{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":32,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":32,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"1d14961659f5","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making"}},"results":[{"id":"W2002894033","doi":"10.1518/155534308x284417","title":"Situation Awareness, Mental Workload, and Trust in Automation: Viable, Empirically Supported Cognitive Engineering Constructs","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":672,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Transport Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Workload; Computer science; Cognitive ergonomics; Situation awareness; Automation; Cognition; Empirical research; Knowledge management; Human–computer interaction; Cognitive science; Psychology; Data science; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Engineering; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02626231158913042,"gpt":0.3443212428714839,"spread":0.3180589312823534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003994859,0.0001928782,0.0003404083,0.0006684166,0.0001154494,0.00006104862,0.00005611507,0.0001186148,0.0004440957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007881269,0.0001897313,0.00006302432,0.0003156001,0.00004614139,0.0004015337,0.00003103787,0.0003596299,0.00001303226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005997411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005433633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002730102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002082996,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998508,0.00004897067,0.0007343218,0.0002019883,0.0003025253,0.0002041844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979028,0.001295133,0.000305087,0.00005564016,0.0003293297,0.0001120136],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003830971,0.0007537004,0.2520425,0.000184867,0.00107731,0.002696522,0.05121936,0.01329653,0.002592789,0.001702988,0.001828683,0.6687737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004933283,0.0002332402,0.8882194,0.003277779,0.00006583241,0.004125684,0.002889785,0.09498972,0.0001642837,0.0001907982,0.0005098597,0.0004003131],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8745799,0.0004323943,0.1236089,0.0000393593,0.0007090879,0.0001317341,0.00001095874,0.00004296847,0.0004446798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996258,0.0001176077,0.003346111,0.00008671062,0.0001266664,0.000005618898,0.000006861825,0.00002097824,0.0000314879],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6683734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7737017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163994264","doi":"10.1177/1555343412445577","title":"Team Cognitive Work Analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Sociotechnical system; Teamwork; Computer science; Task analysis; Work (physics); Domain (mathematical analysis); Task (project management); Decision support system; Knowledge management; Process management; Human–computer interaction; Management science; Engineering; Systems engineering; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02470510731495095,"gpt":0.3721395102661025,"spread":0.3474344029511515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006895497,0.0001318915,0.0003044626,0.0007674519,0.00007272568,0.0000537041,0.00005902545,0.00007827553,0.001479119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008407028,0.0001124628,0.000198869,0.0005577328,0.00002084259,0.000269895,0.00002456028,0.000323004,0.00008755898],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002689778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008822989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":5.141796e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.647967e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988647,0.00005803593,0.0004952617,0.000107989,0.0002588143,0.0002151923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969355,0.00222091,0.0003038116,0.00006074319,0.0003347866,0.000144265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001965342,0.0005328495,0.1361948,0.00001905715,0.005176777,0.0001024506,0.01817517,0.002040256,0.00006372074,0.002232024,0.003801047,0.8296965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001506425,0.0001348303,0.9858879,0.001037584,0.001016477,0.0003174443,0.004459166,0.00189711,0.00003213915,0.0001493622,0.003271882,0.0002896302],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5898782,0.000894281,0.402939,0.00001224792,0.0009883593,0.00004466447,0.000004417776,0.00002351683,0.005215294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973947,0.00001833161,0.001889737,0.0001285945,0.000401833,0.000003154882,0.000001589268,0.00001454877,0.0001475595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8496931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994336,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314523922","doi":"10.1177/1555343416636515","title":"The ShadowBox Approach to Cognitive Skills Training","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Cognition; Cognitive training; Cognitive skill; Psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02058667607297688,"gpt":0.3131264873993531,"spread":0.2925398113263762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008589608,0.0001394495,0.0002138916,0.0001979914,0.0001303727,0.00007155937,0.0001352378,0.00006311563,0.00002412429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001004052,0.00007539786,0.00008190708,0.0001674504,0.00003744704,0.0001153352,0.00004573918,0.0002203649,0.0000182292],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002071158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002102446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":4.018218e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.651872e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989239,0.00002994718,0.0003782191,0.0001555293,0.0002421008,0.000270315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958839,0.003503668,0.0001737516,0.00007528371,0.0002460735,0.0001173496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003052927,0.00003810508,0.0007376998,0.000003128995,0.00009341703,0.00002216176,0.003098458,0.000122398,0.00007524662,0.001487367,0.0001395354,0.9938772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01627363,0.003176795,0.8641956,0.02312905,0.0004888154,0.005572631,0.02946406,0.02048925,0.0001795176,0.0120121,0.0227426,0.002275905],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5194644,0.0004685726,0.4771736,0.00004738036,0.0005239029,0.00007353466,0.000009882521,0.00001047686,0.002228286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956701,0.00008062574,0.003691796,0.0001210476,0.0002913524,0.000007063481,2.494058e-7,0.00002118781,0.0001166196],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9916013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3074636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315359425","doi":"10.1177/1555343413488391","title":"Twenty Years of Cognitive Work Analysis in Health Care","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Patient Safety and Medication Errors","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Alzheimer Society","keywords":"Health care; Work (physics); Health informatics; Cognition; Context (archaeology); Informatics; Computer science; Knowledge management; Management science; Data science; Psychology; Risk analysis (engineering); Medicine; Engineering; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03259160109970542,"gpt":0.3956430049256184,"spread":0.3630514038259129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007373672,0.00009125203,0.000422613,0.0007859542,0.00006928021,0.000002360833,0.00006513124,0.00008300311,0.0001097496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002578353,0.00008233227,0.00009922442,0.0008170056,0.00002495924,0.0001395671,0.00003952119,0.000472133,0.000009295323],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007127624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000129874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001595536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000075032,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983311,0.000130541,0.0008889913,0.0001106901,0.0003241605,0.0002145516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951603,0.003360555,0.0007685951,0.00005709492,0.0005227895,0.0001307009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006032107,0.0001387803,0.427687,0.0003054453,0.0005430972,0.00002864841,0.04224759,0.01253219,0.00001996424,0.00008788853,0.0002663694,0.5155398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001262864,0.0001202545,0.9764043,0.008645209,0.00009761244,0.000002168701,0.01205785,0.001047656,0.000003847618,0.0001008096,0.0001705601,0.00008687854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8488445,0.001212263,0.1492668,0.00007666198,0.0002435519,0.0002181724,0.000009101503,0.000006772267,0.0001221511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971629,0.0001833164,0.002372564,0.0001862347,0.00006074021,0.000008914893,0.000004786495,0.000009564245,0.00001098595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5487173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3357413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100987193","doi":"10.1518/155534307x255654","title":"Intelligent