{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":49,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":49,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"0e03125a4264","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Project Management"}},"results":[{"id":"W2051526268","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006","title":"Does Agile work? — A quantitative analysis of agile project success","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":810,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Humber College","funders":"","keywords":"Agile software development; Process management; Project management; Stakeholder; Knowledge management; Quality (philosophy); Project management triangle; Business; Moderation; Engineering; Management science; Computer science; Systems engineering; Political science; Public relations","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.161762091088707,"gpt":0.4557616298500268,"spread":0.2939995387613198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004483751,0.0001989732,0.0005576429,0.005452146,0.00005388359,0.0003634336,0.001917092,0.0000464861,0.0003806101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006295752,0.0001151653,0.0004641628,0.004287709,0.0001432501,0.001057749,0.0004737223,0.0001773141,0.0000335718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001638911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001863602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001654696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001123789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940959,0.0002556684,0.001620824,0.0003506601,0.003457404,0.0002195699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947996,0.0003358014,0.001905354,0.0003878624,0.002497499,0.00007386476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004155536,0.00117458,0.4612418,0.0000764677,0.02403774,0.0004908115,0.01414526,0.01191494,0.00009280148,0.04088175,0.1445701,0.2972181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006029276,0.001121587,0.1011609,0.00039579,0.003300725,0.00005010925,0.04130289,0.02101288,0.0006299895,0.01360674,0.8103679,0.001021254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8686298,0.0003480834,0.03547417,0.002067561,0.00927668,0.001217868,0.0001009775,0.00005868889,0.08282621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982453,0.0001784235,0.009558533,0.0001383645,0.0001815132,0.00001924085,0.00001239601,0.00001232963,0.007446187],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6657978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4864893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019363971","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.01.001","title":"Preparing project managers to deal with complexity – Advanced project management education","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":469,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Project management triangle; Extreme project management; Project management; OPM3; Project charter; Project manager; Project stakeholder; Program management; Project planning; Project risk management; Project management 2.0; Standardization; Engineering management; Knowledge management; Software project management; Project governance; Project portfolio management; Process management; Project sponsorship; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Systems engineering; Corporate governance; Software development","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1007203046994569,"gpt":0.4076500771176228,"spread":0.3069297724181659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001957345,0.0004057399,0.0004919356,0.004181852,0.0003176173,0.0004809757,0.002411437,0.0000542895,0.0001173344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006576739,0.0003093011,0.0002629784,0.002171996,0.0001816052,0.001485684,0.0007991866,0.0002918955,0.0001136143],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000494557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004206728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001406535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001098346,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931101,0.0001975015,0.001558383,0.0007686316,0.003880594,0.0004848161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965829,0.0001099572,0.001237956,0.000627772,0.001322841,0.000118615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002669332,0.0007584704,0.01083471,0.0001257332,0.001492466,0.0005572172,0.002973607,0.001566475,0.00002508468,0.01679905,0.1518264,0.8103715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002420479,0.0005766273,0.0194328,0.0003546734,0.0001309929,0.0007362896,0.007624664,0.0005154332,0.0001177508,0.001558717,0.965971,0.0005606001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4242108,0.0002296168,0.04849763,0.002273021,0.004926002,0.006843951,0.00002988272,0.0002378697,0.5127512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7204987,0.0007229829,0.237999,0.001220268,0.0006746963,0.0003550187,0.00002448276,0.00006532729,0.03843948],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8141446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079252750","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.03.005","title":"Critical success factors for World Bank projects: An empirical investigation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":442,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Critical success factor; Construct (python library); Project charter; Exploratory factor analysis; Engineering; Process management; Business; Project management triangle; Project management; Knowledge management; Engineering management; Marketing; Computer science; Systems engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2891634443338784,"gpt":0.4638366657197271,"spread":0.1746732213858487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037288,0.0002033437,0.0002809878,0.002346724,0.0001337418,0.0005163465,0.001709618,0.00005095631,0.0005939552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001265121,0.0001481404,0.0002362527,0.0008230001,0.0001681757,0.00233981,0.0002307959,0.0001846083,0.00002420892],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000145376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001367216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003231588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005752008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958932,0.0002416012,0.001262398,0.000386286,0.001952356,0.0002641378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965099,0.0006115019,0.0006931703,0.000307701,0.001758073,0.0001197199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00434956,0.0009499986,0.6974983,0.00009697402,0.0009688946,0.0001726104,0.01692179,0.00007636723,0.0001550462,0.05997641,0.06346516,0.1553689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004743774,0.002230047,0.4950165,0.0002829677,0.0003481304,0.000147043,0.0210669,0.006872981,0.004325953,0.1045996,0.3592496,0.00111655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8923962,0.00005086434,0.07247479,0.002475455,0.007817323,0.001205898,0.00003295958,0.00007782627,0.02346871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753788,0.00001658361,0.02143309,0.0004757884,0.0004272225,0.00003751847,0.000008255024,0.00001710926,0.002205588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2957844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6503392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078601146","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.07.009","title":"Stakeholder management for public private partnerships","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Public-Private Partnership Projects","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":422,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Business; Public–private partnership; Stakeholder management; Public administration; Process management; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; General partnership; Public relations; Political science; Finance; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1313404757102769,"gpt":0.3020763233225671,"spread":0.1707358476122902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00154476,0.0003416045,0.0003268828,0.002146894,0.0001391545,0.001317963,0.001656379,0.00007375702,0.0001205369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008410308,0.0003071859,0.000307451,0.000680037,0.0000685148,0.002397294,0.0005619806,0.0001973611,0.0001058636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002831914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004167734,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002824509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003094596,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965758,0.00002863561,0.001033047,0.0004014304,0.001358842,0.000602264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974921,0.00005467957,0.001148832,0.0003275658,0.0009501296,0.00002674081],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002943143,0.0005599606,0.003731368,0.0003480919,0.0009029479,0.0002972946,0.00002408276,0.0001212158,0.00007557579,0.8554181,0.1253652,0.01286192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003089028,0.0000360404,0.004422835,0.0001271764,0.0001783614,0.00002354071,0.0003261198,0.0005349605,0.0001037686,0.02377094,0.9670107,0.0003765479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1229583,0.0005673383,0.08407533,0.04178119,0.01238006,0.006819784,0.00004050962,0.0006695976,0.7307079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771069,0.00004644624,0.01123166,0.002154929,0.004284833,0.0001911451,0.0001027583,0.00008145476,0.004799905],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8541486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999938,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123114061","doi":"10.1016/s0263-7863(01)00045-x","title":"Understanding and managing risks in large engineering projects","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Capital Investment and Risk Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":347,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Hydro-Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Risk management; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Coping (psychology); Process (computing); Control (management); Finance; Economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1435363064313646,"gpt":0.2900436102705216,"spread":0.146507303839157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005332433,0.00008255535,0.0001729349,0.001267511,0.00002238262,0.0001009529,0.0001773811,0.00002332692,0.00004051973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001844466,0.0000844403,0.0000745393,0.0002236418,0.00001023366,0.0002852784,0.0000881059,0.0001067485,0.000009148134],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002794992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005034799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001065266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003334777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991748,0.000006138057,0.0004552602,0.0001315937,0.00008690331,0.0001452985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996123,0.0000150402,0.0002654393,0.0000592105,0.00002268958,0.0000253098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004516466,0.0001215064,0.1436897,0.00002788112,0.0004978979,0.0004753725,0.0009163911,0.0008846349,0.00000480986,0.8524377,0.0003711566,0.0005277908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01190521,0.0004313206,0.3042864,0.0009361386,0.0001844252,0.0004468372,0.01250614,0.2472061,0.00005759707,0.3009318,0.1196699,0.001438194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8818189,0.01135701,0.05767375,0.002609063,0.001830972,0.000512943,0.0000189721,0.0000345062,0.04414387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904392,0.007943499,0.001067019,0.00009074202,0.00009811107,0.000003912602,0.000002125697,0.000009004684,0.0003464322],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5515059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3443376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023121675","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.05.012","title":"Assessing risk and uncertainty inherent in Chinese highway projects using AHP","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":321,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Bidding; Macro; Engineering; Stakeholder; Project risk management; Transport engineering; Project management; Business; Operations research; Computer science; Project management triangle; Economics; Systems engineering; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1098178918033225,"gpt":0.4478232699552348,"spread":0.3380053781519123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007513733,0.000188776,0.000286481,0.002748307,0.0001004117,0.0007289324,0.000792885,0.00004890352,0.00008291415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004111251,0.0001336654,0.0001184345,0.001084767,0.00008478037,0.001471117,0.0004024351,0.0003009591,0.000007516801],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002740831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009081782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001956254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002304405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960201,0.0001654754,0.001330696,0.0003259531,0.001893191,0.0002645849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976887,0.0003281313,0.001161686,0.0002080881,0.0005518987,0.00006154003],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003226909,0.0001461619,0.4663951,0.00002025448,0.0001948613,0.0003433498,0.001215804,0.0017519,0.0001062629,0.001437266,0.0004990665,0.5275673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005338472,0.000235359,0.8823687,0.0004499689,0.0001028207,0.0004637197,0.01441883,0.03329182,0.0001548712,0.01284471,0.04971438,0.0006163202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9663241,0.000142669,0.02353951,0.0001985803,0.002054587,0.0003590367,0.000002680744,0.00001412542,0.007364747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903138,0.0002276776,0.008717646,0.0001012329,0.0003105879,0.000003228716,0.000001221856,0.00001001024,0.0003145869],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.526951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7029113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112478686","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.11.007","title":"Project