{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":51,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":51,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"67a7c0cdd58a","filters":{"venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly"}},"results":[{"id":"W2167094518","doi":"10.1017/s0020589309001201","title":"ARTICLE 23 OF THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION: A COMPREHENSIVE CODE FOR JURISDICTION AGREEMENTS?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Formality; Jurisdiction; Code (set theory); Relation (database); Law and economics; Exclusive jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Programming language; Data mining","authors":[{"name":"Louise Merrett","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05226057415302587,"gpt":0.3436548449102697,"spread":0.2913942707572438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01215417,0.0003784407,0.0009498251,0.001717974,0.00588776,0.0117916,0.001923387,0.01050127,0.005414301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02868024,0.0006715293,0.0009326409,0.001601942,0.01330119,0.003295801,0.003744654,0.007067719,0.001322513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00824533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02042047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03457562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03456144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9812596,0.005676685,0.002083876,0.001537886,0.006103212,0.00333868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812246,0.01109792,0.002102792,0.001590609,0.003191393,0.0007926715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017724,0.0000168995,0.0003779702,0.00003425048,0.000006201378,0.0001243696,0.001376172,0.0003667557,0.0003370309,0.9800214,0.01360784,0.003713344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001278446,0.000169844,0.006617049,0.001547547,0.0000757036,0.0005273366,0.003645213,0.002538948,0.002809171,0.5587339,0.4228933,0.0003142702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07730599,0.004657295,0.04503757,0.0841436,0.002982596,0.0005915312,0.0006972639,0.0004027814,0.7841813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8959472,0.001158186,0.02227934,0.02554081,0.0009510317,0.0009360231,0.000279106,0.0001093609,0.05279893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03457562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06874871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091946373","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei083","title":"The Enforcement of Jurisdiction Agreements Within The Brussels Regime","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Damages; Context (archaeology); Enforcement; Political science; Subject (documents); Law; Exclusive jurisdiction; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Louise Merrett","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02651177384880028,"gpt":0.3078520052260265,"spread":0.2813402313772262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01215798,0.0002370022,0.0007632017,0.002815412,0.007298403,0.01012348,0.001856161,0.006234587,0.006223539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03794532,0.0005514496,0.0005810974,0.002272889,0.01286666,0.003300844,0.005913246,0.004830107,0.0007378848],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008377197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008433217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04443214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04070888,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9710892,0.01232156,0.001824927,0.002861578,0.006199318,0.005703367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684739,0.02167654,0.003854816,0.002428793,0.002627269,0.0009386881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000900414,0.0000613501,0.003070513,0.00007305557,0.00004286229,0.0009486168,0.003756655,0.003730694,0.0009775052,0.9718062,0.002278445,0.01316411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002523437,0.0004125111,0.0232455,0.001565718,0.0001877697,0.001607629,0.0107115,0.01804341,0.004510674,0.7943259,0.1447889,0.000348167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5051988,0.002520037,0.01249585,0.007680906,0.0002202006,0.0001161157,0.0001102824,0.00006484504,0.471593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911985,0.0002029091,0.001062438,0.0002377614,0.00003764906,0.00002798038,0.00001617335,0.000005479555,0.007211087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04443214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08834702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097091195","doi":"10.1093/iclq/54.1.161","title":"Reframing Sovereignty? Sub-State National Societies and Contemporary Challenges to the Nation-State","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; State (computer science); Nationalism; Globalization; Political science; Political economy; National identity; Power (physics); Popular sovereignty; Law; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Tierney","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07831570187393198,"gpt":0.3217714511584319,"spread":0.2434557492844999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004572156,0.0002015292,0.0003850031,0.0008447494,0.01000062,0.01288255,0.001161336,0.005256634,0.003100789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004922291,0.0001930876,0.0002284551,0.001792447,0.05753216,0.01250621,0.007377692,0.007427427,0.00022178],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008553133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005290749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0100898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01517533,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995826,0.002669989,0.00008866828,0.0003673202,0.0004465894,0.0006014293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979112,0.001218918,0.0001818235,0.0002211873,0.000170505,0.0002964977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000205845,0.000005470095,0.0001428756,0.00001075818,9.583991e-7,0.000037692,0.01082295,0.00007678499,0.00002164042,0.9839571,0.001530368,0.003391377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004538565,0.00001228004,0.0008350612,0.0001809743,0.000002151379,0.0001280502,0.02807052,0.0003213442,0.00004530787,0.8419774,0.1284102,0.00001223115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1373192,0.04341409,0.004498791,0.4177939,0.001197968,0.0000142261,0.00003224675,0.00003389191,0.3956957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791915,0.007876788,0.0003941019,0.007276937,0.000479159,0.00001915706,0.00001299335,0.00001221278,0.004737083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01288255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06205761,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162354815","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300064186","title":"The Kosovo Crisis and Nato's Application of Armed Force Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Novelis (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Offensive; Political science; Jus ad bellum; Law; Serbian; State (computer science); The Republic; International law; Use of force; International court; Member states; Economic Justice; Sovereignty; Economic history; Public international law; European union; International trade; Engineering; Operations research; History; Politics; Theology; Economics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Dino Kritsiotis","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01960039896708949,"gpt":0.3021455511482624,"spread":0.2825451521811729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001016201,0.0001585375,0.0002542087,0.0006198869,0.006483605,0.004317485,0.0004824881,0.001655393,0.001258605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002040486,0.0001662737,0.0001615021,0.0008171638,0.006051688,0.001278959,0.005973395,0.002647924,0.0001000783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01099264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009649666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3206709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4221548,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991369,0.000183132,0.0000285906,0.00005202207,0.00006656364,0.0005328904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995698,0.00009136563,0.000145656,0.00002321702,0.00005963866,0.0001102878],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007579352,0.0001424477,0.1664146,0.000277341,0.0001463511,0.006547467,0.1433243,0.002000179,0.002969577,0.5957599,0.04223827,0.03942148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000810342,0.00008223985,0.4903499,0.0006550048,0.00004508556,0.0007394002,0.1061891,0.0006744873,0.0008750559,0.02707715,0.3731269,0.0001046439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.8724933,0.009635342,0.0001633963,0.0252318,0.000274983,0.00002960598,0.0002036221,0.00001028735,0.09195757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994473,0.0007978934,0.00002735398,0.001783417,0.00001947734,0.000009070642,0.00005474368,0.000003813997,0.002831141],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3206709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6376087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118490530","doi":"10.1017/s0020589308000389","title":"THE SCOPE OF THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE OF THE UNITED NATIONS CHARTER","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Scope (computer science); Political science; Law; United Nations Charter; Relevance (law); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Rain Liivoja","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05235978180989796,"gpt":0.3203038501892126,"spread":0.2679440683793146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02271276,0.000397579,0.0006651005,0.001472745,0.00460189,0.009047746,0.001793043,0.006548071,0.002893499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03232424,0.000557266,0.0005371409,0.001648669,0.01677113,0.007704625,0.002759136,0.008509284,0.000603192],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003755016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009767033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01234374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008435271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9816775,0.009685477,0.00104511,0.001266711,0.004859027,0.001466179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769402,0.016425,0.001729392,0.001403559,0.002993012,0.0005088382],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005721091,0.000005009555,0.00007188833,0.000008802488,8.723768e-7,0.00002360276,0.0005959826,0.0001013719,0.00004744695,0.9952707,0.002058543,0.001810126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003582346,0.00004904497,0.00156499,0.0007508906,0.0000121095,0.0001108422,0.001241007,0.001116286,0.0004254415,0.8682324,0.1263932,0.00006790595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03206176,0.009147293,0.028705,0.03662762,0.001704688,0.0001742803,0.0003087691,0.00006785967,0.8912027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9431696,0.003578224,0.01617202,0.01240485,0.001960291,0.0007935548,0.000307456,0.00007190613,0.02154214],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02271276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767604562","doi":"10.1017/s0020589317000458","title":"SELF-DEFENCE AGAINST NON-STATE ACTORS: ARE POWERFUL STATES WILLING BUT UNABLE TO CHANGE INTERNATIONAL LAW?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); International law; Customary international law; Law; Politics; Self defense; Law and economics; Public international law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jutta Brunnée","is_ca":true},{"name":"Stephen J. Toope","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05123218250217359,"gpt":0.3325977371017578,"spread":0.2813655545995842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01044868,0.000175881,0.0003829425,0.0008809751,0.00405757,0.008933943,0.001005476,0.004190531,0.005501784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01420577,0.0002121386,0.0003365873,0.000717339,0.04436625,0.008766959,0.006484343,0.006865341,0.000548197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00193344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001842042,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002446237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003105472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949543,0.002694019,0.0001755243,0.0007153876,0.0006276231,0.000833099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897673,0.005624956,0.001127473,0.001555842,0.001108547,0.000815985],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009234616,0.00001312824,0.001264271,0.00001621145,0.000004809809,0.00006594263,0.007458884,0.00008274562,0.0001434354,0.9849218,0.001653954,0.004365639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001612092,0.0000472054,0.004248381,0.0003025201,0.00002280076,0.0001674734,0.02329383,0.0008951717,0.0007657484,0.8984723,0.07172608,0.00004229895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2245444,0.00115094,0.0174612,0.09814151,0.0003590876,0.00004652918,0.00003926974,0.00006027942,0.6581967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920373,0.000147875,0.0005596661,0.003459861,0.00004782009,0.00001872542,0.000008111699,0.00001003618,0.003710683],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01044868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05525857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2533991149","doi":"10.1017/s0020589316000373","title":"LEGAL TRANSFERS OF RESTRICTIVE IMMIGRATION LAWS: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Parallels; Immigration