{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":43,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":43,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"430ecd4d75a6","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy"}},"results":[{"id":"W946594587","doi":"10.16997/jdd.157","title":"Public Deliberation in Health Policy and Bioethics: Mapping an emerging, interdisciplinary field","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Scholarship; Bioethics; Public health; Diversity (politics); Discipline; Political science; Field (mathematics); Health policy; Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Health care; Social science; Medicine; Computer science; Engineering; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3056432156566178,"gpt":0.4936459133612777,"spread":0.1880026977046599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001338701,0.0002146628,0.0004932307,0.0009636544,0.001217856,0.00007665762,0.0003965218,0.0002357652,0.0002057114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001723138,0.0001874099,0.00006811743,0.0005907789,0.0001154215,0.002282029,0.000430473,0.001998775,0.00003422803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005943399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001748829,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001696823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001259624,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936588,0.00295793,0.002214021,0.0002462254,0.0003579156,0.0005651004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944085,0.001418679,0.001712929,0.0004402219,0.001546878,0.0004728299],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002297689,0.0006444571,0.1758607,0.001257447,0.0001467208,0.00002048743,0.4038516,0.0001163495,0.0007361493,0.02930471,0.02502586,0.3628057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006512202,0.003990337,0.2648379,0.004981247,0.00002059594,0.000173431,0.2903438,0.01806259,0.0001075082,0.3990648,0.01084432,0.001061322],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4495107,0.002662867,0.002847666,0.5419938,0.0005520605,0.001194016,0.000006510767,0.00004246607,0.001189959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722944,0.000727916,0.01230646,0.0138718,0.0004943188,0.00007357143,0.0000150995,0.00003202482,0.000184358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.528122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9366888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28138704","doi":"10.16997/jdd.164","title":"Stakeholder and Citizen Roles in Public Deliberation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Stakeholder; Public relations; Conversation; Government (linguistics); Normative; Political science; Stakeholder analysis; Citizen journalism; Public participation; Process (computing); Stakeholder engagement; Sociology; Public administration; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08851627796901533,"gpt":0.3594261157301581,"spread":0.2709098377611427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001363758,0.00009063527,0.0001844367,0.000315389,0.0003523774,0.0006344556,0.0001919921,0.00008521736,0.0005715429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001237563,0.00007625398,0.0000435986,0.0003735312,0.0002135957,0.002361988,0.00002847477,0.0003144096,0.00001975109],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008947561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007255288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001806695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006940851,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980702,0.000519728,0.0004761728,0.0001132343,0.0005052688,0.0003153326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983485,0.0003156515,0.0002320415,0.00006875974,0.0007470924,0.000287939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001074185,0.0008161639,0.05272904,0.00003109526,0.0002029941,0.0001327059,0.05472712,0.00005797421,0.006868939,0.4378293,0.09088123,0.355616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00484595,0.0007813385,0.4318534,0.0001813981,0.00003025783,0.000155912,0.03502271,0.001535218,0.001605794,0.4099277,0.1131885,0.0008718387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8892138,0.0001996095,0.0004985259,0.08693004,0.00007714036,0.0002246154,0.000002991611,0.00001034134,0.02284295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959167,0.0002624038,0.0009355163,0.0008803821,0.0002886332,0.000008541028,0.00000156272,0.000006767465,0.001699451],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3791243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6257994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092798810","doi":"10.16997/jdd.368","title":"It’s Not Just the Taking Part that Counts: ‘Like Me’ Perceptions Connect the Wider Public to Minipublics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"KU Leuven; European Commission; Queen's University; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Deliberative democracy; Legitimacy; Polity; Context (archaeology); Perception; Democracy; Political science; Ambiguity; Salient; Empirical research; Sociology; Public relations; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Epistemology; Law; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1721872804754853,"gpt":0.3771176219757368,"spread":0.2049303415002514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007444008,0.0001102414,0.0001909679,0.00004199585,0.001191816,0.0003894082,0.0005003829,0.00007748816,0.001408532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003658587,0.00006468579,0.0001520648,0.0003966258,0.0002917292,0.0004131717,0.00004827696,0.0004346236,0.0001804325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009966324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005864562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004360137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000211281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980373,0.000553987,0.0003232869,0.0001037721,0.0006725346,0.0003091664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973409,0.001272841,0.0003387846,0.0001111428,0.0006384231,0.0002979636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001342856,0.00002909426,0.002548731,0.000003063403,0.000092598,0.0000111452,0.1943666,0.000008969635,0.00005397425,0.020606,0.7789714,0.003295078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001457419,0.00006430235,0.001312905,0.00001643711,0.00005566649,0.000009728339,0.1182025,0.00003472391,0.00002486543,0.001060249,0.8789719,0.0001010075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06597117,0.0001067489,0.000731422,0.90448,0.002208634,0.0002541249,0.00002019303,0.00002179414,0.02620587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.907939,0.0001796354,0.0002077445,0.0875513,0.00315657,0.000006320685,0.000001240346,0.00001282647,0.0009453236],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8419679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626831622","doi":"10.16997/jdd.271","title":"A Randomly Selected Chamber: Promises and Challenges","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Diversity (politics); Political science; Sanctions; Politics; Public administration; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05761206376247559,"gpt":0.2532581248410481,"spread":0.1956460610785725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007311647,0.0001271687,0.000480184,0.0001420643,0.0005943399,0.0001881469,0.0001996277,0.00006888232,0.0001412281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008298043,0.0001202798,0.0001009711,0.00003148953,0.00017358,0.001225898,0.00005150263,0.0002131626,0.00007087593],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003770315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004941943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005908167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001086353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989615,0.00003101465,0.0006519881,0.0001733864,0.00002225476,0.000159856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981601,0.00009350559,0.001253405,0.0002371308,0.0001511688,0.0001046432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004200694,0.0002030063,0.01082894,0.00005142809,0.000454268,0.00006064765,0.002872651,0.00002825875,0.0001613382,0.9763575,0.001731958,0.006829929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01027236,0.0006601371,0.1865449,0.0001682852,0.0000583615,0.0008638064,0.0003896087,0.0006779392,0.001039132,0.6741929,0.1244952,0.00063736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9052539,0.01843646,0.001726196,0.01765595,0.0007128573,0.000225859,0.0000463578,0.0000151511,0.05592722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887009,0.009185316,0.0007926233,0.0001152954,0.0002779918,0.000003899411,7.81801e-7,0.00001177765,0.0009114005],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3021646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4904869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945095353","doi":"10.16997/jdd.319","title":"Building a Better Referendum: Linking Mini-Publics and Mass Publics in Popular Votes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Publics; Deliberative democracy; Deliberation; Voting; Democracy; Democratic legitimacy; Legitimacy; Political science; Public relations; Inclusion (mineral); Tying; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Social science; Politics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03268743419746007,"gpt":0.327725874223723,"spread":0.2950384400262629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001007692,0.00014649,0.0003771653,0.0003055531,0.0002457579,0.0003003273,0.0002545836,0.0002073908,0.00006470027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001174004,0.0001323081,0.00009730344,0.0004119787,0.0001286333,0.001024047,0.00004501328,0.0006302122,0.000008236586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001717711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003426804,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001681805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001943792,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978684,0.0004277695,0.0005685908,0.0001553271,0.0005517456,0.000428199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981995,0.0005685883,0.0004278838,0.00009774642,0.0004743405,0.0002319411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004065075,0.00008650805,0.8539154,0.0000345809,0.0001028407,0.00007640482,0.05286669,0.000009431428,0.002068239,0.06927235,0.001888114,0.0196388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004618164,0.0006779432,0.06725699,0.0009167232,0.0001829783,0.00007808895,0.05908308,0.0006048212,0.002204221,0.5668705,0.2962229,0.001283632],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9795675,0.0003659434,0.0003719456,0.01674047,0.0009566305,0.0001476027,0.000003806344,0.00001221427,0.001833919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847888,0.0002223897,0.01203635,0.001461035,0.001169122,0.000001734918,0.000001812796,0.00001845447,0.0003003015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7866584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5395366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176686526","doi":"10.16997/jdd.78","title":"Public Health Genomics (PHG) and Public Participation: Points to Consider","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Biobank; Deliberation; Public health; Public relations; Public engagement; Scale (ratio); Political