portfolios in dynamic environments: Organizing for uncertainty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":232,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Project portfolio management; Dynamic capabilities; Portfolio; Project management; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Process management; Management science; Engineering management; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Systems engineering; Knowledge management; Business; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1178922316625185,"gpt":0.3942127273135563,"spread":0.2763204956510378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002749266,0.0001768413,0.0002706349,0.002321609,0.00005870936,0.0001631896,0.001465093,0.00004579174,0.0003662762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002513152,0.0001383247,0.0001914542,0.000691262,0.00006282327,0.0008046914,0.0002949493,0.0001598373,0.00003854226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002836017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009350399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000610932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007931388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965882,0.00008658426,0.001291642,0.0003290794,0.001449489,0.000254978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983531,0.0001190623,0.0009225665,0.0002676676,0.0003020229,0.00003561543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002812489,0.001249344,0.05659921,0.00007973996,0.001532591,0.0007014893,0.009534681,0.0008285554,0.0004166507,0.02664258,0.03160263,0.868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007292812,0.0007494079,0.05173917,0.0002878091,0.0001545593,0.0002631088,0.0188743,0.01058303,0.000563099,0.03128569,0.8774511,0.000755952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6581053,0.0005437103,0.1646056,0.002740643,0.01701065,0.006972307,0.00009230383,0.0001123239,0.1498172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784018,0.0003688656,0.01467001,0.0002528314,0.0001540871,0.00005415363,0.000006644242,0.00001992053,0.006071701],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8672441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5640717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228342825","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.11.007","title":"Complexity, uncertainty-reduction strategies, and project performance","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":166,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Complexity management; Reduction (mathematics); Complexity theory and organizations; Complexity science; Project management; Diversity (politics); Production (economics); Computer science; Management science; Operations research; Engineering; Knowledge management; Systems engineering; Business; Mathematics; Economics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04896794859961064,"gpt":0.295207575125266,"spread":0.2462396265256553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006335431,0.0001689074,0.0001651181,0.001118112,0.00009037354,0.0005135977,0.0004513167,0.0000309683,0.00008575783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002375483,0.0001142724,0.00006828624,0.0003548037,0.00009895843,0.001977993,0.0003289194,0.00009299301,0.00005917585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001450616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005007174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005435094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001643636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984636,0.00001472577,0.0005272428,0.0001972278,0.0006035875,0.0001936581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985701,0.00001229446,0.0005474166,0.000124069,0.0007377319,0.000008373476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003105902,0.0001923948,0.001241201,0.0002020712,0.0004106822,0.00005347747,0.0001135869,0.00001751701,0.0003912245,0.8442214,0.01455538,0.1382904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004918943,0.0001556989,0.007354695,0.000745079,0.0001719109,0.0001289253,0.006528577,0.001446862,0.0001551411,0.0233166,0.9545006,0.0005770385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2793113,0.0001633654,0.006664535,0.008178232,0.006880582,0.001325657,0.000006118704,0.0001676876,0.6973026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947835,0.0001795963,0.00097852,0.0004792761,0.001587902,0.00001687707,0.000007182559,0.00001698598,0.001950167],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9399452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4952634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992333321","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.09.007","title":"Project governance and its role in enabling organizational strategy implementation: A systematic literature review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Infection and Immunity; FURTHERMORE grants in publishing","keywords":"Project governance; Corporate governance; Systematic review; Typology; Project charter; Project management; Process management; Knowledge management; Field (mathematics); Business; Management science; Political science; Project management triangle; Engineering; Sociology; Computer science; Systems engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03513935301856388,"gpt":0.3797253805459475,"spread":0.3445860275273836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002923887,0.000180909,0.000409211,0.001017638,0.00004276777,0.0005052761,0.0008978295,0.00003694938,0.0005453496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002546844,0.0001341612,0.0001027824,0.001504242,0.00001602087,0.00135323,0.0002693883,0.0001975903,0.00005966988],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001526803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001365521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008974542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002193326,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957839,0.000202557,0.001478436,0.0003250793,0.002027595,0.0001824823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973124,0.0001539033,0.001233189,0.0002066111,0.001061589,0.00003232478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001108341,0.0009636434,0.1565397,0.09413473,0.003604905,0.0018001,0.01117428,0.001290144,0.000739084,0.4083435,0.0481868,0.2721148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02900713,0.002362443,0.1165335,0.350664,0.001182601,0.006500405,0.06080351,0.02470609,0.001148589,0.02879114,0.374072,0.004228547],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5306992,0.3352198,0.001970762,0.01223359,0.01155925,0.0209866,0.0002039797,0.0001532021,0.08697364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.924617,0.06767589,0.0009077471,0.0008548159,0.000259308,0.00006211128,0.00001850822,0.00002157487,0.005583032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3939178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5971196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979356537","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.12.003","title":"Knowledge management and project-based knowledge in it projects: A model and preliminary empirical results","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge value chain; Personal knowledge management; Project management; OPM3; Body of knowledge; Knowledge engineering; Project management triangle; Construct (python library); Empirical research; Organizational learning; Business; Computer science; Process management; Engineering; Systems engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08160186786524504,"gpt":0.3533305509754631,"spread":0.271728683110218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002126804,0.0003735812,0.0003660298,0.003326696,0.000108652,0.0003616347,0.0005766579,0.00009041793,0.000009719607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007291949,0.0003300647,0.0001085614,0.0009836853,0.00009951722,0.001278491,0.000971455,0.0002992103,0.00004434686],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002654503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007141936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002050408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004584269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972215,0.00005728343,0.001160566,0.0004215438,0.0006360384,0.0005030626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984878,0.00006349976,0.000638171,0.0002394636,0.0005362919,0.0000348126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006047828,0.008465277,0.02895926,0.004444842,0.00170758,0.0006152017,0.008667273,0.0002962111,0.00003556777,0.4860341,0.3432561,0.1114708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01520045,0.0002689247,0.02078771,0.001766153,0.0004978072,0.00006776,0.01575764,0.09392793,0.00003294368,0.001636827,0.8488604,0.001195497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03779745,0.001647736,0.002280468,0.003536969,0.002238316,0.002651185,0.00001100932,0.0001171694,0.9497197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873442,0.0002161783,0.005277549,0.001705293,0.001011696,0.0001365229,0.00002684029,0.00004780313,0.004233889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9495468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145228674","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.02.007","title":"Collaboration and opportunism in megaproject alliance contracts: The interplay between governance, trust and culture","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Cooperative Research Centres, Australian Government Department of Industry; Australian Government","keywords":"Opportunism; Megaproject; Alliance; Corporate governance; Business; Order (exchange); Industrial organization; Public relations; Knowledge management; Management; Economics; Political science; Market economy; Finance; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04918177898093495,"gpt":0.4002019048462584,"spread":0.3510201258653234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002098214,0.0001407681,0.0002565707,0.0002759841,0.0000837676,0.0007819618,0.0006059543,0.00004582318,0.00007964055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004457859,0.0000905864,0.00006209814,0.0006622319,0.0001043718,0.001025617,0.0003232972,0.0002343537,0.000004997125],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009306119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001174856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001773695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001485911,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973105,0.0001675474,0.0008692548,0.000280627,0.001225624,0.0001464603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981086,0.0002287548,0.0007220548,0.0001906375,0.0007082282,0.00004168133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003655464,0.0001272559,0.1466448,0.00003898026,0.0006955556,0.0007341486,0.00542446,0.00007025224,0.0001581934,0.03158307,0.05100346,0.7631543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001914808,0.0001027183,0.1144391,0.0001828086,0.0000608082,0.0002081691,0.007410882,0.000863857,0.0002477887,0.007575759,0.8668038,0.0001895806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8787364,0.005282606,0.005504544,0.04599227,0.004734662,0.001411804,0.00009287086,0.00003215404,0.05821272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982931,0.005953028,0.002257916,0.0006361618,0.0002871878,0.0000130753,0.000005351146,0.000007738834,0.007908532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8158003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7540476,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004487321","doi":"10.1016/s0263-7863(00)00042-9","title":"Working towards best practices in project management","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Institute for Humanities Research, Arizona State University","keywords":"Best practice; Context (archaeology); Business; Sample (material); Organizational culture; OPM3; Knowledge management; Public relations; Project management; Management; Program management; Political science; Computer science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3229584107183903,"gpt":0.4599885660550355,"spread":0.1370301553366452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003813848,0.0002613031,0.0003616368,0.004111556,0.00009759979,0.0008728135,0.002414641,0.00006061208,0.0008819255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003723413,0.0002067325,0.0002433032,0.001811364,0.00007860865,0.001486499,0.000695432,0.0003601329,0.0002830056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000297146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004363547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009906258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001050266,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937303,0.0002288164,0.001695517,0.0004953576,0.003481873,0.0003681217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964661,0.0001633665,0.002345217,0.000434986,0.0005358037,0.00005451751],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002368621,0.0004810853,0.0151026,0.00003169254,0.0005362442,0.001062223,0.001325299,0.0002428212,0.000006127819,0.007298479,0.04855206,0.9251245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001915563,0.000159161,0.003467108,0.0002834024,0.00007691092,0.0001759779,0.006091571,0.003412595,0.00002609018,0.001962933,0.9821455,0.0002832161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06386318,0.001225182,0.004204551,0.00553208,0.01077516,0.001738974,0.000006190643,0.00006605205,0.9125886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9014499,0.00478588,0.01584861,0.0005319085,0.0007501343,0.00006756027,0.000003078922,0.00002949172,0.07653347],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9335934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9656466,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800026723","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.02.007","title":"Governance-as-practice