{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":84,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":84,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"c0572f444e3e","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Forestry"}},"results":[{"id":"W2129132239","doi":"10.1093/jof/104.2.65","title":"Planted Forests and Biodiversity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":576,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Agroforestry; Geography; Forestry; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005913293034221194,"gpt":0.1957527098483639,"spread":0.1898394168141427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009918337,0.00005563884,0.00007555517,0.00004217557,0.00005356816,0.00001985791,0.0001603811,0.00003072416,0.0005291261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001266956,0.00004376176,0.00003728763,0.00007337586,0.0000948093,0.0001908553,0.0001160812,0.00007671989,0.0001614957],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002561294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003545184,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003290173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001322425,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995371,0.000009212182,0.0001309323,0.00005334976,0.0001565873,0.0001127942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997334,0.00001424474,0.0001193799,0.00007762328,0.000004200202,0.00005110389],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002081279,0.0000193763,0.8116163,0.000003327521,0.000004894303,0.00004362273,0.00001936044,0.0002059535,0.00006615941,0.0001560698,0.1874952,0.0003489458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003572085,0.00007178651,0.9680892,0.000007946835,0.0000163023,0.00007400664,0.000007079964,0.0001368873,0.00009590547,0.002506886,0.02857611,0.00006072113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861732,0.00003734048,0.00001695462,0.0004041162,0.00007020992,0.00002711052,0.000002850809,0.000005162687,0.01326312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984079,0.00001467239,0.0003715402,0.00007847955,0.00008501658,1.135241e-7,0.000001411356,0.000002012507,0.001038828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1589191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.579356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009285521","doi":"10.5849/jof.14-016","title":"The Burning Question: Does Forest Bioenergy Reduce Carbon Emissions? A Review of Common Misconceptions about Forest Carbon Accounting","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Forest Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Bioenergy; Greenhouse gas; Carbon accounting; Biomass (ecology); Environmental science; Agroforestry; Carbon sequestration; Carbon neutrality; Natural resource economics; Biofuel; Ecology; Carbon dioxide; Economics; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01886542154627304,"gpt":0.3236539765025566,"spread":0.3047885549562836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001986458,0.0005291801,0.001716409,0.0001754646,0.0003026187,0.0000989095,0.00172348,0.0002923472,0.0001516138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007599941,0.0002863035,0.0008920065,0.0006035676,0.0005008352,0.0001958206,0.0005469257,0.0009400872,0.00001666628],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002874389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001610668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008446873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004592005,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957454,0.000429644,0.002156935,0.0003132393,0.0008374383,0.0005173316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994271,0.0004552902,0.004027432,0.0009517015,0.00007348788,0.0002210613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004576894,0.0002546224,0.01889439,0.07953686,0.000652784,0.00009880079,0.0001773567,0.001408991,0.000009685028,0.002688928,0.03891115,0.8573207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001431666,0.0001054724,0.0004014382,0.1099824,0.0008345762,0.0001362666,0.00001746066,0.0002130528,0.000001631402,0.000440795,0.8874127,0.0003110137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003110453,0.9822019,0.000003966618,0.0004321935,0.0007566678,0.0004743981,0.000007681861,0.00001876285,0.01299392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002549344,0.9941776,0.000141219,0.00008798882,0.00103758,0.0000333977,0.00002836888,0.0000619569,0.001882507],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8570096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999589,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317661629","doi":"10.5849/jof.13-021","title":"Making Monitoring Count: Project Design for Active Adaptive Management","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Adaptive management; Computer science; Checklist; Process management; Stakeholder engagement; Project management; Key (lock); Environmental resource management; Management science; Business; Systems engineering; Engineering; Environmental science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06346676243092705,"gpt":0.3070173986708875,"spread":0.2435506362399605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002340182,0.0001189315,0.0001344146,0.00008839087,0.00009658985,0.00005963772,0.0003818866,0.00004149697,0.0003637866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002485984,0.00009485446,0.00009667638,0.0001379249,0.00005573687,0.0005843692,0.0001439954,0.0001208723,0.0001893383],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001951518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001120861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005000212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001428208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990531,0.00002602337,0.0002480788,0.0001145493,0.000297648,0.0002606443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994357,0.00005903037,0.0002829432,0.000149671,0.00002252545,0.00005019481],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001459924,0.0005276729,0.08813108,0.0002276747,0.0009870399,0.0001833827,0.003951751,0.04365987,0.001087302,0.004730287,0.6201797,0.2348744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007344127,0.004585191,0.7103138,0.001237146,0.0007969115,0.000201728,0.005317362,0.03257103,0.005560661,0.0672079,0.1629639,0.001900226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8788446,0.0001108806,0.02748122,0.0006831373,0.001158627,0.002992532,0.000006678456,0.00004479701,0.08867757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436671,0.00003300534,0.05338775,0.0000657547,0.0003323509,0.00006111434,3.901062e-7,0.00001832218,0.002434286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6221827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3983208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1563389365","doi":"10.1093/jof/103.1.28","title":"Assessing Private Forest Owner Attitudes Toward Ecosystem-Based Management","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; University of Waterloo; Oregon State University; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Craft; Forest management; Business; Wetland; Scale (ratio); Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem management; Environmental planning; Geography; Forestry; Ecology; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02028579204040545,"gpt":0.2807394642431211,"spread":0.2604536722027157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004614751,0.00017235,0.0002088925,0.0001308206,0.00009995889,0.0001718812,0.0006515766,0.00006186605,0.001536491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002370588,0.0001138571,0.0001663911,0.0001968339,0.0000709394,0.0008945593,0.0002276274,0.0001929964,0.0007592072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002374131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001448225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001388402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005854215,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984274,0.0000402552,0.0004955289,0.0001580565,0.0005459736,0.0003327942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990863,0.00002960131,0.0004092029,0.0003124985,0.00001225451,0.00015014],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006428886,0.0003211928,0.7972602,0.0001845888,0.0001249479,0.0002084565,0.0001243048,0.1160621,0.0001541229,0.001664035,0.0521252,0.03170654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001463666,0.0001722174,0.6819859,0.0003160047,0.0001190816,0.00005916151,0.00004436059,0.007468082,0.0002851739,0.0008979137,0.3068253,0.000363084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660905,0.00004777919,0.001042487,0.001979234,0.0002449628,0.0001520297,0.000001516432,0.00002440087,0.03041708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825598,0.00002784196,0.01493157,0.0004198517,0.0003724139,0.000003909166,0.000002031628,0.00002000614,0.001662595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2547001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096709264","doi":"10.1093/jof/107.5.276","title":"A Literal Use of “Forest Health” Safeguards against Misuse and Misapplication","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Northern British Columbia; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Rocky Mountain Research Station; Natural Resources Canada; Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont; North Carolina State University; Northern Research Station; University of Idaho; U.S. Forest Service; University of Northern British Columbia; University of Montana; Northern Arizona University; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Ohio State University","keywords":"Sustainability; Wilderness; Vitality; Business; Environmental resource management; Ecoforestry; Forest management; CLARITY; Popularity; Forest ecology; Environmental planning; Agroforestry; Geography; Ecology; Intact forest landscape; Ecosystem; Psychology; Economics; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01515655402602017,"gpt":0.2706084624227812,"spread":0.2554519083967611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000200423,0.00008576489,0.0001588735,0.00006770102,0.00004362638,0.00003190107,0.0001837892,0.00003978651,0.00007959062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004113781,0.00007003929,0.00006138603,0.0001379526,0.00008751401,0.0003734995,0.0000502687,0.0001119766,0.00001668572],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005539005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001653289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000902595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002414947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991239,0.00002358025,0.0003768067,0.00008465237,0.0002328051,0.0001582742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992653,0.0000222517,0.0003869256,0.0001851355,0.00001245987,0.0001279042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002406522,0.0003217502,0.7483944,0.00006914273,0.00004262729,0.00003006976,0.001191495,0.00403346,0.001760235,0.002359292,0.1305614,0.1109955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005305459,0.0004434912,0.9315718,0.00007589456,0.00001337671,0.00003736023,0.00001291202,0.0008298765,0.00008846605,0.002225687,0.06407086,0.00009968337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956509,0.0001281878,0.00006362409,0.002304423,0.00003635364,0.00009266598,0.000003180043,0.000005067551,0.001715597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953716,0.0002833808,0.002788215,0.0009107756,0.0000943938,5.664401e-7,0.00000279079,0.000005418085,0.0005428852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1831775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2856119,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286717187","doi":"10.1093/jofore/fvac021","title":"Trends in Bark Beetle Impacts in North America During a Period (2000–2020) of Rapid Environmental Change","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests","funders":"","keywords":"Bark beetle; Curculionidae; Bark (sound); Dendroctonus; Climate change; Abiotic component; Ecology; Geography; Forest management; Species richness; Agroforestry; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007171363515525009,"gpt":0.2048587351683459,"spread":0.1976873716528209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002429891,0.0001037957,0.0002137923,0.00022456,0.00008129863,0.000004631653,0.0003380503,0.00003180274,0.007461851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001510972,0.000100893,0.00009129301,0.000447343,0.0001141243,0.0002132113,0.0003850267,0.0003939589,0.00001392731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005577613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001439168,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001593262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006427947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988255,0.00008873524,0.0003909697,0.0001297172,0.0003012515,0.0002638568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994546,0.00001615985,0.0002919069,0.000160055,0.000001043755,0.00007619939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002496797,0.000493332,0.9748757,0.00001196129,0.00001930685,0.0007958529,0.003677099,0.01022269,0.002128074,0.00000170571,0.0006196005,0.00690503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008518038,0.0005319995,0.9955177,0.0000073299,0.000008810045,0.0001635448,0.0009985307,0.0001722962,0.00005658632,0.00002531815,0.001575833,0.00009023446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987547,0.0002155385,6.454327e-7,0.0001434281,0.0001287256,0.00008170318,0.00001462263,0.00000246503,0.0006581711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994637,0.0001354819,0.0001124627,0.0001019035,0.00003726124,0.00001579029,0.000005606889,0.000009233303,0.000118524],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02064204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586373398","doi":"10.5849/jof.2016-034r1","title":"The Precarious State of a Cultural Keystone Species: Tribal and Biological Assessments of the Role and Future of Black