Adaptive Interfaces for the Control of Multiple UAVs","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Workload; Situation awareness; Workstation; Task (project management); Computer science; Control (management); Human–computer interaction; Interface (matter); Simulation; Engineering; Systems engineering; Artificial intelligence; Operating system","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03860555287976615,"gpt":0.3730407804181074,"spread":0.3344352275383413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001008964,0.00008630283,0.0001932052,0.0002081139,0.00005240755,0.00001979714,0.00007987559,0.00004614643,0.0001329007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001095478,0.00005766461,0.0001056274,0.00007307107,0.00002808679,0.00007609328,0.00001322099,0.000182449,0.000004216672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001829207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008414741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.145861e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002042011,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991009,0.00002030875,0.0005352971,0.00007636826,0.0001523055,0.0001148078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902698,0.008859517,0.0003363784,0.0000527265,0.0004416483,0.00003989768],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005145388,0.0001129834,0.001071769,0.00001633638,0.00056045,0.00001893428,0.005649599,0.006929276,0.0008075901,0.004047553,0.0004112259,0.9752289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02047059,0.004627812,0.3344319,0.007790187,0.0008089871,0.001298056,0.07967731,0.5058984,0.01102794,0.005131327,0.02780107,0.001036465],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1693031,0.0009039349,0.828516,0.00002177482,0.000825504,0.0001176268,0.00000714614,0.000007540382,0.0002973276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967318,0.00001942405,0.002988976,0.00006120937,0.0001549175,0.000003306215,1.835764e-7,0.000009946423,0.00003027349],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9741924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2351494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766932986","doi":"10.1177/1555343417732856","title":"Levels of Automation in Human Factors Models for Automation Design: Why We Might Consider Throwing the Baby Out With the Bathwater","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Federal Aviation Administration","keywords":"Automation; Computer science; Throwing; Value (mathematics); Space (punctuation); Human–computer interaction; Data science; Engineering; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.114423581405533,"gpt":0.392168404635185,"spread":0.277744823229652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001009079,0.000132704,0.0002381152,0.0002167109,0.0003195466,0.0001540568,0.000153473,0.00006885369,0.0001058033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003729782,0.00007140597,0.00008280134,0.00004500837,0.00005623852,0.0005075555,0.00002360421,0.0002162467,0.00000132989],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002969005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002101916,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002989649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001117995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989141,0.00008855503,0.0005069369,0.0001145955,0.0002424825,0.0001333222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966309,0.002248983,0.0006205229,0.0001499896,0.0003215201,0.00002804884],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002749632,0.0004847419,0.004840593,0.0002685524,0.001878096,0.0001186256,0.2394945,0.4306489,0.01168712,0.03145605,0.00659043,0.2697828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006174946,0.0006646423,0.3082947,0.005400027,0.000241864,0.0002606862,0.01150077,0.6470711,0.003255514,0.01535774,0.001245828,0.0005322805],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3731451,0.00006792021,0.6258322,0.0002765156,0.0002767548,0.0001736629,0.000005305304,0.00001167691,0.0002108627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965994,0.000004215027,0.003179785,0.00007171137,0.00007257736,0.00001095774,6.791448e-7,0.00001659545,0.00004407468],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6234543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2911851,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046742742","doi":"10.1518/155534307x232848","title":"Using GOMS for Modeling Routine Tasks Within Complex Sociotechnical Systems: Connecting Macrocognitive Models to Microcognition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Cognitive Science and Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociotechnical system; Computer science; Task (project management); Cognitive ergonomics; Cognition; Cognitive model; Socio-cognitive; Work (physics); Systems modeling; Human–computer interaction; Complex system; Management science; Systems engineering; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Software engineering; Poison control; Psychology; Human factors and ergonomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1037909635806773,"gpt":0.3535818224589831,"spread":0.2497908588783058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003774339,0.0002866657,0.0005008137,0.0008167256,0.0003646546,0.00041155,0.0003523075,0.0001340725,0.000001213927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001510251,0.0002720027,0.0001740799,0.0006257287,0.00003269863,0.001067872,0.0002656386,0.0003969996,0.000001470491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001279102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008645632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004788489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002206426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973495,0.00003916021,0.001050335,0.0004480721,0.0005748536,0.0005380669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950663,0.002326248,0.0004812356,0.000118988,0.001749636,0.0002575903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005697352,0.00009164223,0.00003008221,0.0001166308,0.0001384112,0.0001371658,0.004839801,0.743844,0.03569513,0.005910619,0.00001859078,0.2086082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001115926,0.0002401616,0.00006048147,0.003866199,0.00005801574,0.0006913135,0.003007585,0.983498,0.001005477,0.006085772,0.00001463833,0.0003564175],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2689763,0.0001925024,0.7298667,0.00003353694,0.0003640976,0.0004542975,0.00001029217,0.00005491915,0.00004730865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6856895,0.000005880182,0.3138991,0.0001685557,0.0002090013,0.000005747826,0.000001085305,0.00002016795,9.715362e-7],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4167132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617922124","doi":"10.1177/1555343417709669","title":"Modeling Automation With Cognitive Work Analysis to Support Human-Automation Coordination","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Centre for Bioengineering and Biotechnology, University of Waterloo; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Automation; Computer science; Hierarchy; Domain (mathematical analysis); Abstraction; Human–computer interaction; Layering; Software engineering; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03543913124966284,"gpt":0.391931794404927,"spread":0.3564926631552641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008128778,0.0001876899,0.0003744676,0.001138005,0.0004259384,0.0003651016,0.0001428589,0.00009689297,0.0004174443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009059909,0.0001645812,0.0001354071,0.0003574233,0.00002484653,0.0006370767,0.00004124375,0.0002685854,0.00003962412],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006425355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002387559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004990794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000880958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998411,0.00005093485,0.0006730712,0.0002319237,0.0004432007,0.00018987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975324,0.0005408908,0.0006317805,0.0001623013,0.001006054,0.0001265998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002602645,0.00033178,0.01930679,0.00004347391,0.003827297,0.0002534109,0.01412578,0.2727146,0.0003276762,0.002754073,0.0006091249,0.6831034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002983124,0.0006912195,0.5760949,0.0022617,0.001120854,0.0001822138,0.002349406,0.4133225,0.00005770196,0.000369155,0.00009990082,0.000467349],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.500166,0.00001692889,0.4984723,0.00004166328,0.0002361663,0.00009241304,0.00000410632,0.00003451459,0.0009359136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994956,0.000002768742,0.004632792,0.00007802798,0.0001712068,0.00001268782,0.000009401411,0.00002298763,0.0001140888],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.682636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6711425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103865800","doi":"10.1177/1555343414540172","title":"Comparing