{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":21,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":21,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"0aacd79d19a5","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Product Development"}},"results":[{"id":"W1998914217","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2012.051161","title":"Towards innovation in Living Labs networks","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Living lab; Open innovation; Knowledge management; Assisted living; New product development; Product (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); User innovation; Innovation management; Engineering; Business; Computer science; Marketing; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02863897177759931,"gpt":0.2660056846007547,"spread":0.2373667128231554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003068389,0.0001262697,0.0001656449,0.000968489,0.00006497072,0.00007034695,0.0004267926,0.00006997999,0.00009454529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007504407,0.0001148817,0.0000276491,0.000932062,0.0000439019,0.00115996,0.0002715755,0.00031177,0.00002967093],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002902274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001266844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007731046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004720536,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983487,0.00001396752,0.0008254495,0.0001136828,0.0004505604,0.0002476009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982146,0.00002063142,0.0006373884,0.00006778649,0.001052813,0.000006752016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006380118,0.0004597944,0.5438736,0.00002911315,0.0002369721,0.00002655456,0.002306803,0.0001262953,0.0002746759,0.1661975,0.003178064,0.2832268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004418777,0.000005666021,0.8293351,0.0002147814,0.000008922801,0.00003205991,0.0006469995,0.00007566725,0.00215777,0.003400585,0.1633779,0.000302719],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665899,0.0003241725,0.01182085,0.003175382,0.006486797,0.0001725334,2.026258e-7,0.00004196967,0.01138817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870838,0.00001201371,0.009142728,0.001137312,0.002479462,0.000009712784,0.000007444366,0.00001248208,0.0001150294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2854615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4684739,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027504238","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2007.012496","title":"Manufacturing Process Management: iterative synchronisation of engineering data with manufacturing realities","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Manufacturing Process and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Concurrent engineering; Product lifecycle; Design for manufacturability; Product engineering; Systems engineering; Product data management; Process development execution system; Manufacturing execution system; Manufacturing engineering; Product design; Engineering; Collaborative engineering; Computer-integrated manufacturing; New product development; Product management; Process (computing); Computer science; Product (mathematics); Process integration; Work in process; Operations management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01250365740250842,"gpt":0.2421224498916784,"spread":0.22961879248917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005576694,0.0001811103,0.000189139,0.0004132958,0.00003512731,0.00006306551,0.0005863996,0.0000308386,0.00002810947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016756,0.0001542956,0.0000224417,0.0000613557,0.0000192764,0.0006756396,0.00008030577,0.000157742,0.000001360373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001911944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004959943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002332301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004958672,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998333,0.00000623298,0.0006480182,0.0001795391,0.0006433368,0.0001898321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992188,0.00002943063,0.0002768126,0.0001873982,0.0002334261,0.00005419309],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002151715,0.00008403087,0.000518162,0.001160452,0.001307701,0.0001558348,0.004869714,0.8274034,0.0003591882,0.0001777159,0.0001040012,0.1636446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006464499,0.00003217468,0.01400656,0.0007004183,0.00003835402,0.0001427426,0.0004190218,0.002506872,0.9738622,0.00007961322,0.007273744,0.0002918265],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7547683,0.0003443673,0.2418007,0.00009600305,0.001063056,0.0002357455,0.00001062459,0.0000845223,0.001596693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9608076,0.0001054298,0.03871383,0.000009345918,0.0002268462,0.000003117246,0.00004561174,0.00002796883,0.00006026137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9735031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6291994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125530092","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2008.019239","title":"Good theory: developing a foundation for project management","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"Athabasca University","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Project management; Developing country; Management theory; Extreme project management; Frame (networking); Project management triangle; Engineering; Project charter; Program management; Engineering management; Management science; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; OPM3; Computer science; Political science; Systems