{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":12,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"a79f5c8664af","filters":{"venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science"}},"results":[{"id":"W3158056354","doi":"10.1007/s10838-020-09548-w","title":"Should We Strive to Make Science Bias-Free? A Philosophical Assessment of the Reproducibility Crisis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Reproducibility; Philosophy of education; Epistemology; Philosophy of technology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology; Social science; Positive economics; Higher education; Sociology; Economics; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1954733510877003,"gpt":0.3548528575485886,"spread":0.1593795064608883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006556707,0.0002505342,0.000478348,0.0005176715,0.003380079,0.0003204492,0.003500402,0.00004942743,0.0001246119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002205947,0.0001737713,0.0004209026,0.001410847,0.01166738,0.001030664,0.0008604703,0.0004427513,0.000002287454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003156626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002541262,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000331434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000408478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944196,0.00009175267,0.0009314349,0.001277264,0.002667169,0.0006127903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939318,0.000105345,0.000643526,0.002037501,0.002851229,0.0004305723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004660104,0.000348679,0.0001736095,0.00006862218,0.00001618229,0.000004649565,0.004628642,0.0003389007,0.07834196,0.9135995,0.001563909,0.0008687566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005419179,0.0006503828,0.002160594,0.0001722611,0.00005298336,0.00005909415,0.0008982706,0.0003384026,0.04473903,0.9392049,0.01084879,0.0003334168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7467263,0.0004350781,0.0002262217,0.1943656,0.007203173,0.0007350796,0.0003181991,0.00003336614,0.04995696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899598,0.00002589639,0.006298046,0.001592516,0.001668522,0.00001260083,5.515958e-7,0.0000124208,0.0004296259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2432335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075706844","doi":"10.1007/s10838-014-9243-y","title":"The Role of Justification in the Ordinary Concept of Scientific Progress","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Stalemate; Epistemology; Scientific progress; Appeal; Positive economics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08410257148655181,"gpt":0.3204544316997594,"spread":0.2363518602132076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002630105,0.00006905598,0.0001213232,0.0001485699,0.0006773421,0.00004792148,0.001208002,0.00002373192,0.000002437849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003326368,0.00003680357,0.00008249924,0.0006555988,0.005636967,0.0002353132,0.00004861578,0.0001190411,9.40418e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001677269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008332438,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002200081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.764971e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983644,0.0001093306,0.0003966263,0.0002127295,0.0007074225,0.0002094306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988708,0.0001919381,0.0004279854,0.0002387942,0.0002252431,0.00004519888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007971963,0.0001998699,0.0003505608,0.00001235993,0.000001616154,3.271176e-7,0.0004594395,0.0002916298,0.748546,0.2277291,0.0002736576,0.0220557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004111528,0.00059017,0.01102459,0.00005483464,0.000008750159,0.00005464015,0.000172841,0.003606381,0.5193374,0.4619403,0.002718713,0.00008028796],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910775,0.0002169888,0.00005746921,0.006299471,0.0008705193,0.0002096122,0.000009093095,0.000002359437,0.00125695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990135,0.00001176358,0.000655724,0.0001138529,0.0001439514,0.000007410205,4.234754e-7,0.000002637736,0.00005075649],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2342112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210703163","doi":"10.1007/s10838-021-09575-1","title":"Revisiting the Basic/Applied Science Distinction: The Significance of Urgent Science for Science Funding Policy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Social science education; Science education; Science policy; Political science; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Science studies; Politics; Basic research; Science, technology, society and environment education; Scientific enterprise; Sociology; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1956155136819922,"gpt":0.4488157345133466,"spread":0.2532002208313544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04340762,0.0001579379,0.0003244305,0.001096716,0.0120571,0.0002012809,0.002864084,0.00001853095,0.00003086665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0526632,0.00008900536,0.0001504473,0.009542997,0.02749155,0.0006787659,0.0006060763,0.0005808396,5.939216e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001474253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05661942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003773445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.671117e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908352,0.00004366307,0.0007330469,0.0006010128,0.00593303,0.001853975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928203,0.0005506775,0.0006845676,0.0006241302,0.002157319,0.003163005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002954686,0.00006486139,0.0001487825,0.0001598252,0.000004669459,0.000001789706,0.0005849405,0.0003558106,0.8203074,0.1385181,0.0002837022,0.03927459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006955891,0.008596827,0.03410664,0.001020441,0.0001959367,0.001635816,0.006109608,0.06592124,0.6431119,0.166821,0.06445702,0.001067686],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7915072,0.0004030815,0.004451442,0.1891351,0.00246334,0.003693672,0.00007357718,0.00002573694,0.00824682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916248,0.00003939719,0.002843863,0.003314042,0.001965434,0.0001036746,4.711932e-7,0.00001031637,0.00009798646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2001176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972193038","doi":"10.1007/s10838-019-09472-8","title":"Cultural