{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":14,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"755576d66a22","filters":{"venue":"Journal for Juridical Science"}},"results":[{"id":"W1595545527","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v31i1.2922","title":"An international perspective of restorative justice practices and research outcomes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Beaty Naude","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1251056966468923,"gpt":0.5630817214649989,"spread":0.4379760248181066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05837668,0.0008572405,0.0008833921,0.01009196,0.004376536,0.01747351,0.001609911,0.002672035,0.008274622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05027514,0.0003172065,0.000726581,0.01762982,0.02231112,0.01545257,0.009101218,0.005541381,0.00121725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008028405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01057381,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004137267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002930942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9528919,0.03474451,0.003158157,0.002959955,0.003883172,0.002362287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9384656,0.03616556,0.009238093,0.003376839,0.009021959,0.003731954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008298968,0.0002599183,0.01211322,0.002124772,0.00006945331,0.0003198437,0.08449933,0.0003766126,0.0004175899,0.7866483,0.01735374,0.09573407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000415163,0.0005853718,0.03907879,0.01292449,0.0001101959,0.0009701992,0.3237553,0.0003553576,0.0008182736,0.2099516,0.4112818,0.0001269622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07272978,0.1276217,0.01877588,0.2352559,0.004595771,0.0004757544,0.001328699,0.000164137,0.5390524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8293077,0.1048278,0.01926723,0.01791001,0.002862888,0.002205182,0.0009029963,0.0002879558,0.02242827],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05837668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3087291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1907220870","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v32i2.2940","title":"The role of public policy in the nonenforcement of foreign judgments arising from gambling debts in South African courts: A comparative overview","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Enforcement; Debt; Political science; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Foreign policy; Jurisdiction; Public administration; Economics; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Marita Carnelley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1112529788754521,"gpt":0.4212934574958366,"spread":0.3100404786203845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004987648,0.0002156821,0.0003394556,0.006429769,0.004722778,0.00906915,0.0005292073,0.001896414,0.003541354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01174701,0.0003644598,0.0002995538,0.007182235,0.008944399,0.004885021,0.002803909,0.00248651,0.0002110579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00982202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01008283,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0181521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02866588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965304,0.00172441,0.0001691157,0.0001157868,0.0004936615,0.0009665774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906666,0.006794911,0.001273368,0.0001950728,0.0008227568,0.0002473903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008400794,0.00009087392,0.01328549,0.001763302,0.00005212014,0.001732017,0.05239255,0.0008507466,0.0004561453,0.8629969,0.002275842,0.06401998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006291047,0.0004119409,0.1623329,0.01454993,0.0003145553,0.004017044,0.230916,0.00222441,0.003058669,0.158954,0.4230293,0.0001281965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4178128,0.1791031,0.002489951,0.03638544,0.0002846477,0.0001428326,0.0001082711,0.00001350665,0.3636593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393153,0.05592136,0.0003651291,0.0009860555,0.000123768,0.00003837892,0.00001841999,0.000006247936,0.0032254],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0181521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07126415,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1934157515","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v33i1.2951","title":"Gronde vir die weiering van toegang tot inligting soos van toepassing op openbare instellings (deel II)","year":2008,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Benita Roberts","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05383109508393932,"gpt":0.354117746080132,"spread":0.3002866509961927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002191309,0.0009930937,0.0006842812,0.00142313,0.003982703,0.01303979,0.001273925,0.004259048,0.09508735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008029477,0.000729503,0.0005802518,0.001832327,0.004331868,0.004856931,0.005199515,0.005385331,0.02501533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004096411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005165381,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01999831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0209766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956974,0.001069733,0.0003085601,0.0005512187,0.001726517,0.0006465173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987347,0.0006249477,0.0001273404,0.0001628309,0.00024815,0.0001020348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005351865,0.00004178528,0.0002586376,0.0003752351,0.00001483667,0.0004945516,0.008867842,0.000402494,0.001434763,0.7911356,0.1316279,0.06529278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000693696,0.000006807667,0.0001499075,0.0002154574,0.000004001178,0.0001185543,0.0008105567,0.00007273773,0.000465926,0.01430156,0.9838357,0.00001193694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01368664,0.02012195,0.01832695,0.02041533,0.00636843,0.0002304471,0.001684988,0.0003210254,0.9188443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2007688,0.01732867,0.01458505,0.005218364,0.001620416,0.0004613623,0.001183467,0.001128017,0.7577059],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09508735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3180989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969839827","doi":"10.4314/jjs.v28i1.27135","title":"Groepsgedingvoering - die voorstel van die Suid-Afrikaanse Regskommissie vir die sertifisering van 'n groepsgeding","year":2004,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Die (integrated circuit); Theology; Philosophy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Jaco De Bruin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04650540702735572,"gpt":0.3548876752374028,"spread":0.3083822682100471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001405105,0.0004255478,0.0002483776,0.0004896641,0.004337634,0.00455763,0.000698079,0.003119771,0.09290674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003409414,0.0003687853,0.0004056989,0.0008204084,0.00234361,0.002589904,0.002405641,0.003637406,0.02365719],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01061352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1628656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3204503,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973512,0.0003533122,0.0001550052,0.0003899092,0.0009550271,0.0007955265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992107,0.0002325433,0.00007497471,0.00008627981,0.0002682767,0.0001272856],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000794322,0.00008269888,0.002432105,0.0002270544,0.0000143054,0.0002944231,0.009275832,0.0001531697,0.002421051,0.4821439,0.4426637,0.06021235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005085031,0.00001548852,0.003474032,0.00005307058,0.000003172428,0.00004104819,0.001044435,0.00001309377,0.0004245213,0.002931624,0.9919829,0.00001154675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.012817,0.004182466,0.0017213,0.0231296,0.001444897,0.0001569415,0.001701125,0.0001363755,0.9547103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062403,0.00165527,0.001470123,0.008044504,0.0002863269,0.0001221233,0.0008232046,0.0001228906,0.9250726],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1628656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3238353,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7147615037","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v42i1.3807","title":"Religion and the exercise of public authority","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Politics; State (computer science); Neutrality; Ethnography; Public authority","authors":[{"name":"G Du Plessis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05397175854745563,"gpt":0.4055312075681347,"spread":0.351559449020679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006132765,0.0001524504,0.0003254811,0.001468813,0.01076397,0.009706217,0.001213132,0.0031515,0.005078288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00949509,0.0002170104,0.0003046592,0.001603752,0.0366476,0.003245053,0.003370876,0.003037997,0.0003025952],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01713016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02027508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2347787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2797571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99511,0.00188066,0.000102127,0.0002547372,0.001158066,0.001494473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951161,0.002723839,0.0005587437,0.0003801566,0.000696576,0.0005245381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007225444,0.00001041615,0.0005715492,0.000009499605,0.000002938342,0.00004993698,0.00785106,0.0001984369,0.00006145031,0.9866491,0.001469488,0.003118706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002886313,0.00002138404,0.008167794,0.0001457387,0.00001352129,0.00005629031,0.01201442,0.0005964722,0.000176262,0.8619736,0.1167762,0.00002947696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09575208,0.004005556,0.002072353,0.03840635,0.0002177849,0.00002462551,0.00003905725,0.00002698966,0.8594552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988846,0.0005041933,0.0001723205,0.0005567538,0.00006563174,0.000005827475,0.000006768505,0.000006242406,0.009836202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2347787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4668242,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7147116020","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v30i2.2915","title":"Revisiting the judicial role in the allocation of healthcare resources: on deference, democratic dialogue and deliberation","year":2005,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Deliberation; Argument (complex analysis); Health care; Deliberative democracy; Judicial review; Function (biology); Value (mathematics)","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02895318730473439,"gpt":0.3448575097764517,"spread":0.3159043224717173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09530855,0.0005095422,0.00105375,0.003066794,0.01585913,0.02313006,0.003573603,0.01172369,0.002150917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08797858,0.0006017421,0.000772568,0.002165358,0.1322044,0.02161375,0.0175221,0.01357901,0.0003107367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01368127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02577904,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009790373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01132898,"domain_scores_codex":[0.877747,0.09737467,0.002510392,0.003985828,0.009554768,0.008827232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8647261,0.1197726,0.004627556,0.003989717,0.004947684,0.001936252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001