Ash","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; Nipissing University","funders":"Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station; U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Forest Service; National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Emerald ash borer; Agrilus; Ecology; Keystone species; Fraxinus; Introduced species; Geography; Ecosystem; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0111981109758198,"gpt":0.2592938358550774,"spread":0.2480957248792576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003319547,0.00006633266,0.0001633218,0.000009597576,0.0001552118,0.0000173218,0.0004281861,0.00004992804,0.00003502888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005758399,0.00003006104,0.00006079633,0.00002858387,0.001107829,0.000120347,0.0003693594,0.0001445883,4.504835e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002037933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001188039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003751008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001254122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993396,0.00004887373,0.0002660512,0.00006669616,0.0001746677,0.000104123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989894,0.00004451499,0.000700344,0.0002122076,0.00001917139,0.0000343426],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003000303,0.0001373616,0.975988,0.00002621286,0.0001329801,0.000007917923,0.001284226,0.0002343412,0.007530213,0.0006102037,0.001205331,0.01254314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000425299,0.0003574873,0.9901881,0.00001776678,0.00002089879,0.00002207997,0.0006010483,0.00005420002,0.001112585,0.004086878,0.003080831,0.00003286047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969293,0.0002555135,0.000004744071,0.0002754575,0.0001520128,0.00009819864,0.000006820302,7.193068e-7,0.002277185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986746,0.0007976098,0.0001353604,0.00001385687,0.00003584699,6.699923e-7,1.763446e-7,0.000001946315,0.0003399142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01420002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4081841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021339679","doi":"10.5849/jof.11-003","title":"Comparison of Terrestrial and Airborne LiDAR in Describing Stand Structure of a Thinned Lodgepole Pine Forest","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Sport Centre Pacific; Canadian Forest Service; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Lidar; Canopy; Basal area; Environmental science; Crown (dentistry); Remote sensing; Forestry; Thinning; Atmospheric sciences; Ecology; Geography; Geology; Biology; Materials science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02636481825332714,"gpt":0.2792098798084269,"spread":0.2528450615550998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000214344,0.00007957731,0.0002568869,0.00006051908,0.00003010413,0.00000877287,0.0001392186,0.00007042816,0.00002349128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008829861,0.00006265303,0.0000461386,0.0001457874,0.0001502082,0.0001748098,0.00006002083,0.0002030851,6.301894e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004464328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002259709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001841608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001453922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990317,0.00003420978,0.0004843112,0.00006624347,0.0002337333,0.0001497601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992443,0.00005188641,0.0004534927,0.0001510004,0.000008901618,0.00009037246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000135101,0.00013495,0.9393948,0.00001542877,0.00001363098,0.000001721415,0.001254456,0.001452936,0.05141618,0.00004519863,0.0003710293,0.005764606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009145018,0.0002210607,0.971198,0.0001337953,0.00003052433,0.00006213276,0.0005540746,0.001046253,0.02455823,0.0007122757,0.0004847604,0.00008434109],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988018,0.0003017359,0.0003518701,0.0001059168,0.00009146496,0.00006835067,0.000004447921,0.000002052843,0.0002723206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952019,0.00001351594,0.004670644,0.000006112421,0.00009340441,6.367664e-8,9.956485e-7,0.000006626505,0.000006685415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03180329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2554916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507564905","doi":"10.1093/jof/102.6.33","title":"The Effect of the Wildland-Urban Interface on Prescribed Burning Costs in the Pacific Northwestern United States","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Wildland–urban interface; Geography; Interface (matter); Prescribed burn; Environmental science; Forestry; Meteorology; Environmental planning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007005739889581655,"gpt":0.2391730665680332,"spread":0.2321673266784515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008603529,0.0001065467,0.0001420665,0.00003516665,0.000156774,0.00003785518,0.0006780571,0.00004332777,0.00001068386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005941761,0.00004167775,0.00008452855,0.0002637667,0.0001773565,0.0001002309,0.00008100648,0.0005068403,0.000009350847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001702325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002142393,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001278405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003403777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987538,0.0002243051,0.0003067745,0.00007934008,0.0004263007,0.0002094699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989567,0.0003310763,0.0003498381,0.000302981,0.000009443227,0.00004993363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001878987,0.00003297121,0.9801815,0.000007409231,0.00001040675,0.00001094919,0.002117783,0.01511006,0.0001458187,0.00001089246,0.001742595,0.0004417082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001299177,0.001525815,0.9898429,0.0003352384,0.00002522128,0.00006489331,0.001636856,0.0001809627,0.0009271335,0.0002590703,0.003819305,0.00008341808],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967826,0.0001332803,0.00001517217,0.002463535,0.0001175522,0.0001886572,0.000002925817,0.00000251985,0.0002937685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996138,0.00007606528,0.00001157738,0.0001585482,0.00004470233,0.000002151168,7.093378e-7,0.000007423186,0.00008501214],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0149291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2201997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613767947","doi":"10.5849/jof.2016-024","title":"Managing Hardwood-Softwood Mixtures for Future Forests in Eastern North America: Assessing Suitability to Projected Climate Change","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Hardwood; Softwood; Environmental science; Adaptability; Silviculture; Climate change; Forest management; Tsuga; Agroforestry; Forestry; Ecology; Geography; Engineering; Biology; Pulp and paper industry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02304855642491252,"gpt":0.2917797770925866,"spread":0.2687312206676741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005044754,0.0001702421,0.0002899959,0.0001009118,0.0003434423,0.0001453718,0.00081791,0.00008410313,0.0000608478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000222045,0.0001398019,0.0001191063,0.0001110284,0.0001317227,0.0009311719,0.0005119996,0.0002549683,0.00002522488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001648559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001563002,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001169398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005030171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985775,0.00004421989,0.0004004118,0.0002492098,0.0002522073,0.0004763948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987507,0.0000440035,0.0005606308,0.0004782107,0.00002694925,0.0001394693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001317744,0.0001241631,0.9724189,0.00006330869,0.00001930599,0.00007320807,0.0005060723,0.0005438313,0.00001909233,0.00007895301,0.0008485592,0.02517285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006358859,0.0002465985,0.9931668,0.00007395453,0.00002945639,0.00001407002,0.000246355,0.0006392122,0.00003008937,0.002781358,0.001985693,0.0001505254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937915,0.00003865766,0.001278878,0.002894454,0.0006585965,0.0005906759,0.000008987141,0.0000125713,0.0007256775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948033,0.00003456516,0.004314195,0.0003394191,0.0003801838,0.00005470385,0.000003649052,0.00001642167,0.0000535367],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02502232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5700955,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117090772","doi":"10.5849/jof.11-085","title":"How Can We Span the Boundaries between Wildland Fire Science and Management in the United States?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Cambridge; Joint Fire Science Program; Harvard University","keywords":"Boundary (topology); The Internet; Boundary spanning; Fire protection; Business; Knowledge management; Environmental resource management; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Environmental science; Engineering; World Wide Web; Civil engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01158511013496331,"gpt":0.2275514214537333,"spread":0.21596631131877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002013999,0.00008677044,0.0001054723,0.00006111776,0.0003358516,0.0003837154,0.000628404,0.00002484389,0.000008597233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009227289,0.00004250218,0.00002125866,0.0004767022,0.0007829174,0.0004682565,0.0001720517,0.000217437,0.000003547887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001516117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002146399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005177315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002497789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987158,0.00009456269,0.0001651779,0.00007877264,0.0006559186,0.0002898066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993738,0.0001184144,0.0001794465,0.0002222876,0.00001165006,0.00009439119],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009548752,0.00002802935,0.9820598,0.00002335499,0.00001616543,0.00002130856,0.003137453,0.0001703225,0.00002817495,0.00007398427,0.005892702,0.008539197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002195174,0.00007606452,0.8992404,0.0000476971,0.00002205614,0.0000948763,0.001671344,0.0007125559,0.00002771592,0.0003652407,0.09745583,0.00006670376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876733,0.0001667323,0.00001637719,0.01161829,0.0001287852,0.0001653947,0.000003127791,0.000002738215,0.0002252523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999386,0.0001022803,0.00009575198,0.0002328456,0.0001056002,0.000002827122,5.858657e-7,0.000005066839,0.00006903317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09156313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3700177,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523122825","doi":"10.5849/jof.15-116","title":"Engaging African American Landowners in Sustainable Forest Management","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Fraser Health","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Community forestry; Forest management; Sustainable forest management; Land tenure; Redress; Forestry; Land management; Agroforestry; Environmental resource management; Land use; Environmental planning; Geography; Political science; Agriculture; Economics; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005166736433365935,"gpt":0.221894200509923,"spread":0.216727464076557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004164084,0.000105071,0.0001598786,0.0001823312,0.00004907918,0.00002600477,0.0004431547,0.00001924083,0.0007075767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006252513,0.000064331,0.00007192534,0.0003551647,0.0001686098,0.0003395832,0.0002537591,0.0001155541,0.0001487728],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000284031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009618342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003321411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001558016,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988979,0.00003969391,0.000290939,0.0001132002,0.0002768149,0.0003815196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993974,0.00005069259,0.0002320625,0.0002054402,0.000008167032,0.0001062576],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009339399,0.00006383486,0.9428963,0.00001756465,0.00002527209,0.0004879679,0.0002975315,0.001701441,0.00005572383,0.006176291,0.01315743,0.03502725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001389671,0.0002112356,0.7935823,0.00006882918,0.00002495211,0.00002840025,0.001140716,0.0001252428,0.00003747877,0.005442704,0.197754,0.0001943956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8976447,0.00001160044,0.0001497249,0.002043232,0.00005781059,0.00009862743,4.355748e-7,0.000008133481,0.09998576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829624,0.00005958625,0.000802578,0.0001328732,0.00007247285,0.000004185488,2.066691e-7,0.00001054205,0.01595514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1845966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7747468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2403077904","doi":"10.5849/jof.15-008","title":"Progress in Wilderness Fire Science: Embracing Complexity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society","funders":"","keywords":"Wilderness; Wilderness area; Fire regime; Environmental resource management; Wildlife; Fire ecology; Process (computing); Ecosystem management; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Ecosystem; Geography; Ecology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02496483833387857,"gpt":0.2775084421059454,"spread":0.2525436037720669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00176027,0.00009419404,0.0001957599,0.00007617377,0.00006615613,0.00006426112,0.000691644,0.00004802294,0.0000524466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002332705,0.00007421588,0.00004338696,0.0004954388,0.0005727769,0.0008209351,0.0002185877,0.0002530293,0.00005587257],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004627024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001192729,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000136785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007780435,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983461,0.00005613937,0.0003583736,0.0001406607,0.0008159365,0.0002827499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999164,0.000029681,0.0003009606,0.0002245758,0.00003444745,0.0002463039],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003434186,0.0001020911,0.9869822,0.00001566212,0.000002974883,0.0001363399,0.0004833652,0.0006871438,0.0002423432,0.00005985646,0.00120511,0.01004859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008145133,0.0002281046,0.9789738,0.000162041,0.000005387471,0.0004713024,0.0002759804,0.01505981,0.0007342906,0.002654874,0.0004794976,0.0001403773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962819,0.0001440492,0.00002383473,0.0002993621,0.0004750371,0.00009980237,7.133286e-7,0.000008475969,0.002666815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984391,0.00000109411,0.001390164,0.00003123644,0.00009587646,0.000001778473,1.8409e-7,0.000007868184,0.00003268291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01437267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3026436,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782290042","doi":"10.5849/jof.15-014","title":"Restoration Is Preparation for the Future","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Restoration ecology; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Climate change; Functional ecology; Ecology; Forest restoration; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem; Adaptation (eye); Novel ecosystem; Environmental restoration; Ecosystem management; Environmental science; Forest ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01354894278392408,"gpt":0.2630103722913776,"spread":0.2494614295074535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006217921,0.0000464897,0.00006644605,0.0000118741,0.00005331923,0.00002905238,0.0002024332,0.0000454395,0.00004045753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001140269,0.00002727189,0.0000505407,0.00006176274,0.00002197654,0.0003185999,0.00002339436,0.00007915634,0.00004206289],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001193837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002554073,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001848716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005877575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993995,0.00002857925,0.0001813841,0.0000509955,0.0002658588,0.00007370158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994604,0.00005810773,0.0002390732,0.0001556767,0.00002925893,0.00005746583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002774819,0.00004389416,0.03451271,0.00001210402,0.00002361497,0.000004492077,0.001457237,0.003969161,0.00124886,0.0001027969,0.9478325,0.01051512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001625904,0.001661524,0.1046417,0.00004563837,0.00007793549,0.0002989886,0.0008950935,0.05185588,0.003871026,0.005301435,0.8295243,0.0002005479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902453,0.0003075213,0.003177219,0.003731786,0.001422626,0.0002511643,0.000002492915,0.000005982161,0.0008558718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974785,0.000007506838,0.001163416,0.000155949,0.0008872277,0.000005716438,6.342768e-7,0.00000558482,0.0002954797],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1183082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1112115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575930004","doi":"10.5849/jof.16-038","title":"A Case for Indigenous Community Forestry","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Community forestry; Forest management; Context (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Community development; Natural resource management; Natural resource; Business; Sustainable development; Environmental planning; Forestry; Geography; Political science; Ecology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03937807652087405,"gpt":0.2596717489323087,"spread":0.2202936724114347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005257191,0.00007900163,0.0001209764,0.00003208695,0.001594583,0.0001010506,0.0007969032,0.00005844898,0.0001049517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000169609,0.00006437845,0.0001206742,0.00002530444,0.0001897352,0.0002259011,0.0004513882,0.0002280355,0.00001541132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009064212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001862989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008981907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004972152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993577,0.00003463915,0.000199533,0.0000614242,0.0001859622,0.0001607589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988864,0.00005539769,0.0004464994,0.0004880958,0.00002479048,0.0000988098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005213785,0.0001143332,0.9896753,0.00002393816,0.00003408699,0.0005570174,0.001293877,0.0001729487,0.00004283668,0.000004311645,0.0026321,0.005397043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000744533,0.0002203949,0.9806879,0.00001830673,0.00005784331,0.00119465,0.001309942,0.0001006371,0.00008189567,0.001713798,0.01377272,0.00009736602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965584,0.000017405,0.0002930663,0.0004460755,0.00018133,0.0001381767,0.00001012023,0.000005024623,0.002350347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979072,0.00001025789,0.001322271,0.0001298967,0.00009455074,0.000001524938,0.000001239822,0.000005001233,0.0005280381],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01114062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W213893406","doi":"10.1093/jof/105.3.113","title":"Invasive Species in the Last Frontier: Distribution and Phenology of Birch Leaf Mining Sawflies in Alaska","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; U.S. Forest Service; University of Alberta","keywords":"Phenology; Geography; Frontier; Invasive species; Ecology; Distribution (mathematics); Forestry; Biology; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008545769911752184,"gpt":0.2164182537457711,"spread":0.2078724838340189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001063307,0.00006911525,0.0001800138,0.0000707609,0.00002374517,0.00001083005,0.0002206704,0.00006627385,0.00002815514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000313952,0.00004796131,0.00003069621,0.0001878715,0.0001773861,0.0001680139,0.00006679625,0.0001990836,0.000002991113],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001162782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001322847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001024488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002225747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990829,0.00007904801,0.0003768014,0.0000753605,0.0002178288,0.0001681019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992601,0.0003306217,0.0002685268,0.0001042089,0.0000080051,0.00002852117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004139164,0.00004391443,0.9925696,0.00001608499,0.000004986407,0.00006660857,0.001366648,0.0001286718,0.002919615,0.00002549802,0.0009804635,0.001836575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003733233,0.0001495022,0.993381,0.00008284733,0.00000471228,0.0001325767,0.003173643,0.00006345699,0.001862536,0.0002505721,0.0004807258,0.00004505585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986092,0.0002169739,0.0001594437,0.0001935773,0.0001326088,0.0000737385,0.000003594146,0.000001335826,0.0006095143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996292,0.00005376007,0.0002227734,0.00002215334,0.00005037677,7.364923e-7,0.000001122762,0.000003711766,0.00001613962],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002123299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1955806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W60203721","doi":"10.1093/jof/103.1.47","title":"Digital Forestry: A White Paper","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Pacific Northwest Research Station; U.S. Forest Service; Universität Hamburg; Purdue University; Chinese Academy of Sciences; National Natural Science Foundation of China; U.S. Department of Agriculture; Chinese Academy of Forestry; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Northeast Forestry University; West Virginia University; Canadian Forest Service; Division of Mathematical Sciences; Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Greenwich; National Science Foundation; University of Washington; Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University; Syracuse University","keywords":"Forestry; Sustainable forest management; Community forestry; Forest management; Host (biology); Sustainable development; Forest ecology; Environmental resource management; Digital ecosystem; Business; Ecosystem; Computer science; Geography; Political science; Ecology; Environmental science; Knowledge management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006229001995926728,"gpt":0.2190120617482139,"spread":0.2127830597522871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009216281,0.00007235714,0.00009532918,0.00002336133,0.00005975425,0.00005680294,0.0002318458,0.00004801957,0.0004592403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003651527,0.00005564166,0.00009181431,0.0001035986,0.00008014389,0.0004508856,0.00005986112,0.0001698254,0.0003318767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000653778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001488967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006624482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001449249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992831,0.000007200727,0.0002383185,0.00007956402,0.0002494918,0.0001423608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994893,0.00001824162,0.0001548733,0.0002073277,0.0000112745,0.000118962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005494401,0.0002902749,0.3241819,0.000005695896,0.00004285345,0.00004300687,0.0005461768,0.0187847,0.003038031,0.0001768715,0.1334446,0.5193909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004129248,0.0001005261,0.2450216,0.00002443384,0.00001990027,0.0006671094,0.0001526471,0.001224022,0.0003363079,0.001578051,0.7503127,0.000149806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9060286,0.00003618706,0.0009539707,0.002405214,0.00006166437,0.00003735155,0.000002387966,0.00001120225,0.09046337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909587,0.000008825432,0.005984558,0.0002060102,0.0002939227,1.784053e-7,0.000001039132,0.000009118106,0.002537654],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6168681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.502836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190302430","doi":"10.1093/jof/104.6.299","title":"Has the Myth of the Omnipotent Forester Become the Reality of the Impotent Forester?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Urban and spatial planning","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Forester; Mythology; Forestry; History; Geography; Classics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01727124546407444,"gpt":0.2062382815773226,"spread":0.1889670361132482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007908528,0.0001360754,0.0002052297,0.00001576336,0.0002866418,0.00004355052,0.001384869,0.00006909687,0.00006454738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007741943,0.00004713453,0.0003762946,0.0001751981,0.0007085649,0.0001354203,0.0004245633,0.0004023621,0.000003648889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008153388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004612907,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001183253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008109282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980893,0.0001549313,0.0006515213,0.0001032564,0.0007718341,0.0002291918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981899,0.0001384536,0.0009154057,0.0006830533,0.00002969953,0.00004345205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008918889,0.0001334285,0.9093886,0.00001766639,0.00005296211,0.000006774564,0.00070102,0.02373949,0.002195227,0.0002812123,0.06228337,0.001111047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002905051,0.00008387977,0.9848762,0.00006463913,0.0000614709,0.00008807215,0.0001575086,0.0007399917,0.001805128,0.00472015,0.007048724,0.000063698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827815,0.0001397294,0.0001824183,0.01447293,0.0003683819,0.000221519,0.00001190798,0.000002643387,0.001818922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987272,0.000007793479,0.00006934285,0.0005648475,0.000160101,0.000002047568,4.567237e-7,0.000009871349,0.0004583513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07548762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2610737,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139658147","doi":"10.5849/jof.13-012","title":"The Effects of Large Wildfires on Employment and Wage Growth and Volatility in the Western United States","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Wage growth; Earnings; Wage; Volatility (finance); Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Geography; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.003372942764852558,"gpt":0.2095061566423893,"spread":0.2061332138775368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007711185,0.00008321022,0.0001376602,0.00003089661,0.00007038027,0.00003483081,0.0002191084,0.00003345634,0.000005229925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002807307,0.00003949574,0.00002602181,0.00009610404,0.0001185327,0.0001645841,0.0000791356,0.0001783844,0.000002437774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002735056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003676387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001191598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002147397,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990265,0.0002394875,0.00026282,0.00007584433,0.0002406507,0.0001546776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998362,0.001206132,0.0002127371,0.0001592051,0.000007028013,0.00005290032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002492485,0.00006681092,0.9968813,0.00004249814,0.0000104048,0.000009357914,0.0007316183,0.000006794433,0.0004371781,0.00001185853,0.0006263707,0.001150887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004409949,0.0004536192,0.9960816,0.0001133538,0.000007627129,0.00002150542,0.0001277148,0.001417373,0.0004767654,0.000592713,0.0002259955,0.00004075335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985744,0.0002303275,0.000004016089,0.0008285383,0.00006638777,0.0002478254,0.000001854859,0.000002004516,0.00004462404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996349,0.0001151189,0.00001686335,0.0001925338,0.00001693613,0.000005206549,3.635514e-7,0.000004999918,0.0000130507],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001410579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1801347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470031908","doi":"10.1093/jof/102.5.6","title":"Aesthetics: Are We Neglecting a Critical Issue in Certification for Sustainable Forest Management?