{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":12,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"1944a097301e","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce"}},"results":[{"id":"W23168527","doi":"10.1038/nutd.2012.15","title":"Does the Montreal Convention of 1999 require that a notice be given to passengers? What is the validity of notice of a choice of forum clause under Montreal 1999?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases","keywords":"Notice; Convention; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Senai W. Andemariam","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02824364281348419,"gpt":0.2986650529204017,"spread":0.2704214101069176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008949731,0.00009334996,0.0002701591,0.00004364413,0.0001894654,0.00003656264,0.0003138117,0.00007954235,0.00002442118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006981199,0.00004957217,0.0001854632,0.0001265625,0.0003234405,0.000654799,0.00004877613,0.0001398758,3.232045e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003954444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006265918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07237683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06713239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983093,0.0003156766,0.0005033556,0.00008729646,0.0006439358,0.000140507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974824,0.0008894111,0.0009428441,0.0001445072,0.0004952073,0.00004559831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001613907,0.002029432,0.05343088,0.0003814929,0.0008891743,0.000008903393,0.04404049,0.001723039,0.005249183,0.8606331,0.01862776,0.01137265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00388803,0.001811035,0.7213312,0.001264148,0.000983257,0.00001531836,0.06911029,0.0003526178,0.02164739,0.04980257,0.1293225,0.0004716171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.926495,0.00028142,0.0004731735,0.06488354,0.0004644385,0.0002721994,0.00006322252,0.000004320715,0.007062687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976425,0.0002665251,0.0000836363,0.001384071,0.0001812511,0.000001511848,0.00000235757,0.000005794817,0.0004324228],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8108305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400409519","doi":"10.25172/jalc.89.2.3","title":"The Case Law Of The Court Of Justice Of The EU On Art. 17 Of The 1999 Montreal Convention: An Evaluation From A Comparative Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Perspective (graphical); Convention; Economic Justice; European court of justice; Political science; European Union law; European union; Art; Business; International trade","authors":[{"name":"Michael Chatzipanagiotis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03890516883711586,"gpt":0.3594573218969947,"spread":0.3205521530598788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001061103,0.00005838239,0.000142016,0.00001289083,0.0003874688,0.00002435481,0.0002592021,0.00003657452,0.00002390951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007701661,0.00002644309,0.0001512361,0.0001137173,0.000585515,0.0001452851,0.00003260799,0.0001703223,3.211225e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006989139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000151616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01275452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03336552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983206,0.0006556219,0.0003123204,0.00006260483,0.0005900728,0.00005881046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979946,0.0005919245,0.0005268975,0.0001280808,0.0007375259,0.0000209634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009988905,0.0001036188,0.000111125,0.000008588317,0.0001093452,0.000001232861,0.01535256,0.0003269517,0.0002141124,0.9821877,0.001249391,0.0002355021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004414561,0.002100526,0.1713458,0.003158476,0.004053404,0.0001826972,0.3082721,0.01673592,0.02328289,0.3616666,0.104318,0.0004690515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9021773,0.0005962269,0.00003255413,0.01617745,0.0007115427,0.0002788626,0.00008333863,0.000002241048,0.07994047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999221,0.00003281518,0.00001269192,0.0002861649,0.0001351698,0.000001426844,7.13307e-7,0.000002600023,0.0003074785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6205211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797406237","doi":"","title":"A Cure From Rome for Montreal’s Illness: Article 5 of the Rome I Regulation and Filling the Void in the 1999 Montreal Convention’s Regulation of Carrier’s Liability for Personal Injury","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Convention; Law; The Void; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Yehya Ikram Ibrahim