{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":80,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":80,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"95ca7ae14edc","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy"}},"results":[{"id":"W2001015618","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2005.00292.x","title":"Fatherhood and Child Support: Do Men Have a Right to Choose?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Abortion; Differential treatment; Child support; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Economics; Pregnancy","authors":[{"name":"Elizabeth Brake","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01385003556120746,"gpt":0.274322794917293,"spread":0.2604727593560855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005854863,0.0001460565,0.0003538637,0.0003739412,0.002597069,0.003721724,0.0005558978,0.002402592,0.00846115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009174168,0.0001417466,0.0001342311,0.0003426475,0.01266719,0.00333454,0.00248174,0.002696121,0.0003275384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001034042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001245948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002117947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003244305,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963486,0.002664263,0.00006068269,0.0001695033,0.0003329207,0.0004241191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952385,0.003275582,0.0005118512,0.0001654791,0.0001649698,0.0006436386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007963036,0.00007367133,0.009860561,0.00007744065,0.00001484939,0.0004467104,0.05019117,0.0001411523,0.0001398329,0.9106467,0.006499058,0.02182916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007747967,0.0001914835,0.01508853,0.001002953,0.00002811367,0.001492598,0.100172,0.0004259046,0.0003655405,0.6209658,0.2601457,0.0000440082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3164269,0.03149042,0.004061981,0.3688768,0.001298838,0.00002747084,0.0001046165,0.00001271077,0.2777002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837262,0.002648189,0.0001990049,0.007576138,0.000253517,0.000009539888,0.000008019123,0.000003375763,0.005576016],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00846115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03096384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2570731680","doi":"10.1111/japp.12256","title":"Why Childhood is Bad for Children","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Research Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Childhood studies; Identity (music); Criticism; Psychology; Early childhood; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"Sarah Hannan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03444498611026751,"gpt":0.3445870162201607,"spread":0.3101420301098932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006605776,0.0002353897,0.000484443,0.0007431683,0.006845101,0.005575257,0.0006485735,0.004226599,0.006476817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013884,0.000273058,0.0003480051,0.0005807647,0.03558779,0.006115024,0.004121919,0.006486069,0.0009209935],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006425173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003268596,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006557002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007074332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993375,0.003708443,0.0001965367,0.0005436493,0.0009606854,0.001215557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921292,0.003051028,0.001550108,0.0004801637,0.001292284,0.001497317],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005746862,0.00004215872,0.02061374,0.0001595285,0.00003753102,0.001547143,0.1069231,0.0001574157,0.0004368512,0.7981803,0.05440746,0.01743725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002317529,0.000100798,0.0178346,0.001342951,0.00006633322,0.004257224,0.1521383,0.0001684291,0.001128076,0.386374,0.4364831,0.00008305044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1550854,0.01650721,0.003188251,0.6332158,0.002091061,0.0000294353,0.0001781424,0.00004717783,0.1896576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9447965,0.005462865,0.0008190232,0.04089404,0.0004331436,0.00002511017,0.00003796715,0.00004351535,0.007487859],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006845101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0466181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076362515","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00382.x","title":"The Moral Psychology of Conflicts of Interest: Insights from Affective Neuroscience","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Normative; Irrationality; Neuroethics; Deception; Conflict of interest; Moral psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Rationality; Neuroscience; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Paul Thagard","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.189879244467696,"gpt":0.3282893007915307,"spread":0.1384100563238347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003939941,0.0002060102,0.000229584,0.000855729,0.001158491,0.004421095,0.0005052877,0.001670197,0.001802312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01236141,0.0001441306,0.0001988171,0.0004914564,0.01320368,0.004510253,0.001902238,0.002422691,0.0001223326],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001726508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007345186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006737389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005100082,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973858,0.001660783,0.00006171565,0.0001429327,0.0005894587,0.0001592517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920999,0.005469748,0.001015794,0.000283643,0.0006722874,0.0004585793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004421969,0.0000860623,0.002623247,0.0001181557,0.00001974111,0.0002068573,0.006855042,0.001680144,0.001080604,0.9632218,0.001159438,0.02290461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012826,0.00001704845,0.004379097,0.00006969503,0.000005947813,0.0001930809,0.001925116,0.002253723,0.0002443283,0.9851586,0.005728044,0.00001241538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3974141,0.01647703,0.08340541,0.08244635,0.000587227,0.00005016119,0.00006432096,0.00004165018,0.4195136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952198,0.001214514,0.002016108,0.0007906087,0.0001101326,0.000009668171,0.000004534856,0.000003946276,0.0006306878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004421095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02083665,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054172929","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00342.x","title":"Iraq: A Morally Justified Resort to War","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Argument (complex analysis); Just war theory; Morality; Law; Spanish Civil War; Proportionality (law); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; History; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David Mellow","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04779983566186594,"gpt":0.2400857679150213,"spread":0.1922859322531553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004845191,0.0002984671,0.0003381288,0.0006663796,0.006745258,0.004935605,0.0009142691,0.005849076,0.004811705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007595396,0.0001781909,0.0003114182,0.0005804293,0.02799116,0.002305768,0.004618856,0.005268019,0.0005699578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003778792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003648685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00645427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006949492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939818,0.003782739,0.0001559446,0.0002865411,0.0007319636,0.00106101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965239,0.001565908,0.0004095238,0.0003588478,0.0009166667,0.0002251358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002043086,0.00002273301,0.0005121551,0.00002434,0.000006046594,0.0003919206,0.01367293,0.0002013183,0.0002479119,0.9790946,0.002971054,0.002834559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006192771,0.0001525583,0.00318164,0.000452101,0.00002442725,0.0006668278,0.05819349,0.001516759,0.001076191,0.6938567,0.2407502,0.00006734696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2434062,0.001003623,0.01387015,0.0783561,0.001045004,0.00008596522,0.00005120696,0.00005762154,0.6621242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879611,0.0001871887,0.000531694,0.003422295,0.0001341798,0.00002168268,0.000006114014,0.00001082462,0.007724922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006745258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02741712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141402416","doi":"10.1111/japp.12010","title":"Permissible Use and Interdependence: Against Principled Veganism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Animal ethics; Animal rights; Non-human; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Katherine Wayne","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1025710252696502,"gpt":0.2652023652049446,"spread":0.1626313399352944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02536691,0.0005446162,0.0008068048,0.001040185,0.003835747,0.005173586,0.002409245,0.005541717,0.002674177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02732281,0.000506016,0.0008242614,0.0004684276,0.08579006,0.01021397,0.008744983,0.01119873,0.0003955173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003349949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002334046,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00122742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001147206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9736115,0.01847064,0.0006597048,0.002401765,0.003730307,0.001126187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773461,0.01354358,0.001760059,0.0041569,0.002445593,0.0007477737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001458221,0.00001053037,0.0001513101,0.00002005325,0.000007178226,0.00003438586,0.002481502,0.0001965566,0.00008614179,0.994785,0.000592045,0.001620682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001086769,0.000009084655,0.0001089549,0.00003204219,0.000004075883,0.0000408302,0.0004462201,0.0004403543,0.0001113455,0.9940347,0.004753031,0.000008523045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1455975,0.001983821,0.1971694,0.1056537,0.0009787942,0.0001545586,0.00006647895,0.0001768465,0.5482191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823264,0.0002138383,0.009869119,0.004243743,0.0001394008,0.0001213152,0.00001122442,0.00004496834,0.003029855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02536691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1341547,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013654046","doi":"10.1111/japp.12422","title":"The Importance of History to the Erasing‐History Defence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Articulation (sociology); Character (mathematics); Statue; Public history; Sociology; Aesthetics; Law; History; Philosophy; Political science; Media studies; Art history","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Abrahams","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0342151506720975,"gpt":0.2270285302195024,"spread":0.1928133795474049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004679137,0.0004108151,0.0004695247,0.00137623,0.01253196,0.01064418,0.001888526,0.003591426,0.006681382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007988471,0.0002981664,0.0003034724,0.00131158,0.0582451,0.006353559,0.005198884,0.007579264,0.0005322006],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03085063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02299371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3179073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3748812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963554,0.001310925,0.00006857071,0.0003641679,0.001030657,0.0008703195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952608,0.002398798,0.0003716365,0.0005539853,0.0009131217,0.0005017375],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003874112,0.000001466277,0.00007812772,0.00001154747,0.000001364803,0.00003002066,0.003173562,0.00004311957,0.00002973655,0.9929044,0.001521982,0.002200813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001696539,0.00002213076,0.001127794,0.0002366608,0.00001795238,0.0001240853,0.007698572,0.0003275907,0.0003994273,0.5224603,0.4675365,0.00003195454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03822981,0.008107645,0.009438239,0.09211666,0.001191625,0.00004333595,0.00004547225,0.00005894004,0.8507683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9134543,0.001953361,0.002042463,0.009272047,0.0004720016,0.00003105027,0.00002319157,0.00006686032,0.07268465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6820927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6321137,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119571480","doi":"10.1111/japp.12145","title":"Is There a Right to Surrogacy?