{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":444,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":444,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"1bb7c2df57fa","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology"}},"results":[{"id":"W1596936787","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02048.x","title":"Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2311,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Ecosystem; Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Species diversity; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Ecosystem diversity; Gamma diversity; Niche; Ecological niche; Biology; Beta diversity; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Environmental science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01208408186265151,"gpt":0.1782216616107817,"spread":0.1661375797481302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003566181,0.00005596654,0.0001788003,0.00001985269,0.0002987204,0.000002218292,0.0001050446,0.00005512838,0.00048903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003027805,0.00003297079,0.00001907299,0.00005473661,0.0009659757,0.00006601893,0.0004539457,0.0001037983,0.000004653745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001951145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000075023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006828061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006633236,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995512,0.00002174184,0.0001807128,0.00008300076,0.00006979152,0.00009359275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993938,0.0002505252,0.0002657065,0.00003435009,0.0000281372,0.00002747851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006853832,0.0001221254,0.9719481,0.00003612883,0.00008016251,0.00000610915,0.006051694,0.0001113646,0.00008077757,0.02046465,0.0002969696,0.0001165164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008120431,0.0001319166,0.9496739,0.00000157623,0.00003460667,0.00003456189,0.001268358,0.00004919831,0.00002855455,0.04783329,0.00009806565,0.00003393799],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804881,0.00004301692,0.00006579326,0.0003794799,0.00007767036,0.0000700352,0.000001028807,0.000001916085,0.01887301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987308,0.0002498612,0.0004894719,0.0004217238,0.00001543911,0.000002504388,1.577595e-7,0.000001419868,0.00008864622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02736864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5354535,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055032654","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12432","title":"REVIEW: Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1245,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Alberta Innovates; University of Alberta; University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute","keywords":"Occupancy; Wildlife; Abundance (ecology); Sampling (signal processing); Ecology; Camera trap; Distance sampling; Abundance estimation; Environmental science; Geography; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0729098637738287,"gpt":0.3418696760610518,"spread":0.2689598122872231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005259216,0.0003376098,0.002379969,0.0001134406,0.0001659627,0.0000170736,0.0004443075,0.0003819265,0.0007254476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009640924,0.0002617758,0.0002098562,0.0004484056,0.0001209286,0.000116873,0.0001789157,0.0005261137,0.0001224385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002778129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003655856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001454492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008335843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972962,0.000363093,0.001473602,0.0003884588,0.0001434588,0.0003352049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968385,0.0009656681,0.001624804,0.0001920168,0.0001306837,0.0002483937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009332255,0.0001205772,0.0002197678,0.03277306,0.0001360912,0.000004500357,0.00003233495,0.000004438057,7.481658e-8,0.00005692182,0.4383393,0.5283036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001943924,0.000349945,0.0003204202,0.01094687,0.001447764,0.0001812602,0.000007405011,4.212149e-7,3.810917e-8,0.0004043771,0.9858949,0.0002522227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001195047,0.9847785,0.0001836215,0.01166356,0.0002379995,0.002443182,0.0000217018,0.00001325561,0.0006462851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000003550628,0.9707675,0.002267802,0.0261734,0.0001393226,0.0004835303,0.00005230745,0.00002650283,0.00008610947],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5475556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742701433","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12991","title":"Weed suppression greatly increased by plant diversity in intensively managed grasslands: A continental‐scale experiment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":669,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"Miljøministeriet; Science Foundation Ireland","keywords":"Monoculture; Weed; Grassland; Agronomy; Biomass (ecology); Biology; Transgressive; Biodiversity; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01468718182011186,"gpt":0.2161459191270975,"spread":0.2014587373069856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002738314,0.0001157209,0.0003213076,0.00002615898,0.0003045024,0.00004056289,0.0004139814,0.00012561,0.00008182912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003237116,0.00004944282,0.0000895922,0.00003817652,0.00008595116,0.00007371489,0.0003107082,0.000201065,0.000005837928],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006691617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006880145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008557634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001862359,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991682,0.00004188026,0.0002697797,0.0001480075,0.0001537247,0.0002184559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992582,0.00009270344,0.0004232707,0.00006063724,0.00005315964,0.0001120133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001618124,0.0003410768,0.4278413,0.000004291871,0.00005280959,0.0001506474,0.0002602685,0.000002378565,0.5609868,0.00005542,0.006765402,0.001921482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001553281,0.0003415893,0.9788728,0.00001395275,0.00002338117,0.00004212394,0.001184742,0.0001517326,0.01656177,0.0002884014,0.0008324429,0.0001337871],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977176,0.0000236185,5.976225e-7,0.000546929,0.0002046573,0.0001447968,0.00002544543,0.000007644436,0.001328715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995208,0.00002786204,0.00004105687,0.0002722815,0.00007703666,0.000005876471,0.00002250557,9.153279e-7,0.00003160764],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5510315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2342017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118072459","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01164.x","title":"Making better biogeographical predictions of species’ distributions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":653,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Université de Lausanne","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Biological dispersal; Ecology; Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Species distribution; Ecological network; Documentation; Computer science; Geography; Environmental science; Habitat; Biology; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01710593112616347,"gpt":0.2367956439249994,"spread":0.2196897127988359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001682936,0.00007870597,0.0001858484,0.00006733039,0.00009877862,0.000009911551,0.0001624133,0.00009329641,0.0329053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001239736,0.00006892342,0.000120554,0.0002891063,0.0003403708,0.00005403899,0.00007680814,0.0001567278,0.0001114211],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002431102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009328386,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001123924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001617054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999075,0.00001482629,0.0004211564,0.00009682564,0.0001889659,0.0002032014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994729,0.00004793112,0.0003074071,0.0000993817,0.00002367311,0.00004867171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001538828,0.001104599,0.7030936,0.0000127513,0.00008377856,0.00003042884,0.00008536386,0.0008182252,0.0563012,0.0704204,0.1672874,0.0006083887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003789734,0.00008967066,0.9348171,0.000002641124,0.00003627709,0.00004727321,0.0002290642,0.00001686878,0.001380546,0.002821711,0.06011149,0.00006833253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.914308,0.00001081457,0.001589323,0.00115585,0.0002313664,0.000074444,0.0001199094,0.00001110465,0.08249921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993593,0.00001557242,0.000298096,0.0001401163,0.0001093712,0.000004204105,0.0000254894,0.000004597744,0.00004321358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2317235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9679788,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114455599","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01993.x","title":"Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":651,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Johnson and Johnson; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Citizen science; Bioacoustics; Soundscape; Data science; Temporal scales; Ecology; Scale (ratio); Computer science; Biology; Geography; Sound (geography); Telecommunications; Acoustics; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04262599094695181,"gpt":0.2699049356693508,"spread":0.227278944722399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001462734,0.00007620105,0.0001374798,0.00006251859,0.00006164271,0.000007183186,0.0001035718,0.0001590401,0.00001567649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002664796,0.00006952079,0.00002521771,0.00004036454,0.0001610919,0.000003390943,0.00007971814,0.0001761196,0.00000243773],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002891629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003810408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002157684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007404716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994115,0.00002388031,0.0002899399,0.0001170254,0.00004418982,0.0001134506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996331,0.00001627559,0.0001721693,0.0001267802,0.000009359503,0.00004233254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001044423,0.0001620356,0.01417446,0.000001513509,0.00001212439,0.0000052426,0.00003804289,0.00003477416,0.9849095,0.00006246736,0.000008747907,0.0004866823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002379801,0.0007150678,0.1683794,0.00001276171,0.00008842595,0.000386569,0.0008660161,0.00003459108,0.8225967,0.002483711,0.001769319,0.0002875964],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949432,0.0001562242,0.004477471,0.00002807161,0.00004110665,0.0001897368,9.678869e-7,0.000002356212,0.0001608533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838363,0.000179486,0.01583339,0.0000368105,0.00007615974,0.00002315978,0.000001496823,0.000006837246,0.000006379272],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1623127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2834975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012735201","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01112.x","title":"Modelling distribution and abundance with presence‐only data","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":628,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Covariate; Environmental data; Computer science; Environmental niche modelling; Statistical model; Sample (material); Species distribution; Contrast (vision); Sample size determination; Logistic regression; Abundance (ecology); Statistics; Ecology; Econometrics; Ecological niche; Habitat; Mathematics; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02949349491138339,"gpt":0.2452376003698848,"spread":0.2157441054585015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002421581,0.00006934714,0.0001276941,0.00001152182,0.00008088996,0.00002055589,0.0002379567,0.00004787515,0.003896584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008398257,0.00005336912,0.00001126223,0.00007718067,0.0001621341,0.000220586,0.0001486376,0.0001261758,0.00009235922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001902373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001513226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007358583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002134975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993361,0.000009245686,0.0001962133,0.0001422926,0.0001487046,0.0001674633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995341,0.00003557231,0.0001812579,0.0001572041,0.00001143384,0.00008046002],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00309218,0.001800496,0.1606641,0.00007329092,0.0002700558,0.0001351828,0.002189339,0.4476565,0.007855752,0.0394744,0.2387563,0.09803246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003144376,0.0006031965,0.1795619,0.00001943111,0.0001174919,0.0009461204,0.002237588,0.08148648,0.001045157,0.001247415,0.7290893,0.000501585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825976,0.00003862946,0.007841271,0.001093243,0.00004926115,0.00007444745,0.00005048133,0.000007219299,0.008247883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981506,0.0001607833,0.001368649,0.0001619661,0.00006591762,0.000001422041,0.00003727634,0.000004240747,0.00004918143],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.490333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997014,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051083403","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12179","title":"EDITOR'S CHOICE: Stepping stones are crucial for species' long‐distance dispersal and range expansion through habitat networks","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":618,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Habitat; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Population; Woodpecker; Seed