engineering; Economics; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1542383511128897,"gpt":0.4049594250014155,"spread":0.2507210738885258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003867469,0.0001372711,0.0002016497,0.001029938,0.0002188982,0.0001755086,0.0009845156,0.00002224447,0.0001193944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006393522,0.0001029233,0.0001098375,0.0004478025,0.00005875512,0.0007085207,0.0001656408,0.00009146013,0.0000592025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000237071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005467501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001085944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003061584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966161,0.00007412968,0.001112075,0.0002842509,0.00173658,0.000176813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969604,0.0001896115,0.0007931982,0.000178587,0.001842149,0.00003603408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004598589,0.00008775687,0.01194467,0.0000195571,0.0005299231,0.00004538858,0.002617673,0.00006471451,0.00006639118,0.04101465,0.01306783,0.9300816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001020708,0.00004694607,0.02364404,0.00006294254,0.00001499343,0.0003804727,0.0005543702,0.00005912665,0.003272315,0.0135027,0.9572503,0.0001910801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3337162,0.0003149921,0.6271513,0.006603625,0.01310859,0.001567991,0.000005549152,0.00006185832,0.01746995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7125821,0.0002298261,0.2696453,0.0003880339,0.0008510504,0.00005907104,0.00001287612,0.00001735125,0.01621448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9441825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.419709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113882176","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2012.051150","title":"A 'living laboratory' environment for exploring innovative RFID-enabled supply chain management models","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Process management; Supply chain management; Systems engineering; Living lab; New product development; Knowledge management; Process (computing); Negotiation; Product (mathematics); Engineering; Computer science; Engineering management; Business; Human–computer interaction; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04952133234837808,"gpt":0.2441713403147096,"spread":0.1946500079663315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002785533,0.0002516742,0.0002771865,0.0007836252,0.0002129831,0.0001080861,0.000634308,0.00006341382,0.0000768915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001674562,0.0002341952,0.00006428151,0.000521487,0.00007250105,0.002189136,0.0004717943,0.0002419159,0.00003816454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005273245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001011847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002841301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.749709e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977291,0.00001912413,0.0008511823,0.0002491426,0.0007162702,0.0004352452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978108,0.00004478237,0.0007658975,0.0001420321,0.001215416,0.00002106207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004152481,0.001613962,0.05308961,0.0003701332,0.003294815,0.00006108169,0.01032067,0.0006192086,0.001898472,0.7244787,0.008129537,0.1957085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00220347,0.00003703806,0.09537602,0.0006088954,0.00009476343,0.00002579936,0.006275222,0.000144088,0.01652651,0.01502687,0.8625323,0.001149012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8500038,0.0007484535,0.1254188,0.00516062,0.009438748,0.001643242,0.00001028225,0.0001571611,0.007418828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9283113,0.00005907484,0.06826667,0.000858849,0.001922695,0.0002541481,0.00001911258,0.00003543783,0.0002726842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8544028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9550203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116100874","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2008.020396","title":"Localisation and the design and production of sustainable products","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Sustainable Design and Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Sustainable design; Product design; Conceptual design; Design for the Environment; Order (exchange); Engineering; Diversity (politics); Product (mathematics); Sustainable production; Systems engineering; Computer science; Business; Manufacturing engineering; Sustainability; Sociology; Mechanical engineering; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0136636566689225,"gpt":0.2019119726307208,"spread":0.1882483159617983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00133267,0.0001123639,0.0001742959,0.000221685,0.00007817011,0.00002539074,0.0001480182,0.00002238515,0.000004542563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000473472,0.00007826644,0.00001714582,0.0001519628,0.0001509486,0.0002754335,0.00004552298,0.0001082215,7.781018e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001593772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003059575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004134575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.728787e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987821,0.00005996192,0.0004734474,0.0001228008,0.0004251782,0.0001365037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985521,0.00005641206,0.0001632131,0.00008138668,0.001108845,0.00003797197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008577228,0.001055566,0.01533576,0.003206661,0.006593578,0.00201187,0.2535938,0.1612157,0.04547504,0.03578998,0.0871074,0.3800374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006604129,0.0001855252,0.06002406,0.0003143293,0.00009219148,0.006833289,0.006701322,0.002122499,0.7846386,0.006864302,0.1248044,0.0008153365],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9447851,0.004993421,0.04259959,0.004580152,0.001836155,0.0009057188,2.660813e-7,0.00004242785,0.0002572275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743012,0.0009499161,0.02390584,0.00002767878,0.000186882,0.00001450448,0.000001178629,0.00001244471,0.0006003104],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7391636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3191613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507722200","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2016.078866","title":"A