Cognitive Efficiency of Experienced and Inexperienced Designers in Conceptual Design Processes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Cognition; Conceptual design; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Engineering design process; Design process; Design education; Process (computing); Psychology; Human–computer interaction; Engineering; Social psychology; Work in process; Operations management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03648772234528918,"gpt":0.306836422491104,"spread":0.2703487001458148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007310933,0.0001565118,0.0003354553,0.0003799195,0.00003822528,0.0000524945,0.00008256671,0.00005708133,0.000009873631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004141148,0.0001452999,0.00002524011,0.0003919203,0.00008963126,0.0004040528,0.00002059431,0.0002179489,6.182778e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002062896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047758,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.395911e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.842711e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989158,0.00005677286,0.0004906746,0.0001274196,0.0002354327,0.0001739252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950381,0.004364326,0.000169837,0.00004158621,0.000296737,0.00008941775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002094817,0.0003678557,0.0117911,0.000667067,0.000209775,0.00008672002,0.1316947,0.3957991,0.02780165,0.0009969957,0.00008598592,0.4284042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006518837,0.001335799,0.02812689,0.01185719,0.0001469472,0.0005701134,0.05965852,0.8522689,0.03760934,0.0006568674,0.0001605485,0.001090025],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5157945,0.0008087959,0.4830666,0.000001710265,0.0001071115,0.00006063051,3.565505e-7,0.00001218624,0.000148105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845534,0.0001504967,0.01521029,0.00001796039,0.00004244454,0.000006884967,2.394307e-7,0.00001721709,0.000001058783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4687589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5925158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163019878","doi":"10.1177/1555343414532813","title":"Exploring the Use of Categories in the Assessment of Airline Pilots’ Performance as a Potential Source of Examiners’ Disagreement","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Griffith University","keywords":"Aviation; Aviation accident; Psychology; Applied psychology; Aviation safety; Computer science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09387926552206022,"gpt":0.3587214757991561,"spread":0.2648422102770959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009858558,0.00008801997,0.000225495,0.0002288531,0.00003722139,0.00001986927,0.0001100582,0.00002240671,0.00005561626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004124685,0.00005254888,0.00007129583,0.0001450634,0.00004224271,0.0002038359,0.0000301661,0.0002145932,7.037743e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001332105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001326564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008820336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001832795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987404,0.0001039788,0.0006502721,0.00007180482,0.0003428194,0.00009074503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974244,0.001754171,0.0004602354,0.0001009153,0.0002402169,0.00002004425],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001262146,0.0006053951,0.02562197,0.0001816552,0.0004106339,0.00002278473,0.03539097,0.2680248,0.003397705,0.005760473,0.0001889867,0.6591325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001362969,0.0007031076,0.9198808,0.001331365,0.00006820296,0.0001275889,0.007466939,0.06761725,0.0003403949,0.00008887737,0.0009090484,0.0001034731],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.796162,0.00004025181,0.2032124,0.00003432965,0.0003123569,0.00006065656,0.000001204777,0.000002723271,0.0001740174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988295,0.00005025806,0.0009824882,0.00003329099,0.00007610562,0.000004807243,4.982051e-7,0.000007368108,0.00001571846],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8942588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2142881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123927446","doi":"10.1177/1555343412440697","title":"Designing for Social Engagement in Online Social Networks Using Communities-of-Practice Theory and Cognitive Work Analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Usability; Online participation; Social computing; Process (computing); Social engagement; Domain (mathematical analysis); Online community; Computer science; Sociology; Public relations; World Wide Web; Social media; The Internet; Human–computer interaction; Political science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08574631084439252,"gpt":0.3984166853676293,"spread":0.3126703745232368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006858061,0.0001240899,0.0003746974,0.0005962995,0.0004904348,0.00009849181,0.00009158804,0.00008541584,0.00001137011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002475565,0.0001248631,0.0001276122,0.0006896585,0.0000908748,0.0005065188,0.00009833692,0.0003347573,7.779242e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005222412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002601327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008829208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002030354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984763,0.0004401384,0.00044127,0.00008142835,0.0002728054,0.0002880435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894428,0.009727125,0.0003786678,0.00002488837,0.0003676616,0.00005881995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002664025,0.0004278105,0.08335389,0.0000874387,0.002502753,0.00002289462,0.2310669,0.009992859,0.00004126718,0.01015248,0.00002598005,0.6596617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005335138,0.000250805,0.2607717,0.005148828,0.007695652,0.00001270878,0.6491819,0.06651706,0.0000266978,0.003295715,0.0007440974,0.00101964],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4783612,0.001229383,0.5199775,0.000009835786,0.0001190022,0.00009695697,0.000002647179,0.000005217541,0.0001982336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852362,0.0001104234,0.01403688,0.00003887247,0.0005547804,0.000002551091,0.000002028669,0.000013404,0.0000049078],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6586421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5091768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507495592","doi":"10.1177/1555343416661889","title":"Judgment Analysis in a Dynamic Multitask Environment: Capturing Nonlinear Policies Using Decision Trees","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Thales (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Decision tree; Computer science; Machine learning; Heuristics; Artificial intelligence; Bootstrapping (finance); Data mining; Decision tree learning; Decision support system; Incremental decision tree; Decision rule; Task (project management); Econometrics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04999714675743787,"gpt":0.3685728752280218,"spread":0.318575728470584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004524967,0.0004120172,0.001094432,0.004924362,0.0001470096,0.0004292548,0.0006171352,0.0001689574,0.0001607431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01137733,0.0002624915,0.0004769771,0.001664084,0.00009438628,0.0008996544,0.0004211681,0.0003457443,0.00002015456],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002918956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005510111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008709993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002769262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993834,0.000163111,0.002400717,0.0006543958,0.002424334,0.0005234519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837615,0.01407125,0.001017876,0.0004318272,0.0004640368,0.0002535056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006255903,0.0001229411,0.02651556,0.000005100219,0.0002396727,0.0003045476,0.0008116474,0.2304839,0.01074684,0.00002579406,0.00001158641,0.7301068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00417878,0.0001904177,0.2929212,0.004199068,0.0003831775,0.0003153922,0.001338921,0.6900929,0.0004622888,0.004824079,0.0004084583,0.0006852238],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5340149,0.0006347887,0.4649684,0.00003043215,0.0002355088,0.00008412073,0.00001314568,0.000009755799,0.000008950277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8623488,0.000194492,0.1372577,0.00004050647,0.0001075144,0.000002158869,3.166075e-7,0.00003401084,0.00001450674],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7294216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380271342","doi":"10.1177/15553434231171484","title":"Does