{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":51,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":51,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"67a7c0cdd58a","filters":{"venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly"}},"results":[{"id":"W2167094518","doi":"10.1017/s0020589309001201","title":"ARTICLE 23 OF THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION: A COMPREHENSIVE CODE FOR JURISDICTION AGREEMENTS?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Formality; Jurisdiction; Code (set theory); Relation (database); Law and economics; Exclusive jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Programming language; Data mining","authors":[{"name":"Louise Merrett","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05226057415302587,"gpt":0.3436548449102697,"spread":0.2913942707572438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001053674,0.00006421069,0.0001050722,0.00002170014,0.0003247017,0.00005688273,0.0001237512,0.00003290398,0.00004774311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002968416,0.00005082214,0.00006285007,0.0000750929,0.0001814537,0.0002138809,0.000005976179,0.00004308738,0.000004321405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003100262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002176299,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000246059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001284594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992728,0.00006291736,0.0001925333,0.0001237706,0.0002509074,0.00009702415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994017,0.00007886405,0.0001247019,0.00007181784,0.0002877193,0.00003516205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009597084,0.00009111437,0.0004646782,0.000002199696,0.00004043202,1.22785e-7,0.02218623,0.00002004746,0.003538491,0.9653968,0.0007376914,0.007426193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001502689,0.0007764778,0.2319034,0.00006444305,0.00004181322,0.000002896752,0.008051788,0.002994041,0.003105645,0.1347138,0.6166434,0.000199632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9499258,0.00007438244,0.002363484,0.008979312,0.0005102574,0.0004369831,0.00004785973,0.00002882743,0.03763302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980224,0.000005651389,0.0001407153,0.0003671818,0.0002002771,0.00001296833,0.000007181394,0.000001549103,0.001242026],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.830683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2497376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091946373","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei083","title":"The Enforcement of Jurisdiction Agreements Within The Brussels Regime","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Damages; Context (archaeology); Enforcement; Political science; Subject (documents); Law; Exclusive jurisdiction; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Louise Merrett","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02651177384880028,"gpt":0.3078520052260265,"spread":0.2813402313772262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003693932,0.00006524921,0.00007549955,0.00001642216,0.0006753606,0.0001263022,0.0001841744,0.00002395752,0.00006234679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001951337,0.0000385377,0.00004060901,0.00005968556,0.0003977381,0.0001579234,0.00001122607,0.00006294587,0.000008511566],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003366511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002528958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01425453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01591808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990857,0.00009761425,0.0002348077,0.0001013988,0.0003828662,0.000097669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994566,0.0001213651,0.0001712519,0.00007808289,0.0001505866,0.00002205875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003265012,0.00002993623,0.0003277343,6.402286e-7,0.000035429,2.292439e-7,0.01273103,0.0000108462,0.0001110011,0.9843721,0.0007193908,0.001629014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004701158,0.0002842738,0.01149958,0.00002454842,0.00002158531,0.000001890969,0.01447852,0.0007866415,0.0005603086,0.09404545,0.8777105,0.0001166384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5159933,0.000202433,0.0004943388,0.006315762,0.0009593448,0.0003106536,0.00001395754,0.00002770316,0.4756825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949402,0.00001482655,0.00001764666,0.00009408588,0.0002733802,0.00001952505,0.000007090019,0.000001705076,0.004631547],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8903267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097091195","doi":"10.1093/iclq/54.1.161","title":"Reframing Sovereignty? Sub-State National Societies and Contemporary Challenges to the Nation-State","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; State (computer science); Nationalism; Globalization; Political science; Political economy; National identity; Power (physics); Popular sovereignty; Law; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Tierney","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07831570187393198,"gpt":0.3217714511584319,"spread":0.2434557492844999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003606378,0.0001029624,0.0001295825,0.00002277524,0.0004212835,0.0001946863,0.0001650361,0.00003054643,0.00001048284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001976716,0.00007796964,0.00003265493,0.00005189887,0.0003307224,0.000357928,0.00002290781,0.00009458726,0.00002819602],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001059335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009897467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004830465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007852774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988207,0.00008753949,0.0001919311,0.0002066427,0.0005226946,0.000170474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993283,0.0001905676,0.00008496238,0.0000479346,0.0002476251,0.0001006814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001602389,0.00002274852,0.00004494327,0.000003598102,0.00003432782,0.000001503111,0.03492142,0.00001320587,0.00003206214,0.9632428,0.0005810196,0.001086345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000501791,0.0001566095,0.00828658,0.00007135354,0.000002647234,0.000004660587,0.009361769,0.00006743838,0.0001209707,0.6561467,0.3250848,0.0001946316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5993369,0.002012681,0.0005087456,0.06074809,0.0005981621,0.0004428271,0.0002042036,0.0000602911,0.3360882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966643,0.0001006869,0.00004975863,0.001372706,0.0002564577,0.00003474194,0.000004244115,0.000003612593,0.001513533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3973274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.730225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162354815","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300064186","title":"The Kosovo Crisis and Nato's Application of Armed Force Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Novelis (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Offensive; Political science; Jus ad bellum; Law; Serbian; State (computer science); The Republic; International law; Use of force; International court; Member states; Economic Justice; Sovereignty; Economic history; Public international law; European union; International trade; Engineering; Operations research; History; Politics; Theology; Economics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Dino Kritsiotis","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01960039896708949,"gpt":0.3021455511482624,"spread":0.2825451521811729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002574005,0.00007819846,0.0001185337,0.00002174049,0.0005950262,0.0001261735,0.0002842986,0.00003209179,0.00008064147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003457961,0.00004663639,0.00004788971,0.00003989747,0.0006600925,0.0001981594,0.00001063596,0.00007447297,0.000005646923],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002093939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002699258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002057333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005566706,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990451,0.0001046563,0.0002560568,0.0001419664,0.00034673,0.0001054789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992172,0.000241513,0.0001398266,0.0000935152,0.0002735909,0.00003435525],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005334351,0.00003183534,0.0001339491,0.000001729685,0.00005469364,2.089137e-7,0.009013997,0.000003155388,0.00006458983,0.9858086,0.0002100625,0.00462383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006528149,0.0002429449,0.0132342,0.0000291331,0.00001821782,0.000004227687,0.006569407,0.001416672,0.0005947447,0.7744802,0.2025713,0.0001861787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8868495,0.00009743476,0.00009739606,0.003031952,0.00009454386,0.0001817452,0.00001857704,0.00001057789,0.1096183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951422,0.00002899475,0.00002893871,0.000250405,0.0001185962,0.00002897484,0.000009714084,0.000002575712,0.004389598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2113284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4576521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118490530","doi":"10.1017/s0020589308000389","title":"THE SCOPE OF THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE OF THE UNITED NATIONS CHARTER","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Scope (computer science); Political science; Law; United Nations Charter; Relevance (law); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Rain Liivoja","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05235978180989796,"gpt":0.3203038501892126,"spread":0.2679440683793146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001817995,0.00006777263,0.00008513335,0.00006307311,0.0009393097,0.00003778492,0.0004954675,0.00002918185,0.00004526421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002757922,0.00003495487,0.00008153654,0.0003614902,0.0009286436,0.0001697825,0.00002902027,0.00009383274,0.000006115853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002817943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006990471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004741601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01378687,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988707,0.0001991056,0.0002413011,0.00009313731,0.0005038794,0.0000918654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988198,0.0003214718,0.0002063465,0.0001213328,0.0005097344,0.00002135055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001635109,0.00004166556,0.001864885,0.000001127422,0.00004058438,1.172794e-7,0.01019413,0.00001041306,0.0003891572,0.9867362,0.0006083911,0.00009702211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009538393,0.0001719196,0.244022,0.000146962,0.00003304721,0.00001134466,0.00641099,0.0006193246,0.008496773,0.05385884,0.6850469,0.0002281322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8589652,0.00005444725,0.00004157721,0.007257183,0.0006404509,0.0002151091,0.00003819057,0.000008079052,0.1327798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948317,0.00006188055,0.00001608163,0.0002055918,0.0001158387,0.00001367824,0.000005408895,0.000002301003,0.004747562],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9328773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7693395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767604562","doi":"10.1017/s0020589317000458","title":"SELF-DEFENCE AGAINST NON-STATE ACTORS: ARE POWERFUL STATES WILLING BUT UNABLE TO CHANGE INTERNATIONAL LAW?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); International law; Customary international law; Law; Politics; Self defense; Law and economics; Public international law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jutta Brunnée","is_ca":true},{"name":"Stephen J. Toope","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05123218250217359,"gpt":0.3325977371017578,"spread":0.2813655545995842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002784324,0.0002378655,0.0002587619,0.00009463259,0.001509725,0.001320811,0.001062731,0.00006855938,0.0001845304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001148593,0.0002188613,0.00009055908,0.00002828591,0.0004300281,0.001562472,0.00009600252,0.0002082475,0.0002890828],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001854965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004036538,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006923502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02051288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980616,0.0000765767,0.0003218855,0.0004556771,0.0007318297,0.0003524087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984462,0.0001142931,0.0003232389,0.000201547,0.0006970438,0.0002176754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007586366,0.0001305941,0.001181374,0.000005965403,0.0001589607,0.00003002827,0.0342268,0.00001928265,0.00007113171,0.9634508,0.0002798919,0.0003692984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001176469,0.0004157328,0.0131562,0.0002938652,0.00002236257,0.000005887434,0.006473639,0.002782362,0.0007170704,0.1903077,0.7838071,0.0008416413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7412691,0.00002449249,0.0001950065,0.004641619,0.001835887,0.0003410131,0.0001515542,0.00009287435,0.2514485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847241,0.00003518685,0.0003313013,0.001500366,0.001039859,0.00006058721,0.00006168578,0.00001222275,0.01223469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7835272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2533991149","doi":"10.1017/s0020589316000373","title":"LEGAL TRANSFERS OF RESTRICTIVE IMMIGRATION LAWS: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Parallels; Immigration policy; Immigration law; Race (biology); Limiting; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Refugee; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Economics; Gender studies; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Ghezelbash","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02869526770183347,"gpt":0.3109104977525129,"spread":0.2822152300506794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001710591,0.0001090382,0.0001751997,0.00008328836,0.0001939338,0.00005056143,0.0001405756,0.00006520344,0.0001260107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001976891,0.00007746453,0.00007690763,0.000110301,0.0002904447,0.0007420698,0.000003810261,0.00006689288,0.00001303293],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000485335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008865727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01785758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04622443,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988263,0.0001737874,0.0002669787,0.0002269249,0.0003790421,0.0001269273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989965,0.0001564297,0.0001101023,0.00006752732,0.0006004637,0.00006896289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001278512,0.00007915944,0.0002287486,0.000001077919,0.00004337233,7.488407e-7,0.05709353,3.845203e-7,0.002251537,0.9370879,0.0007931713,0.002292539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002878685,0.003739915,0.01294365,0.0001878605,0.00008067056,0.000009914444,0.1445463,0.000345357,0.006754069,0.213118,0.6146213,0.0007743945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7766823,0.0002094129,0.01974159,0.00936137,0.0007789357,0.0003686504,0.00007505024,0.00006617419,0.1927165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954208,0.00005708311,0.0001217925,0.00006725322,0.0002455481,0.00002667074,0.000006252365,0.000003474639,0.004051165],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7239699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886826,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590322391","doi":"10.1017/s0020589317000021","title":"TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY BANISHMENT: CITIZENSHIP STRIPPING IN COMMON LAW NATIONS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Law; Political science; Revocation; Common law; Stripping (fiber); Sociology; Engineering; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Sangeetha Pillai","is_ca":false},{"name":"George Williams","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05464530266512947,"gpt":0.34068087475087,"spread":0.2860355720857405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002468174,0.0001336486,0.0001885991,0.00008882735,0.002215202,0.0007958711,0.000576426,0.0000632235,0.0003094662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006656242,0.0001300245,0.00005999591,0.00002581904,0.0006413565,0.0006154653,0.0000315774,0.0001666143,0.00006467892],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001463184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003225773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009596183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2041921,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986932,0.00009486298,0.0002826178,0.0002561506,0.0004486149,0.0002245321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992074,0.0001795183,0.0001806375,0.000155005,0.0001876733,0.00008978073],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002619276,0.00007074606,0.001388015,0.000002983689,0.00004590405,0.00001171915,0.0091273,0.000003190366,0.0000109201,0.9890563,0.0001142922,0.0001424143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009521515,0.0001036454,0.02233674,0.0001370812,0.000009622658,0.000003414321,0.00180609,0.0001938652,0.00006624786,0.8148568,0.1592592,0.0002750763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4429651,0.00003176292,0.0000174999,0.002540258,0.0006899313,0.0001570326,0.0000454541,0.00002552346,0.5535275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956424,0.00001286993,0.00005139293,0.0003462295,0.0003908203,0.00003149086,0.00003309608,0.000005000873,0.00348668],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5526774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993230620","doi":"10.1017/s0020589319000459","title":"THE DUTY TO COOPERATE IN THE CUSTOMARY LAW OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Obligation; Harm; International law; Political science; Notice; Law; Environmental law; Duty to protect; Customary international law; Normative; International court; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Public international law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Neil Craik","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01644186199601939,"gpt":0.2722843474520698,"spread":0.2558424854560504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002373841,0.0001169829,0.0001192876,0.00004583678,0.0001215875,0.0002765093,0.000313813,0.00001834698,0.0003040174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000117304,0.00006559978,0.00005310853,0.00007495389,0.0001120691,0.0005869163,0.00003735884,0.0001003989,0.0002194667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003991357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009041056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007316769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000794265,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991178,0.00002931952,0.0002522296,0.0001531053,0.000331456,0.0001160933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996231,0.00008861116,0.0001080279,0.0001099668,0.00006098932,0.000009328979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007049507,0.0001081547,0.003272846,0.000002897166,0.00003984117,0.000001383233,0.0004186154,0.00005839923,0.001361314,0.9939539,0.0005511849,0.0001609532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002360903,0.0006212189,0.4388967,0.000081825,0.00002690779,0.00001447946,0.005347918,0.0246705,0.0003746929,0.04602802,0.4810676,0.0005092844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7453414,0.00001657554,0.00001808032,0.002002565,0.0002303082,0.0002653993,0.00001294683,0.00000672976,0.252106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881105,0.000001817978,0.00002229077,0.0112958,0.0001481743,0.00003233313,0.00003638684,0.000003979489,0.00034867],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9479259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3328777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555203996","doi":"10.1017/s0020589316000397","title":"THE WORKING METHODS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL: MAINTAINING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CHANGE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Security council; Political science; Public administration; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Public relations; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Joanna Harrington","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1760731139692933,"gpt":0.4253756158066775,"spread":0.2493025018373841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001058658,0.00005766828,0.00007978536,0.00003664134,0.0005754232,0.0000509054,0.0003304088,0.00002405608,0.00002017684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003132602,0.00002592767,0.00004958204,0.0003266732,0.00058696,0.0001313862,0.00002982664,0.00006073305,8.555427e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007939438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006657602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0098146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987535,0.0004376921,0.0001978563,0.00008256345,0.0004201757,0.0001081922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984401,0.0008066331,0.0001985409,0.00008932742,0.0004459303,0.00001942353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009565418,0.00001062765,0.001322128,7.055978e-7,0.00003681018,4.962774e-8,0.07285446,6.243141e-7,0.00008513119,0.9213161,0.00008411018,0.004279704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005902665,0.000143138,0.01914351,0.00009769689,0.00003376595,0.000001607118,0.2447072,0.0007238728,0.0002893879,0.2195762,0.514559,0.0001343855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9367172,0.0001634137,0.001067559,0.02549434,0.0005975295,0.0004326383,0.00006713611,0.00001478377,0.03544537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994534,0.00006721609,0.00007846988,0.0001795585,0.00008087166,0.00002240293,0.000002315639,0.000001559556,0.0001142672],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7017399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128490749","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei069","title":"Scrutiny and Approval: The Role for Westminster-Style Parliaments in Treaty-Making","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Human rights; Political science; Law; Scrutiny; Treaty; Ratification; Legitimacy; Convention; Prerogative; Public administration; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Joanna Harrington","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02714211082727366,"gpt":0.3194897343308738,"spread":0.2923476235036002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002083036,0.00008280203,0.00009786547,0.00003600876,0.0002828547,0.0001938966,0.0001289641,0.00003359092,0.00001814603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004056873,0.00006427851,0.00002983334,0.00004337905,0.0001790128,0.0002623501,0.00001064834,0.00005518042,0.000005053258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000493418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001642631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006540744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02665685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992452,0.00006653491,0.0001771452,0.0001685465,0.0002082458,0.0001343047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999594,0.0001709741,0.00008125358,0.0000399361,0.00009403561,0.00001975271],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000395655,0.00005535038,0.005629562,0.000001478925,0.00001455201,6.270992e-7,0.006069662,0.000006208767,0.00008791852,0.9841479,0.0000837793,0.003863413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001696543,0.0003352497,0.0582626,0.00009639404,0.00001935359,0.00000582423,0.01915703,0.00684032,0.0002502088,0.3839326,0.5290683,0.000335592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8265771,0.0001358276,0.0005579798,0.002377673,0.0002402449,0.0003755261,0.0000358256,0.00002148403,0.1696783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975969,0.000003552281,0.000195469,0.0002263897,0.0002735676,0.00007849751,0.00002250358,0.000003355434,0.001599797],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6002153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065967823","doi":"10.1017/s0020589310000308","title":"INCOHERENT AND INEFFECTIVE: THE CONCEPT OF PERSISTENT OBJECTOR REVISITED","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Conscientious objector; Dissenting opinion; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Patrick Dumberry","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02265252154409393,"gpt":0.3123902001780045,"spread":0.2897376786339106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001686545,0.00007664497,0.0001192967,0.00002618194,0.000290223,0.00008916843,0.0001760053,0.00003434144,0.0002837681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006697742,0.00005007659,0.00006327766,0.00002351524,0.0007868947,0.0001499043,0.00001664279,0.0001337037,0.000006934009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001667765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002219216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001662104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004434699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992763,0.00009617526,0.0001469382,0.0001354203,0.0002605667,0.00008456038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993449,0.0002082876,0.00008589544,0.00005967653,0.0002549299,0.00004626677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002442951,0.00003366216,0.000247448,0.000001577496,0.00007728223,5.911842e-7,0.01899562,5.739702e-7,0.000386153,0.9797074,0.00009817989,0.0004270813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002717861,0.001741161,0.06970727,0.0001729341,0.000136178,0.00003417861,0.01734664,0.001340742,0.002542874,0.4530569,0.4504562,0.0007470556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9277399,0.00007208419,0.00002052495,0.001001633,0.0003578303,0.0001741489,0.00002568316,0.00001145934,0.07059669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976851,0.000002078037,0.00004117496,0.0001473622,0.000258532,0.00001396643,0.000007721007,0.000002058561,0.001841953],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5266505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3107062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782410272","doi":"10.1017/s0020589317000537","title":"SHELTERING GOVERNMENT SUPPORT TO ‘GREEN’ ELECTRICITY: THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; European union; Government (linguistics); Politics; International trade; Renewable energy; Energy subsidies; Business; Parallels; Economics; Public economics; Energy policy; Political science; Law; Market economy","authors":[{"name":"Gracia Marín