dispersal; Geography; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01427108513299529,"gpt":0.2397780626661287,"spread":0.2255069775331334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000181258,0.0001511906,0.0003200693,0.00002403182,0.0002085027,0.00005695088,0.000181532,0.0001487702,0.007123383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004341944,0.0001277635,0.00008136121,0.00009566242,0.0002641937,0.0002887384,0.0001061806,0.0001888102,0.00007464856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003691449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008948734,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002260523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001039849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988674,0.00001945856,0.0003595284,0.0002043814,0.0001954772,0.0003537408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991572,0.0001779088,0.0003972218,0.0001076808,0.00004024678,0.0001196968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006878703,0.000437648,0.3941027,0.00007540927,0.00009946962,0.00002525559,0.001258071,0.001432092,0.006493074,0.00292358,0.5886284,0.003836489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001453448,0.0001725122,0.9442245,0.00001320606,0.00002976283,0.0000257846,0.002982007,0.0003771061,0.0000965805,0.0002966084,0.05014728,0.000181173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862705,0.0001736479,0.005530223,0.001332485,0.003304356,0.0004779278,0.00001906649,0.00001553834,0.002876274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995811,0.0002228145,0.0003381493,0.0006043441,0.002820878,0.00004488943,0.000008361408,0.00001569774,0.0001338651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5501218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345545404","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12669","title":"Biodiversity and ecosystem services in forest ecosystems: a research agenda for applied forest ecology","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":565,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Hakai Institute","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Biodiversity; Forest ecology; Intact forest landscape; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem management; Forest restoration; Sustainability; Ecoforestry; Ecosystem; Functional ecology; Forest management; Total human ecosystem; Ecosystem health; Ecology; Ecosystem ecology; Business; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02414968882755854,"gpt":0.2648636624551888,"spread":0.2407139736276303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001971916,0.0001626731,0.000416997,0.0003764899,0.0001806156,0.00003024018,0.0004914156,0.0001976252,0.0005679755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003216938,0.0001171411,0.00006519414,0.0002345534,0.0001988846,0.0001656601,0.0004069413,0.0001819929,0.0006410848],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004364351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003500263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001100094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05094746,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982322,0.00007895384,0.0005389678,0.0003054006,0.0002291134,0.0006153825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998649,0.0006286767,0.0003637174,0.0001877323,0.00002878012,0.0001421051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009631845,0.0001897433,0.9493578,0.0002355743,0.00008328746,0.00004682277,0.0007925614,0.0006683382,0.001728549,0.007367983,0.03593194,0.002634226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007617426,0.001220496,0.7483564,0.00005688878,0.00006550144,0.0000678632,0.0007879731,0.0006690133,0.0002536661,0.01531881,0.2251609,0.000425075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877049,0.00001056323,0.00002367744,0.00105895,0.0002257443,0.0007654594,0.0000205802,0.00001000917,0.01018012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989452,0.00006284162,0.0003153313,0.000244465,0.0001328639,0.00006080699,0.000003032497,0.00001189722,0.0002235864],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2010014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9663703,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154773800","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12550","title":"Measuring and assessing resilience: broadening understanding through multiple disciplinary perspectives","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":542,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Acadia University","funders":"European Research Council; Vetenskapsrådet; Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas; European Commission","keywords":"Resilience (materials science); Context (archaeology); Discipline; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Process management; Risk analysis (engineering); Socio-ecological system; Environmental resource management; Management science; Engineering; Environmental science; Sociology; Business; Dependability; Geography; Software engineering; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.431924214928863,"gpt":0.4335870546588,"spread":0.001662839729937027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005155369,0.0001585186,0.0006015645,0.0004398211,0.0004015957,0.0005128235,0.0005085728,0.0001120542,0.0000395102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002670593,0.0001129923,0.0001064374,0.0005174756,0.000210234,0.0008094884,0.0003800614,0.0003556435,0.00001701411],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003648018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002206006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000534967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004124103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967069,0.000176646,0.001132686,0.0003845446,0.001284685,0.0003145209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952503,0.002755995,0.001096831,0.0002619346,0.0004243344,0.0002105976],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002623772,0.0005669528,0.2949776,0.00004812123,0.0003399945,0.0009842805,0.2158118,0.04760163,0.01382595,0.3788389,0.02798505,0.01639592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001539241,0.0002060936,0.04015172,0.00005645365,0.00002015542,0.0007147656,0.3274995,0.004367776,0.0000715842,0.6240034,0.00116336,0.0002058802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8551006,0.001071053,0.126956,0.0003998011,0.0007832007,0.0001213764,6.832917e-7,0.00001552989,0.01555173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887379,0.000007516929,0.01081976,0.00004268021,0.0003093585,0.000001700569,5.224448e-8,0.00001256607,0.00006842496],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2548259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4945168,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158774225","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12289","title":"REVIEW: Can retention forestry help conserve biodiversity? A meta‐analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":442,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais; Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Alberta; Vancouver Island University","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet; Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas","keywords":"Biodiversity; Forestry; Biodiversity conservation; Meta-analysis; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Business; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03365640136169146,"gpt":0.2143163567216188,"spread":0.1806599553599273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006944184,0.0001184917,0.0007395169,0.00004917592,0.0002660415,0.00001101157,0.0002659392,0.0001402146,0.0008756593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005526202,0.0000458838,0.0006821823,0.000378263,0.0001466798,0.00004721323,0.000102522,0.0001759697,0.00005901627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002656156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008793136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004731587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002322686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991025,0.00009882796,0.0003085595,0.0001618597,0.00011568,0.0002125223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989928,0.0002597718,0.0004671264,0.00004527559,0.0001510351,0.00008396214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007083307,0.0006766979,0.5554962,0.0002882398,0.1477974,0.00009949537,0.0002270112,0.0001329005,0.002766961,0.002211826,0.28596,0.003634943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005495923,0.001424888,0.8156025,0.00001316438,0.1122683,0.00005437124,0.0005076427,0.00001221363,0.000275546,0.002602027,0.06634612,0.000343605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800231,0.00210831,0.00000420994,0.01649002,0.000174572,0.0001693285,0.00004659146,0.00001696143,0.0009668834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915658,0.002006213,0.0001312941,0.006121198,0.00008628392,0.000003371008,0.00002815501,2.65283e-7,0.00005742617],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2601064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9587855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120428481","doi":"10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00985.x","title":"REVIEW: The management of wild large herbivores to meet economic, conservation and environmental objectives","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":422,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation","keywords":"Herbivore; Ecology; Moorland; Population; Biodiversity; Geography; Ecosystem; Vegetation (pathology); Habitat; Wildebeest; Foraging; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00483415137659494,"gpt":0.2067012560102066,"spread":0.2018671046336117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004973624,0.00007661303,0.0001797627,0.00002525796,0.00008554527,0.000003832844,0.0001445102,0.00004748062,0.0002725922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004661737,0.00005813624,0.0000342284,0.00004367711,0.0001385463,0.00008530536,0.0001123047,0.00006991164,0.00004090457],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001607877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001096795,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001124425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002637178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993318,0.00002757968,0.0003300874,0.0001127216,0.00007039656,0.0001274188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995139,0.00005105317,0.0002915004,0.00009889904,0.000002633864,0.00004197292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008326026,0.0008128069,0.8617952,0.0003199491,0.0006907462,0.00003686433,0.002615731,0.01295321,0.003803274,0.03542727,0.07570022,0.005012107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008365986,0.0002194349,0.9773384,0.00005500368,0.00007966672,0.00003613852,0.0005764373,0.00001546656,0.000349224,0.006058317,0.01435256,0.00008270468],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905009,0.000351793,0.0000825038,0.006887962,0.00009500559,0.000298987,0.000003180838,0.000002514825,0.001777115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879572,0.001874443,0.0009652307,0.009132386,0.00002417394,0.0000171501,0.000001361689,0.000004998915,0.00002302773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1155432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2984693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487352212","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01466.x","title":"Modelling wildlife–human relationships for social species with mixed‐effects resource selection models","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":407,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Ecology; Canis; Wildlife; Resource (disambiguation); Generalized linear mixed model; Habitat; Geography; Biology; Computer science; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03917761709386359,"gpt":0.2151627379078549,"spread":0.1759851208139913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004450371,0.0001124377,0.0002315457,0.00007578349,0.0009028002,0.000008108105,0.0001281534,0.0001841023,0.00006337678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001674715,0.0001002684,0.00006190881,0.0001543685,0.0002000255,0.0002119263,0.00002569415,0.0003294307,0.00001621765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002019934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003436749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004705033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009313292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990629,0.00006783834,0.0003273334,0.000158661,0.0001549208,0.0002283342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992016,0.000266624,0.0003879563,0.00005756062,0.00003032676,0.00005591148],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004665964,0.0001407102,0.1109409,0.000009402633,0.00005837204,0.000008306438,0.001249457,0.8568079,0.0005959769,0.009314465,0.02031754,0.00009044953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003077081,0.001112078,0.8648689,0.00001055377,0.0001632565,0.0003311933,0.00046003,0.07383394,0.0005725145,0.04800893,0.007181268,0.0003802363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9329869,0.000003001636,0.06144519,0.0005655531,0.00007185411,0.0002418364,6.947723e-7,0.00001607056,0.004668912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898123,0.000004333821,0.009004094,0.000505092,0.000243679,0.00003058817,0.000004069087,0.00001471244,0.0003811265],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7829739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026742653","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12190","title":"REVIEW: Beyond the fragmentation debate: a conceptual model to predict when habitat configuration really matters","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":390,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Habitat fragmentation; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat; Habitat destruction; Ecology; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Geography; Biome; Population; Wildlife corridor; Landscape connectivity; Biological