{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":66,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":66,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"31ab333974bd","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing"}},"results":[{"id":"W2055949247","doi":"10.1108/eum0000000006155","title":"Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2935,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Royal Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Environmentally friendly; Marketing; Business; Green marketing; Consumer behaviour; Advertising; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008854846078452328,"gpt":0.2207263098725569,"spread":0.2118714637941045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003126024,0.0003503655,0.000550255,0.0003528668,0.0003964961,0.0002804625,0.0004466801,0.00009556237,0.0002042421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003640459,0.0002958637,0.0001786136,0.000436955,0.000170023,0.00138919,0.0002672676,0.0003300219,0.00003580871],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002586575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004582605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003227244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004826386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972776,0.00005849966,0.001008773,0.0004127769,0.0005968645,0.0006455354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975585,0.0004076483,0.001338442,0.0002757149,0.000355587,0.00006416083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001096355,0.0002141105,0.9579386,0.000809458,0.0001455947,0.0001256226,0.0001374754,0.001833902,0.006495224,0.00003390406,0.01042448,0.02074528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001627021,0.00003669707,0.3212962,0.000724087,0.0002546654,0.00007289567,0.003589905,0.000909068,0.0002674402,0.000103601,0.6704156,0.0007027318],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874986,0.0007607967,0.002645759,0.007081221,0.000707314,0.0008698542,0.000005363153,0.00004339803,0.0003877271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895338,0.0001666655,0.006550172,0.001959688,0.001300823,0.00003127525,0.00001026523,0.00009465212,0.0003526977],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6599912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999493,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056240825","doi":"10.1108/07363760510605317","title":"Shades of green: linking environmental locus of control and pro‐environmental behaviors","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":400,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Locus of control; Generalizability theory; Psychology; Structural equation modeling; Personality; Social psychology; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Big Five personality traits; Environmental design; Marketing; Developmental psychology; Business; Ecology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004614223099360186,"gpt":0.222493436571286,"spread":0.2178792134719258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001564012,0.0001839946,0.0003635282,0.00007621549,0.00008699812,0.00001158754,0.0002106348,0.00008513015,0.001780951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008593289,0.000168409,0.0001429845,0.0000621666,0.0007898646,0.0003456772,0.0001443746,0.0002549425,0.000009246974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002896317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000202785,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003689862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008763452,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978628,0.0002527699,0.000898834,0.000207331,0.0005363381,0.0002419652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985483,0.0002471621,0.0008512388,0.0001858309,0.000005300077,0.0001622144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001799597,0.000390062,0.873557,0.00003508549,0.00003322382,0.000004752171,0.0008174074,0.00009663124,0.06611545,0.000001453442,0.00004421196,0.05872473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001297766,0.0001487987,0.9876924,0.00006391134,0.0001209709,0.0001070849,0.002517108,0.0001612747,0.004401202,0.0000284296,0.003271937,0.0001891081],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979419,0.001085131,0.00003991773,0.0002795428,0.00005461663,0.0002155564,0.00001516094,0.000003726218,0.0003644771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977315,0.0002635796,0.001685453,0.00009035555,0.00003995347,0.000003311712,0.000001744243,0.00001750713,0.0001665635],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1141354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013079059","doi":"10.1108/07363761111101949","title":"How does corporate social responsibility create value for consumers?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":396,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Value proposition; Value (mathematics); Marketing; Business; Product (mathematics); Originality; Order (exchange); Typology; Consumer behaviour; Qualitative research; Public relations; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06736659517065831,"gpt":0.2632512111291846,"spread":0.1958846159585264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01371417,0.0003296435,0.000733564,0.0004310899,0.0005598372,0.0004875804,0.0003968338,0.0001781271,0.0001201453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01849717,0.000263137,0.0005433085,0.0005405371,0.000412829,0.00160011,0.0001869067,0.0004176265,0.0000094652],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000374462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000891237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006879181,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968017,0.0003071688,0.001374896,0.0003899155,0.0005711651,0.0005551453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901393,0.001293237,0.006004166,0.0002896815,0.002218376,0.00005520797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02108901,0.0004331193,0.8651764,0.001283125,0.0007552363,0.0003758015,0.001058499,0.00000157624,0.01389004,0.009184772,0.003349169,0.08340329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006871432,0.0001515276,0.7439474,0.0007145081,0.00206702,0.0001651686,0.01152651,0.0008720768,0.00347866,0.08709597,0.1410703,0.002039464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.990868,0.0001941707,0.0007356984,0.0009883181,0.001126487,0.0005244024,0.000008086765,0.00007477577,0.005480116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942287,0.00001383154,0.003593285,0.0003365603,0.001052317,0.00001158848,0.000003613823,0.00005977801,0.0007002839],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1377211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999821,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999717168","doi":"10.1108/07363760810845381","title":"Impulse buying: the role of affect, social influence, and subjective wellbeing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Consumer Retail Behavior Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":337,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Impulse (physics); Psychology; Feeling; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Affect (linguistics); Originality","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01144223188733197,"gpt":0.2284530293041632,"spread":0.2170107974168313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001687143,0.0001704761,0.0003747803,0.0002465938,0.0005541721,0.00008275734,0.0002173294,0.00004857747,0.00002617928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009045909,0.0001242297,0.0001510408,0.000326134,0.000335772,0.0006164897,0.0002296513,0.0003159459,0.000004109294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002288309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004727338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009787838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003311976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986556,0.00008632435,0.0005298184,0.0001293154,0.0003611111,0.0002378587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978179,0.0005611543,0.0009964058,0.00009883925,0.0005120916,0.0000136292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000158922,0.00002556164,0.9612889,0.00005665216,0.0001192609,0.00002707638,0.0002892116,0.000001193854,0.003613305,0.00008065083,0.0001017743,0.03423751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005093144,0.000008110777,0.9863861,0.0001156077,0.0002454203,0.0001046724,0.001220652,0.00006150257,0.000110886,0.00007663773,0.01101846,0.0001426014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912703,0.004433274,0.000005741503,0.0002138865,0.0001311647,0.0001263305,7.499968e-7,0.00001402904,0.003804521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999373,0.000241205,0.00008378094,0.00005752354,0.0001949353,0.000002818929,2.202188e-7,0.0000190209,0.00002753361],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03409491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5065939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965528140","doi":"10.1108/07363761011063358","title":"New or recycled products: how much are consumers willing to pay?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":289,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Product (mathematics); Business; Marketing; Profitability index; Price premium; Product category; Population; Economics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01146505379598195,"gpt":0.2217425106924919,"spread":0.2102774568965099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002667738,0.000299955,0.0004676943,0.0004098385,0.000239002,0.0005468788,0.0005124332,0.000118447,0.0006849043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008759732,0.0002183801,0.0001273614,0.0007579325,0.0001103179,0.00155165,0.0002655679,0.0006509286,0.0000461722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009847575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001573754,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001182419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001289625,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978511,0.00006128899,0.0006743969,0.00033381,0.0005859797,0.000493437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972871,0.0004205502,0.001202329,0.0003805761,0.0006204105,0.00008905811],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001535419,0.0001548701,0.793312,0.0006818806,0.0001532896,0.0002292269,0.00008926609,0.00001565664,0.01467727,0.0001068903,0.05213553,0.1369087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001335273,0.00001751937,0.2712178,0.0004309891,0.000206683,0.000133972,0.001409336,0.00009656284,0.000646638,0.0003273426,0.7236236,0.0005542721],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9688699,0.0001931785,0.0008197617,0.0268705,0.00208508,0.000358084,0.000001334105,0.00005995318,0.0007422123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851203,0.000042821,0.009554494,0.00167968,0.002050541,0.000005812876,0.000001943709,0.00006708495,0.001477298],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.671488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987624537","doi":"10.1108/07363760510623939","title":"Purchasing pirated software: an initial examination of Chinese consumers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Purchasing; Marketing; Originality; Exploratory research; Business; Value (mathematics); Consumer behaviour; Software; Advertising; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02325018238294093,"gpt":0.2571541231995911,"spread":0.2339039408166502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002837715,0.0001818091,0.0003404797,0.0004825283,0.0001492155,0.0001875375,0.0002531187,0.00007546553,0.001897773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00354225,0.0001365795,0.0001238595,0.0004287149,0.0001145946,0.002478651,0.00007415797,0.0002792606,0.00003221629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004036225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006651565,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004231533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002992865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982949,0.0001153248,0.0008276007,0.0001441604,0.0003929484,0.0002250543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974576,0.0003750963,0.0009976249,0.0001343404,0.001007218,0.00002816508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001235626,0.0003244135,0.05494571,0.0002734626,0.0001783743,0.00002896521,0.0005150043,0.00004272725,0.01258653,0.00003844293,0.004567374,0.9252633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01061942,0.0004053946,0.508674,0.001976132,0.0008914366,0.0004283198,0.001754767,0.1475174,0.006443122,0.00100257,0.318063,0.002224429],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809895,0.0005609723,0.0007347331,0.0001796115,0.0003964834,0.0001035031,9.620131e-7,0.00003584862,0.01699844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972391,0.00003346149,0.001368181,0.0003478242,0.0008996671,9.245871e-7,0.000004908178,0.00002702548,0.00007892486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.923039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964423073","doi":"10.1108/07363760010349920","title":"Gender differences in information search strategies for a Christmas gift","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":209,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Clothing; Advertising; TRIPS