Durán","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01843336412607489,"gpt":0.2725625140534778,"spread":0.2541291499274029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006458689,0.00009142433,0.00009494312,0.00002391436,0.0006812394,0.0002897165,0.0002625848,0.00001248872,0.0001922753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001263972,0.00005910806,0.00001463632,0.0003534609,0.0005538268,0.0002037648,0.00003623292,0.00007695828,0.000049422],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000622908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001557416,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005536478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01089002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986352,0.0005066625,0.0001652282,0.0001754034,0.0003876913,0.0001298253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999545,0.000137826,0.00007185093,0.00008475071,0.00009769578,0.00006290741],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001773641,0.00001980026,0.0007461619,7.843182e-7,0.00003241294,9.243582e-7,0.03473306,0.000001194099,0.0002678694,0.9592969,0.001056204,0.003826925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001214953,0.0002891366,0.08198171,0.00002555235,0.00003618199,0.0000126503,0.007848692,0.000260031,0.001325709,0.006913641,0.8998044,0.0002874105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2133998,0.00003301013,0.005710121,0.2634933,0.0007502268,0.0007583168,0.00002271727,0.0001255157,0.515707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993749,0.00000370488,0.00005693019,0.002172695,0.000551152,0.000005291751,0.000004816394,0.000007942636,0.003448489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9523833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6076886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040093363","doi":"10.1017/s0020589320000123","title":"THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND THE RIGHT TO LIFE","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Political science; Law; Right to life; Quarter (Canadian coin); Environmental law; Consolidation (business); Geography; Business","authors":[{"name":"Ginevra Le Moli","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02962111536867059,"gpt":0.2888174152393788,"spread":0.2591962998707082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001353964,0.00007591707,0.00008591761,0.00000643049,0.001606979,0.0001654284,0.0001752836,0.00002201833,0.00009921054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002058594,0.00004247657,0.00002729411,0.00002591555,0.0008428004,0.0001203925,0.0000272782,0.00009550322,0.00006829749],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002302816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003633853,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002419375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004185903,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992476,0.0001859678,0.000120224,0.0001328341,0.0002097502,0.0001036501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996763,0.0001038478,0.00004458586,0.00004975504,0.000006302043,0.0001192129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006020773,0.00001637698,0.0001314713,4.890305e-7,0.00002960601,5.18515e-7,0.02290491,0.000001058563,0.0001669975,0.9756453,0.0006527967,0.0003902906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005801733,0.0001831766,0.003263808,0.000004047881,0.000007353712,0.000001237007,0.002777574,0.0001134794,0.0001277998,0.03178959,0.9610588,0.00009293552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.798915,0.0001107884,0.0001310487,0.06900135,0.0001488196,0.0005727394,0.00002554276,0.00002430371,0.1310704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962686,0.000005353048,0.00001097363,0.002171864,0.0003267589,0.00004986293,0.000003404851,0.000002064694,0.001161082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.960406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996928,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013364851","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei132","title":"Homing Devices in Choice of Tort Law: Australian, British, and Canadian Approaches","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Choice of law; Tort; Law; Damages; Political science; Common law; Kingdom; Conflict of laws; Liability; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Reid Mortensen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09087728675211142,"gpt":0.3248591918843926,"spread":0.2339819051322812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008752368,0.0000494047,0.00009259964,0.00002627868,0.000153371,0.0001291846,0.0001025111,0.00003064948,0.00002726469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001128263,0.00005523281,0.00001460372,0.00005366202,0.0002457024,0.0002224237,0.000006492238,0.00005172297,0.000002232098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003791259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003480298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.904851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890679,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994804,0.00002854795,0.0001428534,0.0001268945,0.000109148,0.0001122098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997695,0.00004901637,0.00004540201,0.00003230966,0.00004418181,0.00005960851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001790729,0.0000247495,0.01923514,0.000002758102,0.000007246224,0.000001297255,0.002545018,0.000005436943,0.00002442229,0.9772788,0.0001039121,0.0007694629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003948701,0.00005245342,0.5003105,0.00005352929,0.000007689985,0.000004031757,0.007803494,0.0003307579,0.00007276901,0.03054902,0.4602219,0.0001990026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8163194,0.00008449164,0.00001044346,0.00165453,0.00003749941,0.00009511117,0.00003485798,0.000005990044,0.1817577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998453,0.000002500666,0.0001266668,0.00008495396,0.0001098838,0.00001607174,0.00001173617,0.000001628258,0.001193555],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9467297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2252329,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167845946","doi":"10.1017/s0020589313000353","title":"DIGGING DEEP: PROPERTY RIGHTS IN SUBTERRANEAN SPACE AND THE CHALLENGE OF CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Context (archaeology); Carbon capture and storage (timeline); Digging; Space (punctuation); Climate change mitigation; Property rights; Caking; Climate change; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Natural resource economics; Geography; Sociology; Archaeology; Economics; Geology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Jill Morgan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01940274226170985,"gpt":0.2376118130273362,"spread":0.2182090707656263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000068551,0.00007602427,0.000107977,0.00001636484,0.00005943137,0.00003903269,0.00006273776,0.00002278889,0.0002927226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001701544,0.00003979886,0.00001236443,0.00002595388,0.0003769762,0.0001916948,0.0000242746,0.00009442563,0.000006302421],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000167638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001554933,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01612656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01616848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994984,0.00006109585,0.0001292149,0.0001447919,0.00009763097,0.00006887668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999785,0.00006429345,0.00005320337,0.000053787,0.00001589864,0.00002783539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031299,0.0002941586,0.01675855,0.00001764409,0.00008925463,0.00001521171,0.113276,0.0001968325,0.002788873,0.8608111,0.0002798281,0.005159559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006795859,0.001252721,0.4091667,0.0001657022,0.00004072722,0.0001737105,0.01701153,0.21925,0.0006295358,0.315337,0.02932536,0.0008511361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8845705,0.00006989187,0.0000401294,0.005093704,0.00005618452,0.0001933812,0.000001573197,0.00000612243,0.1099685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990516,0.000006791326,0.0000453401,0.0001008247,0.00001445499,0.00002650554,0.000001952476,0.000001106157,0.0007513744],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5454741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9904251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991665903","doi":"10.1017/s0020589319000447","title":"RECONCEPTUALISING THE LEGAL RESPONSE TO FOREIGN FIGHTERS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Neutrality; Terrorism; State (computer science); Law; Security council; Foreign policy; Phenomenon; International law; Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"John Ip","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03969533688442851,"gpt":0.3379899019845971,"spread":0.2982945651001686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000409777,0.0001129525,0.0001406751,0.000036998,0.0002814021,0.0002602866,0.0003714826,0.00004275136,0.0003940561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001268775,0.00008193338,0.00005547168,0.00007803369,0.0002913971,0.0003957914,0.00002163856,0.0001230012,0.0003569754],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007125935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004611092,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001844023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00110569,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998674,0.0003097136,0.0001902418,0.000233613,0.0003416703,0.0002507743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991114,0.0004597477,0.00005196497,0.0001291379,0.0001211904,0.0001266333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004753523,0.00003557629,0.0005735323,0.000001910391,0.00004257287,0.000005575689,0.3058661,0.00000444174,0.000448404,0.6878892,0.001935153,0.00272224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004377175,0.0006127422,0.005152144,0.00007970667,0.000008783843,0.000006228434,0.4470069,0.0002301242,0.0001331501,0.01130685,0.5347511,0.0002746246],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9198998,0.00003084435,0.0003056945,0.009884097,0.0009844704,0.0002324166,0.00002413697,0.00003413584,0.06860438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915804,0.000002045154,0.00002476186,0.003409904,0.0003171648,0.00002209709,0.000003252508,0.000004217003,0.004636147],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6765823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4588315,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007324430","doi":"10.1093/iclq/53.4.833","title":"A NEW ERA IN THE LAW OF INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR: FROM WARSAW (1929) TO MONTREAL (1999)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carriage; Law; Convention; Political science; International law; Unification; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Bin Cheng","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01997324538303566,"gpt":0.3035774850039419,"spread":0.2836042396209063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000220358,0.0001351346,0.0001765108,0.00006220481,0.0001493556,0.0001311288,0.0005734071,0.00006089715,0.0001500637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009668,0.0001116047,0.00006894387,0.0001092454,0.0001603196,0.0004401494,0.00002360491,0.0001454724,0.00004429813],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001407453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007593269,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2772805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2092222,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984404,0.0001103493,0.0003353078,0.0002560874,0.0006929634,0.000164871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993319,0.0001759585,0.0001222818,0.00009676701,0.0001871899,0.00008590597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009416866,0.0001189826,0.0005203944,6.892429e-7,0.00006101129,0.000004961625,0.04750935,0.00006021686,0.0004048644,0.9480608,0.001520655,0.001643918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004340319,0.0007151791,0.04981626,0.0001949471,0.00003705573,0.000007459615,0.02670654,0.0002914276,0.001866763,0.3669825,0.5484017,0.0006399094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7669378,0.000117264,0.001709636,0.02267418,0.001043879,0.0003887363,0.0003740626,0.00003162688,0.2067228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963067,0.00001008902,0.0004579504,0.00187258,0.0004511495,0.00002722396,0.0001240227,0.00000479563,0.0007455106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5810783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8052074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256235904","doi":"10.1017/s0020589315000275","title":"FOREIGN FADS OR FASHIONS? THE ROLE OF COMPARATIVISM IN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Dignity; Political science; Comparative law; Law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; International human rights law; Common law; Sociology; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Sandra Fredman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09201827566361949,"gpt":0.3557104540449946,"spread":0.2636921783813751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000227047,0.00009190777,0.0001876683,0.00002971886,0.0005095569,0.00005876554,0.0002290524,0.0000315876,0.00004508873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003444318,0.00005697064,0.00003574726,0.000104439,0.00126182,0.0002233472,0.00002351287,0.00008885357,0.00001502061],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000451065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004547234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05468657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2523193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990126,0.0001404693,0.0002266727,0.0001359147,0.0003517574,0.0001325215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994545,0.0001433625,0.00008363695,0.00005554207,0.0002061547,0.00005680685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000388806,0.00007893091,0.001944122,4.117092e-7,0.00003638289,0.000002066364,0.02164709,0.000005881857,0.00003215795,0.9759117,0.0001719251,0.0001304017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004188342,0.0001998106,0.003199221,0.00002432598,0.000006625736,0.000001980043,0.02514785,0.00007247819,0.0001052083,0.8227568,0.1479659,0.0001009854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4235647,0.0001245419,0.00003929658,0.0006039983,0.0001057987,0.0001356862,0.00001276347,0.00001216526,0.5754011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999248,0.00000164661,0.00003171306,0.0001331009,0.0001505669,0.00003005271,0.000005721296,0.000001348727,0.0003978571],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5756834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9516084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287310028","doi":"10.1017/s0020589322000240","title":"REVISITING