{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":80,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":80,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"95ca7ae14edc","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy"}},"results":[{"id":"W2001015618","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2005.00292.x","title":"Fatherhood and Child Support: Do Men Have a Right to Choose?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Abortion; Differential treatment; Child support; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Economics; Pregnancy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01385003556120746,"gpt":0.274322794917293,"spread":0.2604727593560855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000308103,0.0001568928,0.0004190076,0.0002914703,0.00007949233,0.00001779919,0.0001214759,0.0001057939,0.000107663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005170181,0.0001107268,0.00007689972,0.0001437814,0.00006893426,0.0000771968,0.00005049863,0.000463848,0.00005185221],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000659681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006327116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.524706e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.840681e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987771,0.000007657541,0.000446579,0.0002275836,0.0003048467,0.0002362164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999032,0.00001652386,0.0002453752,0.0002895808,0.0001110789,0.0003054339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01077921,0.003543479,0.01059753,0.001140836,0.001561469,0.0008940148,0.009511428,0.0001162816,0.02067483,0.2203056,0.08229325,0.6385821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01125745,0.004543277,0.04596451,0.0005148756,0.0004031586,0.003984571,0.0009623361,0.00001487786,0.06740759,0.2722927,0.5919141,0.0007405854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3812463,0.001224725,0.00006028821,0.1368617,0.0001167045,0.0008280114,0.000007218408,0.00007876446,0.4795763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991173,0.0001479703,0.00433616,0.002467205,0.001744173,0.00001009175,8.809483e-7,0.00002103228,0.00009948415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6378415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4515306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2570731680","doi":"10.1111/japp.12256","title":"Why Childhood is Bad for Children","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Research Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Childhood studies; Identity (music); Criticism; Psychology; Early childhood; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03444498611026751,"gpt":0.3445870162201607,"spread":0.3101420301098932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005518048,0.0001612262,0.0004834113,0.0001302643,0.0003680249,0.00006874797,0.0003765037,0.0002164921,0.00006747346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001586365,0.0001265631,0.0002774565,0.00004818785,0.00009657672,0.0001094538,0.00005544853,0.0007565864,0.00001369897],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004120105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002097151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001489672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.289354e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986053,0.000008568489,0.000524985,0.0001783334,0.0004451966,0.0002375799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979897,0.0000779736,0.0007278365,0.0005406851,0.0003559513,0.0003078622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005462728,0.002941092,0.05022692,0.001751605,0.002809794,0.0002619798,0.01390512,0.00001810309,0.001071473,0.3299653,0.5106839,0.08090202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01280522,0.002589289,0.122483,0.0005029696,0.0008968933,0.0005154311,0.00008595208,0.00002006394,0.002800554,0.5343463,0.3223511,0.0006031435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3902832,0.003552808,0.0006900758,0.3978923,0.002300045,0.002527715,0.0001725172,0.00006295231,0.2025184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693073,0.0003038086,0.004170764,0.01853279,0.007585867,0.000007483734,0.000006773163,0.00003559663,0.00004959357],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5790242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5161093,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076362515","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00382.x","title":"The Moral Psychology of Conflicts of Interest: Insights from Affective Neuroscience","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Normative; Irrationality; Neuroethics; Deception; Conflict of interest; Moral psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Rationality; Neuroscience; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.189879244467696,"gpt":0.3282893007915307,"spread":0.1384100563238347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004018918,0.0001333187,0.0003007092,0.0001633534,0.00009933044,0.00000908571,0.0006773539,0.0000807681,0.000009187575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001228586,0.00008499947,0.0001316016,0.0002764711,0.0008855337,0.00009704341,0.00007343852,0.0003571259,0.000007459901],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001834437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002477224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002736984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002227774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984884,0.0000684863,0.0006497288,0.0002291625,0.0003693369,0.000194947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981357,0.0005297998,0.0008867301,0.0002354757,0.0001008194,0.0001114187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001367057,0.0003074016,0.0001499382,0.000005264299,0.0000130798,0.00003529142,0.0003442265,0.00003371532,0.8745754,0.1210586,0.0002135783,0.001896413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001273538,0.0008707633,0.04559828,0.00004289654,0.00002050371,0.00006951141,0.00004065983,0.00001476447,0.4853606,0.4644928,0.002105023,0.000110677],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9740067,0.00009352454,0.0003626719,0.001876139,0.001106843,0.0001269541,0.000008182335,0.000005719866,0.02241334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973814,0.0000628538,0.0001698689,0.00212185,0.0002476671,0.000001057904,2.614657e-7,0.000008161696,0.000006830358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3892148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3466178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054172929","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00342.x","title":"Iraq: A Morally Justified Resort to War","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Argument (complex analysis); Just war theory; Morality; Law; Spanish Civil War; Proportionality (law); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; History; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04779983566186594,"gpt":0.2400857679150213,"spread":0.1922859322531553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004121861,0.0001599346,0.0002807037,0.000250058,0.000256529,0.0001058556,0.0002754047,0.00007814438,0.0002581276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000191438,0.0001354299,0.0001318273,0.00006531717,0.0001401387,0.0001517549,0.00002782809,0.000354332,0.0002163365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004902749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006359741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004178259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005829344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985391,0.00001805586,0.0006334787,0.0001636658,0.0004425937,0.0002031042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988972,0.00005683767,0.0003746258,0.0002198649,0.0003372268,0.0001142771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003020102,0.0001647169,0.00001340866,0.00005243772,0.00003608875,0.00001567364,0.01042362,0.0003883643,0.002455141,0.938116,0.04726228,0.0007703177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007425136,0.0001878609,0.0003364363,0.00006764113,0.0001174731,0.00001264669,0.001378416,0.00001834364,0.001124685,0.4715263,0.5241811,0.0003066229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1183217,0.0002335499,0.0002258787,0.01325706,0.001399223,0.0003300131,0.00003518367,0.00006819843,0.8661292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888861,0.0000105203,0.0007334043,0.001348878,0.007700006,0.000007131352,0.00001122803,0.00002887033,0.001273898],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8705643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5522672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141402416","doi":"10.1111/japp.12010","title":"Permissible Use and Interdependence: Against Principled Veganism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Animal ethics; Animal rights; Non-human; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1025710252696502,"gpt":0.2652023652049446,"spread":0.1626313399352944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001414306,0.0001304726,0.0001983467,0.0001247462,0.0001007987,0.000091151,0.0002465112,0.0000680104,0.000129683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005866075,0.00009842977,0.00006499537,0.00009169911,0.0001375546,0.0004107231,0.00008236248,0.0003072884,0.0001356914],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002631498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002478287,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001068462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.076005e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989295,0.00002790069,0.0003445632,0.0001984148,0.0003223344,0.0001773118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992698,0.00009780324,0.0002499443,0.0001284164,0.00006407916,0.0001899432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002359054,0.0003243233,0.0004528239,0.00003002949,0.00002723216,0.00009573235,0.0004108147,0.0001018375,0.9485046,0.04296716,0.002432769,0.004416825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004843066,0.0009321196,0.0458027,0.0002441785,0.00005694658,0.001128236,0.0001398037,0.0005248684,0.2260025,0.7064355,0.01311893,0.0007710974],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9714428,0.00002459912,0.00005168708,0.004074685,0.0002853742,0.0001505599,0.000002070369,0.00001489656,0.02395332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943534,0.00008751696,0.0008122851,0.004317591,0.0002884186,0.000005000938,3.55254e-7,0.00001139381,0.0001240042],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7225021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.401385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013654046","doi":"10.1111/japp.12422","title":"The Importance of History to the Erasing‐History Defence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Articulation (sociology); Character (mathematics); Statue; Public history; Sociology; Aesthetics; Law; History; Philosophy; Political science; Media studies; Art history","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0342151506720975,"gpt":0.2270285302195024,"spread":0.1928133795474049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007308972,0.00006953201,0.0001735509,0.0001029802,0.0004741198,0.00003597871,0.0007119395,0.0000473116,0.0002263469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000170824,0.00005549841,0.0001401773,0.0001772963,0.0007484519,0.0000925639,0.0000303639,0.0002873253,0.0000409379],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001778525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001572136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001725238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02094788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987496,0.00005610246,0.0003747195,0.0001009873,0.0005527359,0.0001658889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988233,0.0001256602,0.000495703,0.0001634782,0.0001388169,0.0002530457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001886493,0.00002786253,0.0001018543,0.00001822682,0.00004264783,0.00001622345,0.05465361,0.00006279455,0.000629499,0.3655775,0.5756804,0.003000743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009629558,0.00004101432,0.0002604726,0.000009636233,0.00002118783,0.000001387984,0.0007105503,0.000001163907,0.000007587191,0.006882106,0.9919038,0.00006474811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03193924,0.0214704,0.0001117082,0.1341953,0.003556211,0.000483659,0.00001010189,0.00002958451,0.8082038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860861,0.0004376574,0.0001879367,0.0102461,0.002306917,0.000004798989,1.952814e-7,0.00001456937,0.000715718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9541469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969172,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119571480","doi":"10.1111/japp.12145","title":"Is There a Right to Surrogacy?