{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":7,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"652267a9fe47","filters":{"venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric"}},"results":[{"id":"W4210751148","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.19.3.0321","title":"Addendum: Seeking Hawthorne’s Niagara","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Addendum; Philosophy; History; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Beth L. Hewett","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05596520705454201,"gpt":0.2925316249198616,"spread":0.2365664178653196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006879508,0.0008553948,0.0004675673,0.0007102127,0.01303724,0.00756051,0.001416372,0.003828182,0.1440277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002716102,0.0004192075,0.0003453892,0.0004666579,0.001601936,0.004276689,0.005983943,0.006782597,0.0437675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00345705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005947665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02484868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1207976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992169,0.0001403782,0.00003403524,0.0001403245,0.0002916456,0.0001767107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977696,0.0001601233,0.00006775562,0.00008799693,0.0005711195,0.001343343],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007949225,0.00001692931,0.00009874707,0.00004920288,9.848073e-7,0.0003787701,0.001662075,0.000005419076,0.0001537874,0.001746012,0.9876857,0.008194434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001064387,0.00000635131,0.00008850454,0.00004533031,7.133656e-7,0.0002527637,0.001968433,0.000005524111,0.00003511846,0.0001196704,0.9974731,0.000003580515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.005442339,0.01966486,0.0004553043,0.3069701,0.268032,0.0001641958,0.0003243604,0.0004162154,0.3985306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007159287,0.004594234,0.0003336665,0.03239016,0.01359589,0.00005027809,0.00009967232,0.0002267131,0.94155],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1440277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4818206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225396521","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.25.1.0098","title":"Democracy as Fetish, by Ralph Cintron, University Park: Penn State University Press","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Hegemony; Sociology; Bureaucracy; Liberal democracy; End of history; Hegelianism; Law; Media studies; Political economy; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Kwame Dadugblor","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03523233007786373,"gpt":0.210550944554872,"spread":0.1753186144770083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001501176,0.001078082,0.0004451181,0.001093889,0.004718172,0.01034507,0.001016159,0.00501303,0.01277241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003866229,0.000800522,0.0002927481,0.002410497,0.008122998,0.01393613,0.003218888,0.008013199,0.006063028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00436966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006271697,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01605249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04023071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988387,0.0004609162,0.00005741627,0.0001834895,0.0003265746,0.0001329365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990442,0.0005398721,0.0000841232,0.00008101538,0.0001146054,0.000136204],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002129821,0.00002761086,0.0001723924,0.0001518131,0.000005085702,0.0001040851,0.005090528,0.0001145347,0.0000742961,0.2646482,0.6876748,0.0419154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004896441,0.000003036699,0.000258849,0.0002655853,0.000001463391,0.0000645598,0.001070716,0.00003237676,0.00002803036,0.02269592,0.9755701,0.000004450656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001584376,0.4317437,0.001331151,0.2478013,0.009875984,0.00002751512,0.0002051711,0.0001198313,0.3073111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.108094,0.2524588,0.001597125,0.07860848,0.01088221,0.0002317254,0.0002846739,0.0003018409,0.5475411],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01605249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04272795,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410628735","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.28.1.0105","title":"<i>The Evolution of Mathematics: A Rhetorical Approach</i>, by G. Mitchell Reyes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Art; Philosophy; Literature","authors":[{"name":"Kavi Duvvoori","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02117726509435353,"gpt":0.2508865573063019,"spread":0.2297092922119484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002745462,0.0006848866,0.0005012923,0.002253023,0.004612864,0.006374168,0.001280346,0.002888758,0.002216169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00989271,0.0003245265,0.0003387615,0.001921759,0.01301775,0.01144748,0.002260664,0.007518095,0.001186718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004094458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002548099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005416833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007354423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978532,0.001197203,0.00005765885,0.0002824602,0.0005162798,0.0000931478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939187,0.004654375,0.0003787352,0.0001480612,0.0006290246,0.0002711606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004286578,0.00002448629,0.0004634204,0.0002324615,0.00001005555,0.0002125376,0.01480343,0.000286437,0.0004702664,0.6317729,0.3221172,0.02956405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081891,0.00001424192,0.0004912601,0.0004442393,0.00000625727,0.0002685086,0.004625435,0.0003522162,0.0002725932,0.1383952,0.8550984,0.00002350137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004047562,0.1501595,0.004909335,0.7626554,0.009663137,0.00001816555,0.00004951237,0.0001071163,0.06839035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3661933,0.2146172,0.0206701,0.1838845,0.04165959,0.0002325604,0.000174629,0.0008203818,0.1717477],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02970749,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231639837","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.23.2.0121","title":"The Loudspeaker and the Little Man: Mass Media and Democratic Participation in the Federal Theatre Project’s <i>One-Third of a Nation</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Democracy; Media studies; Narrative; Rhetoric; Sociology; Mass media; Politics; Political science; Law; Literature; Art; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Jordana