{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":103,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":103,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"57893008c7c3","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Documentation"}},"results":[{"id":"W2045935559","doi":"10.1108/00220410310457993","title":"A model of information practices in accounts of everyday‐life information seeking","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":595,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Information seeking; Everyday life; Neglect; Focus (optics); Strict constructionism; Psychology; Sociology; Information needs; Information behavior; Cognition; Computer science; Knowledge management; Social psychology; Epistemology; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03956720142467514,"gpt":0.3266791205103419,"spread":0.2871119190856667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001338302,0.00006305794,0.0001472114,0.0005829128,0.00002782924,0.0001230846,0.0002370494,0.00004343061,0.00001507887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006423653,0.00005515656,0.00005093512,0.0004613573,0.00001455489,0.02795029,0.00002502883,0.000124344,0.00000688922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008943478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003591601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002560295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001950379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979936,0.00006745203,0.001115634,0.0000289476,0.0006956586,0.00009871848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960431,0.00006373741,0.003060939,0.00009855426,0.0006892173,0.00004445205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001010327,0.0007785796,0.08139502,0.001500298,0.0001901207,0.000004386155,0.1815298,0.3483989,0.03530341,0.197025,0.001520627,0.1513435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008436141,0.001068885,0.06063046,0.0004627916,0.00007623398,0.00009758306,0.01225587,0.8232027,0.08123661,0.009946882,0.002080159,0.0005056714],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6292742,0.00001187646,0.3692098,0.0001369893,0.0001261617,0.0001390554,0.000002722348,0.000004375278,0.001094883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776791,0.00004218436,0.02212265,0.0001384553,0.000005170315,0.000001844871,0.000003644278,0.000001164634,0.000005783456],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4748038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9856453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992156462","doi":"10.1108/00220410510578023","title":"“Isms” in information science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":363,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Metatheory; Constructionism; Constructivism (international relations); Originality; Strict constructionism; Epistemology; Collectivism; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Objectivism; Sociology; Knowledge management; Social science; Philosophy; Politics; Individualism","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005605229972077005,"gpt":0.2681537019985687,"spread":0.2625484720264917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007923901,0.0000564783,0.00009397964,0.0007182699,0.0001392258,0.0004752772,0.0001883478,0.00002614482,0.00001680916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001300818,0.00004931168,0.00001817943,0.0008906982,0.000148249,0.0157504,0.00004318304,0.0001337808,0.00000916534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001946448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003423325,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006936398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001565055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988365,0.00002241748,0.000450579,0.00005553818,0.0005079809,0.000127009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990383,0.00005130236,0.000325524,0.00006426912,0.0004483769,0.00007220977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005321247,0.00009381944,0.02505947,0.00002416853,0.00001153075,0.000006162034,0.0145499,0.0005554641,0.00783376,0.1095412,0.0003435946,0.8419277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01692141,0.001853971,0.6814593,0.0002244779,0.00004169301,0.005319831,0.007763641,0.1076222,0.1411438,0.02229296,0.01441405,0.0009426352],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9309981,0.00001890221,0.06553727,0.001234849,0.0002723705,0.0001438556,9.16921e-7,0.00001306162,0.001780624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739239,0.00003763883,0.02583338,0.0001524021,0.00002922002,0.000001622833,4.271095e-7,0.000001048183,0.00002031684],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8409851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010476423","doi":"10.1108/00220411011087832","title":"The individual and social dynamics of knowledge sharing: an exploratory study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge sharing; Social exchange theory; Situational ethics; Preference; Knowledge management; Value (mathematics); Population; Psychology; Originality; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04893244663068837,"gpt":0.3672787913565925,"spread":0.3183463447259041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002280748,0.0000464228,0.00008911563,0.00008436841,0.0005274729,0.0002192061,0.0002564394,0.00003015699,0.00002794911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005711729,0.00003581612,0.00002965673,0.0001117859,0.0001136294,0.0007948542,0.00006679278,0.0001557357,0.000001474646],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003414844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005317744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002591664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01079602,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999181,0.000120565,0.0002617899,0.00006202335,0.0002805189,0.000094105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993854,0.00006414571,0.0002964139,0.00005030131,0.0001654362,0.00003836586],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005821873,0.0004699086,0.2668598,0.00001683713,0.0001368445,0.000002992254,0.5418702,0.000001630174,0.0003441196,0.09306519,0.0003468147,0.09682744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001792336,0.0005530436,0.2175346,0.00001604712,0.0002157323,0.000001471267,0.7587926,0.0002915224,0.00009974942,0.01509705,0.005426818,0.0001789423],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956834,0.00004053777,0.00003364481,0.0002589966,0.0004657751,0.000123061,5.356852e-7,0.00000502057,0.003389056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993286,0.00001969294,0.00005510964,0.000006007338,0.000333335,0.000002061176,0.000001163196,0.000004341757,0.0002497456],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2169225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6024435,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973209021","doi":"10.1108/00220411211225575","title":"A review of theoretical models of health information seeking on the web","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Health Literacy and Information Accessibility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Variance (accounting); Computer science; Originality; Multidisciplinary approach; Management science; Information seeking; Data science; Data collection; The Internet; Information behavior; Knowledge management; Information retrieval; Sociology; Social science; World Wide Web; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1480713470229198,"gpt":0.5300043778624344,"spread":0.3819330308395146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016667,0.0001939356,0.001520295,0.0003046439,0.0002101496,0.0000126376,0.0003140879,0.0001823108,0.001031327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007474442,0.0001027843,0.0003746714,0.0004014775,0.00006750529,0.002804569,0.00005015847,0.001051761,0.00005186051],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005103561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002041577,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001214295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.7229e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9876604,0.003200486,0.008145424,0.00006168472,0.0006669673,0.0002650462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806771,0.001370288,0.01667771,0.0003035886,0.0008573779,0.0001138984],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001983058,0.00003886318,0.00001158672,0.3053613,0.000040106,2.399546e-8,0.0029168,0.000001838273,2.476632e-8,0.03750987,0.00322942,0.6508703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002348191,0.0001323372,0.000009294453,0.2581019,0.0001847662,0.000005206081,0.0005521745,0.0001231323,1.963822e-7,0.001218228,0.7393672,0.00007074304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002206083,0.9901921,0.00309304,0.001034281,0.0005320636,0.001928432,0.00005595653,0.000005843013,0.003136204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006165715,0.993041,0.0004864925,0.005571649,0.0001374557,0.00004593328,0.0000811358,0.00001037358,0.000009408462],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7361377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978591550","doi":"10.1108/jd-12-2018-0209","title":"Disinformation and misinformation triangle","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Disinformation; Misinformation; Social media; Internet privacy; Context (archaeology); Media literacy; Computer science; Digital media; Sociology; Data science; Public relations; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer security; Media studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008770396463127923,"gpt":0.320689587587003,"spread":0.3119191911238751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009759901,0.00004118041,0.00008965094,0.0001637427,0.000103726,0.0002143901,0.00005509113,0.00003656917,0.0005644715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001547284,0.00003510029,0.00003427802,0.000134462,0.00002171194,0.005768579,0.000005459734,0.00005657656,0.00009992762],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008477317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009141588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002989316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007806174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999061,0.00004577097,0.0003942255,0.0000214765,0.0003906957,0.00008677603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999155,0.00004962634,0.0005191362,0.00003745331,0.0001592643,0.00007950394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002947246,0.00006076366,0.005671544,0.0001121198,0.00006295152,0.000001002289,0.4814599,0.0004592135,0.0009190285,0.07776754,0.01466059,0.4185306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01192429,0.001133399,0.1357592,0.0003409152,0.0001145083,0.0001003622,0.421224,0.002792484,0.002895073,0.009166954,0.4139285,0.0006202821],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.936662,0.0000396971,0.001219694,0.001158392,0.0003454057,0.0001712632,7.555313e-7,0.000009716739,0.06039312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980287,0.0001981281,0.0005311905,0.0002877266,0.00008137423,1.508706e-7,0.000004700027,0.000002013207,0.0008659918],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4179103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6180568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963526428","doi":"10.1108/jd-12-2018-0211","title":"Maturing research data services and the transformation of academic libraries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"RDM; Originality; Capability Maturity Model; Service (business); Maturity (psychological); Data science; Knowledge management; Computer science; Transformational leadership; Scholarly communication; Public relations; Political science; Business; Sociology; Marketing; Publishing; Qualitative research; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1375835139840668,"gpt":0.4348543227040539,"spread":0.2972708087199871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00602362,0.00003836683,0.00009130504,0.000218363,0.00006740683,0.001242557,0.002097807,0.00002105809,0.000009680585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009737916,0.00002395007,0.00001354718,0.0002887488,0.00006225205,0.08770283,0.0005945235,0.0003147789,0.00000541183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001320993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004445029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003703867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002644395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982756,0.0003654551,0.0003391448,0.0001008462,0.0008153095,0.0001036603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985331,0.0005414932,0.0003646117,0.0004099416,0.00012346,0.00002734227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000678968,0.00004525837,0.004594244,0.000910119,0.0001775162,0.000004830679,0.01507756,0.0002050955,0.007190028,0.9262936,0.0008711084,0.04395171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03068602,0.00230786,0.1548053,0.002753282,0.0003026788,0.0004024188,0.06757219,0.290056,0.08322262,0.2398051,0.1272104,0.0008762384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9245747,0.001881223,0.04639523,0.02341645,0.0002570304,0.0006243223,0.000005578471,0.00001126279,0.002834223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902911,0.003977609,0.005513296,0.00006633969,0.00003959004,0.000001306424,0.000007387256,0.000002623117,0.0001007916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6864885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066141084","doi":"10.1108/00220411011087841","title":"Managing documents at home for serious leisure: a case study of the hobby of gourmet cooking","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Personal