{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":17,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":17,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"744c65b53d86","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education"}},"results":[{"id":"W1977055232","doi":"10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3","title":"A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: from the general to the applied","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":838,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Distance education; Meta-analysis; Higher education; Mathematics education; Content analysis; Educational technology; Computer science; Educational research; Blended learning; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Social science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06965557126562434,"gpt":0.3623687009919264,"spread":0.292713129726302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001746897,0.00008084156,0.000364944,0.0004389971,0.0001560113,0.00007756428,0.0002641642,0.00007658396,0.000179617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001732411,0.00005063408,0.0001057737,0.001653103,0.00006715059,0.00009357653,0.00004188636,0.0003958053,0.000001460243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006782647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005942757,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006981748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006576736,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984789,0.0005288211,0.0004558736,0.0001329059,0.000258808,0.0001446532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984156,0.0006973248,0.000509063,0.000132569,0.0002048899,0.00004052079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004871429,0.0006743486,0.740704,0.00001302626,0.006916672,6.888408e-7,0.02330918,0.04270912,0.0006903448,0.1081786,0.002080162,0.07467514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001796395,0.00004195486,0.7347919,0.00002717474,0.00558596,8.472188e-7,0.004506762,0.0003659117,0.00002483852,0.002158428,0.2521911,0.0001255288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9403882,0.0006908943,0.00006967589,0.05722586,0.0005492321,0.0001052172,2.878192e-7,0.000007069155,0.0009635722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919204,0.00001570325,0.005302623,0.0004505304,0.0007924518,0.000004292472,0.000002017082,0.000005881946,0.001506167],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2501109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2064798,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069214455","doi":"10.1007/s12528-011-9043-x","title":"Interaction in distance education and online learning: using evidence and theory to improve practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":401,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Distance education; Instructional design; Educational technology; Computer science; Mathematics education; Online learning; Online course; Higher education; Learning theory; Collaborative learning; Psychology; Multimedia; Knowledge management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06737516137194509,"gpt":0.4205813575490324,"spread":0.3532061961770873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001845076,0.00005929653,0.0001059457,0.0002281541,0.000097063,0.00005799378,0.00007110685,0.00004436477,0.00001510205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001783203,0.00005923391,0.00001289788,0.0002856028,0.00003352488,0.0008291184,0.0000221834,0.0003559379,5.099033e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002039735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006627313,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005178442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001091956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988221,0.0005031714,0.0003048808,0.0001145642,0.0001405666,0.0001147402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998681,0.0004948871,0.0004250872,0.00004323731,0.0002868478,0.00006891794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002468101,0.001198642,0.3913372,0.00006260881,0.00001251532,0.00000301513,0.09150953,0.0006906725,0.001153042,0.009649239,0.00006034969,0.5040764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002519051,0.0002539135,0.8665045,0.00210968,0.00004197962,0.00003404287,0.08031492,0.0006246833,0.00005852028,0.002725254,0.04687305,0.0002075836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947469,0.0009101966,0.0006403543,0.001574068,0.001463475,0.00008877056,5.093252e-8,0.000005126225,0.0005710737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971285,0.0001284281,0.02744799,0.0001505862,0.0007515154,6.166103e-7,2.869785e-7,0.000005596937,0.0002299753],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5038688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2415489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085592690","doi":"10.1007/s12528-009-9014-7","title":"Role of instructional technology in the transformation of higher education","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Educational technology; Constructivist teaching methods; Technology integration; Instructional design; Convergence (economics); Collaborative learning; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Mathematics education; Teaching and learning center; Teaching method; Pedagogy; Sociology; Knowledge management; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01457869873671419,"gpt":0.3404196179678708,"spread":0.3258409192311566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008062394,0.00004607504,0.0001229583,0.0004536499,0.00005012076,0.00001162855,0.000183316,0.000081805,0.00004147016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003764987,0.00003803279,0.00003805025,0.0007489835,0.00005012099,0.0002309871,0.000003065074,0.0002381655,4.998458e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009433139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009452415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006915785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001465419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989546,0.0001604557,0.0004850945,0.00004865659,0.0002587394,0.00009248225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991284,0.00006949263,0.0004971561,0.00005614451,0.0002330696,0.00001571437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003595429,0.001093299,0.08593988,0.00003104467,0.00000991185,1.999542e-7,0.02283601,0.001746357,0.002712117,0.4456114,0.000266936,0.4397169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002280547,0.0001073745,0.9100829,0.0002062422,0.00001100883,0.000007292752,0.01147765,0.00003467553,0.0002536879,0.04133873,0.0361958,0.00005664328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.977416,0.0003879633,0.00001556622,0.01560926,0.0006736251,0.00007721513,1.350707e-7,0.000003910879,0.005816359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967134,0.0000227599,0.00259969,0.00007942978,0.0004943525,6.269919e-7,0.000001481978,0.000002084477,0.00008620214],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.824143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1676818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974297166","doi":"10.1007/s12528-013-9069-3","title":"Student behavioural intentions to use desktop video conferencing in a distance course: integration of autonomy to the UTAUT model","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Technology Adoption and User Behaviour","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Expectancy theory; Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology; Autonomy; Psychology; Social influence; Distance education; Videoconferencing; Educational technology; Sample (material); Higher education; Computer-mediated communication; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Multimedia; Mathematics education; The Internet; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1897986364600633,"gpt":0.4353844249770156,"spread":0.2455857885169523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002093341,0.000108564,0.0002563414,0.0006626737,0.00006385062,0.000209768,0.0006613865,0.0000729461,0.0000603029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006006608,0.00007503191,0.00007516397,0.0008973908,0.00003969568,0.0004722623,0.00009368628,0.0003610614,0.00001691871],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003176493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005101253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002150118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003371723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975811,0.0002006722,0.001232007,0.000185473,0.0006343982,0.0001662964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974276,0.0003544882,0.0006486625,0.0003124446,0.00116773,0.00008907894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001575158,0.0004277342,0.9569404,0.000001338241,0.000004669899,6.637396e-7,0.006085526,0.02032504,0.001460981,0.004104823,0.001712592,0.00892044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001812308,0.00005748697,0.9873451,0.0001762286,0.0000108064,0.00000529513,0.002787285,0.007453626,0.0001187549,0.00162302,0.0001657115,0.0000754738],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9312088,0.00002699349,0.057669,0.009738526,0.0009697322,0.0003245189,0.000001270455,0.000009791692,0.00005135547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869206,0.000001159737,0.01212823,0.0004117236,0.00004002257,0.00001650534,7.593233e-7,0.000006518854,0.0004744796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05571179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3059712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133421346","doi":"10.1007/s12528-009-9021-8","title":"Technology’s effect on achievement in higher education: a Stage I meta-analysis of classroom applications","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Presentational and representational acting; Meta-analysis; Psychology; Higher education; Mathematics education; Sample size determination; Cognition; Empirical research; Educational technology; Academic achievement; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05403410038074671,"gpt":0.3935231646006804,"spread":0.3394890642199337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001592915,0.000114258,0.0005373107,0.001527755,0.00009767151,0.00003527413,0.0002967851,0.0001198587,0.0003059117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005238004,0.00009817136,0.0002733593,0.002764366,0.00004643335,0.000130081,0.00001378602,0.0004058818,0.000003669954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003024072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008422186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000070671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005421499,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982002,0.0003626627,0.0006856697,0.0001694237,0.0003947345,0.0001872831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998446,0.0002595026,0.000801384,0.0001953373,0.0002393055,0.00005843538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001210901,0.01093475,0.3938112,0.00009636263,0.009234685,0.000004528594,0.005255632,0.03277149,0.0008863005,0.3166661,0.001578553,0.2286393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004370886,0.0005568334,0.7719913,0.00009328307,0.008498651,8.81041e-7,0.001644468,0.0000623421,0.000132136,0.003243899,0.2130887,0.0002503495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9498247,0.001410605,0.0001233046,0.04004695,0.0006563115,0.0003710488,0.000001129664,0.00002144954,0.007544481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926127,0.00001599538,0.00355283,0.0003257786,0.0004181579,0.00001158907,0.000004657083,0.000005631492,0.003052611],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3781801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4003312,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897840590","doi":"10.1007/s12528-018-9197-x","title":"A