{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":21,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":21,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"31aeb3ccf066","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling"}},"results":[{"id":"W1985136372","doi":"10.1016/s1755-5345(13)70025-3","title":"Modeling the choices of individual decision-makers by combining efficient choice experiment designs with extra preference information","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":241,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Discrete choice; Preference; Computer science; Aggregate (composite); Variance (accounting); Limit (mathematics); Econometrics; Choice set; Revealed preference; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1841817718579511,"gpt":0.2408156124094176,"spread":0.05663384055146645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009304473,0.0001538816,0.0003428613,0.0001722957,0.0002029946,0.00006183329,0.0003529166,0.00007043663,0.00004414789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005749979,0.0001235198,0.00009933247,0.000116667,0.00007029621,0.0008550612,0.00004070682,0.0002385719,0.00001438855],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001520695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004333146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001225655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002558937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982583,0.00002122808,0.001181143,0.000146129,0.0001961113,0.0001971193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982747,0.0002542977,0.001149803,0.0001834257,0.00006075553,0.00007701523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003749329,0.00007256381,0.01019925,0.000008206003,0.00005904555,2.811081e-7,0.002530383,0.9862509,0.00004117174,0.0003018956,0.00005191176,0.0004468919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001182021,0.000187102,0.002411619,0.00009643012,0.00002389112,0.00001693407,0.0005946173,0.9939686,0.000451735,0.0003839809,0.0005092244,0.0001738141],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5842622,0.001026455,0.4142228,0.00003333671,0.00008302288,0.00009787566,0.0000100386,0.000003388429,0.0002609276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919516,0.0004303669,0.007436424,0.0000837148,0.00005572792,0.000007032711,0.000006683229,0.00001381699,0.0000145854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4076895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5036992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100075638","doi":"10.1016/s1755-5345(13)70002-2","title":"A pilot study into the perception of unreliability of travel times using in-depth interviews","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Transportation of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Preference; Christian ministry; Ministry of Transport; Actuarial science; Perception; Travel time; Test (biology); Face (sociological concept); Computer science; Economics; Econometrics; Operations management; Operations research; Marketing; Psychology; Applied psychology; Business; Transport engineering; Engineering; Microeconomics; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2151723079674634,"gpt":0.2898807384876627,"spread":0.07470843052019924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001851995,0.00008041305,0.0003778372,0.0001542262,0.00002773258,0.00001002693,0.0001661375,0.00002296866,0.0000602469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003604454,0.00006913436,0.0001007495,0.00008840903,0.00003566582,0.0002629013,0.00001607307,0.0001546035,0.000003936749],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001749445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001299448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006363816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004699164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985049,0.00004313682,0.001203944,0.0001153833,0.00004783519,0.00008475228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987695,0.00006162519,0.0009749244,0.0001468563,0.00002416058,0.00002295214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000788751,0.001085914,0.3457019,0.00002690694,0.00003952846,3.385495e-7,0.01063762,0.6377687,0.001567227,0.0004878095,0.00000634644,0.002598836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009702377,0.001368665,0.5743281,0.00008068515,0.00002784886,0.000002556365,0.002620436,0.4044265,0.0001365924,0.01591309,0.00001659004,0.0001086788],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.951421,0.0005946366,0.04721008,0.00009805092,0.00009120751,0.0001384352,0.000001442923,8.409919e-7,0.0004442813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974805,0.0001945035,0.002212323,0.00003318012,0.00005704478,6.716275e-7,3.845676e-7,0.000006221902,0.00001523071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2333422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2819217,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143729190","doi":"10.1016/s1755-5345(13)70012-5","title":"On Jointly Analyzing the Physical Activity Participation Levels of Individuals in a Family Unit Using a Multivariate Copula Framework","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Multivariate statistics; Copula (linguistics); Psychological intervention; Physical activity; Demographic economics; Psychology; Household income; Multivariate