{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":62,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":62,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"628dfc12829a","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making"}},"results":[{"id":"W1991011913","doi":"10.1002/bdm.414","title":"A domain‐specific risk‐attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1865,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Risk perception; Scale (ratio); Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Social psychology; Sample (material); Perception; Actuarial science; Risk aversion (psychology); Construct (python library); Expected utility hypothesis; Business; Economics; Computer science; Financial economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1170302024439043,"gpt":0.3829458248159893,"spread":0.2659156223720849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009656786,0.0006340348,0.001369538,0.002006488,0.001524664,0.001836974,0.001866188,0.0004303216,0.002872855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001180324,0.0004880458,0.001032989,0.001363686,0.0004030293,0.001763689,0.0005730452,0.002058016,0.0006126005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006203675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007791947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002684172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9897375,0.0009436671,0.003854342,0.001126971,0.003560494,0.0007770251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892672,0.00280027,0.004568108,0.001416189,0.001278117,0.0006701068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001155283,0.0003794699,0.3669881,8.068766e-7,0.00001449985,0.0001348676,0.001200167,0.0004538324,0.0002334883,0.000007660229,0.002569922,0.6279017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003027675,0.001120542,0.9060094,0.0006180365,0.0009128036,0.001818711,0.006753746,0.0009424826,0.00005332103,0.04802612,0.02947904,0.001238064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9696465,0.001469503,0.02608004,0.00004948712,0.0020329,0.0002743541,0.0001587252,0.00005677701,0.0002317867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.903582,0.003063927,0.09276636,0.00002675487,0.0003831738,0.000006863917,6.689658e-7,0.00007325324,0.00009704755],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6266636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013660131","doi":"10.1002/bdm.683","title":"A choice prediction competition: Choices from experience and from description","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":340,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Harvard Business School; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Stochastic game; Competition (biology); Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Baseline (sea); Econometrics; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Economics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1433559998342561,"gpt":0.4207473031054966,"spread":0.2773913032712405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001513952,0.0002972608,0.0007176154,0.0006446995,0.0003299964,0.001446471,0.0009719542,0.000231157,0.0008235265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001158228,0.0002298374,0.0002942024,0.0005556525,0.0001206301,0.002702948,0.0001513006,0.0004807429,0.00006832281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001627749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006606347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001136052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007630166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946666,0.0001827734,0.002225476,0.0006459431,0.001987129,0.0002920855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948398,0.001886643,0.001676632,0.0006055871,0.0007209062,0.0002704339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000269861,0.0002202649,0.07419473,2.759579e-7,0.000005588207,0.00007879453,0.0008399134,0.0001626861,0.005352173,0.00002884257,0.0008376809,0.9180092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001263014,0.0006975618,0.8201799,0.0005653703,0.0001128169,0.0001474455,0.001599352,0.001752114,0.00027392,0.163782,0.009286573,0.0003399665],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759563,0.0005135692,0.02081032,0.0001470006,0.002203128,0.0001181366,0.00008815348,0.00003466714,0.0001287289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707935,0.00007094371,0.02813558,0.0002727015,0.0006737429,0.000001946272,0.000004869994,0.00001570375,0.00003101071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9176692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102243960","doi":"10.1002/bdm.520","title":"Visceral influences on risk‐taking behavior","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Gratification; Psychology; Condom; Reading (process); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1298224972993391,"gpt":0.3870396823925007,"spread":0.2572171850931616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004969057,0.0002031424,0.0002963244,0.0003808158,0.0003025914,0.0001240097,0.0004857254,0.000110895,0.0002760356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001957414,0.0001536632,0.0002695268,0.0002739627,0.000117576,0.0003876307,0.00006866093,0.0005637385,0.00009374222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001038464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003189764,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000245877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008752769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973426,0.0001447373,0.0008329572,0.0003032697,0.001056634,0.0003198103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976909,0.0002954215,0.001617386,0.000194071,0.0001112715,0.00009100273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001207946,0.002610612,0.319811,0.000005076429,0.000007024606,0.002544786,0.0001514535,0.004922462,0.1845731,0.001596874,0.005066731,0.4775029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001002075,0.000964387,0.9781173,0.000333919,0.0000826955,0.0008466459,0.00004359795,0.00006134646,0.009636725,0.007533382,0.001113359,0.0002646015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967082,0.00005891996,0.0006018887,0.0001120586,0.001553952,0.0001039219,0.00001054735,0.00002545655,0.0008250873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954756,0.0000183466,0.003597382,0.0004116562,0.0003987414,0.00000362809,3.721888e-7,0.00001767818,0.00007662931],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6583062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6266204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576290844","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1792","title":"Extreme Outcomes Sway Risky Decisions from Experience","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Gambling Research Institute, University of Calgary; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Risk-seeking; Actuarial science; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.25457423032658,"gpt":0.4513242219766994,"spread":0.1967499916501194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003235429,0.0005844201,0.001583552,0.001520232,0.000501359,0.002252962,0.0038313,0.0003712034,0.009733296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007547515,0.0003876143,0.001219808,0.001261978,0.0002394489,0.003237747,0.0008163155,0.0008833464,0.002865399],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002717716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001992074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002560471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008711241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9887774,0.0003178201,0.004804611,0.000970225,0.004400936,0.0007290142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819317,0.01011151,0.003158725,0.001882,0.002261881,0.0006541156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001000372,0.000330989,0.1404542,2.070022e-7,0.00001291215,0.0001761537,0.0007681334,0.0002349877,0.001172839,0.00002306521,0.00904265,0.8476838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001758237,0.0004840493,0.6257657,0.0005285926,0.0001448808,0.0002995914,0.006193769,0.001182387,0.0003238544,0.3499884,0.01240854,0.0009220758],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9702504,0.0002958582,0.02414725,0.000267321,0.0043106,0.0002840964,0.00004198977,0.00004694853,0.0003555481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9155983,0.00004366936,0.08342809,0.0003545159,0.0002768624,0.00001362195,0.000001329987,0.00005540769,0.0002281666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8467617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977697135","doi":"10.1002/bdm.544","title":"The reasoning skills and thinking dispositions of problem gamblers: a dual‐process taxonomy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Taxonomy (biology); Set (abstract data type); Competence (human resources); Volition (linguistics); Cognitive psychology; Inference; Dual (grammatical number); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05408152596689883,"gpt":0.403066581888379,"spread":0.3489850559214801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006787773,0.0001842247,0.0003292972,0.0002376379,0.0003999994,0.0001681952,0.0002380372,0.0001101771,0.00005262757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002368954,0.0001236559,0.0001656403,0.0003235112,0.0001052081,0.0002735174,0.00006143402,0.0003123939,0.000004660594],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006039789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004759444,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000792022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004019177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980056,0.00008801752,0.0008922229,0.0002015482,0.0005240297,0.0002886298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980521,0.0003066034,0.0009494825,0.0002430471,0.0003809014,0.00006787597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000444124,0.002571365,0.7463652,0.0000195778,0.0001143051,0.0007635755,0.002697571,0.0002688306,0.001169008,0.003413567,0.001016002,0.2411569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002758103,0.0007563898,0.9774377,0.001914806,0.0007069881,0.001577049,0.00247405,0.00001507191,0.0004152766,0.01090313,0.0007253677,0.0003160398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953768,0.0008800972,0.002522694,0.00003551015,0.0004385939,0.000222027,0.000007484855,0.00001460439,0.0005021597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867191,0.00001534938,0.01299294,0.00001071635,0.0001010336,0.00001983119,0.000001670114,0.00002464904,0.0001146963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2408409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5042543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054517012","doi":"10.1002/bdm.595","title":"To buy or to sell: cultural differences in stock market decisions based on price trends","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Stock market; Stock (firearms); Stock price; Financial economics; Economics; Business; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2766419087971591,"gpt":0.4587063299406395,"spread":0.1820644211434805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004615446,0.0005902015,0.001513025,0.00495979,0.0004668838,0.0007603314,0.002852704,0.0002940041,0.003175728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007194691,0.0003646857,0.0006779506,0.004672063,0.0001033881,0.000945994,0.0004571234,0.0008446974,0.0004240041],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005363128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000372336,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002400503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000235349,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898192,0.0004212792,0.003640669,0.001046277,0.004260655,0.0008119565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883162,0.007061054,0.001317198,0.001190462,0.001231978,0.0008830411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003680079,0.0008393277,0.05898363,7.727655e-7,0.00000534784,0.001345097,0.0008447871,0.004947296,0.0001643764,0.000005362564,0.04940889,0.879775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003318218,0.005953169,0.9476917,0.001813078,0.00008477987,0.001196172,0.002061431,0.007004314,0.00009949249,0.003762164,0.02563694,0.001378507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848206,0.0000312962,0.01130792,0.0006052567,0.001867506,0.0002987384,0.00004616323,0.00003288893,0.0009896409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9389937,0.00001654726,0.05852131,0.000895472,0.0001965084,0.00001371006,7.712949e-7,0.00004704751,0.001314966],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8887081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150479185","doi":"10.1002/bdm.741","title":"What People Want From Their Professionals: Attitudes Toward Decision‐making Strategies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Public