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Ottawa; Fondation Brocher","keywords":"Harm; Interpretation (philosophy); State (computer science); Law and economics; Vulnerability (computing); Law; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06660661995806746,"gpt":0.3252325013290664,"spread":0.258625881370999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003911803,0.00011415,0.0003536401,0.0002286477,0.00003155621,0.000009675467,0.0001461985,0.0000871176,0.00005267822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001152088,0.00007624749,0.00008854714,0.0002804321,0.00005195487,0.00005317559,0.00003954093,0.0003309395,0.000159134],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008410646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001990972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002013384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.484038e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989052,0.000008309215,0.0003521509,0.0001562869,0.0003955256,0.0001825317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987496,0.00002107393,0.0002075116,0.0003166488,0.0003346047,0.0003706017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02542068,0.003131234,0.03127018,0.001340362,0.001396322,0.002205509,0.009198237,0.00009125534,0.02161025,0.2561225,0.5767224,0.07149117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003536692,0.002223182,0.003848027,0.0001450841,0.000101307,0.0005160092,0.0003997309,0.00000293219,0.04302453,0.4931643,0.4528365,0.0002017558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7227788,0.001312927,0.0000996121,0.07603038,0.0003559204,0.0004199032,0.000003139142,0.00006447433,0.1989348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912999,0.00004751454,0.004393035,0.003074037,0.001073427,0.000005578311,4.985305e-7,0.00001611114,0.0000898478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2685211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3109282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122233165","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00383.x","title":"Resources and the Rule of Rescue<sup>1</sup>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Obligation; Context (archaeology); Resource (disambiguation); Moral obligation; Law and economics; Resource allocation; Business; Economics; Law; Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05371932614919323,"gpt":0.4065942984235476,"spread":0.3528749722743543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02052869,0.000127501,0.0004497298,0.0001522019,0.0005992812,0.000007736334,0.0004067704,0.0003055824,0.0001381745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003142221,0.00007487971,0.00009609358,0.000220479,0.0008268642,0.00009947003,0.0001631026,0.00479646,0.00003178187],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004488947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001378623,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002120431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002498531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967462,0.0006731519,0.001258587,0.0001293285,0.000892729,0.0003000065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853776,0.01268219,0.001097103,0.0003015545,0.0003390568,0.0002025381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008288165,0.0001777637,0.0008785013,0.0005326137,0.0002451571,0.00004039823,0.06146457,0.0001003622,0.0006593458,0.9193477,0.005240613,0.00302482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005018721,0.0001292045,0.001275452,0.0003731486,0.0001428834,0.00002825556,0.01081874,0.00005365939,0.0001720614,0.9150301,0.06683619,0.0001215959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4345154,0.001005686,0.0004429202,0.04625465,0.0003701953,0.0004886861,0.000004157166,0.00001747967,0.5169008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886462,0.0002625106,0.00252298,0.006340705,0.002109807,0.000003992816,3.997023e-7,0.00002232519,0.00009107371],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5541307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886846272","doi":"10.1111/japp.12337","title":"Adapting to Climate Change: What We Owe to Other Animals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Environmental ethics; Duty; Climate justice; Adaptation (eye); Context (archaeology); Animal rights; Action (physics); Animal ethics; Economic Justice; Political science; Human rights; Non-human; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Ecology; Psychology; Geography; Biology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05200233163429923,"gpt":0.2708667214531159,"spread":0.2188643898188167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003745344,0.0001648887,0.000231664,0.000120282,0.00009440746,0.00008458354,0.0002929292,0.00005106908,0.001348893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009755317,0.0001415224,0.00007140222,0.0003442272,0.0000362515,0.0003098811,0.0002448936,0.0001265777,0.001779135],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000783358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002509414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005729635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001185101,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987468,0.000008082499,0.0003286715,0.0001951814,0.0003506726,0.0003706552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993242,0.00002555748,0.0001555189,0.0001840045,0.00002160494,0.0002891107],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00235852,0.0005232454,0.002517863,0.0001957475,0.0001670902,0.0001655813,0.05833563,0.004686455,0.6146345,0.009583144,0.01686611,0.2899662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003864692,0.00571762,0.0124334,0.002890869,0.0002259606,0.000297609,0.007358663,0.001179864,0.107135,0.0494192,0.8063736,0.003103479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9113035,0.0003049383,0.0004773832,0.01933485,0.0009669468,0.0006487771,0.00001455845,0.00005809596,0.066891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98893,0.0001528652,0.00386825,0.004408938,0.002577294,0.00001463124,2.685997e-7,0.00003640516,0.00001138207],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7895075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999564,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007979396","doi":"10.1111/japp.12007","title":"The Human Right to Subsistence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Subsistence agriculture; Human rights; Argument (complex analysis); Meaning (existential); Right to food; Subsistence economy; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; History; Agriculture; Food security; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04324374214290207,"gpt":0.3176574348981043,"spread":0.2744136927552022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001090487,0.0001038375,0.0001814309,0.0000690411,0.001238899,0.0001742084,0.0007319348,0.0001080492,0.0001686661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001690065,0.00006660887,0.0001277016,0.0002502062,0.0005351204,0.0001880846,0.00004997051,0.000466457,0.000387658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008663822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001201204,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008690484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002875382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983198,0.00008040672,0.0004161067,0.000107756,0.0006964298,0.0003794933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984513,0.0004001315,0.0002006159,0.0001917466,0.0003038182,0.0004524115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001227312,0.00003227424,0.00001756816,0.000003383929,0.00001782305,0.000003142527,0.001869704,0.000004690251,0.0005486887,0.9947309,0.002276193,0.0004833926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001166649,0.00005322086,0.0003433375,0.00001538852,0.00001159804,0.000001706528,0.0004094283,6.024802e-7,0.000308726,0.9140312,0.08461811,0.00009000255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03617866,0.00005647353,0.00002913873,0.09215581,0.0003738184,0.0002253233,0.000001214493,0.00001836809,0.8709612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934745,0.00002351829,0.0002753096,0.003312415,0.002677375,0.00001015813,1.663897e-7,0.000009423215,0.0002171581],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9572958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9528735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056697798","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00364.x","title":"Equality, Justice, and Paternalism: Recentreing Debate about Physician-Assisted Suicide","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Autonomy; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Bioethics; Physician assisted suicide; Assisted suicide; Beneficence; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1069719051627067,"gpt":0.43664445783216,"spread":0.3296725526694533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004606301,0.0002399538,0.000570577,0.0001707105,0.0008583384,0.00003698419,0.0003391594,0.0003608217,0.0001142149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007251452,0.0001983025,0.0001040242,0.0002595075,0.0002221756,0.0002628569,0.0001706888,0.004394862,0.0000994806],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001589864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002155263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001497757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001906513,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959185,0.0008823468,0.001484601,0.0002496357,0.0009530665,0.0005118363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932221,0.003857496,0.001907996,0.000282302,0.0004576566,0.0002724204],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001374594,0.0004855726,0.002119791,0.002065601,0.000240839,0.0002794365,0.002767529,0.00009429578,0.01436315,0.9552881,0.01303993,0.007881145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002618557,0.00009038798,0.009450854,0.001032439,0.0005459203,0.0000353854,0.0008321757,0.00005654085,0.0004497497,0.9674587,0.01712659,0.000302653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2246859,0.00112151,0.002371673,0.01878398,0.002342404,0.0005934192,0.00001976948,0.00008525081,0.7499961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789485,0.0003611704,0.003144333,0.01232036,0.004914723,0.000009373986,0.000006752341,0.00004984294,0.0002449269],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7542626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554921354","doi":"10.1111/japp.12254","title":"On the Complementarity of the Ages of Life","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Psychology; State (computer science); Politics; Early childhood; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0486300407714053,"gpt":0.2153062290200913,"spread":0.166676188248686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000423347,0.0001072803,0.0002729452,0.00005495514,0.0001678542,0.000007957591,0.0004986299,0.00003339248,0.001906888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004643453,0.00004122332,0.0002128615,0.00002707044,0.0008107578,0.00005172919,0.00005712053,0.0001893891,0.00001376685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001051619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003546019,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006676803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001021384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990144,0.00006696108,0.0004799967,0.0000677546,0.0002704998,0.0001004016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982604,0.0005698309,0.0007612634,0.0002520873,0.0001190136,0.0000374337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003558346,0.0001203564,0.0001437747,0.0000166365,0.0001406535,3.925055e-7,0.001884319,0.00000317892,0.0007006035,0.9919688,0.00445227,0.000213185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006207682,0.0002156055,0.0007639386,0.00009174953,0.00004667758,0.000001400429,0.0001228094,2.454621e-7,0.002210007,0.9810265,0.01484074,0.00005954565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6213272,0.0001288058,0.000008193972,0.04660925,0.0006829608,0.0002013064,0.00009088413,0.000005861275,0.3309456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974301,0.0000118264,0.00001569481,0.001600794,0.000858376,0.000001689821,2.928049e-7,0.000007717026,0.00007353991],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3761029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046043772","doi":"10.1111/1468-5930.00170","title":"Good Soldiers, A Traditional Approach","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cruelty; Courage; Virtue; Moral courage; Law; Harm; Dimension (graph