THE LEGALITY OF TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW DURING COVID-19","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"COVID-19 epidemiological studies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; International Health Regulations; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Solidarity; Proportionality (law); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; International law; Law; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine; Outbreak; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Lisa Forman","is_ca":true},{"name":"Roojin Habibi","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3106735596728564,"gpt":0.4438547724766831,"spread":0.1331812128038267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006223213,0.0001427557,0.0002858457,0.00004317692,0.0008221103,0.00004807131,0.0004091002,0.00002508701,0.0003938971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001445848,0.0001050772,0.0001078507,0.0001120443,0.00032371,0.0001284071,0.0001835714,0.0002727155,0.000003422275],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002322429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003024755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001726841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003978387,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982816,0.0003496814,0.0005130958,0.0002844436,0.0004241788,0.0001470244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971359,0.002210553,0.0002995666,0.0001614724,0.0001297176,0.00006275174],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008261848,0.00007812741,0.00165018,0.0000175218,0.0001984671,0.000004109472,0.002716171,0.000292229,0.0002880697,0.9942167,0.0003688165,0.00008697541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001034177,0.0001927566,0.04342331,0.00002548855,0.00004692176,0.00005981063,0.0141731,0.001428531,0.0001110113,0.9003474,0.03890145,0.0002561063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8764886,0.0002065651,0.009689693,0.05789434,0.0006817057,0.0004559613,0.0003595453,0.0001011175,0.0541225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966717,0.000007005222,0.0003060221,0.002004649,0.000207512,0.0001043663,0.00001515728,0.000005214716,0.0006783107],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1201832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6323091,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016639784","doi":"10.1017/s0020589320000093","title":"PASSPORTS, THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL, AND NATIONAL SECURITY IN THE COMMONWEALTH","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Commonwealth; Statutory law; Political science; Law; Denial; National security; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Paul F. Scott","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0784037260624742,"gpt":0.345930562693594,"spread":0.2675268366311198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000437139,0.00005980681,0.00007192924,0.00001661468,0.0003121059,0.0001568853,0.000213756,0.00001631891,0.00003116879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001543199,0.00003659213,0.00001373365,0.0000932694,0.0001733302,0.0001907222,0.00001595524,0.0001375803,0.0000183238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001790435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001970314,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001761688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009685405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990931,0.0002325477,0.000127762,0.0001401447,0.0003183339,0.00008815354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996061,0.0001813005,0.00004073161,0.0000380813,0.00007714397,0.00005667117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000447154,0.00002773194,0.0002243264,0.00000339015,0.000007697941,0.000004991771,0.1354425,0.000001608109,0.00001975279,0.8604524,0.003001664,0.0007692607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004381828,0.0005458549,0.03122206,0.00002863907,0.00001724986,0.00001305843,0.1721031,0.0008420674,0.00003136319,0.06178097,0.7327786,0.0001987947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6449947,0.000129001,0.000756571,0.2028166,0.0002031744,0.0005579832,0.00009538262,0.00002416714,0.1504225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881523,0.00001390178,0.00002881788,0.01146879,0.0002771427,0.00001760143,0.00001081521,0.000001469146,0.00002913096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7986714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5404683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037167014","doi":"10.1093/iclq/52.4.969","title":"A Role For Tort In Pre-Contractual Negotiations? An Examination Of English, French, And Canadian Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Plaintiff; Mistake; Law; Tort; Negotiation; Database transaction; Business; Liability; Certainty; Unjust enrichment; Work (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Restitution; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Paula Giliker","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0275917556304269,"gpt":0.3076206284420986,"spread":0.2800288728116718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002241881,0.00005730249,0.00009258857,0.00004378402,0.0001741044,0.00007737699,0.00008201019,0.00003945546,0.00003041165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002202515,0.00005896235,0.00001538281,0.00005311716,0.0001494526,0.0003885609,0.00000259687,0.00004579159,7.238049e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005090759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007282939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2100788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8453054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994109,0.0000745353,0.0001573856,0.00013888,0.0001083571,0.0001099324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994331,0.0001180434,0.00005541646,0.00004800602,0.000253719,0.00009171824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003713488,0.00004569162,0.0008128803,0.000001232478,0.000007983462,8.137408e-8,0.06340034,0.000006236306,0.00004989199,0.934678,0.00001409526,0.0009798319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001321806,0.0004767381,0.282361,0.00002682997,0.00001795768,0.000001115612,0.0350708,0.00237731,0.0002940071,0.0983813,0.5793568,0.0003143516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8480456,0.00004666076,0.0001804595,0.000176188,0.00008676441,0.0002990803,0.00007154626,0.000008222957,0.1510854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991527,0.0000027829,0.0002923526,0.00009884635,0.0000892932,0.00007559464,0.00002683925,0.000002148842,0.0002593994],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8362967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7951813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124063117","doi":"10.1017/s0020589309001213","title":"CLIMATE FINANCE AND ITS GOVERNANCE: MOVING TO A LOW CARBON ECONOMY THROUGH SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FINANCING?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Climate Finance; Corporate governance; Emissions trading; Greenhouse gas; Climate change; Business; Leverage (statistics); Abandonment (legal); Finance; Economic policy; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Developing country","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin J. Richardson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04384114303078949,"gpt":0.2795644619666809,"spread":0.2357233189358914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001994037,0.0001621813,0.0003373891,0.00005090918,0.0002259783,0.0001920951,0.0001941357,0.00005737885,0.00003419728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001138904,0.0001917061,0.00004650608,0.0001037956,0.00004280005,0.0004892696,0.00004084226,0.0001405922,0.00005097477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009983451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000418554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002782252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000518501,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990487,0.00002227969,0.0003675008,0.0002797752,0.00004405828,0.0002377307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952,0.0000688841,0.0001921798,0.0001012265,0.00006382615,0.00005387914],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007224272,0.00005005605,0.0009393145,0.000005253718,0.0000248536,0.000003179826,0.01096415,0.000007315311,0.00004740578,0.9858488,0.000158203,0.001879166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00152877,0.0009138341,0.2319388,0.0001709185,0.000007109864,0.00001106881,0.001226255,0.003901235,0.0004052832,0.6969857,0.06208123,0.000829794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.85238,0.0007555137,0.0000863682,0.004660252,0.0001782628,0.0001585292,0.00006723685,0.00002356129,0.1416903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966791,0.0001637897,0.0005678756,0.001533768,0.00009724971,0.0000156451,0.00000803202,0.00000597682,0.0009285291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2888631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7817548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091500395","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300064162","title":"Lockerbie: The Other Case","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International court; Political science; Economic Justice; Action (physics); Diplomacy; Convention; Civil aviation; International law; Aviation; Public international law; Engineering; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Anthony Aust","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04271379868121977,"gpt":0.3314521153436676,"spread":0.2887383166624478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001483193,0.00008009197,0.00007826282,0.00001714229,0.0007024626,0.0002022958,0.0002111074,0.0000295272,0.005863505],"category_scores_gemma":[8.833036e-7,0.00005269346,0.0000422669,0.00002373158,0.000455108,0.0002239525,0.000005148687,0.00008767357,0.0003833422],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002905443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001917588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009967993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02548735,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999231,0.000104493,0.00013232,0.0001425056,0.000262731,0.0001269946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996343,0.0001048747,0.00003355346,0.00006949762,0.0001071366,0.00005067193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000217113,0.00003107622,0.00001699405,3.666877e-7,0.00003636924,0.00004847423,0.01629132,0.000002240763,0.000003531844,0.9804653,0.0006038037,0.002478817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001852099,0.00005613949,0.0002007246,0.000007246582,0.000005542944,0.0001045047,0.001451859,0.0001541592,0.00001461949,0.1917942,0.8059349,0.00009084033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5219809,0.00002766213,0.00002391814,0.002962601,0.0001845334,0.00008056586,0.00001497722,0.00002308922,0.4747017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9377485,0.000002175646,0.00003536066,0.001116663,0.0005252995,0.00001616596,0.000003410002,0.000002889934,0.06054952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8053311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966247,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130785796","doi":"10.1093/iclq/51.1.17","title":"Judicial Review in ec Law—Some Reflections on the Origins and the Actual Legal Situation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Element (criminal law); Convention; Quarter (Canadian coin); Action (physics); Disadvantage; Order (exchange); Judicial review; Human rights; History; Business","authors":[{"name":"Jürgen Schwarze","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1190288468488151,"gpt":0.3706774742421635,"spread":0.2516486273933484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003982117,0.00009494863,0.0001431299,0.0000260875,0.0006085787,0.0001491519,0.0001834396,0.00001870851,0.0001945191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003175513,0.00005529624,0.00004250418,0.00007297866,0.0007897941,0.0003141073,0.0000169548,0.0001609903,0.00008081586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006626105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009384479,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003537784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01576813,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988768,0.0003229908,0.0002021662,0.0001626126,0.0003241169,0.0001113397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992493,0.0004720236,0.00007710602,0.00006402976,0.0001087524,0.00002880112],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003021675,0.0000407387,0.00001208924,0.000001988712,0.00003369285,0.000001444289,0.01049235,0.000001061398,0.000005465274,0.9870643,0.001856616,0.0004600362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006762093,0.0001772339,0.001125496,0.0001891349,0.00001712579,0.000004616643,0.003353056,0.0003138715,0.000008394678,0.05043636,0.9435689,0.0001295425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06756917,0.001963266,0.00001411929,0.06870113,0.000430361,0.0003518529,0.00001626148,0.00002370933,0.8609301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882299,0.001453194,0.000008343424,0.007839279,0.0003787043,0.00004147534,0.000003344527,0.000002859603,0.002042863],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9417123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8798988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986722370","doi":"10.1017/s0020589314000621","title":"CHOICE-OF-COURT