science; Public participation; Population; Medicine; Environmental health; Bioinformatics; Geography; Biology; Law; Nursing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5451220002251645,"gpt":0.5589103209076058,"spread":0.01378832068244129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005390754,0.0001563515,0.0005827064,0.0003232747,0.0002330586,0.0001878636,0.0001664517,0.0001628173,0.0001831716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02442209,0.0001229998,0.0001196868,0.0003821214,0.0001618267,0.0004465797,0.00007645749,0.001628464,0.00004127073],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000296738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002474775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003174362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003026199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966725,0.000384098,0.00121834,0.0002482206,0.0009602841,0.0005166339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919468,0.002727644,0.0005012226,0.0002876401,0.002978848,0.001557882],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00238377,0.006019702,0.1014645,0.0004285592,0.001578095,0.0021865,0.0237293,0.00004495463,0.007893139,0.1714351,0.1690106,0.5138258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009031886,0.01498485,0.4678259,0.0007104869,0.0001253133,0.003241369,0.00191027,0.000577344,0.001383583,0.4546655,0.04493039,0.0006131028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4525916,0.0004380984,0.002844335,0.5428583,0.0001011489,0.0002364662,0.000003068098,0.000009910936,0.0009171297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9299837,0.0006806931,0.02289104,0.04556156,0.0003951463,0.000002509656,0.000002622016,0.0000171105,0.0004655703],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5132127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9837956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767393296","doi":"10.16997/jdd.287","title":"Reading Between the Lines of Participation: Tenant Participation and Participatory Budgeting in Toronto Community Housing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizen journalism; Deliberation; Reading (process); Public relations; Democracy; Sociology; Community engagement; Political science; Business; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09448942154642608,"gpt":0.409787478978476,"spread":0.3152980574320499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003350426,0.00008748789,0.0002700568,0.00002669979,0.001619767,0.0001436616,0.0002808288,0.00005656976,0.000007614027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034504,0.00005521998,0.00004865184,0.000057508,0.0003398118,0.0009506569,0.00005992233,0.0003108809,5.006878e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001382457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001205359,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007249318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01044245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979129,0.0009055689,0.0005737544,0.000072188,0.0003130941,0.0002224219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971619,0.0009580482,0.00128497,0.0001914011,0.0003150575,0.00008860381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004842509,0.00006144787,0.9326785,0.00001176711,0.0000365332,0.000005915139,0.05442584,0.00008172131,0.0003193592,0.0005086033,0.000275967,0.0115459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003529615,0.000119389,0.9890308,0.000272499,0.00005825737,7.305873e-7,0.006942161,0.0003058233,0.0009025419,0.001272453,0.0006563986,0.00008595837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947584,0.0002746361,0.0002135295,0.003412811,0.0001359617,0.00008749965,0.000003208209,0.000004854991,0.001109107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999028,0.0001361662,0.0003679193,0.00006408116,0.0003172319,0.00000294983,4.026659e-7,0.000006509757,0.00007671728],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0563523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993617038","doi":"10.16997/jdd.160","title":"Synthesising the outputs of deliberation: Extracting meaningful results from a public forum","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Framing (construction); Legitimacy; Thematic analysis; Set (abstract data type); Political science; Public relations; Epistemology; Sociology; Qualitative research; Computer science; Social science; Law; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04919299678980261,"gpt":0.3164352843833619,"spread":0.2672422875935593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001148373,0.0001427579,0.000338773,0.0001075068,0.0009258508,0.0003294075,0.0004213226,0.0001316442,0.0001416397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009868697,0.0001000023,0.0002002389,0.000314462,0.0002957036,0.001419063,0.00004115846,0.0004244945,0.00002574833],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001244868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005914469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001087251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003526083,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968314,0.0008554684,0.001005691,0.0001354234,0.0007868782,0.000385137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991532,0.005041514,0.00135665,0.0001683632,0.001687468,0.000213951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000248389,0.0004884068,0.02172732,0.00001617697,0.0008995177,0.00005493319,0.5390425,0.00007681207,0.01584496,0.05676724,0.05866481,0.3061689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003721955,0.0005105348,0.01780194,0.0008138982,0.0004656384,0.00004941598,0.6004038,0.0007955829,0.03627708,0.2384255,0.0997335,0.001001217],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9090686,0.000486616,0.002132314,0.07894945,0.001135734,0.0002702209,0.00001730104,0.00001878696,0.007920948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931113,0.00009522149,0.004028985,0.0008227477,0.001661722,0.0000041995,0.000002311632,0.00001559158,0.0002579474],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3051677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1012686375","doi":"10.16997/jdd.77","title":"Mad scientists bend the frame of biobank governance in British Columbia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Narrative; Public engagement; Sociology; Rhetoric; Politics; Ethnography; Political science; Accountability; Media studies; Participant observation; Public relations; Democracy; Social science; Law; History; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1176505370390309,"gpt":0.4699137561880382,"spread":0.3522632191490074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003916604,0.00008485493,0.0004836914,0.00006097352,0.0001261019,0.0001612728,0.0004172795,0.0001886251,0.0003784036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01390997,0.00008205519,0.0001992429,0.0005972304,0.0004505227,0.0002526243,0.0000660715,0.002384893,0.000008187411],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001458091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007153593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004877268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007981668,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967191,0.0002021523,0.001101612,0.0001948475,0.001498953,0.0002833778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945922,0.002662768,0.0006615108,0.0002865788,0.001628967,0.0001679653],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001123662,0.004239553,0.5816919,0.0003415263,0.0004222318,0.004894534,0.002496128,0.00009697501,0.0199638,0.008131393,0.1312242,0.245374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001840574,0.001143219,0.882576,0.001297278,0.00003234767,0.0005298413,0.0001143235,0.0001017713,0.0007678592,0.1102326,0.001279647,0.00008457773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676483,0.001536605,0.0001427455,0.02758802,0.0002484482,0.0002387406,0.00001739392,0.000003998497,0.002575696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890989,0.001804672,0.003290713,0.001914206,0.0002073932,0.000001023119,9.158068e-7,0.00001081585,0.00367138],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3008841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093209147","doi":"10.16997/jdd.395","title":"Participatory Deliberative Democracy in Complex Mass Societies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Corporate governance; Political science; Government (linguistics); Variety (cybernetics); Public administration; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1875615503538444,"gpt":0.3899247675046263,"spread":0.2023632171507819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001578856,0.0002529441,0.0006207079,0.0001161483,0.0007691587,0.0001598619,0.0004971847,0.0002363131,0.0004506087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002632034,0.0002276834,0.0002931943,0.0005545207,0.0008824081,0.001190133,0.00006426119,0.001286736,0.00009343652],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002642154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009025544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003856445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005426777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956881,0.001393046,0.001060553,0.0002548467,0.0009306365,0.0006728377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966757,0.001138781,0.000507656,0.0001189741,0.0008496614,0.0007091989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008413669,0.0007038944,0.01219918,0.0001305381,0.000506764,0.0007871732,0.328741,0.001523324,0.005369154,0.4971008,0.1479224,0.004174477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001789415,0.0004781544,0.006504498,0.0001099722,0.00009753904,0.00001191364,0.01893379,0.001482392,0.001169606,0.9419308,0.02693314,0.0005587913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3190179,0.0009781803,0.008927939,0.6009626,0.000662494,0.0005844865,0.00004735771,0.00009837369,0.06872065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770688,0.0002126119,0.00388325,0.01722262,0.001325339,0.000004377584,0.00000284906,0.00002403635,0.0002560627],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.658051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9284661,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414857648","doi":"10.16997/jdd.242","title":"Framing and power in public deliberation with climate change: Critical reflections on the role of deliberative practitioners","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Deliberation; Reflexivity; Transformative learning; Viewpoints; Political science; Sociology; Climate change; Public