{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":34,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":34,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"89fe768115ba","filters":{"venue":"Journal of International Political Theory"}},"results":[{"id":"W2916059466","doi":"10.1177/1755088219828768","title":"Feminist foreign policy as ethical foreign policy? A care ethics perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Militarism; Foreign policy; Sociology; Power (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Transformative learning; Feminism; Gender studies; Politics; International relations; Ethics of care; Political economy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Fiona Robinson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03479279894347687,"gpt":0.4110495915603796,"spread":0.3762567926169028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007192614,0.0004722864,0.0003826751,0.001035895,0.006534995,0.009643096,0.0009355712,0.007105583,0.005269698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005916342,0.0001737736,0.0003144185,0.0007126511,0.05104479,0.007055549,0.004516123,0.007282091,0.0005057862],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01216194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00929108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008935712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008026238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918104,0.006457751,0.00007997741,0.0002909834,0.0006009285,0.0007599691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996157,0.002703782,0.0002365783,0.0001737655,0.0002992601,0.0004296158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002710677,0.000005873074,0.00005177844,0.00001632062,7.369068e-7,0.00003729899,0.005260422,0.00005755957,0.0000170113,0.9897054,0.002792091,0.002052767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001045155,0.00002242447,0.0001958851,0.0005069511,0.00000295697,0.0001408507,0.02399761,0.0002992254,0.0001480172,0.6841887,0.2904764,0.000010467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01301491,0.01905969,0.008372133,0.6250355,0.002009221,0.00003625944,0.00002634172,0.00002447144,0.3324216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8536314,0.00999984,0.00316917,0.08044025,0.002719446,0.0001605466,0.00001954757,0.00005092708,0.04980884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01216194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08824146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985248823","doi":"10.3366/e1755088210000479","title":"An Ethnography of Migrant ‘Illegality’ in Sweden: Included Yet Excepted?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Ethnography; Phenomenology (philosophy); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Politics; Lived experience; Gender studies; Precarity; Embodied cognition; Immigration; Political science; Criminology; Migrant workers; Critical ethnography; Political economy; Economic growth; Law; Geography; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Shahram Khosravi","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02269940123348468,"gpt":0.3792605952428714,"spread":0.3565611940093867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002350457,0.0006347395,0.0007220033,0.001860261,0.0119415,0.005126292,0.00100493,0.001605675,0.003062258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003290422,0.0005994936,0.0003027534,0.001680318,0.01159312,0.004257105,0.006382388,0.002400442,0.0002964731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00227479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002114768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01723734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03887225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997382,0.001803581,0.0001030142,0.0001596261,0.0001643552,0.0003875554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974426,0.001672529,0.0003198782,0.0001002583,0.0001158394,0.0003489294],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008418217,0.000008341403,0.001063127,0.00002569348,0.000001151553,0.0005706826,0.9967815,0.000006235054,0.0001634836,0.0004556834,0.0001535241,0.0007622123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.154323e-7,0.00001084964,0.0008695158,0.00004789961,0.000001183594,0.0002354897,0.995065,0.000007801848,0.0000387911,0.00007711862,0.003641555,0.000004162394],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936022,0.0006752068,0.0002455837,0.000730911,0.00004791539,0.00002624591,0.00003595669,0.000005481697,0.00463045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954222,0.001064998,0.0002295042,0.0003206493,0.0000230233,0.00005141895,0.0000476991,0.00001636225,0.002824246],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01723734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03427398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168669772","doi":"10.1177/17550882211020409","title":"From critique to reaction: The new right, critical theory and international relations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Reactionary; Critical theory; Ideology; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; International relations theory; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Political philosophy; International relations; Left and right; Liberalism; Law and economics; Realism; Political science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jean-François Drolet","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michael C. Williams","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02152655153540835,"gpt":0.3885693377191227,"spread":0.3670427861837143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01618336,0.0007985047,0.0006922734,0.004295707,0.008011664,0.01729804,0.001368621,0.00533387,0.002934625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01686356,0.0003174779,0.0004709537,0.003027632,0.1109796,0.01787479,0.006238423,0.00979224,0.0003696369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01131731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006830063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003063637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002492607,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9825311,0.01447075,0.0002623934,0.0008675069,0.001252303,0.0006159435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754655,0.02073129,0.0009965975,0.001112143,0.0008464557,0.0008480507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005316412,0.000005486863,0.0000578143,0.00003830201,0.000002288137,0.00003093933,0.009519557,0.00007732107,0.00002096113,0.9856685,0.002334093,0.002239338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000759374,0.000004898166,0.00005194038,0.0001877252,0.000001832181,0.00002970292,0.006662548,0.0001469117,0.00005061351,0.9569668,0.03588229,0.00000726278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02694219,0.06264386,0.03637666,0.4226432,0.004463857,0.00009991087,0.0000574923,0.0001007955,0.4466719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393213,0.0135259,0.007187373,0.02039548,0.003215767,0.0001772718,0.00003503729,0.0001328345,0.0160091],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01729804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08558685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029974543","doi":"10.3366/e1755088209000317","title":"Political Friendship among Peoples","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia; University of St Andrews","keywords":"Friendship; Politics; Political philosophy; Political science; Duty; Sociology; Political economy; Equity (law); Law; Social psychology; Law and economics; Social science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Lu","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03654066236211519,"gpt":0.3680689016871556,"spread":0.3315282393250404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001333679,0.0001033782,0.0002066196,0.001131397,0.002861507,0.002264086,0.0002152027,0.0005663764,0.004638094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003266004,0.00007798235,0.0001100631,0.0008463847,0.00434717,0.002540159,0.001882636,0.0005634463,0.0003978532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007578167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003771105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001665521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001289002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998345,0.0008662581,0.00004029168,0.0001820186,0.0002631769,0.000303191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987108,0.0004063572,0.0002744133,0.0001344143,0.0001855993,0.0002884718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006186598,0.00006285251,0.03451642,0.0000874566,0.00005008588,0.0005483199,0.1301681,0.0002212936,0.0007396628,0.7452605,0.006445365,0.081838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002790219,0.0002386891,0.08889422,0.0002621932,0.00006858524,0.001360603,0.1436319,0.001125722,0.0006441112,0.2951613,0.4685067,0.0000780707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7179728,0.002964834,0.002983732,0.009776839,0.0001638579,0.00002315394,0.00008080208,0.0000415461,0.2659925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971634,0.0002462351,0.0001517714,0.0001382031,0.00002615614,0.000003562148,0.000008458824,0.000001947059,0.002260349],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004638094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01551598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605832155","doi":"10.1177/1755088217702671","title":"Pregnant