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Pacific Insight Electronics (Canada); University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Certified wood; Forest management; Sustainable forest management; Business; Agroforestry; Environmental resource management; Environmental ethics; Aesthetics; Environmental science; Economics; Philosophy; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01669916894153808,"gpt":0.284590892800708,"spread":0.2678917238591699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000312576,0.0001162257,0.000154658,0.0001715548,0.0001207518,0.00007568298,0.0003737012,0.00006331313,0.0002338436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001830725,0.0001055605,0.00009437813,0.0003093028,0.0001010718,0.0005006493,0.0001270589,0.0001622717,0.00009137674],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002981846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000139029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001021394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000109532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988381,0.00001869134,0.0003923669,0.0001440694,0.0002158011,0.0003909265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994159,0.00004692916,0.000209922,0.0002042092,0.00002937275,0.00009368514],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006769205,0.001326275,0.364509,0.001259975,0.00008785914,0.001430348,0.002733309,0.3359342,0.0001489814,0.117085,0.1564007,0.01840737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00449139,0.0008957234,0.1144988,0.0006683059,0.0001539327,0.000179695,0.004597998,0.004915887,0.0003347432,0.5206428,0.3479891,0.0006315516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9421638,0.0002387826,0.00469071,0.0230679,0.00029885,0.0007500357,0.000001846453,0.00002965821,0.02875847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915603,0.00009284365,0.004919522,0.0002267358,0.0001672794,0.00001786691,0.000001239714,0.00001856206,0.002995656],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4035578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4304632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548277342","doi":"10.5849/jof.15-111","title":"Using Risk Analysis to Reveal Opportunities for the Management of Unplanned Ignitions in Wilderness","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society","funders":"","keywords":"Wilderness; Wilderness area; Environmental resource management; Context (archaeology); Geography; Natural resource; Fire regime; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental planning; Environmental science; Ecology; Computer science; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04939311396620197,"gpt":0.2808634996657938,"spread":0.2314703856995918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007536652,0.00006598945,0.0001756824,0.0001169161,0.00005343396,0.00001027472,0.0002882065,0.00002674795,0.00006148477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004082097,0.00003614044,0.0001264159,0.0002733296,0.00005097216,0.0001465052,0.00007322276,0.00005033652,0.000002798898],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000118992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000921716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001578066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001695913,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991448,0.00005543666,0.0003549239,0.00007477999,0.0002358622,0.0001342293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991847,0.0002049267,0.0003430356,0.0001920233,0.00001666019,0.00005859882],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003923693,0.0002632093,0.8585576,0.0001401217,0.002088384,0.0001639385,0.0005817118,0.05002543,0.004293012,0.0002527903,0.003723699,0.07951778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001150104,0.0002624985,0.9852898,0.0005224551,0.001261018,0.00004127716,0.001729193,0.005617768,0.001125398,0.001580025,0.001243642,0.0001768444],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827094,0.00002621132,0.01615086,0.0005388783,0.00009787612,0.0001869494,0.0000360059,0.000002012271,0.0002517798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963878,0.000037208,0.003342349,0.00002414311,0.00003217385,0.000007329421,3.53224e-7,0.000006022683,0.0001626321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1267322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1473764,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W169980242","doi":"10.1093/jof/109.8.454","title":"What Is Limiting More Flexible Fire Management—Public or Agency Pressure?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Northern Research Station; U.S. Forest Service; Joint Fire Science Program","keywords":"Limiting; Agency (philosophy); Business; Engineering; Sociology; Mechanical engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07224514658528015,"gpt":0.323152033507531,"spread":0.2509068869222508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005610887,0.0001079624,0.000157032,0.000122546,0.0003183712,0.0003223522,0.000974931,0.00007282892,0.001409075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007218127,0.00007888739,0.0001291264,0.0003279173,0.0001963553,0.002190463,0.000172037,0.0001631281,0.00003158241],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002373731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008291796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003246528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002757566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984822,0.00006075272,0.0003442388,0.0001378284,0.0006176207,0.0003574211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990995,0.00002911463,0.0003603198,0.0002253558,0.0001147235,0.000170975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003647798,0.0009525749,0.09461945,0.0006042707,0.001055762,0.001432725,0.1788051,0.00003412347,0.00002422108,0.06067516,0.1778711,0.4835606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001332445,0.0004073746,0.1057443,0.001115598,0.0004496226,0.0000416627,0.1987162,0.0001747399,0.0002160231,0.02596703,0.6651901,0.0006449077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5858853,0.003002588,0.0002380901,0.005506896,0.002889,0.0003580666,0.000002425407,0.00007592504,0.4020417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9304163,0.003362803,0.001498583,0.0004844497,0.0004293535,0.000003252331,4.210817e-7,0.00001284911,0.06379201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.487319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995038,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W195257448","doi":"10.1093/jof/107.1.50","title":"Mitigating Climate Change with Managed Forests: Balancing Expectations, Opportunity, and Risk","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Additionality; Afforestation; Carbon offset; Kyoto Protocol; Climate change; Deforestation (computer science); Clean Development Mechanism; Business; Greenhouse gas; Natural resource economics; Climate change mitigation; Emissions trading; Forest management; Land use, land-use change and forestry; Sustainable forest management; Carbon credit; Carbon sequestration; Agroforestry; Land use; Environmental science; Economics; Environmental economics; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01568816608752005,"gpt":0.2487690926525359,"spread":0.2330809265650158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002830487,0.0001084729,0.0001369676,0.00007662382,0.0001675509,0.00005603757,0.0001894359,0.00003368274,0.000176126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006773874,0.00008140446,0.0000405779,0.000146963,0.00007583704,0.0005593728,0.00008077692,0.0001960666,0.00002371452],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004149989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006318809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006601348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001354387,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991323,0.00003529207,0.0002454703,0.00009935391,0.0002583989,0.0002291813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992689,0.00003258059,0.0003798063,0.0001438284,0.000009599636,0.0001652532],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004122559,0.000034994,0.9713411,0.00001597898,0.00001886574,0.0001104165,0.0008279083,0.0001825747,0.00002345535,0.0004545095,0.002862033,0.0240869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005644266,0.000390299,0.9936912,0.0001106379,0.00006423346,0.000113171,0.0004372053,0.00109665,0.00002587815,0.002623782,0.000747013,0.0001355014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892109,0.0001021912,0.00004619341,0.0006953619,0.0000390166,0.000101409,0.000002677839,0.00001310262,0.009789131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955993,0.0003225617,0.003535083,0.0002517211,0.0001609831,0.000002166612,0.000001644333,0.00000850506,0.0001179919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0239514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3319578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511142278","doi":"10.1093/jof/101.2.48","title":"Market and Resource Impacts of a Canadian Lumber Tariff","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tariff; Revenue; Softwood; Agricultural economics; Resource (disambiguation); Business; Offset (computer science); Natural resource economics; Economic impact analysis; Economics; International trade; Pulp and paper industry; Engineering; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006331662903287467,"gpt":0.2043949987571526,"spread":0.1980633358538652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003281273,0.00006424139,0.0001062021,0.00015294,0.00003759821,0.00001531127,0.0001497851,0.00004314738,0.003304274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001241597,0.00005242438,0.00004315819,0.0002189997,0.00009806765,0.0001387417,0.00003444797,0.0001118738,0.0000246026],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005301136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003495135,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02293017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02205653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993689,0.00003167808,0.0001948089,0.00005554589,0.0001669643,0.0001821233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994475,0.00002090697,0.0001519688,0.0001290564,0.000005756933,0.0002448429],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001805759,0.00001692136,0.5904899,0.00001175906,0.00001829354,0.00004321624,0.0001950758,0.00007566841,0.0001078954,0.0005383826,0.4079249,0.0005598815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003262979,0.00009496092,0.5134588,0.0000269206,0.00002085091,0.0001248997,0.00004567709,0.00004192032,0.0001171559,0.001055978,0.4846102,0.00007630049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7429369,0.00005926282,9.311912e-7,0.0003116851,0.00003447491,0.00002922672,0.000001677755,0.000001022462,0.2566248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951142,0.000048163,0.0006575755,0.0002064599,0.00003355993,2.248801e-7,2.389554e-7,0.000006160043,0.003933388],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2526914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976068,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983595398","doi":"10.5849/jof.13-041","title":"Managing Heterogeneous Stands Using a Multiple-Treatment Irregular Shelterwood Method","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"FPInnovations; Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux des Laurentides","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; FPInnovations","keywords":"Microsite; Understory; Canopy; Clearcutting; Environmental science; Stocking; Regeneration (biology); Scarification; Forestry; Silviculture; Agroforestry; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Agronomy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02985166255556681,"gpt":0.2528591320698816,"spread":0.2230074695143148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002579367,0.0001169473,0.0002360162,0.00002054037,0.0002517563,0.00002789575,0.0002225341,0.00007893323,0.00005233188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006037448,0.00004157926,0.0001846634,0.00008360938,0.00005313082,0.00009095797,0.0000828234,0.00009064667,0.000005059944],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006093588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000666528,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004314369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001104497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992406,0.00008450682,0.0002125695,0.0001150345,0.0001434209,0.0002038408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994079,0.0001808059,0.0002112701,0.00004845546,0.00007080365,0.00008077881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004959738,0.0004745274,0.8304085,0.00002744254,0.0006548633,0.00035799,0.0003346204,0.00361467,0.02970177,0.000135584,0.0006859688,0.1331082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004104799,0.01170062,0.8646234,0.0002458122,0.0008284032,0.002250468,0.001917405,0.02347769,0.02901183,0.01326069,0.04745764,0.001121197],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981312,0.0002056871,0.0004979011,0.0008000114,0.0002063747,0.00005097151,0.000009349481,0.0000106453,0.00008792429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953987,0.00005899144,0.004101109,0.000103827,0.0002987735,4.610429e-7,0.000001799047,5.962977e-7,0.00003576364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.131987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1936331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312068647","doi":"10.1093/jofore/fvac039","title":"Climate Adaptive Management in the Northeastern United States: Common Strategies and Motivations of Rural and Urban Foresters","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Environment and Natural Resources","keywords":"Psychological resilience; Adaptive strategies; Globe; Adaptive management; Adaptation (eye); Adaptive capacity; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Categorization; Resilience (materials science); Resistance (ecology); Geography; Green infrastructure; Forest management; Climate change adaptation; Climate resilience; Climate change; Business; Forestry; Ecology; Environmental science; Computer science; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01283483876106944,"gpt":0.2374434525370413,"spread":0.2246086137759719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003061357,0.00007241082,0.000100201,0.0001257481,0.000106554,0.00003801009,0.0002386982,0.00001099439,0.00006185871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002691482,0.00005149937,0.00002579776,0.0002392283,0.0001419748,0.0002780678,0.0002861888,0.0001475839,0.000001074543],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003106959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003678505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002930584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001522446,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992521,0.0000749501,0.0002431922,0.00004914604,0.0002479077,0.000132744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999607,0.00004697515,0.000201978,0.0001100138,0.000004317726,0.00002970837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001876721,0.0001204351,0.9184489,0.00004066403,0.00004838081,0.00005080698,0.008020691,0.05891569,0.000008335791,0.01044598,0.001216123,0.002496357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007279675,0.0004584835,0.9426216,0.00003971632,0.00004242525,0.00004220068,0.04195283,0.006909854,0.000001681696,0.004972505,0.002140455,0.00009030904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996057,0.00004771412,0.00001287991,0.0003491943,0.00002535747,0.0001306232,0.000009787726,0.000002062709,0.003365434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995377,0.0001234247,0.00009979897,0.0001481724,0.00001012173,0.000005072243,0.000006695172,0.000004662695,0.00006432688],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05200584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2100083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2188652991","doi":"10.1093/jof/106.2.83","title":"Species and Spacing Effects of Northern Conifers on Forest Productivity and Soil Chemistry in a 50-Year-Old Common Garden Experiment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Forestry; Agroforestry; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Botany; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01103505815823178,"gpt":0.2021430079172636,"spread":0.1911079497590318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001156366,0.00009056355,0.0002147901,0.00001176872,0.0000436628,0.00001151728,0.00008235803,0.00005884628,0.000004567135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007544866,0.00003947138,0.00005045905,0.00005959503,0.000116175,0.0000498548,0.00004104163,0.0001563487,1.636675e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002721076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001069098,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001359367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008925042,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994022,0.00002575119,0.0001838733,0.00009960739,0.0001724044,0.0001161097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995812,0.0001103335,0.0001621836,0.00004238776,0.00003394703,0.00006998899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001557842,0.0000907419,0.8634426,0.00003331422,0.00001299395,0.0000464387,0.0002164878,0.00003062481,0.1354393,0.00001018136,0.00001652538,0.0005050323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003750187,0.0003544884,0.9226615,0.0001019404,0.000007528909,0.0001521584,0.0004522358,0.00004768,0.07564388,0.0001073247,0.00002009833,0.00007612839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990997,0.000349558,9.601197e-8,0.0001562858,0.00004222468,0.00006303252,0.000002159423,0.000003522758,0.0002834476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999675,0.0001198644,0.00001853909,0.0000123861,0.0001179633,0.000001139032,9.58846e-7,9.853545e-7,0.00005315274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05979541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1609596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2579419932","doi":"10.5849/jof.2016-065r1","title":"Native American Student Perspectives of Challenges in Natural Resource Higher Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Nortel (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Forester; Natural resource; Natural resource management; Resource (disambiguation); Natural (archaeology); Public relations; Higher education; Resource management (computing); Political science; Environmental resource management; Sociology; Business; Geography; Forestry; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02126349198377092,"gpt":0.3214197612010072,"spread":0.3001562692172363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001844015,0.00006739733,0.0001372139,0.00007442522,0.00005379103,0.00002190054,0.000541836,0.00001879254,0.0002142694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006094929,0.00005282324,0.00005569162,0.00005139253,0.0002958399,0.0002720555,0.0001690435,0.0001565358,0.00001275163],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001215608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001656848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002283792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001065216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993373,0.00003181254,0.0001826459,0.00008337822,0.0002604538,0.0001044623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991279,0.00002251784,0.0005607622,0.000234567,0.00001468693,0.00003957552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001582558,0.0007303177,0.9050635,0.00002658663,0.00007917338,0.00002324352,0.01721492,0.000354375,0.0002052563,0.009398894,0.01604242,0.05070306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002059335,0.000130488,0.9859842,0.00004000616,0.000008478869,0.000003790639,0.003976731,0.00001054289,0.00003591767,0.0008836944,0.008664919,0.00005531295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9155495,0.0006709648,1.353879e-7,0.003144206,0.0001267038,0.00004653866,3.580787e-7,0.000001552419,0.08046002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962047,0.0002826288,0.0001638356,0.00003231196,0.000154919,0.000001256191,1.589611e-7,0.000004937432,0.003155306],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0809207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113955682","doi":"10.1093/jofore/fvaa053","title":"Save Our Species: A Blueprint for Restoring Butternut (<i>Juglans cinerea</i>) across Eastern North America","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Plant and Fungal Interactions Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Canker; Hybrid; Resistance (ecology); Habitat; Range (aeronautics); Introduced species; Tree breeding; Abundance (ecology); Juglans; Woodland; Agroforestry; Genetic diversity; Ecology; Botany; Woody plant","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05132174444341468,"gpt":0.3286507086996864,"spread":0.2773289642562717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009253052,0.0001169522,0.000183044,0.00003104607,0.00006877272,0.00005438088,0.0003804772,0.00007114314,0.000008835566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002866331,0.00009785201,0.000194945,0.00007260525,0.00002448686,0.00001141931,0.0001426884,0.0002634082,0.00001402691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002365014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007729756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001149783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000387865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990615,0.00002132581,0.0003027068,0.0001609344,0.0001943521,0.0002591271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991997,0.00002004161,0.0002042532,0.0001844146,0.0001973864,0.000194131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002824391,0.0001730456,0.2139939,0.0001385695,0.0004523713,0.0002092987,0.0009230624,0.001892328,0.7205372,0.00001559069,0.05254296,0.006297278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002810465,0.003325099,0.04940361,0.0001511808,0.0000696947,0.0005485618,0.004427694,0.002077908,0.1149076,0.00004637157,0.8216934,0.0005384654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900472,0.0001801992,0.00746119,0.001466186,0.000271123,0.00009474406,0.00009933479,0.000004465583,0.0003756006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952725,0.0001798592,0.001073181,0.0003094189,0.002195075,0.000005401771,0.00003571596,0.00001675342,0.0009120652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7691504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3990289,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189441247","doi":"10.1093/jof/109.6.332","title":"Applying a Spruce Budworm Decision Support System to Maine: Projecting Spruce-Fir Volume Impacts under Alternative Management and Outbreak Scenarios","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Spruce budworm; Forestry; Hectare; Choristoneura fumiferana; Forest management; Geography; Forest inventory; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Douglas fir; Ecology; Biology; Tortricidae; Lepidoptera genitalia","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01434569964764993,"gpt":0.2408216154361261,"spread":0.2264759157884761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001255538,0.000251939,0.0003682056,0.0001933853,0.0001503433,0.00009183028,0.0005267339,0.00009091308,0.0001339965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009142415,0.0001996659,0.0001077803,0.0002524881,0.00005148022,0.000549574,0.0005101212,0.0002922664,0.0001971308],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007373782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002628105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006197115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001405281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976989,0.00007131774,0.0006889118,0.0003165429,0.0007611979,0.0004631179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985479,0.00007581132,0.0006048938,0.0003465593,0.00003330491,0.0003915327],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001101692,0.000434712,0.8693799,0.0008692222,0.0004764068,0.003287075,0.005329522,0.004486089,0.003595633,0.0003565932,0.00941974,0.1012634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002571798,0.001674034,0.9639633,0.002530584,0.0001872683,0.004634702,0.005521487,0.01298336,0.001594612,0.0006492097,0.002918575,0.0007711068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872264,0.00003552375,0.005132256,0.00005081594,0.0006111547,0.0009661493,0.000004004823,0.00002882114,0.005944907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846823,0.000008977547,0.01471673,0.0001070383,0.0001559483,0.00003250776,4.557353e-7,0.00003564074,0.0002603963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1004923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8142138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W270065931","doi":"10.1093/jof/107.3.119","title":"Forest Management and Climate Change Mitigation: Good Policy Requires Careful Thought","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Forest management; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Environmental planning; Business; Ecology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01301377865293308,"gpt":0.2600595583999383,"spread":0.2470457797470053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002293479,0.0001468331,0.0001659258,0.0001439027,0.0001175406,0.00006745729,0.0003383204,0.0000574588,0.0001898635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001926597,0.0001192234,0.00008473377,0.0002662307,0.000104576,0.0006078462,0.0001931015,0.0001322372,0.00009691273],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009271433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005948807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004498943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003966642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988239,0.0000254839,0.0003297332,0.0001391211,0.0003550186,0.0003267716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993221,0.0000138481,0.0002618559,0.0002350102,0.00001005997,0.0001571126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015201,0.0002090182,0.7227142,0.0001220148,0.00008243148,0.0004356928,0.0009959168,0.0006381865,0.0001130352,0.1106078,0.0557371,0.1081926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006108905,0.0003759551,0.9259049,0.0001032436,0.00005832155,0.0001195151,0.00006439573,0.0002255727,0.00004733077,0.01257817,0.05972216,0.0001895836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8867485,0.0003077129,0.00001243858,0.006632024,0.0001373125,0.0002028896,0.00000466328,0.00002050056,0.105934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937127,0.0008822701,0.001661969,0.001207755,0.0007910578,0.000003908532,0.0000026453,0.00001110374,0.001726594],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2031907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.486179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2405555489","doi":"10.5849/jof.15-050","title":"The