{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":38,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":38,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"f2fc3eb4b315","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W2316695912","doi":"10.1111/jels.12035","title":"Empirical Analysis of Data Breach Litigation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Army Research Office; Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst; York University","keywords":"Plaintiff; Data breach; Redress; Class action; Business; Harm; Odds; Credit card; Securities fraud; Information privacy; Law; Actuarial science; Internet privacy; Payment; Finance; Political science; Supreme court","authors":[{"name":"Sasha Romanosky","is_ca":false},{"name":"David Hoffman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Alessandro Acquisti","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1744729292061837,"gpt":0.4349621365672465,"spread":0.2604892073610628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009512174,0.0004821088,0.0007083475,0.01266008,0.003031932,0.004153947,0.002415197,0.002804935,0.009092324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09628277,0.00054988,0.0006802761,0.01316581,0.002287716,0.003531076,0.002345288,0.003436101,0.001951995],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003673106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002917981,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01800409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01586567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9821761,0.005266493,0.002508396,0.001869745,0.006422546,0.001756652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7187517,0.1518392,0.1090329,0.005312671,0.01194409,0.003119455],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002013582,0.001429961,0.9397686,0.000420599,0.0002233122,0.0009937208,0.003648673,0.002896625,0.0002707443,0.01107098,0.01321608,0.02585947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005049139,0.0003435756,0.9519185,0.0004859017,0.0001521962,0.001429011,0.01168016,0.0112713,0.001015416,0.00466378,0.01690004,0.0000895863],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9697903,0.002315831,0.00240065,0.002067482,0.00003205772,0.0003924988,0.006805987,0.00005716553,0.01613797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873799,0.00106663,0.001020948,0.0004447217,0.00008486796,0.0003158624,0.006280805,0.00002174275,0.003384616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01800409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05030578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110943459","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01239.x","title":"Mechanisms for Eliciting Cooperation in Counterterrorism Policing: Evidence from the United Kingdom","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Open Society Institute; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Procedural justice; Terrorism; Legitimacy; Law enforcement; Perception; Sample (material); Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Community policing; Enforcement; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Aziz Z. Huq","is_ca":false},{"name":"Tom R. Tyler","is_ca":false},{"name":"Stephen J. Schulhofer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5508604380521529,"gpt":0.5116323480429372,"spread":0.03922809000921568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004999231,0.0003032624,0.0004097456,0.0008597157,0.001678522,0.001474369,0.0006065429,0.0008251447,0.002401535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02386494,0.0004441519,0.0003355399,0.0006716922,0.00258094,0.0006409776,0.002484494,0.0005026701,0.0004189059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002198028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001611604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0466323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07368274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9891005,0.008367769,0.0004643255,0.0004856549,0.0009205767,0.0006612258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.953844,0.02463837,0.0146138,0.002746863,0.003047087,0.001109789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00359882,0.0007653493,0.7953985,0.001655702,0.0005048827,0.002052594,0.09251397,0.0008433065,0.006229463,0.003539171,0.00152496,0.09137323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001929921,0.0009188203,0.9524395,0.0005039737,0.0001741181,0.00072314,0.03439747,0.0004506973,0.001784956,0.0005922638,0.007753223,0.00006890652],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934407,0.0008967514,0.0002192058,0.0002598485,0.00000682599,0.00002187583,0.00001869912,0.000002433107,0.00513363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987943,0.0005780042,0.0002414666,0.00008352108,0.000002678265,0.00001588236,0.00001549219,0.00000288682,0.0002657052],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0466323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0927217,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409716856","doi":"10.1111/jels.12413","title":"Hallucination‐Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading <scp>AI</scp> Legal Research Tools","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Stanford Law School; University of Toronto; Fordham University","keywords":"Hallucinating; Automatic summarization; Legal psychology; Typology; Lexis; Computer science; Legal case; Legal research; Psychology; Data science; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Varun Magesh","is_ca":false},{"name":"Faiz Surani","is_ca":false},{"name":"Matthew Dahl","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mirac Suzgun","is_ca":false},{"name":"Christopher D. Manning","is_ca":false},{"name":"Daniel E. Ho","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3252983431727126,"gpt":0.5757539876260013,"spread":0.2504556444532887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08605786,0.0006704377,0.0009030268,0.006744006,0.001584683,0.007902852,0.00309882,0.002631462,0.002425232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.53018,0.0006317749,0.0006143615,0.003596926,0.003712983,0.007832309,0.007094907,0.002074446,0.001663334],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002147727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001948739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004348563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003182405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8916167,0.05578578,0.01127214,0.008499637,0.0307736,0.002052121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2797127,0.5692166,0.06136611,0.04578853,0.03852417,0.005391843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003379101,0.001652304,0.4795417,0.003120526,0.001064732,0.0007612717,0.04870131,0.01646373,0.009944828,0.005643711,0.01160913,0.4181177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005695639,0.007892582,0.6049523,0.002070366,0.001337861,0.002535345,0.03933703,0.2362376,0.04694758,0.02011336,0.03703967,0.0009666422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9670214,0.0008045329,0.01378294,0.001593029,0.00009264274,0.0005635216,0.0006428939,0.002123374,0.01337563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902462,0.0001295738,0.007894843,0.0002095241,0.00004316503,0.0001276852,0.0005404877,0.00012056,0.0006878562],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9139422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4551229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111199343","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2004.00022.x","title":"Disappearing Trials? A Comparative Perspective","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Perspective (graphical); Incidence (geometry); Geography; Period (music); Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Herbert M. Kritzer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2753685447373979,"gpt":0.3958572564372291,"spread":0.1204887116998313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004320897,0.0001286191,0.0007135971,0.004814185,0.002567125,0.006830887,0.00146275,0.001418295,0.01255731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01963994,0.0001653518,0.0002536553,0.007834618,0.00987446,0.005888718,0.002003588,0.001836185,0.0004829077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007636181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005269936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1313897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1919035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961305,0.001492452,0.0002088814,0.0004998229,0.0007058944,0.0009625246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816458,0.00732717,0.002803906,0.001367385,0.004561157,0.002294531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001791448,0.00006704126,0.03264839,0.0004932705,0.00003563456,0.0007305432,0.02812387,0.0004752414,0.0003678075,0.8115012,0.01901261,0.1063653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006257997,0.0002230265,0.2998664,0.001010215,0.00008259164,0.001547504,0.08438252,0.0008136008,0.0003215753,0.1121354,0.4994949,0.00005965151],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3302506,0.03885888,0.002006175,0.05885778,0.0005854488,0.0000406677,0.0008263768,0.00002851611,0.5685456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652911,0.01265074,0.000531915,0.002928676,0.000466624,0.00002361116,0.0002932495,0.00002714577,0.01778692],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2612499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020830203","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2008.00144.x","title":"To Lawyer or Not to Lawyer: <i>Is</i> that the Question?