analysis; Econometrics; Economics; Geography; Statistics; Medicine; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1526901459484767,"gpt":0.4139989149787202,"spread":0.2613087690302436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002041839,0.0001019167,0.0003019678,0.0001292857,0.0002246794,0.00006596705,0.0002769395,0.0001174168,0.00001580927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004841207,0.00007322186,0.0001415883,0.0004587103,0.0001412153,0.0005057506,0.00001376895,0.0009317912,4.710195e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004630989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001996872,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001834637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005455419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984567,0.0002561112,0.000421644,0.0001248863,0.0005106253,0.0002299928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979425,0.0009679918,0.0006682852,0.0001442394,0.0001971964,0.00007978829],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001402341,0.0009385425,0.4677844,0.00003183998,0.00008234807,0.000005367818,0.03454493,0.4560901,0.03142784,0.003479196,0.000001850688,0.005473293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005898919,0.00006582948,0.6449611,0.0003878808,0.0001353467,2.53026e-7,0.0006533517,0.3145013,0.003135989,0.03533641,0.0000409499,0.0001916381],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9108593,0.0000181299,0.08853864,0.0001973168,0.000179201,0.0001051708,0.000004501637,0.000004888282,0.00009286316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966677,0.000003744366,0.002945352,0.00002534924,0.0003442588,0.000001001892,1.626131e-7,0.000008147886,0.000004294022],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1771767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4048221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622124186","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2017.11.003","title":"Discriminative conditional restricted Boltzmann machine for discrete choice and latent variable modelling","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Ryerson University","keywords":"Latent variable; Latent class model; Latent variable model; Discriminative model; Graphical model; Probabilistic latent semantic analysis; Boltzmann machine; Robustness (evolution); Generative model","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1602269290040661,"gpt":0.2689309657490891,"spread":0.1087040367450231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005935154,0.0001542132,0.0003952737,0.0001371173,0.0004576642,0.0001880132,0.000242354,0.00008653549,0.00004889747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001171645,0.0001604935,0.0001221663,0.00002448363,0.00007385943,0.001049113,0.00005536724,0.0002088177,0.000008601709],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001338774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000182885,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003081856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000801228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998703,0.00001158626,0.0007618387,0.0002479083,0.00006029538,0.000215397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998054,0.0001809544,0.001394985,0.0002059736,0.00005414484,0.0001099118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003593204,0.00005673594,0.0544346,0.00003634109,0.0001114702,8.841557e-7,0.0001860948,0.9064599,0.00003400546,0.03842307,0.000100151,0.0001207598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00123493,0.00009456874,0.02562697,0.00004600589,0.00004181689,0.000006223207,0.00001681072,0.8684372,0.00002945044,0.1019599,0.00232988,0.0001762312],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2878859,0.0009893595,0.709157,0.0004366139,0.0002272066,0.0001423913,0.0001570861,0.000004287477,0.001000168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773312,0.0005910855,0.02107555,0.00007411555,0.000350446,0.000009855089,0.0000367182,0.00002614271,0.000504836],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6894453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6544734,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977561751","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2014.12.001","title":"Too many attributes: A test of the validity of combining discrete-choice and best–worst scaling data","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Variance (accounting); Confounding; Statistics; Econometrics; Sample size determination; Computer science; Sample (material); Conjoint analysis; Object (grammar); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4004933586336893,"gpt":0.2853370130650486,"spread":0.1151563455686407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001843653,0.0001108215,0.0004339942,0.00008828525,0.0000647465,0.00003301812,0.000454494,0.00006893708,0.00001376336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005276624,0.00009875827,0.00008936974,0.00009403941,0.00008941624,0.0006090627,0.0002109745,0.0002102124,0.000005160959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008766418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000317119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000188176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000829114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985051,0.00002762251,0.001049012,0.0001855237,0.0000904425,0.0001423672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975839,0.0004042627,0.001500661,0.0003739319,0.0000489604,0.00008831171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007845335,0.000118227,0.8501483,0.00004198475,0.00004727616,3.044825e-7,0.0004589265,0.1480372,0.00007338041,0.0007729558,0.0001420877,0.0001514513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001920205,0.0002720965,0.0645727,0.0003085483,0.0001116644,0.00001968989,0.0006075863,0.9190618,0.0005913445,0.009768519,0.002499861,0.0002659236],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9400748,0.001329067,0.05738816,0.0002899176,0.0002484609,0.00008053023,0.0001151449,0.000002051913,0.0004718758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966066,0.0003471931,0.00278097,0.00003473593,0.0001403798,6.236532e-7,0.000006991726,0.00001465349,0.00006778528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7855756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4027245,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337324867","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2016.03.002","title":"A formal and empirical