{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":19,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":19,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"dbe9a93fb984","filters":{"venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development"}},"results":[{"id":"W2312023466","doi":"10.1057/jird.2016.6","title":"Narrative practice in international politics and diplomacy: the case of the Crimean crisis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development","topic":"Public Relations and Crisis Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Diplomacy; International relations; Public diplomacy; Negotiation; State (computer science); Politics; Political science; Sociology; International political economy; Political economy; Media studies; Law; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02068308376390178,"gpt":0.3551323443988018,"spread":0.3344492606349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001169246,0.0000497921,0.00007020343,0.0001386005,0.0003591883,0.00006149648,0.000254245,0.00003966816,0.00009442285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001748833,0.00002557897,0.00002895102,0.0001275657,0.0001626933,0.0005466841,0.00009786269,0.0001283603,0.000001324788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001718276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003248883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002939745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003763514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989443,0.0001943749,0.0004311378,0.00006151957,0.0002984676,0.00007024679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979701,0.0008083894,0.0004254722,0.00008625402,0.0006695641,0.00004024583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003605433,0.000203465,0.04279036,0.000002081988,0.00027826,0.00002183297,0.1835379,0.00004397707,0.00005732748,0.7238114,0.004180565,0.04503674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001076695,0.00003130707,0.151889,0.0001716766,0.00003658369,0.0005822033,0.1884239,0.0001135455,0.00008543763,0.02572052,0.6317292,0.0001398638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7593392,0.0006135555,0.002379151,0.1894746,0.0005956732,0.0001740252,0.000006468889,0.000004659767,0.04741271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952201,0.0006530545,0.003064784,0.0001771754,0.00005070026,0.000003782231,5.188505e-7,0.000002794993,0.0008271391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6980909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2762622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739567860","doi":"10.1057/s41268-017-0112-2","title":"Performing solidarity: whiteness and status-seeking in the non-aligned world","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Racism; Colonialism; Sociology; International relations; Gender studies; Ignorance; Political science; Context (archaeology); Political economy; Law; Politics; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03462343992744512,"gpt":0.2586971722660515,"spread":0.2240737323386064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002887997,0.00005620983,0.00009002435,0.0001259277,0.0005286672,0.0003276917,0.0001321771,0.00001512234,0.0001281932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000692469,0.00003595143,0.00002010127,0.00001006781,0.00009104702,0.0003768094,0.00004215593,0.0001091711,0.000003686049],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006399387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007898384,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005708917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000563395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999361,0.00001232348,0.000292041,0.00005535677,0.0001908151,0.00008839848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995283,0.00007918266,0.0001778495,0.00005031884,0.0001191699,0.00004510308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005721172,0.0001421249,0.1920939,0.00001958558,0.0001058701,0.00005075494,0.05471398,0.00001617091,0.00001402809,0.7069603,0.001124798,0.04470125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005410179,0.00003302635,0.2516102,0.0001297959,0.00001000681,0.000023482,0.002809679,0.002169318,0.000002342467,0.00687822,0.735679,0.000113827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7921063,0.0002189316,0.000862539,0.004720707,0.0007345133,0.00007477657,0.00000554982,0.000003110717,0.2012736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936416,0.00002799394,0.0005413192,0.0001728886,0.000160793,0.000002230109,0.000002174986,0.000002932538,0.005448055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7345542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4066134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296701614","doi":"10.1057/s41268-022-00275-x","title":"The LIO’s growing democracy gap: an endogenous source of polity contestation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung; Université de Montréal; Universität Wien","keywords":"Polity; Legitimation; Technocracy; Democratic deficit; Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Politics; Political economy; Normative; Law and economics; International political economy; Political science; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04229658822645385,"gpt":0.3016687154531524,"spread":0.2593721272266986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001681349,0.00006143343,0.00009023231,0.0001755003,0.001428815,0.00007410259,0.0002884768,0.00002152303,0.000363999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000348993,0.00005045124,0.00004404827,0.0001189648,0.00008310547,0.0004565682,0.0000749927,0.000169042,0.000004400219],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003423447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007149687,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001289633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007244752,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982748,0.0001472932,0.0005358562,0.00007764342,0.0008467814,0.0001175928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984565,0.0003523748,0.0004936403,0.00004256742,0.0005870929,0.00006780794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002583987,0.0004186023,0.120452,0.000006549721,0.0004859222,0.00002552153,0.06068024,0.003385303,0.001018418,0.7259333,0.002878605,0.0844572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000954489,0.0001344212,0.1238061,0.00004281979,0.00001979758,0.0001335519,0.02866537,0.0005276469,0.0004380571,0.02321903,0.8218373,0.0002213845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9285535,0.0003859958,0.006111145,0.01100448,0.001767849,0.0002096175,0.00000907184,0.0000164756,0.05194187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930375,0.00008595267,0.003402692,0.0001289924,0.0001128492,0.000006140118,0.00001032641,0.000005161229,0.003210366],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8189587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171676075","doi":"10.1057/jird.2010.16","title":"Civilianising warfare: ways of war and peace in modern counterinsurgency","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Toronto; National Security Agency; World Bank Group; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Interventionism (politics); International relations; Political economy; Politics; Political science; Doctrine; Corporate governance; Humanitarian intervention; Collective security; Global governance; Law; Sociology; Economics; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06563001004201836,"gpt":0.2950105543871558,"spread":0.2293805443451374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006565711,0.00005392852,0.0001016178,0.0001953922,0.00009466094,0.00001503644,0.0001130823,0.00004871031,0.0001772408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001913757,0.00004985078,0.00002360626,0.0000662957,0.00007245217,0.0002930789,0.00003287996,0.0001315392,0.000001561244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001228999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001817954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002186174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001997699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990609,0.00003045829,0.0004057812,0.00007359163,0.0003453872,0.00008384079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993375,0.00006950907,0.0002344311,0.00002704795,0.0002800069,0.00005151378],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001790474,0.0005154714,0.6097617,0.00003053667,0.0002971414,0.00007365928,0.2224631,0.0001094664,0.001059814,0.1010593,0.008235225,0.05621561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008288379,0.00006718945,0.742614,0.0003680791,0.00001154254,0.00006283379,0.005174225,0.0006461907,0.0005708794,0.009145587,0.2402901,0.0002205387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677051,0.001654998,0.005085185,0.001535329,0.0002981165,0.00005049343,0.000002812988,0.000004938151,0.02366297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895368,0.001864997,0.008248849,0.00009833297,0.00004965348,0.000001063116,0.000001012085,0.000003177903,0.0001961444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2320549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2032856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982193338","doi":"10.1057/jird.2011.15","title":"Making serious measures: numerical indices, peer review, and transnational actor-networks","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Copenhagen Business School","keywords":"Governmentality; Actor–network theory; Relevance (law); Sociology; Corporate governance; Development studies; International political economy; Global governance; Empirical research; International relations; Epistemology; Positive economics; Politics; Social science; Political science; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07319963904797265,"gpt":0.3425993906747211,"spread":0.2693997516267484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001401094,0.00008450745,0.0001421433,0.0001533064,0.000276068,0.00006295773,0.0001757107,0.00006937485,0.0006714683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004654993,0.00007412866,0.00004248272,0.00009717586,0.00008212309,0.0003836306,0.00002934024,0.0002287334,0.000003611866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001672892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002648178,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002752507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006036763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983594,0.00006824988,0.0004431522,0.000107069,0.0009064508,0.0001156958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984739,0.00009824168,0.0002976296,0.00003134735,0.0009904046,0.0001084466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002413953,0.0006949984,0.1495972,0.00007446665,0.001504699,0.00006653689,0.06704177,0.0002023646,0.00003810586,0.6054608,0.06384256,0.1112351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002977417,0.00002520178,0.148946,0.0002034755,0.00003633407,0.00006549206,0.0005230996,0.000114153,0.000007694967,0.0009405907,0.8487074,0.0001328715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2517706,0.06582881,0.2507375,0.1021735,0.005501357,0.001172387,0.00005939955,0.0001496732,0.3226067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829381,0.003594524,0.01144057,0.000433845,0.0001422433,0.000004568482,0.000007294881,0.000005885174,0.001432997],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7848648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7352107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306776525","doi":"10.1057/s41268-022-00279-7","title":"Resilience, gender, and