{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":5,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"eb0a39bc95f3","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Legal Discourse"}},"results":[{"id":"W4311446111","doi":"10.1515/ijld-2022-2072","title":"Politics behind the law: unveiling the discursive strategies in extradition hearings on Meng Wanzhou","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Discourse","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; Zhejiang University","keywords":"Politics; Cognitive reframing; Injustice; Adjudication; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Le Cheng","is_ca":false},{"name":"Xiuli Liu","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0270326233834485,"gpt":0.3498941774991905,"spread":0.322861554115742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007959325,0.00007517565,0.000097718,0.00007239249,0.001145325,0.0002045952,0.0005836267,0.00001615712,0.0001015342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009011854,0.00004515093,0.0001100336,0.00008811676,0.0007052463,0.0004466705,0.00008147051,0.0004608192,0.000003222225],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003409563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004563622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009440967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00476184,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981466,0.0002144478,0.000270301,0.00008181497,0.001114241,0.0001726124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993002,0.0002427234,0.0001994661,0.00005226511,0.0001671434,0.00003816116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000453805,0.0001016995,0.0004126345,3.491564e-7,0.00006130824,0.00006676812,0.01207552,0.003110498,0.00002085029,0.9830469,0.0006034159,0.0004547099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007312724,0.0002243091,0.01546715,0.000104252,0.00005388709,0.00009235482,0.4076959,0.00007247247,0.00004966306,0.4079724,0.1673301,0.0002062058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7164475,0.0005116151,0.0001177214,0.1780954,0.002956247,0.0001687982,0.00005858112,0.000009314161,0.1016348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975555,0.00006198981,0.000009492715,0.0009909077,0.001152133,0.00000923949,0.000002535143,0.000003954548,0.0002142553],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5750745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125260050","doi":"10.1515/ijld-2017-0002","title":"Arguments of statutory interpretation and argumentation schemes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Discourse","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Defeasible estate; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory interpretation; Defeasible reasoning; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Statutory law; Inference; Computer science; Mathematics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Fabrizio Macagno","is_ca":false},{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01467202955076423,"gpt":0.3397208606678457,"spread":0.3250488311170814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003248611,0.00007564852,0.0001304083,0.000155634,0.00006956539,0.0003227131,0.0007051498,0.00002573894,0.00001116294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001067924,0.00006427675,0.00006711359,0.00001857186,0.00006366582,0.002656454,0.0001103685,0.00008216075,0.000002921237],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004885144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006904589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005638521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008536585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988471,0.00003815694,0.0004159299,0.0001064553,0.0005186598,0.00007364683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982227,0.0000299217,0.0011519,0.0001733227,0.0003691788,0.00005299042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005794959,0.001003654,0.1455527,0.0001202859,0.001396001,0.0002580307,0.01116738,0.000605788,0.1009482,0.2972283,0.002368662,0.4387715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006969491,0.0006907354,0.8429687,0.001361203,0.0001098996,0.0003975815,0.001172163,0.07419021,0.0573415,0.0060759,0.008149073,0.0005735715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7912658,0.0001301362,0.2042388,0.001513222,0.002073605,0.00007053309,0.000006837864,0.000005692704,0.0006953391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948297,0.00004884225,0.004761464,0.00004673708,0.000145264,0.000001250439,0.000002154296,0.000003980211,0.0001606101],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6974159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3111929,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771314859","doi":"10.1515/ijld-2017-0016","title":"Legal system: an additional variable in the analysis of short-term diachronic evolution of legal terminology","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Discourse","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Variation (astronomy); Term (time); Linguistics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Katia