AGREEMENTS, THE ITALIAN TORPEDO, AND THE RECAST OF THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Prima facie; Supreme court; Political science","authors":[{"name":"David Kenny","is_ca":true},{"name":"Rosemary Hennigan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08029000003947137,"gpt":0.3381065878157076,"spread":0.2578165877762363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000451465,0.0000553857,0.00009829753,0.00001207854,0.0002266758,0.00006146923,0.0001933403,0.00002358715,0.00003292923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000131614,0.00002722049,0.00003858285,0.00006610748,0.0007843449,0.000161019,0.00002090469,0.0000547011,0.000001667919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001744818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002822093,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006171589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006817291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991406,0.0001894853,0.0001767398,0.00008454198,0.0003453952,0.00006327747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993331,0.0001716627,0.0001694046,0.00008866026,0.0002089809,0.00002818832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007830878,0.00002819151,0.003173303,0.000001714381,0.000056813,6.323288e-8,0.07422786,0.000005168048,0.00007619403,0.917455,0.000857958,0.00403945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002453463,0.0003389026,0.1825661,0.0000867244,0.00006820647,0.00000411643,0.0423487,0.001660403,0.0003843225,0.09617276,0.6737456,0.00017077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8939133,0.0002104076,0.0001049398,0.0172199,0.0005443987,0.0002907639,0.00001391867,0.000006941326,0.08769539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979674,0.000009061695,0.00001382322,0.0001302553,0.0001780262,0.000008791296,0.000001919777,0.00000140696,0.001689286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8212822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9329637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051603156","doi":"10.1017/s0020589313000481","title":"<i>RE FLIGHTLEASE</i>: THE ‘REAL AND SUBSTANTIAL CONNECTION’ TEST FOR RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS FAILS TO TAKE FLIGHT IN IRELAND","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Irish; Law; Enforcement; Political science; Test (biology); Common law; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"David Kenny","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05449964257874465,"gpt":0.3126494242527124,"spread":0.2581497816739677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002746662,0.00007447333,0.0001217431,0.00004137633,0.0002067804,0.0001008225,0.00005835706,0.00003263762,0.00005130476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001098937,0.00005785115,0.00002011238,0.0000501233,0.0001434262,0.0001980122,0.000008892966,0.00003937271,0.000001713005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001883103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001053277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00327931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02297658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993443,0.0000535823,0.0001869556,0.0001504167,0.0001632697,0.0001013984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994097,0.0003064983,0.00007534539,0.00003696437,0.000118375,0.00005310093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003184298,0.000114915,0.008267305,0.00001471312,0.00005638936,4.965682e-7,0.0463367,0.000004084256,0.0007762884,0.9236739,0.000271255,0.02016556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01004675,0.00738373,0.1004213,0.0004149522,0.0001429367,0.000008965249,0.1098721,0.007606323,0.004675971,0.2613214,0.4971075,0.0009981415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9392768,0.00002783505,0.0007473742,0.001474473,0.0001575044,0.000438318,0.00007050049,0.000009333962,0.05779791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993912,0.00002487647,0.00005943722,0.0001701972,0.0001417811,0.00005414033,0.00002448741,0.000002367171,0.0001315269],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6623525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948515,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990658214","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300064642","title":"Constitutional Challenges to Sexual Orientation Discrimination","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Statutory law; Lesbian; Legislation; Same sex; Law; Political science; Convention; Human rights; Legislature; Sociology; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Kenneth Norrie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0891685153541418,"gpt":0.3677277836966911,"spread":0.2785592683425493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001212559,0.00009070764,0.0001062744,0.00001622493,0.0005122184,0.0001045835,0.0001126562,0.00003298708,0.0005503194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008144979,0.00007803439,0.00002181997,0.00005347146,0.000586986,0.0004090612,0.00000826686,0.00005625815,0.000190663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009461971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001480026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002127063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007246777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990678,0.00008687478,0.0001416325,0.0002140571,0.0003554751,0.0001341217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995774,0.00008343644,0.00003370603,0.00003782673,0.0001831012,0.00008454958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003013888,0.00004476718,0.0001341005,0.000001674277,0.00003112378,0.000001023686,0.09923552,0.00001119068,0.00004646284,0.8626726,0.00028178,0.0375096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006732304,0.0004024695,0.04310778,0.00003534074,0.00001983371,0.000004102432,0.1274899,0.0001382727,0.00006286776,0.0145187,0.8131876,0.0003599352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6883405,0.0001868823,0.0001890644,0.01463783,0.0003582601,0.0002444911,0.00002917296,0.00005617268,0.2959576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996054,0.00004419043,0.0002603621,0.0003145754,0.0003071918,0.00004731231,0.00002147916,0.000001300412,0.002949619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8481539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6025612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606851650","doi":"10.1017/s0020589317000161","title":"JAPANESE APPROACHES TO EXTRATERRITORIALITY IN COMPETITION LAW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Economic Zones and Regional Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Royal Irish Academy; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Extraterritoriality; Competition law; Competition (biology); Context (archaeology); Commission; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; International trade; Economics; Jurisdiction; Market economy; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Marek Martyniszyn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2585119866204537,"gpt":0.2762031427799723,"spread":0.01769115615951855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001962953,0.0001088674,0.0002483965,0.00005097196,0.000173193,0.000274353,0.0002604233,0.00004224416,0.00007224296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001957414,0.0001132492,0.00003856497,0.00001461207,0.0001235357,0.0003496641,0.00003679084,0.00007147398,0.0002136743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006529147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004728116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003897799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004346089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991744,0.00001137738,0.000352316,0.0003042829,0.00003307278,0.0001246179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999567,0.00002082429,0.0001643866,0.0001646899,0.00001842843,0.00006464325],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003331705,0.0000677831,0.003497396,0.000004300311,0.00002686741,0.000002504463,0.003165164,0.00001213423,0.000009976881,0.9930075,0.00006021241,0.0001128146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001540591,0.000240708,0.3152992,0.00006908827,0.000002405106,0.00001316974,0.001617023,0.001880407,0.00006843516,0.4997261,0.1790106,0.000532204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7707872,0.00006155026,0.0001254351,0.004359929,0.001294438,0.0001498067,0.00006624052,0.000009352138,0.2231461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982109,0.000004651079,0.0002793259,0.0003087515,0.0002674973,0.00004531754,0.00002225307,0.000004144131,0.0008571307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4932814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5892333,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137015572","doi":"10.1017/s0020589313000158","title":"COHABITANTS IN PRIVATE LAW: TRUST, FRUSTRATION AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT IN ENGLAND, GERMANY AND CANADA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Appeal; Law; Political science; Autonomy; Legislature; German; Common law; Private law; Comparative law; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Anne E. Sanders","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02178360568076308,"gpt":0.2859977473163106,"spread":0.2642141416355475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009967823,0.00007252579,0.0001015158,0.00002458529,0.000125183,0.0001315613,0.00007499581,0.00002874786,0.00004374865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001845195,0.00006667436,0.00000615392,0.00004559161,0.0001389599,0.0003609433,0.00001364222,0.00008265729,0.000003685828],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007751403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004377387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7739384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9725581,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993399,0.00005300018,0.0001714687,0.0001600844,0.0001555346,0.0001200393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997341,0.00007039494,0.00004577747,0.00003935322,0.00004374607,0.00006662731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008053572,0.00003577607,0.035752,0.000002584185,0.000007502174,0.000002106964,0.009245947,0.00000204316,0.0001373034,0.9536165,0.00005059532,0.001139558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001201567,0.0001059846,0.7860869,0.00003363693,0.000004338096,0.000003323729,0.006798042,0.001500836,0.00004436778,0.05447828,0.1495084,0.0002343326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719707,0.00005328031,0.00001278241,0.003206765,0.00005441331,0.0002256035,0.00001544573,0.000005846491,0.02445511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992026,0.00002051671,0.00004903688,0.0002933484,0.0000532418,0.00005966971,0.000007205166,0.000001727227,0.0003126413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8991383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2718901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128619142","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei030","title":"II. Legality Of Use Of Force (Serbia And Montenegro v Belgium) (Serbia And Montenegro v Canada) (Serbia And Montenegro v France) (Serbia And Montenegro v Germany) (Serbia And Montenegro v Italy) (Serbia And Montenegro v Netherlands) (Serbia And Montenegro v Portugal) (Serbia And Montenegro v United Kingdom): Preliminary Objections. Judgment Of 15 December 2004<sup>1</sup>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Montenegro; Jurisdiction; Principle of legality; Law; Political science; Unanimity; Declaration; Geography; Ancient history; History","authors":[{"name":"Christine Gray","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03983409062192907,"gpt":0.2719262635370158,"spread":0.2320921729150867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001668136,0.002755265,0.003900705,0.001227184,0.002636692,0.001313169,0.001303454,0.001265078,0.0001282592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002551114,0.002595278,0.0005190584,0.0008813738,0.004673258,0.004161232,0.0009800696,0.001668635,0.000003312041],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005565162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005603036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3362436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4750465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9860034,0.001088256,0.004067893,0.003616704,0.002986108,0.002237662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98952,0.001653724,0.002422752,0.001318265,0.003144792,0.001940486],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02530573,0.007202351,0.3668278,0.004249184,0.01373166,0.001449129,0.1197312,0.002732184,0.03624238,0.3827554,0.01954037,0.02023257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02432186,0.009445972,0.7840838,0.004991667,0.00280321,0.001450156,0.02571476,0.07618066,0.005031004,0.0278603,0.03003053,0.008086056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9735002,0.01500512,0.0002294766,0.002997805,0.0006964648,0.002873272,0.001559918,0.0002109621,0.002926806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983651,0.003106976,0.00159214,0.001214298,0.0006464819,0.0003191676,0.0003112862,0.0002413926,0.008917249],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.417256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999706565","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300064228","title":"“Making Public Law, ‘Public’: An Analysis of the Quebec Reference Case and its Significance for Comparative Constitutional Analysis”","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scrutiny; Political science; Supreme court; Politics; Legal profession; Public law; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial review; Legal opinion; Constitutional