Badr","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01358610939700403,"gpt":0.278334226228995,"spread":0.264748116831991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001191468,0.00005257446,0.0001222437,0.00001892079,0.0003498908,0.00002665862,0.0001265693,0.00005193404,0.00000991586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001411622,0.00002930002,0.00007864442,0.00007258944,0.0002844663,0.0002178251,0.00001439913,0.00007035248,5.090073e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003633731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004651026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009842259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02333518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991001,0.000190729,0.0003045094,0.00007124647,0.0002525204,0.00008090717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987442,0.0004599719,0.000367127,0.00007071515,0.0003371846,0.00002080553],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028299,0.0005699538,0.05795884,0.0001491582,0.000258311,3.748238e-7,0.2329895,0.0002766142,0.01123057,0.6519721,0.004143431,0.03762119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008760956,0.0002736537,0.8744441,0.0001072659,0.00008454151,0.000001960636,0.006658006,0.005461853,0.001284477,0.103537,0.00720012,0.00007100188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909001,0.00009621385,0.0005845323,0.007546518,0.0001312371,0.0002877481,0.00007791831,0.000001632562,0.0003741226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992949,0.00001630497,0.0001030934,0.0002370711,0.0002584829,0.000006227518,0.000004176647,0.000003148752,0.00007656141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8164852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967513,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89481661","doi":"","title":"Recent developments in aviation law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Plaintiff; Jurisdiction; Political science; Federal preemption; Doctrine; Tort; Aviation; Preemption; Engineering; Liability; Welfare","authors":[{"name":"Jared L Watkins","is_ca":false},{"name":"Evan Katin-Borland","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01733055058625443,"gpt":0.2922876204488917,"spread":0.2749570698626373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000727514,0.00003372096,0.00007281644,0.00002792335,0.0001443621,0.00002783128,0.00007770375,0.0000340136,0.00001948894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005141845,0.00002979302,0.00001727631,0.0000511866,0.00004445653,0.0002354976,0.00001024301,0.00008197177,0.000004538097],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006667586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000345533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009399434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006573388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993678,0.0001091698,0.0001868293,0.00003854439,0.0002209337,0.00007666934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996048,0.0000684422,0.0001264588,0.0000233524,0.0001351093,0.0000418674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001185032,0.00002755718,0.003654859,0.000001325477,0.000004046864,7.447908e-7,0.0009054308,0.00000581745,0.0000182033,0.9814079,0.0001790871,0.01378316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003164765,0.00003760259,0.04207591,0.00003660687,0.000003387072,0.000002569907,0.0001726573,0.000009510696,0.00009386837,0.01831747,0.9388849,0.00004903592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4248567,0.0001178127,0.0007343666,0.01365468,0.0006252999,0.00007579414,8.623946e-7,0.000008507961,0.559926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952201,0.0002201547,0.0005725317,0.003541761,0.000149531,4.753087e-7,9.678703e-7,0.000002204288,0.000292281],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9630904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3668105,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088460503","doi":"","title":"The West Caribbean Conundrum: The United States Versus France on the Availability of Forum Non Conveniens Under the Montreal Convention of 1999","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Political science; Law; Geography","authors":[{"name":"David Cluxton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.022176400045676,"gpt":0.2745792757437305,"spread":0.2524028756980545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009694701,0.00006410803,0.0001171027,0.00000968557,0.0006331013,0.00003932109,0.0003342376,0.00003446479,0.00002131703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001151563,0.00002761986,0.0000960304,0.00012067,0.0007183459,0.00008419804,0.000030644,0.000212634,0.000001612046],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002503257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005892032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009606964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007331308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987988,0.0003564282,0.0003003108,0.00005766895,0.0003765861,0.0001101422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975335,0.001565136,0.000432036,0.0001075756,0.0003242258,0.00003755473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006008525,0.0000743588,0.002365722,0.000009802209,0.0001397298,6.771982e-7,0.0084364,0.0005464649,0.00007908499,0.9828984,0.003879681,0.0009688649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003295279,0.001685486,0.09872121,0.0001608818,0.0002363377,0.00000468298,0.1159877,0.003582582,0.001841928,0.02805156,0.746193,0.0002393587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8044235,0.0001778175,0.0001630055,0.1872601,0.0003378874,0.0001947421,0.00002566523,0.000003691328,0.007413583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960621,0.0002686013,0.00000348422,0.003422966,0.0001021514,0.000001501966,0.000002909128,0.000003461151,0.0001328153],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9548468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981633065","doi":"","title":"Pilots