{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":17,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":17,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"a3e1db71dfa7","filters":{"venue":"Israel Law Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W3122897509","doi":"10.1017/s0021223700012310","title":"The Status of Arabic in Israel: Refiections on the Power of Law to Produce Social Change","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Hebrew; Legal status; Prima facie; Law; Arabic; Political science; Power (physics); Politics; Ethnic group; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1405444752561408,"gpt":0.3537027600262742,"spread":0.2131582847701334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008227295,0.00009817263,0.0002828921,0.00001719242,0.0005202924,0.00001740835,0.0002534565,0.0000359056,0.00002820096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003310326,0.00005606572,0.000108915,0.0004337103,0.0004209121,0.00007435211,0.00005643261,0.0001206749,0.00008830441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000607558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002117116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01274646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06109041,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984756,0.0003271782,0.0003060101,0.0001652325,0.0003307882,0.0003952241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992337,0.0001902846,0.0001408746,0.0002461351,0.0001328428,0.00005612053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003029498,0.00006713141,0.0005056852,0.0001162034,0.00001701794,4.230507e-7,0.004211996,3.143279e-8,0.000004480475,0.9749184,0.001362018,0.01879364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006806117,0.00006226161,0.001409183,0.000765955,0.00002478145,2.164152e-7,0.002175595,1.20751e-7,0.00001884758,0.0007599598,0.9946351,0.0000798957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02554315,0.370979,8.053536e-7,0.05355314,0.0005456262,0.002278869,0.0000388525,0.0000368193,0.5470237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9388105,0.05349082,0.000007349305,0.00624821,0.0001716547,0.0001837114,4.615501e-7,0.000009897767,0.001077449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938278,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125166712","doi":"10.1017/s0021223716000029","title":"Juxtaposing Constitution-Making and Constitutional-Infringement Mechanisms in Israel and Canada: On the Interplay between Common Law Override and Sunset Override","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Legislature; Common law; Political science; Constitutional law; Delegation; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Parliamentary sovereignty; Politics; Parliament","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02927075477351136,"gpt":0.3191953073681385,"spread":0.2899245525946271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008857716,0.0001846615,0.0003835969,0.00002420344,0.001181826,0.00006868911,0.0001293934,0.00005227354,0.00002169209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001971028,0.0001165122,0.00003430226,0.0001000966,0.004403876,0.0001952668,0.0001488226,0.0001280564,0.000004465084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000290326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003118476,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6493724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8734071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984862,0.0001977738,0.0003496656,0.0002981214,0.0003727627,0.0002954934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987494,0.0008461303,0.0001242973,0.0001198618,0.00006095261,0.00009938351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005677662,0.000008231677,0.01049771,0.00006398779,0.00003660973,0.00001224717,0.00005164843,2.162824e-7,0.00001435892,0.9873719,0.0002857833,0.001651686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006527012,0.000061239,0.006681613,0.01833399,0.0002161676,0.00002846142,0.001049382,0.000002138491,0.00007222322,0.155504,0.8168016,0.00059647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2444482,0.1545102,0.001812901,0.1261356,0.001378027,0.004367453,0.0008055083,0.0001666926,0.4663754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778191,0.01315577,0.00004104748,0.008850345,0.00007811504,0.00003192858,0.000002635936,0.000003580543,0.00001747734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8318679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983056,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124474087","doi":"10.1017/s0021223715000187","title":"The Canadian Override: Constitutional Model or<i>Bête Noire</i>of Constitutional Politics?