{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":14,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"755576d66a22","filters":{"venue":"Journal for Juridical Science"}},"results":[{"id":"W1595545527","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v31i1.2922","title":"An international perspective of restorative justice practices and research outcomes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Beaty Naude","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1251056966468923,"gpt":0.5630817214649989,"spread":0.4379760248181066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008773292,0.00006628963,0.0001311216,0.0002493597,0.001987187,0.0005288526,0.0009362145,0.00006038656,0.00004514687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01830512,0.00005069985,0.00004310369,0.0007416002,0.003874613,0.002255259,0.00009323507,0.0003822845,0.000004160748],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004205025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001055092,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002166371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003461348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967793,0.0003045245,0.0002511654,0.0002721071,0.001987322,0.000405553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958977,0.001160287,0.0003767306,0.0001242427,0.00216286,0.0002782003],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008845078,0.0002275539,0.01487949,0.000005653911,0.00001019757,0.00001048824,0.04860795,0.00001527157,0.002087913,0.9323722,0.001028677,0.0006661816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001118933,0.001153222,0.09221641,0.00007011073,0.00008953558,0.00002700174,0.1429632,0.0008243722,0.002060181,0.3146866,0.4443693,0.0004211278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8116701,0.0004495949,0.0008034907,0.0250202,0.002138507,0.0004333886,0.00002251811,0.00003275362,0.1594295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925883,0.0000492214,0.005721288,0.00004398251,0.0007918151,0.000005140284,2.33607e-7,0.000004385086,0.0007955654],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6176856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1907220870","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v32i2.2940","title":"The role of public policy in the nonenforcement of foreign judgments arising from gambling debts in South African courts: A comparative overview","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Enforcement; Debt; Political science; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Foreign policy; Jurisdiction; Public administration; Economics; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Marita Carnelley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1112529788754521,"gpt":0.4212934574958366,"spread":0.3100404786203845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01484255,0.0001154817,0.0002820524,0.0002915424,0.001029748,0.000279949,0.001584543,0.00006349773,0.00001644129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002442046,0.00006731541,0.0001148615,0.002115116,0.001774115,0.0005031808,0.0001320631,0.0003678383,0.000001611844],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005586505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001289291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003932771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00265261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959917,0.0002809904,0.0008014407,0.0002116261,0.001882893,0.0008313456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973903,0.001336143,0.0005801112,0.0002080516,0.0002466328,0.0002388057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001599103,0.0003655217,0.04318824,0.00001160911,0.00002807418,0.000008409354,0.5338992,0.0001770825,0.0009840725,0.4031935,0.00005742808,0.01792699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002475105,0.0006107122,0.06156057,0.0005613041,0.00005272725,0.000006151278,0.4847463,0.004028187,0.004090306,0.2822133,0.1590834,0.0005720039],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9515984,0.003024421,0.002350029,0.001866437,0.0003045178,0.0008611076,0.00001994774,0.000009086164,0.03996602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987638,0.00009537091,0.0007949361,0.0001168123,0.0002005733,0.000008559094,4.449385e-7,0.000004477546,0.00001503135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.159026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7920097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1934157515","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v33i1.2951","title":"Gronde vir die weiering van toegang tot inligting soos van toepassing op openbare instellings (deel II)","year":2008,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Benita Roberts","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05383109508393932,"gpt":0.354117746080132,"spread":0.3002866509961927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006300756,0.0006702947,0.0009234283,0.0004738913,0.02185718,0.002221322,0.00382469,0.0004584576,0.0003546561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004050428,0.0006060572,0.0006123549,0.002632939,0.005258067,0.004416014,0.001375896,0.001968123,0.0001613163],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001838289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00318023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007217455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000139769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9894864,0.0002929449,0.001690797,0.001359626,0.004046425,0.003123831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947978,0.0006577342,0.00111142,0.000580972,0.0007847578,0.002067283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008673221,0.003200564,0.01795823,0.0006203513,0.0003557321,0.002746529,0.6799039,0.00926269,0.03973344,0.02641373,0.02273257,0.1962049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002247902,0.00114345,0.001991288,0.00133832,0.0002066606,0.0004010318,0.01121275,0.01571828,0.007747646,0.01078941,0.9447154,0.002487851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9087337,0.004002898,0.007348564,0.005780853,0.008640945,0.001222133,0.00004602622,0.0002481449,0.06397679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775946,0.0004378947,0.01009913,0.0005078929,0.004517741,0.00002010341,0.000002512311,0.00007474051,0.006745439],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9219828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969839827","doi":"10.4314/jjs.v28i1.27135","title":"Groepsgedingvoering - die voorstel van die Suid-Afrikaanse Regskommissie vir die sertifisering van 'n groepsgeding","year":2004,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Die (integrated circuit); Theology; Philosophy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Jaco De Bruin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04650540702735572,"gpt":0.3548876752374028,"spread":0.3083822682100471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01092545,0.001037134,0.001208682,0.0007509544,0.01161022,0.004086745,0.004547365,0.0006448199,0.000341627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007018928,0.0009196555,0.0009734043,0.002284818,0.005179713,0.005027627,0.0011522,0.002550112,0.0003349687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003638943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002672131,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001064468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003790498,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9857976,0.0002995536,0.002182138,0.001929372,0.00520523,0.004586056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925604,0.0008117896,0.001171915,0.0008862793,0.0009978388,0.003571721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002776856,0.005907468,0.02074336,0.001991239,0.001051754,0.008467478,0.5450488,0.02364467,0.153463,0.08907372,0.01008255,0.1377491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004102279,0.001326832,0.003044574,0.00232305,0.0004897895,0.000228868,0.008832515,0.001967555,0.01716099,0.07727047,0.8799858,0.003267301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8300185,0.01210431,0.01862782,0.02197735,0.03109295,0.002703187,0.0001376449,0.0008684931,0.08246979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794314,0.0009048223,0.006028221,0.0003715767,0.006758897,0.00004538064,0.000003196751,0.0001444244,0.006312088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8699032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7147615037","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v42i1.3807","title":"Religion and the exercise of public authority","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Politics; State (computer science); Neutrality; Ethnography; Public authority","authors":[{"name":"G Du Plessis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05397175854745563,"gpt":0.4055312075681347,"spread":0.351559449020679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01575345,0.0001530416,0.0003917924,0.00009101754,0.0210747,0.003509076,0.002317023,0.0001742781,0.00006601764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01106674,0.00009359509,0.0004824674,0.0003874888,0.01963015,0.001882758,0.0003503631,0.0006914952,0.000009523343],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001622417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001639545,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009213605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001078011,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965364,0.0002291382,0.0006588965,0.0003405095,0.001536862,0.0006981589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958737,0.0006391722,0.001199118,0.0004977053,0.0009533738,0.0008369526],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002144445,0.0002142967,0.001568182,0.00003697999,0.00003789104,0.000003167385,0.01361746,0.000001593379,0.0003914435,0.8988399,0.02912181,0.05595287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005224006,0.0004934444,0.01825855,0.0007225793,0.0003330953,0.0001366675,0.01187282,0.006102539,0.0007220031,0.3746901,0.5808122,0.0006319261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4954104,0.004813624,0.00349488,0.4255252,0.0183316,0.001700036,0.00002760855,0.00003218944,0.05066444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656451,0.03151049,0.0003127892,0.000284487,0.0005643801,0.00001014656,9.876522e-8,0.000005855472,0.001666644],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5516904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7147116020","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v30i2.2915","title":"Revisiting the judicial role in the allocation of healthcare resources: on deference, democratic dialogue and deliberation","year":2005,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Deliberation; Argument (complex analysis); Health care; Deliberative democracy; Judicial review; Function (biology); Value (mathematics)","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02895318730473439,"gpt":0.3448575097764517,"spread":0.3159043224717173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01443034,0.0001937294,0.0003101747,0.0001840245,0.004213507,0.0007639553,0.001467567,0.0001571235,0.00001878169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004957626,0.0001119012,0.0001183596,0.00182885,0.002552282,0.0007975078,0.0001103604,0.0008867467,0.000006960363],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003442378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001025248,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004485213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008583584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994671,0.001050789,0.001024193,0.0004207133,0.00207721,0.0007560184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965711,0.001702541,0.000710682,0.0002772505,0.0004450943,0.0002933