conceptual framework on the role of creativity in sustaining continuous innovation in new product development","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; New product development; Context (archaeology); Innovation management; Knowledge management; Pace; Product innovation; Conceptual framework; Key (lock); Product (mathematics); Process management; Business; Conceptual model; Marketing; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04482533591067837,"gpt":0.3557284452546559,"spread":0.3109031093439775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001928389,0.0001396502,0.0002226288,0.0006349956,0.00003559552,0.00002568984,0.0005163898,0.00003919363,0.0003850488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003982439,0.00008827299,0.00002748097,0.0005911532,0.0001330551,0.0001720109,0.00006617432,0.0002726602,0.00001998196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004073379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001523432,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002585407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003170771,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976704,0.0001809585,0.001017287,0.0002741814,0.0006451829,0.0002120446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978679,0.000604331,0.0007261952,0.0001768208,0.0005886614,0.00003606335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000507254,0.001006985,0.3162239,0.000003143107,0.00008399293,0.00003553549,0.05958291,0.00001722005,0.01299957,0.09431419,0.0009215734,0.5143037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009949745,0.0001248045,0.7090536,0.0007323148,0.000003329569,0.00007405467,0.00667785,8.160632e-7,0.2002138,0.003761042,0.0781474,0.0002160728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865565,0.0001131951,0.0009743628,0.009269834,0.001412282,0.0002547719,0.0000013723,0.000006323576,0.001411346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953043,0.00001060193,0.002960632,0.0002662171,0.000228155,0.00001666522,9.938905e-7,0.000009399299,0.001203034],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5140877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4767639,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066639344","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2011.042026","title":"The effects of managerial output control and team autonomy on the speed of new product development: the moderating effect of product newness","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Autonomy; New product development; Product (mathematics); Control (management); Business; Product innovation; Sample (material); Process management; Marketing; Economics; Management; Mathematics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05472165095065659,"gpt":0.306881722336077,"spread":0.2521600713854204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009595198,0.0002292268,0.0004599823,0.0003308821,0.0002753392,0.0001274853,0.001394549,0.00003027077,0.00003148045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009332351,0.00009855325,0.0001067829,0.0004124596,0.0002334775,0.0002263968,0.0002335447,0.0002729292,0.00000496851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008815861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009346647,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001433538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000522063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949921,0.0004006498,0.001965964,0.0003311835,0.002098406,0.0002117055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932071,0.001806084,0.002498169,0.0003874389,0.002044019,0.00005717591],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00195581,0.0002619252,0.01663546,0.0001019251,0.000868374,0.00001116653,0.02492189,0.0002520156,0.01733001,0.00389054,0.003411783,0.9303591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003196146,0.0004339998,0.1062369,0.0006458523,0.00006119149,0.0001337878,0.0007382961,0.000441458,0.8603259,0.002054095,0.02543411,0.0002982129],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889554,0.0004145208,0.001175432,0.003301885,0.002970911,0.0009818316,0.000001723323,0.000007350638,0.002190976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954146,0.00001130426,0.002823023,0.0001088718,0.0004146403,0.000009687215,8.660068e-7,0.00001324656,0.001203761],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9300609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990125,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014288437","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2009.026178","title":"Approximated unimodal region elimination-based global optimisation method for engineering design","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmark (surveying); Computation; Global optimization; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Field (mathematics); Ideal (ethics); Function (biology); Algorithm; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02460793354931061,"gpt":0.3084243863992482,"spread":0.2838164528499376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007956442,0.0001648974,0.0001727992,0.0002927851,0.00006671204,0.000125786,0.0007557128,0.00004130465,0.000002435975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000611379,0.0001592516,0.00006890484,0.0003188172,0.000009946696,0.0006989315,0.0000358331,0.00009706421,0.00000163242],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000793639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005288806,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":6.216266e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.354537e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983065,0.00005934509,0.0005719764,0.0002814331,0.000600613,0.0001801884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970074,0.000122853,0.000504759,0.0001474462,0.00213791,0.00007963173],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008876543,0.0001433195,0.00001991647,0.000004947274,0.00006492079,0.00001979798,0.0002778365,0.7304615,0.0008978405,0.004963655,0.0001391734,0.2629183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001352122,0.0001394845,0.00232831,0.00006721314,0.000008858284,0.0001841771,0.00001228006,0.9401788,0.05169965,0.001695805,0.002106431,0.0002268712],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001330821,0.00005172358,0.9937846,0.004630978,0.0009698887,0.0003337941,0.000001344383,0.0000650113,0.00002955897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06394194,0.000005452098,0.9355641,0.0002525653,0.0001754726,0.00001490783,0.000009513347,0.000008208274,0.00002783179],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2626914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6494094,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034225708","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2009.026175","title":"Matrix-based