.4190409,0.001747615,0.00001358877,0.0001759126,0.0000557106,0.3556754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.934934,0.02065148,0.000491041,0.02157729,0.001240652,0.00001662562,0.0000491357,0.00006593946,0.02097384],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009073655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04218721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113553566","doi":"10.1093/icon/mop019","title":"European Committee of Social Rights: The right to a healthy environment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Social rights; Human rights; Law","authors":[{"name":"Mirja A. Trilsch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01879741835836446,"gpt":0.3055340406164871,"spread":0.2867366222581226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01722632,0.0009244846,0.0009150682,0.001718924,0.004944796,0.009501281,0.001814968,0.01674987,0.005897232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02017758,0.0004063098,0.0008290329,0.002128956,0.00778501,0.003713644,0.005265791,0.008027243,0.00206631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004450407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02684406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02820589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02382536,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9753388,0.006936412,0.001876548,0.002472848,0.009686529,0.003688893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945431,0.001671523,0.0005370104,0.000925403,0.001646475,0.0006765736],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002199799,0.00002644551,0.000394669,0.00009046525,0.00001370385,0.0001339122,0.001216001,0.0002028529,0.0003055655,0.9050738,0.06763132,0.02488932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002690922,0.00002770463,0.001842601,0.0003936562,0.00001912954,0.0002199789,0.000316791,0.0001000899,0.000376928,0.06247066,0.9341627,0.0000428699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009150852,0.02787703,0.01128777,0.06154444,0.00530232,0.0005669846,0.0007126123,0.0001925176,0.8833655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.424621,0.02047368,0.03167997,0.1264582,0.005576408,0.002275574,0.002009652,0.0003546001,0.3865511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02820589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0911026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309326512","doi":"10.1093/icon/moac087","title":"Against settlement before the European Court of Human Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Isaac Newton Trust; York University","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Human rights; Political science; Law; Business","authors":[{"name":"Veronika Fikfak","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01550137056749943,"gpt":0.3051885748191843,"spread":0.2896872042516848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07028954,0.0004509022,0.0007853037,0.002633211,0.0102193,0.01501388,0.001859187,0.0079384,0.01015594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08399366,0.0005188209,0.0009404899,0.003311104,0.01192912,0.006705149,0.01246324,0.008678168,0.00170759],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003833581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008367145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004997511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00673465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.924399,0.04158304,0.00490426,0.006907151,0.01467889,0.007527604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9472424,0.0350324,0.005923639,0.005442751,0.00450084,0.00185792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001132752,0.0001007616,0.009622244,0.00009028729,0.00004370145,0.002187861,0.01360016,0.0006002675,0.0009811764,0.9152669,0.01988557,0.0375077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002542132,0.0006275203,0.04130003,0.001232567,0.0002254874,0.004607724,0.0523368,0.004849475,0.008495727,0.2708372,0.6149175,0.0003158215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.4937477,0.003629718,0.03009005,0.0404947,0.001570795,0.0005187072,0.0002653044,0.0002919339,0.4293912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750026,0.0004308369,0.001801435,0.005999508,0.0002671388,0.00007842902,0.00005787418,0.00004168409,0.01632044],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07028954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3717311,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969659142","doi":"10.1093/icon/moq007","title":"Reassessing the new Commonwealth model of constitutionalism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Normative; Parliamentary sovereignty; Political science; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Law and economics; Constitutional theory; Politics; Sovereignty; Law; Separation of powers; Public administration; Sociology; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Gardbaum","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04087235918594995,"gpt":0.353521775698546,"spread":0.3126494165125961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01092729,0.0003242961,0.0006979862,0.002558765,0.00914091,0.0145479,0.001923819,0.004204866,0.002509942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01134314,0.0003601429,0.0004953322,0.001691506,0.07418361,0.01597488,0.006430515,0.008419683,0.0003702251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05324524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03511126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3985177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4152943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9845595,0.005693925,0.0003681511,0.001513938,0.005286666,0.002577908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939091,0.002632032,0.0003969055,0.0008682965,0.00155307,0.000640489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002846399,0.00000271892,0.0001141271,0.0000114189,0.000001432081,0.00003648318,0.005093883,0.0001068973,0.00003485847,0.9905097,0.001227407,0.002858229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002188883,0.00003220111,0.001770512,0.0002727907,0.00001307822,0.0001942022,0.01355434,0.001366726,0.0002325937,0.7236744,0.258808,0.00005936738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09181655,0.01842387,0.04650156,0.2499501,0.002173951,0.00007837434,0.00009303402,0.0001500645,0.5908124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578579,0.005124154,0.005801795,0.007144885,0.0006507707,0.00005453484,0.00003510683,0.00008452943,0.02324634],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3985177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7923961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142844092","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol007","title":"Institutions, constitutions, actor strategies, and ideas: Explaining variation in paid parental leave policies in Canada and the United States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Normative; Political science; Government (linguistics); Maternity leave; National Policy; Parental leave; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Linda