{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":68,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":68,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"aaac0c7e56e5","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics"}},"results":[{"id":"W4290975602","doi":"10.1007/s10805-022-09455-3","title":"Ethical Issues in Research: Perceptions of Researchers, Research Ethics Board Members and Research Ethics Experts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","keywords":"Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9246870940716804,"gpt":0.7868419606354342,"spread":0.1378451334362462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","open_science","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8477365,0.0009124562,0.004881968,0.009192936,0.01161545,0.0001489635,0.00692209,0.05245612,0.003687086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8893743,0.0007813775,0.0008073516,0.009587964,0.0198485,0.0008156273,0.008592446,0.8326184,0.0001670632],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006479172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09121796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004427989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001810523,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1976531,0.7289366,0.01159964,0.002379536,0.05351712,0.005914001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1590974,0.8101343,0.003313527,0.002366256,0.02279031,0.002298213],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007246225,0.0004650058,0.0002436572,0.1217581,0.0004766207,0.0007945314,0.49806,0.000006040378,0.00003754271,0.1158802,0.2252368,0.03631688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006532902,0.0007269928,0.00001463155,0.06665161,0.0001369135,0.0001285954,0.1568125,0.000009607706,0.000001117602,0.06387389,0.7105898,0.0004010683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001474572,0.7405572,0.00001592783,0.2481782,0.001406014,0.002450345,0.00006990905,0.0000354658,0.00713951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002235354,0.9860054,0.002122051,0.003319511,0.003202002,0.0006287943,0.00003109736,0.0003698872,0.004097722],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7801623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013202718","doi":"10.1007/s10805-020-09363-4","title":"The Paradox of Faculty Attitudes toward Student Violations of Academic Integrity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Assiniboine Community College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Academic integrity; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Medical education; Dishonesty; Cheating; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2376150711559044,"gpt":0.4779997630386497,"spread":0.2403846918827453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01383504,0.0001624992,0.0005008241,0.000079063,0.0004999166,0.00002221212,0.0017625,0.002873051,0.00004289726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01771754,0.0001116081,0.0002891229,0.0004830364,0.001136555,0.0004267396,0.0001573242,0.03214277,0.00000786966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001292576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001680428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002719165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005931436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946056,0.001211569,0.001608523,0.0001619202,0.002068571,0.0003437915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920526,0.004557796,0.001808249,0.0001150103,0.001184637,0.0002817477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002949778,0.00008770444,0.1998421,0.0002083697,0.0004076288,0.000006968275,0.4819394,0.0002782512,0.004843006,0.2880574,0.01997204,0.004062162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002229536,0.001042765,0.121256,0.002523121,0.000826569,0.0000589702,0.2629843,0.000446134,0.01175544,0.138855,0.4570153,0.00100685],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6756201,0.006064434,0.004148555,0.3099207,0.001086334,0.0003882164,0.00007756685,0.00003312869,0.00266098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972701,0.02394647,0.0006345583,0.001690891,0.0009159562,0.000001528863,0.000001760048,0.00001004545,0.00009781657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4370432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788131552","doi":"10.1007/s10805-018-9302-9","title":"Discrepancy between Learning and Practicing Digital Citizenship","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Etiquette; Citizenship; Digital literacy; Curriculum; Psychology; Public relations; The Internet; Digital society; Political science; Pedagogy; Medical education; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Medicine; Law; Politics; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1347514501462544,"gpt":0.4652468865616928,"spread":0.3304954364154383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002674065,0.00007097456,0.0001859737,0.00007001226,0.0006234465,0.00009478234,0.0001625915,0.0005352721,0.00001945426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03033093,0.00006382898,0.00005272838,0.0001539199,0.0008057316,0.0003891028,0.00003968644,0.003873699,0.000009945044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006738583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000551072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005427394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000102513,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982611,0.0004002999,0.0003562193,0.00007567542,0.0006270914,0.0002796006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939691,0.004894004,0.0004680835,0.00003261383,0.0003766504,0.0002595646],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000152718,0.000004528563,0.7158169,0.00001818228,0.00006016683,0.00001038886,0.2408992,1.242657e-7,0.0001143385,0.03312561,0.0007575299,0.009177738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000710691,0.0005627506,0.02188296,0.0006426547,0.0002439891,0.00006718728,0.1835769,0.000004481164,0.0006535393,0.284014,0.507234,0.0004067932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.96139,0.0003722234,0.0002359764,0.02276048,0.0006452965,0.00004594537,0.000002010422,0.00002020018,0.01452784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899402,0.001140719,0.0002942568,0.0003956866,0.007748587,2.12946e-7,3.471531e-7,0.000009987221,0.0004699469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6939339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984244,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333304710","doi":"10.1007/s10805-016-9257-7","title":"Ethics in Community-University-Artist Partnered Research: Tensions, Contradictions and Gaps Identified in an ‘Arts for Social Change’ Project","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"The arts; Sociology; General partnership; Public relations; Participatory action research; Community engagement; Reflective practice; Pedagogy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.958899942375165,"gpt":0.7455696377607194,"spread":0.2133303046144456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1176682,0.0001007239,0.0003246095,0.0008188805,0.002201288,0.00006228804,0.0005974857,0.001097678,0.000007126674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05882864,0.00008585482,0.00006731469,0.0008032582,0.002014733,0.00108567,0.0001495414,0.01125107,0.000001467691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005347755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002428137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001562594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02444529,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9713712,0.02576564,0.00056166,0.0001762264,0.001355348,0.0007699562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975254,0.02285774,0.0002726084,0.0001373009,0.001176047,0.0003023235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009507698,0.0003652079,0.03265447,0.0001506663,0.00004243281,0.00008784319,0.7995937,0.000001104161,0.0200813,0.1311121,0.002682046,0.01227828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007727095,0.001610296,0.1585857,0.002790976,0.00008629533,0.00002719052,0.3656976,0.0001961875,0.001090607,0.1425283,0.3190063,0.0006534578],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9260105,0.0003006661,0.0003683258,0.07206041,0.0002171614,0.0006809512,0.00002835977,0.00001678586,0.0003167917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935514,0.004521107,0.0006323486,0.0004693228,0.0004643358,0.00001576951,9.52449e-7,0.00001530114,0.0003294894],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4338962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971358034","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9085-0","title":"Confronting Condescending Ethics: How Community-Based Research Challenges Traditional Approaches to Consent, Confidentiality, and Capacity","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Women's Health Research Institute; British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women's Health; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Cognitive reframing; Informed consent; Research ethics; Constructive; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Psychology; Process (computing); Law; Social psychology; Medicine; Engineering; Computer science; Alternative medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9907431019658851,"gpt":0.7288981110496008,"spread":0.2618449909162843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1302273,0.0001811329,0.0004859543,0.0006431789,0.003653445,0.00006358907,0.0007084738,0.001191388,0.00004730119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04676482,0.0001700484,0.00006793312,0.0004017964,0.0008460443,0.0004605691,0.000126767,0.03859473,0.00001106197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004233035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004974934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001794978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000346779,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9714038,0.02376952,0.001447611,0.0002399403,0.002234071,0.000905065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9317977,0.06459743,0.001069077,0.0002586801,0.001527282,0.0007498369],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001779977,0.00009932539,0.005598517,0.002261211,0.00004915143,0.00001002585,0.646266,0.00004163794,0.005121539,0.3157143,0.02367839,0.0009818607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006816581,0.002110265,0.06035448,0.008199132,0.0001027773,0.0002518734,0.4912283,0.0004919978,0.00192801,0.2186568,0.2089122,0.0009476971],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3114321,0.0002480081,0.003857299,0.6821665,0.0004133213,0.0005537906,0.00005248774,0.00002497958,0.001251579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9292447,0.0008552565,0.005036174,0.06402371,0.000712053,0.00001300594,0.000003474541,0.00001497328,0.00009662961],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6181427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976436,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2094641390","doi":"10.1007/s10805-012-9172-5","title":"Defending Research Confidentiality “To the Extent the Law Allows:” Lessons From the Boston College Subpoenas","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Law; Pledge; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3607289776047449,"gpt":0.5384027022675052,"spread":0.1776737246627603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03609541,0.0001463871,0.0002364271,0.00007174282,0.001590935,0.00005905506,0.001294739,0.0006430303,0.0003612396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001929277,0.0000687975,0.0001611799,0.0003833021,0.0004571613,0.0001897505,0.0001342778,0.01177056,0.0002204653],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001350325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000375367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003399794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003713923,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992273,0.004526161,0.0008654356,0.0001774016,0.001412339,0.0007456804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880086,0.01012645,0.0004795624,0.0005466447,0.0004950459,0.0003436875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002654323,0.00007228629,0.00755946,0.00001340737,0.0001467156,0.000005845478,0.1901607,0.00001291447,0.0003420166,0.5817119,0.2192348,0.0004744138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006142454,0.0001215137,0.117072,0.000145332,0.0001094563,0.00018247,0.05681574,0.000009064152,0.0002620652,0.01591426,0.8086226,0.0001312928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5594077,0.009814395,0.0004994003,0.4230628,0.003414016,0.0005235996,0.00007069776,0.0000116232,0.0031957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749103,0.00129784,0.00005572541,0.01954126,0.003520974,0.00002050454,0.000002804972,0.00002144355,0.0006291057],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5893878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093519592","doi":"10.1007/s10805-011-9141-4","title":"Encouraging Active Classroom Discussion of Academic Integrity and Misconduct in Higher Education Business Contexts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Misconduct; Academic integrity; Psychology; Scientific misconduct; Perception; Presentation (obstetrics); Psychological intervention; Higher education; Medical education; Social psychology; Medicine; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1604399279181177,"gpt":0.4030493709071121,"spread":0.2426094429889945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008472675,0.000170502,0.0004272918,0.0003331228,0.0002049133,0.00001291549,0.0005812534,0.003524517,0.0001638216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004963063,0.0001188843,0.00007904107,0.0004917522,0.0007177406,0.001218828,0.00007966121,0.02886584,0.000002717591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000248996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002702763,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001739613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001886144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966497,0.001079943,0.0009628001,0.0001955244,0.0007938201,0.0003181912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996547,0.001130201,0.001172034,0.00009339275,0.0008563426,0.0002009882],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007034236,0.0002404367,0.1302606,0.0002967955,0.0001038337,0.00001734946,0.581311,0.000005225525,0.01338502,0.2010677,0.005134736,0.06747391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001498328,0.0001743332,0.301804,0.006226531,0.0002145153,0.0001095127,0.1363999,0.00002030044,0.007419113,0.4905998,0.05480848,0.0007251388],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9055707,0.003204865,0.0002096716,0.07848394,0.002374035,0.0002369493,0.000008341252,0.00001520446,0.009896227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873978,0.009043866,0.0006018322,0.001072511,0.0007342706,0.000002141809,0.000001281803,0.0000123564,0.001133928],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.444911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972427259","doi":"10.1023/b:jaet.0000006893.06303.41","title":"The “Ethical” Professor and the Undergraduate Student: Current Perceptions of Moral Behavior among Business School Faculty","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Division of Materials Research; Niagara University","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Accreditation; Social psychology; Business ethics; Higher education; Medical education; Public relations; Political science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3281117012425074,"gpt":0.52354572248922,"spread":0.1954340212467127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03804873,0.0001664544,0.0003941566,0.0001650262,0.00103743,0.0002580899,0.001219539,0.0007578685,0.00002823698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06479849,0.00007534515,0.0001623831,0.0009258903,0.00223313,0.0004741066,0.0001599441,0.01118209,0.00000922066],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006993275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001320271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002153128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005674776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926165,0.002106985,0.001688038,0.0002239983,0.003105047,0.0002593957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979514,0.01267957,0.001936431,0.0004365765,0.005254142,0.0001792921],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001364045,0.0002012036,0.5778459,0.00007391907,0.00007044832,0.000002511711,0.02213226,0.0002888316,0.0002220515,0.3840868,0.008694932,0.006244688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007897347,0.00002423229,0.6542631,0.0002489527,0.0001328426,0.00005007132,0.01375396,0.0000360313,0.00003286775,0.3271193,0.003439238,0.0001097224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8528997,0.001965829,0.001463411,0.1408608,0.002356976,0.0002946015,0.000006070695,0.000005404819,0.0001472167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874779,0.01096731,0.0002737443,0.000501247,0.0002472197,0.00001672258,7.86238e-7,0.00001190881,0.0005031454],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1403596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163402237","doi":"10.1007/s10805-021-09412-6","title":"Academic Integrity Education Across the Canadian Higher Education Landscape","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Higher education; Medical education; Political science; Library science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09033786103858327,"gpt":0.4372861451135481,"spread":0.3469482840749649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01345602,0.0001484253,0.0002348651,0.0001199313,0.00166255,0.0001268262,0.00100469,0.004700847,0.000519234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008665985,0.000113552,0.0001496561,0.0006263957,0.0004617654,0.0006276045,0.00005704608,0.04341111,0.00005747285],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007486491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04658421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05849984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1147936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960406,0.00143689,0.0007005018,0.0001817756,0.001133449,0.0005067996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995152,0.001525295,0.0006215762,0.0001764719,0.002033613,0.0004910648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002472701,0.00005531366,0.02995764,0.00004173891,0.00006332437,0.000008067079,0.1256217,0.0000116179,0.0002429877,0.4854296,0.3352421,0.02330122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009411677,0.00001164893,0.009051465,0.0002628099,0.00004534026,0.000092772,0.03496286,0.000003776279,0.0001404673,0.075785,0.8794061,0.000143631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1664762,0.01610968,0.00006087816,0.7475246,0.0113733,0.000195629,0.00001951769,0.00002562402,0.0582146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9238009,0.01257873,0.0004147039,0.0361876,0.007568258,0.000005588589,0.000011764,0.00001730954,0.01941518],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7573247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001267417","doi":"10.1007/s10805-013-9182-y","title":"The Ethics of Ethics Reviews in Global Health Research: Case Studies Applying a New Paradigm","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Global Health and Surgery","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficence; Research ethics; Capacity building; General partnership; Public relations; Global health; Dignity; Accountability; Engineering ethics; Political science; Ethical code; Community-based participatory research; Sociology; Public health; Participatory action research; Medicine; Nursing; Autonomy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.598888911851605,"gpt":0.6006446405847162,"spread":0.00175572873311125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1130841,0.0002225427,0.001239625,0.0002282427,0.0006492371,0.00002355106,0.0003859087,0.001664257,0.000008332706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1089398,0.0001372002,0.0002453015,0.001123662,0.0007579632,0.000210085,0.0001494554,0.03959907,0.00002196783],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009014924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01346226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001691708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007686205,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9871277,0.00584286,0.003193806,0.0002435389,0.002498709,0.001093342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9579605,0.03470515,0.002313147,0.0005866396,0.002967734,0.001466832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00160192,0.0003623351,0.04535433,0.01822846,0.0005077171,0.00318654,0.1445823,0.00008390058,0.0001393324,0.09343278,0.4906868,0.2018336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003248153,0.00191036,0.005945836,0.02458958,0.000137661,0.02415159,0.03936809,0.0001356109,0.00004351524,0.2384305,0.6616452,0.0003938811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0706009,0.3066531,0.000204109,0.6199484,0.0009398297,0.001382331,0.000005339974,0.00001153938,0.0002545468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2598118,0.7013242,0.001862295,0.03585456,0.0008979465,0.00002609583,0.000001023413,0.00002292473,0.0001991745],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5840938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996318,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989859002","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9082-3","title":"Moving Toward Evidence-Based Human Participant Protection","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Participant observation; Human research; Corporate governance; Human rights; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Business; Law; Social science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8824121199937545,"gpt":0.6554673319314336,"spread":0.2269447880623209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03617718,0.0001414215,0.0004655789,0.0002595161,0.0001957025,0.0000308423,0.0003915796,0.001983106,0.00008367525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1370164,0.00009674376,0.0002560742,0.0002493971,0.0002721422,0.0003045365,0.00005101489,0.03383434,0.00002326607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002527137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002505386,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001487296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005305685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944423,0.0005239276,0.001399747,0.0002138768,0.002978213,0.0004419349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870803,0.009378493,0.0005483528,0.0002958329,0.002238237,0.0004587559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001865639,0.0003968875,0.005070832,0.001642223,0.0001546081,0.0003913541,0.007066828,0.0005977863,0.9557911,0.01631406,0.0007481323,0.009960585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005366184,0.01646386,0.04384734,0.0404327,0.0008991412,0.0007543728,0.001511056,0.001811781,0.3882815,0.4958969,0.004087949,0.000647186],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.620334,0.001775438,0.005601816,0.3712466,0.0002990545,0.0003670511,4.550594e-7,0.00003999706,0.0003355083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842483,0.003021848,0.001525168,0.009718467,0.001130305,0.000003411507,4.001209e-7,0.00001707524,0.0003350289],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5675095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993125,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967722566","doi":"10.1007/s10805-019-09340-6","title":"Plagiarism Intervention Using a Game-Based Tutorial in an Online Distance Education Course","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Educational Games and Gamification","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"Korea Institute of Energy Research","keywords":"Mathematics education; Game Developer; Psychology; Significant difference; Intervention (counseling); Computer science; Multimedia; Game design; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1175963886097987,"gpt":0.4790997388643708,"spread":0.361503350254572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002290647,0.0001039845,0.0001893139,0.0001966982,0.00002439937,0.00002096757,0.0002609512,0.0007024616,0.0001654088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003153117,0.0001016787,0.00008863943,0.0002097725,0.00005312207,0.0003182474,0.000009461479,0.003553842,0.00001701269],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000239757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001006888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007315668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003817738,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981317,0.0004197836,0.0007549305,0.0001678298,0.0003721736,0.000153571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980308,0.000347144,0.0008848261,0.0001895227,0.0004606395,0.0000870969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002586787,0.009295627,0.7021155,0.0004458401,0.0001716838,0.0000138096,0.06572813,0.009187279,0.01995934,0.1239498,0.003968015,0.06257814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005092376,0.000949555,0.8922944,0.002427601,0.0001850374,0.0001506314,0.02214158,0.007277788,0.0002461213,0.01664856,0.05201985,0.000566473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840257,0.001182994,0.00309497,0.004768163,0.006674553,0.0001490215,0.000008322826,0.000006902494,0.00008940751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953969,0.00005887268,0.001483008,0.0008783454,0.00169913,0.000003006634,0.00003561549,0.00001738864,0.0004277831],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1901789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998745,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2009566815","doi":"10.1007/s10805-010-9113-0","title":"Going Boldly Where No One Has Gone Before? How Confidentiality Risk Aversion is Killing Research on Sensitive Topics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Harm; Statute; Agency (philosophy); Legislature; Political