architecture; Marketing; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04443974800924988,"gpt":0.2699036275212691,"spread":0.2254638795120192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001708498,0.0001126544,0.0001989607,0.0004441825,0.0001228308,0.0006425248,0.0001892355,0.00005427771,0.001221823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000158959,0.0001006225,0.0001000609,0.0002453065,0.00004710635,0.00283461,0.00001902624,0.0001730644,0.00007585663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002400612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008884013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006645111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002942673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987174,0.00004161053,0.0006722963,0.00009037479,0.0002824169,0.0001958761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990183,0.0001637284,0.0003410972,0.00009710726,0.0003647662,0.00001497144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007698443,0.00008894096,0.250634,0.0003391013,0.00004148491,0.000004019332,0.0003147107,0.00002725265,0.0003723179,0.0007320772,0.002269704,0.7444065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001316738,0.000003998154,0.9325277,0.0001131354,0.00006704441,0.00001176767,0.001603991,0.001362939,0.0000102677,0.0004469722,0.06236434,0.0001711283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948069,0.0003550039,0.0002811375,0.0002286865,0.0002498332,0.0001968482,0.000002061331,0.00001819242,0.003861319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991285,0.0001583544,0.0002252251,0.0001784042,0.000165884,0.00001237871,0.00000734399,0.00000781845,0.0001161114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7442354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084562564","doi":"10.1108/07363760810858837","title":"Decision making process of community organic food consumers: an exploratory study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":208,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Marketing; Niche market; Business; Mainstream; Food systems; Focus group; Exploratory research; Food marketing; Market segmentation; Food security; Agriculture; Sociology; Geography; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0362319722805845,"gpt":0.2611263407493655,"spread":0.224894368468781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002248991,0.0001686131,0.0003909167,0.00003185062,0.0004550592,0.00003414986,0.0005067784,0.00008687249,0.0002625638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008189516,0.00006312576,0.0001098543,0.0004537202,0.00009185549,0.0003893296,0.00009476214,0.0005339594,0.000002793185],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002319459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004728858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005512539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003580123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975442,0.0009731968,0.0006879298,0.0001135443,0.0004723046,0.0002088745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973384,0.001157035,0.0007698887,0.00008608584,0.0005317901,0.0001168605],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001297279,0.003660613,0.4838475,0.00009127307,0.0003795262,0.00009983242,0.0149439,0.000004777258,0.3447507,0.000002890741,0.001733547,0.1491882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008975882,0.002895688,0.9062341,0.000413066,0.0001067642,0.0005024118,0.08259525,0.00000391114,0.005023496,0.00008601096,0.0009201529,0.0003215419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987593,0.0007321627,0.000002874092,0.0000842411,0.0001567436,0.0001458905,0.000007228114,0.00002013917,0.00009146833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996324,0.00008046355,0.0001076542,0.00005318098,0.0001162199,0.000001217882,0.000001647834,0.000002233367,0.000004961065],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4223866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3499994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041317966","doi":"10.1108/07363760610663303","title":"The impact of country of design and country of manufacture on consumer perceptions of bi‐national products' quality: an empirical model based on the concept of fit","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Marketing; Country of origin; Quality (philosophy); Perception; Product category; Business; Product design; Economics; Advertising; Mathematics; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05309889522100614,"gpt":0.3299275928550855,"spread":0.2768286976340794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004247764,0.0001991534,0.0004754366,0.0003092765,0.0001632756,0.00006282933,0.0002992581,0.000100238,0.0001859329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00104775,0.0001251495,0.0001917407,0.0003329795,0.0006008504,0.0003189784,0.00003504791,0.000265712,9.154066e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004002593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003028344,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002028442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001867984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970855,0.0003125613,0.001383323,0.0001812043,0.0008730479,0.0001643273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935274,0.001720472,0.002571443,0.0003173316,0.001842851,0.00002050323],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009590616,0.003219039,0.7573028,0.001337817,0.0008416756,0.000003084991,0.0005655666,0.03975454,0.1084445,0.004097278,0.02603539,0.0488077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001636598,0.00006131416,0.9635988,0.0004948612,0.0003878533,0.000006468565,0.0006219839,0.02919665,0.00281722,0.0004050499,0.0005598163,0.0002134186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977915,0.0004072828,0.0005372782,0.0004182266,0.0001034974,0.0003280572,0.00008421686,0.000006234106,0.0003237432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992918,0.00007407797,0.0004065308,0.00007777786,0.00006891906,0.00000512799,0.00001738815,0.00001705903,0.00004135191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.206296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5103449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031838336","doi":"10.1108/07363760910976592","title":"An exploratory investigation of the consumer religious commitment and its influence on store loyalty and consumer complaint intentions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Halal products and consumer behavior","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Innovative Medicines Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Loyalty; Religiosity; Marketing; Value (mathematics); Originality; Consumer behaviour; Consumption (sociology); Business; Market segmentation; Advertising; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Creativity; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0294318505341246,"gpt":0.3007403494660021,"spread":0.2713084989318775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003041473,0.0001707435,0.0003159384,0.0001366207,0.0005761133,0.00009903043,0.0002674581,0.000094082,0.00001876924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001152896,0.0001285846,0.00007341225,0.000215015,0.0007417458,0.0003817032,0.00004719578,0.0004042485,0.000001838579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007164219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003146984,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000614265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000162259,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970023,0.001258308,0.0006581272,0.0002144122,0.0006177594,0.0002490784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975463,0.000469973,0.0007509342,0.0002252943,0.0007481869,0.0002593131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005203676,0.0004110339,0.8571854,0.0001176382,0.000205477,0.00004026738,0.0250678,0.00002721301,0.02991035,0.003205115,0.003234212,0.08007509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001366517,0.0003642314,0.9606245,0.001155169,0.0003802286,0.00008523676,0.00875331,0.00005017,0.002098019,0.0006879095,0.02400321,0.000431482],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921467,0.004476066,0.000003755826,0.002403689,0.0002510188,0.000376868,0.000008721607,0.00001551314,0.0003176424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969748,0.002222336,0.0001860366,0.0005271492,0.00004620918,0.000004441688,6.086319e-7,0.000009989141,0.00002843006],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1034391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5243526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101230886","doi":"10.1108/07363760810915671","title":"Marketing in subsistence marketplaces: consumption and entrepreneurship in a South Indian context","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Innovation and Socioeconomic Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Marketing; Embeddedness; Mindset; Entrepreneurship; Marketing research; Bottom of the pyramid; Business; Marketing management; Consumption (sociology); Marketing strategy; Qualitative marketing research; Subsistence agriculture; Originality; Relationship marketing; Influencer marketing; Qualitative research; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02521717032515718,"gpt":0.2171346359006373,"spread":0.1919174655754801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006581586,0.0001687547,0.0003463564,0.0008011559,0.00008343686,0.00009151598,0.0001534945,0.00008475408,0.0004170297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00170097,0.0001709767,0.00005543793,0.000238047,0.0001153072,0.0007537557,0.00008020075,0.000356396,0.00002424221],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001689763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001191405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003907822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001388479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981205,0.0001758008,0.0009884656,0.0002038408,0.0002147104,0.0002966283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982097,0.0005863049,0.0009203947,0.00009098357,0.0001696717,0.00002300248],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004854844,0.00002997276,0.9875445,0.0001678297,0.00001874408,0.0001637247,0.001495873,0.000003250647,0.00004270167,0.00006868169,0.0003453448,0.009633862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001775947,0.000002906567,0.987117,0.0005976289,0.00001035396,0.0001003905,0.003636082,0.0002099818,0.000006474484,0.000028065,0.006311534,0.0002036274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942642,0.0008691897,0.00000469227,0.0003243726,0.0003412868,0.0001478555,4.307468e-7,0.00001232718,0.004035617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981186,0.0002759674,0.0002442102,0.001061319,0.0001225946,0.000004681204,0.000001754177,0.00001620782,0.0001546473],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009430235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6972226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077899008","doi":"10.1108/07363760910940465","title":"Canadian and French men's consumption of cosmetics: a comparison of their attitudes and motivations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Attractiveness; Originality; Marketing; Metropolitan area; Cosmetics; Population; Advertising; Sample (material); Affect (linguistics); Value (mathematics); Consumer behaviour; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Sociology; Geography; Demography; Medicine; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02768567386846084,"gpt":0.2751749548749774,"spread":0.2474892810065166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009986648,0.0001161253,0.0003155725,0.0005379836,0.000123452,0.0001038781,0.0001090943,0.00005730584,0.0001083839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002988076,0.0001062264,0.00005787153,0.000172586,0.000115634,0.0004331143,0.00002509712,0.0001418154,0.000002132859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002357442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000583835,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001058486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001389837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988273,0.0000468492,0.0006943989,0.0001127261,0.0001870309,0.0001316309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982543,0.0002093622,0.0008774122,0.0001107712,0.0005102521,0.00003789723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004041107,0.00006673663,0.8942577,0.0001499261,0.00004099039,9.233453e-7,0.0001912199,0.000002101858,0.00511265,0.0001916539,0.0006486061,0.09929707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005277524,0.000008056546,0.9961018,0.0002490572,0.0001287086,0.00001068247,0.000377118,0.0004363817,0.0001825943,0.0001762753,0.001700903,0.0001006596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966834,0.002091113,0.00003742655,0.0004073929,0.0001095564,0.000117764,0.000004490088,0.000007218361,0.0005416172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992183,0.0003365099,0.0002899914,0.00006396051,0.00004457662,0.000001115881,0.000004354087,0.00000652915,0.0000346604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1018441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4331787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797091037","doi":"10.1108/jcm-02-2017-2076","title":"Antecedents and pro-environmental consumer behavior (PECB): the moderating role of religiosity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Originality; Value (mathematics); Islam; Social psychology; Psychology; Generalizability theory; Marketing; Sample (material); Business; Geography; Creativity; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006373937299220142,"gpt":0.2422022389376426,"spread":0.2358283016384225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00194641,0.0001416069,0.000208968,0.00003123803,0.0002908458,0.00003555887,0.0002144256,0.00005558937,0.0009085951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003250688,0.0001001072,0.00007944003,0.00007167059,0.001012622,0.0002361143,0.000226453,0.0002363819,0.00001621111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001507422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002038175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005096071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001087821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983131,0.0003350896,0.0005423957,0.0001801537,0.0004173555,0.0002119021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989056,0.0002517178,0.0005067661,0.0002052409,0.00001631986,0.0001143412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001235578,0.0001238533,0.9466125,0.00000936707,0.00001829028,0.00000267412,0.0007949671,0.000003489071,0.03066031,0.000001743965,0.0002678529,0.02138143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004306358,0.0001301032,0.9865118,0.00003225984,0.0000832271,0.0001225848,0.002758683,0.000260384,0.006893865,0.00006449602,0.002587138,0.0001248117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973273,0.0005414863,0.00001725848,0.0001418494,0.0001006294,0.0002355888,0.000003369212,0.000004431594,0.001628087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987857,0.0001506859,0.000790987,0.00009941922,0.00003860366,0.000005864016,5.123171e-7,0.00001167556,0.0001165384],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03989935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059269918","doi":"10.1108/07363761011052378","title":"Rethinking the TAM model: time to consider fun","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Marketing; Product (mathematics); Sample (material); Structural equation modeling; Maturity (psychological); Consumption (sociology); Technology acceptance model; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Business; Value (mathematics); The Internet; Consumer behaviour; Advertising; Computer science; Usability; Psychology; Sociology; Mathematics; Creativity; Social psychology; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02251065396792728,"gpt":0.2990559844650765,"spread":0.2765453304971492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01498893,0.0001175962,0.0002458126,0.00009379134,0.0007079787,0.000326071,0.0004723046,0.0001282827,0.0005151746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02597668,0.00008669376,0.0001574079,0.0002479156,0.0003604596,0.0002600086,0.00007766917,0.0007764346,0.00009318589],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004327325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005545576,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003934277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001642421,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976972,0.0005478627,0.0004825361,0.0001257126,0.000759196,0.0003874344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942957,0.004322124,0.0004197019,0.0001593674,0.0005255771,0.0002775647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001162805,0.0002534371,0.03433072,0.00007365792,0.0004860996,0.0001775562,0.1376872,0.0002707605,0.01342493,0.009001543,0.3121192,0.4910121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008612507,0.00007370679,0.008876246,0.0005984927,0.0001991657,0.00007093348,0.008245217,0.001131626,0.0001668281,0.02098588,0.9580488,0.000741863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7456722,0.0001536356,0.00005606728,0.01132699,0.00113025,0.0001561799,0.000002266145,0.00004173497,0.2414607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912641,0.00003709694,0.002152401,0.001140975,0.0007854535,0.000002326584,1.721404e-7,0.0000194793,0.004598019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6459296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9822279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055318835","doi":"10.1108/07363760210420540","title":"Consumer perceptions of “green power”","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Impact; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Waterloo","funders":"Commission for Environmental Cooperation","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Business; Marketing; Hydropower; Price premium; Environmental economics; Green marketing; Variance (accounting); Electricity; Nuclear power; Variety (cybernetics); Scale (ratio); Economics; Microeconomics; Geography; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009063894757443527,"gpt":0.2394898044663227,"spread":0.2304259097088792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001165921,0.000100951,0.0001938731,0.00005672516,0.00008775046,0.00001200614,0.0001930128,0.00004881812,0.0432242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004541634,0.00008914991,0.0001334327,0.0001406249,0.000386043,0.0002027719,0.00007952272,0.0002012747,0.0001671272],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001616151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001247319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005082356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008531092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986096,0.0002065767,0.0005330588,0.0001189762,0.0003525375,0.000179254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990013,0.0002645468,0.0003849022,0.0001828289,0.00003004868,0.0001364149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003677035,0.0002476278,0.9575618,0.00001850407,0.00002533751,0.000006302706,0.001294278,0.00002820385,0.004768634,0.000005383414,0.009213576,0.02679361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003781177,0.00005317744,0.958182,0.00002959711,0.00003800717,0.00008893292,0.003377709,0.0001187797,0.0001571502,0.00004728062,0.03740225,0.0001270188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9782892,0.0004044637,0.00004905852,0.000689415,0.0001233216,0.00007830339,0.000002361089,0.000005184904,0.02035867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958939,0.0002164195,0.002110715,0.0001567542,0.0000167999,0.000001296906,2.702359e-7,0.000009220861,0.001594612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04305707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9576504,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019688489","doi":"10.1108/07363760710720966","title":"The effects of multiple‐ads and multiple‐brands on consumer attitude and purchase behavior","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Originality; Affect (linguistics); Advertising; Marketing; Competition (biology); Value (mathematics); Dual (grammatical number); Psychology; Business; Consumer behaviour; Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01341533391036586,"gpt":0.2518235158879423,"spread":0.2384081819775765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00335368,0.0002200104,0.0003286501,0.0003678945,0.0004041476,0.0002831828,0.0002035132,0.00009291472,0.00003027055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00268223,0.0001640252,0.000123536,0.0002042866,0.0003259951,0.0004645217,0.0001050335,0.0003245961,0.00000944075],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002040618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002539832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003930096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007370099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981403,0.00007789726,0.0008574524,0.0002127342,0.0004210669,0.0002905536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953433,0.00295559,0.0009807413,0.0002246451,0.0004408916,0.00005484936],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007802368,0.0001177846,0.6123099,0.0002205622,0.00006457631,0.00002889605,0.00004233291,2.283504e-7,0.01904994,0.00007110113,0.0003008593,0.3670136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002714895,0.00001791821,0.9754266,0.0003568582,0.0004042936,0.00004836057,0.0001923269,0.00008633491,0.0013354,0.00001957167,0.01919563,0.00020187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944411,0.00396103,0.0000501133,0.0001619907,0.0007920596,0.0003844907,0.000001925062,0.00002080309,0.0001865039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984678,0.0009707026,0.0001116129,0.0001401929,0.0001700562,0.000008369244,0.000002182131,0.00002439868,0.0001047104],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3668117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6688755,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096194304","doi":"10.1108/07363760610712902","title":"The art of storytelling: how loyalty marketers can build emotional connections to their brands","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty; Storytelling; Marketing; Originality; Loyalty program; Advertising; Loyalty business model; Business; Order (exchange); Brand loyalty; Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Psychology; Computer science; Service (business); Narrative; Creativity; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0137534662504429,"gpt":0.21867270086872,"spread":0.204919234618277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004626031,0.0001838588,0.0003186622,0.0003008879,0.0004459146,0.0002997887,0.0003607597,0.00006326455,0.0001418432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006395614,0.0001336193,0.0002494196,0.0004426817,0.000104245,0.0003923062,0.00008573224,0.0003114678,0.0000131793],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004663003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007470915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001796544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007005036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982402,0.0001456931,0.0006812048,0.0001546949,0.0004742315,0.0003040206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969424,0.00116,0.0009651058,0.0002073882,0.0006912392,0.00003384772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004815321,0.0005963535,0.532822,0.0012747,0.001005759,0.00005179828,0.0004196918,0.003092549,0.005921794,0.008109071,0.3774886,0.06440233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009227189,0.00002155063,0.2386059,0.0003536585,0.0001396403,0.00003726858,0.001235397,0.0009742723,0.0001921709,0.00041443,0.7568198,0.0002832409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9680495,0.0004891772,0.0008502146,0.0211564,0.001208741,0.0001847981,0.00001106356,0.00003085184,0.008019204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996548,0.00003852268,0.0002261206,0.001197242,0.001101534,0.000002806019,0.000004691703,0.00002292305,0.0008581587],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3793312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5448837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977022938","doi":"10.1108/07363761011038275","title":"How do involvement and product knowledge affect the relationship between intangibility and perceived risk for brands and product categories?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Originality; Product (mathematics); Marketing; Perspective (graphical); Relevance (law); Psychology; Value (mathematics); Risk perception; Product category; Sample (material); Argument (complex analysis); Business; Social psychology; Perception; Computer science; Creativity; Mathematics; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04219477286927659,"gpt":0.2837762014367534,"spread":0.2415814285674768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005573596,0.0001792403,0.000259348,0.0002093162,0.0006436533,0.0009663752,0.0001380899,0.00005605697,0.0000149089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00492056,0.0001285972,0.00007070077,0.0001846136,0.0002711584,0.0008813295,0.0001035708,0.0004530043,0.000001361172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001446747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004094589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000317765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000158321,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987686,0.0001332148,0.0004341816,0.0003030443,0.0001795679,0.0001813989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971462,0.001389564,0.0006786101,0.0002446625,0.0005044286,0.00003654133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001110556,0.00002422819,0.8442969,0.0002470926,0.0000392201,3.170301e-7,0.0001980759,2.62036e-8,0.00135712,0.0001519463,0.0003873391,0.1531867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009037206,0.000006286257,0.9825188,0.00007463312,0.0004635133,0.00001560749,0.0003999021,0.00003628919,0.00004467061,0.0007074183,0.01467155,0.0001575887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939743,0.002652373,0.00004664188,0.002147071,0.0004783604,0.0006196364,0.000005406298,0.00001921814,0.00005697107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987163,0.0001991585,0.0002148785,0.00002651326,0.0006506353,0.0000240345,0.000006364338,0.00001759864,0.0001445323],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1530291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9318779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034996818","doi":"10.1108/07363760110404378","title":"When conspicuous consumption becomes inconspicuous: the case of the migrant Hong Kong consumers","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conspicuous consumption; Ethnic group; Consumption (sociology); Proposition; Advertising; Consumer behaviour; Marketing; Identification (biology); Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Business; Demographic economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02509703817607386,"gpt":0.2496254223738034,"spread":0.2245283841977295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003444768,0.0003033628,0.0004817221,0.0004023652,0.0006718602,0.0003797072,0.0006839162,0.0001219521,0.0008836645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00121838,0.0001939265,0.0004426582,0.0004924377,0.0006686812,0.0008784495,0.0002107897,0.0005545574,0.00006645239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006015507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000118938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007711988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009866375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971114,0.0003058366,0.001456772,0.0002605656,0.0004945645,0.0003708507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995125,0.0009414596,0.002397085,0.0005704737,0.0009241687,0.0000418093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003374584,0.0001365082,0.8527173,0.0002010072,0.0002253936,0.0003168977,0.0002334816,0.000008916585,0.002132679,0.0003524708,0.005435269,0.1379026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00270282,0.000009405142,0.8411781,0.0007232497,0.001424104,0.006088935,0.002360041,0.0004909509,0.0002151784,0.0004248331,0.1438764,0.0005059349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913542,0.002759167,0.00007178355,0.003083094,0.0016499,0.000434069,0.000006930177,0.00003910058,0.0006018166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982949,0.0004247238,0.000118444,0.0005780065,0.0002342988,0.0000119483,0.00000303008,0.00003278977,0.0003018614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1384412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9675506,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025520255","doi":"10.1108/jcm-06-2019-3257","title":"A psychological approach to regaining consumer trust after greenwashing: the case of Chinese green consumers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Greenwashing; Marketing; Originality; Loyalty; Business; Value (mathematics); Sustainability; Consumer behaviour; Process (computing); Qualitative research; Advertising; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02066505636879012,"gpt":0.2535307097660021,"spread":0.2328656533972119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003075823,0.0003524961,0.0006287578,0.0002258364,0.0002164104,0.0001922439,0.0006319374,0.000121165,0.0002664901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003543275,0.0002350819,0.0002869405,0.0009139524,0.0004290803,0.0007805257,0.0004819716,0.0006225395,0.00002852783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006003011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003172429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001855627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001442302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973511,0.0002159991,0.001146039,0.0003752982,0.0004730952,0.0004385017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974086,0.0006534192,0.001112092,0.0003647038,0.0003653666,0.00009579043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002496663,0.0002781943,0.9698625,0.0007281294,0.0002186159,0.00135138,0.0008897303,0.0001642962,0.0003458127,0.000119812,0.00162816,0.0219167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004053021,0.0001153587,0.9322152,0.0003681267,0.0007054626,0.003396894,0.009012698,0.004908925,0.00001849874,0.0004261491,0.04367255,0.001107077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901825,0.0006575241,0.0004366374,0.004641457,0.0002004027,0.0004467561,0.000004755583,0.00003056626,0.003399441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930976,0.00001911158,0.00175043,0.004555407,0.000481057,0.00001747477,0.000001868414,0.00004531469,0.0000317446],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04204439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.958636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345884154","doi":"10.1108/jcm-01-2015-1273","title":"The customer is king: culture-based unintended consequences of modern marketing","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marketing; Business; Service provider; Service (business); Entitlement (fair division); Copying; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Economics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02429357453934001,"gpt":0.2564096436039019,"spread":0.2321160690645619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087545,0.0002323334,0.0004138117,0.000249054,0.0003551081,0.0002229429,0.0006119574,0.00009834603,0.000345512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00284656,0.0001252454,0.0002911718,0.0004034085,0.0006159252,0.0007169939,0.0001199875,0.0002872004,0.00003619614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004424069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001439358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007679717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004112174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973387,0.0003055569,0.001091892,0.000197965,0.0006675028,0.0003983933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946044,0.001772884,0.002100837,0.000280111,0.001206149,0.00003560547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008995102,0.0003487087,0.3904806,0.002192124,0.001191782,0.0001272245,0.0007804696,0.0000580923,0.08104271,0.00587992,0.04867999,0.4602233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005718703,0.00005193697,0.07185412,0.005853046,0.000824573,0.0001074081,0.003582808,0.002435148,0.006222492,0.007311491,0.8948627,0.001175614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9049117,0.006921847,0.001362614,0.03664593,0.002022121,0.000454727,0.00001456145,0.0001112308,0.04755525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969049,0.0001855671,0.0003256636,0.001686323,0.0004151972,0.000002679956,6.382255e-7,0.00002540506,0.0004536793],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8461826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5107359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077760101","doi":"10.1108/07363760410525696","title":"Strategies for influencing parental decisions on food purchasing","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Purchasing; Interpersonal influence; Psychology; Interpersonal communication; Socialization; Marketing; Consumer behaviour; Social influence; Social psychology; Function (biology); Developmental psychology; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04338633759207341,"gpt":0.2800443762569675,"spread":0.2366580386648941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00136987,0.0001681088,0.0002358755,0.000475932,0.0003512059,0.0006711701,0.0002411136,0.00006212579,0.00007232884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000999422,0.000152962,0.0002149642,0.0002386166,0.00005791826,0.001313966,0.00004613776,0.0002139341,0.00003679752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007389063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000128222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001907717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003901777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984955,0.0000242317,0.0007019356,0.0001758265,0.0003605442,0.0002419304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981118,0.0004186128,0.0007579307,0.0001602353,0.0005238796,0.00002746927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002579103,0.0006859414,0.0838574,0.0003721885,0.0003618345,0.00004676449,0.0004782452,0.001477028,0.02318288,0.0242657,0.00374516,0.8589478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01336746,0.0001450805,0.7786286,0.004437501,0.00110516,0.0002575319,0.0127361,0.0005515073,0.001032979,0.02315528,0.1631246,0.001458185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950297,0.0003824706,0.001971266,0.000394403,0.000997449,0.0002148845,0.000003501332,0.00003845263,0.000967898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981952,0.0000413566,0.0009961399,0.000300914,0.0004073727,0.00001119684,0.000005053584,0.00002415153,0.00001860689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8574896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6472108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801590351","doi":"10.1108/jcm-09-2016-1941","title":"Does “sharing” mean “socially responsible consuming”? Exploration of the relationship between collaborative consumption and socially responsible consumption","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Sharing Economy and Platforms","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Sustainable consumption; Originality; Marketing; Variance (accounting); Business; Consumer behaviour; Value (mathematics); Sustainability; Sharing economy; Advertising; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Political science; Sociology; Production (economics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06810363617536362,"gpt":0.2899102214397256,"spread":0.2218065852643619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006450328,0.0002229298,0.0004374787,0.0004695321,0.0007609501,0.000364867,0.0003199422,0.0001860061,0.000164803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005528252,0.0001506565,0.0001271765,0.0004921719,0.0005161517,0.002723762,0.0002036027,0.0003982875,0.00003691889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007895974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008494121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003445144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007593001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997779,0.0002222053,0.001069477,0.0002565746,0.0004010481,0.0002716731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934154,0.002800368,0.002400662,0.0002434383,0.001104859,0.00003524264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009750582,0.000022337,0.9714004,0.0001943721,0.0001160782,0.000002305208,0.000630278,0.000002857125,0.000623284,0.02326529,0.0005540622,0.00221364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001213511,0.00003175416,0.9396693,0.000798763,0.0002959372,0.000007822825,0.000784416,0.00009528628,0.0008039026,0.05158608,0.004455774,0.0002574405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942337,0.0002973337,0.0002167817,0.002299434,0.0008206996,0.0003566439,0.00001185609,0.00003425265,0.001729295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966819,0.0001132754,0.001725174,0.0001897214,0.0009521815,0.000006116419,0.000007214931,0.00002705263,0.0002973879],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03173112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6618233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028107074","doi":"10.1108/07363761111127626","title":"Matching consumers' country and product image perceptions: an Australian perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Country of origin; Originality; Product (mathematics); Marketing; Business; Perception; Sample (material); Advertising; Perspective (graphical); Value (mathematics); China; Psychology; Geography; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03177253104766767,"gpt":0.2726729061552846,"spread":0.2409003751076169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002042012,0.000219692,0.0002902765,0.000455524,0.000333608,0.0004804196,0.0002535249,0.00006577658,0.00160764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003342596,0.0002080627,0.00009980613,0.0002601643,0.0002415399,0.002793197,0.00007362163,0.0003654849,0.0001052855],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005484226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006050754,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006210934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009317524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983548,0.0001043785,0.0006537716,0.0002960096,0.0003247593,0.0002662877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979182,0.00007025178,0.0007578274,0.0002424269,0.0009569182,0.00005440682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001681879,0.0008603649,0.7061778,0.0005829341,0.0004071286,0.0001596759,0.005046347,7.40069e-7,0.0551015,0.005466262,0.007423577,0.2170918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001018562,0.000007579897,0.9683544,0.0002099674,0.0004947159,0.0002439645,0.01652014,0.00002966937,0.0001126503,0.001320536,0.01128449,0.0004033273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942093,0.0006821418,0.00008783051,0.0003076639,0.0006972427,0.0002023834,0.000004018409,0.00005856455,0.003750793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970102,0.0001921869,0.001945373,0.0001870017,0.0003233324,0.000006614294,0.000005659973,0.00003107736,0.0002984992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2621766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999305,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011869944","doi":"10.1108/07363760310472236","title":"Which decision heuristics are used in consideration set formation?