relations; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science; Law; Politics; Geography; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03227020555362969,"gpt":0.3017704957236606,"spread":0.2695002901700309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007328232,0.0001561391,0.0002183176,0.0000876961,0.00026866,0.00006259025,0.0001325464,0.00007032117,0.0004818622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000942559,0.00008309005,0.0000511562,0.0003360165,0.0004185941,0.001733007,0.00007003453,0.0002822414,0.00001242966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000299156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004542489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001664726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002431245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983376,0.0003130794,0.0004378128,0.0002122181,0.0004203752,0.0002789427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981748,0.0009500691,0.0004028484,0.0001526787,0.0002243793,0.00009518231],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00586265,0.00477792,0.247807,0.0001432345,0.0004227174,0.0003741226,0.1970877,0.0007446702,0.1426136,0.2549396,0.002827757,0.1423991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006192002,0.007735557,0.5719918,0.001930743,0.0002128304,0.001071982,0.1324117,0.001110744,0.04826468,0.2132988,0.01419707,0.001582172],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646103,0.000122463,0.000748586,0.03031979,0.00006256103,0.0002531404,0.0000158385,0.00000676879,0.003860574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976278,0.0003490045,0.001079615,0.0008136249,0.00005385004,0.00002805842,5.93855e-7,0.00001370191,0.00003373619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3241848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5276054,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992305380","doi":"10.16997/jdd.145","title":"Participatory budgeting - the Australian way","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public administration; Metropolitan area; Bay; Citizen journalism; Local government; Political science; Participatory budgeting; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Public relations; Politics; Geography; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.144316347013426,"gpt":0.4461524632280535,"spread":0.3018361162146276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004305255,0.0000733315,0.0001280489,0.00006887232,0.0009482872,0.000168985,0.000318984,0.00005663517,0.0005636695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001752126,0.00004597412,0.0001025764,0.0002626191,0.0003148209,0.001039994,0.00002642491,0.0003884074,0.00005431348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000774532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004565378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006306376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004612516,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976558,0.0008498654,0.0003700294,0.00005398515,0.0005958906,0.0004744204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983521,0.0005422208,0.0002951369,0.00008969937,0.0003512367,0.0003696762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001227177,0.0007083655,0.05974313,0.00001707299,0.0003203313,0.00004886089,0.1672075,0.00004603578,0.002702214,0.375195,0.3561844,0.03770436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004011425,0.000119382,0.04730558,0.00003009807,0.00003629746,0.00003890913,0.01985803,0.00002498529,0.002635041,0.00826137,0.9211139,0.0001752728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8038186,0.0002779368,0.0003022708,0.1405648,0.0006662934,0.0001626534,0.000004534982,0.00001634452,0.05418649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913941,0.00004676511,0.0003014255,0.0009411612,0.001900006,0.000002924905,3.448491e-7,0.000005491859,0.005407779],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5649295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7293555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W35669232","doi":"10.16997/jdd.116","title":"Deliberating Future Issues: Minipublics and Salmon Genomics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Dilemma; Public relations; Political science; Public engagement; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Politics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04555016149254459,"gpt":0.3250897915944939,"spread":0.2795396301019493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006325718,0.0001478018,0.0003075458,0.0001198994,0.0006122402,0.0001329704,0.0002320074,0.0001764302,0.0001482734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007057359,0.0001301886,0.0001063142,0.0002118952,0.0002635301,0.0007006615,0.00003666712,0.0003837875,0.000009749258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004529433,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001953294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000201107,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982755,0.0003540661,0.0005253087,0.0001240662,0.0003815713,0.0003395307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980816,0.0002858806,0.0004673541,0.0000902573,0.0007357455,0.0003391734],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001088511,0.0002096868,0.02284163,0.00002744151,0.0002316614,0.0001864068,0.8084167,0.000002998359,0.0007436814,0.07333241,0.02362068,0.07027785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001657404,0.0007170382,0.007904962,0.0001351604,0.0002422031,0.0001520285,0.3439844,0.00009665621,0.003893283,0.1231097,0.5173445,0.0007626243],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741361,0.00222207,0.0003567101,0.009708659,0.001768255,0.0001542161,0.000005881622,0.00002353198,0.01162459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9444302,0.004648134,0.03888716,0.002137624,0.008826799,0.000003170162,0.000001991997,0.00003965242,0.00102528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4937238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5308939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781643775","doi":"10.16997/jdd.69","title":"Action planning to improve issues of effectiveness, representation and scale in public participation: A conference report","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizen journalism; Transparency (behavior); Public participation; Action (physics); Deliberative democracy; Institutionalisation; Scale (ratio); Engineering ethics; Political science; Public relations; Participatory action research; Management science; Democracy; Sociology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07197954559128268,"gpt":0.3657453087776514,"spread":0.2937657631863688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00216423,0.00009255386,0.0002490144,0.0004385533,0.0001040142,0.0000596414,0.00008413078,0.00007966345,0.000008232875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007207412,0.00008373863,0.00002917724,0.0006734576,0.00007736772,0.001143846,0.00007322327,0.0002014795,0.000001693514],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005704935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004216986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002729825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002777967,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988617,0.00003722557,0.0006130596,0.0001410589,0.0002005756,0.0001463324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982036,0.00009530373,0.0006997084,0.00007365433,0.000915672,0.00001201133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000492318,0.0002196319,0.8887312,0.0001461064,0.0001007524,0.0001597863,0.00253757,0.00005266529,0.0229972,0.02645037,0.0002346051,0.05787773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006173787,0.00005984061,0.9384105,0.0001583162,0.00001925371,0.00002833904,0.002252537,0.0001683351,0.02866287,0.02891237,0.0005867921,0.000123471],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9685088,0.0000372442,0.02803669,0.001473902,0.0002433914,0.0001987283,2.39751e-7,0.00001069874,0.001490345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963706,0.000005902125,0.003219835,0.0001531627,0.0001938229,0.000007674841,0.000003752636,0.000006562438,0.000038661],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05775426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3414762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080453674","doi":"10.16997/jdd.398","title":"Rethinking Representation and Diversity in Deliberative Minipublics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; Diversity (politics); Representation (politics); Deliberative democracy; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1198871397200454,"gpt":0.3626676237196472,"spread":0.2427804839996019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004872712,0.00008871244,0.0002482517,0.00009362472,0.0005585468,0.00009927183,0.0001676233,0.0001010034,0.00004464039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002952571,0.00008551325,0.00006816542,0.000410855,0.0002093447,0.0008455936,0.0001029948,0.0003878742,0.000003562456],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001028871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002683233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002818975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000278094,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982587,0.0005805583,0.0003730452,0.0001246221,0.0004610064,0.0002020933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981738,0.0007069354,0.0003290361,0.00004138768,0.0004862892,0.0002626041],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008400361,0.00003859281,0.1678324,0.00000755404,0.00004575926,0.0001144725,0.8119822,0.00002000147,0.0001832944,0.01104699,0.003436093,0.005208625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005311967,0.0009511628,0.1114409,0.0002360349,0.0002241408,0.0000505022,0.3898746,0.00108745,0.00319244,0.4682887,0.01846914,0.0008729455],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9564502,0.0001805559,0.000577169,0.0396598,0.0003365096,0.000127158,0.000003236263,0.00001111639,0.002654301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940253,0.0003184702,0.002298986,0.002564749,0.0007181531,6.850895e-7,0.000001046042,0.000006261809,0.00006633528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4572417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4295947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554115623","doi":"10.16997/jdd.256","title":"When is Deliberation Democratic?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Democracy; Political science; Voting; Framing (construction); Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law and economics; Equity (law); Public relations; Public administration; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0299422865835419,"gpt":0.3311247084832722,"spread":0.3011824218997303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006246822,0.0001423139,0.0002940575,0.0001341616,0.0005454719,0.00009894711,0.0002843589,0.0001468534,0.0009442171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001670106,0.00009441122,0.0001855427,0.0001768846,0.0002853434,0.001033413,0.0000227863,0.0001857806,0.0001100778],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002313743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007011942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000557445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007401226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976764,0.0004918705,0.0006254598,0.0001289325,0.0007091456,0.0003681362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969777,0.0009159637,0.0005092467,0.0001212366,0.00115081,0.000325065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001539969,0.0002368442,0.0241339,0.00001313661,0.0003080687,0.00009450253,0.2029842,0.000001583066,0.01025094,0.0529728,0.4854234,0.2234265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00157179,0.0003136345,0.001754722,0.0001600543,0.0001194726,0.00003325831,0.00774748,0.00001059865,0.01460749,0.744151,0.2291724,0.0003580487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8319605,0.0003783449,0.01979179,0.1300694,0.002468346,0.0003076796,0.00001859709,0.00004659612,0.01495871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807531,0.0004531828,0.005935294,0.003734642,0.002965925,0.000004033801,6.131004e-7,0.00002170484,0.006131455],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6911782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W227516296","doi":"10.16997/jdd.226","title":"Deliberation