dispersal; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00865814514206941,"gpt":0.2285055415366485,"spread":0.219847396394579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004302106,0.0001017591,0.0002141652,0.00003410829,0.0001679925,0.00001433308,0.0002098239,0.00006679173,0.001351409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004179314,0.00007032481,0.0000457871,0.00007202032,0.0002328769,0.0001781797,0.00006950468,0.0001725764,0.0005942413],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000141259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002378571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009531845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003146819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999025,0.00005608913,0.0004555917,0.0001298267,0.0001501924,0.0001833098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992566,0.0001615857,0.0003607814,0.0001009585,0.00004855839,0.00007158621],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008443123,0.00009648078,0.01027689,0.00003315746,0.0001100517,0.000003751881,0.004933452,0.1043792,0.006410593,0.002495567,0.8686455,0.002530913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004904054,0.00245807,0.7214891,0.000185708,0.0006830257,0.0002493333,0.007089012,0.07438703,0.0009377776,0.1628451,0.02370289,0.00106892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8809158,0.0002923665,0.015151,0.07994636,0.0004810262,0.001661919,0.000005632406,0.0000207236,0.02152524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9176889,0.0005573232,0.00526402,0.07592332,0.00004951234,0.0001563415,0.000006796316,0.00001067128,0.0003431437],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8449426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995615,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620357847","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12945","title":"Impacts of salvage logging on biodiversity: A meta‐analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":385,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Université Laval; Royal Alberta Museum; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Logging; Biodiversity; Salvage logging; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Geography; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Forestry; Ecosystem; Biology; Forest ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02659221893901622,"gpt":0.2641752097883129,"spread":0.2375829908492967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004125413,0.0000802158,0.0004187124,0.0001834732,0.0001470352,0.00002197626,0.000442221,0.00004963853,0.004730826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002026167,0.00006108942,0.0003258646,0.00009115278,0.0001771961,0.0001090414,0.0002028103,0.0001071588,0.0004543158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005028755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006283797,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001792692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002894966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993514,0.00001648767,0.0002101987,0.00009245216,0.0001603331,0.0001691168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989247,0.00005001357,0.0007008975,0.0002469592,0.00000558944,0.00007178814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008033258,0.0006440579,0.777034,0.0000493552,0.09422777,0.0002238876,0.00150987,0.02791534,0.004403101,0.004594424,0.08658449,0.002010342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001041419,0.0004982671,0.9384832,0.00000157267,0.04450024,0.0000062034,0.00006133453,0.000178292,0.001510382,0.001948831,0.01156677,0.0002034893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9400805,0.000009208289,0.00001364557,0.001096457,0.00006803306,0.00005991668,0.000003368145,0.000003101036,0.05866581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989785,0.00002514549,0.0003198171,0.0004800202,0.00002682335,5.961806e-7,5.52401e-7,0.00000242778,0.000166126],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1614491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037158451","doi":"10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00899.x","title":"A quantitative approach to conservation planning: using resource selection functions to map the distribution of mountain caribou at multiple spatial scales","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":376,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Threatened species; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Scale (ratio); Ecology; Species distribution; Elevation (ballistics); Physical geography; Cartography; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02204205090597237,"gpt":0.2465647803494772,"spread":0.2245227294435049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005553035,0.00009813013,0.000187272,0.00006579357,0.0003368363,0.000009645803,0.0001342394,0.0001163206,0.0000310526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001333743,0.00008112639,0.00004673456,0.0003141352,0.0001393958,0.00008730633,0.00008337126,0.0001727531,0.00003740577],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008560754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005156272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004156594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002322261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990107,0.00007731162,0.0003976873,0.000158561,0.0001702282,0.0001855183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992357,0.0001887104,0.0003691072,0.0000858033,0.00005012432,0.00007053734],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009131122,0.0001397948,0.3552446,0.00000445527,0.00003233485,8.909725e-7,0.001098148,0.6286505,0.01012171,0.0006485068,0.003054764,0.00009115833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007045254,0.0005184804,0.9859669,0.000007907232,0.00004836412,0.00004500282,0.00128909,0.006985118,0.00138085,0.0005639186,0.002389254,0.0001005464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9001564,0.000003030342,0.09735706,0.001803764,0.0001155754,0.000321785,0.00001350566,0.000007005487,0.0002218773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940599,3.288843e-7,0.00500604,0.0007909294,0.00006046509,0.00002251992,0.00003252304,0.00000699172,0.0000202664],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6307223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3308238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002198107","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12041","title":"Ecosystem function enhanced by combining four functional types of plant species in intensively managed grassland mixtures: a 3‐year continental‐scale field experiment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":369,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"Science Foundation Ireland; Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering and Technology","keywords":"Monoculture; Weed; Agronomy; Species evenness; Biology; Biomass (ecology); Sowing; Grassland; Polyculture; Ecosystem; Field experiment; Species richness; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006353204178050473,"gpt":0.1855058116599237,"spread":0.1791526074818733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002025088,0.00009690945,0.0002950612,0.00007534635,0.00006389809,0.000007134645,0.00009108015,0.0000965924,0.001073123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002807933,0.00008158321,0.00004823079,0.00007234042,0.00007314493,0.0000817512,0.00006409361,0.0001813735,0.00006745244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009422442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008392063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001739952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006125969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991322,0.00003794106,0.0004283855,0.0001247595,0.000119436,0.0001572512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992932,0.0002107428,0.000370182,0.00005618354,0.00003358434,0.00003609361],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001858792,0.0006514722,0.4722335,0.00006094046,0.0004225835,0.00001466628,0.003007488,0.005615103,0.4353686,0.001486735,0.07870892,0.000571205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002688198,0.0009366709,0.9642493,0.00002859504,0.00004548005,0.00002509036,0.005483088,0.0005569087,0.02251233,0.002473669,0.0008119596,0.0001887216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921523,0.0000224104,0.0009588215,0.0003405661,0.0003982691,0.000187227,0.000003905446,0.000004523268,0.005931954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991554,0.00003421602,0.0002649892,0.0002425529,0.00002878699,0.00002673572,0.000005143257,0.00000534612,0.0002368272],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4920158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1888716368","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01010.x","title":"Effects of radio‐collar position and orientation on GPS radio‐collar performance, and the implications of PDOP in data screening","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":363,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Selkirk College","funders":"","keywords":"Global Positioning System; Dilution of precision; Collar; Telemetry; Orientation (vector space); Computer science; Position (finance); Ranging; Remote sensing; Radio frequency; Geodesy; Environmental science; Telecommunications; Geography; Engineering; GNSS applications; Mathematics; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007028231469094701,"gpt":0.2193166408126311,"spread":0.2122884093435363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007138987,0.00006590284,0.0002028705,0.00008064979,0.00008775049,0.000004831825,0.0001600293,0.00007923636,0.00002768518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004350804,0.00005129132,0.00001498212,0.0001662046,0.0002527795,0.0002012527,0.00007138923,0.0001295364,0.000002254083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005275346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001938804,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006840062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000822831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992645,0.00006098883,0.0003593125,0.0001203589,0.00009346584,0.0001013155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990541,0.0003646593,0.0004038759,0.0001345226,0.00001339109,0.00002945298],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001827769,0.000253652,0.9317086,0.00005673028,0.00008487642,0.000002901517,0.001117837,0.009848275,0.01370232,0.005239777,0.001897523,0.03425979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002332198,0.0002102761,0.9920382,0.00001160755,0.00005386933,0.00003751504,0.00006607564,0.002407779,0.001908445,0.0006305214,0.0002585382,0.00004500016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963276,0.00005013014,0.00029739,0.002396488,0.00004080258,0.0002895599,0.000002260583,0.000001794619,0.0005939356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973563,0.0002026772,0.001992264,0.0003760658,0.00004332229,0.00001106891,0.000005106262,0.000003980912,0.000009189919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06032962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2091599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550500279","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01819.x","title":"Beyond taxonomy: a review of macroinvertebrate trait‐based community descriptors as tools for freshwater biomonitoring","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":361,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Biomonitoring; Trait; Ecology; Freshwater ecosystem; Habitat; Environmental resource management; Biology; Ecosystem; Computer science; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06114742104348776,"gpt":0.2808134940381888,"spread":0.2196660729947011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002115016,0.0005433295,0.00296364,0.0002639838,0.0003133882,0.00004755369,0.001551772,0.0007979459,0.005018064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000193774,0.0004462873,0.0009665267,0.0003088447,0.0006216442,0.0003026678,0.0004305453,0.00164128,0.0003029481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000474014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003523938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001039468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001401784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966727,0.0003672305,0.001707229,0.0003372393,0.0002719995,0.0006436108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996057,0.0007368805,0.002328238,0.0005314832,0.00008020264,0.0002662333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003844818,0.001199437,0.0001881022,0.08104196,0.0009249638,0.0001178774,0.0003420007,0.00005160112,0.001024695,0.0003666871,0.1101344,0.8042238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007907636,0.0006949485,0.00001434435,0.003282001,0.001074932,0.0001280318,0.00005863715,0.00001536791,0.0005400421,0.000716151,0.992281,0.0004037375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004573242,0.9737552,0.0002591791,0.000376494,0.005130186,0.005994034,0.0008740291,0.00005212005,0.008985513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002550565,0.9894162,0.007431491,0.002056576,0.0002416564,0.0002267354,0.000175705,0.00007500883,0.0001215916],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8821467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117835647","doi":"10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00902.x","title":"Removing GPS collar bias in habitat selection studies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":352,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Foothills Medical Centre; University of Alberta","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Global Positioning System; Statistics; Sampling (signal processing); Terrain; Weighting; Sampling bias; Environmental science; Collar; Range (aeronautics); Sample size determination; Mathematics; Computer science; Geography; Cartography; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1257415600662107,"gpt":0.2499682802939554,"spread":0.1242267202277447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009476417,0.00008484664,0.000389364,0.000275295,0.0000533444,0.00001157588,0.00008608702,0.00009168417,0.0000923655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007927007,0.00009587307,0.00006182047,0.0001207624,0.00004591338,0.0001421374,0.0000275396,0.0001626244,0.0002169566],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008844006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002789044,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001074792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002644231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998875,0.000008472658,0.000786536,0.000142667,0.00002088972,0.000166432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991647,0.00006160155,0.0006652207,0.00006045486,0.00001307637,0.00003492186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008687812,0.0002023459,0.8238736,0.00002241741,0.0001462831,0.00001210382,0.001322638,0.07455306,0.0004155292,0.09825826,0.0004261173,0.000680722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002393876,0.0003140813,0.7832152,0.00001298763,0.00001159374,0.00005357954,0.001001034,0.0001794271,0.0005410858,0.210203,0.001901112,0.0001729501],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933704,0.0004626886,0.0003133575,0.0006368959,0.0003970407,0.000100587,0.000001638703,0.000004368298,0.004713077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964331,0.0006471312,0.002422572,0.0003297667,0.0001066378,0.000006451516,9.032649e-7,0.00001076433,0.00004262725],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1119448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3909591,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474287676","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12732","title":"Faster