theory); Psychology; Battlefield; Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1280809853598076,"gpt":0.2364397842064269,"spread":0.1083587988466194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003436615,0.0001242755,0.0002140834,0.0001552275,0.0002681564,0.00009693393,0.0001973824,0.00006792776,0.0005533053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009498955,0.0001039761,0.0001417671,0.00004306527,0.0002246856,0.0002056313,0.00001044609,0.0003361481,0.00004975351],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003824213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005823348,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002658832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002864201,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989063,0.00001745455,0.0004181269,0.000121802,0.0003856904,0.000150647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991955,0.00005983662,0.0003465895,0.0001249457,0.0001757321,0.00009742672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001337857,0.0002668914,0.000007114157,0.0000279805,0.00006803858,0.000006191184,0.01016125,0.00006405448,0.0001195983,0.9803422,0.008047889,0.0007550059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008054205,0.0001154591,0.0000805349,0.00002399513,0.00008019388,0.00006890304,0.002101511,0.00006851152,0.00006033689,0.6849216,0.3114886,0.0001849291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01208883,0.0001648763,0.0004422446,0.00353321,0.0006409549,0.0001154448,0.00002009493,0.00002640212,0.982968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902976,0.00005380372,0.0008240241,0.0006956811,0.007547161,0.000006273333,0.00002049015,0.00001850097,0.0005364983],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9824315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6058306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391051720","doi":"10.1111/japp.12711","title":"Productive Justice in the ‘Post‐Work Future’","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; Irish Research Council","keywords":"Economic Justice; Work (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Unemployment; Value (mathematics); Technological change; Sociology; Variety (cybernetics); Distributive justice; Production (economics); Relation (database); Law and economics; Economics; Positive economics; Law; Political science; Neoclassical economics; Microeconomics; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04695928595927107,"gpt":0.3757352954611961,"spread":0.328776009501925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001162697,0.0001353674,0.0002465212,0.0001713013,0.0003320782,0.00001674995,0.0002581657,0.00008570455,0.00006913245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004346934,0.00007439463,0.00009174514,0.0005073979,0.00005144233,0.0001052274,0.0000577485,0.001215774,0.000138475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007698659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001237207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002680305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003503482,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985798,0.000137464,0.0005382032,0.0001439461,0.0003506106,0.0002499665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990016,0.0004526945,0.0001954084,0.0001580425,0.0001497039,0.00004250426],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001052226,0.0002157819,0.00248554,0.00106392,0.0003120572,0.0001824813,0.09832792,0.00002712958,0.0001794342,0.7267151,0.1621882,0.007250196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001174797,0.00033096,0.02780945,0.001006772,0.0004610196,0.00001959848,0.02577204,0.000002622949,0.00003104244,0.4109578,0.5321211,0.0003127219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2262169,0.006871607,0.00003520897,0.3537143,0.009683236,0.001379889,0.00001163167,0.00007359595,0.4020137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811895,0.0002354676,0.0001184029,0.003117168,0.01511375,0.00004309207,0.000001700974,0.00002034373,0.0001606018],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7549726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5282001,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213452630","doi":"10.1111/japp.12561","title":"From Sovereignty to Guardianship in Ecoregions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo; European Commission; Queen's University; Universitetet i Oslo; H2020 European Research Council; Norges Forskningsråd; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Sovereignty; Treaty; Context (archaeology); Interdependence; Kyoto Protocol; Deforestation (computer science); Legal guardian; Natural resource; Biodiversity; Political science; Environmental resource management; Law; Climate change; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Politics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04356443142731427,"gpt":0.3168137493074591,"spread":0.2732493178801448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002906652,0.00008279404,0.0002553947,0.0001029548,0.0001963505,0.00002930242,0.0001939991,0.00006924335,0.0002061781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001229853,0.00007314655,0.0001097797,0.000350661,0.0001068661,0.00007299582,0.00005392028,0.000218612,0.00006336443],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001068209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002720162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002866355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000359294,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989883,0.00005993991,0.0002985939,0.0001191272,0.0003207792,0.0002132186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993155,0.0001749431,0.0001373841,0.0001117539,0.00007560235,0.0001847895],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009339915,0.0001116281,0.001519161,0.000005273349,0.00008932081,0.0001328491,0.03965452,0.00005691601,0.00008746656,0.9346271,0.02157768,0.002044659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003452914,0.00001919906,0.005351558,0.0000406669,0.0000196607,0.0000021406,0.007421581,4.189962e-7,0.0001075345,0.9201245,0.06646235,0.0001050735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05999976,0.0001981602,0.00008059772,0.08685247,0.0003539325,0.00009243712,0.00001202799,0.000009621155,0.852401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992736,0.000125234,0.001713868,0.002466992,0.002829049,0.000002806706,6.634054e-7,0.000007811612,0.0001175452],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9327363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.298283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001770078","doi":"10.1111/japp.12412","title":"The Ethics of Citizen Selection of Refugees for Admission and Resettlement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Selection (genetic algorithm); Democracy; Worry; Order (exchange); Political science; Law; Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Medicine; Business; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04209081317286596,"gpt":0.3430178283248406,"spread":0.3009270151519746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001083129,0.00004814413,0.000149749,0.00002596697,0.0002312295,0.00001647499,0.0001517183,0.00008387474,0.000005097429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003188515,0.00003424492,0.00006430719,0.0001377544,0.0001448441,0.00004489963,0.00002408638,0.0002141931,1.78293e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002273565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001515635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008783431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002332437,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990823,0.00005632424,0.0003149691,0.00005892543,0.0003931581,0.00009431846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989274,0.0002650731,0.0004057362,0.00003840728,0.0002685994,0.00009484408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001165217,0.00006351675,0.0002177956,0.0001878908,0.00007993008,5.775685e-7,0.01915618,0.00006711688,0.007332911,0.9642797,0.004092552,0.003356621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009825496,0.0008109034,0.0002165076,0.00007771305,0.00008423564,0.000001205043,0.004243749,0.0002965234,0.002927885,0.7642909,0.2259596,0.0001082687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6439451,0.001177254,0.001437244,0.3070389,0.0004164357,0.001114863,0.00006773879,0.00002236522,0.04478007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997909,0.0003655561,0.0009820632,0.0004021831,0.000329079,0.000001254077,7.755983e-7,0.000003977751,0.000006125864],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3539639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1778453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309907949","doi":"10.1111/japp.12631","title":"Work, Justice, and Collective Capital Institutions: Revisiting Rudolf Meidner and the Case for <scp>Wage‐Earner</scp> Funds","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond; Universidade do Minho; University of Oxford; Concordia University; British Academy; Universitat Pompeu Fabra; Independent Social Research Foundation","keywords":"Capital (architecture); Democracy; Wage; Economic Justice; Power (physics); Politics; Economics; Economic democracy; Property rights; Political economy; Law and economics; Political science; Market economy; Neoclassical economics; Law; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04206139977257874,"gpt":0.290516866998671,"spread":0.2484554672260922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001970143,0.0001027995,0.0002699423,0.0001000638,0.002149863,0.0001217097,0.0001500866,0.00005323102,0.0000178718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006427417,0.00008007431,0.00009080897,0.0002438138,0.0006514554,0.0001739346,0.000115934,0.000385661,0.00000121322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001495133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003292247,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003257542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001001647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989381,0.0001414783,0.00032577,0.0001475598,0.000181658,0.0002653786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976684,0.001686786,0.0002829627,0.00007605612,0.00008502244,0.0002007303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001090196,0.00002724783,0.00001331553,0.00002282488,0.00006400215,0.00006692884,0.008484779,0.00005488815,0.000004131533,0.9883925,0.00108807,0.001672245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002642259,0.0001164831,0.00004939106,0.0000236597,0.0003530158,0.0003966876,0.0245478,0.0000608868,0.000009451131,0.8711709,0.1005383,0.00009113104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2924462,0.001748171,0.0004014111,0.01097053,0.0004975779,0.000870713,0.000049913,0.00002134963,0.6929942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962071,0.0001025845,0.0004631341,0.001456598,0.001344476,0.00006145373,8.997997e-7,0.000008347044,0.0003553841],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.703761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963325051","doi":"10.1111/japp.12383","title":"Getting Obligations Right: Autonomy and Shared Decision Making","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Dublin City University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Autonomy; Decision maker; Order (exchange); Health care; Psychology; Personal autonomy; Yield (engineering); Informed consent; Patient participation; Law and economics; Social psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Medicine; Business; Political science; Law; Management science; Economics; Alternative medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05057608937582626,"gpt":0.4271765285822344,"spread":0.3766004392064081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004277478,0.0001381345,0.0003489345,0.0002199282,0.00072278,0.00002826955,0.0002849089,0.0002997585,0.001065352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001475538,0.0001104778,0.00006819883,0.0002090027,0.00008520716,0.0003493673,0.0001765355,0.004126997,0.0003949121],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001719566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004367229,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001468613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.85016e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976131,0.0002749729,0.001004079,0.0001936367,0.0006356778,0.0002785068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900574,0.00797772,0.001213272,0.0002537148,0.0003152749,0.0001825998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006294663,0.0001448239,0.007253879,0.0005259088,0.0001555747,0.00004074467,0.01031849,0.0001342277,0.002717017,0.9620599,0.004573985,0.01144599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001344986,0.00006837881,0.004952068,0.001118805,0.00005271131,0.00001956593,0.000773597,0.0002549177,0.00002584306,0.9671795,0.02406334,0.0001462713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3611011,0.0002654681,0.004592334,0.01817952,0.002034283,0.0008331912,0.000007294424,0.00005370906,0.6129331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559647,0.0000268095,0.03790668,0.004760647,0.001240244,0.000008655019,0.000001427589,0.00002651541,0.00006433716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6128687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023215759","doi":"10.1111/japp.12434","title":"Poverty and the Peril of Particulars","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Poverty; Duty; Argumentative; Odds; Political science; Law; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Duty to protect; Law and economics; Social science; Computer science; Logistic