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Ottawa; Fondation Brocher","keywords":"Harm; Interpretation (philosophy); State (computer science); Law and economics; Vulnerability (computing); Law; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Christine Straehle","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06660661995806746,"gpt":0.3252325013290664,"spread":0.258625881370999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0126663,0.0002125817,0.000594678,0.0005935019,0.004288941,0.007020437,0.001201133,0.006827132,0.00560869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01484469,0.0002613291,0.0004845903,0.0007131267,0.04469624,0.008087558,0.004031352,0.00785558,0.0006608476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004565058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003861879,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002356349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001592075,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9904919,0.006174922,0.0002620541,0.0007141136,0.001880468,0.0004765732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914283,0.006497866,0.0005495874,0.0005709581,0.0006025796,0.0003505832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002684231,0.000003081198,0.00006481279,0.00001017498,0.000001108195,0.00002235423,0.001018541,0.00004344599,0.00003438792,0.9966289,0.001013229,0.00115725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005567517,0.00001171389,0.0001217911,0.0002013781,0.000004257136,0.0001013799,0.001508235,0.0002538344,0.00009186698,0.9340914,0.06360085,0.000007786503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02774217,0.01276178,0.03066275,0.5189397,0.001498906,0.00006444871,0.00008632574,0.00003533222,0.4082085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9109338,0.007294401,0.007288775,0.0459268,0.0010401,0.0001536874,0.00003410484,0.00004584876,0.02728244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0126663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06698662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122233165","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00383.x","title":"Resources and the Rule of Rescue<sup>1</sup>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Obligation; Context (archaeology); Resource (disambiguation); Moral obligation; Law and economics; Resource allocation; Business; Economics; Law; Computer science; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Mark Sheehan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05371932614919323,"gpt":0.4065942984235476,"spread":0.3528749722743543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01887355,0.0002961468,0.00091036,0.001183815,0.003578284,0.005631114,0.001668049,0.005924834,0.004564708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02125962,0.0004469425,0.001025812,0.0005941355,0.03096847,0.007574735,0.004375724,0.006297569,0.001055449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004080805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003815935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003440227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001669002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9780804,0.01351015,0.001698576,0.002006275,0.003462808,0.001241826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977316,0.01586283,0.001497452,0.001900752,0.002970729,0.0004522434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003837468,0.000002825715,0.00002811872,0.00001154674,0.000002177963,0.00003384395,0.0002974054,0.0002611825,0.00003581629,0.9977315,0.0007776344,0.0008140027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008610074,0.000008083281,0.00005561996,0.00004953541,0.000002907584,0.00004952558,0.000210624,0.0009275472,0.00009840383,0.986505,0.01207315,0.00001097134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05149919,0.002658895,0.1689196,0.09257093,0.001567766,0.0002057488,0.0001720144,0.0001131127,0.6822928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9493422,0.0006188826,0.02446905,0.007117958,0.0004436866,0.0002007814,0.00004921534,0.00004874687,0.01770944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01887355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09981412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886846272","doi":"10.1111/japp.12337","title":"Adapting to Climate Change: What We Owe to Other Animals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Environmental ethics; Duty; Climate justice; Adaptation (eye); Context (archaeology); Animal rights; Action (physics); Animal ethics; Economic Justice; Political science; Human rights; Non-human; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Ecology; Psychology; Geography; Biology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Angie Pepper","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05200233163429923,"gpt":0.2708667214531159,"spread":0.2188643898188167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009157384,0.0003274806,0.0005490324,0.0007882538,0.009246758,0.007945722,0.001133105,0.008033765,0.004054577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007199082,0.0001901067,0.0004565628,0.000503898,0.07404969,0.009862341,0.004353267,0.00766286,0.0006044153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002442042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002035298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004963794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005473309,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951757,0.003115958,0.00009429701,0.0004938045,0.0004372013,0.0006830488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948696,0.002631342,0.0004335514,0.0007191692,0.0006220128,0.000724242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002061036,0.00005407089,0.001616881,0.00006577939,0.000024519,0.0002497419,0.05580292,0.0002739645,0.0005913284,0.9223824,0.007397837,0.01152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009223709,0.0000581658,0.001890516,0.0002830988,0.00002305961,0.0003216146,0.03021341,0.0003723739,0.0004779478,0.7413967,0.224908,0.00004589216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1008081,0.01365701,0.03109452,0.443363,0.00349768,0.00005074831,0.0000663679,0.00007833022,0.4073842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575234,0.003095709,0.002053439,0.02716881,0.0007328875,0.00003327923,0.00001992674,0.00004647715,0.009326011],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009246758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04842949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007979396","doi":"10.1111/japp.12007","title":"The Human Right to Subsistence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Subsistence agriculture; Human rights; Argument (complex analysis); Meaning (existential); Right to food; Subsistence economy; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; History; Agriculture; Food security; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Charles W. Jones","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04324374214290207,"gpt":0.3176574348981043,"spread":0.2744136927552022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005953874,0.0002572921,0.0005699269,0.0009698277,0.002927847,0.005113673,0.0008830219,0.004043067,0.006694652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008785177,0.0001951921,0.0004032866,0.0006465277,0.04420333,0.005387674,0.004181942,0.004682609,0.0008372635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003030273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00318603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002702385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00154364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943646,0.003258627,0.0001536185,0.0007221703,0.0009957228,0.000505203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945018,0.003252871,0.0003432092,0.0007686288,0.0008305879,0.0003028127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002878066,0.000002765983,0.00004196876,0.000008964428,0.000001643795,0.000008693636,0.0002762433,0.00005544935,0.00004488232,0.9974709,0.0008565317,0.001229223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003656374,0.000004343899,0.00008661978,0.00005219462,0.000002761629,0.00001617512,0.0002093864,0.00009725503,0.00009252303,0.9779207,0.02151056,0.00000382243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0364156,0.006539872,0.03664237,0.1798367,0.0009093297,0.00005073672,0.0001751498,0.00006895095,0.7393614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625998,0.001979765,0.004694944,0.01101734,0.0006893775,0.00007972639,0.00005758974,0.00003352772,0.01884787],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006694652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03148746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056697798","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00364.x","title":"Equality, Justice, and Paternalism: Recentreing Debate about Physician-Assisted Suicide","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Autonomy; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Bioethics; Physician assisted suicide; Assisted suicide; Beneficence; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Sneddon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1069719051627067,"gpt":0.43664445783216,"spread":0.3296725526694533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04353267,0.0002754175,0.000756369,0.001232276,0.008786896,0.0113503,0.002425688,0.02415247,0.002274153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04186085,0.0004336021,0.0006278848,0.001753076,0.05561879,0.008191001,0.006634894,0.02279757,0.0002567818],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01403095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008348453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01017877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01071848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9694166,0.02215759,0.0009767145,0.001348074,0.004475089,0.001625975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9286298,0.06176163,0.002527424,0.001150348,0.004237667,0.001693184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002058097,0.00001834901,0.0001580128,0.00008240202,0.000006403803,0.0001477182,0.007317699,0.0001590881,0.00004577065,0.9804878,0.005438874,0.006117365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005427295,0.00007179685,0.001703103,0.001159822,0.00002164378,0.0004393039,0.01290767,0.001018169,0.0003899377,0.7401183,0.2420637,0.00005229961],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.021534,0.03895469,0.003332539,0.8662468,0.002892843,0.00001133492,0.00001250203,0.000006399401,0.06700896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8235661,0.02519628,0.00127438,0.13323,0.009482287,0.000028672,0.00001400839,0.00002047364,0.007187711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04353267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2302255,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554921354","doi":"10.1111/japp.12254","title":"On the Complementarity of the Ages of Life","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Psychology; State (computer science); Politics; Early childhood; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Weinstock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0486300407714053,"gpt":0.2153062290200913,"spread":0.166676188248686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003762873,0.0002204249,0.0003036321,0.00124586,0.002786657,0.004764366,0.0004559055,0.001164185,0.009813699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01038548,0.0002957371,0.0003125514,0.0005460349,0.009242072,0.008037137,0.005333971,0.002322524,0.0007095088],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002645849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00122742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001642031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00246444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977161,0.001129265,0.00008983011,0.0003201313,0.0003362359,0.0004085352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920699,0.003872904,0.001024377,0.0006536401,0.001299699,0.001079358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002728474,0.000005834591,0.0008506762,0.00001072039,0.000001927028,0.00003276477,0.002574697,0.00004791362,0.00004719607,0.9932489,0.0003116031,0.002840478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000198994,0.00004707284,0.00579476,0.0001427688,0.00001544277,0.0002768385,0.007123352,0.0003229648,0.0003713282,0.9353782,0.05048675,0.00002066144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1942265,0.004519282,0.02021869,0.009519086,0.000280414,0.00004670786,0.0003246514,0.00003900895,0.7708255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873832,0.000689871,0.002318895,0.0004277322,0.00008074979,0.00002976935,0.00005850586,0.00001891955,0.008992309],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009813699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03283006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046043772","doi":"10.1111/1468-5930.00170","title":"Good Soldiers, A Traditional Approach","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cruelty; Courage; Virtue; Moral courage; Law; Harm; Dimension (graph theory); Psychology; Battlefield; Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Hilliard