woman versus mosquito: A feminist epidemiology of Zika virus","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Global Maternal and Child Health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Johnson and Johnson; University of Guelph","keywords":"Zika virus; Reproductive rights; Reproductive health; Abortion; Context (archaeology); Political science; Economic growth; Public health; Politics; Reproductive justice; Global health; Gender studies; Sociology; Health care; Population; Law; Geography; Medicine; Pregnancy; Virology; Demography; Biology; Nursing; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Candace Johnson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0583042223935205,"gpt":0.4087457597322906,"spread":0.3504415373387701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003629101,0.0002776376,0.0002679798,0.001475721,0.006502449,0.003950554,0.0004995493,0.001843693,0.005059749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005303716,0.0002624499,0.0001517429,0.0008386032,0.01961396,0.004451067,0.005256722,0.002689749,0.0002080211],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003411201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001428887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008932221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01165577,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967624,0.002601911,0.00004415999,0.0001415016,0.0001493284,0.0003005747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960631,0.003324655,0.000286179,0.00006263868,0.0001150122,0.0001483767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004415823,0.00002472955,0.01222624,0.0001494446,0.000008578844,0.00179419,0.5030219,0.00007896575,0.0006541476,0.4524204,0.00729989,0.02227745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001570961,0.00009424137,0.01467156,0.0009321269,0.00001916562,0.00497949,0.59606,0.000350031,0.0004184439,0.06980435,0.3126255,0.00002931939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4423901,0.05189973,0.006434195,0.2751462,0.0009277544,0.00007051777,0.0001832707,0.00003274893,0.2229155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766572,0.01103191,0.0007583711,0.005573112,0.0004605183,0.00003136097,0.00002419176,0.00001784537,0.005445542],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9934976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02475011,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023347283","doi":"10.1177/1755088215573092","title":"Theorizing state civil disobedience in international politics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Civil disobedience; Argument (complex analysis); State (computer science); Power (physics); Law; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Civil society; Order (exchange); Political philosophy; Sociology; Economics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Antonio Franceschet","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02393240686092428,"gpt":0.3473827315028335,"spread":0.3234503246419092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006073856,0.0004672243,0.0004196725,0.002392145,0.005805278,0.007705941,0.001319768,0.003788536,0.004730219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007075387,0.0004860791,0.0008396959,0.001814162,0.06459507,0.01285642,0.006654934,0.004935584,0.0003337108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005584912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002170092,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003002363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002465986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951419,0.002608343,0.0001278387,0.0006269815,0.0007217615,0.000773222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953097,0.00291122,0.000620593,0.0006433672,0.0002522001,0.0002629746],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013576,0.000004152644,0.0001933603,0.000004878115,0.000001462577,0.00002306001,0.001951661,0.0002583275,0.00002354743,0.9969504,0.0001057799,0.0004819877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007828185,0.000008932678,0.0003977242,0.00003487078,0.000005648742,0.00004328033,0.002125646,0.001469791,0.00008014333,0.9881265,0.007694025,0.000005679375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1648043,0.001270511,0.08758976,0.02473395,0.0001410346,0.0001102394,0.00004192228,0.00005125396,0.7212571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919026,0.0003128901,0.002616281,0.0006066178,0.00004885983,0.00008168916,0.00001005236,0.00001465331,0.004406337],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007705941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04052156,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111643050","doi":"10.3366/jipt.2012.0038","title":"<i>Jus Domicile</i> : In Pursuit of a Citizenship of Equality and Social Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Citizenship; Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Inequality; Settlement (finance); Global justice; Political philosophy; Law; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Harald Bauder","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03662754781409244,"gpt":0.36656328346689,"spread":0.3299357356527975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00682189,0.0002182138,0.0005106718,0.0006686444,0.007304012,0.008310142,0.0007514102,0.003960934,0.001529696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005399694,0.000146654,0.0004491103,0.0006665235,0.0370254,0.006984706,0.007573674,0.005011154,0.0003383081],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002402264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005818291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002696519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00417156,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954235,0.002806394,0.0001687691,0.0004108672,0.0005226998,0.000667764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974924,0.0009638838,0.0003611854,0.0003595291,0.0003614923,0.0004615426],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006929068,0.000006226965,0.0003824712,0.00001393062,0.000001654608,0.00004362761,0.004124696,0.00003617128,0.00009019382,0.9907886,0.00218754,0.002317948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009874533,0.00004150552,0.001482539,0.0001573583,0.000006368387,0.0003246625,0.01418207,0.000584113,0.0004755499,0.8833115,0.09939782,0.00002667131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1233117,0.004253418,0.06003401,0.2165594,0.002238255,0.0001160214,0.00005960914,0.0001172709,0.5933102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732699,0.0005526631,0.006264665,0.00949671,0.0003183842,0.00008054144,0.00001687365,0.00002580562,0.009974411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008310142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03607804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983906571","doi":"10.1177/1755088214555597","title":"Drone warfare and the limits of sacrifice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Violence, Religion, and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sacrifice; Biopower; Drone; Politics; Revolution in Military Affairs; Political science; Militarization; Political economy; State (computer science); State of exception; Citizenship; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Military science; History","authors":[{"name":"Bianca Baggiarini","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05126544717323265,"gpt":0.2837875246610274,"spread":0.2325220774877948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002940565,0.0002413577,0.0003485576,0.0007225829,0.005812394,0.006288171,0.0006963016,0.002268101,0.002566651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00332639,0.0002479931,0.0002655995,0.0003942914,0.06877904,0.006413364,0.006240399,0.004380169,0.0003629953],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001842798,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003777137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00448509,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973789,0.001622928,0.00004708225,0.0003116073,0.0003184248,0.000321012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985984,0.0007954024,0.0001173364,0.0002482809,0.0001318876,0.0001085886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004351106,0.000002904948,0.00007794567,0.0000069124,0.000001194325,0.00001918431,0.005615073,0.00007309815,0.00006211189,0.9916201,0.0003516096,0.002165491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008266203,0.00003036307,0.0006211598,0.0001405596,0.000004410197,0.0001419223,0.007141066,0.0002399842,0.0002915292,0.8577792,0.1335872,0.000014292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1141053,0.01998045,0.01796311,0.03120138,0.0003540432,0.00002349977,0.00002541758,0.00004066698,0.8163062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836187,0.001536713,0.001117863,0.001261579,0.0000569512,0.00001818727,0.000004984657,0.00001877931,0.01236618],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006288171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0260728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531031562","doi":"10.1177/1755088216671735","title":"Interlocuting classical realism and critical theory: Negotiating ‘divides’ in international relations