science; Law; Doctrine; Business; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.526142216288434,"gpt":0.5798356312565092,"spread":0.05369341496807511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07192368,0.0002455446,0.0007537523,0.0004731294,0.0007674504,0.0001524531,0.0006956562,0.004831919,0.0002083707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1555331,0.0002064586,0.0003767062,0.0004972917,0.001668098,0.0003109571,0.0003949461,0.123526,0.0002094408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003517062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003478031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001803405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004118919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9889846,0.001559088,0.001270856,0.0005076815,0.0068941,0.0007836062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9421991,0.04255041,0.0011516,0.0008302754,0.01231968,0.0009489288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01576878,0.002626227,0.1225196,0.009329027,0.003335729,0.002578517,0.09325926,0.00007761402,0.5065747,0.1064815,0.1073305,0.03011858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01560156,0.01493818,0.04436079,0.03354474,0.001391803,0.001301336,0.01544429,0.003665827,0.2224172,0.3379115,0.3078056,0.001617063],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7339972,0.0002565603,0.0007285072,0.2610225,0.001542179,0.0003440022,0.00002221684,0.00002452235,0.002062354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9543232,0.02164426,0.005434809,0.004202065,0.006106443,0.000001836893,0.000003676897,0.00006209274,0.00822161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2841575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99646,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2478381396","doi":"10.1007/s10805-016-9263-9","title":"Ethical Evaluations of Business Students in an Emerging Market: Effects of Ethical Sensitivity, Cultural Values, Personality, and Religiosity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Psychology; Personality; Social psychology; Cultural sensitivity; Ethical values; Business ethics; Sensitivity (control systems); Sociology; Political science; Social science; Public relations; Psychotherapist","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2685298681223711,"gpt":0.5349892805494001,"spread":0.266459412427029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07603071,0.0001795334,0.0006642433,0.0004681282,0.0001660657,0.00006526343,0.0007262903,0.002325224,0.00002704031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1542594,0.0001101933,0.0001244455,0.0009792008,0.000966364,0.0006713426,0.0003174282,0.007879044,0.00000160027],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001130582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001027818,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001077344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001340723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9869916,0.005221283,0.001915131,0.0003659983,0.005241656,0.0002643108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9510185,0.03974395,0.001692726,0.0003453029,0.006997901,0.0002016931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004644629,0.0003887443,0.8517657,0.0006542779,0.00008460233,0.00002489309,0.04438661,0.000253089,0.07801025,0.01330558,0.002682184,0.007979657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008637691,0.0001128746,0.8658191,0.002046205,0.00007206827,0.00008706215,0.001313577,0.0002072504,0.001967533,0.127299,0.00006474746,0.0001467605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9159638,0.0004731082,0.002882638,0.07973226,0.0007624265,0.0001265226,0.000005499728,0.000004581682,0.00004911901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943072,0.003173144,0.001027507,0.001173283,0.0002557616,0.000001445817,5.523593e-7,0.00001143666,0.000049713],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1139935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022237381","doi":"10.1007/s10805-020-09367-0","title":"An Institutional Self-Study of Text-Matching Software in a Canadian Graduate-Level Engineering Program","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Academic integrity; Similarity (geometry); Plagiarism detection; Matching (statistics); Psychology; Institutional review board; Set (abstract data type); Misconduct; License; Rubric; Medical education; Graduate students; Psychological intervention; Empirical research; Computer science; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Medicine; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Social psychology; Image (mathematics); Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1450758898708603,"gpt":0.3912096063939756,"spread":0.2461337165231153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006934199,0.0001206525,0.0002927055,0.000246858,0.0002794469,0.00002952909,0.000674111,0.001369935,0.00001341739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006403225,0.0001170643,0.00006531137,0.0005392159,0.0001164495,0.000608221,0.00002896048,0.01414094,0.00000259613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003449655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004172875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1202332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09029874,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972917,0.0004253525,0.0007310974,0.0001372627,0.001029584,0.0003849748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980358,0.0005941106,0.0003595858,0.00005705214,0.0003717353,0.0005816637],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005293333,0.0002568059,0.08277044,0.0001601666,0.0001067194,0.0001407904,0.8794557,0.009562554,0.0001890503,0.02329481,0.0003276871,0.003682286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007908378,0.005237187,0.2159992,0.004761823,0.0006331152,0.0004046143,0.5380738,0.02376679,0.0004734706,0.03876712,0.1608298,0.003144687],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852236,0.0001454374,0.0009153354,0.01290744,0.0002592561,0.0002943309,0.00001237898,0.000041903,0.0002003258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991474,0.0002811564,0.006625694,0.001025921,0.0005748562,0.000002976526,0.000001452411,0.00001001433,0.000003973787],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3413819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067197983","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9007-3","title":"Practicing What We Teach – Ethical Considerations for Business Schools","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Cynicism; Public relations; Philosophy of business; Business ethics; Product (mathematics); Business analysis; Business; Business relationship management; New business development; Political science; Business model; Marketing; Electronic business; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5226695605924452,"gpt":0.5427723460260362,"spread":0.02010278543359101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04411781,0.0001720527,0.0004389687,0.0004747341,0.000694097,0.0009732771,0.0006965437,0.002061419,0.0001551797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3620321,0.0001264484,0.0001711026,0.0007367773,0.0002401964,0.003764962,0.00008588527,0.01544424,0.00006379846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001609468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004014771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005556949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003336864,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939709,0.0007665353,0.002019251,0.0003065842,0.00261976,0.0003170154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9167449,0.06970704,0.002181841,0.0004065292,0.01070871,0.0002508997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003109512,0.000315757,0.002982852,0.0002260778,0.0001560417,0.00001639928,0.05713351,0.01936022,0.01046199,0.3819063,0.4344842,0.09264573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005914744,0.00005785669,0.001357395,0.0008713188,0.00007884722,0.0004972293,0.0130297,0.0009164559,0.001110354,0.7627034,0.2185605,0.0002254377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03060671,0.002797274,0.05663005,0.9061675,0.003391456,0.0001858648,0.000003545574,0.00001514426,0.0002024805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8784698,0.01562381,0.07315157,0.02719814,0.004815232,0.00001040074,0.000001475441,0.00002988094,0.000699716],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8789694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991962083","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9010-8","title":"Academic Citizenship: An Academic Colleagues’ Working Paper","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Higher Education Practises and Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; Royal Military College of Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Abdication; Citizenship; Welfare; Corporate governance; Public relations; Political science; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Public administration; Management; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1776183817983223,"gpt":0.4453856118859089,"spread":0.2677672300875865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0160812,0.0002072554,0.0003520329,0.0002606961,0.001100289,0.00008385331,0.001030038,0.002003655,0.0004427508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002935513,0.0001956036,0.0001610621,0.0006417659,0.000397006,0.001060207,0.000069202,0.01716946,0.00005727232],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000443606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001570049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002796365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009693109,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943411,0.001711561,0.001322852,0.0002584691,0.001743227,0.0006227687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995366,0.002303972,0.001266325,0.0001829,0.0004679743,0.0004127671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002210281,0.0001426596,0.09003327,0.00006848333,0.0001848634,0.0000637446,0.1270794,0.001010624,0.009687927,0.4083949,0.3478888,0.01522431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005577993,0.00007970858,0.014003,0.0003523488,0.0001132499,0.00004345943,0.01629074,0.00001022498,0.0002172549,0.08135866,0.886622,0.0003516203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7671277,0.01077167,0.0006307302,0.166066,0.00606328,0.0004162039,0.000007770576,0.0001506299,0.04876599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587249,0.02002509,0.001056052,0.00624216,0.008096176,0.000005354464,0.000003747912,0.00003788494,0.005808637],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5387331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048339357","doi":"10.1007/s10805-005-9005-x","title":"How research ethics boards are undermining survey research on Canadian university students","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Survey Methodology and Nonresponse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Research ethics; Compromise; Survey research; Quality (philosophy); Research integrity; Medical education; Public relations; Scientific misconduct; Psychology; Sample (material); Political science; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Law; Applied psychology; Engineering; Alternative medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8855140124169397,"gpt":0.668081444994438,"spread":0.2174325674225017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6459479,0.0001237525,0.0003146868,0.001438416,0.00366375,0.0001429259,0.001983001,0.003022565,0.00005082443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3759445,0.000124311,0.0000944907,0.001783195,0.001965753,0.0004657432,0.0001740616,0.04050153,0.00003693371],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002040578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01674268,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05563579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6647768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7107214,0.2803045,0.0004932722,0.0003812658,0.006671724,0.001427855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8075981,0.186693,0.0002962343,0.00022748,0.004325848,0.0008593716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007937573,0.0002012767,0.6092721,0.00005064505,0.0002595242,0.00092819,0.2790636,0.0001858585,0.0001830927,0.02987945,0.06770309,0.004335628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005927673,0.0002696595,0.4993421,0.00032842,0.00001365435,0.00001645897,0.1246892,0.000004697342,0.0001194285,0.002625394,0.3718011,0.0001972211],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7703935,0.0003804741,0.00006469748,0.225567,0.0006180959,0.0001373969,0.00002105618,0.00001137991,0.002806373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829466,0.005332919,0.0005256193,0.001444427,0.0009956511,3.630586e-7,0.000001286674,0.00001733165,0.008735857],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.609141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004180286","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9083-2","title":"The Ethics of Conducting Community-Engaged Homelessness Research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Health Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Viewpoints; Research ethics; Ethical issues; Negotiation; Public relations; Informed