Aronovitch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1280809853598076,"gpt":0.2364397842064269,"spread":0.1083587988466194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004448711,0.0006835125,0.0004682946,0.002216218,0.005011142,0.00506421,0.001320182,0.003055422,0.007438142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005193621,0.000269889,0.0002970777,0.0006134918,0.03435301,0.006817049,0.003838492,0.004527084,0.001350261],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004070547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002505173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002826563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004916421,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969487,0.001447418,0.00009251675,0.0005231825,0.0006952562,0.0002930379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980934,0.0005296571,0.000230723,0.0003041338,0.0004785897,0.0003635228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006623735,0.00001408121,0.0003330383,0.00003380888,0.000004380536,0.00003923821,0.002542198,0.00008017124,0.00004953032,0.9873354,0.003602932,0.005958648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001400319,0.00004738027,0.0006535046,0.000147794,0.00001021913,0.0001841077,0.003926604,0.000415154,0.0001200256,0.8148785,0.1795895,0.00001324352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04169717,0.009357275,0.05440345,0.1190957,0.002512157,0.0001942666,0.000108817,0.0001093882,0.7725218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8411906,0.004673481,0.01509927,0.02283142,0.001747112,0.0002126699,0.00005872679,0.0000898062,0.1140969],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007438142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02953404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391051720","doi":"10.1111/japp.12711","title":"Productive Justice in the ‘Post‐Work Future’","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; Irish Research Council","keywords":"Economic Justice; Work (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Unemployment; Value (mathematics); Technological change; Sociology; Variety (cybernetics); Distributive justice; Production (economics); Relation (database); Law and economics; Economics; Positive economics; Law; Political science; Neoclassical economics; Microeconomics; Economic growth","authors":[{"name":"Caleb Althorpe","is_ca":false},{"name":"Elizabeth Finneron‐Burns","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04695928595927107,"gpt":0.3757352954611961,"spread":0.328776009501925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008493684,0.0001925291,0.0002223655,0.0009881195,0.00823011,0.007475163,0.001097624,0.003145329,0.003071524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006271305,0.0001517889,0.0003038076,0.0005742392,0.04130759,0.0055314,0.004525026,0.003158242,0.0003369463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004542229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003986153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003477262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003987368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934836,0.003594888,0.0001631551,0.000479633,0.001085591,0.001193117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941239,0.001830181,0.0006524558,0.0009686691,0.001442561,0.0009821207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004911376,0.0000156913,0.0002561799,0.000005763179,0.000001308692,0.00004186144,0.006653884,0.00006574508,0.00005719401,0.9903601,0.0006663,0.001870948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000543359,0.0000214541,0.001657053,0.00006481538,0.000003048215,0.00008144243,0.008515809,0.0003157088,0.0001182352,0.9368874,0.05231766,0.00001188865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1516592,0.002501505,0.02561842,0.05619526,0.0005098517,0.00004051893,0.00003685331,0.0000376501,0.7634009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924868,0.0001763807,0.0005762549,0.0008894005,0.0001070052,0.0000160331,0.000005716477,0.000008292374,0.005734127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008493684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04491937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213452630","doi":"10.1111/japp.12561","title":"From Sovereignty to Guardianship in Ecoregions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo; European Commission; Queen's University; Universitetet i Oslo; H2020 European Research Council; Norges Forskningsråd; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Sovereignty; Treaty; Context (archaeology); Interdependence; Kyoto Protocol; Deforestation (computer science); Legal guardian; Natural resource; Biodiversity; Political science; Environmental resource management; Law; Climate change; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Politics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Alejandra Mancilla","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04356443142731427,"gpt":0.3168137493074591,"spread":0.2732493178801448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01764861,0.000251594,0.0005245486,0.0006225146,0.005220138,0.0054865,0.001140819,0.005604517,0.002828005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01027727,0.0003354193,0.0005688925,0.0006293994,0.05522193,0.008716479,0.006748194,0.009066079,0.0002166275],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005179005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007298831,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006840375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004312626,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903712,0.006325527,0.0004465291,0.001162082,0.000896654,0.0007980195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923939,0.004714731,0.0005155806,0.001004572,0.0008836281,0.0004876929],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002807534,0.000002189963,0.00006672612,0.00000487081,0.000001528517,0.00001033619,0.0008319464,0.00008805195,0.00002340177,0.9980317,0.0004581482,0.0004783491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001966157,0.00002033055,0.0002608265,0.0001016554,0.000007174868,0.00003974459,0.001592006,0.0004092324,0.0001212792,0.9628072,0.03460947,0.0000114662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.137331,0.006512882,0.05529891,0.2276088,0.001261982,0.0001431289,0.0001096809,0.0000710587,0.5716625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760162,0.0009298123,0.003229068,0.01148778,0.0002777771,0.0001094995,0.00002108109,0.000021613,0.007907242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01764861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09333587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001770078","doi":"10.1111/japp.12412","title":"The Ethics of Citizen Selection of Refugees for Admission and Resettlement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Selection (genetic algorithm); Democracy; Worry; Order (exchange); Political science; Law; Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Medicine; Business; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Patti Tamara Lenard","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04209081317286596,"gpt":0.3430178283248406,"spread":0.3009270151519746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01353343,0.0002027015,0.0003772106,0.0004389654,0.009401978,0.006322031,0.0009063221,0.005912899,0.002648116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009351614,0.0002735625,0.0003731389,0.0004470216,0.04052028,0.003178122,0.005736926,0.00634442,0.0003223959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005097426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006457467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006810343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007021547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9801378,0.01540464,0.0003759775,0.0009573008,0.001179293,0.001944983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946786,0.003162947,0.0003658483,0.0005342942,0.0006194399,0.0006389391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008586251,0.0000098764,0.0003486439,0.000005668187,0.000001799899,0.00007186848,0.005787694,0.0001021459,0.0000633953,0.9915422,0.001247108,0.000810963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005125286,0.0000568233,0.0009940522,0.0001459155,0.0000129685,0.0001676579,0.01511863,0.001672493,0.0004213351,0.9023298,0.0789936,0.00003543968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.229533,0.001080094,0.02704688,0.1241784,0.000535398,0.0001580158,0.00003962754,0.00004642814,0.617382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986128,0.0001182161,0.001106869,0.003536044,0.00007331383,0.00006438752,0.000004669539,0.00001259299,0.008955932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01353343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07157248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309907949","doi":"10.1111/japp.12631","title":"Work, Justice, and Collective Capital Institutions: Revisiting Rudolf Meidner and the Case for <scp>Wage‐Earner</scp> Funds","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond; Universidade do Minho; University of Oxford; Concordia University; British Academy; Universitat Pompeu Fabra; Independent Social Research Foundation","keywords":"Capital (architecture); Democracy; Wage; Economic Justice; Power (physics); Politics; Economics; Economic democracy; Property rights; Political economy; Law and economics; Political science; Market economy; Neoclassical economics; Law; Microeconomics","authors":[{"name":"Markus Furendal","is_ca":false},{"name":"Martin O’Neill","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04206139977257874,"gpt":0.290516866998671,"spread":0.2484554672260922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009319817,0.000353072,0.0004645218,0.002426818,0.007998377,0.009632584,0.00155068,0.005827817,0.003095723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006339889,0.0002526541,0.0004749303,0.001435873,0.06250195,0.008922116,0.006231675,0.00387731,0.000378587],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01170203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005484898,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01057794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009603332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994791,0.002966295,0.0001314226,0.0004944197,0.0007493276,0.000867559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946785,0.003848821,0.0004035609,0.0003216592,0.0003914406,0.0003561559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001909513,0.000005332027,0.00004991311,0.00000854065,7.539537e-7,0.00003031705,0.002501471,0.00008326181,0.000006548674,0.9955077,0.0008382435,0.0009660497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009008746,0.000006035924,0.0002383334,0.0001248144,0.000002529945,0.00004807839,0.003494068,0.0002846504,0.00004979785,0.9437995,0.0519337,0.000009522077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07235205,0.03340846,0.01559418,0.2994333,0.001580801,0.00005424661,0.00004466083,0.00004797114,0.5774843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768518,0.004135821,0.001461173,0.005606857,0.0005694907,0.00005300327,0.000006946056,0.00002774231,0.01128729],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01170203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08490455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963325051","doi":"10.1111/japp.12383","title":"Getting Obligations Right: Autonomy and Shared Decision Making","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Dublin City University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Autonomy; Decision maker; Order (exchange); Health care; Psychology; Personal autonomy; Yield (engineering); Informed consent; Patient participation; Law and economics; Social psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Medicine; Business; Political science; Law; Management science; Economics; Alternative medicine","authors":[{"name":"Jonathan Lewis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05057608937582626,"gpt":0.4271765285822344,"spread":0.3766004392064081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05366649,0.0004481481,0.0007251533,0.00119337,0.005633628,0.009515998,0.00187519,0.006250804,0.003813501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05552847,0.0004877639,0.001010608,0.0008374095,0.06450744,0.0111754,0.01286868,0.008129722,0.0004859957],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005860844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01053665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002104165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001513436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9292194,0.05520192,0.002582183,0.002980417,0.007127228,0.002888799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.936119,0.04412895,0.005289603,0.005847873,0.004574005,0.004040573],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001124904,0.00001322837,0.0001993783,0.00002510162,0.000009489923,0.000097465,0.004394722,0.0004191426,0.0000615614,0.9912608,0.0007518791,0.002755944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001632956,0.00001019679,0.0001012424,0.00005689968,0.000004109133,0.00005960181,0.0009031684,0.0006911976,0.00009318834,0.9912794,0.006773311,0.00001137396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09923861,0.004423775,0.2521692,0.1976285,0.001116348,0.0003580474,0.0000903274,0.00009128214,0.4448839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732268,0.0006173119,0.01835544,0.004271012,0.0002246191,0.000145492,0.00002084566,0.00001765649,0.003120773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05366649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2838189,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023215759","doi":"10.1111/japp.12434","title":"Poverty and the Peril of Particulars","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Poverty; Duty; Argumentative; Odds; Political science; Law; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Duty to protect; Law and economics; Social science; Computer science; Logistic regression","authors":[{"name":"Jordan Arthur