law; Democracy; Subject (documents); Private law; Black letter law","authors":[{"name":"James McHugh","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1375669828113801,"gpt":0.3561090799552209,"spread":0.2185420971438408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002475746,0.0001001576,0.0003082987,0.0003030333,0.001187816,0.0005382409,0.0002476051,0.00005113709,0.0007407055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006949568,0.00009605441,0.00012727,0.0006288421,0.002384792,0.0006814359,0.0000101454,0.00008943192,0.000003543727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001966457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002856457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2532054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987817,0.0002165511,0.0002637187,0.0002786834,0.00029613,0.0001632283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989897,0.00019344,0.0001509674,0.000107615,0.0004369398,0.0001213162],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002563351,0.00006349833,0.0005853307,0.000002315655,0.0009486715,0.000004015869,0.01614252,0.00006430587,0.00001834391,0.981121,0.00007157736,0.0009527612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009638425,0.000265709,0.03245111,0.00003071127,0.002010702,0.00002615439,0.03486248,0.01914591,0.00002503274,0.0106219,0.8989508,0.000645696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9409108,0.0002319113,0.0004548072,0.0015273,0.0001108027,0.000273518,0.0007913925,0.00001839316,0.05568105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977407,0.00000683131,0.00005145374,0.0002367624,0.00005740995,0.00003497798,0.00005606216,0.000001448563,0.001814299],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9704991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9135841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092981200","doi":"10.1093/iclq/51.2.197","title":"Bills of Rights in Common Law Countries","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Criminal Justice Association","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Common law; Law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Fundamental rights; Rest (music); Bill of rights; Human rights; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Beverley McLachlin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05867579530143412,"gpt":0.3362403487742775,"spread":0.2775645534728434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001391891,0.0001086641,0.0002575171,0.00006195065,0.0002328038,0.00006647065,0.000212021,0.0000349777,0.0005686697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001946747,0.00009330027,0.00004665996,0.00008510899,0.0008185724,0.0003805786,0.00001930074,0.00008470818,0.00005836728],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005224343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007106333,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02112848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1181835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998897,0.0001158254,0.0003096818,0.0001719187,0.0003624457,0.0001431621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993054,0.0002571326,0.0001083957,0.00006389194,0.0002222333,0.00004296871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002558582,0.0001137649,0.002183183,0.00000191171,0.00004785111,0.000003159095,0.02121657,0.000002952836,0.00002869999,0.9755286,0.0007284497,0.0001192795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006777836,0.0002858699,0.005439985,0.00007572253,0.000007906394,0.000002271931,0.003761273,0.0004499471,0.0004427073,0.2217539,0.7668896,0.0002130443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5433533,0.0003015661,0.00001309198,0.001399432,0.0002214376,0.0001067938,0.00002793095,0.00001414888,0.4545623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980668,0.00003396728,0.00004417039,0.0002824562,0.0001103333,0.00001860661,0.000004983182,0.000001793671,0.001436906],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7661611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9853899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966968079","doi":"10.1017/s0020589310000655","title":"JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING AND TRANSNATIONAL LAW: A SURVEY OF COMMON LAW SUPREME COURT JUDGES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Precedent; Political science; Majority opinion; Judicial independence; Comparative law; Jurisprudence","authors":[{"name":"Brian Flanagan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09705707278559123,"gpt":0.3479574279139581,"spread":0.2509003551283668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003774273,0.0001197281,0.0002532678,0.00003769336,0.0005503242,0.00005741623,0.0001838692,0.00005395445,0.0001490847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001011044,0.0001095674,0.00004419774,0.00008329298,0.001788951,0.0003107338,0.00002591503,0.00008875042,0.00000508153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003001989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004709245,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04428379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2997285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987556,0.0001477948,0.0002938215,0.0002069552,0.0004482626,0.0001475563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988465,0.0005269422,0.0001050525,0.00004966508,0.0004102265,0.00006163809],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001612788,0.0001158666,0.009466194,0.000001548673,0.00009189657,0.000002576872,0.01269446,7.463876e-7,0.00001512613,0.976381,0.00007036098,0.0009989179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004521516,0.0002249362,0.2354168,0.00004853194,0.00002190523,0.000004256562,0.003667044,0.00006473928,0.00004121825,0.7535897,0.006275765,0.0001929212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7355831,0.0002625214,0.0004664154,0.0009015863,0.0003559278,0.0001611716,0.0001803916,0.00002499584,0.2620639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992251,0.00001336162,0.0002680636,0.0003480035,0.00009551416,0.00001221494,0.00001498932,0.000002904656,0.00001988802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.263642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9620804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092409353","doi":"10.1017/s0020589320000354","title":"FOREIGN INVESTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES AND CONTRIBUTORY FAULT IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Treaty; Compensation (psychology); Consistency (knowledge bases); Fault (geology); Investment (military); Business; Foreign direct investment; Investment arbitration; Law and economics; International arbitration; Law; International investment; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Psychology; Seismology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Jean‐Michel Marcoux","is_ca":true},{"name":"Andrea K. Bjorklund","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04795132605533763,"gpt":0.2550262469968719,"spread":0.2070749209415343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001578982,0.0001685707,0.0001908507,0.0001112361,0.00009547325,0.0003040219,0.0001259114,0.00004426299,0.00009451965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002166341,0.0001559838,0.00003430297,0.0001019758,0.0001905372,0.001388244,0.00003696782,0.0001409214,0.00006362589],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004306158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002012539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005154407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006554126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989196,0.00002806188,0.0003374033,0.0003027424,0.0002578333,0.0001543572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995492,0.00006201155,0.0001307628,0.00005901475,0.000166875,0.00003220099],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000159991,0.00004798017,0.001987581,0.00001517443,0.00002883146,0.000005228488,0.001115821,0.000009984854,0.0007400445,0.9951912,0.0006326053,0.00006559029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003885864,0.0004357117,0.02422673,0.0001008254,0.00003107525,0.00001077926,0.007923335,0.06712718,0.0006544231,0.5791466,0.315751,0.0007065885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7227923,0.00009963922,0.0001728483,0.006414215,0.0001765452,0.0002907749,0.00001365064,0.00005892693,0.2699811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.929095,0.000003708441,0.0001203835,0.07010002,0.0003998123,0.00004293927,0.00007035583,0.000006276324,0.0001614608],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4160446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6360837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367316018","doi":"10.1017/s002058932300012x","title":"NET ZERO EMISSIONS AND FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS: EFFORTS AT INTEGRATING CLIMATE GOALS BY THE UNITED KINGDOM AND AUSTRALIA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"New Zealand Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Free trade; Climate change; International trade; Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; Negotiation; Liberalization; Parliament; European union; General partnership; Emissions trading; Political science; Enforcement; Greenhouse gas; Business; Kyoto Protocol; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Margaret A. Young","is_ca":false},{"name":"Georgina Clough","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1080895209207512,"gpt":0.3037109109912649,"spread":0.1956213900705137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001783287,0.0001291111,0.0002381088,0.00005169694,0.0004349208,0.000136606,0.0001212258,0.00004057344,0.00006862875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006067523,0.0001031586,0.00003336218,0.00007217851,0.000174037,0.0001399988,0.00007908033,0.0000915598,0.00003904723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003367517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001583144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001756542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006789659,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992087,0.00001701755,0.0003185211,0.0002405498,0.00003270999,0.0001824905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995823,0.0001152011,0.0001510567,0.0000787774,0.00001227004,0.00006041952],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002921599,0.00002508389,0.07647488,0.000009312983,0.0001967396,0.00000224523,0.008321731,0.000005319967,0.0000411066,0.8869565,0.02754391,0.0003939309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002638448,0.0004255163,0.2485047,0.00008797013,0.0000292018,0.0000195368,0.006705317,0.005723475,0.00005296509,0.2196162,0.5155408,0.0006558297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900054,0.0002428216,0.00004812946,0.002954631,0.0002116451,0.000117798,0.0004588239,0.00002317459,0.00593761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976508,0.0001498015,0.00002298103,0.0003248104,0.00006014933,0.00002561478,0.0000878003,0.00000523262,0.001672804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6673403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4206684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389648687","doi":"10.1017/s0020589323000532","title":"REGULATING TRANSNATIONAL DISSIDENT CYBER ESPIONAGE","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universitetet i Oslo","keywords":"Human rights; Espionage; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Democracy; Politics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Siena Anstis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05238225661906652,"gpt":0.3453152542922187,"spread":0.2929329976731521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002398209,0.00009609976,0.0001256369,0.00006214713,0.0006479435,0.0001375935,0.0001516792,0.00003749787,0.0001713745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007252048,0.00009261084,0.00005861501,0.0001693577,0.0003534307,0.0003219754,0.00001916172,0.00008678778,0.00007182737],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004043615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002347667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005960942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008796083,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988924,0.0000871314,0.0001773531,0.0002041585,0.0004568538,0.0001821435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995009,0.0001926728,0.00005057211,0.00005136282,0.0001365789,0.00006794395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001291077,0.00002432696,0.0004443316,0.000001694513,0.00005056341,0.000004032639,0.06722195,0.000009216531,0.00003795951,0.929653,0.0008276263,0.001712358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006638518,0.000109014,0.06483859,0.00002813123,0.0000175999,0.000003744299,0.08374129,0.0008895321,0.0000610495,0.441503,0.4077962,0.0003480157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7212867,0.00006802408,0.0002609123,0.02716734,0.0006615877,0.0001880419,0.00005210534,0.0002026261,0.2501127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953018,0.0000100376,0.00005664955,0.000205147,0.0002545529,0.00003225988,0.00004209954,0.000003564293,0.004093817],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.48815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4983523,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104515135","doi":"10.1017/s002058931000045x","title":"PUBLIC HEARINGS AT THE WTO APPELLATE BODY: THE NEXT STEP","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Adjudication; Transparency (behavior); Jurisdiction; Openness to experience; Political science; Law; Authorization; Settlement (finance); Business; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Alberto