It MultiMatch? What Scanpath Comparison Tells us About Task Performance in Teams","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Workload; Task (project management); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Similarity (geometry); Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02030495061285501,"gpt":0.3666193155963371,"spread":0.3463143649834821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006743203,0.0001392075,0.0003023571,0.0006644368,0.00006896613,0.0001338517,0.00009449826,0.00008030864,0.0003323765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003227297,0.00009757499,0.00007496269,0.0003057203,0.00002468379,0.0005006446,0.00003382421,0.0004024254,0.0001347357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004668402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001608063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001645678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000449101,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986452,0.00004173043,0.0006775686,0.0001516245,0.000272333,0.0002114919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982139,0.001193252,0.0002638156,0.00007856515,0.0001769504,0.00007346839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006144146,0.000145391,0.03990433,0.00005540111,0.0001127351,0.0001981784,0.01740441,0.04411967,0.0002556582,0.00008903164,0.001314561,0.8957862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002011481,0.0001736382,0.7203553,0.005702092,0.00002570081,0.0001322867,0.01249795,0.25165,0.0000911899,0.0001116034,0.006987548,0.0002611714],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9713817,0.0003044017,0.02511619,0.00006237882,0.002347076,0.00008361258,0.00000354745,0.00004445074,0.0006566842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982653,0.0003068931,0.0009701085,0.0001228626,0.0001642885,0.000004832601,0.000001698098,0.00001811791,0.000145955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.895525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3978993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158737396","doi":"10.1177/1555343415591395","title":"Cultural Practices and Cognition in Debriefing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Griffith University","keywords":"Debriefing; Recall; Cognition; Psychology; Think aloud protocol; Applied psychology; Protocol analysis; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1699656160480233,"gpt":0.5254188067284895,"spread":0.3554531906804662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001930895,0.00007653176,0.0001901532,0.0002725834,0.000124025,0.00002343513,0.00003593501,0.00007871766,0.00001148967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0121961,0.0000598065,0.00001834822,0.0001549402,0.00001825788,0.000418625,0.00004688532,0.0006053149,0.000005571193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005191005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001716492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001017113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001132396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987742,0.0001196279,0.0004716764,0.00009318918,0.0003319279,0.0002093698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932357,0.005508452,0.0003842263,0.000027102,0.0006593169,0.0001851915],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005143485,0.0001065907,0.2986271,0.0004764821,0.00006066888,0.0002746079,0.008180518,0.00092389,0.0002333241,0.0009335064,0.000759091,0.6842808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006115602,0.0005588757,0.934701,0.01033005,0.00004341072,0.0003118672,0.01115919,0.02866717,0.00001394413,0.005543587,0.002310126,0.000245216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848913,0.001939812,0.01160458,0.0002253868,0.0002780351,0.0001643197,0.000003217882,0.000007572558,0.0008857735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943687,0.0003391579,0.004892547,0.0001535366,0.0002235986,0.000006069313,0.000001264988,0.000007955045,0.000007182063],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6840355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099372490","doi":"10.1177/1555343412446193","title":"Support Requirements for Cognitive Readiness in Complex Operations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Cognition; Computer science; Task (project management); Term (time); Risk analysis (engineering); Focus (optics); Knowledge management; Cognitive psychology; Process management; Management science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Systems engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1915389963374728,"gpt":0.4439131823142863,"spread":0.2523741859768135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005840411,0.0002306838,0.0006722008,0.001279736,0.0001666384,0.0003562514,0.0002893272,0.00009110665,0.0001806103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01732924,0.0001760749,0.0001986237,0.000756769,0.0000411134,0.001060705,0.000146565,0.0002368437,0.00002122318],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005740856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006187752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001864718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008263889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961511,0.00009496458,0.001767626,0.0002893214,0.001269478,0.0004274793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987057,0.01048905,0.0004893509,0.0001599912,0.001577646,0.0002269687],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002302844,0.0006099744,0.08088047,0.00006022887,0.0002227043,0.0001558014,0.006508234,0.01482583,0.002257795,0.0106699,0.007322312,0.8741839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01228476,0.001245416,0.7241041,0.006651661,0.0002244162,0.001861752,0.01237436,0.1899163,0.0002592594,0.03484821,0.01476979,0.001459936],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4308038,0.0006422512,0.5673174,0.00002193755,0.0006339996,0.0002232315,0.00002466824,0.000008912496,0.0003238051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801756,0.00001049966,0.01916015,0.0001271319,0.0004301639,0.00001319336,0.000002218537,0.00002433588,0.00005677692],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.872724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909482,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075418616","doi":"10.1518/155534309x441853","title":"Modeling SGOMS in ACT-R: Linking Macro- and Microcognition","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Cognitive Science and Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive architecture; Sociotechnical system; Computer science; Cognitive science; Cognition; Architecture; Cognitive model; Macro; Selection (genetic algorithm); Software engineering; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01489880722757877,"gpt":0.2751815534824121,"spread":0.2602827462548333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008371511,0.0001392552,0.0002305478,0.000628207,0.00008424593,0.000262279,0.0001702065,0.00005629802,0.000001209878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004505336,0.0001270715,0.00005152858,0.0004010658,0.00001622358,0.000980793,0.00009194842,0.0003064891,0.000001045837],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002509276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003327146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":6.055186e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.594808e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988231,0.00002037317,0.0004098497,0.0002247536,0.0002862916,0.0002356307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999001,0.0004696217,0.0001217718,0.00006096265,0.0002588478,0.00008784988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003758687,0.00002452611,0.0003546124,0.00001008994,0.000007386715,0.0001219183,0.0008950559,0.005492839,0.003367255,0.0005924872,0.000001943853,0.9890943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001078335,0.0002129062,0.01365857,0.00472171,0.00001491999,0.000644374,0.0002621099,0.9583727,0.0003951846,0.02035169,0.00002735033,0.0002601139],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4502419,0.0006154425,0.5488778,0.00004775861,0.00008670105,0.00003927438,2.886146e-7,0.00001224034,0.00007862169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9482554,0.0002226056,0.05121464,0.0002169943,0.00008342957,6.945835e-7,1.925166e-7,0.000004980991,0.000001093808],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9888342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5181827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385145728","doi":"10.1177/15553434231189375","title":"The