{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":4,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"d12bf05f87e5","filters":{"venue":"JCAジャーナル"}},"results":[{"id":"W383816584","doi":"","title":"判例から見る仲裁法(33)投資仲裁と仲裁判断の取消し[United Mexican States v. Metalclad Corp., 2001 BCSC 664, British Columbia Supreme Court; May 2, 2001]","year":2008,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"JCAジャーナル","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"達也 中村","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03031921723771982,"gpt":0.2170044312591579,"spread":0.186685214021438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00141381,0.0004156192,0.0002036873,0.0007912318,0.005913827,0.005183112,0.0007315302,0.006950013,0.01736303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003115952,0.0005317428,0.000532101,0.0006381761,0.003462769,0.001705922,0.001406328,0.005228125,0.005562878],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00593346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006533887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2153448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3796769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981009,0.000214791,0.000089744,0.0002771246,0.0007356302,0.0005817522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989495,0.000247575,0.0001067312,0.00007262515,0.0005476963,0.0000759546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004917247,0.00003858914,0.002185138,0.00007863713,0.00001340329,0.0005932466,0.002847778,0.0001989467,0.00149781,0.7806411,0.1971461,0.01471003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003981738,0.00006135746,0.009855618,0.0002014322,0.00004939086,0.0004631374,0.001858696,0.0004453139,0.002233652,0.06670143,0.9179979,0.00009219898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02315322,0.002059224,0.002115243,0.03812246,0.001048803,0.0001924644,0.00084208,0.0001477476,0.9323187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3611837,0.001703546,0.00295324,0.05106645,0.0008308516,0.0002516005,0.0003025727,0.00005160754,0.5816565],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7846552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4281827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W378134884","doi":"","title":"判例から見る仲裁法(35)仲裁判断の取消手続と承認・執行手続との関係[Dalimpex Ltd. v. Janicki, 64 O.R. (3d) 737, Ontario Court of Appeal, May 30, 2003]","year":2008,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"JCAジャーナル","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"達也 中村","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03051982411474679,"gpt":0.2802264896142281,"spread":0.2497066654994813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002045806,0.0004445763,0.0002679745,0.0008348671,0.006459189,0.004015483,0.0009332493,0.006221782,0.01781294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003326368,0.0005122071,0.0005567107,0.0005669249,0.004891451,0.001761507,0.00167138,0.004640623,0.00573926],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006840087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007780879,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2141245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3559943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980904,0.0001894866,0.0001104086,0.0003364607,0.000707834,0.0005653795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990097,0.0002242211,0.0000914073,0.00006906816,0.0005068911,0.00009859198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004392183,0.00003698674,0.002408231,0.00009002614,0.00001791867,0.0005511586,0.006682198,0.0001246611,0.001881687,0.8573692,0.1126979,0.01809603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003017938,0.00005534504,0.006535816,0.0001666499,0.00006030759,0.0004655338,0.002484756,0.0002215587,0.002399786,0.06536756,0.9221331,0.00007932312],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02470777,0.002803937,0.002879718,0.03130478,0.0008094177,0.0001769369,0.0006654942,0.0001035906,0.9365484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3879331,0.002123007,0.005231963,0.0374262,0.000677555,0.0002267287,0.0002896293,0.00005677098,0.5660351],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7858756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4257562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W303835224","doi":"","title":"投資協定仲裁判断例研究(18)最近の仲裁人忌避申立てに対する判断--Vito G. Gallo v Government of Canada事件における忌避申立てに対する決定(Decision on the Challenge to Mr. J. Christopher Thomas, QC)","year":2010,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"JCAジャーナル","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"直樹 井口","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02333015908019425,"gpt":0.2812254961925654,"spread":0.2578953371123712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002571895,0.0004050948,0.0002638298,0.001031101,0.006903276,0.004236161,0.001014783,0.006454591,0.009616924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004995544,0.000357999,0.0005257359,0.0008177735,0.009212116,0.001684364,0.001030369,0.004955269,0.00197327],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01405651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01953222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5184935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.711096,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972313,0.0002617575,0.0001259597,0.0003238393,0.001281151,0.000775957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976355,0.0004349867,0.0001935428,0.00006875223,0.001458652,0.0002086755],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005058595,0.00002592039,0.003872062,0.00009802256,0.00002224117,0.0003755482,0.005775728,0.0001377369,0.001124728,0.8677564,0.1062209,0.01454014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005363286,0.00006132908,0.01182845,0.0002590644,0.00008097168,0.0002765132,0.003204034,0.0002951377,0.002323115,0.09038798,0.8911595,0.00007022461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05157875,0.006500507,0.003327718,0.1405566,0.001530347,0.0002050509,0.001253617,0.00008527037,0.7949621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.569464,0.003634553,0.004648805,0.06124808,0.001150852,0.0001882773,0.0003536184,0.00006479011,0.359247],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4815065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9686844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W614083899","doi":"","title":"判例から見る仲裁法(31)仲裁判断の取消しと当事者自治[Noble China inc. v. Lei, 42 O.R. (3d) 69, Ontario Court of Justice, November 4, 1988 ]","year":2007,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"JCAジャーナル","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Economic Justice; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"達也 中村","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01871193973247826,"gpt":0.2911006400693372,"spread":0.2723887003368589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002001631,0.0004257021,0.0002531247,0.0007011717,0.008776474,0.004206684,0.0009519668,0.007991805,0.02106209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003936153,0.0006789762,0.0005917983,0.0005918082,0.003838366,0.001840927,0.001845122,0.005124957,0.007389557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006767356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01078174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2448763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5300036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978471,0.0002269633,0.0001192748,0.0003184321,0.0007914706,0.0006966974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988219,0.0002976067,0.00010303,0.00006679004,0.0005778188,0.0001328754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006043973,0.00005601074,0.003579725,0.0001078778,0.00001676047,0.000818104,0.006054883,0.0001963225,0.001882232,0.7367672,0.235245,0.01521548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003951971,0.00007960303,0.008371293,0.0001858594,0.00004695907,0.000468223,0.002395043,0.0003077034,0.002254133,0.03830553,0.9474567,0.00008953662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02302015,0.001948519,0.001513081,0.0333011,0.0007685013,0.0002122174,0.0007734444,0.00009143859,0.9383717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2713462,0.001806213,0.002633401,0.05129045,0.0005489649,0.0002978958,0.0003489211,0.00004205447,0.6716859],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2448763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4869019,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}