Out of Uniform: How the Sixth Circuit’s Etihad Decision Undermines the Purpose of the Montreal Convention","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; Aeronautics; Political science; Operations research; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Julia C. Spring","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02568142600922374,"gpt":0.2795815256466614,"spread":0.2539000996374377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008294081,0.00005341763,0.0001206807,0.00001810611,0.0002302839,0.00003501536,0.0003423075,0.00004081919,0.00001847244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007017324,0.00002392996,0.0001150553,0.00006969964,0.0002135977,0.0001912786,0.00003855478,0.0001228885,0.0000013137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002546154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006653465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001097435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004466554,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989991,0.0001793897,0.0002285786,0.00004557478,0.0004688503,0.00007854527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987664,0.0003570868,0.0004482929,0.0001136964,0.0002907817,0.00002373101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008972988,0.00009338,0.007334513,0.00001227088,0.00005137419,5.915097e-7,0.003856207,0.00005892472,0.0007215719,0.9777367,0.001126727,0.008918012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002446026,0.0007515093,0.5273443,0.000641612,0.0002229912,0.00003554939,0.01468708,0.000228175,0.003057871,0.1786398,0.2716937,0.0002514645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.952585,0.0001488294,0.0003833718,0.01840327,0.0007152256,0.0001879579,0.000005760038,0.00000246691,0.0275681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974376,0.00014055,0.00001506894,0.0005769103,0.0001183781,5.764527e-7,4.358068e-7,0.00000315859,0.001707321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7990969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2492442,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386382784","doi":"10.25172/jalc.88.2.2","title":"Recent Developments in Aviation Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aviation law; Aviation; Doctrine; Deregulation; Civil aviation; Law; Aeronautics; Aviation accident; Political science; Engineering; Tort; Business; Liability; Economics; Aerospace engineering","authors":[{"name":"Brittany C. Wakim","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02861324557856281,"gpt":0.3181537627697393,"spread":0.2895405171911765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000653898,0.00003202569,0.00006652377,0.00004809708,0.0001593553,0.00002707584,0.00007581946,0.0000329388,0.00001964998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003944844,0.00002899351,0.00001808833,0.000140071,0.00003990383,0.0002365541,0.0000142541,0.00007987599,0.00001448409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007199217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005018275,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008801632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005798175,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993731,0.00007134349,0.0001826905,0.00003890722,0.0002449368,0.00008905849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996535,0.00006516204,0.0001016117,0.00002097063,0.0001202675,0.00003852398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001339392,0.00002245349,0.004438656,0.000001843443,0.00000641087,0.000005989973,0.001785755,0.00001266656,0.00002664932,0.9836283,0.000793883,0.009264051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003033793,0.00002750581,0.08730106,0.00004316749,0.000003313378,0.000002611747,0.0005874123,0.000009192879,0.00008590875,0.01667639,0.8949065,0.00005352965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7036591,0.0001120742,0.00007089075,0.01934252,0.0007300344,0.00008700223,0.000002076212,0.00002020576,0.2759762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962528,0.000693022,0.0001804591,0.002038292,0.0001167739,7.864392e-7,0.000002454321,0.000002594078,0.000712776],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9669518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3235518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293072862","doi":"10.25172/jalc.87.2.3","title":"Back to Air in Disarray?: Disparity in Practices and Interpretations on ADIZs Disrupting the Safety of Civil Aviation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Civil aviation; Aviation law; Aviation; State (computer science); Engineering; Political science; Scope (computer science); Law; Aeronautics; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Aerospace engineering","authors":[{"name":"Sanghoon