comparison of two score measures for best–worst scaling","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Aggregate (composite); Scaling; Set (abstract data type); Econometrics; Computer science; Best practice; Data set; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3460014929289207,"gpt":0.3245567448474951,"spread":0.0214447480814256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007885441,0.00008277221,0.0003716862,0.0001213542,0.00006112537,0.00001895324,0.00009327699,0.0000517236,0.00002012341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005557582,0.00006884379,0.0001165707,0.00002969845,0.00004321002,0.0004458714,0.00002114948,0.00007471624,0.000006242617],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007730675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001214444,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001751117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005494104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988338,0.000007773124,0.0008460924,0.0001192266,0.00004238331,0.00015073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988949,0.0001635636,0.0007689805,0.00007558273,0.00003145629,0.00006555075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007263551,0.0001061032,0.871846,0.00003767154,0.00007113774,2.078907e-7,0.0006316102,0.1114453,0.0003168248,0.0033963,0.00008087052,0.01199543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006923961,0.000740873,0.0389728,0.0004710536,0.0001095761,0.00002346666,0.0003385677,0.8910996,0.003519746,0.05080708,0.006496921,0.0004963257],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5767058,0.001179151,0.4216883,0.000158271,0.00008348262,0.00004770845,0.000008618009,0.000001241149,0.0001274735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904862,0.0002565921,0.008976544,0.00003500027,0.0001864629,0.000002116569,6.448033e-7,0.00001234895,0.00004408176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8328732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2807368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137048146","doi":"10.1016/s1755-5345(13)70052-6","title":"Conceptual Relations Between Expanded Rank Data and Models of the Unexpanded Rank Data","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Victoria","funders":"University of Victoria","keywords":"Rank (graph theory); Ranking (information retrieval); Econometrics; Respondent; Logit; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Information retrieval; Combinatorics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3950151912127773,"gpt":0.2862860371419336,"spread":0.1087291540708437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001719716,0.0001033475,0.0003589191,0.00008041058,0.0001035069,0.0000252837,0.0006839232,0.0000817933,0.00006192421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008229524,0.00009094371,0.00005897706,0.00006958081,0.0001051224,0.001966767,0.0003043503,0.0002187704,0.0000110394],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005542724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002282777,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006366777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003812708,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986081,0.00003516479,0.0009289148,0.0001887963,0.00007028785,0.0001687024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979922,0.0002025111,0.001006634,0.000697252,0.00001794139,0.00008351156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002101105,0.00008645265,0.7555451,0.00001504307,0.0002055353,1.2612e-7,0.002184168,0.2287213,0.00003733034,0.01199846,0.000595718,0.0005897927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001954815,0.00003384895,0.05397243,0.00006270265,0.0001418691,0.00000876486,0.0005050784,0.9197139,0.00006774148,0.01869366,0.004616261,0.0002289943],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7534859,0.004417513,0.2404575,0.0002825611,0.0002165041,0.00009580603,0.0002700683,0.000002737915,0.0007714364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944101,0.0005605881,0.004528976,0.00004226146,0.0002817404,7.304634e-7,0.00005123369,0.00001507995,0.0001092948],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7015727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3708577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006763140","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2014.01.003","title":"A GEV model with scale heterogeneity for investigating the role of mobility tool ownership in peak period non-work travel mode choices","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mode choice; TRIPS architecture; Work (physics); Mode (computer interface); Econometrics; Scale (ratio); Car ownership; Preference; Context (archaeology); Economics; Demographic economics; Public transport; Transport engineering; Microeconomics; Computer science; Geography; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08059461768342124,"gpt":0.2352108069303922,"spread":0.154616189246971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001683139,0.000142008,0.0004431383,0.0001023411,0.00009112959,0.00004096851,0.0002526896,0.00008080629,0.000005754231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005976552,0.0001140379,0.0001547381,0.00008767159,0.00008250632,0.0003852157,0.00002378316,0.0002183796,0.000002115366],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001300143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002994593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001165507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007977537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985263,0.00002599178,0.0009487232,0.0002201996,0.00006732839,0.0002114753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985523,0.0001463066,0.0009899529,0.0002161582,0.0000341985,0.00006107807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003585624,0.00005717586,0.1968341,0.00002750725,0.00002009653,3.01903e-8,0.001015042,0.8010162,0.0001910508,0.0004907561,0.000001270705,0.0003109234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007651188,0.00009517815,0.02900566,0.00006459647,0.00001666801,0.000002044208,0.0002214979,0.9532898,0.000919231,0.01543919,0.00004616478,0.0001348466],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7221731,0.0002418584,0.2769744,0.0001032743,0.00003060529,0.0001644825,0.00001205929,0.000001799235,0.0002984568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850302,0.00003270591,0.01467582,0.00007406843,0.0001155922,0.00001918944,0.000002416745,0.00002122807,0.00002873243],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2628571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4650328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206765967","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2022.100343","title":"Volumetric