and farther: wolf movement on linear features and implications for hunting behaviour","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":345,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"World Wildlife Fund Canada; Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute; University of Alberta","funders":"Government of Alberta; Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Felling; Taiga; Predation; Foraging; Ecology; Geography; Forestry; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009468480979000396,"gpt":0.2336553276739113,"spread":0.2241868466949109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002139415,0.00005699051,0.0001014379,0.00002820543,0.0001010805,0.000006003636,0.00005639371,0.00007279152,0.0001077982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002074796,0.00003831767,0.00001864818,0.00002206101,0.00008188873,0.00005609952,0.00003940578,0.00006229254,0.000009979521],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006653649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001810872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008898423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995671,0.00001023204,0.0001666997,0.0001041568,0.00003519272,0.000116604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995655,0.0001630674,0.0001639312,0.00005556198,0.000009404443,0.00004247637],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008694441,0.00004457626,0.9725329,0.000001347362,0.00001313076,4.252594e-7,0.00008737052,0.00002100724,0.007194593,0.001603903,0.001907977,0.01650587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006163979,0.0002363736,0.9919381,0.000003052437,0.00001669856,0.00001455564,0.00003744963,0.000005080655,0.0004958863,0.005466987,0.001122945,0.00004645466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893067,0.000006420594,0.0003094752,0.00949521,0.00006280988,0.0001407012,0.000002990745,0.000003372486,0.0006722676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995532,0.00002113941,0.001543584,0.00261555,0.00005939948,0.00002096601,4.175916e-7,0.000005012652,0.000201884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01940526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1562549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220054153","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12598","title":"Quantifying relative fish abundance with <scp>eDNA</scp>: a promising tool for fisheries management","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":340,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Catch per unit effort; Abundance (ecology); Fishery; Environmental science; Relative species abundance; Environmental DNA; Biomass (ecology); Trout; Ecology; Spatial ecology; Spatial distribution; Biology; Biodiversity; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02886702329648378,"gpt":0.2277814525993959,"spread":0.1989144293029121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004394664,0.0001658432,0.0002959283,0.00004824153,0.0002162501,0.00002917049,0.0002562955,0.00007554857,0.00004158775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004922019,0.0001386454,0.00006193242,0.0001140086,0.0003774264,0.0003074169,0.0002539015,0.0001729099,0.00006161215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004931234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007845443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002885924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006624926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988157,0.0000227818,0.0003072073,0.0002344775,0.0002982701,0.0003215437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991575,0.0001785419,0.0004267901,0.000125222,0.00001548098,0.00009645388],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000480881,0.0003258907,0.9179294,0.00006802261,0.0005581892,0.00008025637,0.006770267,0.004299158,0.0009344174,0.000761644,0.06576588,0.002026022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00386036,0.002235372,0.8929552,0.00003746006,0.0002303972,0.00007757021,0.009848085,0.0000594585,0.002509418,0.003025678,0.08494369,0.0002173521],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867179,0.00001973765,0.001082774,0.0003614672,0.0001694254,0.0005125565,0.000008480164,0.00001418124,0.01111347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9009213,0.00004333232,0.09787177,0.0005278035,0.00005217892,0.00003334694,0.000002369331,0.00001741613,0.0005305329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09678899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5653797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168196608","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2003.00855.x","title":"Responses of periphyton and insects to experimental manipulation of riparian buffer width along forest streams","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":319,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Marine Fisheries Service","keywords":"Periphyton; Riparian buffer; Riparian zone; Environmental science; Biomass (ecology); STREAMS; Buffer strip; Ecosystem; Photosynthetically active radiation; Aquatic ecosystem; Ecology; Benthic zone; Hydrology (agriculture); Biology; Water quality; Habitat; Botany; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01011225170763104,"gpt":0.2282510101711679,"spread":0.2181387584635369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002887184,0.00008610591,0.0002416959,0.00007287581,0.00004298124,0.000002581398,0.00008701321,0.00009031267,0.0005532104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002128795,0.00007545551,0.0000306024,0.00008886791,0.0001518874,0.00008966782,0.00001975826,0.00008374338,0.000004430623],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003341231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000223448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002448541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002042217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992176,0.00003249578,0.0003742745,0.0001143987,0.0001248843,0.0001363076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995402,0.00006275374,0.000242306,0.00007110495,0.00001091735,0.00007277507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001308296,0.0003722983,0.8396409,0.00002155076,0.00005922172,0.00001976539,0.001903662,0.00787507,0.1468358,0.001139375,0.00007947998,0.0007445356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001020499,0.001188544,0.8179044,0.000007739543,0.00004098503,0.00005197814,0.0003118268,0.00003864212,0.1774402,0.001124332,0.000775874,0.00009497195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997398,0.00005509503,0.00009806643,0.00006556368,0.00007619915,0.0001142254,0.000001151271,0.000002390571,0.002189364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983461,0.00001345091,0.001478815,0.0001262936,0.0000105059,0.000004149789,7.41608e-7,0.000006176017,0.00001369561],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0306044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6057266,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1710959950","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00666.x","title":"Are urban bird communities influenced by the bird diversity of adjacent landscapes?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":310,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Urbanization; Habitat; Boreal; Species richness; Ecology; Temperate climate; Urban ecology; Spatial ecology; Latitude; Physical geography; Biology; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0103734438872468,"gpt":0.2106176969414298,"spread":0.2002442530541829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003600049,0.00008185324,0.0002334855,0.00003900189,0.0003751752,0.000004528755,0.0003548424,0.00007775167,0.0004721805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002061226,0.00005690632,0.00005394495,0.0001128193,0.0003640384,0.00006550822,0.000385033,0.0002379123,0.0000599653],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007720035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007516704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008665325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007500817,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993128,0.00006152524,0.000274568,0.00005892632,0.0001313853,0.0001608584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989428,0.0002411656,0.0006399156,0.0001116067,0.00002642857,0.00003810431],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009467916,0.00009896512,0.9898406,0.000003171414,0.0000607849,0.000006625769,0.002025751,0.002051227,0.000173417,0.0001509132,0.005360425,0.0001333844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005547407,0.0001285106,0.9922739,0.000003289379,0.00003709648,0.00003109486,0.003770339,0.0001417468,0.00004912273,0.001332927,0.001613071,0.00006420784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966184,0.00005476627,0.00003995972,0.0007008289,0.0001212369,0.00007821557,0.000002233377,0.00001132165,0.002373008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988842,0.0001953061,0.00007612886,0.0007548953,0.00001840646,0.000002949502,3.8295e-7,0.000006456843,0.00006127184],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007414163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5170045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140992867","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01106.x","title":"Barriers to forest regeneration of deforested and abandoned land in Panama","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":303,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute; Smithsonian Institution","keywords":"Species richness; Seed dispersal; Saccharum; Biology; Regeneration (biology); Seedling; Shrub; Biological dispersal; Secondary forest; Propagule; Vegetation (pathology); Agronomy; Agroforestry; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007288871268816641,"gpt":0.194566032589617,"spread":0.1872771613208003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003015013,0.00006285861,0.0002222432,0.00002822877,0.00004454309,0.000008649807,0.00008621406,0.0000892041,0.0000579425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000362643,0.00002498781,0.00002905806,0.0001292161,0.00002804825,0.00005766343,0.00001979396,0.00007951073,0.000002504389],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002624327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001338943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004701155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01170427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993303,0.00002935366,0.0003476421,0.00008022555,0.00008031589,0.0001321571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995435,0.00007438014,0.0001931485,0.00001925758,0.00003699997,0.0001327066],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004123804,0.00003351713,0.8890908,0.00000589453,0.00001045978,0.000006693499,0.0002220189,0.002825957,0.09582713,0.00069715,0.0003117293,0.01055628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004564559,0.0004290688,0.993668,0.000009270853,0.000006431666,0.00003194331,0.0001947244,0.0001515104,0.002435072,0.0003698715,0.002183225,0.00006443353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984835,0.00003248353,0.000006715869,0.001058198,0.00005805508,0.0001194508,0.000002423184,0.00000262974,0.0002364846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994236,0.00001197471,0.0001471455,0.00014531,0.0002442987,0.000003971113,0.000002191576,5.029062e-7,0.00002098523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1045772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6531255,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098055937","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01234.x","title":"Chronic industrial noise affects pairing success and age structure of ovenbirds <i>Seiurus aurocapilla</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":294,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Society of Professional Biologists; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Pairing; Noise (video); Boreal; Environmental science; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Physics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01044989980424841,"gpt":0.2389729910926895,"spread":0.2285230912884411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001173311,0.0001103225,0.0002517785,0.0000535629,0.00004942988,0.00001067385,0.0002024154,0.0002466973,0.00002401306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001552224,0.00009627694,0.00006395354,0.00007103139,0.0001371112,0.000003947532,0.0001124164,0.0002278194,6.478115e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002600211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009833046,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001538026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002670286,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993031,0.00003838454,0.0003027333,0.0001171309,0.00008696006,0.0001517125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993534,0.0000252711,0.000359993,0.00015322,0.00005341749,0.00005471031],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002145002,0.00005107486,0.01059734,0.00001511058,0.00002651417,0.000008608825,0.00001525293,0.000129205,0.9856723,0.0002721051,0.0007699522,0.002228065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003512808,0.001798088,0.2058316,0.00001912606,0.0001128784,0.0001349872,0.00008357316,0.00001075321,0.7733162,0.0004467275,0.0144799,0.0002533889],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985042,0.0003921815,0.00003906429,0.0001002426,0.00009706384,0.0001000466,0.000005624635,0.000003156582,0.0007583951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990714,0.00008670575,0.0002477954,0.00007986767,0.000456941,0.000001610112,0.00001335416,0.00001283551,0.00002948734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2123561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.392606,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040027717","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00758.x","title":"Mercury accumulation in the fish community of a sub‐Arctic lake in relation to trophic position and carbon sources","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":284,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Makivik Corporation; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Biomagnification; Trophic level; Food chain; Food