for major public infrastructure projects: A case of multilevel project governing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Conceptualization; Corporate governance; Ostensive definition; Project governance; Performative utterance; Process (computing); Process management; Knowledge management; Political science; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09028958687950508,"gpt":0.4295393342990354,"spread":0.3392497474195303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004051675,0.0002924615,0.0004490413,0.001442067,0.0002034011,0.0007331633,0.001889462,0.00009373233,0.0002723938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004561513,0.0002237204,0.0003535585,0.00106859,0.0002425438,0.00313122,0.0005987432,0.000276564,0.0000418076],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003067412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005157517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002182094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001061984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944881,0.0002003057,0.001832666,0.0005034705,0.00260235,0.0003730902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904485,0.0007490524,0.003292249,0.0004746697,0.004968397,0.00006717775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003074281,0.0005016429,0.003333471,0.0001525078,0.002056848,0.001187467,0.004631659,0.00004008832,0.0002619428,0.0706003,0.08326043,0.8308994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003850076,0.001075922,0.001204806,0.000188536,0.0001887817,0.00435531,0.0148983,0.002644583,0.0006789445,0.003324528,0.9672451,0.0003451195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5469468,0.0008957515,0.1990555,0.01103441,0.02239458,0.007806974,0.0006145962,0.0001632346,0.2110882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9384792,0.0003423493,0.05340595,0.0005612595,0.001191708,0.00007026686,0.000007362446,0.00003193765,0.005909933],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8839847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9123052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045088315","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.009","title":"Organisational project management: An historical approach to the study of PMOs","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Project management; Context (archaeology); Process management; PMOS logic; Knowledge management; Grounded theory; Positivism; Process (computing); Project charter; Engineering; Project management triangle; Business; Engineering management; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Systems engineering; Qualitative research; Social science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1242820601670663,"gpt":0.4085243065340134,"spread":0.2842422463669471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009381537,0.0002239033,0.0003573305,0.002663631,0.0001689403,0.0002356561,0.003057761,0.00004130353,0.0001169385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002315417,0.000144645,0.0001843971,0.001817451,0.0000529059,0.0007238581,0.0006534197,0.0002375955,0.00003728698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004921774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007325312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001217711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006110658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928929,0.0002696874,0.001960129,0.0004585751,0.004118994,0.0002997375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966832,0.0002542885,0.001217344,0.0006010473,0.001158016,0.0000860881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002484772,0.006714664,0.04035096,0.00007344007,0.002658902,0.0002580913,0.02081958,0.003593422,0.00003386627,0.05550465,0.1302924,0.7372152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003476697,0.001401137,0.08016606,0.00005576215,0.0002371436,0.0001629955,0.0576181,0.00126079,0.00006091344,0.002580829,0.8525548,0.0004247537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4996215,0.0001957791,0.2757788,0.002474955,0.01022915,0.006299811,0.00001869976,0.00008947944,0.2052918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700479,0.00003914589,0.01999054,0.0003380953,0.0006678709,0.00003881978,0.000004683875,0.0000201699,0.008852768],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7367905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5898452,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515615030","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.07.010","title":"Project management self-efficacy as a predictor of project performance: Constructing and validating a domain-specific scale","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Comparability; Project management triangle; Project management; Scale (ratio); OPM3; Domain (mathematical analysis); Program management; Set (abstract data type); Project planning; Software project management; Measure (data warehouse); Project manager; Engineering management; Knowledge management; Process management; Computer science; Engineering; Systems engineering; Software; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05127633460751074,"gpt":0.3559900418015657,"spread":0.3047137071940549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004031202,0.0003751332,0.0005661381,0.002984021,0.0001850452,0.0004520685,0.001664711,0.00008069979,0.0002207777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000125518,0.0002457435,0.0002820454,0.001187293,0.0002832711,0.001426144,0.0009827011,0.0002342587,0.00004089449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002503128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001786823,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001749209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003604473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931147,0.0002567769,0.002195625,0.0006630522,0.003321854,0.000448018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995797,0.0004200581,0.00211929,0.0005195361,0.001062033,0.00008202252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001331364,0.0006461673,0.05247973,0.0003117003,0.001983224,0.0002241652,0.004600663,0.00002075987,0.0008507674,0.02069558,0.01235352,0.9045023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01390382,0.001291176,0.02484672,0.002367737,0.000348756,0.001362079,0.02343117,0.0003690659,0.003519506,0.004391005,0.9231565,0.001012438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9343639,0.0001917738,0.005592134,0.0005039886,0.002214413,0.001674739,0.00002485955,0.00007719573,0.05535699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9359239,0.003138778,0.05641541,0.00009718299,0.0005599154,0.00007110146,0.000003918292,0.00004033588,0.00374945],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.910803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055272691","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.01.010","title":"A conceptualization of knowledge governance in project-based organizations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Relation (database); Corporate governance; Knowledge management; Context (archaeology); Process management; Macro; Engineering; Business; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04985275369409702,"gpt":0.3888321521506335,"spread":0.3389793984565365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002362831,0.0001327631,0.0002755228,0.001495737,0.00003925787,0.0001254513,0.001181478,0.00004067209,0.0002958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001055491,0.0001079635,0.0001057536,0.002102487,0.00009393645,0.0005460224,0.000182847,0.0001202114,0.00002926312],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001411913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002116966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004233506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008424982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966037,0.0002190414,0.001314626,0.0002293974,0.001487583,0.000145677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964361,0.0002713825,0.001264074,0.0002527891,0.00175034,0.00002529491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005961318,0.001138895,0.1362359,0.0001370069,0.0003934357,0.00004401713,0.005033261,0.008466965,0.0002454324,0.3306149,0.07465193,0.4424421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005786478,0.0004200782,0.05110669,0.0005093877,0.00007279005,0.00003368422,0.002627967,0.06435677,0.001405441,0.005602352,0.8676574,0.0004209898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.250984,0.0006248616,0.423713,0.004011231,0.01072336,0.002548584,0.0000585707,0.00009539504,0.307241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931123,0.0001041955,0.004433502,0.0001395616,0.0001621786,0.00001046078,0.00000565684,0.00001100928,0.002021195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7930054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4402624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016149547","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.07.008","title":"Governance performance in complex environment: The case of a major transformation in a university hospital","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University Health Centre; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Corporate governance; Process management; Relation (database); Action research; Transformation (genetics); Process (computing); Action (physics); Citizen journalism; Sociology; Management; Knowledge management; Business; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03379301637555077,"gpt":0.2927628630962473,"spread":0.2589698467206966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00131496,0.00009562012,0.0001641219,0.0007115432,0.00004083046,0.0001081939,0.000905133,0.00002339259,0.0003471594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003607162,0.00006746554,0.00008969055,0.0005438628,0.00008692754,0.001660215,0.0001526827,0.0001506988,0.00003168741],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000185856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002776632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003573351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001422295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980459,0.0001016431,0.0007839173,0.0001410512,0.000797205,0.0001303072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988967,0.00009429532,0.0006435859,0.0001696307,0.0001783009,0.0000175506],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000500218,0.0005902539,0.09377213,0.00007348767,0.0002695557,0.001203903,0.008210821,0.004099356,0.00007629312,0.04624351,0.003749116,0.8412114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005288713,0.0003489636,0.8264126,0.0001845939,0.00003894987,0.0005588369,0.02130451,0.03849295,0.0001355063,0.003556133,0.103366,0.0003123129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834591,0.0000325898,0.001845051,0.001988827,0.000285239,0.0005263377,0.000006846441,0.000003101783,0.01185291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980014,0.0004229237,0.0007785545,0.00004529755,0.00002997495,0.000005215206,0.000001188339,0.000003317497,0.0007121498],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8408991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3801152,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097298738","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.10.005","title":"Cross-learning between project management and international development: Analysis and research agenda","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Project management; Centrality; Work (physics); International development; Political science; Program management; Extreme project management; OPM3; Domain (mathematical analysis); Project charter; Engineering management; Engineering; Process management; Systems engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2748837281500756,"gpt":0.4972756037461349,"spread":0.2223918755960594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005263004,0.0002276912,0.0003919679,0.004317349,0.0002976955,0.001593951,0.001604309,0.0000589093,0.000332562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000406466,0.0001875819,0.0001753691,0.002383933,0.0001996099,0.001029399,0.001746118,0.0004821106,0.00004558651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001424587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007776316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002471533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001144313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939591,0.0002889773,0.001401032,0.0006260137,0.003399696,0.0003251297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974296,0.0003069021,0.0007493886,0.0001991593,0.00119216,0.0001227615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000278104,0.00004721943,0.4755059,0.00004734171,0.004321519,0.0001809423,0.003047485,0.0001676529,0.000008950466,0.00140931,0.003995564,0.51099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001477115,0.0001380243,0.2841206,0.00005735119,0.0002390005,0.00002916946,0.004055416,0.002235043,0.00008257166,0.0006132308,0.7066951,0.0002573855],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8865176,0.0005781091,0.0372577,0.005948404,0.001731848,0.001354061,0.00002812504,0.00009313149,0.06649095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722216,0.0008420643,0.01484099,0.0002737859,0.0004847932,0.0000235861,0.0000187042,0.00001763681,0.01127684],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7026995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556549032","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.002","title":"Theories