consent; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6597622844542826,"gpt":0.6201695496986037,"spread":0.03959273475567893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2531332,0.0001496877,0.0007563399,0.0002122549,0.01590418,0.00002316723,0.001360882,0.002368462,0.00002164353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1048742,0.00009950571,0.0001469473,0.000683045,0.0007553032,0.0002698371,0.0001971484,0.2138031,0.00001087516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001943721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002469199,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003174843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006376765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9054706,0.08982055,0.001880461,0.0001087466,0.00199505,0.0007246436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8644831,0.1291774,0.001405762,0.0003509032,0.004404952,0.0001778542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001327547,0.00006315733,0.004995611,0.0003935214,0.00005136273,0.000009082649,0.9408712,0.00001191165,0.004379974,0.04443535,0.0002920775,0.004364043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005628698,0.0002371727,0.004592622,0.001478381,0.00002666931,0.000002475757,0.916862,0.000007392304,0.001118186,0.06788302,0.007120695,0.0001084994],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9585781,0.003279769,0.0001081714,0.03475939,0.0009600573,0.0002403363,0.000004360556,0.0000186348,0.002051135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984524,0.01340812,0.0001382546,0.0006845089,0.0009820941,0.000003492021,0.000001088605,0.00002284767,0.0002356551],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2114346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070641505","doi":"10.1007/s10805-010-9123-y","title":"Ethical Dilemmas in Community-Based Research: Working with Vulnerable Youth in Rural Communities","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Rural community; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Socioeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6427163859664523,"gpt":0.5597398828057365,"spread":0.08297650316071581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1042265,0.0002025593,0.0005801974,0.001119795,0.002987897,0.00002247525,0.001338165,0.002773572,0.00009545834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007948261,0.0001610842,0.00005308942,0.001027067,0.0006444725,0.0001855008,0.0004365822,0.297411,0.00001265542],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005090982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006684134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009188791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07744613,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9681067,0.02763601,0.001756215,0.00007104959,0.001375421,0.001054531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9561055,0.04133902,0.0006290131,0.0005689574,0.0009749477,0.000382507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001074985,0.0001779372,0.527147,0.0006376717,0.00001185038,0.00002374392,0.4648879,0.0001562347,0.0001316301,0.004092971,0.0007238083,0.0009343477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006449609,0.0006400648,0.07021845,0.01652571,0.00001963132,0.00002938321,0.8592545,0.0002349364,0.00006404557,0.01747247,0.02867531,0.0004158381],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9464834,0.0001643511,0.00005630578,0.04978596,0.0005232311,0.0004231584,0.00000406259,0.00002105956,0.002538471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807359,0.0006304881,0.001847905,0.01640821,0.0002370905,0.00002581765,0.00001452592,0.00003295706,0.00006707743],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4569285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087938750","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9017-1","title":"Oral History and Ethical Practice: Towards Effective Policies and Procedures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Informed consent; Oral history; Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Law; Alternative medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05827586340143535,"gpt":0.3484229942201846,"spread":0.2901471308187493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002722205,0.0001876003,0.0004162906,0.0002842765,0.0003147033,0.00005456581,0.0001501295,0.0006334963,0.0001014579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004019548,0.0001468545,0.0001034276,0.00004737999,0.001490787,0.0004835195,0.00004700123,0.00622132,0.000003835165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003490099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005186332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005833131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006172677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997924,0.0005440601,0.0005467412,0.0001687495,0.0006138755,0.0002025522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971141,0.001156615,0.0007056118,0.00008036326,0.0008261985,0.0001170648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004980326,0.0001203085,0.001250815,0.0005072571,0.0003989782,0.00008840536,0.4088887,0.00002094979,0.002489105,0.3469797,0.2348866,0.003871049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006354944,0.0004915143,0.002094558,0.0001900246,0.0004588297,0.0002377032,0.01489771,0.00002504241,0.0002073037,0.01398787,0.966501,0.0002729517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6269408,0.1200733,0.0001656462,0.187738,0.002217943,0.0005480915,0.00002369424,0.0000940659,0.06219833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838311,0.002244225,0.000356573,0.007663366,0.001963489,0.000004055836,0.000001150146,0.00002587876,0.003910148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7316144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960713,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048315736","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9011-7","title":"Grey Matter: Ambiguities and Complexities of Ethics in Research","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Research ethics; Confusion; Anonymity; Engineering ethics; Value (mathematics); Informed consent; Ethical issues; Sociology; Qualitative research; Psychology; Population; Epistemology; Political science; Social science; Medicine; Law; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Engineering; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3892142001725453,"gpt":0.5230702184353923,"spread":0.1338560182628469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0139868,0.0000937222,0.0004358038,0.0004661335,0.00008669752,0.00001826301,0.0001558761,0.0006670987,0.0001016092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003377894,0.00007601569,0.00006811534,0.0002576914,0.000695869,0.0001508451,0.00006229067,0.009818082,0.000003377944],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009197419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001871591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009687548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006899093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966918,0.0006804758,0.0009798431,0.0001060119,0.001225647,0.0003162884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952529,0.003077901,0.0003297296,0.0001261306,0.001018846,0.0001944673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001190146,0.0004909181,0.5429748,0.008958266,0.0001205213,0.0002499148,0.0345108,0.00008376865,0.001438888,0.3543364,0.05201034,0.003635255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003514587,0.001108798,0.6490864,0.005519333,0.00009517714,0.0008317906,0.02371966,0.0001620253,0.0004169842,0.2717013,0.04361203,0.0002319066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8741795,0.004530362,0.00005478201,0.1110124,0.0001542622,0.000128535,0.00001306305,0.000005016637,0.009922069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911637,0.003627456,0.0006618704,0.003355158,0.0005368162,0.000001032763,0.000002896473,0.00001498226,0.0006360959],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1169841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013869192","doi":"10.1007/s10805-004-4306-z","title":"Perceptions of Ethical Behaviour among Business Faculty in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Sample (material); Social psychology; Business ethics; Medical education; Public relations; Political science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3023876591968305,"gpt":0.479361925312585,"spread":0.1769742661157545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01373527,0.0001284964,0.000421976,0.0003976618,0.000131132,0.00003974467,0.001005427,0.0012438,0.00009613164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03677164,0.00009596937,0.00009643879,0.00145612,0.0003510866,0.0004338919,0.00008978321,0.01136605,0.00000490914],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006803517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01604864,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3643101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6618616,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941939,0.0003461131,0.001852696,0.0001984695,0.003172563,0.0002362421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904951,0.003649906,0.001291031,0.0002583643,0.004134951,0.0001706434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002936236,0.00007367157,0.9555421,0.0000384449,0.00001045645,0.00002513495,0.01268502,0.02061458,0.0009485441,0.00694259,0.002088684,0.001001448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003489802,0.00001899197,0.9177205,0.0003797516,0.00001748028,0.00006150488,0.00967411,0.00002586559,0.0002522776,0.07109367,0.000300981,0.0001058613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9272267,0.0001053469,0.001999262,0.0693133,0.001156749,0.00005293107,0.00001233486,0.000002440274,0.0001309133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965199,0.0006016282,0.001298257,0.00128647,0.0002141394,0.000001234555,0.00000213518,0.000009676424,0.00006660492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2975515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996950681","doi":"10.1007/s10805-008-9058-8","title":"A Troubled Dance: Doing the Work of Research Ethics Review","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Context (archaeology); Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Work (physics); Qualitative research; Sociology; Dance; Pedagogy; Psychology; Social science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8570439862865543,"gpt":0.7029669626209594,"spread":0.1540770236655949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2009176,0.0001831412,0.0009777802,0.0003122785,0.0005725152,0.00001212996,0.001495474,0.003487909,0.0001084122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4381562,0.0001104246,0.0004543795,0.001988486,0.003322902,0.000165801,0.0004133189,0.1558716,0.00003311109],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002384841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01264594,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001918738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009915325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9789454,0.004687717,0.003082198,0.0003496616,0.01215573,0.0007792715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.684523,0.2931529,0.001924027,0.001388183,0.01830395,0.0007079256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01068282,0.001738691,0.1020462,0.1235077,0.002555446,0.003775841,0.1141814,0.000208924,0.0201293,0.2756546,0.3328238,0.01269528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007275994,0.004279439,0.01650429,0.3828258,0.0009086906,0.006917348,0.003927073,0.00004514699,0.007717998,0.183404,0.3854839,0.0007103694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0653917,0.1650136,0.000652065,0.7564031,0.0007393081,0.0009695602,0.00000345252,0.00002639931,0.01080077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.227791,0.7509316,0.003923294,0.01382367,0.001129577,0.000006898819,7.199736e-7,0.00003958367,0.002353664],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7425795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980046310","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9097-9","title":"Gaining Institutional Permission: Researching Precarious Legal Status in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Deportation; Vulnerability (computing); Refugee; Political science; Negotiation; Law enforcement; Legal process; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Immigration; Criminology; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1090065293782652,"gpt":0.4478984911356575,"spread":0.3388919617573923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002882775,0.00009944087,0.0002079282,0.0002181698,0.0001967726,0.00001512961,0.0002410285,0.0003713356,0.000131974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001480163,0.00008748499,0.00004222966,0.0002320566,0.0000458069,0.0002341247,0.00001414988,0.008363655,0.000004608337],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007547016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01316016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3508411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4397154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973513,0.0004397014,0.0007922771,0.0001358634,0.0008082102,0.0004726457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983087,0.0006807566,0.0003170482,0.0001031335,0.0002099802,0.0003803891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002302744,0.0002571855,0.2913956,0.0001934389,0.0001301946,0.003069823,0.2616316,0.007801753,0.001030232,0.1965916,0.0491239,0.1864719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002647448,0.0004566687,0.7542178,0.0006884849,0.00001881043,0.001159572,0.007277641,0.000370207,0.00006539073,0.008570002,0.224251,0.0002769876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9686071,0.004103336,0.0002487539,0.01774038,0.0009365774,0.00009372931,0.000007126132,0.000006471637,0.008256479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937479,0.0007350261,0.0003705191,0.004333749,0.0005149305,9.582802e-7,0.000002809813,0.000006468446,0.0002876669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4628222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989878827","doi":"10.1007/s10805-010-9125-9","title":"Cultural