policy; Immigration law; Race (biology); Limiting; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Refugee; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Economics; Gender studies; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Ghezelbash","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02869526770183347,"gpt":0.3109104977525129,"spread":0.2822152300506794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003001915,0.0002331703,0.0002070396,0.002799805,0.008493528,0.005376177,0.0009921551,0.002975605,0.004867849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006043835,0.0003033925,0.0001467266,0.002310103,0.02410474,0.005900515,0.003263982,0.005291916,0.0002735834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01194638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004076206,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03421952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03166962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980165,0.0009042206,0.00007781547,0.0002740751,0.0003047064,0.0004226641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976495,0.001403541,0.0003211254,0.0001624633,0.0003438112,0.0001196312],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006770842,0.00002264236,0.0007881522,0.00003989811,0.000001947557,0.0003556107,0.03378865,0.0001706756,0.00009741791,0.9532457,0.001255449,0.01022726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001737599,0.0001096802,0.01155899,0.001793016,0.0000177591,0.001799737,0.06805671,0.001296083,0.001189097,0.1732121,0.7408706,0.00007889805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2266084,0.01927036,0.008100986,0.02934084,0.0006609663,0.00007247745,0.0001437795,0.00004021137,0.715762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704906,0.009371606,0.000869102,0.001455591,0.0003901554,0.00004223471,0.00004102126,0.00002212665,0.01731758],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03421952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08667743,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590322391","doi":"10.1017/s0020589317000021","title":"TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY BANISHMENT: CITIZENSHIP STRIPPING IN COMMON LAW NATIONS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Law; Political science; Revocation; Common law; Stripping (fiber); Sociology; Engineering; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Sangeetha Pillai","is_ca":false},{"name":"George Williams","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05464530266512947,"gpt":0.34068087475087,"spread":0.2860355720857405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006671917,0.000145031,0.0003131707,0.000987297,0.01307015,0.005326707,0.00115401,0.004157456,0.004655269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008522851,0.0002504741,0.0003039698,0.0009213937,0.02968103,0.003383578,0.005094559,0.007019476,0.0002140885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01828393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01285791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3496652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4744441,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958614,0.001362474,0.0001318582,0.0004593819,0.0008152518,0.00136975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947156,0.00228125,0.0005526468,0.0007798484,0.001128272,0.0005422814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002384778,0.0000398905,0.001798821,0.00003091369,0.000005261578,0.0003403931,0.05429145,0.0001556668,0.0003521915,0.9284787,0.004454785,0.01002819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004374177,0.0001366799,0.03115033,0.0005619708,0.00003704019,0.0004168755,0.0771512,0.001266142,0.003077094,0.1281989,0.7578009,0.0001590139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4702713,0.001916875,0.00316452,0.02184443,0.0003335233,0.00006895204,0.00005199484,0.00004087767,0.5023075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695094,0.0002818269,0.0002970256,0.002606655,0.00003321535,0.00001737724,0.00001249703,0.00001141709,0.02723061],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3496652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6952599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993230620","doi":"10.1017/s0020589319000459","title":"THE DUTY TO COOPERATE IN THE CUSTOMARY LAW OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Obligation; Harm; International law; Political science; Notice; Law; Environmental law; Duty to protect; Customary international law; Normative; International court; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Public international law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Neil Craik","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01644186199601939,"gpt":0.2722843474520698,"spread":0.2558424854560504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05574002,0.0006784173,0.001640938,0.001905447,0.01127162,0.02120055,0.004968936,0.02392529,0.00460955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04913375,0.001522837,0.00176605,0.001916896,0.05745507,0.01352556,0.01301544,0.02935705,0.001111371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008826247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02158832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02468525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02055177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9418203,0.01690681,0.006784485,0.008515232,0.02086657,0.005106613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9492204,0.03021693,0.002625969,0.008565225,0.007945219,0.001426216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002601184,0.00001040204,0.00008704447,0.000009420547,0.000003016192,0.00003870503,0.0006292019,0.0001257311,0.00005647237,0.9964275,0.001721385,0.0008885219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003060627,0.00003532098,0.0005228047,0.0003395884,0.00003409616,0.0001921819,0.0006361975,0.001283268,0.0003502946,0.9088781,0.08759919,0.00009835245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02406337,0.003199109,0.07867908,0.08778512,0.001903428,0.000251476,0.0002120349,0.0002300873,0.8036762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.880273,0.001618975,0.02137487,0.05086119,0.001822124,0.0006769911,0.0001296167,0.0002054665,0.0430377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05574002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.294785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555203996","doi":"10.1017/s0020589316000397","title":"THE WORKING METHODS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL: MAINTAINING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CHANGE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Security council; Political science; Public administration; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Public relations; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Joanna Harrington","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1760731139692933,"gpt":0.4253756158066775,"spread":0.2493025018373841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2411245,0.0006418457,0.0005724555,0.00478469,0.01565149,0.02504564,0.00378762,0.008631561,0.003377604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2458281,0.000733503,0.0005673924,0.003498553,0.06195958,0.01972952,0.01776771,0.01103268,0.0006118506],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0223959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06399602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01697509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01112884,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6878389,0.2621318,0.008102426,0.005998207,0.03028045,0.005648314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7391492,0.1612282,0.01455046,0.03793122,0.03547176,0.01166928],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002312161,0.0001051102,0.002912825,0.000196765,0.0000183528,0.0001803347,0.08544179,0.0007835238,0.0002857673,0.8005556,0.02351935,0.08597746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004398674,0.0001325624,0.004090856,0.003116344,0.00002392293,0.0001828233,0.07430167,0.002974487,0.00099472,0.4215291,0.492468,0.0001414521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05031843,0.00543717,0.1654364,0.5004177,0.003931751,0.001086299,0.00008472098,0.0005986648,0.272689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.903139,0.001318788,0.07041872,0.01224289,0.0004418431,0.001213027,0.00005390219,0.0001910895,0.01098079],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2411245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9358287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128490749","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei069","title":"Scrutiny and Approval: The Role for Westminster-Style Parliaments in Treaty-Making","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Human rights; Political science; Law; Scrutiny; Treaty; Ratification; Legitimacy; Convention; Prerogative; Public administration; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Joanna Harrington","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02714211082727366,"gpt":0.3194897343308738,"spread":0.2923476235036002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0832651,0.0006826934,0.001099093,0.004450769,0.01294988,0.03520234,0.003534721,0.01490771,0.009270728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1551037,0.001659265,0.0008584019,0.004831785,0.03800973,0.02645969,0.0143146,0.0166421,0.002997234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02388552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02060919,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0335831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8286873,0.1168046,0.007508766,0.01024705,0.02363236,0.01312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.908074,0.06678565,0.007868203,0.00640017,0.008835288,0.002036617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001086296,0.00001813379,0.0005490987,0.0001958414,0.00001691563,0.0002301848,0.02181079,0.0001599352,0.0002456674,0.9210771,0.02588888,0.02969887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001070758,0.00009130909,0.003467593,0.001395484,0.00007417899,0.0002257046,0.00752876,0.0007203559,0.001490635,0.2090043,0.7757363,0.0001582232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03748735,0.04476404,0.02850102,0.2035082,0.004496242,0.0003857735,0.0001047849,0.0003156748,0.680437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8487936,0.00849025,0.005605672,0.03275527,0.002136953,0.0004141696,0.00008783524,0.0003669287,0.1013493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0832651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4403532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065967823","doi":"10.1017/s0020589310000308","title":"INCOHERENT AND INEFFECTIVE: THE CONCEPT OF PERSISTENT OBJECTOR REVISITED","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Conscientious objector; Dissenting opinion; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Patrick Dumberry","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02265252154409393,"gpt":0.3123902001780045,"spread":0.2897376786339106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01804893,0.0008653661,0.001406832,0.005365993,0.006583288,0.01283583,0.004099094,0.01045559,0.004648275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02961118,0.0009301091,0.001291868,0.003691157,0.1114338,0.03901984,0.009993821,0.01379971,0.0005429643],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007554613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006041821,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002437174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001429782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9791501,0.01181645,0.001123089,0.00233284,0.003720622,0.001856934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726907,0.01713979,0.003179461,0.003621483,0.002374437,0.0009941768],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003549453,0.000004452789,0.00008742121,0.00001342331,0.000002026331,0.0000396788,0.001512732,0.00003630292,0.0000232185,0.9973139,0.0001677057,0.000795581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001148983,0.00001489478,0.0001854313,0.00008773625,0.000007996956,0.0001426398,0.001287668,0.0004466567,0.00007724465,0.9898738,0.007850895,0.00001359712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1094039,0.01328574,0.1514851,0.07731166,0.001174287,0.0002641079,0.0001399846,0.0001525445,0.6467827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725126,0.0027407,0.009301721,0.004890405,0.0009787459,0.0002566225,0.0000446486,0.0001421942,0.009132377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01804893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09545296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782410272","doi":"10.1017/s0020589317000537","title":"SHELTERING GOVERNMENT SUPPORT TO ‘GREEN’ ELECTRICITY: THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; European union; Government (linguistics); Politics; International trade; Renewable energy; Energy subsidies; Business; Parallels; Economics; Public economics; Energy policy; Political science; Law; Market economy","authors":[{"name":"Gracia Marín