A. White","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02199477243476488,"gpt":0.3083591455743253,"spread":0.2863643731395604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004455673,0.0001473935,0.000327728,0.003163229,0.006503428,0.003821968,0.0009977382,0.0005379961,0.001843278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01652199,0.000179543,0.0002452834,0.005008221,0.008149339,0.0009018445,0.002106247,0.0009690195,0.00006069757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05988437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04760547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9743701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9825937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968314,0.0007326968,0.0001054247,0.000247999,0.0008969196,0.00118555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918756,0.003408012,0.0013814,0.0003857559,0.001873401,0.001075698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001329199,0.00009440225,0.6213796,0.000066395,0.0001039755,0.0002818043,0.07135088,0.004426617,0.0004774051,0.2597661,0.002993139,0.03892682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003581083,0.00002852054,0.8523046,0.0002586769,0.00008525483,0.00005531662,0.08917677,0.004338696,0.0004529228,0.02297947,0.03021807,0.0000659364],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.969889,0.0007479265,0.0006756895,0.002695093,0.00001583835,0.00003313712,0.0002191167,0.000009767498,0.02571442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998835,0.0002498942,0.0002030469,0.00007081233,0.000002214319,0.000008187926,0.00006291449,0.000004184285,0.0005636804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05988437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4344935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152664636","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol009","title":"Property rights and regulatory innovation: Comparing constitutional cultures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Political science; Intellectual property; Business; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"David Schneiderman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02586636513874751,"gpt":0.3019422523031773,"spread":0.2760758871644298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008626294,0.0001296987,0.0002909251,0.002473655,0.003351777,0.007110752,0.0006838255,0.0006765389,0.003100032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04106135,0.000161061,0.0003379359,0.002412822,0.01764896,0.00620471,0.005193473,0.002140824,0.000112796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005686834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004429636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0174072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01704592,"domain_scores_codex":[0.989272,0.005963888,0.0006722453,0.0007442642,0.002171125,0.001176574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586022,0.02607279,0.005941609,0.003442687,0.004039441,0.001901285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001111342,0.0001133285,0.06558307,0.0001326347,0.00008270254,0.0002113634,0.09276715,0.001189438,0.0008871745,0.789048,0.0004125518,0.04946144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007890437,0.0002717153,0.2225377,0.0007838405,0.0001567111,0.0004712626,0.2936566,0.002941285,0.003496497,0.4134095,0.0619736,0.0002223722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7878387,0.002183082,0.005122839,0.00365809,0.00005113335,0.00003551859,0.0000675252,0.00001154004,0.2010316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987936,0.0003471848,0.0002853039,0.0001085642,0.000006757945,0.00001163201,0.0000124327,0.00000374904,0.0004306666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0174072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04562074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082811238","doi":"10.1093/icon/moaa055","title":"Populist rhetoric, false mirroring, and the courts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mirroring; Rhetoric; Populism; Politics; Democracy; Representation (politics); Political science; Narrative; Sociology; Law; Law and economics","authors":[{"name":"Alon Harel","is_ca":false},{"name":"Noam Kolt","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03514698423166811,"gpt":0.3140154183536302,"spread":0.2788684341219621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01255414,0.000369007,0.0004434069,0.002000124,0.0104254,0.01200805,0.001538818,0.004655724,0.003696648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02152388,0.0003144499,0.0002135415,0.001264438,0.03638628,0.007133577,0.003911922,0.005273434,0.0003926406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006798086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002434409,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003170946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003798125,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9887515,0.007889609,0.0002137076,0.0005696674,0.001902328,0.0006732241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971764,0.02346442,0.001442157,0.001393729,0.00153073,0.0004049856],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001045962,0.000009803341,0.000301114,0.00002010194,0.00000271262,0.0001993732,0.009795245,0.00009622171,0.0001184071,0.9853513,0.0018402,0.002255166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005334429,0.00008025327,0.0009377088,0.000455841,0.00002766204,0.000557329,0.02133667,0.003258216,0.002922402,0.8343493,0.1359681,0.00005318641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2623995,0.005681885,0.01965123,0.073103,0.0008792385,0.0000709771,0.00006469218,0.00009665717,0.6380528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937891,0.0002497861,0.0007428552,0.001432788,0.0001203082,0.00001428734,0.000005031147,0.00001602825,0.003629638],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01255414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06639344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059164208","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol004","title":"Religious freedom in Canada and the United States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious freedom; Religiosity; Jurisprudence; State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Politics; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitution; Establishment Clause; Sociology; Power (physics); First amendment; Supreme court; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Christopher L. Eisgruber","is_ca":false},{"name":"and Mariah Zeisberg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006682597125488249,"gpt":0.2537705217135791,"spread":0.2470879245880908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001181612,0.0001126575,0.0003197567,0.002553328,0.01192367,0.004088194,0.0007005258,0.0008947094,0.003542877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00576815,0.0001423887,0.0002983573,0.003977165,0.005476503,0.0006803994,0.002091886,0.001668427,0.0001184702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09852415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1191063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980075,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965405,0.0002618328,0.00006730625,0.000189227,0.001307765,0.001633397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960436,0.000500109,0.0003155455,0.0001234149,0.001766209,0.001251072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000155215,0.00006088385,0.06783923,0.0001273211,0.00007238374,0.0006919153,0.01670538,0.001621644,0.0005935078,0.8331199,0.02594596,0.05306664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001283539,0.00004987009,0.4834028,0.0006205119,0.0001071914,0.0003248634,0.03215805,0.001441613,0.0006818634,0.0309043,0.4499658,0.0002148246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5701458,0.009059457,0.0006880829,0.02894232,0.0002666298,0.00006184531,0.001503277,0.00004801987,0.3892845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875572,0.001494779,0.0002695032,0.001856262,0.00001903703,0.00001099551,0.000225287,0.000008017185,0.008558927],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09852415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7148461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069583645","doi":"10.1093/icon/mor055","title":"Nonproblematic