web; Pelagic zone; Isotope analysis; Mercury (programming language); Predatory fish; Ecology; Benthic zone; Arctic; Environmental chemistry; Salvelinus; Environmental science; Biology; Chemistry; Trout; Fishery; Predation; Fish <Actinopterygii>","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.029773335141233,"gpt":0.2599342267335674,"spread":0.2301608915923344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006682648,0.00005033503,0.0001386092,0.00009267431,0.00005525208,0.000005604465,0.00007394438,0.00004783794,0.00007807647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005721596,0.00003861357,0.00001549842,0.000188827,0.00006547572,0.00007573803,0.0000315609,0.0002145373,0.000003056537],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000679136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002625241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009281296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003343987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993168,0.0001513535,0.0002858363,0.00004434074,0.000113771,0.00008794941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995139,0.0002060299,0.0001861202,0.00006213335,0.000008461297,0.00002330607],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001660234,0.0002831693,0.9125213,0.00002043966,0.00001680801,0.000005776135,0.03895456,0.01249095,0.03172144,0.0001066547,0.0002494999,0.003463398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000398663,0.0001606784,0.9964753,0.000008995685,0.00001085289,0.00001639169,0.00101144,0.0003742164,0.000296885,0.001162072,0.00004872472,0.0000357228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972444,0.00001308026,0.000006291045,0.001235757,0.00002523074,0.0001306965,7.702919e-7,0.000001250528,0.001342489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994799,0.00004310003,0.00006598158,0.000387452,0.00001300522,0.000004436786,8.878251e-7,0.00000246423,0.00000271927],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08395408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1866023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1732723623","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01857.x","title":"MINI‐REVIEW: Habitat analogues for reconciliation ecology in urban and industrial environments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":280,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Biological dispersal; Ecosystem; Biodiversity; Natural (archaeology); Ecosystem engineer; Urban ecosystem; Geography; Biology; Urban planning; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01342884626383233,"gpt":0.2236587433634044,"spread":0.2102298970995721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008285271,0.00009932613,0.0003355813,0.00006074905,0.00005032691,0.000008394279,0.0001564025,0.0001965685,0.0004763316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004768733,0.00007926765,0.00004290203,0.00006522614,0.00003490715,0.0001298793,0.00005782404,0.0002355987,0.00005295559],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008005692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001771906,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000122794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006325593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990158,0.00003189647,0.0004894714,0.0001592904,0.00009084618,0.0002126738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992579,0.0001735673,0.0003916143,0.0000895121,0.000004717034,0.00008270132],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001890473,0.0001478328,0.9790377,0.00005804735,0.00003398355,0.00000899401,0.0002407778,0.0001466224,0.004295164,0.00005549256,0.01046115,0.005325198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003540595,0.0006987245,0.8479646,0.00003751156,0.00009088655,0.00005722573,0.0001114528,0.0003477307,0.0006913856,0.001899603,0.1443309,0.0002292701],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976362,0.00008901749,0.000003623261,0.0007060313,0.0005125778,0.0003362818,0.000005501386,0.00000225408,0.000708543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998068,0.0004767279,0.0004500716,0.0007519518,0.0001913524,0.00003130775,0.000007547353,0.000007410194,0.00001557104],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1338698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5215497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1768651869","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02112.x","title":"Predicting the speed of tick invasion: an empirical model of range expansion for the Lyme disease vector <i>Ixodes scapularis</i> in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Vector-borne infectious diseases","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":277,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Public Health Agency of Canada; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ixodes scapularis; Tick; Biological dispersal; Lyme disease; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Borrelia burgdorferi; Biology; Population; Ixodes; Vector (molecular biology); Geography; Ixodidae; Demography; Virology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02455408033856891,"gpt":0.2523034002051589,"spread":0.22774931986659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006774467,0.0001418933,0.0004320988,0.00008344493,0.0001211898,0.000003579556,0.0003282322,0.0001307715,0.0000835154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002374283,0.00008433093,0.0001246516,0.0001085474,0.0001928989,0.00009070322,0.00007317304,0.0002973219,0.000001765638],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001831677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001192805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008866367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06507687,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986264,0.0001655968,0.0006627033,0.0001198598,0.00007837357,0.0003471392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978989,0.001050685,0.0006016688,0.0002489006,0.0001271681,0.00007270051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004104628,0.001070555,0.8440087,0.0001038237,0.0004678025,0.0000053187,0.001938775,0.01981348,0.1232815,0.0006724983,0.003757634,0.0007752111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004344323,0.00050319,0.9620732,0.00004425136,0.0006635377,0.00008396649,0.00247135,0.003967617,0.024381,0.0008433075,0.0003991974,0.0002250568],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997107,0.001209129,0.0001219875,0.0004565181,0.0005825135,0.0004107361,0.00005301349,0.00000495159,0.00005420553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999306,0.00004975029,0.00004580926,0.0004286114,0.0001168386,0.0000204923,0.000007217342,0.00001609484,0.000009165046],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1180645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977337,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109828141","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01848.x","title":"Climate change and range expansion of an aggressive bark beetle: evidence of higher beetle reproduction in naïve host tree populations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":277,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mountain pine beetle; Bark beetle; Pinus contorta; Dendroctonus; Ecology; Climate change; Brood; Herbivore; Range (aeronautics); Outbreak; Biology; Reproductive success; Population; Productivity; Geography; Bark (sound); Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0255711422117293,"gpt":0.2722866966416536,"spread":0.2467155544299243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006314542,0.00008206667,0.0002414824,0.000125628,0.00005359896,0.000003116224,0.0001373713,0.0001242739,0.0005888809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006282688,0.00007298634,0.0000299862,0.0001562945,0.0002260922,0.0002635324,0.0001141766,0.0002074872,0.000009075487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004247334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007829174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007163112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002940027,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990888,0.00004243701,0.0004058224,0.0001825107,0.0001213447,0.000159064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998982,0.00006062388,0.0007042971,0.0001831383,0.00001956114,0.00005035218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001780109,0.0008741572,0.4030142,0.0001370108,0.00004179044,0.00009421734,0.003433706,0.001022248,0.5523602,0.004866169,0.000712522,0.03166365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005242366,0.0004704629,0.9939309,0.00002668573,0.00002907176,0.00003254268,0.00009780086,0.00006054211,0.002810718,0.001870135,0.00008386376,0.00006304661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982445,0.00006821617,0.000003618652,0.0002067542,0.0005153191,0.0002473243,0.000001776395,0.000003351014,0.0007091035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998007,0.0001888402,0.001597296,0.00008006608,0.00008328472,0.00001831054,0.000001147855,0.000006654953,0.00001738698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5909167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6447833,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137517217","doi":"10.1046/j.0021-8901.2001.00678.x","title":"Drainage culverts as habitat linkages and factors affecting passage by mammals","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":270,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Parks Canada","funders":"Government of Canada; Public Works and Government Services Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Culvert; Transect; Habitat; Environmental science; Wildlife; Ecology; Drainage; Traffic volume; Geography; Hydrology (agriculture); Biology; Engineering; Geotechnical engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006170245967587697,"gpt":0.222558759281801,"spread":0.2163885133142133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002731183,0.0001000565,0.0001750819,0.00004993275,0.0001371023,0.00003389486,0.0000997265,0.00008743152,0.001169952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005179249,0.00008336553,0.00004491356,0.00009404366,0.00007714942,0.0002155915,0.00006127026,0.0002038645,0.00007392059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001106599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008757615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004225144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009172364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999267,0.00003192895,0.0002663031,0.0001298788,0.0001222135,0.0001826717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999357,0.00020113,0.0002726339,0.00007339743,0.00000955713,0.00008628675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008669701,0.0002032538,0.8917323,0.000007469537,0.00006828875,0.00008029111,0.001172627,0.0004939631,0.06239451,0.000259376,0.03353498,0.009966264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006349058,0.0004209999,0.9510953,0.0000101181,0.00003982186,0.0003318055,0.001839667,0.0001421464,0.003890782,0.002769775,0.03863453,0.0001901165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9747333,0.00001563045,0.0001093309,0.0008864735,0.0001669466,0.00008774504,8.416651e-7,0.000008899324,0.02399082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984186,0.00006278717,0.0003206185,0.000663703,0.00005488861,0.000002464522,0.000001478737,0.000008772806,0.000466674],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05936306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997431,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1640554899","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12333","title":"FORUM: Do green roofs help urban biodiversity conservation?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Urban Heat Island Mitigation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":262,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Green roof; Green infrastructure; Habitat; Ecosystem services; Geography; Ecosystem; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Generalist and specialist species; Environmental resource management; Recreation; Environmental planning; Roof; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006085244665425812,"gpt":0.1834210134289835,"spread":0.1773357687635577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003491361,0.00007754542,0.000167416,0.0000505995,0.0001023553,0.00001163182,0.0001867243,0.00009185407,0.001289357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002206196,0.00006885653,0.00004872881,0.00009646101,0.0001134803,0.0001230191,0.00008089477,0.0001389252,0.000622823],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001466654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001261004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004537861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002646327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992617,0.00003280134,0.000249213,0.0001141073,0.000161534,0.0001805831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994582,0.0000875012,0.0002438067,0.0001051462,0.00001544137,0.00008988588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006799933,0.00005708295,0.8698847,0.000003199114,0.00001822271,0.000003663924,0.0002465638,0.000305945,0.00375915,0.001061329,0.1223349,0.002257279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00122767,0.0003555751,0.8614004,0.00000294484,0.00003877139,0.00003643131,0.0001439392,0.0001831665,0.002274158,0.01135544,0.1228348,0.0001466622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857597,0.000004635344,0.0007667789,0.002010304,0.0001923724,0.00009947184,0.000002553838,0.000009411369,0.01115482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966865,0.000004633211,0.001178061,0.001890648,0.0000932482,0.000001770238,0.00000255137,0.000003871543,0.0001387536],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01101607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972551940","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00831.x","title":"Foraging by bats in cleared, thinned and unharvested boreal forest","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":256,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Foraging; Habitat; Ecology; Insectivore; Biology; Forage; Snag; Human echolocation; Myotis