Failure to Grasp Automation Failure","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Automation; GRASP; Computer science; Construct (python library); Aviation; Confusion; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Software engineering; Psychology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01836648249610327,"gpt":0.3559266117424469,"spread":0.3375601292463436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006985384,0.00009955878,0.0001428216,0.0003991982,0.0001775628,0.0001323744,0.00009841431,0.00005859134,0.0001897859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001087031,0.00007029554,0.00007853837,0.0003806399,0.00001233904,0.0001432543,0.00003265589,0.0002473485,0.0002519031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002397918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001279821,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":3.829547e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003571018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990057,0.00004133422,0.0004140165,0.0001042244,0.000271521,0.0001631601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974403,0.001939917,0.0001723633,0.00007957761,0.000285766,0.00008201857],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004393661,0.00004184749,0.0006374912,0.0000178386,0.0002703967,0.0001678504,0.008221732,0.01099034,0.0007711282,0.009699371,0.08822776,0.8805149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003407847,0.0007026006,0.6082969,0.003605541,0.0001278898,0.001573376,0.02219525,0.06908286,0.0001683967,0.006584377,0.2835185,0.0007364107],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6990452,0.0001376462,0.2963525,0.001284552,0.001973984,0.0001323215,0.000004962829,0.0001375076,0.0009313587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976124,0.0000136287,0.001782482,0.0001295797,0.0002455322,0.000006665373,9.828813e-7,0.0000151628,0.0001935604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8797784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3237788,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148104117","doi":"10.1177/1555343414554702","title":"Personality, Cognitive Style, Motivation, and Aptitude Predict Systematic Trends in Analytic Forecasting Behavior","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity; Interior Business Center; University of Toronto; U.S. Department of the Interior","keywords":"Aptitude; Psychology; Personality; Cognition; Big Five personality traits; Psychometrics; Cognitive style; Sample (material); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08933300199234538,"gpt":0.3610452068848606,"spread":0.2717122048925152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006052542,0.0002754058,0.0009255811,0.001936893,0.0001308195,0.0005029243,0.0002642233,0.0001265569,0.00004802011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02786368,0.0002094697,0.0001799177,0.0008559826,0.00007501059,0.0006486828,0.000153024,0.0004114113,0.0000048385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006550106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003085814,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003267475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000109491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962876,0.0001700468,0.00175875,0.0004281429,0.001069429,0.0002860072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811435,0.01665687,0.0009929342,0.0001616914,0.0008522721,0.000192676],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002165927,0.0001332441,0.08977061,0.0001427519,0.00005936651,0.0001412563,0.001238593,0.002348858,0.00003599225,0.00008175943,0.00003598351,0.905795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00338611,0.0007370472,0.6341968,0.02833625,0.0005175918,0.001445218,0.004038861,0.3149207,0.0000196265,0.0117433,0.00002261018,0.0006358376],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9139345,0.0003477125,0.0850779,0.00001831654,0.0002770446,0.0001462379,0.00001275693,0.00001421734,0.0001712625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964452,0.00001784478,0.00330826,0.00004491026,0.0001318779,0.000007803668,0.00000108271,0.00002375341,0.00001927852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9051592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.980325,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393010663","doi":"10.1177/15553434241240553","title":"The Influence of Agent Transparency and Complexity on Situation Awareness, Mental Workload, and Task Performance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Workload; Computer science; Task (project management); Comprehension; Human–computer interaction; Computer security; Engineering; Systems engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03941185628199759,"gpt":0.362154476461626,"spread":0.3227426201796284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003492505,0.00007513722,0.0001149164,0.0001315196,0.0001068906,0.00006324098,0.00003399799,0.00002971831,0.00003541381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007556473,0.00005252308,0.00002803397,0.00007802461,0.00004569446,0.0001465854,0.00001110047,0.000170209,0.000002457502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001406524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001043966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.917097e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001227142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993418,0.00002516087,0.0003142442,0.0000882938,0.0001602826,0.0000701711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988832,0.0008541649,0.0001012555,0.00003551956,0.00009182176,0.00003406736],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000683113,0.00004561372,0.004289939,0.00008571299,0.0001516739,0.00002488688,0.009449167,0.005106749,0.0005690395,0.00222984,0.0001363652,0.9772279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007437813,0.0003233716,0.9348623,0.004799059,0.00004566105,0.0002746791,0.001007913,0.05552352,0.00007745196,0.0008387159,0.001377638,0.0001258801],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.977657,0.001684142,0.01998593,0.00005717791,0.0003834442,0.00005264468,0.000005787826,0.0000104709,0.0001633575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990334,0.0006567442,0.0002194176,0.00002594331,0.00004429261,0.00000186204,4.852246e-7,0.000005649808,0.00001218961],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.977102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2141829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2473322218","doi":"10.1177/1555343416657237","title":"Training Change Agents in CTA to Bring Health Care Transformation to Scale","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Transformational leadership; Scale (ratio); Health care; Medical education; Interview; Motivational interviewing; Computer science; Applied psychology; Psychology; Intervention (counseling); Nursing; Knowledge management; Process management; Medicine; Engineering; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5271666404804437,"gpt":0.6279348470391299,"spread":0.1007682065586862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002137709,0.0001023805,0.0002705674,0.0007908238,0.0001584519,0.00001648747,0.00009629186,0.00004552446,0.00003490759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001946584,0.00007772748,0.00003042886,0.0004403107,0.000006560705,0.0004010554,0.00004146661,0.0002172613,0.00002910861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003172556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001857251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000148364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001000585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979547,0.000125229,0.0009305373,0.0001366035,0.0003969481,0.0004559328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970804,0.001987861,0.0002398868,0.00005654872,0.0002763092,0.0003589536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009238354,0.000004214141,0.003294837,0.0000918221,0.000003207072,0.000005241448,0.2062357,0.0001286642,0.0001421164,0.00002409956,0.0001405979,0.7898371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005517845,0.0009544605,0.8366181,0.0503348,0.00001396729,0.00005778717,0.08023936,0.001101818,0.000115472,0.0001935699,0.02437206,0.0004807499],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7558169,0.00005686071,0.2403149,0.002851095,0.0003556587,0.0004491387,0.0000194676,0.00001186184,0.0001241734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838457,0.00003902122,0.0092765,0.006569609,0.0002306865,0.00001943579,2.56938e-7,0.00001386373,0.000004936831],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8333232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3169635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762075223","doi":"10.1177/1555343417735398","title":"The