decomposition algorithms for engineering applications: the survey and generic framework","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Product Development and Customization","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Design structure matrix; Decomposition; Matrix decomposition; Matrix (chemical analysis); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Algorithm; Matrix multiplication; Theoretical computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Systems engineering; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01937702514256057,"gpt":0.2791244410310668,"spread":0.2597474158885063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001052827,0.0001242013,0.000125462,0.0002639623,0.0001240517,0.0002473167,0.0003389584,0.0000305376,0.0000110938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000270856,0.00009453944,0.00003752138,0.0002400831,0.00001419411,0.0004322782,0.00003303492,0.0001010572,0.000007265963],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008188175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001011189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002595507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001505943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989085,0.000008375146,0.0004311879,0.0001654532,0.0003574201,0.0001291328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985505,0.00007004374,0.0003733646,0.00008983137,0.000903925,0.0000123794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006445966,0.0005137267,0.02638066,0.000152148,0.0004951148,0.0000125533,0.0004195897,0.009599854,0.00385891,0.01799745,0.008367275,0.9315581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001908124,0.00004266146,0.4613501,0.0002617977,0.00008151078,0.00006395009,0.00006103999,0.01199849,0.008256439,0.009944776,0.5053017,0.0007294652],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08367805,0.001269249,0.8977575,0.01427506,0.002006308,0.0008742216,0.000003840258,0.00006098394,0.0000747544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8728054,0.00003446423,0.1228364,0.001451837,0.002671181,0.00004716315,0.00009184383,0.00001707196,0.00004467233],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9308286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3855206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131599256","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2012.051160","title":"Developing professional competencies using a Living Lab approach: an exploratory study in the field of management education","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Living lab; Artifact (error); Scope (computer science); Engineering; Knowledge management; Engineering management; Set (abstract data type); Field (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Computer science; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0669709610421585,"gpt":0.3347829509665686,"spread":0.2678119899244101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003700748,0.0001466285,0.0001929555,0.0006821134,0.0001375014,0.0000587458,0.0007663238,0.00004469868,0.00001617286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002299297,0.0001090827,0.00003310698,0.0005261429,0.00004963235,0.001191431,0.0003460739,0.0002548105,0.000003021293],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002242442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003375042,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001323408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001076285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981137,0.00008423825,0.0007356917,0.0001503545,0.0007166031,0.0001994486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984471,0.00005751,0.0006566149,0.0001271775,0.0007031624,0.000008397086],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001324039,0.006476559,0.6687477,0.0002464972,0.000556892,0.00001939882,0.06876938,0.00005502104,0.0002423146,0.1702725,0.0006749216,0.08380647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006469442,0.00003589528,0.7833171,0.0006135518,0.00005303464,0.00003987958,0.1955924,0.00005317053,0.001086804,0.00285226,0.01527756,0.0004313765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922541,0.000125625,0.002752458,0.0007753136,0.002170144,0.0004212332,1.563078e-7,0.00001194065,0.001488982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569651,0.000005095782,0.04121248,0.001007001,0.0007208415,0.00004233162,0.000004736328,0.00001032807,0.00003209318],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1674202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4448263,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241223412","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2017.087365","title":"An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach for risk evaluation of new product in a pipe industry","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; TOPSIS; Ideal solution; Analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy logic; Ranking (information retrieval); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; New product development; Product (mathematics); Fuzzy number; Engineering; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Reliability engineering; Data mining; Fuzzy set; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3365760225838111,"gpt":0.5020920421712596,"spread":0.1655160195874485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02563665,0.0002164266,0.0004841645,0.001166046,0.0001374062,0.0006166935,0.003238153,0.0001128807,0.000174929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03610039,0.0001592016,0.0001267025,0.0002906145,0.00008840771,0.001367294,0.0002200943,0.0005206915,0.00000872396],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004369147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002570909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007931736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000594007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915514,0.0004338065,0.002277986,0.0006143046,0.004888944,0.0002335561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871428,0.000252328,0.003493976,0.0008496611,0.008103507,0.0001577042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005583701,0.0004431766,0.06948326,0.000005082616,0.000129367,0.000008023067,0.003261775,0.00509368,0.003776667,0.0000613056,0.002728753,0.9144505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006348399,0.0001922036,0.8672181,0.0003716028,0.00007636574,0.0001722406,0.001763107,0.0160718,0.05828165,0.01923902,0.02975522,0.0005103078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560853,0.0002061454,0.03842289,0.001339242,0.002854703,0.000708175,0.00002006633,0.000007102491,0.0003563384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8156963,0.00000760378,0.1832858,0.00002996675,0.0006360574,0.00001656815,0.000009640538,0.00001474819,0.000303323],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9139403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.972019,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252612491","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2016.083624","title":"Life-cycle costing of an aircraft wing project with innovative materials using an eco-demonstrator","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Life Cycle Costing Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Activity-based costing; Life cycle costing; Cost driver; Engineering; Process (computing); Systems engineering; Manufacturing engineering; Transport engineering; Computer science; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03873166319522733,"gpt":0.2848560346973472,"spread":0.2461243715021199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001488876,0.0001965433,0.0003330705,0.0007726321,0.00009989772,0.0002255124,0.0005432511,0.00003334696,0.0000781722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013275,0.0001301768,0.00003797285,0.0005197911,0.00006961341,0.002678,0.0001303271,0.00009586964,0.000007055743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001812912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007645939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001148819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002171661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976609,0.00004167901,0.0009901169,0.0002779435,0.0008151584,0.0002141551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949678,0.00004628672,0.00164787,0.0001603206,0.003143209,0.00003451949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001017106,0.0009708557,0.1756923,0.0001814835,0.002070555,0.0002147806,0.001374859,0.001364791,0.7028223,0.0004859889,0.0003498613,0.1134551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007920324,0.0003506973,0.26264,0.006388024,0.0005354316,0.0005816926,0.003748254,0.002206327,0.7022218,0.001230924,0.009933757,0.002242849],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958341,0.00001482133,0.002496697,0.0007506094,0.0005752737,0.0001418379,0.000004321498,0.0000279785,0.0001543473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705105,0.000001844579,0.02725248,0.0002667078,0.001904651,0.00000334668,0.000009846241,0.00003065882,0.00001992098],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1112122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5308456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084714953","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2006.009361","title":"Measuring changes in software product line an experience report","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Product line; Software; Software product line; New product development; Computer science; Engineering; Systems engineering; Product (mathematics); Manufacturing engineering; Software engineering; Software development; Business; Operating system; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07754296224781256,"gpt":0.3218828820311485,"spread":0.2443399197833359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00151894,0.0001548386,0.0002079014,0.0004145014,0.00003698702,0.00008847258,0.001270037,0.00002397454,0.000004133121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002067421,0.0001390188,0.0000309825,0.0002507449,0.00002985651,0.000879143,0.0002190339,0.0002062195,0.000002147873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003499985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000290787,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001166172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003368826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997847,0.00006719125,0.0006697683,0.0003679918,0.0008256884,0.00022237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983757,0.00009461491,0.0004106035,0.0003122823,0.0007541623,0.00005269309],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009348246,0.0006535557,0.0504052,0.00005175811,0.0001238936,0.005996658,0.009587677,0.1939713,0.0362952,0.0009303014,0.0002628604,0.7016281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000731032,0.000121007,0.186225,0.0003527438,0.000004397609,0.005470836,0.000111286,0.0002075638,0.7784321,0.007301236,0.02035328,0.0006894215],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1911102,0.0004161714,0.8048015,0.001105668,0.002375186,0.00008617702,2.919152e-7,0.00008768654,0.00001708923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3277686,0.00001405275,0.6715629,0.00003165503,0.0004874735,0.00001019977,0.000002024497,0.000008851089,0.0001143185],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.742137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5669023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761500406","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2017.10008341","title":"An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach for risk evaluation of new product in a pipe industry","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; TOPSIS; Ideal solution; Analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy logic; Ranking (information retrieval); Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Product (mathematics); New product development; Fuzzy number; Computer science; Engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Reliability engineering; Data mining; Fuzzy set; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3365760225838111,"gpt":0.5020920421712596,"spread":0.1655160195874485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02563665,0.0002164266,0.0004841645,0.001166046,0.0001374062,0.0006166935,0.003238153,0.0001128807,0.000174929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03610039,0.0001592016,0.0001267025,0.0002906145,0.00008840771,0.001367294,0.0002200943,0.0005206915,0.00000872396],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004369147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002570909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007931736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000594007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915514,0.0004338065,0.002277986,0.0006143046,0.004888944,0.0002335561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871428,0.000252328,0.003493976,0.0008496611,0.008103507,0.0001577042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005583701,0.0004431766,0.06948326,0.000005082616,0.000129367,0.000008023067,0.003261775,0.00509368,0.003776667,0.0000613056,0.002728753,0.9144505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006348399,0.0001922036,0.8672181,0.0003716028,0.00007636574,0.0001722406,0.001763107,0.0160718,0.05828165,0.01923902,0.02975522,0.0005103078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560853,0.0002061454,0.03842289,0.001339242,0.002854703,0.000708175,0.00002006633,0.000007102491,0.0003563384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8156963,0.00000760378,0.1832858,0.00002996675,0.0006360574,0.00001656815,0.000009640538,0.00001474819,0.000303323],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9139403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.972019,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386298688","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2023.133056","title":"What makes a product manager A dynamic capabilities view of product management","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; New product development; Dynamic capabilities; Knowledge management; Function (biology); Product (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Process management; Task (project management); Business; Engineering; Marketing; Computer science; Systems engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01997110146060723,"gpt":0.2672765830455476,"spread":0.2473054815849403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002147833,0.0003065803,0.0004013958,0.001901917,0.0001114173,0.0004514205,0.0009653555,0.00002539037,0.000204051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002089486,0.0002655971,0.00014636,0.00128457,0.00009569363,0.001679701,0.0005717808,0.0001879029,0.0004167279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002351237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001075504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007121645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002140672,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964036,0.00002723602,0.001379157,0.0004699652,0.001362675,0.000357354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996437,0.00002279151,0.001003291,0.0003695233,0.002147319,0.00002007068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004541607,0.001199739,0.006763172,0.004190728,0.003033254,0.0005114354,0.003132976,0.0003602124,0.001570508,0.1135892,0.04549899,0.8196957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001415247,0.00002706816,0.03999771,0.001490274,0.0001366386,0.0000488413,0.005703284,0.0002104923,0.003355247,0.00728337,0.9396674,0.000664421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7209426,0.006532047,0.0007633278,0.0771273,0.05716306,0.004831486,0.00001035202,0.0006644245,0.1319654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788197,0.000649337,0.003146002,0.0008632424,0.001713929,0.00006669584,0.00006423001,0.0000541311,0.01462272],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8941684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108875588","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2008.016369","title":"Design-for-six-sigma for multiple response systems","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Six Sigma; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Sigma; Design for Six Sigma; Mathematical optimization; Control theory (sociology); Computer science; Control engineering; Control (management); Manufacturing engineering; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2444946671296656,"gpt":0.4820971252253927,"spread":0.2376024580957272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04113451,0.000187736,0.0003638853,0.0007770073,0.0001249484,0.0003160349,0.001436762,0.00006062127,0.00003639828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01930104,0.0001407778,0.0001721826,0.0002550736,0.00005762664,0.0004402915,0.000101239,0.000122385,0.00002383821],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005400893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006539044,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002399627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001417518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947192,0.0003711937,0.001913188,0.0003930978,0.00228305,0.000320276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876874,0.006871957,0.001089042,0.0002415695,0.003939538,0.0001705065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04028279,0.0005844607,0.002825393,0.00001919182,0.000678529,0.0001378996,0.005241606,0.01135428,0.6227718,0.0009896175,0.02784271,0.2872717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002449833,0.0004776414,0.007683799,0.00008943071,0.00001298424,0.0003487935,0.0009948397,0.001640023,0.6550435,0.001544807,0.3294058,0.0003084609],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.06786534,0.000561864,0.9231128,0.000988108,0.006595608,0.0007631832,0.000008327287,0.00001336886,0.00009138968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4261123,0.000003071653,0.5716941,0.00009573287,0.0005524186,0.00002819143,0.000001809839,0.00001704144,0.001495379],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3582469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9889598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605641189","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2016.10004480","title":"Life-cycle