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Legal service; Economic Justice; Legal profession; Political science; Business; Law","authors":[{"name":"Herbert M. Kritzer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3002855949768109,"gpt":0.5415371594144396,"spread":0.2412515644376287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009569224,0.0001288418,0.0004949588,0.0008308043,0.003008688,0.007156992,0.001149854,0.004535714,0.006941556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05130915,0.0001911413,0.0002809906,0.001453817,0.01146817,0.01053361,0.002328139,0.00501984,0.001054475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003987567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004449606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01653101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01918618,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935288,0.003454129,0.0003254723,0.0005744501,0.0009665464,0.001150562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721065,0.01632003,0.006632544,0.0004706696,0.002589648,0.001880693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003059204,0.0005042322,0.2801105,0.000881339,0.0001924434,0.001229033,0.09723198,0.0003206107,0.0004727193,0.3152255,0.1403425,0.1631834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006613907,0.0002091116,0.1497038,0.003473568,0.0001569058,0.001932538,0.5124322,0.001000585,0.000787731,0.1458621,0.184226,0.0001492893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2350587,0.0135233,0.001956797,0.6927082,0.001267525,0.00003851716,0.0002668004,0.00001329125,0.05516685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9440598,0.005430543,0.0005479612,0.04572259,0.0008215617,0.0000282716,0.00007347732,0.00001421155,0.00330144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01653101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0506075,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122982036","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2012.01251.x","title":"Will Tort Reform Bend the Cost Curve? Evidence from Texas","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Tort reform; Tort; Economics; Public economics; Actuarial science; Accounting; Liability","authors":[{"name":"Myungho Paik","is_ca":false},{"name":"Bernard S. Black","is_ca":true},{"name":"David A. Hyman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Charles Silver","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3294400808438403,"gpt":0.5554552672090723,"spread":0.226015186365232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004946713,0.0003612169,0.0004398587,0.001984865,0.001483023,0.003032579,0.001320014,0.002091862,0.01844743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03068466,0.0003207628,0.0009308347,0.003097187,0.002632461,0.00274623,0.001826384,0.002555647,0.001185146],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006557754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004715148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05021046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06197441,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966183,0.001165763,0.0002046207,0.0003867938,0.0008634513,0.0007611303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9328848,0.03008778,0.02525886,0.002035718,0.007459184,0.002273619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003870167,0.001436788,0.7242876,0.002041661,0.001414759,0.0008361403,0.004765615,0.004692763,0.0005512989,0.06825065,0.08845425,0.09939838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005575984,0.0008471446,0.9045104,0.002557152,0.001273426,0.0002791351,0.01034443,0.001694566,0.0008801693,0.01072187,0.06624217,0.00009197834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8177314,0.0178887,0.0007532909,0.08461222,0.0003086862,0.0001164925,0.003600405,0.00003036628,0.0749584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767671,0.008090191,0.0002535595,0.009478014,0.0003817172,0.00003245719,0.001270488,0.0000181537,0.003708199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05021046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09983635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139397807","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2004.00007.x","title":"A Broken System: The Persistent Patterns of Reversals of Death Sentences in the United States","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Sunnybrook Health Science Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; State (computer science); Psychology; Political science; Econometrics; Economics; Computer science; Natural language processing","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Gelman","is_ca":false},{"name":"James S. Liebman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Valerie West","is_ca":false},{"name":"Alexander Kiss","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1044547122618205,"gpt":0.3953407969997022,"spread":0.2908860847378817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002020959,0.0001413848,0.0003149991,0.002871895,0.0009595993,0.001329963,0.0007654732,0.0006461944,0.00194976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01566072,0.0003949662,0.000277234,0.002775684,0.0008123206,0.0009485554,0.00199707,0.00141624,0.0003609672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001262275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009820916,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07178593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1574347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980204,0.0005970683,0.000334802,0.000376659,0.0003455102,0.0003256201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816278,0.003524538,0.01024173,0.001526894,0.001959718,0.001119304],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007784815,0.00005288984,0.9917074,0.00001551118,0.00004719879,0.000071145,0.001155797,0.0001503341,0.0001227511,0.0002764894,0.001146608,0.005175988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002529667,0.00002107432,0.9980477,0.00001287646,0.000008844425,0.00005927294,0.0008908549,0.0003013242,0.00004683915,0.00009452298,0.0005057552,0.000008386512],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.99718,0.0001851101,0.0001178609,0.0002863936,0.00000937336,0.00001322158,0.001580462,0.00001147438,0.0006161151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976681,0.00006850551,0.0001104303,0.00004564778,0.000006320543,0.00001052172,0.001910017,0.000004874151,0.000175627],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07178593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1427362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153327433","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2012.01263.x","title":"Does Tort Law Deter Individuals? A Behavioral Science Study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Sanctions; Variety (cybernetics); Liability; Strict liability; Joint and several liability; Tort reform; Law; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Actuarial science; Law and economics","authors":[{"name":"W. Jonathan Cardi","is_ca":false},{"name":"Randall D. Penfield","is_ca":false},{"name":"Albert Yoon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1311556972428465,"gpt":0.3604201102486919,"spread":0.2292644130058454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00564984,0.0001760025,0.0004279234,0.0009697408,0.00132028,0.001971734,0.000366686,0.001670782,0.003175836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01690117,0.0002431579,0.0004872595,0.0007551371,0.001963029,0.002166044,0.0009016057,0.002418601,0.0004705987],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006973682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006270105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003634783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004743122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963908,0.002577375,0.00009663816,0.0002695992,0.0003707537,0.0002948682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97835,0.01469345,0.003664284,0.000901293,0.0008295933,0.001561464],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003265971,0.008079969,0.9283205,0.0000885225,0.0002600439,0.0002411506,0.01299912,0.0004148816,0.0004609967,0.01185476,0.002382298,0.03457119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006078195,0.001945201,0.9695236,0.00008932298,0.00009079697,0.0003699959,0.01538893,0.001543957,0.000169749,0.005356007,0.005427053,0.0000346813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932777,0.000224943,0.0001161267,0.00282336,0.00001294699,0.00002235988,0.00003266441,0.000001250659,0.00348865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972296,0.0004406086,0.0001306979,0.001378065,0.00003635002,0.00001955858,0.00003853222,0.000001074293,0.0007253701],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00564984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02987951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1932150760","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2012.01272.x","title":"Race and Selective Enforcement in Public Housing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Enforcement; Law enforcement; Race (biology); Criminology; Public housing; Business; Nexus (standard); Law; Political science; Engineering; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jeffrey Fagan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Garth Davies","is_ca":true},{"name":"Adam Carlis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2193499402849032,"gpt":0.4822578547904881,"spread":0.2629079145055849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001398863,0.0001144135,0.0002483506,0.0006090489,0.001120691,0.00101716,0.0004897033,0.0004937885,0.002866466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005457077,0.0001808438,0.0002558476,0.0007797542,0.0009759951,0.0006549294,0.00136036,0.0006463776,0.0001694739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00140109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00123043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03879504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06185189,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983099,0.0007394297,0.0000607092,0.0001669472,0.0002502009,0.0004728942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950346,0.0005599936,0.003089944,0.0002553327,0.000238003,0.0008222374],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001395281,0.0007967224,0.9797921,0.00001433435,0.00006205827,0.0001140708,0.001737243,0.0003024076,0.0002159959,0.001467107,0.000679825,0.01467856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006438472,0.00008814262,0.9974914,0.00001760096,0.00001347443,0.00003852058,0.001241294,0.0003642986,0.00007413155,0.0002023127,0.0004590954,0.000003286158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983842,0.0001091606,0.00003765565,0.0002796637,0.000005794645,0.000004556927,0.00001850914,0.000001177924,0.001159193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996694,0.0000445794,0.00001731407,0.00002895085,0.000005993629,0.00000349782,0.00001492982,5.993026e-7,0.0002147309],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03879504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07713842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122772384","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2004.00005.x","title":"Empirical Estimates of Filtering Failure in Court‐Supervised Reorganization","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Plan (archaeology); Sample (material); Empirical research; Type I and type II errors; Actuarial science; Estimation; Econometrics; Business; Computer science; Economics; Operations management; Statistics; Mathematics; Management; History","authors":[{"name":"Timothy S. Fisher","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jocelyn