for Reconciliation in Divided Societies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Normative; Politics; Ideal (ethics); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Ethnic group; Democracy; Law; Geography; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.109697390179676,"gpt":0.3923190074059476,"spread":0.2826216172262715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001404566,0.00007951127,0.0002166176,0.000104344,0.0002124275,0.00008230971,0.0001251059,0.0001142124,0.00001686089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003990543,0.0000741676,0.0001055222,0.0002010385,0.0001027279,0.000723135,0.000008726194,0.0001655555,0.000005686544],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003857898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001028887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008009791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003642797,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984643,0.0003470046,0.0004816418,0.00007597895,0.0004088978,0.0002222161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974102,0.0006774721,0.0003617048,0.00004511489,0.001334194,0.0001713617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004035664,0.0003033427,0.05194384,0.00003131392,0.0001293117,0.00001841786,0.6070583,0.0004278594,0.0008008339,0.05261748,0.2387024,0.04756338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004648462,0.0007045583,0.005808024,0.0001228421,0.00008965075,0.000009143319,0.1430893,0.0005901287,0.00297505,0.7100086,0.1315419,0.0004122962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9661525,0.0003958055,0.005902334,0.02200549,0.001918537,0.0003680954,0.000007380782,0.00001558491,0.003234251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989886,0.0001429833,0.006211069,0.001031502,0.001764339,0.000011735,0.000004142794,0.00001086905,0.0009372996],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6573911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.477734,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805876460","doi":"10.16997/jdd.294","title":"Citizen Panels and Opinion Polls: Convergence and Divergence in Policy Preferences","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Divergence (linguistics); Public opinion; Convergence (economics); Political science; Public relations; Process (computing); Opinion poll; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04334705903911817,"gpt":0.3666152995937578,"spread":0.3232682405546396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004539652,0.00009812081,0.000221965,0.0001582498,0.0003569325,0.00007382105,0.0001539647,0.00009016842,0.00008705498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001502114,0.0000838973,0.0000312439,0.0003078553,0.0007640254,0.0004603397,0.00004757409,0.0001774206,0.000005740243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000723377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005108475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001520958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003524864,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986226,0.0003468132,0.0003419459,0.0001182345,0.0003051767,0.0002652307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986456,0.0004226741,0.0002459222,0.00004853379,0.0004108084,0.0002264517],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001101423,0.00008337221,0.6307662,0.00002663692,0.00006674085,0.00002494826,0.2751895,0.000001055335,0.0009768908,0.04895133,0.002502103,0.04130114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001759359,0.001072046,0.5320951,0.0004079468,0.00004650225,0.00006017731,0.06968617,0.00008739212,0.003648167,0.365592,0.02499893,0.0005462603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.988438,0.0005041524,0.0001503698,0.007743737,0.0008043624,0.0001108117,0.00000723514,0.000006606057,0.002234707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929501,0.004232205,0.000503813,0.0005195656,0.001627704,0.000001393265,2.970576e-7,0.000005033804,0.0001598688],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3166407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3421233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W82525739","doi":"10.16997/jdd.171","title":"The Politics of Subnational Decentralization in France, Brazil, and Italy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Civil society; Politics; Ideology; Corporate governance; Dialectic; Democracy; Public administration; Political science; State (computer science); Political economy; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Economic system; Economics; Law; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01070962793785138,"gpt":0.3191385547068558,"spread":0.3084289267690044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004062383,0.00005129143,0.000131806,0.0000611693,0.000564143,0.00004888626,0.00009212043,0.00004429288,0.00001237174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006908933,0.00003139397,0.0000426595,0.0002050277,0.000375127,0.0004220914,0.00001541787,0.0001056217,0.000001483005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003767672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001448601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000341965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000262407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990401,0.0001459404,0.0003428911,0.00004044216,0.0002773354,0.0001533185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986429,0.0004148725,0.0002813401,0.00002678699,0.0005814409,0.00005270086],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000236595,0.0001834244,0.2905913,0.00002024931,0.0002079124,0.000004680074,0.106472,0.00008246396,0.0003943574,0.5720538,0.01248094,0.01748529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005693703,0.00006811607,0.5805221,0.00004291978,0.00001477857,0.000003982502,0.01402685,0.00008780936,0.0002534698,0.4004794,0.003841026,0.00009023368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.966197,0.001034996,0.0001344913,0.02755177,0.0002209821,0.0001425305,0.000002551114,0.000002741523,0.004713002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961558,0.002168097,0.0001922205,0.0002684151,0.0003129571,0.00000172888,2.935537e-7,0.000003335032,0.0008971632],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2899308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4338989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377037164","doi":"10.16997/jdd.1182","title":"Discourse, Deliberation and Difference in an Authoritarian Public Sphere","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Deliberation; Elite; Context (archaeology); Democracy; Public sphere; Political science; Deliberative democracy; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Law; Philosophy; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03806926227637236,"gpt":0.3519883928989261,"spread":0.3139191306225538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001116398,0.0001204325,0.0002652305,0.0001237208,0.0005017458,0.0003070993,0.0002204802,0.00009782699,0.00007165875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003211521,0.00009594369,0.00006391999,0.0003314802,0.0001817645,0.002019803,0.00003806793,0.0003186839,0.00001181242],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002008645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004119557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003171814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007776835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985203,0.0002381321,0.0004782988,0.0001700364,0.0002979644,0.0002952247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989484,0.0001498058,0.0003809043,0.00009790959,0.0002113137,0.0002116735],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001237143,0.0003324171,0.2885405,0.00002414663,0.0000893211,0.0001857253,0.1299441,0.0002356345,0.0008380538,0.2194381,0.005614792,0.3546336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001100908,0.0002522955,0.8118005,0.00007724886,0.00001529392,0.00001638958,0.02666714,0.001545362,0.00003617511,0.153201,0.00499157,0.0002960763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9776586,0.0001765572,0.0003172481,0.01954059,0.0003401223,0.0001212655,0.00000637182,0.00001836379,0.001820918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996451,0.0007092278,0.0006206679,0.0001501017,0.0004278317,0.000003086221,0.000003568148,0.00001141182,0.001623157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5232601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4339656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993298708","doi":"10.16997/jdd.309","title":"Stealth Democracy: Authoritarianism and Democratic Deliberation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Deliberation; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02855932763907833,"gpt":0.3479209280848095,"spread":0.3193616004457311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001240423,0.0002036058,0.0004224693,0.0001996637,0.001845467,0.0002179418,0.0002605167,0.0002118201,0.0001770552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001909267,0.000183666,0.0001185742,0.0003716639,0.0007293965,0.001023329,0.00004276751,0.0004416603,0.00004157511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002051693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00107543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000208116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005043961,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969476,0.0008501151,0.0007963161,0.0002001111,0.0007017368,0.0005041165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964461,0.0007782235,0.0006384302,0.000135765,0.001468921,0.0005325821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000394935,0.000520761,0.04319565,0.00007772205,0.000585949,0.0002319141,0.3374898,0.000008698861,0.004588572,0.377396,0.09714592,0.138364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002585885,0.001963264,0.02092986,0.0002436482,0.0003876979,0.0002147145,0.04017206,0.0003865058,0.003377784,0.8577341,0.07116537,0.0008391388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9468015,0.0005462728,0.008437653,0.02885127,0.002880197,0.0003686528,0.000008521091,0.00005126276,0.01205469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801176,0.0004221971,0.01129416,0.001773036,0.004902318,0.000002739095,0.000001987608,0.00002590819,0.001460099],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.480338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999454,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W186427143","doi":"10.16997/jdd.83","title":"Democratizing Public Consultation Processes: Some Critical Insights","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Collusion; Government (linguistics); Deliberative democracy; Citizenship; Constructive; Political science; Public administration; Democracy; Public participation; Public relations; State (computer science); Sociology; Process (computing); Politics; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04685808639459019,"gpt":0.3765681914689312,"spread":0.329710105074341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00117836,0.0001780678,0.0003449966,0.0002377518,0.001391359,0.0004754863,0.000336757,0.0002079776,0.00008599952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01818559,0.0001488374,0.0001185208,0.0006327936,0.0004688353,0.00360806,0.00001634126,0.0007009791,0.0000370258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001601389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001920161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001129163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001146005,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971244,0.0005889653,0.0007473987,0.0001900002,0.0009261349,0.0004230673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936324,0.001784248,0.000461225,0.0001055004,0.003635343,0.0003812188],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001715951,0.0007330807,0.0004075096,0.00006894363,0.0001159921,0.0002633559,0.2109909,0.00004864112,0.001710186,0.7457882,0.01750448,0.02219712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001476194,0.0007795987,0.00152145,0.0002877298,0.0001000635,0.0001115421,0.02951921,0.0001805152,0.001321949,0.8832461,0.08092717,0.0005285323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4506276,0.008257989,0.02022687,0.4581491,0.003038855,0.0006783593,0.00001046231,0.0001831728,0.05882759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889982,0.001044036,0.004254085,0.003938786,0.001163466,0.000001793419,0.000002177257,0.00001211615,0.0005853064],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5383707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993252100","doi":"10.16997/jdd.234","title":"Public Engagement with Internet Voting in Edmonton: Design, Outcomes, and Challenges to Deliberative Models","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Jury; Public participation; The Internet; Political science; Stakeholder; Public relations; Population; Public administration; Variety (cybernetics); Public engagement; Sociology; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.290890559113918,"gpt":0.3604319325008393,"spread":0.06954137338692135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002227346,0.0001912855,0.0004385963,0.0002536013,0.000195731,0.0001858432,0.0002510097,0.0000970341,0.00001309338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001671159,0.0001455319,0.00005137924,0.0002698411,0.0001548035,0.00108103,0.00006844118,0.0004159195,0.000005046964],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003533316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000752218,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003033039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00228512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969144,0.001261937,0.0005238225,0.0001888773,0.0006823213,0.0004285836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971344,0.0008416078,0.0003213681,0.00007657127,0.001010162,0.0006158575],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002891361,0.0003310563,0.03378054,0.00001943947,0.0002905823,0.0001937456,0.8037041,0.001133134,0.00002283867,0.1237708,0.003851968,0.03261266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01354193,0.006683906,0.03275213,0.001142072,0.0003238145,0.000156461,0.6553777,0.006535044,0.001028062,0.2203664,0.0596655,0.002426886],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8173693,0.003962475,0.06156606,0.1065622,0.0008186698,0.001029855,0.000004939732,0.00004323018,0.008643241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824564,0.0004216067,0.01546589,0.001024627,0.0003517801,0.00001391402,4.669408e-7,0.00001850469,0.0002468221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.165087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5934618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2401000633","doi":"10.16997/jdd.169","title":"What’s in a name? The search for ‘common ground’ in Kenora, Northwestern Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Common ground; Common currency; Rhetoric; Currency; Political science; Geography; Economy; Sociology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02805625927972797,"gpt":0.3290118196975094,"spread":0.3009555604177814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001948831,0.0001123603,0.0002624625,0.0001956464,0.001795862,0.0003681383,0.0003565501,0.00009865648,0.0001924909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008603492,0.00007032134,0.00009459097,0.0002663356,0.0001422806,0.001867843,0.000002761915,0.0005199126,0.00002998047],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009070747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01004207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7152715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978179,0.0005799062,0.0006334146,0.0001304482,0.0003906144,0.0004477485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982141,0.0006116594,0.0002938411,0.0001188739,0.0006291772,0.0001324052],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003992068,0.0002230233,0.05225099,0.00001167994,0.00001682744,0.000008005615,0.9388536,0.00003953107,0.000002157934,0.006117895,0.0002388047,0.002197573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001852251,0.0005783603,0.5554302,0.0003702886,0.00002522256,0.0000426747,0.1765128,0.00008751646,0.00007572717,0.05947278,0.2051834,0.0003688343],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.987245,0.0003260788,0.00005377984,0.006803755,0.001014665,0.0009044529,0.000001154388,0.000003293249,0.00364787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869009,0.001908389,0.0004109872,0.000302606,0.0005678711,0.000009739177,0.000003062586,0.00001209762,0.009884409],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7623408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995037,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286424219","doi":"10.16997/jdd.1208","title":"The Discursive Functions of Deliberative Voting","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation","keywords":"Deliberation; Voting; Facilitator; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Process (computing); Public relations; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02324162704753223,"gpt":0.3234011844705962,"spread":0.300159557423064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001061699,0.0001071734,0.0002577592,0.00009090275,0.003699159,0.00007116333,0.000379865,0.0000420794,0.0002353819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001791469,0.00007761968,0.0002325131,0.000477223,0.0004783155,0.0003227966,0.00008302999,0.0005864359,0.000005408262],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002524986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008729238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000160437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002112504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996936,0.001215975,0.000600737,0.00009487954,0.0008374254,0.0003150002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957033,0.00222248,0.0008674447,0.00009095954,0.0009638273,0.0001519675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003730594,0.0005306206,0.02409909,0.00001336112,0.0008543581,0.00008031387,0.5680884,0.001388303,0.001193733,0.2629805,0.1072993,0.03309892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001064073,0.0008139546,0.003251704,0.00004340672,0.0002229381,0.00004391179,0.6808738,0.0001337047,0.001139255,0.05717744,0.2549324,0.0003033861],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9393024,0.001412652,0.002308994,0.03963711,0.004977339,0.0004184161,0.00006986447,0.00002086083,0.01185232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955397,0.0001175632,0.0003387547,0.0003622049,0.0009861386,0.0000114485,0.000001894162,0.00001237168,0.002629954],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.205803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154282876","doi":"10.16997/jdd.971","title":"Expertise and Participatory Governance: The Incorporation of Expert Knowledge in Local Participatory Processes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citizen journalism; Democratization; Corporate governance; Local governance; Participatory GIS; Knowledge management; Political science; Process (computing); Democracy; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Public administration; Local government; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1212023188515261,"gpt":0.4334960371071644,"spread":0.3122937182556383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001384461,0.00008025115,0.0002061859,0.00005175061,0.0002596551,0.0000791532,0.0001624694,0.00006460392,0.00008802271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00248183,0.00005785487,0.00004448668,0.0005038331,0.0005728831,0.0007042824,0.00004208444,0.0002197749,0.000002027811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001068395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003889798,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009076009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002844872,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978988,0.0008071281,0.0005310342,0.0001090226,0.0004360861,0.0002179718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979482,0.00053815,0.0003601254,0.00008978811,0.0009124164,0.000151351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006643297,0.003119215,0.0413895,0.0003097329,0.0002671412,0.0004585928,0.5779295,0.0002926519,0.0116038,0.2063942,0.03078908,0.1267823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007736687,0.001589872,0.1891549,0.00193834,0.0001297699,0.0001602441,0.3157559,0.004663243,0.2064573,0.09648991,0.1745897,0.001334077],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9696226,0.006877342,0.001158834,0.0183722,0.0001728154,0.0001378826,0.000005570763,0.000005507396,0.003647263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976107,0.001300421,0.0001518251,0.000343634,0.0002316043,0.00001357069,5.508799e-7,0.00000519043,0.0003424693],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2621736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6900336,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993881387","doi":"10.16997/jdd.159","title":"“Citizens As Analysts” Redux: Revisiting Aaron Wildavsky on Public Participation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Normative; Process (computing); Politics; Public relations; Teleology; Political science; Public participation; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04605309493380466,"gpt":0.3711589622671172,"spread":0.3251058673333125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001685122,0.0001427193,0.0003150114,0.0001748926,0.0007629978,0.0003510608,0.0002469137,0.00009848762,0.001738815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003676667,0.0001179131,0.0002116725,0.0004243458,0.0002252136,0.001263466,0.00002441288,0.0004264433,0.0003577713],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001346307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001466349,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000355052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000496372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970933,0.001083988,0.0006492471,0.0001660648,0.0006391851,0.0003682422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706,0.0009464548,0.0004299625,0.0001398066,0.001034817,0.0003889608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001142626,0.0002359312,0.001051132,0.00001377099,0.0001577057,0.00005732738,0.008103217,0.00007660427,0.002442772,0.9426861,0.005735276,0.03932593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006598984,0.0006281698,0.00309729,0.0002225084,0.00009857174,0.00002302539,0.003161808,0.0001926277,0.001415574,0.9670101,0.02317051,0.0003198972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7810262,0.0001249827,0.0006277463,0.08745315,0.0003151363,0.0002223516,0.000002635265,0.00002775124,0.1302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947003,0.00007959786,0.0005494507,0.002111112,0.001836986,0.000005821626,0.000002102034,0.00001297552,0.000701645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2136741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W334855578","doi":"10.16997/jdd.70","title":"Crackpot