relations; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4211742596639609,"gpt":0.516615133703507,"spread":0.0954408740395461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001429586,0.0004663626,0.001034078,0.00063265,0.00132954,0.0002076954,0.001811813,0.0005267024,0.002474827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005927981,0.0003399805,0.0004167748,0.0005763208,0.0001037675,0.003233357,0.001064827,0.002343853,0.0001682233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005523909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001349265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002588767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001795488,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926738,0.001130333,0.003347797,0.0004951981,0.001552729,0.0008001667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890147,0.004240916,0.003183173,0.001269433,0.001962578,0.0003291356],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002346091,0.001066005,0.5353388,0.0001603191,0.00008809352,0.0001411241,0.1318198,0.00006144553,0.0002825531,0.0007342114,0.002992123,0.3249694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001550389,0.0004714278,0.6909887,0.02363206,0.0001189692,0.00004697267,0.2279476,0.0002688434,0.00003930146,0.05342237,0.0009834444,0.0005299232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9699138,0.007507069,0.01286217,0.0003824096,0.008154861,0.0008565831,0.00004160213,0.00008879176,0.0001927444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9158663,0.0004732304,0.08257364,0.0005258185,0.0003896645,0.00006613715,0.000007935685,0.00008011328,0.00001717809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3244395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999706,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494441066","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1973","title":"Real‐World Correlates of Performance on Heuristics and Biases Tasks in a Community Sample","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Heuristics; Psychology; Debiasing; Sample (material); Discounting; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2132508711534191,"gpt":0.4443537811037341,"spread":0.2311029099503151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005695039,0.0002440949,0.0008419473,0.001622661,0.0001965665,0.0001777907,0.001015574,0.0001369921,0.0002124867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005958021,0.0001452503,0.0002183328,0.0008115072,0.0002329822,0.0006412604,0.0003310054,0.0006039002,0.00002617389],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000165941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001057504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000970184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000386594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952794,0.000376202,0.002459742,0.0002844975,0.00130427,0.0002958391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793416,0.0173837,0.001795385,0.0007064109,0.0006181187,0.0001547755],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004551234,0.0002833528,0.3362001,0.000001999401,0.000002622606,0.00003487371,0.0002147386,0.0002532656,0.0003448673,0.00005740661,0.0002667338,0.6618848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002306911,0.002585849,0.9012395,0.004770052,0.00007737722,0.0001804265,0.001210247,0.0009666514,0.000686003,0.08404859,0.001469982,0.0004583788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972898,0.0000600823,0.001553066,0.00005242272,0.0007108221,0.0000989575,0.00005982983,0.000008986312,0.0001659729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912536,0.0002045619,0.00838832,0.0000323826,0.00004882009,0.000001261768,4.422249e-7,0.00002112493,0.00004945074],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6614265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7132738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334115192","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1794","title":"True Context‐dependent Preferences? The Causes of Market‐dependent Valuations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Context (archaeology); Product (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Reservation; Microeconomics; Distribution (mathematics); Market price; Econometrics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1788883731314558,"gpt":0.3073040042169438,"spread":0.1284156310854881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001480071,0.000127911,0.0003992553,0.0002092426,0.0001087813,0.0000984849,0.0003765455,0.00008201339,0.006218023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001006835,0.0001005439,0.0002322406,0.00008992277,0.0000639747,0.0005744863,0.00009075992,0.0002082992,0.0002369577],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001786628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000265257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000160697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004830944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980368,0.00004846044,0.001394779,0.0001789833,0.0001795116,0.0001614734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978807,0.0002056512,0.001474215,0.0002932471,0.00008788343,0.00005832539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008737928,0.000584198,0.7426188,0.00001374717,0.0001503931,0.000007027159,0.001498414,0.003909398,0.0003705649,0.005190278,0.003963592,0.2416062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008076888,0.0002664822,0.9521082,0.0000999132,0.00006641269,0.00003351819,0.001522004,0.001284769,0.0001811513,0.04275805,0.0006928015,0.0001789978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894498,0.00129594,0.006741037,0.0001204865,0.0006338022,0.000242096,0.0000276669,0.000003666414,0.001485493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997725,0.000209869,0.001554411,0.00007475797,0.00007132078,0.00001306831,0.000001146803,0.00001428337,0.0003361722],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2414272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965719994","doi":"10.1002/bdm.649","title":"Evaluating advisors: A policy‐capturing study under conditions of complete and missing information","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Trustworthiness; Advice (programming); Interpersonal communication; Contrast (vision); Psychology; Decision aids; Knowledge management; Computer science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2487715698887714,"gpt":0.5712880498592928,"spread":0.3225164799705215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002508542,0.00007325972,0.0001944235,0.0005505908,0.0005261155,0.0002888188,0.0001976334,0.0000529335,0.0000576829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007293329,0.00006570576,0.00006904368,0.0004200447,0.00009405298,0.001334681,0.00003423085,0.0002024582,0.000001493065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001030565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005574751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001252189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006568908,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977545,0.0002257439,0.0007405753,0.00006826611,0.001011997,0.0001989338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984505,0.0002802951,0.0006001486,0.00008652575,0.0004468732,0.0001356795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002122568,0.0007073489,0.005381622,0.00001040729,0.00002500492,0.00001752411,0.05185584,0.0007319226,0.006620273,0.02383089,0.0001677145,0.9104392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003850354,0.003310988,0.7246121,0.001104107,0.0001534837,0.0001124834,0.1416898,0.002395663,0.0001540296,0.1205666,0.001595287,0.0004551304],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928371,0.00002374534,0.004816657,0.001169617,0.00006201177,0.0001643399,0.00000698318,0.000007997742,0.0009114889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940338,0.000005526488,0.005686619,0.0001318939,0.0001272749,7.897946e-7,7.716854e-7,0.00000270901,0.00001060772],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9099841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4046509,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134645122","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1763","title":"The Effect of Temporal Distance on Attitudes toward Imprecise Probabilities and Imprecise Outcomes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Salience (neuroscience); Construal level theory; Outcome (game theory); Ambiguity aversion; Dimension (graph theory); Psychology; Subjective expected utility; Social psychology; Econometrics; Computer science; Expected utility hypothesis; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Mathematical economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08945839551006228,"gpt":0.4362293446541526,"spread":0.3467709491440903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01065343,0.0004240856,0.001247926,0.0005319155,0.0003894856,0.0006564214,0.001433988,0.0001944853,0.00008562748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004419752,0.0002132901,0.0007019969,0.0004790456,0.0003996348,0.001230373,0.000414658,0.0005606789,0.00003300417],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001719588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007636764,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001217587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002704403,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933597,0.0004732071,0.002755813,0.0004214831,0.002423795,0.0005660182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833494,0.01253083,0.00228768,0.0009256006,0.0005950704,0.0003114469],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007773843,0.0001277205,0.4586644,0.000004707054,0.00001082036,0.00001106071,0.0003024074,0.00004944053,0.00008088354,0.00006757002,0.0004982547,0.5394053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002969097,0.005255759,0.93788,0.001137379,0.0003203821,0.0003606432,0.001922298,0.0001758932,0.001487404,0.0392931,0.008373215,0.0008248264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944068,0.001210575,0.001288744,0.0001184075,0.002509537,0.0003286038,0.00002847584,0.00001570602,0.00009321957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956418,0.00006130911,0.003962993,0.00002893751,0.0001666652,0.000008916002,3.499596e-7,0.00003288893,0.00009611803],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5385805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8697717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766389015","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2055","title":"Geopolitical Forecasting Skill in Strategic Intelligence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; York University; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"York University; Defence Research and Development Canada","keywords":"Interpretability; Intelligence analysis; Benchmarking; Forecast skill; Ignorance; Certainty; Strategic intelligence; Scoring rule; Econometrics; Calibration; Psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematics; Knowledge management; Management; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1617665139859434,"gpt":0.3887484956651958,"spread":0.2269819816792524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069758,0.0001629075,0.0003106676,0.000464527,0.0002788433,0.0008648522,0.0008223788,0.00007508286,0.000397779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004801219,0.0001369588,0.0001721667,0.0001693685,0.0001021025,0.001608741,0.000336916,0.0003993784,0.0001246348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006869361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004388136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001042134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003752405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982665,0.00001045705,0.0007899599,0.0001862851,0.0004203274,0.0003264413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998181,0.0001555746,0.0008134225,0.0002887875,0.000536514,0.0000246612],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002616039,0.000463407,0.1923184,0.00004896221,0.000009391772,0.00196195,0.0001615545,0.0002754742,0.0002177058,0.08354641,0.0001330367,0.7206021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009445683,0.0002480287,0.2645095,0.006016143,0.0001603746,0.0004794348,0.004613032,0.03262908,0.000451242,0.684922,0.004056158,0.0009704507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786899,0.0001035626,0.007233482,0.00005960208,0.001087588,0.00007301862,5.858059e-7,0.000009090358,0.01274319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968896,0.000008733101,0.001951413,0.00008773132,0.001005517,0.000001178377,2.812046e-7,0.00001635808,0.00003918107],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7196316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.833979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562319537","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2000","title":"Associations Between Delay Discounting and Risk‐Related Behaviors, Traits, Attitudes, and Outcomes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Impulsivity; Delay discounting; Psychology; Generality; Deviance (statistics); Discounting; Trait; Intertemporal