comparison of lecture-based, active, and flipped classroom teaching approaches in higher education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Innovative Teaching Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Durham College; University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Active learning (machine learning); Flipped classroom; Mathematics education; Flexibility (engineering); CLARITY; Teaching method; Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive flexibility; Cooperative learning; Higher education; Blended learning; Educational technology; Community of inquiry; Pedagogy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1748287753306736,"gpt":0.4573276380494189,"spread":0.2824988627187454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003467957,0.0001290142,0.0003469211,0.000631746,0.0002044512,0.00006106695,0.0002335231,0.0001360327,0.00005682719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000404364,0.0001250008,0.00004459358,0.0006493793,0.0002157287,0.0002751022,0.0000274804,0.0006995339,8.173667e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005039367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001239028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005297164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001024106,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970055,0.001522097,0.0007133777,0.0001753421,0.00035814,0.0002255506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979078,0.0005645834,0.001011357,0.0001186606,0.0003356691,0.00006189984],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001094292,0.001540547,0.7985165,0.0000682551,0.00002225661,2.558835e-7,0.04763212,0.0004461755,0.00150943,0.03664853,0.0008368085,0.1126697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004178819,0.0001497872,0.9805002,0.0004538736,0.00001798667,0.000001743343,0.003181766,0.0005013273,0.0007661043,0.004097786,0.00975281,0.0001587444],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.977902,0.0002298976,0.00247185,0.003370674,0.003325626,0.0001755758,2.276421e-7,0.00001159968,0.01251254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9472236,0.000001401936,0.05073265,0.0001909234,0.001572478,0.000002427072,0.000001701318,0.00001314384,0.0002616553],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1819837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5097383,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207009873","doi":"10.1007/s12528-021-09305-y","title":"A scoping review of computational thinking assessments in higher education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Teaching and Learning Programming","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Killam Trusts; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Computational thinking; Likert scale; Empirical research; Critical thinking; Higher education; Psychological intervention; Computer science; Mathematics education; Class (philosophy); Domain (mathematical analysis); Medical education; Psychology; Knowledge management; Medicine; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1334610626915267,"gpt":0.4568294880976183,"spread":0.3233684254060916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004073362,0.0003176921,0.001439054,0.001224294,0.0001213325,0.0001635332,0.001363952,0.0001358695,0.0001410035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001400167,0.0003083052,0.0003456431,0.001646349,0.00002348213,0.0004419376,0.0002725253,0.001545216,0.000002910287],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008769314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005756985,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003324644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.564438e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945859,0.001488697,0.00234986,0.0003928469,0.0008950867,0.000287603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943243,0.0009582576,0.004033443,0.0003723832,0.0002301432,0.00008152747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001166226,0.0005010298,0.0002831954,0.06054924,0.00003089794,0.000003684568,0.0004282773,0.001015504,2.036349e-8,0.002863155,0.0002551439,0.9340687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001327375,0.00007304405,0.001709881,0.5394923,0.00007651298,0.00008641845,0.0000173712,0.00007559195,2.007148e-8,0.0003713886,0.4577225,0.0002422231],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004564036,0.989598,0.002572484,0.0004431547,0.006333345,0.000584019,3.307455e-7,0.00002849135,0.0003945329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005331141,0.8951426,0.1028115,0.0004247631,0.0007199661,0.00003596904,0.00003602137,0.00004086979,0.0002552249],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9338264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999369,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560046333","doi":"10.1007/s12528-016-9128-7","title":"MOOC—making and open educational practices","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Online Learning