judicial review: A case study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Conceptualization; Political science; Icelandic; Law; Technocracy; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Ragnhildur Helgadóttir","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07757805518062609,"gpt":0.3637788328078143,"spread":0.2862007776271882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01454121,0.0005592006,0.0007371763,0.002156143,0.01519133,0.006420648,0.002545953,0.01118732,0.003320253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02817163,0.0005634,0.0009065571,0.00385564,0.006011731,0.00201823,0.004143951,0.005698297,0.0006379079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005907517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005008072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01399569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9839761,0.009792363,0.0007649773,0.000923539,0.002129118,0.002413862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9685956,0.02214995,0.003911744,0.001506069,0.001880491,0.001956207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004870144,0.005438246,0.0998858,0.001130127,0.000187457,0.4303382,0.08045521,0.004379879,0.002404079,0.2444255,0.0362666,0.09460191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007664001,0.002347521,0.135655,0.002487023,0.0003443473,0.3225598,0.1844588,0.01062393,0.00343499,0.04632327,0.2905764,0.0004225958],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8824379,0.009635452,0.004367359,0.01950025,0.000366731,0.0005700102,0.0001162553,0.00003499473,0.082971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977211,0.007130328,0.003510706,0.004077047,0.0004949896,0.0002467102,0.00006727073,0.00002909448,0.007232902],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01519133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07690221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964565917","doi":"10.1093/icon/1.3.534","title":"Ukraine: Constitutional Court invalidates ban on Communist Party","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Communism; Political science; Ukrainian; Constitutional court; Law; Constitution; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Alexei Trochev","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04026618908334577,"gpt":0.3324371031461624,"spread":0.2921709140628166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0104399,0.0003387706,0.001473706,0.001682058,0.01002394,0.01118917,0.003393494,0.01137859,0.00416647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02541281,0.001190814,0.001025309,0.001890428,0.004575816,0.002811843,0.006025834,0.01220249,0.0008585197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01648067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02592685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1643047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2182091,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9884661,0.001718274,0.001110237,0.002106274,0.002218125,0.004380936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894271,0.005698977,0.00121982,0.001282577,0.001609837,0.0007616926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000477473,0.0001671119,0.01592514,0.0001507284,0.0002855646,0.003680773,0.01334758,0.001610545,0.006355037,0.9251204,0.0205196,0.01236003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000913137,0.0007125842,0.1982661,0.000994631,0.001523843,0.002336283,0.01724676,0.006640803,0.02821285,0.1253018,0.6170654,0.0007856493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7132362,0.002462535,0.001631564,0.01521079,0.0008629026,0.0002306728,0.0008824656,0.0001095051,0.2653733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658481,0.00038993,0.0005464806,0.008976612,0.0001845449,0.00007562411,0.0002170569,0.00003381023,0.02372787],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1643047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3266966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198643327","doi":"10.1093/icon/moac040","title":"Para-constitutional engineering and federalism: Informal constitutional change through intergovernmental agreements","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Legislature; Constitution; Federalism; Constitutional amendment; Political science; Compromise; Constitutional review; Politics; Law and economics; Law; Constitutional law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Johanne Poirier","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jesse Hartery","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03548451119361003,"gpt":0.3047917556772627,"spread":0.2693072444836527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00927698,0.0002190371,0.0003670711,0.001129158,0.006508776,0.007952867,0.001450357,0.002750777,0.004032689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01406859,0.0002126253,0.0004331401,0.001632352,0.05311579,0.00636002,0.005680558,0.004422934,0.0001926672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01418954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0103878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04577245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05835173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9887167,0.006518818,0.000292653,0.0009310876,0.002029528,0.001511196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895811,0.005480133,0.001294457,0.002297709,0.0009626637,0.0003839934],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003198912,0.000004356591,0.0002177227,0.000007961693,0.00000240538,0.00005301212,0.001679348,0.0005055681,0.00009412367,0.9957165,0.000135406,0.001580306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001977958,0.00002523517,0.002382251,0.0001078454,0.00001581706,0.000107118,0.004170922,0.003523485,0.000605084,0.9337064,0.05530542,0.00003068109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2251631,0.001754421,0.1393507,0.02068261,0.000177251,0.0001445314,0.00005909379,0.0002031496,0.6124651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945368,0.0001026472,0.001876055,0.0002463841,0.00001605763,0.00002346893,0.000005788202,0.00001127963,0.00318162],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04577245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1029528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034634205","doi":"10.1093/icon/1.1.35","title":"Realizing equality in the twentieth century: the role of the Supreme Court of Canada in comparative perspective","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Doctrine; Politics; Constitutional right; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Claire L’Heureux-Dubé","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04158335274513759,"gpt":0.3465534930473471,"spread":0.3049701403022095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00364265,0.0003398712,0.0005080262,0.005859683,0.03844785,0.02149965,0.001871912,0.006083801,0.005019263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008083351,0.00031582,0.0003808908,0.007190063,0.03729474,0.00694387,0.003950125,0.005444635,0.0002323523],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2125264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1430141,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9783237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990816,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928861,0.001477145,0.00009009998,0.0003705499,0.001883806,0.003292306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955339,0.001523828,0.0002303582,0.0001006935,0.001834222,0.0007769597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008521701,0.000005982793,0.0004471164,0.00003165184,0.00000642915,0.0001752846,0.01542404,0.0001464843,0.0000447065,0.9717228,0.006070229,0.005916719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002034215,0.0000206541,0.009623642,0.0009016792,0.00004900721,0.0002832855,0.0694098,0.0004863504,0.0003554772,0.1531105,0.7656472,0.0000919504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05961679,0.1012277,0.00144737,0.08512861,0.001079661,0.00002600176,0.0001445705,0.00002594093,0.7513033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.932066,0.02983053,0.0006967435,0.0111044,0.0003494464,0.00002461454,0.00006539921,0.00003487688,0.02582808],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2125264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9133577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011843670","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol006","title":"Constitutionalism