Lee","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02145872975537324,"gpt":0.3313914995370912,"spread":0.309932769781718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00121569,0.00004201804,0.00009906568,0.0000580048,0.0002677758,0.00002219702,0.0001187755,0.00001770054,0.00004414353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002683648,0.00003291797,0.00002549018,0.0001473195,0.00005791202,0.0002858986,0.00004717295,0.0002121099,6.091284e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009277308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004027379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003807063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04931522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989881,0.0003416066,0.0002762386,0.0000619361,0.000256376,0.000075745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989463,0.0005286002,0.0003929492,0.00004140383,0.00005857407,0.0000321378],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004573098,0.0003109951,0.1861882,0.00001853204,0.00002553303,0.000003416659,0.04867421,0.003466545,0.0001172919,0.7565627,0.0003356469,0.003839644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008020083,0.0004174435,0.8897284,0.0002137487,0.0000234954,0.00001070796,0.01816716,0.0006245239,0.00004257196,0.007803364,0.08202625,0.0001403275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9461638,0.00006777141,0.0002041505,0.02841596,0.0001429727,0.0001254347,0.000009009315,0.000001511859,0.02486936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981184,0.00004820742,0.00009947563,0.001568421,0.00004625537,0.000003181665,0.000001468637,0.000002455893,0.0001121069],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7487593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9680323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389583895","doi":"10.25172/jalc.88.4.5","title":"Navigating Through Cloudy Skies: The Montreal Convention & Article 17 “Accidents” Post-Moore","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Treaty; Confusion; Law; Accident (philosophy); Event (particle physics); Supreme court; Perspective (graphical); Air transport; Petitioner; Aviation; Rubric; Operations research; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Aeronautics; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Elan Wilson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02410867634235168,"gpt":0.3435751679732096,"spread":0.3194664916308579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007695546,0.0000548561,0.00009314346,0.000009595647,0.0006348052,0.00009434835,0.0001653715,0.00004048337,0.00005012129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001103746,0.00003870537,0.00007918155,0.0001247244,0.0001193834,0.000413874,0.0000335743,0.0002019728,0.00002886648],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003620593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003180057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006720416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009291339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990464,0.0001430564,0.0002439779,0.00006067391,0.0003655796,0.0001402727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999219,0.0002116493,0.0002161006,0.00006264528,0.0002451158,0.00004548116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001243029,0.0001434584,0.0143753,0.00001407021,0.0001308376,0.00002281837,0.04834574,0.0002326153,0.0007339226,0.9061735,0.01673194,0.01297146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001795838,0.0003263243,0.3053684,0.0004237508,0.0001289044,0.00006246597,0.04173268,0.0002356341,0.0004827675,0.1383193,0.5107827,0.0003412946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9602247,0.00008293049,0.0001328112,0.02158815,0.0002961657,0.00006876978,0.000003692521,0.00002005195,0.01758274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955316,0.0001166469,0.0001032933,0.002412615,0.0004126157,0.00000147267,0.000004542013,0.000004992442,0.001412219],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7678543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765105073","doi":"","title":"The Montreal Convention - The Eleventh Circuit Embraces Airlines","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eleventh; Convention; Aeronautics; Aviation; Political science; Engineering; Law; Aerospace engineering; Physics; Acoustics","authors":[{"name":"Lindsey Ray Altmeyer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03271350760482804,"gpt":0.3014152642650026,"spread":0.2687017566601746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001201281,0.0000395073,0.00006320147,0.00001039387,0.0005781534,0.00009485567,0.0001882409,0.00002705028,0.000006476335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000101516,0.00002049657,0.00005201283,0.00004132726,0.0001698274,0.0002264212,0.00001560498,0.0001020112,0.000003767441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003052607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007528075,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002435177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007703237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991973,0.0001754405,0.0001738833,0.00003518096,0.0003310895,0.00008708117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992154,0.0001991909,0.0002022374,0.00004773288,0.0002774941,0.00005791519],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