{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":20,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":20,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"5d3a1342978c","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family"}},"results":[{"id":"W2030536740","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebr014","title":"Children's Experiences with Family Justice Professionals in Ontario and Ohio","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Psychology; Mental health; Mythology; Social work; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Rachel Birnbaum","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":true},{"name":"Francine Cyr","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03246308992886996,"gpt":0.3129073070930209,"spread":0.280444217164151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003643281,0.0005020205,0.0009574312,0.001455172,0.03540939,0.006320465,0.002163602,0.002263312,0.00488328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008371815,0.0008649976,0.0006369896,0.002502145,0.01135499,0.002459406,0.00885109,0.004306355,0.0002881031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05606955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0502304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8660384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9623537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917496,0.002192148,0.0003225998,0.0006056491,0.001685223,0.003444802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904739,0.001770624,0.001509975,0.0002111584,0.001993921,0.004040404],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001938539,0.00003494669,0.0136537,0.00003458134,0.000005102012,0.001171645,0.9808766,0.00001014997,0.0001590672,0.0004183807,0.001238776,0.002377576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002479499,0.00002263047,0.01089805,0.00005670557,0.000003342731,0.0001860819,0.9795913,0.000008873974,0.0000312229,0.00004600946,0.009140062,0.00001335908],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885654,0.0006450522,0.0000757345,0.003879839,0.00009809759,0.00004721079,0.00009501445,0.000007354141,0.006586279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917122,0.0007882055,0.0002021734,0.001262458,0.0000240331,0.00006479154,0.00007094553,0.00001526061,0.005860039],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1339616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4068149,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089722476","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebl018","title":"Conceiving Parents Through Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Reproduction; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"A. Campbell","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04732629277696299,"gpt":0.39640947325239,"spread":0.349083180475427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007490862,0.0002817572,0.0003452807,0.0008541299,0.01063364,0.008190179,0.001096783,0.003531919,0.004769311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01030029,0.0002488047,0.0002188676,0.0006700197,0.03621925,0.009559246,0.003899208,0.004086786,0.0005529515],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0124422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01645294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1071217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1226962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958174,0.002518365,0.00008276694,0.0004530372,0.0005538407,0.0005746639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996502,0.001775821,0.0002592164,0.0003372036,0.0006108361,0.0005149228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000292794,0.000004910602,0.001028439,0.000007898278,0.000001066367,0.0001968523,0.06029439,0.00004096082,0.00007176388,0.9239579,0.004745195,0.009647723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007315409,0.00002955201,0.001911427,0.0004811427,0.000009251663,0.0005799114,0.09707147,0.0003134121,0.0002837259,0.3725263,0.5267563,0.00003009604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1167036,0.01545629,0.04268073,0.1911328,0.001316417,0.0001527991,0.0002067058,0.0001664029,0.6321843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9408119,0.003733743,0.005412699,0.008437653,0.0001720677,0.00005695351,0.00003923001,0.00004283259,0.04129303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1071217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2129964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059075898","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/16.2.145","title":"Context and Inclusivity in Canada's Evolving Definition of the Family","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Charter; Commission; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Inclusion (mineral); Interdependence; Law; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04102726335986378,"gpt":0.2980762770370748,"spread":0.257049013677211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00538339,0.0003784398,0.0006086804,0.003707247,0.04022001,0.01837467,0.002939082,0.003586597,0.005865024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01222749,0.0004217743,0.0004290042,0.006610287,0.04088388,0.005730505,0.009227667,0.006176692,0.0001868791],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2006563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3043566,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962839,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9899427,0.002333136,0.0003548963,0.0008162455,0.003837796,0.002715229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897343,0.001886523,0.0004755071,0.0003437246,0.004308481,0.003251494],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003203933,0.00001545378,0.004484966,0.0000755656,0.00001367512,0.0003907621,0.09255213,0.0004757678,0.0001938141,0.8637859,0.01806798,0.01991198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003615722,0.00003182979,0.02948971,0.001842926,0.00004835363,0.0004030394,0.2432636,0.0009244167,0.0002591741,0.1344799,0.588939,0.0002818871],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2513765,0.03818894,0.005866635,0.2375848,0.001663428,0.0001374656,0.0006039455,0.00008568073,0.4644926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765697,0.004729262,0.001000947,0.006436103,0.00007150884,0.00003048051,0.00004526716,0.00003138796,0.01108539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2006563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9271254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210682962","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebac008","title":"Urgent Care Proceedings for New-born Babies in England and Wales – Time for a Fundamental Review","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Harm; Political science; Medicine; Child protection; Population; Nursing; Family medicine; Law; Environmental health","authors":[{"name":"Karen Broadhurst","is_ca":false},{"name":"Claire Mason","is_ca":false},{"name":"Harriet Ward","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04968573114284434,"gpt":0.3818860813052129,"spread":0.3322003501623685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01017209,0.0005325543,0.002423128,0.004140569,0.0008512305,0.003452511,0.001412109,0.003000385,0.004550567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03575663,0.0006437859,0.001202948,0.004219765,0.001462599,0.003457448,0.001369457,0.002942464,0.0007215594],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004078268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01805215,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009267103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02265161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953541,0.002016829,0.001076209,0.0002325555,0.001095622,0.0002246901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9597455,0.02955015,0.003618316,0.0005536526,0.005743491,0.0007888805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001147521,0.0001163745,0.0003484896,0.2590548,0.0002920479,0.000209318,0.001069606,0.0001361457,0.0002558229,0.008731617,0.03860581,0.6910652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000652064,0.0002895268,0.00338198,0.4754894,0.0006281696,0.0008244844,0.001566077,0.00004781083,0.0001455892,0.001647548,0.5158764,0.00003769236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001102026,0.9981996,0.00001736845,0.0009999869,0.0002974391,0.00002075307,0.000009898265,0.000001712597,0.0003431116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001704544,0.9971089,0.0001032791,0.0007637606,0.0001653349,0.00003859393,0.0000139724,0.000001435765,0.0001001393],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01017209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05379575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109720334","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebt017","title":"Family Law Reform in (Neoliberal) Context: British Columbia's New Family Law Act","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Family law; Law; Context (archaeology); Law reform; Political science; Best interests; Guardian; Relocation; Dispute resolution; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"R. Treloar","is_ca":true},{"name":"S. B. Boyd","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02404655992224456,"gpt":0.3120802885177703,"spread":0.2880337285955257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00336034,0.0002911474,0.0003877682,0.001476832,0.01827141,0.009712575,0.00188045,0.004798015,0.003584869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01127304,0.0003719579,0.0002376797,0.002256006,0.01279579,0.001920381,0.002961901,0.006516187,0.0003270145],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1679222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2103681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9910733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939418,0.001237775,0.0001604544,0.0004423222,0.002219866,0.001997842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935209,0.001785026,0.0002626611,0.0003001896,0.002559222,0.001572026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005168714,0.0001177799,0.01007107,0.0002065753,0.00002363173,0.001652606,0.04503084,0.001566048,0.0008064437,0.714866,0.1590264,0.06658088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003613772,0.00003056008,0.03565607,0.0006645106,0.00002822394,0.0002384773,0.02166387,0.0009627177,0.0003240548,0.02153928,0.9186962,0.0001599018],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2186636,0.02472301,0.001990413,0.3254187,0.002524383,0.0001977729,0.0006745511,0.000127098,0.4256805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8249071,0.007187463,0.001947619,0.057114,0.0002170751,0.0001424284,0.0001893171,0.00004589416,0.1082491],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8320777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9650923,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265908887","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebv007","title":"Positions Taken by Judges and Custody Experts on Issues Relating to the Best Interests