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Knesset; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Politics; Political science; Law; Legislature; Section (typography); Law and economics; Sociology; Parliament","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05925652900322724,"gpt":0.3300560492398081,"spread":0.2707995202365808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000761355,0.0001416588,0.0002829345,0.00002359761,0.003269999,0.00003791849,0.0003423333,0.00007416998,0.0002473641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005737958,0.0000747829,0.0001493679,0.0001781013,0.01866335,0.0001869376,0.00005296588,0.00008833147,0.0001984733],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003877317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006507857,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1802115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6688907,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998216,0.0001174884,0.0003983734,0.0002013621,0.0005928586,0.0004738837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986203,0.0004252483,0.0001283485,0.0001745329,0.0003811376,0.0002704253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004037655,0.00001162384,0.0003221733,0.00003124822,0.00004215515,0.000004953037,0.00001821069,0.000002782543,0.000003852325,0.9897133,0.008989705,0.0008560072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001327515,0.000007500255,0.0000573167,0.0009582539,0.00005420487,0.000008311654,0.00002567809,0.000002945686,0.000005517878,0.08116243,0.917452,0.0001330501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001067293,0.06316379,0.001073512,0.05925161,0.0007277001,0.0006718585,0.0006999744,0.00005029792,0.8742545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9401366,0.04885479,0.000157461,0.00898547,0.0003469559,0.00006002203,0.000007561788,0.000004032562,0.001447081],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9400299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022904008","doi":"10.1017/s002122371300023x","title":"Transitional Justice Accountability and Memorialisation: The Yemeni Children Affair and the Indian Residential Schools","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Transitional justice; Settlement (finance); Accountability; Ethnic group; Institution; Economic Justice; Political science; Narrative; Sociology; Gender studies; Criminology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02000776481229383,"gpt":0.2979301332942987,"spread":0.2779223684820049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002857269,0.00009350511,0.0002213056,0.000006681543,0.001148,0.000155855,0.0001743499,0.00003765351,0.00002363743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002795447,0.00005129094,0.00005826212,0.0001005169,0.0009249342,0.0002018891,0.00005182772,0.0001283564,0.00002182866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001455957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004025412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002979911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01274007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984311,0.0007119005,0.0002040364,0.0001835294,0.0003088544,0.0001605148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993066,0.0003059393,0.0000797828,0.0001743114,0.00007477594,0.00005855685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001331007,0.000009103183,0.002155215,0.0002581902,0.00004171627,1.839608e-7,0.00190573,4.952655e-8,4.830605e-7,0.982659,0.0008783757,0.01207859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003178502,0.00005419852,0.05279204,0.001875019,0.002130283,0.00003416533,0.01460784,0.000003963965,0.000004968315,0.06195944,0.8627828,0.0005767455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.125056,0.5876706,0.0001930786,0.204387,0.002009418,0.005144444,0.00009891501,0.0001373065,0.07530319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708467,0.02224059,0.00003198415,0.00549494,0.001251964,0.00005114123,0.000005182432,0.000004859025,0.0000726116],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9206996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8829603,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086088690","doi":"10.1017/s0021223711000021","title":"Is There Ever a ‘Right to One's Own Law’? An Exploration of Possible Rights Foundations for Legal Pluralism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Political science; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Reservation of rights; Law; Pluralism (philosophy); Law and economics; International human rights law; Autonomy; Legal realism; Right to property; Legal profession; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1322611533537275,"gpt":0.392984007197022,"spread":0.2607228538432945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007468674,0.0001213432,0.0002832035,0.00002766284,0.000763914,0.00009363196,0.0002198909,0.00006136888,0.001454665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001429019,0.00008297423,0.0001068863,0.0001742679,0.0001214181,0.002064762,0.00002249282,0.00004806828,0.0002427547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000779814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001041414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006103326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02050072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986612,0.0001383987,0.0003610628,0.0001876522,0.0003432368,0.0003084001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991421,0.00004909142,0.0001319114,0.0002491265,0.0002202619,0.0002075363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002843966,0.00009104451,0.0000135845,0.0001445846,0.00001887915,2.017048e-7,0.00436672,1.230703e-7,0.000008439943,0.9911432,0.003151097,0.001059264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001091431,0.00004236645,0.00005577532,0.0005877853,0.00005122935,2.47552e-7,0.00009049672,4.641902e-7,0.000241799,0.03278513,0.9658826,0.0001529448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03561111,0.03801842,0.006341467,0.03302869,0.002361799,0.011111,0.0002100859,0.0003620267,0.8729554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96052,0.002427456,0.01149361,0.01165115,0.0008854749,0.0005494968,0.00009591314,0.0000320665,0.0123448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9627315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994581,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318623215","doi":"10.1017/s0021223716000017","title":"The