Martel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06177666075663323,"gpt":0.3142868177006645,"spread":0.2525101569440312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007970938,0.0003179271,0.0005380423,0.004093307,0.0007930778,0.001271025,0.000946497,0.0009823013,0.003350086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08434702,0.0004115465,0.0005886688,0.003260015,0.001573369,0.001139931,0.001114863,0.001479576,0.000348753],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001853012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001339212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05905102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06402972,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941446,0.001879851,0.0007697025,0.0007055142,0.001492844,0.001007407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.746135,0.1174487,0.1144114,0.00941578,0.008403096,0.004185887],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004675848,0.00004603778,0.9933318,0.000006859101,0.00005643981,0.00007034391,0.0002415764,0.00225804,0.00005245079,0.000202727,0.0002605898,0.003426314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004370895,0.00005003813,0.9951054,0.00001450164,0.00002189647,0.0001636984,0.0003285703,0.003642711,0.0001164236,0.0003061176,0.0002337261,0.00001257678],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969056,0.0001275128,0.001212069,0.00009125812,0.000002950085,0.00003177634,0.000582043,0.0000187567,0.001027958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998558,0.00005423641,0.0002438374,0.00001340395,0.000006438556,0.00001412525,0.0007691823,0.000003397073,0.0003374317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05905102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1174146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002433399","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01162.x","title":"Capital Flows and Hedge Fund Regulation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Hedge fund; Finance; Capitalization; Open-end fund; Investment fund; Robustness (evolution); Cost of capital; Economics; Microeconomics; Institutional investor; Profit (economics); Market liquidity","authors":[{"name":"Douglas J. Cumming","is_ca":true},{"name":"Na Dai","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07175906070194905,"gpt":0.3130002708074401,"spread":0.2412412101054911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002862715,0.000243698,0.0002796609,0.002420568,0.0007890317,0.003612325,0.0004720366,0.00107355,0.002150952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01465517,0.0002145682,0.0005388172,0.001328499,0.002886345,0.00168375,0.001538637,0.001241618,0.0001735053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002439087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001470101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006665814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004023714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971112,0.0007086187,0.0002233931,0.0003640876,0.0009794626,0.0006132781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841558,0.004907527,0.008617654,0.0009850698,0.000982455,0.0003515169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002787952,0.0002017458,0.1718006,0.000165906,0.0002828277,0.0007577877,0.001501082,0.03158692,0.002919942,0.7239662,0.004490156,0.06204794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001391053,0.0004173272,0.6049846,0.0003788797,0.0003480582,0.0008188052,0.001262423,0.02453898,0.01287709,0.2657425,0.08828208,0.000210098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8391036,0.003170964,0.01314623,0.003291952,0.00009018902,0.0001119773,0.0005665026,0.0001376541,0.1403809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969946,0.0003218963,0.0004542749,0.0002417316,0.0000466921,0.00002155716,0.00009009628,0.000006404024,0.001822642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006665814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01769686,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536165996","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01210.x","title":"Do Joint Parenting Laws Make Any Difference?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Presumption; Child custody; Discretion; Mediation; Law; Family law; Conciliation; Political science; Psychology; Criminology; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Douglas W. Allen","is_ca":true},{"name":"Margaret F. Brinig","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2996618889400789,"gpt":0.4056146463713802,"spread":0.1059527574313013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01007132,0.0002983206,0.001171423,0.001347506,0.00147442,0.003728322,0.001726426,0.002417705,0.01504042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06522661,0.0003908754,0.001161162,0.002655585,0.003717586,0.00554545,0.002271989,0.003527628,0.001445687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001151024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001433823,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01547799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01717341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913865,0.003470962,0.0005670504,0.001657187,0.001603678,0.001314533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9255004,0.04059109,0.02450415,0.005253835,0.001824691,0.002325813],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002810856,0.0004774156,0.916698,0.0001292348,0.0006669844,0.000596181,0.00322329,0.0008116773,0.0002863494,0.02537508,0.004126246,0.0473284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001163787,0.0004470045,0.9367759,0.0002390622,0.0006501136,0.0002755654,0.009303805,0.002704326,0.0003639229,0.02870651,0.02037039,0.00004702469],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.936802,0.004872041,0.002495628,0.01979221,0.0004038979,0.0001045533,0.001547909,0.00005216823,0.03392949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953718,0.0008691101,0.0003118269,0.001341175,0.0001810606,0.00003980406,0.0005405864,0.00001831546,0.001326386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01547799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05326289,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334777707","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00109.x","title":"A Quarter‐Century of Summary Judgment Practice in Six Federal District Courts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Summary judgment; Supreme court; Plaintiff; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Law; Expansive; Quarter (Canadian coin); Civil procedure; Trial court; Political science; Psychology; History","authors":[{"name":"Joe S. Cecil","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rebecca N. Eyre","is_ca":false},{"name":"Dean Miletich","is_ca":false},{"name":"David Rindskopf","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05306115369832261,"gpt":0.3166783985502088,"spread":0.2636172448518862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003615041,0.00009672972,0.0002489962,0.00340706,0.001971469,0.001795757,0.0006506448,0.000935062,0.001290626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01482493,0.0003618923,0.0003759863,0.004696023,0.001482297,0.00152795,0.001439636,0.001098321,0.0002442484],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003459999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001661583,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02821141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08068941,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955972,0.0009556154,0.000500457,0.0008277789,0.001391352,0.0007276053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747854,0.006385039,0.01272915,0.001697416,0.002594943,0.001807998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002658164,0.0001752229,0.940769,0.0000552152,0.00006404671,0.000438555,0.01200509,0.0005376356,0.002367892,0.001782231,0.001418713,0.0401206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003454806,0.00008630946,0.9946219,0.00001648787,0.000009758673,0.0001124738,0.002246283,0.0001726007,0.0004207473,0.000122266,0.002172694,0.00001514665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981079,0.0002906719,0.0001725003,0.0002666468,0.000006433801,0.000006453341,0.0002292516,0.000004433342,0.0009156418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984683,0.0001720755,0.0001911369,0.00007462194,0.0000134727,0.000009419977,0.0003975761,0.000002648586,0.0006706765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02821141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05609441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045704255","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2005.00034.x","title":"The Irrelevance of Direct Bankruptcy Costs to the Firm's Financial Reorganization Decision","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Business; Finance; Indirect costs; Economics; Microeconomics; Actuarial science; Accounting","authors":[{"name":"Timothy S. Fisher","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jocelyn Martel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0359171997451788,"gpt":0.3109992275759567,"spread":0.2750820278307779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003181534,0.0002675749,0.0004676179,0.00242011,0.0004799917,0.002402282,0.0008459952,0.0009124124,0.003949858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03635238,0.0004516928,0.0005180247,0.002269185,0.001085492,0.001235337,0.0007340757,0.001605068,0.0003373895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006388006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001682288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1263337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1757051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982539,0.0003129602,0.0001346396,0.0002348902,0.0006085341,0.0004550795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9272251,0.04199599,0.02320736,0.00235944,0.003474394,0.001737713],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003126539,0.0001447867,0.9593043,0.00002693019,0.0001781683,0.0001312034,0.0001565141,0.02578463,0.0003372355,0.003047443,0.0003966733,0.01017939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002685576,0.00009522057,0.958199,0.000016114,0.00009794607,0.0001259978,0.0002919702,0.03806509,0.0004637928,0.001937849,0.0006496538,0.00003055551],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.99648,0.0001388306,0.0005292214,0.0001527412,0.000002410731,0.00002145323,0.0004824044,0.000006050464,0.002186936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990262,0.00006146473,0.00009832355,0.00000920348,0.000005425917,0.000005543217,0.000335134,0.000001269248,0.0004573379],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1263337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2511967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590918633","doi":"10.1111/jels.12140","title":"Unintended Consequences: The Regressive Effects of Increased Access to Courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Unintended consequences; Legislature; Damages; Law; Business; Trial court; Economics; Political science; Supreme court","authors":[{"name":"Anthony