Thomson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05908765488951209,"gpt":0.2195284486806416,"spread":0.1604407937911295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004682607,0.0003170266,0.0004392415,0.001336587,0.008872131,0.00597232,0.0008673625,0.003371023,0.008848865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005663769,0.000320399,0.0004027927,0.0007948818,0.04679418,0.008032162,0.009825925,0.004702653,0.0004441407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005473224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001933696,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002591036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003714112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959128,0.002019083,0.000111723,0.0005899454,0.0005550127,0.0008113072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966168,0.001323322,0.0004634284,0.0005453907,0.0005473999,0.0005035877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004556399,0.00000473097,0.0001649018,0.000009766824,0.000002618761,0.00004588215,0.001945674,0.00006267974,0.00003653828,0.9960718,0.0008258728,0.0008250505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008483828,0.00001215905,0.0006588612,0.00007184579,0.000005892373,0.0001140236,0.004087854,0.0001779841,0.00008274621,0.9515862,0.04318677,0.000007188385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09647461,0.001832802,0.01139236,0.03274648,0.0002367795,0.00003421714,0.00005517374,0.00003688813,0.8571908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877421,0.0003299212,0.0005534429,0.001282723,0.00007194937,0.00002288557,0.00001162324,0.00001711759,0.009968331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008872131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03971124,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159278972","doi":"10.1111/japp.12513","title":"Unintentional Residence and the Right to Vote","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Order (exchange); Citizenship; Democracy; Argumentation theory; Right to the city; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Politics; Business; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Patti Tamara Lenard","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03628425403623007,"gpt":0.3118070360283171,"spread":0.275522781992087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004782595,0.0001896024,0.0003282083,0.0005854152,0.003849417,0.003867498,0.0006889041,0.002216312,0.01042082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006408866,0.0001637446,0.0002918666,0.0004412176,0.01804518,0.002028216,0.004492224,0.003228257,0.0007632192],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001686348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002223343,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005034088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005058849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945101,0.002807098,0.0001993968,0.0006732229,0.0005377762,0.00127248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934227,0.0030674,0.0009477008,0.0009717125,0.0009421394,0.0006482656],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002197574,0.00003328853,0.003279373,0.00001423281,0.00000696744,0.00009523884,0.002258512,0.0001764628,0.0001448574,0.9897468,0.00126611,0.002956297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006081715,0.00009181951,0.007457844,0.0001661771,0.00003324531,0.0002846459,0.005919723,0.0009082714,0.0006935734,0.9185141,0.06583029,0.00003946171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3140742,0.001101483,0.01174125,0.03564857,0.0003422525,0.00004419999,0.0001305927,0.00003537035,0.636882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911219,0.00008917497,0.0002730259,0.0007742614,0.00004830184,0.00001584405,0.00001471531,0.000005117565,0.007657696],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01042082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03486115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132377965","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00333.x","title":"Authentic Education and Moral Responsibility","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Dialectic; Epistemology; Moral education; Sociology; Moral responsibility; Moral philosophy; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Pedagogy; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Stefaan E. Cuypers","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ishtiyaque Haji","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04756807476837063,"gpt":0.3525397499776171,"spread":0.3049716752092464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008041765,0.0004004498,0.0003468022,0.000885033,0.004579293,0.007662219,0.00112194,0.004509996,0.005865321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01278346,0.0002224721,0.000472952,0.000522888,0.05539067,0.007644858,0.007894042,0.006164833,0.0006995604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00501505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00397667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001806276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009782927,"domain_scores_codex":[0.988643,0.008209065,0.0002896851,0.0008572129,0.001388559,0.0006124504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924116,0.004121919,0.0009402672,0.001048665,0.0007803226,0.0006972116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001471454,0.000005164914,0.000057152,0.000008258967,9.786373e-7,0.00002184096,0.001587369,0.00008665006,0.00001894931,0.996935,0.0002551647,0.00102199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000754813,0.00001234289,0.0001105651,0.00006662164,0.000002530659,0.00007191271,0.001332831,0.0003614097,0.0001358764,0.9716551,0.02623709,0.000006134164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.04686521,0.002875445,0.09463835,0.05809148,0.0003971292,0.0001117359,0.0000422915,0.00008778059,0.7968906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828608,0.0005382456,0.004451661,0.001292437,0.0001079958,0.00005466917,0.00001315009,0.00002292758,0.01065807],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008041765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04252946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2437483072","doi":"10.1111/japp.12227","title":"Just Schools and Good Childhoods: Non‐preparatory Dimensions of Educational Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Early childhood education; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Colin M. MacLeod","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03460870043729657,"gpt":0.3283612645121003,"spread":0.2937525640748037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003687981,0.0001912133,0.0002915854,0.0008516017,0.004003855,0.006639949,0.0006223414,0.002113375,0.003967585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006827097,0.0001742626,0.0002878733,0.0005736806,0.03771669,0.005796346,0.006201665,0.003595175,0.00017445],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002973124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002915291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00307058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004981398,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942539,0.003418016,0.0001605026,0.0003766944,0.0006705388,0.001120365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911774,0.004356626,0.001415979,0.0009795097,0.0008533322,0.001217125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005590066,0.00001189149,0.0004600116,0.000009249225,0.000001201937,0.00002155556,0.001692647,0.00004759393,0.0000296387,0.9963505,0.0002329851,0.001137175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001216192,0.00002447431,0.003851915,0.0001045901,0.000006432997,0.00008212325,0.005643446,0.0002083467,0.0002111151,0.9702294,0.01961205,0.000013936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2814756,0.002743581,0.02488077,0.05596649,0.0002472229,0.00005793268,0.00007960922,0.00004888937,0.6344998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996268,0.0001893977,0.000761251,0.0006375338,0.00002964099,0.00001312806,0.000004642569,0.000003884157,0.002092491],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006639949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02157164,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115213813","doi":"10.1111/japp.12084","title":"Comic Immoralism and Relatively Funny Jokes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Comics; Literature; Psychology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Art","authors":[{"name":"Scott Woodcock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07541071611739873,"gpt":0.2545362362568509,"spread":0.1791255201394522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001639096,0.0002517111,0.0003236891,0.0009723169,0.001830856,0.00281615,0.0004340477,0.001438433,0.003400005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007912501,0.0001991028,0.0002065505,0.0003414426,0.01017754,0.002105861,0.003818635,0.001719232,0.0002328264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007809273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004152113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005142106,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982364,0.0008178229,0.0001067061,0.0001989731,0.0004241806,0.0002157605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992374,0.003191679,0.002058854,0.0008130246,0.0009319978,0.0006304528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007833264,0.0004532179,0.03627537,0.0005464986,0.0001144894,0.006854269,0.06793885,0.0006633596,0.01351216,0.8338225,0.00527807,0.03375784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008104413,0.0003131503,0.04717143,0.0002989609,0.00006720339,0.01245089,0.04021017,0.003850239,0.00787033,0.85261,0.03498871,0.00008793055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8106169,0.0009652074,0.01206678,0.004784528,0.0002175904,0.00003627211,0.00003714135,0.00007276557,0.1712028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985145,0.0000347341,0.0002759933,0.000115723,0.00002121714,0.00000428718,0.000005059831,0.000004277053,0.00102432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003400005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01137412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293223756","doi":"10.1111/japp.12613","title":"(E)‐Trust and Its Function: Why We Shouldn't Apply Trust and Trustworthiness to <scp>Human–AI</scp> Relations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Trustworthiness; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Function (biology); Express trust; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Public relations; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Pepijn Al","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06930212240057451,"gpt":0.2698932261597339,"spread":0.2005911037591594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0162017,0.0002953961,0.0006936315,0.00125501,0.003499311,0.008028721,0.001186412,0.005143018,0.003223327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04034718,0.0003612231,0.000397337,0.0008261093,0.06131981,0.01379091,0.003697707,0.005828469,0.0005314144],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006673826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003393802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009133505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003855715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9899261,0.006346154,0.0004417528,0.001097878,0.001515326,0.0006728621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9654166,0.01811182,0.004023059,0.00326763,0.006564747,0.002616079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002848391,0.00001734013,0.001408377,0.00008442442,0.00002226899,0.00009589805,0.006335611,0.0002830852,0.0001294018,0.9803452,0.003164486,0.008085448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000219181,0.0000253812,0.001405225,0.0001548835,0.0000148626,0.000141143,0.00263805,0.001070925,0.0001383683,0.9812264,0.01313744,0.00002527338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1370759,0.01422532,0.08711091,0.4250006,0.002247507,0.000110492,0.00007926996,0.0001690873,0.333981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913731,0.0007877545,0.002134018,0.003882819,0.0001499756,0.00002263097,0.000005996577,0.00002415754,0.001619565],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0162017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08568382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160313205","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00359.x","title":"Cultures and Cultural Property","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Archaeological Research and Protection","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Cultural property; Property (philosophy); Indigenous; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Law; Cultural heritage; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"James O. Young","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0305653152795875,"gpt":0.2682665543053608,"spread":0.2377012390257733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002279752,0.0002797286,0.0003340467,0.001158491,0.005212223,0.008835663,0.0007369582,0.001986627,0.007656239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004031675,0.0001882576,0.0003098971,0.001521633,0.04925886,0.008280834,0.006333796,0.00319565,0.0004311524],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003477497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001613642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003562814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002210631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971817,0.001687055,0.0001155413,0.0003199064,0.0003689405,0.0003269071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964462,0.001843916,0.0004873633,0.0005632861,0.0003499186,0.0003092634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003930628,0.000007118025,0.0004540295,0.00001641015,0.000003228021,0.00006563109,0.004618159,0.00008321406,0.00005931849,0.9927568,0.000322352,0.001609785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008249709,0.0000238027,0.001507038,0.0001563647,0.000007923361,0.0001721254,0.0138461,0.000221297,0.0002228211,0.9354119,0.04841011,0.00001231189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1415435,0.008408872,0.01110316,0.02068813,0.0002629446,0.00004099278,0.00008921727,0.00002485674,0.8178384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918419,0.001557754,0.0007042161,0.0005586577,0.00008336674,0.00001996463,0.0000141831,0.000009205176,0.005210817],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008835663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02561271,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137790678","doi":"10.1111/japp.12143","title":"Licensing