357946,0.000009489036,0.0002264429,0.00005740583,0.000004528971,0.0001096204,0.0259809,0.0002716029,0.00008606195,0.9686779,0.0005685067,0.003994081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003165222,0.00003182693,0.0004633475,0.0005133021,0.00001424748,0.0001131378,0.02750491,0.0007261386,0.000409325,0.9184213,0.05173888,0.00003193246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.163947,0.01997478,0.07835232,0.4262869,0.001196963,0.0001794852,0.00003870429,0.00004273292,0.3099811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860215,0.001707225,0.003038598,0.00649648,0.000233915,0.00006088493,0.000004978217,0.00001511469,0.002421397],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09530855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5040458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933453569","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v36i2.3018","title":"Pecuniary interests and the rule against adjudicative bias: The automatic disqualification or objective reasonable approach?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitution; Theology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Chuks Okpaluba","is_ca":false},{"name":"Laurence Juma","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09870584771046623,"gpt":0.3610285210144931,"spread":0.2623226733040269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04386534,0.0004739659,0.001096645,0.002533809,0.004474778,0.01077585,0.004684721,0.01010155,0.002998156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08204658,0.0005637737,0.001216589,0.001586014,0.03582482,0.01409232,0.005115452,0.01200175,0.0006144102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006995089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01234913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009354524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01864228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9398206,0.0243283,0.004366163,0.005452076,0.02179333,0.004239486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9572,0.02748284,0.004553966,0.004779085,0.005071742,0.0009123009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007087684,0.00000769148,0.000278783,0.00002918765,0.000007882294,0.00003556077,0.0006637756,0.00009646051,0.00008287912,0.9937304,0.000538055,0.004522197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004764281,0.00004725051,0.0009268487,0.0003430572,0.00002837583,0.0001576512,0.0009514003,0.001064304,0.0005380956,0.9748135,0.02102952,0.00005233223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09185032,0.01125248,0.2989911,0.1879085,0.001933565,0.0005720509,0.0002325828,0.0001743036,0.4070852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9343091,0.001297325,0.03911278,0.01717496,0.0008509369,0.0003179121,0.00005037518,0.00004999283,0.006836623],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04386534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2319849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795423455","doi":"10.18820/24150517/jjs42.v2.5","title":"Can law avoid creating culture and religion in its own image? The context for diversity, religion and culture in MEC for Education: KwaZulu-Natal and Others v Navaneethum Pillay: Reflections a decade later","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Conscience; Law; Ambivalence; Political science; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Iain T. Benson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02303375758220615,"gpt":0.3737030121332806,"spread":0.3506692545510744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004473476,0.0002923746,0.0003456311,0.000483027,0.01204481,0.00712042,0.001255922,0.008834744,0.003594682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006377319,0.000359358,0.0004144907,0.0004998551,0.02330973,0.007801429,0.005541016,0.01089978,0.0003319337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01222892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008440142,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07795373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1372928,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962314,0.001495906,0.0001427474,0.0003495762,0.0005535813,0.001226821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982837,0.001149004,0.000153861,0.0001149349,0.0001455303,0.0001528899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002156905,0.00002250784,0.0006665926,0.0001007266,0.000007479471,0.0005740231,0.04586378,0.00006156921,0.0008453294,0.9306939,0.01209756,0.009045053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004360069,0.00008034106,0.008346942,0.00079776,0.00002893832,0.0004779781,0.06844354,0.0001461093,0.001567701,0.124404,0.7955425,0.0001205718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1331827,0.02113343,0.001546649,0.5638791,0.0025851,0.000133516,0.00005039494,0.00001991698,0.2774692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8919078,0.003278475,0.0006154227,0.05879588,0.0004108599,0.0001267393,0.00001402939,0.00002288713,0.04482795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07795373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527759247","doi":"10.18820/24150517/jjs41.v1.5","title":"Die strafregtelike aanspreeklikheid van regspersone: Lesse uit Kanada","year":2016,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","authors":[{"name":"Du