Niblett","is_ca":true},{"name":"Albert Yoon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1218395122076772,"gpt":0.3596450892130476,"spread":0.2378055770053704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003827684,0.0003007172,0.0005939772,0.0009543566,0.001486676,0.002243845,0.001377693,0.001246835,0.01794417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04256056,0.0004015608,0.001015527,0.001050875,0.003444547,0.002356046,0.002588884,0.002738927,0.0006718686],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003160751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002325517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07285901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1281857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946714,0.001653344,0.0004581251,0.0009719633,0.001172154,0.001073013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9359549,0.02692264,0.02426808,0.007541867,0.003168407,0.002144048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005048072,0.00069813,0.8999875,0.0002114653,0.0005953138,0.001666773,0.001931565,0.009808114,0.001931062,0.03164833,0.00541443,0.04560244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006095444,0.0003162436,0.9618598,0.0001276374,0.0002475969,0.0003556508,0.001459481,0.004912101,0.001835008,0.02095754,0.007809401,0.00005870238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9355106,0.001903698,0.005018159,0.009277797,0.0001055468,0.0001188768,0.001854181,0.0001156688,0.0460956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953667,0.0002801888,0.0004281596,0.0004925575,0.00004632682,0.00002051056,0.000105607,0.00001389112,0.003246211],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07285901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1448699,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910887493","doi":"10.1111/jels.12208","title":"Damage Caps and Defensive Medicine: Reexamination with Patient‐Level Data","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute","keywords":"Defensive medicine; Medicine; Malpractice; Medical malpractice; Psychological intervention; Medicare Part B; Tort reform; Health care; Liability; Emergency medicine; Finance; Economics; Tort; Nursing","authors":[{"name":"Ali Moghtaderi","is_ca":true},{"name":"Steven A. Farmer","is_ca":true},{"name":"Bernard S. Black","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3288642863183848,"gpt":0.5338800208500991,"spread":0.2050157345317143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06379889,0.0009679833,0.002239736,0.003812329,0.001230482,0.00494835,0.003425906,0.002651519,0.01014684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2416016,0.0006217654,0.003784941,0.00861284,0.003047592,0.005230955,0.003547741,0.006358965,0.001056669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002630707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003291137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03674425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02973963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9508279,0.03273752,0.00378465,0.004061308,0.006982426,0.001606142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3886631,0.5079431,0.06245311,0.02807204,0.01073115,0.00213746],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008406278,0.0003990342,0.8850265,0.001061308,0.005652796,0.001111543,0.002472522,0.01245975,0.0003578037,0.02562526,0.02390896,0.04108399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003001008,0.001063699,0.8630682,0.0012645,0.003789181,0.0005620838,0.004196869,0.0381411,0.001370111,0.02532867,0.06071449,0.0002009828],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8232443,0.01419045,0.04210538,0.06488374,0.001009789,0.0008142636,0.02797481,0.0004457114,0.02533159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800939,0.001102753,0.006508553,0.004305605,0.0005881707,0.0001903619,0.004618753,0.00009294929,0.002499015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06379889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3374048,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896956484","doi":"10.1111/jels.12207","title":"Lawyers at the Peak of Their Careers: A 30‐Year Longitudinal Study of Job and Life Satisfaction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Job satisfaction; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Life satisfaction; Longitudinal study; Demographic economics; Demography; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Economics; Geography","authors":[{"name":"John Monahan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jeffrey W. Swanson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1533597785901825,"gpt":0.3538760813707227,"spread":0.2005163027805402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002043853,0.0001631337,0.0003359637,0.0008625577,0.00174671,0.001383998,0.0004450663,0.001034473,0.001138215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002785406,0.0004088166,0.0004973481,0.001144225,0.000359903,0.001485681,0.00104339,0.002301402,0.0006363798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000489188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001076,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0251241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04502737,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993118,0.0001937789,0.00004060544,0.00008917999,0.0001470586,0.0002176347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976286,0.0001762721,0.0005571238,0.0001350564,0.0003953969,0.001107509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003910215,0.0003893229,0.9938174,0.000005199483,0.00002711116,0.00008011068,0.002279776,0.00001923425,0.000195548,0.00004814176,0.0005396781,0.002559419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003766006,0.000144686,0.9954745,0.00001261892,0.000009450716,0.00008178152,0.003429487,0.00007629408,0.0000360252,0.00003346986,0.0006897755,0.000008163881],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988642,0.0001231495,0.00006647032,0.0002834565,0.00001054596,0.00001139418,0.0003018861,0.000001985149,0.000336819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982797,0.0001717571,0.0001110639,0.0002410225,0.00001684701,0.00002476851,0.0005288348,0.000003555348,0.0006224312],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0251241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04995573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941399481","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01212.x","title":"Incorporation Law, Ownership Structure, and Firm Value: Evidence from Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Endogeneity; Corporate governance; Shareholder; Voting; Business; Value (mathematics); Enterprise value; Context (archaeology); Accounting; Economics; Law; Market economy; Finance; Econometrics; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Narjess Boubraki","is_ca":false},{"name":"Yves Bozec","is_ca":true},{"name":"Claude Laurin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Stéphane Rousseau","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1144488141922548,"gpt":0.2854516471605041,"spread":0.1710028329682493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001068429,0.0003236537,0.0004603013,0.002801465,0.003625831,0.00215891,0.001254371,0.0005950394,0.003052642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005491839,0.0002161641,0.0005015109,0.008342399,0.001410892,0.0007378641,0.0009825245,0.0007995524,0.0002152177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03932596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03677958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998757,0.00008686515,0.00004411227,0.0001719622,0.0005556473,0.0003843211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902721,0.001597489,0.002506662,0.0003098517,0.003921859,0.001392015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001147251,0.00008383573,0.972456,0.0001169298,0.0001088628,0.0003456081,0.002647739,0.0005034785,0.0001826061,0.002358936,0.005760599,0.01532067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001393002,0.00002195078,0.9881825,0.00009951997,0.00007255549,0.00006410625,0.003159302,0.0009068282,0.0001866644,0.0001712654,0.00709663,0.00002476771],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771721,0.003199335,0.0003292858,0.001905171,0.00002257387,0.00004306814,0.006179723,0.00001461367,0.01113416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932287,0.001210734,0.0002158539,0.0002035886,0.00001138983,0.000008188167,0.002788905,0.000006007995,0.002326607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03932596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2853311,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574187393","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01241.x","title":"Property Rights, Resource Access, and Long‐Run Growth","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Supreme court; Economics; Stock (firearms); Resource (disambiguation); Per capita; Supreme Court Decisions; Proxy (statistics); Microeconomics; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Ian Keay","is_ca":true},{"name":"Cherie Metcalf","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1521234812437365,"gpt":0.3030523322902792,"spread":0.1509288510465427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001235363,0.000437392,0.0004516205,0.001220834,0.001290401,0.00302598,0.0006874956,0.000963859,0.003030869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005576265,0.0001435652,0.0006184268,0.001929273,0.001981237,0.001202103,0.001217632,0.001498636,0.000162327],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01258478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00552559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7034758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7016484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995247,0.00005717534,0.00002369266,0.00007347854,0.0001335291,0.0001873176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966119,0.001377806,0.001073841,0.0001327848,0.0004064859,0.0003971439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003555222,0.0003207025,0.7091628,0.0001299675,0.0003662377,0.0008144936,0.0009995957,0.179078,0.001558274,0.07635918,0.002107151,0.02874805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005904366,0.0001849559,0.7788951,0.00009293294,0.0002653907,0.000155863,0.001648832,0.1501613,0.001972189,0.05608621,0.01035147,0.0001268595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9754362,0.001906529,0.003623968,0.0021793,0.00003310661,0.00003575004,0.001977958,0.0000605792,0.01474651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968395,0.0006291887,0.0002892132,0.00004428335,0.0000145327,0.00001109484,0.0007356621,0.000004555042,0.001431931],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7034758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5965409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107540882","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01207.x","title":"Settlement