theory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"International relations theory; Epistemology; Sociology; International relations; Negotiation; Critical theory; Modernity; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Politics; Post-realism; Realism; Humanity; Political philosophy; Field (mathematics); Narrative; Social theory; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Hartmut Behr","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michael C. Williams","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02007869099528795,"gpt":0.3610663045509476,"spread":0.3409876135556597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03187811,0.000935253,0.001102671,0.005783487,0.01135396,0.01808749,0.002789889,0.006289935,0.003926141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03418425,0.000650487,0.0008246691,0.003543101,0.1179986,0.02975541,0.0140833,0.01155429,0.0004750811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01396508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005807661,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001991876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002045073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9709146,0.02449983,0.0003635806,0.001093903,0.001897807,0.001230315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9626081,0.03166654,0.001628545,0.001770679,0.001271789,0.001054312],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005378948,0.000003703799,0.00003472508,0.00001089026,0.000001574871,0.00002253911,0.006585625,0.00007068542,0.00001528312,0.9921269,0.0003246819,0.000798057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008682377,0.000005110176,0.00003372935,0.00006153596,0.00000221353,0.00001838442,0.004645946,0.0004076451,0.00005233568,0.9876598,0.007098424,0.000006347428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08875682,0.01067256,0.182157,0.1318042,0.002161919,0.0001731694,0.00005174494,0.0001185515,0.5841041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759107,0.001132157,0.0133246,0.003529192,0.0005489651,0.0001911677,0.00002053038,0.00009357239,0.005249121],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03187811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1685896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2676463658","doi":"10.1177/1755088217714010","title":"David Mitrany on the international anarchy. A lost work of classical realism?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Anarchism and Radical Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Realism; Order (exchange); State (computer science); International relations; International relations theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Economics; Politics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Lucian M. Ashworth","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04494376860665758,"gpt":0.3681614132473323,"spread":0.3232176446406747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001556012,0.0003479906,0.000404952,0.001137415,0.005045871,0.004100494,0.0007142792,0.002289499,0.005491527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003108436,0.0001760611,0.0002629744,0.001017288,0.01756331,0.007484494,0.002226659,0.004537684,0.0008720222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00445403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001804947,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005764459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006881366,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987179,0.0007484902,0.00001782455,0.000145614,0.000225171,0.0001450351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987817,0.0008058433,0.00008771952,0.00008976625,0.000142028,0.00009285851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003988011,0.00000256597,0.00002490965,0.000006835086,8.173949e-7,0.00001447533,0.0005428471,0.00004871429,0.00001276207,0.9897161,0.008168167,0.001457649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007505542,0.000006395241,0.000145165,0.00008481231,0.000002039266,0.0000348538,0.0007954878,0.0002120703,0.00005736832,0.8544621,0.1441852,0.00000681916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01833882,0.04735932,0.01385861,0.3228804,0.002264683,0.00002206989,0.00008253457,0.0000545271,0.5951391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8419462,0.01971795,0.004776643,0.02960687,0.004120756,0.00008715782,0.00005352899,0.000110783,0.09958],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005764459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03231639,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469507082","doi":"10.1177/1755088213507189","title":"Discourses of motherhood and women’s health: <i>Maternal Thinking</i> as feminist politics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Politics; Sociology; Gender studies; Normative; Power (physics); Feminist ethics; Feminist philosophy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Fiona Robinson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01436732530431039,"gpt":0.3583452101120881,"spread":0.3439778848077777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008997347,0.0005630089,0.0003921534,0.001448511,0.01335149,0.009407171,0.001247224,0.004070356,0.002013071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005179128,0.0002700859,0.0002691343,0.001144951,0.07516437,0.005468098,0.004377523,0.004755692,0.0001903616],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0258837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01207586,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1306156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1123564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922948,0.005863207,0.00007592769,0.0003497615,0.0006407447,0.0007754758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956003,0.003448036,0.0003339246,0.0001088461,0.000255283,0.000253469],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001324258,0.000007649042,0.0003872286,0.00005545791,0.00000337758,0.000153819,0.2992168,0.00007068722,0.0001869997,0.6915323,0.004050305,0.004322043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002006095,0.00003050659,0.001490225,0.000799249,0.00001575308,0.0003154437,0.3213166,0.0003253406,0.0008859258,0.1894498,0.4853133,0.00003789079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1584577,0.0429161,0.008672914,0.4670601,0.001385802,0.00003604461,0.00007176049,0.00005475988,0.3213449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707334,0.0043991,0.0009167428,0.01330038,0.000297262,0.00002783559,0.00001108446,0.00002623997,0.01028793],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1306156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2597107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329438416","doi":"10.1177/1755088214533042","title":"Brown’s Paradox: Speed, <i>ressentiment</i> and global politics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reactionary; Politics; Resentment; Sociology; Power (physics); Contradiction; Subject (documents); Environmental ethics; Political economy; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Simon Glezos","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01407332154454717,"gpt":0.2985567920409959,"spread":0.2844834704964488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006881336,0.0003577073,0.0004458056,0.00125446,0.007598074,0.01021755,0.0009873328,0.003941749,0.005544635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01024328,0.0002369516,0.000384178,0.001652181,0.04025384,0.01309801,0.0070805,0.007669357,0.0005045044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008595362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006619245,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01141206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009968231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940256,0.003611771,0.0001083766,0.0005658897,0.001033841,0.0006543884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929318,0.00466465,0.0005339386,0.0006418162,0.000612343,0.0006154723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006578977,0.000004475396,0.0001433715,0.00001406669,0.00000184587,0.00003708197,0.004187014,0.0001034147,0.00004072076,0.9899966,0.003795766,0.001669233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001301094,0.00001148745,0.0003116255,0.00009155683,0.000003956774,0.0001119699,0.01025141,0.0004034887,0.0001507891,0.8584597,0.1301701,0.00002093965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0760914,0.01011774,0.01682979,0.3521367,0.00211709,0.00003392422,0.00005304534,0.0001113018,0.542509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951534,0.00207165,0.002170157,0.02450008,0.000583216,0.00004098042,0.0000157778,0.0001274032,0.01895657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01141206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06236398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079501509","doi":"10.3366/e175508821000042x","title":"Kant, International Law, and the Problem of Humanitarian Intervention","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Humanitarian intervention; Responsibility to protect; Principle of legality; Law; Intervention (counseling); Coercion (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; International law; Politics; Security dilemma; Sociology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Antonio