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Color perception and design","field":"Psychology","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Heuristic; Set (abstract data type); Selection (genetic algorithm); Lexicographical order; Computer science; Decomposition; Choice set; Product (mathematics); Marketing; Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Business; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Econometrics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05004822720303802,"gpt":0.3437606807724192,"spread":0.2937124535693811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003492458,0.00009643315,0.000223579,0.0002792879,0.0000753073,0.00006192525,0.00006843076,0.00009715324,0.002333255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003565505,0.00008953267,0.00005869009,0.0002407728,0.0000205255,0.0001849846,0.000008266882,0.0002948224,0.0000873508],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006959182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007894586,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002900554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001344549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977958,0.0009340442,0.0007617027,0.00009873717,0.000241631,0.0001681222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972315,0.001638978,0.0005514275,0.0001258868,0.0003772375,0.00007490867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001800034,0.0003143421,0.8663777,0.00005359617,0.00008838552,0.0002342611,0.004574926,0.0002490839,0.001555309,0.001167381,0.1020748,0.02151026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004683111,0.0001148075,0.945979,0.000385354,0.00005824922,0.001320529,0.007154285,0.0007126416,0.0001183351,0.001203044,0.03797531,0.0002953263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753838,0.0003292807,0.0112714,0.0002593116,0.0008097488,0.0001223121,0.00000266306,0.00001097929,0.0118105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967641,0.00005230136,0.002790202,0.0001987572,0.00004606305,0.000002466501,0.000001122267,0.00001033789,0.0001346357],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07960136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076449491","doi":"10.1108/07363761211221701","title":"Relationship between intangibility and perceived risk: moderating effect of privacy, system security and general security concerns","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Technology Adoption and User Behaviour","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Generalizability theory; Marketing; Purchasing; Originality; Sample (material); Risk perception; Product (mathematics); Perception; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06727780266032572,"gpt":0.3717211286081228,"spread":0.3044433259477971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02287146,0.0001641658,0.0006047634,0.000253758,0.0002780464,0.00009153529,0.0002549521,0.0002021452,0.00002237263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01560729,0.0001195194,0.0001249478,0.0002205083,0.0002562772,0.0005368065,0.0001956502,0.000703449,0.000001804604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005972883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004565996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002418458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005500548,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949926,0.002736022,0.001200164,0.0002186479,0.0006107399,0.0002418046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890565,0.008610815,0.001503341,0.0002824641,0.0003460451,0.0002008322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118439,0.00001405574,0.9948542,0.00005406114,0.00002594086,0.000002278753,0.001547988,0.000001328583,0.0001472126,0.0000830359,0.00006164605,0.003089861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007646754,0.00006847134,0.9960163,0.0001069874,0.0001541061,0.000119434,0.001077129,0.0008229839,0.0001972378,0.0005036715,0.00005993755,0.0001090473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977449,0.001333963,0.0003200498,0.00008345371,0.0001782745,0.0001619463,0.00002203711,0.00002467215,0.0001307203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985937,0.00002358397,0.001244306,0.000005451539,0.0001140216,0.000001524183,5.671037e-7,0.000008680951,0.000008146902],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007264169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039411970","doi":"10.1108/07363760810870644","title":"Inciting consumers to buy fairly‐traded products: a field experiment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Marketing; Business; Popularity; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Originality; Advertising; Concreteness; Control (management); Consumer behaviour; Field (mathematics); Economics; Psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01572613695379023,"gpt":0.2249404674686102,"spread":0.20921433051482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001890665,0.0002632085,0.0004115827,0.0003769907,0.0003322728,0.0001430019,0.0003814584,0.0000782757,0.0003510144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004428418,0.0002481468,0.0001340766,0.0005582798,0.0001382162,0.001066157,0.0002773581,0.000341888,0.00006927949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001900383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008465448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001232305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004264786,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976773,0.00007143189,0.0008891268,0.0002862398,0.0006141877,0.0004617173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980726,0.000419827,0.0007609263,0.0002788775,0.0004153484,0.00005238449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001620004,0.0005580321,0.9028234,0.001006178,0.0002635875,0.0008054223,0.001063777,0.0001798255,0.03235956,0.0001897721,0.03185428,0.02727613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003696744,0.0001300979,0.4482215,0.001089918,0.0003030298,0.0009224106,0.006754881,0.0002648165,0.01394674,0.0001612418,0.5229232,0.001585348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902255,0.0006240443,0.0002011906,0.005218379,0.0005680122,0.0003588788,6.193329e-7,0.00004534652,0.002758049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940263,0.00004772718,0.002482111,0.002539173,0.000708119,0.00001255171,0.000001481929,0.00003871043,0.0001438263],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.491069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041999560","doi":"10.1108/07363760710746175","title":"The effects of risk disclosure and ad involvement on consumers in DTC advertising","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Advertising; Originality; Risk perception; Perception; Order (exchange); Marketing; Information processing; Business; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Consumer behaviour; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007830401502662359,"gpt":0.2339784317849259,"spread":0.2261480302822635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00464979,0.0001497249,0.0002468604,0.0004041145,0.0002232011,0.0001548756,0.0001806828,0.00005703747,0.0000161004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002193919,0.0001107726,0.0001017443,0.0002909757,0.0001518452,0.0003769728,0.00006537046,0.0003241989,0.000005478501],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004390332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002655524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008637999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004304975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982449,0.0001032789,0.0008515217,0.0001491595,0.0003811946,0.0002699305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963185,0.00208913,0.001142401,0.0001679747,0.000253186,0.00002879827],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004179158,0.00005692718,0.6159924,0.0001433922,0.00003657355,0.00001277438,0.00004894459,5.932633e-7,0.001677719,0.0001470399,0.0001606571,0.3813051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001339555,0.000007920333,0.9873545,0.0006823289,0.0001620161,0.000006831172,0.0007220134,0.00003686492,0.0003754633,0.000162738,0.009022458,0.0001273394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941968,0.004207077,0.00004788981,0.0002102309,0.0007714773,0.000200316,7.747532e-7,0.000009634517,0.0003558449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985697,0.001136691,0.00006897515,0.0001113744,0.00006622729,0.000002663707,0.00000103886,0.00001449683,0.000028849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3811777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4517174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037187622","doi":"10.1108/07363761111127644","title":"College binge drinking: a new approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Binge drinking; Moderation; Originality; Psychology; Consumption (sociology); Social psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Environmental health; Medicine; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06052596944943418,"gpt":0.2714644889331107,"spread":0.2109385194836765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001022666,0.0001336551,0.0003861688,0.0001977149,0.00005339742,0.00001021184,0.0001023634,0.00006060036,0.0006694891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004200733,0.00009659912,0.0001989307,0.0001918514,0.00003815844,0.0001302687,0.00001899746,0.0002262454,0.00002509647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006073509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002183732,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004243529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003429838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998863,0.00008738076,0.0004428168,0.0001093896,0.0002854607,0.0002119534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989024,0.0002509826,0.00035204,0.0001553197,0.0001411848,0.0001980977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001792796,0.0001829398,0.9724555,0.00003073917,0.0004815097,0.0004729862,0.001665709,1.38604e-7,0.0003155912,0.0001082553,0.01053682,0.01195702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01676666,0.0003626448,0.9293621,0.001372135,0.001848465,0.004548593,0.005556037,0.00008934678,0.002863745,0.0003216733,0.03642383,0.0004847868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9226226,0.00246371,0.0001988527,0.000145208,0.0002713334,0.0001446159,2.404801e-7,0.00002567645,0.07412772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673274,0.0002862847,0.02832225,0.0001853142,0.0002082525,0.000001151899,6.625452e-7,0.00002252101,0.003646169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07048155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7330436,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224240596","doi":"10.1108/jcm-05-2020-3863","title":"What to believe, whom to blame, and when to share: exploring the fake news experience in the marketing context","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Perception; Advertising; Business; Vetting; Conceptual framework; Marketing; Social media; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06229106227004924,"gpt":0.3128619136501001,"spread":0.2505708513800509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02186256,0.0001878467,0.0003425649,0.0002259954,0.001727263,0.001503421,0.00107273,0.00003724549,0.0001954098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02042888,0.0001395956,0.000110738,0.0008789352,0.0001733028,0.0008159948,0.0004909237,0.0005963896,0.000007565714],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002015969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002531524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005179649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002132858,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940153,0.003015408,0.0007395847,0.0002993954,0.001295965,0.0006343325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991588,0.00729426,0.0003211273,0.0002279031,0.0002117135,0.0003570204],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006673475,0.00004446215,0.03539127,0.00001555725,0.00002581444,0.00005412354,0.43279,0.00002516965,0.00009076327,0.0001065392,0.0135446,0.5172444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001832924,0.00005400279,0.04820191,0.0003674193,0.0000115438,0.00001506313,0.4889306,0.000003028954,0.000005270989,0.00006658252,0.4619941,0.0001672131],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9596355,0.001038276,0.00001001194,0.03115655,0.00163809,0.0005479176,0.000004426102,0.00001653209,0.005952698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923156,0.0003473315,0.0003120513,0.005703268,0.0004407372,0.000156055,3.073694e-7,0.0000223611,0.000702245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5170771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529814768","doi":"10.1108/jcm-05-2015-1417","title":"I’m worth it or I need it? Self-gift giving and consumers’ self-regulatory mindset","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Regulatory focus theory; Situational ethics; Originality; Marketing; Value (mathematics); Gift giving; Perception; Psychology; Social psychology; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03560061604579739,"gpt":0.3457252729764678,"spread":0.3101246569306704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00308517,0.000237375,0.0004535388,0.0003108148,0.0002089896,0.00005631915,0.0002340334,0.0001906516,0.004784901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003984942,0.0001587914,0.00021054,0.0001770678,0.0001340146,0.0003051396,0.00006976302,0.0004106172,0.00009312714],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002365133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002064581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006205274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996957,0.0007411546,0.001185609,0.0002581506,0.0003050234,0.0005530798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966966,0.001347069,0.0009589187,0.0002725658,0.0002970866,0.000427777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001263712,0.0003870582,0.7661785,0.0001227729,0.0005101124,0.0002113954,0.00126824,3.273205e-8,0.0005861184,0.00005278496,0.1023335,0.1270858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003313612,0.0002990714,0.6759335,0.001117376,0.0003433072,0.001228082,0.001873392,0.000004646739,0.00004577118,0.000009027886,0.3155029,0.0003293209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888155,0.002391497,0.00005213954,0.003025622,0.001738254,0.0001975902,0.0000202816,0.00005321072,0.003705834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920624,0.0004093235,0.001771353,0.0006373289,0.0002211305,0.00000935663,7.891791e-7,0.00003899753,0.004849273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2131694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129117088","doi":"10.1108/jcm-07-2020-3943","title":"Shopping well-being: the role of congruity and shoppers’ characteristics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Consumer Retail Behavior Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Originality; Structural equation modeling; Marketing; Conceptual model; Shopping mall; Advertising; Business; Value (mathematics); Conceptual