of Children in Custody Disputes in Québec","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Best interests; Psychology; Relevance (law); Ideology; Social psychology; Law; Criminology; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Élisabeth Godbout","is_ca":true},{"name":"Claudine Parent","is_ca":true},{"name":"Marie‐Christine Saint‐Jacques","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03355166571764596,"gpt":0.3543123552134338,"spread":0.3207606894957879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01945267,0.0003615023,0.0006606791,0.002349081,0.03631888,0.007934101,0.002573928,0.003591897,0.002920966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02846751,0.0006622959,0.0003262,0.002843601,0.0155517,0.001219774,0.003217568,0.003693432,0.0001285286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1212866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1026125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9689283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.989094,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9800792,0.009288748,0.0006384233,0.001302527,0.003682324,0.005008834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9592565,0.02053447,0.002754987,0.0005646822,0.01059463,0.006294786],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001331193,0.00005299243,0.05620937,0.0001648113,0.00003789106,0.003734068,0.9001432,0.0004418979,0.002509304,0.00965329,0.007674931,0.0192452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002441374,0.00006616722,0.0956928,0.0004992056,0.00004043194,0.0003571682,0.8600109,0.0007063695,0.0006749982,0.0009023012,0.04090719,0.0001181497],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9673372,0.0016283,0.0004597079,0.008798117,0.00009050748,0.00008297746,0.00006133365,0.00001119094,0.02153067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994087,0.0004710703,0.0003343705,0.000926558,0.00001337393,0.00002738036,0.00002235841,0.000005416136,0.004112424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1212866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8800002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290805179","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebac014","title":"Family Court Responses to Claims of Parental Alienation in Quebec","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Family law; Psychological intervention; Family court; Psychosocial; Social psychology; Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychiatry; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Amylie Paquin-Boudreau","is_ca":true},{"name":"Karine Poitras","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03146273681468897,"gpt":0.3472758280890271,"spread":0.3158130912743382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002564395,0.0001212038,0.0002005876,0.00264666,0.00423739,0.001292594,0.0009486213,0.0008619977,0.004223388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01386982,0.000172726,0.0001785096,0.00257586,0.001414955,0.0003461196,0.001137992,0.0007799687,0.0001943805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01576196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00607209,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8683388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9464337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973687,0.0007059117,0.0001606349,0.0002119988,0.001020531,0.0005322909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812809,0.00572284,0.008009263,0.0004723221,0.003359432,0.001155244],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009886578,0.00007855679,0.9393818,0.0001022496,0.0000616821,0.007297547,0.02715881,0.0002863031,0.0007494433,0.0009164332,0.006873574,0.01699484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006252146,0.00003055458,0.9751765,0.0001030749,0.00001157712,0.001161294,0.01758635,0.0004108151,0.0002179575,0.0001049545,0.005166457,0.00002423906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934583,0.0003525808,0.00006480623,0.000738761,0.00001798,0.0000283243,0.0004027957,0.000005532943,0.004930979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977167,0.0002107662,0.00006261331,0.0002501408,0.000007353834,0.00001056852,0.0001733494,0.000002071702,0.00156653],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1316612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2648731,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760568154","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebx008","title":"Views of the Child Reports: The Ontario Pilot Project","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Toolbox; Economic Justice; Psychology; Child custody; Social justice; Medical education; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Law; Criminology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Rachel