at Policy Limits and the Duty to Settle: Evidence from Texas","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Plaintiff; Actuarial science; Liability; Damages; Duty; Harm; Tort; Economics; Duration (music); Incentive; Liability insurance; Business; Insurance policy; Law; Payment; Finance; Political science","authors":[{"name":"David A. Hyman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Bernard S. Black","is_ca":true},{"name":"Charles Silver","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3485872869177174,"gpt":0.5371381870422434,"spread":0.188550900124526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003138668,0.0002736181,0.0003965106,0.002026353,0.001414165,0.002022763,0.00132382,0.0009784326,0.007989952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02010454,0.0003639211,0.0006093464,0.002822178,0.001638753,0.001439256,0.002002373,0.001361999,0.0007279002],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002777748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001829122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03833963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0558493,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978383,0.0005468899,0.0002107051,0.0003672345,0.0006696705,0.0003671834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9391512,0.01727876,0.03681237,0.001969488,0.00282126,0.001966937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007392925,0.0006366352,0.9643307,0.0001364424,0.0002818777,0.0007147782,0.003072588,0.002459117,0.0003679454,0.003175273,0.005550697,0.01853461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007209038,0.0003332591,0.9857471,0.000158331,0.0001290341,0.000334894,0.003615035,0.002143195,0.000294779,0.001253425,0.005893514,0.00002540103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932172,0.0004399456,0.0002305109,0.0009291384,0.0000082475,0.0000213123,0.0005261082,0.000005189039,0.004622403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962943,0.0006504707,0.0001627848,0.0002937827,0.00003649225,0.00001869851,0.0007437108,0.000006415487,0.001793325],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03833963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07623291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767571406","doi":"10.1111/jels.12161","title":"Triaging the Law: Developing the Common Law on the Supreme Court of India","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Precedent; Original jurisdiction; Majority opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Law of the case; Court of equity; Common law; Salience (neuroscience); Concurring opinion; Court of record; Citation; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Green","is_ca":true},{"name":"Albert Yoon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1899221810226416,"gpt":0.4294245830542436,"spread":0.2395024020316021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01010591,0.0002762548,0.0003550689,0.006802463,0.008646671,0.01377463,0.002638095,0.001780317,0.005050046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02874085,0.0005458546,0.0005570732,0.00668627,0.01335101,0.008489685,0.008506041,0.004486893,0.0007761558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0189084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02294334,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07995362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1601821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909758,0.004140627,0.0003915646,0.0008173515,0.001960733,0.001713904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750104,0.01562596,0.002223615,0.002158361,0.003597653,0.001384058],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001479558,0.00005228837,0.007767713,0.00005175653,0.00001093522,0.0007027087,0.03640227,0.0008013629,0.000216326,0.9169059,0.006007913,0.03106606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003380567,0.0001551597,0.08871581,0.001490543,0.0001496691,0.0008592316,0.1214134,0.008886137,0.002411638,0.3521025,0.4235163,0.0002657383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4523644,0.004992972,0.01392288,0.0374859,0.0004132689,0.0002856791,0.0002388197,0.0001292735,0.4901668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831877,0.001592599,0.004742597,0.00114223,0.000132046,0.00005917497,0.0001104924,0.00004016572,0.00899293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07995362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1589764,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974865494","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00081.x","title":"Do Defendants Pay What Juries Award? Post‐Verdict Haircuts in Texas Medical Malpractice Cases, 1988–2003","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Verdict; Jury; Plaintiff; Medical malpractice; Damages; Psychology; Law; Medicine; Actuarial science; Malpractice; Business; Political science","authors":[{"name":"David A. Hyman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Bernard S. Black","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kathryn Zeiler","is_ca":false},{"name":"Charles Silver","is_ca":false},{"name":"William M. Sage","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1347782210330183,"gpt":0.52219806871887,"spread":0.3874198476858517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002525421,0.0001078937,0.000215635,0.001626397,0.001045677,0.0009870356,0.0005328272,0.0008837972,0.003059065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01618247,0.0003010807,0.0002325671,0.001455166,0.0005949092,0.0007085236,0.0009615563,0.0008494949,0.0004671844],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00255265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001124036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02884436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06312453,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982889,0.0003206694,0.0001733966,0.000203475,0.0005628961,0.000450598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98396,0.002856237,0.00989854,0.0004950299,0.001382926,0.001407291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002236694,0.0001853708,0.9761212,0.00002070633,0.00004113463,0.00029069,0.002114493,0.0003269965,0.0002544729,0.0005724636,0.00443739,0.01541133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004914032,0.00003355535,0.9985435,0.000007264082,0.000004244701,0.0000622053,0.0005119318,0.00009837366,0.00005312598,0.0000827913,0.0005941807,0.000003933899],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974651,0.0001751679,0.00004041793,0.0007372472,0.00001373977,0.00001229527,0.0002118966,0.00000388839,0.001340173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998064,0.0001423204,0.00004652179,0.000151682,0.00003748662,0.00001622758,0.0002688312,0.000001855659,0.001271038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02884436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0573529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972118969","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01145.x","title":"Universal Health Insurance and the Effect of Cost Containment on Mortality Rates: Strokes and Heart Attacks in Japan","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Subsidy; Quarter (Canadian coin); Business; Medicine; Medical emergency; Actuarial science; Economics; Geography","authors":[{"name":"J. Mark Ramseyer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0899652005005557,"gpt":0.5237263794844247,"spread":0.433761178983869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001712263,0.0005332807,0.0007988734,0.002303615,0.0008624311,0.002315784,0.0006884571,0.001148587,0.003444961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009592023,0.0003312351,0.001365366,0.002258944,0.00110357,0.001280225,0.002467897,0.001290772,0.0001887278],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00299802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001572383,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09567676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09067039,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980121,0.0006137018,0.0001569749,0.0002882282,0.0002549144,0.0006740394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883642,0.002516795,0.005426801,0.0003095599,0.0008598401,0.002522816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001551442,0.0001172572,0.9913126,0.00005793064,0.0003959579,0.0002299224,0.0001666446,0.001318659,0.00008270088,0.001214215,0.000772598,0.004176443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003560487,0.00008209096,0.9949287,0.0000303705,0.0003902328,0.00006980863,0.0007643648,0.002483757,0.00006548945,0.000620212,0.000513282,0.00001599255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894423,0.00317398,0.0003248615,0.002312846,0.00004237047,0.00002622541,0.0005905362,0.00001402911,0.004072849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986307,0.0004464736,0.00008284695,0.0001745319,0.00003522614,0.000008068432,0.0002990644,0.000002698507,0.0003203481],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09567676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1902397,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210919575","doi":"10.1111/jels.12336","title":"Stay at home if you can: <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 stay‐at‐home guidelines and local crime","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Demographic economics; Exploit; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Latin Americans; Work (physics); Business; Geography; Political science; Economics; Medicine; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"Carlos Díaz","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sebastian Fossati","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nicolás Trajtenberg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1831726732014202,"gpt":0.4493406635364326,"spread":0.2661679903350124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006763461,0.00008805604,0.000213349,0.0004275228,0.001026218,0.001184594,0.0006124396,0.0003616904,0.0091021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004551099,0.00009653428,0.00021875,0.0005181324,0.0007350564,0.0004957091,0.001461424,0.0006485528,0.0006712919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001686182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001918835,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1664064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.302869,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993932,0.0002302286,0.00004340319,0.00005055605,0.000109703,0.0001729455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953808,0.0004830211,0.001833657,0.0002564295,0.0007502475,0.001295928],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006226067,0.0004932929,0.9626932,0.00006250464,0.00004550867,0.0001445468,0.002594138,0.0003482589,0.0002617203,0.0007941434,0.01059136,0.02190891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004713948,0.00007858199,0.9868346,0.0000580956,0.00001033597,0.00002981561,0.008048782,0.0001985988,0.0001167455,0.00009245129,0.004518833,0.000008592653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894187,0.0001480678,0.0001424752,0.00220701,0.00002398283,0.00002292542,0.0008484072,0.00001809669,0.007170428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976699,0.00008977627,0.0001399578,0.0001384924,0.00001458164,0.00002343232,0.0003543051,0.000006391125,0.001563174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1664064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3308756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309258126","doi":"10.1111/jels.12333","title":"Examining