regression","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05908765488951209,"gpt":0.2195284486806416,"spread":0.1604407937911295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000254986,0.00006199189,0.0001878804,0.00002208364,0.0001059889,0.00004197162,0.0001047592,0.00002544769,0.0001527342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000317056,0.00003584219,0.00007596709,0.00001983631,0.0003625748,0.0000696166,0.00001832222,0.0001842956,0.000006813343],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004262567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002091828,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003186165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000164726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993705,0.00002126519,0.0003011457,0.00005846208,0.0001898576,0.00005874657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993913,0.00007835855,0.0002907813,0.00007212412,0.0001150301,0.00005242936],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004022359,0.00002242313,0.00000815865,0.00005050806,0.00005147477,0.000001067513,0.05040066,0.00002155562,0.0003658555,0.9460332,0.002277083,0.0003657863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003398726,0.0002329616,0.000153652,0.00005139456,0.0002971277,0.00000968571,0.009213239,0.0003665278,0.001961062,0.7442195,0.2399038,0.0001923223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2461066,0.001983362,0.0001757967,0.2110141,0.0008323502,0.0004905575,0.00003280418,0.00003130241,0.5393332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951033,0.00005963233,0.00005832673,0.003545328,0.001205451,0.000001328583,7.06768e-7,0.000006611468,0.00001930833],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7489967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1672333,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159278972","doi":"10.1111/japp.12513","title":"Unintentional Residence and the Right to Vote","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Order (exchange); Citizenship; Democracy; Argumentation theory; Right to the city; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Politics; Business; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03628425403623007,"gpt":0.3118070360283171,"spread":0.275522781992087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001457148,0.00007477907,0.0001927102,0.00005324294,0.0004372769,0.00008142838,0.000250014,0.0000820897,0.00003968882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005903871,0.00005016062,0.0001019224,0.0002513958,0.0007913799,0.0001080895,0.00007010593,0.000414239,0.00001619259],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004089088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002699007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002236403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003429298,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986522,0.0001511955,0.0002979351,0.0001105031,0.0005931332,0.000195003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985373,0.0006277093,0.0001276431,0.0001143822,0.0003362769,0.0002567126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001688856,0.00002193727,0.000009945016,0.000005490842,0.00002354822,0.00002867813,0.00178918,0.00001054251,0.000121653,0.9968978,0.0007489659,0.0001734234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004875059,0.00001918992,0.00020328,0.00004110301,0.00002792315,0.00001800991,0.0002712078,0.000002193959,0.0003064882,0.9689788,0.02957973,0.00006462113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01267486,0.0003381967,0.0003094243,0.3641012,0.0003940407,0.0001138252,0.000004932379,0.00001043809,0.6220531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898442,0.00008958489,0.0008224816,0.007286191,0.001717241,0.000002006651,3.362009e-7,0.000005304356,0.0002326459],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9771693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3363225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132377965","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00333.x","title":"Authentic Education and Moral Responsibility","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Dialectic; Epistemology; Moral education; Sociology; Moral responsibility; Moral philosophy; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Pedagogy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04756807476837063,"gpt":0.3525397499776171,"spread":0.3049716752092464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003267359,0.00007864453,0.000162987,0.0001393646,0.0002572099,0.00003739142,0.0001614077,0.0001350953,0.00002356436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003373275,0.00007073872,0.00006664119,0.0001886845,0.0004914551,0.0001588481,0.00002383161,0.0003715195,0.00001038835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009960198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004297465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002828589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001189378,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998789,0.00006909094,0.0003700935,0.0001073897,0.0004304012,0.0002340772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988489,0.0003598413,0.0001971448,0.0001106861,0.0001558688,0.0003276297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002108672,0.0001403456,0.0002782183,0.00001361088,0.0000107951,0.000003512872,0.004753532,4.226034e-7,0.0001519018,0.99072,0.0001449978,0.003571843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001788767,0.00005065017,0.004111686,0.00002017053,0.00002328848,0.000005797888,0.0008126074,6.218115e-7,0.000223718,0.9879217,0.00657461,0.00007624902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3714827,0.0001816031,0.0001224784,0.0115802,0.0005550716,0.0001195034,0.000001604464,0.00001598083,0.6159409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957916,0.00002196116,0.0009916082,0.001144217,0.001986711,6.358014e-7,3.50566e-7,0.000006304214,0.000056612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6243089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2884641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2437483072","doi":"10.1111/japp.12227","title":"Just Schools and Good Childhoods: Non‐preparatory Dimensions of Educational Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Early childhood education; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03460870043729657,"gpt":0.3283612645121003,"spread":0.2937525640748037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000788801,0.0001238324,0.0002844023,0.0001363389,0.0003184348,0.00002180028,0.0002637269,0.0001649916,0.00009219097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004999917,0.00007993625,0.0001069371,0.0001758073,0.0006111105,0.0002526156,0.00005274719,0.0003423731,0.00003817576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007325725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006612414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001156275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002764569,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984737,0.00007470713,0.0004965806,0.000150923,0.0005505205,0.0002535733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979349,0.0008407151,0.0003895388,0.0001586801,0.0002772138,0.0003989738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007148483,0.0001725992,0.0002020973,0.00003222241,0.00005303773,0.000001338178,0.001569906,0.000002943691,0.001683772,0.9948259,0.001107259,0.0002774344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006176998,0.00009682027,0.00170926,0.0001615838,0.0001489316,0.000006586382,0.0004936685,5.736791e-7,0.0005630431,0.9909374,0.005128257,0.0001362294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2485292,0.0005432943,0.0001273093,0.125796,0.001030063,0.0003362956,0.00005629802,0.00001846963,0.6235631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953647,0.0002758133,0.0008676442,0.001041313,0.002360179,0.000003379887,4.523897e-7,0.00001124922,0.00007530226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7468355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3259705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115213813","doi":"10.1111/japp.12084","title":"Comic Immoralism and Relatively Funny Jokes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Comics; Literature; Psychology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07541071611739873,"gpt":0.2545362362568509,"spread":0.1791255201394522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002824645,0.0001132523,0.000216684,0.0001107765,0.0001064265,0.00002098263,0.0001893533,0.00006045758,0.00003260962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000488482,0.0000870267,0.000081,0.00008336764,0.0001951538,0.0001140741,0.00004063117,0.0002771253,0.00005681425],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001615105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001048741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":4.112737e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.384884e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990932,0.00004866581,0.0003000521,0.0001660827,0.0002521522,0.0001398744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992989,0.0001673512,0.0002905121,0.00009497324,0.00002766339,0.0001206464],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006126697,0.0002000821,0.00023284,0.00002129463,0.00003114601,0.00002761607,0.0003784402,0.00008767821,0.2666405,0.7233066,0.004022289,0.004438806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001779628,0.0004118139,0.01096132,0.00004585776,0.00003156329,0.0002659402,0.00001673214,0.00006376518,0.02013698,0.9507127,0.01538161,0.0001920915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9023334,0.00006857431,0.0001816232,0.01198281,0.0004702715,0.00007795933,0.000003662408,0.00001457971,0.08486712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946874,0.00004978254,0.0007230789,0.003999905,0.0004794974,0.000001245287,2.818578e-7,0.000009370344,0.00004939557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2465036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3548846,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293223756","doi":"10.1111/japp.12613","title":"(E)‐Trust and Its Function: Why We Shouldn't Apply Trust and Trustworthiness to <scp>Human–AI</scp> Relations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Trustworthiness; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Function (biology); Express trust; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Public relations; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06930212240057451,"gpt":0.2698932261597339,"spread":0.2005911037591594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003969361,0.0002285813,0.0003292659,0.0003548072,0.000877503,0.00007083607,0.0003040285,0.00008323513,0.0001934295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005348854,0.0002101463,0.00009053839,0.0004810479,0.0001170885,0.0002515972,0.0002304233,0.0007840715,0.00003284615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006500351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003696056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.356804e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.698259e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980736,0.00007426742,0.0005165342,0.0004156347,0.0006501095,0.0002698884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989586,0.000165177,0.0003324118,0.000167829,0.00007236105,0.0003035705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001299293,0.001432921,0.002391291,0.0001387809,0.0001956076,0.0002966552,0.003148307,0.01036597,0.1403546,0.7127717,0.1226275,0.004977251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004403614,0.001962279,0.01756985,0.0000649521,0.0002176021,0.001420534,0.0005421535,0.0003932982,0.003338672,0.509124,0.4605456,0.0004174861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9250089,0.0004541122,0.0002327894,0.03430484,0.001048667,0.0004594357,0.00005017971,0.00004825533,0.03839283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849477,0.00006152318,0.0001354229,0.01342479,0.0007380872,0.00004279037,0.000003406742,0.00002637365,0.0006198718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.337918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.856952,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160313205","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00359.x","title":"Cultures and Cultural Property","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Archaeological Research and Protection","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Cultural property; Property (philosophy); Indigenous; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Law; Cultural heritage; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0305653152795875,"gpt":0.2682665543053608,"spread":0.2377012390257733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005903416,0.00006769383,0.000112049,0.00006071114,0.0001131869,0.00002206573,0.0001070306,0.0000505045,0.0002692879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004785239,0.0000299315,0.00003737137,0.000101168,0.0001450493,0.0001299855,0.00001071719,0.0002725491,0.00002394441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002908657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001431196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000363096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003419297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992705,0.00001586618,0.0001889327,0.00007774132,0.0002740755,0.0001728773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995383,0.00006725188,0.0000992276,0.00003857967,0.00006334384,0.0001933083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003907939,0.00003040034,0.02264702,0.00005870814,0.00008150401,0.0001605859,0.001397688,0.0002454495,0.004130192,0.006976707,0.001884746,0.958479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001042539,0.001615682,0.2814504,0.00003365349,0.00001825076,0.0003705136,0.0003822405,0.0001088479,0.003792706,0.6476099,0.06331154,0.0002636743],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7714261,0.001064744,0.0009633242,0.002908982,0.0001706351,0.0002501126,0.000005808024,0.00001897166,0.2231913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957469,0.0001529176,0.003272425,0.0002777961,0.0005072827,1.341626e-7,0.000001969325,0.000001114793,0.00003946667],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9582154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2948513,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137790678","doi":"10.1111/japp.12143","title":"Licensing