003163886,0.00002664263,0.0009096595,0.00000108638,0.00002548515,0.000001752149,0.002043899,0.00002203008,0.000006052238,0.9823202,0.006079464,0.008532028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003711419,0.00009895033,0.01048275,0.00002316126,0.00002633575,0.00001694165,0.005143374,0.00005984622,0.00003529268,0.08695885,0.8967298,0.00005356315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4908448,0.002866916,0.001587081,0.1232482,0.002722535,0.0002662764,0.000006137971,0.00002678306,0.3784313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952289,0.0002309893,0.0000188659,0.001145503,0.0005532915,9.481942e-7,5.598122e-7,0.000002492063,0.002818419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8953614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4446747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400408708","doi":"10.25172/jalc.89.2.4","title":"Still Far From Home – How Personal Jurisdiction Doctrine Undercuts The Montreal Convention’s “Fifth Jurisdiction” For “Wandering Americans”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Doctrine; Personal jurisdiction; Convention; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Hans Huggler","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01869872879212366,"gpt":0.2862827407417565,"spread":0.2675840119496329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000467402,0.00008862385,0.0001399231,0.00005388754,0.0004101233,0.000224287,0.0001241675,0.00005649474,0.00003684617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002285595,0.00006386553,0.0001498375,0.00009531707,0.000151766,0.0004360773,0.00001575741,0.0001981182,0.000002235074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001272841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001006044,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00447655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003439947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990845,0.0000985813,0.0002055374,0.000114049,0.0003564514,0.0001409162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992349,0.0003070718,0.000151073,0.00004689696,0.0001831132,0.00007694877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003181039,0.0001631303,0.001305319,0.0000440479,0.0006381002,0.00002381384,0.0308286,0.0001199614,0.0004778963,0.9008269,0.01044791,0.05480627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005579722,0.0002208048,0.0135873,0.0000996754,0.0001462372,0.00002441289,0.002776728,0.001566397,0.00004956742,0.02154868,0.959287,0.0001351828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7617728,0.003470794,0.09031492,0.1255732,0.00459444,0.0005163747,0.0002259247,0.0001236433,0.01340789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955876,0.0005980423,0.0002305715,0.0008293462,0.001269063,0.000005520682,0.00001193732,0.000009168878,0.001458767],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9488391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6767235,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1144749573","doi":"","title":"The Montreal Convention--the Eleventh Circuit embraces airlines' practices of \"bumping\" to deny plaintiffs' recovery for personal injury under Article 17","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eleventh; Bumping; Plaintiff; Personal injury; Convention; Law; Business; Political science; Engineering; Aeronautics; Mechanical engineering; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Lindsey Ray Altmeyer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04655635939066351,"gpt":0.3442827713406515,"spread":0.2977264119499881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001769581,0.00005635039,0.0001087804,0.00002355891,0.0004916848,0.00009794786,0.0001864994,0.00003861591,0.0000100371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004824835,0.00003530427,0.00008634825,0.00007015043,0.0001396707,0.0003379558,0.00002228961,0.000104426,0.000002083597],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005530062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001745033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00165319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007138514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989815,0.0001624174,0.0002846203,0.00006548082,0.0003776253,0.0001283118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998046,0.0007068712,0.0006083634,0.00005156964,0.0004963225,0.00009088679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001376974,0.0003055442,0.00336313,0.00002153751,0.0002891345,0.000002521863,0.0145133,0.0002267996,0.0004013424,0.9235085,0.03233425,0.02365699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001767664,0.001316308,0.02819033,0.0001952702,0.0001992804,0.00003632663,0.04242345,0.0007707541,0.0009731665,0.1061641,0.817691,0.0002723586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9360857,0.0003772626,0.003030993,0.0490178,0.0007220987,0.0002606084,0.00001699499,0.00000715549,0.01048138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956814,0.00006438194,0.0001107705,0.0018899,0.0004229425,0.000004286506,9.530917e-7,0.000004521637,0.001820842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8173444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3983459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}