choice; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Econometrics; Economics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08440660447203183,"gpt":0.4427868225745218,"spread":0.35838021810249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008684907,0.0002519771,0.0005829438,0.0003654767,0.0002819871,0.0001299846,0.0001864872,0.0002366002,0.0001727037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001002479,0.0001606526,0.000192449,0.0001707357,0.00009270196,0.0004267981,0.00009322545,0.000371518,0.000016463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001177587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002778049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001105967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005631124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976557,0.0001533661,0.001042376,0.0003056467,0.0005045451,0.0003382966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977641,0.0006416885,0.001065263,0.0001862404,0.0001724059,0.000170372],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002180364,0.0001873506,0.7129731,6.534671e-7,0.00008095312,0.0001137278,0.0003803606,2.605055e-7,0.0001385594,0.00004103878,0.00006125779,0.2860009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002250199,0.0002707186,0.9952785,0.0002100852,0.0009710934,0.0001796191,0.0001068386,2.873846e-7,0.00001147589,0.0004727315,0.00005853554,0.0001899061],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977463,0.0004804456,0.000797661,0.00007324697,0.0005226297,0.0001409327,0.0001771326,0.00002729407,0.00003431437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968767,0.00006990133,0.002774672,0.000009037985,0.0000641043,0.000003613632,0.000003605844,0.00003768017,0.0001606838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.285811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6551223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1806059501","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1863","title":"When Does Framing Influence Preferences, Risk Perceptions, and Risk Attitudes? The Explicated Valence Account","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"York University; Government of Canada; Defence Research and Development Canada","keywords":"Framing effect; Framing (construction); Prospect theory; Risk perception; Perception; Risk-seeking; Psychology; Valence (chemistry); Social psychology; Economics; Loss aversion; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Engineering; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1262111218641538,"gpt":0.4200131924037594,"spread":0.2938020705396056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01141169,0.0003866947,0.0007661293,0.0006660608,0.000716005,0.001943728,0.00240771,0.0002567957,0.000284278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00653951,0.0001982554,0.0003252428,0.0007019136,0.0003667971,0.002187063,0.0007273781,0.001241721,0.0001632911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002243068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002676029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002278347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928395,0.0006558561,0.002480697,0.0007230158,0.002849667,0.0004512307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894738,0.003638285,0.003297805,0.001160214,0.002025019,0.0004048502],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001335503,0.0001032888,0.4292388,8.982191e-7,0.00000922106,0.00002541912,0.001366412,0.001332737,0.00005840163,0.000007275555,0.00152854,0.5661955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001026041,0.0005800709,0.7838513,0.0005248127,0.0003351894,0.0004373509,0.008365598,0.001709353,0.00003289393,0.195763,0.006839468,0.0005348985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875091,0.0007047849,0.01014256,0.0001144029,0.001158216,0.0002330332,0.00006821042,0.00003212169,0.00003761252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729902,0.0007183229,0.02591477,0.00008950238,0.0002016994,0.000007955903,6.711072e-7,0.00002823317,0.0000486826],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5656606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990923,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139262047","doi":"10.1002/bdm.620","title":"Sex differences when searching for a mate: A process‐tracing approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mate choice; Moderation; Psychology; Term (time); Sample (material); Social psychology; Biology; Ecology; Mating","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1564795664510704,"gpt":0.4409172547155165,"spread":0.284437688264446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009411335,0.000233814,0.0005182988,0.0005024869,0.0005540543,0.00005431049,0.0005414063,0.0002337096,0.0007120601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003999671,0.0001921103,0.00030599,0.0001633583,0.0001700627,0.0003833425,0.00004795607,0.0006760368,0.0000269245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006929274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008264573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005246613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000278171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975287,0.000154285,0.0009346487,0.0003571001,0.0005678303,0.0004573894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983294,0.000298399,0.0006523913,0.0002768365,0.000307437,0.0001355492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004942331,0.005535277,0.6966857,0.00009310621,0.0002009436,0.001612984,0.07511359,0.0001659928,0.001952286,0.002212479,0.01684828,0.194637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004540806,0.002155167,0.9500573,0.0006226826,0.0003542043,0.01176771,0.009174614,0.0003719185,0.00004097262,0.01962204,0.0005630033,0.0007295933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9326255,0.0004589651,0.06470721,0.00003830281,0.0009045318,0.0003100464,0.00001199188,0.00003421919,0.000909235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634897,0.000007996895,0.03510604,0.00007534557,0.000372138,0.00003999746,0.000002826268,0.00003693476,0.0008690571],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2533716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7834032,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604806010","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2010","title":"On the Counterfactual Nature of Gambling Near‐misses: An Experimental Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Medical Research Council; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Wellcome; Shenzhen University; National Natural Science Foundation of China; University of Cambridge; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Luck; Counterfactual conditional; Regret; Near miss; Psychology; Social psychology; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2653274951832202,"gpt":0.5239354939175626,"spread":0.2586079987343424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00758745,0.0003391054,0.0008752501,0.0004887624,0.001229358,0.002926695,0.004412923,0.0002564524,0.0008654739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003847844,0.0001922181,0.0004959135,0.0002523398,0.0002964888,0.001644367,0.0005470603,0.001114235,0.00006491323],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001355839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001838152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002240473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003890173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931187,0.0003108433,0.002307181,0.0005469516,0.003378592,0.0003377515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899243,0.002808337,0.003807558,0.002146146,0.001113891,0.000199746],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003376405,0.008362226,0.06289101,0.000001951464,0.00005156107,0.0008225817,0.007573314,0.002671167,0.004853438,0.000411796,0.004929761,0.9040548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01531593,0.05570191,0.4302086,0.004237016,0.0009794192,0.002091445,0.2194037,0.01180943,0.01918235,0.2293333,0.008097368,0.003639443],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961399,0.0001128292,0.0005138987,0.00009424404,0.002612593,0.000274609,0.00001648756,0.00001028922,0.0002251368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969981,0.00000319669,0.002621287,0.000121201,0.0001813992,0.000002677391,2.347649e-7,0.00003417972,0.00003775758],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9004154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112727590","doi":"10.1002/bdm.513","title":"Illusion of confirmation from exposure to another's hypothesis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Confidence interval; Point (geometry); Illusion; Psychology; Econometrics; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1159070215032221,"gpt":0.389568273463285,"spread":0.2736612519600629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003194808,0.0002878992,0.0009634967,0.001301699,0.0001634184,0.0004206217,0.001387421,0.0002316704,0.001274491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001366269,0.0002121589,0.0005692394,0.0009445983,0.00008034022,0.0008299098,0.0002550101,0.0002863942,0.0002230292],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001577884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001382506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001200269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930118,0.0002171278,0.003439423,0.0004536738,0.002574579,0.0003033851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919792,0.00295955,0.002695926,0.0007984669,0.001418535,0.0001483693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004573109,0.0003178283,0.01155482,9.73052e-7,0.000006376143,0.00007064388,0.0003243001,0.003668769,0.02092764,0.00003375002,0.006035322,0.9566023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003438278,0.002643416,0.5442101,0.00170542,0.0003491252,0.0003019429,0.003162643,0.000936834,0.01336079,0.3964508,0.03223751,0.001203135],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9671181,0.0001861884,0.03059272,0.000151974,0.001410227,0.0001661992,0.00006901558,0.00001638595,0.0002892079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9316906,0.000007539591,0.06776349,0.0001441943,0.0002807183,0.000001711278,0.000001214663,0.00003171421,0.00007878085],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9553992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014622127","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2179","title":"How representations of number and numeracy predict decision paradoxes: A fuzzy‐trace theory approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Nursing Research; Savoy Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Numeracy; Categorical variable; GiST; Psychology; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology; Ordinal data; Statistics; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1227505478469635,"gpt":0.420808850625137,"spread":0.2980583027781735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005031053,0.0004154654,0.001304349,0.0006607617,0.0002871174,0.001161717,0.001654462,0.0002836691,0.000318104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006920405,0.0003012837,0.0006986399,0.001387109,0.0002864915,0.002150475,0.0005614263,0.0007557219,0.00004924887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007747873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001845189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005049134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002996381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922017,0.0004670352,0.003056322,0.0008584545,0.00300183,0.0004146387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883593,0.005894025,0.002988322,0.0008938156,0.001347299,0.0005172163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001296885,0.0003961321,0.03570601,0.00000725998,0.00002573344,0.0001442573,0.001762104,0.001006128,0.0007746186,0.0004543057,0.004359371,0.9540672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007291538,0.002546051,0.09442531,0.001579921,0.001036999,0.003486092,0.03463997,0.01153794,0.001003771,0.8269975,0.01368828,0.00176665],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8462578,0.000476932,0.1514646,0.0003956912,0.0006705142,0.0002523848,0.00004551532,0.00002422145,0.0004122883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8719437,0.00007368594,0.127504,0.0001288514,0.0002303034,0.000004226952,0.000001275603,0.00004262154,0.00007134656],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9523005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3105916523","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2214","title":"Resistance to cognitive biases: Longitudinal trajectories and associations with cognitive abilities and academic achievement across development","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Sophistication; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive bias; Cognitive development","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2517763837896289,"gpt":0.4622960291594745,"spread":0.2105196453698457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00283435,0.0003249074,0.0007999209,0.000333999,0.0005641156,0.000773835,0.0004582521,0.0001537432,0.00005465852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00683747,0.0002351536,0.0001208571,0.0007707115,0.0002327548,0.0009659457,0.0003757015,0.0005965284,0.00001987286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001702785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002439594,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005735746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002418974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951529,0.0001596884,0.001810324,0.0006638741,0.001805629,0.0004075815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904051,0.006210736,0.001268762,0.0001585039,0.001496326,0.0004605749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001874107,0.0001354733,0.3702339,0.000004869468,0.00003857623,0.0001515865,0.01777647,0.0000595098,0.0001179424,0.00001844281,0.0003396726,0.6092494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00210108,0.001470008,0.9393238,0.002403739,0.000208198,0.0001310959,0.04816121,0.00003795931,0.0005519005,0.004014844,0.0009919443,0.0006042107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857063,0.0003882933,0.01269079,0.0004851262,0.0002253951,0.0003008189,0.0001609872,0.00001796103,0.00002433087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828172,0.00003115612,0.01657324,0.0003919471,0.0001151785,0.00001001634,0.000002100003,0.00002529405,0.00003384529],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6086452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9589286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1813082302","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1844","title":"‘Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is!’: Effects of Streaks on Confidence and Betting in a Binary Choice Task","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Medical Research Council","keywords":"Roulette; Stochastic game; Psychology; Outcome (game theory); Task (project management); Randomness; Social psychology; Confidence interval; Econometrics; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08297874841532561,"gpt":0.41757058493766,"spread":0.3345918365223344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004970724,0.0004310684,0.001311762,0.001589054,0.0001918354,0.0005126537,0.001332959,0.0003181014,0.00008424497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003912564,0.0003267685,0.0004085284,0.0008825633,0.0001574316,0.0009669423,0.0004141059,0.0008694257,0.00004496028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001450852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000127253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009735472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006589137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931698,0.0003969669,0.002907559,0.000751144,0.002273616,0.0005009248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894646,0.005930544,0.002744135,0.0008364745,0.000719838,0.0003043663],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003694426,0.000385123,0.08189202,0.00001574129,0.000008502304,0.0002276913,0.001013874,0.00110979,0.00577442,0.0000372556,0.0008498047,0.9083163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00836168,0.005914859,0.880949,0.01266906,0.0004096864,0.0005045571,0.005060454,0.01413238,0.003562022,0.06267384,0.004076315,0.00168612],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962788,0.0005592459,0.001563847,0.0001411578,0.001079325,0.0002302046,0.00001699741,0.00001498726,0.0001154732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923109,0.00005450408,0.007112024,0.000233768,0.0001754136,0.000003037841,4.03656e-7,0.00004073532,0.00006924204],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9066302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973154528","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2154","title":"Examining children's ability to delay reward: Is the delay discounting task a suitable measure?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Research Councils UK","keywords":"Delay discounting; Discounting; Delay of gratification; Psychology; Gratification; Task (project management); Temporal discounting; Impulsivity; Sensation seeking; Intertemporal choice; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Econometrics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09533285482985453,"gpt":0.3918347828173961,"spread":0.2965019279875415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0186234,0.0005228278,0.001245998,0.001021255,0.000613688,0.002059304,0.003492906,0.0003096487,0.001296749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003836444,0.0003167292,0.0008071544,0.001764447,0.0001287015,0.001775378,0.000960596,0.001199333,0.001074432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004037455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000309405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006601997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006192549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9894874,0.0004760784,0.003631079,0.001077876,0.004474012,0.0008535289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890381,0.004328534,0.002451696,0.002006486,0.001772985,0.0004021593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003331382,0.0002033992,0.3589807,0.000001762035,0.00001834818,0.0000869523,0.001254553,0.002500762,0.001350954,0.0000194999,0.006186743,0.6290632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003745134,0.002884985,0.8948073,0.002536292,0.0006476755,0.003656001,0.010878,0.001634236,0.0006026054,0.05114998,0.02504198,0.00241583],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871695,0.0002511408,0.008520564,0.0003763179,0.002694295,0.0005430431,0.00003879352,0.00003078703,0.0003755793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843242,0.000007549591,0.01439406,0.0006751313,0.000316656,0.000006282915,8.103855e-7,0.0000625367,0.0002128059],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6266474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999285,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165868536","doi":"10.1002/bdm.645","title":"Goal attainment as a resource: The cushion effect in risky choice above a goal","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Salient; Resource (disambiguation); Goal pursuit; Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05689584315870033,"gpt":0.4383285056321897,"spread":0.3814326624734893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01303724,0.0004818562,0.001142324,0.001291708,0.0004006996,0.001234588,0.00260844,0.0003242012,0.0004268209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004280516,0.00028169,0.000851387,0.001561449,0.0001395194,0.001001027,0.0003442579,0.001390552,0.0003503185],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005669817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001870367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000416271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009609207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906982,0.0008266239,0.003286823,0.0007352837,0.00375881,0.0006942626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894495,0.006316191,0.002264262,0.001170383,0.0004976332,0.000302051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001031225,0.0003704182,0.02694178,8.247527e-7,0.000005828582,0.0005196054,0.0005953002,0.001710743,0.0005762348,0.00003856137,0.005261721,0.9629478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007704145,0.009403849,0.7033191,0.002025056,0.0003717243,0.002115589,0.004245677,0.002570181,0.000543382,0.178639,0.08760681,0.00145555],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952866,0.0004045918,0.001006143,0.0008908883,0.001250334,0.0004055822,0.000008465873,0.00002345118,0.0007239375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960405,0.00002507513,0.002498979,0.0007890057,0.0004229694,0.000005455586,6.633977e-7,0.00003206759,0.0001853232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9614922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979248804","doi":"10.1002/bdm.626","title":"How do we evaluate future gambles? Experimental evidence on path dependency in risky intertemporal choice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Management and Science University; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Lottery; Discounting; Econometrics; Path (computing); Economics; Time preference; Intertemporal choice; Choice set; Prospect theory; Expected utility hypothesis; Value (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2626441372739362,"gpt":0.4735475796671665,"spread":0.2109034423932304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00564845,0.0005943064,0.001312342,0.001967008,0.000375032,0.001150228,0.002613678,0.0003807554,0.0006007361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002560422,0.0004224526,0.0008537914,0.001334797,0.0001726675,0.003070561,0.0004832546,0.001354339,0.0001770433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000668756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003481642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002519598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007107101,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9904598,0.0006162848,0.003043936,0.001022021,0.004186575,0.0006713739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918974,0.002892892,0.00265389,0.001197324,0.0009667092,0.0003917745],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001142458,0.0008946142,0.09968626,0.000002362803,0.000008217731,0.001932752,0.001427701,0.0003797405,0.001552221,0.00002191148,0.005085045,0.8878667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01811278,0.01846664,0.6856661,0.02337967,0.0004765884,0.0157176,0.04330816,0.004966277,0.007415326,0.1222972,0.05429924,0.005894335],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989277,0.004257583,0.001197477,0.0006730829,0.004189314,0.0002893948,0.00001268046,0.00002633415,0.00007712394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888704,0.0005647035,0.009480841,0.0001344037,0.0007065836,0.000008893208,4.683652e-7,0.000055615,0.0001781185],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8819724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488440709","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1864","title":"Intelligence, Executive Functions, and Decision Making as Predictors of Antisocial Behavior in an Adolescent Sample of Justice‐Involved Youth and a Community Comparison Group","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental Health; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; University of Toronto; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Attribution; Cognition; Executive functions; Sample (material); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Antisocial personality disorder; Economic Justice; Clinical psychology; Poison control; Injury prevention; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.276789160868735,"gpt":0.4147292364924121,"spread":0.1379400756236771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001444596,0.0001924447,0.0005468784,0.0005210156,0.0002054283,0.00004819302,0.0003426583,0.0001489808,0.00001122726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005764844,0.0001666531,0.0001003005,0.000353495,0.0003213477,0.0004732331,0.0002376919,0.0007327335,7.952106e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001040571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005991836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000866745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001599725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971042,0.0004737684,0.001187026,0.0002204466,0.0007950512,0.0002195311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977258,0.0006948638,0.0009288799,0.0002022465,0.0002728792,0.0001753037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004122696,0.004006733,0.8239362,0.00003168896,0.000007128123,0.00006140867,0.007853664,0.0002528466,0.0090077,0.0001078445,0.0001007692,0.1505113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002068312,0.004708391,0.9311383,0.002018508,0.000374951,0.0001438654,0.05156273,0.0005953702,0.001617668,0.005468911,0.0000156548,0.0002873641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876317,0.000183574,0.01100443,0.000009189405,0.0008822419,0.0002093099,0.00005618567,0.000008082489,0.00001532741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933857,0.00004983337,0.006441643,0.00004575717,0.0000576793,0.000002027003,0.000002928061,0.0000135159,8.988114e-7],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1502239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6795917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130962282","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1904","title":"Inferring Others' Hidden Thoughts: Smart Guesses in a Low Diagnostic World","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Irish Research Council for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Psychology; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Confirmation bias; Cognitive psychology; Lie detection; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Deception","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0869167357280344,"gpt":0.4202337297077499,"spread":0.3333169939797155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00112555,0.0001935723,0.0004328824,0.001214031,0.00004598775,0.00008052219,0.0003424842,0.0001600174,0.001436412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003866102,0.0001660384,0.0001785049,0.0007581211,0.00008213025,0.0003154128,0.00006770601,0.0005893086,0.0003801902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001803076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005842938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002701227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004396497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976314,0.0002221548,0.001056251,0.0002526952,0.0005005061,0.0003370214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980789,0.0005446148,0.0005858591,0.0003276016,0.0002614737,0.0002015397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001278832,0.0009973646,0.22788,0.000005609363,0.00003708072,0.002068571,0.004826391,0.0001870479,0.0001307814,0.0003270807,0.03780261,0.7244587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01027811,0.001680223,0.8786398,0.002199738,0.0001508345,0.003429878,0.007849684,0.00008628954,0.000106838,0.01658006,0.07816053,0.0008380837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781808,0.0005373493,0.006864694,0.0001529654,0.008439836,0.0001385005,0.000002630367,0.00003528704,0.0056479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946823,0.0000137149,0.003559347,0.0003524625,0.0005320576,0.000008283545,5.513744e-7,0.0000335162,0.0008177338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7236206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994764,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588403970","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1874","title":"A