and policies toward women: Canada and the United States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parallels; Constitutionalism; Dozen; Gender equity; Political science; Equity (law); Political economy; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Economics; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Leslie Friedman Goldstein","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01187455551884461,"gpt":0.2638273933151415,"spread":0.251952837796297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003242809,0.0002693117,0.0005441731,0.002916467,0.02358531,0.01003427,0.001512987,0.003128912,0.00471935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009412385,0.0002901857,0.0004004017,0.005217128,0.01579909,0.002185072,0.003049526,0.003888035,0.0001449478],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1448319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2094295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975634,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933677,0.0007393131,0.0001047436,0.000412849,0.001977494,0.003397874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959018,0.001000925,0.0002863508,0.0001018668,0.001333109,0.001376031],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009297457,0.00003259967,0.01187239,0.0001076566,0.00004666516,0.0003329984,0.01161583,0.001157209,0.0003031966,0.9277646,0.0198985,0.02677528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001482241,0.00009607316,0.1484262,0.001529921,0.0002386633,0.0002914814,0.06817437,0.001573756,0.001341914,0.1128712,0.6649885,0.0003197611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3475289,0.04218082,0.001269968,0.1832145,0.0007680063,0.00006667896,0.0009012396,0.00005513259,0.4240148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676125,0.007135832,0.0003978285,0.009498522,0.00007273905,0.00002101466,0.0001268221,0.00001994326,0.01511476],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1448319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903239299","doi":"10.1093/icon/moaa006","title":"Shadow constitutional review: The dark side of pre-enactment political review in Ireland and Japan","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitutionality; Politics; Institution; Judicial review; Parliament; Shadow (psychology); Law; Political science; Constitutional theory; Constitutional law; Sociology; Constitution; Law and economics; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"David Kenny","is_ca":false},{"name":"Conor Casey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03028044152842603,"gpt":0.3364541747398641,"spread":0.3061737332114381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02817876,0.0001638337,0.0009021449,0.004031938,0.007858037,0.0146191,0.001591946,0.002773349,0.003002378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0638095,0.0005158977,0.0005140207,0.004426602,0.02188116,0.007564304,0.009395244,0.004048139,0.0002650789],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03175604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04052145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1473491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1876026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9642859,0.01223217,0.002492213,0.003582925,0.007599326,0.0098076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9150156,0.03274799,0.01458738,0.008282585,0.02149916,0.007867293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005886917,0.0001611816,0.1385378,0.00105787,0.0001359393,0.004724735,0.1889758,0.001003617,0.003363727,0.556066,0.019974,0.08541054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001963219,0.0004172259,0.4201414,0.001214964,0.0003209405,0.001227953,0.2402308,0.002283183,0.003825244,0.06609376,0.2635196,0.0005286875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.821766,0.003921368,0.00270432,0.02946656,0.0002437146,0.0001655589,0.000150679,0.00006093505,0.1415209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99313,0.0004611775,0.00050084,0.002048027,0.00004830108,0.00004568604,0.000039829,0.00002147462,0.003704586],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1473491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2929828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230516096","doi":"10.1093/icon/mov014","title":"Central and Eastern European constitutionalism a quarter century after the fall of the Berlin Wall: Introduction to the Symposium","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Ancient history; History; Law; Archaeology; Politics; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Michael Rosenfeld","is_ca":false},{"name":"Wojciech Sadurski","is_ca":false},{"name":"Roberto Toniatti","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01494302481010717,"gpt":0.2626868314514025,"spread":0.2477438066412953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003584517,0.0005051023,0.0005825737,0.001928779,0.005793028,0.0133022,0.0007659603,0.003751003,0.005414748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003174665,0.0003122959,0.0004707481,0.002608612,0.0100997,0.004492591,0.004432418,0.003938816,0.0005197147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01054925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003438862,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01378992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01152986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982729,0.0006990344,0.00008036308,0.0002802075,0.0002568755,0.0004106336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990442,0.0004884909,0.0001168886,0.00008180894,0.0001202843,0.0001483547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006961352,0.00007942528,0.0008175063,0.0002313082,0.00002395278,0.0005994026,0.01999559,0.0003238464,0.0004027495,0.8798877,0.06769282,0.02987604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001099082,0.00003037036,0.004847454,0.0009114723,0.0000183153,0.000213376,0.007990429,0.00008165287,0.0002613378,0.02799938,0.9576088,0.00002649756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.08511394,0.3304473,0.001937909,0.1024323,0.0230807,0.00005053349,0.0002314976,0.00007873014,0.456627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.814673,0.0608315,0.0006005322,0.008068031,0.00776073,0.00008649136,0.0001377969,0.00007873552,0.1077632],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01378992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07654053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285201175","doi":"10.1093/icon/moac034","title":"The gatekeepers: Executive lawyers and the executive power in comparative constitutional law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Separation of powers; Constitution; Constitutional law; Law; Constitutionalism; Executive power; Political science; Power (physics); Executive order; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Conor Casey","is_ca":false},{"name":"David