framework; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01099287414190559,"gpt":0.2218381454178872,"spread":0.2108452712759817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001939784,0.0001608806,0.0004101157,0.0001346007,0.000228442,0.0002120432,0.0001973307,0.00004007153,0.0001866047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001530143,0.0001229856,0.0001398674,0.0002210232,0.000169228,0.0003911795,0.0003287576,0.0003032459,0.000006335153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001836478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006374381,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001881502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003926632,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985522,0.00008368856,0.000671991,0.0001418184,0.0003290661,0.0002212185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975832,0.0005735551,0.0009059574,0.0001770364,0.0007415817,0.00001870106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006366504,0.00002800012,0.9165363,0.0001069159,0.0001309263,0.0000522931,0.00006080077,1.443047e-7,0.004590106,0.0003533667,0.00009399672,0.07798345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005205633,0.000004456441,0.8836928,0.0004109637,0.0005946149,0.0001570627,0.003184729,0.0002330096,0.0001875562,0.00008060885,0.1107229,0.0002107942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838877,0.004319236,0.00001369571,0.0008933237,0.0003676776,0.00007545591,0.000001137528,0.000011247,0.01043049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990199,0.0004386805,0.0001243567,0.0001427986,0.0001815394,0.000001434569,0.000001139367,0.00001829944,0.00007180592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1106289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5015205,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001171528","doi":"10.1108/jcm-08-2013-0660","title":"The importance and formalization of service quality dimensions: a comparison of Chile and the USA","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Burnaby Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"SERVQUAL; Service quality; Marketing; Respondent; Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory; Quality (philosophy); Sample (material); Service (business); Reliability (semiconductor); Business; Psychology; Empathy; Social psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02567898871586084,"gpt":0.2878368354979856,"spread":0.2621578467821248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008477525,0.00008374234,0.0003148768,0.00005542905,0.0002432517,0.00007802389,0.0001310998,0.00003276459,0.00001566457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001168975,0.00004713481,0.00005266422,0.000205084,0.0001470193,0.0003745556,0.0001152703,0.0001391001,6.711603e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003806141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001437887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003810331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001010921,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985057,0.0002197963,0.0008346414,0.00007043204,0.0002603559,0.0001090366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959363,0.001592819,0.001864054,0.0001433974,0.0004521647,0.0000113123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007336073,0.0000332673,0.9808668,0.0006387659,0.00006487822,1.801663e-7,0.0004270107,0.0000224244,0.0001646028,0.009748554,0.0002292838,0.007070657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001887579,0.00001128851,0.9654485,0.0003336564,0.0001874114,0.000009465435,0.002326699,0.0122389,0.0000537708,0.001457415,0.01593284,0.0001124699],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994557,0.00212883,0.0001154691,0.001923709,0.0000978351,0.00009942899,6.527222e-7,0.000003319069,0.0010738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998737,0.0001823054,0.00009935669,0.0008705279,0.00009582238,0.000001035354,7.6427e-7,0.000005574293,0.00000755195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01570355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2938158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582361544","doi":"10.1108/jcm-07-2015-1491","title":"Life after death? Study of goods multiple lives practices","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Marketing; Value (mathematics); Incentive; Perspective (graphical); Business; Qualitative research; Public relations; Economics; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06730785153254572,"gpt":0.3185081044139014,"spread":0.2512002528813557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002316142,0.0001544311,0.0003247793,0.0002962202,0.0003732771,0.0006364975,0.000508647,0.00004622701,0.0003838433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009067369,0.0001360301,0.000140124,0.00008232462,0.00007832395,0.002347655,0.0001896643,0.0002336517,0.00003680669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001300844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000643697,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002906345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001682341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983118,0.00009489379,0.0008199356,0.0001758187,0.000428329,0.0001692758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933536,0.0003542912,0.005120798,0.0004458664,0.0006863407,0.00003911891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068147,0.0004328705,0.9528787,0.0001043256,0.0001190568,0.00002572274,0.0001564988,8.97668e-7,0.0005620046,0.00000704545,0.0005719642,0.04445942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001536493,0.0000108992,0.9822174,0.0001658464,0.0004354255,0.00001077086,0.00216071,0.00008775133,0.00002303982,0.00001496155,0.01318863,0.000148021],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967206,0.0007552329,0.00001126664,0.0003121035,0.000812885,0.0002132105,0.000001847551,0.00001515415,0.001157669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990963,0.0001037171,0.0001511526,0.0000962361,0.0003652379,0.00001053762,7.389925e-7,0.0000185683,0.00015748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0443114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977173147","doi":"10.1108/07363760710737085","title":"An inquiry into the factors that impact on consumer appreciation of a board game","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Educational Games and Gamification","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ubisoft (Canada); HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Marketing; Surprise; Popularity; Psychology; Entertainment; Game Developer; Advertising; Perception; Game design; Social psychology; Business; Political science; Computer science; Multimedia","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0434953354037797,"gpt":0.3802012430096285,"spread":0.3367059076058488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004581206,0.0001495227,0.0002493466,0.0002433173,0.00006914909,0.00003549146,0.0002607997,0.0001096418,0.0004402448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005419697,0.00009351366,0.0001865274,0.0001871004,0.0001392363,0.0001557544,0.00001203567,0.0003455161,0.00001334189],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001026168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009906192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001190188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001765495,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980353,0.0005417221,0.00066538,0.0001436712,0.0003921038,0.0002218381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954467,0.002580017,0.001230896,0.0002956604,0.0003319476,0.0001148038],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001156189,0.0002856796,0.8969654,0.00001588397,0.0002851116,0.000003214323,0.02489607,0.0000202726,0.002041192,0.000215355,0.002189194,0.07192637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003783704,0.0001487174,0.9786935,0.00007441676,0.00006789143,0.00002287902,0.01300725,0.00001230192,0.0005283768,0.0001352989,0.006832872,0.00009815495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946952,0.001250988,0.0007885015,0.0003161142,0.00124842,0.0001266422,0.00000240995,0.000008044173,0.001563644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990991,0.00008262031,0.000333474,0.0001198212,0.0002272834,0.000002010933,0.000005385534,0.0000184311,0.0001118345],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.081728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4820372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044959721","doi":"10.1108/jcm-11-2019-3503","title":"Can corporate social responsibility deter consumer dysfunctional behavior?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Dysfunctional family; Corporate social responsibility; Reputation; Attribution; Harm; Business; Marketing; Consumer behaviour; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Social psychology; Public relations","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05640539721486736,"gpt":0.2655359031783276,"spread":0.2091305059634603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006161561,0.0003145454,0.0006408753,0.0002674402,0.0004747115,0.0003971351,0.0003356632,0.000162202,0.0006820806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01054998,0.0003055787,0.0004234493,0.0008146034,0.0002701612,0.0009029938,0.0002612783,0.0007458468,0.00006760516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001444461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005744115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005222882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006230718,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962154,0.0003186181,0.001686007,0.0004018594,0.0009211775,0.0004569551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929558,0.0007193835,0.004319678,0.0001963997,0.001715602,0.00009312251],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004058249,0.0001293821,0.9387589,0.0002147167,0.0001619147,0.0005140504,0.0001995608,0.000006896124,0.0141196,0.0002593333,0.006290035,0.03528739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002131724,0.00005608874,0.9264824,0.0001397772,0.0008120161,0.0001380302,0.0012373,0.0006355819,0.0003014124,0.002072361,0.06515164,0.0008416275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921628,0.0001699619,0.00009174649,0.004273421,0.0007270965,0.0002855757,0.000007891905,0.00007925541,0.002202219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948773,0.000007115534,0.0004681136,0.002446675,0.002024485,0.000006830092,0.000007044042,0.00005129807,0.0001111277],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0588616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999396,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089809562","doi":"10.1108/07363761111127608","title":"Anxiety and search during food choice: the moderating role of attitude towards nutritional claims","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Marketing; Originality; Anxiety; Consumption (sociology); Product (mathematics); Food choice; Skepticism; Perception; Psychology; Point of sale; Business; Economics; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03536779937746058,"gpt":0.2483145068537436,"spread":0.212946707476283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001695301,0.0001289576,0.0002069266,0.0002167885,0.000321212,0.0001890978,0.0002318007,0.00005574298,0.0003173217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002241342,0.0001011002,0.00012182,0.0001924256,0.0001224942,0.0007478931,0.0001238786,0.0002863891,0.00000574501],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001811301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004457667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000737844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002846962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985904,0.00007313542,0.0006104759,0.000145633,0.0003946776,0.0001856521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985801,0.0001281111,0.0005563113,0.0001487704,0.0005638273,0.00002287798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002423754,0.0001355832,0.8590333,0.0002823155,0.0001243835,0.000002037083,0.0002789263,0.000003525927,0.01875691,0.0005101936,0.0001060173,0.1205244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007790925,0.000004476909,0.9947304,0.0001866036,0.0001313957,0.00005133605,0.0006721396,0.0003918069,0.001127532,0.0002825987,0.001520224,0.0001224294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964125,0.001644467,0.00003239226,0.0001715433,0.000169846,0.0001340259,0.000002786884,0.00001465257,0.00141777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989688,0.0002568557,0.0003999867,0.00005607769,0.0002617875,0.000005749649,0.000001869758,0.00001485958,0.00003400777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.135697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4122747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497216014","doi":"10.1108/jcm-03-2016-1740","title":"Retrospective evaluations of playful experiences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Riverside; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Originality; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Construct (python library); Consumption (sociology); Marketing; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Social science; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02690915781325603,"gpt":0.2821044983970405,"spread":0.2551953405837845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00197094,0.0001015069,0.0002211006,0.0003468441,0.0001108961,0.00008730805,0.0002202178,0.00004154448,0.001812587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001592835,0.00006987293,0.0001361913,0.0002668907,0.0001345556,0.0009990528,0.00004692301,0.00008401473,0.00005441496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003727806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005690881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001214516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007799438,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985587,0.00005577244,0.000677469,0.0001255592,0.0004470691,0.0001354354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974645,0.0002028622,0.001137232,0.0001555342,0.001024154,0.00001565167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000273161,0.0001030146,0.5388927,0.00005207449,0.00007388311,0.000004580721,0.0002847497,5.255512e-7,0.0339523,0.0006079638,0.003684314,0.4220707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009665621,0.00000564926,0.9815448,0.0003357868,0.0001624685,0.00001623158,0.001318582,0.00002495619,0.0009416745,0.0003634469,0.01417453,0.0001453208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961937,0.0003960644,0.0003281673,0.0004554754,0.0007546822,0.00009051622,0.00000159274,0.00001587616,0.001763907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992513,0.00008773568,0.0001627161,0.00005249919,0.0002269903,0.000008284239,4.97143e-7,0.000009853149,0.0002000911],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4426521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049098825","doi":"10.1108/jcm-05-2013-0569","title":"Prior consumer satisfaction and alliance encounter satisfaction attributions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Cognitive dissonance; Marketing; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Attribution; Psychology; Originality; Resource dependence theory; Explanatory power; Social psychology; Business; Economics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01857671663656599,"gpt":0.248228622696547,"spread":0.229651906059981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001574983,0.0001751325,0.0002833155,0.0001825718,0.0002985787,0.0004201792,0.00009141184,0.00009206773,0.001287467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005032416,0.0001574023,0.00009663388,0.0002430325,0.00008269992,0.002425602,0.00006945895,0.000343476,0.0002376014],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005318666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003799139,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001474303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000440922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998507,0.00008040804,0.0006488424,0.0001715777,0.0003306302,0.0002615831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980037,0.0003384118,0.0008411487,0.0001393666,0.0006402715,0.0000370902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008745884,0.00002155649,0.8942079,0.0002093475,0.00008670968,0.000005172197,0.00004485289,0.000005234618,0.001260218,0.0001786048,0.009452194,0.09444075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006307759,0.000006911773,0.949528,0.0002092361,0.0001200318,0.00005325934,0.0003959183,0.0004201294,0.00001744279,0.0002868538,0.04814431,0.0001871723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946463,0.001220037,0.0002476071,0.001783936,0.0006730352,0.000201392,0.000002309697,0.00003521372,0.001190228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972545,0.0003521741,0.0005253637,0.001225453,0.0005211734,0.000007853447,0.000002289766,0.00001790795,0.00009331122],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09425358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996255,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001507795","doi":"10.1108/jcm-08-2013-0662","title":"The dimensions of prescription drug brand personality as identified by consumers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Roche (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Personality; Medical prescription; Originality; Psychology; Prescription drug; Personality psychology; Marketing; Competence (human resources); Scale (ratio); Big Five personality traits; Advertising; Business; Social psychology; Medicine; Pharmacology; Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01272782550503662,"gpt":0.2348550998509735,"spread":0.2221272743459369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002811681,0.0001816544,0.000292773,0.000203117,0.0004794576,0.0005948504,0.0003722796,0.00006291726,0.0008252949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001126364,0.0001234096,0.0002336178,0.0002770698,0.0002709831,0.001346419,0.00009221143,0.0002858399,0.0001644083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003101802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006041635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001000921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000741623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977559,0.0001681149,0.001041772,0.0001872365,0.0005886752,0.0002583126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963641,0.0006166055,0.001509577,0.0002747797,0.001194158,0.00004082804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006958006,0.0002935165,0.3666567,0.0002982688,0.0003745376,0.000005670243,0.0002048758,0.000001897348,0.1030065,0.0004703237,0.2965463,0.2314456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002026737,0.000005790193,0.7275522,0.0003449064,0.0005978136,0.00004192803,0.001934558,0.0003033274,0.001099595,0.0008274101,0.2648775,0.0003882441],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930385,0.002848628,0.00002775587,0.001440723,0.001067952,0.0003171849,0.000003138278,0.00002443072,0.001231737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971219,0.0006410917,0.00004020773,0.0002114945,0.00009059533,0.00001529766,0.000007701118,0.00001996982,0.001851746],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3608955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9036401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210505550","doi":"10.1108/jcm-07-2021-4752","title":"Rescuing marketing from its colonial roots: a decolonial anti-racist agenda","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Innovation and Socioeconomic Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Sociology; Colonialism; Transformative learning; Transformational leadership; Anti-racism; Ideology; Public relations; Gender studies; Politics; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01802422588491499,"gpt":0.2407512196419736,"spread":0.2227269937570586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009298082,0.000219649,0.0004371677,0.0004713676,0.0009731337,0.0004153174,0.0004572142,0.00006338676,0.004247483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001749089,0.000235998,0.0001808436,0.0004348973,0.00004306255,0.0007702353,0.0004716723,0.000641417,0.00006410364],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003119129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002413456,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005592681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002747227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973248,0.0002608295,0.001201287,0.0002558069,0.0005552807,0.0004020361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969571,0.0006856436,0.001754672,0.0001410086,0.0004366812,0.00002493455],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004802739,0.0004555144,0.7101851,0.0003942373,0.001090061,0.001052366,0.001340444,0.0006788531,0.006810373,0.001550249,0.1847008,0.08693928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001922667,0.00001072905,0.2967878,0.0001238871,0.00009424943,0.00004971584,0.001148345,0.001777604,0.00003010262,0.0001256278,0.6975415,0.0003877293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.983444,0.0003665907,0.00004683305,0.002019376,0.002985378,0.0001723491,0.000009349231,0.00004208235,0.01091409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942707,0.0000259272,0.0009710145,0.002775542,0.001486088,0.00001185754,0.00001627911,0.00004137079,0.000401236],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5128407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2577923797","doi":"10.1108/jcm-07-2014-1069","title":"The evolving gift-giving practices of bicultural consumers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Acculturation; Immigration; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Homeland; Ethnic group; China; Sociology; Marketing; Chinese americans; Gift giving; Conceptual framework; Empirical research; Qualitative research; Focus group; Advertising; Social psychology; Psychology; Business; Political science; Social science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0409636885769042,"gpt":0.3042786681152239,"spread":0.2633149795383197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004493774,0.0001668636,0.0002880097,0.0001880432,0.001484134,0.001719172,0.0008537046,0.00006258349,0.0002448969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01024201,0.0001156721,0.0002200997,0.0001167743,0.0003472409,0.002737179,0.000198569,0.0003234506,0.00003541775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002726271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007477533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002094495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001355951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980786,0.00009329325,0.0009125776,0.0001599278,0.000502459,0.0002531108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896758,0.0008660989,0.007682332,0.0004662224,0.001284096,0.00002550154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002963758,0.0000590894,0.7072939,0.0001759489,0.0001726279,0.00001321392,0.00006045618,0.00000108023,0.01116068,0.0003108178,0.005011199,0.2754446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006635063,0.000002671803,0.8684704,0.0002701887,0.0002742677,0.00003666394,0.0008499785,0.0002423284,0.0001728652,0.00007497487,0.1287763,0.0001658881],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890631,0.002671039,0.00001987262,0.001812752,0.001745522,0.0001456221,0.000001383801,0.0000193352,0.00452132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998322,0.0005470045,0.0001887496,0.00006652964,0.0003214405,0.000003741241,0.000001109753,0.00001690404,0.00053253],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2752787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089951169","doi":"10.1108/07363761111181482","title":"Creative consumers: awareness, attitude and action","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Action (physics); Marketing; Exploratory factor analysis; Scale (ratio); Set (abstract data type); Creativity; Value (mathematics); Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Empirical research; Test (biology); Business; Social psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09276083414142831,"gpt":0.2893660218803731,"spread":0.1966051877389448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001387092,0.0001645278,0.000257614,0.0003867123,0.0002245557,0.0002211469,0.0001662572,0.00007090499,0.001074145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004202729,0.0001504261,0.0001020808,0.0002162922,0.0001478968,0.001440561,0.00007118808,0.0002170895,0.00007041638],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002574884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005262564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002383832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006127337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987403,0.0000646332,0.0005731951,0.0001794186,0.0002577496,0.0001846871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982737,0.0001200387,0.0008658454,0.0001464545,0.0005631672,0.00003082253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004654727,0.0001046597,0.7602551,0.0001355376,0.0001095955,0.00001726978,0.000122923,1.512233e-7,0.002004225,0.0002944938,0.001529302,0.2349613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008477843,0.000004370054,0.969037,0.000175666,0.0003158546,0.00005481314,0.0006845028,0.00005452503,0.0002451915,0.0002034456,0.02817812,0.0001987137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928483,0.001169643,0.0001718492,0.0001081025,0.0007599858,0.0001205795,0.000001170057,0.00003890313,0.004781403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841,0.0004969615,0.0004898947,0.0001652323,0.000183562,0.000005560936,0.000002776264,0.00001915087,0.0002268907],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2347626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071326248","doi":"10.1108/jcm-09-2013-0697","title":"Can priming a healthy eating goal cause depleted consumers to prefer healthier snacks?