Goal‐Priming Approach to Cognitive Consistency: Applications to Judgment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Priming (agriculture); Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Preference; Wishful thinking; Task (project management); Process (computing); Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3070542495043695,"gpt":0.4760887536961202,"spread":0.1690345041917506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006779051,0.0003697402,0.000997614,0.001765489,0.0003014193,0.001002108,0.001782406,0.0001858067,0.0001063012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003321516,0.0002851192,0.0004764124,0.001902658,0.0000897308,0.0007141015,0.0006808002,0.000491177,0.0009912872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004668146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004834409,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001377578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000183945,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924523,0.0002065836,0.00281157,0.0008048253,0.003195053,0.0005297288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916941,0.001761502,0.001340982,0.0008476941,0.003194188,0.001161513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004653574,0.0006319886,0.002826452,0.000001274337,0.00001142347,0.00006465824,0.001673982,0.002331601,0.0002487635,0.0001466532,0.01010888,0.9814889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01279945,0.01048686,0.0515356,0.004398453,0.001835466,0.005970471,0.1293878,0.003815255,0.001683902,0.4066664,0.3656303,0.005790016],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7019922,0.0001157341,0.2938074,0.0002036997,0.0009389473,0.0005826491,0.00003043731,0.00002519423,0.002303648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8317207,0.000002656007,0.1670469,0.0007503858,0.0002569143,0.0000429174,0.000001180339,0.00003628579,0.000142053],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9756989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999601,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414376403","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1965","title":"For the Win: Risk‐Sensitive Decision‐Making in Teams","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Football; League; American football; Psychology; Actuarial science; Marketing; Business; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08746145299335434,"gpt":0.4757352038551683,"spread":0.388273750861814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002415027,0.0002347852,0.0004741967,0.000525239,0.0003089143,0.00007604112,0.0005551451,0.0002253978,0.0009165999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004282866,0.0001270211,0.0006103563,0.0003804208,0.0001054316,0.00037624,0.0001041048,0.000588716,0.00009392875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002935077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000985641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006484323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003503658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967018,0.0002372201,0.001623721,0.0003168916,0.0005620642,0.0005582925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946667,0.003051196,0.001193236,0.0004550381,0.0004925724,0.0001412609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001615749,0.0003436603,0.04062326,0.000001708288,0.00001482392,0.0001283767,0.0005943882,0.00001473582,0.0001221953,0.0002852578,0.007254993,0.9490008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004670669,0.001846175,0.9658995,0.004127889,0.0002679253,0.0006029471,0.003095637,0.0000847291,0.00005932923,0.007383244,0.01159184,0.0003700727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8560191,0.000684657,0.1387726,0.0003049161,0.003598125,0.0004276867,0.00005196285,0.00001479283,0.0001260979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867735,0.00005988008,0.01232564,0.000193864,0.0003791343,0.00003039086,3.958053e-7,0.00004134403,0.000195874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9486308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118224716","doi":"10.1002/bdm.725","title":"The Value of Task Conflict to Group Decisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Decision quality; Psychology; Social psychology; Group decision-making; Preference; Quality (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Group (periodic table); Microeconomics; Economics; Statistics; Operations management; Computer science; Management; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.126068477965723,"gpt":0.4047300640592875,"spread":0.2786615860935646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002374061,0.00008636323,0.0001951169,0.0002569671,0.0004667214,0.00009873975,0.0006309323,0.00006336833,0.0001892348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005138573,0.00005966817,0.000189864,0.0004595459,0.00008900758,0.0003120849,0.0001193707,0.0001487222,0.00002019208],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006986961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006157066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002031171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005673566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979113,0.0001447705,0.0006846675,0.0001040604,0.0009402088,0.0002149859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998122,0.0006163013,0.0005719524,0.0001975979,0.0003734994,0.0001186183],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000383245,0.0001923154,0.009620618,0.000001149033,0.00002138755,0.00003177602,0.02273138,0.00002273765,0.001035487,0.0440089,0.003682401,0.9182686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001035068,0.001084558,0.3517145,0.0007010583,0.0002852703,0.00001449527,0.01433766,0.00008812732,0.0002889226,0.01739787,0.6126872,0.0003652608],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745846,0.0002056354,0.01894154,0.0002092414,0.001169355,0.0002205962,0.000001578958,0.00001095427,0.004656447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921554,0.0001897152,0.007241729,0.00008365596,0.0001380623,0.000001812697,1.38139e-7,0.00000858106,0.0001809316],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9179034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3589691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005516635","doi":"10.1002/bdm.540","title":"Classifying simulated air threats with fast and frugal heuristics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Heuristic; Contrast (vision); Probabilistic logic; Constraint (computer-aided design); Task (project management); Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09805858381858683,"gpt":0.4133919434235256,"spread":0.3153333596049387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002593066,0.0003928791,0.000947479,0.00101525,0.0003824639,0.0009079551,0.0009096403,0.0002428072,0.0001791038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004804822,0.0002572459,0.0002975931,0.0008792951,0.0002169673,0.001014224,0.0002727876,0.000645887,0.00005584215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000161586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001566735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002609574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009331981,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940724,0.0001471667,0.00240135,0.0006015961,0.002308036,0.0004694673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940532,0.00189087,0.001923114,0.0006282582,0.001262147,0.0002424229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005791248,0.0002847104,0.1202548,0.000001987339,0.000009607036,0.0008585823,0.0001343349,0.01551845,0.0003150014,0.00009308269,0.001498485,0.8604518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008405733,0.004169498,0.4777646,0.002459585,0.000810241,0.007338556,0.003924319,0.03096746,0.0004884697,0.448668,0.01262701,0.002376547],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9715783,0.0003603477,0.02656343,0.0001072098,0.0008150662,0.0001342732,0.00001663844,0.00003226503,0.0003924647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678869,0.00001866391,0.03152782,0.00007763676,0.0002723938,7.396703e-7,0.000001090305,0.00004624948,0.0001684984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8580753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014960425","doi":"10.1002/bdm.583","title":"Subjective valuation and asymmetrical motivational systems: implications of scope insensitivity for decision making","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Université Laval","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Feeling; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Scope (computer science); Computer science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1878685832245359,"gpt":0.4716123886249829,"spread":0.283743805400447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01458271,0.0003188911,0.001022354,0.002602399,0.0003814924,0.0005780261,0.0007700843,0.0003093254,0.00005382835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01330323,0.0002512123,0.0004840639,0.001805604,0.0001727638,0.001314547,0.0002801,0.000408702,0.0000138748],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004004745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002660696,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001896894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004455222,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925492,0.0002277408,0.00377137,0.0006363498,0.00238699,0.000428371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9671476,0.02353138,0.003477451,0.0006029599,0.00501354,0.0002270419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006801576,0.0003018744,0.06115342,0.000004979019,0.00001477568,0.00001612848,0.0001818497,0.001167951,0.001313037,0.0006808526,0.0005847338,0.9339002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001092128,0.0007436291,0.7399482,0.0009456395,0.0001333978,0.0005045151,0.001178457,0.002827246,0.0002552476,0.2517605,0.0002891881,0.0003219236],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5704291,0.0002241208,0.4280619,0.00004085434,0.0007635148,0.0003653059,0.00004003363,0.000009135639,0.00006605328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8635279,0.00001733032,0.1361584,0.00005119238,0.0001972511,0.000007173794,0.000001700257,0.0000302438,0.000008792352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9335783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124191659","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2232","title":"Arithmetic computation with probability words and numbers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of National Defence; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Calculator; Computation; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Point (geometry); Computer science; Statistics; Probability distribution; Arithmetic; Percentage point; Mathematics; Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1245200551150639,"gpt":0.4298713309285001,"spread":0.3053512758134361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003593273,0.0002422533,0.000723418,0.0004826167,0.0002181341,0.00101065,0.0004986632,0.0001430224,0.0002570494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001406402,0.0001654619,0.0002442596,0.00102035,0.0001714839,0.0009040588,0.0002386354,0.0004582916,0.00003227552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001516274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002984204,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006931796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009381001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951457,0.0002543314,0.001807434,0.000554141,0.00195289,0.0002854715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994292,0.00205638,0.001291717,0.0004828816,0.001644556,0.0002324525],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002517553,0.0002488308,0.04999125,0.000002361356,0.000008260959,0.0005124095,0.000401484,0.001467321,0.0001545512,0.00004401105,0.0004537333,0.946464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004419772,0.002083972,0.2337222,0.001575698,0.0004638157,0.01094361,0.008218624,0.003880727,0.0004727304,0.7262675,0.006756052,0.001195218],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9325879,0.0001968922,0.06594165,0.0001823094,0.0007374624,0.0001056551,0.000006930043,0.00001467262,0.0002265811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8244649,0.00001244922,0.1752975,0.00008300971,0.0000728423,0.000001248858,5.928349e-7,0.0000182594,0.00004918408],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9452688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9745718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529245342","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1995","title":"Cultural Variations in Reasons for Advice Seeking","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Advice (programming); Closeness; Psychology; Competence (human resources); Social