conflict: thinking about resilience in a multidimensional way","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Peacebuilding; Sierra leone; Scholarship; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); International relations; Reflexivity; Disarmament; Conflict resolution; Interdependence; Indigenous; Development studies; Psychological intervention; Resilience (materials science); Political science; Development economics; Political economy; Social science; Politics; Law; Psychology; Socioeconomics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01941715673524666,"gpt":0.323877958416753,"spread":0.3044608016815064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00273959,0.0001694517,0.0002683038,0.0006070013,0.0006611201,0.0001541311,0.0004126989,0.0002488331,0.000618412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002554993,0.0001634764,0.00005878742,0.0001701726,0.0001845979,0.0004105425,0.0002279769,0.001025635,0.00000547922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008124129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001603699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003624104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003151036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962391,0.0001731748,0.0008306106,0.0002793905,0.002267146,0.0002106238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972527,0.001162836,0.0006896369,0.000068224,0.0006836902,0.0001429129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000138174,0.0001797224,0.0107571,0.00001805976,0.0001649083,0.0000859491,0.0274491,0.0005718092,0.00002297066,0.02767763,0.9288906,0.004043942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052107,0.00002511557,0.02199768,0.0002119998,0.000009441253,0.00001350918,0.002082107,0.0001119323,0.000003472413,0.0006282384,0.9742233,0.0001721349],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.1243292,0.02252058,0.001311569,0.002379607,0.7673978,0.0005966215,0.0001486472,0.00005254132,0.08126341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3564679,0.09240203,0.07065422,0.0008058784,0.4295578,0.0001412038,0.00051979,0.0001467199,0.04930441],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.33784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6771178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080286430","doi":"10.1057/jird.2010.9","title":"The social purpose of new governance: Lisbon and the limits to legitimacy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Embeddedness; Neoliberalism (international relations); Legitimacy; Corporate governance; Hegemony; Context (archaeology); Economic system; Political economy; European union; Pledge; Economics; Political science; Politics; Sociology; International trade; Social science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02537642432368674,"gpt":0.3514087782759274,"spread":0.3260323539522407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007270594,0.00004144049,0.00008378414,0.00002847169,0.0009200939,0.00006565094,0.0001354958,0.00003532195,0.00001734514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000736737,0.00002116912,0.00003400677,0.00007360085,0.0002681619,0.0001128405,0.00004126068,0.000149449,0.000002263323],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003254921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003249946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001775936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008852099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992584,0.00002607499,0.0002623952,0.00003839256,0.0003389415,0.00007580091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991679,0.0002823193,0.0002332064,0.00002108043,0.000244457,0.00005104899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001170262,0.00002252822,0.005072252,0.000001401387,0.0001386336,7.290801e-7,0.08450403,0.000003757395,0.00003314319,0.7723575,0.01444008,0.1233089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007288684,0.00001512325,0.2361437,0.00002069363,0.00001188988,0.000005649694,0.006355654,0.000005120861,0.00004198624,0.01903797,0.737577,0.00005629096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6420878,0.0007933167,0.0004403841,0.2498184,0.00241991,0.0003199275,0.000005100733,0.000006748145,0.1041085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871114,0.001027821,0.001320113,0.0002398786,0.0008860955,0.000003528319,2.146192e-7,0.000002772511,0.009408208],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7533196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7076712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615213019","doi":"10.1057/s41268-017-0103-3","title":"Normative spaces and the UN Global Compact for transnational