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Priming (agriculture); Psychology; Product (mathematics); Marketing; Control (management); Originality; Task (project management); Consumer choice; Preference; Advertising; Social psychology; Food choice; Business; Medicine; Economics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05441445377476846,"gpt":0.3820257071107076,"spread":0.3276112533359392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005236972,0.0002650186,0.0005908496,0.0004523323,0.0003756103,0.00006682929,0.0003091135,0.0001871273,0.0008081285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001485195,0.0002504748,0.0002500952,0.0003419873,0.00008458056,0.0001475141,0.00006940868,0.0009703877,0.00008572575],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002330879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003150803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005176847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004298347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950018,0.001645818,0.001698152,0.0003321002,0.0004138487,0.0009082727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960698,0.001045393,0.001140826,0.0003605077,0.0004645533,0.0009188942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003296932,0.0004187521,0.6223483,0.0003031234,0.0003013024,0.0000821756,0.003398733,0.000005403813,0.0005827444,0.000382528,0.03668476,0.3321953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004083939,0.001792062,0.8342221,0.001873524,0.0003075827,0.0008007858,0.002381556,0.00009005849,0.00005119135,0.00004989113,0.1537167,0.00063055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872935,0.001110025,0.0004119031,0.00400003,0.002758483,0.0004282809,0.00001521072,0.00004863435,0.003933922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917443,0.00003480871,0.003298939,0.004010276,0.0003678022,0.00002781401,0.000003994852,0.00005901062,0.0004530023],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3315647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296131172","doi":"10.1108/jcm-04-2021-4635","title":"Motives of the self and brand hate","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Subconscious; Psychology; Originality; Perspective (graphical); Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Consumer behaviour; Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01293353309896064,"gpt":0.2155441302081774,"spread":0.2026105971092167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00173968,0.00007823441,0.0001548852,0.0001753687,0.0003290635,0.0001038049,0.0002226452,0.00001617948,0.000409088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002321055,0.00006032165,0.0001013229,0.0002408487,0.00006816239,0.0003675598,0.0002096654,0.000202997,0.00000255664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001548357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003628039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001695347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004453915,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989688,0.0001018314,0.0004257024,0.00009009759,0.0003157253,0.00009779906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986943,0.0001457231,0.0008240864,0.0001241639,0.0002025474,0.000009179509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002545419,0.0001245144,0.8509165,0.0001659575,0.00009616955,0.000004923334,0.0001787705,0.00001090628,0.006688192,0.0003188366,0.002727507,0.1385132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006856127,0.000002396997,0.9288696,0.00005313784,0.000177205,0.0000425221,0.0004895309,0.0001465492,0.00008649756,0.0001189958,0.06924637,0.00008160222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967043,0.001081407,0.000006606318,0.0006803051,0.000596896,0.00009829399,0.000001828542,0.00001051051,0.0008198526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994014,0.00008800835,0.00005783228,0.0001664584,0.00007914865,0.000003455643,5.533282e-7,0.000009007524,0.0001941357],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1384316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4479226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210253105","doi":"10.1108/jcm-01-2021-4390","title":"Development of a brand community engagement model: a service-dominant logic perspective","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Thompson Rivers University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Structural equation modeling; Brand community; Originality; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Customer engagement; Marketing; Perspective (graphical); Entertainment; Service-dominant logic; Service (business); Business; Brand management; Sociology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics; Social media; Social psychology; Geography; Political science; Statistics; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07598693813917361,"gpt":0.2864760902090334,"spread":0.2104891520698598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01210122,0.0001764639,0.0004172658,0.0003653031,0.000985467,0.00007869722,0.0005555164,0.00003279703,0.0004648953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003948001,0.0001640575,0.0001474059,0.0005311354,0.0000385365,0.0004430537,0.0007637567,0.0009066198,0.000007443605],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001814783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002243375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003691095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003100463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975837,0.0004807047,0.0009151165,0.0001263266,0.0006407001,0.000253433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971725,0.000402591,0.001395319,0.0002198794,0.000786298,0.00002335473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04465584,0.02003781,0.1798809,0.02669112,0.008877367,0.0006768368,0.3411965,0.07609794,0.06807446,0.05534068,0.03223455,0.1462359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01495832,0.0001732798,0.09049305,0.001568332,0.001695568,0.0002249989,0.4685688,0.08436298,0.0008888979,0.01090297,0.3238791,0.002283641],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909366,0.0004702897,0.0006212539,0.001298674,0.0002351572,0.0001807656,0.000003491336,0.00001693299,0.006236783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943466,0.00001338735,0.003271165,0.002189276,0.0001037314,0.00001043453,0.000003609884,0.00002048411,0.00004127064],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2916446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7579514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977786914","doi":"10.1108/jcm-04-2018-2632","title":"Improving consumers’ eating habits: what if a brand could make a difference?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Netnography; Psychology; Originality; Competence (human resources); Marketing; Consumer behaviour; Brand management; Advertising; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Brand awareness; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Social media; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01578261422524698,"gpt":0.2344065932101,"spread":0.218623978984853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002615341,0.0003288968,0.0005598988,0.0006109437,0.0002802837,0.001768417,0.0004610633,0.0001455842,0.001268394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008806022,0.0003027217,0.0002966205,0.0004429088,0.0001125347,0.002397509,0.0001695636,0.0005688707,0.0003203292],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006771118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001169029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001011851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003797628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971606,0.00011072,0.001221751,0.0003642279,0.000689331,0.0004533686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963567,0.0005348301,0.001865116,0.000367231,0.0008203429,0.00005582151],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003199081,0.00007623818,0.4663408,0.0003416686,0.00008533392,0.00001765161,0.00008226028,0.000002417617,0.0163838,0.00009316541,0.000319351,0.5159374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003999215,0.00001498867,0.9483202,0.002098157,0.000538571,0.0001489352,0.002679597,0.002695547,0.0001821724,0.0001204575,0.03846133,0.0007408003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924218,0.002622536,0.000210943,0.0004208807,0.002573077,0.0003717349,0.000002045846,0.0000685204,0.001308462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997335,0.0003817395,0.0003020151,0.0006735902,0.0003391059,0.0000103009,0.000008080464,0.00004847213,0.0009016554],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5151966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146557549","doi":"10.1108/07363761211221747","title":"Decomposition of cross‐country differences in consumer attitudes toward marketing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Marketing; Consumerism; Consumer behaviour; Originality; Economics; Business; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03948885144916454,"gpt":0.3096451456390539,"spread":0.2701562941898894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005577717,0.0002208432,0.0004674685,0.0006616239,0.0001360017,0.0003056549,0.000311163,0.0001126953,0.0007182774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001233489,0.0002045205,0.0001727666,0.0004401352,0.0001831359,0.002122772,0.0001074328,0.0003394651,0.00003943504],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005599652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005185468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009039409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002814767,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997419,0.0001982279,0.001304073,0.0001794936,0.0005120901,0.0003870929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969822,0.000675438,0.001518491,0.0001860185,0.0005964866,0.00004140348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004894353,0.0002129169,0.9524869,0.0003758828,0.00005453929,0.000004770735,0.00005752297,0.000001459117,0.003836391,0.00009248041,0.0003200026,0.04206775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000952822,0.00000259372,0.9935463,0.00061479,0.0001490331,0.00003196713,0.0002207958,0.00007578443,0.0001436534,0.00002605562,0.004015594,0.0002206025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993295,0.00389234,0.00005091457,0.0001020024,0.001151295,0.0001551883,0.000003301484,0.0000230793,0.001326925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986889,0.0003776732,0.0003711023,0.0001032713,0.000366574,0.000007146955,0.000006970103,0.00002258794,0.000055802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04184715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8340103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057374783","doi":"10.1108/07363760510631174","title":"Direct‐to‐consumer advertising of prescription drugs: help or hindrance to the public's health?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Manitoba Health","funders":"","keywords":"Direct-to-consumer advertising; Originality; Advertising; Marketing; Value (mathematics); Business; Public health; Perspective (graphical); Medical prescription; Prescription drug; Public relations; Medicine; Political science; Sociology; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.276097349135661,"gpt":0.5053014589844609,"spread":0.2292041098487999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01030072,0.0002473689,0.0005625296,0.0002583526,0.0004739733,0.00005103057,0.0005504883,0.0002734754,0.001115485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026508,0.0001755438,0.0001662872,0.0005377181,0.000148867,0.0003657764,0.0001333875,0.001834543,0.00006785986],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002391935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006791882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001749414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005932837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943107,0.002749326,0.00142028,0.0002569148,0.0004616705,0.0008010641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952345,0.002053572,0.0008329501,0.0002389244,0.000576823,0.001063205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004644685,0.0004356271,0.01998359,0.0003766197,0.0004442329,0.0000372998,0.004861304,0.0006364268,0.009790402,0.00008996225,0.1184403,0.8402596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001101472,0.0001588934,0.006508229,0.0003576369,0.0000995727,0.0001530761,0.0007454754,0.000518928,0.006411052,0.000006602058,0.983739,0.0002001287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7916148,0.01811616,0.0004515543,0.1800935,0.003343506,0.001138982,0.00008561563,0.00006017471,0.00509566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737871,0.001626351,0.001422727,0.0212224,0.0009048199,0.00001663985,0.000001619211,0.00002942912,0.0009889513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8652986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944885666","doi":"10.1108/jcm-01-2017-2051","title":"How do smokers respond to pictorial and threatening tobacco warnings? The role of threat level, repeated exposure, type of packs and warning size","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Disgust; Valence (chemistry); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Arousal; Originality; Social psychology; Advertising; Environmental health; Medicine; Anger; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03777013891443257,"gpt":0.3313165089854977,"spread":0.2935463700710651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027672,0.000144442,0.000412598,0.0001488413,0.00009708018,0.00004954438,0.0001555534,0.0001224672,0.0002364248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00115225,0.0001033046,0.0001060524,0.0002060804,0.000089247,0.0001538847,0.00007574673,0.0004128742,0.000002261485],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002337885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006077136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007666676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007364349,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980654,0.0005733221,0.0006880261,0.0001782516,0.0002383738,0.0002566469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971842,0.001133148,0.0009051103,0.0002133311,0.000429639,0.0001346036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003368454,0.00004058957,0.9120039,0.00003153228,0.0001261103,0.000007889212,0.002511133,6.733488e-7,0.009574418,0.00004267953,0.0003867447,0.07190587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001776838,0.001253459,0.9781253,0.0007904499,0.0001624802,0.0001587971,0.006465845,0.00000375515,0.0007198131,0.00005119613,0.01033969,0.0001523947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902307,0.007187549,0.000008539922,0.0002638398,0.001029075,0.0001994391,0.000008032922,0.000006688505,0.001066173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983735,0.0001414841,0.0005226649,0.00003025155,0.0001294411,0.000002322751,6.766779e-7,0.00001984758,0.0007798061],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07175347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4212638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}