Canadian Charter's Override Clause: Lessons for Israel","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Legislature; Charter; Political science; Politics; Supreme court; Law; State (computer science); Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07008557188768984,"gpt":0.363649075735374,"spread":0.2935635038476842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008316452,0.0001006911,0.0001972076,0.00001079605,0.003403899,0.00006420357,0.0003074101,0.00005043137,0.00005468503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003228931,0.00005313683,0.000134528,0.0001231344,0.0008304369,0.0001184566,0.00002660881,0.00005018942,0.0002902929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002155453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005779674,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5782469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9772983,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988498,0.00009022081,0.0001965774,0.0001751351,0.0002450511,0.0004432161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990995,0.0003203009,0.00006870387,0.0001654093,0.0001591578,0.0001869318],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001320834,0.000003760183,0.0001047525,0.0000223522,0.00002328799,9.883441e-7,0.00003163318,4.512863e-9,0.000002317493,0.9530674,0.02203585,0.02470638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007913272,0.000009012066,0.0003592352,0.0007176613,0.0000404361,6.830069e-7,0.00007152725,6.676795e-8,0.000002559549,0.02781465,0.9708035,0.0001015234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009192382,0.1537123,0.00005612426,0.4769378,0.0009097565,0.001144418,0.0001633897,0.00005995795,0.3669243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7122546,0.2449504,0.0000576949,0.03524905,0.001375343,0.0005577546,0.000005728729,0.0000184154,0.005531007],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9487677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322550496","doi":"10.1017/s0021223714000247","title":"Distinction Matters: Rethinking the Protection of Civilian Objects in Non-International Armed Conflicts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Political science; Customary international law; International law; Armed conflict; Argument (complex analysis); Municipal law; Public international law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07012386273845256,"gpt":0.3382422731432702,"spread":0.2681184104048176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001411421,0.00007696226,0.0001574994,0.00003330239,0.0001588771,0.00004507364,0.000285248,0.00004831544,0.0001226991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001160631,0.00005403646,0.00006591323,0.00009220314,0.0001880811,0.0002169139,0.00002766867,0.0001382234,0.00006669264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001609456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007160157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01174585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02065678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987023,0.000204077,0.0002955042,0.0001429697,0.0005221892,0.0001329005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999338,0.0000542572,0.0001948325,0.0001247374,0.0002423091,0.00004588739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000096303,0.00002972101,0.00006696978,0.0001319995,0.00001349911,0.000002531251,0.002220846,0.000002586889,0.00001672016,0.9965985,0.0005187485,0.0003881767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003563192,0.00003619098,0.00095133,0.00331195,0.00002994013,0.000005008518,0.0001640189,0.00006055365,0.0001311006,0.0515771,0.9432298,0.0001466927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09764057,0.004064067,0.000495992,0.05854068,0.005830459,0.004055451,0.00002174339,0.0001363019,0.8292148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994673,0.000296058,0.00005225502,0.003034928,0.0004039877,0.00006739466,0.00001003961,0.00000685862,0.00145551],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9450215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972137,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793425435","doi":"10.1017/s0021223717000255","title":"Compensation for Palestinian Refugees: Law, Politics and Praxis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Refugee; Negotiation; Politics; Compensation (psychology); Political science; Palestinian refugees; Praxis; Law; Refugee law; Core (optical fiber); Displacement (psychology); Engineering; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05550244314126337,"gpt":0.3651099420690154,"spread":0.309607498927752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005324704,0.00008324123,0.0002137002,0.000008051984,0.0006066093,0.00004161312,0.0000902902,0.00003986748,0.000008317616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001762659,0.00007208382,0.00004591981,0.00007331913,0.0006437707,0.0001097488,0.00003031101,0.00003404645,0.00006616515],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002295631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003079051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001817944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01725651,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991839,0.00008995293,0.0001857719,0.0001635066,0.0001362135,0.0002406505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994195,0.0001022236,0.00008154272,0.0001210141,0.0001862028,0.00008955241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[8.885083e-7,0.000008852397,0.0005536756,0.000442261,0.00001055299,2.591959e-7,0.0003017519,1.012175e-9,0.000001305768,0.9791249,0.0004217192,0.01913384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001103143,0.00006235315,0.0002096146,0.0008794928,0.00005702168,0.000001179375,0.0002402218,9.350545e-7,0.000005960968,0.008468745,0.9898709,0.00009324068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01281383,0.3635261,0.0003285408,0.01159087,0.0009148495,0.002866219,0.0000889357,0.0002146242,0.607656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516068,0.02161585,0.002469422,0.02018237,0.001390043,0.0001225071,0.00001848231,0.00002374758,0.002570836],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9894492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9629537,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093334220","doi":"10.1017/s0021223700000972","title":"The Primacy of Liberty and Proportionality, Not Human Dignity, When Subjecting Criminal Law to Constitutional Control","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Dignity; Law; Proportionality (law); Political science; Criminal law; Constitutional law; Human rights; Constitutional court; Supreme court; Constitution","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1380059451606296,"gpt":0.3800465991972338,"spread":0.2420406540366042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002352739,0.0001209978,0.0003012625,0.00001098819,0.00132792,0.00006724416,0.0003226076,0.00004272353,0.0001450502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003216614,0.00008385177,0.00010246,0.00008652644,0.00240095,0.0002608659,0.00009957781,0.0001227888,0.00002744319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004216677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001617809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0227784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01452068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998256,0.0002858457,0.0004635324,0.0002320265,0.0004894444,0.0002731063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998843,0.0003045836,0.0002018586,0.0002027748,0.0002915862,0.0001561756],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001766705,0.0000402654,0.0009041792,0.0004839495,0.00001679233,0.000003142723,0.0007314078,2.737116e-8,0.0000603187,0.9959899,0.0003847804,0.00136761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002862394,0.0001277486,0.00312424,0.00263792,0.0004042946,0.00002303414,0.000417092,5.334886e-7,0.0003296222,0.04528648,0.9470611,0.0003016536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04883169,0.04668754,0.0005134936,0.02785041,0.0005742697,0.004236356,0.00008135518,0.0001632269,0.8710617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929872,0.001307291,0.0003398459,0.004949878,0.0001111519,0.00004813032,0.000002248746,0.000005287011,0.0002489797],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9507034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311956886","doi":"10.1017/s0021223722000140","title":"Rethinking ‘Jurisdiction’ in International Human Rights Law in Rescue Operations at Sea in the Light of <i>AS and Others v Italy</i> and <i>AS and Others v Malta</i>: A New Right to be Rescued at Sea?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Human rights; Law; Political science; International law; Politics; Covenant; International waters; International human rights law; Right to property","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01382338453926804,"gpt":0.2739583864437869,"spread":0.2601350019045189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001041497,0.0001837379,0.0002933144,0.00006910474,0.000362794,0.00005754126,0.0003626944,0.00005098766,0.001743464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002708897,0.000149858,0.00004099566,0.0003101955,0.0002162588,0.0003031363,0.0005751794,0.0002426562,0.00002975314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003901621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001213537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08585143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3499102,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979108,0.0003667035,0.0005082227,0.0004617333,0.0005425945,0.0002099694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994822,0.00009758346,0.00007027456,0.0002538785,0.00001324896,0.00008281037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001