{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":120,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":120,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"d912d284155d","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management"}},"results":[{"id":"W2052495896","doi":"10.1108/13673270210417664","title":"Managing effective knowledge transfer: an integrative framework and some practice implications","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":891,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge transfer; Competitive advantage; Process (computing); Knowledge value chain; Set (abstract data type); Key (lock); Computer science; Organizational learning; Conceptual framework; Business; Conceptual model; Process management; Marketing; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01940304148992048,"gpt":0.2845775252730982,"spread":0.2651744837831777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001418398,0.0004307554,0.0005063256,0.001454387,0.0004400031,0.0005131979,0.0006006747,0.0001117628,0.0001440659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001908887,0.0003701636,0.0001835973,0.001440022,0.0001368761,0.003180185,0.0003482631,0.0005669899,0.0004696955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001957801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001159218,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004137257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001989033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977754,0.0001132173,0.0008935939,0.0004581554,0.0003134469,0.000446179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977428,0.0002390778,0.0004821531,0.0004398513,0.001026788,0.00006934487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000720934,0.00101811,0.0001539396,0.0003030837,0.0003300225,0.00003166707,0.001329852,0.000006419832,0.00002084562,0.7720627,0.005270424,0.2194008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003591198,0.0004841153,0.004003826,0.001135066,0.001564727,0.00006986594,0.0178583,0.0100255,0.00006186762,0.1434575,0.8165199,0.001228132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003176271,0.004620736,0.02835993,0.00449679,0.001721698,0.001258825,0.000002232589,0.0001555921,0.9562079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885632,0.000841731,0.003663142,0.002340281,0.002432203,0.00009523207,0.000005566701,0.00007302453,0.00198564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9853869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022807203","doi":"10.1108/13673270910997088","title":"Knowledge management and organizational performance: an exploratory analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":791,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Organizational performance; Business; Knowledge management; Excellence; Originality; Organizational learning; Formative assessment; Operational excellence; Organizational culture; Value (mathematics); Exploratory research; Best practice; Marketing; Psychology; Public relations; Management; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01589655192570328,"gpt":0.2341168799400382,"spread":0.2182203280143349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008940271,0.0003166881,0.0005068711,0.002494793,0.0003261487,0.000333373,0.0005073814,0.00006760942,0.0004629172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001379424,0.0002653744,0.0002452126,0.003100544,0.00006226978,0.002047308,0.0002464601,0.0002056442,0.0003794782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009321678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001885088,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001252381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002120853,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981078,0.00002763079,0.0007464364,0.0003248774,0.0004378904,0.0003553756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985035,0.00001827339,0.0004456605,0.0003065951,0.0006629166,0.00006304163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00106567,0.006187819,0.09709096,0.003091752,0.01307788,0.000371449,0.007533106,0.002929978,0.0001831957,0.2964642,0.05723169,0.5147723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00578908,0.001161041,0.432963,0.0005699932,0.02012149,0.00005596207,0.01657894,0.0825203,0.0002677794,0.009747597,0.4275135,0.002711383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6414494,0.002469598,0.00180105,0.0002401234,0.0005857223,0.000287539,0.000001355792,0.00008488912,0.3530803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937377,0.0008617727,0.0005371774,0.0006058631,0.001180501,0.000005226677,0.00002487177,0.00002339858,0.003023476],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5120609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953515272","doi":"10.1108/jkm-03-2018-0190","title":"Evaluating the role of social capital, tacit knowledge sharing, knowledge quality and reciprocity in determining innovation capability of an organization","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":584,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Structural equation modeling; Social capital; Business; Knowledge value chain; Common-method variance; Competitive advantage; Explicit knowledge; Quality (philosophy); Marketing; Organizational learning; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07799425124846517,"gpt":0.4071929542881517,"spread":0.3291987030396865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01105733,0.0002063638,0.0005550465,0.0006509832,0.0003381055,0.00009641639,0.0007451706,0.000128918,0.0001166297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008171569,0.0001808682,0.0000978177,0.002059682,0.0002448421,0.0007013072,0.0005362769,0.0003020366,0.00001297882],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003470134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001799031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007819595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009332859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964922,0.0007969947,0.00153793,0.0003463631,0.0004970586,0.0003294483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965636,0.0002551858,0.001308951,0.0003033103,0.001503533,0.00006547117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013245,0.001249006,0.3160968,0.001155509,0.0002247129,0.000001644848,0.2434176,0.00004393058,0.003002249,0.1974893,0.00005399284,0.2371329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004205426,0.0009389456,0.7908149,0.0008384219,0.0004216564,0.000002800973,0.1607193,0.006506252,0.002637801,0.02364054,0.008454168,0.0008197359],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9105096,0.0005846655,0.00008438945,0.00005485766,0.0003878112,0.0006091418,0.000001628366,0.00001667797,0.08775115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980094,0.00005112208,0.0004956626,0.000008421036,0.0002370013,0.000008332733,0.000003978371,0.00002219044,0.001163859],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4747182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7375592,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507132064","doi":"10.1108/jkm-05-2016-0203","title":"Understanding