Parents in International Contract Pregnancies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; Political science; Vetting; State (computer science); Business; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05281687393416345,"gpt":0.318361155103381,"spread":0.2655442811692175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007101368,0.00005857023,0.0001402971,0.0001363187,0.00006031718,0.00005847004,0.0001781411,0.00005713151,0.00002984105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007544535,0.00005383921,0.0000511683,0.0001263248,0.00006876844,0.0002385514,0.00001847302,0.0001623,0.0000102881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001495476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001698361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001176365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008007908,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989697,0.00002857132,0.00030145,0.00006653505,0.0005080492,0.0001257168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993113,0.00004486135,0.0002685859,0.00004891799,0.0001995472,0.0001267503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002063654,0.001123895,0.05053365,0.00002244039,0.0002470783,0.00020466,0.1879486,0.0009863859,0.001997283,0.6461587,0.003188761,0.1055249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005599428,0.000249552,0.02656827,0.0004097883,0.0000506746,0.00002733038,0.0092618,0.0001606131,0.0004887879,0.2461821,0.7105782,0.0004234361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5061237,0.0002047639,0.00006011017,0.00644142,0.001506324,0.0001194882,0.000001670536,0.00001480486,0.4855278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980084,0.0000824942,0.0002454486,0.0002268187,0.001399724,0.000001031318,6.561258e-7,0.000004951368,0.00003048837],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7073894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2195499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553096919","doi":"10.1111/japp.12250","title":"The Problem of Predation in <i>Zoopolis</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Liminality; Sovereignty; Harm; Competence (human resources); Predation; Environmental ethics; Aside; Sociology; Intervention (counseling); Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Ecology; Biology; Social psychology; Psychology; Anthropology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00927120159844076,"gpt":0.2058311920312453,"spread":0.1965599904328046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006603351,0.00009794351,0.0001512622,0.00003628573,0.00006554549,0.000007490929,0.000327671,0.00007087907,0.0001169058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001092814,0.00005143785,0.00006927385,0.0001432092,0.0003980254,0.0001991927,0.0001014622,0.0001901652,0.00006468182],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001258984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001111585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004964455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005734052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987594,0.00003308702,0.0005098242,0.000108475,0.000436096,0.0001530923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991605,0.0001700974,0.000435804,0.0001645487,0.00000724985,0.0000618257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002050332,0.001053698,0.03023449,0.00007918055,0.0001109865,0.00002218772,0.002399264,0.004030131,0.4656983,0.3909809,0.003742693,0.09959786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009125622,0.0001636185,0.008243834,0.0000675917,0.00001293303,0.000009440912,0.00003645618,0.000004806293,0.02331736,0.9584084,0.008712284,0.0001106832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5830278,0.0001274651,0.0003310998,0.0190786,0.0001663488,0.0004465317,0.00001088949,0.00001045449,0.3968008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983689,0.0001830128,0.001078354,0.0001945528,0.0001263886,0.000004379784,2.885149e-7,0.000009952114,0.00003413603],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5674275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2097575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1777881526","doi":"10.1111/japp.12141","title":"Real‐World Love Drugs: Reply to <scp>N</scp>yholm","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Philosophy of love; Argument (complex analysis); Romance; sort; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Philosophy; True love; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science; Literature; Business; Art; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09033557131280645,"gpt":0.3287252332511948,"spread":0.2383896619383883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001067681,0.0002771094,0.0004435363,0.0007705833,0.0001140217,0.0001162313,0.0009081597,0.00008950041,0.00005927381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001988825,0.0002474911,0.0001302213,0.001707332,0.0003244594,0.0002714022,0.0002270199,0.001003685,0.00111617],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001993464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002640809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004745081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000122446,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963006,0.00008585059,0.001123225,0.0004783222,0.001552084,0.000459853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966431,0.0007771802,0.000915185,0.0005707699,0.0004031656,0.0006906051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002233349,0.0006916419,0.00002692778,0.00005488949,0.00004744394,0.0002125281,0.006699636,0.0002146335,0.3610584,0.3243988,0.3053862,0.0009854891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001433949,0.0005416708,0.00006316154,0.00008058864,0.00003684781,0.00003964052,0.0003456915,0.00002073807,0.2640718,0.4216994,0.311492,0.0001745291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1887156,0.00001850035,0.0007264053,0.03296061,0.002144862,0.0006097269,0.0000288322,0.0001036497,0.7746918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471871,0.0000294978,0.002283429,0.04572157,0.002265973,0.00001013367,0.000001703689,0.00006395893,0.002436625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7722552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791821199","doi":"10.1111/japp.12299","title":"The Ethics of Boycotting as Collective Anti‐Normalisation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Boycott; Politics; Harm; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05284431397674069,"gpt":0.3291528205444917,"spread":0.2763085065677511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001994501,0.0000663165,0.0001667438,0.00005968319,0.001015322,0.00004023819,0.0002237538,0.00008042382,0.000006265388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004558641,0.0000455947,0.00007603422,0.0002670187,0.0006226164,0.0001050419,0.0000372826,0.0002820412,0.00001515391],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006092334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003733369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004371723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008835111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987801,0.0001056749,0.0003389591,0.00006486612,0.0005499343,0.0001604547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981616,0.000447582,0.0005905935,0.00007311408,0.0006694899,0.00005759364],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001906213,0.00004985315,0.001835671,0.00001140476,0.0001476642,0.000001814348,0.05991698,0.000004359368,0.0009178639,0.9270341,0.0004838469,0.009405795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005955382,0.0003388329,0.001952684,0.00008016533,0.00006259498,0.000005488978,0.0239831,0.000004391148,0.005412617,0.9374937,0.02994082,0.000130057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2381263,0.000792083,0.0001287707,0.007553563,0.0007341265,0.0001720541,0.000002384814,0.000009948863,0.7524807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972253,0.0002024534,0.0002015167,0.0002716314,0.001951991,0.00000128239,1.277264e-7,0.000005700104,0.0001400015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.759099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7809141,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509167444","doi":"10.1111/japp.12238","title":"Reclaiming Proportionality (Society for Applied Philosophy Annual Lecture 2016)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Wrongdoing; Consequentialism; Morality; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05799821567031576,"gpt":0.2582990294060854,"spread":0.2003008137357696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007928169,0.0002768024,0.0004417132,0.0001251663,0.000635877,0.00009006856,0.000332371,0.0002006776,0.0003027826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004974585,0.0001811269,0.0005007989,0.00005851907,0.0004736706,0.0003230438,0.00003722503,0.0003950114,0.00004644963],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001205517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001967529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002611242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004100958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978966,0.00002059747,0.000890481,0.0003179699,0.0005636771,0.0003107003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997511,0.0002564395,0.001030553,0.0002810703,0.0007684875,0.0001524917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006667349,0.0002034015,0.000007163223,0.0001936421,0.0002427344,0.000001183874,0.01156814,0.00001740912,0.003852181,0.9512458,0.02505707,0.006944517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001283577,0.0001304226,0.00002751532,0.0001053898,0.0001297405,0.000005912647,0.0005576065,0.000004163783,0.001673352,0.7611459,0.2346639,0.0002725504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04588487,0.001910693,0.03390677,0.182331,0.008287495,0.005098637,0.00212351,0.0005234322,0.7199336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831322,0.00008014331,0.002263037,0.001513568,0.01242421,0.00005217088,0.00002717443,0.0000530278,0.0004545102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9372473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7386139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063734872","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00338.x","title":"A Living Will Clause for Supporters of Animal Experimentation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association for Co-operative Education; Suncor Energy (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Misfortune; Democracy; Sign (mathematics); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1146218405958649,"gpt":0.3785454714203166,"spread":0.2639236308244517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002157142,0.0001141855,0.0002358296,0.0001199373,0.00004869076,0.00001615571,0.0001331606,0.00003750243,0.00003735634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001680787,0.0001015357,0.000133589,0.00006788885,0.00005277993,0.0001709601,0.00002328679,0.00009706101,0.000002574591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003138382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002440166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006452646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.236315e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990342,0.00001587244,0.0005088577,0.0001100693,0.0002009096,0.0001301426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989072,0.0001838938,0.0006840315,0.00007708863,0.0001058709,0.0000419203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003693335,0.0004122098,0.001190656,0.00009954648,0.0001021631,0.00003608755,0.001337971,0.00005578838,0.9584193,0.03329404,0.0007407673,0.000618158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01395598,0.0561774,0.07719509,0.002081748,0.000768075,0.001315535,0.006276919,0.002749129,0.3130286,0.5193012,0.004852979,0.002297287],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882697,0.00007237374,0.001133404,0.0001017947,0.00008216374,0.0001295118,0.00001103231,0.00001612159,0.01018391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891872,0.000002649565,0.00983945,0.00005373644,0.0008714683,0.000006843557,0.00000255477,0.00002231809,0.00001378406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6453907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4140505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2311112747","doi":"10.1111/japp.12214","title":"Fiduciary Duties and the Ethics of Public