choice experiments (VCEs)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negative binomial distribution; Discrete choice; Econometrics; Multinomial logistic regression; Computer science; Multinomial distribution; Product (mathematics); Marketing; Statistics; Economics; Business; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1863004751600981,"gpt":0.2486653014331528,"spread":0.06236482627305473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008729735,0.0001066971,0.0003059163,0.0003765342,0.0002073547,0.00004171371,0.0002970297,0.00003488075,0.001443652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004033227,0.0001336835,0.000167251,0.0002057562,0.0000172125,0.0004312242,0.00008633893,0.0002947587,0.0001160044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004620255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001682929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001259018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001074846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986527,0.00002422639,0.0008494649,0.0001851163,0.00009570001,0.0001927699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998705,0.00007810218,0.0009635024,0.0001561332,0.00001486647,0.00008244965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001399992,0.0001680946,0.1724329,0.00000716285,0.00006995422,0.000002797427,0.0004730884,0.823419,0.00006421531,0.001803149,0.0009270675,0.0006185262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002791539,0.0004683192,0.03786396,0.00001681647,0.00003691475,0.0000554429,0.0006151786,0.722222,0.0002197571,0.01087668,0.2242681,0.0005652474],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9321814,0.005070203,0.05766458,0.000191203,0.0008881392,0.00007682306,0.00001540689,0.000007307744,0.003904943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959961,0.0001886192,0.002227993,0.0002613592,0.0003053122,0.000008428908,0.00000394864,0.00002367293,0.0009845501],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.223341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230021276","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2015.12.003","title":"Simulations of firm location decisions: Replicating office location choices in the Greater Toronto Area","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Replicate; Test (biology); Business; Econometrics; Economics; Computer science; Marketing; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1380040078716728,"gpt":0.2817084705210827,"spread":0.1437044626494099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002002051,0.00009689775,0.0002939733,0.0001610388,0.00006013471,0.00006984719,0.0003016195,0.00007469267,0.00001872516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007540906,0.00008682103,0.0000684285,0.0002431396,0.0000218115,0.0007378373,0.00001981856,0.0001448323,0.00000921598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002406949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006484502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008755319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004605205,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998436,0.00003159258,0.001164207,0.0001550149,0.00007284007,0.0001403228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977347,0.0004500904,0.001170799,0.0002978251,0.0002920418,0.00005449694],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003751667,0.00006800298,0.02535359,0.00001308811,0.00001521569,4.144008e-7,0.002114529,0.9700615,0.00000565234,0.001141191,0.00008645209,0.001102843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006491989,0.00006693642,0.006743629,0.0001456924,0.00001546303,0.000006872734,0.0006108831,0.9775469,0.00002543065,0.00925606,0.004793461,0.0001394332],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8171253,0.001784676,0.1743547,0.000255526,0.0002002432,0.0001192085,0.000004252842,0.000005104661,0.006150969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958592,0.0002410735,0.003566336,0.0000810507,0.0001992988,0.000002569737,0.000003832572,0.00001349458,0.00003316159],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1787339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3540459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2204800319","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2015.10.001","title":"What determines student satisfaction with university subjects? A choice-based approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Likert scale; Task (project management); Class (philosophy); Rating scale; Psychology; Sample (material); Scale (ratio); Applied psychology; Higher education; Mathematics