and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Openness to experience; Open educational resources; Open education; Perspective (graphical); Higher education; Pedagogy; Educational technology; Sociology; Best practice; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05997376297766913,"gpt":0.4109639921663806,"spread":0.3509902291887115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007825116,0.00006266208,0.0001220262,0.0001791415,0.00005896352,0.0002653363,0.0006135763,0.00002902069,0.00002012647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003005749,0.00004391114,0.00002124449,0.0002230373,0.0000181303,0.0009217914,0.0001697915,0.0001344986,0.000004647678],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006911877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000555968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009877504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001324135,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991768,0.000103341,0.0003205239,0.0001276565,0.0001645745,0.000107101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981557,0.0004747425,0.0009955553,0.0001318804,0.000192555,0.00004954132],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001925064,0.0007994279,0.5373205,0.00004376395,0.00004352345,0.000005474874,0.002249709,0.000526798,0.0008557276,0.2690016,0.005937131,0.1831971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004041734,0.0000900657,0.9414057,0.0007327558,0.00001029816,0.000139264,0.00005957433,0.002885127,0.00002661696,0.03925578,0.01485296,0.0001376804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7401208,0.0006535724,0.01051588,0.2425786,0.002792924,0.00008557769,1.650193e-7,0.00001447825,0.003238036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9343514,0.00001803485,0.06364266,0.0003378822,0.0006491567,3.998793e-7,1.373777e-7,0.000004128185,0.0009961769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4040852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2558644,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198134704","doi":"10.1007/s12528-021-09295-x","title":"IoT text analytics in smart education and beyond","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"IoT and Edge/Fog Computing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Analytics; Computer science; Learning analytics; Internet of Things; Web analytics; Data science; Categorization; Big data; World Wide Web; Data analysis; Order (exchange); The Internet; Knowledge management; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Web intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02200203272695504,"gpt":0.2955306357545096,"spread":0.2735286030275546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007192985,0.0001123086,0.0002202435,0.0004594458,0.00006041948,0.000190053,0.0002970679,0.00006683054,0.000004681003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008671683,0.0001168426,0.00004614183,0.0009295042,0.00001875283,0.0002700171,0.0001234052,0.0003215555,0.000003343545],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001913258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00129695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001961878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000038605,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986202,0.0001369084,0.0006068744,0.0002059857,0.0002214917,0.0002085633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988117,0.0001910058,0.000361667,0.0002043906,0.0003438858,0.00008733711],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001299246,0.002166425,0.5210579,0.0001562112,0.00003704535,0.0000475152,0.01063286,0.002394074,0.001064195,0.01499101,0.02001412,0.4274257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003733553,0.0000543736,0.96152,0.0004126828,0.00001048832,0.0002602531,0.0002068727,0.01538448,0.0003428675,0.006030812,0.01520175,0.0002021199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9675709,0.001621482,0.004111677,0.004336974,0.01938402,0.00005384587,2.025354e-8,0.0000122044,0.002908875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9535698,0.00001993415,0.04312126,0.0006926909,0.002120966,5.160717e-7,0.000001104663,0.000007859721,0.0004659089],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4404621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4764704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977130472","doi":"10.1007/s12528-014-9084-z","title":"An exploration of bias in meta-analysis: the case of technology integration research in higher education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Technology Adoption and User Behaviour","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Higher education; Publication bias; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Order (exchange); Mathematics education; Computer science; Epistemology; Political science; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6321440034384781,"gpt":0.5481170955846667,"spread":0.0840269078538114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01387547,0.0001180791,0.0006353292,0.006606525,0.00005929413,0.00006251488,0.0007115859,0.0002247255,0.000150216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008479826,0.00007702783,0.00019461,0.007287758,0.0001629873,0.000783456,0.00005213585,0.0007000544,0.00000372159],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001366915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004005059,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003155307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005870041,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951942,0.001807677,0.00189505,0.0002647602,0.0006662204,0.0001720669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951