Durán","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01843336412607489,"gpt":0.2725625140534778,"spread":0.2541291499274029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007899787,0.0001678698,0.000365006,0.001253744,0.002605935,0.01386008,0.0009461688,0.01008045,0.003652544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010688,0.0001495804,0.0003658278,0.002000399,0.01178758,0.005023208,0.003388957,0.00383895,0.0001936951],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004814283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004880744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009760989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01249192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949425,0.002713722,0.0001894096,0.0004318343,0.0008555123,0.0008670054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927871,0.004728592,0.001025551,0.0003489677,0.0005987922,0.000511008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002391494,0.0000146186,0.0009699001,0.00002416571,0.000007689597,0.0001116789,0.0009153822,0.0003298832,0.00004744443,0.9875745,0.003791387,0.006189449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004437508,0.00006232142,0.0166238,0.002293836,0.00005053324,0.0002072321,0.01205554,0.001509084,0.0004863696,0.6870261,0.2795646,0.00007625592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1617457,0.03549166,0.002454572,0.2373226,0.001082238,0.00001779865,0.00009445946,0.00002183302,0.5617693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718311,0.004840021,0.0005471908,0.01675985,0.0002941537,0.00001566827,0.00002352661,0.000009219781,0.005679208],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01386008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04177856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040093363","doi":"10.1017/s0020589320000123","title":"THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND THE RIGHT TO LIFE","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Political science; Law; Right to life; Quarter (Canadian coin); Environmental law; Consolidation (business); Geography; Business","authors":[{"name":"Ginevra Le Moli","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02962111536867059,"gpt":0.2888174152393788,"spread":0.2591962998707082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009004169,0.0004153797,0.0004983378,0.001091877,0.009760887,0.0127451,0.001826058,0.0185367,0.008392524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01620095,0.0003978832,0.0004267844,0.001403444,0.0217051,0.004612842,0.004409892,0.01405995,0.00118972],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01759376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03108762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2676474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2258325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9887962,0.004561229,0.000526237,0.001692473,0.00264337,0.001780593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913634,0.004849535,0.0006455284,0.0005766245,0.001777172,0.0007877191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001422506,0.00001412015,0.0004111214,0.00006326786,0.000005269776,0.0001701404,0.002067439,0.000156082,0.000252238,0.9061046,0.08387225,0.006869159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002402749,0.00003200841,0.002651145,0.0007162256,0.00001561808,0.0001334694,0.002626648,0.0002212322,0.0004209086,0.09019717,0.9028963,0.00006527064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01074234,0.02398471,0.002306291,0.3902165,0.004063411,0.0001582473,0.0002075938,0.00005347571,0.5682675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.550599,0.01128156,0.003480189,0.2062445,0.003131358,0.0004409469,0.0002136159,0.0001219132,0.2244869],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2676474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.532179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013364851","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei132","title":"Homing Devices in Choice of Tort Law: Australian, British, and Canadian Approaches","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Choice of law; Tort; Law; Damages; Political science; Common law; Kingdom; Conflict of laws; Liability; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Reid Mortensen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09087728675211142,"gpt":0.3248591918843926,"spread":0.2339819051322812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00799025,0.0004312716,0.0007598411,0.01034224,0.01928788,0.01351148,0.00316166,0.004122784,0.006411195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01870614,0.0004541265,0.0005498603,0.01413755,0.02314845,0.004127323,0.005100888,0.005306476,0.000251902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1146681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06984794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9867789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9884538,0.003080669,0.0003781116,0.0008056386,0.004487104,0.002794676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881707,0.004424626,0.00057326,0.0003989362,0.004850164,0.001582338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004016371,0.00004135369,0.004663594,0.000135201,0.00002136577,0.0003248434,0.04667158,0.000397837,0.0001625565,0.9173459,0.006723874,0.02347173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005445261,0.00009466746,0.08354327,0.002631006,0.0002410722,0.0008337354,0.1506082,0.005324012,0.0004860697,0.2545193,0.5011844,0.00047985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2011772,0.02200835,0.00263209,0.03867789,0.0003426777,0.0001495928,0.0002314966,0.00003079605,0.7347499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682129,0.009185757,0.00236738,0.003657019,0.00007145801,0.0000609502,0.00005502901,0.00002041804,0.0163691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1146681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8319794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167845946","doi":"10.1017/s0020589313000353","title":"DIGGING DEEP: PROPERTY RIGHTS IN SUBTERRANEAN SPACE AND THE CHALLENGE OF CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Context (archaeology); Carbon capture and storage (timeline); Digging; Space (punctuation); Climate change mitigation; Property rights; Caking; Climate change; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Natural resource economics; Geography; Sociology; Archaeology; Economics; Geology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Jill Morgan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01940274226170985,"gpt":0.2376118130273362,"spread":0.2182090707656263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003328491,0.0001827761,0.0003472101,0.001107745,0.005408064,0.00939805,0.001191723,0.005007477,0.007874002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004975594,0.0002140567,0.0004067623,0.001139651,0.03174406,0.008716459,0.006174501,0.003965418,0.0003786864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004541848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004252452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03013206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03597298,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979394,0.0007612639,0.0000564764,0.0002434313,0.0003924178,0.0006068763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966533,0.001952133,0.0002928622,0.0003637927,0.0004583424,0.0002796548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007922856,0.000007116558,0.0002563655,0.000006536914,0.000001439466,0.0001028914,0.001222042,0.0003693386,0.0001720365,0.9947232,0.0007736316,0.002357547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001200146,0.00002489771,0.001338024,0.0001423226,0.000007218216,0.000122874,0.006601991,0.001336141,0.0004378534,0.9265385,0.06341579,0.00002244784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2830763,0.004458916,0.01555629,0.0752222,0.0002661261,0.00003105535,0.0001156492,0.000027463,0.621246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867003,0.0006784854,0.0006042821,0.001202367,0.00009264267,0.0000168071,0.00001200775,0.000008679621,0.01068449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03013206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05991334,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991665903","doi":"10.1017/s0020589319000447","title":"RECONCEPTUALISING THE LEGAL RESPONSE TO FOREIGN FIGHTERS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Neutrality; Terrorism; State (computer science); Law; Security council; Foreign policy; Phenomenon; International law; Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"John Ip","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03969533688442851,"gpt":0.3379899019845971,"spread":0.2982945651001686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02854442,0.0003336466,0.0004960584,0.003497319,0.009064485,0.01418307,0.003629002,0.01252146,0.00698021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0442271,0.0003715944,0.0005166651,0.001554628,0.04155312,0.008020078,0.01094941,0.007703571,0.0006877158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0139534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02184649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01792345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01794077,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9726287,0.01736941,0.001226122,0.001738369,0.003780413,0.003256969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745597,0.01547892,0.001828625,0.002067392,0.004849805,0.001215647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004899686,0.0000175827,0.0003050117,0.00002680505,0.000002411677,0.0001184523,0.01655521,0.0001976374,0.0001097515,0.9747877,0.003111987,0.004762577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004467892,0.0000812893,0.002595251,0.001058353,0.00002739257,0.0003106733,0.08877175,0.003040553,0.001021313,0.5544909,0.3484684,0.00008936256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1077762,0.002613053,0.02850991,0.1874117,0.002126503,0.0002500753,0.00006965744,0.0001535456,0.6710894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678624,0.0005854567,0.004272182,0.01030225,0.0004378233,0.0001286308,0.0000294228,0.00005293594,0.01632881],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02854442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1509591,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007324430","doi":"10.1093/iclq/53.4.833","title":"A NEW ERA IN THE LAW OF INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR: FROM WARSAW (1929) TO MONTREAL (1999)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carriage; Law; Convention; Political science; International law; Unification; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Bin Cheng","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01997324538303566,"gpt":0.3035774850039419,"spread":0.2836042396209063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001302227,0.0007177695,0.0002451221,0.001832469,0.006924223,0.008542889,0.001104917,0.003234888,0.009897148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003342424,0.0004917411,0.0002565574,0.004426646,0.02115064,0.008480494,0.002699135,0.00479053,0.0007263667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05160571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01947795,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7584704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7548424,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988599,0.0002391289,0.00003421404,0.0001980536,0.0003591705,0.0003095918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999329,0.0002080852,0.000094732,0.00003917827,0.0001924092,0.000136684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001584999,0.00001656577,0.0004771,0.00004461906,0.000004134528,0.00009298533,0.006660875,0.0001159729,0.0001414076,0.9258026,0.04893874,0.01768909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001014066,0.00001301828,0.003345491,0.00018509,0.00000540265,0.00004890978,0.00169909,0.00008055964,0.0001802905,0.0396363,0.9547721,0.00002368901],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02809982,0.1784168,0.006363593,0.1213886,0.004023814,0.00006720325,0.0006045006,0.00008779043,0.6609478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6945477,0.06945788,0.003935806,0.02496189,0.003063513,0.000111126,0.0002393406,0.0001547133,0.2035281],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7584704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4859041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256235904","doi":"10.1017/s0020589315000275","title":"FOREIGN FADS OR FASHIONS? THE ROLE OF COMPARATIVISM IN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Dignity; Political science; Comparative law; Law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; International human rights law; Common law; Sociology; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Sandra Fredman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09201827566361949,"gpt":0.3557104540449946,"spread":0.2636921783813751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03439829,0.0003013357,0.0008034671,0.002600905,0.00758222,0.01586396,0.002016017,0.004692605,0.007064139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03343808,0.0003536039,0.0006841426,0.001986026,0.07768215,0.02503224,0.01012484,0.004901336,0.0003764132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007872386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003955441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003614088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002669726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.969022,0.0248506,0.0004711261,0.002111908,0.001795139,0.001749381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686771,0.02404259,0.001725109,0.003230792,0.001425125,0.0008993394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005856652,0.000003649012,0.00009957555,0.000008734703,0.000002050022,0.00001619427,0.002183209,0.00004274494,0.00001227436,0.9961519,0.0002403113,0.001233533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001279496,0.00001966738,0.0002747963,0.00009828569,0.000007342332,0.00003771754,0.005695538,0.000268636,0.0001050453,0.9760739,0.01739781,0.00000851922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1506112,0.007541627,0.03740072,0.09066108,0.000675212,0.00007129514,0.00006962082,0.0000925085,0.7128768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930956,0.0004362512,0.001689787,0.001661314,0.0001304294,0.00002988879,0.00001038744,0.00001902904,0.002927373],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03439829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1819178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287310028","doi":"10.1017/s0020589322000240","title":"REVISITING