Blankets: Epistemological Pluralism in the Evolutionary Epistemology of Mechanisms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Language and cultural evolution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociocultural evolution; Philosophy of science; Evolutionism; Evolutionary epistemology; Sociology; Pluralism (philosophy); Social epistemology; Explanatory power; Darwinism; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0356604807049528,"gpt":0.3330007537251263,"spread":0.2973402730201735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002237382,0.00009194431,0.0002184039,0.0001175283,0.0005210207,0.00003400854,0.0008781592,0.00009039671,0.00006672777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002881779,0.0000512027,0.0001580853,0.0005969854,0.001554493,0.0005662896,0.00004477152,0.0001681693,0.000005996124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001391303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002160514,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000404037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004170918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981292,0.0002080128,0.0003958146,0.000186259,0.0007412967,0.0003393792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989862,0.0001051626,0.000315116,0.0001317637,0.0003874941,0.00007420783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000612087,0.00008064295,0.0008723997,0.00001807246,0.000007120423,0.000005893683,0.008966771,0.0001664888,0.04345173,0.9454162,0.0005818587,0.000371668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001068729,0.001017157,0.02505163,0.0001118572,0.00002545413,0.0002383239,0.01674439,0.000507897,0.001706449,0.9507029,0.002533628,0.0002915924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829627,0.0003503719,0.00007609833,0.007139027,0.0008994558,0.0003761837,0.000009535632,0.000006984929,0.008179687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961278,0.00005561741,0.002699133,0.0003332135,0.0003543395,0.000006282003,0.000002241364,0.000002544654,0.0004187934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04174528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5727594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042566227","doi":"10.1007/s10838-009-9074-4","title":"How Scientific Is Scientific Essentialism?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Essentialism; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Context (archaeology); Face (sociological concept); Philosophy; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04790178020497761,"gpt":0.3434511361927821,"spread":0.2955493559878045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003530429,0.0002393187,0.0003244301,0.0007646189,0.002975535,0.001647115,0.002150504,0.00009747021,0.0001945327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002632542,0.0001893327,0.000335774,0.002636325,0.010559,0.001362089,0.00009654182,0.0002977175,0.00003955642],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007527453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003063446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002010288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.822729e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959952,0.00006085803,0.0005021252,0.0009305102,0.001543932,0.0009673451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972836,0.00006083621,0.0004231127,0.0007178374,0.0009238136,0.0005907794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005682368,0.0001945209,0.00001234571,0.000005858214,0.000008699953,0.000007172011,0.0007708217,0.000006918799,0.1518556,0.8386517,0.003580962,0.004848632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005333358,0.0004860223,0.0006238708,0.00003446658,0.00002357485,0.0001156649,0.00007313488,0.0002808573,0.03810407,0.9504037,0.009068997,0.0002523375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8406286,0.0009320066,0.004259248,0.05714048,0.02260815,0.0006389852,0.0001110904,0.00007108457,0.0736104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990176,0.000003343914,0.003332929,0.0007767237,0.001185376,0.000005538859,0.000002346828,0.000009937534,0.004507856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1495474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280623825","doi":"10.1007/s10838-022-09616-3","title":"Rebuttal to Douglas and Elliott","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Challenges","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rebuttal; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of education; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Higher education; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.144563494485516,"gpt":0.470453959452878,"spread":0.325890464967362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003118106,0.00008544588,0.0002118304,0.0002720054,0.003885184,0.00001223341,0.0003660204,0.00004015972,0.00005887293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001235903,0.00007049317,0.00004791475,0.0004007684,0.0002013518,0.0001539726,0.0002433846,0.000521312,0.000005163595],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005973276,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007025868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001036604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980844,0.0001541782,0.0004958641,0.0002253069,0.000594111,0.0004461636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987859,0.00009540477,0.0002594736,0.0001573135,0.0003196597,0.0003822777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009171834,0.000419903,0.007431275,0.001588897,0.00006862461,0.00003873696,0.05312554,0.0008230177,0.1159899,0.6992127,0.09040177,0.02998243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002892662,0.005301707,0.01158098,0.0003897573,0.00002198407,0.0002722721,0.01580619,0.000679987,0.0005289477,0.2142215,0.7477163,0.0005877065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9578257,0.0007153746,0.0001029136,0.0312153,0.004704989,0.0005976746,0.00005059347,0.00001299241,0.004774436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923804,0.00006470302,0.002373808,0.001655316,0.002239136,0.00006534757,5.895971e-7,0.00001108459,0.001209598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6573145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974116,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769414228","doi":"10.1007/s10838-017-9382-z","title":"Facts