Birnbaum","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09454657027648862,"gpt":0.3924908063477374,"spread":0.2979442360712488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03084161,0.0005645003,0.0004658254,0.001966109,0.01540388,0.003994374,0.002365825,0.001433689,0.003336913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03962412,0.0007599417,0.0004476979,0.003256838,0.008086995,0.001828006,0.005364962,0.002456997,0.0004145557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06638336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09207835,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.923023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9617327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9700974,0.01628752,0.000906954,0.001031946,0.008510138,0.003165971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9507089,0.01573881,0.004454008,0.004419998,0.01899261,0.005685702],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001328245,0.0002179472,0.03726212,0.0001239175,0.0000137551,0.001677871,0.9263137,0.00006037037,0.0022076,0.001901834,0.009646676,0.02044135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003986749,0.0003025447,0.1011456,0.0001881779,0.00002034676,0.0003964709,0.7995785,0.0001134572,0.001589287,0.0002092852,0.09634323,0.00007318154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690827,0.0003937606,0.0005047733,0.004716897,0.00006268017,0.000858365,0.0008146857,0.00003733894,0.02352881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781573,0.001084042,0.002295101,0.00105105,0.00003167411,0.001068308,0.0005171338,0.00006040515,0.01573483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07697695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4816473,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389634029","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebad024","title":"Introducing a randomized controlled trial into Family Proceedings: Describing the ‘how?’ and defending the ‘why?’","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre","funders":"National Institute for Health and Care Research","keywords":"Randomized controlled trial; Randomization; Intervention (counseling); Hindsight bias; Best practice; Psychological intervention; Economic Justice; Medicine; Psychology; Family medicine; Political science; Nursing; Law; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Carol Atkinson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Matt Forde","is_ca":false},{"name":"Karen Crawford","is_ca":false},{"name":"Marion Henderson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Philip Wilson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Dennis Ougrin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Helen Minnis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04883326152579963,"gpt":0.3245925051070547,"spread":0.275759243581255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6258406,0.002371525,0.007730254,0.00423295,0.005057793,0.0176161,0.006589447,0.02906581,0.004818953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6542984,0.002355665,0.008003457,0.003429117,0.02588939,0.01562181,0.006435138,0.02836154,0.001637318],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008769595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02446692,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001969852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001813326,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1469466,0.800387,0.02663817,0.006382029,0.01801774,0.001628419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2338515,0.7087823,0.0144981,0.02657522,0.01367521,0.002617718],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01236373,0.001252483,0.002125025,0.0807348,0.00722046,0.001302973,0.01812471,0.004865604,0.002051429,0.5335272,0.09331682,0.2431146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03755148,0.008272315,0.001441702,0.1740434,0.004825744,0.0007224296,0.003001693,0.01908466,0.003623236,0.421614,0.3249624,0.0008569145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.007650694,0.07883572,0.2908592,0.440526,0.07725469,0.0904536,0.000667097,0.001184348,0.01256854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1102413,0.01486425,0.5055704,0.1922331,0.01043883,0.1635355,0.000167451,0.0003680521,0.002581155],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3741594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4614052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980370897","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebz013","title":"One Parent, Three Parents: Judges and Ontario’s All Families Are Equal Act, 2016","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Champion; Legislation; Discretion; Law; Variety (cybernetics); Diversity (politics); Family law; Political science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Robert Leckey","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05575411323421887,"gpt":0.3267932573809631,"spread":0.2710391441467442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005758327,0.0001637366,0.0002573929,0.0006890633,0.0311704,0.005395315,0.001393054,0.003470133,0.00681156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01696306,0.0003570435,0.0002121583,0.00126088,0.007232637,0.00144693,0.00250726,0.003958595,0.0004056194],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1348533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1786523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9847177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966323,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946796,0.0007039715,0.000167557,0.0004172693,0.002214888,0.001816679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874014,0.00335963,0.0007560271,0.000395098,0.004720578,0.003367245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002125775,0.0001138109,0.07002321,0.0002131601,0.00003353184,0.002992298,0.1848294,0.0004863466,0.001475289,0.3145371,0.3759693,0.04911399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004743768,0.00004917552,0.1383454,0.0003974272,0.00004385728,0.0002690951,0.07292746,0.0003272222,0.000539769,0.006645256,0.7803018,0.0001062151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4470147,0.006721295,0.0006158341,0.2299926,0.001231318,0.0001871615,0.001176473,0.00004432027,0.3130162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8744006,0.002022786,0.0003742886,0.01195943,0.0001628504,0.0000660066,0.0001676515,0.0000228461,0.1108236],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1348533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9784341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028132958","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebt012","title":"Protection