Missteps and Ethical Considerations with Indigenous Populations: Preliminary Reflections from Northeastern Ontario, Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"First Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba; Laurentian University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Mainstream; Indigenous; Silence; Sociology; Public relations; Media studies; Political science; Aesthetics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08591479552798713,"gpt":0.3921573746949343,"spread":0.3062425791669472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001565462,0.0001135845,0.0001945426,0.0000816048,0.006422432,0.00007090596,0.0001565964,0.001010238,0.0001125369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002097302,0.00008273539,0.00003323427,0.0001295351,0.0003932509,0.0002619911,0.000002161772,0.008753611,0.000001371932],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004150672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08840659,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9930437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979481,0.0003868101,0.0005240828,0.000140987,0.0007134005,0.0002866065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997128,0.001057008,0.0004517991,0.0001049145,0.0009147674,0.0003435546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003762793,0.00002775731,0.02947598,0.00001054895,0.00003452471,0.00001580993,0.9303749,0.00002299919,0.00003019441,0.0396112,0.0003113755,0.00004709638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007667098,0.000444894,0.1274844,0.000302183,0.0002719043,0.0008926759,0.07201689,0.00001004543,0.00009483594,0.04584779,0.7513455,0.0005220924],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9758636,0.0002550978,0.00004683321,0.01895706,0.001459921,0.0002224512,0.00001160755,0.00001170623,0.003171748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906861,0.00142335,0.004213364,0.00113313,0.001172985,0.000001132638,0.000008756857,0.00001087422,0.001350361],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.858358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391444098","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09513-y","title":"Participants’ Right to Withdraw from Research: Researchers’ Lived Experiences on Ethics of Withdrawal","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Healthcare cost, quality, practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University Grants Commission","keywords":"Psychology; Psychoanalysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9341552100674787,"gpt":0.7093959531298536,"spread":0.2247592569376251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1207368,0.0002794661,0.0007839547,0.0009028948,0.001297211,0.00006738192,0.001441232,0.00294992,0.0007828756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1369475,0.000208086,0.0001639007,0.001507424,0.001127663,0.0007868562,0.0004714164,0.0732032,0.0004982089],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007709473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01435563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002025825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000547949,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9578295,0.03105311,0.00296035,0.000590427,0.006005937,0.001560647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8922969,0.1007556,0.001060487,0.0006224159,0.003943651,0.001321016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001294508,0.0001135334,0.00485388,0.001274626,0.0001791614,0.0002225066,0.9586568,0.00003337157,0.003623393,0.007875771,0.02094006,0.0009323501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001024049,0.002954329,0.00567738,0.02358416,0.0001078107,0.00002275314,0.6243599,0.0002071114,0.006652334,0.03081276,0.304101,0.0004963346],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.749038,0.00334247,0.000256376,0.2434788,0.002013807,0.0005682775,0.00002456963,0.00004602082,0.001231709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777702,0.004848087,0.001730543,0.01221334,0.002296887,0.00007268741,0.000002733335,0.00007048972,0.0009949999],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3342969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983445,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392236213","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09515-w","title":"Academic Integrity Policy Analysis of Chilean Universities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo","keywords":"Academic integrity; Cheating; Context (archaeology); Academic dishonesty; Misconduct; Public relations; Enforcement; Political science; Higher education; Accreditation; Scarcity; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07720241088372569,"gpt":0.4308833690309664,"spread":0.3536809581472407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01608388,0.0001618839,0.0005608883,0.001800341,0.0003167177,0.00003616882,0.001069156,0.004271906,0.0002262132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004857745,0.0001409418,0.0005476166,0.003012319,0.0009806195,0.0008123726,0.00009223394,0.04048825,0.00001342152],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000615951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006110466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002966315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002203994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959123,0.001122011,0.0009451161,0.0001793149,0.001463508,0.0003777694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945832,0.003803452,0.0006090013,0.0001169169,0.0006398417,0.0002475311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005027643,0.0000131672,0.00297566,0.00009621969,0.001314933,0.00002721618,0.1943856,0.0002068766,0.0005175418,0.7878476,0.009646685,0.002918116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003855057,0.000192506,0.00426926,0.002021524,0.004749184,0.00007399585,0.1988866,0.001641731,0.001241869,0.1808912,0.6050172,0.0006293198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.672357,0.01553455,0.006235042,0.2605684,0.002568655,0.0001931474,0.0001602912,0.0001333775,0.04224953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638191,0.03012884,0.0003080194,0.001442432,0.001972417,2.755254e-7,0.000003841137,0.00001234705,0.00231274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6069565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046822084","doi":"10.1007/s10805-007-9051-7","title":"Qualitative Health Research and the IRB: Answering the “So What?” with Qualitative Inquiry","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Montreal Children's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Qualitative property; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7337959060309328,"gpt":0.7422280501717977,"spread":0.008432144140864906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5723822,0.0001952127,0.0005734116,0.0002375372,0.005481863,0.00007136309,0.0009137904,0.001271777,0.0000289688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1668763,0.00009008549,0.00006711548,0.000808948,0.008890339,0.001031899,0.0003362814,0.1135305,0.00002160938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004330782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004567123,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002846951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003675399,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8686506,0.1201048,0.003309912,0.0004163733,0.005955862,0.001562497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4910453,0.5019346,0.002491293,0.0003958597,0.00365426,0.0004786919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001080462,0.00001809598,0.00006954659,0.0002546615,0.00008328101,0.0000101479,0.7753702,0.000003006622,0.00001680796,0.2185292,0.003546686,0.001017876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001430921,0.0004124658,0.0002783959,0.002401096,0.00002296675,0.00004504224,0.7459602,0.000007989556,0.000009251876,0.229781,0.01957239,0.00007821557],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1084464,0.01889726,0.01715945,0.8511508,0.001544897,0.0009581848,0.000002734444,0.00002076661,0.0018195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8213137,0.07463142,0.004772043,0.0951162,0.003227029,0.00002748938,0.000001272483,0.0000737087,0.0008371017],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7560346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958129,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372349141","doi":"10.1007/s10805-023-09476-6","title":"Contract Cheating and Student Stress: Insights from a Canadian Community College","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Bow Valley College","funders":"Bow Valley College","keywords":"Cheating; Stress (linguistics); Community college; Psychology; Political science; Business; Social psychology; Linguistics; Medical education; Medicine; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0888554506618393,"gpt":0.4014505113765932,"spread":0.3125950607147539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009301829,0.0001059361,0.0002709915,0.0002125723,0.001557974,0.0000499351,0.0006130172,0.00216855,0.00004159798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007424794,0.00009469727,0.0000591073,0.0003592817,0.0003541778,0.0003567837,0.00006810114,0.02325438,0.00001344302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002792212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001881164,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.328869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4539037,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963228,0.001913414,0.0005183655,0.00008588422,0.0008346998,0.0003248397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923525,0.006364616,0.0003686082,0.00008566349,0.0003619507,0.0004666314],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003521076,0.00003032071,0.08672005,0.00003261467,0.0001683437,0.0001434958,0.8322395,0.00005264409,0.0005795468,0.06787699,0.01083608,0.00128518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001094929,0.000141904,0.1517538,0.001391621,0.0001429842,0.00002865575,0.5759646,0.0003515972,0.0002799032,0.1216534,0.1467582,0.0004383768],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9653595,0.001159365,0.00001757083,0.02718929,0.0005670046,0.0001073091,0.00009201882,0.0000234176,0.005484503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989987,0.006121515,0.0001183339,0.002778532,0.000790499,9.632012e-7,0.000005051563,0.000008661397,0.0001895153],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2562749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990115063","doi":"10.1007/s10805-005-0502-8","title":"Challenges to Integrity in University Administration: Bad Faith and Loyal Agency","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty; Faith; Public domain; Agency (philosophy); Institution; Public relations; Sociology; Administration (probate law); Compromise; Public university; Identification (biology); Face (sociological concept); Political science; Law; Public administration; Epistemology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1135791579015276,"gpt":0.4072753184921449,"spread":0.2936961605906174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002229748,0.00004722765,0.00009703254,0.00007621397,0.0001287072,0.000012412,0.0001730131,0.0002782164,0.00001758288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007042572,0.00004596387,0.00001966762,0.0001744226,0.0000856249,0.0002583377,0.00001947109,0.001630817,0.000005616042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002908563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002562976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002100826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002217435,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990734,0.0001341199,0.0002014147,0.00008132251,0.0003950938,0.0001146781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999332,0.000161253,0.0001513277,0.00003519143,0.0001720361,0.0001482054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009418315,0.0001067349,0.02832745,0.00003041122,0.00001860514,0.00007448056,0.6314195,0.00004658495,0.00006757904,0.3252944,0.001454879,0.01306519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006306716,0.0001742432,0.5713804,0.0003738372,0.00001003929,0.00002387026,0.04314185,2.544792e-7,0.0001423195,0.03491002,0.3490313,0.0001811714],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7672957,0.000920813,0.0002885968,0.2254946,0.0003491405,0.00006108381,9.386806e-7,0.000005442308,0.005583685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821304,0.01451971,0.001961374,0.0007732143,0.0002171654,1.673551e-7,9.999589e-8,0.000002004826,0.000395844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5882777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7085177,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981277024","doi":"10.1007/s10805-014-9206-2","title":"Investigating