Kenny","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02572172234803232,"gpt":0.3160142050173216,"spread":0.2902924826692893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02464457,0.0001568794,0.0003872762,0.003043348,0.00520447,0.01097082,0.001376205,0.002363622,0.005642518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05479774,0.0002977733,0.0001847689,0.002894523,0.06580462,0.009837572,0.004439789,0.002666308,0.0002045845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01670746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008826177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02575955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05140837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9817084,0.01366695,0.0004013914,0.001171104,0.001409983,0.001642175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9404705,0.04650658,0.005292717,0.002919982,0.003058426,0.001751764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002747729,0.00002357573,0.005316356,0.00003798808,0.000007506252,0.0001195352,0.02059853,0.000415033,0.0001076114,0.9652262,0.000761063,0.00735918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000867065,0.0001402741,0.04876743,0.0007238194,0.00005789398,0.0001913289,0.07495466,0.002370309,0.001471557,0.7501069,0.1210196,0.0001094397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5565397,0.004289099,0.01271608,0.03898272,0.000159853,0.0000664621,0.00006857877,0.00004218079,0.3871354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976885,0.0001742254,0.0003852097,0.0002919299,0.00001913555,0.00000731831,0.000003881835,0.000006251843,0.001423558],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02575955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1303345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955978599","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz035","title":"Secession and post-sovereign constitution-making after 1989: Catalonia, Kosovo, and Quebec","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Sovereignty; Constitution; Declaration of independence; Law; Political science; Democracy; Sovereign state; Context (archaeology); Ratification; Politics; Sociology; History","authors":[{"name":"Sujit Choudhry","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005643424257650911,"gpt":0.2876483302288222,"spread":0.2820049059711713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00288457,0.0001704157,0.0004746846,0.001115649,0.008456372,0.005601403,0.001685269,0.001623257,0.005155936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005300814,0.0001998196,0.0003213391,0.002379206,0.005647325,0.001337054,0.002382536,0.003586636,0.000191081],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09424652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04704756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9858719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997588,0.0003814056,0.00007044496,0.0002204999,0.0002803525,0.001459338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967635,0.0007563853,0.0004447873,0.000184518,0.001252517,0.0005983895],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009844904,0.000579687,0.2357846,0.0002613493,0.0001940197,0.003796448,0.14793,0.005210858,0.001992766,0.5069862,0.03481411,0.06146542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001494283,0.0001416154,0.6955532,0.0003824792,0.00007887099,0.0001650643,0.1000853,0.002281153,0.0009351749,0.005083847,0.1949879,0.0001558548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9416762,0.001438694,0.0001564556,0.006171789,0.00007224199,0.00003989521,0.0004008953,0.000009827698,0.05003403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907308,0.0003105823,0.00007663845,0.0003961343,0.000007448628,0.00001149085,0.0001808278,0.000005071145,0.008280967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09424652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6838096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062874933","doi":"10.1093/icon/1.4.745","title":"The Security of Freedom: Essays on Canada's Anti-Terrorism Bill","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"David Cole","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02086310994059187,"gpt":0.3075274076155274,"spread":0.2866642976749356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01227339,0.001092616,0.001642848,0.004771025,0.0471498,0.02795785,0.00473817,0.04549111,0.007726789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03542311,0.001321717,0.001425636,0.006085864,0.0330344,0.006356558,0.005991171,0.03509316,0.0008645193],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1432318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1870807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9863715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9841527,0.001873494,0.0004194994,0.001149528,0.006311341,0.006093299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776531,0.01107506,0.0004272919,0.0005731329,0.007631671,0.002639767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005418997,0.00003096829,0.0005139774,0.00008698757,0.0000432803,0.000250794,0.00890873,0.0003293453,0.000164917,0.6176968,0.3642682,0.007651813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008312076,0.00001439793,0.003164809,0.0007665744,0.0001033807,0.00007597041,0.01025575,0.0003329419,0.0003799756,0.08504258,0.8995972,0.0001833918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01565888,0.02452297,0.0007952641,0.6592655,0.007105018,0.0001027422,0.0003933203,0.00003596793,0.2921203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3632802,0.01500965,0.001333316,0.4329431,0.005827383,0.0001900659,0.0001946835,0.0002217822,0.1809998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1432318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937297,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003053514","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz061","title":"Enforcing constitutional conventions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Normative; Power (physics); Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Farrah Ahmed","is_ca":false},{"name":"Richard Albert","is_ca":false},{"name":"Adam Perry","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02184051372922488,"gpt":0.3199942387729693,"spread":0.2981537250437444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04868243,0.0004808405,0.0007645546,0.002344774,0.007586254,0.01129521,0.003175098,0.004765732,0.003161753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06873077,0.0007041553,0.0006376198,0.001543763,0.0475358,0.007152426,0.01027038,0.008789692,0.0006869478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007784447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02061218,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01381658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01433485,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9521493,0.02057988,0.003051266,0.006641994,0.01363157,0.003945965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9220653,0.0312931,0.007323658,0.02314021,0.01360996,0.002567844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002249702,0.00001145524,0.0005184821,0.00001731444,0.000007090128,0.00003944725,0.003239144,0.0002865971,0.0004893082,0.9901087,0.0008187488,0.004461383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003610481,0.00005243799,0.001462809,0.0002363282,0.00004775917,0.0001026593,0.002049225,0.001892546,0.003115594,0.883096,0.1078449,0.00006359402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1282524,0.001612672,0.171127,0.03060088,0.0007671649,0.0005600257,0.0001182425,0.0004933432,0.6664683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659703,0.0003690501,0.01747625,0.002956194,0.0002267612,0.0001962767,0.00003970683,0.00008458132,0.01268078],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04868243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2574604,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2368594978","doi":"10.1093/icon/mov048","title":"Proportionality