Benefits and the Costs of Using Auditory Warning Messages in Dynamic Decision-Making Settings","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Task (project management); Computer science; Notice; Cued speech; Computer security; Warning system; Work (physics); Applied psychology; Situation awareness; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Human–computer interaction; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01567050555873399,"gpt":0.3620453346085886,"spread":0.3463748290498546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002241047,0.0001327161,0.0003166468,0.0002552326,0.0005425518,0.0002121645,0.0002040065,0.00006457356,0.00002759861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004126227,0.00008340039,0.00008841501,0.0000734239,0.0001208828,0.0002501703,0.0001056477,0.0004237919,0.000001355568],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005645737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002498616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004034285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001129221,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986023,0.0001053725,0.0006908377,0.0001367279,0.000293803,0.0001709799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917902,0.0069351,0.0008244669,0.0001597204,0.000249438,0.0000410891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007327509,0.0000190005,0.001801745,0.00001083602,0.0001019365,0.00002979965,0.003466006,0.006670567,0.00006400009,0.001340074,0.0001135792,0.9856497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006322417,0.0001441105,0.6844713,0.02404457,0.0001027612,0.001014374,0.00901081,0.2705548,0.00001812339,0.00293977,0.001008971,0.0003679821],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9177119,0.003773479,0.076596,0.0001781405,0.001325887,0.0001060482,0.000002967937,0.000008479728,0.0002971692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978185,0.0002690134,0.001714033,0.00005662928,0.0001149003,0.000002182806,1.199945e-7,0.00001589558,0.000008752336],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9852817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4939778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765913378","doi":"10.1177/1555343417724975","title":"Automation and the Human Factors Race to Catch Up","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Automation; Pace; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Race (biology); Data science; Sociology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03573835585750612,"gpt":0.3980936480376214,"spread":0.3623552921801153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006240156,0.00009387438,0.0001914613,0.0001752394,0.0003724504,0.0002355014,0.000110104,0.00004623956,0.0001643893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001228365,0.00006214863,0.0000566733,0.00003506175,0.00003899894,0.0002110795,0.00004465938,0.0002080928,0.00001276353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001613345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006487218,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005173916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002312587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992635,0.00003934907,0.000329768,0.00009617378,0.0001744929,0.00009670357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982648,0.001037264,0.0003229617,0.0001153202,0.0001915341,0.0000681399],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002017069,0.0001269233,0.02186484,0.0000493133,0.0006869264,0.0001096839,0.07958115,0.00169375,0.001191109,0.0388453,0.007362342,0.8464716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002967332,0.0001053255,0.9841993,0.0007857254,0.00005554807,0.0002067978,0.002747038,0.004571586,0.00006784628,0.001356824,0.002775772,0.000160869],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8907346,0.0001017917,0.1063846,0.000217155,0.001066357,0.00008036356,0.000001954754,0.00001652105,0.00139661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990276,0.000009553483,0.0005162754,0.00008685557,0.0001457717,0.000002593978,3.189483e-7,0.00000977383,0.0002012781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9623345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2864625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009277668","doi":"10.1518/155534307x264898","title":"Development and Evaluation of an Intuitive Operational Planning Process","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Operational planning; Process management; Computer science; Military doctrine; Operations research; Key (lock); Set (abstract data type); Action (physics); Comprehensive planning; Land-use planning; Doctrine; Operations management; Management science; Engineering; Computer security; Land use; Business; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05984600777436973,"gpt":0.4481580114559222,"spread":0.3883120036815524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002053194,0.00007423184,0.0001339779,0.0003243014,0.00005912273,0.00002787713,0.0000326056,0.00004554843,0.000145834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004866074,0.00006578289,0.00001881396,0.00008456021,0.00001495158,0.0002327656,0.00001016588,0.0001417298,0.000001430215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002918205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004518329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.119725e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.183468e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989455,0.00003163546,0.0004677635,0.00009081623,0.0003828548,0.00008138888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982876,0.0005795921,0.0002324951,0.00002692632,0.000817476,0.00005586383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005905698,0.0000922473,0.001463485,0.00001688778,0.0001227303,0.00002876305,0.02689421,0.007281286,0.0003999274,0.001180127,0.0000178398,0.9619119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003877711,0.0003808983,0.8863282,0.002763774,0.0001126647,0.0008729211,0.02455115,0.07672878,0.002332616,0.001244807,0.0005055511,0.0003009002],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8012379,0.0001878147,0.1973783,0.000003913252,0.0002288342,0.0000546925,0.000001026497,0.000006053814,0.0009015318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902833,0.000001517215,0.009576823,0.00003275417,0.0000901229,0.000002132549,0.000001632829,0.000006887926,0.000004866478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.961611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2682548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319833901","doi":"10.1177/1555343414555159","title":"Finding Common Ground","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Common ground; Construct (python library); Computer science; Interpretation (philosophy); Process (computing); Cognition; Task (project management); Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Management science; Cognitive science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02823934258251807,"gpt":0.3742108125234656,"spread":0.3459714699409475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005922928,0.000090277,0.0001926934,0.0002931547,0.0000719991,0.00006645126,0.00006268507,0.00005485184,0.0004849861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005493929,0.00007844722,0.00007156962,0.00009074975,0.00001298139,0.000148105,0.00001937991,0.0002604276,0.00004368588],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001968095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005063255,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.042165e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.291724e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991807,0.00004500096,0.000392782,0.00008802285,0.0001773273,0.000116124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976582,0.001859862,0.0002195655,0.00005769242,0.0001410882,0.00006357161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003577888,0.00007351047,0.00262543,0.00001623665,0.0001396031,0.00006851095,0.00295393,0.001437166,0.0002248397,0.01251611,0.001442308,0.9781446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005686074,0.0009551318,0.8566207,0.004946274,0.0001660452,0.003165313,0.003670609,0.06966767,0.00011563,0.01036358,0.04391263,0.000730295],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6314797,0.0001323971,0.3620049,0.00002451134,0.001096941,0.00002487105,8.984783e-7,0.00001954908,0.005216286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973111,0.000007917511,0.002160501,0.0001431231,0.0002874855,0.000001089237,4.237789e-7,0.00001242227,0.00007599573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9774143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5310257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391484721","doi":"10.1177/15553434241230604","title":"How