the effects of antidiscrimination laws on children in the foster care and adoption systems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Zürich; University of Virginia; Tel Aviv University; University of Toronto; Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich; Hebrew University of Jerusalem","keywords":"Welfare; Foster care; Politics; Welfare state; Causal inference; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Public economics; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Netta Barak‐Corren","is_ca":false},{"name":"Yoav Kan‐Tor","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nelson Tebbe","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09411984896468889,"gpt":0.413301780346135,"spread":0.3191819313814461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005810391,0.0002278047,0.0003320631,0.001508246,0.001362216,0.002717021,0.001139735,0.0008087087,0.005119467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02199142,0.000252552,0.0006539704,0.002108759,0.002071525,0.001943859,0.003468453,0.001998251,0.0002296111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005045386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00297405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07724424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1042938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933896,0.003164691,0.0002772967,0.0005212405,0.0008718503,0.001775272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.965619,0.01475126,0.01478094,0.0009086201,0.001834658,0.002105644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009961789,0.0001943396,0.9811848,0.00003340166,0.0002313861,0.0001360998,0.001421281,0.002304092,0.000146057,0.00603872,0.0006482764,0.007562019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002692402,0.0002428309,0.9839163,0.00006665381,0.0001550385,0.0000815318,0.007938635,0.002731756,0.0004206516,0.00179561,0.002603876,0.00002003155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934779,0.0003675284,0.000333352,0.001013528,0.000009455754,0.00002883131,0.0003846359,0.000004514261,0.004380158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990061,0.000148458,0.0001399094,0.00008580366,0.00000875451,0.0000162846,0.0001565052,0.000001661396,0.0004364527],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07724424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1535893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123791578","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01209.x","title":"The Paradox of “Fraud‐on‐the‐Market Theory”: Who Relies on the Efficiency of Market Prices?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Endogeneity; Damages; Market efficiency; Economics; Profit (economics); Efficient-market hypothesis; Microeconomics; Financial economics; Stock market; Econometrics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Grigori Erenburg","is_ca":true},{"name":"Janet Kiholm Smith","is_ca":false},{"name":"Richard L. Smith","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09351026016447354,"gpt":0.2795344347899108,"spread":0.1860241746254372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05710172,0.000564321,0.001902783,0.003899041,0.002141882,0.01202106,0.003462729,0.006381378,0.007735641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1721156,0.0006596089,0.001524199,0.002266291,0.03022129,0.02380345,0.004254387,0.008185076,0.001125367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004495588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004970014,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002215737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001469037,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9693605,0.01381439,0.001766601,0.004021879,0.008652789,0.002383812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7867165,0.1430658,0.02657853,0.0289688,0.01247178,0.002198521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007266695,0.0001078865,0.009931202,0.00008929183,0.0001107264,0.0001535952,0.0007817994,0.002197153,0.00011771,0.9534455,0.006273759,0.0267188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009324628,0.00007326862,0.006925188,0.0001282837,0.00004999641,0.000217129,0.0006548288,0.008404336,0.0009174637,0.9732397,0.009248659,0.00004795122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.3628388,0.00606507,0.1732878,0.2166032,0.0006259953,0.0003464913,0.0004593619,0.0003005938,0.2394727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831039,0.0008281891,0.005075248,0.008124727,0.0005739254,0.00006542908,0.00005673301,0.00005791849,0.002113913],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05710172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3019863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308441130","doi":"10.1111/jels.12338","title":"Should patients use online reviews to pick their doctors and hospitals?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Malpractice; Discipline; Control (management); Medical record; Family medicine; Uncorrelated; Medicine; Medical malpractice; Service (business); Psychology; Actuarial science; Business; Medical emergency; Medical education; Political science; Law; Economics; Surgery; Management; Marketing","authors":[{"name":"David A. Hyman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jing Liu","is_ca":false},{"name":"Bernard S. Black","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3887285531217053,"gpt":0.5413272086344832,"spread":0.152598655512778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00296294,0.0001529968,0.0003141944,0.0006564848,0.0004409374,0.001878408,0.0002626852,0.0005185545,0.006354797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04462573,0.0001333535,0.0002858066,0.0008200852,0.0002879844,0.001151553,0.0005795501,0.0005337239,0.001221033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003617752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005085052,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001632962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002900845,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966059,0.00211498,0.0003120739,0.000185576,0.0006051597,0.0001763182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9592573,0.01892494,0.01470263,0.001346703,0.003244384,0.002524016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004550454,0.0003334665,0.9259123,0.000100101,0.00008212888,0.00008116935,0.001092165,0.0001390166,0.0002462562,0.0001717498,0.006019406,0.06536715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009351819,0.0007976581,0.9807225,0.0001165739,0.00009362723,0.00050475,0.007124214,0.001929548,0.0006496069,0.0005523154,0.00737703,0.00003866597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867378,0.0007101374,0.0007206058,0.003371596,0.0000736493,0.00007063647,0.0006528571,0.00005453868,0.007608288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975092,0.0001903595,0.0007473851,0.0006877877,0.00006261623,0.00002306158,0.0001933723,0.000006299168,0.0005798432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006354797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02125895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077351741","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2008.00128.x","title":"Medical Malpractice Review Panels and Medical Liability System Cost, Timeliness, and Efficiency: A Cross‐Sectional Study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Sunnybrook Health Science Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Malpractice; Actuarial science; Panel data; Medical malpractice; Statutory law; Tort reform; Payment; Tort; Defensive medicine; Business; Medicine; Liability; Cross-sectional study; Accounting; Economics; Finance; Econometrics; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Frederick J. White","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lawrence W. Pettiette","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rendi B. Wiggins","is_ca":false},{"name":"Alexander Kiss","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2210737587598115,"gpt":0.5481335006616314,"spread":0.3270597419018199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00482867,0.0002860915,0.0003230017,0.00140036,0.0005411616,0.001004594,0.0007048055,0.0009313723,0.003631386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01519894,0.000719096,0.000672151,0.001071165,0.0004381753,0.001058766,0.000759278,0.001327046,0.0006980943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005850563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006252132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005316028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005598679,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973058,0.001430294,0.0002073784,0.0003769453,0.0004011058,0.0002785216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730282,0.01060555,0.01026215,0.002097101,0.002018014,0.001988861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006436865,0.0002562911,0.9986038,0.00000345665,0.00009392632,0.00001997062,0.00008077458,0.00005137822,0.00003392488,0.00003455784,0.0001070598,0.0006505171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001013482,0.0003475297,0.9985202,0.00000639395,0.00006431247,0.0001363709,0.0001866769,0.0003731604,0.00006339895,0.00002961477,0.0002566595,0.000005622455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989868,0.0001417272,0.0002004998,0.00006031751,0.00000667674,0.00001886706,0.0002596272,0.000003100572,0.0003223809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988476,0.00008874304,0.000198817,0.00005363614,0.0000251746,0.00002642569,0.0004364773,0.000002865163,0.0003203431],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005316028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02553678,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886473766","doi":"10.1111/jels.12186","title":"A Rose by Any Other Name: Understanding Judicial Decisions that Do Not Cite Precedent","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"CITES; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Judicial opinion; Foundation (evidence); Phenomenon; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Kawin Ethayarajh","is_ca":true},{"name":"Andrew Green","is_ca":true},{"name":"Albert Yoon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2462212841917908,"gpt":0.4361165046390323,"spread":0.1898952204472416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009940241,0.000210146,0.0005342856,0.00251831,0.003441188,0.008746484,0.001264747,0.002329336,0.005110218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05962664,0.0002767736,0.0004247477,0.003473766,0.007834051,0.01564617,0.002309821,0.002992705,0.0008141168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003655077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01510518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02176614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941233,0.003182242,0.0002709253,0.001043037,0.0009482113,0.0004323604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9471365,0.03779637,0.007630877,0.003307614,0.003194962,0.0009336852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000580163,0.00009252314,0.02942477,0.0001323513,0.00003538046,0.000410555,0.02942755,0.001740451,0.0003476306,0.8824134,0.003916451,0.05200085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002293512,0.00007363439,0.05648422,0.0006584692,0.00007099662,0.0003537692,0.02232774,0.01343537,0.0006519526,0.8142522,0.0915876,0.00008096964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5596365,0.006029648,0.04397261,0.04296346,0.0003746072,0.0001014961,0.0005468332,0.00009458452,0.3462802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892337,0.001067334,0.004121139,0.001010447,0.0001196343,0.00002628382,0.000181582,0.00003486866,0.004204992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05256963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121915089","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01204.x","title":"An Empirical Examination of the Governance Choices of Income Trusts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Accounting; Jurisdiction; Finance; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Anita Anand","is_ca":true},{"name":"Edward Iacobucci","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1350407318106366,"gpt":0.4267307255811078,"spread":0.2916899937704712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001369454,0.0001085607,0.0002348743,0.00137378,0.001457723,0.001739298,0.0004769108,0.0002897277,0.003017363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009429936,0.0001602794,0.0001896829,0.002620563,0.001741751,0.001120597,0.001234615,0.0006044388,0.0002369479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007052544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003543943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4599682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6525421,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976727,0.0003759083,0.0001397275,0.0002410437,0.0007267008,0.0008438975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772738,0.003374846,0.01347084,0.0009430113,0.002377553,0.002560049],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002864594,0.00002792642,0.9924639,0.0000076702,0.00001518678,0.0001139107,0.003465475,0.0001431153,0.0001021165,0.0008777071,0.0003508905,0.002403327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000316746,0.00002175809,0.9857555,0.00001377513,0.000007717307,0.00005691675,0.0120433,0.0004595417,0.00009588022,0.0001319941,0.001403012,0.000007449885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982454,0.00003566417,0.0000678277,0.000088935,0.000001050521,0.000008355869,0.0002219061,9.892647e-7,0.001329838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992229,0.00002733638,0.00002899491,0.000007961329,0.000001439029,0.00000345285,0.0001847029,8.868618e-7,0.0005222994],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4599682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9145818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084571232","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00122.x","title":"Alternative Methods of Appellate Review in Trade Remedy Cases: Examining Results of U.S. Judicial and NAFTA Binational Review of U.S. Agency Decisions from 1989 to 2005","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Free trade agreement; Political science; Law; Settlement (finance); Judicial review; Dispute resolution; Standard of review; Law and economics; Economics; Free trade; International trade; Sociology; Payment","authors":[{"name":"Juscelino F. Colares","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2384257796983763,"gpt":0.4881777595488758,"spread":0.2497519798504996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2501395,0.0004431857,0.001199371,0.02194342,0.003806757,0.01071172,0.002631723,0.004214451,0.002311101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5746334,0.001088714,0.00184891,0.02033515,0.006867601,0.01033005,0.004411632,0.002886376,0.0007800314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01509728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01046105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1243518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7058035,0.1767865,0.0185487,0.01154889,0.07898626,0.008326213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1995999,0.6240172,0.05792049,0.01714764,0.09989791,0.001416971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002306446,0.0007396405,0.521493,0.003465887,0.002005623,0.00110596,0.1309001,0.004296369,0.001674182,0.09923864,0.03051083,0.2022635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005755762,0.001920009,0.7834248,0.004971256,0.001658056,0.001104241,0.04893097,0.01041582,0.006181073,0.0227179,0.1175497,0.000550684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7695068,0.0301291,0.01425199,0.01183193,0.0004624721,0.001715171,0.002426874,0.0001339653,0.1695417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777246,0.004273876,0.006672387,0.003202218,0.0003103165,0.001062281,0.0007810695,0.00007639662,0.005896953],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2501395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9247115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894910955","doi":"10.1111/jels.12227","title":"Entrepreneurs’ Legal Status Choices and the C Corporation Survival Penalty","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Corporate governance; Business; Limited liability; Supreme court; Limited partnership; Finance; Actuarial science; Economics; Accounting; Law; General partnership; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Emily A. Satterthwaite","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04339464939446907,"gpt":0.2933446869079912,"spread":0.2499500375135221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003444521,0.000139331,0.0003417131,0.001292038,0.0009718931,0.001436831,0.0004934535,0.000631727,0.005460145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02416254,0.000141466,0.0003992856,0.001134067,0.001235909,0.001117512,0.001710038,0.001874764,0.0005620117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005122708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006040487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006081901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007372303,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978314,0.0006915451,0.0002200168,0.000270729,0.0004557675,0.0005304334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9525204,0.01711171,0.0222417,0.001795876,0.001465862,0.004864552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001110435,0.00008368775,0.9907764,0.000005913771,0.00002051297,0.000172762,0.0001961144,0.000469371,0.00004803552,0.00113511,0.001259616,0.005721413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002325566,0.0001491021,0.9889025,0.00003068096,0.00003322342,0.0004864513,0.001590215,0.003687846,0.0002387651,0.002797131,0.00204011,0.00002078753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968427,0.0001299052,0.0002567699,0.0005425055,0.00001115554,0.000007850284,0.0003841056,0.000006762129,0.001818255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989417,0.00004993276,0.0000490014,0.00003580806,0.00001168843,0.000003625613,0.0003743659,0.000001558494,0.0005323546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006081901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01826602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405649322","doi":"10.1111/jels.12404","title":"Patents Used in Patent Office Rejections as Indicators of Value","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trademark; European patent office; Novelty; Patent office; Value (mathematics); Metric (unit); Assertion; Business; Patent troll; Quarter (Canadian coin); Subject (documents); Patent application; Intellectual property; Computer science; Marketing; Political science; Law; Patent law; Psychology; Commerce; Library science; History","authors":[{"name":"Christopher Anthony Cotropia","is_ca":false},{"name":"David L. Schwartz","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2554220099689555,"gpt":0.3405438970153245,"spread":0.08512188704636903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009007029,0.0003371506,0.0008641565,0.01018788,0.0005634003,0.003768347,0.001203821,0.001364081,0.003044263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1147867,0.0001453767,0.0006128271,0.00904304,0.001442722,0.003105724,0.001811106,0.001730324,0.0007377884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001047698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006214313,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001486999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001102105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9891059,0.001999887,0.001752788,0.000961867,0.005665679,0.0005139283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5897835,0.1827262,0.1962007,0.009473089,0.01720201,0.004614335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002439744,0.0002462094,0.9721974,0.000164946,0.0002381623,0.0001688254,0.0005908738,0.001762017,0.001107203,0.002875953,0.0008071816,0.0195972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002151103,0.0003576365,0.9830158,0.00008499133,0.0001234867,0.000492218,0.0009737476,0.005535745,0.002237783,0.003805783,0.003294056,0.00005709434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878946,0.001071496,0.002228426,0.0003070248,0.00003654795,0.00004275913,0.001138643,0.00003372791,0.007246898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982204,0.0001701531,0.0003330537,0.00002381698,0.00009640864,0.00001672242,0.0006582325,0.000006204639,0.0004750422],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.990993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04763424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411214515","doi":"10.1111/jels.12419","title":"In the Eye of the Beholder: How Lawyers Perceive Legal Ethical