THE LEGALITY OF TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW DURING COVID-19","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"COVID-19 epidemiological studies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; International Health Regulations; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Solidarity; Proportionality (law); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; International law; Law; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine; Outbreak; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Lisa Forman","is_ca":true},{"name":"Roojin Habibi","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3106735596728564,"gpt":0.4438547724766831,"spread":0.1331812128038267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02664291,0.0001791904,0.0004348097,0.002968415,0.006295988,0.01057934,0.002127707,0.00392555,0.005941182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04930781,0.0004305811,0.0004145734,0.002759485,0.02848436,0.009222553,0.007222906,0.007127841,0.0003801311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007045808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01287406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05174155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04275095,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9806861,0.010779,0.001391727,0.001550508,0.003095628,0.002497083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9494138,0.03413245,0.005167561,0.003617206,0.006787639,0.0008813724],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004130588,0.00001184796,0.001056924,0.00002681398,0.000002058505,0.00007694721,0.004545932,0.00007112871,0.00002945622,0.9898403,0.002018201,0.002316438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002702329,0.00009753908,0.01824728,0.003805226,0.00004077881,0.0005093842,0.05527616,0.001436727,0.0006055173,0.5685077,0.3513555,0.00009118803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1527204,0.01156182,0.01864946,0.1213242,0.001572642,0.0001807799,0.0005273994,0.00004528113,0.6934179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806865,0.00219801,0.002357715,0.007934036,0.0003927638,0.0000961454,0.0001184175,0.00002265376,0.006193708],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05174155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1409028,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016639784","doi":"10.1017/s0020589320000093","title":"PASSPORTS, THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL, AND NATIONAL SECURITY IN THE COMMONWEALTH","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Commonwealth; Statutory law; Political science; Law; Denial; National security; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Paul F. Scott","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0784037260624742,"gpt":0.345930562693594,"spread":0.2675268366311198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002385905,0.0001378288,0.0003054607,0.00145685,0.005446596,0.008435734,0.0007287453,0.002790208,0.00788024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005337101,0.0002417819,0.0002739927,0.001698482,0.03647331,0.005256043,0.007374669,0.003052343,0.0002232969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009512933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01147075,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2421466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2992772,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972063,0.001160235,0.0001299052,0.0002117368,0.0005580065,0.0007338341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968003,0.001493945,0.00045978,0.0002618421,0.0004640865,0.0005200518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003290284,0.000006186841,0.0007508523,0.000007726335,0.000001860557,0.00008138738,0.003769198,0.00009383528,0.00002381391,0.9927632,0.0007723036,0.001726279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001780322,0.00003639575,0.01404697,0.0005618235,0.00002509141,0.0003771169,0.03223312,0.0007076258,0.000203533,0.7235538,0.2281758,0.0000609549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1625624,0.005214932,0.003797549,0.04296468,0.0002360903,0.0000347,0.00009420722,0.00001548332,0.7850798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798432,0.001150076,0.0003138782,0.00090588,0.00005226931,0.00001515836,0.00001406025,0.000005094299,0.01770036],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2421466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4814742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037167014","doi":"10.1093/iclq/52.4.969","title":"A Role For Tort In Pre-Contractual Negotiations? An Examination Of English, French, And Canadian Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Plaintiff; Mistake; Law; Tort; Negotiation; Database transaction; Business; Liability; Certainty; Unjust enrichment; Work (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Restitution; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Paula Giliker","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0275917556304269,"gpt":0.3076206284420986,"spread":0.2800288728116718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006415597,0.000604453,0.0005376206,0.005247188,0.02096671,0.0158657,0.003080809,0.006441974,0.008379609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01387886,0.0003725658,0.0008295319,0.005769312,0.03268513,0.007989786,0.00281176,0.004335452,0.0005889239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.107677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06956677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9573371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9446187,"domain_scores_codex":[0.989262,0.002490032,0.000188867,0.0005938914,0.003345572,0.004119643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937323,0.00269165,0.0004529798,0.0003065795,0.002167233,0.000649229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006015247,0.00000533438,0.0003482514,0.00001835619,0.000001563366,0.00005982464,0.005187046,0.00006655266,0.00001918802,0.9871331,0.002995444,0.004159419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002709546,0.00003322754,0.01987491,0.001016022,0.0000493819,0.0004453731,0.02594166,0.001132968,0.0002117982,0.2151882,0.7359694,0.0001100722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04104641,0.04736225,0.002947616,0.07252435,0.0003087576,0.0000550822,0.0001695199,0.00005342121,0.8355325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9112207,0.02429239,0.0022597,0.01105005,0.0003465016,0.00006413145,0.00009494461,0.00005321924,0.05061831],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7812551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124063117","doi":"10.1017/s0020589309001213","title":"CLIMATE FINANCE AND ITS GOVERNANCE: MOVING TO A LOW CARBON ECONOMY THROUGH SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FINANCING?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Climate Finance; Corporate governance; Emissions trading; Greenhouse gas; Climate change; Business; Leverage (statistics); Abandonment (legal); Finance; Economic policy; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Developing country","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin J. Richardson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04384114303078949,"gpt":0.2795644619666809,"spread":0.2357233189358914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005752204,0.0001430312,0.0002168267,0.0006742557,0.001434976,0.009822846,0.0005303444,0.003643016,0.004293299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01141079,0.0001228178,0.0001879629,0.0007130122,0.01136975,0.005675667,0.0031838,0.003492596,0.0002301018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004813659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008486711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005627289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005933119,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971924,0.001633151,0.00006820921,0.0001627422,0.0003867836,0.0005566678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939709,0.002714961,0.001092364,0.0003975811,0.0008637353,0.0009605404],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006198199,0.00001594454,0.001125718,0.00001350845,0.000002956486,0.00003359516,0.0002977478,0.0008168587,0.00004469612,0.9893419,0.00318123,0.0051197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001232579,0.0000156558,0.00198603,0.0001361752,0.000004315445,0.00002550038,0.0008735055,0.002319499,0.0001556713,0.96218,0.03228126,0.00001019963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1401558,0.006353882,0.02513486,0.5494367,0.0007492678,0.00007126265,0.00007859755,0.00006697993,0.2779527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913919,0.0009620038,0.000793875,0.003657677,0.0002485198,0.00001839422,0.000009061177,0.000006953549,0.002911534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009822846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0349257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091500395","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300064162","title":"Lockerbie: The Other Case","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International court; Political science; Economic Justice; Action (physics); Diplomacy; Convention; Civil aviation; International law; Aviation; Public international law; Engineering; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Anthony Aust","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04271379868121977,"gpt":0.3314521153436676,"spread":0.2887383166624478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009580234,0.0003861577,0.0004532166,0.001695378,0.01223527,0.003817931,0.001434168,0.008970355,0.03188932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003906996,0.0002275271,0.0006731587,0.001135306,0.003374866,0.001995852,0.00355578,0.008827348,0.003436993],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003757084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005489431,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07922269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1578185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984645,0.0001660752,0.00003457874,0.0002206831,0.0002565233,0.0008576062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989219,0.0002451066,0.00006327457,0.00008020195,0.000140023,0.0005495841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001846633,0.0003475459,0.005896114,0.0002040855,0.00005218464,0.02385434,0.01832093,0.00014345,0.0009603169,0.5730674,0.3353612,0.04160798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009931522,0.00008884494,0.005687814,0.0005653021,0.00005912549,0.01079425,0.01452658,0.0002539273,0.0009280113,0.01443101,0.9524912,0.00007463805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.08365209,0.005077947,0.0007712633,0.09176902,0.001988039,0.0001050461,0.0002411841,0.00006879555,0.8163267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5239815,0.003031762,0.000514332,0.08477133,0.0007237448,0.000139718,0.0001938821,0.00006122861,0.3865826],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07922269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1575231,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130785796","doi":"10.1093/iclq/51.1.17","title":"Judicial Review in ec Law—Some Reflections on the Origins and the Actual Legal Situation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Element (criminal law); Convention; Quarter (Canadian coin); Action (physics); Disadvantage; Order (exchange); Judicial review; Human rights; History; Business","authors":[{"name":"Jürgen Schwarze","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1190288468488151,"gpt":0.3706774742421635,"spread":0.2516486273933484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02502966,0.0002882075,0.0006051435,0.002826188,0.007900423,0.03129737,0.00296919,0.01649905,0.003649914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04052854,0.0007154142,0.0006156074,0.004871704,0.04659538,0.01642744,0.003462981,0.01336641,0.0005555787],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02233888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0153526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04829456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04002653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9749185,0.01401347,0.001290329,0.001860914,0.005002609,0.002914161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635628,0.02580592,0.001658547,0.001755457,0.006277686,0.0009397187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003138088,0.000006832429,0.00008138234,0.00003011839,0.000001289595,0.00009186855,0.001354791,0.00008489365,0.00001995675,0.9876308,0.006696729,0.003998232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002230535,0.00002695811,0.001634569,0.001002533,0.000006022039,0.0003948043,0.004087376,0.0006969867,0.0002562669,0.4683395,0.5234677,0.00006494883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01468969,0.1410813,0.008155596,0.4113674,0.003713601,0.0000656007,0.00006182607,0.00004222159,0.4208227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7412704,0.1179387,0.005725054,0.07428832,0.0143193,0.0001776069,0.00007336438,0.0001432214,0.046064],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04829456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1620807,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986722370","doi":"10.1017/s0020589314000621","title":"CHOICE-OF-COURT