costing of an aircraft wing project with innovative materials using an eco-demonstrator","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Life Cycle Costing Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Activity-based costing; Life cycle costing; Cost driver; Engineering; Process (computing); Systems engineering; Manufacturing engineering; Aeronautics; Transport engineering; Computer science; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03873166319522733,"gpt":0.2848560346973472,"spread":0.2461243715021199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001488876,0.0001965433,0.0003330705,0.0007726321,0.00009989772,0.0002255124,0.0005432511,0.00003334696,0.0000781722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013275,0.0001301768,0.00003797285,0.0005197911,0.00006961341,0.002678,0.0001303271,0.00009586964,0.000007055743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001812912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007645939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001148819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002171661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976609,0.00004167901,0.0009901169,0.0002779435,0.0008151584,0.0002141551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949678,0.00004628672,0.00164787,0.0001603206,0.003143209,0.00003451949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001017106,0.0009708557,0.1756923,0.0001814835,0.002070555,0.0002147806,0.001374859,0.001364791,0.7028223,0.0004859889,0.0003498613,0.1134551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007920324,0.0003506973,0.26264,0.006388024,0.0005354316,0.0005816926,0.003748254,0.002206327,0.7022218,0.001230924,0.009933757,0.002242849],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958341,0.00001482133,0.002496697,0.0007506094,0.0005752737,0.0001418379,0.000004321498,0.0000279785,0.0001543473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705105,0.000001844579,0.02725248,0.0002667078,0.001904651,0.00000334668,0.000009846241,0.00003065882,0.00001992098],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1112122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5308456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049206658","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2013.058546","title":"An inquiry on managers use of decision-making tools in the core front end of the innovation process","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); New product development; Core (optical fiber); Front and back ends; Identification (biology); Process management; Product innovation; Product (mathematics); Knowledge management; Engineering; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08655201195818649,"gpt":0.35434428926587,"spread":0.2677922773076835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007424502,0.000071489,0.00009153711,0.0002681518,0.00001845396,0.00006249135,0.0004710526,0.00002009751,0.0001008337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008122405,0.00004411257,0.00002073266,0.0002468974,0.00002536632,0.0006873404,0.00001472093,0.0001700621,0.000004830739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001065375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001513466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004008436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004378968,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986598,0.00004308739,0.0005800818,0.00006868039,0.0005826051,0.0000656925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998538,0.0002602155,0.0003556781,0.0001330287,0.0007015651,0.00001153352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001969421,0.0005528732,0.01412028,0.00007408579,0.0002781353,0.00001339322,0.0396777,0.08201683,0.01037536,0.001965131,0.008843519,0.8418857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005403217,0.0000776146,0.9337051,0.001016211,0.00001782626,0.0001241239,0.004057041,0.001151785,0.03763743,0.003288957,0.0181582,0.0002254086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945492,0.00003159746,0.002709985,0.0007969342,0.001424092,0.0001821646,0.00000110225,0.000003881288,0.0003010147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928676,0.00001120128,0.006729835,0.0002393964,0.0001150009,0.000008287408,0.000002080278,0.000007326747,0.00001928791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9195848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1798858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607195755","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2016.10004479","title":"The relevance of configuration management in supply chain management in the aerospace industry","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Product Development and Customization","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Aerospace; Supply chain; Process management; Supply chain management; Relevance (law); Business; Product (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Reliability (semiconductor); Systems engineering; Manufacturing engineering; Engineering; Engineering management; Marketing; Aerospace engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01258193798662118,"gpt":0.2368992336274998,"spread":0.2243172956408786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002505709,0.0001567463,0.0001586316,0.0004869605,0.00007830331,0.0001328999,0.0009253297,0.00004488958,0.000041135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001978965,0.00008489597,0.0000416987,0.0004906015,0.00005957977,0.0007512205,0.0001522468,0.0002006233,0.00002665933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002256786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007155533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009292295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005522478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976704,0.00003945945,0.0008994511,0.0002163003,0.0009516067,0.0002227468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985839,0.00006895231,0.0007186853,0.0001945489,0.0004252795,0.000008601962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000789915,0.0005294872,0.07172894,0.0001365594,0.0005198421,0.0002494447,0.001775241,0.0003733702,0.001411347,0.09649162,0.02059461,0.8053996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032298,0.00001557362,0.4780493,0.0008564214,0.00003411953,0.00002665376,0.002041938,0.00003624275,0.00602389,0.006913466,0.5024157,0.0003568739],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8392852,0.0007877092,0.002135169,0.1323345,0.004663678,0.001722207,0.000001688371,0.00003097652,0.01903887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959603,0.000404857,0.001260767,0.0006297016,0.0004592924,0.00004116078,0.000005484987,0.00001257773,0.001225848],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8050427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3461957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974362856","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2013.052156","title":"Exploring the parametric design space to manage computational weld mechanics analyses using design of experiment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cwm; Parametric statistics; Welding; Parametric design; Design of experiments; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Distortion (music); Industrial engineering; Space (punctuation); Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; RDF","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2269312900758748,"gpt":0.3341213209552191,"spread":0.1071900308793443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004515598,0.0001333069,0.0001733832,0.0004298564,0.0000502472,0.00007231138,0.0004499069,0.00001767218,0.00004051573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001113306,0.00009395731,0.00005089491,0.0002954485,0.00001321908,0.0002338132,0.00008128784,0.0001148933,0.000006091558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002176318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006288894,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002407868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.479851e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985664,0.00004854884,0.0005118623,0.0001082972,0.0006245953,0.0001402924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990632,0.0001384047,0.0001723048,0.0000970117,0.0004699154,0.00005916298],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001505857,0.00003562532,0.00001658441,0.00001084951,0.0002804309,0.000009387064,0.0006095333,0.9751773,0.01700295,0.00006842166,0.0009235076,0.005850338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001798538,0.00007610102,0.001472327,0.0002333393,0.00002677402,0.00007294309,0.0002569278,0.03630702,0.9587719,0.001212096,0.001180003,0.0002106892],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2142103,0.0003513717,0.7841554,0.0003943237,0.0005938993,0.0002487907,5.33696e-7,0.00002676441,0.00001868468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6377175,0.00008676528,0.3620461,0.00001789795,0.00009303207,0.00001818606,5.091075e-7,0.00001225308,0.000007786357],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.941769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3831468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235374894","doi":"10.1504/ijpd.2016.083623","title":"The relevance of configuration management in supply chain management in the aerospace industry","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Product Development","topic":"Product Development and Customization","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Aerospace; Process management; Supply chain management; Supply chain; Business; Relevance (law); Product (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Systems engineering; Manufacturing engineering; Engineering; Engineering management; Marketing; Aerospace engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01258193798662118,"gpt":0.2368992336274998,"spread":0.2243172956408786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002505709,0.0001567463,0.0001586316,0.0004869605,0.00007830331,0.0001328999,0.0009253297,0.00004488958,0.000041135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001978965,0.00008489597,0.0000416987,0.0004906015,0.00005957977,0.0007512205,0.0001522468,0.0002006233,0.00002665933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002256786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007155533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009292295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005522478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976704,0.00003945945,0.0008994511,0.0002163003,0.0009516067,0.0002227468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985839,0.00006895231,0.0007186853,0.0001945489,0.0004252795,0.000008601962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000789915,0.0005294872,0.07172894,0.0001365594,0.0005198421,0.0002494447,0.001775241,0.0003733702,0.001411347,0.09649162,0.02059461,0.8053996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032298,0.00001557362,0.4780493,0.0008564214,0.00003411953,0.00002665376,0.002041938,0.00003624275,0.00602389,0.006913466,0.5024157,0.0003568739],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8392852,0.0007877092,0.002135169,0.1323345,0.004663678,0.001722207,0.000001688371,0.00003097652,0.01903887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959603,0.000404857,0.001260767,0.0006297016,0.0004592924,0.00004116078,0.000005484987,0.00001257773,0.001225848],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8050427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3461957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}