psychology; Dilemma","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1560057382188668,"gpt":0.4741543567155689,"spread":0.3181486184967021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004367741,0.0001193193,0.0002564972,0.0001860978,0.00008501763,0.00006230555,0.0002387393,0.0001030546,0.0005691863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001364696,0.00006482702,0.0002057073,0.0001828047,0.00002318082,0.0003603217,0.00003545225,0.0001409794,0.00002322897],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009705879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002288314,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002840952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009800289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998666,0.00006941393,0.0006230127,0.0001568222,0.0002468904,0.0002378308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986624,0.0004214498,0.0004325641,0.0001347296,0.0002838206,0.00006506176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007236053,0.0003785251,0.133334,0.000004874912,0.00003254964,0.00009054972,0.003661951,0.000009771343,0.01058483,0.007255224,0.01053256,0.8333915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002789314,0.0005520961,0.9765761,0.001147466,0.000110159,0.0003061211,0.002231936,0.0001024756,0.00003036124,0.008929047,0.006962051,0.0002628339],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759308,0.000173916,0.02178157,0.0003397822,0.001281171,0.0001317382,0.00001686286,0.00001496763,0.0003292644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862378,0.00001448783,0.01291717,0.00005187762,0.0002537712,0.000008562317,7.960046e-7,0.00001162177,0.0005039273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8432421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6232191,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606816334","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2018","title":"Evaluating Effort: Influences of Evaluation Mode on Judgments of Task‐specific Efforts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Social psychology; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2906369977474804,"gpt":0.5750266530973823,"spread":0.284389655349902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003084422,0.0001880686,0.0005504118,0.0004746317,0.0002916991,0.00006335515,0.0005697662,0.0001764953,0.00109263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001603507,0.0001566896,0.0004198215,0.0001279336,0.0001271793,0.0004624989,0.00007363203,0.0003899195,0.00002318711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001371126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001159394,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001054835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002719128,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956911,0.0001878855,0.001977347,0.0002451593,0.001608465,0.0002900035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939114,0.0001194747,0.004042639,0.0007215439,0.001080299,0.0001245871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001032066,0.0009179874,0.08096299,0.00001638144,0.00002611939,0.00003178359,0.000650899,0.0005760075,0.005069446,0.0002660441,0.0006485669,0.9098017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002494654,0.003146185,0.9872448,0.002636708,0.0002837473,0.00006213567,0.0003310887,0.0004592295,0.001370148,0.001658204,0.0001411565,0.0001719454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956209,0.0004634167,0.0003749052,0.0000225422,0.002562307,0.0003656897,0.00002377841,0.000005387181,0.0005610693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950568,0.00001787103,0.004700689,0.00002020361,0.0001220991,0.00001338115,0.000002783786,0.00002113229,0.00004502349],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9096298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998205,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755120453","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2039","title":"Why Improvement Can Trump Consistent Strong Performance: The Role of Effort Perceptions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Perception; Promotion (chess); Trait; Psychology; Investment (military); Social psychology; Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09829980618987051,"gpt":0.4108718380136088,"spread":0.3125720318237383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004674301,0.0002962209,0.0008062332,0.0005427086,0.001230421,0.001181224,0.003098965,0.0001601603,0.0006828564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007826372,0.0001748057,0.0007559717,0.0002254642,0.0003962335,0.0009724483,0.0006703504,0.0005805074,0.00003955479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002084124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002328073,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008317038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002095051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939743,0.0000899607,0.002630475,0.0004125145,0.002478214,0.0004145918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920963,0.0007013901,0.003929766,0.001763238,0.001306504,0.0002028263],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001676138,0.0001893058,0.1045563,0.000001438892,0.00001375886,0.00001970464,0.0003875869,0.0004685873,0.001780999,0.00004784215,0.00132575,0.8910411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002905131,0.003359136,0.8791837,0.001222723,0.0006390121,0.000759557,0.01980922,0.005673106,0.002857126,0.05355115,0.0291111,0.0009290085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961573,0.0001086025,0.0008129792,0.0003728289,0.001757141,0.0002234338,0.00003533525,0.000008568489,0.000523844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955857,0.00004804057,0.003908225,0.0001537861,0.000198932,0.000005082557,6.032844e-7,0.00002573224,0.00007383615],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.890112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308752211","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2307","title":"Meta‐informational cue inconsistency and judgment of information accuracy: Spotlight on intelligence analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Data Quality and Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Government of Ontario; Government of Canada; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Information quality; Quality (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Natural language processing; Information system","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2553747945718307,"gpt":0.4526845200344707,"spread":0.1973097254626401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008691698,0.0001443977,0.0006220968,0.002327006,0.0002719886,0.0003031339,0.0009350239,0.00003658386,0.001802853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008950435,0.0001020629,0.000494375,0.001833014,0.00005891373,0.002349505,0.0007124312,0.0002918988,0.00002147355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001179179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008493637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000145137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001310331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929978,0.0002681406,0.002623358,0.000161539,0.003798485,0.0001506798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945153,0.001574774,0.002763584,0.0004412393,0.0006139582,0.00009115424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000580873,0.0003543947,0.002818594,0.00001035255,0.0007851437,0.00002720498,0.002847959,0.05928753,0.00002301832,0.01341155,0.003877451,0.9159759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003489551,0.006507377,0.2392246,0.000378076,0.02497226,0.0006091426,0.08099983,0.05032125,0.001273998,0.27747,0.3128084,0.001945603],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7592959,0.0003106314,0.2371829,0.000900719,0.00085891,0.0003082262,0.0002341331,0.00001221008,0.0008963562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884812,0.00003795967,0.01090771,0.0005021204,0.00001628022,0.000006307882,0.000009860017,0.000003444379,0.00003506435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9140303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392863756","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2377","title":"Attention! Do We Really Need Attention Checks?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1264952074393649,"gpt":0.4466319224044139,"spread":0.320136714965049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007622189,0.0004317412,0.0009499607,0.002440485,0.0003197047,0.003574125,0.001761173,0.0003399714,0.001683501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001096761,0.0003107623,0.001368126,0.001920233,0.0001319585,0.002338547,0.0004010311,0.0009417981,0.001360798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003745636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002811097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008302816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001748595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911181,0.0002604239,0.003729503,0.000838955,0.00351703,0.0005359846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938785,0.001954131,0.001530228,0.0009312012,0.001373322,0.0003326111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001956325,0.0002069193,0.005363513,0.000005656034,0.00002033284,0.0007715079,0.000226925,0.0002182342,0.003593435,0.0002572867,0.02017978,0.9689608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002589079,0.002404212,0.06192491,0.01004142,0.0008781422,0.005374103,0.006479792,0.00651159,0.0001804834,0.686282,0.2155425,0.001791712],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622926,0.00303048,0.02517662,0.0007958623,0.007887752,0.0001865047,0.00002778261,0.00008402177,0.0005184412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802429,0.0003837736,0.01779615,0.00006910239,0.0006658209,0.00000396896,0.000001658235,0.00006533754,0.0007712747],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.967169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908259334","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2115","title":"Less willing to pay but more willing to buy: How the elicitation method impacts the valuation of a promotion","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Willingness to pay; Product (mathematics); Contingent valuation; Promotion (chess); Business; Value (mathematics); Economics; Microeconomics; Marketing; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2495305762842026,"gpt":0.357772780472725,"spread":0.1082422041885224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003767813,0.0001358486,0.0003500486,0.0002969125,0.000130269,0.0001328607,0.000304434,0.0000770948,0.00006786858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001846065,0.00008774097,0.0001803116,0.0002666482,0.00001792645,0.0005380225,0.00007100114,0.0002111055,0.0000585669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002320628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004332143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001320484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983852,0.00007335466,0.0009410777,0.0002145282,0.0002049391,0.0001808888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980456,0.0002342815,0.0012767,0.0002712482,0.0001060343,0.00006620141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002587826,0.0002224691,0.3184874,0.00002507272,0.00006129437,0.000002633235,0.008618061,0.2107781,0.01344187,0.002323427,0.0002739272,0.445507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007789463,0.0008079507,0.9534994,0.0004083836,0.00007527808,0.00003861366,0.004896427,0.02527457,0.001527387,0.01195321,0.0004692133,0.0002706537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7437873,0.0001031814,0.2537996,0.001434683,0.0004620655,0.0003713793,0.00001012584,0.000003145869,0.00002853955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737003,0.00003279069,0.02584069,0.0002073636,0.0001231151,0.000008552125,0.000002495943,0.00002173363,0.00006292605],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.635012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3577973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220750995","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2280","title":"Information‐seeking when information doesn't matter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Portfolio; Certainty; Action (physics); Psychology; Instrumental variable; Economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Finance; Econometrics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06879234510743981,"gpt":0.3845880225931744,"spread":0.3157956774857346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007170096,0.0002951443,0.0006944662,0.002453031,0.0007965349,0.001859388,0.002254958,0.00012534,0.01063166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001010473,0.0002316355,0.000584885,0.001033077,0.00006809542,0.008702168,0.001058607,0.0009223677,0.001547446],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005016725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002425556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001897346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005297813,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908308,0.0002801255,0.004082189,0.0002162216,0.00416108,0.0004295694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926475,0.001226232,0.003844856,0.000790832,0.001282772,0.0002078231],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003318038,0.0001110399,0.01790774,0.000001796866,0.000007623748,0.00003701641,0.00262524,0.00509273,0.00004551955,0.000060905,0.06502555,0.908753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002567412,0.001031238,0.05022528,0.0002202997,0.000156037,0.00252968,0.01883617,0.002782501,0.00004574461,0.2386744,0.6819879,0.0009433099],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9509321,0.00005218394,0.04245535,0.0005189797,0.004275224,0.0002045681,0.00007468688,0.00002948569,0.001457378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772266,0.000004132528,0.02048652,0.001999148,0.000140884,0.00001006799,0.000006215738,0.00001875454,0.0001077123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9078097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772399711","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2070","title":"Maximizing