689],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002448892,0.0002057808,0.002774253,0.00007681208,0.00001460213,0.000004722747,0.460911,0.0008923098,0.0006444992,0.1576194,0.000428063,0.3761837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004111279,0.004484969,0.08914308,0.004016805,0.0004511758,0.0001631628,0.1339684,0.0765381,0.001532786,0.2745681,0.4090304,0.001991688],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8404209,0.004683363,0.0006521667,0.1448298,0.0008063396,0.001333023,0.00001584287,0.00001378632,0.007244764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942477,0.0005290417,0.0005932311,0.001699189,0.002851074,0.0000219966,7.866334e-7,0.000008608333,0.00004833732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4086024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933453569","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v36i2.3018","title":"Pecuniary interests and the rule against adjudicative bias: The automatic disqualification or objective reasonable approach?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitution; Theology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Chuks Okpaluba","is_ca":false},{"name":"Laurence Juma","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09870584771046623,"gpt":0.3610285210144931,"spread":0.2623226733040269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009413562,0.0001352624,0.0002062167,0.00008121815,0.004025635,0.0004687365,0.001534886,0.00007266537,0.00006729116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009279433,0.00005938533,0.0001006415,0.0009728724,0.008064122,0.000768705,0.0002017877,0.0004330552,0.00001981763],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002274504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008875409,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003001815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006222424,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971502,0.0006244954,0.0003761555,0.0003190861,0.0009902607,0.0005397517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973546,0.001297231,0.0003990811,0.0002955335,0.0003140956,0.0003394453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003349593,0.0002054814,0.0005816357,0.00001709975,0.0000417972,0.000005563291,0.7425494,0.000002864773,0.00004783972,0.226228,0.001830053,0.02815537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005995679,0.0009115317,0.04994958,0.0005190659,0.0004256061,0.0001876846,0.3768442,0.03088974,0.0009421902,0.2814246,0.250357,0.001553145],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5863517,0.003103176,0.01766592,0.03123356,0.00286315,0.005120781,0.00004412829,0.0003292801,0.3532884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941776,0.0001696267,0.003797834,0.000541546,0.0002987199,0.00009059198,4.997878e-7,0.000009582783,0.0009140339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4078259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795423455","doi":"10.18820/24150517/jjs42.v2.5","title":"Can law avoid creating culture and religion in its own image? The context for diversity, religion and culture in MEC for Education: KwaZulu-Natal and Others v Navaneethum Pillay: Reflections a decade later","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Conscience; Law; Ambivalence; Political science; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Iain T. Benson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02303375758220615,"gpt":0.3737030121332806,"spread":0.3506692545510744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001873318,0.0001173573,0.0001573225,0.00009144567,0.004044889,0.000466036,0.0003143645,0.0001310173,0.000002537475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001472876,0.00007666126,0.00004512943,0.0004263897,0.001703718,0.0006045049,0.0001561973,0.0002730343,7.078364e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002239379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003112911,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001522357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01245199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985929,0.00008351439,0.0002353158,0.0003278794,0.000346791,0.0004136671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989405,0.0002560213,0.0001424263,0.00008083753,0.0003402216,0.0002400365],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000479403,0.0001510943,0.005430351,0.00009705172,0.00002213364,0.000005096362,0.7717371,0.000002641327,0.006992509,0.1873117,0.02223226,0.005538699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001710591,0.0007598132,0.0008150693,0.0003224236,0.0000525143,0.00008184877,0.02512702,0.0003189195,0.001719543,0.0965761,0.8721365,0.0003796197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9120914,0.004272611,0.0007301741,0.05897841,0.001966981,0.003520092,0.00009628447,0.00006354464,0.01828045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935199,0.0004599567,0.003055471,0.001204223,0.0005232289,0.0000371382,9.823798e-7,0.00000773018,0.001191343],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8499043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527759247","doi":"10.18820/24150517/jjs41.v1.5","title":"Die strafregtelike aanspreeklikheid van regspersone: Lesse uit Kanada","year":2016,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","authors":[{"name":"Du