Are Automation Failures Characterized in the Driving Domain? Insights From a Scoping Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Automation; Domain (mathematical analysis); Computer science; Human factors and ergonomics; Engineering; Poison control; Human–computer interaction; Systems engineering; Psychology; Medicine; Medical emergency","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04748859424286141,"gpt":0.4074343293494068,"spread":0.3599457351065454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008247899,0.0003551486,0.001408201,0.0008117354,0.00007372564,0.0004262706,0.000225898,0.0001957616,0.0001277279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001072493,0.0002188224,0.0004238187,0.0004279524,0.00001784195,0.0003149048,0.0000528081,0.00102449,0.00004005793],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007460962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006322563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.104945e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004670706,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974899,0.0003599223,0.001281174,0.0002773635,0.0004222793,0.0001693326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949602,0.003418084,0.001228018,0.0001683012,0.0001697037,0.00005570936],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001924108,0.00003175493,0.000002221057,0.01061391,0.0002612764,0.0004082372,0.00173651,0.000002645609,0.000001065315,0.000260571,0.0004412347,0.9862213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003226414,0.00003278962,0.0003976239,0.8778333,0.0005508311,0.0005229443,0.0006071308,0.0001414316,5.425659e-8,0.0002441248,0.1191119,0.0002352376],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005767152,0.9766135,0.02046374,0.0001266036,0.001481882,0.0005679166,0.00001179249,0.00004004634,0.0001178043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008453746,0.9899297,0.0007742122,0.0001579752,0.0005493616,0.00006010249,0.00001238205,0.00004524478,0.00001728882],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9859861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8923317,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3178658338","doi":"10.1177/15553434211029530","title":"Ecological Design of an Augmentative and Alternative Communication Device Interface","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fondation Brain Canada","keywords":"Augmentative and alternative communication; Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Interface (matter); Augmentative; Process (computing); Domain (mathematical analysis); User interface; Workload; Workspace; Psychology; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1110878445421994,"gpt":0.4709468004480844,"spread":0.359858955905885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00129111,0.00008993653,0.0002707294,0.0001196765,0.000170321,0.000008852314,0.0001332146,0.0001067942,0.00004880743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003253561,0.00007534131,0.00002741319,0.0001256661,0.0001007546,0.0001622926,0.0002303302,0.0005953627,0.0000010715],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000520256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007387417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000142303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004251592,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986082,0.0005260729,0.0005201764,0.0001106857,0.0001299841,0.0001049226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908737,0.007611641,0.0004549866,0.0001463293,0.0008576307,0.00005571826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003400138,0.001401663,0.04783521,0.0003430152,0.0009183257,0.000156956,0.02576715,0.01053505,0.01750233,0.007821595,0.0003512237,0.8839673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007378202,0.001918707,0.7722744,0.01212049,0.0003322811,0.0003526994,0.06496766,0.1031083,0.008211575,0.02810461,0.0006363033,0.0005947728],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5923305,0.001102373,0.4062167,0.00006877042,0.00005969344,0.00009413119,0.000003903992,0.000009863077,0.0001140918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9036209,0.0005701119,0.09568791,0.00008508132,0.00001528164,0.000006832468,0.000001087038,0.000006664712,0.000006107544],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8833725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3895051,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408546962","doi":"10.1177/15553434251327697","title":"Designing High-Impact Experiments for Human–Autonomy / AI Teaming","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Division of Information and Intelligent Systems","keywords":"Autonomy; Computer science; Psychology; Human–computer interaction; Engineering; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02800911645837078,"gpt":0.430526081579753,"spread":0.4025169651213822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004820034,0.0001415439,0.000273423,0.0005717848,0.0001545399,0.0001047349,0.00008256792,0.00007477246,0.0002829338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004415764,0.0001245639,0.0001410681,0.0001291261,0.00001441542,0.0002058255,0.00002474664,0.0002422299,0.000006135233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009851583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004367212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001803625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.716102e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989687,0.00003317197,0.000543205,0.0001422201,0.000138527,0.0001742413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978954,0.001430742,0.0002364411,0.00006985163,0.0003078162,0.0000597241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002660186,0.0005224227,0.006249211,0.0001226951,0.002246626,0.0001497422,0.01253706,0.01599054,0.02217485,0.02905491,0.009481137,0.8988106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05239595,0.00527067,0.6181753,0.04088153,0.00147904,0.001653644,0.0279012,0.1208588,0.02684744,0.05141802,0.04940544,0.003712886],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3139336,0.000291598,0.6837773,0.00002176062,0.000871196,0.0000965295,0.000002936511,0.00002373741,0.0009813887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877867,0.000002951355,0.01160404,0.0001893223,0.0001721451,0.00001338663,0.000001373423,0.00001607098,0.0002140745],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8950977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5079568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318833987","doi":"10.1177/15553434231153311","title":"Cognitive and Behavioral Impacts of Two Decision-Support Modes for Judgmental Bootstrapping","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Dalhousie University; McGill University; Thales (Canada)","funders":"Ministère de la Défense Nationale","keywords":"Mode (computer interface); Decision support system; Computer science; Workload; Shadow (psychology); Cognition; Human–computer interaction; Dwell time; Automation; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06056309050174091,"gpt":0.4371068951363076,"spread":0.3765438046345667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006237622,0.0001495572,0.0003234505,0.0006196987,0.00008762624,0.00005576343,0.00005854341,0.00007035345,0.0001901526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005322737,0.0001352326,0.0001281281,0.0001881771,0.00003939836,0.0002423707,0.00003950728,0.000201606,0.000008807503],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002162834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002590667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002012249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001734272,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987022,0.00002425233,0.000646411,0.0001631088,0.0002632419,0.0002007901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964015,0.002715415,0.0003400566,0.00005152504,0.0003776577,0.0001138321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002859862,0.0002427596,0.006375051,0.00007702186,0.0004352874,0.0002080333,0.007260008,0.001501487,0.003543401,0.001265785,0.001321836,0.9749095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03550005,0.005424307,0.7358188,0.01935544,0.001098072,0.003937314,0.04987222,0.1310955,0.003777,0.01109293,0.001365031,0.001663352],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7726821,0.0001539947,0.2262369,0.00001029519,0.0004650085,0.0001297168,0.00004284968,0.00002501911,0.0002540729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965649,0.00004718793,0.003161877,0.00004557414,0.0001190478,0.000008526772,0.00000514093,0.0000225486,0.00002517989],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9732461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5514625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885852522","doi":"10.1177/1555343418789831","title":"Evidence-Based