585,0.001024213,0.001526802,0.0006333726,0.001617135,0.00003996603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001317581,0.004695157,0.6754243,0.0000271445,0.0008056569,0.00001685765,0.008545473,0.02386915,0.002528993,0.1819455,0.0007700328,0.1012399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003798397,0.0002823685,0.8859818,0.00007159828,0.001161332,0.00005355334,0.01133665,0.002624091,0.0009289439,0.09648903,0.0005608472,0.0001299308],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841383,0.0004732962,0.001177605,0.01314655,0.0007043163,0.0001820307,5.772206e-7,0.000007962351,0.0001693651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966115,0.000007847121,0.003001917,0.00006905479,0.00009364357,0.00001367675,0.000002573378,0.000007140276,0.0001925883],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2105575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5894933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998215200","doi":"10.1007/s12528-010-9041-4","title":"A multi-year investigation of the relationship between pedagogy, computer use and course effectiveness in postsecondary education","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Predictive power; Psychology; Sample (material); Mathematics education; Regression analysis; Computer literacy; Higher education; Perception; Technology integration; Educational technology; Medical education; Computer science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1137058181416069,"gpt":0.3942036769720837,"spread":0.2804978588304768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001581912,0.00006188585,0.0001391128,0.0002003197,0.00009817125,0.00003072169,0.0001251084,0.00008093909,0.000008893652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002783455,0.00005314332,0.00003379017,0.0003676975,0.0001087928,0.0004061691,0.00002329273,0.0003191071,5.890582e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001145043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002018551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006303273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001624625,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983876,0.0008860422,0.0003772074,0.00008829205,0.0001611753,0.00009964921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983521,0.000792222,0.0004914121,0.0000748775,0.0002404177,0.00004903129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008283603,0.0001269461,0.9836704,0.00002741874,0.000004493055,1.232824e-7,0.01091878,0.00004680542,0.00002891793,0.001667036,0.00002341248,0.003477409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002554343,0.00003479515,0.9963913,0.0005014347,0.00001667902,0.00000176197,0.001363254,0.00003273477,0.00002698191,0.001171689,0.0001499007,0.00005401154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978811,0.0001061409,0.00009562797,0.0007261116,0.0009462556,0.000155779,3.781444e-7,0.00000409529,0.00008456149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878021,0.000003927682,0.01169153,0.00004065534,0.0004065571,9.931082e-7,0.000001775234,0.000006006174,0.00004646736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01272095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3580823,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980807682","doi":"10.1007/s12528-019-09239-6","title":"What can completion time of quizzes tell us about students’ motivations and learning strategies?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Summative assessment; Psychology; Time management; Tracking (education); Mathematics education; Self-regulated learning; Cognition; Scale (ratio); Academic achievement; Learning Management; Computer science; Pedagogy; Formative assessment","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03280258115621192,"gpt":0.3566545169118064,"spread":0.3238519357555945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005840696,0.000101687,0.0002445878,0.0002048405,0.00006120468,0.0001438764,0.0001755412,0.00007263649,0.0004216298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002867772,0.00009521217,0.00004412509,0.0001954748,0.00005320954,0.0003112722,0.00002882742,0.0003000005,0.00001458124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008634212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000211876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002024109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005601212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987398,0.0002184593,0.0005466444,0.0001308825,0.0002166675,0.0001474817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998529,0.0003766877,0.0006786503,0.0001084845,0.0002655196,0.00004170015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002195917,0.0002754,0.9859619,0.00004150343,0.00003862748,5.354967e-7,0.005423808,0.002416326,0.0003548381,0.005010969,0.0003686095,0.00008556333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003030173,0.0001714734,0.9912844,0.0002935594,0.00001433617,0.00002690494,0.006756955,0.00004137411,0.000009837278,0.0001568893,0.0008586051,0.00008260877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929682,0.0009699661,0.00002346833,0.0003452775,0.002920683,0.0001207029,4.67587e-7,0.000008399025,0.002642854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972636,0.00006142631,0.0004028371,0.00009720829,0.0003083778,0.000001598146,0.000009052253,0.000009944846,0.001845933],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005322579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4616551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2735696209","doi":"10.1007/s12528-017-9158-9","title":"The role of behavioral expectation in technology acceptance: a CEGEP case