lucifugus; Taiga; Predation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009628323079296413,"gpt":0.1998480079946477,"spread":0.1902196849153513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005261128,0.0001028466,0.0003008309,0.00002533611,0.0001324062,0.00001059975,0.0001101491,0.0002016535,0.00009411034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007449829,0.00004250027,0.00003620411,0.0001284979,0.0001446455,0.0000645256,0.00003656475,0.0002583401,0.000006956153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002671657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001009779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002066397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005198621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991457,0.00007020736,0.0003176595,0.0001417132,0.00004524668,0.0002794408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994161,0.0002741865,0.0001940389,0.00002135145,0.00003272327,0.00006161229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004252546,0.0002617278,0.9422131,0.000007810704,0.0001027575,0.00005269982,0.0003462111,0.0000144712,0.02430367,0.005190936,0.009879198,0.01720216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006155659,0.0004574987,0.9820307,0.000003260179,0.00001073871,0.00008104771,0.0008132599,0.000004657666,0.0005639799,0.005823312,0.009498443,0.00009746207],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936658,0.0002167963,0.000001105526,0.001078167,0.0001521459,0.00009052583,0.00000274592,0.000007025189,0.004785687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989299,0.0001597505,0.0001066614,0.0007011475,0.00004982099,0.000005666434,0.00000449604,7.636123e-7,0.00004181024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03981768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2900953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129164653","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01472.x","title":"Accounting for population variation improves estimates of the impact of climate change on species’ growth and distribution","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":246,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Government of British Columbia; University of Alberta; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Pinus contorta; Ecology; Population; Species distribution; Productivity; Effects of global warming; Temperate climate; Environmental science; Habitat; Geography; Global warming; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02102092485786109,"gpt":0.2538963057556452,"spread":0.2328753808977841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002141473,0.00007745207,0.0001921819,0.00002677408,0.0001142737,0.000005424421,0.00009017366,0.00006586275,0.0003782351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008173902,0.00005176589,0.00008969675,0.0001127949,0.0001060559,0.0001086214,0.00005231061,0.00006407162,0.000002091879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002200057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007056475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005575693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001821747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993182,0.00001142735,0.0003178466,0.00008103743,0.0001282005,0.0001432936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999091,0.00009488132,0.0006914553,0.00006499568,0.00002989258,0.00002781205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006093103,0.0003140334,0.8484192,0.00006103376,0.00004895879,7.610395e-7,0.0006822585,0.0002749983,0.1376922,0.009774979,0.0005550698,0.001567165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004637184,0.0002680886,0.993798,0.000006258482,0.00002134344,0.00001385939,0.0001003615,0.0002856253,0.004183039,0.0007971846,0.0000177123,0.0000448363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984502,0.000005595648,0.00009223769,0.000111022,0.00009685303,0.0002158209,0.00009674927,0.000003011898,0.0009284702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996734,0.0001140733,0.00009505972,0.00002932497,0.00004786909,0.000007659773,0.00002656262,0.000004674492,0.000001434669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1453787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4141409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1723472082","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02043.x","title":"Caribou encounters with wolves increase near roads and trails: a time‐to‐event approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":245,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Parks Canada","funders":"Petroleum Technology Alliance Canada; Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers; Parks Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Canis; Ungulate; Predation; Geography; Woodland caribou; Ecology; Wildlife; Seasonal breeder; Biology; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006699325311741459,"gpt":0.1760289348560218,"spread":0.1693296095442803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004246062,0.0001053535,0.0002128298,0.00004618652,0.000102795,0.00001160926,0.0001563867,0.00009892715,0.001825743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001894524,0.0000818679,0.00002798507,0.0001044083,0.0002394907,0.0001201879,0.00006503894,0.0001676341,0.000143562],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000861161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005064269,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005697762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009990072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992394,0.00003820059,0.0002513747,0.0001582579,0.0001114526,0.0002013027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994677,0.00004546233,0.0002007052,0.00009241295,0.00001003606,0.0001836603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004141962,0.001268193,0.9402393,0.00002249241,0.0003525304,0.0001501553,0.01465556,0.005728701,0.002436419,0.001050187,0.01981235,0.01014214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076969,0.0007649829,0.994606,0.000003783163,0.00005815177,0.0002234693,0.0003347727,0.0004640718,0.000102568,0.0005510436,0.001991005,0.0001304673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9782488,0.000005118859,0.0002819754,0.0002795612,0.00003764447,0.0001574401,0.000001130731,0.000006939426,0.0209814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870646,0.000003600274,0.01089174,0.001871742,0.00002926977,0.00001594012,0.0000012185,0.000008447166,0.000113442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05436668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553199639","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12843","title":"The missing link in grassland restoration: arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation increases plant diversity and accelerates succession","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":242,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; U.S. Department of Agriculture; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Ecological succession; Species richness; Grassland; Inoculation; Plant community; Species diversity; Ecology; Biodiversity; Botany; Agronomy; Horticulture","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01361077630798883,"gpt":0.2037856884792099,"spread":0.1901749121712211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003863132,0.00007292709,0.0001354899,0.00002690844,0.0005768146,0.00004010175,0.0001161223,0.00008702261,0.0002290387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001152823,0.00002146151,0.00003361745,0.00009485552,0.00001313667,0.0001576467,0.0001021025,0.0001207502,0.00001037805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003424457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001063233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001444656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007423866,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993467,0.0000724454,0.0002502334,0.00009496808,0.0001021667,0.000133434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972285,0.002416135,0.0002183542,0.00002515118,0.00005071338,0.00006117185],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004923008,0.00003376523,0.9273008,0.00000240229,0.00001329884,0.00001883889,0.00005667517,0.00001559643,0.04956689,0.0008268057,0.0009037171,0.02076898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001688455,0.000165169,0.984365,0.00004587731,0.00001560977,0.0001057948,0.0001007036,0.00008527642,0.0009444694,0.005721275,0.008201583,0.00008036858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967204,0.0002845465,0.00001318399,0.002441922,0.0001798724,0.00007514272,0.00003205076,0.000005341588,0.000247585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977624,0.001808031,0.00003690673,0.0000793759,0.0002692373,0.000001583247,0.00002534107,5.026952e-7,0.00001656398],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05706429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.443645,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050511102","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01686.x","title":"Use of resource selection functions to identify conservation corridors","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":238,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Government of Alberta","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Habitat; Wildlife; Geography; Ecology; Resource (disambiguation); Wildlife conservation; Endangered species; Forage; Environmental science; Biology; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01782543704987868,"gpt":0.2423475758244659,"spread":0.2245221387745872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003875704,0.00007314047,0.0001770605,0.0001153044,0.0001001751,0.000009933929,0.0001066968,0.0001180712,0.0006810878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001118052,0.00007220753,0.00004748602,0.0003292306,0.00006255359,0.000195966,0.00002485117,0.0001649902,0.0001574922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001381719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002996891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000184139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002008304,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99913,0.00004777262,0.0004295395,0.0001142562,0.0001350426,0.0001434252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992512,0.0001467403,0.0004095001,0.00008315049,0.00004001509,0.00006931904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000627998,0.0002289594,0.7359861,0.000002437712,0.0000322131,0.000004190584,0.0002865593,0.04155308,0.04064515,0.0003928797,0.1754346,0.004805829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002567971,0.000475591,0.9782278,0.000002950956,0.0000319408,0.00003858331,0.00007375325,0.0002745525,0.0008757108,0.0008131553,0.01886733,0.00006183766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933981,0.000001195747,0.001564273,0.003093173,0.0001976928,0.0001369789,0.000001209337,0.000009561656,0.00159776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926924,0.000002556466,0.001878613,0.005030407,0.00006153285,0.000003730068,0.000002949429,0.00000438176,0.000323413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2422417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7457434,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142288624","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01403.x","title":"Do small mammals avoid roads because of the traffic?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":236,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Peromyscus; Wildlife; Habitat; Limiting; Ecology; Population; Environmental science; Geography; Biology; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01042978995467121,"gpt":0.2214696678518193,"spread":0.2110398778971481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007053048,0.00007076225,0.0001531435,0.00004817147,0.00007050207,0.000008365981,0.0002554465,0.00008033793,0.00144212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003235046,0.00004848271,0.00008852515,0.0001523019,0.0001098952,0.00006786388,0.00006495573,0.0002119059,0.00006532065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001199487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002290585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001598689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004600258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991243,0.00002414065,0.000458006,0.00008533927,0.000147192,0.0001610339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991758,0.0001242981,0.0004860898,0.0001425337,0.00002024787,0.00005101277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001529426,0.001676692,0.4675428,0.00003191992,0.0003078752,0.00005958234,0.003961319,0.06577644,0.2732526,0.004333675,0.05256041,0.1289673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005806491,0.0001992643,0.9586619,0.000009073751,0.00004231139,0.0001286802,0.0005259888,0.0001049497,0.01074796,0.0007093971,0.02819374,0.0000960508],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863895,0.000006591319,0.0001530324,0.0007624818,0.0003468461,0.00009142623,7.424994e-7,0.000003355342,0.012246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980781,0.00001121094,0.0009104055,0.0006409856,0.00008818667,0.000001722596,2.3377e-7,0.000006085555,0.0002630844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4911191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2958032279","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.13475","title":"The contribution of constructed green infrastructure to urban biodiversity: A synthesis and meta‐analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":236,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; Toronto and Region Conservation Authority; University of Toronto","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Biodiversity; Green infrastructure; Ecosystem services; Environmental resource management; Wetland; Trophic level; Geography; Ecosystem; Habitat; Environmental planning; Ecology; Business; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006533362771186107,"gpt":0.2064082953191899,"spread":0.1998749325480038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004057394,0.00007999326,0.0005138363,0.00009704049,0.00009760544,0.000009073612,0.0001732903,0.00008100186,0.001448157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001946366,0.00005058821,0.0001403517,0.0003069532,0.0001627133,0.00004794437,0.0001059417,0.0001283398,0.00004759404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008238793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002501577,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001691179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001569785,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992459,0.0000438782,0.0002632161,0.0001110362,0.0001639444,0.0001720683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991193,0.0002412821,0.0003816735,0.0001233284,0.00002974684,0.000104665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002245176,0.00001618837,0.9853594,0.000004105451,0.008128295,0.00000200842,0.0003227355,0.0003712295,0.001783553,0.0004609453,0.003008782,0.000318215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004448555,0.0002560357,0.9674755,6.046862e-7,0.02539492,0.00001500599,0.0005425188,0.00004872254,0.0008036516,0.0007723968,0.004142024,0.0001037332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972977,0.00004624303,0.0000519205,0.001983,0.00003723019,0.0001742335,0.0000126822,0.000002461589,0.0003945364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990053,0.00003065065,0.0004702005,0.0004433667,0.00001082612,0.000001825448,5.672679e-7,0.000001992254,0.00003527557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01788389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994646,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994865037","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01643.x","title":"Spring Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) predicts