Problems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Fiduciary; Professional conduct; Harm; Legal ethics; Professional responsibility; Scholarship; Perception; Political science; Legal profession; Affect (linguistics); Politics; Law; Interdependence; Public relations; Social psychology; Psychology; Duty","authors":[{"name":"Albert Yoon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07652903511287192,"gpt":0.319650085111803,"spread":0.2431210499989311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008923163,0.0002498776,0.000372543,0.001894109,0.00762249,0.01099946,0.001094375,0.003815797,0.004576129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0328786,0.0005427522,0.0003683775,0.0007612794,0.01299795,0.00478233,0.003804745,0.004338047,0.000480783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008882321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006088734,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.103028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1618126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921846,0.004601438,0.0001717407,0.0004564431,0.001530042,0.001055758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819094,0.009499965,0.003312435,0.000522772,0.002126705,0.002628652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008170603,0.0002421879,0.08082339,0.00008074234,0.00003069381,0.0006113214,0.8938174,0.0001171685,0.00203953,0.004392115,0.0031705,0.01459318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028305,0.00008611607,0.04105479,0.0001538241,0.00002469348,0.0002379512,0.9388607,0.0005214892,0.0002202634,0.004713678,0.01405065,0.00004748634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9754121,0.0006006774,0.0008930815,0.009435066,0.00003529535,0.00004136066,0.00001463763,0.00001216434,0.01355567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964959,0.0003153966,0.0003467034,0.001762207,0.00001191232,0.00001147758,0.000009587076,0.000008100405,0.001038815],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.103028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2048566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394757774","doi":"10.1111/jels.12380","title":"Rankings without U.S. News: A revealed preference approach to evaluating law schools","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Preference; Ranking (information retrieval); CLARITY; Legal education; Scope (computer science); Psychology; Mathematics education; Political science; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Jesse Rothstein","is_ca":false},{"name":"Albert Yoon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.258648525459174,"gpt":0.4668240924227282,"spread":0.2081755669635542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01523913,0.000972727,0.001883658,0.008053389,0.001709681,0.007606196,0.001938496,0.00163443,0.00502599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06007225,0.0007442421,0.001629632,0.009897386,0.002585661,0.004997502,0.001929439,0.002618951,0.000594112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006144501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002767142,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02298498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0291237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9591611,0.03305794,0.001255111,0.002342759,0.002802921,0.001380093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9235396,0.05842423,0.008359444,0.003385305,0.004303767,0.0019876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00242245,0.001610049,0.3182617,0.0007579168,0.002212812,0.001478323,0.003893317,0.2598975,0.001405929,0.2727128,0.01151301,0.1238343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001424224,0.001098927,0.04233591,0.0001059261,0.0003099118,0.0001954715,0.005036313,0.7995206,0.0008272026,0.1459022,0.004242435,0.0002826946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7194782,0.0009033666,0.246079,0.003035534,0.000126535,0.0008510674,0.004452985,0.0002393736,0.02483395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736444,0.0001349844,0.02415986,0.0001123997,0.00005766319,0.0001749605,0.0006053921,0.00001576298,0.001094363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08059323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163252776","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01244.x","title":"The Price Effects of Event‐Risk Protection: The Results from a Natural Experiment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Credit Risk and Financial Regulations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Issuer; Comparability; Bond; Event study; Event (particle physics); Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Natural experiment; Bond valuation; Econometrics; Financial economics; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Karl S. Okamoto","is_ca":false},{"name":"David J. Pedersen","is_ca":false},{"name":"Natalie Bucciarelli Pedersen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08069201403991479,"gpt":0.3007496494646755,"spread":0.2200576354247607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01474276,0.0006824034,0.00116136,0.0004134895,0.0009088845,0.002295088,0.001658337,0.002861557,0.01548053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07226381,0.0004471679,0.0009238339,0.0003805767,0.002812303,0.003281086,0.001460774,0.003895574,0.001642335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007672883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009684607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006777388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005058328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912748,0.005059933,0.0006386094,0.0010947,0.00156523,0.0003667057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8393536,0.128873,0.0143502,0.01288506,0.00264468,0.001893495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.176974,0.2510176,0.05706758,0.004428286,0.002040303,0.00216405,0.007898324,0.02101952,0.1135321,0.1827497,0.02163873,0.1594699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05746865,0.208613,0.1533046,0.0004306546,0.002266418,0.00165705,0.002726337,0.07907332,0.05907604,0.3796011,0.05505704,0.0007258403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9590908,0.0002278658,0.01293676,0.002148231,0.0005086189,0.002497032,0.0008764612,0.0001271672,0.02158703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719089,0.0002360778,0.01338318,0.002102756,0.0002881877,0.004263703,0.0004309002,0.00006331102,0.007323096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01548053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07796812,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208587775","doi":"10.1111/jels.12303","title":"The Canada Trademarks Dataset","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","authors":[{"name":"Jeremy N. Sheff","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1276425770108899,"gpt":0.4145328229771462,"spread":0.2868902459662563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008903634,0.0008073439,0.0008037377,0.009089757,0.002945194,0.002988204,0.002704512,0.001227944,0.0186169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007698036,0.0003633283,0.0006886444,0.02181401,0.0006684765,0.0009800078,0.001365137,0.001564825,0.01681827],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01698628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9214166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9588537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998068,0.0001351497,0.000133689,0.0003487142,0.0009185154,0.0003958624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937971,0.0005913586,0.0004416098,0.000726633,0.003908668,0.0005346527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005991516,0.00003607501,0.00832646,0.0001767772,0.00003747275,0.00009865404,0.0001000071,0.0004559289,0.0001297629,0.002933772,0.9792722,0.008372867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005784737,0.000008376205,0.01924417,0.0001332671,0.00002774213,0.00008490761,0.0003286565,0.0009986912,0.0003342312,0.0008140763,0.977926,0.00004203985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","genre_scores_codex":[0.002016662,0.0002157861,0.0001429558,0.0002128413,0.00002142515,0.0000392302,0.9934301,0.0001886916,0.003732291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004565181,0.0001986726,0.0008166404,0.0001017422,0.00001257941,0.00009411093,0.9913326,0.00004361873,0.002834875],"genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07858342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1580924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121178051","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01247.x","title":"The Value of Capital Market Regulation: IPOs Versus Reverse Mergers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Initial public offering; Context (archaeology); Humanities; Capital market; Political science; Economics; Welfare economics; Accounting; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Cécile Carpentier","is_ca":true},{"name":"Douglas J. Cumming","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jean‐Marc Suret","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07164956170675067,"gpt":0.3182569178283952,"spread":0.2466073561216445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00378189,0.0002588935,0.0005524728,0.001054632,0.0007522854,0.004384486,0.0009220721,0.001791884,0.00292637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02614828,0.0001784572,0.0005353824,0.001230781,0.003594994,0.003104618,0.001488577,0.002399555,0.0001984149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002183018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009825643,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002310029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001950139,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981833,0.0007527862,0.00008690298,0.0002036561,0.0003306819,0.0004427322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9087515,0.0525923,0.03147022,0.002790044,0.002319084,0.002076839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002978938,0.001726339,0.4972562,0.000423872,0.0005537406,0.002640023,0.001756025,0.1028725,0.01376277,0.2934533,0.004033509,0.07854287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003712982,0.002055608,0.556668,0.0002806236,0.001086157,0.001471101,0.004839546,0.1948375,0.0162388,0.2147037,0.007189683,0.0002579216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9795005,0.001184227,0.001949963,0.00221997,0.00002220063,0.00002292751,0.0001140748,0.000011074,0.01497503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993056,0.0001860063,0.00009926281,0.00006400698,0.00004660686,0.00000315234,0.00002137926,0.000002322119,0.0002716606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004384486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02000076,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}