AGREEMENTS, THE ITALIAN TORPEDO, AND THE RECAST OF THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Prima facie; Supreme court; Political science","authors":[{"name":"David Kenny","is_ca":true},{"name":"Rosemary Hennigan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08029000003947137,"gpt":0.3381065878157076,"spread":0.2578165877762363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01551742,0.0003502574,0.0006218929,0.002037239,0.01030491,0.01768623,0.003067141,0.01126467,0.004564601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02895073,0.0005022996,0.0007597919,0.002216039,0.03594403,0.005957052,0.008247104,0.01603942,0.0006091067],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02169127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01531358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09784491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1115906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.971612,0.01229608,0.001085961,0.003110426,0.006057787,0.005837736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820237,0.01001621,0.0019322,0.002112896,0.002815778,0.001099292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008397723,0.000006007853,0.0003042823,0.000008613808,0.000002197448,0.0001392677,0.003401192,0.0001467119,0.00002489284,0.9912454,0.0033069,0.00140605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008804413,0.00008820599,0.004405075,0.0008828556,0.00005854877,0.0005802711,0.02218061,0.002519822,0.0008072979,0.4898143,0.4783282,0.0002467535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.07848526,0.00161234,0.007227236,0.06183274,0.0007608789,0.00009739927,0.00009127644,0.00006609335,0.8498267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9523607,0.0003567606,0.001491928,0.008995284,0.0002749554,0.00009879023,0.00003366475,0.00003451281,0.03635336],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09784491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1945508,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051603156","doi":"10.1017/s0020589313000481","title":"<i>RE FLIGHTLEASE</i>: THE ‘REAL AND SUBSTANTIAL CONNECTION’ TEST FOR RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS FAILS TO TAKE FLIGHT IN IRELAND","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Irish; Law; Enforcement; Political science; Test (biology); Common law; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"David Kenny","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05449964257874465,"gpt":0.3126494242527124,"spread":0.2581497816739677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02202116,0.0003033914,0.0009272295,0.002204876,0.008142817,0.009261417,0.003281564,0.006425393,0.01074551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0820108,0.0004696317,0.001086661,0.001346664,0.01947572,0.004415692,0.004932674,0.009949393,0.001208824],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01386221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02948138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4027089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4818674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9780332,0.004544307,0.00159301,0.003174541,0.00531772,0.007337225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9669161,0.01356138,0.002706429,0.003195401,0.009215384,0.004405309],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005502242,0.0002882303,0.06549614,0.0001165439,0.0001550006,0.00237728,0.01782961,0.0009909,0.001110476,0.7779946,0.1153202,0.01777069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006146448,0.0006663894,0.2002908,0.001539042,0.0005657294,0.002071559,0.1534417,0.008524366,0.008706334,0.3193201,0.3032092,0.001050205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3538622,0.000352608,0.002408318,0.0784426,0.0008896525,0.0002296917,0.000751442,0.00006821238,0.5629952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739974,0.00008919049,0.0007796921,0.01217927,0.0001396746,0.00005724502,0.0001712643,0.00002834983,0.01255793],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4027089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8007299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990658214","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300064642","title":"Constitutional Challenges to Sexual Orientation Discrimination","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Statutory law; Lesbian; Legislation; Same sex; Law; Political science; Convention; Human rights; Legislature; Sociology; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Kenneth Norrie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0891685153541418,"gpt":0.3677277836966911,"spread":0.2785592683425493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02156244,0.0004267388,0.000724389,0.001290665,0.01322205,0.01422,0.004268046,0.02267361,0.01013684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03110899,0.0006546767,0.0008522299,0.001665764,0.03215898,0.008834469,0.01035717,0.02316047,0.001389864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008644431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01259392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01718906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01756629,"domain_scores_codex":[0.987452,0.003557302,0.0006453189,0.002071982,0.004444633,0.0018288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880342,0.007661606,0.0006075516,0.0009587776,0.001394302,0.001343616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004994357,0.00001511346,0.0001323502,0.00001509203,0.000002002264,0.00007411275,0.0009135502,0.00004971559,0.00007680681,0.9818029,0.01252584,0.004387612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004368461,0.00003404764,0.0005988454,0.0003523998,0.000009807721,0.0002406066,0.002505956,0.000180172,0.000207495,0.5757808,0.4200159,0.0000303543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01826094,0.009146278,0.004409018,0.6333808,0.004914553,0.00007279829,0.0002119692,0.00005198379,0.3295516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4312575,0.009004402,0.004823267,0.4366836,0.01216482,0.0005186169,0.0003160927,0.0001042511,0.1051274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02267361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1140345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606851650","doi":"10.1017/s0020589317000161","title":"JAPANESE APPROACHES TO EXTRATERRITORIALITY IN COMPETITION LAW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Economic Zones and Regional Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Royal Irish Academy; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Extraterritoriality; Competition law; Competition (biology); Context (archaeology); Commission; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; International trade; Economics; Jurisdiction; Market economy; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Marek Martyniszyn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2585119866204537,"gpt":0.2762031427799723,"spread":0.01769115615951855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004294906,0.000285482,0.0003233092,0.001953661,0.00299057,0.005233393,0.0008870457,0.002584147,0.003911192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00461071,0.000268688,0.0004675624,0.002224362,0.01170534,0.003827853,0.003767437,0.003153183,0.0002765811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006445738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003293681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01472943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02015022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963381,0.001441781,0.0002841135,0.0006655077,0.0007441238,0.0005264167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954476,0.001535704,0.0008898103,0.000604132,0.001187376,0.0003354837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008522963,0.00001300049,0.0008401201,0.00004390081,0.000007288742,0.0002025306,0.003103992,0.0004332553,0.0003205473,0.9887289,0.001146586,0.005151464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003523695,0.0001324008,0.01317177,0.0003710326,0.0001105343,0.0007683669,0.007328372,0.005832428,0.001432751,0.7464134,0.2242895,0.0001142265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2225455,0.01071807,0.03906784,0.02850256,0.0004524904,0.00006074781,0.00007157192,0.00006588738,0.6985153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812843,0.00155136,0.002914504,0.001906228,0.0001651429,0.00002876412,0.00001436267,0.00001306241,0.01212222],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01472943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04676729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137015572","doi":"10.1017/s0020589313000158","title":"COHABITANTS IN PRIVATE LAW: TRUST, FRUSTRATION AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT IN ENGLAND, GERMANY AND CANADA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Appeal; Law; Political science; Autonomy; Legislature; German; Common law; Private law; Comparative law; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Anne E. Sanders","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02178360568076308,"gpt":0.2859977473163106,"spread":0.2642141416355475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00555537,0.0002306213,0.0006196889,0.001983424,0.03502003,0.00986684,0.002673846,0.004213807,0.006968827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01599663,0.0004090093,0.0002934861,0.003516067,0.02129082,0.002691512,0.005431119,0.005577687,0.0002758085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1348434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1191341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967443,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9885185,0.001653857,0.0002791404,0.000791422,0.003013644,0.005743338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873553,0.004183101,0.0009563611,0.0004429274,0.002812713,0.004249624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002175992,0.0002712372,0.06081311,0.000228901,0.00007529565,0.005194433,0.4493897,0.0006783466,0.000999514,0.3915356,0.04753648,0.04305977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006636076,0.0000566087,0.1082624,0.0006599978,0.00006354554,0.0007332907,0.6614153,0.001101055,0.0007378877,0.01220554,0.2144632,0.0002347833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8888217,0.003087921,0.0003480341,0.0317293,0.000153064,0.00008075203,0.000204572,0.00001811712,0.0755566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901286,0.0006059467,0.00007963633,0.002282929,0.000009612934,0.00001164363,0.00003414044,0.000007930508,0.006839575],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1348434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9783622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128619142","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei030","title":"II. Legality Of Use Of Force (Serbia And Montenegro v Belgium) (Serbia And Montenegro v Canada) (Serbia And Montenegro v France) (Serbia And Montenegro v Germany) (Serbia And Montenegro v Italy) (Serbia And Montenegro v Netherlands) (Serbia And Montenegro v Portugal) (Serbia And Montenegro v United Kingdom): Preliminary Objections. Judgment Of 15 December 2004<sup>1</sup>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Montenegro; Jurisdiction; Principle of legality; Law; Political science; Unanimity; Declaration; Geography; Ancient history; History","authors":[{"name":"Christine Gray","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03983409062192907,"gpt":0.2719262635370158,"spread":0.2320921729150867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005345854,0.0005085121,0.0005571271,0.002917245,0.007522355,0.008897837,0.002532272,0.01245205,0.004683767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01031547,0.0006946913,0.001027231,0.002207293,0.01012267,0.002828804,0.002332781,0.006778006,0.001725446],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00695718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009433419,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1578144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1770081,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924479,0.001199746,0.0004880305,0.000860649,0.002074036,0.002929642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938837,0.003142653,0.0008856198,0.0003801548,0.001403108,0.0003046979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005380564,0.0000375807,0.00295798,0.0001410756,0.00002131342,0.0006982891,0.005058165,0.0001411405,0.0004159207,0.9032441,0.07540639,0.01182428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006627622,0.0001083062,0.03963454,0.001707198,0.00008191259,0.001016231,0.009103362,0.0004624363,0.001493158,0.08131619,0.8649081,0.0001022824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03977674,0.01724314,0.001799638,0.05441207,0.003222656,0.0002160956,0.001601583,0.00005117734,0.8816768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7599623,0.008912371,0.00251045,0.07547027,0.002452188,0.0006491229,0.001505695,0.00008233049,0.1484552],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8421856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3137916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999706565","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300064228","title":"“Making Public Law, ‘Public’: An Analysis of the Quebec Reference Case and its Significance for Comparative Constitutional Analysis”","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scrutiny; Political science; Supreme court; Politics; Legal profession; Public law; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial review; Legal opinion; Constitutional law; Democracy; Subject (documents); Private law; Black letter law","authors":[{"name":"James McHugh","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1375669828113801,"gpt":0.3561090799552209,"spread":0.2185420971438408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005834637,0.0005771734,0.0007528734,0.00568623,0.03687313,0.01492944,0.004468382,0.009347064,0.01476329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01178847,0.0004324519,0.0006835561,0.009303669,0.03094807,0.007254634,0.004078634,0.005907139,0.0006173198],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1457238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08520272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9752287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9845054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9889416,0.004057694,0.00008951534,0.0005641623,0.002568312,0.003778873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949461,0.002320414,0.0002166424,0.0002963055,0.001882058,0.0003384789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006771831,0.00001101866,0.0002477391,0.00002395288,0.000004309925,0.0002162719,0.005827623,0.0001381868,0.00003209085,0.9806653,0.009955907,0.002870823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000622104,0.00005500204,0.0174481,0.0012387,0.0001021053,0.0004344413,0.07236792,0.003630362,0.0005502799,0.3188733,0.5850574,0.0001802397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0561029,0.01397518,0.003959959,0.06024625,0.0003524228,0.0001352365,0.0003427294,0.0000574447,0.8648279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9232261,0.003735006,0.00142792,0.009338125,0.000223695,0.0001863968,0.0001814449,0.00006566048,0.06161564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1457238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092981200","doi":"10.1093/iclq/51.2.197","title":"Bills of Rights in Common Law Countries","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Criminal Justice Association","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Common law; Law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Fundamental rights; Rest (music); Bill of rights; Human rights; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Beverley McLachlin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05867579530143412,"gpt":0.3362403487742775,"spread":0.2775645534728434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006428066,0.0004100161,0.0005464845,0.003097168,0.01031666,0.01179985,0.001128119,0.004782366,0.01160775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01118348,0.0004389757,0.0005549306,0.003889842,0.01873739,0.007803438,0.007205626,0.005140899,0.001355648],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01002027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01063081,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05367664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04304655,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906825,0.003736875,0.0004676067,0.001099271,0.001978329,0.002035424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968114,0.001028465,0.0003257971,0.0006859983,0.0007296316,0.0004186172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[6.370499e-7,8.864887e-7,0.00002120688,0.000001113629,3.373571e-7,0.000003840521,0.0001438434,0.00002414505,0.000002964373,0.9977344,0.001546695,0.0005200176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001655866,0.00001109944,0.0007430981,0.0001276139,0.000005497344,0.0000451031,0.0007760433,0.0002784725,0.00006066138,0.6781784,0.3197373,0.00002023739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01209107,0.002801912,0.005349775,0.01325284,0.0002547285,0.00009687084,0.0002030238,0.00003271008,0.9659172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8005844,0.00408044,0.009966835,0.01197839,0.0004663916,0.000822551,0.0006133611,0.00006364081,0.171424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05367664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1067284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966968079","doi":"10.1017/s0020589310000655","title":"JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING AND TRANSNATIONAL LAW: A SURVEY OF COMMON LAW SUPREME COURT JUDGES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Precedent; Political science; Majority opinion; Judicial independence; Comparative law; Jurisprudence","authors":[{"name":"Brian Flanagan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09705707278559123,"gpt":0.3479574279139581,"spread":0.2509003551283668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007208682,0.0001590699,0.0004464258,0.003129985,0.002655746,0.003741757,0.0005421725,0.0009474439,0.003231847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02640732,0.0003067155,0.0001835356,0.003456651,0.002295662,0.002141393,0.001910248,0.001302181,0.0004205331],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001204528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001307531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01889493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03053422,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936381,0.003344067,0.0004354752,0.0005018577,0.001117318,0.0009631656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753395,0.01087164,0.005521731,0.0008194735,0.004558759,0.002888888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008819832,0.0002063333,0.6493261,0.00007307004,0.0000436052,0.0005961938,0.3219076,0.0001344828,0.0009311794,0.003760538,0.001887984,0.02104476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001583324,0.0002870098,0.4970745,0.0002180157,0.00002124829,0.0007259274,0.4832499,0.0007633904,0.0003131404,0.001734045,0.0155421,0.00005502867],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966891,0.0003795262,0.0001223097,0.0003717559,0.000007489667,0.0000127227,0.00003388587,0.000001474312,0.002381604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993591,0.0001576091,0.00003679298,0.00008476226,0.000005036561,0.000007509,0.00002986758,0.000001757571,0.0003175708],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01889493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03812355,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092409353","doi":"10.1017/s0020589320000354","title":"FOREIGN INVESTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES AND CONTRIBUTORY FAULT IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Treaty; Compensation (psychology); Consistency (knowledge bases); Fault (geology); Investment (military); Business; Foreign direct investment; Investment arbitration; Law and economics; International arbitration; Law; International investment; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Psychology; Seismology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Jean‐Michel Marcoux","is_ca":true},{"name":"Andrea K. Bjorklund","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04795132605533763,"gpt":0.2550262469968719,"spread":0.2070749209415343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02574414,0.0003776237,0.0004780135,0.002432856,0.006248326,0.01103609,0.001375123,0.005425639,0.003591491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05203556,0.000354348,0.000481242,0.001448442,0.0139194,0.00697831,0.006358718,0.006432529,0.0003061321],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005181224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006316265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005454924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00443434,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9839288,0.008029725,0.001156434,0.001033718,0.003250628,0.002600673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691471,0.02012455,0.003620348,0.002337597,0.00372183,0.001048435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002930602,0.00002257732,0.003480455,0.0000257418,0.000009863498,0.0006547166,0.007393453,0.0007698635,0.0001812274,0.9778416,0.001506178,0.008084876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001016321,0.0001390144,0.01332759,0.0009541652,0.0001065209,0.002263419,0.02326598,0.006860287,0.002740225,0.8550249,0.09508565,0.0001305045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3852885,0.003390201,0.0258796,0.02642791,0.0009407491,0.0001144707,0.00002819166,0.00007119961,0.5578592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936487,0.0002278314,0.0004736932,0.0007347753,0.00009401254,0.00001553558,0.00000409861,0.000006464539,0.004794847],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02574414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1361496,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367316018","doi":"10.1017/s002058932300012x","title":"NET ZERO EMISSIONS AND FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS: EFFORTS AT INTEGRATING CLIMATE GOALS BY THE UNITED KINGDOM AND AUSTRALIA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"New Zealand Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Free trade; Climate change; International trade; Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; Negotiation; Liberalization; Parliament; European union; General partnership; Emissions trading; Political science; Enforcement; Greenhouse gas; Business; Kyoto Protocol; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Margaret A. Young","is_ca":false},{"name":"Georgina Clough","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1080895209207512,"gpt":0.3037109109912649,"spread":0.1956213900705137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0139601,0.000273106,0.0004198446,0.001532532,0.004731447,0.009013015,0.001035142,0.00480244,0.002024407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01651565,0.0004360043,0.0005348886,0.002031515,0.004007881,0.004830478,0.008750164,0.003484237,0.0002292851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0133117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0246295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1153059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1350959,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9832246,0.008138339,0.0009621684,0.0007628943,0.004622654,0.002289345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910222,0.004469243,0.0006890284,0.0005643871,0.002295121,0.0009600731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108868,0.00006769339,0.003299021,0.0006422373,0.00004308495,0.001114166,0.04043555,0.003637582,0.001524356,0.870048,0.01423617,0.06484322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006071312,0.0002126394,0.02379529,0.002760886,0.0000796223,0.0005333603,0.0264739,0.004948658,0.002151216,0.07453661,0.8642855,0.000161726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2660355,0.05234557,0.008775868,0.1144276,0.001653499,0.0002475543,0.00007827651,0.00007132161,0.5563647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9453563,0.009390716,0.004901054,0.008742278,0.0001235549,0.00007337389,0.0000355388,0.00003396813,0.0313433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1153059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2292696,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389648687","doi":"10.1017/s0020589323000532","title":"REGULATING TRANSNATIONAL DISSIDENT CYBER ESPIONAGE","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universitetet i Oslo","keywords":"Human rights; Espionage; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Democracy; Politics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Siena Anstis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05238225661906652,"gpt":0.3453152542922187,"spread":0.2929329976731521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01067283,0.0003988128,0.0003121429,0.001731658,0.004835856,0.007953356,0.002075907,0.005623405,0.007936545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01520572,0.0003377891,0.0006687776,0.0008449958,0.0114348,0.005544677,0.01153049,0.006542246,0.001009157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003673462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006377301,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008427023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01018597,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9899728,0.002740316,0.0007361905,0.001705428,0.002580892,0.002264437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885982,0.005238169,0.001182364,0.002100477,0.00225233,0.0006283453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004054814,0.0001818684,0.004908377,0.0001499063,0.00002237255,0.0007351774,0.0166053,0.000828064,0.004464865,0.9290065,0.00633804,0.03671908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008030033,0.0005128078,0.01630455,0.002537902,0.0001758364,0.001500539,0.04877308,0.004608125,0.02019138,0.3586272,0.5464572,0.0002310479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2064238,0.001840489,0.04718873,0.01833132,0.0008666241,0.0004533624,0.00008551018,0.0004008085,0.7244094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9597953,0.0004062747,0.003985015,0.005952006,0.0001072026,0.0001878682,0.00003581334,0.00004702707,0.02948354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01067283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05644393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104515135","doi":"10.1017/s002058931000045x","title":"PUBLIC HEARINGS AT THE WTO APPELLATE BODY: THE NEXT STEP","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Adjudication; Transparency (behavior); Jurisdiction; Openness to experience; Political science; Law; Authorization; Settlement (finance); Business; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Alberto