Toit","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03340037909171334,"gpt":0.2839854300215252,"spread":0.2505850509298119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001906029,0.0003615213,0.0004307705,0.0003216673,0.002977295,0.001540389,0.001332017,0.0001009625,0.001398681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001005895,0.0002262003,0.0003175322,0.00090264,0.00145798,0.003320851,0.0003663394,0.0002855237,0.0007435724],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002597266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000425108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007419361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002068862,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958553,0.00002021937,0.0007012212,0.0006695912,0.001581922,0.001171769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977627,0.0001714394,0.000631499,0.0003753321,0.0008434465,0.000215533],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005521728,0.0006317377,0.02121676,0.0005315957,0.0002355047,0.0002069543,0.0002774665,0.00007301398,0.01623805,0.09970107,0.3804342,0.4799014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00184492,0.0001207165,0.03892023,0.0008238523,0.0001283279,0.00004450206,0.0005043517,0.0009347615,0.0003866764,0.02357364,0.9320133,0.0007046973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4910755,0.01094634,0.0533442,0.2839404,0.03198562,0.00266984,0.0001244513,0.0004517013,0.1254619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976164,0.0007257411,0.0003530887,0.001603807,0.004107368,0.00001431143,0.000001154336,0.00003178934,0.01699867],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5515791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7147256335","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v32i2.2944","title":"Gronde vir die weiering van toegang tot inligting soos van toepassing op openbare instellings (deel I)","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Appeal; Freedom of information; Promotion (chess); Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law","authors":[{"name":"B. Roberts","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03694009050939181,"gpt":0.3772576109602823,"spread":0.3403175204508905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02234779,0.0008112666,0.001043761,0.0007436384,0.01480126,0.005149707,0.004972332,0.0006070331,0.0006454425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007770951,0.0007468825,0.0007333086,0.003896805,0.005452647,0.00596236,0.00136857,0.002652143,0.0001990203],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002876699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003193286,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003382489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002491486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9856891,0.0002856835,0.002471153,0.001668824,0.005156644,0.004728606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916109,0.00142207,0.00152551,0.0006908732,0.001097307,0.0036533],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009576253,0.001379799,0.005777076,0.0004140923,0.0002166242,0.001131288,0.3160591,0.001952117,0.03454825,0.03123959,0.001874318,0.6044501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002586403,0.001202351,0.001785586,0.001950869,0.0002999423,0.0002192953,0.03489782,0.0109075,0.01875241,0.02402387,0.9003451,0.003028875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7392057,0.006700093,0.08720677,0.007100014,0.02256668,0.002529898,0.00004573298,0.0003472713,0.1342978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739388,0.0003763278,0.01633565,0.0007716177,0.006081738,0.0000121067,0.000001395646,0.00008821212,0.002394177],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8984708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278178224","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v29i2.2894","title":"Die Class Proceedings Act van Ontario — ’n voorbeeld van wetgewing vir die regulering van Suid-Afrikaanse groepsgedingvoering","year":2004,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promulgation; Legislation; Commission; Law; Statutory law; Class (philosophy); Theology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jaco De Bruin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03768844067980392,"gpt":0.273592432931702,"spread":0.2359039922518981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003364182,0.0006581007,0.0006650473,0.0006981533,0.003340259,0.005154412,0.002023518,0.0002569202,0.0003837646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001924838,0.0005872312,0.0005344028,0.0007374005,0.001360237,0.00684194,0.0006818114,0.001377757,0.0001385505],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002173135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008642912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002529863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002571305,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993259,0.000009876827,0.001372208,0.001121153,0.002299895,0.001937896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971361,0.0001401542,0.001037386,0.0002681208,0.001047712,0.0003705514],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002170106,0.004478381,0.155107,0.003699013,0.0009871818,0.001379958,0.00769921,0.01538359,0.08953504,0.6601574,0.02675403,0.03264911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004488136,0.0004602104,0.05057845,0.003053156,0.0004925317,0.0002394364,0.0007814724,0.008714178,0.004877267,0.1326443,0.7913744,0.002296377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8914613,0.000391909,0.01201668,0.01016006,0.01044521,0.0008837832,0.00002058098,0.0002524621,0.07436808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846975,0.0001189362,0.001745853,0.001029999,0.007938229,0.00001811824,0.000008493591,0.00008307918,0.004359792],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7646204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996579,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W146917027","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v29i3.2898","title":"Exploring fairness in health care reform","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Deference; Accountability; Affirmative action; Health care; Health equity; Political science; Economic Justice; Public economics; Health policy; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Rebecca