or Genius? Canada Steps onto the World Stage as a Democratic Innovator","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Innovator; Genius; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Democratic deficit; Law; Politics; Entrepreneurship; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03319619471212112,"gpt":0.3123227054357273,"spread":0.2791265107236062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007527181,0.0002064935,0.0003782374,0.0001307609,0.001434905,0.0001170425,0.0006355968,0.00006496997,0.0009933983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001669769,0.0001351003,0.0001327551,0.001075496,0.0003735959,0.0006860489,0.00003962974,0.0005945443,0.00002146642],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000929691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01283028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6775257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9904321,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970194,0.0004390688,0.0007510301,0.0001727928,0.001090359,0.0005274042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969377,0.0008228114,0.0008758592,0.000227413,0.0007265535,0.0004096978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002101763,0.00005966943,0.002057996,0.000008341114,0.0001384997,0.001255572,0.01249794,0.00006459682,0.00008736217,0.01209875,0.9696319,0.00188919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006717102,0.0001285131,0.01134891,0.00005924245,0.0000336314,0.000262077,0.002081985,0.0000263182,0.0004002217,0.002713276,0.9820148,0.0002593084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8665614,0.0006255598,0.0001493242,0.1088498,0.000886043,0.0004208584,0.0001161588,0.00001482602,0.02237608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7558512,0.0002412284,0.0004409337,0.02147529,0.001150789,0.000005612651,7.7765e-7,0.00002155498,0.2208126],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3129064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994531653","doi":"10.16997/jdd.293","title":"Democracy Transformed: Perceived Legitimacy of the Institutional Shift from Election to Random Selection of Representatives","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Selection (genetic algorithm); Democracy; Embeddedness; Perception; Political science; Politics; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03061197254953935,"gpt":0.3593977130259994,"spread":0.3287857404764601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007619087,0.0001188616,0.0003545982,0.0001294195,0.0006666974,0.00004017562,0.0002139522,0.00008692826,0.0002875343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001141634,0.0000827874,0.00021592,0.0006109023,0.0004758195,0.0007171216,0.00001527794,0.0002189178,0.000007508041],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001685071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006047486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004196039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003870663,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973028,0.0008251368,0.000834819,0.0001413659,0.0006579973,0.0002378604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973795,0.0004853702,0.0005892087,0.00009216749,0.001303426,0.0001503434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006192563,0.001303753,0.2650583,0.00009170477,0.001129078,0.000008955704,0.1923465,0.001341856,0.4511321,0.05362375,0.007561561,0.02020985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002846331,0.001073128,0.7886085,0.0003551215,0.0001913045,0.00001436237,0.001717051,0.0003820443,0.1259252,0.07604389,0.002592709,0.0002503248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771533,0.00002886641,0.01256882,0.006928186,0.0006224327,0.0003792753,0.00001537641,0.000007867656,0.002295864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997794,0.00001105743,0.0008337353,0.0001649719,0.0009417275,0.000005219143,0.000001636678,0.000007810469,0.0002398836],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5235502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6343184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220900416","doi":"10.16997/jdd.1043","title":"Mini-Public Replication: Emotions and Deliberation in the Citizens' Initiative Review Redux","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Scholarship; Satisficing; Impartiality; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Legitimacy; Quality (philosophy); Social psychology; Public engagement; Test (biology); Political science; Public relations; Democracy; Epistemology; Computer science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07673279628731786,"gpt":0.3697045286754346,"spread":0.2929717323881168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002416104,0.00009175674,0.0002320879,0.0001277094,0.001306518,0.00009216536,0.0002880787,0.0000398345,0.0002384036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002943964,0.00007405029,0.00008489134,0.0007295373,0.0002011295,0.0004371922,0.00004190085,0.0005009162,0.000002989958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001945621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006677703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004132822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001000144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961723,0.002287044,0.0005634982,0.0001367972,0.000628608,0.0002117671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976432,0.00102517,0.0004968098,0.0001614546,0.000565351,0.0001079595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000540676,0.0005633204,0.01193324,0.0001051386,0.0001553013,0.0001501629,0.4386224,0.00001793694,0.0001438958,0.2175763,0.2697614,0.06091686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001463518,0.0006404019,0.02883443,0.0004347616,0.0002088743,0.0004186057,0.2047507,0.00005751767,0.0000496181,0.1483826,0.6143072,0.0004517728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4289714,0.01074739,0.0003516085,0.5421029,0.0008315406,0.0009971226,0.00003953231,0.00002056366,0.01593788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762374,0.006746912,0.0005515813,0.01553218,0.00061982,0.00005278887,0.00001139723,0.000009191661,0.0002387357],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5472659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940612514","doi":"10.16997/jdd.317","title":"Civic Virtue in the Deliberative System","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Normative; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Civic virtue; Sociology; Virtue; Epistemology; Function (biology); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01646309330701,"gpt":0.3150605961390226,"spread":0.2985975028320126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003172212,0.0001379457,0.0003344988,0.0001316696,0.0003687657,0.000156062,0.000507438,0.0000960082,0.0002069384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004220296,0.00008892421,0.000182447,0.0004767046,0.0001907989,0.0007004364,0.00002712795,0.0005867942,0.0001673932],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001520701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001797306,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002603619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003598461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964516,0.001946344,0.00057138,0.0001410775,0.0006251125,0.0002644919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974174,0.001614459,0.0002660834,0.0001600748,0.0004266522,0.0001153295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001232884,0.000114801,0.001035335,0.00001644036,0.00003845545,0.0001076688,0.02830415,0.00008926196,0.0001984963,0.968271,0.000689242,0.001011855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002804615,0.001087112,0.003814181,0.0007124724,0.0001139983,0.0002796857,0.1230694,0.0003910087,0.0006396153,0.815891,0.05054409,0.0006528763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7144539,0.0004224081,0.000876132,0.02084121,0.0009749922,0.0005158341,0.000007582533,0.00001945167,0.2618885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972079,0.00003025357,0.0002542892,0.001389927,0.0007039288,0.00000374091,6.492259e-7,0.000009868909,0.0003994805],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.282754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3626224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992224963","doi":"10.16997/jdd.298","title":"Me on the Map: A Case Study of Interactive Theatre and Public Participation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Citizen journalism; Foundation (evidence); Happiness; Commission; Participatory design; Public participation; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology; Law; Operations management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4708899559229693,"gpt":0.6081509576689814,"spread":0.1372610017460121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004840676,0.00009970796,0.0002388123,0.0001592665,0.0007018206,0.0001268542,0.0002034185,0.00004164872,0.0001678618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004405633,0.00006003485,0.00005763289,0.0003433372,0.0005695834,0.0006643551,0.00006154013,0.0003355506,0.000008681155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009987016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002837619,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002877468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001318731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939214,0.004539914,0.0004621643,0.0001264261,0.0006848173,0.0002652624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950338,0.002826718,0.0004906781,0.0001450233,0.001287575,0.0002162203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001132926,0.003919872,0.05406478,0.00001457765,0.0008411948,0.001143105,0.8390995,0.00001386248,0.003383825,0.01214692,0.003440569,0.08079886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002888077,0.01433547,0.02478568,0.0001780442,0.000240406,0.0002730879,0.9186767,0.001824499,0.008571075,0.02350993,0.004354045,0.0003630293],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921367,0.00003640329,0.0004751555,0.004775632,0.0001638981,0.0003521005,0.00000190749,0.000005264353,0.002052987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991043,0.00001102205,0.0003215208,0.0001654217,0.0002956588,0.00001178064,6.065892e-8,0.000008005049,0.00008226775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08043583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5397907,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995137137","doi":"10.16997/jdd.342","title":"Venue Coupling and Actor Circulation in Deliberative Systems: Health Care Governance in Ontario","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Corporate governance; Deliberative democracy; Bureaucracy; Legislature; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Politics; Key (lock); Public administration; Epistemology; Computer