972952,0.0003518358,0.03690576,0.0003583741,0.00007827055,0.000223958,0.01587166,0.00111772,0.006608818,0.9307559,0.007133083,0.0003973191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001086605,0.0001729394,0.00510074,0.001061124,0.00003392573,0.0001627941,0.0001164308,0.0002093392,0.0008915674,0.009420858,0.9813955,0.0003481456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8704005,0.004839694,9.240821e-7,0.01914638,0.00007738743,0.00110737,0.00005182029,0.00001653623,0.1043593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803278,0.0009728885,0.0003093824,0.01511096,0.0000310445,0.0001503541,0.00004050041,0.00002400036,0.003033005],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9742625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139395764","doi":"10.1017/s0021223700000248","title":"Suspending Sovereignty: Reassessing the Interlocking of Occupation, Failed and Fragile State, Responsibility to Protect, and International Trusteeship (Lessons from Lebanon)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Middle East Politics and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Belligerent; Responsibility to protect; State (computer science); International law; Politics; Law; Political science; Territorial integrity; Political economy; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0764725498357493,"gpt":0.3766211957482509,"spread":0.3001486459125016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001545439,0.0001088257,0.0002717138,0.00002082909,0.000586773,0.0001007133,0.000222185,0.00004929025,0.0001769755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006768464,0.00008366474,0.00006641073,0.0001626061,0.0003848045,0.0002165024,0.0001244847,0.0001442841,0.000003388458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008013524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001358709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005380377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001993434,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984241,0.0004561952,0.0003560946,0.0002654873,0.0002988531,0.0001993449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989039,0.0004189836,0.0001797272,0.0002182053,0.0001681565,0.0001110065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031507,0.0000484345,0.03000954,0.0003502342,0.00007499454,0.000004514313,0.01611583,0.000001259114,0.0000686557,0.9384391,0.0003719994,0.01448398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001657149,0.0001770823,0.1368691,0.01969267,0.0003191439,0.00002906755,0.01500511,0.0003856933,0.0005981795,0.2164988,0.6073372,0.001430699],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9398667,0.01742624,0.0005275217,0.006169952,0.0002584699,0.001509102,0.000136838,0.00005192684,0.03405328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935684,0.004255855,0.0007299074,0.001072938,0.00008825547,0.0000276611,0.000006365942,0.00000865438,0.0002419221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7219402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8133557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210263457","doi":"10.1017/s0021223721000273","title":"An Interdisciplinary Dialogue with the Business and Human Rights Literature","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Jurisdiction; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Latin Americans; Legislation; International human rights law; International law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0143575509314475,"gpt":0.2533062785720552,"spread":0.2389487276406077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003275582,0.0002149137,0.0002941641,0.00005009032,0.002481599,0.0004384735,0.0004147949,0.00002317405,0.0003258366],"category_scores_gemma":[5.028413e-7,0.000114016,0.0000517763,0.0004934287,0.0001444194,0.0008382646,0.000521906,0.0002469014,0.00003357618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001523528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006959378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005370997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005142033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989802,0.00004587804,0.0002047537,0.0003406988,0.0002324684,0.0001959919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991891,0.00001508793,0.0001838262,0.000467904,0.0001280452,0.00001605518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001505161,0.00007343377,0.00009201228,0.001243894,0.00001904027,0.0001151262,0.00005300566,0.000002099636,0.0000109299,0.9902332,0.007758295,0.0003838753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002357071,0.00003476575,0.001530125,0.0009785281,0.000160192,0.00004711745,0.00002024222,0.000009685384,6.448205e-7,0.05021354,0.9465068,0.00026268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8092355,0.0628207,0.00004154474,0.01905888,0.0007956625,0.003025639,0.00005187521,0.0005335974,0.1044367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899004,0.0000869218,0.00001350379,0.008141204,0.0008108495,0.0001309789,0.0003060797,0.00002884419,0.0005811967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9400197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323996072","doi":"10.1017/s0021223715000230","title":"The ‘Unique Role’ of Government Lawyers in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Legislature; Political