Parents in International Contract Pregnancies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; Political science; Vetting; State (computer science); Business; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Botterell","is_ca":true},{"name":"Carolyn McLeod","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05281687393416345,"gpt":0.318361155103381,"spread":0.2655442811692175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01804765,0.0001909779,0.0003274191,0.0004180305,0.005299929,0.005643907,0.0009994498,0.005214612,0.005698067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03188722,0.0003101643,0.0003257382,0.0004045148,0.01689809,0.005767952,0.006638185,0.005369473,0.0004954091],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002142719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004511098,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004363666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003258361,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9879125,0.007079119,0.000585319,0.0009939913,0.001813356,0.001615726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856527,0.00972672,0.0009856891,0.001521956,0.001351239,0.0007616921],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008221905,0.00001450135,0.0008910709,0.000007313912,0.000001155554,0.0001949924,0.006704654,0.00005928714,0.0001024046,0.9852733,0.001389804,0.005353448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006312635,0.0001614854,0.002762795,0.00045291,0.00003271324,0.001523731,0.02288062,0.001496118,0.002353128,0.6869287,0.2812744,0.00007036197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1762578,0.002003802,0.02356027,0.03896132,0.0009900186,0.0001875959,0.00003798331,0.00005876993,0.7579423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733388,0.0005771465,0.001932366,0.005714233,0.0001752277,0.000103181,0.00001315563,0.00001649465,0.01812942],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01804765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09544623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553096919","doi":"10.1111/japp.12250","title":"The Problem of Predation in <i>Zoopolis</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Liminality; Sovereignty; Harm; Competence (human resources); Predation; Environmental ethics; Aside; Sociology; Intervention (counseling); Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Ecology; Biology; Social psychology; Psychology; Anthropology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Andrée‐Anne Cormier","is_ca":true},{"name":"Mauro Rossi","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00927120159844076,"gpt":0.2058311920312453,"spread":0.1965599904328046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003404968,0.0001296542,0.0002535346,0.0003788343,0.007503852,0.004820561,0.0007338955,0.003399699,0.003409104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001823714,0.0002484934,0.0002791476,0.0003550928,0.0233171,0.003026986,0.004077836,0.004677163,0.0002959165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006182076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002876111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01839944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01518618,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975095,0.001524102,0.00006468066,0.00030035,0.0003211204,0.0002803163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998871,0.0005522128,0.0001383279,0.0001469811,0.0001920853,0.00009927095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004557854,0.000006003598,0.0003690233,0.00001245457,0.000003515892,0.0001112836,0.00248286,0.000108904,0.00006739655,0.9926636,0.002654774,0.001515683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001838201,0.00002765563,0.001316878,0.0002134662,0.00001498935,0.0004376927,0.005132097,0.001215978,0.0004503091,0.7727083,0.2184329,0.00003130192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1341209,0.006484234,0.01241906,0.1275641,0.0004544282,0.00003983018,0.0000540334,0.00004480231,0.7188186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698797,0.0008989393,0.001213749,0.005977905,0.00009144437,0.00003253893,0.000009858422,0.00001418893,0.02188169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01839944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04485428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1777881526","doi":"10.1111/japp.12141","title":"Real‐World Love Drugs: Reply to <scp>N</scp>yholm","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Philosophy of love; Argument (complex analysis); Romance; sort; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Philosophy; True love; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science; Literature; Business; Art; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Hichem Naar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09033557131280645,"gpt":0.3287252332511948,"spread":0.2383896619383883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01265581,0.0008977978,0.001613976,0.0009337675,0.008754074,0.00602954,0.005354655,0.07583354,0.004584908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04765683,0.0009651226,0.001617002,0.001252883,0.01472291,0.009074684,0.004655901,0.09498433,0.002978665],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007925642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008958722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01679427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01891271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908935,0.00388183,0.000680768,0.001560925,0.002298428,0.0006845578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598989,0.03115188,0.001303801,0.001208583,0.005066711,0.001370229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002651674,0.00001426675,0.0001581643,0.00007291211,0.00001292817,0.0004627233,0.000993801,0.00006250734,0.00008476969,0.01790735,0.9767091,0.003495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000496257,0.00003863081,0.0008976267,0.0006465049,0.00003212006,0.0009524363,0.003678745,0.0005384957,0.0004222708,0.03440158,0.9581949,0.0001471462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001556695,0.0008675886,0.00008318526,0.9919477,0.006075572,0.000003748569,0.0000120069,0.000008163682,0.0008462867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002745764,0.0004382948,0.0001068776,0.9906915,0.004698907,0.00002168669,0.000004408738,0.0000127274,0.001279842],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07583354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06693113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791821199","doi":"10.1111/japp.12299","title":"The Ethics of Boycotting as Collective Anti‐Normalisation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Boycott; Politics; Harm; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Yael Peled","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05284431397674069,"gpt":0.3291528205444917,"spread":0.2763085065677511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008251072,0.0002352116,0.0002641421,0.0005657937,0.005041215,0.005579544,0.0008161596,0.003708805,0.001793774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008285346,0.0002080433,0.0001771928,0.0005546758,0.06208121,0.00251111,0.00302961,0.004213487,0.0001966996],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004053641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003039946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004423396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003840137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9867633,0.01004367,0.0002341812,0.0005673582,0.001375703,0.001015811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916124,0.004633741,0.001339804,0.000820903,0.001172016,0.0004210298],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006941188,0.000009284864,0.0003495538,0.00001295746,0.000002669164,0.00007336171,0.01729175,0.0002110102,0.0001693708,0.9793562,0.0008307831,0.001686205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002098289,0.00005337239,0.001867493,0.0002549479,0.00001225289,0.0003301209,0.0281442,0.002147398,0.001061235,0.8556218,0.110446,0.00004025387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2703998,0.001716493,0.03647916,0.03866309,0.0004188348,0.00005600764,0.00002160549,0.00005687297,0.6521882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945173,0.0000897275,0.0006298532,0.0005001278,0.00004558388,0.00001169857,0.000001977688,0.000009397073,0.004194493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008251072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04363638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509167444","doi":"10.1111/japp.12238","title":"Reclaiming Proportionality (Society for Applied Philosophy Annual Lecture 2016)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Wrongdoing; Consequentialism; Morality; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Arthur Ripstein","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05799821567031576,"gpt":0.2582990294060854,"spread":0.2003008137357696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005827008,0.0008787061,0.0006752747,0.001023706,0.003007352,0.007224045,0.0008985715,0.003068838,0.04378609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007465432,0.0004736385,0.0008302032,0.0007858243,0.006845567,0.007537811,0.005030318,0.009359343,0.01792805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005439205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00466623,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002302487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002528956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967405,0.001387479,0.0001515491,0.0004745383,0.0009951023,0.000250799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998408,0.0006776391,0.0001119537,0.0001722467,0.0003815444,0.0002485645],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002466565,0.00002686376,0.000110707,0.0001402919,0.000009806502,0.00004424534,0.001002445,0.0002150231,0.0001762735,0.4139163,0.5049114,0.07942209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004227578,0.00001050543,0.0002218523,0.0003662377,0.000003210447,0.00005255812,0.0002148345,0.0002325014,0.00006609104,0.1369273,0.861892,0.000008666027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002404739,0.1385415,0.02398093,0.2776393,0.1025886,0.00005132458,0.0003122723,0.0005959859,0.4538853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1322331,0.1029698,0.02093265,0.04096483,0.05221321,0.0003494462,0.0005083669,0.001395671,0.6484329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04378609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.146479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063734872","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00338.x","title":"A Living Will Clause for Supporters of Animal Experimentation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association for Co-operative Education; Suncor Energy (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Misfortune; Democracy; Sign (mathematics); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David Sztybel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1146218405958649,"gpt":0.3785454714203166,"spread":0.2639236308244517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03782726,0.000588723,0.000713265,0.0006883853,0.008729083,0.007816565,0.001906154,0.0202872,0.01063484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05428851,0.0006636805,0.0009446942,0.0005782965,0.03021083,0.01369451,0.007533756,0.02423379,0.002452165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002870986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002291105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002729382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.975552,0.01328502,0.0015861,0.001951433,0.006134811,0.001490584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9640987,0.0237951,0.002113354,0.003540575,0.00503119,0.001421174],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001063688,0.000007760661,0.00003530454,0.0000149327,0.000002220307,0.00002436677,0.0008046732,0.00002270641,0.0001142761,0.9906467,0.006977528,0.001338881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007419176,0.00006904935,0.0002813099,0.0002139764,0.00002259532,0.0001913906,0.0008774852,0.0003418187,0.0004576172,0.5711404,0.4262837,0.00004642585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009656994,0.004113142,0.03328571,0.3386826,0.005138205,0.0001909068,0.0001033401,0.0001465041,0.6086825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4943232,0.001915869,0.02708784,0.3001144,0.005960444,0.0009915185,0.000115273,0.0002141826,0.1692774],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03782726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.200052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2311112747","doi":"10.1111/japp.12214","title":"Fiduciary