and Constitutional Culture","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"David Schneiderman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04997758329638755,"gpt":0.3510176951362327,"spread":0.3010401118398451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008662176,0.0002776609,0.0004624318,0.0020552,0.008026719,0.008415186,0.00113865,0.001245238,0.01030966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0277798,0.0003167985,0.0002467988,0.002132068,0.03120723,0.006456518,0.004347108,0.00459834,0.0005350117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003475246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002798764,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00497937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004852241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991319,0.004922973,0.000386267,0.001440413,0.001102015,0.000829358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844796,0.008360553,0.001427751,0.002450166,0.002221687,0.00106015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000489893,0.000009512831,0.0003444672,0.000004874835,0.000003335416,0.000009089187,0.003375951,0.00004215076,0.00004003371,0.9936271,0.0002755217,0.002263095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000165073,0.0000214118,0.00147832,0.00003129298,0.00001280037,0.00005491219,0.005060804,0.0003304852,0.000301418,0.9685119,0.02416506,0.00001505672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1732303,0.001113427,0.01057403,0.00958469,0.0001748337,0.00004862636,0.00005798406,0.00003433189,0.8051819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920416,0.0001129378,0.0005372282,0.0003002055,0.0000434142,0.00002014259,0.000009588507,0.0000148966,0.006919848],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01030966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04581052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246219574","doi":"10.1093/icon/1.1.163","title":"Transitional justice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"David Dyzenhaus","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02867599649337276,"gpt":0.2437882533252084,"spread":0.2151122568318357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002500414,0.0003174468,0.0004736728,0.001040224,0.01325463,0.009519562,0.001489657,0.00543242,0.05795975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006652453,0.0002787404,0.0004995046,0.0008739916,0.008485107,0.005403754,0.0052515,0.007491645,0.0064373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004049583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00837558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009745952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01919934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997466,0.0005752749,0.00008801833,0.0005177272,0.0004723151,0.0008806899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988262,0.0003412359,0.00005990147,0.0002733787,0.0002304848,0.0002687308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006022751,0.00001570479,0.00009191532,0.000007416607,0.000001449199,0.00003626248,0.001060428,0.00002639671,0.00002781277,0.9634841,0.02899315,0.00624928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001300979,0.00001750178,0.0006018738,0.0001188957,0.00000790471,0.00009471194,0.003988159,0.000176803,0.0002327075,0.4901898,0.5045469,0.00001171413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006561953,0.0009924008,0.002285163,0.01843266,0.000896103,0.00005930062,0.00008953366,0.00005435611,0.9706286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4260114,0.0008752153,0.001504458,0.01585141,0.0006831386,0.0001869929,0.0001482036,0.0001222142,0.5546169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05795975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1938947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402666796","doi":"10.1093/icon/moae047","title":"Care as a constitutional value","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Political science; Mathematics; Statistics","authors":[{"name":"Sandra Fredman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0198243323268937,"gpt":0.3464563101381688,"spread":0.3266319778112751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01037604,0.0003384994,0.0005142701,0.001352565,0.00719185,0.0118581,0.001337184,0.005958817,0.005992349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01498106,0.0002882528,0.0005709265,0.0010289,0.06298975,0.006682727,0.006703118,0.007099271,0.0005538361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01308753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01346489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01561127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01528147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9874774,0.0061057,0.00048499,0.001498731,0.00271819,0.001715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907351,0.004967723,0.0005832868,0.001510919,0.001596387,0.0006065506],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001318222,0.000002199816,0.00005164768,0.000004938157,8.390938e-7,0.00001331696,0.0004354192,0.0000466206,0.00001936461,0.9980762,0.0004894413,0.0008587398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001434228,0.00003485111,0.0005629465,0.0003059486,0.00002171769,0.0001106793,0.00194849,0.0004372426,0.0003667055,0.854458,0.1417087,0.00003042807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02629062,0.003884471,0.02155378,0.07421891,0.0009933709,0.00008643475,0.0001037566,0.00005613763,0.8728125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665621,0.001269406,0.00323529,0.008044696,0.0006034132,0.00008835714,0.00005002511,0.00002767197,0.02011898],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01561127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09495711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213326079","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab127","title":"Judicial amendment of the constitution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial interpretation; Constitutional amendment; Law; Political science; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Politics; Original intent; Extant taxon; Originalism; Invocation; Constitutional law; Amendment; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Emmett Macfarlane","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02444199024478361,"gpt":0.3182933570958354,"spread":0.2938513668510518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01244688,0.000334643,0.0006398619,0.001974439,0.0088114,0.01068321,0.002281657,0.00622491,0.004978768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02748923,0.0003757766,0.0006663377,0.001673026,0.03312463,0.003260368,0.003517244,0.009829224,0.0007329865],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01566128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02348571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05084603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05678328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.976254,0.008611726,0.0008073123,0.002265936,0.007774449,0.004286524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866406,0.007030041,0.0007438329,0.001917531,0.003326726,0.0003413623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002155343,0.000002273164,0.00008654352,0.00000598916,0.000001054061,0.00003711925,0.0006152771,0.00006679865,0.00003754437,0.9972621,0.001019806,0.000863283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003783503,0.00004512874,0.001834525,0.0005059422,0.00003732583,0.0002047577,0.002791612,0.001415753,0.001107366,0.6708132,0.3211412,0.00006543589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0295011,0.001990068,0.01077568,0.01624228,0.0007824934,0.0001316079,0.0001012482,0.00005506083,0.9404204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9479286,0.0007347145,0.002976098,0.004154811,0.0003760409,0.00009859228,0.00007261991,0.00003286085,0.04362559],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05084603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1136311,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172672511","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab046","title":"Dialogue