{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":3,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"ae59bc868ce7","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Controversial Ideas"}},"results":[{"id":"W4225136396","doi":"10.35995/jci02010007","title":"Figleaves Right and Left: A Case-Study of Viewpoint Diversity Applied to the Philosophy of Language","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Controversial Ideas","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Politics; Epistemology; Social science; Sociology; Statement (logic); Public relations; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"John Turri","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03148567429728358,"gpt":0.2488508686545885,"spread":0.2173651943573049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006493268,0.00009062388,0.000390752,0.00009750453,0.0005038418,0.00001711619,0.0002095302,0.00001894983,0.0002395067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000523813,0.00006324233,0.0001390909,0.00003042702,0.0001813249,0.0000762247,0.0002692707,0.0002897098,9.578523e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002729527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003725702,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008567793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001142169,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989657,0.0001711304,0.0003493207,0.00008541714,0.0003282908,0.0001001625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998893,0.0002665803,0.0004953186,0.0001353219,0.0001555767,0.00005416325],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001204817,0.0008130959,0.0006584784,0.0001025638,0.0008360782,0.0008466316,0.7406455,0.0001720172,0.0005483896,0.2486829,0.004797425,0.0006921062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009944774,0.007048496,0.001123385,0.00007090052,0.001629489,0.0009647388,0.8203569,0.00003361748,0.0004042884,0.04571091,0.1122502,0.0004623022],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874598,0.0005048618,0.00001413924,0.001768292,0.0005052602,0.0002651017,0.00006019948,0.000003665908,0.009418692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986146,0.00000763376,0.00001142144,0.0006454337,0.0004514022,0.000001007915,4.904291e-7,0.000005679478,0.0002623369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.202972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3875195,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308415793","doi":"10.35995/jci02020004","title":"Will Moralization of Science Lead to “Better” Science?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Controversial Ideas","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Harassment; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Social psychology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Yves Gingras","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04857680857281557,"gpt":0.4730880520497666,"spread":0.424511243476951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02073853,0.00008011686,0.0002938336,0.0006358683,0.002481896,0.00001964,0.001044089,0.00005334558,0.0006407065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03526661,0.00007149691,0.00007268858,0.001653571,0.001333491,0.001455893,0.0004935864,0.002254242,0.00001916758],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008187275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004216586,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001174386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009673541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947363,0.0009127149,0.000811681,0.0001715211,0.002950666,0.0004170765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938957,0.002342943,0.00124816,0.0002465232,0.001934356,0.0003323071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002904171,0.0004983537,0.02027698,0.0001895154,0.00009128925,0.0001360481,0.02671571,0.002698396,0.3417848,0.531257,0.06725024,0.006197515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0154122,0.006115094,0.02647952,0.0009540601,0.0004698256,0.000214218,0.08152442,0.004253176,0.005834986,0.2778035,0.5800213,0.0009176805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8710037,0.0001762127,0.01499298,0.07194481,0.01095163,0.0006671532,0.00001651658,0.000021608,0.03022531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876374,0.0000106912,0.00165813,0.009845869,0.0005110654,0.000003847523,2.455034e-7,0.000008493699,0.0003242659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5127711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412070501","doi":"10.63466/jci05010002","title":"How Ideology, Not Science, Determined Teaching Children to Read in Ontario","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Controversial Ideas","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Ideology; Mathematics education; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Reich","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03516474386275428,"gpt":0.3581991585894777,"spread":0.3230344147267234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002380715,0.00009567879,0.0003335335,0.0006848768,0.0004846228,0.0001690718,0.0005695485,0.00008895482,0.00003313453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003547957,0.00009095354,0.0001204044,0.0003895593,0.0005129788,0.0004195779,0.00004729588,0.0005770977,0.000003470334],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001681897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003805942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1366797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2956974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984777,0.0001670915,0.0003225457,0.0001724011,0.0004661519,0.0003940841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989551,0.0003138499,0.0002133833,0.0001149031,0.0001925718,0.0002101814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001167288,0.00040044,0.5129713,0.000006581466,0.0001337187,0.0001077982,0.08160689,0.00005431185,0.002409289,0.3364675,0.01918664,0.04548826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002841958,0.0004573645,0.3768437,0.0001483962,0.00009427289,0.00001660379,0.0137962,0.000004990193,0.00005650285,0.006837023,0.5986039,0.0002991044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9091805,0.0001041362,0.0002135876,0.03394571,0.002587008,0.0001406743,9.04637e-7,0.0000127498,0.05381471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882269,0.000003396219,0.0005621326,0.001461459,0.000377844,0.000001092467,1.491775e-7,0.000003690799,0.009363374],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5794172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8690692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}