Perceptions of Students to a Peer-Based Academic Integrity Presentation Provided by Residence Dons","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Presentation (obstetrics); Psychology; Residence; Perception; Test (biology); Medical education; Qualitative property; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0998699436681297,"gpt":0.4575987969335344,"spread":0.3577288532654047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02866826,0.0001823863,0.0004117872,0.0002808177,0.0005738351,0.00005360526,0.00156023,0.003022578,0.00005253715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07920896,0.000168667,0.0001524054,0.0006258478,0.000619115,0.000717876,0.0001130067,0.02633366,0.00001672852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002758155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001854212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001555699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002307855,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918745,0.002621283,0.001346591,0.0002447137,0.003485992,0.0004269413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911421,0.005045557,0.001311391,0.0001590598,0.001847631,0.0004942639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001569731,0.0001285937,0.3977592,0.0002516309,0.00008476218,0.000002601524,0.3079633,0.0007465545,0.08838932,0.04374175,0.1578356,0.002939741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005825567,0.002518143,0.1244122,0.01526416,0.001077516,0.00008782734,0.2613212,0.003777512,0.05219787,0.3245397,0.2062303,0.002748081],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8401012,0.0001717418,0.01855445,0.1395867,0.0004950238,0.0003604975,0.00002313964,0.00003288865,0.0006743145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860116,0.0005680642,0.006191118,0.005511656,0.0008011983,0.0000076579,0.000005229117,0.00001698969,0.0008865505],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.280798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994627569","doi":"10.1007/s10805-012-9153-8","title":"Examining the Impact of Dons Providing Peer Instruction for Academic Integrity: Dons’ and Students’ Perspectives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Psychology; Academic dishonesty; Mathematics education; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Higher education; Social psychology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1944490051208468,"gpt":0.476068806780816,"spread":0.2816198016599692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03152115,0.0001706612,0.0003621876,0.0002027382,0.0007460341,0.00004813293,0.0007501011,0.002632632,0.00001922051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0221131,0.0001108776,0.0001961534,0.0002913758,0.0008698337,0.001219735,0.0001102921,0.02275696,9.458362e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003749169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009465566,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005339823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001808051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962959,0.0009673628,0.0007504543,0.0001444441,0.001372169,0.0004696112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928105,0.00473777,0.00109391,0.00009266398,0.001037604,0.000227565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001712361,0.00003973921,0.2733938,0.00004803411,0.0002258359,6.308816e-7,0.6663655,0.00001597046,0.002242635,0.0506249,0.003076276,0.003795438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00166139,0.0005449892,0.1023649,0.001031412,0.0004507831,0.000363966,0.8124574,0.0001014019,0.001183776,0.06000413,0.01934988,0.0004859866],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.97621,0.003932321,0.001697531,0.01653416,0.0007065721,0.0003083862,0.00001438333,0.00001418454,0.0005824496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884832,0.007753508,0.0008780122,0.0002318667,0.002381482,0.0000047276,7.648222e-7,0.00001479795,0.0002516586],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1710289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966134375","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9095-y","title":"Health Research in Complex Emergencies: A Humanitarian Imperative","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Health and Conflict Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Compromise; Research ethics; Impartiality; Scrutiny; Engineering ethics; Neutrality; Humanitarian aid; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.797211777837566,"gpt":0.6892092806596678,"spread":0.1080024971778982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02573114,0.0001360434,0.0005895575,0.0005244936,0.001790068,0.000005254632,0.0004109685,0.0007025229,0.0001279852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004242622,0.000109169,0.0000703127,0.0006747238,0.000151855,0.0001841098,0.00008241451,0.02365589,0.00006215378],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007039084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00506637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003381815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003451384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926291,0.003129784,0.001951908,0.0001667944,0.001076013,0.00104642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942203,0.003109487,0.0007185738,0.0001590341,0.001372456,0.0004201325],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002420935,0.0001025158,0.008691872,0.0004694635,0.00003149691,0.00003584286,0.8489362,0.00001134945,0.0004917178,0.03001293,0.10216,0.008814591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001186159,0.001263101,0.1130815,0.001365689,0.000005245534,0.00001587156,0.06439167,0.00003741515,0.000005068315,0.009004269,0.8095057,0.0001383767],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07466654,0.005415971,0.0001169508,0.9096274,0.0006032047,0.0006237293,0.000008263708,0.00001829078,0.008919665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8322988,0.0214476,0.0006936836,0.1423998,0.002007863,0.00001468367,0.000003221468,0.00002065024,0.001113779],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7845445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077595266","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9021-5","title":"Conflict and Convergence: The Ethics Review of Action Research","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Mandate; Research ethics; Divergence (linguistics); Action (physics); Action research; Subject (documents); Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8694228001024319,"gpt":0.7241808917392281,"spread":0.1452419083632038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1516095,0.0001136413,0.0005184069,0.0001911397,0.0002523098,0.00001379572,0.0005019166,0.002491233,0.0001123577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2379163,0.00006953635,0.0001697095,0.0005835861,0.002185727,0.0001242849,0.0001870167,0.07591505,0.000009999167],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001129167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004689926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001072876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003604278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9888248,0.002655786,0.001799846,0.000212748,0.006136788,0.0003700181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8540805,0.1318111,0.00112684,0.000540555,0.01214393,0.0002970327],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001884833,0.0004969476,0.04320526,0.1465577,0.0005798839,0.0002329079,0.01160148,0.00001951639,0.07362395,0.5277844,0.1871828,0.00683035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002822723,0.002635455,0.02718264,0.1357612,0.0005766362,0.001879566,0.003520785,0.0001106484,0.02526571,0.3142939,0.4856055,0.0003452236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.07924468,0.2232746,0.0003215373,0.6913853,0.0006265573,0.0006248025,0.000006261835,0.00001210474,0.004504194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1942805,0.7956112,0.000421104,0.007356174,0.0007615957,0.000002559454,0.000001127772,0.00001705154,0.001548703],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6840291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988037,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388418020","doi":"10.1007/s10805-023-09491-7","title":"The Defining Characteristics of Ethics Papers on Social Media Research: A Systematic Review of the Literature","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Social Media in Health Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Women and Children’s Health Research Institute; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Research ethics; Scholarship; Information ethics; Sociology; Meta-ethics; Media ethics; Engineering ethics; Social research; Social science; Informed consent; Applied ethics; Public relations; Political science; Journalism; Media studies; Medicine; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7117743619659367,"gpt":0.6190236587617237,"spread":0.09275070320421297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1233123,0.0002745019,0.002638527,0.0002989249,0.001702462,0.00006136293,0.002521023,0.003812549,0.000006132936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6595774,0.0001481492,0.0009295272,0.003024849,0.001714294,0.00009363707,0.0001601018,0.03520798,0.00001106686],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007948371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01723223,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003550714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006891297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9624745,0.02643435,0.004198235,0.0002124703,0.006100657,0.0005797542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7123293,0.2727915,0.01004664,0.0004359825,0.004189422,0.0002070718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004584504,0.00001132274,0.00000226472,0.8249738,0.0001084408,0.000002109927,0.1336098,1.201141e-8,1.103998e-7,0.02254086,0.00101011,0.01773663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003006046,0.00002364504,0.00001781009,0.7439091,0.0007254411,0.000006983641,0.006382971,2.606613e-8,1.105586e-7,0.001446539,0.2473688,0.00008858286],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001566498,0.9601306,1.134515e-7,0.02979651,0.007712704,0.002086302,0.00005649076,0.00000952363,0.00019206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000335118,0.9958534,0.00001656662,0.0006578654,0.003173032,0.0001549348,0.000006583705,0.00005195164,0.00005218507],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5362652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995972,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057407474","doi":"10.1007/s10805-007-9035-7","title":"Strict Confidentiality: An Alternative to Pre’s “Limited Confidentiality” Doctrine","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Confidentiality; Doctrine; Privilege (computing); Law; Jurisprudence; Duty; Political science; Duty to warn; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1493687211564676,"gpt":0.479225109627066,"spread":0.3298563884705984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02890358,0.0001680201,0.0003770371,0.0003156088,0.0004884872,0.0001527533,0.001076553,0.0006539647,0.0001807208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007564764,0.0001590482,0.0001642978,0.0005597023,0.0004097404,0.001050117,0.00009896763,0.003835331,0.00002601137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000273769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008122495,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007449761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004788808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947882,0.00108678,0.001162529,0.0002425521,0.002164262,0.0005556374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941337,0.002531851,0.0008540172,0.0001956801,0.001510968,0.0007738181],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002798411,0.0003611976,0.01570296,0.0001698796,0.0003905648,0.0004359037,0.5037791,0.0005181233,0.0170128,0.4207852,0.0144965,0.02354936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001734662,0.00139064,0.02956179,0.0009575599,0.000528186,0.0002242383,0.08195405,0.00004746786,0.02095748,0.05022383,0.8114218,0.000998328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9342976,0.0005279416,0.02494693,0.03235495,0.002676001,0.0003413187,0.00001045621,0.00004824937,0.00479662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907519,0.001453576,0.0006284563,0.003530669,0.002748641,9.919561e-7,0.000001387953,0.00001411887,0.0008702202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7969253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999481,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1135046832","doi":"10.1007/s10805-015-9237-3","title":"Stop Drinking the Kool-Aid: The Academic Journal Review Process in the Social Sciences Is Broken, Let’s Fix