Franceschet","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007495935423929406,"gpt":0.3078618922745757,"spread":0.3003659568506463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01073141,0.0006164849,0.000748514,0.00216602,0.008748331,0.01038285,0.001429903,0.01042311,0.003630489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01104018,0.0004728118,0.000734019,0.002433861,0.07587375,0.008735052,0.005012146,0.01031412,0.0005360352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008703387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00703721,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003791667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002883209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9884893,0.007577781,0.0003467822,0.000923573,0.001331368,0.001331229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926744,0.00550518,0.0005266129,0.0005940576,0.0004097221,0.0002901331],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002225418,0.00000243395,0.0000211753,0.000006935035,0.000001067787,0.000007332286,0.0002842945,0.0001231619,0.000004920261,0.9978166,0.000865769,0.0008641107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005482166,0.000003959924,0.00005311672,0.00004186215,0.000002211259,0.00001719106,0.0002623055,0.0001638258,0.00002198432,0.9821836,0.01723971,0.000004694971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0158543,0.03321873,0.03027615,0.2024253,0.001235522,0.00005175829,0.00005995713,0.00008208238,0.7167962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9326939,0.01095407,0.008085876,0.01796645,0.002024799,0.0001874245,0.00004703988,0.00009167207,0.02794876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01073141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06314772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316466952","doi":"10.1177/17550882221144643","title":"Rationalism and the “rational actor assumption” in realist international relations theory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Epistemology; Rationalism; Ecological rationality; Realism; Great Rationality Debate; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Brian C. Schmidt","is_ca":true},{"name":"Colin Wight","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02436730631115338,"gpt":0.3614746077903063,"spread":0.3371073014791529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009975749,0.000480403,0.0006818527,0.001571079,0.002521636,0.006446743,0.001456399,0.004045199,0.002584516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008072142,0.0004334251,0.0009459214,0.001582327,0.03536766,0.008754619,0.002660359,0.006648903,0.0005288974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005057965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002446711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002853953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001705831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916815,0.005453093,0.0002628086,0.0008064585,0.001288361,0.0005078263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942089,0.004213319,0.0004728192,0.0005369951,0.0003942255,0.0001738315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001476451,0.00000173725,0.00002230134,0.000005675235,0.000001117093,0.000005948304,0.0002206139,0.000151946,0.000008293698,0.9989721,0.0002161495,0.0003927044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003197081,0.000002653314,0.00004135025,0.00001724156,0.000001674462,0.00000789456,0.00009468192,0.0004558636,0.00002543359,0.9945044,0.004842368,0.000003303469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04490888,0.02487738,0.251188,0.1375709,0.001178765,0.000124388,0.0001763529,0.0001580665,0.5398173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471337,0.005578179,0.02942454,0.004967064,0.001201581,0.0002157771,0.00008065862,0.00008175866,0.01131671],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009975749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05275744,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074862659","doi":"10.1177/1755088214555596","title":"Scapegoat racism and the sacrificial politics of “security”","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Violence, Religion, and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Scapegoat; Racism; Politics; Sociology; Race (biology); Persecution; Security studies; Criminology; Gender studies; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Margaret Denike","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0258869274908025,"gpt":0.2646393626298035,"spread":0.238752435139001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002994796,0.0003429721,0.0002319543,0.0008640235,0.01002419,0.005676205,0.0007223626,0.002035575,0.001662786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003115579,0.000142345,0.0002462932,0.0005821253,0.05483812,0.003271004,0.00571443,0.00384803,0.0001744202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003936241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002305637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009434779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009574377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967178,0.002138626,0.00003840398,0.0002429928,0.0004184808,0.000443732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987588,0.0006341274,0.0001428413,0.0001827161,0.0001325375,0.0001489967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006697247,0.000004498829,0.0003535034,0.000007703605,0.000002189466,0.00003730466,0.04811336,0.00008042988,0.00009027035,0.9486317,0.0005822686,0.002089999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001303066,0.0000462672,0.003136643,0.0001659919,0.00001593952,0.0003634657,0.07087109,0.0006699057,0.0008773732,0.7143925,0.2094173,0.00003052726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3001797,0.003546205,0.01478468,0.02636111,0.0003057182,0.00002335905,0.00001510042,0.00003417095,0.6547499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945747,0.0002503579,0.0004205019,0.0005608991,0.00003129251,0.000006890737,0.00000270839,0.000007580339,0.004145112],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01002419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02855963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255632812","doi":"10.1177/1755088213507183","title":"Symposium: Maternal thinking for international relations? Papers in honor of Sara Ruddick","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; International relations; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Computer science; Internet privacy","authors":[{"name":"Fiona Robinson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Catia C. Confortini","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01584687597487063,"gpt":0.313847872583663,"spread":0.2980009966087924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004999055,0.001030694,0.00099666,0.0009152064,0.0042004,0.006366957,0.001314449,0.006279946,0.01516174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01339587,0.0003964047,0.0007861362,0.0007264442,0.002567497,0.004875802,0.004093684,0.01124344,0.003706052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003393652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003426865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003429664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006198037,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982059,0.00077922,0.00008548029,0.0003801772,0.0003164881,0.0002326875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932382,0.002422596,0.0003018001,0.0001946024,0.001989992,0.001852737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004609821,0.00002555783,0.0001057678,0.00008716999,0.000009597578,0.00005445192,0.0005320788,0.00004041976,0.0001104337,0.007318201,0.9834166,0.008253703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002544129,0.00002617793,0.0006737497,0.0004452369,0.00002270763,0.00008442896,0.002289957,0.00008130084,0.0001791547,0.005546516,0.9906036,0.00002167703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.001050926,0.03934218,0.0002316412,0.7913092,0.1583446,0.00001629782,0.00006585381,0.00001714892,0.009622139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08471855,0.1001106,0.001160322,0.2291825,0.4004835,0.000227872,0.0002433621,0.0002040282,0.1836694],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01516174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05072111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379389365","doi":"10.1177/17550882231178884","title":"Rethinking the political in the pluriverse: The ethico-political significance of care","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Foregrounding; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Political philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Maggie