Information Management and User Behavior","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hobby; Computer science; Ethnography; Originality; Conceptual framework; Data collection; Sociology; World Wide Web; Qualitative research; Social science; Visual arts; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1140262969435522,"gpt":0.4451857493267632,"spread":0.331159452383211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002328464,0.00009266598,0.0002555524,0.0003352302,0.0001707849,0.0001505931,0.0004512601,0.00003002247,0.0001634615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001480684,0.00005842484,0.0001656783,0.0004042755,0.00003938291,0.001393246,0.0001125257,0.0001234273,0.000003680962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004717647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003009184,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007317293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002693009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973519,0.000089768,0.001138155,0.00009986611,0.001206554,0.0001137745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969269,0.0002414645,0.002030479,0.0002324274,0.0005221561,0.00004656108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006698733,0.0008480898,0.8452986,0.00007775558,0.0003119253,0.0001320212,0.03057675,0.001887248,0.02848636,0.0005474447,0.007471132,0.08369281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02562798,0.003869309,0.6760027,0.0002162284,0.001526933,0.002707725,0.2342953,0.004045877,0.02571864,0.01345678,0.01173137,0.0008011725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978791,0.00001334508,0.0005232631,0.0002756507,0.0006865509,0.0004974852,0.000006336265,0.000002832533,0.0001154237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988511,0.000004692252,0.000482275,0.00004034704,0.00004552129,0.00000694841,9.251344e-7,0.00000584398,0.0005623896],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2037186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2382496,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531228058","doi":"10.1108/00220410710723902","title":"Purls of wisdom","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Collectivism; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Naturalistic observation; Value (mathematics); Field (mathematics); Social constructivism; Social psychology; Psychology; Knowledge management; Qualitative research; Pedagogy; Computer science; Social science; Individualism","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0108255901799412,"gpt":0.3230281029477945,"spread":0.3122025127678533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007298709,0.00004455459,0.00009315979,0.0003718002,0.00002665575,0.00002674541,0.0002615741,0.00003554275,0.00003832448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000454805,0.00003950912,0.00003974302,0.000267787,0.00003356189,0.001382811,0.00002018295,0.0001336639,0.00001252929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008090051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000266506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000292744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001784369,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991481,0.00002184136,0.0004530416,0.00005535818,0.0002408168,0.00008085638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987341,0.00005600349,0.0007511593,0.00009863922,0.0003439798,0.00001608839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001192656,0.000226732,0.009279131,0.00002295471,0.0001300371,0.00006996065,0.003437312,0.00007479762,0.6322103,0.2189016,0.004392043,0.1311359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007482767,0.0005166243,0.02948809,0.00004295947,0.000009915213,0.0002404568,0.0004441233,0.0001277073,0.9471192,0.01921557,0.001972487,0.00007455608],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5024266,0.00001631237,0.4951743,0.0003704363,0.0003437479,0.00003311918,1.114744e-7,0.000008847815,0.001626528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678563,0.000004810737,0.03190989,0.00009603921,0.00005882874,2.7353e-7,3.890256e-7,0.000002324542,0.00007115032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4654297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1611135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007620454","doi":"10.1108/00220410210441","title":"A proposed ethical warrant for global knowledge representation and organization systems","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Hospitality; Declaration; Knowledge management; Information ethics; Representation (politics); Information system; Cultural diversity; Engineering ethics; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Globalization; Public relations; Computer science; Business; Political science; Law; Tourism; Engineering; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04247622556466026,"gpt":0.3905917446769292,"spread":0.348115519112269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001114401,0.00006139663,0.0001296725,0.00007222724,0.0003775124,0.0002841576,0.00006690362,0.00009266703,0.00009423218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003872616,0.00005506829,0.00003557371,0.0003175172,0.00005419892,0.001116868,0.000007757725,0.00006864873,0.000008854518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000237273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006275017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000101143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003749107,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986747,0.000234173,0.0005671424,0.00006945321,0.0003349751,0.0001195756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983003,0.0001073651,0.0005881758,0.00004316727,0.0008895616,0.00007143959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001520818,0.0001311084,0.01355949,0.0002651132,0.0001401505,0.000002400572,0.206788,0.0002212359,0.001250146,0.7076839,0.02627348,0.0435329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01982525,0.002401871,0.01792119,0.0006409137,0.000621786,0.0004346152,0.582421,0.01296376,0.003506041,0.03170355,0.3263785,0.001181566],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6944805,0.0007699034,0.2734966,0.01104294,0.004635045,0.003183268,0.00003169991,0.00008794309,0.01227213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982275,0.0001489091,0.000792659,0.0001046374,0.0003791327,0.000006804307,0.00001362984,0.000005376709,0.0003213448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6759803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2903558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041328912","doi":"10.1108/00220410510585214","title":"Scholarly journal usage: the results of deep log analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Visitor pattern; Originality; Computer science; Information seeking; Value (mathematics); Digital library; World Wide Web; Quarter (Canadian coin); Information behavior; Data science; Information retrieval; Library science; Sociology; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01784896142118223,"gpt":0.3123404645847844,"spread":0.2944915031636021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002352689,0.00006085778,0.0001429821,0.0004265704,0.0001524448,0.0007441708,0.0006422836,0.00002984279,0.00006914209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001696587,0.00003646252,0.0001972366,0.0009137203,0.00002927044,0.006858698,0.000044266,0.0003129457,0.00001563363],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009144232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009099937,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006758154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006855348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979573,0.0001482893,0.000842385,0.00005280341,0.0008785538,0.0001206488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977341,0.00009652045,0.001076351,0.000158544,0.0008536074,0.00008092143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004873716,0.000346859,0.01004887,0.00001685864,0.001019587,0.00004381671,0.02409542,0.03967751,0.007521332,0.00649986,0.00408786,0.9061546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01566302,0.003448893,0.6698182,0.0001336394,0.00216109,0.001971401,0.005349173,0.1702973,0.08315227,0.007027066,0.04015563,0.0008222977],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4196717,0.0001769085,0.5722006,0.006744643,0.0002709864,0.00008843729,0.00000219356,0.000006793555,0.0008377826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780238,0.00008019681,0.02133955,0.000246429,0.0001408731,3.869771e-7,0.000001212787,0.000001760022,0.000165746],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9053323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7176056,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020726632","doi":"10.1108/00220411111145061","title":"The modernity of classification","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Originality; Foundation (evidence); Mainstream; Epistemology; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Computer science; Engineering ethics; Data science; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Engineering; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05275711360074811,"gpt":0.3107569152511119,"spread":0.2579998016503638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002453284,0.00002626754,0.00004215892,0.00001385711,0.00002976171,0.000005331863,0.00008680483,0.00003536354,0.000008764421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008740488,0.00001597126,0.00003732963,0.00002349737,0.0000637069,0.000003548029,0.000009934824,0.00003601287,8.507071e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004659603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002557366,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004717913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003466596,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996212,0.00003552994,0.0001849634,0.00003163708,0.0000861424,0.00004059051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995623,0.00001184293,0.0002532395,0.00006282182,0.00009229316,0.00001748867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005068188,0.0001332025,0.01599375,0.00001490947,0.0001331814,0.000001334381,0.0009787719,0.000007779789,0.6974171,0.0009553468,0.004388435,0.2794693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001200004,0.001748645,0.2588161,0.00003065705,0.00007063375,0.00005266123,0.003331513,0.0001342498,0.7071811,0.006467382,0.02084748,0.00011959],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881613,0.0004313495,0.0101458,0.0001625546,0.0001272435,0.00002562786,6.525702e-7,0.000001170933,0.0009442787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971086,0.0002655367,0.002454552,0.00002160718,0.00005013449,7.332283e-7,0.000001791223,0.000001889389,0.00009517837],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2793497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06512891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054904740","doi":"10.1108/00220410910937624","title":"Revisiting “what is a document?”","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Historical Linguistics and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Documentation; Originality; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Instrumentalism; Point (geometry); Foundationalism; Computer science; Order (exchange); Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Social science; Qualitative research; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01761342571706066,"gpt":0.2888991013678106,"spread":0.27128567565075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001835096,0.00006253908,0.0001285924,0.0000699565,0.0001548213,0.0003554451,0.0000607706,0.00001059855,0.001631798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005153767,0.00004777788,0.00007978651,0.00002296147,0.00002190795,0.0006091148,0.000005270706,0.00007814371,0.00002328394],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006268461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001074009,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001267932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002418127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993076,0.00001896925,0.000323144,0.0000519524,0.0002112576,0.00008712758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993747,0.00003065884,0.0002933092,0.00004431776,0.000220119,0.00003684992],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008575516,0.00009541215,0.00008059333,0.00004282591,0.0001466278,0.0001040618,0.2255042,0.00001278994,0.0003904749,0.3044354,0.03158817,0.4375138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006829363,0.0004696917,0.0002671437,0.0002401952,0.0001131512,0.00001694846,0.02265852,0.00001234132,0.0002755616,0.02317541,0.9519194,0.0001686799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2981741,0.04976004,0.001504651,0.035492,0.01034401,0.0005566711,0.00001411595,0.0001065698,0.6040479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906861,0.0006829054,0.0005188035,0.001780278,0.002610877,4.353839e-7,0.00000158835,0.000004737188,0.003714318],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9203312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059516109","doi":"10.1108/jd-03-2014-0056","title":"Untangling search task complexity and difficulty in the context of interactive information retrieval studies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Task (project management); Context (archaeology); Information