education; Perception; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2010326859471334,"gpt":0.3964668658721853,"spread":0.195434179925052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003119603,0.0001089006,0.0001988319,0.0002066428,0.0003459456,0.0003394038,0.0002908488,0.00007602809,0.00001082835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003782552,0.00009432645,0.00007497415,0.0002488497,0.00008733451,0.00352657,0.00001721882,0.0003475523,0.000003763336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004349758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007203726,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003201534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002990786,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975082,0.0006298744,0.0002575662,0.0001448145,0.001269026,0.000190478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975554,0.0006006266,0.0007771089,0.0001217466,0.0007166822,0.0002283881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001662163,0.0001410321,0.08776984,0.00001312836,0.00006100363,0.00001146784,0.014067,0.8949727,0.00002200507,0.0002119686,0.0001149049,0.002448716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01241678,0.001790257,0.03229532,0.001113719,0.001387795,0.0000774014,0.1901422,0.5992789,0.0002133738,0.0009203868,0.1589489,0.00141499],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8506637,0.0002477258,0.1450687,0.002004497,0.0005044221,0.0001364553,3.252772e-7,0.00002854395,0.001345696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812536,0.0001205776,0.01765241,0.00008394476,0.0005170738,5.001123e-7,5.915129e-7,0.00001154238,0.0003597199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2956938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4839782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982396960","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2014.05.003","title":"Categories shape preferences: A model of taste heterogeneity arising from categorization of alternatives","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Taste; Econometrics; Economics; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Psychology; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1752728935689516,"gpt":0.2421232077903534,"spread":0.06685031422140186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005298566,0.0001021776,0.0004188377,0.0001391466,0.00003473027,0.00002003315,0.0001788591,0.00006317429,0.00003608657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004354637,0.0001077661,0.0001127751,0.00004946015,0.00004720406,0.0004679542,0.00002692094,0.0001055931,0.000004401117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006448296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001707499,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002617745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000139256,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986314,0.00002215371,0.00103273,0.0001477327,0.00006403603,0.0001020184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979078,0.00008478261,0.001785863,0.0001269095,0.00005146439,0.00004320439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001397336,0.0000462365,0.1155938,0.00002155013,0.00005872423,4.14099e-8,0.0009449099,0.8782386,0.0009419457,0.003559652,0.000001939316,0.0005786649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003653309,0.00006582167,0.004887983,0.00003601969,0.00001933357,4.438204e-7,0.00007318203,0.9197256,0.005616064,0.06909993,0.00002198803,0.00008828443],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5385174,0.0003149172,0.4607368,0.00001493086,0.00008001561,0.00002731063,0.00002184336,0.000001386627,0.0002853841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98952,0.0004452824,0.009873978,0.00001719675,0.0001060197,9.934733e-7,0.000008731673,0.00001274723,0.00001505562],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4510026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4394575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130489108","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100451","title":"On-demand transit user preference analysis using hybrid choice models","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Transportation and Mobility Innovations","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Toronto Metropolitan University","keywords":"Latent class model; Preference; Service (business); Computer science; Public transport; Latent variable; TRIPS architecture; Discrete choice; Variable (mathematics); Revealed preference; Mode choice; Latent variable model; Service design; Operations research; Transport engineering; Business; Service provider; Econometrics; Marketing; Statistics; Economics; Engineering; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08803331288135398,"gpt":0.2756119974091903,"spread":0.1875786845278364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000311331,0.000154843,0.0003176929,0.0007467002,0.00008366637,0.00005089118,0.0001716564,0.00005806251,0.00003292907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001541804,0.000151161,0.0002259271,0.001304712,0.00001624996,0.000484189,0.000003275917,0.0003343416,0.000006214573],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006024794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003758878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002259261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003075859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986213,0.00001884895,0.0006402542,0.0001312755,0.0003626372,0.0002256645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991784,0.000182638,0.0001238177,0.0001771875,0.0002374991,0.0001004509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008413481,0.00002195133,0.0003166882,0.00003010086,0.0004036998,0.000006292684,0.0003510981,0.9971573,0.00105538,0.0004106633,0.00009315346,0.0001452723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003353196,0.00001762848,0.0007865997,0.0000576684,0.0004299961,0.000003303604,0.00003338965,0.9958119,0.0007028056,0.001368534,0.0003048145,0.0001480747],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4956662,0.00004438744,0.5039082,0.00003014535,0.0001066899,0.00004117754,0.00001358129,0.00006345031,0.0001261294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961036,0.0001184098,0.003513019,0.0000521265,0.0001105185,0.000002286899,0.00001428986,0.00002780098,0.00005792919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5004374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6164166,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385281006","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100431","title":"Theory-driven