{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":2,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"410841734a81","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Research in Interdisciplinary Studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W4416258201","doi":"10.65138/ijris.2025.v3i11.232","title":"Evaluating Prototype Fidelity: Impacts on Cognitive Workload and Mental-Model Alignment in Flight-Booking Interfaces","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Research in Interdisciplinary Studies","topic":"Usability and User Interface Design","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Workload; Workflow; Usability; Task (project management); Fidelity; Cognition; Task analysis; Cognitive walkthrough; Cognitive load","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2607040440764267,"gpt":0.558120519085233,"spread":0.2974164750088062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00522318,0.0005265534,0.0003349708,0.0005059617,0.0002619657,0.001521062,0.0005619774,0.0006271044,0.001638105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05790804,0.0003697334,0.000420076,0.0002488725,0.0004022376,0.001161461,0.001004647,0.0004061878,0.0002057603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003032265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003060099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007104594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008215428,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964611,0.001844022,0.0003733952,0.0002392657,0.0008955422,0.0001866896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.957304,0.03416461,0.003210062,0.002045514,0.00246488,0.0008109673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008853609,0.006882648,0.2592895,0.002220457,0.0003944331,0.0005907905,0.02177281,0.01367539,0.24084,0.0006258227,0.0008915991,0.443963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003808706,0.02626459,0.8783946,0.0002385827,0.0003506428,0.0007661756,0.007818803,0.02608626,0.05650445,0.0006943535,0.00225037,0.0002502339],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951262,0.00003455244,0.004276771,0.00001859363,0.000005044138,0.0001045937,0.00001571728,0.00005347945,0.0003649483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880915,0.00004697586,0.01141042,0.00001767459,0.000005445765,0.0001313212,0.00006002944,0.000016504,0.0002201499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00522318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02762318,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416828038","doi":"10.65138/ijris.2025.v3i11.236","title":"Understanding Emotional Adaptivity in Study Tools: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Eunoia","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Research in Interdisciplinary Studies","topic":"Emotion and Mood Recognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Transparency (behavior); Cognition; Trustworthiness; Agency (philosophy); Affect (linguistics); Perception","authors":[{"name":"Tanisi Das","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6669168537356942,"gpt":0.6571752127368403,"spread":0.009741640998853884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02322815,0.0007935041,0.001301089,0.001302583,0.0009175526,0.001656312,0.0008542378,0.0008886979,0.001970728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02342402,0.0004291088,0.001300055,0.0006272299,0.0009410012,0.001036571,0.001565707,0.0006641042,0.0003723607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007358421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001008993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003660144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009378502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9887902,0.007647728,0.001041736,0.0009409077,0.001145124,0.0004343216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757194,0.01559156,0.001877128,0.001589631,0.004274179,0.0009480568],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02990699,0.05621111,0.14854,0.00833574,0.001689467,0.0007529725,0.1059491,0.001307229,0.04011676,0.001329998,0.001660758,0.6041999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007524404,0.2166567,0.6338167,0.002050455,0.002333763,0.0007666816,0.0738132,0.005160251,0.02697285,0.002360678,0.02813352,0.0004108853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867291,0.0003222789,0.00466339,0.00006095152,0.00003290164,0.006671247,0.0001508333,0.00003669135,0.001332456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9391887,0.0005192532,0.02852353,0.0002325751,0.00007021255,0.02918314,0.0003143241,0.00005500403,0.001913277],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02322815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1228437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}