Next 50 Years: Opportunities for Diversifying the Ecological Representation of the National Wilderness Preservation System within the Contiguous United States","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society","funders":"","keywords":"Wilderness; Wilderness area; Geography; National park; Diversity (politics); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Land management; Habitat; Land use; Environmental planning; Political science; Environmental science; Archaeology; Law; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1349822696623732,"gpt":0.2949218034864229,"spread":0.1599395338240498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001344164,0.00005529937,0.00008811,0.00001702026,0.0004491277,0.0000423649,0.0004619114,0.00004227952,0.000004173786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078779,0.00002250161,0.00006598604,0.0001206973,0.0004439583,0.000247904,0.0001539532,0.000142844,9.667102e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001045225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000492791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004905584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001593901,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989722,0.0002075842,0.0003064257,0.00005625311,0.0003705767,0.00008701041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982004,0.0008714915,0.0006239821,0.0001080639,0.0001730144,0.00002302427],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004385902,0.0001241914,0.5184541,0.0000393113,0.0003438511,0.000006316899,0.0111079,0.4045279,0.0001157527,0.03042156,0.03379789,0.0006225831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007152046,0.0001672338,0.858539,0.00004150992,0.00007838045,0.00003988394,0.0589047,0.05509174,0.0000514873,0.02341324,0.002888931,0.00006873657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917371,0.00006372358,0.0003409332,0.006834998,0.0003375124,0.0002290052,0.000007728405,0.000004107761,0.0004448438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992183,0.00003802318,0.0001108063,0.0002267378,0.00005309717,0.0000139169,0.000002955761,0.000003234571,0.0003329423],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3494362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3454373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330650502","doi":"10.5849/jof.14-118","title":"A Rapid Forest Assessment Method for Multiparty Monitoring Across Landscapes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptive management; Environmental resource management; Forest management; Natural resource management; Transparency (behavior); Understory; Scale (ratio); Scope (computer science); Citizen science; Resource management (computing); Forest ecology; Computer science; Natural resource; Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Ecosystem; Agroforestry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07777581261126397,"gpt":0.3811198097237952,"spread":0.3033439971125312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008121498,0.00009631574,0.0001717882,0.00001604331,0.00008648856,0.00005497783,0.0002747047,0.00006296245,0.0009126409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001655218,0.00007299452,0.0001298221,0.00008714797,0.00003535806,0.0002396592,0.0001135059,0.0001359767,0.00003881258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003906991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002575938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002632659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005902224,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989789,0.00003031134,0.0002858083,0.0001013276,0.0003497353,0.0002539677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992545,0.000077179,0.0002509032,0.0001444722,0.00005356411,0.0002193732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001788391,0.0002139499,0.9364972,0.00001919427,0.00004500497,0.00002574523,0.0007009308,0.001631152,0.002267475,0.0001281665,0.04584488,0.01244744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002996102,0.0005258222,0.7888788,0.00003430248,0.00003915642,0.0001573849,0.008434338,0.002252985,0.002876477,0.0007853883,0.1928053,0.0002139312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882582,0.0001188419,0.007833869,0.0004495193,0.0006225251,0.0001093587,0.00004954865,0.00001152742,0.002546559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748032,0.00004301691,0.02459786,0.00005324704,0.0003112539,0.0000125485,0.00000852616,0.00001158094,0.0001587861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1476184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181582694","doi":"10.1093/jof/107.1.16","title":"Litigants' Characteristics and Outcomes in US Forest Service Land-Management Cases 1989 to 2005","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Office of the General Counsel; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Service (business); Business; Forest management; Land management; Forestry; Environmental resource management; Geography; Agroforestry; Land use; Environmental science; Marketing; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009214184871839157,"gpt":0.25069836130391,"spread":0.2414841764320709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000210442,0.0001323119,0.0002151516,0.0001338148,0.00004355158,0.00005223003,0.0002976327,0.00004106684,0.0002576068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004649912,0.0001056341,0.00004241147,0.0001914255,0.0000272093,0.0002445346,0.0001545758,0.0001287257,0.0001448562],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006965172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006092549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002282579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008422044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989675,0.00001718894,0.0003544424,0.000119255,0.0002591778,0.0002824795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994485,0.00003221165,0.0001533237,0.0001831895,0.000008282331,0.0001744907],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004824789,0.00008937797,0.9888155,0.00001626639,0.00001354684,0.0003593219,0.0001355177,0.0005332751,0.00001740634,0.0001601809,0.005635584,0.004175785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004472139,0.0001643038,0.9859237,0.00005324628,0.00001873747,0.00006305097,0.00002392707,0.0001699695,0.000006473352,0.0005578919,0.01245289,0.0001185908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929682,0.00001885818,0.000009367397,0.003017292,0.0001071867,0.0001273494,0.00000601035,0.000006888368,0.003738833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950375,0.00008420499,0.001032316,0.002564933,0.00009257888,0.000001102199,0.000002044265,0.000007514916,0.001177812],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006817307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4307633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021468693","doi":"10.1093/jofore/fvaa002","title":"Ontario, Canada’s LTSP Experience: Forging Lasting Research Partnerships and the Adaptive Management Cycle in Action","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Logging; Environmental science; Biomass (ecology); Adaptive management; Forest management; Productivity; Agroforestry; Silviculture; Environmental resource management; Forestry; Geography; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08065701772588439,"gpt":0.2949117833818413,"spread":0.2142547656559569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000783301,0.00006149184,0.0001054684,0.00003059065,0.0001695416,0.00002146928,0.0002509067,0.00002765592,0.0002570004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008337679,0.00004284893,0.00002257282,0.0001436712,0.000209494,0.0001911753,0.0002895459,0.0004116824,0.000005051262],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004345478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006017997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1435697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8749979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998977,0.00009850402,0.00021865,0.0001154113,0.0003687901,0.0002216381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996084,0.0001007407,0.0001115485,0.00008468335,0.000008614182,0.0000860147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002798598,0.0001436823,0.8158014,0.00008241319,0.0001580563,0.001540166,0.02985626,0.03838398,0.00007244827,0.05815526,0.04253063,0.01047716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002689185,0.0002620957,0.9104685,0.00007709905,0.00002779265,0.00004979885,0.02613634,0.007144004,0.0001055988,0.01206687,0.04080971,0.0001629992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817502,0.00002400886,0.0001601746,0.00550271,0.00009869532,0.000149942,1.648591e-7,0.000002106428,0.01231192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988344,0.00001882765,0.0003433439,0.0003276451,0.00003946496,0.000008088962,1.424905e-7,0.000003481618,0.0004245855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7314282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8621333,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280817995","doi":"10.1093/jof/102.6.21","title":"Federal and State Influence on Community Responses to Wildfire Threats: Arizona, Colorado, and New Mexico","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Public administration; Business; Federal state; Environmental planning; Political science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01521797757727773,"gpt":0.25567626963587,"spread":0.2404582920585923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005748319,0.0001343739,0.000209857,0.00005386519,0.0002183971,0.00009148195,0.000266888,0.00005657486,0.00001325539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000311321,0.0001076816,0.00003119837,0.0001129306,0.000128709,0.000381782,0.0001750185,0.0004193646,0.00002564427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001935501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005079322,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001665063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007187739,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989662,0.0001540851,0.000271725,0.0001095989,0.0003030998,0.0001952483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990184,0.0002290618,0.0001825505,0.0002305314,0.000008240256,0.0003311862],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001359847,0.0001902659,0.9593916,0.00003067852,0.00004065203,0.0002361244,0.002622864,0.006111298,0.007739474,0.00004802323,0.002308542,0.01992064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009533909,0.001956142,0.9888593,0.0002291837,0.000008275945,0.000440278,0.0001234079,0.00003303415,0.00146902,0.005170852,0.0006248462,0.0001322818],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976193,0.0001032513,0.00005416474,0.001729459,0.00007760261,0.0001430614,0.000004575318,0.00001014045,0.0002583872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980015,0.00003920389,0.001135118,0.0006400837,0.00002919785,0.000001373138,2.314387e-7,0.00001127001,0.0001420915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02946769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4391128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037614227","doi":"10.1093/jofore/fvaa022","title":"Preliminary Results from a Structural Conversion Thinning Trial in Eastern Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Thinning; Abies balsamea; Balsam; Silviculture; Environmental science; Forestry; Crop; Agroforestry; Competition (biology); Horticulture; Geography; Biology; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01206261715572517,"gpt":0.2106537336416774,"spread":0.1985911164859522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001305132,0.00006996441,0.0001319502,0.00001526229,0.00003637255,0.000009093697,0.0002923748,0.00004748537,0.0003180484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001603822,0.00005719762,0.00003624561,0.00006923035,0.00004139329,0.0001750794,0.0001904217,0.000241297,0.00001446238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001456919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006445567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06439315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05113021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991356,0.0000387371,0.0003405655,0.000110366,0.0002438057,0.0001309512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994989,0.00005945105,0.0002458146,0.00008976617,0.000004336444,0.0001016991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.1947711,0.0001104319,0.5450728,0.00003026427,0.0001165816,0.004156282,0.004527448,0.06665607,0.00024214,0.0001186022,0.1817434,0.002454953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04133081,0.001980604,0.9334246,0.00005691663,0.00003998022,0.00002353629,0.0008501047,0.01467446,0.0002121364,0.001985049,0.005222941,0.0001988479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957185,0.00001955938,0.00002416605,0.002852063,0.0004768928,0.00009253331,0.000006435681,0.000002927254,0.0008069448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987457,0.000003156768,0.0003696541,0.0006705831,0.0001391067,4.9894e-7,0.000003551727,0.000003784879,0.00006399968],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3883518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9661842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2466989844","doi":"10.5849/jof.15-074","title":"Is There a Place for Legislating Place-Based Collaborative Forestry Proposals?: Examining the