science; Law; Management; Economics; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01994110037367948,"gpt":0.3082275576872034,"spread":0.2882864573135239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000937397,0.0001102495,0.0003570513,0.00006773015,0.000211728,0.000124772,0.0001669254,0.00008197772,0.00003462409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001764853,0.0001028211,0.00005077126,0.0003511109,0.00008505833,0.0009411749,0.0000216463,0.0004027068,0.000004390021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001811075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001737529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1670009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6340192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982627,0.0001929777,0.00052798,0.0001847732,0.0005416327,0.0002899358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986137,0.0001763298,0.0007804987,0.00006695788,0.0002499651,0.0001125903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000645208,0.000040312,0.7769706,0.0000200035,0.00001148425,0.00002151732,0.2117485,0.004351809,0.00005451553,0.004631323,0.0002403237,0.001845094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008647517,0.0001587534,0.9648156,0.0004251122,0.000003969848,0.000005155896,0.02828702,0.0005840163,0.000006312894,0.0009253967,0.003766522,0.0001573801],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922927,0.00333894,0.00004788436,0.002335639,0.0006235478,0.0003196957,0.000005435881,0.000003682298,0.001032447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988583,0.0003298265,0.0001719708,0.0001740422,0.0001515206,0.000002923855,7.558551e-7,0.000006819205,0.0003038571],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4670183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8385462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241962641","doi":"10.16997/jdd.82","title":"Pyramidal Democracy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Delegate; Pyramid (geometry); Democracy; Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Deliberation; Hierarchy; Deliberative democracy; Direct democracy; Group (periodic table); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Law; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009085778772102763,"gpt":0.2855816124780604,"spread":0.2764958337059576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002416314,0.0001678598,0.000327637,0.00009324501,0.0002603866,0.0001149621,0.0002475093,0.00004504375,0.0002706403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002827053,0.0001405811,0.0002567885,0.0001957478,0.00005436136,0.0005929673,0.00002117739,0.0003985785,0.00003159019],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003750276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001521267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007180859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.275204e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986917,0.00007414484,0.0005906855,0.0001253672,0.000278201,0.0002399094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985806,0.00008648785,0.0005293916,0.0001288147,0.0005128849,0.0001617651],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002764992,0.001567357,0.08175935,0.00001193685,0.0006757752,0.0001255913,0.004736157,0.004028787,0.01213775,0.5217801,0.02694103,0.3459596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001934708,0.0006689023,0.07465447,0.00009938247,0.00008186651,0.00003817791,0.0008163321,0.003289883,0.002565579,0.9090262,0.006283795,0.0005407264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9455661,0.0001192796,0.02927348,0.008918974,0.0005491453,0.0001290478,0.00001715438,0.00001612055,0.01541073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938143,0.00001586937,0.004014625,0.0006823472,0.0008929141,5.227745e-7,0.000003808031,0.00001075902,0.0005648044],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3872461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5732731,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W179297983","doi":"10.16997/jdd.166","title":"Communities of fate and the challenges of international public participation in transnational governance contexts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Political science; Public involvement; Accommodation; Public relations; Public administration; Transnational governance; Process (computing); Standardization; Climate change; Public policy; Sociology; Economics; Psychology; Law; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0688763425870268,"gpt":0.3862675527040443,"spread":0.3173912101170175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001641395,0.00004955355,0.0001718765,0.00009760198,0.0001151707,0.00006340184,0.0002632314,0.0000364934,0.0001868708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007627971,0.00003427423,0.00004913916,0.0001254522,0.0006742823,0.0009851867,0.00002072798,0.000172443,4.892213e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003284324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002887892,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003076764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002003979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982282,0.0006406257,0.0004776773,0.00003851591,0.0005037535,0.0001112232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974703,0.001020427,0.000464721,0.00005113767,0.000939021,0.00005446051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000597343,0.0001079197,0.004763791,0.000006585168,0.00004371765,4.807368e-7,0.02393712,0.00001450368,0.00008791919,0.963141,0.0001189413,0.007718247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004397784,0.0001934512,0.7476134,0.0001023466,0.00001417181,0.00000868186,0.02993739,0.001837424,0.0007233502,0.210698,0.004344665,0.0001293383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7793294,0.0004668995,0.0001495142,0.2106064,0.00006738711,0.000146328,0.00001136688,0.000001581659,0.009221161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980862,0.001461797,0.000141693,0.000127949,0.00005422095,0.000008773784,9.26378e-7,0.000002271016,0.0001162174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.752443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2484421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404414688","doi":"10.16997/jdd.1603","title":"Deliberative Democracy in Practice: Handbooks on Commissioning, Facilitating, and Evaluating Deliberative Processes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"United Nations Democracy Fund","keywords":"Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03755812200973334,"gpt":0.4036957118175656,"spread":0.3661375898078322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003958263,0.0004159887,0.0007232031,0.0004691758,0.001833015,0.0009253594,0.0003027454,0.0001907341,0.00009987509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02066353,0.0003452469,0.000155045,0.0009025472,0.0005510186,0.002657525,0.000110928,0.001277323,0.00003017499],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003776071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001715426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001804249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003161357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944321,0.001783912,0.001322184,0.0005173565,0.001309588,0.0006348458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988101,0.008165807,0.0007115301,0.0001328891,0.002574511,0.0003142327],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001143819,0.0007914781,0.002739571,0.0004312613,0.001051577,0.001964153,0.5564536,0.0007360898,0.0009760695,0.004464604,0.1825844,0.2466634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01091794,0.01026728,0.00645619,0.02288861,0.00139664,0.001599371,0.6512927,0.007547281,0.006989249,0.1076239,0.1688651,0.004155778],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7890994,0.04273687,0.004047129,0.05322832,0.001496659,0.00165192,0.00006691471,0.0001953702,0.1074774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656751,0.004868258,0.02189942,0.002230187,0.0009523438,0.00004023869,0.000006086365,0.00005985354,0.004268475],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2425076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146587215","doi":"10.16997/10.16997/jdd.949","title":"Diverse Discussion in Public Deliberation on Cancer Drug Funding","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Deliberation; Diversity (politics); Public health; Political science; Public health policy; Public policy; Cancer drugs; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Management science; Drug; Health policy; Medicine; Epistemology; Pharmacology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4403780437412744,"gpt":0.4764178396950721,"spread":0.03603979595379764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009498768,0.00009286213,0.000181926,0.0002055021,0.0005780136,0.0001960845,0.0001895254,0.0000653006,0.001643397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005226089,0.00006812311,0.00009716242,0.0004902804,0.00006859502,0.0009458705,0.00005162616,0.0003400444,0.00002511818],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004796194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035483,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001024939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009568681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980105,0.000834838,0.0004100026,0.0001202734,0.0004233098,0.000201046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985759,0.0002069025,0.0003130763,0.0001295197,0.0006379252,0.0001366335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002418436,0.001081606,0.04826012,0.00002799827,0.00008822017,0.0001404738,0.2435262,0.0008835646,0.008609159,0.02473915,0.026817,0.6455847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005862278,0.0002953432,0.2329867,0.001706706,0.000117944,0.00005301054,0.3569293,0.001563313,0.00283489,0.03090218,0.3655667,0.001181574],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8682572,0.0003812177,0.0002843507,0.117891,0.000766915,0.0001225899,0.000008257967,0.00001560493,0.01227287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882415,0.007336885,0.0004439396,0.001107399,0.0004142417,0.000004902606,0.00001280695,0.000009249822,0.002429079],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6444031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994811072","doi":"10.16997/jdd.341","title":"Embedded Public Reasoning: A Response to Jonathan Haidt’s The Righteous Mind","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Faith; Civility; Morality; Epistemology; Moral reasoning; Deliberation; Legitimacy; Politics; Psychology; Moral psychology; Action (physics); Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06573292530910865,"gpt":0.300513184843008,"spread":0.2347802595338994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00131035,0.0001972805,0.000297733,0.0002383534,0.0003111997,0.0001442985,0.0006586524,0.00007488931,0.0005829785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001681494,0.0001164539,0.0001947745,0.0004051741,0.000121504,0.00051794,0.00009865922,0.0005236596,0.0008537702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001001659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001889095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001043575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001766304,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972324,0.0008606313,0.0005437126,0.0003104578,0.0006840373,0.0003687064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977529,0.0009351281,0.0004305244,0.0002983279,0.000314079,0.0002690449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007274217,0.0008540682,0.001667742,0.000008118666,0.0001226208,0.0008390028,0.006482123,0.0005122848,0.8916455,0.004736491,0.07247439,0.01338343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01038999,0.009894198,0.1222609,0.0005436966,0.0001476102,0.01534286,0.002416491,0.001802754,0.3703709,0.04236221,0.4228,0.00166834],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9091273,0.00006322987,0.0003463479,0.08632092,0.0009723877,0.0002576092,0.000007588736,0.00001005696,0.002894593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981969,0.00001492338,0.001652215,0.008783634,0.0002244683,0.000004142461,4.490467e-7,0.00001677938,0.007334366],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5212746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999242,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911455787","doi":"10.16997/jdd.275","title":"Review