It","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2082210426346617,"gpt":0.4105906332708144,"spread":0.2023695906361527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02403038,0.0002004537,0.0003073701,0.0001848497,0.001828757,0.0003855138,0.002433089,0.0002425623,0.00007928227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004348243,0.00009031597,0.0001346716,0.001505776,0.0004590848,0.001492699,0.0003415507,0.006569438,0.00003526488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000680677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003008326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001770549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002139478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960532,0.0002174595,0.0009574943,0.0001536131,0.002264294,0.0003539364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967183,0.0006699399,0.001597709,0.0001063371,0.0008911935,0.00001652909],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002960378,0.00002572719,0.03926516,0.0005310344,0.00008919102,0.000014764,0.02323866,0.0002021578,0.000006802678,0.03203625,0.9027377,0.001822934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005840769,0.00002479155,0.006334818,0.001961878,0.0003249,0.0001062347,0.02931552,0.0001710175,0.00000476094,0.08297785,0.8779492,0.0002449881],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03136921,0.04277249,0.0002040604,0.9164847,0.0009280017,0.0003810249,6.094525e-7,0.00001487423,0.007845057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6373683,0.05536836,0.00004238721,0.2969008,0.009885036,0.000007686205,0.000001105922,0.00002801121,0.0003983169],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6195839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W60732914","doi":"10.1023/a:1025469622261","title":"The Duty to Protect: Privacy and the Public University","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Legal Issues in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07460358045830927,"gpt":0.3978224015659227,"spread":0.3232188211076135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0148111,0.00004421428,0.00008144925,0.00004018549,0.001232358,0.00008767992,0.0005650669,0.0002419761,0.00001075491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02606461,0.00002487873,0.00003671999,0.0003136477,0.0007156071,0.0003303086,0.00003756386,0.00273113,0.000005260085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001677141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001118361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009359448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001186214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975702,0.001490589,0.000180246,0.00006014575,0.0005315646,0.0001672314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969016,0.002233312,0.0002513672,0.00009890911,0.0003879082,0.0001269203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002901284,0.000006750426,0.001082682,0.000003272649,0.00001401455,0.000001183053,0.1470972,0.000002105361,0.00003304138,0.8471753,0.003090119,0.001465365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001997304,0.00001547915,0.0004456592,0.00001749211,0.00001186468,0.00001055158,0.01963108,0.000001274817,0.00004949168,0.04245022,0.9371316,0.0000355213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2101252,0.001444451,0.00049835,0.7707469,0.001115199,0.0003508475,3.715305e-7,0.00001037574,0.01570822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919873,0.003770523,0.0004987218,0.001275722,0.0003505394,5.647366e-7,1.909608e-8,0.00000360752,0.002112967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9340415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995696,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005604407","doi":"10.1023/b:jaet.0000006892.06098.9a","title":"Are University Professors Qualified to Teach Ethics?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Applied ethics; Engineering ethics; Information ethics; Point (geometry); Meta-ethics; Philosophy of business; Sociology; Nursing ethics; Pedagogy; Management; Political science; Public relations; Business model; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6183924234101609,"gpt":0.5346416535497331,"spread":0.08375076986042773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06299467,0.0001526781,0.000397698,0.0006059029,0.0005475052,0.00009490122,0.001390726,0.001664779,0.0001493458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2166699,0.000119768,0.0001537285,0.001423269,0.00022643,0.0005795491,0.0001064635,0.01449691,0.0001228787],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001925481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002392687,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001234491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005613429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918307,0.003050803,0.001129049,0.000313347,0.003364634,0.0003114611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724041,0.01972697,0.002203459,0.0004531098,0.004850292,0.0003620736],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003782173,0.0003478376,0.04331082,0.0002117509,0.0000972621,0.00008376144,0.1658778,0.001842892,0.00225752,0.5560518,0.2273396,0.002200802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000484131,0.00008774132,0.01096697,0.0005426657,0.00003943214,0.0000893823,0.0888163,0.00001318678,0.0009778282,0.2354417,0.6622649,0.0002758017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.569099,0.0005346453,0.01750613,0.4017865,0.005938007,0.0002430082,0.000008241655,0.00002585563,0.004858595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976684,0.001022312,0.004230042,0.01056449,0.0004730051,6.58339e-7,3.48977e-7,0.00001748866,0.007007675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4349253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404147567","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09583-y","title":"The Role of Stewards of Trust in Facilitating Trust in Science: A Multistakeholder View","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Centre for Social Innovation","funders":"HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme; European Commission","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Knowledge management; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0967104146766581,"gpt":0.4361157299627017,"spread":0.3394053152860436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02031519,0.00006416401,0.0001935807,0.0003159022,0.0001729298,0.00004453259,0.0005254826,0.0002094685,0.00003652578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003309222,0.00004502386,0.00007888418,0.0009991877,0.001004301,0.0003548528,0.00005968945,0.002133824,0.000002457585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002223374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001040147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006015615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000820087,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973333,0.0003818272,0.0008006808,0.0001071734,0.001153933,0.0002230293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998443,0.0009042325,0.0002867102,0.00007907333,0.0002214947,0.00006550521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003580239,0.00005047198,0.01042444,0.000236691,0.00002016479,0.00000956446,0.6406311,0.0006001978,0.007436302,0.1093224,0.0002837721,0.2309492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006329794,0.0001274431,0.02501357,0.002113857,0.00003257311,0.000005779862,0.6611032,0.003156979,0.0006256977,0.03315425,0.2738503,0.0001833563],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750354,0.007156658,0.0001206654,0.009263125,0.0004947357,0.0001935948,0.000004322349,0.000007561617,0.007723967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855074,0.01350235,0.0004142923,0.0001117901,0.00007362693,0.000001788764,7.082121e-8,0.000004209762,0.0003845135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2735665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9270524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2309581811","doi":"10.1007/s10805-016-9256-8","title":"Research Ethics Board (REB) Members’ Preparation for, and Perceived Knowledge of Research Ethics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Research ethics; Economic Justice; Political science; Agency (philosophy); Dignity; Mandate; Institutional review board; Ethical code; Human research; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Social science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7895200134646957,"gpt":0.7096263880695409,"spread":0.07989362539515477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3386615,0.0002723328,0.0009782806,0.001347842,0.000849186,0.00005423001,0.001142287,0.01067088,0.00009517909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6378446,0.0001857145,0.0003385734,0.001133055,0.006077803,0.0004318699,0.0007218136,0.1149857,0.00003034501],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006909058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02037992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000101284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005267665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9709243,0.01134262,0.003317344,0.0008909882,0.01202799,0.001496747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3927821,0.5531431,0.0009981092,0.001076556,0.05080345,0.001196713],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01543365,0.0009513082,0.01032896,0.01724168,0.0008553325,0.0000901262,0.2546775,0.00001449961,0.2747587,0.3986549,0.02110881,0.005884538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009892677,0.013551,0.009896954,0.03184588,0.0003083782,0.0003991647,0.0189658,0.0003158003,0.02964632,0.817969,0.06662977,0.0005792733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5768993,0.007056921,0.00262729,0.4032267,0.0009247459,0.001745559,0.00003807808,0.00004368125,0.007437673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8700057,0.1135833,0.005896388,0.0008546889,0.001556008,0.00002688698,0.000002432866,0.00008627194,0.007988291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5781422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966271,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395047582","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09529-4","title":"Framing Integrity Resolution: An Integrative Approach to Academic Ethics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Academic integrity; Research integrity; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1642146089733534,"gpt":0.4563299925771124,"spread":0.2921153836037589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05363696,0.0003558984,0.0005921754,0.0006079538,0.001187283,0.0002040481,0.001922284,0.01231173,0.00007338719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03441096,0.0002879886,0.0003023279,0.001392707,0.00102203,0.001924514,0.0001780271,0.1544099,0.00007474621],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008772276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00597116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008657263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000228395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902703,0.004096517,0.001455549,0.0005112872,0.002869007,0.0007973844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897218,0.007342981,0.000518832,0.0002281265,0.001387152,0.0008011544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009411819,0.00003331993,0.0001707936,0.0001248868,0.00007923321,0.00002375739,0.4682769,0.0001500519,0.0006142802,0.5020024,0.02359486,0.004835362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002124228,0.0003195651,0.0001133876,0.002965562,0.0001610903,0.0002214623,0.1189529,0.002286412,0.0005454518,0.1602537,0.7133821,0.0005858859],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07423422,0.02956827,0.3789451,0.42256,0.01237915,0.001160684,0.0001002114,0.0006102289,0.08044215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8958478,0.03549004,0.0301687,0.02068312,0.01348765,0.00001678957,0.00001521067,0.00009433131,0.004196383],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8216136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118989750","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9015-3","title":"A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Ethics Board: Studying the Meaning of Farm Life for Farm Children","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Dilemma; Context (archaeology); Normative; Sociology; Meaning (existential); Statement (logic); Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Ethical dilemma; Process (computing); Point (geometry); Law; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering; History; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.075859855389673,"gpt":0.3103413155641406,"spread":0.2344814601744676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01477246,0.0001694502,0.0002695922,0.00001953956,0.001242467,0.00008537337,0.001157066,0.0004504583,0.000009931471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007046368,0.00004040356,0.0002281517,0.000357142,0.000162128,0.00008451485,0.0001686491,0.004816164,0.000001703118],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006736236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000124093,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002354786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004208425,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971188,0.0006744268,0.0007557579,0.0001698612,0.0009498842,0.0003312452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900795,0.008582612,0.0006038714,0.00009371989,0.0005653862,0.00007487063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002026621,0.0004981454,0.1910488,0.0002453869,0.0009116282,0.000009269307,0.1545329,0.005917726,0.1128721,0.3646201,0.03068613,0.1366312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006826135,0.001109462,0.7684891,0.000547522,0.0001727542,0.00003218268,0.04704247,0.0001912336,0.007239284,0.09734258,0.07660016,0.0005506545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7360002,0.0003095932,0.0000619982,0.262706,0.0001798954,0.0004617336,0.000005825753,0.000009323026,0.0002654806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883628,0.0002250244,0.0001469609,0.01025463,0.0008181273,0.000009448962,0.000001945753,0.000002293352,0.0001787171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5774402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059545875","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9086-z","title":"Protecting