retrieval","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04345031035981671,"gpt":0.349304838060599,"spread":0.3058545277007823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001427349,0.00005133774,0.0001292316,0.0001731918,0.00006241751,0.0001306477,0.0002134361,0.00001802062,0.000002575471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002159055,0.00003179842,0.00003141678,0.0002483873,0.00006290906,0.003224635,0.00005223515,0.0001618335,0.000002297243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006676501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002849392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002380793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006398002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987767,0.0001756351,0.0004771699,0.00003633308,0.0004549877,0.00007919782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998774,0.0002727335,0.0003721009,0.0000693539,0.0004877837,0.00002403826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009950418,0.0002756212,0.01584713,0.0002819882,0.0001502934,0.000009071244,0.6232991,0.000624619,0.007028828,0.1085626,0.0006075019,0.2423183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01007195,0.003779277,0.5784203,0.0005824956,0.00007790125,0.0003260365,0.2610133,0.08098947,0.04879327,0.01400438,0.001470424,0.0004711682],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722354,0.00003050514,0.02648447,0.0009313315,0.0001056816,0.0001241878,0.000001583042,0.000003020256,0.00008377367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982427,0.00004668613,0.001471455,0.0002140759,0.00001903491,6.566057e-7,0.000002360562,7.95225e-7,0.00000225863],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5625732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2337783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996460024","doi":"10.1108/00220410810844178","title":"Understanding the information and communication technology needs of the e‐humanist","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Originality; Computer science; Information and Communications Technology; Interview; Sociology; World Wide Web; Knowledge management; Social science; Qualitative research; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0494176736175535,"gpt":0.333281641358533,"spread":0.2838639677409795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005392192,0.00002498236,0.00004329813,0.0001171371,0.0006513603,0.00005143161,0.0001488496,0.0000317035,0.00002427836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001534446,0.00001588184,0.00001716474,0.0004930751,0.0003025795,0.0008775272,0.00001396947,0.00007959109,9.096911e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001440875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001777277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000510589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009482163,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993687,0.0001224377,0.0002383128,0.00001224543,0.0002176751,0.00004062996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991341,0.00006321265,0.0004871159,0.00007499224,0.0002284584,0.00001209638],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001960059,0.00003112736,0.0289997,0.00000681757,0.00002142167,5.225884e-8,0.1986826,0.0001052412,0.0003366085,0.7650858,0.003567286,0.003143736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007286615,0.0000979643,0.03952523,0.00006511949,0.00005014705,0.00003184193,0.8376479,0.00005652659,0.001195865,0.08531961,0.03519562,0.00008554674],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9523652,0.0001933779,0.005041153,0.03219222,0.0003554408,0.0001981293,6.392135e-7,0.00000735813,0.009646473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990004,0.0005078287,0.0002158439,0.0001411635,0.00003485276,0.000001673739,6.924746e-7,0.000001127851,0.00009639258],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6797662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5009802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069777712","doi":"10.1108/00220410910998924","title":"Emotional labour in librarians' instructional work","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Emotional Labor in Professions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Emotional labor; Affect (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Information literacy; Invisibility; Pedagogy; Qualitative research; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01638539607486422,"gpt":0.3472404543812423,"spread":0.3308550583063781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005706034,0.00005474055,0.0001003745,0.0002301202,0.00017559,0.00007554336,0.0001481956,0.00006689187,0.001089555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001950681,0.00005257785,0.00005329135,0.0005897574,0.00005025362,0.001554491,0.000006985873,0.0002140975,0.0000183112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002074076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003390889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002687034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003159955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985811,0.0002196515,0.0003869421,0.00006940295,0.0006086329,0.0001343385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993042,0.0001030846,0.0002832993,0.00003932953,0.0001895121,0.00008061124],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007307653,0.0001752835,0.06501154,0.000002451091,0.00001376956,0.00001457512,0.003709943,0.000400656,0.0001873765,0.8990119,0.003276228,0.02812317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000598455,0.00005350869,0.7600408,0.00008317571,0.000005900773,0.000009229218,0.001693547,0.000001984963,0.00003501112,0.2271754,0.01024115,0.0000619174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9640909,0.0001078708,0.0003512565,0.02328632,0.001236199,0.00009575899,0.000003850325,0.00001334411,0.01081455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895296,0.00007693953,0.007933564,0.000589528,0.0007261431,8.558748e-7,0.000005115688,0.000003502202,0.001134724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6950292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089259215","doi":"10.1108/00220411011066763","title":"Classification in a social world: bias and trust","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Computer science; Pluralism (philosophy); Transparency (behavior); Value (mathematics); Foundation (evidence); Trustworthiness; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Sociology; Data science; Political science; Law; Social science; Internet privacy; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03093916958424952,"gpt":0.3438346007629026,"spread":0.3128954311786531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002416711,0.00003408885,0.00005638534,0.0000756205,0.00002482099,0.00001952804,0.00004023696,0.00005613125,0.00001400992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008506703,0.00002814277,0.00002084099,0.00006279983,0.00004795353,0.000005673181,0.00000941458,0.00009931571,7.301866e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005318054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002330067,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003199787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006042497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999639,0.00002598639,0.0001614802,0.00005230058,0.00007004131,0.0000511675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997736,0.00001003496,0.0001338498,0.00002842415,0.00003154649,0.00002254102],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008796492,0.00005531495,0.09290814,0.00000705117,0.00001432779,0.000002626065,0.0002612851,5.367066e-7,0.8066816,0.0003255939,0.0019864,0.09766918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001824586,0.0002748424,0.9191672,0.00001340866,0.00001770163,0.00005450421,0.0008633398,0.00003870678,0.03393036,0.001197939,0.04251462,0.0001028272],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984432,0.000072449,0.000160558,0.0008483604,0.0001140696,0.00002204297,5.493131e-7,0.000001252062,0.0003375385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975933,0.00004154346,0.001898484,0.00007400858,0.0002428155,0.000001148657,0.000004830824,0.000002576993,0.0001412316],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.826259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1147629,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542508357","doi":"10.1108/jd-06-2016-0073","title":"What everybody knows: embodied information in serious leisure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Sport Psychology and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Phenomenology (philosophy); Hobby; Sign (mathematics); Sociology; Reading (process); Amateur; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Psychology; Visual arts; Political science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01956514335399904,"gpt":0.37805689168247,"spread":0.358491748328471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000568012,0.00008111724,0.0001615805,0.0001971749,0.0001211212,0.0002263121,0.0002288962,0.0001062409,0.0008830367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002477412,0.00007316862,0.00005261189,0.00004789807,0.00004103758,0.007114331,0.00001323657,0.0002343792,0.0002948917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004935262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002847902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004462442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004329693,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990959,0.00004398568,0.0005016775,0.00006574563,0.0001552205,0.0001374517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986469,0.00002044123,0.0009689132,0.000225779,0.00009793957,0.00004007342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001585703,0.0002269169,0.7581441,0.00003276566,0.0001467765,0.0001017115,0.01820417,0.0002037486,0.0002290555,0.002815652,0.01335828,0.2049511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002586308,0.0002229121,0.973964,0.00008453098,0.00001853216,0.0001546269,0.002641842,0.00001794318,0.0001271056,0.0008593183,0.01923229,0.00009057583],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792174,0.0002695031,0.00008840435,0.001065905,0.004519248,0.0001169646,9.399691e-7,0.000005880847,0.01471581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984252,0.0003569009,0.0001158345,0.0003038229,0.0001891738,0.000005860843,0.000008130119,0.00000490675,0.0005902019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2158199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9668633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105523876","doi":"10.1108/00220411011087850","title":"A multilevel model of HIV/AIDS information/help network development","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Social network (sociolinguistics); Social support; Coping (psychology); Originality; Sociology; Knowledge management; Psychology; Computer science; Business; Social psychology; Qualitative research; World Wide Web; Psychiatry; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01782160198863562,"gpt":0.3004902507299031,"spread":0.2826686487412675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008540629,0.00005700014,0.0001233234,0.00006766729,0.0002039161,0.00005994466,0.0001407217,0.00007739505,0.0001599558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000840226,0.00005122267,0.00006497982,0.0001426071,0.00006865124,0.001381501,0.00001650661,0.0001733819,0.00001386586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005969506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003172498,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003184154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008028122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988272,0.00004219414,0.0004849028,0.00003462935,0.000468944,0.0001421808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989215,0.00005741037,0.0005661207,0.00003844504,0.0003345854,0.0000819104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002895015,0.0002155836,0.01579623,0.00004567518,0.0001884977,0.000001939963,0.4569252,0.03921833,0.002981195,0.1179209,0.02256498,0.3438519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01697149,0.001331717,0.1036841,0.0008532308,0.0006307343,0.00005321678,0.2962884,0.05561787,0.01619809,0.3032679,0.2024086,0.002694602],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9773759,0.00003223336,0.01547133,0.0002986424,0.0006808802,0.0001338938,0.000001782475,0.0000098292,0.00599551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675944,0.00004324649,0.03146217,0.00008176448,0.0004644969,0.000002728245,0.000003864473,0.000003292393,0.0003439928],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3411573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011175967","doi":"10.1108/00220410810867551","title":"Classification, interdisciplinarity, and the study of science","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Computer science; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Scholarship; Point (geometry); Sociology; Data science; Management science; Social science; Mathematics; Machine learning; Philosophy; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02714921974607397,"gpt":0.3443138993624349,"spread":0.3171646796163609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004765008,0.00002665385,0.00006317435,0.0000373849,0.00009528725,0.000009047263,0.0001107487,0.00001603522,0.000001991385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001257222,0.00001520123,0.00001726615,0.00007615664,0.0007490335,0.000006687974,0.00005116804,0.00003774611,1.539751e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005169496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004168897,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005650821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003872307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995389,0.00003888099,0.0001814257,0.00005124379,0.0001519781,0.00003757348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995859,0.00001649607,0.0001909059,0.00006332873,0.0001242857,0.00001912719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001906024,0.001150925,0.2837885,0.00003250601,0.0002523984,0.00001157477,0.03762718,0.0000520302,0.5979114,0.001010893,0.004463275,0.07179323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006654947,0.003069617,0.9194737,0.00002297142,0.00006388737,0.0003168926,0.03651694,0.0001149528,0.03162019,0.001161123,0.0008910217,0.00009372376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985245,0.0001696933,0.0006169311,0.0004695052,0.0000701065,0.00005053612,1.778103e-7,6.323007e-7,0.00009793158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993443,0.0001129454,0.0004421791,0.00002279743,0.00003957135,0.000001090861,3.788933e-7,0.000001163224,0.0000356024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6356852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2759845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760487352","doi":"10.1108/jd-07-2016-0089","title":"Health