{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":7,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"652267a9fe47","filters":{"venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric"}},"results":[{"id":"W4210751148","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.19.3.0321","title":"Addendum: Seeking Hawthorne’s Niagara","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Addendum; Philosophy; History; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Beth L. Hewett","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05596520705454201,"gpt":0.2925316249198616,"spread":0.2365664178653196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001062605,0.00008875432,0.0001866075,0.00007588686,0.0008932522,0.000009136378,0.0003592242,0.00005540783,0.0003051783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004344692,0.00004578535,0.0002241489,0.0001062475,0.0003284242,0.0002209368,0.0000227671,0.0001152552,0.00002557599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001770114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002607219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006757025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005911053,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988678,0.0001183508,0.000272676,0.0001073316,0.0003723605,0.0002615126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986899,0.000635113,0.0002560152,0.0001247848,0.0001859212,0.0001082392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006025946,0.00003864344,0.0003147289,0.00001018304,0.00006268649,0.000003413168,0.02882652,4.550957e-7,0.0005247298,0.01821931,0.9060644,0.04587468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002390041,0.0000692249,0.00011909,0.00003551565,0.00003351429,0.000003928214,0.0004296506,0.00000179142,0.000003914352,0.001679351,0.9973022,0.00008279579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01952462,0.2034516,0.03870399,0.03940258,0.2334376,0.00161227,0.00006365037,0.000335939,0.4634677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2249874,0.002250928,0.0004004274,0.0002017449,0.004099914,0.00001986471,1.67863e-7,0.00001952984,0.76802],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3045523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6870264,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225396521","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.25.1.0098","title":"Democracy as Fetish, by Ralph Cintron, University Park: Penn State University Press","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Hegemony; Sociology; Bureaucracy; Liberal democracy; End of history; Hegelianism; Law; Media studies; Political economy; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Kwame Dadugblor","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03523233007786373,"gpt":0.210550944554872,"spread":0.1753186144770083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003100235,0.0001244872,0.0002059612,0.00006571368,0.001628937,0.00001769122,0.0005116527,0.00002236286,0.00266656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002562198,0.0001042067,0.000269489,0.00003584707,0.0002832715,0.000190797,0.0001263096,0.0004162114,0.000008939745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001253245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001265654,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001922349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000821263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998858,0.0002112722,0.0001920408,0.0001462457,0.0003224835,0.000269979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990526,0.0002708475,0.0002437163,0.000161807,0.0001199561,0.0001510297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005482376,0.0001774015,0.00001136076,0.00002109153,0.0001170529,0.00002133834,0.002891785,0.00003612003,0.00002231178,0.2660478,0.7295972,0.0005083221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007298876,0.0002656307,0.00001691703,0.0000063229,0.0001197107,0.00002365118,0.001646824,0.00005063075,0.000003977865,0.01078324,0.9862202,0.0001329908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1475991,0.05104667,0.001577705,0.07230489,0.147854,0.003302944,0.005778211,0.0004318062,0.5701047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3170601,0.0006597067,0.00001824787,0.0003564419,0.0006050564,9.839658e-7,0.00001352997,0.00001980071,0.6812662],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2566231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410628735","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.28.1.0105","title":"<i>The Evolution of Mathematics: A Rhetorical Approach</i>, by G. Mitchell Reyes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Art; Philosophy; Literature","authors":[{"name":"Kavi Duvvoori","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02117726509435353,"gpt":0.2508865573063019,"spread":0.2297092922119484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002369713,0.0001723932,0.0003590843,0.0001407807,0.0004353228,0.00004038561,0.001957972,0.00008944845,0.000003010248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004433462,0.0001043764,0.0003653287,0.0004506277,0.0002779012,0.0001894569,0.0002214948,0.0003188531,0.000001712906],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002582487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000631262,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001995326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002100271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980089,0.0001409282,0.0007665078,0.0002431887,0.0005282424,0.0003122437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996622,0.001466915,0.0006481592,0.0007784461,0.0004103095,0.00007416087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009660486,0.001297697,0.000139635,0.0004895368,0.0003278906,0.000001461053,0.004813705,0.0008163048,0.004186028,0.2467467,0.7030182,0.03806622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008324942,0.0003376035,0.0001438702,0.00007788069,0.0001117615,0.00008196179,0.0005563654,0.1876722,0.0003325249,0.1084028,0.7011961,0.0002544225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005119505,0.02741602,0.9595253,0.0009090027,0.00865132,0.0003524485,0.000002465621,0.00003698668,0.002594541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2947493,0.001695288,0.5365936,0.0002958548,0.001475913,0.0002721026,0.000002489878,0.0001000053,0.1648155],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4229317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6753114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231639837","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.23.2.0121","title":"The Loudspeaker and the Little Man: Mass Media and Democratic Participation in the Federal Theatre Project’s <i>One-Third of a Nation</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Democracy; Media studies; Narrative; Rhetoric; Sociology; Mass media; Politics; Political science; Law; Literature; Art; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Jordana