Human Dignity in Research Involving Humans","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Nothing; Relevance (law); sort; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6910183662585482,"gpt":0.6950585981818452,"spread":0.004040231923297055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2431019,0.0001500487,0.0004370147,0.0006333074,0.003480339,0.00002268982,0.0009596514,0.002973613,0.0001199466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.316337,0.0001295658,0.00008164328,0.0008037202,0.0004149035,0.0006829496,0.0002181632,0.2492181,0.00005271341],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007710421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002138071,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000163655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001766542,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9670733,0.0266345,0.002246006,0.0002533187,0.002862226,0.000930709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9385756,0.05702625,0.001464361,0.0003186567,0.002271761,0.0003434071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004307982,0.000463653,0.09369457,0.001840895,0.00006696396,0.0004409985,0.3757376,0.00007240694,0.09744123,0.4079224,0.01684935,0.005039047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001348885,0.0005338909,0.02378501,0.006743957,0.0000221683,0.00003131492,0.04369009,0.00003922606,0.0003597807,0.9112307,0.01199802,0.0002169981],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8280134,0.00138767,0.0005073026,0.1375384,0.0009161039,0.000788666,9.124082e-7,0.00004672824,0.0308009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861307,0.001299432,0.001363509,0.008713996,0.002028818,0.000007972222,4.759858e-7,0.000024637,0.0004305153],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5033082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041765548","doi":"10.1007/s10805-007-9034-8","title":"On Doffing the Mask","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Courtesy; Criticism; Task (project management); Quality (philosophy); Simple (philosophy); Common sense; Psychology; Sociology; Public relations; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Management; Philosophy; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.156066261210114,"gpt":0.3622735320230197,"spread":0.2062072708129057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01221393,0.00005782647,0.00008758599,0.00009972489,0.0004918208,0.0002687927,0.0006913097,0.0001874836,0.00006844349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002900208,0.00003346074,0.00007018087,0.00003686958,0.0001391217,0.0006693897,0.00004117449,0.007992783,0.00001643196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004559912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000955339,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001648475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000477421,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987969,0.0001753702,0.0003959209,0.00004149044,0.0004622864,0.0001280335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964111,0.002673214,0.0003935342,0.0001663707,0.0003073144,0.00004841081],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003845351,0.00001489407,0.0001286283,0.000005477886,0.00002099692,0.000003356379,0.09193423,0.00002318206,0.0001362798,0.8855786,0.01799403,0.004121841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002224942,0.0001083552,0.000778789,0.0001806596,0.00002413321,0.00003593854,0.009456155,0.00002110254,0.0001399836,0.1020777,0.8868694,0.00008533126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6654128,0.002737907,0.0008651071,0.1411527,0.002655413,0.00008219942,0.000002977024,0.00003948826,0.1870513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903687,0.0003903151,0.00008524463,0.006164524,0.001317138,1.685017e-7,4.977131e-7,0.000007489165,0.001665914],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8688753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408279470","doi":"10.1007/s10805-025-09605-3","title":"Sex and Gender Identity: Data Collection and Language Considerations for Human Research Ethics Committees and Researchers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Sex and Gender in Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Western Sydney University","keywords":"Human research; Data collection; Research ethics; Gender identity; Identity (music); Psychology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Engineering; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7885206986603697,"gpt":0.6494212849343131,"spread":0.1390994137260566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02307867,0.00008124921,0.0002506465,0.0004060131,0.0009441365,0.00008353516,0.0001301128,0.000799319,0.00000643296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02358703,0.00007215832,0.00002011324,0.0002467186,0.0005020077,0.0002617719,0.0002429464,0.009094401,1.594365e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007650712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00130587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001787992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003750217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974973,0.0009218382,0.0004318841,0.0002324904,0.0006933401,0.0002231238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880167,0.01044553,0.0001059763,0.0002505817,0.0009949742,0.000186196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009861983,0.0001852092,0.208017,0.01485443,0.001310183,0.0001966581,0.3798625,0.000004160533,0.03591081,0.1536757,0.192718,0.01227918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006538815,0.00125363,0.06326452,0.001798187,0.0005020751,0.001730468,0.1742741,0.001215473,0.002812935,0.7194463,0.02684937,0.0003140776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7375564,0.03132881,0.001206829,0.2282578,0.0002351039,0.0007646772,0.00004040559,0.00001755043,0.0005924898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737323,0.01679709,0.003061375,0.004901562,0.0003249291,0.000006079101,0.00001301452,0.00001514658,0.00114849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5657707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400598916","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09545-4","title":"Signs of Dysconscious Racism and Xenophobiaism in Knowledge Production and the Formation of Academic Researchers: A National Study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Higher Education Practises and Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; British Academy; Queen's University Belfast; Leverhulme Trust; Queen's University; Society for Research into Higher Education","keywords":"Sociology; Consciousness; Racism; Politics; Narrative; Ethnic group; Rationality; Representation (politics); Relation (database); Knowledge production; Social science; Epistemology; Media studies; Gender studies; Political science; Law; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.288545761863965,"gpt":0.5183254171022522,"spread":0.2297796552382872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02793234,0.00005337398,0.0001501189,0.0002702071,0.0001704608,0.00002793406,0.000156751,0.0002291908,0.00001035832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007835976,0.00003819336,0.00002800261,0.0004341422,0.0004734058,0.0007265026,0.00004466044,0.003232533,9.405684e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001307085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009419234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000106506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001408845,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970146,0.001398941,0.000600922,0.00009137708,0.0007849039,0.0001092004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965499,0.002543354,0.0003282297,0.00004300718,0.000483204,0.00005228323],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001575843,0.0001131204,0.003022262,0.0002594652,0.00006211101,0.000001626838,0.9459864,0.00008114328,0.002177747,0.03736359,0.00311226,0.007662712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003748495,0.0008595285,0.03011466,0.0030515,0.0002646075,0.0001072011,0.7072104,0.0008733612,0.001590074,0.1869503,0.06485663,0.0003732608],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9451256,0.009153707,0.00007304259,0.0437846,0.0005110611,0.0003707343,0.000001704432,0.000005066443,0.000974444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837781,0.01552362,0.00006645786,0.00006034677,0.0002801027,0.000006000273,2.043727e-7,0.000004353917,0.0002808293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.238776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1822264542","doi":"10.1007/s10805-015-9242-6","title":"The Role of Intent on Accounting Students’ Ethical Attitudes Towards Earnings Management","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Earnings management; Earnings; Psychology; Management accounting; Work (physics); Public accounting; Business; Public relations; Actuarial science; Political science; Audit; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04361731888660757,"gpt":0.3302204668278038,"spread":0.2866031479411962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01376268,0.0002819594,0.0004260964,0.0003030485,0.0003354237,0.0002882263,0.001945544,0.0005388265,0.00002205999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03066477,0.0002034963,0.0002102894,0.0005202454,0.0002727938,0.0007494789,0.001187069,0.008082735,0.00009808492],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001935195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001153723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007773212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009406171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945521,0.0001155231,0.001216786,0.0002730299,0.003374234,0.000468356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780708,0.0005691567,0.019783,0.000300491,0.00122357,0.00005297807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007436659,0.0002893631,0.5620506,0.000806324,0.0009040141,0.00009772306,0.0037161,0.003188485,0.0004444244,0.2320497,0.02303594,0.1726736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001409681,0.0001288441,0.1521393,0.00153302,0.000270566,0.00001609861,0.005477795,0.0002899389,0.0002097453,0.01571952,0.8224269,0.0003785968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9223852,0.001137233,0.01108762,0.03631643,0.002038928,0.000523117,0.000001483817,0.0001007356,0.02640928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900163,0.0009680248,0.0003648191,0.006268828,0.001638463,0.000006128382,0.000001157277,0.0000478259,0.0006883919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.799391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193471211","doi":"10.1007/s10805-021-09435-z","title":"Biomedical Authorship: Common Misconducts and Possible Scenarios for Disputes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Promotion (chess); Publishing; Scientific misconduct; Field (mathematics); Research ethics; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6851221122734525,"gpt":0.6349770259293422,"spread":0.0501450863441103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00591663,0.0001920585,0.0004561741,0.0001131898,0.0004196534,0.00002721445,0.0003155365,0.003110166,0.0002374647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004210856,0.000165597,0.0001334644,0.0002493247,0.000536615,0.0002271925,0.0001147814,0.01759683,0.000007445123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007540193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001176267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002903382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004942959,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968337,0.00119116,0.0008764233,0.0002221608,0.0003594885,0.0005170785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931211,0.004710894,0.0004136347,0.00010632,0.0005880753,0.001060006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003985338,0.001734428,0.09738012,0.00523381,0.001922632,0.00208877,0.02995286,0.0003431299,0.5106394,0.08012013,0.1455119,0.1210875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004571703,0.0006549957,0.001967503,0.0005963558,0.0006964019,0.002501793,0.002206916,0.002743782,0.1023126,0.05159485,0.8296748,0.0004782802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7970058,0.01334769,0.0002880595,0.1860972,0.002647555,0.0002292336,0.0001005688,0.00002646439,0.0002574504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644105,0.007044126,0.001377827,0.02430528,0.001845677,0.000007103888,0.00001959643,0.00002663571,0.0009632024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6841629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}