information practices of young parents","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Health Literacy and Information Accessibility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Child and Family Research Institute; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; McGill University","keywords":"Information literacy; Seekers; Originality; Context (archaeology); Information seeking; Health literacy; Focus group; Information sharing; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Health care; Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08270499803879422,"gpt":0.5511381592614655,"spread":0.4684331612226713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003873793,0.00006287059,0.0002303388,0.000145114,0.0008338431,0.00007942158,0.0002412555,0.00005993352,0.0002394293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00195404,0.00004889146,0.00004928571,0.00005355416,0.000028417,0.01648655,0.00004001596,0.0003291365,0.0000571312],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001937792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006227777,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007521487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005440324,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965777,0.0003261806,0.002484872,0.00003902177,0.0004070332,0.0001651488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976521,0.0001368321,0.02216946,0.0002254833,0.0008359943,0.0001112118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002750342,0.00005702048,0.8884037,0.001007983,0.00002463046,2.292566e-7,0.02060201,0.00001246868,0.00002914514,0.0008383939,0.006123438,0.08262599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001967607,0.0002428167,0.9604484,0.0005006622,0.00001420569,0.00000784944,0.009220697,0.0002429353,0.0001155175,0.000724016,0.02645261,0.00006268117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790061,0.00006106366,0.005104156,0.004526292,0.001745162,0.0004839745,0.00001702743,0.000008606399,0.009047668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954025,0.000183877,0.002950695,0.001201016,0.0001485763,0.000006007901,0.00002089491,0.000002847545,0.00008358623],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08256331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112341358","doi":"10.1108/jd-10-2013-0133","title":"Beyond traditional publishing models","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Timeline; Originality; Audience measurement; Publicity; Scholarly communication; Sociology; Product (mathematics); Electronic publishing; Process (computing); Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; The Internet; Social science; History; Political science; Qualitative research; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1789991944869216,"gpt":0.282738277874853,"spread":0.1037390833879314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001197598,0.00005359628,0.0000888683,0.0001667763,0.0001284815,0.003720309,0.0002637037,0.00002596828,0.0002279827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001810753,0.00004555036,0.00005528576,0.00003728806,0.00003686519,0.02551517,0.00001679426,0.0002562631,0.00001019174],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001156396,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006401425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003867257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989694,0.00009757598,0.0003363928,0.00004673458,0.000473179,0.00007671425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987118,0.00006289777,0.0003625623,0.00008906713,0.0006772898,0.00009635314],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003488357,0.0000792713,0.00008788867,0.000003274282,0.00003304284,0.000002463767,0.03586059,0.0007602285,0.00003716883,0.840519,0.1180628,0.004519392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001276114,0.0002127599,0.0002426549,0.00003362012,0.00003752433,0.00004353842,0.01414622,0.001230853,0.00004929091,0.9215463,0.06106907,0.00011208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3930804,0.0008925746,0.002694917,0.01984037,0.002561988,0.00011252,0.00002194901,0.0000457651,0.5807496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964548,0.00001512776,0.001270693,0.0004311682,0.0009570674,0.000001638134,0.00004268821,0.000006579397,0.0008202349],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6033744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996025826","doi":"10.1108/eum0000000007123","title":"Semiotics and evaluative bibliometrics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Web visibility and informetrics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Semiotics; Reciprocal; Sign (mathematics); Citation; Context (archaeology); Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Computer science; Linguistics; Sociology; Epistemology; Library science; History; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02080494030839736,"gpt":0.3272440855243747,"spread":0.3064391452159773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009618762,0.00004848467,0.00009229262,0.001865574,0.00004694757,0.0002402468,0.0002014464,0.00002704554,0.0001176153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001855688,0.00003982488,0.00003286791,0.004924975,0.00001874061,0.002539699,0.00002280059,0.00009347994,0.00001719822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005047922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005461177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003386157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.94558e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990524,0.00004595605,0.0003198637,0.00006564781,0.0004350981,0.00008103881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992619,0.0001547598,0.0002026956,0.00009258933,0.0002224113,0.00006562188],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000212855,0.00007291592,0.004891379,0.00001511335,0.0000292427,0.000006543467,0.00167355,0.0007266226,0.0001901491,0.004051933,0.002358947,0.9859623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008795273,0.006662188,0.6259793,0.0001907979,0.0001939667,0.001041187,0.001234147,0.157696,0.01913326,0.1316638,0.04647511,0.000934986],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8392149,0.0005034402,0.1556579,0.0007736068,0.0002166499,0.00008348059,7.214792e-7,0.00001158951,0.003537758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9328143,0.001328865,0.06515943,0.0004020469,0.00006919174,3.225372e-7,5.079012e-7,0.000002656936,0.0002226624],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2366287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342073150","doi":"10.1108/jdoc-09-2015-0111","title":"On the composition of scientific abstracts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Computer science; Rhetorical question; Argumentation theory; Relation (database); Information retrieval; Originality; Similarity (geometry); Scientific writing; Composition (language); Value (mathematics); Linguistics; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01361670198581772,"gpt":0.3029858504638016,"spread":0.2893691484779839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005761395,0.00004044314,0.0000742152,0.0001526334,0.00005766597,0.00008001317,0.0003308732,0.00001278923,0.00002435465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004697774,0.00001981332,0.00006132214,0.0002000601,0.00004816929,0.001047699,0.00002180539,0.00004298615,0.00001043433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000544818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002313943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001087841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.121263e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991562,0.00004918841,0.0003119743,0.00006694288,0.0003584615,0.00005722961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987911,0.000194099,0.0006179136,0.0001694714,0.000206207,0.00002119595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002009128,0.00008894367,0.000202666,0.000003305074,0.00002876129,0.000003879211,0.0002384826,0.000196932,0.817978,0.1028931,0.001769838,0.07657597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028048,0.0002113524,0.005436606,0.0001159726,0.00001342936,0.00001559772,0.00001829587,0.0001313621,0.8867733,0.1066447,0.0003077374,0.00005108739],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5095412,0.00001067703,0.4878926,0.002120086,0.0001054646,0.00003092811,3.336094e-7,0.000009184007,0.0002895847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825998,0.000007293326,0.0172355,0.0000632464,0.00001816844,7.946938e-7,2.086855e-7,0.000001827016,0.00007318478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4730586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08079638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077911880","doi":"10.1108/jd-08-2013-0110","title":"An interdisciplinary platform for information behavior research in the liberal arts hobby","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hobby; Sociology; The arts; Originality; Context (archaeology); Social science; Scholarship; Public relations; Leisure studies; Sociology of leisure; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Qualitative research; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08543100293549707,"gpt":0.4921809328197194,"spread":0.4067499298842223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003392427,0.00007915865,0.0001219848,0.0004823418,0.0001389682,0.000226431,0.0002903821,0.00005653627,0.00009228575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002162592,0.00005737663,0.00005966145,0.0002148678,0.00003369952,0.002505059,0.00002865775,0.000213623,0.00003685046],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001264212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002025873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003698671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004311237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984376,0.0002434069,0.0005776681,0.00008542417,0.0004672451,0.0001885938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989391,0.0002258294,0.0003753355,0.0001969497,0.0002210954,0.00004169875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001526419,0.001176858,0.1551845,0.00009997429,0.0000980491,0.000016764,0.09222227,0.0007916981,0.000257344,0.06776597,0.03366308,0.6471971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003310048,0.002334624,0.9302804,0.00007907634,0.00006688846,0.00006725272,0.02639276,0.0005499577,0.0001399808,0.02573959,0.01089561,0.00014375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796527,0.00001412475,0.01106361,0.001335206,0.0005687628,0.0007922954,0.000001826734,0.000007618042,0.006563854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983969,0.000005528694,0.0008686096,0.00006892964,0.0002976576,0.0001697957,0.00004940399,0.0000086529,0.0001345658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.775096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2339751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954119398","doi":"10.1108/jd-11-2018-0184","title":"Mitigating risk: mediating transition through the enactment of information literacy practices","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Grounded theory; Information literacy; Context (archaeology); Originality; Sociology; Literacy; Qualitative research; Constructivist grounded theory; Social constructivism; Pedagogy; Knowledge management; Public relations; Social science; Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04168111512975738,"gpt":0.416762787159714,"spread":0.3750816720299566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001360539,0.00004308656,0.0000975128,0.00005390418,0.000212553,0.00009174482,0.00009774492,0.00003319795,0.0001450363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006817193,0.00002815593,0.0000623948,0.0001478674,0.00004322664,0.003272142,0.000003485598,0.0001624981,0.00001040561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001472949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001786639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001426463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002936654,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986578,0.0002905687,0.0004571542,0.0000360081,0.0004701018,0.0000883238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966284,0.0005589849,0.002498641,0.00004715971,0.0002359934,0.0000308052],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004074772,0.00004951955,0.007219613,0.00003515312,0.00004039517,2.713071e-7,0.959007,0.0004931428,0.0004966922,0.002684568,0.0003602259,0.02957265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001522491,0.0006318475,0.01072139,0.0002321821,0.0002140831,0.000008916369,0.8860715,0.0002452396,0.001433283,0.008634928,0.09010943,0.0001746816],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871681,0.0001464279,0.001051807,0.004445571,0.0007824768,0.0001416833,0.000002283233,0.000006053081,0.0062556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960303,0.0002218266,0.003236929,0.0001616579,0.000297126,0.000001735068,0.000004173953,0.000002400368,0.00004380872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08974921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2372224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508121523","doi":"10.1108/jd-07-2015-0080","title":"Pictorial