study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Technology Adoption and User Behaviour","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Technology acceptance model; Technology integration; Educational technology; Psychology; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Knowledge management; Mathematics education; Computer science; Economics; Human–computer interaction; Usability; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1186954295049269,"gpt":0.4721840870853664,"spread":0.3534886575804395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001975178,0.00008006214,0.000226794,0.0008017202,0.0002460916,0.0001355757,0.0009537159,0.0001104084,0.00002453807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003874513,0.00005610362,0.00005140249,0.0005015622,0.0001303965,0.0003010757,0.0001071392,0.0003836428,0.000003007884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008878049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000178649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001753798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000405622,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981453,0.0001542217,0.0009915892,0.0001514779,0.0004200827,0.0001372662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970614,0.0002192178,0.001660686,0.0005415658,0.0004894731,0.00002765213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000151992,0.0006022723,0.9320562,4.302292e-7,0.000002463305,0.00005183444,0.003048165,0.00004324794,0.0001467417,0.000459713,0.00004643468,0.06352723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004284084,0.000144832,0.9418537,0.0000283267,0.000008293776,0.0002816357,0.0521121,0.00007690416,0.0001348292,0.004624217,0.0002564511,0.00005031295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968178,0.0002537705,0.00002716167,0.001034815,0.001598482,0.0001535819,1.739896e-7,0.00000845354,0.0001057643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990773,0.000003887744,0.00072084,0.00000725875,0.00007400812,0.000004326803,7.518538e-8,0.000005107865,0.0001071845],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06347691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.228784,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281726885","doi":"10.1007/s12528-022-09323-4","title":"A synthesis of surveys examining the impacts of COVID-19 and emergency remote learning on students in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"COVID-19 and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Higher education; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Psychology; Distance education; Medical education; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Mental health; Public relations; Pedagogy; Political science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08656635490327597,"gpt":0.4325439889953315,"spread":0.3459776340920556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003633505,0.00006561718,0.0002002574,0.0002279068,0.00007669042,0.000003426215,0.0001830016,0.00001792536,0.0002087304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002589396,0.00005666351,0.0000210973,0.0003338533,0.00001257652,0.00002246393,0.00005373062,0.0003332297,1.418893e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001273658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002485219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5911436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08257122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973949,0.001426255,0.0006115898,0.00009735134,0.0003295628,0.0001404006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978818,0.001134105,0.0007702648,0.00009843476,0.00004101624,0.00007432461],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006775613,0.0001926864,0.9782153,0.00008811498,0.00001608291,0.000004871837,0.007598991,0.003720519,0.00004819807,0.00003548328,0.000318583,0.009693384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003182439,0.0001991196,0.9923398,0.0001059809,0.000008279084,0.00001452837,0.006262243,0.00007104831,0.00001293945,0.00003558828,0.0005892958,0.00004285556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967722,0.0004853205,0.0000176011,0.0007348825,0.001673196,0.0001030307,0.000001367309,0.00000132888,0.0002110531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995324,0.00003160376,0.00003229924,0.0002321077,0.00006572623,0.000001290447,7.270662e-7,0.000007226764,0.00009659916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5085724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9341695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122842921","doi":"10.1007/bf02940853","title":"Agent toolkit satisfaction and use in higher education","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptation (eye); Computer science; User satisfaction; Higher education; Point (geometry); Knowledge management; Multimedia; Human–computer