Alvarez-Jiménez","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0701482926053307,"gpt":0.3038374953565425,"spread":0.2336892027512118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002740741,0.00009877069,0.00009327736,0.00002078578,0.001036317,0.0006105038,0.0004590404,0.00003916601,0.001286991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001081433,0.00005755525,0.00003921934,0.0001360876,0.0009074998,0.0003896659,0.00004450914,0.0002134013,0.0002681694],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003336332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003186734,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001341681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05154986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989796,0.0001317927,0.0001546155,0.0001805321,0.0003768457,0.0001765896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992917,0.0002365293,0.00008277036,0.0001440633,0.0001691749,0.0000757283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007266739,0.00002325856,0.001409858,4.746512e-7,0.00003222202,6.801175e-7,0.009243683,5.201538e-7,0.0007329838,0.9842892,0.003549849,0.000709965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001719034,0.00003169178,0.01099032,0.000003059702,0.000005891234,0.000006397184,0.002322549,0.0001698252,0.000192516,0.008572607,0.9774373,0.00009591289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5896494,0.00005368653,0.00009342223,0.1836904,0.001050594,0.0002557984,0.000009882297,0.00006242815,0.2251344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885672,0.000004851843,0.00002831473,0.001600167,0.000393151,0.00001456599,0.000007650508,0.000005421624,0.009378686],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9757167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999626,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416194669","doi":"10.1017/s0020589325101012","title":"The International Seabed Authority, the Problem of Disregard and the Case for Administrative Accountability","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Accountability; Delegation; Jurisdiction; State (computer science); Administrative law; Process (computing); International law; Core (optical fiber)","authors":[{"name":"Neil Craik","is_ca":true},{"name":"Julian Jackson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Aline Jaeckel","is_ca":false},{"name":"Hannah Lily","is_ca":false},{"name":"Pradeep Singh","is_ca":false},{"name":"Hope Elizabeth Tracey","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02878632355721898,"gpt":0.3291889563334191,"spread":0.3004026327762001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006655329,0.0001375557,0.0001586591,0.00001279064,0.0004851695,0.0002530484,0.0005531225,0.00003352132,0.00009517394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002175526,0.00006856574,0.00007248333,0.00006164204,0.001821267,0.0002271982,0.0001722633,0.000135465,0.000005843406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006984134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001719273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002365738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00884794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988699,0.0001314324,0.0003353348,0.0002548985,0.0002824539,0.000125993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979022,0.001630783,0.0001504727,0.000150311,0.0001397123,0.00002647966],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005388558,0.00006273888,0.001719033,0.000005194389,0.0001781203,0.000002863159,0.002985394,0.00001062318,0.00009345116,0.9883001,0.00143327,0.00467037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003214196,0.0003830809,0.01847745,0.00005774347,0.00008637449,0.0001910936,0.01136571,0.01936616,0.001092896,0.6837326,0.2617643,0.000268291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7845256,0.0001850611,0.00131151,0.04651144,0.000618809,0.001470495,0.0002615401,0.000024491,0.1650911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958623,0.000007909046,0.0004113133,0.0004203996,0.00006170581,0.0002410545,0.00001184665,0.000003146556,0.002980294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3045674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6710532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405549352","doi":"10.1017/s0020589324000381","title":"EXIT RIGHTS, SEAMLESS BORDERS AND THE NEW CARCERAL STATE","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Criminology; Computer security; Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Audrey Macklin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04129423642595931,"gpt":0.3498394484123714,"spread":0.308545211986412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002131708,0.00007092286,0.00008017004,0.00004024085,0.00032251,0.0004915372,0.0001195289,0.00001576152,0.00006546023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002877582,0.00004596695,0.0000242154,0.00007727213,0.0004652092,0.0003770836,0.00001600377,0.0001112358,0.00004605741],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001528255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003059823,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01858569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01208371,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993007,0.0001397046,0.0001046279,0.0001636994,0.0001912084,0.0001000813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996712,0.0001512739,0.00002309994,0.00004596037,0.00004823546,0.00006028583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008733854,0.000006239977,0.000005106707,0.000005682407,0.00004165135,0.000007804884,0.04880426,0.000001387139,0.00001861164,0.9352509,0.002948394,0.01282259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004406438,0.0001060046,0.0001875699,0.00004337962,0.00003011862,0.000008616627,0.01377357,0.001121996,0.00002849818,0.1436004,0.8405514,0.0001077683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4941062,0.00454436,0.01266179,0.04466011,0.002455937,0.0007831787,0.0001201379,0.0002615083,0.4404068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943245,0.000149191,0.00006051674,0.0002942597,0.0003507543,0.000007643013,0.000008530582,0.000002681591,0.00480193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.837603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9879496,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098660069","doi":"10.1093/iclq/53.3.579","title":"CANADIAN REFLECTIONS ON THE TOBACCO WARS: SOME UNINTENDED CONSEQUE5NCES OF MASS TORT LITIGATION","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Mass tort; Legislation; Tort; Legislature; Political science; Commonwealth; Law; Tort reform; Unintended consequences; Jurisprudence; Harm; Economic Justice; Action (physics); Law and economics; State (computer science); Sociology; Liability","authors":[{"name":"Jeff Berryman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06344834934063906,"gpt":0.2925820214590201,"spread":0.2291336721183811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007484705,0.00009792097,0.0001023228,0.0001191025,0.0002284899,0.0001776824,0.0001456952,0.00003028442,0.0001548891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006090605,0.00007337632,0.00004941113,0.0001280777,0.0001862842,0.0005773568,0.000008162023,0.00009224848,0.0001050681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009956596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005097689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04407572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08876238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993762,0.00001109768,0.0001811712,0.0001412818,0.0001706067,0.0001196273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995316,0.00003448354,0.0001083317,0.00008791826,0.0002165687,0.00002112936],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001648377,0.00004022961,0.0001398392,0.000002498046,0.00004652871,0.000001366241,0.0002000567,0.0000527035,0.0004363663,0.9982715,0.000531662,0.0002608131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008483535,0.0001579313,0.006655958,0.0001259871,0.00003807784,0.000008390371,0.01076758,0.0009057654,0.00067845,0.463459,0.5160594,0.000295032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3597372,0.00003337858,0.0003852348,0.03457125,0.0007508646,0.0002338905,0.00004062249,0.00005339778,0.6041942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962385,0.000003226332,0.00003725495,0.002945987,0.0002652803,0.00002768231,0.00003316165,0.000003866414,0.0004450808],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6365013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9622899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132611068","doi":"10.1017/s0020589310000680","title":"JUDICIAL SCRUTINY OF MERGER DECISIONS IN THE EU, UK AND GERMANY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Academic Association for Contemporary European Studies","keywords":"Scrutiny; Context (archaeology); Discretion; Judicial review; Political science; Standard of review; Agency (philosophy); Judicial discretion; Credibility; Law; Relevance (law); Law and economics; Economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Michael Harker","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sebastian Peyer","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kathryn Wright","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.11478234541187,"gpt":0.343483034046881,"spread":0.2287006886350109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002915704,0.00006649802,0.000111081,0.00004116824,0.0001697569,0.00003391082,0.000211845,0.00001815423,0.0001297899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001565131,0.00004632945,0.00002930783,0.00006178677,0.000518346,0.0001340243,0.0000212453,0.00007050252,0.00001422897],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009868966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001224672,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002768474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007211099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991957,0.0001324066,0.0001974931,0.0001204991,0.000261667,0.00009223806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995174,0.0002127245,0.00007019661,0.00004755392,0.0001247706,0.00002732168],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003070137,0.00005206161,0.001944436,3.77512e-7,0.00002598516,0.0000030267,0.05673603,9.222899e-8,0.00005643283,0.9400112,0.000442695,0.0006969356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008346036,0.0004819921,0.5611188,0.00009365317,0.00002258245,0.000008443815,0.04977221,0.0000968185,0.0001191198,0.1078744,0.27931,0.0002672569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5363791,0.0001225592,0.00001784266,0.0008604813,0.0001487696,0.00006765598,0.00000990494,0.000004562527,0.4623891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988161,0.00007996261,0.0001064472,0.000467616,0.00009948796,0.000007812177,0.000001690555,0.000001731417,0.0004191129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8321368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4185123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124660054","doi":"10.1017/s002058931100042x","title":"INTERNATIONALISATION AND CONSTITUTIONAL BORROWING IN DRAFTING BILLS OF RIGHTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centre for Engineering Research and Development; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Indigenous; Internationalization; Context (archaeology); Political science; Key (lock); Northern ireland; Indigenous rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Focus (optics); Law; Public administration; Sociology; Business; International trade; Geography; Computer science; Ethnology","authors":[{"name":"Anne Smith","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08964935228637383,"gpt":0.3210730041536363,"spread":0.2314236518672624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002047861,0.00007409426,0.0001332471,0.0000779363,0.0002301236,0.00002682201,0.00009048446,0.00003223596,0.0000998405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000150365,0.00006728485,0.00002417977,0.0000750596,0.002523422,0.0003538145,0.00001852053,0.00006142229,0.000004519336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003824427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004135907,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01382664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007320786,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99922,0.00006366466,0.0002315804,0.0001477943,0.0002393183,0.00009766749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995195,0.000117199,0.00008530692,0.0000259533,0.0002141947,0.00003781831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000273281,0.00004868619,0.01926702,0.00000114742,0.00003211233,0.000002359258,0.0254031,0.000001128702,0.00006882175,0.9546971,0.00001148766,0.0004396686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008213469,0.0001375924,0.09973583,0.0001530801,0.00001492388,0.000006829171,0.01173578,0.0001870716,0.0003711919,0.8717066,0.01488844,0.0002413263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6973323,0.0001858655,0.000926447,0.0003464292,0.0003458503,0.0001107999,0.00002175254,0.00001477201,0.3007157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994065,0.00001484665,0.0003174869,0.00007730377,0.0001097053,0.00001197287,0.00000591752,8.646556e-7,0.00005540283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3020742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982156666","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei175","title":"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Index (typography); Convention; Liability; Law; Media studies; Sociology; Art; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Bin