Duties and the Ethics of Public Apology","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law; Duty of loyalty; Sociology; Criticism; Discretion; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law and economics","authors":[{"name":"Alice MacLachlan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05561099989035762,"gpt":0.3145470765413991,"spread":0.2589360766510415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01564877,0.0003126602,0.0003667035,0.0008958896,0.005519462,0.007944271,0.001068764,0.006041551,0.002958523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02860664,0.0003134757,0.0002983379,0.0004514771,0.05597533,0.005603103,0.005433595,0.005060803,0.0005423183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004113532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003646706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001232434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001031048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9808117,0.01453282,0.0004868442,0.0007628936,0.002428756,0.000977059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781044,0.01375224,0.002188801,0.002580994,0.002294732,0.00107873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004767261,0.00001192399,0.0001723758,0.00001217271,0.000002237974,0.00005811613,0.005108877,0.00009623278,0.00005673096,0.9916918,0.0008441558,0.001940511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009157451,0.00001786202,0.0003088099,0.00009748638,0.000003329003,0.0001745104,0.00262815,0.0006611685,0.0001566501,0.9725685,0.02336244,0.00001195857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1499764,0.004231005,0.08646376,0.07617822,0.0007829058,0.00008444222,0.00002141447,0.0001011997,0.6821607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990017,0.0002578018,0.002009963,0.001130401,0.00009741272,0.00002322421,0.000002740543,0.00001664999,0.006444854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01564877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08275956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258432295","doi":"10.1111/japp.12179","title":"Divide and Rule Better: On Subsidiarity, Legitimacy and the Epistemic Aim of Political Decision‐Making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Legitimacy; Politics; Prima facie; Scrutiny; Political philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics; European union","authors":[{"name":"Yann Allard‐Tremblay","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03367762303359811,"gpt":0.3214303236464803,"spread":0.2877527006128822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01131611,0.0002573406,0.0008217604,0.001459753,0.004321755,0.00891839,0.0009565481,0.003754135,0.005244005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01897991,0.0002348392,0.000546613,0.0006486439,0.03890508,0.008993465,0.006939627,0.004579451,0.000479624],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003905687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002979974,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001614024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001640381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9904367,0.005488474,0.0003245077,0.001316367,0.001514211,0.0009196976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812284,0.01221071,0.00144324,0.002382746,0.001568262,0.001166707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001200849,0.00001463675,0.0001859561,0.000008343543,0.000003810885,0.00003457517,0.00118456,0.0002619023,0.00007901825,0.9958208,0.0002920477,0.00210242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001364934,0.00001329271,0.0002731663,0.00003263829,0.000004374032,0.00001977776,0.0007790969,0.001011389,0.0001445511,0.9931129,0.004589055,0.000006252629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2242145,0.001728202,0.0988108,0.05166306,0.0003597082,0.000111579,0.00003838589,0.00006633061,0.6230075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994415,0.0001216859,0.002442174,0.0006080121,0.00006627763,0.00002744336,0.000004996025,0.0000113523,0.002302999],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01131611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05984598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891321095","doi":"10.1111/japp.12340","title":"Rights to the Oceans: Foundational Arguments Reconsidered","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Object (grammar); Epistemology; Commons; Global commons; Intellectual property; Property (philosophy); Law; Natural (archaeology); Human rights; Sociology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; History; Computer science; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Cara Nine","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0145819959209861,"gpt":0.24730410196818,"spread":0.2327221060471938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01151613,0.0004894606,0.0007696339,0.002914863,0.006721251,0.009433255,0.002840933,0.009525755,0.006561986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01507785,0.000404161,0.000973535,0.00174655,0.05686344,0.01401801,0.006359953,0.007991971,0.0006878332],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01034031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004753339,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01582174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01062882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929081,0.00331547,0.0002446431,0.0008135685,0.001849666,0.0008684783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883531,0.007664601,0.0006512466,0.001187787,0.001694786,0.0004486615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000159821,0.000001906619,0.0000168495,0.00000503701,9.755047e-7,0.00001224426,0.0002900392,0.0001123625,0.000008882719,0.9989631,0.000224465,0.0003625349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008985947,0.000004774062,0.00008370382,0.00009085538,0.000004988899,0.0000190975,0.0006819306,0.0006376903,0.00006166155,0.9838307,0.01456869,0.000006833678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04216781,0.004231809,0.05545913,0.0831964,0.0009018418,0.00005705026,0.0001010082,0.00005311151,0.813832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803768,0.001198985,0.004351997,0.00368912,0.0005385175,0.00006706988,0.00003862486,0.00003389416,0.009705012],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01582174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07502449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950612791","doi":"10.1111/japp.12040","title":"Exploitation, Justice, and Parity in International Clinical Research","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Citizenship; Law and economics; Parity (physics); Law; Deadlock; Subject (documents); Transactional leadership; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Vida Panitch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6055928016743222,"gpt":0.6121652703710433,"spread":0.006572468696721123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1541159,0.00040403,0.001677857,0.002118024,0.007097389,0.01538967,0.002582685,0.006005175,0.003991914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1708089,0.0007745288,0.000748341,0.001738986,0.08324721,0.0170666,0.02492902,0.008636205,0.0003660366],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006062062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01088314,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009552986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008067522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7991746,0.1579277,0.008714871,0.007231337,0.02070203,0.006249502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8372838,0.114227,0.01232766,0.0211001,0.00949012,0.005571221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002414543,0.0000205991,0.0006377829,0.00003640924,0.0000108285,0.00005097786,0.002378118,0.0001551691,0.00007791364,0.9913676,0.0003398108,0.004900736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002515535,0.00003873335,0.0004587929,0.0001302227,0.000008504092,0.0000987107,0.0009977522,0.0004084606,0.0001213562,0.9935663,0.00413418,0.00001178197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1623112,0.006626016,0.1873063,0.1828345,0.001059922,0.0004997997,0.00008772145,0.00007953404,0.459195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807009,0.0004538599,0.01191271,0.004201164,0.0002068897,0.0003704083,0.00001222677,0.00001804585,0.002123887],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1541159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8150527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793455378","doi":"10.1111/japp.12304","title":"Dissidents and Innocents: Hard Cases for a Political Philosophy of Boycotts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Boycott; Coercion (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Face (sociological concept); Group (periodic table); Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Weinstock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08627191106746301,"gpt":0.3648509930300102,"spread":0.2785790819625472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01714261,0.0006260748,0.0007649992,0.001686384,0.01258029,0.01214053,0.001992785,0.01341912,0.008390691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02089946,0.0005920375,0.0007054758,0.0007625496,0.09223399,0.01650437,0.008784101,0.01801605,0.0006049924],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006700566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003443128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004113595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00385341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9820092,0.01227087,0.0003778081,0.001257437,0.002494709,0.00159002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803852,0.01470691,0.00112605,0.001230382,0.001158123,0.001393371],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004711532,0.000005423913,0.00005588356,0.000006004812,0.000001263952,0.00004904447,0.001148353,0.00006044062,0.00001732613,0.9973808,0.000861266,0.0004095411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001955388,0.00000816339,0.0001107973,0.00005131666,0.00000297708,0.00006102192,0.002383402,0.0006764713,0.0000556719,0.983404,0.01321504,0.00001141643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1037363,0.002772146,0.05436648,0.2702082,0.001364111,0.0001553061,0.00004547483,0.00006931572,0.5672826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755179,0.0003672418,0.004439535,0.007656721,0.0005079438,0.0001165218,0.000007941751,0.00003978708,0.01134651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01714261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09065986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133179509","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2010.00492.x","title":"Combat Trauma and the Moral Risks of Memory Manipulating Drugs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Posttraumatic stress; Military service; Moral injury; Psychiatry; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Elisa A. Hurley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08657595068658226,"gpt":0.3374062576477158,"spread":0.2508303069611335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002937784,0.0001750889,0.0002080969,0.000412135,0.002604632,0.003466451,0.0004104864,0.003052922,0.004700411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008636108,0.0001454635,0.0003332505,0.0001629128,0.01124711,0.002078966,0.002374155,0.003051079,0.0002633212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001280338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00109738,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008297884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006588406,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997371,0.001931229,0.00006280682,0.0001034628,0.0003382382,0.0001933535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928837,0.004651779,0.001288242,0.0004146016,0.0004383754,0.0003232473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004552764,0.0005930323,0.01193521,0.0003562238,0.0001280206,0.00232995,0.01721601,0.0005984681,0.002207078,0.8724664,0.01439726,0.07731707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003013524,0.002316825,0.02291212,0.00179772,0.0002253401,0.01264222,0.02939457,0.002490625,0.005419376,0.5794613,0.3428955,0.0001429465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4008242,0.03649531,0.006136933,0.1813436,0.001175234,0.00009470381,0.00007615038,0.00004792523,0.373806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786791,0.004780976,0.0006812517,0.01077753,0.0003394437,0.00002493941,0.000005498408,0.000007010928,0.004704397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004700411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01572448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021160958","doi":"10.1111/japp.12437","title":"Bad Faith, Bad Behaviour, and Role Models","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Doping in Sports","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Admiration; Situational ethics; Faith; Agency (philosophy); Virtue; Social psychology; Existentialism; Bad faith; Conversation; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Leslie