Apology","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law; Duty of loyalty; Sociology; Criticism; Discretion; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law and economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05561099989035762,"gpt":0.3145470765413991,"spread":0.2589360766510415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001211557,0.000104878,0.0003249179,0.0001470588,0.00008254661,0.000008292921,0.000238698,0.0002830985,0.0003472298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004386286,0.00004634461,0.0001155511,0.0001042431,0.0009821453,0.00005284518,0.00005079766,0.000537165,0.00001766433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001243568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005606431,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006912274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.131075e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989172,0.0001638011,0.0004576771,0.0001031634,0.0001979231,0.0001602035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985114,0.0005861855,0.0005105859,0.0001971005,0.000129856,0.0000648991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000683962,0.0001034655,0.0006511073,0.00001367483,0.0002081821,0.0000135816,0.002582753,7.990885e-7,0.001064386,0.986103,0.000424291,0.008150817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007578957,0.0003784545,0.006965841,0.00009357896,0.0002269551,0.0003420648,0.001034811,5.892633e-7,0.0009889295,0.9676433,0.0145617,0.0001847693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7956634,0.003302659,0.0002666329,0.09661498,0.001911785,0.0002478182,0.00001152824,0.00001679144,0.1019645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988112,0.0003627352,0.00007081702,0.0003457422,0.0002866087,0.000004848512,2.681226e-7,0.00001341636,0.0001043849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2031478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3801923,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258432295","doi":"10.1111/japp.12179","title":"Divide and Rule Better: On Subsidiarity, Legitimacy and the Epistemic Aim of Political Decision‐Making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Legitimacy; Politics; Prima facie; Scrutiny; Political philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics; European union","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03367762303359811,"gpt":0.3214303236464803,"spread":0.2877527006128822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001841742,0.0001350019,0.0003884262,0.0001104082,0.0003246815,0.00005531006,0.0003071838,0.000150907,0.00002124508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008073501,0.00007340773,0.0001222559,0.0001074425,0.002471751,0.000164275,0.0001049974,0.0003949473,0.000006871328],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006454791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001155079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003111542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007119952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981092,0.0001700359,0.0005252709,0.0001555367,0.0006816096,0.0003583914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944499,0.004704516,0.0002796508,0.0001632826,0.0001277469,0.000274966],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004758428,0.00004597057,0.0003391464,0.00001739727,0.00003126594,0.000006345032,0.0008279155,5.350284e-7,0.00009857309,0.9925209,0.00006504943,0.005571001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00147068,0.00006968435,0.001501368,0.0002771202,0.00004618974,0.00001419336,0.00008247423,0.000001773552,0.0001832645,0.9954708,0.0007852432,0.00009723331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4783532,0.0003185486,0.000965269,0.2462704,0.0003159345,0.0003023147,0.00002912529,0.00001844076,0.2734267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953633,0.000131559,0.0002491232,0.0029454,0.001291477,0.000002552671,9.59051e-8,0.00001100847,0.000005474188],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5170101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9107268,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891321095","doi":"10.1111/japp.12340","title":"Rights to the Oceans: Foundational Arguments Reconsidered","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Object (grammar); Epistemology; Commons; Global commons; Intellectual property; Property (philosophy); Law; Natural (archaeology); Human rights; Sociology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; History; Computer science; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0145819959209861,"gpt":0.24730410196818,"spread":0.2327221060471938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003286533,0.0001027743,0.0001201282,0.00004716839,0.0001961426,0.00005081898,0.0004407498,0.0000343651,0.005242006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002433859,0.00006767234,0.00006128938,0.0001381368,0.0001714053,0.0001689713,0.0001156741,0.0001338029,0.003470403],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001385092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001284254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001769564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002683464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998759,0.00002018071,0.0003393891,0.0001363899,0.0006017814,0.0001433136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993989,0.0000724451,0.0002157222,0.0001571515,0.000060291,0.00009543483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001584179,0.0007116162,0.003435622,0.00000966056,0.0004739918,0.00006283058,0.004233594,0.001887464,0.01164139,0.6165516,0.346857,0.01255107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003622244,0.0001641891,0.004181224,0.00001654169,0.00001642511,0.00005031472,0.00001238183,0.00005469816,0.003217169,0.6586072,0.3332004,0.0001171959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3281641,0.00001094676,0.0003550632,0.01540112,0.0008285298,0.0002709202,0.000007895292,0.00001407822,0.6549473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898761,0.000001494416,0.005363632,0.002912675,0.001516556,0.000004110013,0.000001626725,0.000009304676,0.0003145332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6617119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950612791","doi":"10.1111/japp.12040","title":"Exploitation, Justice, and Parity in International Clinical Research","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Citizenship; Law and economics; Parity (physics); Law; Deadlock; Subject (documents); Transactional leadership; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6055928016743222,"gpt":0.6121652703710433,"spread":0.006572468696721123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01127042,0.00008158343,0.000345722,0.0004370311,0.00005573528,0.00005371032,0.0002784796,0.0002889239,0.000269091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01058832,0.00006504187,0.00008286261,0.0002888281,0.00048122,0.0001558635,0.0001657507,0.004100236,0.0001087543],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008350008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003404526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001147549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000560107,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967,0.0001370384,0.001151316,0.0002154639,0.001571035,0.0002251024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889784,0.008389631,0.0002226131,0.0002199629,0.001843609,0.0003457116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00447199,0.003228548,0.1310141,0.0009861524,0.0003952142,0.0003405255,0.001885956,0.0000232374,0.002352443,0.8017761,0.0178045,0.03572123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002399736,0.0004731336,0.1135776,0.0002096789,0.00003029099,0.00002958394,0.0004406275,0.0001148272,0.00007448396,0.8812701,0.001319212,0.00006071312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8180674,0.0001522658,0.00006476605,0.05645838,0.0004491253,0.0004259819,0.000001416132,0.000007564157,0.1243731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899927,0.001489034,0.005560337,0.00115652,0.001632115,0.00001439973,0.000001418895,0.00001447831,0.0001389726],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1719254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793455378","doi":"10.1111/japp.12304","title":"Dissidents and Innocents: Hard Cases for a Political Philosophy of Boycotts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Boycott; Coercion (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Face (sociological concept); Group (periodic table); Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08627191106746301,"gpt":0.3648509930300102,"spread":0.2785790819625472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009763819,0.0001946711,0.0005039176,0.0002220364,0.0004016278,0.00005339944,0.0003898962,0.0002473795,0.00004079102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009059951,0.000172176,0.0001950305,0.0002581721,0.001982841,0.0002801862,0.00007761727,0.000342813,0.00001002004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009624663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002899239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004765199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006639159,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976382,0.00008354774,0.0007572442,0.0002194794,0.0007316611,0.0005699199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973915,0.0007071039,0.0004403665,0.0001839766,0.000661207,0.000615879],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005279827,0.0001508061,0.000266667,0.0001008792,0.00007897889,0.00001014907,0.001554253,2.372189e-7,0.0002631853,0.9962752,0.0003687118,0.0004029127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009967079,0.0005629285,0.0005110631,0.0001390743,0.00009525838,0.00001908756,0.0003718903,0.000003491935,0.001055667,0.9890748,0.006991785,0.0001782332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3829013,0.0003920803,0.0005213323,0.0816332,0.001622097,0.001029403,0.0002454799,0.00006208281,0.5315931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897212,0.00004029048,0.001372215,0.00183441,0.006979362,0.000006685569,0.000002008918,0.00002290775,0.00002088853],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.730586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133179509","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2010.00492.x","title":"Combat Trauma and the Moral Risks of Memory Manipulating Drugs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Posttraumatic stress; Military service; Moral injury; Psychiatry; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08657595068658226,"gpt":0.3374062576477158,"spread":0.2508303069611335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002211577,0.00009261347,0.0002881871,0.00005451596,0.0003449402,0.00004542323,0.0002952295,0.0001488109,0.00005258868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007941177,0.00006109291,0.0001218784,0.00009465325,0.001131323,0.0001069328,0.00003152927,0.0008217185,0.000001708646],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001190719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006915146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002083565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001263235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987526,0.00008571817,0.0004009554,0.00008907964,0.0005200105,0.0001516399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986935,0.0003953334,0.0005540758,0.000129106,0.0001177115,0.0001102466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002324017,0.00004397202,0.0003983634,0.00001940938,0.00004730491,0.000002848529,0.03205685,0.00002290158,0.0004652645,0.9587511,0.0001316893,0.007827854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002632402,0.00006139283,0.004536043,0.00003553181,0.0001067421,0.00001015525,0.006475859,0.00004483589,0.0007475043,0.9787445,0.006433972,0.0001710304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.701118,0.000170086,0.00001076692,0.004995164,0.0006052466,0.0001559713,0.000001833129,0.000009299591,0.2929336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972706,0.00003533091,0.0005665802,0.0004173909,0.001664081,0.000001304745,2.412487e-7,0.000009481279,0.00003502972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2961526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4168408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021160958","doi":"10.1111/japp.12437","title":"Bad Faith, Bad Behaviour, and Role Models","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Doping in Sports","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Admiration; Situational ethics; Faith; Agency (philosophy); Virtue; Social psychology; Existentialism; Bad