or data-driven? Modelling ride-sourcing mode choices using integrated choice and latent variable model and multi-task learning deep neural networks","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Transportation and Mobility Innovations","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Latent variable; Latent variable model; Econometrics; Discrete choice; Econometric model; Pandemic; Task (project management); Mode (computer interface); Preference; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Economics; Marketing; Business; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07617742007943569,"gpt":0.2935783376492094,"spread":0.2174009175697737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008102601,0.0003607874,0.0005288972,0.0004548276,0.0003707624,0.0002315724,0.0003456099,0.000192669,0.00000729112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000957884,0.0003229631,0.0000732126,0.0007534403,0.00006547164,0.001313483,0.00007416221,0.001137515,7.15221e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008638956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006437604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001569822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001538905,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976796,0.00008589987,0.001028195,0.0003788365,0.0003225956,0.0005049014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998302,0.0005230452,0.0003408216,0.0002963184,0.0003203712,0.0002174602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003974622,0.00002913706,0.001931656,0.000101704,0.0001748703,0.000009171778,0.001105971,0.9943098,0.00121159,0.0001164191,0.000005098826,0.0009648225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009676356,0.00003089228,0.0001076277,0.000240193,0.0002438748,0.00003188834,0.0003222772,0.9974183,0.00001753725,0.0001632413,0.0001190849,0.0003374004],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4162713,0.0003768628,0.5828946,0.00001753639,0.0001485494,0.000118306,0.00001824753,0.0001474043,0.000007140473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9034418,0.0006939108,0.09539071,0.00004549188,0.000204918,0.000004826581,0.00007694817,0.00009189193,0.00004951816],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4875039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389284528","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100454","title":"Ordinal-ResLogit: Interpretable deep residual neural networks for ordered choices","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Ordinal regression; Ordinal data; Computer science; Residual; Logit; Consistency (knowledge bases); Artificial intelligence; Artificial neural network; Ordered logit; Statistics; Econometrics; Machine learning; Mathematics; Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.14154998753376,"gpt":0.2570540448490615,"spread":0.1155040573153015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001051654,0.0001371188,0.0004121716,0.0002455399,0.000127194,0.00009475598,0.0002517453,0.0001001754,0.000107259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000964375,0.0001476445,0.0001938052,0.0001550889,0.00002903595,0.0005774091,0.00004553267,0.0002092687,0.00005916355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001007258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004779011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001450958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984916,0.00001486116,0.0009204749,0.0002166964,0.00004724584,0.000309108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986914,0.0002392078,0.0008031006,0.0001473922,0.00003496054,0.00008387288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003987819,0.00002196299,0.0198628,0.00001553986,0.00005940528,0.000001385174,0.0001343981,0.9775515,0.000008398451,0.0007883637,0.0006486116,0.0008678041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000726111,0.0001211482,0.003929094,0.0000211246,0.00001969273,0.000006079439,0.00007837533,0.9811949,0.00001542552,0.008378748,0.005353051,0.0001562107],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4667483,0.001530263,0.5297533,0.0003957493,0.0007034751,0.0001252598,0.00001301991,0.00001806521,0.0007125962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952916,0.0005302975,0.002504188,0.0001757452,0.0007543809,0.00001073003,0.00001469144,0.00003292419,0.0006854755],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5285433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6020769,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016566795","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2015.01.003","title":"Choosing how best to choose: Antecedent Volition and decision process representation in discrete choice models","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Volition (linguistics); Representation (politics); Discrete choice; Process (computing); Decision process; Aestivation; Computer science; Econometrics; Economics; Management science; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04553781292878291,"gpt":0.3025384815119891,"spread":0.2570006685832062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009433205,0.0001873868,0.0003212568,0.0006706717,0.0001504375,0.000584606,0.0002021277,0.00007115065,0.00000803139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003088897,0.0001721462,0.00007671281,0.0005012997,0.00001741586,0.003211063,0.00008122865,0.0002974277,0.000003275951],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005250655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001741198,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006074898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001745574,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984095,0.00002393194,0.0005365788,0.0002709182,0.0004845588,0.0002745891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987127,0.0002332969,0.000472566,0.0001595275,0.0003725144,0.00004935856],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002776936,0.0001109141,0.1358168,0.0002555208,0.00001965763,0.00001156033,0.0004716649,0.6608526,0.001744358,0.0002732696,0.00007469159,0.2000913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001098463,0.00002342325,0.02192266,0.001063863,0.0001036254,0.00001369453,0.0002979879,0.966619,0.0001200856,0.007657588,0.0008162967,0.0002632756],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6903048,0.0001342978,0.3084034,0.0005031605,0.0001981331,0.0001360976,3.576439e-7,0.00001229948,0.0003074901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962573,0.00006091887,0.00246702,0.0002275452,0.0009184367,0.000005441851,0.00000263849,0.00002882719,0.00003186498],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3059525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7019916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176909959","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2021.100302","title":"Separating generalizable from source-specific preference heterogeneity in the fusion of revealed and stated preferences","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Preference; Revealed preference; Premise; Econometrics; Generalizability theory; Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2662613018923997,"gpt":0.2482723318761791,"spread":0.01798897001622063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006986135,0.00007685558,0.0002733909,0.00006307763,0.00004885615,0.00004775441,0.0001205007,0.00004970302,0.00006712043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002333994,0.00006803795,0.00005204719,0.0000785298,0.00002267833,0.0002588413,0.00002984514,0.0001424901,0.000003717503],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004366155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001356554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002252624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007190181,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988968,0.00005758216,0.0007413625,0.0001530296,0.000050149,0.0001010765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999059,0.000123263,0.0006448057,0.0001202943,0.00002477991,0.00002791971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001831823,0.0000703571,0.4406174,0.00001663069,0.00002877166,0.000001695485,0.001828977,0.5551037,0.001232189,0.0003901762,0.00004080064,0.0006509072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001630122,0.0001407707,0.2645652,0.0002055397,0.0000252551,0.00001651973,0.000920576,0.6993455,0.004031036,0.02558025,0.003246711,0.0002924873],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9413804,0.005901166,0.05221208,0.00007482668,0.00006838785,0.0000503036,0.00001558013,0.000001332082,0.0002959097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912918,0.003452752,0.00509047,0.00004658235,0.00006990441,0.000001452437,0.000008083234,0.000006234323,0.00003267345],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1760522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2774507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593641299","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2017.03.003","title":"An integrated model of intensity of activity opportunities on supply side and tour destination & departure time choices on demand side","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Demand side; Supply side; Economics; Business; Computer science; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.11651466014019,"gpt":0.3386050712401533,"spread":0.2220904110999633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001309491,0.0001473707,0.0004288145,0.0001370304,0.0004159601,0.0001104309,0.0003746056,0.0001377097,0.00001266372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003534458,0.0001202583,0.0001069892,0.0000525146,0.0003119003,0.001287451,0.00001581977,0.0003452295,3.390783e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005628529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002344761,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001750684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00279748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985771,0.0001186568,0.000447122,0.0001709106,0.0005069138,0.0001793559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974159,0.0002636982,0.00118177,0.0002537797,0.000723911,0.0001609448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002533534,0.00131752,0.2154361,0.0002439596,0.0001963246,0.00002313948,0.01195811,0.7075791,0.04160724,0.0006764182,0.0001480163,0.01828057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001539088,0.0007466623,0.1573831,0.001330949,0.0003314431,0.000004093486,0.0011131,0.7967521,0.02900504,0.01082189,0.0004248059,0.0005476996],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809958,0.00005152183,0.01714562,0.0003702843,0.00007203123,0.000103729,0.00002103691,0.00001027355,0.001229742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974984,0.0001092894,0.001964645,0.00003805193,0.0001480519,6.475277e-7,0.000003565884,0.00000999058,0.0002273739],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08917303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4903993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405317212","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2024.100535","title":"Location choice of residential housing supply: An application of the multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Discrete choice; Value (mathematics); Econometrics; Economics; Extreme value