J. Cook","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1353799606156776,"gpt":0.3948435848409313,"spread":0.2594636242252537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002940175,0.00006927593,0.0001315862,0.0001809614,0.002527008,0.0002444652,0.000477312,0.00002762895,0.0000323549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001804152,0.00004745102,0.00005233419,0.0005984138,0.0004887878,0.000961383,0.00004238382,0.0002027574,0.00001270479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003299223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004115487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001623268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003986557,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979044,0.00002920123,0.0003235638,0.0001978391,0.0008818863,0.00066311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991607,0.00002380995,0.00009894859,0.00007375206,0.0001361776,0.0005066223],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002487198,0.00009658312,0.0003054474,0.00003088417,0.000002447254,0.00003216184,0.1217212,0.0001268325,0.00005084611,0.8170363,0.000137342,0.06043507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002026773,0.0004626042,0.02642583,0.0005212171,0.000003138496,0.00003371559,0.06815109,0.00001144907,0.0009069133,0.1230051,0.7779006,0.0005515418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9556664,0.0002624512,0.002148593,0.02174925,0.002399909,0.0004106966,0.000001947637,0.00004906047,0.01731168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962486,0.0002263451,0.002695224,0.0003276019,0.000316864,0.00001523624,2.413188e-7,0.000004300236,0.0001655701],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7777632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987715,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7147707594","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v28i1.2858","title":"Groepsgedingvoering — die voorstel van die Suid-Afrikaanse Regskommissie vir die sertifisering van ’n groepsgeding","year":2003,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promulgation; Commission; Legislation; Certification; Class (philosophy); Class action","authors":[{"name":"J. H. De Bruin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03937184074087862,"gpt":0.2945533595771468,"spread":0.2551815188362682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006394907,0.0008950207,0.0008693467,0.001189277,0.008899621,0.00650025,0.001827541,0.0003355503,0.001662885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004801764,0.0008075003,0.0008890634,0.001996287,0.001224188,0.008920441,0.0006603583,0.001619784,0.0004200444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009423278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007372382,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005411652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005553207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9910974,0.0000801647,0.001821554,0.001442068,0.002513039,0.003045769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958452,0.0003022045,0.00115191,0.0006765792,0.001115709,0.0009084059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001949752,0.006925345,0.02706262,0.004664136,0.001276727,0.002211113,0.002515087,0.006820964,0.1562059,0.4186912,0.04703356,0.3246436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001672287,0.0001238426,0.003244928,0.0008355384,0.0003244395,0.000185594,0.001086915,0.01553586,0.001845094,0.009495026,0.9644214,0.001229093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4533238,0.009201897,0.0805669,0.0202622,0.04559597,0.003105713,0.00004842377,0.0008542408,0.3870409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839929,0.001657331,0.001216147,0.001150781,0.004217482,0.00004953622,0.000004361842,0.0001386995,0.007572719],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9173878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7147147736","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v31i1.2918","title":"Polygyny and HIV/AIDS: A health and human rights approach","year":2006,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Polygyny; Dignity; Human rights; Redress; Human sexuality; Population; Domestic violence; Reproductive health; Condom","authors":[{"name":"L. M. Kelly","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03965751315849483,"gpt":0.3619056714644127,"spread":0.3222481583059179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007455087,0.0002474662,0.000421185,0.0003059087,0.01650879,0.001582035,0.0005813182,0.0001868627,0.00007891799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005344611,0.0001930872,0.0001092468,0.001061,0.003954875,0.001150294,0.0001507531,0.0006799597,0.000005871416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002589348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001304038,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009928386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004227113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955206,0.0003508755,0.0008114979,0.0006722159,0.001466266,0.001178535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969757,0.0003822784,0.0004736782,0.0001712486,0.000204972,0.001792129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004129827,0.0003369368,0.004284188,0.00006915924,0.00001322731,0.000008088849,0.007897517,0.000005269726,0.0002624456,0.9721749,0.007938943,0.006968051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002754359,0.002697528,0.01210075,0.000273432,0.0001010832,0.0003876707,0.009099726,0.003235601,0.00007730501,0.5408096,0.4273347,0.001128256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.917418,0.005110692,0.01001604,0.01022137,0.001461836,0.001300473,0.00003491142,0.000052248,0.05438442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883051,0.0001369487,0.004014115,0.0003013866,0.001412796,0.000008825665,0.000002834078,0.00001033233,0.005807699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4313653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994544,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}