annual variation in timing of peak faecal crude protein in mountain ungulates","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":228,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Alberta Conservation Association; Université Laval; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université de Sherbrooke; Foundation for North American Wild Sheep; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; Vegetation (pathology); Environmental science; Biomass (ecology); Enhanced vegetation index; Physical geography; Ecology; Vegetation Index; Geography; Climate change; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006005232608153178,"gpt":0.2108807741046016,"spread":0.2048755414964484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007104721,0.00009743183,0.000258282,0.0001794842,0.00003507699,0.00000593916,0.0001595047,0.000178186,0.0000895159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000883196,0.00009636996,0.00002821147,0.0002353413,0.00006239972,0.0002287784,0.00003827699,0.0002785042,0.000007250798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002605813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004541967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008586874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001240474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987735,0.0000850239,0.0006277792,0.0001394383,0.0001666169,0.0002076923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992771,0.00009401685,0.0004970685,0.00007360642,0.000019435,0.00003884182],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003977423,0.000220944,0.918425,0.000009758015,0.000007717602,0.00001435436,0.001409772,0.02694491,0.04997024,0.0004949091,0.000006476803,0.002098183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001344058,0.0002404634,0.9838797,0.00002394142,0.000008147927,0.00000764437,0.00009782006,0.007779578,0.001240338,0.005295975,0.000005178339,0.00007714413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982962,0.000007372312,0.0005485579,0.0003155536,0.0000584263,0.0002583039,4.871042e-7,0.00000513797,0.000509974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985217,0.000003921176,0.001233805,0.0001831645,0.00003051586,0.00001076673,0.000001063755,0.000004361096,0.00001063885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06545471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3929853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110994363","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01468.x","title":"Exploring reservoir dynamics: a case study of rabies in the Serengeti ecosystem","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Rabies epidemiology and control","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":225,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Tanzania Government; Universidade de São Paulo; Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology; Zoologische Gesellschaft Frankfurt; Department for International Development; University of Edinburgh; Princeton University; Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute; Wellcome Trust; National Institutes of Health; Pew Charitable Trusts; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Carnivore; Rabies; Wildlife; Biology; Ecology; Population; Wildlife disease; Rabies virus; Predation; Environmental health; Virology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08070937686384347,"gpt":0.2613352460755128,"spread":0.1806258692116693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001991117,0.0001617045,0.0008295778,0.0002712416,0.0002021752,0.000002498512,0.0004471797,0.0002286656,0.00005616141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001652357,0.0001074085,0.00011374,0.0001703198,0.0001824773,0.00009746818,0.00006880559,0.0008074951,0.00002395523],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000777905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008131519,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001249721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005926134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974879,0.0008717769,0.001095928,0.0001707262,0.00004298606,0.0003306977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973422,0.001531962,0.0007193569,0.0002899156,0.00009850692,0.00001800465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01486983,0.01089057,0.6515241,0.0002860667,0.005672636,0.03962554,0.1988046,0.03139206,0.01478565,0.01679186,0.00705682,0.008300217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03098674,0.01305926,0.1967376,0.00008227843,0.0005871974,0.1626116,0.5858702,0.0004707201,0.00175778,0.002816878,0.004241431,0.000778329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974121,0.0002978075,0.00001644136,0.0005278408,0.0005894998,0.0003863274,0.000004032198,0.000007819154,0.000758066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995034,0.0001438142,0.00002271943,0.0001471431,0.00006043735,0.00007641964,0.000001710723,0.000009833008,0.0000345347],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4547865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4379992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560244927","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12849","title":"Invader Relative Impact Potential: a new metric to understand and predict the ecological impacts of existing, emerging and future invasive alien species","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":220,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Windsor","funders":"British Ecological Society; Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Ecological Society of America","keywords":"Trophic level; Ecology; Invasive species; Introduced species; Biology; Range (aeronautics); Abundance (ecology); Metric (unit); Herbivore","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02817386675800784,"gpt":0.2761854225421079,"spread":0.2480115557841001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004250105,0.0001405639,0.00035604,0.00009575434,0.0001791403,0.00001024503,0.0001507717,0.0001338752,0.000920029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001723151,0.00006709138,0.00006044823,0.0001988593,0.0005218335,0.0001336657,0.000286277,0.0001873269,0.000008859481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001750716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004753421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004304312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990292,0.0000571112,0.0003359393,0.0001691981,0.0001478679,0.0002607181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988727,0.0004731678,0.0003961134,0.00007255071,0.00002050601,0.0001649748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00107073,0.0002019072,0.929364,0.00001208208,0.0004188025,0.00009223713,0.008141415,0.0001502342,0.03767298,0.002857593,0.01383489,0.006183133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007505863,0.001393413,0.9894978,0.000007218448,0.0001130932,0.0001179737,0.003646353,0.000001315502,0.0003942527,0.003376347,0.0006146203,0.00008706715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934973,0.0001247747,0.0001417464,0.003595635,0.0001008366,0.0002009927,0.000004394211,0.000004231751,0.002330049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985808,0.000530298,0.000447051,0.0001931499,0.000118627,0.000001930688,1.372594e-7,0.000006413465,0.0001216684],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06013376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976497918","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01662.x","title":"Effects of marine reserve age on fish populations: a global meta‐analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":218,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Marine reserve; Nature reserve; Trophic cascade; Fishery; Marine protected area; Ecology; Fish mortality; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Trophic level; Habitat; Food web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02590565978289561,"gpt":0.290000064980154,"spread":0.2640944051972584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003767953,0.00009275718,0.0005317259,0.0001014018,0.00004472602,0.00001186184,0.000279741,0.00007996367,0.006019257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006398941,0.00007147093,0.0003221645,0.0006004124,0.00007865286,0.00006379817,0.0001436546,0.0001799453,0.0000184383],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001180942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001124242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001297244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001163708,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989012,0.00006112254,0.0003760813,0.0001310201,0.0003247719,0.0002057503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993476,0.0001156938,0.0002619432,0.00016212,0.00001708955,0.00009553191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004977996,0.00510513,0.7362183,0.0001451417,0.06036941,0.001790629,0.0004930715,0.03585463,0.00462902,0.02466883,0.04214287,0.08360499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005860523,0.0009282437,0.9726112,4.930315e-7,0.006406077,0.00001063286,0.00001399271,0.000129412,0.0003317127,0.01567995,0.00320972,0.0000925285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7018954,0.000008546757,0.0001096788,0.00150682,0.00005772769,0.0002359261,0.000003776272,0.000006559477,0.2961755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970224,0.000027545,0.001891698,0.0007027889,0.00003282604,0.000005320413,0.000003617476,0.000003259493,0.0003105431],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.295865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582748070","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12874","title":"A synthesis of tree functional traits related to drought‐induced mortality in forests across climatic zones","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":217,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Royal Society Te Apārangi","keywords":"Edaphic; Abiotic component; Drought tolerance; Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Ecosystem; Climate change; Tree (set theory); Geography; Environmental resource management; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Agronomy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01913551224405997,"gpt":0.2758981464190878,"spread":0.2567626341750278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001051987,0.0001135719,0.0003868298,0.00007223383,0.0001726527,0.00001331696,0.0004145836,0.0001512051,0.0007989221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001959561,0.00009943848,0.00008357581,0.00008996132,0.0002133815,0.000157708,0.0002421767,0.0001935083,0.0001344737],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000155382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002102933,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004080334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01341665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986708,0.00003837429,0.000624318,0.0001762883,0.0001876427,0.0003025579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988568,0.0001477543,0.0006713164,0.0002251213,0.00001244201,0.00008654778],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007294029,0.0008988159,0.9535228,0.00005044026,0.0002462266,0.0001372463,0.001396853,0.01461044,0.004418009,0.01166069,0.002032764,0.0102963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007146369,0.0002035878,0.9790154,0.00001024855,0.00003672956,0.00001705309,0.0001571891,0.0001287661,0.0006531592,0.01888959,0.00008705203,0.00008664174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877263,0.000001306814,0.00008427681,0.0005763495,0.0002684944,0.0002310891,0.000002420373,0.000004206459,0.01110554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990947,0.000004580873,0.0006261412,0.0001218387,0.0000202489,0.00003186639,4.683945e-7,0.000007975877,0.00009220076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02549252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8747637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2471370287","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12702","title":"Species distribution models predict rare species occurrences despite significant effects of landscape context","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":214,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Liber Ero Foundation; National Health Insurance Service","keywords":"Rare species; Habitat; Ecology; Edaphic; Habitat fragmentation; Endangered species; Population; Context (archaeology); Geography; Species distribution; Woodland; Plant community; Biology; Species richness","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01571124427307824,"gpt":0.2064338563785054,"spread":0.1907226121054272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002712984,0.0001474682,0.0003710373,0.00004506238,0.00007455601,0.00001542598,0.0002895923,0.0001074184,0.01490921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007958088,0.00009336408,0.0001184617,0.0001499143,0.0004275701,0.0001807751,0.0001055205,0.0001093435,0.0001388203],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002889778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002537033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004521261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000631919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986992,0.00004195916,0.0004857109,0.0001679955,0.000315869,0.0002892844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988537,0.000299058,0.0005427693,0.0001354156,0.00004671743,0.0001223233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001735265,0.001390241,0.3395599,0.0001995306,0.0003310294,0.0001252266,0.001935945,0.0005263135,0.3713606,0.05173889,0.2118353,0.01926171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002739483,0.0009724731,0.8898015,0.00006835748,0.000113307,0.00003972005,0.003386704,0.00006472247,0.07072639,0.003115675,0.02867337,0.0002982654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857447,0.00008265017,0.001926786,0.0004089891,0.0004109681,0.0001885417,0.0002114604,0.00001312062,0.01101282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992529,0.000343635,0.00002679613,0.00007340146,0.0000813789,0.00000965139,0.00001789218,0.000006174939,0.0001881609],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5502416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9859913,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143586222","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01290.x","title":"Density‐related