Scales Do Not Reliably Predict Maximizing Behavior in Decisions from Experience","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Maximization; Stochastic game; Utility maximization; Sampling (signal processing); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Econometrics; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematical economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1993645323040618,"gpt":0.4524464993842472,"spread":0.2530819670801854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00679457,0.0007055794,0.001865354,0.00216089,0.001412508,0.005093642,0.007011964,0.0005605382,0.0008351784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01268012,0.0005566853,0.001095833,0.0007464067,0.0004982959,0.004417356,0.001830212,0.001474321,0.0002650776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005047213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002864812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000209494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004181807,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9871762,0.0003285318,0.005482286,0.001428752,0.004609837,0.0009744418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837966,0.00535998,0.005394894,0.00346779,0.001382253,0.000598483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007426606,0.0004445481,0.1968724,7.151162e-7,0.000007161875,0.001643072,0.0007321888,0.0004022816,0.001937158,0.0000264302,0.0007871262,0.7964043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003464183,0.0006373414,0.9123949,0.002427193,0.0002050202,0.0006899352,0.00505195,0.00142919,0.0008376503,0.06753544,0.004163835,0.001163375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866331,0.0003798744,0.00679341,0.0001911637,0.005163692,0.0003609624,0.0001044992,0.00004066863,0.0003326544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9149145,0.0001505649,0.08424159,0.0001219341,0.0004078764,0.00002159108,0.000001815034,0.00008048302,0.00005968042],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7952409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753598526","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2032","title":"How Incidental Confidence Influences Self‐Interested Behaviors: A Double‐Edged Sword","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Altruism (biology); Self-confidence; Low Confidence; SWORD; Social psychology; Confidence interval; Statistics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1004309513392791,"gpt":0.4425084805309055,"spread":0.3420775291916264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001406694,0.0003170999,0.000662855,0.0003296926,0.002341132,0.002700277,0.001995428,0.0002267005,0.0001333629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002347176,0.0002921379,0.0004065306,0.0001444612,0.0007469308,0.003547251,0.0005747451,0.0005532019,0.00003015463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006660856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002826305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001308468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003578574,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996794,0.0001356287,0.0009990502,0.0003721174,0.001141656,0.0005575292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960576,0.0001626273,0.002266924,0.0005643627,0.0006483777,0.000300158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009468407,0.000961484,0.8588216,0.0000106535,0.00007934069,0.001171128,0.02817083,0.00000857054,0.01786071,0.003161488,0.001130654,0.0876767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01013926,0.00256641,0.816583,0.003777323,0.001194399,0.0006657937,0.1268685,0.00002953207,0.01293907,0.007760086,0.01477474,0.002701868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995299,0.0005297147,0.0001033988,0.0004553903,0.002378119,0.0003250165,0.000007301915,0.00005116714,0.0008508767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993454,0.0002035117,0.005650496,0.00005218779,0.0004003578,0.00001225808,5.403336e-7,0.0000308909,0.0001957151],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09869763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999531,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123962758","doi":"10.1002/bdm.735","title":"Effects of Spikes in the Price of Gasoline on Behavioral Intentions: A Mental Accounting Explanation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Gallon (US); Mental accounting; Gasoline; Economics; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Public economics; Microeconomics; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.164158019772203,"gpt":0.4335051786725509,"spread":0.2693471589003479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006089029,0.0002655447,0.0007984978,0.001692005,0.0001212167,0.0001576012,0.001726708,0.0001666532,0.0001620313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002115769,0.0001679519,0.0005351818,0.001175305,0.0001398185,0.0009706639,0.0002049528,0.0005148815,0.00001651747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001348823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001078436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005197528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006997262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931432,0.0003229069,0.003119982,0.0003638002,0.002746698,0.0003034369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922088,0.002821543,0.003338032,0.0005904094,0.0009629884,0.00007825295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001375886,0.00452951,0.08126008,0.00001511824,0.00001028069,0.0002847945,0.00698434,0.0001301428,0.01350468,0.0002649255,0.0007634595,0.8908768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006541163,0.009165042,0.852017,0.006039559,0.0006142765,0.001024041,0.02614726,0.0008807058,0.02761453,0.0680867,0.0008163348,0.001053365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956763,0.0001383519,0.002361841,0.00002848394,0.001210059,0.0003181338,0.00001361052,0.000006852856,0.0002463744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907884,0.00002882432,0.009028251,0.00004899677,0.00006933525,0.000006161095,8.953305e-7,0.00002052322,0.000008584948],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8898234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6848879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180279903","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2259","title":"The effects of trait social anxiety on affective and behavioral reactions to others' resource allocations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Ultimatum game; Dictator game; Trait; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Interpersonal communication; Anxiety; Trait anxiety; Empirical research; Resource allocation; Interpersonal relationship; Developmental psychology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05696202337491201,"gpt":0.4471408656213003,"spread":0.3901788422463883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000643154,0.0001725149,0.0003441187,0.0002361412,0.0005424462,0.00007517986,0.0002377286,0.0001710322,0.0001863126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001299858,0.000135257,0.0003640923,0.0004536895,0.0001062122,0.0001322341,0.00006876617,0.0005842638,0.00001232649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001373902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009135349,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006825487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001729071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977573,0.0003615571,0.0008651855,0.0002469506,0.0004571368,0.0003119243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979059,0.0006184306,0.0005659014,0.0002870793,0.0004400261,0.0001827152],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007175585,0.001796758,0.004728097,0.00001652298,0.00003969327,0.0001088101,0.005525444,0.000007548217,0.005797049,0.001907605,0.01103386,0.968321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002676931,0.005270579,0.9202809,0.001561609,0.000607216,0.0006176534,0.01126189,0.000005694733,0.001703613,0.0008760066,0.05474242,0.0003954624],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961006,0.0004491814,0.0009715149,0.000463483,0.001299562,0.0002912085,0.00002702438,0.00001339628,0.0003840513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977787,0.00002172428,0.001288862,0.0001545586,0.00017368,0.00002760121,0.000001962301,0.00002857553,0.0005244031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9679256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.551562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394617843","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2381","title":"Measuring Rational Thinking in Adolescents: The Assessment of Rational Thinking for Youth (ART‐Y)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Rationality; Numeracy; Cognition; Literacy; Developmental psychology; Mathematics education; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2126545867215017,"gpt":0.4519607289546748,"spread":0.2393061422331731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01459922,0.0002995098,0.000735218,0.001417437,0.000489905,0.001516694,0.001740828,0.0001828833,0.0001595621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001022156,0.0001902665,0.0007407049,0.001050106,0.0001135521,0.001479825,0.0001998599,0.000792991,0.00002025727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004013315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008789113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009332241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916674,0.0002804626,0.003353627,0.000533723,0.003794124,0.0003705979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935459,0.003104388,0.001518342,0.0005105446,0.001217148,0.0001037074],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005827327,0.0007681063,0.07639559,0.00003942228,0.00005258885,0.0001877773,0.006549409,0.03082785,0.001168261,0.008776992,0.002771375,0.8718799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003375465,0.001041306,0.1268773,0.01426882,0.0004795388,0.0005064568,0.01064297,0.06188248,0.0003471506,0.7714164,0.008130046,0.001032078],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8402662,0.0004168212,0.155212,0.000293677,0.003155406,0.0003694959,0.0000524957,0.00001972703,0.0002142038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9609181,0.0000206469,0.03850875,0.0000962148,0.0003685126,0.000006353839,0.000003501042,0.00003564902,0.00004225639],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8708478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113706740","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2226","title":"Individual differences in exploring versus exploiting and links to delay discounting","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Discounting; Temporal discounting; Delay discounting; Preference; Exploit; Adaptation (eye); Psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Cognitive psychology; Time preference; Intertemporal choice; Social psychology; Computer science; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.298145339055819,"gpt":0.4214703928566457,"spread":0.1233250538008267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008091208,0.0001522721,0.0003881986,0.0002315983,0.0003397941,0.0003051428,0.0003551434,0.00009604029,0.00003492162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003139706,0.0001451658,0.0000869162,0.0003270643,0.00009147638,0.00101609,0.0003277048,0.0004796839,0.000006163564],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001797839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006091601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001686799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000526416,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980734,0.00008446832,0.0007238492,0.000230565,0.0005545901,0.0003331375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989879,0.0002811194,0.0003530844,0.0000639902,0.00008964295,0.0002243045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000436692,0.00009338056,0.6670662,0.000005115604,0.00001480505,0.0001880847,0.1237424,0.0000612404,0.001096994,0.0005319958,0.00005578337,0.2067074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005037745,0.002698399,0.3168879,0.002249765,0.0002529976,0.00003113798,0.667385,0.0002188448,0.0009240234,0.001177188,0.001682125,0.001454798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978608,0.0003282739,0.0002085979,0.0005716562,0.0006878814,0.0001292149,0.000002841035,0.0000150278,0.0001956532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917631,0.0001126642,0.007666589,0.0001133421,0.0003180805,0.000008615423,1.913594e-7,0.00001551205,0.000001975891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5436426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5919688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119649307","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2222","title":"Consumption