faith; Conversation; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03270623957627899,"gpt":0.2728278807510686,"spread":0.2401216411747896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004104547,0.000115687,0.0002690334,0.0000664187,0.0001984777,0.000079338,0.0002847892,0.00009937234,0.00008723791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000242392,0.0001084322,0.00008736824,0.0001922313,0.0001758583,0.0002859897,0.00005465346,0.0002947716,0.00001552249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000412895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001233496,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002706094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005200135,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998671,0.00002748964,0.0003580551,0.0001562244,0.0005775488,0.0002097113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990883,0.00004010326,0.0003219522,0.0000911088,0.0000986707,0.0003598536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004238039,0.0002511201,0.01087769,0.00004070519,0.0001327468,0.000183679,0.06953814,0.002038729,0.001054596,0.898509,0.006751987,0.01019778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001266209,0.0002550498,0.003189241,0.00007434636,0.0001441885,0.00002279504,0.003079254,0.0003679121,0.0003507821,0.9572456,0.03353692,0.0004676842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4610682,0.0005798428,0.000515072,0.02262907,0.0004109735,0.0003146798,0.0000082937,0.00007246171,0.5144014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951659,0.0001095738,0.001873502,0.001380773,0.00142617,0.000002176526,6.14103e-7,0.00001685054,0.00002447024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5340976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4421735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200177648","doi":"10.1111/japp.12569","title":"Why a <scp>UBI</scp> Will Never Be High Enough","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Economics; Workforce; Payment; Distribution (mathematics); Labour economics; Welfare; Perception; Consumption (sociology); Income distribution; Basic income; Economic inequality; Public economics; Demographic economics; Welfare economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Psychology; Market economy; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02193911097089959,"gpt":0.2544453852962975,"spread":0.2325062743253979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005948454,0.0002085763,0.0004280595,0.0001364125,0.0004116351,0.0001395296,0.0004828555,0.0002321159,0.0001057353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001542488,0.0001980488,0.0002374739,0.0006432357,0.00021308,0.0004595793,0.0000827864,0.0005020681,0.00002701996],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001534242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005539504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008016886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005538054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976709,0.0001072779,0.0005296324,0.0002494519,0.0009845138,0.0004582171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982068,0.0002595695,0.000438661,0.0002556811,0.0005003263,0.0003389597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003148264,0.0004051623,0.0009838792,0.00003588113,0.0002491002,0.0001921747,0.02340672,0.0005006723,0.002046597,0.9338941,0.03780494,0.0004492731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001020413,0.00008420816,0.002494606,0.00003119004,0.0001077077,0.00001918215,0.00986483,0.00001509824,0.0003031335,0.3889434,0.5969691,0.0001470938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6141072,0.0008932711,0.0007188329,0.02515682,0.002456679,0.0002599324,0.00004217134,0.0000681934,0.3562969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794964,0.000577656,0.003246101,0.0127107,0.003291788,0.000004023539,0.000008127662,0.00003488483,0.000630388],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5591642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8076198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279145249","doi":"10.1111/japp.12181","title":"Connecting Applied and Theoretical Bayesian Epistemology: Data Relevance, Pragmatics, and the Legal Case of Sally Clark","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Rationality; Pragmatics; Epistemology; Inference; Bayesian probability; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02023307035500067,"gpt":0.2578727470564803,"spread":0.2376396767014796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001938863,0.0001701447,0.0004534159,0.00007382117,0.0001425536,0.00009620918,0.0008972544,0.0001024135,0.000004302748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002004758,0.00009051151,0.00004256149,0.0001279054,0.0006998397,0.0002694461,0.0005144923,0.0003250005,0.000001473964],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001268385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008251289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002394432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001450709,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984646,0.0001030775,0.0006767264,0.0003074895,0.0002441742,0.0002038615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971386,0.001305651,0.0006040208,0.0006970199,0.0001181053,0.0001365787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002242994,0.00002754417,0.000005630911,0.00003595517,0.0000526567,0.00009483893,0.000345761,0.00001071596,0.0008106322,0.973421,0.00004722612,0.02492375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002095466,0.0001168873,0.00001154674,0.0001119732,0.00005901339,0.003666624,0.000080977,0.01288576,0.0004499593,0.9802114,0.0001567801,0.0001536407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04381106,0.0003861741,0.9339219,0.011391,0.0001667318,0.0002360446,0.0000124043,0.00002750363,0.01004714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9461141,0.0001141835,0.05322858,0.0003386824,0.0001886679,0.000002026012,3.980682e-7,0.00001159596,0.000001811006],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.902303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3690952,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387575490","doi":"10.1111/japp.12691","title":"<i>Ubuntu</i> Thinking on Biodiversity Loss: The Inadequacies of Egalitarian and Communitarian Solutions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Communitarianism; Anthropocentrism; Environmental ethics; Personhood; Sociology; Animal ethics; Biodiversity; Utilitarianism; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Ecology; Political science; Biology; Liberalism","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07455513470287974,"gpt":0.2770908785839675,"spread":0.2025357438810877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001198665,0.0001077698,0.0002503461,0.00009461707,0.002059191,0.00004111164,0.0004589325,0.00007443911,0.00002129918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009860258,0.00006580225,0.0001127463,0.0005577747,0.001065011,0.0001127437,0.000188177,0.0003857386,0.00001939437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000456651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004764867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000277495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001081511,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987491,0.0001313201,0.0002853915,0.00008731302,0.0005297513,0.000217058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988808,0.0004694082,0.0002925913,0.0001214261,0.0001410252,0.00009476616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009980663,0.00005323397,0.0005544355,0.0000132455,0.0001060957,0.000006318915,0.03912229,0.00003906215,0.00004783098,0.9560914,0.003415397,0.000450879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003141039,0.0001496297,0.002864195,0.0000443169,0.00006182842,0.00000229878,0.01505726,0.000001773119,0.00002317894,0.9411259,0.04024188,0.0001135866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4546354,0.0004936097,0.000009607513,0.339478,0.0004434598,0.0003340761,0.00008678933,0.0000669362,0.2044521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982846,0.0004494182,0.00005479699,0.0007614453,0.0004253988,0.00000156533,0.000001966481,0.000003320868,0.00001744044],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5436493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200068504","doi":"10.1111/japp.12563","title":"Teaching Children How to Think: Rational Autonomy as an Aim of Liberal Education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Rationality; Duty; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Enlightenment; Sociology; Practical reason; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02205268738389898,"gpt":0.3393262565037452,"spread":0.3172735691198462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006221235,0.0001228124,0.0003517197,0.0001914535,0.00009172711,0.00003294069,0.000135465,0.0001428002,0.00007605785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001539131,0.0001087077,0.0001170807,0.0001770486,0.0000298613,0.0001589913,0.00003734731,0.0009568961,0.000007883767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001129639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002799763,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002354861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001427929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986009,0.00006322317,0.0004871665,0.000170755,0.0005394502,0.0001385131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984114,0.00007775584,0.0003437875,0.0002375716,0.0005834151,0.0003460682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009206954,0.002427904,0.008921889,0.0005359976,0.0004268249,0.00008224607,0.02868893,0.0002194247,0.006428779,0.8941376,0.006736412,0.05047328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004978525,0.003805816,0.06479089,0.0009444531,0.0007089374,0.001872606,0.002701047,0.0001236508,0.01092133,0.8340015,0.07429715,0.0008540721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8501855,0.0005673026,0.0001996124,0.08752106,0.0005211566,0.0003320852,0.000009938767,0.00001637168,0.06064694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698111,0.00002546047,0.01832455,0.00619165,0.005251982,0.00000379172,0.0000434852,0.0000204993,0.0003274988],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1196256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4966659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078117039","doi":"10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00263.x","title":"Capacities, Context and the Moral Status of Animals","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Intellect; Epistemology; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08876108472863845,"gpt":0.2600836443225862,"spread":0.1713225595939477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002243564,0.00009217486,0.0002473091,0.00006652493,0.0000755316,0.00001147661,0.0001718793,0.00003738727,0.00002177329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004230972,0.00005496134,0.00007854233,0.00008371714,0.0009087402,0.00007987771,0.00003034928,0.0002033045,0.000006818254],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002745638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004423266,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009032894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.468877e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990585,0.00003126418,0.0003474089,0.0001063718,0.0002909573,0.000165507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993147,0.0001152208,0.0003415895,0.0000936689,0.00004077698,0.00009403988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00160342,0.00009741239,0.00003652235,0.00001330108,0.00002010113,0.00001560972,0.0009830301,0.000124137,0.0439078,0.9521093,0.0001552406,0.000934123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005155229,0.0002823902,0.0009728702,0.00003389456,0.00002340045,0.0001611983,0.0002384651,0.000002872747,0.03894095,0.95252,0.001591755,0.00007703768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622605,0.0004683355,0.00003840658,0.007826539,0.0002056842,0.0001256497,0.00001490345,0.000004984575,0.02905493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972485,0.0002286638,0.0002497257,0.002068402,0.0001886493,0.000001885414,1.414722e-7,0.000006006721,0.000008059637],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0349879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3348291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137886643","doi":"10.1111/japp.12503","title":"Is Humane Farming Morally Permissible?