Toit","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03340037909171334,"gpt":0.2839854300215252,"spread":0.2505850509298119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00167216,0.0004564471,0.0005860947,0.0009553855,0.006282497,0.008970753,0.00128839,0.002392044,0.02856518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004073417,0.0005713401,0.0003114229,0.001184592,0.004683974,0.003144898,0.003139887,0.004200409,0.003480542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01299704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02056862,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4288479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5037071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957578,0.0008687293,0.0001636758,0.0004553803,0.002011018,0.0007433319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986901,0.0004386511,0.0001337662,0.0001042655,0.0004575714,0.0001756557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009441977,0.0001036727,0.002334377,0.0005808751,0.00003882685,0.001177978,0.03920981,0.001357301,0.001792982,0.7382243,0.05627783,0.1588076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008711496,0.00001224807,0.001291638,0.0004402155,0.00001460022,0.00026855,0.006544893,0.0002626607,0.0006892377,0.01958227,0.97085,0.00003504405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09520117,0.05925878,0.01290127,0.05840019,0.002800248,0.00009135873,0.0007503532,0.0002730135,0.7703236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6799594,0.02112344,0.004768992,0.003104286,0.0002662387,0.00005935667,0.0002779301,0.0003557873,0.2900847],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5711521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8527035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7147256335","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v32i2.2944","title":"Gronde vir die weiering van toegang tot inligting soos van toepassing op openbare instellings (deel I)","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Appeal; Freedom of information; Promotion (chess); Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law","authors":[{"name":"B. Roberts","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03694009050939181,"gpt":0.3772576109602823,"spread":0.3403175204508905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002395616,0.0008026478,0.0006164341,0.001523953,0.004165965,0.01247141,0.001220287,0.00399798,0.07506417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009983777,0.0007201778,0.0004736933,0.002004022,0.004442448,0.005246961,0.00582513,0.004696292,0.01927442],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003515991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005393375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01621994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02015635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952326,0.001419249,0.0003608863,0.0005173655,0.00190976,0.0005600223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982675,0.0009474269,0.0001740626,0.0001690113,0.0003041341,0.0001377256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005687133,0.00004686494,0.0004087272,0.000528691,0.00001719935,0.0006531695,0.01142979,0.0004926661,0.001565667,0.7882818,0.1092884,0.08723014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007812368,0.00001038631,0.0002194304,0.0002873377,0.000005493994,0.0001793722,0.001393236,0.0001182738,0.0006577767,0.02268589,0.9744173,0.00001773715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0205167,0.02480684,0.02527465,0.02519816,0.005889121,0.0002501174,0.001503253,0.0003747929,0.8961864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3172368,0.02423733,0.01882703,0.005055216,0.001698197,0.0004186335,0.001227077,0.001026077,0.6302735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07506417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2511147,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278178224","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v29i2.2894","title":"Die Class Proceedings Act van Ontario — ’n voorbeeld van wetgewing vir die regulering van Suid-Afrikaanse groepsgedingvoering","year":2004,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promulgation; Legislation; Commission; Law; Statutory law; Class (philosophy); Theology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jaco De Bruin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03768844067980392,"gpt":0.273592432931702,"spread":0.2359039922518981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002756003,0.0004539348,0.0003024562,0.0008727171,0.01028688,0.007499439,0.001104775,0.004505,0.02005898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00655679,0.0007589437,0.0003344281,0.001787827,0.005518376,0.001708431,0.00230189,0.004533884,0.00326826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04324253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09912533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9435067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9693025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930859,0.0005095863,0.0002449748,0.0003861646,0.004283168,0.001490243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973844,0.0006193853,0.0002717176,0.0002090077,0.001023193,0.0004923715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008355619,0.00003247294,0.001839808,0.0002064537,0.00001753696,0.0006511183,0.009259807,0.0003418379,0.001778441,0.5940882,0.3431677,0.04853301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006632525,0.000003123844,0.001608379,0.00004833607,0.00000277605,0.00002041619,0.0003413628,0.00002267652,0.0001668482,0.001852208,0.9959123,0.00001494764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02228851,0.01505976,0.003283593,0.05996781,0.00215089,0.0003942043,0.00280878,0.0001561598,0.8938903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1426195,0.006097117,0.003801379,0.01197914,0.0003200475,0.0003162274,0.0009283297,0.000142897,0.8337954],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05649334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.313748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W146917027","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v29i3.2898","title":"Exploring fairness in health care reform","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Deference; Accountability; Affirmative action; Health care; Health equity; Political science; Economic Justice; Public economics; Health policy; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Rebecca