on steroids: The effect of testosterone on preferences for conspicuous consumption and the moderating role of intrasexual competition","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Sexual Differentiation and Disorders","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Testosterone (patch); Sexual selection; Conspicuous consumption; Competition (biology); Consumption (sociology); Digit ratio; Psychology; Biology; Endocrinology; Economics; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03180580714231282,"gpt":0.3403150496897561,"spread":0.3085092425474433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004080393,0.00009080832,0.0002009204,0.0000445133,0.0000815727,0.00003417254,0.00007904851,0.00006524181,0.00001462213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001944754,0.00005116814,0.00007751394,0.00002821991,0.0001184677,0.000009461774,0.00003107522,0.00009190261,3.685218e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007274874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002024195,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000191417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000172947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990231,0.0002048651,0.0003854848,0.0001091766,0.0002068298,0.00007047565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987931,0.0004662213,0.0004398791,0.0001184559,0.0001625974,0.00001974492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00867738,0.0003111187,0.05598419,0.0001095161,0.00009036042,0.000002103823,0.0005076039,0.001228089,0.6946539,0.001023124,0.00007688298,0.2373358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02046421,0.01612857,0.1536222,0.001665423,0.0006419707,0.0001761892,0.003034301,0.003177732,0.7975451,0.002976394,0.0001687808,0.0003991461],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942743,0.0007914288,0.004535875,0.00002731921,0.0001315186,0.0002077186,0.0000176886,0.000001347745,0.00001277021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994413,0.00008112599,0.0003499936,0.00005649622,0.00003460402,0.000006621501,0.00001973996,0.000006004172,0.000004079372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2369366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2086576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801881220","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2081","title":"Explaining reluctance to benefit from others' misfortune","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Misfortune; Harm; Psychology; Social psychology; Relation (database); Positive economics; Economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1591990378291487,"gpt":0.3826193365137207,"spread":0.2234202986845719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003342167,0.0001490665,0.0002601281,0.0002249962,0.0001971596,0.00006969968,0.0005109181,0.00008088923,0.0007365764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001634208,0.0001209812,0.0001399481,0.0002691206,0.00008378936,0.0003205021,0.00009911311,0.0002438509,0.0002512565],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002290361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007170264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001197065,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980649,0.00004084292,0.0006127071,0.0003043323,0.0007067239,0.0002704633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988435,0.0002079472,0.0003888205,0.0002254884,0.0001556689,0.0001785672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001585299,0.0003542897,0.005245542,0.000001514695,0.000008050652,0.000557291,0.001449285,0.0001545296,0.4733365,0.000569964,0.009552296,0.5071854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007833076,0.01033805,0.4497169,0.006094744,0.0002730895,0.002929491,0.002492605,0.0007413722,0.2843364,0.1199214,0.113047,0.002275772],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887865,0.00006349867,0.0076289,0.000695604,0.002150721,0.00007294748,0.0000120922,0.00001788121,0.0005718485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671908,0.00001371808,0.02970458,0.002297554,0.0006347989,0.000001432063,2.375015e-7,0.00001795283,0.0001388924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5049096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8064995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400512097","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2399","title":"When Half Is at Least 50%: Effect of “Framing” and Probability Level on Frequency Estimates","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Forecasting Techniques and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Ministère de la Défense Nationale","keywords":"Framing (construction); Econometrics; Statistics; Framing effect; Psychology; Mathematics; Economics; Social psychology; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1963843125055303,"gpt":0.4594626639077974,"spread":0.263078351402267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00390909,0.0002016926,0.0005102733,0.0004825643,0.0001652394,0.0003312495,0.0005982096,0.0001260499,0.0003274267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001112156,0.0001243536,0.0002872195,0.0004572701,0.0001633315,0.000353127,0.0002453752,0.0003468758,0.00003266785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001255273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005942428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002772187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001459101,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965896,0.0001033638,0.001273535,0.0003984597,0.001437863,0.000197174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958049,0.002615847,0.0006184198,0.0004669888,0.0003829687,0.0001108485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002348438,0.0001360989,0.04283598,0.00004446516,0.00001371512,0.00006340894,0.0006104949,0.00006674937,0.008678873,0.001269972,0.009658796,0.9363866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009777471,0.005808161,0.09041595,0.005886418,0.0003662679,0.001443596,0.0001598089,0.01010718,0.02812576,0.8459273,0.01008115,0.0007006748],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9731655,0.0006014392,0.0251293,0.0003325809,0.0002712752,0.000231885,0.00003962643,0.00003400509,0.0001944628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8986863,0.00001045638,0.101117,0.00002353604,0.00005189461,0.000005985532,5.050213e-7,0.00001674318,0.00008761109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9356859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5070993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1776244204","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1795","title":"Altering the Shape of Punishment Distributions Affects Decision Making in a Modified Iowa Gambling Task","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University; McMaster University; Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Skew; Iowa gambling task; Variance (accounting); Psychology; Preference; Task (project management); Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Analysis of variance; Perception; Econometrics; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Cognition; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Communication; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1385662250916485,"gpt":0.4314551819299026,"spread":0.2928889568382541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007827435,0.0004794934,0.001278033,0.001715604,0.0003733842,0.001276641,0.002706735,0.0002905858,0.0007100865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00345824,0.0003083666,0.0008197068,0.002019423,0.000212423,0.001739704,0.0009120968,0.001004138,0.0001130362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004635876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002157912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004586599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008981985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908539,0.0004025912,0.00414315,0.0007166232,0.00314511,0.0007385973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872999,0.006701766,0.003203011,0.001254638,0.001294293,0.0002463493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002882858,0.0003783301,0.01376342,0.000004021542,0.00001132128,0.0001331763,0.000566899,0.009188701,0.003124032,0.00011582,0.00128828,0.9711377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005112563,0.001894005,0.4676828,0.008726379,0.0003696752,0.001450053,0.007652488,0.1023942,0.001256978,0.3990611,0.002633805,0.001765948],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9366649,0.0003295831,0.06039129,0.0002009643,0.001735289,0.0005024217,0.00002751672,0.00001990337,0.0001281185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741769,0.00004325308,0.0254436,0.00009253446,0.0001654886,0.00001844351,0.000001251546,0.00004377201,0.00001478845],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9693717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134566371","doi":"10.1002/bdm.663","title":"Aggregating conclusive and inconclusive information: Data and a model based on the assessment of threat","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences; Experimental Psychology Society","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Navy; Computer science; Psychology; Econometrics; Social psychology; Operations research; Mathematics; Political science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1493852811351128,"gpt":0.4096454101921023,"spread":0.2602601290569894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006381292,0.0001014873,0.0001922215,0.0001314227,0.0001963178,0.00006203358,0.000355242,0.0000458578,0.00001411848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002462654,0.00006220393,0.0000354417,0.0001263489,0.0001062951,0.0006275199,0.0001966382,0.0002399149,5.688326e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003435431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007194365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.002668e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.948308e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986308,0.00006963757,0.000487186,0.0001341137,0.0005722658,0.0001060243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984823,0.0004683932,0.0006349684,0.0002229481,0.000144085,0.00004731846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000751665,0.0005320497,0.005728091,0.00001637766,0.0000104622,0.0001503943,0.001477208,0.02059994,0.0267897,0.006163898,0.002734677,0.9350455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002862547,0.002162224,0.07083558,0.001487028,0.0001040564,0.000582729,0.0007053554,0.8970132,0.002105977,0.02159979,0.0002604928,0.0002809791],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9756135,0.00003525044,0.02085115,0.0028244,0.0001104939,0.0001256046,0.00002960719,0.000003835003,0.0004061753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828125,0.00003161152,0.01387242,0.003251646,0.00002501964,5.504825e-7,0.00000105103,0.000002789607,0.000002370533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9347646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2536603,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089376958","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2210","title":"The moderating role of processing style in risk perceptions and risky decision making","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Risk perception; Perception; Psychology; Social psychology; Risk aversion (psychology); Risk analysis (engineering); Style (visual arts); Risk assessment; Medicine; Computer science; Economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08454026949192234,"gpt":0.4135205257038696,"spread":0.3289802562119473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006369079,0.0003336947,0.0009269933,0.0007107198,0.0007714703,0.001268957,0.001380449,0.0002153954,0.000121065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005781884,0.000217652,0.0003988991,0.001229959,0.0002098083,0.001303943,0.0005748495,0.001009983,0.00002215066],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001352721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001924192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001772835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001415643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928209,0.0003747618,0.003584743,0.0006129865,0.002160851,0.0004457901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899465,0.005084128,0.003230249,0.0005322846,0.0009720128,0.0002348446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003993574,0.00009884835,0.08635632,0.00000227179,0.000004178472,0.00003248148,0.002569721,0.006809933,0.0008579335,0.00001515638,0.0001661583,0.9026877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003307883,0.001601549,0.3476326,0.00332206,0.0003139661,0.0005652023,0.05579022,0.2955437,0.0001974159,0.2885012,0.002133808,0.001090432],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9594381,0.001326253,0.03844974,0.0001247184,0.0003406198,0.0001936225,0.00001887598,0.00001536035,0.00009267533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9404815,0.00017056,0.05907545,0.0000739725,0.0001546,0.000003072347,2.209183e-7,0.00003589019,0.000004714019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9015972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997678,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}