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Agriculture; Raising (metalworking); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Ecology; Mathematics; Medicine; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01398701940225664,"gpt":0.2333672681568821,"spread":0.2193802487546255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001990404,0.000162688,0.0002421186,0.00002745624,0.0001376981,0.00003871509,0.0002347121,0.00008268681,0.005081596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001598089,0.0001240746,0.0001743222,0.0002220352,0.0001426231,0.0002513055,0.0001691617,0.0002999076,0.0002156695],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002737114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002224705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004395376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001328704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986728,0.00002202606,0.0003766192,0.0002014614,0.0004879203,0.0002391467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993151,0.00002460012,0.0002348576,0.0002006412,0.00001615944,0.0002086343],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001138587,0.004632373,0.07919041,0.0003821043,0.0006911653,0.003232754,0.02397039,0.0265935,0.7046377,0.01590672,0.07959028,0.060034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003414902,0.0007354295,0.2485539,0.0001163426,0.0003165403,0.001509385,0.004852426,0.0001037776,0.1261208,0.464221,0.1486214,0.001434046],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8334488,0.0001128071,0.00008979379,0.003445536,0.00009827315,0.00009307622,0.000003518304,0.00001133989,0.1626968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956514,0.00003858211,0.001868863,0.001701287,0.0002692118,0.00000156514,0.000002267277,0.00001309344,0.0004536796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5785169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200107615","doi":"10.1111/japp.12547","title":"Justice Principles, Empirical Beliefs, and Cognitive Biases: Reply to Buchanan's ‘When Knowing What Is Just and Being Committed to Achieving it Is Not Enough’","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Individualism; Argument (complex analysis); Ideology; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Sociology; Cognition; Positive economics; Empirical research; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Economics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1824390077859002,"gpt":0.3929880644301023,"spread":0.210549056644202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001554568,0.0002876255,0.0005999381,0.0002322717,0.001057352,0.0005089561,0.0003142724,0.0002535989,0.00006442072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002153979,0.0002871825,0.0001346342,0.0005449299,0.000342981,0.0006010458,0.0003847795,0.0009149691,0.00002596698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001347144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003683109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007321557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003485624,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969726,0.0002134565,0.0007519466,0.0005065444,0.0009520865,0.0006034325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555,0.002280765,0.0002668837,0.0002279989,0.000578083,0.00109622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011604,0.0005905657,0.000331226,0.0004696216,0.0006582547,0.0006562916,0.4781101,0.00003594251,0.001436769,0.4803791,0.00853931,0.02763242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003187387,0.000988809,0.001277563,0.006981272,0.001964075,0.0001853641,0.1058665,0.00006261563,0.006079373,0.504759,0.3668193,0.001828779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.19467,0.001040322,0.0004114258,0.7257184,0.000548489,0.0005590359,0.0000633995,0.00004523035,0.07694368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8103741,0.0005356409,0.002184227,0.1845432,0.002237248,0.000007450303,0.00000285327,0.00002889376,0.00008636899],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6157041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758668236","doi":"10.1111/japp.12287","title":"Kagan on Speciesism and Modal Personism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Modal; Argument (complex analysis); Prejudice (legal term); Object (grammar); sort; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05970444737332933,"gpt":0.2497312792024159,"spread":0.1900268318290865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003768458,0.0001582312,0.000291168,0.0001069469,0.0008842067,0.0003902431,0.0003787833,0.00007729352,0.0002627502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003986322,0.0001180718,0.0001260798,0.000006765955,0.0007265439,0.0001820876,0.00007349245,0.0005683256,0.00004438155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001977825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003036531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004369675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002828345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990594,0.00001482104,0.0002835585,0.0001407005,0.0003418434,0.0001597228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988973,0.00008937047,0.0004611939,0.0002968397,0.0001027393,0.0001526202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000202745,0.00007526635,0.000002412781,0.00001699878,0.00005850125,0.00002962631,0.003723718,0.000002092679,0.0001807891,0.9943655,0.0001560942,0.001186243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006702244,0.0002157308,0.0001418763,0.00005013668,0.00003065989,0.00001152217,0.0001934359,0.000008903795,0.0001561992,0.9655207,0.03286077,0.000139782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1324966,0.00007848765,0.000003511366,0.01985879,0.0005552261,0.00006631112,0.00001228988,0.0000103147,0.8469185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929074,0.00005893713,0.00005058332,0.001592053,0.005202666,0.00000142847,5.273973e-7,0.00002066048,0.0001657511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8604108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6800693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935024517","doi":"10.1111/japp.12069","title":"Why Should We Save Nature's Hidden Gems?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Argument (complex analysis); Natural (archaeology); Aesthetic value; Aesthetics; Taste; Environmental ethics; Quality (philosophy); Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Psychology; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02009919059838753,"gpt":0.2394130251033881,"spread":0.2193138345050006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007109121,0.0002884605,0.0003828725,0.00008845009,0.0001909516,0.00004336037,0.0006744258,0.0003918005,0.001046433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003431863,0.0002351879,0.0002280692,0.0002092804,0.0003979564,0.0003056187,0.0002578764,0.001523237,0.0006481864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001902788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009133088,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000041935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002957508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977302,0.00005937284,0.0005621207,0.000308318,0.001012036,0.0003279352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986976,0.0001501129,0.0004556517,0.0003920078,0.00001088348,0.0002936847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002469864,0.002615142,0.005961236,0.0003252236,0.0006781951,0.0002995284,0.004858448,0.01443914,0.1398923,0.4878233,0.2365384,0.1040993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008319577,0.0002745316,0.001647864,0.00004356282,0.00006535959,0.00006932335,0.00003413706,0.00008621432,0.005689439,0.765952,0.2249513,0.0003543555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09941296,0.000366614,0.0007457103,0.06703252,0.0009805067,0.0003379219,0.000008239919,0.00005671999,0.8310588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792011,0.0001742281,0.003674616,0.01557137,0.001284766,0.000004139528,0.000002582188,0.00004067864,0.00004648735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8797882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392706257","doi":"10.1111/japp.12724","title":"On the Ethics of Interacting","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"All Souls College, University of Oxford; Leverhulme Trust; University of Leeds; KU Leuven; Universität Wien; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08602893023251612,"gpt":0.3967186661777949,"spread":0.3106897359452788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001511591,0.00005350445,0.0001265466,0.00007941354,0.0001488852,0.00003691164,0.0002632935,0.0001006788,0.0002528507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003423539,0.00003297594,0.0001284672,0.0002059762,0.0002100094,0.00006386778,0.00001661454,0.0008040671,0.00003744631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003947924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009797684,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001677867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005532331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991201,0.0001069681,0.0002708786,0.00006381724,0.0003392205,0.00009902442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784,0.00177868,0.0001872765,0.00006380097,0.000092246,0.00003793825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006158882,0.00002942498,0.000004632323,0.000009183429,0.00004830951,0.000005022992,0.02922317,0.000003317685,0.0008802008,0.9623365,0.005059636,0.00233898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007226244,0.0001114083,0.00002926319,0.0001536002,0.00001614058,0.00000283541,0.00395484,0.000004782434,0.0003710395,0.9304224,0.06481646,0.0000450193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1275015,0.0001685663,0.00009550816,0.08341964,0.002662071,0.00007856451,0.000001384142,0.00001507124,0.7860577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966403,0.00006360102,0.00006065896,0.001511896,0.001654049,0.000001216147,8.488611e-8,0.000006696382,0.00006154298],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8691387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3493316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306407811","doi":"10.1111/japp.12630","title":"Normalization of Racism and Moral Responsibility: Against the Exculpatory Stance","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Ignorance; Racism; Normalization (sociology); Moral responsibility; Sociology; Epistemology; Criminology; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Psychology; Gender studies; Philosophy; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04824270936049058,"gpt":0.3038509386585937,"spread":0.2556082292981031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002938301,0.00007893079,0.000198584,0.00008999175,0.0006805043,0.00002045134,0.0003123316,0.00005889816,0.00004049723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001971627,0.00006246761,0.00008101101,0.0002918676,0.0006685005,0.0001411254,0.00009556705,0.0005200634,0.000001004143],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009980088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002901411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001202268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004386192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981726,0.0003289932,0.0004208103,0.0001030823,0.0007979725,0.0001765232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987962,0.0003924485,0.0003899542,0.0001531649,0.0001517863,0.0001164578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003536369,0.0000670041,0.0001763628,0.00001928833,0.00002124045,0.000005663663,0.008414709,0.0002841343,0.0002952825,0.989448,0.0001525803,0.0007621606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003327618,0.00009095541,0.0007164293,0.00001116484,0.00002321809,0.000003011794,0.001923249,0.00002737984,0.0001534253,0.9851605,0.01147958,0.00007831297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6883665,0.0007733483,0.0001351591,0.02517646,0.0005696953,0.0003357098,0.00004194619,0.00001961585,0.2845815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975065,0.00009263605,0.0001258545,0.00172877,0.0005140636,0.000004536382,9.282115e-7,0.000007520272,0.00001919983],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.30914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5233958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094161273","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00387.x","title":"A Reply to Cholbi's ‘Suicide Intervention and Non‐Ideal Kantian Theory’","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Ideal (ethics); Morality; Rationality; Irrational number; Commit; Paternalism; Philosophy; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02341285297158642,"gpt":0.2746533006099369,"spread":0.2512404476383505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001050525,0.0001376619,0.0002177404,0.0002665554,0.0001035127,0.00005020068,0.0002647343,0.00004706866,0.00005944161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001358814,0.0001097553,0.0001218666,0.0002726989,0.00007601245,0.0001573216,0.00007838438,0.0002746736,0.00005907287],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002728949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001426367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004902722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001457793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986449,0.00002964081,0.0005392933,0.0002221357,0.0003292114,0.0002348497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990973,0.0001246585,0.0003282626,0.0001742807,0.00004590875,0.0002296269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002193857,0.0003661838,0.0003937539,0.00007058033,0.00003374597,0.0004046139,0.001369211,0.00004573131,0.7754455,0.151499,0.001741259,0.06643655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002144021,0.0009764737,0.01214717,0.0002571705,0.00005698055,0.0004313709,0.0001430178,0.00001946143,0.4515648,0.5128394,0.01902857,0.0003914869],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9295815,0.00006690262,0.005293992,0.002418533,0.0004876619,0.0002368531,0.000004377727,0.00002412735,0.06188607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993524,0.00001692697,0.0008226646,0.004892548,0.0006611237,0.00000172499,2.474216e-7,0.00001725284,0.00006355788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3613405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4475693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}