J. Cook","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1353799606156776,"gpt":0.3948435848409313,"spread":0.2594636242252537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06565291,0.0005598811,0.001221524,0.002877018,0.01211874,0.01239877,0.002168364,0.009577584,0.004472437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06177161,0.0003907033,0.001143672,0.002487466,0.05463875,0.01594309,0.01410508,0.009197874,0.0002848464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0158004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01839679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008200361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00530809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9359811,0.048842,0.001053242,0.002682323,0.006327697,0.005113559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9542096,0.0370988,0.002280744,0.002251512,0.002891952,0.001267439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005377977,0.000007064796,0.00009629546,0.0000161352,0.000003096712,0.00001424871,0.000846818,0.0002923626,0.00001127793,0.9958977,0.0004240606,0.002385586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009316259,0.00001119078,0.0001027935,0.00006577918,0.000003508124,0.000007463314,0.0006063339,0.000317232,0.00002852543,0.9909115,0.007931311,0.000004973725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0498077,0.02724415,0.08518721,0.4563268,0.002263443,0.0002484617,0.00007902655,0.00004194763,0.3788013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9538796,0.004929345,0.01253357,0.01903056,0.001846332,0.0002905038,0.00002439621,0.00002598863,0.007439665],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06565291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3472099,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7147707594","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v28i1.2858","title":"Groepsgedingvoering — die voorstel van die Suid-Afrikaanse Regskommissie vir die sertifisering van ’n groepsgeding","year":2003,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promulgation; Commission; Legislation; Certification; Class (philosophy); Class action","authors":[{"name":"J. H. De Bruin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03937184074087862,"gpt":0.2945533595771468,"spread":0.2551815188362682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002162512,0.000371189,0.000262714,0.0006870315,0.004562279,0.006268091,0.000907967,0.002911314,0.03534138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006167361,0.0003555223,0.0002284803,0.0008178646,0.0029489,0.003753145,0.003709034,0.003978697,0.005131077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003981708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008878087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06678871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08378776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971693,0.0006914917,0.0001577371,0.0002917006,0.001064258,0.0006255554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989203,0.0004945202,0.0001246172,0.0001212015,0.0001844316,0.0001549912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000533916,0.00004706376,0.001338197,0.0001815587,0.00001231566,0.0006181447,0.01262466,0.0005898867,0.0009526678,0.7023124,0.1497201,0.1315499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003576,0.000008464993,0.0007445395,0.0001125894,0.000002652579,0.0001304073,0.002023838,0.000076943,0.0004189509,0.01200665,0.9844588,0.00001267838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04994554,0.02934651,0.01383605,0.08796289,0.005658424,0.0001390667,0.0004766732,0.0002107145,0.8124241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4517639,0.01623502,0.008405498,0.008989504,0.0009274282,0.0001091452,0.000450611,0.0003886361,0.5127302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06678871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1327999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7147147736","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v31i1.2918","title":"Polygyny and HIV/AIDS: A health and human rights approach","year":2006,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Polygyny; Dignity; Human rights; Redress; Human sexuality; Population; Domestic violence; Reproductive health; Condom","authors":[{"name":"L. M. Kelly","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03965751315849483,"gpt":0.3619056714644127,"spread":0.3222481583059179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00895509,0.0003920143,0.0004276441,0.00252284,0.004412999,0.005156729,0.001352233,0.003787109,0.004743065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007224629,0.0002254591,0.0003624382,0.001087363,0.043756,0.006042506,0.005123391,0.004693801,0.0002569018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004095778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007604524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006699626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00690204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993813,0.004734172,0.0001175507,0.0003538394,0.0005558084,0.0004256984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938529,0.004367577,0.000470296,0.0003508199,0.0004115199,0.0005469663],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002845513,0.00001836333,0.0008817502,0.0000264164,0.000003874856,0.00008259367,0.002842674,0.00008627088,0.00003069074,0.990872,0.0006524131,0.00450019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008488425,0.00005313494,0.002205278,0.0003195082,0.00001187792,0.0002519761,0.007375835,0.0004976735,0.00008041928,0.9255797,0.06360368,0.00001229575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.06638268,0.04090912,0.0635028,0.3544543,0.002139397,0.0002344027,0.0001517973,0.00003703126,0.4721884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434116,0.01353187,0.009868644,0.0134106,0.002173939,0.0002183096,0.0000413447,0.00001563614,0.01732801],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00895509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04735959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}