A. Howe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03270623957627899,"gpt":0.2728278807510686,"spread":0.2401216411747896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0123604,0.0004196453,0.0003531172,0.001216782,0.006600421,0.007782734,0.001191878,0.002925983,0.002643528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009333232,0.0003150303,0.0003337665,0.0004812218,0.05216561,0.005057248,0.006559472,0.005541709,0.0003006702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003728872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002918914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003232741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00239808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9834822,0.01306461,0.0002340279,0.0006476719,0.001337249,0.00123422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871229,0.005652889,0.001592604,0.001268427,0.001214232,0.003148924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002632015,0.0001084042,0.003356069,0.00003141961,0.00001111212,0.0002039589,0.06702255,0.0002290151,0.0002155437,0.9222742,0.002283917,0.004237446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000459613,0.0001437229,0.003722958,0.0002702463,0.00002286246,0.000614149,0.1094226,0.003781851,0.0004044828,0.8069447,0.0745521,0.00007438048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4576123,0.002184509,0.0371537,0.1040254,0.0008671701,0.0001166664,0.00003203208,0.0001009607,0.3979073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960456,0.0001570451,0.0007730649,0.000837267,0.00002291398,0.00001179146,0.000002932341,0.000006793227,0.002142496],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0123604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06536889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200177648","doi":"10.1111/japp.12569","title":"Why a <scp>UBI</scp> Will Never Be High Enough","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Economics; Workforce; Payment; Distribution (mathematics); Labour economics; Welfare; Perception; Consumption (sociology); Income distribution; Basic income; Economic inequality; Public economics; Demographic economics; Welfare economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Psychology; Market economy; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Joseph Heath","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02193911097089959,"gpt":0.2544453852962975,"spread":0.2325062743253979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006670618,0.0001255682,0.0002115063,0.000299608,0.004290889,0.003807884,0.0007214305,0.004176999,0.01130713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01596507,0.0001584231,0.0002682528,0.0003223259,0.01109576,0.003261781,0.001650463,0.004572297,0.002425075],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002867618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00290959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009231809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009420106,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995876,0.001709817,0.0001158093,0.0003698244,0.001178437,0.0007501142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921382,0.002214982,0.000698906,0.0007247698,0.002841955,0.001381153],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001164272,0.0001193949,0.01883451,0.0002383052,0.00004439074,0.0006694391,0.01732073,0.0002689685,0.002456868,0.5316658,0.3332377,0.09502754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002903732,0.0001685364,0.02391727,0.0005905826,0.00002815336,0.0008140858,0.03648877,0.0008771754,0.002390888,0.2353856,0.6992143,0.00009565987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1118549,0.002285261,0.005267876,0.6854906,0.003695465,0.00005132549,0.00009884212,0.0001507131,0.191105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9033499,0.0008408554,0.00175098,0.06606585,0.0005742834,0.00003730855,0.00002351182,0.0001118087,0.02724539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01130713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03782606,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279145249","doi":"10.1111/japp.12181","title":"Connecting Applied and Theoretical Bayesian Epistemology: Data Relevance, Pragmatics, and the Legal Case of Sally Clark","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Rationality; Pragmatics; Epistemology; Inference; Bayesian probability; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Matthew J. Barker","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02023307035500067,"gpt":0.2578727470564803,"spread":0.2376396767014796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05957724,0.0003715639,0.0009002258,0.003194303,0.009650386,0.01134897,0.003342786,0.006649627,0.004493524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1505291,0.0008621452,0.0005824288,0.002849484,0.06751681,0.01334662,0.008945992,0.01165962,0.000268764],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01505824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01075052,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04323426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04563685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9461097,0.04160042,0.001425599,0.002381054,0.006506123,0.001977078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8297751,0.1517087,0.005504993,0.005284954,0.006218,0.001508186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003126658,0.00001635076,0.001298719,0.00005846806,0.00001430221,0.0006805505,0.02936602,0.0004587891,0.0001222894,0.9603822,0.002192213,0.005378902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003009112,0.00001308144,0.0009835379,0.0001896295,0.00001830459,0.0003412745,0.01844093,0.002522683,0.0003416279,0.9600633,0.01701148,0.00004402587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2690305,0.004436673,0.1223226,0.4483016,0.000591194,0.0001731321,0.000129292,0.00009856874,0.1549164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838414,0.000393106,0.009350538,0.004457537,0.0001187524,0.00005533194,0.000016544,0.00003254528,0.001734243],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05957724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3150783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387575490","doi":"10.1111/japp.12691","title":"<i>Ubuntu</i> Thinking on Biodiversity Loss: The Inadequacies of Egalitarian and Communitarian Solutions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Communitarianism; Anthropocentrism; Environmental ethics; Personhood; Sociology; Animal ethics; Biodiversity; Utilitarianism; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Ecology; Political science; Biology; Liberalism","authors":[{"name":"Olusegun Steven Samuel","is_ca":true},{"name":"Rotimi Omosulu","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07455513470287974,"gpt":0.2770908785839675,"spread":0.2025357438810877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008548553,0.0004726616,0.0004843391,0.001574029,0.006963272,0.009393841,0.001535724,0.003666775,0.00217778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004637492,0.0002139999,0.0003531826,0.0008453304,0.0504706,0.008656093,0.005402097,0.006595587,0.0002978394],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006685821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003953971,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004209419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003613001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933948,0.004891388,0.0000921757,0.000311626,0.0008146603,0.0004954805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971339,0.001565307,0.0002708619,0.0003316212,0.0004452211,0.0002530301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005932719,0.000008382255,0.00007418802,0.00001809771,0.000002633615,0.00001631027,0.003584137,0.0001263902,0.00003354066,0.9906149,0.001784306,0.003731191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004316192,0.00001089907,0.0002190408,0.0002010471,0.000004427925,0.00005253261,0.004969222,0.0007013793,0.0001338573,0.9530981,0.04059616,0.000009036627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08001051,0.01882095,0.04692706,0.2968507,0.001840995,0.00004715033,0.0000354854,0.00009005954,0.5553771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748565,0.002283165,0.005019715,0.01061818,0.0003434093,0.00004832474,0.000008708585,0.00004703732,0.006775083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009393841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04850924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200068504","doi":"10.1111/japp.12563","title":"Teaching Children How to Think: Rational Autonomy as an Aim of Liberal Education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Rationality; Duty; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Enlightenment; Sociology; Practical reason; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Franklin‐Hall","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02205268738389898,"gpt":0.3393262565037452,"spread":0.3172735691198462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008931389,0.0003458216,0.0002943007,0.000452132,0.002451473,0.005262492,0.0008078599,0.003034618,0.004185625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01430768,0.0003035175,0.0003658001,0.0003085204,0.02123266,0.005236839,0.006570188,0.007911808,0.0008051321],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004317618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004258817,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001806564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002914953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911374,0.007031242,0.0001615925,0.0003371398,0.000745861,0.0005867308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859216,0.01073139,0.001147362,0.000618119,0.0005559637,0.001025656],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006998883,0.0003722355,0.00409176,0.0002494966,0.00001196172,0.0008446192,0.1824155,0.000953503,0.00143802,0.7556695,0.02163957,0.03224395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001024875,0.0002832684,0.003522218,0.001201523,0.00004070289,0.0009106796,0.07906142,0.002319634,0.005179584,0.5325113,0.3747856,0.00008158675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.356445,0.005011868,0.06909148,0.2616723,0.001189657,0.0002569365,0.00009118632,0.0003152897,0.3059263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675035,0.001320224,0.01442363,0.008148547,0.0001072417,0.000120017,0.00001753974,0.00005120751,0.008308038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008931389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04723424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078117039","doi":"10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00263.x","title":"Capacities, Context and the Moral Status of Animals","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Intellect; Epistemology; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Sherri Irvin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08876108472863845,"gpt":0.2600836443225862,"spread":0.1713225595939477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001553494,0.0002483307,0.0002094513,0.0007484751,0.001927467,0.003854902,0.0004688793,0.0009717909,0.002611754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042822,0.0001813531,0.0001593696,0.000307298,0.01790686,0.003880823,0.003379541,0.001245127,0.0002419715],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009707179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005022623,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008067092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001124993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986346,0.0008531731,0.00004705183,0.0001539067,0.0001587003,0.0001525596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981287,0.0007032027,0.0004535793,0.0001757141,0.0001759596,0.0003628046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008740019,0.00003446693,0.006503991,0.0001095428,0.00002827744,0.0002718506,0.01225474,0.000954415,0.002511883,0.9607469,0.0006852766,0.01581119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001952127,0.0001053883,0.01638979,0.0001546356,0.00002260455,0.000437451,0.006560338,0.0008374623,0.000749865,0.9455113,0.02916316,0.00004861025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6394889,0.005000082,0.01443518,0.005697989,0.000167729,0.0000305688,0.00005239733,0.0000415191,0.3350857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970438,0.0004138201,0.00127292,0.0001600705,0.00001726316,0.000009585781,0.000007254902,0.000004928416,0.001070314],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003854902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008737206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137886643","doi":"10.1111/japp.12503","title":"Is Humane Farming Morally Permissible?