and Values in Pragmatism and Logical Empiricism: Addressing the Eclipse Narrative","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Empiricism; Epistemology; Narrative; Philosophy of science; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Eclipse; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1738731482428517,"gpt":0.3488834492615162,"spread":0.1750103010186644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001212927,0.0001188992,0.0002027837,0.0001761115,0.005230159,0.0007022487,0.0005873471,0.00002366389,0.00002263627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002353351,0.00007064539,0.0000501112,0.00003858388,0.008646218,0.001371256,0.000118108,0.0001945474,7.772933e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000348272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001137936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004704896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008231901,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988336,0.00003550004,0.0002664879,0.0002344989,0.00038261,0.0002473308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990876,0.00006932051,0.0003552966,0.0001871754,0.0001761428,0.0001244239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006780948,0.00009145599,0.0006707247,0.00004697909,0.00001296731,0.00001281027,0.1753096,0.00002486928,0.003218547,0.8124976,0.001606734,0.006439967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005254143,0.0002882916,0.01313606,0.0001336588,0.00001308655,0.00005281558,0.003143864,0.000805571,0.0001590702,0.976781,0.004776244,0.0001849849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9588202,0.0006320617,0.000007531954,0.00682439,0.001151025,0.0001614906,0.00001166423,0.000004778611,0.03238684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972587,0.00007245933,0.0003726333,0.0003771818,0.001515521,0.00000300688,1.920344e-7,0.000004549029,0.0003957203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1721657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401540350","doi":"10.1007/s10838-024-09680-x","title":"Back to Reichenbach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute; Western University","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Underpinning; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Relation (database); Agency (philosophy); Cosmology; Philosophy; Physics; Computer science; Quantum mechanics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.034884623537252,"gpt":0.3255611561682164,"spread":0.2906765326309644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003753991,0.00006950277,0.00009189887,0.0001353214,0.0002585838,0.0001263971,0.000339317,0.00001038791,0.0001518391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004244608,0.00005562248,0.0001076314,0.0005117169,0.0001028809,0.0001921271,0.00004229838,0.00009064363,0.0000748437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001945064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001430579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005188577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.255982e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992281,0.000003726888,0.0001948573,0.000179205,0.0002062318,0.0001879058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995106,0.00001615377,0.00004734124,0.0001245708,0.0001431824,0.0001581471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002655201,0.00001957802,0.00001074455,0.00000738689,0.000007415139,1.214906e-7,0.00005879685,0.00006181507,0.07001206,0.9229316,0.00327399,0.003613873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006942782,0.00009173987,0.00002515741,0.00003795675,0.000008513528,0.000003801319,0.00002057925,0.00668329,0.01720692,0.9517959,0.02397319,0.00008346915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6777277,0.0002758997,0.2636065,0.01568187,0.002888425,0.0005943889,0.0001665699,0.00002290925,0.03903567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877319,0.000002180095,0.01024113,0.0001012751,0.00124312,0.00001175216,0.000001514925,0.00000807071,0.0006591018],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3100041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2268219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323926222","doi":"10.1007/s10838-022-09635-0","title":"The Role of Quantum Jumps in Quantum Ontology","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Quantum process; Quantum probability; Open quantum system; Quantum operation; Quantum discord; Quantum; Quantum algorithm; Quantum dissipation; Quantum dynamics; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Theoretical physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02643719592406523,"gpt":0.3054025811372781,"spread":0.2789653852132129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009224082,0.00007493119,0.0001561705,0.0001677227,0.0004330282,0.00002765136,0.0005566074,0.00001853471,0.000007116694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002089744,0.00005242595,0.0001131158,0.00072003,0.0003816859,0.0001189902,0.00006055884,0.0001238226,0.000004848858],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001463107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001592315,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004999049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002891711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989393,0.00001638016,0.0003729968,0.0001444033,0.0002437089,0.0002832281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992313,0.00008425153,0.0002640604,0.0001761943,0.0001749297,0.00006930625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001023908,0.00003756574,0.0006252055,0.00000274896,0.000005792075,1.237639e-7,0.00007794139,0.0001721328,0.04826683,0.948394,0.000124278,0.002283169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001708582,0.00008479673,0.0009246983,0.00001359924,0.000004264781,0.000001438726,0.0002776554,0.08805043,0.008547808,0.9002335,0.001636916,0.00005403496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948608,0.0001267833,0.001446137,0.001951042,0.0004275176,0.0001648154,0.00003063251,0.000005519452,0.0009867724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994646,0.00002694517,0.0001881466,0.0000118316,0.0002507275,0.00001859708,0.000001794584,0.000005935327,0.00003137939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0878783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3330546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399811180","doi":"10.1007/s10838-023-09669-y","title":"The