Cheng","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04178532391807655,"gpt":0.3541998219142938,"spread":0.3124144979962172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001192258,0.0001688437,0.000189469,0.0001124175,0.0009187901,0.000330296,0.0003737768,0.00008378318,0.00007658319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001553357,0.0001662055,0.00007816189,0.0001321012,0.0006020091,0.001197637,0.00002079053,0.0001601105,0.00002322484],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001564203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004291767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01805274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1111912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978632,0.0001303452,0.0004313806,0.000339761,0.0008472357,0.0003880304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984765,0.0004343819,0.0001742007,0.00008793395,0.0006153956,0.0002115654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001684971,0.0001082809,0.005147917,0.000001114446,0.00006047482,0.0000124133,0.04382306,0.000003357986,0.0007474706,0.9465038,0.00004392207,0.00337967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002231014,0.0007454226,0.176526,0.00006523269,0.00002538995,0.00002685116,0.0855166,0.0003185988,0.002543388,0.3015264,0.4297177,0.0007574303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7992364,0.00003397924,0.006213681,0.004441781,0.0007980344,0.0001961114,0.00001319202,0.00008582127,0.188981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954038,0.00000921098,0.0006284115,0.001376956,0.0009190621,0.00001705685,0.00003055127,0.000004971774,0.001609969],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6449774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9884861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294835859","doi":"10.1017/s0020589314000608","title":"Transparency in International Law, edited by Andrea Bianchi and Anne Peters [Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013, 642pp, ISBN 978-1-107-02138-9, £90.00 (h/bk)]","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"King's University College","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Media studies; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Elaine Kellman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01632909760284116,"gpt":0.2180275793456246,"spread":0.2016984817427835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001988961,0.0003191391,0.0003146955,0.0002063987,0.0001901924,0.0004819063,0.0004172938,0.00008622106,0.0001279288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006999377,0.0003236102,0.0000818972,0.0001392571,0.0002746954,0.002335425,0.00006195446,0.0002221109,0.00006866718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006825881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001325132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005184607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001210884,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982238,0.00005250667,0.0004470576,0.0005425953,0.000462563,0.0002715171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991772,0.00008340747,0.0002524056,0.0001392227,0.0002922218,0.00005554903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002220021,0.0002355346,0.001243721,0.00002164876,0.0001119209,0.00001118022,0.000181644,0.00001692323,0.0005703183,0.9554979,0.04165884,0.0002283448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002885366,0.0001427466,0.009077174,0.0001015259,0.0000341986,0.00001106727,0.0004764236,0.03068619,0.0002152724,0.001907634,0.953941,0.0005213422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2840095,0.00020687,0.001724008,0.008379803,0.001872297,0.0004475632,0.000272986,0.0001318711,0.7029551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880677,0.00004709198,0.0001025715,0.005611601,0.0007632032,0.00001309954,0.000554161,0.00001538782,0.004825133],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9535903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138983123","doi":"10.1093/iclq/52.4.1074","title":"Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by Robert J Sharpe, Katherine E Swinton, and Roach Kent, 2nd edn. Toronto: twin Law Inc, 2002. ISBN 1-55221-063-4 Pbk, Np.]","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Faisal Saifee","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02046895009650561,"gpt":0.2899661993872281,"spread":0.2694972492907224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002557264,0.0001897693,0.0002757465,0.00003036378,0.0003775655,0.0001922291,0.0001974829,0.00008127915,0.001037944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005471388,0.0001690868,0.0000365651,0.00005221287,0.0006164607,0.0006639886,0.00001641598,0.000103446,0.00001441759],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001114033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005429883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7692775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9323243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986393,0.0001343194,0.0002931693,0.0003391741,0.0003099981,0.0002840406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991879,0.0001060894,0.0001014304,0.0001068136,0.0001993451,0.0002983717],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004320182,0.0000908142,0.00102019,0.00001016391,0.00008211453,0.000007039797,0.02069619,7.907803e-7,0.0003803896,0.9632704,0.01388691,0.0005117675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006386083,0.0003842409,0.001528152,0.00005954651,0.00002869938,0.00002061537,0.00417055,0.0001651952,0.00025231,0.02008379,0.9723327,0.0003356437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5972773,0.003987931,0.0001279728,0.003686272,0.0005400613,0.000415806,0.0002671257,0.00003178457,0.3936658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937397,0.00005987041,0.0001342591,0.0004516196,0.0001221952,0.0000170571,0.00002100064,0.000006162593,0.005448173],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9584457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101812110","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300065416","title":"II. Cases Before the Court","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Convention; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Malcolm D. Evans","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05220578403016417,"gpt":0.3395507520688009,"spread":0.2873449680386367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001468766,0.00008635394,0.00009110337,0.00002564549,0.00113123,0.0001697213,0.0002859876,0.00003075139,0.0007633138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003501611,0.00005643522,0.00004735664,0.00002941334,0.0004813572,0.0002753414,0.00001766706,0.00009074757,0.00008722769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004276793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002445545,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003504773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04003195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991453,0.00006810413,0.000139974,0.0001449696,0.0003587521,0.0001429303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995141,0.00009995538,0.00005641205,0.00006706204,0.0002078811,0.00005456956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002137754,0.00004263774,0.0002776711,3.202908e-7,0.00003856551,0.00001633954,0.01858276,9.616065e-7,0.000004675233,0.9794234,0.0010695,0.0005217928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001684824,0.0001820438,0.002678494,0.000009890116,0.000006336689,0.00003009008,0.00224604,0.00009977275,0.000008683618,0.3062515,0.6882426,0.00007608378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6836376,0.00003060057,0.00005106737,0.009017842,0.0004553679,0.00009660144,0.00001374747,0.00003005929,0.3066671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9620941,0.000003839825,0.00002906904,0.0007726304,0.0007209135,0.00001832824,0.00001225294,0.000002669848,0.03634617],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6871731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9774849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413254345","doi":"10.1017/s0020589325100821","title":"Internationality Overreach in the Interpretation of Uniform Private Law Conventions: The <i>Contra Proferentem</i> Rule and the CISG","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Convention; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Relevance (law); Conflict of laws; Underpinning; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Katarzyna Kryla-Cudna","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0285058520107497,"gpt":0.3365693171446842,"spread":0.3080634651339345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001299794,0.0001125769,0.0001713164,0.000045171,0.0003417119,0.0002572482,0.0005817842,0.00003290452,0.0000362309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004356899,0.00006048225,0.00007548181,0.0001194941,0.001420339,0.0003792845,0.00004401903,0.000218808,0.000004926328],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004505199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003460645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002477012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007396661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982446,0.0006643576,0.0004102633,0.0001730669,0.0003879666,0.000119715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984705,0.0009425301,0.0001883096,0.0001285231,0.000249835,0.00002027625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000217369,0.00007843242,0.0004591481,0.000004898991,0.00009338119,6.388552e-7,0.01448774,0.000005959359,0.00002708767,0.9839518,0.00005855536,0.0006150077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004015694,0.0001607743,0.04782615,0.0002892513,0.00006581579,0.000006353408,0.02335494,0.00778446,0.00009096265,0.6821273,0.234041,0.0002372878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.406595,0.000510254,0.00177263,0.02261984,0.0005572557,0.0008741791,0.0000512672,0.00002102017,0.5669985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957302,0.00005337235,0.00001951042,0.002748988,0.00007232001,0.00006811118,0.00001949614,0.000002554383,0.001285478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5891351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5233297,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118708210","doi":"10.1017/s0020589320000512","title":"Negotiated Settlements in Bribery Cases: A Principled Approach, edited by Tina Søreide and Abiola Makinwa [Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2020, 384pp, ISBN 978-1-78897-040-2, £110 (h/bk)]","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human settlement; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Elizabeth Acorn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03536953140302822,"gpt":0.3063289879147936,"spread":0.2709594565117654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003283549,0.0002033768,0.00031056,0.0000666924,0.0002348028,0.0002820261,0.0001890819,0.00008944655,0.0005976695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002105312,0.0002107187,0.00005350567,0.000168534,0.0002166289,0.0002829175,0.00007028607,0.0001803434,0.00006589868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002086355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000141483,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001996747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007005722,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982484,0.0001990976,0.0004614595,0.0004932421,0.00029361,0.0003041816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992722,0.0001368051,0.0001526158,0.0001053557,0.0001726286,0.0001603827],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001816465,0.004921051,0.09639555,0.000178907,0.002058962,0.0008638895,0.2669275,0.0001024506,0.007929455,0.4871427,0.06184423,0.06981885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003719521,0.0002791739,0.05209084,0.0001312222,0.00003137471,0.0001117756,0.03052865,0.003731818,0.00019511,0.001906759,0.9064049,0.0008688446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.936782,0.0002286933,0.0002025289,0.002764267,0.0006340149,0.0003140592,0.0001148598,0.00004109017,0.05891846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907035,0.00007913025,0.0004799845,0.0008068208,0.0001836669,0.00006474597,0.0002343656,0.000007989249,0.007439792],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8445607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8592858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801151102","doi":"10.1093/iclq/52.3.802","title":"V. Cases Before the Court","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Malcom D Evans","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04222243539908536,"gpt":0.332795888426871,"spread":0.2905734530277856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002287534,0.00007111739,0.00007201227,0.00001913776,0.0004976434,0.0001582584,0.0001581791,0.00002822453,0.0003065728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001568655,0.00005010912,0.00003741575,0.00004654239,0.0002813314,0.0002467555,0.000005061193,0.00007422448,0.00006634532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004126914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003040888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002401057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01742452,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991884,0.0001341236,0.0001260828,0.0001223918,0.000313765,0.0001152007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995173,0.0001348257,0.00005958564,0.00005330047,0.0001930581,0.00004193777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006797312,0.00002624697,0.0009777533,4.017936e-7,0.00002586604,0.000003118677,0.01016139,0.000001627295,0.00001106932,0.9875567,0.000692801,0.0005362079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002063685,0.0001235595,0.003958228,0.000009698521,0.000007217167,0.00001720243,0.009714352,0.0000826351,0.0000812023,0.125244,0.860467,0.00008857169],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4342233,0.00006538244,0.0003491406,0.007817844,0.0008315215,0.0001566977,0.00002122335,0.00003350079,0.5565014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930533,0.000004376601,0.00007390277,0.0006344518,0.0002517777,0.00001906483,0.000009410032,0.000002313408,0.005951411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8623127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.972329,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}