metaphors for information","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Originality; Computer science; The arts; Set (abstract data type); Beauty; Information science; Identity (music); Psychology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Visual arts; Linguistics; Qualitative research; Social science; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01567880060376273,"gpt":0.3246865931880457,"spread":0.3090077925842829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000426173,0.00006013013,0.0001080763,0.0001603199,0.00003552398,0.00003997821,0.00006793751,0.00004896433,0.001041388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001198487,0.00003685286,0.0001082862,0.00006985793,0.00001266902,0.001325873,0.000003893491,0.00003914891,0.0001124141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005326291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002265799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000106128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002348633,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999197,0.00005831299,0.0004091265,0.00004547092,0.0001896322,0.0001004306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990193,0.0001101158,0.0004758656,0.00006205478,0.0002909533,0.00004177072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002202179,0.0001486836,0.001123587,0.00002673054,0.0004540852,0.000005494899,0.0104677,0.000002023801,0.01947239,0.04454247,0.03392956,0.8876251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06059838,0.006836338,0.09319358,0.0003255648,0.001937713,0.0004561248,0.02655819,0.00001241957,0.09617049,0.1635951,0.5492111,0.001105006],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7490444,0.0002030427,0.2246896,0.001328667,0.01087789,0.0005115615,0.00003832204,0.00002908562,0.01327753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971523,0.00002248815,0.001136084,0.0002104003,0.0009481264,0.00001782149,0.00001164591,0.000005963389,0.0004951411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8865201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520992866","doi":"10.1108/jd-11-2015-0144","title":"The role of agency in historians’ experiences of serendipity in physical and digital information environments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Serendipity; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Originality; Grounded theory; Computer science; Sociology; Epistemology; Qualitative research; Social science; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006658093759537086,"gpt":0.1958820623895149,"spread":0.1892239686299778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005426412,0.00002948912,0.00005766975,0.00006018491,0.00001826101,0.00003497468,0.00004360862,0.000002544674,0.00001548613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007576641,0.00001599846,0.00002075804,0.00001153032,0.00009045091,0.00189635,0.00001103579,0.00001748253,0.000001261349],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002287038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005406179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009153669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006782153,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995535,0.000009582684,0.0002384527,0.0000209245,0.0001413022,0.00003626377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997063,0.00004280426,0.000212118,0.00002000025,0.000008618079,0.00001021311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001596561,0.0002776942,0.004352067,0.00002227088,0.0000305795,0.00000105985,0.2852702,0.00001564462,0.0005871447,0.2508362,0.00005064911,0.4583969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002640759,0.001115187,0.3327845,0.0002809882,0.0000241235,0.000003913789,0.1118624,0.00009027711,0.00300962,0.494168,0.05382977,0.0001905554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875271,0.00001932967,0.00002068158,0.00006226929,0.00006526708,0.00003863004,0.000005686821,4.15637e-7,0.01226067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998115,0.00003963986,0.000006660888,0.00000359597,0.00002982985,0.000002506531,0.000001611009,8.381148e-7,0.0001038047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4582064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1374808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992860209","doi":"10.1108/00220411211277064","title":"Discourse structure differences in lay and professional health communication","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Health Literacy and Information Accessibility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Sentence; Politeness; Pragmatics; Linguistics; Value (mathematics); Discourse analysis; Originality; Psychology; Nursing research; Sociology; Computer science; Qualitative research; Medicine; Nursing; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05120499320712839,"gpt":0.5114823189936186,"spread":0.4602773257864902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002510533,0.00006962632,0.0001991147,0.0001446105,0.0003223853,0.00001617414,0.00009232169,0.00006973786,0.0004055027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001323903,0.0000474021,0.00001832577,0.0001274416,0.00003401913,0.003180062,0.00003636412,0.0005577703,0.000006060365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001888359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002610681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008279413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006125229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971997,0.0009431094,0.001347347,0.00004625128,0.0002353581,0.000228238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979125,0.0002576865,0.001442166,0.00009920918,0.0001322257,0.0001561787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006307617,0.0000585337,0.953457,0.0001837596,0.000004198977,5.509363e-8,0.03153422,0.000001165782,0.00002630224,0.001515361,0.00130833,0.01184801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008935875,0.00005091014,0.9805345,0.000368019,0.000003492964,0.000003590185,0.01495559,0.00007401751,0.000009174852,0.001133212,0.001927367,0.00004652091],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993468,0.0007632061,0.0003277593,0.004350322,0.0005368887,0.0003285353,0.000009059977,0.000005004153,0.0002112374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950192,0.0002791885,0.002434317,0.001994183,0.0001430346,0.000008294014,0.0000220463,0.000003827024,0.00009592339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02707753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.443997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088638006","doi":"10.1108/00220411311300057","title":"Interpreting reference work with contemporary practice theory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Typology; Sociology; Knowledge management; Face (sociological concept); Structuring; Interpersonal communication; Computer science; Service (business); Public relations; Social science; Qualitative research; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03050691912772365,"gpt":0.3466890264161326,"spread":0.316182107288409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001058559,0.00004065598,0.00006157742,0.00004861614,0.0001511367,0.0003441688,0.0001308754,0.00002426192,0.0004652899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000305439,0.00002864277,0.00001827945,0.0001990135,0.00008921347,0.008727856,0.00000684491,0.0001026124,0.0000375767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003487629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002985792,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000135311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007757567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989865,0.0002986208,0.0002192222,0.00005693633,0.0003533023,0.0000853516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989108,0.0003038037,0.0004692116,0.00004037234,0.0002047049,0.0000711114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001934268,0.0005282255,0.1700709,0.00003295494,0.0002348155,0.0001174306,0.2375177,0.0001264141,0.004913075,0.3315483,0.06061075,0.1923652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002162353,0.002752124,0.05473996,0.0008696199,0.0001016522,0.00009302367,0.663737,0.00002784884,0.003562799,0.08371525,0.1876127,0.00062573],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7581369,0.0001456214,0.003497808,0.02023323,0.0002840451,0.0002571782,3.134751e-7,0.00001975273,0.2174251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945354,0.00002640488,0.003577324,0.0008379493,0.0001149234,0.000002227542,0.000001003276,0.000002522146,0.0009022436],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4262193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6327485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064566779","doi":"10.1108/00220410610653299","title":"Building “civilisational competence”: a new role for libraries?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Politics; Competence (human resources); Realm; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Management; Economics; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02097025533264822,"gpt":0.3234456326904028,"spread":0.3024753773577546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000391705,0.00004180879,0.00006932619,0.00007673588,0.0002484979,0.0003514657,0.0001361862,0.00002822218,0.0001848796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000712789,0.00003828999,0.00005989529,0.0001702292,0.00005624724,0.004382178,0.000005165262,0.00004062177,0.000003163164],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004397253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006355025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002146416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008867914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991554,0.00004314109,0.0002690444,0.00006170078,0.0003569599,0.0001137732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993954,0.0001210219,0.0003053421,0.0000274592,0.00008243503,0.00006828825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005626395,0.00003872755,0.01003284,0.000003430765,0.000007310985,0.000001079889,0.002075812,0.0003183417,0.006759209,0.9663801,0.009760139,0.004566784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009702191,0.0003269304,0.01517179,0.00003065065,0.00002468638,0.00000682273,0.005807448,0.0002417733,0.013392,0.828654,0.1352357,0.0001379888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8720743,0.0002917128,0.09054029,0.0165294,0.001043273,0.0004124022,0.000007134515,0.00003557815,0.0190659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9237379,0.000009306325,0.0734698,0.000207419,0.001454499,0.000001720773,0.00000887325,0.0000032539,0.001107265],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1377261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3389192,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988841194","doi":"10.1108/jd-03-2019-0055","title":"Conceptualizing information work for health contexts in Library and Information Science","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Affordance; Information behavior; Information science; Work (physics); Originality; Invisibility; Sociology; Computer science; Personal information management; Scholarship; Information system; Knowledge management; Data science; Dichotomy; Value (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Management information systems; Social science; Human–computer interaction; Library science; Qualitative research; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0137154342041175,"gpt":0.3379475450649256,"spread":0.3242321108608081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001049054,0.00003758508,0.00008233734,0.0002792837,0.0001678757,0.0005037776,0.0001113848,0.00002304779,0.00004352152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000951985,0.00003412757,0.00001763011,0.0005398649,0.0001082531,0.1076397,0.00001064443,0.0000517986,0.000006667237],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005331402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006922759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001696384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000355715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990637,0.00004669843,0.0004062486,0.00004000678,0.0003110998,0.0001323053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999261,0.00007373666,0.0004935873,0.00003092927,0.00006237576,0.00007843503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002889324,0.00003519946,0.1865492,0.0000868782,0.000006472302,3.197914e-7,0.1593145,0.0003594777,0.000276005,0.5244737,0.001470932,0.1271383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005903508,0.00174296,0.5072714,0.0006278598,0.0000111595,0.00001036843,0.1684553,0.0006615943,0.002341226,0.01370858,0.2988343,0.0004317484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855699,0.00005691184,0.0006281288,0.008428052,0.0004139614,0.0004511312,0.000002230015,0.000009559119,0.004440135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964938,0.0002076799,0.001407073,0.001790694,0.00004686264,0.000002281316,0.000007776156,0.000001102863,0.00004271011],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5107651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9048413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015225850","doi":"10.1108/00220411311295315","title":"Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Semiotics; Terminology; Meaning (existential); Knowledge organization; Domain (mathematical analysis); Perspective (graphical); Computer science; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Sociology; Linguistics; Data