Against Unilateral Dispositions of the Family Home - An Irish Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Irish; Legislature; Veto; Law; Position (finance); Perspective (graphical); Family law; Political science; Common law; Business; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Kathryn O’Sullivan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02798579549462919,"gpt":0.3344826306900675,"spread":0.3064968351954383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01061506,0.0003316487,0.0005390661,0.001145822,0.007528075,0.009984871,0.002495196,0.00556042,0.004420069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01076012,0.0004843779,0.001056853,0.0007301512,0.02683301,0.00521743,0.009095028,0.0076595,0.0007282642],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01614352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02619497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.142373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1426642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880391,0.004015091,0.0005530732,0.001170917,0.002448515,0.003773337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957961,0.001458251,0.0004584524,0.0007091798,0.000814854,0.0007632888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000182768,0.00003100511,0.002157392,0.00003415725,0.000006709534,0.0003770321,0.009744145,0.0003091324,0.000193104,0.9729475,0.004580026,0.009601593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009435073,0.0003026303,0.02026416,0.001937448,0.0001137312,0.001650037,0.07761022,0.001158611,0.002640115,0.3057583,0.588148,0.0003223899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1217405,0.003588302,0.006183024,0.0726332,0.0007629961,0.00009315037,0.0001643891,0.00005317184,0.7947813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9208357,0.002980878,0.002414774,0.01368954,0.0003797181,0.00009449894,0.00006940147,0.00002852213,0.0595069],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.142373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2830886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410347839","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebaf014","title":"Parental union in Quebec: a model for recognizing cohabitants?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Social Policies and Family","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford","keywords":"Psychology; Political science; Theology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Robert Leckey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03528852351554066,"gpt":0.3713485858631986,"spread":0.336060062347658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001317551,0.000318234,0.0003362071,0.001095673,0.008945028,0.004263171,0.002113368,0.002487393,0.01826455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003619357,0.0001652949,0.0004885955,0.001445449,0.004902646,0.001985785,0.001768371,0.0018622,0.0006265956],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04488741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02759684,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9702307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9788325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998892,0.0003758793,0.00001444991,0.0001171392,0.0001357944,0.0004647986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998219,0.0004536244,0.0001542919,0.000122239,0.0006042115,0.0004465743],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000540981,0.00008868387,0.02497849,0.00002508766,0.0000175527,0.0005728136,0.009113359,0.003858947,0.0001181097,0.9293681,0.01673109,0.01507376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000217592,0.0002003758,0.09140152,0.0009162127,0.0002275346,0.0008823509,0.1039002,0.1014761,0.0004332404,0.3403677,0.3597718,0.0002054871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3136893,0.002322936,0.01494332,0.07618351,0.0004227633,0.0002356312,0.001109722,0.00009569838,0.5909971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678211,0.0005268954,0.00155676,0.00222187,0.00005042679,0.00005859805,0.0001402937,0.00001195508,0.02761214],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04488741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3256825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391975176","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebae004","title":"Child support and income inequalities: a cross-continental comparison from welfare design to judicial implementation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Welfare; Inequality; Economic inequality; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Demographic economics; Mathematics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Émilie