corporations: the norm diffusion paradox","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Brock University; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","keywords":"Normative; Norm (philosophy); Multinational corporation; Livelihood; Sociology; Corporate social responsibility; International relations; Global governance; Political science; Business ethics; Positive economics; Political economy; Economics; Public relations; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02492043264990865,"gpt":0.3186040393326366,"spread":0.2936836066827279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001318831,0.00008572704,0.0001182651,0.00005874167,0.002490931,0.0004981274,0.0003589183,0.00004223958,0.00009637344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005099917,0.00004828597,0.00005820391,0.00004032228,0.0004319833,0.0005503614,0.00004127399,0.0001085581,0.000003373162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001407468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003623761,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004443452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003929889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987964,0.00006036244,0.0004019792,0.00008097383,0.0005613142,0.00009898127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980951,0.0005001706,0.000623645,0.00005855543,0.0006670192,0.00005552363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001344011,0.0000327742,0.03429739,0.000001616989,0.0001569931,9.407559e-7,0.006179179,0.00003561853,0.00000206881,0.9524673,0.001335584,0.005356086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002171081,0.00002121389,0.7252904,0.00003884784,0.00002696999,0.00002608079,0.00227044,0.0007461684,0.00001752251,0.09042714,0.1788557,0.0001084303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4436015,0.0005704499,0.0432802,0.4435574,0.002427627,0.0009622343,0.00006616338,0.00001617709,0.06551824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931707,0.0001911052,0.00479152,0.0002318666,0.0001751339,0.00001191993,0.00001087774,0.000003097578,0.001413823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8620402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054092425","doi":"10.1057/jird.2010.12","title":"Ambiguous universalism: theorising race/nation/class in international relations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development","topic":"Political theory and Gramsci","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"International relations; Racism; Universalism; Sociology; Nationalism; International political economy; Gender studies; Eurocentrism; International relations theory; International studies; Political economy; Politics; Political science; Social science; Law; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01770167596299015,"gpt":0.3078972661936452,"spread":0.290195590230655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001397185,0.00008224136,0.0001161344,0.0004317444,0.000315943,0.0001237856,0.0002623109,0.0001119918,0.00149288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001192525,0.00007803438,0.00004901936,0.0001817773,0.0001751691,0.0006590188,0.00004742238,0.0004262554,0.00006107886],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000291746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005008628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001173847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003508093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986222,0.00008869721,0.0004982977,0.000111717,0.0005212058,0.0001578825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987774,0.0003112941,0.0002509909,0.00005642351,0.0004668518,0.0001369815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003123119,0.0001014556,0.01477122,7.801327e-7,0.00006059871,0.00001728863,0.007885551,0.0001663461,0.0001168999,0.9662075,0.0007736231,0.009867512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009297159,0.00001824579,0.0946552,0.00006622565,0.00001211371,0.00004498039,0.005754644,0.0003728089,0.00008576329,0.127586,0.7702891,0.0001851936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6486555,0.00006198137,0.01023909,0.01987761,0.004063858,0.0001346632,0.000009137112,0.00002370729,0.3169344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977886,0.00004171058,0.009466049,0.0001538555,0.0003382136,0.000002425821,0.000008611588,0.000006162279,0.01209696],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8386214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107711287","doi":"10.1057/s41268-020-00203-x","title":"Welfare and world money: the domestic foundations of currency internationalisation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development","topic":"Global Financial Crisis and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Currency; Internationalization; Economics; Reserve currency; Liberian dollar; China; Welfare; Element (criminal law); Politics; Devaluation; Market economy; Political science; Monetary economics; International