theory; Business; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04952255018475651,"gpt":0.2495570566271881,"spread":0.2000345064424316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001121694,0.000151993,0.0004634581,0.0002957457,0.00009241518,0.0001075311,0.0004103768,0.0001222704,0.000009505982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000132036,0.0001439661,0.0002458862,0.0002792514,0.00006331853,0.0008160374,0.00005042352,0.0002840344,0.000004228508],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001430237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001013433,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009111764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001609977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998054,0.00003187141,0.00135977,0.0002526473,0.0000992714,0.0002024293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980379,0.0001819949,0.001198499,0.0003609857,0.0001532152,0.00006737497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003854035,0.00006115433,0.01431812,0.0001561587,0.0000522988,4.038363e-7,0.0006232983,0.976536,0.001318438,0.00507851,0.00003722426,0.001779852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003352244,0.00003594736,0.0009402832,0.0002037427,0.00004718448,0.000003928737,0.00004795941,0.9822286,0.001186143,0.01416895,0.0006585539,0.000143418],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4897715,0.0009612413,0.5082033,0.0001462375,0.0003679662,0.0001030451,0.00001646736,0.000009117708,0.0004211495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933649,0.0002903171,0.005745822,0.00002298968,0.0004674834,0.000002964963,0.000004652494,0.00004467725,0.00005623986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5035934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5870768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403454640","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2024.100521","title":"Modelling household online shopping and home delivery demand using latent class & ordinal generalized extreme value (GEV) models","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Urban and Freight Transport Logistics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Latent class model; Class (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Econometrics; Ordinal data; Extreme value theory; Economics; Ordinal regression; Generalized extreme value distribution; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1900562356428044,"gpt":0.2445423431532561,"spread":0.05448610751045169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004515712,0.000407131,0.0006199419,0.000465282,0.0001290405,0.0002382609,0.0002261009,0.0002199717,0.000008223958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004428889,0.0003763485,0.0002696919,0.0002757767,0.00005940587,0.0008095268,0.00002956981,0.0008687522,0.000001211558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002125384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008318501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006766224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001335479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976165,0.00003934636,0.001043385,0.0003011899,0.0004954889,0.0005040608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990811,0.0001460255,0.0001347868,0.000206706,0.0001537101,0.0002777031],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003711072,0.00003574138,0.000142417,0.000317739,0.0002591543,0.0001463857,0.0002907025,0.993915,0.003815368,0.0007602251,0.00007050563,0.0002096368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005816867,0.00002884229,0.000005164136,0.0008146795,0.0004138905,0.0002255964,0.00001716747,0.9933497,0.00007791547,0.003135795,0.0009182221,0.0004313761],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4552918,0.01581356,0.5281872,0.00002134426,0.0004679243,0.00005789037,0.00002385959,0.00009979415,0.00003664897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8915761,0.007399402,0.09982987,0.00004257916,0.0009620972,0.000001014394,0.00001195713,0.0001302003,0.00004679716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4362842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W644441382","doi":"10.1016/s1755-5345(13)70036-8","title":"Reducing simulation bias in mixed logit model estimation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Mixed logit; Monte Carlo method; Logit; Logarithm; Variance reduction; Mathematics; Statistics; Econometrics; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Logistic regression","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2578737441275352,"gpt":0.2775745288175643,"spread":0.01970078469002906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001098442,0.00008419759,0.0002295839,0.0002553897,0.00004211519,0.00004033234,0.0001057122,0.00009317729,0.00005508938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001402108,0.00009754745,0.00007816782,0.00007208074,0.00001622209,0.0006895797,0.00001370529,0.0002978001,0.00004343429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001243137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001620835,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005628277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001344914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988325,0.000008935555,0.0008537039,0.000137375,0.00004133444,0.0001261859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989801,0.0001011616,0.000737866,0.0001146643,0.0000194963,0.00004669344],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006904664,0.00003531076,0.01945542,0.000005766914,0.000006224824,3.992641e-7,0.0002537782,0.97677,0.0001958931,0.002027128,0.000007131649,0.001236022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004062211,0.00001820257,0.008047665,0.00001804502,0.00000442358,0.000002489239,0.00001628104,0.9608932,0.0001144412,0.03031035,0.00007363713,0.00009506328],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5765408,0.00007114845,0.4225705,0.00009050439,0.0002096399,0.00003669963,0.000001827098,0.000002876414,0.0004760507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667293,0.00004308896,0.03297741,0.00003984269,0.0001286325,0.000001318817,0.000003225689,0.00001372617,0.00006344858],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3901885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3977869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}