Alvarez-Jiménez","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0701482926053307,"gpt":0.3038374953565425,"spread":0.2336892027512118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02811995,0.0004638857,0.000703198,0.001070321,0.00916708,0.01927197,0.002890675,0.02663295,0.05109767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05254488,0.0006329221,0.001026295,0.0009877627,0.006110574,0.01980191,0.007488835,0.01595109,0.01773049],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003969058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0210049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01074525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009366918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9801652,0.00514063,0.0006270242,0.001487182,0.007166943,0.005413084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9659317,0.01343568,0.002214066,0.004475881,0.008916902,0.005025727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009874292,0.0003895024,0.001059763,0.0001739593,0.00003218463,0.0006596936,0.002293841,0.0002790097,0.002208867,0.4975896,0.4134719,0.08174305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007311102,0.0001557784,0.002703183,0.0006280113,0.00003385928,0.0003741808,0.003936299,0.0008841311,0.001798603,0.2004899,0.7888259,0.00009719002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0181175,0.004827083,0.05035208,0.6267225,0.006491487,0.0005377461,0.0005394496,0.0008473026,0.2915649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4832762,0.00328453,0.04054133,0.2160157,0.005682162,0.0006772306,0.0009126163,0.0006880254,0.2489222],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05109767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1709387,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416194669","doi":"10.1017/s0020589325101012","title":"The International Seabed Authority, the Problem of Disregard and the Case for Administrative Accountability","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Accountability; Delegation; Jurisdiction; State (computer science); Administrative law; Process (computing); International law; Core (optical fiber)","authors":[{"name":"Neil Craik","is_ca":true},{"name":"Julian Jackson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Aline Jaeckel","is_ca":false},{"name":"Hannah Lily","is_ca":false},{"name":"Pradeep Singh","is_ca":false},{"name":"Hope Elizabeth Tracey","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02878632355721898,"gpt":0.3291889563334191,"spread":0.3004026327762001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05441366,0.0003239373,0.0007007799,0.002904486,0.01790807,0.02070161,0.003036823,0.01368095,0.003233777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06444641,0.0006676472,0.0007725025,0.002717309,0.09836353,0.01849365,0.01312553,0.01694779,0.0004502917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01620017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02109677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03032387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01880886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9387344,0.03969898,0.002304606,0.003526214,0.01048505,0.005250815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9338815,0.04858537,0.004180265,0.004347137,0.006550451,0.002455322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003372857,0.000005269055,0.0002551752,0.00001130457,0.000002092067,0.00006586969,0.004023014,0.0001026937,0.00002080744,0.9918777,0.002032343,0.001600435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001931845,0.00002641199,0.00120594,0.0004753277,0.00001914195,0.0001519133,0.01153433,0.0007563692,0.0002447258,0.863723,0.1217971,0.00004640491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.07431769,0.007065259,0.01533712,0.4250439,0.001356261,0.00006311514,0.00004544947,0.00006858445,0.4767027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971573,0.001212899,0.00161668,0.01712223,0.0005269019,0.00008193918,0.00001379461,0.00005214037,0.007800414],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05441366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2877704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405549352","doi":"10.1017/s0020589324000381","title":"EXIT RIGHTS, SEAMLESS BORDERS AND THE NEW CARCERAL STATE","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Criminology; Computer security; Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Audrey Macklin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04129423642595931,"gpt":0.3498394484123714,"spread":0.308545211986412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002784763,0.0001537165,0.0002674053,0.0007911884,0.004370025,0.009104917,0.001028366,0.002470265,0.006173557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003766802,0.0001687958,0.0002991374,0.0006337346,0.03669569,0.005752731,0.00905067,0.003785492,0.000294571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002803424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002384614,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004774814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005443954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976854,0.0008835846,0.00009768788,0.0003527149,0.0003584414,0.0006221171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977806,0.0007720334,0.0004387601,0.0003716953,0.0002821766,0.000354767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005855299,0.000004684333,0.0003004863,0.00001058361,9.583148e-7,0.00007729826,0.004108598,0.00008417608,0.00003758058,0.9932851,0.0002754784,0.001809164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002568908,0.00009235797,0.003801347,0.0007572245,0.00001784277,0.0008089314,0.04716127,0.0009657415,0.0005590938,0.7576468,0.1881125,0.00005114305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.3107064,0.002883282,0.01067842,0.01842553,0.0002188493,0.00003499672,0.00004021746,0.00003836954,0.656974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927563,0.0002688439,0.000353264,0.0004700669,0.00002779439,0.000009709078,0.000008207072,0.00000469068,0.006101256],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009104917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02065259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098660069","doi":"10.1093/iclq/53.3.579","title":"CANADIAN REFLECTIONS ON THE TOBACCO WARS: SOME UNINTENDED CONSEQUE5NCES OF MASS TORT LITIGATION","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Mass tort; Legislation; Tort; Legislature; Political science; Commonwealth; Law; Tort reform; Unintended consequences; Jurisprudence; Harm; Economic Justice; Action (physics); Law and economics; State (computer science); Sociology; Liability","authors":[{"name":"Jeff Berryman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06344834934063906,"gpt":0.2925820214590201,"spread":0.2291336721183811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008302572,0.0007583354,0.0008366693,0.004235552,0.04231415,0.02156954,0.004274296,0.01794372,0.02595599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01778295,0.0007789804,0.0009287497,0.009884111,0.0250065,0.009504261,0.005773148,0.01685409,0.001779273],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2078714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1889478,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9888085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947366,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9884729,0.001452631,0.0003246014,0.001000045,0.005074113,0.003675736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897481,0.003470886,0.0006442707,0.0003198363,0.003916652,0.001900104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009730607,0.00004160061,0.001753866,0.0002891967,0.00002248739,0.00116503,0.03299183,0.0002435518,0.000368958,0.4762143,0.4533224,0.03348945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002574189,0.00001543252,0.003413236,0.0003473845,0.00001862322,0.000213038,0.02534259,0.00008740152,0.0002366436,0.01934296,0.9508662,0.00009080351],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0137012,0.03382903,0.0002492268,0.7118541,0.002611607,0.00003658538,0.0005635218,0.00004504394,0.2371097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4031408,0.06139734,0.001122913,0.3639295,0.002827596,0.00005207774,0.0003675341,0.0001999055,0.1669624],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2078714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9187569,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132611068","doi":"10.1017/s0020589310000680","title":"JUDICIAL SCRUTINY OF MERGER DECISIONS IN THE EU, UK AND GERMANY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Academic Association for Contemporary European Studies","keywords":"Scrutiny; Context (archaeology); Discretion; Judicial review; Political science; Standard of review; Agency (philosophy); Judicial discretion; Credibility; Law; Relevance (law); Law and economics; Economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Michael Harker","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sebastian Peyer","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kathryn Wright","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.11478234541187,"gpt":0.343483034046881,"spread":0.2287006886350109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01314007,0.0001565324,0.0005919839,0.004678855,0.002451958,0.005375448,0.0007631069,0.002965671,0.001501307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04940756,0.0002425726,0.0003685659,0.003953826,0.003926352,0.001898335,0.002527141,0.001300025,0.0001667319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006897976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00296232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03603405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05310365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9836112,0.006657098,0.001339156,0.00153036,0.003548667,0.003313556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94846,0.03414081,0.009535842,0.00136235,0.005608565,0.0008924825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001879671,0.0003707702,0.3091671,0.00142703,0.001054372,0.01884703,0.07528911,0.01174486,0.01792251,0.4086946,0.02326299,0.13034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001692853,0.000502906,0.7963825,0.001594076,0.0007453763,0.003002317,0.03999746,0.007154156,0.0173027,0.03443208,0.09831146,0.0004055854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9678142,0.004134683,0.0005186309,0.003104469,0.00005031518,0.000029152,0.00009320113,0.000007432836,0.0242479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985535,0.0003798376,0.000095569,0.0003491857,0.00002018113,0.000003848303,0.00002659014,0.000001560836,0.000569651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03603405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0716486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124660054","doi":"10.1017/s002058931100042x","title":"INTERNATIONALISATION AND CONSTITUTIONAL BORROWING IN DRAFTING BILLS OF RIGHTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centre for Engineering Research and Development; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Indigenous; Internationalization; Context (archaeology); Political science; Key (lock); Northern ireland; Indigenous rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Focus (optics); Law; Public administration; Sociology; Business; International trade; Geography; Computer science; Ethnology","authors":[{"name":"Anne Smith","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08964935228637383,"gpt":0.3210730041536363,"spread":0.2314236518672624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04416819,0.0002306122,0.0004917268,0.002433571,0.01156451,0.01004877,0.001915502,0.002400653,0.005423774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07625385,0.0004480657,0.0003160133,0.002745574,0.04429501,0.006017298,0.006980616,0.006144294,0.000318173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01719156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01256053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04055075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04756338,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9611384,0.02518228,0.001563087,0.002484246,0.005840733,0.003791341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9401249,0.04210774,0.004462989,0.006605961,0.00535188,0.001346526],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001936439,0.00002380054,0.002635277,0.00005114196,0.000006460867,0.0003431953,0.1033867,0.0005115363,0.0004999399,0.8732493,0.001267892,0.01800536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005440204,0.0001576779,0.02218877,0.001084124,0.00004309445,0.0009655544,0.2133831,0.00246339,0.00252215,0.3446817,0.4123125,0.0001435767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3017783,0.001499886,0.02577277,0.01148528,0.0001307919,0.0001944348,0.00004136034,0.00006339104,0.6590338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896151,0.0002013022,0.001998401,0.0002885916,0.00002469542,0.00003676628,0.00001273072,0.00003040817,0.007792054],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04416819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2335865,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982156666","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei175","title":"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Index (typography); Convention; Liability; Law; Media studies; Sociology; Art; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Bin