trade; Finance; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03907205749315124,"gpt":0.2710398153553714,"spread":0.2319677578622201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002312853,0.0000609691,0.0001367272,0.0001693142,0.000105276,0.00005070409,0.000114099,0.00002131531,0.0002340615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000292519,0.00004985091,0.00003722701,0.0001359865,0.00004438459,0.0002058134,0.00004423331,0.00009433421,0.00001702126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004437453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003976722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002236121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001278397,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991457,0.000007751706,0.0006342395,0.00007674735,0.00008220585,0.00005332586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991544,0.00006531087,0.000520298,0.00003584621,0.0001763317,0.00004774516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001520129,0.00003332066,0.08995754,0.000008683327,0.00009539116,9.474998e-7,0.002610643,0.0002629982,0.000007305125,0.9009296,0.002280263,0.003798086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003449709,0.00003510801,0.44721,0.00002906411,0.000007849311,0.00001546224,0.0002664978,0.0008443497,0.00001672844,0.01449058,0.536661,0.00007844973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8248535,0.005959495,0.03849094,0.09317591,0.001399352,0.0002453047,0.000149654,0.00001209713,0.03571372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963674,0.0002091196,0.002803978,0.000234749,0.00008770401,0.000002493632,0.000008826203,0.00000369674,0.0002820184],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.886439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.256281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317259221","doi":"10.1057/jird.2015.6","title":"The Eurasian union: actor in the making?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Central European University; University of Reading; Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia; St. Thomas University","keywords":"Regionalism (politics); Regionalisation; International relations; Political science; Treaty; Regional integration; European union; Development studies; Diplomacy; Customs union; Collective security; International trade; Economic geography; Geography; Politics; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04938791260811311,"gpt":0.3639103883400475,"spread":0.3145224757319344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002284185,0.00004956184,0.00005367315,0.000141499,0.0004732079,0.0002216541,0.0003069835,0.00003843767,0.00006031575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007560212,0.00002805174,0.00002912176,0.0001490604,0.0001219159,0.0002427984,0.00002618171,0.0001758869,0.00002455107],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002433462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006963263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003075862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002829285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987358,0.000125337,0.0003556716,0.00004870987,0.0006335743,0.0001009182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989836,0.0002775057,0.0002119742,0.000045709,0.0004380501,0.00004320009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001894486,0.00003953967,0.02438404,3.577138e-7,0.00003852693,0.000008548252,0.02593881,0.0001203619,6.806283e-7,0.9268994,0.01000416,0.0125466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002238994,0.00001469309,0.07278356,0.00002068874,0.000002762536,0.0000300449,0.009196875,0.00006945826,0.000001001504,0.01859135,0.899026,0.000039625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07990695,0.00068856,0.004704438,0.05318808,0.001142774,0.0002054923,0.00000298439,0.00000854567,0.8601522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937118,0.00007033975,0.001785308,0.0002841572,0.000265028,0.000004260726,0.000001568178,0.000002989391,0.003874554],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9138048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3639581,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1157350195","doi":"10.1057/jird.2015.24","title":"A Hegelian realist constructivist account of war, identity, and state formation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constructivism (international relations); Hegelianism; Epistemology; International relations; Realism; Normative; Sociology; Nationalism; International relations theory; Politics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03192601492638605,"gpt":0.3191846709160811,"spread":0.287258655989695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006779882,0.00004070764,0.00008373938,0.0001286158,0.0001062718,0.00006262488,0.0000783292,0.0000283538,0.00001515103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001977014,0.00003654686,0.00001653699,0.00007359251,0.00009814191,0.0008205809,0.0000347168,0.00006568687,0.000002604776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001587893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003278201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002599629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001358567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990959,0.00002796865,0.0003329482,0.00004203315,0.0004406011,0.00006057306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989439,0.00003525248,0.0002946306,0.00002207304,0.0006153564,0.00008876657],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002145581,0.0002909125,0.3177809,0.00004859942,0.0003853763,0.00003147715,0.1572616,0.0006881362,0.0001087403,0.4546586,0.01252005,0.05601102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003049,0.000181834,0.2908101,0.0003902861,0.00005470359,0.0002913533,0.05928514,0.002383119,0.0001021277,0.1386207,0.5044191,0.0004124771],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728869,0.0002936863,0.01107708,0.001772135,0.0003510801,0.00006358055,0.00001129652,0.000004119494,0.0135401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914083,0.0004470215,0.007764308,0.00004170154,0.00003421547,5.672788e-7,0.000005476084,0.000001830391,0.0002965248],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4918991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1490338,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386737031","doi":"10.1057/s41268-023-00304-3","title":"Crisis