Biland","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04720538233803346,"gpt":0.4360260783765567,"spread":0.3888206960385233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005654522,0.0001568061,0.0003812107,0.003189979,0.001748599,0.002633561,0.0006552359,0.0004640343,0.003309535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01555372,0.0001227027,0.0003292422,0.004130818,0.002608575,0.0007973493,0.002973315,0.0004960804,0.0001799393],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005857459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002414539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2488918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2793936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929379,0.003910378,0.0001747734,0.0005876331,0.00113577,0.001253608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913127,0.004066168,0.00143286,0.0005833408,0.002153113,0.0004518557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005348402,0.0002533215,0.9030803,0.000188275,0.0005071672,0.0001739727,0.02332068,0.0009600077,0.0006689935,0.01873564,0.001679232,0.04989763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009740009,0.0001068338,0.9819422,0.0001298153,0.00005424661,0.00002042671,0.01321141,0.0002176909,0.0001971754,0.0003925134,0.003706604,0.00001139142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816543,0.001729864,0.0004749449,0.0004086143,0.00001644277,0.00003974442,0.0004177618,0.000005322595,0.01525293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986882,0.0002360939,0.0001324567,0.00006093056,0.000006220775,0.00002062456,0.0002055144,0.000004947163,0.0006450641],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2488918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4948861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564531045","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebx002","title":"Cohabitation, Law Reform, and the Litigants","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Plaintiff; Legislature; Legislation; Unjust enrichment; Duration (music); Law reform; Political science; Law; Property (philosophy); Common law; Business; Demographic economics; Economics; Restitution","authors":[{"name":"Robert Leckey","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0319693443003046,"gpt":0.3577228666456351,"spread":0.3257535223453304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00302818,0.0001001166,0.0002914581,0.001094235,0.01405824,0.003763738,0.0007689591,0.001499591,0.003003438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0109269,0.000148577,0.0001588119,0.00133344,0.01117863,0.001767053,0.003713022,0.002319249,0.0001487187],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01536847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5239251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.680295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948379,0.00152467,0.0001014384,0.0002525725,0.0008920318,0.002391302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958382,0.0009902037,0.001041546,0.000129751,0.0006947718,0.001305514],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001751381,0.0002637472,0.4469262,0.00006193255,0.00004905416,0.003061745,0.4073846,0.0002889233,0.001010319,0.07040046,0.006213011,0.06416481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001948645,0.0001074487,0.3851334,0.0001447158,0.00002486562,0.0004995698,0.5835539,0.0002397147,0.0003221862,0.004297863,0.02562123,0.00003560803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9739173,0.0008987217,0.00008678761,0.007501056,0.00002199897,0.00001913248,0.0000125339,0.000001629279,0.01754099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979908,0.0002251891,0.00001479566,0.0005739661,0.000006819149,0.000004111946,0.000005433077,9.251107e-7,0.001177884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5239251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9577572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405222990","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebae020","title":"Enforceability of mahr under a sha<i>rīʿa</i> law-based contract in New Zealand: a comparison with United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Islamic Finance and Banking Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Kingdom; Political science; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Durgeshree Raman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03154028426730086,"gpt":0.2924168718455855,"spread":0.2608765875782846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00326846,0.0001190279,0.0004108789,0.001854678,0.002328471,0.002965564,0.0009011101,0.000545346,0.003073315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01073517,0.0002365538,0.0003438026,0.002258531,0.003312745,0.0009390044,0.001542304,0.001010903,0.000169409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01982418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02162739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9366845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9556195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961089,0.0003482841,0.0003056634,0.0002608657,0.001879493,0.001096797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911909,0.00135066,0.002810794,0.000568528,0.002898911,0.001180247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001271958,0.0009721669,0.6385951,0.0007067004,0.0002967858,0.005654688,0.05375645,0.003551287,0.008085048,0.1519223,0.007630561,0.1275569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009143551,0.0002608454,0.9354568,0.0002179699,0.0001220808,0.0005438892,0.02404439,0.002927925,0.0009364372,0.001254204,0.0340555,0.00008860815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9520039,0.0003701535,0.0002456298,0.0006902273,0.00001150133,0.0001228521,0.0001402682,0.00001033319,0.04640523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966621,0.0002251442,0.0002368152,0.0000673812,0.000003104982,0.00001595029,0.00005209275,0.000003974614,0.002733425],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06331545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1438352,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407591516","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebaf003","title":"Unblocking