FitzGerald","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05752746537160647,"gpt":0.3902646340341692,"spread":0.3327371686625627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01057686,0.0003366974,0.0004180978,0.001329771,0.008975515,0.01193839,0.001120433,0.003887535,0.002028355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008159262,0.000250354,0.0003477215,0.0008448182,0.1075606,0.01231372,0.007696591,0.008840935,0.0002202417],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009338577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007274559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005423961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007561326,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908495,0.007051626,0.0001070626,0.0005069521,0.0009385097,0.0005465254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918082,0.00640868,0.0004621934,0.0004392831,0.0004894098,0.0003922658],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001795359,0.000002325447,0.00004088752,0.000006050912,5.193099e-7,0.00001547832,0.006347538,0.00003122769,0.0000145144,0.9919779,0.0005064256,0.001055269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000996273,0.00001847045,0.0003080949,0.0001763186,0.00000353917,0.00008597518,0.01390038,0.0003099817,0.0001416664,0.8664894,0.1185417,0.00001465369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06380837,0.01129248,0.04870456,0.3685831,0.002193518,0.00005811449,0.00002788563,0.0000415251,0.5052904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734387,0.002274078,0.003137972,0.011617,0.0006286768,0.00005647078,0.000008280012,0.00004693627,0.00879186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01193839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06775641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955238354","doi":"10.1177/1755088219860858","title":"Potentiality, political protest and constituent power: A response to the special issue","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Opposition (politics); Epistemology; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Social science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Michael P. A. Murphy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01223956724919104,"gpt":0.3298534615171496,"spread":0.3176138942679585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01295513,0.001324439,0.002392265,0.003490118,0.008635022,0.01664442,0.004269449,0.02231544,0.006058811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02672595,0.0008980866,0.001925806,0.004257673,0.02484915,0.02323507,0.01030642,0.03832651,0.001316483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006574936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006799229,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003195612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00585284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920744,0.003798933,0.000552869,0.00125792,0.001423898,0.0008919468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738429,0.01986936,0.001036131,0.0008659443,0.002911835,0.001473841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002751909,0.00006329217,0.0003852098,0.0002185539,0.00001146021,0.0002017203,0.003626293,0.0001286455,0.00006056945,0.1528005,0.8327937,0.009682582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002260679,0.00004040411,0.001178613,0.0006893631,0.00001740769,0.0004028565,0.007683877,0.0005743893,0.00007400234,0.08986098,0.8993903,0.00006523408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001099401,0.01648137,0.0007731219,0.8696151,0.1058567,0.00001780766,0.0000443518,0.00002383702,0.006088311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05004961,0.03751294,0.002268221,0.3963733,0.4927496,0.0002623148,0.0001639949,0.0002764974,0.02034355],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02231544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06851411,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234880639","doi":"10.1177/1743453x0700300205","title":"Is Workfare Egalitarian?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Workfare; Entitlement (fair division); Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Politics; Citizenship; Welfare state; Basic income; Social citizenship; Economics; Sociology; Welfare; Political economy; Political science; Economic system; Law; Social science; Microeconomics","authors":[{"name":"N. Hibbert","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03797498586827643,"gpt":0.4172372418689003,"spread":0.3792622560006239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009351303,0.0002913106,0.0005871447,0.001191212,0.005228214,0.01053209,0.001602524,0.006024167,0.005857287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01382234,0.0002524348,0.0004651406,0.001216697,0.04225188,0.008464832,0.004825206,0.00578936,0.001029586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004696929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003817916,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002982548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00295004,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918759,0.003290568,0.0001623216,0.001280175,0.001315998,0.002074952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941174,0.00246731,0.001150052,0.001149053,0.0006918847,0.0004243533],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001023905,0.000009911067,0.0004133976,0.00001326369,0.000006074603,0.00002418947,0.001599454,0.00006362842,0.00002586706,0.9922612,0.001236754,0.004336029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001171742,0.0000135077,0.001170964,0.0001234113,0.00001086998,0.00005130022,0.002407707,0.0001808472,0.000206453,0.9354462,0.06036537,0.00001163648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08292127,0.004940342,0.02896457,0.2376561,0.0009127739,0.00005186312,0.0000665372,0.00005845403,0.644428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691793,0.001364671,0.001519041,0.01531285,0.0004490812,0.00004506156,0.00001855637,0.00002920679,0.01208236],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01053209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04945499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904617869","doi":"10.1177/1755088218814038","title":"Defining a relationship between transitional justice and <i>jus post bellum</i> : A call and an opportunity for post-conflict justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Transitional justice; Economic Justice; Jus ad bellum; Relation (database); Scope (computer science); Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Criminology; Law and economics; International law; Use of force; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Kirsten J. Fisher","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05094727598569326,"gpt":0.3797413628914925,"spread":0.3287940869057993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01021772,0.0003019705,0.0007624588,0.002608701,0.01208238,0.01630389,0.001850653,0.003648174,0.003686375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01585247,0.0003048826,0.0005018306,0.002305973,0.05895058,0.01752509,0.02055781,0.01006025,0.0002622223],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008817004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01170287,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007389589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01408746,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920962,0.004149396,0.0002625862,0.0003742407,0.0007011448,0.002416557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882406,0.006253328,0.00194337,0.0005636476,0.0009909953,0.00200815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003890826,0.00004426899,0.004642293,0.0001223562,0.000007348748,0.0002956631,0.08539014,0.00005521536,0.000127916,0.8936751,0.001594867,0.01400573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008683583,0.0001091191,0.01909305,0.001349359,0.00001780767,0.0005443826,0.4261059,0.0002917488,0.0004138594,0.4816342,0.07035907,0.00007271938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3499056,0.02611039,0.02226976,0.2270761,0.001763795,0.0001905476,0.0000893799,0.00007922616,0.3725153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915765,0.001479761,0.001340511,0.003510522,0.0001384365,0.00008839943,0.00001287303,0.00001720794,0.001835844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01630389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06397212,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572338458","doi":"10.1177/1755088216687783","title":"The Law of Peoples as inclusive international justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"China; Politics; Economic Justice; Duty; Law; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Political philosophy; Political science; International law; Rule of law; Peaceful coexistence; Chinese law; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Municipal law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Zhichao Tong","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03769398107149594,"gpt":0.4201988635511015,"spread":0.3825048824796056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004862519,0.0003555816,0.0003455351,0.00124618,0.005007366,0.007121165,0.0009405898,0.003323274,0.003456157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005472533,0.0002341492,0.0004933155,0.001071235,0.04394405,0.007621805,0.005541394,0.004464534,0.000389926],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004711017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005752881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009351202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007661679,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958313,0.001666523,0.0001433556,0.0005119626,0.001147325,0.0006994096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982921,0.0007046307,0.0001946016,0.0003487703,0.0002661538,0.0001937997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001050455,0.000001998663,0.00007318693,0.000004754339,0.000001004634,0.00001341231,0.001318544,0.0000496311,0.00001735784,0.997099,0.0005115381,0.0009084205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008503016,0.00001381087,0.000419426,0.00005775311,0.000006230463,0.000042601,0.001869458,0.0003226344,0.0001210645,0.911768,0.08536102,0.000009558612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05097014,0.004271815,0.02924121,0.04545329,0.0008265125,0.00009224322,0.00004526667,0.00008746448,0.8690121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9534376,0.001180646,0.002874431,0.006648526,0.0005163488,0.0001148119,0.00001904496,0.0000371405,0.03517149],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009351202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111118299","doi":"10.1177/1755088220981093","title":"Introduction: Why read Reinhold Niebuhr now?