science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004937244930533337,"gpt":0.2683386110452432,"spread":0.2634013661147099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001301282,0.00006059652,0.0001081235,0.0001175412,0.00005113161,0.0002152506,0.0001240844,0.0000246123,0.00002773822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005227593,0.00005132432,0.00001436982,0.0001732676,0.00003433047,0.002105852,0.00006204796,0.00006258244,0.00000674212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003807406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002023591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007605943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001437328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999449,0.00004129045,0.0002395399,0.00008914868,0.0001148591,0.00006619936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992379,0.00005413431,0.0002535539,0.00007727779,0.0003243104,0.00005279971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001038367,0.000262754,0.09736857,0.0001256195,0.000255966,0.00001719398,0.02158683,0.0003094503,0.1236958,0.06915385,0.01779889,0.6694148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004347324,0.001173125,0.2364514,0.0004659536,0.0002849958,0.0006113698,0.003267264,0.04612682,0.3853924,0.3169177,0.003822409,0.00113931],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1568974,0.0005931469,0.8413934,0.000874431,0.00006522681,0.0000769853,1.52158e-7,0.00002816159,0.00007112004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8782803,0.0001906186,0.1213026,0.00008509101,0.00004471828,6.780864e-7,0.000001000499,0.000004493737,0.00009040069],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.721383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2092945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102117701","doi":"10.1108/jd-08-2020-0137","title":"Information experiences of Bangladeshi immigrants in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Settlement (finance); Descriptive statistics; Ethnic group; Refugee; Sociology; Personally identifiable information; Public relations; Geography; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01559912207984282,"gpt":0.3007575732186039,"spread":0.2851584511387611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000115985,0.00002445741,0.00008006412,0.00003577457,0.00003040615,0.00001691748,0.00007665205,0.00001694066,0.0001143196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002692979,0.00002306893,0.00001906047,0.0001714032,0.0000275377,0.0007770118,0.000003138761,0.00004909654,0.00000126418],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001769279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00100453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6752569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4221227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991899,0.00006365892,0.0003013338,0.00001384203,0.0003575541,0.00007377249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994823,0.00006808186,0.0002832765,0.00001196764,0.00008610035,0.0000683121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001989682,0.000004840168,0.04913526,0.000009657166,0.000004930999,0.000001866869,0.9446178,0.00002556063,0.00009894618,0.0006194598,0.0009190788,0.004542698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002790358,0.00004107398,0.008424337,0.0000154758,0.000004880387,3.391702e-7,0.9858369,0.00001178828,0.001971171,0.0001997932,0.003185694,0.00002951169],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970174,0.00003256567,0.0000312841,0.00195074,0.0003465206,0.00004599089,0.000001062177,0.000001037572,0.0005734088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993026,0.00004809448,0.00007809089,0.0004377645,0.0001280406,0.000001150671,8.121525e-7,8.609414e-7,0.000002605176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2531342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5884221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011107083","doi":"10.1108/jd-05-2019-0076","title":"Information and contemplation: a call for reflection and action","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contemplation; Meditation; Originality; Epistemology; Wonder; Sociology; Psychology; Aesthetics; Social science; Philosophy; Qualitative research; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07026668982467237,"gpt":0.4162822061813308,"spread":0.3460155163566584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001171764,0.00003759007,0.00006851962,0.00004413064,0.00005081214,0.00005313698,0.0000168134,0.00003093889,0.00003866016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002624044,0.00003239409,0.00001769305,0.00005130443,0.0000125675,0.001225592,0.000003403486,0.00004544999,0.000003317109],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001545313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009310277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001787377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002972485,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995864,0.00002081281,0.0002387405,0.00003347902,0.00007450805,0.00004608144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995637,0.00002803647,0.0002680267,0.00001541962,0.00007889309,0.00004590306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007975024,0.0001128446,0.02276933,0.0002445368,0.0002991558,0.00000519542,0.1616423,0.0002327649,0.04471131,0.02548294,0.01582705,0.7206976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0227278,0.01179331,0.2439051,0.0001099081,0.0003070281,0.001033595,0.06732795,0.005624345,0.01002568,0.003450384,0.6330841,0.0006107445],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9490973,0.0002683596,0.04639932,0.00216571,0.0004134907,0.0002050981,0.000002893689,0.000008863,0.001438911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983615,0.00006599324,0.000759333,0.0005548887,0.0001650233,0.000007033777,0.000004711071,0.000002042879,0.00007944091],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7200868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1320993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035928974","doi":"10.1108/00220411011023607","title":"On the prevalence and scientific impact of duplicate publications in different scientific fields (1980‐2007)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Originality; Metadata; Field (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Scientific literature; Information retrieval; Altmetrics; Computer science; Data science; Social science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3250730453549586,"gpt":0.5600739134317266,"spread":0.2350008680767681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01668051,0.00008504598,0.0001731983,0.01961779,0.000253275,0.003742555,0.001190106,0.00005193063,0.001001553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01385032,0.00003988714,0.0001298458,0.03372576,0.0003724681,0.001073185,0.0001436857,0.0003720052,0.00002087137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006693607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000200652,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002218499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003038415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947132,0.0001566649,0.0007689255,0.0002787129,0.003866325,0.0002161249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935275,0.002968302,0.0007226714,0.0004913376,0.002117091,0.0001731212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007077141,0.000574014,0.868578,0.00001732087,0.00002607319,0.000002118951,0.001038099,0.0001686592,0.05897966,0.01399077,0.0244717,0.03208282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032256,0.0002335211,0.9698034,0.00001579077,0.000005988374,0.000009891068,0.0000995026,0.001430199,0.00258943,0.02490987,0.0005281107,0.00005177602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960828,0.0001315654,0.0003795408,0.002195826,0.000725141,0.0001839805,0.00001124061,0.000001855872,0.0002880682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982828,0.00004277292,0.0001058429,0.00001439566,0.00003758146,0.000004031459,0.000001034655,0.000002962578,0.001508572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1012254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801569311","doi":"10.1108/jd-10-2017-0137","title":"“Natural allies”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Snowball sampling; Outreach; Originality; Library science; Sociology; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Qualitative research; Political science; Knowledge management; Social science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03249098943109329,"gpt":0.276497369952192,"spread":0.2440063805210987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001414585,0.00005120231,0.00007544555,0.00006894353,0.0001328497,0.0005750732,0.00009298726,0.000008974625,0.004094183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001744252,0.00003847048,0.00005985744,0.00001280493,0.0001124846,0.001809081,0.000009893743,0.00007996391,0.0001105371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002887945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001448959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001043013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001126854,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994451,0.00001516698,0.0002309099,0.00003720588,0.0001902258,0.00008137786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994363,0.00002032345,0.000189965,0.00004109164,0.0002829714,0.00002937834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002013622,0.0001083132,0.000466028,0.00001846696,0.0001283122,0.00002132903,0.06744183,0.00000175311,0.0005405173,0.8231753,0.07744016,0.0304566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007012896,0.0008185093,0.001180974,0.00005042239,0.00003796934,0.00003837462,0.01340603,0.00001144066,0.0008715683,0.0323453,0.950401,0.0001371103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.79921,0.0001588089,0.00002196371,0.0003921211,0.001790275,0.00003769721,0.000002229204,0.00001011005,0.1983768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824459,0.000008626338,0.00008684325,0.0004390092,0.002081188,3.84947e-7,0.000002555361,0.000005579878,0.01492993],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8729609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027894627","doi":"10.1108/00220411011087814","title":"Documentary tools in everyday life: the wedding planner","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Planner; Originality; Apprenticeship; Everyday life; Documentation; Sociology; Ideology; Computer science; Knowledge management; Qualitative research; Political science; Social science; Artificial intelligence; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02462641334983725,"gpt":0.3695865067420276,"spread":0.3449600933921904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002482329,0.00005459996,0.00009357768,0.0001214069,0.0002880301,0.0003137121,0.0001710564,0.00003924462,0.001008398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002472316,0.00003830036,0.0000489499,0.0002041716,0.00005554489,0.00311575,0.00001232708,0.000199393,0.00002291047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009910289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001476887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006004646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008643758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986302,0.0001695506,0.0005603594,0.00004210747,0.0004545942,0.0001431364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990398,0.000196942,0.0005132788,0.00006079127,0.0001314998,0.00005770768],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003843873,0.0001221252,0.09200007,0.00004211611,0.0001478604,0.00001403475,0.387299,0.0005513491,0.008017564,0.3604896,0.05166344,0.09926847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003067214,0.0001992961,0.06133538,0.00008574673,0.00005297708,0.00003914017,0.353274,0.00007297483,0.001663627,0.01345526,0.5664622,0.0002921628],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828302,0.00002471775,0.0004508002,0.005225025,0.001843972,0.0002517668,0.000003140215,0.000006886412,0.009363442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982311,0.00004541804,0.0003207687,0.0005867322,0.0005657085,0.000005771904,0.00000619455,0.000003705054,0.0002345922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5147988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999048,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205881137","doi":"10.1108/jd-03-2021-0047","title":"“Bouncing ideas” as a complex information practice: information seeking, sharing, creation, and cooperation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Information seeking; Knowledge management; Computer science; Metaphor; Sociology; Information science; Information needs; Component (thermodynamics); Information mapping; Information system; Coding (social sciences); Work (physics); Data science; Qualitative research; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Management information systems; Personal information management; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01409583770597688,"gpt":0.3221682997447058,"spread":0.308072462038729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001014192,0.00009990242,0.0001347035,0.0002854411,0.000241912,0.001901852,0.000192418,0.00005447798,0.00009688883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008267025,0.00009344166,0.00004524612,0.0004525037,0.00002094476,0.04384861,0.00009494739,0.0001693835,0.00007708152],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001813607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003369692,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003824466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002395575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998098,0.00008281236,0.000860538,0.00007061791,0.0007526936,0.0001353584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961731,0.00007735259,0.0009100116,0.0001416412,0.002597448,0.0001003969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002822448,0.0001823493,0.004190768,0.00024333,0.0001621012,0.00004145817,0.04805951,0.003953886,0.007105152,0.6141408,0.007887872,0.3137505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01190199,0.002111429,0.09505247,0.0004667814,0.0003124638,0.007487603,0.02102765,0.3076893,0.02435427,0.02107292,0.5072069,0.001316259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08871869,0.00007255249,0.9012529,0.004644854,0.0003713286,0.0002432367,0.000003287097,0.00004389821,0.004649281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9546244,0.000199193,0.04051846,0.004277718,0.00008976711,0.000007365753,0.0001371157,0.000004416848,0.0001415363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8659058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011782761","doi":"10.1108/00220410510625840","title":"Usability and user perceptions of a thesaurus‐enhanced search interface","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Thesaurus; Usability; Interface (matter); Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; User interface; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01621378828393648,"gpt":0.3400056202123258,"spread":0.3237918319283893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005348143,0.00004338512,0.00009031071,0.0001087725,0.0000448934,0.00008433278,0.000181706,0.0000205663,0.0001241179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002754049,0.00003349307,0.00004145879,0.0001491255,0.00004133899,0.002032521,0.00004844676,0.0001038785,0.00001200485],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005891805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000517622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007462027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002922948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991276,0.0000597591,0.0003545727,0.0000535472,0.0003243166,0.00008019494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999358,0.00004796995,0.0001649187,0.00009071301,0.0002834461,0.00005496295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002141324,0.0004650916,0.01795778,0.0001006626,0.00006194176,0.000002098593,0.0511366,0.003714179,0.2664175,0.008317656,0.0007308049,0.6508815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003292907,0.001678846,0.4746869,0.0001427955,0.00004529128,0.0001520536,0.006812871,0.02341868,0.4862981,0.001266971,0.001891144,0.000313432],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7632647,0.00001821098,0.2357307,0.000748675,0.00003721092,0.00006169993,7.136012e-7,0.000003993613,0.0001341195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733552,0.00004522044,0.02639515,0.00004585056,0.00002650049,8.247914e-7,3.110582e-7,0.000001408608,0.0001295041],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6505681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1473528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127942799","doi":"10.1108/jd-04-2020-0051","title":"Perceptions and experiences of virtual reality in public libraries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Media, Religion, Digital Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Sociology; Conversation; Virtual reality; Public relations; Situated; Mainstream; Sociotechnical system; Perception; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Psychology; Knowledge management; Social science; Qualitative research; Political science; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06022043366209056,"gpt":0.302622856818945,"spread":0.2424024231568544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000178019,0.0000383625,0.00009812531,0.0001011904,0.00006934924,0.0002958126,0.00007014687,0.00001486074,0.0004297421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001105889,0.0000332931,0.00002765055,0.00004864672,0.0001703038,0.001798499,0.0000261106,0.00006457872,0.000001041827],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002008986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008496376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003056997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000245761,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993163,0.00009074379,0.0003450946,0.00004275798,0.0001568671,0.00004818957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999423,0.00008210129,0.000225841,0.00007228616,0.000167493,0.0000293324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002530683,0.0001425129,0.002473624,0.00002258588,0.0000203086,0.000003155619,0.5205046,0.00000699661,0.0005932812,0.4679742,0.0009561964,0.007277202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001498987,0.0006369445,0.0200705,0.0002257663,0.00004271977,0.00006400042,0.7966248,0.0001137115,0.004112165,0.1687515,0.007629924,0.0002289626],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.972504,0.0003946029,0.00007102302,0.001065312,0.0001259287,0.0000313429,0.000002031318,0.000003154083,0.02580261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991555,0.0003390944,0.0001403217,0.00005255835,0.00006848198,0.000003066507,0.00001172184,0.000002685422,0.0002265268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2992227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4705374,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797548704","doi":"10.1108/jd-07-2017-0111","title":"“Systemic Managerial Constraints”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Data Analysis and Archiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grounded theory; Managerialism; Agency (philosophy); Precarity; Sociology; Originality; Context (archaeology); Structure and agency; Qualitative research; Thematic analysis; Information system; Public relations; Social science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01523604953677004,"gpt":0.3516649995912342,"spread":0.3364289500544642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009877615,0.00002717903,0.00008142076,0.00006863575,0.0002077626,0.0002664007,0.000220742,0.00001264896,0.001144124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008815665,0.00002312046,0.00004077749,0.0001087454,0.0001540895,0.0008398156,0.00002283571,0.00003631443,0.00003553701],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004173136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007608865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001278584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001608046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992911,0.0001315496,0.000227228,0.00004294828,0.0002286683,0.00007855831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994674,0.00003801263,0.0003042297,0.00004077643,0.00010173,0.00004779527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001817363,0.0001577247,0.01703823,0.00002069899,0.0003648556,0.00004891845,0.0644972,0.00001834661,0.02741784,0.2012813,0.04776965,0.6412035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007890592,0.001568828,0.02790222,0.001011851,0.0008244353,0.0002555034,0.2436846,0.0002142034,0.006070944,0.09319023,0.6164384,0.0009482072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8612716,0.00004003424,0.01300376,0.001696938,0.001311799,0.0001399734,0.000004174591,0.000009305314,0.1225224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969715,0.00005092859,0.001414636,0.00009802873,0.001017895,3.388595e-7,0.000001393061,0.000001949345,0.0004432708],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6402553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999769,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133732808","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2014-0129","title":"The role of emotions in online information seeking and sharing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Digital Communication and Language","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Amusement; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Contempt; Worry; Information seeking; Content analysis; Information sharing; Computer science; Anxiety; World Wide Web; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01712079679858132,"gpt":0.2922698340236151,"spread":0.2751490372250338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003565091,0.00002014863,0.0000367882,0.00007746764,0.00002226403,0.0001434822,0.0002009975,0.000007556489,5.589275e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005732093,0.00001446087,0.00001078393,0.0001151676,0.000009170883,0.00230885,0.00006138362,0.00004869059,7.059623e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002402634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002246028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001551716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000242943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996002,0.00002059705,0.0002078019,0.00001689502,0.0001220002,0.00003248513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995503,0.00003254755,0.000223878,0.00008264519,0.00008832151,0.00002231548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003475287,0.0001170504,0.0213043,0.00001354056,0.00002340664,0.000001507854,0.02620588,0.001872445,0.001465404,0.2133764,0.00011562,0.7354696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005992346,0.000884792,0.3575016,0.00046622,0.0000264883,0.0002843797,0.08225079,0.2830954,0.00348494,0.1959746,0.06965595,0.000382507],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9576165,0.0004705829,0.03093001,0.001898495,0.00006893525,0.0000706439,8.224956e-7,0.00000753343,0.008936484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963382,0.00003838004,0.003559988,0.00004378384,0.000004920155,2.776181e-7,0.000001295126,6.379231e-7,0.00001247019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7350872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1673861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885032795","doi":"10.1108/jd-04-2018-0057","title":"The lifeways we avoid","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Social Work Education and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Context (archaeology); Originality; Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Conversation; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Public relations; Sociology; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Political science; Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03280066827371713,"gpt":0.4227661797611073,"spread":0.3899655114873901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001495471,0.00002569972,0.00003863737,0.0000263298,0.001271866,0.0002124216,0.0001249123,0.00002394656,0.001187144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007181125,0.00001817527,0.0000357698,0.0002482439,0.0001356361,0.000562619,0.000004652943,0.00008555236,0.0002038826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008197661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002156034,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006110328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002063226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991264,0.0002786329,0.0001739616,0.00002834712,0.0003062479,0.00008638635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988121,0.0004608324,0.0003362357,0.0000377857,0.0002968151,0.00005618624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001425857,0.0000795004,0.003387846,0.000002834092,0.00007111903,0.00000161747,0.1515352,0.00000151451,0.0003602222,0.2044764,0.4533219,0.1866193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118852,0.00004794906,0.001629421,0.000004638274,0.00001347616,0.000001777847,0.04840431,6.666205e-7,0.0001713676,0.01333662,0.9362471,0.00002380141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1416928,0.001041423,0.001308979,0.5785285,0.009566234,0.0002321215,4.932118e-7,0.00002562578,0.2676038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852891,0.001112166,0.000471139,0.0007074267,0.002817266,0.000001235093,1.928688e-7,0.000003363796,0.009598141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8435963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391490528","doi":"10.1108/jd-10-2023-0217","title":"Dancing with the devil: the use and perceptions of academic journal ranking lists in the management field","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Journal ranking; Originality; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Perception; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Library science; Citation; Information retrieval; Social science; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01692613896150367,"gpt":0.2671337750561174,"spread":0.2502076360946137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009771836,0.00007437872,0.00008269236,0.0001724519,0.0002694629,0.0006759495,0.0001990555,0.00001572322,0.00006760364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003773157,0.00003200314,0.00003697064,0.0004296457,0.00003779129,0.001595048,0.00006328155,0.0002594798,0.000002670806],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002349891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006735994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002947351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006985773,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991593,0.00003004785,0.0002919933,0.00005976075,0.0003723449,0.00008658622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994013,0.0001897519,0.0002603101,0.0000549219,0.000090101,0.000003670432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004046592,0.0001412767,0.5280989,0.001537214,0.001544649,0.000221373,0.03184929,0.006449041,0.0007012552,0.183651,0.1536724,0.09172892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001575793,0.00009784957,0.8419608,0.001445432,0.001264413,0.0001692211,0.05245194,0.002202586,0.00003302564,0.0181239,0.0804187,0.0002563708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9615118,0.001344225,0.008776056,0.02701998,0.000250795,0.0002757244,2.497664e-7,0.000007417159,0.0008137361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965067,0.0008510417,0.0002447313,0.001798039,0.0004871352,0.000003254468,9.720513e-7,0.000007126737,0.0001010076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3138618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6518196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140842165","doi":"10.1108/eum0000000007098","title":"Mapping