narratives and institutional resilience: a framework for analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Resilience (materials science); Politics; Sociology; Psychological resilience; International political economy; Power (physics); Institutional analysis; Development studies; Political economy; Political science; Positive economics; Economic system; Social science; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03823195520236293,"gpt":0.3837337525199883,"spread":0.3455017973176253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009076024,0.00005478894,0.0001080795,0.0004946051,0.0005236314,0.00009420696,0.0001153197,0.00005609959,0.0001257955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007691004,0.00004844649,0.00005796595,0.0003781264,0.0001014249,0.0002820219,0.00003091732,0.0001012021,0.000005695025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001174119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002783257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002696613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007225893,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990416,0.00003319892,0.0003039124,0.0001008423,0.0004250418,0.0000953753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989585,0.0003036299,0.0001855214,0.00002684442,0.000441175,0.00008430913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007816681,0.00007947272,0.07046795,0.000006408268,0.001156058,0.00000738156,0.04429992,0.00163807,0.00004365674,0.8538857,0.01903405,0.009303147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003252466,0.00003028429,0.2828265,0.00006039482,0.00004863946,0.0000076397,0.01211365,0.0009221965,0.0000241208,0.04263348,0.6608816,0.0001262639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7947238,0.0006678817,0.1838995,0.0150074,0.000681527,0.0001167156,0.00001993152,0.00002508377,0.004858188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9293613,0.0008009834,0.06840835,0.0001092216,0.0001833496,0.000009272012,0.0000123155,0.000002748658,0.001112416],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8112522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4027402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793375097","doi":"10.1057/s41268-018-0135-3","title":"The EU’s realist power: public procurement and CETA negotiations with Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European Commission","keywords":"International trade; European union; Procurement; Negotiation; Liberalization; International relations; Business; Economics; International economics; Political science; Market economy; Politics; Marketing; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.019235973815117,"gpt":0.26246253702518,"spread":0.243226563210063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004742715,0.00004507557,0.0000467753,0.00004052082,0.0008441402,0.0001364837,0.0001224849,0.00001411499,0.00006910061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002985119,0.00002858717,0.000007971851,0.0000799667,0.0001507277,0.0001921363,0.00002525011,0.000078973,0.000002388585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001857655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001452884,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009054163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.357123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991437,0.0000394802,0.0002269211,0.00005703138,0.0004378915,0.00009499271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989957,0.0001051592,0.000247998,0.00003722986,0.0005255587,0.00008839469],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003528392,0.0000377435,0.0403318,0.000001592756,0.0001608392,0.000006936141,0.007835086,0.000008309162,0.00000546011,0.8852348,0.05815339,0.008188767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001354149,0.00002178814,0.1773002,0.00001781705,0.000002634438,0.00001227184,0.0008999613,0.000005508115,0.000007120261,0.0002029849,0.8213587,0.00003563362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.191495,0.001068243,0.004875822,0.2200273,0.001468319,0.000298924,0.0000206436,0.00001679366,0.5807289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904097,0.0002445058,0.001851285,0.0005222634,0.0001424824,0.000001512425,0.000001056638,0.000003207256,0.006824037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8850318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975446,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402552828","doi":"10.1057/s41268-024-00335-4","title":"Placing machine learning into the hermeneutic circle: a combined computational-interpretive method for text analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"International political economy; International relations; Development studies; International studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Philosophy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01747494432851966,"gpt":0.3696908922903049,"spread":0.3522159479617852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00228411,0.00008447951,0.0001873943,0.0005467998,0.0006130835,0.000249097,0.0001623152,0.0000406885,0.0002343799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008137668,0.00006353803,0.0001850122,0.000599941,0.00006380689,0.0002063994,0.00004128528,0.0002052433,0.000007864528],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003315369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006417275,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009162943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001790729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985042,0.0002389365,0.000509397,0.0001429754,0.0005025954,0.0001019585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959058,0.00316216,0.0002294674,0.00003222283,0.0005866073,0.00008378641],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001649965,0.00009088148,0.01257919,0.00002570553,0.007972253,0.00001397415,0.148229,0.3412009,0.00003484741,0.1284119,0.0006512013,0.3606251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003370137,0.00007180739,0.01439872,0.0001351236,0.0004985574,0.00001594572,0.006650034,0.7448347,0.00001127626,0.04017738,0.1926958,0.0001736514],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01407497,0.0009651701,0.9761009,0.00580367,0.0003634012,0.0001085874,0.000003078624,0.00001800787,0.002562184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8007923,0.00006086214,0.1961597,0.0001370892,0.000117968,0.0000110425,0.00002444433,0.000006601669,0.002689916],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7867174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4715405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088113266","doi":"10.1057/s41268-020-00200-0","title":"Making neoliberal subjects: ‘idle’ youth, precarity, and development intervention in Sierra Leone","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Sierra leone; Precarity; International political economy; Development studies; Intervention (counseling); Gender and development; International studies; Political science; Neoliberalism (international relations); International relations; Sociology; Development economics; Gender studies; Political economy; Psychology; Socioeconomics; Social change; Politics; Economics; Social science; Social transformation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07050723344709897,"gpt":0.338997861705766,"spread":0.268490628258667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008171881,0.00009584759,0.000146643,0.0002190385,0.0001960749,0.0001357907,0.0001696693,0.00007021501,0.0002074066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003962128,0.00009383064,0.00003577102,0.0001214216,0.00006372746,0.0004668575,0.00009454586,0.0002454962,0.00000891707],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003049014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003097715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001043865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004131634,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985119,0.00007765477,0.0006126974,0.0001431796,0.0005153702,0.0001391864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992071,0.00008350689,0.0003010189,0.00002560285,0.0002577225,0.0001250908],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004095898,0.0005214838,0.3992959,0.00005695998,0.0004927926,0.00006275557,0.4042093,0.0005942861,0.000172192,0.02274855,0.00317585,0.1682603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002623244,0.0001127384,0.4837883,0.0008280808,0.00002276677,0.00004698799,0.01769539,0.000875366,0.0002746623,0.001465528,0.4918183,0.0004486953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9783229,0.00126965,0.006209379,0.004139333,0.0005001961,0.0001177652,0.000003924769,0.00001652022,0.009420371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874648,0.0003199955,0.01142909,0.0002207661,0.0001777798,0.000003308732,0.000008727876,0.000005880968,0.0003696872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4886424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3826303,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395693639","doi":"10.1057/s41268-024-00324-7","title":"Salient discourses in international society: When and how have United Nations global conferences acted as catalysts?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"International political economy; Salient; International relations; Political science; International studies; Development studies; Public international law; Political economy; Sociology; Public administration; International law; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02400242035829617,"gpt":0.3414468479207212,"spread":0.317444427562425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006266096,0.0001261575,0.0001362643,0.00124288,0.000289018,0.000561743,0.0002284231,0.000107017,0.0002738521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005219092,0.0001103956,0.0000742729,0.000502902,0.0001945021,0.00083279,0.00007594895,0.00023049,0.00001736465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000586173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001217755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004921212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001049487,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998449,0.00004718954,0.0004347129,0.0001760837,0.0007350569,0.0001580066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987081,0.0002919886,0.0002074697,0.00004470296,0.0006229689,0.0001247559