science; Democracy; Public sector; Law; Private sector; Public administration; Population; Work (physics); Politics; Sociology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01826727070952758,"gpt":0.3250305103093783,"spread":0.3067632395998507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009130811,0.0000344865,0.0000818052,0.000002822494,0.0001311028,0.00001294067,0.0001654986,0.0000125487,0.0002037263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004932712,0.00001872253,0.00001888649,0.0001984832,0.00007884566,0.0001503658,0.00001148645,0.00006081423,0.00001413468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004535455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001539043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9749955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991291,0.0002069575,0.0002031667,0.00005837075,0.0002953079,0.0001070679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991922,0.000461132,0.0001215452,0.0001364477,0.00005522398,0.00003339246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[6.979799e-7,0.000006833471,0.0008629304,0.00002170308,0.000003551046,1.725875e-7,0.0001225608,2.142221e-8,0.00001555103,0.9635651,0.006399029,0.02900181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002663703,0.000001833209,0.0003964345,0.0003126579,0.000004936333,1.421293e-7,0.0007957938,8.487675e-8,0.00004559696,0.0008956068,0.9974896,0.00003065653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001882338,0.0225569,0.00000415839,0.3517998,0.0003263783,0.0004202354,0.00001715219,0.000006998899,0.6229861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9369179,0.05207258,0.00004094952,0.008850904,0.00003995448,0.00004420938,3.933037e-7,0.000003722701,0.002029376],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2730196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245887729","doi":"10.1017/s0021223700012140","title":"ISR volume 35 issue 2-3 Cover and Front matter","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Oxford; University College London; University of Alberta; Università degli Studi di Milano; McGill University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Tulane University; University of Cambridge; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Political science; Computer science; Geography; Engineering; Physics; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Meteorology; Thermodynamics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03325649030705256,"gpt":0.2241751962969659,"spread":0.1909187059899134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004136419,0.000149373,0.0005481492,0.00003843942,0.0001222953,0.00008260934,0.0001624968,0.0000438077,0.1080547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001489782,0.0001526098,0.0001091721,0.00007159712,0.0001027733,0.0002503967,0.0001163497,0.00006887553,0.4403392],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004150363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003739102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000523494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001622926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988016,0.000009061097,0.0004685768,0.0004352508,0.00002386037,0.0002615746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993812,0.0000145833,0.0001771164,0.0003321761,0.00001497634,0.00007997054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000222515,0.00002412094,0.01462257,0.0003019613,0.00005420898,0.0000048036,0.00005123563,9.528711e-7,1.729844e-7,0.05394243,0.9300369,0.000958426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001688666,0.000009637277,0.00149148,0.0001987184,0.00001875505,0.000009288273,0.00001834188,0.00004751193,4.318888e-7,0.0006334003,0.9972069,0.0001966385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009752762,0.1923465,0.00004546772,0.002028144,0.0009391716,0.0002245304,0.0001388051,0.00002113326,0.803281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00733463,0.1355091,0.0002258791,0.01953925,0.0001795781,0.00003485712,0.00001178017,0.0000225566,0.8371424],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3322846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8927607,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586772489","doi":"10.1017/s0021223716000327","title":"Limits on Constitutional Rights: The Marginal Role of Proportionality Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Dignity; Law and economics; Political science; Proportionality (law); Autonomy; Social rights; Fundamental rights; Law; Human