Herger-Feinstein Quincy Library Group Forest Recovery Act Pilot Project","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Stillwater (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Forest management; Logging; National forest; Environmental resource management; Service (business); Business; Forestry; Environmental planning; Geography; Marketing; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01811631045234839,"gpt":0.2402228075216518,"spread":0.2221064970693034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001444059,0.0004327246,0.0005338536,0.0001270809,0.0003743141,0.000213839,0.001094548,0.0002024454,0.0002410501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007771669,0.0002328609,0.0002506558,0.000520714,0.0002698297,0.002098461,0.0002386857,0.0004275632,0.0000393827],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003786443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005344342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001173148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003832266,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967463,0.0004153399,0.0009492245,0.0004421454,0.0007801577,0.0006668312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956146,0.002092159,0.00142336,0.0006335164,0.00005541302,0.0001809402],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003973117,0.0004740351,0.882637,0.0003285253,0.0002794387,0.0001673316,0.001010094,0.001029571,0.008550793,0.0001214994,0.07395729,0.02747126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02675349,0.04214151,0.7180583,0.01187099,0.0005577574,0.001047632,0.004459074,0.03031018,0.03055464,0.005860982,0.1246539,0.003731485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909662,0.0003161992,0.001504381,0.001913236,0.0006014975,0.001682697,0.0001054836,0.00006603754,0.002844293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915113,0.00003716825,0.006374822,0.0002738108,0.0005634261,0.000140258,0.000005359385,0.0001111644,0.0009826409],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1645787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9495791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136695370","doi":"10.1093/jofore/fvab003","title":"Changes in Relationships between the USDA Forest Service and Small, Forest-Based Communities in the Northwest Forest Plan Area amid Declines in Agency Staffing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Place Attachment and Urban Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Staffing; Business; Overtime; Service (business); Public relations; Political science; Marketing; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.137657520959735,"gpt":0.317909650781569,"spread":0.1802521298218339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002519915,0.0001562048,0.0003043608,0.0002136092,0.0005675636,0.0001505248,0.0006234074,0.0001267405,0.000006842468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006943582,0.0001024291,0.00005823788,0.0007359094,0.0002210158,0.000283936,0.0001137401,0.0008107194,7.073281e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009106776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002790596,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007166647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9662395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979119,0.0007417533,0.0005095786,0.0001047769,0.0003786659,0.0003533263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962166,0.003024157,0.000323128,0.0002302575,0.0001463045,0.00005953381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003280457,0.00005859497,0.9741448,0.00002830078,0.00001734508,0.00007869861,0.02338288,0.00128661,0.000001033858,0.0006287168,0.0001272261,0.0002130076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000625925,0.00005021472,0.9180899,0.0003070267,0.0000297654,0.000007325137,0.07558581,0.0001959162,0.000002349188,0.003719428,0.001278954,0.0001073393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815507,0.001342153,0.00001314,0.01630191,0.00009446326,0.0001961334,0.00001597959,0.000006757239,0.0004787701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986039,0.0006846817,0.0001282415,0.0002847984,0.0002178222,0.00001688149,0.00002615361,0.000009539991,0.00002791201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9590728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994447,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2402574006","doi":"10.5849/jof.15-007","title":"The US Wilderness Managers Survey: Charting a Path for the Future","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society","funders":"","keywords":"Wilderness; Stewardship (theology); Legislation; Wilderness area; Public relations; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental planning; Political science; Politics; Public administration; Geography; Ecology; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04240614268381711,"gpt":0.3297255957899896,"spread":0.2873194531061725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003559155,0.0001517684,0.0002186352,0.00005822771,0.0002729384,0.000152065,0.000876023,0.00009406492,0.00002317624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002839547,0.00007871999,0.0001741236,0.0001764764,0.00008837005,0.0001560134,0.00007095226,0.0002959376,0.00001784926],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006966686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008385217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001034616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001587565,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983268,0.0002597811,0.0005236211,0.0001446581,0.0004181963,0.0003269389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975452,0.0006565577,0.0007858221,0.0005538078,0.0003424743,0.0001160987],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006340207,0.0001002729,0.7174343,0.00002417776,0.0005749578,0.00005108887,0.001470165,0.0007422848,0.000001870516,0.008290047,0.2187336,0.05194321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001205895,0.0001611087,0.8012171,0.00003377111,0.0001045141,0.00007016346,0.004194601,0.0003080262,0.00000508948,0.003443578,0.1891425,0.0001136418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9590877,0.005500535,0.01126216,0.01030269,0.008885818,0.0008399702,0.00001306089,0.0000307021,0.00407733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929788,0.0001667674,0.0002816426,0.000126964,0.002635862,0.00005183875,0.000005407854,0.00004122396,0.003711497],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08378278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3210108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152732560","doi":"10.1093/jof/107.7.378","title":"Response to “More Kids in the Woods: Reconnecting Americans with Nature”","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bruyère","funders":"","keywords":"Forestry; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006452998074002918,"gpt":0.2344088367650262,"spread":0.2279558386910233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004400955,0.00009481894,0.0001319162,0.00005200471,0.00007071179,0.000006383435,0.000414218,0.00004477991,0.00009626245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006896013,0.00005235019,0.00005719602,0.0002693309,0.0004183411,0.0001221695,0.00003257967,0.0004472611,0.00002284005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002429772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002032287,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002519513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001368224,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990418,0.00009079017,0.0001948612,0.0001127276,0.0003892739,0.0001705311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994484,0.00009828714,0.0001780054,0.0001767023,0.00000316417,0.00009547064],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01570747,0.002075483,0.5829966,0.00001255571,0.00009166585,0.004566528,0.04738507,0.06322309,0.05262264,0.0001345246,0.1054247,0.1257597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003210337,0.001394414,0.9579935,0.00005005732,0.000009194284,0.0008117874,0.007440994,0.00001284448,0.0001545797,0.0002286101,0.03144876,0.0001342495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857824,0.00006643394,0.0001137943,0.01122015,0.00004709396,0.00006420071,6.742181e-7,0.000003152729,0.002702024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897507,0.00001043939,0.003524569,0.006440521,0.00005826605,0.00000129507,1.837108e-7,0.000005973116,0.0002080833],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3749969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2134779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992140348","doi":"10.1093/jof/98.2.30","title":"Outcomes-Based Forestry Education: An Application in New Brunswick","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Diverse Educational Innovations Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Forestry; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer science; Pedagogy; Medical education; Geography; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02624196591987863,"gpt":0.2866812706906043,"spread":0.2604393047707256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000164193,0.0000874642,0.0001368284,0.0000389614,0.00007630318,0.00003698888,0.0003302263,0.00005936143,0.0006014952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006246541,0.00003790825,0.0000645074,0.0004282167,0.00003187824,0.0002949772,0.00001154388,0.0001434152,0.00003575649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006151788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005542375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008159634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001362485,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991751,0.0000232992,0.000353764,0.0001066671,0.0002173703,0.0001238092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994131,0.00007710943,0.0001879735,0.0000747642,0.0001551299,0.00009191652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003265883,0.0005202077,0.8564974,0.000003150828,0.000009262027,0.000001439778,0.00005699021,0.0002509866,0.0002753432,0.0026896,0.005891629,0.1337713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001595324,0.0001157807,0.9682809,0.00002142298,0.00000672635,0.00001105913,0.0003760552,0.00003230368,0.00004173031,0.004495585,0.0263812,0.00007769953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901868,0.000087694,0.00000795635,0.007262075,0.000170188,0.00008899443,0.000002440031,0.000009121113,0.002184796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995859,0.0000151204,0.001358,0.0007037339,0.0005764003,0.000003230316,0.0000253036,8.995109e-7,0.001458293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1336936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6585951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528948218","doi":"10.5849/jof.15-051","title":"Monitoring Nontimber Forest Products Using Forest Inventory Data: An Example with Slippery Elm Bark","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Stephen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Bark (sound); Forest inventory; Forestry; Forest management; Agroforestry; Geography; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1251844961092062,"gpt":0.298513626523289,"spread":0.1733291304140828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009049785,0.0002305836,0.000264891,0.0001190361,0.0001245272,0.0001259617,0.001205499,0.00008077271,0.00008671508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001148272,0.0001757202,0.00004830367,0.0003395271,0.0002016986,0.002589465,0.0005999717,0.0003119375,0.00009133746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002255518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001302429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001681763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006465202,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979215,0.00006413864,0.0004373446,0.0003379149,0.0007922964,0.0004468267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980089,0.00002112906,0.0004270682,0.001070675,0.00006082215,0.0004113979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001275082,0.0001294576,0.9555081,0.00002252162,0.00004113523,0.0001202949,0.0003900622,0.02405696,0.000184689,0.00003987667,0.01886282,0.0005166153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00309984,0.001491005,0.8757985,0.0003981582,0.0003275232,0.000851361,0.0008261402,0.02060347,0.0003770801,0.001647062,0.09362154,0.0009583012],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955938,0.0001274279,0.0001305671,0.0001116058,0.0006195958,0.0001646398,0.000002997935,0.00002133214,0.003228042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865209,0.00001794642,0.01086954,0.00005402161,0.001602134,0.000002089361,0.0000108447,0.00004314701,0.0008793441],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07970954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7165663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529041484","doi":"10.5849/jof.14-086","title":"Regeneration Dynamics of White Spruce, Trembling Aspen, and Balsam Poplar in Response to Disturbance, Climatic, and Edaphic Factors in the Cold, Dry Boreal Forests of the Southwest Yukon, Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western Forest Products; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Edaphic; Regeneration (biology); Disturbance (geology); Balsam; Ecology; Taiga; Abies balsamea; Bark beetle; Environmental science; Mountain pine beetle; Coarse woody debris; Forestry; Biology; Geography; Bark (sound); Botany; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008317449047245625,"gpt":0.2100826704396798,"spread":0.2017652213924342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001528751,0.00011097,0.0002475677,0.00007759641,0.00004933414,0.00001940375,0.0002948054,0.00006140587,0.000001665804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005762128,0.0000664709,0.00002792523,0.0003566217,0.00008424171,0.0001773949,0.0001103171,0.0001944413,1.169851e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002807585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000150275,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07499186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.878339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984288,0.0002850323,0.0005248836,0.0001071922,0.0004972086,0.0001568896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989789,0.0002414818,0.0004314241,0.0002245272,0.00002929898,0.00009442208],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001924049,0.00002830982,0.9934008,0.00002399945,0.000004602393,0.00001336895,0.001033205,0.004200359,0.0007826662,0.00003055055,0.0001970468,0.00009274729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005132303,0.0001688305,0.9898871,0.0001459517,0.00001085911,0.00002971885,0.001036403,0.007744304,0.0002565054,0.0001081689,0.00003205912,0.00006682141],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987684,0.00008191755,0.00003103767,0.0006351067,0.000138571,0.0002479945,0.00002741697,9.230502e-7,0.00006866967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997494,0.000006272293,0.0001661135,0.00003311753,0.0000198383,0.000002342035,0.000001633165,0.000008229817,0.00001312012],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8033472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9311678,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408153778","doi":"10.1007/s44392-025-00015-2","title":"Silviculture—More Complex Than Ever","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Silviculture; Agroforestry; Forestry; Environmental science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01105216994837826,"gpt":0.2668427007674537,"spread":0.2557905308190754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001258201,0.00008301729,0.0001187196,0.00005332109,0.0000637634,0.00002944769,0.0004290057,0.0000445371,0.002481547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003887731,0.00005883302,0.000103741,0.0002049926,0.0001020908,0.000192478,0.0001737369,0.0001486563,0.000280355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006429847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001143141,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005580017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000262782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999313,0.0000159612,0.0002182823,0.00007214429,0.0002265732,0.0001540343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996046,0.00001791444,0.0001346256,0.0001708935,0.00000981453,0.00006209675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002651502,0.00004774873,0.2436133,0.00001115435,0.00003167909,0.00002684939,0.0001403848,0.0007503092,0.000513394,0.001254473,0.7520211,0.001563072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003361922,0.00004352806,0.6641607,0.00002847503,0.00002742979,0.00001753921,0.00004415936,0.0002207948,0.0001060175,0.002525959,0.3324182,0.0000710888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8394997,0.00005407367,0.00004857911,0.003680794,0.0002517683,0.00006120476,0.000001509307,0.000009833496,0.1563925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769751,0.0000178985,0.000893984,0.00106452,0.0001297891,7.334315e-7,0.000001493965,0.000004572735,0.02091195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4205473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984303,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548937660","doi":"10.5849/jof.15-141","title":"Factors Affecting Plantation Grown White Spruce (&lt;I&gt;Picea Glauca&lt;/I&gt;) Acoustic Velocity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Tree Root and Stability Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Forestry; Environmental science; White (mutation); Horticulture; Biology; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0152771809357459,"gpt":0.2242010619801545,"spread":0.2089238810444086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002724262,0.0002164246,0.0003427875,0.0001310989,0.0001220835,0.00003824385,0.0002209914,0.0001184924,0.00003582308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003805643,0.0001414432,0.0001759031,0.0001353079,0.00005425636,0.0003993062,0.00004360066,0.0002351954,0.00001043212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001848514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000364533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001480212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005984608,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987414,0.00003479506,0.0004672222,0.0001209867,0.0003213874,0.0003141579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989996,0.0003766891,0.0001922796,0.0001881069,0.0001162337,0.000127074],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011992,0.00009062691,0.7576622,0.0004681867,0.0005182651,0.00008622884,0.003210278,0.006127127,0.213766,0.00008895856,0.005825527,0.01203663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006401682,0.000115441,0.9944936,0.0002557843,0.00009284892,0.00005041905,0.0001801879,0.0003757989,0.002584185,0.0003176339,0.0006711385,0.0002227782],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909872,0.0005297302,0.006809227,0.0001215622,0.0009902894,0.00007578293,0.00002119246,0.00008770092,0.0003773273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990525,0.00006542663,0.0003309684,0.000004287037,0.0004149451,0.00000134006,0.000001414109,0.00002727658,0.0001019025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2368314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5767887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136110618","doi":"10.1093/jof/107.5.267","title":"More Energy from Wood: What Are the Prospects?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; New Mexico State University","keywords":"Agroforestry; Environmental science; Forestry; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005324969718533123,"gpt":0.221914820767324,"spread":0.2165898510487909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001642478,0.0001083791,0.0001424862,0.00001338362,0.00009872442,0.00008993815,0.0004495773,0.00006039782,0.0006920166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005774206,0.0000633157,0.0001205123,0.00008781758,0.0001765905,0.0007904667,0.00009117937,0.0002163179,0.00001777412],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002340962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001045608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007941231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001693587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999032,0.00003498957,0.0002428111,0.0001048219,0.0003874986,0.0001978588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992697,0.00003289576,0.0002493269,0.0003161486,0.000005856044,0.0001261252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000189368,0.0005955766,0.9150577,0.000004507949,0.00004722567,0.0003414767,0.002214469,0.002672727,0.004450203,0.0001806986,0.01383174,0.06041434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002487859,0.0001721812,0.9695838,0.00002549888,0.00001809297,0.00005266411,0.004644235,0.00006816038,0.002239206,0.01972074,0.00313501,0.00009161418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932936,0.000554263,0.00006157052,0.005030557,0.0001230274,0.00004742865,0.000001687848,0.000005323449,0.0008824886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978863,0.0001662689,0.0002654185,0.001293779,0.0001565833,7.183491e-7,8.40837e-7,0.000005686332,0.0002243768],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06032272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7577096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482859397","doi":"10.1093/jof/101.8.42","title":"British Columbia's Environmental Forestry Policy Record in Perspective","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Clearcutting; Forestry; Certified wood; Riparian zone; Forest management; Logging; Service (business); Environmental policy; State (computer science); State forest; Business; Geography; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Ecology; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01002593327170898,"gpt":0.2426712873637009,"spread":0.2326453540919919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003863999,0.0001158864,0.0002735243,0.0001399419,0.0001100137,0.0004922057,0.0002702789,0.0001240321,0.0003490299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001049259,0.0001575487,0.0002032129,0.0003419076,0.00012196,0.001056966,0.00005605396,0.0003625284,0.000008333033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005906394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000164647,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03318835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008777799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987237,0.00002849167,0.0004224523,0.0001485092,0.0003027031,0.0003740746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993408,0.00002752003,0.0003494245,0.0001458058,0.00009344781,0.00004298448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002749981,0.0003131331,0.9899712,0.00003291303,0.0000303492,0.000286664,0.0001998828,0.000032405,0.000008147761,0.002930789,0.004513564,0.001653445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001074008,0.00005376852,0.8379709,0.00006741052,0.00003470212,0.00008978576,0.02110866,0.00001255788,0.000001732481,0.1311143,0.008281698,0.000190482],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760187,0.0002037073,0.000007350606,0.0004314924,0.0003103879,0.0001324719,0.000004337581,0.00001122429,0.02288031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978237,0.00005805587,0.00009682471,0.0004581941,0.001206286,0.000001590338,0.00000170474,0.00001889273,0.0003347764],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1520003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9732497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2491302013","doi":"10.5849/jof.15-070","title":"Where the Wild Things Are: A Research Agenda for Studying the Wildlife-Wilderness Relationship","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society","funders":"","keywords":"Wilderness; Wildlife; Wilderness area; Wildlife conservation; Geography; Wildlife management; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Environmental ethics; Biodiversity; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08670314383139398,"gpt":0.3192210046873986,"spread":0.2325178608560046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003409345,0.00007778725,0.0001024608,0.00003199542,0.0008174034,0.00004672341,0.0007271628,0.00008904137,0.0001229747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001570503,0.00003297346,0.0000929137,0.0002006036,0.0003823459,0.0005279453,0.0001510306,0.0004244968,0.00005105164],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001271767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005747312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002117419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008538942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986047,0.0002656196,0.0003152704,0.0001172276,0.0004503242,0.0002469313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968007,0.002445413,0.0003442245,0.0002971223,0.00006358347,0.0000489461],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005626656,0.00002751653,0.8430473,0.000004711014,0.0000172804,0.000004347683,0.0004497237,0.00005857737,0.00004463371,0.000576617,0.1539239,0.001789222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004028796,0.00008657568,0.9522402,0.0001109135,0.00002004395,0.000049184,0.0007955834,0.00005839568,0.0000126442,0.01966853,0.02650135,0.00005367749],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9000508,0.0001355373,0.001290064,0.09762197,0.0003363749,0.0002435087,0.000001302152,0.000006222028,0.0003142442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963574,0.00004910716,0.0002968352,0.001314109,0.0002500534,0.00002451012,1.576857e-7,0.00001004522,0.001697827],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1274225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6286889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2396416721","doi":"10.5849/jof.15-069","title":"Science Informs Stewardship: Committing to a National Wilderness Science Agenda","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society","funders":"","keywords":"Wilderness; Stewardship (theology); Political science; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Environmental ethics; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0779885195194186,"gpt":0.3901115472228232,"spread":0.3121230277034046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005152583,0.0001443326,0.0002223372,0.001145595,0.0002658188,0.0002799012,0.001735178,0.0000536073,0.00005444814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001407618,0.0001172756,0.00007052677,0.001963442,0.0005980995,0.001330646,0.0003217343,0.0002667066,0.00011143],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005281554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002117399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005362386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000824315,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962867,0.00003869518,0.0006202112,0.0002465167,0.002352654,0.000455238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966957,0.00007571057,0.0005713889,0.0004016344,0.001797063,0.0004584937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002447277,0.0004078604,0.8404911,0.00003442847,0.00009717563,0.0001208024,0.01023172,0.006131233,0.0005197363,0.08081948,0.03517785,0.02572388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001551031,0.0006164487,0.9555801,0.0001550668,0.0000297774,0.0004028453,0.005077288,0.0003644839,0.0006166871,0.007415327,0.02788532,0.0003056949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9264496,0.00005559151,0.002829229,0.0009554348,0.001871346,0.0001798772,0.000002208362,0.00002178703,0.06763496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949256,0.000001541325,0.003226424,0.0001913066,0.0004088958,0.000006554474,7.043963e-7,0.00001297996,0.001226003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1150889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.478236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}