for classification vs. classification as theory: Implications of classification and typology for the development of project management theories","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Classification scheme; Confusion; Field (mathematics); Project management; Flourishing; Epistemology; Range (aeronautics); Management science; Computer science; Data science; Sociology; Engineering; Mathematics; Psychology; Social psychology; Systems engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1301697786006877,"gpt":0.4252738119766556,"spread":0.295104033375968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005602424,0.0002060548,0.0003282327,0.00113897,0.0002476651,0.0001396569,0.001358596,0.00007085034,0.00005260396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006615598,0.0001165639,0.0001955249,0.0005183693,0.0004232565,0.0005364492,0.0002360085,0.0000754099,0.000005757428],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001452857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001956013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003516625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001877893,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964722,0.0001791066,0.001751804,0.0003976904,0.0009861949,0.0002129852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936074,0.001753316,0.002285244,0.0005020933,0.001819801,0.00003213275],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009336957,0.00008249182,0.001978261,0.0000533987,0.0004778037,1.863037e-7,0.0009522142,0.000002137903,0.0009235717,0.6536736,0.001639536,0.339283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003055013,0.0004022623,0.1173764,0.0002196181,0.0003826147,0.00002464968,0.02938665,0.0008286194,0.002219453,0.4679536,0.3778317,0.000319503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03262386,0.0002310311,0.9346225,0.01122098,0.001828987,0.004044722,0.0001288515,0.00003379899,0.01526529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651725,0.0007641604,0.03002619,0.0001025794,0.0001540296,0.0005895017,0.0000191451,0.00001877372,0.003153122],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9325486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4753337,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779477037","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.12.003","title":"A model to control environmental performance of project execution process based on greenhouse gas emissions using earned value management","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Ontario Centres of Excellence","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Work breakdown structure; Earned value management; Project management; Project planning; Environmental economics; Work (physics); Control (management); Schedule; Carbon tax; Project management triangle; Engineering; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Systems engineering; Computer science; Project charter; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0987097440407331,"gpt":0.401123825310736,"spread":0.3024140812700029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002389911,0.0002936278,0.0004062971,0.002170008,0.0003947045,0.0004426782,0.002532474,0.00005998589,0.00009954313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001574126,0.0002323948,0.0002739634,0.0003311045,0.0001349148,0.001029486,0.0004382325,0.000222409,0.00002622768],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000298693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001388007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002620498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004282978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943665,0.0001163582,0.00131493,0.0004885548,0.003392411,0.0003212316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996792,0.00008046866,0.00187304,0.0007922736,0.0003620628,0.0001002127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007149733,0.001662758,0.03212392,0.0002504436,0.001279318,0.0002502332,0.001561557,0.595388,0.001012452,0.003662236,0.004830819,0.3508285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004350831,0.0006852466,0.009144209,0.000611807,0.0001982788,0.00003421176,0.00111453,0.9738525,0.0009417196,0.0009056887,0.007781529,0.0003794742],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9343883,0.00001532764,0.04756251,0.0008750045,0.001215774,0.001559894,0.00004769856,0.00002536741,0.01431012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872763,0.0001110073,0.01043503,0.000301956,0.0001490376,0.00004241154,0.00000360066,0.00002342442,0.001657258],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3784645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9476783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992459549","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.09.008","title":"A grounded theory examination of project managers' accountability","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Grounded theory; Reflexivity; Snowball sampling; Public relations; Business; Political science; Sociology; Process management; Qualitative research; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0658936160230841,"gpt":0.3954174046827533,"spread":0.3295237886596691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008567698,0.000193558,0.0003745839,0.0023298,0.00004963612,0.0002951392,0.001851464,0.00005798103,0.000944415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002673853,0.0001463115,0.0002995029,0.001014344,0.0001090675,0.001424676,0.0004598444,0.0002027403,0.0001182603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002058032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001081165,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000443651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001391128,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994444,0.0003952336,0.001504233,0.0003683247,0.003082972,0.0002052943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959669,0.0004546386,0.001609544,0.0004974117,0.001440117,0.00003143079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001360455,0.0006288734,0.0212319,0.0001628827,0.001451349,0.00005919155,0.003456598,0.0002222742,0.0002332415,0.114694,0.006289517,0.8502097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01273493,0.001532408,0.3525542,0.0007335654,0.0005503524,0.0003283779,0.05708383,0.006527539,0.001826571,0.09631462,0.4685314,0.001282203],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7634616,0.0001008213,0.01264378,0.0003490284,0.004832458,0.001273306,0.00001449449,0.0000317667,0.2172928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872794,0.0001347582,0.002728533,0.0001264785,0.0001745931,0.00001377386,0.000004733222,0.00001227805,0.009525457],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8489276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800590594","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.04.001","title":"Why and how do project management offices change? A structural analysis approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamic capabilities; Context (archaeology); Popularity; Knowledge management; Process management; Project portfolio management; Grounded theory; Project management; Adaptation (eye); Integrated project delivery; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Systems engineering; Qualitative research; Sociology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04035839652490928,"gpt":0.2961872235030447,"spread":0.2558288269781354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094587,0.0003394355,0.0003865533,0.004294142,0.0001919847,0.001390982,0.0009576721,0.00005834445,0.0001028155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002496901,0.0002792852,0.0002410617,0.002100628,0.0001357042,0.001489408,0.0008646215,0.0001733109,0.00002676948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001329859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001304077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008527151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005693432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973837,0.00003682837,0.0005865492,0.0004599276,0.001176868,0.0003561311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975826,0.00001437208,0.0009474687,0.0002890809,0.001147115,0.00001939494],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008768172,0.000644369,0.01416181,0.001140721,0.01823383,0.0004666074,0.001573434,0.00002623177,0.00002431472,0.7064339,0.1378208,0.1185972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00283427,0.0001145284,0.01335904,0.0001825349,0.00223692,0.0000339267,0.008049863,0.01014073,0.00001544602,0.002103124,0.9602621,0.0006675001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04783398,0.0007632934,0.0200538,0.0100408,0.006579668,0.003829589,0.00001949554,0.0002744604,0.9106049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786395,0.0001395876,0.008938765,0.004919645,0.004331611,0.00008811253,0.00005163114,0.00003964483,0.002851476],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9308056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989644731","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.05.007","title":"The Project Involvement Index, psychological distress, and psychological well-being: Comparing workers from projectized and non-projectized organizations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Psychological distress; Psychology; Workload; Discriminant validity; Applied psychology; Index (typography); Reliability (semiconductor); Validity; Distress; Project management; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Psychometrics; Engineering; Computer science; Psychiatry; Internal consistency","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07786959652416699,"gpt":0.4748866588906032,"spread":0.3970170623664362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001643992,0.0002566188,0.0003913827,0.0004244144,0.0009109877,0.0001642514,0.0006937594,0.0001594119,0.0000742113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003757161,0.0001635392,0.00008266687,0.0005624348,0.0001697073,0.0002405537,0.0003371491,0.0009970394,0.00001625949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002976871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000166424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003394289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001125437,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961541,0.0005692114,0.001211727,0.0004433703,0.001092855,0.0005287508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973612,0.0007578135,0.0006731455,0.0002628238,0.0007841118,0.0001608979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01112141,0.001886971,0.8072401,0.000173908,0.001039348,0.0002824676,0.005491794,0.00003391824,0.0001163054,0.01153547,0.03980632,0.1212719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007451171,0.0009646354,0.9577002,0.0005187123,0.00007238419,0.00003690983,0.005664379,0.001196775,0.000007197725,0.006728522,0.01937426,0.0002848328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9464928,0.0004440844,0.003762162,0.01091084,0.002177753,0.004341389,0.00002566008,0.00007940361,0.03176592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925305,0.002302049,0.002737225,0.0009746879,0.000617541,0.0001367317,0.00004554498,0.00001853724,0.0006371325],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1504601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7006673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774048509","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.11.006","title":"Feeling good, being good and looking good: Motivations for, and benefits from, project management certification","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"Project Management","keywords":"Certification; Feeling; Competence (human resources); Public relations; Turnover; Professional certification (computer technology); Business; Marketing; Psychology; Social psychology; Management; Political science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03393992134242697,"gpt":0.2926177103759451,"spread":0.2586777890335182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000460327,0.0002116798,0.0002076127,0.0007273062,0.0005293953,0.001413471,0.0005092687,0.00005640149,0.00003540439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009813644,0.0002031384,0.00008392954,0.0001294854,0.00004981068,0.001797423,0.000419306,0.0001323484,0.000009495065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001102268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002073903,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002687839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005852465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982789,0.00001238793,0.0005849628,0.0003274589,0.0005989021,0.0001974387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998245,0.00005185695,0.0008949182,0.0002230333,0.0005654132,0.00001980208],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002092061,0.0002852982,0.4662875,0.000292418,0.001169587,0.00005097363,0.0004184421,0.0001737887,0.0003802336,0.3992754,0.002445956,0.1290112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003042845,0.00003253812,0.8882427,0.000536548,0.0005491796,0.00002031516,0.001096688,0.001543318,0.0001911667,0.007198154,0.09714106,0.000405497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9285528,0.000596438,0.02496636,0.008894982,0.004209294,0.002906475,0.00006804752,0.0001517217,0.02965388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988524,0.000357919,0.008668641,0.0004421372,0.0009778761,0.00004873539,0.00006330205,0.00003892928,0.000878437],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4219552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996232,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004089492","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.05.001","title":"Dancing in the white spaces: Exploring gendered assumptions in successful project managers’ discourse about their work","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"University of Calgary; Athabasca University","keywords":"Work (physics); White (mutation); Sociology; Public relations; Aesthetics; Political science; Engineering; Art; Mechanical engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1963574793092829,"gpt":0.3828298515660296,"spread":0.1864723722567467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005831762,0.0001233617,0.0001585408,0.0008777773,0.0001713888,0.0002730133,0.001094115,0.00004313103,0.00004418123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007953798,0.0000943179,0.000124955,0.0007628527,0.00009388595,0.0008762417,0.0001506883,0.0003221557,0.000006423719],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005016071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009856169,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00146441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006135038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975619,0.0003438484,0.0005154213,0.0001789122,0.001048763,0.0003511188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992347,0.0001157083,0.0003320805,0.0001370141,0.0001440962,0.00003639926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003250816,0.0006794769,0.4301447,0.00005530988,0.0003873123,0.001114319,0.5098428,0.00079645,0.000007906605,0.02652748,0.00269189,0.02742723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008890978,0.00003486918,0.3393267,0.0003042851,0.00003025997,0.000006192999,0.6272611,0.00002207265,0.000009585704,0.001172963,0.03076715,0.0001756744],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9222602,0.0001815335,0.007051498,0.005917253,0.001648044,0.0007649888,0.000006298076,0.00002155346,0.06214866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974715,0.0005075072,0.0009129598,0.0002326612,0.0003394245,0.00001400615,0.000002845118,0.000006484847,0.0005126609],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1174183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3846172,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986733737","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.11.004","title":"Professionalization, risk transfer, and the effect on gender gap in project management","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ","funders":"","keywords":"Overtime; Workforce; Professionalization; Autonomy; Work (physics); Discretion; Control (management); Obstacle; Risk management; Position (finance); Business; Public relations; Engineering; Management; Political science; Sociology; Labour economics; Economics; Economic growth; Finance; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.113412196063436,"gpt":0.3869814685257342,"spread":0.2735692724622982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006791163,0.0002388005,0.0003343077,0.00205093,0.0001456089,0.0002385157,0.001322453,0.00004997502,0.0002555349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001950343,0.0001327272,0.000196723,0.0008817058,0.0001791374,0.0005432157,0.0003114095,0.0003209455,0.00003724238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001021302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003877623,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006494301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003031732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951905,0.0007480971,0.001209211,0.0003914705,0.002222268,0.0002384439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983492,0.0003888762,0.0005597426,0.0003422165,0.0003213356,0.00003862506],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01131002,0.0005368206,0.1398506,0.0001564641,0.002059153,0.0005172951,0.0135953,0.0003344913,0.000004631222,0.2376382,0.01816442,0.5758325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05487942,0.002568237,0.4228277,0.001247065,0.0009584104,0.0004235476,0.01953027,0.007425625,0.0005205571,0.1188925,0.3692235,0.001503204],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.594366,0.0007579629,0.0277086,0.001514514,0.007595207,0.006316824,0.00002420528,0.00007598642,0.3616407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992725,0.001226459,0.001577816,0.0003604186,0.0001657651,0.0001180829,0.000002765244,0.00001740051,0.003806257],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5743294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.541246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977653487","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.01.011","title":"Connecting changes to projects using a historical perspective: Towards some new canvases for researchers","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Project management; Statement (logic); Knowledge management; Frame (networking); Change management (ITSM); Problem statement; Process management; Management science; Computer science; Engineering; Data science; Political science; Systems engineering; Operations management; Mechanical engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1519167132939748,"gpt":0.3901562549865551,"spread":0.2382395416925803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001215264,0.0001986459,0.0002371339,0.002099791,0.0001482504,0.0004931775,0.0007740133,0.00005186657,0.00007287154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007661417,0.0001806431,0.0001441509,0.0006249351,0.00001742214,0.0006828841,0.0004360364,0.0002653463,0.00002016658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009675917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001652373,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001525957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008455826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980422,0.0000133887,0.0004698127,0.0002935224,0.0008450541,0.0003360533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973939,0.00003995239,0.0004910416,0.0001646496,0.001873097,0.00003733849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007276378,0.0003878387,0.0002162028,0.0002361185,0.0007701513,0.0001583343,0.001186783,0.00008993888,0.003007681,0.8424077,0.07340724,0.07740436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001958679,0.000116892,0.000143511,0.0001539184,0.0001227474,0.00002282449,0.006424788,0.001869341,0.0003840038,0.007548566,0.9809206,0.0003342008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2440743,0.0007283372,0.08023481,0.257486,0.05988692,0.01190724,0.00003077766,0.0006035989,0.3450479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.898715,0.00003439303,0.05772752,0.01083343,0.0240589,0.0001174025,0.00001681516,0.0001297102,0.008366857],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9075133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.736641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220767401","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.03.005","title":"Project, program and portfolio management as modes of organizing: Theorising at the intersection between mergers and acquisitions and project studies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Project portfolio management; Portfolio; Project sponsorship; Position (finance); Bridge (graph theory); Project management; Intersection (aeronautics); Mergers and acquisitions; Project management triangle; Project charter; Business; Process management; Management science; Engineering management; Engineering; Management; Economics; Finance; Transport engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1091294364282034,"gpt":0.4479962925874523,"spread":0.3388668561592489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003198807,0.0002103914,0.0003358351,0.001435741,0.0005124298,0.0003001443,0.0006133384,0.00002482433,0.00009153198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001121903,0.0001441317,0.0001068789,0.0009193434,0.0003165245,0.0005561215,0.002000217,0.0002177679,0.000001663538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002142904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000543838,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000819903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002064795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964577,0.000271082,0.0009911179,0.000397111,0.001679829,0.0002031521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980083,0.0002614801,0.001004735,0.0002368377,0.000454028,0.00003459851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009622925,0.0002914285,0.02549617,0.0002184471,0.004740039,0.0001696686,0.0135464,0.0002442448,0.0001830874,0.04625806,0.02408844,0.8838018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005627491,0.002846887,0.02284613,0.0005215291,0.001565952,0.001512886,0.408131,0.004214792,0.0007936306,0.0472274,0.5036706,0.001041699],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9776978,0.001416479,0.001105743,0.001880621,0.001142417,0.001995518,0.0000347381,0.00004238378,0.01468432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992473,0.002058393,0.002035031,0.0001291692,0.0001187786,0.0001112142,0.000006726128,0.00001592383,0.003051737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.88276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5877518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W392595529","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.04.001","title":"Examining new product development project termination decision quality at the portfolio level: Consequences of dysfunctional executive advocacy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Decision quality; Dysfunctional family; Corporate governance; Business; Context (archaeology); Quality (philosophy); Dilemma; Portfolio; Product (mathematics); Process management; Psychology; Marketing; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1680673681533889,"gpt":0.3582097636716726,"spread":0.1901423955182837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003087447,0.0002375369,0.0002798044,0.001264171,0.0001325122,0.0002371873,0.0007871349,0.00003930425,0.0001227128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006019956,0.0001686343,0.0001086671,0.0007659988,0.0001213764,0.0008686426,0.0006624696,0.0001593758,0.00007514631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004921083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005410266,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002288656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008073182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962547,0.00005381618,0.001314928,0.0003031917,0.001854674,0.000218619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952736,0.00007773645,0.001803635,0.0002206688,0.002604077,0.00002021513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002527508,0.0009168047,0.02393669,0.0003352448,0.001829192,0.0002049292,0.003102927,0.0003037608,0.0006276467,0.1428831,0.4304583,0.3928739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004706689,0.0001259002,0.03283003,0.000600968,0.000203308,0.00007040625,0.0116936,0.0002104314,0.002624872,0.005830079,0.9405446,0.0005591033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.328911,0.0006017228,0.02047791,0.004932562,0.01416513,0.003291504,0.00001267898,0.0001370278,0.6274704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724525,0.00003138792,0.00808799,0.0009181225,0.001883038,0.00003873497,0.00005758167,0.00002778087,0.01650287],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6435415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6876708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995712371","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.06.008","title":"Project-based and temporary organizing: Reconnecting and rediscovering","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Project management; Key (lock); Argument (complex analysis); Management science; Process management; Engineering; Engineering management; Knowledge management; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Systems engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07320449723344426,"gpt":0.370314978031812,"spread":0.2971104807983677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003207086,0.0001386315,0.0002138868,0.001292933,0.000111449,0.0006628291,0.0005469618,0.00003194479,0.00005068155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005774889,0.0001063931,0.00006451441,0.0004134926,0.00007044843,0.0008687237,0.0003329579,0.0001529827,0.000006496258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004873049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005718433,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000325946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001153027,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975961,0.0001192535,0.0007665115,0.0002860618,0.001086398,0.0001456965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984125,0.0003019611,0.0006934928,0.0001749941,0.0003741884,0.00004282458],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003853296,0.00009319057,0.1430643,0.00008864317,0.0003773838,0.0001000751,0.001176665,0.000120357,0.0002684789,0.01248693,0.0187298,0.8231089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005453472,0.0007136399,0.04084748,0.0005711238,0.0001345065,0.0006062209,0.009231381,0.03163625,0.001203162,0.01205287,0.8968226,0.000727334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8952695,0.0002570517,0.04577275,0.003758523,0.003407716,0.0006312758,0.000005493502,0.00005837635,0.05083935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887945,0.0001333232,0.009418401,0.0003390597,0.0003371313,0.000005246266,0.00000136965,0.00001182121,0.0009591715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8780928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6391677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360601987","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102451","title":"Performance measurement in new product development projects: findings from successful small and medium enterprises","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Process management; New product development; Product (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Small and medium-sized enterprises; Project management; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations management; Marketing; Systems engineering; Engineering; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1329635433472004,"gpt":0.3465632886551451,"spread":0.2135997453079447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00453248,0.000234997,0.0003295993,0.002915923,0.0000926135,0.0004631476,0.001415224,0.00003946951,0.0001546515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004404825,0.0001829813,0.00008871801,0.001292158,0.0000638646,0.000860834,0.0006763098,0.0002261391,0.000106704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002961455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004511197,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001367035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003379188,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944762,0.0001023157,0.001425587,0.0004918282,0.003186273,0.0003177698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982628,0.0001362521,0.0005918384,0.0002592847,0.000663491,0.00008639071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003995319,0.0001032667,0.5552272,0.00004434584,0.0003929821,0.0001503361,0.003889748,0.0001498006,0.0001443727,0.0001014349,0.01618128,0.4232157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00256162,0.0001271536,0.7384585,0.0005538048,0.00004644284,0.00004099706,0.003291665,0.001028925,0.0019679,0.0008818293,0.2506753,0.0003658429],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896405,0.000236909,0.000989945,0.002263933,0.002687133,0.0006160437,0.000003669659,0.00004586008,0.003515973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902981,0.0010529,0.004847332,0.0001573601,0.0003644568,0.00002688632,0.000006867206,0.00001648368,0.003229597],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4228498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7461759,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031817052","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.03.007","title":"The dynamics of inter-node coordination in social networks: A theoretical perspective and empirical evidence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Node (physics); Context (archaeology); Interdependence; Consistency (knowledge bases); Social network (sociolinguistics); Task (project management); Computer science; Multinational corporation; Social network analysis; Knowledge management; Operations research; Management science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Business; Management; Economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1454022849643564,"gpt":0.4284731171053888,"spread":0.2830708321410323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003497043,0.00009914529,0.0001799025,0.0006963949,0.00008651796,0.0001577281,0.0009091994,0.00003626243,0.00008171051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006168343,0.00006247273,0.0001052447,0.000512902,0.0003726947,0.0004948919,0.0003717163,0.000195285,0.000002692042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002032975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004727215,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003592632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008849926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976664,0.0002178186,0.0008308651,0.0001818787,0.0009674201,0.0001355756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997851,0.0004894846,0.0006231426,0.0001253905,0.0008882117,0.00002283979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008042227,0.0001013603,0.05205721,0.000006306991,0.0001818721,0.00003521956,0.003621286,0.00003700868,0.000001522807,0.7873501,0.002501475,0.1533024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003296608,0.0007826893,0.2731451,0.0005612821,0.0001678721,0.0002076648,0.07267107,0.1971077,0.00005317859,0.4401657,0.01135357,0.0004875708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.473637,0.001235986,0.3490545,0.0416538,0.006493179,0.001743683,0.00001369582,0.00004053996,0.1261277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980628,0.0002876976,0.0009855677,0.00009096614,0.0001213184,0.000006780697,3.277282e-7,0.000004685085,0.0004397795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5244259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2547564,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291662593","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.010","title":"Projects with internal vs. external customers: An empirical investigation of variation in practice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Variation (astronomy); Context (archaeology); Project management; Business; Knowledge management; Process management; Empirical research; Computer science; Engineering; Systems engineering; Statistics; Mathematics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07591680970319234,"gpt":0.4045666716464686,"spread":0.3286498619432763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004229521,0.0001747318,0.0002853035,0.002398798,0.00003432921,0.0002145948,0.00120976,0.00005215696,0.0001262083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006077409,0.0001020663,0.00009879922,0.0008850574,0.0001322331,0.003326947,0.0002049697,0.00017698,0.00002217301],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002519699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002090189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009017442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005880417,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948661,0.000390253,0.001405978,0.0003509535,0.002790216,0.0001965039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957814,0.0004319408,0.001828682,0.0002978909,0.001590521,0.00006954937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007153835,0.0007109239,0.4968413,0.00004797305,0.0008647788,0.0005557733,0.008695056,0.0005608647,0.003988277,0.01347372,0.003069252,0.4640383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01341703,0.003616833,0.8504877,0.00209058,0.0003046207,0.001118287,0.008462982,0.003482072,0.005089019,0.01270436,0.09837224,0.0008542769],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9168402,0.00004202158,0.06605697,0.004093702,0.001719767,0.0006247095,0.00000791534,0.0000223717,0.01059233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796368,0.0001375799,0.01885372,0.0003271739,0.0002542717,0.00001473163,0.000001095715,0.00001220546,0.0007624598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.463184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4162142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391115664","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102561","title":"Beneficiary participation is an imperative, not an option, but does it really work in international development projects?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Work (physics); Business; Operations management; Engineering management; Engineering; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05224948136306076,"gpt":0.384518865033206,"spread":0.3322693836701452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001839028,0.0002049609,0.0001844731,0.001252923,0.0001391428,0.0007783948,0.001008603,0.00008842664,0.0004598069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008589192,0.0001695341,0.0001006171,0.0003946195,0.00007599646,0.002090269,0.0001390418,0.0002585961,0.00004737439],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009859104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005090413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003076181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00131469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963381,0.0001856443,0.0009557608,0.0003696971,0.001849874,0.0003008679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998593,0.00006911572,0.0002927073,0.0001054638,0.0008406572,0.00009902072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00155797,0.001836142,0.01465719,0.00008206652,0.001912707,0.001423138,0.3053227,0.0007777283,0.0006451414,0.3163066,0.006308098,0.3491706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00293353,0.0004621582,0.1572801,0.002792449,0.0001399065,0.00004771601,0.0627046,0.005156351,0.003944157,0.01098261,0.752042,0.001514475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9535066,0.00008137841,0.002742623,0.01624108,0.007286062,0.0007133684,0.00002692823,0.00009556733,0.01930634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828072,0.0004605799,0.009038362,0.0007397586,0.001104903,0.00007073545,0.00006468175,0.00002267129,0.005691158],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7457339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7506078,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989929382","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.09.002","title":"Integration projects as relational spaces: A closer look at acquired managers’ strategic role recovery in cross-border acquisitions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Extant taxon; Mergers and acquisitions; Bridging (networking); Business; Context (archaeology); Knowledge management; Sample (material); Middle management; Process management; Marketing; Computer science; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02353049928206665,"gpt":0.3244201548767643,"spread":0.3008896555946977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001018816,0.0003082724,0.0003084491,0.002478654,0.0001106827,0.0007756025,0.0005962767,0.0001045227,0.002434182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005880249,0.0002858208,0.000214497,0.001007154,0.00005529295,0.00218715,0.0005008812,0.0002173218,0.001699725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000667932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008512811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000103741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001302355,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970034,0.00003915076,0.00104631,0.0004147516,0.001154205,0.0003421731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976531,0.00004310266,0.0009945653,0.0002683901,0.001023072,0.00001781203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001485935,0.0008338295,0.02176435,0.0002654457,0.0008152949,0.0003738157,0.0005336214,0.001841336,0.0009500748,0.9587055,0.00496122,0.007469516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02282331,0.0006424766,0.08497863,0.002852406,0.0005380763,0.0002346885,0.03104174,0.02368927,0.0006428683,0.1278151,0.7018893,0.002852152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3779089,0.0000708275,0.0002458611,0.0009561844,0.002021597,0.0008776138,0.000003716842,0.00004335633,0.6178719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960811,0.00005840876,0.00127027,0.002273679,0.0009477831,0.00006234185,0.0001369994,0.00004182708,0.03439773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8308905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044252682","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.07.004","title":"Toward gendered projects in international development: Paradoxes, resistance and convergent approaches","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Face (sociological concept); Perspective (graphical); Action (physics); Field (mathematics); Order (exchange); Sociology; Development theory; Subject (documents); Action research; Management science; Engineering; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Social science; Economic growth; Business; Economics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1039760701272199,"gpt":0.3068632964377978,"spread":0.2028872263105779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008024708,0.0001518313,0.000204984,0.0003651797,0.00008156407,0.0001710869,0.0007107578,0.00005633602,0.00009771412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001162868,0.0001455232,0.00007710376,0.0002120821,0.00008368318,0.0003672002,0.0002140996,0.0001816736,0.00001508627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004108909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003882893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001027147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001961365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975553,0.0001113986,0.0006558349,0.000263595,0.001171473,0.0002423671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992173,0.00003730558,0.0003624038,0.00005889689,0.0002026816,0.0001214554],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002217146,0.0009597814,0.03341403,0.0003468075,0.003231054,0.003135421,0.7563342,0.0001710771,0.0000432096,0.03849105,0.06813037,0.09352585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002586111,0.00005580706,0.02507869,0.0002190548,0.00003143164,0.00001847471,0.06591418,0.000190994,0.000143617,0.001021921,0.9043599,0.0003798627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6230749,0.008539873,0.02980453,0.1168402,0.01217611,0.004383554,0.00004278075,0.0002679527,0.2048701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802907,0.00152299,0.01585862,0.0006321428,0.0004577201,0.00002869338,0.000007419962,0.00001320182,0.001188499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8362295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5934264,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390226714","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102558","title":"Risk factor prioritization in infrastructure handover to operations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Public Procurement and Policy","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Prioritization; Handover; Context (archaeology); Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Beneficiary; Project management; Identification (biology); Risk management; Operations management; Computer science; Process