effects of deer browsing on the regeneration dynamics of boreal forests","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":205,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Centre de Recherche Industrielle du Québec; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Université Laval","keywords":"Odocoileus; Abies balsamea; Balsam; Herbivore; Understory; Biology; Regeneration (biology); Canopy; Taiga; Seedling; Stocking; Ecology; Silviculture; Disturbance (geology); Forest ecology; Ecosystem; Agronomy; Botany; Animal science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.003994880645140003,"gpt":0.1956459330270913,"spread":0.1916510523819513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008088256,0.00006383653,0.0001666723,0.00005390193,0.00006534942,0.000002135166,0.0001205831,0.0001435532,0.00007206618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009380946,0.00004652127,0.00004644201,0.0001270318,0.0001628607,0.00004647292,0.00003225802,0.0001777178,0.00001018321],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001312814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001937787,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001094882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001187774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992296,0.00004248666,0.000393752,0.00007217999,0.0001328383,0.0001291224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987789,0.0005231504,0.000552792,0.00009161301,0.00002417936,0.00002938242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004147665,0.0001902084,0.9542526,0.00001260406,0.00006702307,0.00001883276,0.0003577689,0.00783579,0.01190749,0.01956578,0.001097309,0.004279839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003902673,0.0002978599,0.9683585,0.000006755626,0.00003203958,0.0000233933,0.00004130501,0.001313892,0.02174245,0.007742341,0.00001233914,0.00003890172],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947858,0.000003561292,0.001244081,0.0006508197,0.000212471,0.0001296799,2.611283e-7,0.000002526452,0.002970739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990398,0.000004745835,0.0005454458,0.0003520638,0.00002430296,0.000001193629,0.000001915897,0.000004917815,0.00002560148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01410587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1897082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562201543","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01956.x","title":"Ecosystem management based on natural disturbances: hierarchical context and non‐equilibrium paradigm","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Ecosystem dynamics and resilience","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Context (archaeology); Ecology; Ecosystem; Natural (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Ecosystem management; Environmental science; Geography; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005045969887430546,"gpt":0.1857759569560969,"spread":0.1807299870686664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003626674,0.0001407449,0.0002947216,0.00006900378,0.00007158778,0.00001671835,0.0003024547,0.00007778332,0.0002468486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004368901,0.0001011826,0.00006517787,0.00008810107,0.0001358708,0.00006900131,0.0001032926,0.0002387796,0.00007520083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001340382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001074068,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005962068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000229788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988595,0.0000352868,0.0004040987,0.000226121,0.0002059528,0.0002690896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993151,0.0000805684,0.0002943974,0.0001640341,0.000005572472,0.000140286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01022045,0.004456614,0.7465627,0.001191563,0.0009324377,0.002876418,0.007307135,0.03515959,0.01034927,0.1027427,0.009172349,0.06902874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003212689,0.001386134,0.9208851,0.00009785352,0.00008311129,0.0002053663,0.0005395715,0.06218434,0.0005529287,0.005593879,0.004768813,0.0004901627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9527384,0.00002734385,0.000272898,0.0001659645,0.0004598772,0.0002450339,0.000002817664,0.000007080189,0.04608056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984639,0.00001573115,0.001038351,0.0003421838,0.00004153079,0.00001036629,6.590898e-7,0.00001005309,0.00007717601],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1743225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4126109,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106102330","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02073.x","title":"Validation of reflex indicators for measuring vitality and predicting the delayed mortality of wild coho salmon bycatch released from fishing gears","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":197,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Wildlife Federation","keywords":"Stressor; Oncorhynchus; Wildlife; Fishery; Reflex; Endangered species; Bycatch; Fishing; Physiological stress; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Physiology; Habitat; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02839453887781752,"gpt":0.2385513576745843,"spread":0.2101568187967668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001341095,0.00008501289,0.000279758,0.00004708265,0.0001360752,0.000003858034,0.000199432,0.00009329351,0.0001015428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001284433,0.000065887,0.00005232332,0.00009101596,0.0002783665,0.0001222691,0.0001566232,0.0001464299,8.880276e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005809854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001110873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002019066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006175785,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998974,0.00006215548,0.0005205576,0.0001419976,0.0001522553,0.0001490383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985968,0.0002757874,0.0009485096,0.000125337,0.00001835031,0.00003524951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002721906,0.0001067862,0.9922907,0.00002292774,0.0002751369,0.000001340752,0.002010735,0.0001465838,0.003549145,0.0001011288,0.0007153359,0.0005080314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005118932,0.0001690751,0.9834458,0.000006379652,0.0001892258,0.000001272793,0.0008012323,0.00006313046,0.01019564,0.004524811,0.00003787043,0.00005363102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963663,0.000007706923,0.0002759883,0.0001601166,0.0001074931,0.0002744107,0.000009450137,0.000005213887,0.00279338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985667,0.00003272645,0.001223647,0.0001273743,0.00002371936,0.00001364168,0.000002450148,0.000006153739,0.000003626534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008844818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2686794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2350079511","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12689","title":"Investigating the impacts of field‐realistic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide on bumblebee foraging, homing ability and colony growth","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Insect and Pesticide Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":195,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Wellcome; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government; Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; W. Garfield Weston Foundation; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Bumblebee; Foraging; Neonicotinoid; Biology; Pesticide; Homing (biology); Pollinator; Pollination; Ecology; Forage; Toxicology; Zoology; Pollen; Imidacloprid","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01740440279411953,"gpt":0.2551543331974115,"spread":0.237749930403292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009594266,0.00009747628,0.0002559812,0.00002781457,0.0001433352,0.0000231404,0.0002359455,0.00009038308,0.0001456306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001292141,0.00002862415,0.00005198286,0.0001502826,0.0001201782,0.00003828494,0.00007834079,0.000201058,0.000004046507],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004015272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004499963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001450068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000664925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989531,0.00008901735,0.0003629113,0.0001277322,0.000184362,0.0002828811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959402,0.003439477,0.0002664477,0.00004825729,0.0001481588,0.000157433],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004204833,0.00009069902,0.1384986,0.0000363978,0.00003432822,0.00001046394,0.0005600069,0.00003668113,0.8285102,0.004456113,0.001042203,0.02630384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005039123,0.004846865,0.9484847,0.00008481192,0.0000285867,0.00006231818,0.00030493,0.00001772877,0.02653776,0.01874464,0.0002610732,0.0001226569],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920568,0.00002334133,0.00001620576,0.007080597,0.00006878246,0.0001760987,0.000005203064,0.000004845314,0.0005680966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989372,0.00002578923,0.0001910037,0.0006310811,0.0001994879,0.000005976407,4.059204e-7,0.0000010792,0.00000799731],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8099861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1594552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501437510","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01049.x","title":"Effects of logging on gastrointestinal parasite infections and infection risk in African primates","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":195,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Wildlife Conservation Society; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Logging; Primate; Biology; Ecology; Generalist and specialist species; Species richness; Biodiversity; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008566830326375638,"gpt":0.2851585402247174,"spread":0.2765917098983418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004685059,0.0001350837,0.0004121058,0.0005298305,0.00005944803,0.00000662282,0.00007776605,0.0001230038,0.0001881237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008054026,0.000126921,0.0000628678,0.0001449259,0.0001068768,0.00006098508,0.00003336996,0.0004984757,0.00004293933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001420876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000338615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005296324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003358925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998823,0.0001127009,0.0005300511,0.0001600849,0.00006821245,0.0003059711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985667,0.0006125184,0.0006046169,0.00009878059,0.00004097436,0.00007638948],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005766997,0.001234681,0.9783551,0.00004033144,0.00005047336,0.00005573734,0.0008062032,0.001040106,0.008217515,0.001542968,0.0002688135,0.007811373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001835827,0.001620002,0.9932709,0.00001843556,0.00008495712,0.0006602678,0.00009604821,0.00002847674,0.001372918,0.0007403578,0.0001842376,0.00008761136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935864,0.00003075887,0.0001960393,0.0001014567,0.0002925673,0.0001846205,0.000001651426,0.00001371727,0.005592837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989289,0.00005985006,0.0007646121,0.00008113011,0.0001132803,0.0000231988,7.531092e-7,0.00001307019,0.00001522142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01491576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5175689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509224156","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00790.x","title":"Moisture controls on <i>Sphagnum</i> growth and CO<sub>2</sub> exchange on a cutover bog","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":193,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Yukon Department of Environment","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sphagnum; Bog; Peat; Environmental science; Primary production; Photosynthesis; Ecosystem respiration; Ecosystem; Ecology; Agronomy; Botany; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00514937026872211,"gpt":0.1992304520156203,"spread":0.1940810817468982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004249648,0.000194442,0.0004312504,0.00008074383,0.0001217256,0.000018877,0.0001542981,0.0002216841,0.000491194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006067013,0.0001494859,0.00007449934,0.00009071052,0.0001546982,0.00006247095,0.00003913673,0.0003947854,0.0001611873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001202421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001813739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002942834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009671703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987318,0.00007650109,0.0003466138,0.0002501162,0.000205102,0.0003898456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990999,0.0002674242,0.000320218,0.0001111141,0.00001025375,0.0001910561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004168594,0.002054838,0.3040602,0.00006215971,0.0003765807,0.000801781,0.001115159,0.001606735,0.4613619,0.01460265,0.2013646,0.008424839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01427167,0.006734137,0.7778925,0.00002292309,0.0001613077,0.0008885906,0.0001555245,0.00005287135,0.08791307,0.01436627,0.09675819,0.0007829336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9281196,0.00003296228,0.00002224053,0.0005056337,0.0001989991,0.0001898467,0.000005608478,0.000008673362,0.07091646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937928,0.0002265644,0.00009473004,0.005666806,0.0001230125,0.00001595503,0.000001956867,0.00001593178,0.0000622927],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4738323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6095856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}