rights; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0624862405199772,"gpt":0.3794631902142362,"spread":0.316976949694259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001077451,0.0001030704,0.0003562059,0.000009469489,0.002878368,0.00006683693,0.0004837119,0.00004403038,0.0003306658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003966221,0.00005451993,0.0002999159,0.0001475419,0.003289099,0.0001703982,0.00005299906,0.0001082782,0.00008228578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008107271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006598452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01664521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009017662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985061,0.0002297603,0.0002880904,0.0001863154,0.0006135874,0.0001761111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987907,0.0001294132,0.0003949831,0.0003471328,0.0002780374,0.00005972942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003172797,0.00004016673,0.005850302,0.00006880784,0.0002604086,9.117495e-7,0.000149218,0.000001448532,0.000002615309,0.9922047,0.0005908591,0.0008273619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006962741,0.00001073048,0.04616783,0.0003820937,0.0006105939,3.424134e-7,0.0001101538,0.000002242464,0.00002153283,0.00407338,0.9484492,0.0001022804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0199279,0.07000636,0.00001935401,0.05046718,0.0003143754,0.001624793,0.0001195606,0.00006193556,0.8574585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919855,0.006369795,0.00008974764,0.0008055108,0.0001459795,0.00004508053,0.000008461752,0.000001647634,0.0005482564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9881313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146094808","doi":"10.1017/s002122370001222x","title":"Regulating (Hetero)Sexual Offences in British Columbia, 1885-1940","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Harassment; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sexual assault; Criminal trial; Sentence; Psychology; Criminal law; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Poison control","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02594540335203918,"gpt":0.2710025709097028,"spread":0.2450571675576636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008427871,0.00005483902,0.0002771173,0.00004538098,0.0009008227,0.0007597372,0.0002639733,0.0000713959,0.001405906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001631936,0.0001108619,0.00007361739,0.0004951087,0.0005476169,0.0003145653,0.0000262507,0.0001316055,0.0001719424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004027622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002893264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985734,0.000218418,0.0003195124,0.0002432346,0.0003108784,0.0003345613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994807,0.00005732152,0.0001017157,0.0001641924,0.00004763819,0.0001484595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002355418,0.0001440332,0.03997,0.001798437,0.00003021447,0.0004952694,0.001842203,0.000001271151,0.000008877686,0.0459755,0.2069638,0.7027681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008715729,0.00001115843,0.005190863,0.001519928,0.00001580896,0.00001278216,0.0002356925,7.860501e-7,3.578591e-8,0.0003311584,0.9924567,0.0001379181],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2880876,0.3203735,0.000003282896,0.003310142,0.0009626567,0.001095202,0.00003278159,0.0001478771,0.3859869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6111414,0.2680996,0.000314971,0.01575541,0.001194107,0.0001536397,0.00002959336,0.00005317234,0.1032581],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.785493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249919637","doi":"10.1017/s0021223700012048","title":"ISR volume 35 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Oxford; University College London; University of Alberta; Università degli Studi di Milano; McGill University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Tulane University; University of Cambridge; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Political science; Geography; Physics; Engineering; Mathematics; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03403801593413107,"gpt":0.2242906415507686,"spread":0.1902526256166376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004074535,0.0001464569,0.0005399212,0.00003757721,0.0001192707,0.00008114288,0.0001594643,0.00004291033,0.111705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001498839,0.0001495681,0.0001072292,0.00007001853,0.0001013688,0.0002455751,0.0001144597,0.00006750559,0.4442358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004081845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003657341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005158299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001560262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988221,0.000008841078,0.0004605953,0.0004282498,0.00002329886,0.0002569282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993915,0.00001454168,0.0001740166,0.0003270385,0.00001464175,0.00007827223],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002131231,0.0000234557,0.0146783,0.0002937703,0.00005296487,0.000004584458,0.00005007576,9.29276e-7,1.680981e-7,0.05181175,0.9321603,0.0009215667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001632575,0.000009416369,0.001492895,0.0001971099,0.0000184374,0.00000900597,0.00001744494,0.00004637556,4.217693e-7,0.0006348183,0.997218,0.0001928201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009429211,0.1919318,0.0000445336,0.0019711,0.0009089343,0.0002203005,0.0001421248,0.00002056443,0.8038177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007574398,0.1315259,0.0002225496,0.0195018,0.0001702275,0.00003486979,0.00001185695,0.0000221208,0.8409362],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3325308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.889107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}