Cheng","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04178532391807655,"gpt":0.3541998219142938,"spread":0.3124144979962172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001189948,0.0009365201,0.0002978258,0.001540407,0.003758956,0.005243971,0.001560522,0.004163806,0.04054593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003951888,0.0003706443,0.0004101152,0.001935128,0.001889482,0.00328316,0.001599407,0.004037096,0.01373925],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01022444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01191099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3033709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4511332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998588,0.0001182683,0.00005860293,0.0002319507,0.0007769453,0.0002262051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992064,0.00007024577,0.00007589463,0.00008766245,0.0004660531,0.00009376169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001553999,0.0000135063,0.0002576118,0.00003300019,0.000003437807,0.0000265229,0.0002247054,0.00005699524,0.0001175691,0.1283966,0.8548465,0.01600804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003043748,0.000003956514,0.001019786,0.00009591563,0.000002153057,0.00002156924,0.00008663032,0.00003879998,0.0001010183,0.005445757,0.9931744,0.000006999288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001803411,0.0336061,0.001576164,0.03613732,0.007697131,0.0001165076,0.003167302,0.0002623498,0.9156337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02818432,0.006980881,0.001238303,0.01324979,0.001594495,0.0001125677,0.001242913,0.0001791576,0.9472176],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9594541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294835859","doi":"10.1017/s0020589314000608","title":"Transparency in International Law, edited by Andrea Bianchi and Anne Peters [Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013, 642pp, ISBN 978-1-107-02138-9, £90.00 (h/bk)]","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"King's University College","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Media studies; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Elaine Kellman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01632909760284116,"gpt":0.2180275793456246,"spread":0.2016984817427835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002019096,0.001449838,0.001279314,0.003495557,0.001767642,0.007494982,0.001006573,0.003294313,0.02215891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00490697,0.00138683,0.0006871609,0.00650832,0.00372511,0.008656163,0.001869205,0.005113569,0.008060805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004632141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005586843,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01369312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987539,0.0003737283,0.00009691263,0.0001514055,0.0005050268,0.000118987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982672,0.0009759573,0.0002222691,0.0001340404,0.0002956335,0.0001048793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002290149,0.00001725399,0.0001449029,0.0005837886,0.00001440259,0.00007272424,0.0007780698,0.0003593635,0.0001623803,0.1099547,0.7946049,0.09328464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009512722,0.00000857044,0.00112972,0.001495154,0.000009274263,0.0002105752,0.0003215091,0.0002841647,0.00009445073,0.0740869,0.9223289,0.0000212354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005098318,0.8618589,0.002883642,0.03768631,0.005584967,0.00002026829,0.0003666728,0.0001702824,0.0909192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03297271,0.8411509,0.005267337,0.006877632,0.01007092,0.0001138296,0.0005961601,0.0003917264,0.1025587],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02215891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07412887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138983123","doi":"10.1093/iclq/52.4.1074","title":"Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by Robert J Sharpe, Katherine E Swinton, and Roach Kent, 2nd edn. Toronto: twin Law Inc, 2002. ISBN 1-55221-063-4 Pbk, Np.]","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Faisal Saifee","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02046895009650561,"gpt":0.2899661993872281,"spread":0.2694972492907224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002667412,0.00208495,0.001195122,0.009788368,0.007645827,0.006796953,0.002561568,0.002992163,0.03697531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004392843,0.001498689,0.0005989641,0.01715341,0.005436531,0.004581506,0.001658506,0.00457503,0.008973017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05733265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09130149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9611212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9848073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972979,0.0001828274,0.000149967,0.0002547326,0.001817235,0.0002974239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973266,0.0002435381,0.0001907993,0.0001342724,0.001757491,0.0003473182],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006110178,0.00000444449,0.0001086832,0.00008118192,0.000002976363,0.00001925593,0.0002447858,0.00007427503,0.00002566149,0.02572836,0.9540225,0.01968174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003316344,0.000002422206,0.00156996,0.0002173659,0.000003415764,0.00003877301,0.0002328705,0.0000434717,0.00003435013,0.003113156,0.9947224,0.00001848742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001386191,0.4389354,0.004849444,0.0699833,0.01560614,0.0005295296,0.02814391,0.0005660282,0.4400001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02921722,0.2883236,0.0118749,0.006875851,0.002356213,0.0003043996,0.01188558,0.0005823806,0.6485798],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05733265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4159794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101812110","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300065416","title":"II. Cases Before the Court","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Convention; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Malcolm D. Evans","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05220578403016417,"gpt":0.3395507520688009,"spread":0.2873449680386367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004386826,0.0005138117,0.0005352382,0.00172549,0.01605082,0.01035697,0.002278971,0.0212772,0.01661524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01683578,0.0007459461,0.0008983728,0.001661732,0.006806423,0.005402952,0.004410699,0.01587107,0.004287778],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007084524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0102403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08628965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1166726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932768,0.0007201089,0.0001933389,0.0008788256,0.001827563,0.003103361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962567,0.001766688,0.0003206462,0.0003076178,0.0008103344,0.0005379957],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003391068,0.00004478413,0.0009051692,0.00004921812,0.000006873871,0.001586143,0.002533046,0.0001237171,0.0002905901,0.8791872,0.1095458,0.00569355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006858796,0.00006609257,0.003275694,0.0006480695,0.0000308655,0.0008057215,0.008329616,0.0004298665,0.001132505,0.1445235,0.8406187,0.0000707251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0194273,0.003070573,0.002059052,0.0676516,0.002562146,0.0002594634,0.0004593491,0.00006383342,0.9044467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3816026,0.002817015,0.001810897,0.1878464,0.002555268,0.0006324569,0.0004156433,0.0001017146,0.422218],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08628965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1715748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413254345","doi":"10.1017/s0020589325100821","title":"Internationality Overreach in the Interpretation of Uniform Private Law Conventions: The <i>Contra Proferentem</i> Rule and the CISG","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Convention; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Relevance (law); Conflict of laws; Underpinning; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Katarzyna Kryla-Cudna","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0285058520107497,"gpt":0.3365693171446842,"spread":0.3080634651339345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03214517,0.0003097901,0.001119004,0.001560622,0.004554903,0.01362057,0.001899987,0.005964014,0.002081431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04331925,0.0005245729,0.0007275902,0.001577631,0.05161377,0.01035411,0.008697353,0.009603354,0.0003089925],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006130177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006752047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006489973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00356001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9622357,0.02292785,0.002192874,0.003632999,0.006981099,0.002029555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9654548,0.02075675,0.002749847,0.006381229,0.004064621,0.0005926124],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003538048,0.000003714489,0.00009957591,0.000005060872,0.00000165833,0.00002398169,0.002132925,0.0001117727,0.00003727579,0.9961887,0.000283638,0.001108228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002196685,0.00002593813,0.0006000728,0.000131528,0.0000129122,0.00008769468,0.002908507,0.001843293,0.0005497292,0.9703198,0.02346323,0.00003536249],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2126525,0.002446425,0.1228994,0.03251811,0.0008395287,0.0001613203,0.00007112933,0.0001128056,0.6282988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871157,0.0002368635,0.00594955,0.002073241,0.0001610447,0.00007878201,0.00001706099,0.00004362913,0.004323971],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03214517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1700019,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118708210","doi":"10.1017/s0020589320000512","title":"Negotiated Settlements in Bribery Cases: A Principled Approach, edited by Tina Søreide and Abiola Makinwa [Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2020, 384pp, ISBN 978-1-78897-040-2, £110 (h/bk)]","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human settlement; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Elizabeth Acorn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03536953140302822,"gpt":0.3063289879147936,"spread":0.2709594565117654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008941111,0.001008085,0.001505384,0.003201095,0.006761955,0.01995625,0.004722222,0.009059235,0.01471076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01376517,0.001639772,0.0009217695,0.005665761,0.03174835,0.02011114,0.009470443,0.009221059,0.002187525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01213102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01154146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008740094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01387417,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9885838,0.008096809,0.0004005085,0.0005651696,0.001517254,0.0008363554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945815,0.003907581,0.0005492631,0.0003388039,0.000364406,0.0002582958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001016631,0.00004731424,0.0001205255,0.0002635483,0.000008939061,0.00009083291,0.006576198,0.0007360154,0.00003351024,0.9167368,0.05063476,0.02474146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002322872,0.00001689102,0.0008075269,0.002868523,0.00001138292,0.0002202491,0.01151922,0.0008594873,0.00008178943,0.6504687,0.3330841,0.00003888454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.008209534,0.2624003,0.0273867,0.09568902,0.003034959,0.000323888,0.0001964891,0.0001067323,0.6026524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5779575,0.2137055,0.02404073,0.008501993,0.004228421,0.001476611,0.0004900481,0.0002807521,0.1693185],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01995625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08801711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801151102","doi":"10.1093/iclq/52.3.802","title":"V. Cases Before the Court","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Malcom D Evans","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04222243539908536,"gpt":0.332795888426871,"spread":0.2905734530277856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004370668,0.0004910385,0.0004630558,0.001283529,0.01471661,0.008759152,0.001857131,0.01645168,0.01491065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01723783,0.0006695617,0.0007766803,0.001386999,0.004820444,0.003468645,0.002928171,0.01236637,0.00271206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008856852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01467666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1956522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2749229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937993,0.0008772509,0.0001831668,0.0007329048,0.0017073,0.002700086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995946,0.001766131,0.0002969123,0.0003685234,0.001173079,0.0004492707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004085245,0.00003037168,0.001204447,0.00003371419,0.00001265302,0.001328214,0.002060213,0.0001467532,0.0004824788,0.8677861,0.1199041,0.006970173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103539,0.0000596916,0.003940719,0.0003332107,0.00004860689,0.0007400961,0.003329566,0.0005885446,0.001290775,0.1194998,0.8699902,0.00007527936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02765729,0.002228265,0.002328893,0.05068622,0.001394641,0.0002024588,0.000379175,0.0001084419,0.9150145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4557051,0.001714075,0.001449975,0.1452116,0.001501121,0.0003372118,0.0002554988,0.0001079107,0.3937176],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1956522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3890267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}