of Deliberation across Deeply Divided Societies: Transformative Moments by Jürg Steiner, Maria Clara Jaramillo, Rousiley C. M. Maia, Simona Mameli (Cambridge U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2017)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Deliberation; Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03032285348762659,"gpt":0.3360527838809305,"spread":0.3057299303933039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001532351,0.0003501186,0.0009290247,0.00005766801,0.002297553,0.0002762619,0.001058318,0.0002974053,0.00003793872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001282393,0.0003344035,0.0004997869,0.0001941264,0.0008494718,0.002698755,0.0001265033,0.0006628812,0.00001187854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004743981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007176933,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001362226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008410047,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958039,0.0009848317,0.001124932,0.0002727005,0.001134769,0.0006788939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943771,0.0005083479,0.002336713,0.0003871276,0.001969972,0.000420674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003053118,0.0004392926,0.003875123,0.001049617,0.0007412759,0.00007233403,0.03144498,0.00001442204,0.0008808443,0.005463669,0.9473855,0.008327615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01006066,0.001508345,0.02168271,0.009968066,0.001591219,0.00005718082,0.06826728,0.000357178,0.007834337,0.001827613,0.8746624,0.002183013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9042925,0.03422527,0.005128196,0.02392306,0.00311882,0.002234618,0.001947177,0.00007428059,0.0250561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7987961,0.1856491,0.001243508,0.003181379,0.001150709,0.000009693274,0.00008525216,0.0000617917,0.009822532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1514238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246755408","doi":"10.16997/jdd.384","title":"Book Reviews Volume 16, Issue 1","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Scholarship; Democracy; Miller; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04359663490131852,"gpt":0.3490384361508882,"spread":0.3054418012495697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004767737,0.0001173605,0.0004127168,0.00004341775,0.0003746845,0.00008241808,0.0002920491,0.0000936929,0.003366883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002951212,0.00009883444,0.0002224054,0.0002685029,0.0001819576,0.0005702847,0.00002403664,0.0003758997,0.0005442619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001255575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004003285,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000508354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001639645,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979566,0.0006270336,0.0005902552,0.0001017127,0.0004456505,0.0002787527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982474,0.0002450063,0.0005123132,0.00006751193,0.0004419625,0.0004858145],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001769407,0.0000259706,0.001642953,0.00001046339,0.00002914979,0.0000258878,0.04699252,0.000001175069,0.0001005605,0.0009504125,0.9415883,0.008614935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002452291,0.0001446952,0.0001354877,0.00003822125,0.00004506805,0.000004649379,0.005239703,0.00000889793,0.0002703928,0.002135363,0.9916228,0.0001095079],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04596555,0.09402876,0.00594363,0.7510055,0.00567519,0.001170351,0.00002345287,0.00009976739,0.09608781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4340752,0.06151301,0.009946437,0.3632014,0.05866327,0.00002026819,0.000008098288,0.000115712,0.07245664],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3881096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975442,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383961755","doi":"10.16997/jdd.1335","title":"The Influence of Leaders on the Quality of Citizen Deliberation: An Exploratory Assessment of Online Deliberation in New Zealand","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Quality (philosophy); Exploratory research; Exploratory analysis; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Data science; Social science; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1109213171274181,"gpt":0.4390941595107846,"spread":0.3281728423833665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002857557,0.000124333,0.00038192,0.0001515515,0.0003081056,0.0000412608,0.0003843454,0.0001037839,0.00001795839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002203236,0.00008054738,0.0001264109,0.0007181901,0.0005436584,0.0005141622,0.00002773969,0.000364748,0.000001264933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001118116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00190653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004687494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003194475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956824,0.001734194,0.001257348,0.0001112238,0.0009768503,0.0002380306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943843,0.003009326,0.001150826,0.0001908498,0.001138717,0.0001259903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006815234,0.001049607,0.1984031,0.00009913964,0.0004025773,0.00002167519,0.5505443,0.02246551,0.02946787,0.1582559,0.01497834,0.02363051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002095264,0.001133029,0.7008818,0.0003555552,0.00008297357,0.00000235631,0.205505,0.0005360034,0.007195079,0.08013767,0.001762535,0.0003127327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9824994,0.00006067977,0.00008480415,0.01663345,0.0002527564,0.000244947,0.00001920801,0.00000768291,0.0001970828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980989,0.0004442487,0.0004351155,0.0004020018,0.000368308,0.000003963926,0.000006058155,0.00001061835,0.0002308023],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5024787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3382103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220858112","doi":"10.16997/jdd.949","title":"Diverse Discussion in Public Deliberation on Cancer Drug Funding","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Provincial Health Services Authority; McMaster University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Deliberation; Diversity (politics); Political science; Public health; Public policy; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Management science; Sociology; Epistemology; Medicine; Politics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1434078455342779,"gpt":0.3525369138953248,"spread":0.2091290683610468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002204824,0.00009971955,0.0001994769,0.0003025666,0.001730129,0.0001197521,0.0003132382,0.00003543448,0.001434779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002566203,0.00007691931,0.0001178127,0.0005326599,0.00006883894,0.001134383,0.0001256809,0.0005510019,0.000008970183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008828142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004578881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004138348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001355118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997031,0.001273994,0.0003910479,0.0001524025,0.0008724968,0.0002791011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989603,0.0001444861,0.0004107018,0.00007986992,0.0002519773,0.0001527157],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009678816,0.002021183,0.1955875,0.00002851174,0.0002411366,0.0003515138,0.4600729,0.02235921,0.001076256,0.07399168,0.1190813,0.124221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005762111,0.0009045223,0.150213,0.00017298,0.0001205007,0.00002387485,0.5756932,0.0009496899,0.0006203806,0.05597807,0.2085145,0.00104723],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9440532,0.00009822818,0.0002753522,0.04931736,0.001088637,0.0001649659,0.0000204038,0.00001294277,0.004968902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963951,0.0001326251,0.0001660401,0.001000633,0.0002605741,0.000004878012,0.000003685355,0.000006170679,0.002030263],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1231738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200939096","doi":"10.16997/10.16997/jdd.1043","title":"Mini-Public Replication: Emotions and Deliberation in the Citizens' Initiative Review Redux","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Scholarship; Satisficing; Impartiality; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Legitimacy; Social psychology; Quality (philosophy); Public engagement; Test (biology); Political science; Public relations; Democracy; Epistemology; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08109871442850337,"gpt":0.379265197670663,"spread":0.2981664832421597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001464092,0.00009607369,0.0002585445,0.00007903018,0.0005475163,0.0001458545,0.0001793997,0.00007819464,0.0001216056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006772049,0.00007460319,0.0000913277,0.0006919495,0.0002178048,0.0005355096,0.00002125243,0.0003525041,0.000005997025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001037387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009894667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002081425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000249863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969532,0.001657611,0.0005754416,0.0001466988,0.0004581685,0.0002088171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967209,0.001148097,0.0003960674,0.0001798203,0.001426391,0.0001286911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003287901,0.0006472305,0.01723104,0.0002385288,0.000252358,0.0004681096,0.3584316,0.000003790489,0.0005441246,0.3123418,0.2070908,0.1027178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002174759,0.0003743033,0.07425556,0.002544074,0.0004054212,0.0008182824,0.1827843,0.00004369914,0.0007467479,0.2497052,0.4854479,0.0006997444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3507749,0.01867367,0.0007697624,0.6053025,0.000698898,0.0005787007,0.00001910771,0.00001737284,0.02316512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9483344,0.02924362,0.001860624,0.01902181,0.001101568,0.00001809694,0.00001455442,0.00001082887,0.0003944838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5975595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8107265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}