interaction; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05888305272924555,"gpt":0.3062965242361509,"spread":0.2474134715069054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007172753,0.0001188053,0.0001851301,0.0004463863,0.00005344407,0.0002009867,0.0001334938,0.00007770617,0.00004200275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000517722,0.0001147669,0.00003852098,0.0004229558,0.00001057385,0.001023458,0.00002334746,0.0002029273,0.000005414781],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003278319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003582658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002018043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002478978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984804,0.0002621817,0.0006436186,0.0001994507,0.000252483,0.0001619032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988786,0.0001305882,0.0005537072,0.0001867371,0.0001709873,0.00007938388],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007327286,0.0004037341,0.9345992,0.00004950532,0.00001032274,0.000002311531,0.001449898,0.001278891,0.0007308495,0.04012544,0.001641112,0.01970136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003340377,0.00003682363,0.9895615,0.0002226473,0.000004968862,0.00003753539,0.00004336436,0.0007290985,0.0000711249,0.0007759831,0.008068106,0.0001148301],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865823,0.0005453111,0.003463143,0.0009022896,0.007833107,0.0001634773,1.046796e-7,0.00001282164,0.000497437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985768,0.00002913361,0.01268693,0.0002734846,0.0003437783,0.000003331429,9.303076e-7,0.0000081488,0.0008862495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05496223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.468006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399336118","doi":"10.1007/s12528-024-09404-6","title":"Using text mining and machine learning to predict reasoning activities from think-aloud transcripts in computer assisted learning","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Think aloud protocol; Coding (social sciences); Affordance; Computer science; Protocol analysis; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Human–computer interaction; Usability; Cognitive science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04898514004665845,"gpt":0.2987161317507466,"spread":0.2497309917040881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001372508,0.0002143935,0.0003772481,0.0007871846,0.0001618632,0.0006340198,0.000304934,0.00009516512,0.00001003268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000808872,0.0002076974,0.00007929446,0.000656906,0.00001788028,0.0007241561,0.0001073309,0.000915568,0.000001669098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003242704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002409501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003469077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001105158,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977472,0.000477766,0.0007265445,0.0003708934,0.0003621942,0.0003153468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987801,0.0005696709,0.0003244582,0.0001181109,0.00009983429,0.0001078318],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004623022,0.0001742811,0.1957971,0.0002147206,0.0001155476,0.0001546554,0.1562569,0.4464006,0.00711659,0.004189111,0.00006968243,0.1894647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003016914,0.0002240067,0.2323375,0.006957279,0.00001988887,0.0001734997,0.002027469,0.7537509,0.0001715917,0.00007334012,0.003649616,0.0003131952],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7706243,0.001902348,0.2238905,0.0002323266,0.003097838,0.00008481264,2.415019e-7,0.00006357726,0.0001039834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9124454,0.00001390131,0.08606843,0.00006183593,0.00101456,6.127401e-7,0.000001465548,0.00002516327,0.0003686321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3073503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8469654,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416936833","doi":"10.1007/s12528-025-09475-z","title":"Bridging educational equity gaps: expanding the CHAT-ACTS framework for personalized GenAI chatbots in higher education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"AI in Service Interactions","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Simon Fraser University; Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Mount Saint Vincent University","keywords":"Transformative learning; Higher education; Bridging (networking); Equity (law); Educational equity; Inclusion (mineral); Generative grammar; Instructional design; Conceptual framework; Educational technology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06388826660073885,"gpt":0.4103529744882723,"spread":0.3464647078875335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001273802,0.0002020052,0.0002922591,0.0007256591,0.0002537625,0.0003900515,0.001124195,0.0001279336,0.0001084685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002446085,0.0001797945,0.0001404701,0.001240286,0.00004499952,0.0008678371,0.0002024496,0.0006217721,0.000006555515],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001042292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002408327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006269481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008326982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978109,0.0002146131,0.0008949303,0.0003259583,0.0003890556,0.0003645612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967371,0.001360669,0.0008331715,0.0004050791,0.00057946,0.00008452489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005657538,0.001391176,0.03183196,0.0002721696,0.00006641381,9.684633e-7,0.007018806,0.002076432,0.0005635429,0.9208816,0.008266021,0.02757439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007626035,0.00007113835,0.8201047,0.004054779,0.00004244408,0.00005423012,0.0009952253,0.006478511,0.0003096818,0.141841,0.02489903,0.0003866963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5364142,0.00425119,0.1844067,0.2163465,0.05207543,0.001001848,0.000001562132,0.00006388903,0.005438626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9425988,0.00002769881,0.04878407,0.003485958,0.002309388,0.00005279391,0.000004778031,0.0000158159,0.002720697],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7882727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7331807,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}