Ontology of Causation: A Carnapian-Pragmatist Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Pragmatism; Ontology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04060502530993591,"gpt":0.3584393326745564,"spread":0.3178343073646205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002491514,0.0001182309,0.0002083622,0.0001846153,0.0006757525,0.00009571612,0.001017529,0.00006259891,0.00004995329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000220247,0.00007090877,0.0001753746,0.0008586344,0.004896005,0.0002775132,0.00006681217,0.0002445499,0.000008706819],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005004292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002115351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001357216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001222867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981622,0.00008173908,0.0005025517,0.0003085476,0.0005536397,0.0003913752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998742,0.0003305639,0.0002118385,0.0002907827,0.0002627463,0.0001620608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005364576,0.0000495843,0.00001546546,0.00002680106,0.00002791359,0.000005605577,0.0006377432,0.00003897915,0.006082713,0.9873094,0.000397348,0.005354803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001953407,0.000348653,0.0006585151,0.00003330068,0.00002378015,0.0003803022,0.00008769637,0.00206162,0.001128503,0.9928628,0.002123347,0.00009618195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2099892,0.007624361,0.02424174,0.02245259,0.01431513,0.0008153367,0.0001045901,0.00006251027,0.7203946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953982,0.00003043477,0.003253565,0.0001062657,0.0007441537,0.0000163395,6.200703e-7,0.000007398252,0.0004430849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.785409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413470032","doi":"10.1007/s10838-025-09723-x","title":"Pluralistic and Monistic Tendencies in the Life Sciences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Monism; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of education; Epistemology; Philosophy of technology; Philosophy; Nomothetic and idiographic; Social science; Sociology; Higher education; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0867901704991153,"gpt":0.3064821822531195,"spread":0.2196920117540042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001956309,0.0001083155,0.0001708612,0.0005023271,0.002960981,0.0002949399,0.0009987126,0.00001824391,0.00001737257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003878849,0.00006722028,0.00006486217,0.0003695379,0.01254587,0.0007228995,0.00005961337,0.0001563487,0.000001140604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003548122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000383799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006768671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004246571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986035,0.00003085233,0.0003274377,0.000237597,0.0005188053,0.0002817613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992948,0.0001615202,0.000153447,0.0001189249,0.0001963982,0.00007494394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000135794,0.00003354963,0.00007089923,0.00002884195,0.000003031598,0.000001384215,0.00457421,0.00006430517,0.0009100119,0.9931184,0.0009072801,0.0002745007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002612048,0.0003115204,0.001238325,0.00009747843,0.0000205976,0.00001749806,0.002208445,0.001189143,0.0000787843,0.9825751,0.01187796,0.0001239731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6851009,0.005321999,0.0001430242,0.04534622,0.00354779,0.0005309702,0.00004148339,0.00002374612,0.2599439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970152,0.00005723768,0.0004922125,0.001559811,0.00043169,0.000007665319,1.778562e-7,0.000002147955,0.0004338501],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3119143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998337,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310022035","doi":"10.1007/s10838-022-09632-3","title":"Daniel S. Brooks, James DiFrisco, and William C. Wimsatt (Eds.): Levels of Organization in the Biological Sciences","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Philosophy of education; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Higher education; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1026873330544839,"gpt":0.2796053491573694,"spread":0.1769180161028855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002389247,0.0001062293,0.0001924848,0.0003394798,0.003040375,0.0001227231,0.001080918,0.00001655922,0.00008478768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000187144,0.00006855339,0.00005336648,0.0005884495,0.007469665,0.0006597844,0.0001483616,0.0001840039,4.632305e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004186887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002141202,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002377689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006352094,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983206,0.00007826483,0.0003851744,0.0002551834,0.0007220524,0.0002386958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991425,0.0001046833,0.0003368644,0.0001156671,0.0002428175,0.00005748612],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003031833,0.0001701559,0.0006381433,0.00002205211,0.000005405754,0.000002107501,0.01988088,0.0004473654,0.02638228,0.9498965,0.001421569,0.001103254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009162898,0.003095582,0.006278653,0.00006325989,0.00002318544,0.0001670219,0.006919074,0.0005729927,0.002748822,0.9400775,0.03873215,0.0004054953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808614,0.001126588,0.00003081676,0.004928668,0.0008915057,0.0002348035,0.00008445453,0.000008128311,0.0118336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983107,0.00005671172,0.0005268196,0.0006174428,0.0003459083,0.000005706826,7.736069e-7,0.000004038072,0.0001319272],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03731058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}