Cox","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1047207266849278,"gpt":0.273284003858445,"spread":0.1685632771735173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001082027,0.00008864947,0.0001876156,0.00002554683,0.0009188163,0.00006711783,0.0002840665,0.00002048405,0.000009162781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001777736,0.00003581667,0.00007915102,0.00004861073,0.0006371488,0.0001054626,0.00003906298,0.0002024997,6.800045e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006322866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006601474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005579638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002738085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989445,0.0002541507,0.0003734008,0.00006995736,0.0002501197,0.0001078914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977472,0.001592681,0.0003293368,0.0001671711,0.0001442233,0.00001940075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005474645,0.00008050739,0.0003456088,0.00008990043,0.0002083605,4.895325e-7,0.6401906,0.00001322272,0.00002911449,0.2101191,0.1418004,0.006575246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001368837,0.0001586031,0.0007425333,0.00003944875,0.0001592191,0.00000730879,0.04792355,0.001471481,0.000003898685,0.01669225,0.931336,0.00009685805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1228787,0.4305531,0.001972422,0.3326237,0.0110461,0.005270822,0.00005030868,0.00007258835,0.09553221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914503,0.004304433,0.00004030485,0.0006555583,0.0004276638,0.00008864784,8.225368e-7,0.000009258913,0.003023025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8685716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7066885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210781667","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.22.1.0001","title":"The Fourth Master Trope, Antithesis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Trope (literature); Antithesis; Irony; Synecdoche; Metonymy; Metaphor; Theme (computing); Rhetoric; Literature; Hyperbole; Philosophy; Simile; Aesthetics; Art; Linguistics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Randy Allen Harris","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03880120831446821,"gpt":0.2738340010083725,"spread":0.2350327926939043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007535209,0.00009862537,0.0001637704,0.00006637738,0.0002118628,0.00001723675,0.0003354356,0.00005670417,0.001230538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004679358,0.0000492408,0.0002529388,0.00006870741,0.0000714882,0.00007293559,0.00001372777,0.000209786,0.0003045275],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002032041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006016719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001491936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005831152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990827,0.0001249315,0.0002656459,0.0001086979,0.0002069277,0.0002111177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988058,0.0003881444,0.0003127356,0.0003220896,0.0001285123,0.00004269142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00132332,0.0002037875,0.001387279,0.000046684,0.0007548045,0.0000143666,0.0108871,0.00001149238,0.002543275,0.01295015,0.8585293,0.1113484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007299253,0.0002220224,0.002231759,0.00001458737,0.0001308521,0.0001017768,0.00172154,0.00002726746,0.00003066774,0.0009594228,0.9937429,0.00008730246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.419163,0.1306209,0.0104944,0.002786252,0.1891171,0.001826903,0.0000324591,0.00008697632,0.2458719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4848397,0.0004418365,0.0001404337,0.0003377625,0.0009745456,0.00002618627,0.00000109508,0.00003601418,0.5132024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2673305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300411693","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.17.1.0088","title":"The Rhetorical Transformation of the Masses from Malthus’s “Redundant Population” into Marx’s “Industrial Reserve Army”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Population; Terminology; Meaning (existential); Rhetorical device; Politics; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Epistemology; Neoclassical economics; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Political science; Linguistics; Demography","authors":[{"name":"Ian E. J. Hill","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1058563387129551,"gpt":0.2742022453401618,"spread":0.1683459066272067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00120939,0.0001435842,0.0002784512,0.0000556624,0.001884941,0.00005748293,0.0008289996,0.00006091836,0.00008950245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002975547,0.0000683568,0.0003386292,0.00006004262,0.0003787675,0.0002153778,0.00006437785,0.0003543908,0.000003898481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005766114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000127171,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000998152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007552818,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981752,0.0003075898,0.0007614357,0.00009633778,0.0004849097,0.0001745384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970561,0.001212193,0.0008414988,0.0004980368,0.0003486894,0.00004343383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005947598,0.0001656326,0.00120893,0.00005208002,0.0004384177,1.224077e-7,0.08760606,0.0001155494,0.00009287103,0.5231709,0.3517683,0.03478637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005177151,0.0001089627,0.0009637529,0.00004162023,0.0001153734,0.000002225916,0.004709322,0.0003540167,0.00001394658,0.0118797,0.9812051,0.0000882703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4071234,0.1152701,0.01253745,0.09501491,0.2580063,0.005025957,0.0002687881,0.0002410715,0.106512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775372,0.001155933,0.00007577828,0.00007309014,0.001791573,0.00003561025,0.000005003601,0.00001878516,0.01930709],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6294368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994144,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390678812","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.26.3.0283","title":"Nietzsche’s Mad Eloquence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Aphorism; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Ethos; Style (visual arts); Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Irrationality; Literature; Confusion; Rhetorical device; Aesthetics; Linguistics; Art; Psychology; Rationality; Psychoanalysis","authors":[{"name":"Ian E. J. Hill","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1440443448849555,"gpt":0.2855232703451368,"spread":0.1414789254601813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005133183,0.00008192056,0.0001527835,0.00009408705,0.000688654,0.00002169452,0.0004051172,0.00001951011,0.0003059013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007535477,0.0000524003,0.0001694112,0.00005261456,0.0002457191,0.0001168082,0.00004693429,0.0001535285,0.000100023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002845341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000900936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003022834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002369637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999289,0.00003285168,0.0002637607,0.00006687742,0.0001991602,0.0001483502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998931,0.0003134422,0.000239172,0.0002474106,0.0002360986,0.00003291489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000185894,0.00001663385,0.00002268737,0.00001518325,0.0000654132,6.594905e-7,0.02610497,0.000009711577,0.0000397386,0.08086685,0.888959,0.003880566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001483391,0.00005375057,0.0001092089,0.00001461554,0.00003401367,0.00000605831,0.005806254,0.00008219934,0.000002944325,0.003032676,0.9906416,0.00006835486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02915799,0.2445915,0.002543434,0.02060378,0.1778574,0.001357157,0.00009284232,0.000717465,0.5230784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2616146,0.006208703,0.0001001396,0.0002136963,0.001383952,0.00005107052,0.000002556761,0.0000244063,0.7304009],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2383828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.529664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}