Medicine, Best Practices, Transductive Models, and Naturalistic Decision Making: Commentary on Paul R. Falzer, Naturalistic Decision Making and the Practice of Health Care","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Healthcare cost, quality, practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Health care; Evidence-based medicine; Psychology; Naturalism; Quality (philosophy); Best practice; Evidence-based practice; Task (project management); MEDLINE; Management science; Computer science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Epistemology; Political science; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4087943743353505,"gpt":0.5413866205489544,"spread":0.1325922462136038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01272178,0.0005066912,0.001239116,0.0007586263,0.001276836,0.0001149214,0.000344838,0.0003322448,0.00002940215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08573439,0.0003368915,0.0001218203,0.0006112866,0.0005176074,0.001759142,0.000216172,0.002630809,0.000002891682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000382599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004852815,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002004181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001097021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917237,0.002895318,0.00245542,0.0006113589,0.001698599,0.0006156135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8509551,0.1410281,0.004357977,0.0003498865,0.003048392,0.0002604625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02854589,0.0001748692,0.0008761835,0.001565933,0.0002827455,0.0001581133,0.02515749,0.001367038,0.00003033534,0.001764499,0.001825591,0.9382513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02884173,0.01204284,0.02949221,0.5633808,0.002982613,0.001813276,0.164198,0.1506825,0.00003061683,0.03057971,0.01383018,0.002125541],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3972603,0.1350912,0.4396576,0.02237638,0.00318856,0.002024702,0.0000834387,0.00005917347,0.0002586487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9440134,0.006651405,0.03682205,0.01160096,0.0008263699,0.00001741556,0.000004049613,0.00006226815,0.000002093351],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9361258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403378968","doi":"10.1177/15553434241292400","title":"Stumbling Towards a Shared Apprehension of Automation Failure","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Apprehension; Automation; Computer science; Computer security; Psychology; Engineering; Human–computer interaction; Cognitive psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02777989866861204,"gpt":0.3719330363808515,"spread":0.3441531377122395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004750866,0.0001063393,0.000220009,0.0005964725,0.0000369512,0.00008867318,0.00005825168,0.0000769953,0.000641157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004551939,0.00008936344,0.000115076,0.0002302734,0.00001296484,0.0002842748,0.00002406235,0.0002684735,0.00002031072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002675587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002674183,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.591612e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.658182e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998897,0.00003381684,0.0005662281,0.00012257,0.0002786047,0.000101788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984816,0.0008992149,0.0001937623,0.00005835107,0.0003168216,0.00005025462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003519719,0.00007809747,0.0001580287,0.0001726914,0.0003390796,0.00017757,0.009270699,0.004118424,0.003072161,0.003726085,0.002687676,0.9758475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004455092,0.001087649,0.1860132,0.03438222,0.0004561031,0.003499834,0.01129899,0.7282423,0.001120349,0.004874093,0.0236876,0.0008826051],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5283312,0.001107022,0.4681869,0.00005634455,0.001293628,0.00006013474,0.000006914284,0.00005871866,0.0008991854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927188,0.00002205576,0.006989359,0.00002603212,0.0001838923,0.000002141087,0.000001609547,0.00001635605,0.00003976727],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9749649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.702022,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214934859","doi":"10.1177/15553434221078215","title":"Evaluation of an Ecological Interface Design–Driven Augmentative and Alternative Communication Interface","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Fondation Brain Canada","keywords":"Augmentative and alternative communication; Interface (matter); Workload; Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Information transfer; Usability; Brain–computer interface; Multimedia; Psychology; Telecommunications","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.154361633055667,"gpt":0.4962199834657256,"spread":0.3418583504100586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006094703,0.000100855,0.0002602165,0.000228254,0.0003676576,0.000007876281,0.0002252545,0.00006641455,0.0001561314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00306768,0.00008931437,0.00003186053,0.0001390036,0.0001021444,0.0001734702,0.0004760309,0.0008424846,7.267677e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002404342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001015323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002835308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003884482,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970294,0.00171389,0.0005816766,0.000130148,0.0004316279,0.000113314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929991,0.005055111,0.0007007294,0.0001591828,0.00103724,0.00004866544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002801619,0.001174861,0.01144883,0.00007679744,0.0006712103,0.00001215769,0.03026262,0.169384,0.004657734,0.001587198,0.0003017909,0.7776212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00612817,0.00266604,0.1999177,0.002137913,0.0004678461,0.0001030532,0.06008715,0.7068532,0.001147556,0.01992,0.0002358192,0.0003356109],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7216991,0.0009458996,0.2767439,0.00006866159,0.0001107805,0.0002957564,0.000009349919,0.00001306126,0.0001135623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749763,0.0001310901,0.024773,0.00004454461,0.00001333194,0.00004764502,0.000001536226,0.000009092339,0.000003491278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7772855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3672521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415395963","doi":"10.1177/15553434251390009","title":"Situation Awareness in Fast Rescue Crafts Operators—A Simulator Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Situation awareness; Task (project management); Underpinning; Human factors and ergonomics; Psychological intervention; Poison control; Guard (computer science); Confidence interval; Situational ethics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02245843575836776,"gpt":0.3978891858409092,"spread":0.3754307500825414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000635425,0.0001096783,0.000236836,0.0008100081,0.00006495397,0.00007316643,0.00007264656,0.0000623957,0.0001751763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007749559,0.00009805756,0.00005060978,0.0003266186,0.00000856385,0.0001865499,0.0000299637,0.0002784359,0.0000112604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005064051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003578787,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004754553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001476261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988959,0.00007916049,0.0005779622,0.0001401398,0.0001934161,0.0001134647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984374,0.00102198,0.0001175194,0.00007472905,0.0003078856,0.00004049328],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002253117,0.001262789,0.1328494,0.00005066986,0.0004910328,0.0005262397,0.0232129,0.1718818,0.0003493472,0.001752009,0.0006799363,0.6646908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003981499,0.0002475089,0.9171124,0.001923411,0.00004957154,0.00005344156,0.008461624,0.06708369,0.00003830075,0.0002630912,0.0006005304,0.0001849521],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8201802,0.0001328714,0.1779886,0.00002332623,0.001010676,0.0001119279,0.000001515929,0.00001590987,0.0005350066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993896,0.000007507173,0.0003599671,0.0000846746,0.00008520544,0.000005490578,4.888325e-7,0.000009368574,0.00005773479],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.784263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3998671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}