Cox","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1047207266849278,"gpt":0.273284003858445,"spread":0.1685632771735173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008160126,0.0005737213,0.0002860315,0.001378162,0.0272449,0.01369416,0.001438833,0.003320235,0.008286072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009197622,0.0004997291,0.000288152,0.0006902062,0.02258116,0.006305855,0.01060646,0.007261403,0.000907063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006268652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003008364,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01196628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02467355,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9890451,0.008455321,0.0001095608,0.0004554621,0.0007862672,0.001148284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896839,0.006123429,0.001064357,0.0004098279,0.0005692847,0.002149167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007206067,0.0001411349,0.002566146,0.0000901973,0.00001015449,0.0007719964,0.9039073,0.0000400292,0.0009750762,0.05087304,0.02500584,0.01554696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001619114,0.00008324894,0.003082089,0.0002695055,0.00001085713,0.0003553508,0.7707322,0.0001407711,0.0008592915,0.004022195,0.2203957,0.000032707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6397689,0.002442488,0.002749791,0.07476325,0.001666027,0.00008202472,0.00008149746,0.0001039827,0.2783421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807429,0.0003491636,0.0002738071,0.003235339,0.0002183691,0.00004902542,0.000016628,0.0000526113,0.0150621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0272449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04548246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210781667","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.22.1.0001","title":"The Fourth Master Trope, Antithesis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Trope (literature); Antithesis; Irony; Synecdoche; Metonymy; Metaphor; Theme (computing); Rhetoric; Literature; Hyperbole; Philosophy; Simile; Aesthetics; Art; Linguistics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Randy Allen Harris","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03880120831446821,"gpt":0.2738340010083725,"spread":0.2350327926939043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005363886,0.000388382,0.0006335144,0.001756321,0.002997097,0.005593629,0.0007811029,0.002767569,0.006807177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01618967,0.0003571131,0.000253851,0.0007463408,0.02684261,0.01210954,0.002789406,0.008133521,0.001085983],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002902157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002001244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001610366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001482546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995481,0.002468401,0.0001909271,0.0005119277,0.001073334,0.0002743582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870296,0.007009514,0.0009788165,0.001930807,0.002387051,0.0006643079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003286083,0.000009557305,0.0002893785,0.00005649029,0.000007236385,0.00005716577,0.003074792,0.00007675787,0.0002086642,0.9851745,0.005680785,0.005331814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003239319,0.0000423055,0.0007054952,0.0002865149,0.00001498225,0.0002608752,0.002979211,0.0008180182,0.0005282419,0.8916541,0.1026573,0.00002060716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07703444,0.01421612,0.09654714,0.1838242,0.00693724,0.00009631329,0.0002920899,0.0004008361,0.6206517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642967,0.001867763,0.006907443,0.006512572,0.002005788,0.00005440186,0.0000596605,0.000140045,0.01815558],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006807177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02836728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300411693","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.17.1.0088","title":"The Rhetorical Transformation of the Masses from Malthus’s “Redundant Population” into Marx’s “Industrial Reserve Army”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Population; Terminology; Meaning (existential); Rhetorical device; Politics; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Epistemology; Neoclassical economics; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Political science; Linguistics; Demography","authors":[{"name":"Ian E. J. Hill","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1058563387129551,"gpt":0.2742022453401618,"spread":0.1683459066272067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00924395,0.0004777978,0.000425214,0.002525436,0.005078251,0.006209296,0.000977647,0.001984358,0.003502125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0166377,0.0002587548,0.0002723693,0.001382324,0.03729352,0.0102478,0.004673766,0.004295422,0.000568761],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006649344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002277719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001994109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001066583,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903337,0.007443176,0.0001601172,0.0003940276,0.0013483,0.0003206564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916838,0.006176029,0.000474526,0.0007515553,0.0007487059,0.0001653538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001410159,0.000005423532,0.00004366381,0.00002345779,0.000001425073,0.00004215864,0.02016755,0.00006396662,0.0002306934,0.9746624,0.001355825,0.003389326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003642141,0.00007676413,0.0004160692,0.0003564847,0.00001824277,0.0002638914,0.02395355,0.001538936,0.002049183,0.6898295,0.2814254,0.00003562137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1520531,0.006723457,0.08482505,0.1003926,0.002779392,0.0001537335,0.000116095,0.0002971713,0.6526594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871827,0.0005312533,0.003139091,0.001608754,0.000363971,0.00004422168,0.00001565024,0.0000707172,0.007043717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00924395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04888725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390678812","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.26.3.0283","title":"Nietzsche’s Mad Eloquence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Aphorism; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Ethos; Style (visual arts); Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Irrationality; Literature; Confusion; Rhetorical device; Aesthetics; Linguistics; Art; Psychology; Rationality; Psychoanalysis","authors":[{"name":"Ian E. J. Hill","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1440443448849555,"gpt":0.2855232703451368,"spread":0.1414789254601813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005310489,0.0003910629,0.0003100448,0.00169228,0.004314792,0.006229538,0.0007323331,0.002531238,0.002738291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01276986,0.0002187402,0.0002068885,0.000537261,0.02510383,0.006772833,0.00371095,0.004277951,0.0006739393],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004353696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001774147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002223184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00246846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937658,0.003872073,0.0001375783,0.0005630347,0.001349963,0.0003115825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940073,0.004513522,0.0002884072,0.0004171866,0.0006458029,0.0001276859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008359631,0.000003150999,0.00006313091,0.00001569277,0.000001679885,0.00004498512,0.005512952,0.00004353962,0.0001081083,0.9898084,0.002038013,0.002352027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001960423,0.00002618507,0.0002233264,0.0002351712,0.00001315457,0.000290411,0.005839674,0.0007056111,0.001522033,0.5678216,0.4232708,0.00003238238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06320347,0.008288428,0.02973012,0.1105021,0.002493289,0.00005253163,0.000077973,0.0001916164,0.7854605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631804,0.001032696,0.002566376,0.003728275,0.0004498328,0.00003065676,0.00001509816,0.00005802118,0.02893861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006229538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03158849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}