management; Engineering; Finance; Telecommunications; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01693523397429385,"gpt":0.2975120282062378,"spread":0.280576794231944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004078037,0.0001169575,0.0001274571,0.002138464,0.00005566494,0.000440766,0.00050647,0.00003320825,0.0001746877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001935575,0.0001023292,0.00006902747,0.001014531,0.000009945689,0.001221833,0.0002576245,0.0001376116,0.0001837623],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001320239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003844066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001908561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001540278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986444,0.00001309984,0.0004272865,0.000135228,0.000595391,0.0001846075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993059,0.00001496654,0.0002095807,0.00009223567,0.0003639108,0.00001341837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005402723,0.0004008277,0.2189631,0.0002125513,0.001010868,0.0004535305,0.002187531,0.03704713,0.0007429653,0.1200911,0.3723959,0.2459542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00213014,0.00003021076,0.3870095,0.0001424112,0.00004486433,0.000005773757,0.0004337047,0.006418071,0.00004641429,0.004728123,0.5987512,0.0002595829],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9319316,0.0000573708,0.01045861,0.01202813,0.005700112,0.001433563,0.00005425252,0.0001857923,0.03815056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939625,0.0001130272,0.0008828291,0.001789268,0.002002257,0.00002221114,0.00003018745,0.0000181957,0.001179483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2456947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4250317,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385584715","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102498","title":"Grandstanding? The elusive process of shaping megaproject symbolism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Megaproject; Process (computing); Action (physics); Stakeholder; Epistemology; Sociology; Process management; Cognitive science; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Engineering; Public relations; Management; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03136336662430805,"gpt":0.2995893847067044,"spread":0.2682260180823964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009045578,0.0001640958,0.0002337277,0.001117815,0.000164062,0.0002184967,0.0009818893,0.00002603065,0.0001103498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001337672,0.0001109349,0.0001518977,0.0012809,0.00007118467,0.0007003393,0.0005089042,0.0001184821,0.00005239558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005536301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002462841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003962877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001380822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997861,0.00001179567,0.0006000529,0.0001626462,0.001160318,0.0002042472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981001,0.00005273198,0.0008032977,0.0001225221,0.0009146514,0.000006699619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009040416,0.0005506629,0.06700715,0.001877064,0.006534916,0.0007145971,0.004267092,0.00368558,0.0002456598,0.5855231,0.304351,0.02433915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007897512,0.0001590936,0.1234814,0.001833423,0.001520933,0.00005501535,0.03598913,0.008662083,0.0007599293,0.1321383,0.686212,0.001291115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.500055,0.002006762,0.01288198,0.03224022,0.01619796,0.004550517,0.00003526859,0.0006296617,0.4314027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996187,0.0003522564,0.0001525655,0.0007937273,0.001503043,0.00001973968,0.00001522512,0.00002518938,0.0009512436],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4961321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4523792,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404055344","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102650","title":"The stress-inducing potential of inclusive leadership: Does resilience help?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Resilience and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Resilience (materials science); Stress (linguistics); Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Materials science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03045018909793699,"gpt":0.4100671733195473,"spread":0.3796169842216103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000690436,0.00009190095,0.0001116988,0.0003213709,0.00007983596,0.00009578562,0.0007103386,0.00003198609,0.0001108386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002193038,0.0000519679,0.000118964,0.0001632784,0.0001026263,0.0002010311,0.000159524,0.0002100809,0.00002608458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001651036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009524255,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001363152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003600807,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982882,0.00009832773,0.0005122473,0.0001611421,0.0007367322,0.0002034149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992817,0.0001078468,0.0002700973,0.0001411509,0.0001630656,0.00003615193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001286624,0.0005586085,0.002443325,0.0004220165,0.002091878,0.003238156,0.01354467,0.000444515,0.002435249,0.07955711,0.02829579,0.8656821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006256115,0.003645644,0.08900097,0.009237093,0.0007144063,0.002329004,0.523683,0.001978185,0.0238982,0.02257451,0.3155243,0.001158551],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8507803,0.0115658,0.008894014,0.0225243,0.03488995,0.001397426,0.00006506943,0.0000661232,0.069817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921588,0.0006705702,0.000233814,0.0001653799,0.0005045488,0.000009730812,0.000001681887,0.000009153217,0.006246288],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8645235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2119189,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407436871","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102681","title":"Casting a long shadow: On the death and abiding influence of Daniel Kahneman in shaping project management theory and practice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow (psychology); Prospect theory; Sociology; Management; Economics; Psychology; Engineering; Psychoanalysis; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1665158613288645,"gpt":0.4628692077930668,"spread":0.2963533464642024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01159963,0.000146795,0.0002730258,0.00166425,0.0001079812,0.0004670072,0.0008799143,0.00002807802,0.000009297225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003760094,0.00009237546,0.00007667177,0.0006031289,0.00006154432,0.000496437,0.0008175347,0.0002022368,0.000001662587],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001157395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004951205,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000102082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002970042,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961792,0.0005688923,0.001191425,0.000323696,0.001574176,0.0001625754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937134,0.004526908,0.0009530743,0.0002526265,0.0005299481,0.00002400615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001109637,0.0001785067,0.01378269,0.0001093074,0.0005745626,0.0007993588,0.003148461,0.002823194,0.0001290946,0.882346,0.002126018,0.09287314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005771873,0.0006519445,0.4916352,0.01378495,0.0003564542,0.001271894,0.09388743,0.01611705,0.0001628894,0.3159855,0.05958874,0.0007860546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8355966,0.001881392,0.04438727,0.002328249,0.0008086023,0.001511456,0.000004948884,0.00001564486,0.1134658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947982,0.0001235759,0.003205269,0.0005209223,0.00004364416,0.0000140003,1.095741e-7,0.000006494136,0.001287749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5663605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4503361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888495254","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.07.006","title":"Corrigendum to “A model to control environmental performance of project execution process based on greenhouse gas emissions using earned value management” [Int. J. Proj. Manag. 36 (3) (April 2018) 397-413]","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Ontario Centres of Excellence; Ryerson University","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Earned value management; Project management; Control (management); Work breakdown structure; Schedule; Work (physics); Carbon tax; Environmental economics; Process (computing); Project planning; Operations research; Engineering; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Computer science; Systems engineering; Project charter; Economics; Mechanical engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07822955925435883,"gpt":0.3672923398841496,"spread":0.2890627806297907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003865752,0.0009766283,0.001205846,0.007680664,0.0003880974,0.0005850773,0.004417208,0.00033547,0.0004476449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002270027,0.0008124292,0.0006744457,0.001865168,0.0002271071,0.001027293,0.00106523,0.000929606,0.0001899215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001191731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006105799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006729333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002047299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9865422,0.0003247706,0.003156727,0.00143738,0.007682267,0.0008566923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938962,0.00009360642,0.003342879,0.001302672,0.001062567,0.0003019997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006478867,0.001098216,0.0008571244,0.0005414286,0.001567474,0.0002078742,0.0009864117,0.05391163,0.00008315682,0.0003928962,0.8631776,0.0706973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003832164,0.002051808,0.0009972721,0.002669364,0.0007032591,0.00006914369,0.001490394,0.4754423,0.0002381499,0.000519403,0.5107966,0.001190068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2179283,0.0006513543,0.2765163,0.006347442,0.1700757,0.03387722,0.002355329,0.0005343825,0.291714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.527652,0.002865765,0.04219225,0.004181612,0.005236828,0.0007572012,0.0003428065,0.0004477209,0.4163238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4215307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994327,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413161059","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102753","title":"Theorizing temporary organizing to foster true cross fertilization: Focus on projects, processes and practices","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Human fertilization; Process management; Political science; Operations management; Sociology; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Public administration; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0556886740752451,"gpt":0.4153169468309692,"spread":0.3596282727557241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004881222,0.0001190753,0.0001843748,0.0008277829,0.00006878635,0.0001343307,0.0002211658,0.00004253607,0.000007415666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001576415,0.00008747168,0.00003253933,0.0004671186,0.00003971568,0.0003010085,0.0001853957,0.0001822082,0.00000358785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001405269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002644244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001217981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003785948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987466,0.00003273717,0.0004136751,0.0002479399,0.0004245685,0.0001344642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985034,0.0000833658,0.0004591919,0.0001569567,0.000758904,0.0000381901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01272515,0.00171205,0.4749348,0.004495563,0.002878818,0.001727808,0.003476288,0.00004557659,0.001901148,0.03960722,0.029007,0.4274886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01609264,0.008051326,0.3448431,0.01405052,0.0009037266,0.001725178,0.02212721,0.0001408855,0.1465839,0.03885689,0.405457,0.001167624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8271384,0.002634851,0.008111673,0.1079329,0.001745809,0.002619429,0.000005561927,0.0001610628,0.0496503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926857,0.0004451646,0.00377668,0.001891137,0.0002302709,0.00003119379,0.000002005271,0.00001178433,0.0009259997],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4263209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3566992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888329229","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.08.001","title":"Call for papers: Special issue – Managing open and user innovation by projects: Sensing, seizing and transforming","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Open Source Software Innovations","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Engineering management; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02773701255272663,"gpt":0.33179575868532,"spread":0.3040587461325934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001261996,0.000327479,0.0004119692,0.001338433,0.0002024739,0.002058116,0.001781133,0.0001309007,0.0000652509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007171914,0.0003119751,0.00006986776,0.0006354536,0.00008212597,0.00153748,0.00102853,0.000317064,0.00002083619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002841618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001932626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007746089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001653392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974247,0.00006485501,0.001034047,0.0005288209,0.0006571319,0.0002904172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972628,0.0001018908,0.001102527,0.0002423304,0.001246669,0.00004378979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008654471,0.00005796873,0.00001198486,0.0001901909,0.0007289755,0.00003645948,0.001815194,0.000009105499,0.00009672671,0.006241853,0.77903,0.211695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001332352,0.000216331,0.00001270995,0.0007910304,0.00006317395,0.0001501705,0.0004901135,0.0006576508,0.0002285989,0.0006342095,0.9950818,0.0003418373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006578084,0.0003244801,0.8355144,0.007452835,0.008170893,0.0034646,0.0001111852,0.00004099493,0.1442628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003986944,0.002331872,0.7353916,0.006224219,0.01750787,0.0001687123,0.0004003346,0.0002162898,0.2337721],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2160519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409261117","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102705","title":"Considering alternatives to megaprojects for a sustainable future with degrowth principles","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Degrowth; Economics; Business; Engineering; Sustainability; Ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06329464197952668,"gpt":0.4013051474179775,"spread":0.3380105054384508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002141394,0.0001872369,0.0002882366,0.002725637,0.0001512568,0.0007257395,0.001384607,0.00003222238,0.00005474921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004385012,0.0001285537,0.0001529312,0.001069985,0.00005516388,0.0008370023,0.0004633122,0.0001309745,0.000008551652],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002084844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000235242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002060508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004081844,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970445,0.00006778201,0.0008519946,0.000347936,0.001400156,0.0002876009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965659,0.0002684555,0.0005826846,0.0002657149,0.002262269,0.00005494255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002674342,0.0002044017,0.01371617,0.0001711163,0.001852686,0.0004065865,0.001973096,0.001900796,0.00005008633,0.7020121,0.05967512,0.2153636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001965103,0.0002888529,0.003551356,0.0001897126,0.00006968644,0.00004835789,0.01516001,0.0006759239,0.0007321131,0.01203065,0.9650958,0.0001924283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1905627,0.000432393,0.5577493,0.01946361,0.006016434,0.004401498,0.00001842081,0.00009776159,0.2212579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8570588,0.0001722986,0.07143699,0.001521512,0.0008458021,0.0001904826,0.000003372701,0.00002332904,0.06874742],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9054207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6998323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404453250","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102653","title":"Lifecycles, processes, and practices in strategic projects and programs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Public-Private Partnership Projects","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Process management; Business; Engineering management; Operations management; Management science; Engineering; Systems engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06337659144019164,"gpt":0.3506138490317453,"spread":0.2872372575915537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001868412,0.0004865528,0.0005240206,0.002810473,0.00005259126,0.003538502,0.001021926,0.000308495,0.00001106369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001083116,0.0004111598,0.00009024888,0.0008879944,0.0001008854,0.002569466,0.001015757,0.001101468,0.00002601209],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000227568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000564085,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005753477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006142381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960675,0.00004467122,0.0009732507,0.0006471127,0.001859666,0.0004078415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960124,0.0002023017,0.002402041,0.0001921149,0.001161853,0.00002923211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006494303,0.0007232947,0.001933123,0.0137511,0.001703837,0.00362092,0.0006162021,0.000005658246,0.000009669749,0.01433959,0.9445435,0.0181037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001388115,0.00009535254,0.0001311033,0.002685693,0.0003303933,0.00005301478,0.001524936,0.0002135116,0.00000202304,0.005241419,0.9878759,0.0004585644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.02847216,0.01085322,0.00003581066,0.004785298,0.8699195,0.004215636,0.00003828399,0.0002875682,0.08139247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1050885,0.005493087,0.001450542,0.0004043704,0.8847743,0.0002850231,0.0003153941,0.0002197675,0.001969089],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07942338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890907567","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.08.003","title":"Corrigendum to “The downside risk of project portfolios: The impact of capital investment projects and the value of project efficiency and project risk management programmes” Int. J. Proj. Manag., 34 (2016), pp. 1460–1470","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Public-Private Partnership Projects","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Downside risk; Value (mathematics); Capital budgeting; Investment (military); Project risk management; Project portfolio management; Business; Economics; Project management; Actuarial science; Finance; Management; Computer science; Political science; Project appraisal","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02243883129951761,"gpt":0.2942247366132854,"spread":0.2717859053137677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00983242,0.001514405,0.00196061,0.004299875,0.0004965407,0.001111511,0.004685342,0.0003921293,0.0000349662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001306558,0.0008006596,0.001192925,0.003161047,0.0015811,0.00129116,0.004165069,0.001745076,0.00001550964],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000660141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001475644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01886153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005652389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9887478,0.0008510709,0.00360345,0.00138646,0.004124025,0.001287224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851441,0.0002727224,0.01009234,0.001688521,0.002723431,0.00007882466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003803017,0.001659627,0.004294568,0.003585332,0.01315892,0.0002162993,0.007808971,0.0001337798,0.000009253038,0.02320131,0.9275506,0.01457832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01345032,0.003218408,0.01617511,0.006416063,0.008490653,0.0004083775,0.02490428,0.007628057,0.0001109004,0.005355996,0.9113667,0.002475132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2930284,0.03677211,0.003235422,0.009876095,0.06966303,0.1615711,0.002149649,0.0007534595,0.4229507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7791694,0.09084719,0.01481824,0.004227345,0.02306553,0.00966331,0.001187711,0.001679006,0.07534222],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.486141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416051775","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102788","title":"What Do We Really Know? A 40-Year Scientific Realist Examination of Theory Testing in Project Management","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Scholarship; Legitimacy; Empirical research; Project management; Conceptual framework; Development theory; Scientific theory","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07398197123150943,"gpt":0.3894116356311072,"spread":0.3154296643995977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01127904,0.0002360959,0.0003847297,0.007045737,0.0001313009,0.001396757,0.002057155,0.00006156269,0.0001258574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005840997,0.000193817,0.0001978998,0.003643612,0.0002147149,0.001804805,0.0008014838,0.0002489418,0.00002164028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000329108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001910084,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000347458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005534662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939994,0.0004620408,0.001952662,0.0005517156,0.002741982,0.0002922501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959714,0.0005303135,0.001377986,0.0005337311,0.001552332,0.00003421545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004553793,0.0002713145,0.003926376,0.0001489829,0.0003672821,0.0001189153,0.00156519,0.0003155241,0.0000538286,0.1006516,0.008527628,0.8835979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007100663,0.0004777957,0.0832163,0.008571694,0.0003420922,0.00009226124,0.08090337,0.005444712,0.0006323565,0.1535078,0.6589018,0.000809279],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2798991,0.006178086,0.0375753,0.006187553,0.03194807,0.006180184,0.00005249304,0.0001595044,0.6318197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.927497,0.005954834,0.01679898,0.0001578616,0.0002171539,0.00007974748,0.00001154585,0.00002446992,0.04925835],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8827887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616261335","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.007","title":"Erratum to “Success conditions for international development capacity building projects” [Int. J. Proj. Manag. 35 (1) (January 2017) 44–63]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Public-Private Partnership Projects","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"INT; Engineering; Computer science; Operating system","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07880476731230542,"gpt":0.3481704962688392,"spread":0.2693657289565338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002566542,0.001097499,0.001148071,0.006017148,0.0006969763,0.004081672,0.007344586,0.0004985296,0.0001561726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001228904,0.001060847,0.0007181289,0.0005896984,0.0001764902,0.004171009,0.002771532,0.00140399,0.0002024953],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001639175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009293759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002799521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002628839,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920707,0.00005883594,0.00225796,0.001236941,0.003286984,0.001088585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898331,0.00008838007,0.004604922,0.0009315678,0.0044281,0.0001139337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004302436,0.000529288,0.0003907332,0.001044549,0.003220273,0.000419286,0.0002869308,0.0000629655,0.00005694645,0.01136277,0.976625,0.005571005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002107622,0.00007664275,0.002338028,0.002607891,0.0004242192,0.00007610275,0.0003437071,0.000586374,0.0000816165,0.002969439,0.9872364,0.001151946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.004865887,0.0005758505,0.01049454,0.01655783,0.246971,0.01001801,0.0004298037,0.0004465851,0.7096405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.105874,0.001751704,0.08229572,0.01802767,0.1342778,0.006631623,0.00704003,0.001258548,0.6428429],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1126932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409534071","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102708","title":"Managing cultural projects: Plural creativity as creative practice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Plural; Creativity; Engineering; Sociology; Business; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04856398709301062,"gpt":0.4068054410796663,"spread":0.3582414539866556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009919493,0.0001361491,0.0001741171,0.0003500115,0.0002594004,0.0004099446,0.0006309657,0.00005476231,0.0002388614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000657125,0.0001055558,0.0001231574,0.0004347509,0.0001326146,0.001030864,0.0002007739,0.0002417121,0.00001737942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008760273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003716699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003920789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000229408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979827,0.0002110961,0.000442966,0.0001726344,0.0009615865,0.0002290277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998105,0.0001280068,0.0004372748,0.00007952554,0.001198433,0.00005170689],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000881412,0.0004840569,0.001991641,0.00003912789,0.003143817,0.0008499716,0.02783484,0.0000776724,0.00004371104,0.1532327,0.6110686,0.2003524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006194633,0.00006024941,0.0008480086,0.0002479671,0.00009289478,0.00002201769,0.09035695,0.00001620615,0.0001554497,0.001719992,0.9057387,0.0001220739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01032821,0.0003362839,0.001294171,0.0627243,0.002218588,0.000652981,0.000003560812,0.00004307698,0.9223988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5076465,0.003578478,0.009178242,0.003576607,0.001138508,0.00006030058,0.00001292649,0.00001645378,0.474792],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4973183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5927086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}