Peruzzo","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0334637849087395,"gpt":0.3193381833314398,"spread":0.2858743984227002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004425785,0.0001414021,0.0004513899,0.00052444,0.0002159711,0.0002115283,0.001045247,0.00005321343,0.0005345212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002015357,0.00009826002,0.0002678816,0.00003917588,0.0008245988,0.0008436385,0.00009902972,0.0002533394,0.000001844333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001384344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000243433,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001787207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003721658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982883,0.000100016,0.000762634,0.0001451332,0.0005292239,0.0001747012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977689,0.0001490986,0.0009375663,0.0002833662,0.0008265501,0.00003448501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001174489,0.0004228512,0.01089817,0.0000195265,0.001906619,0.0002568298,0.001746043,0.0001800308,0.0000949117,0.9830835,0.0008018126,0.0004722892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003307227,0.001450885,0.8645881,0.0009615031,0.005301379,0.0007569028,0.02482697,0.006220278,0.0001440048,0.007168976,0.08450688,0.0007668965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9574209,0.0002367946,0.0001905558,0.0007988918,0.002740456,0.00009885847,0.001893363,0.000006516149,0.03661364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980524,0.00001340383,0.0000648373,0.00002580944,0.00140585,0.000006759932,0.00008484455,0.000007858499,0.0003382784],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9759145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5852633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114910121","doi":"10.1515/ijld-2020-2039","title":"The semiotic puzzle: Authentic languages & international law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Discourse","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Legal translation; Human rights; Convention; Political science; Linguistics; International law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; History; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Clara Chapdelaine-Feliciati","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02221681016427631,"gpt":0.3688770784409022,"spread":0.3466602682766259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006271842,0.0001274974,0.0001504945,0.00007673566,0.0004786589,0.0006812537,0.001740549,0.00005652914,0.0008629741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004604527,0.00008732479,0.0002449353,0.00005377081,0.0005113417,0.0007897454,0.00009512666,0.000342915,0.0001814528],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001771643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002309331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004034347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002169194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973658,0.0001427026,0.0005067696,0.0001437707,0.00161298,0.0002279906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981301,0.0002465733,0.0004295681,0.00009609009,0.0008953452,0.0002022547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001146391,0.00006545362,0.0001592705,0.000001422888,0.000264298,0.0001317859,0.003753651,0.00004973964,0.0001234909,0.9886351,0.005860297,0.0008408332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005608851,0.00004118053,0.0004880414,0.00005822001,0.00004060661,0.00005605495,0.001704571,0.00007028466,0.0001212956,0.03038755,0.9663205,0.0001507721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2556829,0.0004441871,0.001629189,0.3199273,0.01202881,0.0002355855,0.00008412744,0.00007713901,0.4098908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777101,0.0000695381,0.0002170625,0.001885485,0.005035032,0.000002165,0.00001183107,0.00001447325,0.01505434],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9604602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9448962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884221379","doi":"10.1515/ijld-2018-2005","title":"The stories we tell victims: Victim participation and outreach programs at the extraordinary chambers in the courts of Cambodia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Discourse","topic":"Cambodian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Outreach; Economic Justice; Prioritization; Public relations; Bridging (networking); Political science; Restorative justice; Work (physics); Relevance (law); Narrative; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Business; Engineering; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"Tine Destrooper","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02527731196649556,"gpt":0.3681620508621119,"spread":0.3428847388956163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001824283,0.00008457001,0.0001140725,0.00003245477,0.0006763441,0.0001964656,0.0004816801,0.00005011325,0.00004113213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001694266,0.00004433684,0.0001144396,0.0001074149,0.001992502,0.0004247152,0.00004451904,0.0002193558,0.000003445747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002262148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002324886,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009428382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01003277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982966,0.0003236293,0.0003369421,0.00008899005,0.0007794458,0.0001744616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987589,0.0003401205,0.0003623898,0.0001122635,0.0003706944,0.00005564942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005680561,0.0004816261,0.07299077,0.000008546041,0.0002747554,0.00007806701,0.8314317,0.00005146161,0.0002401633,0.04596331,0.01899645,0.02891508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007660298,0.0004129218,0.05128694,0.0001424722,0.0001054353,0.00008063338,0.2290277,0.0001342041,0.0001207061,0.001774071,0.7159544,0.0001945209],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9652137,0.0009026912,0.0000196477,0.02564718,0.001263048,0.0001613887,0.000007495888,0.000004398058,0.006780406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976352,0.0004405011,0.00002612494,0.000154104,0.0007259525,0.000008824878,0.000001586952,0.000005506964,0.001002142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6969579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7341456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}