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001859432,0.00007122674,0.02426334,0.000005839592,0.0003338406,0.00002174065,0.01253568,0.00007382197,0.000009383316,0.9461827,0.009295117,0.007188746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000503208,0.0000315221,0.04278197,0.0003006801,0.00002802382,0.00007104862,0.01169963,0.002036788,0.00001805052,0.03742926,0.9049151,0.0001846946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3618018,0.001981603,0.006308293,0.101498,0.002289873,0.0003939837,0.0001418424,0.00006244277,0.5255222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798369,0.001629152,0.005758558,0.0001879033,0.000267384,0.00001140988,0.00008295172,0.000007335583,0.01221841],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9087534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5416901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412370831","doi":"10.1057/s41268-025-00351-y","title":"After Twitter: aesthetic insecurity and the future of digital diplomacy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development","topic":"Media Studies and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Diplomacy; International relations; International political economy; Public diplomacy; Political science; Development studies; International studies; Political economy; Media studies; Sociology; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01025215200340192,"gpt":0.2934727678064616,"spread":0.2832206158030597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003635898,0.00003244389,0.0000730648,0.00006460287,0.0001632171,0.0000467297,0.0001026309,0.00002145565,0.00002865064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008388564,0.00002038888,0.00002318623,0.00006194613,0.0001601039,0.0001188715,0.00006175153,0.0000807574,8.993745e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003498051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001312441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008562619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004231203,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994662,0.00003494165,0.0002403983,0.00003299566,0.0001872937,0.00003812003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994673,0.0001195261,0.0001415551,0.00003747786,0.0002131044,0.0000210048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002711241,0.000120255,0.2395984,0.00001066423,0.0002285092,0.000002346609,0.06110474,0.000005062808,0.000002018586,0.5081665,0.002975728,0.1875146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008745656,0.00001186654,0.197622,0.00008683027,0.00001666613,0.000006730618,0.008316627,0.00002369809,0.000003684501,0.02519675,0.7677947,0.00004584434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8894078,0.009597337,0.001063166,0.05649154,0.000513098,0.0001288617,0.000002070301,0.000003608233,0.04279249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958506,0.00248002,0.0007245049,0.000112905,0.00004427461,0.000004265261,6.872133e-7,9.683472e-7,0.0007818399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.764819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1255351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195273984","doi":"10.1057/s41268-021-00237-9","title":"Czechs and Germans in the twenty years’ crisis: Mackinder, Carr and Wiskemann on Central and Eastern Europe after the peace","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Relations and Development","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Carr; Vision; Viewpoints; International relations; Interwar period; Democracy; Politics; Economic history; Political science; Political economy; World War II; History; Sociology; Law; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01925043380520533,"gpt":0.2221019997581664,"spread":0.2028515659529611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001358897,0.00006000984,0.00007185488,0.00004527715,0.0001064546,0.0001464965,0.00004895817,0.0000168863,0.00008114706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002263599,0.00003472206,0.00001499605,0.00001752823,0.00006955783,0.000112926,0.00003703446,0.0001556338,0.000002722365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002688421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004618133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001790072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001197842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994171,0.00004309376,0.0002151651,0.00007483952,0.0001752169,0.00007459485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996858,0.00008502446,0.00006100507,0.00003472152,0.0000872423,0.00004619417],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002408636,0.0003549236,0.116451,0.00004084289,0.00031877,0.0005278551,0.1797332,0.00003826224,0.000005352627,0.6637627,0.009407813,0.02911836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003905254,0.00004119397,0.3730973,0.00006462222,0.00001514499,0.0001128106,0.003812816,0.000322484,8.789186e-7,0.001698273,0.6203635,0.00008047131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779081,0.001769372,0.0001240902,0.009616515,0.0002630907,0.00005151891,0.00001085109,0.000002174574,0.01025427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955042,0.0002884084,0.00007915618,0.0009324944,0.0001065468,0.000002343502,0.000002618477,0.000003495682,0.00308076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6620645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1415925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}