the implementation of altruistic surrogacy in Portugal: inclusive legal reform proposals through a comparative analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Portuguese; Political science; Presidential system; Strengths and weaknesses; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Arnau Nonell i Rodríguez","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03264502392212487,"gpt":0.4474482634525465,"spread":0.4148032395304216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01508239,0.0001858403,0.0004611155,0.0019287,0.004353306,0.005206776,0.0009362364,0.001812293,0.004447311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02081788,0.0001801008,0.0005042105,0.002773755,0.005500862,0.002624152,0.00295929,0.001634232,0.0001399607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01635715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01685468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03185435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0606657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900844,0.006613655,0.0002873501,0.0004307375,0.001315682,0.001268093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985508,0.01051439,0.001270221,0.001079359,0.001252081,0.0003758606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001619773,0.0001376759,0.007177223,0.000684762,0.00003574365,0.001145289,0.02737258,0.001993697,0.0002925599,0.9109845,0.002421124,0.04759285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002170199,0.000837545,0.1138424,0.00895507,0.0003614394,0.001707237,0.2567008,0.01156252,0.003426002,0.1390979,0.4631546,0.0001375255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5657263,0.006612761,0.006513417,0.01574483,0.0002310031,0.0003082514,0.0002076525,0.00002852958,0.4046273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993133,0.001180069,0.002024039,0.0007568236,0.00003943814,0.00006410723,0.00003197403,0.000008752118,0.002761863],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03185435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11868,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204919874","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebab038","title":"<i>Legal Recognition of Non-Conjugal Families: New Frontiers in Family Law in the US, Canada and Europe</i>, Nausica Palazzo","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Heading (navigation); Diversity (politics); Law; Sociology; Family law; Family ties; Political science; Genealogy; History; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Robert Leckey","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0311817100973837,"gpt":0.3077276335350605,"spread":0.2765459234376768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00131054,0.0002861136,0.0002973753,0.0008243694,0.01231876,0.008024722,0.001073605,0.002220891,0.003777385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00194328,0.0001762018,0.0001717565,0.001405982,0.01788006,0.004236133,0.001833247,0.00409082,0.000303534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03664178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03947102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7197903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8344831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987716,0.000401541,0.00001860551,0.00008548486,0.0003944428,0.0003283323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991195,0.0003857755,0.00005857353,0.00003104069,0.0002190764,0.0001860863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001375549,0.00002591773,0.00101296,0.0001363745,0.000004365233,0.0002802726,0.07010005,0.0001614393,0.0001211713,0.6513767,0.2360137,0.04075327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002918997,0.000007077341,0.002808305,0.0004972004,0.00000306338,0.0001757171,0.04306822,0.0001203688,0.0001147155,0.02666178,0.9265243,0.00001632518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.03066629,0.2089832,0.001808958,0.2451813,0.003925194,0.00006749407,0.00009349993,0.00006288195,0.5092112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6631582,0.1212333,0.001037221,0.03653166,0.001829344,0.00009049215,0.00009293154,0.0001077848,0.175919],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2802097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5637199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384519883","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebad017","title":"Cohabitant protection on relationship breakdown in Ireland: A lesson in illusory justice?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Irish; Cohabitation; Jurisprudence; General partnership; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Law reform; Common law","authors":[{"name":"Kathryn