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Power (physics); Politics; Cruelty; Liberalism; Communism; Religious studies; Sociology; Enlightenment; Philosophy; Law; Theology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Liane Hartnett","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lucian M. Ashworth","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06336651254960735,"gpt":0.2808230444798089,"spread":0.2174565319302016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002238877,0.001053841,0.0009115952,0.0016895,0.003117257,0.006857741,0.001401416,0.006485039,0.05182705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01273077,0.0003556905,0.0004634501,0.001543144,0.002162765,0.01054277,0.002424157,0.00916352,0.02999333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002100836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002090966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004911853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006138703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986296,0.0003269029,0.00007847113,0.00035882,0.000440642,0.0001656826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943739,0.00231096,0.0002853248,0.0002254704,0.002098077,0.0007062334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006857235,0.000004974156,0.00005296969,0.00004936051,0.000001016283,0.00001804079,0.0001329569,0.000005758445,0.00002344885,0.002851782,0.9922191,0.004633768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003364409,0.000007643748,0.000285141,0.000248383,0.000001771591,0.00004014085,0.0003521132,0.00001714572,0.00003209507,0.001771363,0.9972339,0.000006939206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004555294,0.04070958,0.0004208884,0.5122929,0.4132456,0.00002565731,0.0003012046,0.0001646285,0.03238394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01231032,0.03554025,0.0005444095,0.3271318,0.4345632,0.00009678423,0.000558652,0.0005674665,0.1886871],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05182705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1733787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381052104","doi":"10.1177/17550882231181422","title":"Building the pluriverse with care","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Ethics of care; Generative grammar; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Maggie FitzGerald","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03790506225177424,"gpt":0.3727108677247483,"spread":0.3348058054729741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0150985,0.0005872695,0.0006381187,0.001089424,0.009120042,0.009932315,0.001364246,0.005869702,0.004134322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01516484,0.0004021044,0.0007145324,0.0005862326,0.08859175,0.0201852,0.02039468,0.01089793,0.0008283834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007185177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009756109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004128195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004905734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9881749,0.007688951,0.0003213022,0.001271309,0.0014193,0.001124229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930862,0.003683594,0.0004837287,0.001313929,0.0006460846,0.0007865309],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001755756,0.000002617382,0.0001068649,0.00001280464,0.000001795549,0.00002374017,0.006302894,0.0000637511,0.00002575296,0.9900141,0.001431512,0.002012503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005549368,0.0000167245,0.0001309501,0.000175164,0.000005075349,0.0001093119,0.005325527,0.0002782259,0.0001758365,0.8653498,0.1284125,0.00001537441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04400841,0.004151559,0.1023796,0.2313109,0.001689617,0.0001326505,0.0000518383,0.0001811275,0.6160944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9301457,0.001328787,0.01245245,0.02418078,0.0003240225,0.0002145635,0.00003439186,0.000201147,0.0311181],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0150985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07984942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112048689","doi":"10.1177/1755088220979728","title":"Re-reading Niebuhr’s <i>The Children of Light and the Children of Darkness</i> : The crisis of democracy in an interdependent world then and now","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Impossibility; Democracy; Settlement (finance); Argument (complex analysis); Theme (computing); Sociology; Reading (process); Interdependence; Political economy; Politics; History; Law; Political science; Social science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Lucian M. Ashworth","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00833632137754686,"gpt":0.224822253879283,"spread":0.2164859325017361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001230927,0.0004379784,0.000339578,0.0008528105,0.004500189,0.004704535,0.0007249895,0.00196288,0.003787245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002355313,0.0002320185,0.0001909987,0.000917005,0.01458172,0.009123659,0.002276624,0.006029134,0.0004231923],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00487418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003219901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02311912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05632406,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991512,0.0004415753,0.00001637751,0.00008845059,0.0001771868,0.0001250306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986627,0.0009530945,0.0000974619,0.00004769896,0.0001312384,0.0001078391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002791503,0.00001668144,0.00057478,0.0001176929,0.000007204415,0.0002143194,0.0672649,0.0001085744,0.0002853992,0.7940568,0.1252397,0.01208608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006396526,0.00001582995,0.0008186292,0.0003301605,0.000005515391,0.0001561063,0.02510757,0.00004786605,0.0001869551,0.07207187,0.9012368,0.00001636149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05239752,0.08942258,0.003436192,0.3300855,0.00752142,0.00004428235,0.0002115048,0.00006708439,0.516814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7259763,0.03406039,0.00228241,0.04827904,0.002751852,0.00009112356,0.00008392559,0.0001732974,0.1863017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02311912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04596913,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189474062","doi":"10.1177/17550882211036635","title":"In the eyes of all mankind: Interests and independence in Vattelian statehood","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Soviet and Russian History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Frost","is_ca":true},{"name":"Rebekah K. Pullen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02329617307235494,"gpt":0.3607489412515763,"spread":0.3374527681792214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002879776,0.0001848017,0.0001990607,0.0008860269,0.007423442,0.007051351,0.0005258981,0.002223553,0.001752191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003368262,0.0001957351,0.0002516499,0.0005859491,0.02959796,0.005523999,0.006158978,0.003493725,0.0002434428],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004425155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002603769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006272817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007469554,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979764,0.001163727,0.00004061357,0.0002290564,0.000178047,0.0004121721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988728,0.0006857168,0.0001125241,0.0001074606,0.0001046618,0.0001167845],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004126714,0.000003526152,0.0001176184,0.000002344483,7.240139e-7,0.0000230666,0.008099166,0.00004339821,0.00002295939,0.9901574,0.0004085472,0.001117104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001600892,0.00001232859,0.0004569195,0.00005647654,0.000003508455,0.00005378421,0.005414051,0.0002537984,0.0001438041,0.9413337,0.052243,0.00001252336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1511447,0.004748308,0.008949742,0.03364801,0.0001797785,0.0000256832,0.00002530733,0.00001790178,0.8012607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885976,0.0003281877,0.000469941,0.00096582,0.00005391427,0.00002144576,0.000005058532,0.000006733614,0.009551284],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007423442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03210688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951762308","doi":"10.1177/1755088219852646","title":"Global justice, sovereignty, and the problem of perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Global justice; Economic Justice; Sovereignty; Sociology; Framing (construction); Public international law; Law; Theory of criminal justice; Public sphere; Law and economics; Realm; Political science; International law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer Szende","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02012461258210399,"gpt":0.3559391360233175,"spread":0.3358145234412135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01097028,0.0005090765,0.000882022,0.001764714,0.009733534,0.01268077,0.001294997,0.005138326,0.003053016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008553812,0.0003827138,0.0007830846,0.001475955,0.08265456,0.01739251,0.01276443,0.01060396,0.0003128206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006350002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004758311,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004375185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003674134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906428,0.006211441,0.0002015129,0.0009423835,0.001104273,0.0008975468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926701,0.004946567,0.0005351205,0.0008495137,0.0005154701,0.0004832706],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001239862,0.000001491314,0.00003729018,0.000003572799,0.000001085291,0.00001119279,0.001429244,0.00003343984,0.00000875788,0.9977755,0.0001525834,0.0005445531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041741,0.000003491146,0.00005095271,0.00002577348,0.00000229846,0.00002350151,0.001219673,0.00007960268,0.00002854712,0.9901804,0.008377967,0.000003527929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0606725,0.009237445,0.05948113,0.1552778,0.000805334,0.00003619323,0.00006253432,0.00006084577,0.7143661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852338,0.001735388,0.003064044,0.004727604,0.0003123229,0.00005054099,0.0000213964,0.00003951677,0.004815419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01268077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05801708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542139064","doi":"10.1177/1755088216673078","title":"Caught between vulgar and effete realists: Critical theory, classical realism and mythographies of power","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Realism; Temporality; Sociology; Geopolitics; Mythology; Dialectic; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Power (physics); State of exception; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Timothy W. Luke","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02067468740697245,"gpt":0.3547124768272814,"spread":0.3340377894203089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01022885,0.000602111,0.0005654662,0.005367505,0.008432188,0.01483306,0.001464584,0.002820726,0.002593087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01253822,0.000425762,0.0004009129,0.003036363,0.09512983,0.02175651,0.005705039,0.004895621,0.00027422],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0092555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003082297,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003192972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002643147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9901116,0.007971099,0.0001202559,0.0005159883,0.0007790418,0.0005019414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874264,0.01056535,0.0006083829,0.0006835486,0.000440442,0.0002759041],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008600872,0.000005471877,0.00007987418,0.00002607003,0.000002710649,0.00004383792,0.0293858,0.00007346077,0.00002993155,0.9680913,0.0006545618,0.001598438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001106919,0.00000861133,0.0001144878,0.0001724378,0.000003365723,0.00005771867,0.02599864,0.0003521068,0.000113689,0.9477259,0.02543376,0.000008276232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2379003,0.02806582,0.06680679,0.09713084,0.00162343,0.0001526052,0.0001026209,0.0001066356,0.5681109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889797,0.001813909,0.002783674,0.001364397,0.0002416146,0.00007953551,0.00002061724,0.00005593071,0.004660675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01483306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06715363,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387860917","doi":"10.1177/17550882231197720","title":"Impartial third and disinterested judgment: Kojève and Arendt’s cosmopolitan phenomenologies of human rights as a response to Schmitt","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Normative; Human rights; Law; Realm; Contradiction; Political philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Bogdan Ovcharuk","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03329648522562954,"gpt":0.3848538846497691,"spread":0.3515573994241395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00603014,0.0004239607,0.000429837,0.001389327,0.008227114,0.009024232,0.001664808,0.006135539,0.001868621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009062318,0.0003327508,0.0005937588,0.001034049,0.0672302,0.01563924,0.005366566,0.007406385,0.0002475636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006592182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002710796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005824895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004090657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939814,0.004039768,0.0001074685,0.0004652718,0.0009568724,0.0004492441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960809,0.002860696,0.0002301386,0.0003342485,0.0003072552,0.0001866953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006597324,0.000009976836,0.00007683507,0.0000137648,0.000001957363,0.0001413696,0.0945464,0.00009356916,0.0001146379,0.9029251,0.0009131489,0.001156662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001648717,0.00002063703,0.0002893418,0.0001579091,0.000005854633,0.0004504642,0.0775963,0.0007501697,0.0003236574,0.8041741,0.1161703,0.0000449168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2507296,0.00718881,0.05214551,0.09553132,0.001121438,0.0001057512,0.00005584593,0.00009207104,0.5930297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871202,0.0006511414,0.001818355,0.002735205,0.00009164259,0.00005439356,0.00001109506,0.00003180352,0.007486199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009024232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04782987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377242283","doi":"10.1177/17550882231169489","title":"A human right to political membership &amp; the right to territory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Politics; Human rights; Sovereignty; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics","authors":[{"name":"Afifa Khwaja","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07290947138363313,"gpt":0.4059478553666996,"spread":0.3330383839830665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003087873,0.0002911926,0.0003047806,0.0006898994,0.005056171,0.006866434,0.0007536382,0.004814269,0.01554546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002930122,0.0002285088,0.000360561,0.0007187175,0.03301774,0.005548054,0.00513358,0.003891095,0.002117045],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00208947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002504653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004651259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005417555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956696,0.002522205,0.0001272301,0.0005338771,0.0006359193,0.0005110997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998199,0.0008507137,0.0001688514,0.0003432821,0.0002214419,0.000216638],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002571919,0.000003801322,0.00007153011,0.00001087047,0.000001077793,0.00001929666,0.001786611,0.00004019163,0.00006939439,0.9931022,0.002441383,0.002451075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005928739,0.00001394765,0.0007270396,0.0001227266,0.000003723914,0.0001674594,0.002671021,0.0001909275,0.0002700061,0.7325729,0.2632366,0.00001775404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01434988,0.002379992,0.01465898,0.03435114,0.0004209526,0.00002791015,0.0001180091,0.00004719476,0.933646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8884196,0.00153866,0.008250714,0.00681424,0.000393264,0.0001413824,0.00009721766,0.00006276772,0.09428221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01554546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05200475,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328375590","doi":"10.1177/1755088215573093","title":"Rethinking states in international politics: Introduction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; International relations; Political economy; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Antonio