and distrust: John Hart Ely and the Canadian Charter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Distrust; Context (archaeology); Law; Skepticism; Sociology; Judicial review; Politics; Political science; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Geoffrey Sigalet","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01698306541262447,"gpt":0.2754866363459421,"spread":0.2585035709333177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01524815,0.0003118225,0.000567433,0.002702874,0.04022773,0.01535749,0.002067099,0.00745333,0.006246875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02585869,0.0004675613,0.0003949681,0.002606772,0.05460951,0.005846817,0.005834703,0.00914376,0.000294884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1299178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1271717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9557649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9603912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9801401,0.006086208,0.0003136319,0.001644617,0.007538128,0.004277278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96945,0.01826784,0.001021225,0.000945917,0.007833139,0.002481886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002346388,0.00002271596,0.0007771204,0.0000295703,0.000006074305,0.0002331578,0.03399057,0.0004121812,0.0001166336,0.9282325,0.02592573,0.01023025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007282083,0.00004444127,0.006208088,0.000442387,0.0000393854,0.0001983364,0.06065487,0.002284112,0.0008281691,0.2699902,0.6589364,0.0003008385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09078228,0.01017982,0.003869676,0.3774989,0.00101119,0.00009492827,0.0001245554,0.00007053313,0.5163682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9375587,0.002381209,0.001185286,0.02101835,0.0002893096,0.00003155908,0.00002040283,0.00004227567,0.03747294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1299178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9426237,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967142330","doi":"10.1093/icon/mon036","title":"Are legislatures good at morality? Or better at it than the courts?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Argument (complex analysis); Morality; Law; Legislature; Statute; Political science; Institution; Positivism; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics","authors":[{"name":"David Dyzenhaus","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06940194629138205,"gpt":0.2979388650938896,"spread":0.2285369188025075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01421697,0.0004388146,0.0009837099,0.001374264,0.006711002,0.01789622,0.001364713,0.007675285,0.008485957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03234506,0.0004953053,0.000748465,0.001247551,0.0378034,0.01809228,0.003071924,0.008456955,0.001494097],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005437139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005618909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004344436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005702743,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9830462,0.008691276,0.0004382645,0.002199272,0.003310148,0.002314792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834953,0.009476256,0.002268656,0.001352695,0.001949796,0.001457235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001359703,0.00001761156,0.0006122199,0.00004099553,0.00001749805,0.00002469122,0.002016031,0.00007869697,0.0001100222,0.9805905,0.008614632,0.00786362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002403431,0.00004182167,0.001926465,0.0002120115,0.00003447457,0.00006977065,0.003338428,0.0002958345,0.0003832624,0.8346068,0.1590294,0.00003766426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03344466,0.01362768,0.02713214,0.6122507,0.00265852,0.00003793818,0.00006199245,0.0001482935,0.310638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8911957,0.004819677,0.005656225,0.07054531,0.002150737,0.0001071334,0.00004126149,0.0001272904,0.02535661],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01789622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07518744,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401857849","doi":"10.1093/icon/moae036","title":"The normative development of laws on asset preservation and confiscation: An examination of emerging best practices","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confiscation; Normative; Asset (computer security); Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Computer security; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Leonardo S. Borlini","is_ca":false},{"name":"Cecily Rose","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07750610510110867,"gpt":0.3372916704582022,"spread":0.2597855653570935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1636117,0.0006773676,0.001070672,0.008391365,0.007973203,0.02882166,0.007458119,0.01429607,0.00222805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1513411,0.001354501,0.00105427,0.005390779,0.06315307,0.01829543,0.007625481,0.02033575,0.0004533456],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02647628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05228052,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02355808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01892828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8889877,0.04803755,0.009000055,0.006892762,0.042925,0.004156893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7346936,0.1682674,0.01201697,0.02617419,0.05569311,0.003154608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002789586,0.00002495565,0.0001667528,0.00006878762,0.000003114392,0.00003572904,0.002178687,0.0004143373,0.00006736187,0.986938,0.00191158,0.008187896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001987564,0.00005593154,0.0008555706,0.003711852,0.00002269763,0.0001844331,0.006519063,0.003554318,0.001242955,0.8124802,0.1712655,0.00008769301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0353012,0.02770174,0.1537054,0.3178046,0.001868999,0.0005080022,0.0001451803,0.0003664415,0.4625985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8263154,0.01803141,0.1083377,0.03120285,0.001108835,0.0008399657,0.0001752183,0.0002330906,0.01375548],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1636117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8652715,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744710824","doi":"10.1093/icon/moz078","title":"“Dominion status”: History, framework and context","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Context (archaeology); Reservation; History; Law; Political science; Genealogy; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Peter