O’Sullivan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0623155216299992,"gpt":0.3681828603350946,"spread":0.3058673387050954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01461417,0.0001832939,0.0005782265,0.001004678,0.008732963,0.006281717,0.003120114,0.004339119,0.008984771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03493531,0.0002734788,0.0005863505,0.0009279674,0.01749486,0.006874568,0.01433504,0.008571672,0.0007285321],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01251702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03111231,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1167061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1884927,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9846035,0.006296691,0.0005006581,0.0007971656,0.002119382,0.0056827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852208,0.004552199,0.001280632,0.001406712,0.002598288,0.004941246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002969266,0.0004079106,0.02712665,0.0004750065,0.00004886492,0.002211038,0.08480954,0.0004957202,0.0009732545,0.6514253,0.07420424,0.1575255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001354017,0.0005719202,0.05036879,0.00408505,0.00008501996,0.001398259,0.3808363,0.001009334,0.001544748,0.1950626,0.3646773,0.0002252469],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2608683,0.005282569,0.004004598,0.4199121,0.001428912,0.0001776304,0.0001517886,0.00005641946,0.3081177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9440498,0.001346347,0.0008952268,0.03977191,0.0002343856,0.00009624527,0.00003539885,0.00002306657,0.01354775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1167061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2320535,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285178857","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebac016","title":"Mothering Practices and Human Rights Abuses of Girls in Marginalized Contexts: Examining the Moral Culpability of Women who Abuse Children","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Culpability; Criminalization; Criminology; Sociology; Human rights; Psychology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Julie Ada Tchoukou","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04203768626629395,"gpt":0.3662662694527719,"spread":0.3242285831864779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003660586,0.0004315784,0.0007178905,0.001797795,0.009455564,0.006390016,0.001299983,0.001667136,0.003439004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01023239,0.0005064401,0.0003489784,0.001631635,0.0157659,0.005113792,0.009258696,0.003414821,0.0002554746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003955539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003010272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02056809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03400296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951943,0.002727539,0.0001590898,0.0002466307,0.0004651918,0.001207244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937565,0.003437422,0.001753015,0.0001999266,0.000301067,0.0005520613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001735912,0.00006997514,0.04539645,0.00005132396,0.000009299441,0.0006573331,0.9444561,0.00001219043,0.0001431176,0.005050719,0.0002150661,0.003921097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001650715,0.00003192863,0.02219567,0.0001030626,0.000004539525,0.0004073014,0.9743159,0.00001874438,0.00007139962,0.0005272604,0.002317768,0.000004748904],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911533,0.001141854,0.00008088606,0.001598472,0.00001688598,0.00001415857,0.00001522694,8.811984e-7,0.005978424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979252,0.001112675,0.00005462204,0.0002562491,0.00001437293,0.00002333073,0.000009854709,0.000002775863,0.000600828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02056809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04089671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289355304","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebac013","title":"Experience with Ontario’s <i>Parenting Plan Guide</i> and <i>Template</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Multidisciplinary approach; Plan (archaeology); Conciliation; Psychology; Mental health; Resource (disambiguation); Medical education; Nursing; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Psychiatry; Law; Mediation","authors":[{"name":"Rachel Birnbaum","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03837738926233174,"gpt":0.3298844137549609,"spread":0.2915070244926291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006761436,0.000328814,0.0002213609,0.000700428,0.0106602,0.002114181,0.001564158,0.001125013,0.01143916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01300888,0.0007347104,0.0003290614,0.001614816,0.003330389,0.001381779,0.002618377,0.001498449,0.001345035],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03315781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04089132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9095637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9776111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952029,0.002051797,0.0001738081,0.0002985527,0.001435434,0.0008375354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915648,0.002222949,0.0004767964,0.0006813903,0.002297737,0.002756329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007838729,0.0004418856,0.02502692,0.0001518986,0.00000991961,0.004226141,0.7669417,0.0004958708,0.002239632,0.004293875,0.0871941,0.1088997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002583478,0.0002701083,0.04934788,0.0002940109,0.00001395054,0.0009821021,0.2906832,0.0008964941,0.0009150773,0.0004991359,0.6559758,0.00009645685],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8255141,0.0009541711,0.005407516,0.01027113,0.0002718034,0.0006552489,0.0009919704,0.0003747722,0.1555593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8868755,0.001821642,0.01078824,0.002062056,0.00004591506,0.0003246512,0.001039065,0.0003348574,0.0967082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09043628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2405779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}