Franceschet","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02509449535912566,"gpt":0.3389629346593855,"spread":0.3138684393002598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00272516,0.001098444,0.0009425773,0.002562305,0.003289213,0.00832502,0.001764889,0.005253782,0.0117696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004518898,0.0006085348,0.0007491915,0.004312314,0.01926352,0.01749883,0.00599979,0.009162377,0.001038301],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003828133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002214912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004238796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006354062,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985999,0.000746116,0.00005499314,0.0002539408,0.0002078515,0.0001371979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949151,0.004012718,0.0002230282,0.0003791626,0.0003130586,0.0001569014],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009527845,0.00001558411,0.000194287,0.0001974955,0.000006957,0.000027564,0.003246446,0.0003035459,0.0001218434,0.9762118,0.006049107,0.0136158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008715567,0.00002935812,0.0005515007,0.0006433845,0.00001443763,0.00006179393,0.002602087,0.000576179,0.000181914,0.7402512,0.2550512,0.00002811394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03382703,0.2944774,0.07153694,0.2695332,0.02339396,0.0001770529,0.0005718476,0.0003035346,0.306179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6541378,0.1444822,0.03322953,0.05581455,0.04177209,0.0006770619,0.0003932477,0.0007418511,0.06875161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0117696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03937322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243231905","doi":"10.1177/1743453x0500100110","title":"Book Review: The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Criminology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"A. Plaw","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0965919479108357,"gpt":0.3748351379764756,"spread":0.2782431900656399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001478163,0.001225939,0.001956427,0.003543291,0.001863388,0.005116481,0.001552596,0.007014356,0.02540208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00971865,0.0005782425,0.000514376,0.006423983,0.003363613,0.004168124,0.001390727,0.007813464,0.01059397],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004249316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004966664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008877466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03211295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985676,0.0004637359,0.00008094731,0.0001597881,0.0006475374,0.00008037224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895862,0.00673514,0.0004474714,0.0001995518,0.002526725,0.0005049279],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003482949,0.000004092984,0.00002026794,0.0002043597,0.000002857993,0.000007935766,0.00002755306,0.0000289052,0.00000914994,0.001983804,0.9904128,0.007294875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007983703,0.000009057942,0.0002622016,0.00125637,0.000007607989,0.00009186254,0.000104722,0.00004905348,0.00001935952,0.003961089,0.9942217,0.000008927579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002746461,0.647677,0.0005758297,0.1591775,0.1449705,0.00006046116,0.000285706,0.00004516962,0.04693318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007027581,0.4813279,0.0007750551,0.1195976,0.2118477,0.0001837457,0.0004664778,0.0001895771,0.1785844],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02540208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0849784,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380610366","doi":"10.1177/17550882231182169","title":"Beyond ‘globalizing’ care: Care ethics for the pluriverse","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Communitarianism; Dualism; Criticism; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Liberalism; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Fiona Robinson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1412130201669691,"gpt":0.5528811106299262,"spread":0.411668090462957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01290319,0.0007588682,0.0006213795,0.0009045222,0.005728497,0.01167106,0.001207895,0.01012209,0.004952404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01299151,0.0002110297,0.0005302118,0.001157336,0.05751089,0.01919196,0.01429383,0.01492883,0.001024173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005638489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009613406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003874935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005575712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9878226,0.008599654,0.0002541513,0.0007375521,0.001600021,0.0009861108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924191,0.004726495,0.0003997492,0.0008060245,0.0006691578,0.0009794851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008311352,0.00000682675,0.0001643235,0.00006736566,0.000003330474,0.00005210304,0.00818022,0.0000885141,0.00004987563,0.9680225,0.01494444,0.008412128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008682792,0.00002024791,0.0002596367,0.0005766494,0.000004825618,0.0001478318,0.006734686,0.0001866785,0.00008965743,0.7511098,0.2408469,0.00001437485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01141359,0.04024225,0.02578162,0.6349339,0.005260805,0.00004893705,0.00004147772,0.00007592353,0.2822015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6639954,0.02366742,0.01328928,0.252294,0.006651501,0.0002151763,0.00009244483,0.0003164954,0.03947826],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01290319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06823945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612527315","doi":"10.1177/1755088217705893","title":"Adam Smith: So what if the sovereign shares in ignorance?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Politics; International relations; Law; Sociology; Economics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Lev Marder","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06143409351898797,"gpt":0.3856862017956098,"spread":0.3242521082766218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002644251,0.0003651114,0.0004777354,0.0004991714,0.003227438,0.004126703,0.0005863517,0.003911695,0.004786257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006227147,0.0002201298,0.0003028634,0.0007248286,0.01606609,0.01033524,0.001788448,0.006548264,0.0007970291],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002822102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001494036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005790894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003932702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984237,0.0008731502,0.00004560848,0.0002412185,0.0002444136,0.0001718587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984636,0.0009226096,0.0001616464,0.00009682451,0.0002123986,0.0001429892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002156826,0.00001096104,0.0006615738,0.00005433057,0.00001303421,0.000250954,0.01048516,0.0001085484,0.0002267598,0.9434187,0.03673031,0.008018227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001086496,0.00001926286,0.0006671966,0.0001857947,0.00001266883,0.0002953566,0.010533,0.0003039659,0.0005797185,0.7460318,0.2413355,0.00002482968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0347742,0.02062225,0.01032564,0.7060307,0.002227488,0.00003813714,0.0001057436,0.00004052112,0.2258354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.841671,0.01001114,0.003285357,0.08673286,0.001720878,0.00005011029,0.00005864378,0.00006434497,0.05640565],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005790894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02047586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918818536","doi":"10.1177/1755088219833416","title":"Revisiting Rosa Luxemburg’s internationalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalism (politics); Eurocentrism; Political economy; Politics; Militarism; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Robert O’Brien","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02331127467741932,"gpt":0.3606040081813228,"spread":0.3372927335039035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004467597,0.00059301,0.0003620621,0.001733393,0.004466421,0.006029097,0.000990272,0.002872163,0.00449779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004787825,0.0002232247,0.0004713511,0.0009285486,0.0212953,0.008715734,0.005129359,0.00624391,0.0007883253],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01054321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003299829,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00548706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007602102,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971353,0.001646519,0.0000821222,0.0003246305,0.0003799408,0.000431493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988441,0.0007035712,0.0001004036,0.0001007104,0.0001507144,0.0001003999],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004022627,0.000004380326,0.00004760151,0.00001822374,0.000001205931,0.00006731383,0.005651264,0.00004336015,0.00005513757,0.9811833,0.0101756,0.0027486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001190697,0.00001929762,0.0003213098,0.000193734,0.000003648557,0.0001649182,0.004248043,0.0002231818,0.0001717394,0.2874945,0.7071318,0.00001591786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03849019,0.01780629,0.01181626,0.417003,0.007267525,0.00008386868,0.00008072505,0.000106187,0.5073459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8243376,0.007424633,0.00726079,0.04494709,0.003566647,0.0002430066,0.00006734837,0.0002136244,0.1119392],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01054321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07649672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}