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Agriculture; Raising (metalworking); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Ecology; Mathematics; Medicine; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Doran Smolkin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01398701940225664,"gpt":0.2333672681568821,"spread":0.2193802487546255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01518172,0.0003095185,0.0005215719,0.0007109614,0.005764776,0.00595211,0.001459649,0.00726198,0.004556905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01591915,0.0002621548,0.0004324624,0.0005971976,0.06249817,0.006559065,0.004000641,0.007898595,0.00064643],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003116004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003119236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001605405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001173213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9869731,0.008617385,0.000246011,0.000937656,0.002156826,0.001068989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986955,0.007625109,0.001486861,0.001329646,0.001800146,0.000803199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006204697,0.00001684427,0.0002366062,0.00002683638,0.000005662765,0.00009150752,0.002401726,0.00008590623,0.00009330229,0.9927234,0.002839839,0.001472251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001060716,0.00001400189,0.0003476706,0.0001464139,0.00000660352,0.0001251142,0.003547322,0.0002968214,0.000196433,0.9608035,0.03449261,0.0000129788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08561999,0.003434746,0.0229187,0.3025787,0.001682194,0.00005433107,0.00006679688,0.00005022177,0.5835943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711929,0.0007243214,0.001991923,0.01873351,0.0003820485,0.00004690598,0.00001771072,0.00001966043,0.006890937],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01518172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08028954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200107615","doi":"10.1111/japp.12547","title":"Justice Principles, Empirical Beliefs, and Cognitive Biases: Reply to Buchanan's ‘When Knowing What Is Just and Being Committed to Achieving it Is Not Enough’","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Individualism; Argument (complex analysis); Ideology; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Sociology; Cognition; Positive economics; Empirical research; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Margaret Moore","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1824390077859002,"gpt":0.3929880644301023,"spread":0.210549056644202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03027155,0.0005196242,0.001080291,0.001818917,0.004994643,0.00657526,0.00309807,0.02507807,0.003034516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07204453,0.0006410779,0.0005261129,0.001533732,0.05360859,0.01501666,0.00642736,0.02714982,0.0007288978],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004187222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002927718,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003611002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002738942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9882137,0.007877342,0.0004950241,0.001198849,0.001717303,0.0004978106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8839571,0.1039793,0.003130075,0.002753565,0.004911898,0.001268077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009321128,0.00005732851,0.0008824495,0.0001658471,0.00004261805,0.0004914847,0.0243981,0.0004063214,0.0002246689,0.8527226,0.1040068,0.01650856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005961568,0.00002169188,0.0006721513,0.0004276164,0.00001412986,0.0003025995,0.00709372,0.0008697651,0.0003329651,0.9192989,0.07084397,0.00006290483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.006921827,0.004187093,0.002351292,0.9774948,0.001965014,0.00000574865,0.00001747703,0.00001531608,0.007041479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.595116,0.00506216,0.003801707,0.3783044,0.01271819,0.00009214953,0.00002556583,0.00008593337,0.004793998],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03027155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1600931,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758668236","doi":"10.1111/japp.12287","title":"Kagan on Speciesism and Modal Personism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Modal; Argument (complex analysis); Prejudice (legal term); Object (grammar); sort; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Doran Smolkin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05970444737332933,"gpt":0.2497312792024159,"spread":0.1900268318290865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002878851,0.000298111,0.0004300259,0.0009731817,0.003181965,0.002734911,0.0006825299,0.00198077,0.004111618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004236306,0.0002328286,0.0004365682,0.0005862187,0.02405657,0.005971201,0.00338196,0.003569324,0.0004538158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002446988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009909261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002494141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001762882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966846,0.002308201,0.00006654538,0.0002894627,0.0004108601,0.0002403637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971758,0.001874445,0.0001721631,0.0002298302,0.000400835,0.0001469346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001195701,0.00000646339,0.0001086958,0.00001879316,0.000004260079,0.00003071355,0.001658373,0.00008931662,0.0000866386,0.9940738,0.002488032,0.001422933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006990658,0.000008643118,0.0001883749,0.00003862536,0.000004598028,0.00004748115,0.0007976391,0.0002722263,0.0001180265,0.9828095,0.01569975,0.000008150522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09574447,0.006343631,0.03924128,0.1413923,0.001096065,0.00004376928,0.00008853398,0.0001134332,0.7159365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795107,0.0008536825,0.002823663,0.006227838,0.0002355651,0.00004115013,0.00001441527,0.00003501807,0.01025791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004111618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01775426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935024517","doi":"10.1111/japp.12069","title":"Why Should We Save Nature's Hidden Gems?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Argument (complex analysis); Natural (archaeology); Aesthetic value; Aesthetics; Taste; Environmental ethics; Quality (philosophy); Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Psychology; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Glenn Parsons","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02009919059838753,"gpt":0.2394130251033881,"spread":0.2193138345050006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00206426,0.0001664768,0.0001625068,0.0002619624,0.00523785,0.003196481,0.0006134178,0.002440317,0.002655775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002294244,0.00009625823,0.0001417821,0.000254484,0.01969318,0.002274332,0.001646145,0.003228687,0.0003346405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005196066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003147361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04390061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08603038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989988,0.0004345896,0.00001592915,0.0001089943,0.0002225033,0.0002191728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991166,0.0002737776,0.00007209706,0.0001348036,0.0002158377,0.0001868953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003421286,0.00003313343,0.001940448,0.00008168507,0.00001059004,0.0004540066,0.02970106,0.0005176721,0.00110523,0.9076514,0.03899157,0.01947902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002361202,0.00006388178,0.005341082,0.0003303385,0.00002216729,0.0005448319,0.03547799,0.0008948967,0.001396588,0.3205929,0.635276,0.00003564832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1867599,0.006659444,0.01186428,0.3800408,0.00245803,0.00004583635,0.00004757815,0.00008269913,0.4120414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537568,0.0009112816,0.001504937,0.01023494,0.0001561054,0.00001259193,0.000008888086,0.00002082345,0.03339346],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04390061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08729017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392706257","doi":"10.1111/japp.12724","title":"On the Ethics of Interacting","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"All Souls College, University of Oxford; Leverhulme Trust; University of Leeds; KU Leuven; Universität Wien; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Kimberley Brownlee","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08602893023251612,"gpt":0.3967186661777949,"spread":0.3106897359452788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01038629,0.0003797627,0.0004267014,0.001051243,0.006582687,0.007902553,0.001073221,0.003963439,0.003239146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01320802,0.0003312281,0.0004266709,0.0007176726,0.06234135,0.006794551,0.006417914,0.004705165,0.0007671089],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003661537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002436085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001294702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9730921,0.020982,0.0005624946,0.0009771213,0.002974935,0.001411254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841903,0.009593857,0.001390997,0.001970871,0.001928642,0.0009253276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000426503,0.000004739679,0.0001602405,0.00000944554,0.000001253614,0.0000366345,0.003575912,0.0001250703,0.00003732112,0.9942539,0.0005663904,0.001224821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006362779,0.000009489938,0.0002346569,0.00006228775,0.0000026009,0.00008795657,0.002952725,0.0007110866,0.0001140879,0.9693207,0.02648944,0.000008712278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06748654,0.002776338,0.06890084,0.04710718,0.0003714331,0.00008843065,0.00005379173,0.00005670388,0.8131588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979036,0.0007830595,0.00555862,0.001813449,0.0001663209,0.0001110799,0.00001839733,0.0000386271,0.01247441],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01038629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0549286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306407811","doi":"10.1111/japp.12630","title":"Normalization of Racism and Moral Responsibility: Against the Exculpatory Stance","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Ignorance; Racism; Normalization (sociology); Moral responsibility; Sociology; Epistemology; Criminology; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Psychology; Gender studies; Philosophy; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Federica Berdini","is_ca":true},{"name":"Sofia Bonicalzi","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04824270936049058,"gpt":0.3038509386585937,"spread":0.2556082292981031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02310915,0.0005171667,0.0009034954,0.001633659,0.00584547,0.0070953,0.002076473,0.005946842,0.001558421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03750879,0.0005149198,0.00104054,0.0006879164,0.1066893,0.008952979,0.01430106,0.01126982,0.0002800102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006868825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005979607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003093863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002168298,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9650913,0.0209122,0.001128274,0.002598944,0.008334484,0.001934675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96891,0.0114625,0.004450506,0.009056517,0.004792538,0.001327986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002076918,0.0000236908,0.0009143414,0.00004347041,0.00001807889,0.0001686216,0.008233896,0.0005636092,0.000409609,0.9836737,0.0006271594,0.005303103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002617789,0.00004900637,0.001792821,0.0001967317,0.00002607618,0.0003637252,0.003765359,0.001680075,0.001242737,0.9723616,0.01844418,0.0000515243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2687408,0.002023341,0.1187081,0.1085736,0.0006374412,0.0001878794,0.0000308126,0.0003883422,0.5007098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920047,0.0001057802,0.002974009,0.002487575,0.00009699779,0.00005149682,0.000003545793,0.00003479422,0.00224113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02310915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1222143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094161273","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00387.x","title":"A Reply to Cholbi's ‘Suicide Intervention and Non‐Ideal Kantian Theory’","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Ideal (ethics); Morality; Rationality; Irrational number; Commit; Paternalism; Philosophy; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Ryan Tonkens","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02341285297158642,"gpt":0.2746533006099369,"spread":0.2512404476383505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02183899,0.0006132892,0.001100757,0.001106484,0.004736079,0.004446853,0.003078782,0.02953782,0.006950559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04603197,0.0005604781,0.0008387527,0.001068581,0.02507715,0.01024925,0.005210717,0.03410468,0.002252268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006919591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005482097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004456942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9882456,0.007053457,0.0005368477,0.001116789,0.002340361,0.0007069077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733533,0.02028258,0.0009027023,0.001176832,0.003359782,0.0009248173],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005723101,0.00003495374,0.0001189459,0.0001196962,0.00001331137,0.00009142663,0.002606109,0.0001838834,0.00009392264,0.7333305,0.2546408,0.008709253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008846418,0.00003706179,0.000450416,0.0004184,0.00001297101,0.0002289172,0.001521317,0.0009273155,0.0003036254,0.6127286,0.3832233,0.00005966664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009693887,0.002980843,0.00224412,0.9862367,0.002194439,0.000005351865,0.00001610362,0.00001986298,0.005333134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1235719,0.005605488,0.003449445,0.8482702,0.006943641,0.0001202312,0.00003539739,0.0000984583,0.01190527],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02953782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}