national research profiles in social science disciplines","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Data science; Field (mathematics); Baseline (sea); Citation impact; Citation analysis; Scientometrics; Regional science; Bibliometrics; Computer science; Benchmark (surveying); Statistics; Geography; Information retrieval; Econometrics; Data mining; Library science; Political science; Cartography; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7583291958422465,"gpt":0.6992803763177389,"spread":0.05904881952450758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09545375,0.0000590726,0.0001585869,0.08692347,0.0005117872,0.002456693,0.001443035,0.00004004246,0.0003017999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0341233,0.00004061968,0.00006820988,0.1821378,0.0003445516,0.003148187,0.0002866577,0.000338558,0.00006556389],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007444668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009273901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001494119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000612552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9739368,0.0002874021,0.0008970406,0.0002514248,0.02422717,0.000400169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827369,0.001711306,0.0004232573,0.0000992784,0.01488188,0.0001473798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001507457,0.0004467123,0.6891846,0.000007636105,0.00001197335,0.0000708915,0.004195155,0.0002636864,0.04312862,0.01235654,0.0278623,0.2223211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007863914,0.0001433114,0.8687799,0.00002007455,7.79527e-7,0.00004578278,0.007280326,0.00159079,0.001590425,0.1116686,0.008007415,0.00008616879],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779146,0.0001114536,0.001111262,0.003420162,0.0003045746,0.0001223498,0.000001887141,0.00000230751,0.01701142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997849,0.00008754471,0.0009836679,0.00003440173,0.0003721707,0.000003192578,4.758041e-7,0.000003251282,0.0006663181],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2222349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985788,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540888225","doi":"10.1108/00220411211277028","title":"Archiving electroacoustic and mixed music","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Music Technology and Sound Studies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Electroacoustic music; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Relevance (law); Usability; Process (computing); Knowledge management; Originality; Human–computer interaction; Sociology; Visual arts; Art; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01391372146500788,"gpt":0.2571372731749467,"spread":0.2432235517099388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002810154,0.00003845305,0.00007196955,0.0000891755,0.00007370785,0.00003700571,0.000106303,0.00001661268,0.00000479573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003956621,0.00003064031,0.00001917957,0.00007964847,0.00002184871,0.0007199388,0.00003977019,0.00008809102,0.00000215777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001771946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001033636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001337388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001598374,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995865,0.00002943283,0.0001368533,0.00003931351,0.00009998077,0.0001079802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996935,0.00006265278,0.0001324715,0.00005353532,0.00002693183,0.00003095209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003953361,0.000255322,0.07537998,0.00006271245,0.0003050023,0.00002491302,0.03650847,0.00005218399,0.03603023,0.2581939,0.01014257,0.5830052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002252044,0.0009070237,0.8434419,0.0001050265,0.0001550442,0.001592242,0.002414496,0.002609303,0.01044685,0.1286121,0.00701858,0.0004453594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7587568,0.0005410138,0.2397221,0.0003943497,0.0002908295,0.0000210798,4.624746e-8,0.00001152024,0.000262277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834012,0.00005608494,0.01631198,0.000109528,0.00008500901,7.548478e-7,7.139437e-8,0.000001392989,0.00003399386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7680619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1249476,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759724852","doi":"10.1108/jd-04-2016-0045","title":"Information activities as serious leisure within the fanfiction community","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Originality; Library science; Information science; World Wide Web; Public relations; Qualitative research; Computer science; Political science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01972860829692162,"gpt":0.3430180985635017,"spread":0.3232894902665801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001087271,0.00003755786,0.00006461576,0.00003432985,0.0008127394,0.0009067146,0.000230394,0.00003054235,0.00002900647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003410079,0.00002582244,0.00004290786,0.00002894734,0.0001275182,0.005618435,0.00001884325,0.0001840661,0.00001268342],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007730887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001197891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001011726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000960678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992665,0.0001365781,0.000186751,0.00001324243,0.0003315402,0.00006538315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989256,0.00006026702,0.0007565313,0.0001014116,0.0001156892,0.00004050218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001629599,0.00008228896,0.01061051,0.00002125643,0.00007775894,0.000002258508,0.3807396,0.0001713572,0.0004068385,0.02838935,0.003001736,0.5763341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001144449,0.000475154,0.1489433,0.0001082228,0.00007254291,0.00004346258,0.5018789,0.00002024533,0.001609907,0.01168726,0.3338598,0.000156684],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8957551,0.00001156423,0.00008943626,0.002205635,0.0007623624,0.00008813386,0.0000010666,0.00000636789,0.1010803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977823,0.00007428387,0.00004609316,0.0001272326,0.0001705949,0.000001540149,0.000001969305,0.000001865171,0.001794085],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5761774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.874347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180934268","doi":"10.1108/jd-02-2021-0024","title":"“So many things were new to us”: identifying the settlement information practices of newcomers to Canada across the settlement process","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Originality; Process (computing); Public relations; Information needs; Sociology; Information system; Knowledge management; Political science; Business; Library science; Qualitative research; Social science; Computer science; Law; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03232419148134497,"gpt":0.3929137670858592,"spread":0.3605895756045143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001399208,0.0000646835,0.00009033371,0.00003811128,0.0006195442,0.0008568844,0.0003491815,0.00001900291,0.000185579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003511937,0.00004140496,0.00004004088,0.0004899848,0.0000351405,0.005283533,0.00004138587,0.0001051584,0.000005532697],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001810706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002569675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06908391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1786008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979584,0.0001338839,0.0005054647,0.00007291186,0.001152677,0.0001766884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982997,0.0001143987,0.001079597,0.00009223389,0.0002881286,0.000125986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001558976,0.00008136603,0.029857,0.0001102054,0.0001558588,0.00001500167,0.8027576,0.006008646,0.003366924,0.005829517,0.08192093,0.06974109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003713275,0.0001505652,0.03183135,0.0001081515,0.00004651423,0.00001045607,0.6066434,0.00002603138,0.01464453,0.00095143,0.3450914,0.0001247961],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8263887,0.00004756157,0.001091699,0.1706623,0.0006933825,0.0003485639,0.00001554991,0.000004003909,0.0007482279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900863,0.00005461231,0.0007284342,0.008341203,0.000213575,0.00000502093,0.0000122066,0.0000028173,0.0005558573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2631705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9371151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796106067","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2016-0113","title":"Feeling documents: toward a phenomenology of information seeking","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Personal Information Management and User Behavior","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Phenomenology (philosophy); Feeling; Existentialism; Cognition; Originality; Psychology; Consciousness; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Computer science; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Creativity; Communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2027897148776843,"gpt":0.4657704889685669,"spread":0.2629807740908826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00230153,0.00008067204,0.0002257616,0.0005550173,0.0002013656,0.0008407815,0.0007526741,0.00003946213,0.0004494433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008109375,0.0000618848,0.0001174104,0.0001312568,0.00005478587,0.01198029,0.0001058538,0.0001008363,0.00009296761],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006764998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004768775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000246733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002953147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973126,0.00005578516,0.001320597,0.00006231872,0.00113136,0.0001173351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951289,0.0001031315,0.003756605,0.0002517968,0.0007065604,0.00005300842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007137838,0.0001885136,0.2498768,0.00009348973,0.0002831114,0.00001423785,0.03464404,0.002730654,0.006492474,0.02058631,0.0138913,0.6704853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009717961,0.001229692,0.7612671,0.0002892693,0.0003432189,0.00009314257,0.05469172,0.006092567,0.00600494,0.07266146,0.08696941,0.0006395639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9598417,0.0000341525,0.03133005,0.001629582,0.0007440414,0.0001303585,0.000003968233,0.000005830313,0.006280275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964865,0.0000399313,0.003010564,0.00015772,0.00007164809,0.000001771744,0.000003456515,0.000002622999,0.0002257317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6698457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8685421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197846497","doi":"10.1108/jd-06-2021-0119","title":"Intellectual structure of information science 2011–2020: an author co-citation analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Co-citation; Citation; Dominance (genetics); Specialty; Information science; Computer science; Citation analysis; Field (mathematics); Data science; Web of science; Library science; Information retrieval; Psychology; MEDLINE; Political science; Mathematics; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.286229173528639,"gpt":0.5805644529410221,"spread":0.2943352794123831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01169111,0.00007694072,0.0002697307,0.05218516,0.0001712946,0.002091552,0.0009045153,0.00005553896,0.003135133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02643112,0.00005560663,0.0001579343,0.1457664,0.0001593359,0.009190271,0.00009231918,0.0001776181,0.00004191185],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001724472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007256593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002234839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001478404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9894114,0.0002479022,0.001266211,0.0001877302,0.008690562,0.0001962115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848049,0.001244126,0.001322977,0.0002771011,0.01211064,0.0002402964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003077735,0.0003605786,0.1700358,0.00002671176,0.0004175236,0.00002189408,0.01802172,0.01690392,0.3367737,0.00284331,0.01271906,0.4415679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001256193,0.0009620355,0.6814498,0.00001335037,0.0002279814,0.00008205228,0.01931376,0.02904701,0.2501842,0.01457868,0.002652045,0.0002329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9435525,0.0000900696,0.05525596,0.0003338287,0.0003436748,0.00006064887,0.00002392694,0.000002483903,0.0003369389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927154,0.00007803296,0.006985927,0.00005379238,0.00004619553,2.730907e-7,0.0000225038,0.000002132239,0.00009574402],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.511414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}