Oliver","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0170526380514353,"gpt":0.3057070906816013,"spread":0.288654452630166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002246799,0.0003003617,0.0002339397,0.004059524,0.004860696,0.008123133,0.000959469,0.001465721,0.00365283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003474421,0.0001448288,0.0001132316,0.004063936,0.0415666,0.006875806,0.003981438,0.003098437,0.0001757774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01033631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002931337,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01655638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01409165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998492,0.0008417198,0.00004358042,0.0001979057,0.0001696057,0.0002551487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978478,0.001442469,0.0002722434,0.00007413994,0.0001733294,0.0001899918],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004037559,0.00000450969,0.0004388932,0.00002060303,8.190074e-7,0.00006378175,0.00830009,0.00005755501,0.00003426147,0.9866943,0.0007179913,0.003663153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009976234,0.00003614119,0.006666629,0.0008795273,0.00000702631,0.000342732,0.03165106,0.0007405921,0.0003766875,0.5319363,0.4273158,0.00003743638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.122858,0.03324021,0.004713352,0.03215652,0.0004068261,0.0000384146,0.0001311514,0.00002930329,0.8064262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912464,0.003326155,0.0002505636,0.0004585185,0.0002485228,0.00001642488,0.00002444498,0.00001022707,0.004418799],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01655638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07499552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122426454","doi":"10.1093/icon/mol002","title":"Prologue: North American constitutionalism?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prologue; Constitutionalism; Political science; History; Law; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":true},{"name":"Christopher L. Eisgruber","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.014854806903517,"gpt":0.2973220546938847,"spread":0.2824672477903677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003560236,0.000310833,0.0004083694,0.001526485,0.008256025,0.009013215,0.00100405,0.003749914,0.02423844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009421797,0.000241122,0.0003188404,0.002287649,0.01368465,0.008914282,0.003382367,0.009721023,0.002946894],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007806971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005894435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02672325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03473082,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99729,0.001132978,0.00009487136,0.0004493753,0.0006310488,0.0004017289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970303,0.001731468,0.000169719,0.0003364335,0.0004578302,0.0002743092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004284841,0.000008085082,0.00008890042,0.00002329898,0.00000156815,0.00004714357,0.0008583121,0.00002446744,0.00001111581,0.9350377,0.05645978,0.007435188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000731302,0.000004139358,0.0004560273,0.0001405437,0.000003268097,0.00009540119,0.000932014,0.00006971757,0.00002949408,0.2155596,0.7826958,0.000006554162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.003091361,0.01748767,0.001363972,0.1457446,0.005040455,0.00001365369,0.00008732949,0.00004890381,0.827122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5054895,0.0377154,0.002515803,0.1206658,0.02088879,0.0002828445,0.0003783347,0.000258422,0.3118052],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9732767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08108562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995720989","doi":"10.1093/icon/mot022","title":"Judicial institutions, the legitimacy of Islamic state law and democratic transition in Egypt: Can a shift toward a common law model of adjudication improve the prospects of a successful democratic transition?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legitimacy; Legal history; Sharia; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Statutory law; Islam; Democracy; State (computer science); Politics; Public law; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Mohammad Fadel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0163367469426727,"gpt":0.2783535088359245,"spread":0.2620167618932518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003870176,0.0001547439,0.0002073915,0.001310905,0.006200843,0.01063492,0.0009170072,0.004298247,0.005242135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007447844,0.0002027125,0.0001507191,0.001540247,0.02485318,0.005672304,0.003170605,0.004216193,0.0002757801],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01214403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01201803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02794966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03911577,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980896,0.0008017924,0.00007829477,0.0001612614,0.0002617213,0.0006072792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966235,0.001825994,0.0006981856,0.0001589704,0.0004180519,0.0002751828],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000177274,0.00001980884,0.0006764288,0.00002649352,0.000002496293,0.0001282939,0.002156472,0.0001836823,0.00004505053,0.989604,0.001967611,0.005171908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001050488,0.00004456946,0.01234873,0.000447835,0.00002987795,0.0001320536,0.01269865,0.001850177,0.0004736012,0.8886551,0.0831637,0.0000505917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3286966,0.02402987,0.003134911,0.195485,0.0003505706,0.000095331,0.0001668931,0.00004709349,0.4479937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907182,0.002174671,0.0002669679,0.001531333,0.0001352369,0.00001736468,0.00001632534,0.000004208281,0.005135698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02794966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08811152,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317979143","doi":"10.1093/icon/mot055","title":"On constitutionalism and the paradoxes of tolerance: Reflections on Egypt, the US, and beyond","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Michael Rosenfeld","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01787544199259335,"gpt":0.3286928420024435,"spread":0.3108174000098502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006460814,0.0006748199,0.0007276037,0.001917191,0.006343849,0.01420671,0.002031744,0.008015872,0.004925983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008660128,0.0002731447,0.0004565881,0.002256612,0.02631424,0.01153574,0.004764054,0.01319343,0.00048328],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009810674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005507976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009001127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01493725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968458,0.001419032,0.0001528156,0.0003005766,0.0006562815,0.0006254687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919252,0.006226064,0.0003940042,0.0002155387,0.0007570437,0.0004822738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005975193,0.00002743507,0.0002854214,0.0006567584,0.00002853974,0.0008230615,0.03229742,0.0002803214,0.0002256927,0.7075731,0.2317449,0.02599766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001608669,0.00001421054,0.0006565555,0.0008896239,0.00001366337,0.000186953,0.02414876,0.000112503,0.0001511909,0.1017176,0.8720528,0.00003988818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01121723,0.1899215,0.0009958274,0.6926674,0.0438626,0.00001591347,0.00005733193,0.00004087006,0.06122132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4775402,0.1386651,0.0009338879,0.2233445,0.1163083,0.00005842574,0.00006888746,0.0001966556,0.04288406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01420671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07118171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}