counterproductive knowledge behavior: antecedents and consequences of intra-organizational knowledge hiding","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":515,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge value chain; Organizational learning; Knowledge worker; Body of knowledge; Personal knowledge management; Knowledge economy; Business; Psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0857896919783409,"gpt":0.3291235540236057,"spread":0.2433338620452648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002433658,0.000265368,0.0004899469,0.0008236697,0.0005062022,0.0001238239,0.0006343219,0.0001045897,0.0002152554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003061932,0.0002069588,0.0001457664,0.0007994311,0.000984382,0.000695259,0.0004083474,0.0001647957,0.00004933159],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008769863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002369294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000820603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000222697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974809,0.0003384785,0.0008784763,0.0003610801,0.0004906429,0.0004503714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978643,0.0003222465,0.0006478193,0.000206909,0.0007449483,0.0002137708],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001690523,0.001435108,0.08631186,0.0005984527,0.001093743,0.00008408982,0.04404278,0.00000171961,0.005168534,0.8064379,0.009462528,0.04519423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02249976,0.002591876,0.07916254,0.01740004,0.006189044,0.0002305615,0.2732936,0.0002264507,0.02119714,0.1381896,0.4336754,0.005343984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2075207,0.0104426,0.02140667,0.001510004,0.005997487,0.001453057,0.00002020989,0.0001278,0.7515215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904712,0.002114456,0.0004309918,0.000009327607,0.0005714269,0.00001022108,9.562759e-7,0.00002993357,0.006361443],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7829506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8439535,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898166599","doi":"10.1108/jkm-11-2017-0531","title":"Evasive knowledge hiding in academia: when competitive individuals are asked to collaborate","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":306,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Knowledge management; Originality; Moderation; Tacit knowledge; Knowledge transfer; Situational ethics; Competitive advantage; Sample (material); Interdependence; Knowledge value chain; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Organizational learning; Business; Marketing; Political science; Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04145261881499063,"gpt":0.3569663508547202,"spread":0.3155137320397295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004558725,0.0003127454,0.000639302,0.001540674,0.0005595395,0.0002690062,0.001241573,0.0003345089,0.0003526427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005642217,0.0003092239,0.0001654979,0.002170454,0.0002598244,0.0005838789,0.000801713,0.0008923425,0.00102716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009732608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002300952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001656483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00291088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964877,0.0006391946,0.0009923386,0.0004191741,0.0006721691,0.0007893841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972152,0.0002619451,0.0006421072,0.0002616469,0.001222681,0.000396494],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002806367,0.001387767,0.1085659,0.000451853,0.00115805,0.0003581843,0.3005472,0.00002741536,0.0001053633,0.3011367,0.2108563,0.07512464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001681969,0.0002612048,0.02849974,0.001301466,0.00018294,0.0000018417,0.06515982,0.00004452517,0.0002096413,0.003070076,0.8991247,0.0004620939],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09514973,0.001379181,0.0004310373,0.003176856,0.002652495,0.001169452,0.000007359868,0.00006577161,0.8959681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718961,0.0003818566,0.001756625,0.0003461942,0.002169874,0.0000370543,0.000001487283,0.0000403338,0.02337053],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8767463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803632083","doi":"10.1108/jkm-05-2017-0179","title":"Tell me if you can: time pressure, prosocial motivation, perspective taking, and knowledge hiding","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":288,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Mainstream; Causality (physics); Field (mathematics); Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02889767172326793,"gpt":0.3141020095074482,"spread":0.2852043377841802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002376747,0.0002684891,0.0004186897,0.0005818026,0.001070585,0.0003154198,0.0006256457,0.0001193215,0.0003768222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005611292,0.0002554367,0.0001635244,0.0007608425,0.0004586388,0.0005192999,0.0004836151,0.000270663,0.00019374],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004896111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001842365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006119438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003648188,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976275,0.0003289081,0.0006029974,0.0003856187,0.0005096276,0.0005453632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974719,0.0001335233,0.0006693311,0.0002073509,0.001284772,0.000233151],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001972664,0.001205393,0.02142559,0.0004606335,0.002379416,0.000067808,0.30715,0.000006859469,0.0002400737,0.4830788,0.1196309,0.06415727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001977078,0.0004078361,0.01829882,0.0005062185,0.0008885127,0.000006439091,0.03885609,0.0005868725,0.000222169,0.008748264,0.9288205,0.0006812292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0202158,0.003096289,0.0004220179,0.0009245392,0.00153951,0.0007014369,0.000002793982,0.00008567458,0.9730119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9105341,0.0003334506,0.0005345845,0.00004299434,0.00364059,0.00001222745,0.00000104702,0.00003549099,0.08486555],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8903183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999898,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110967597","doi":"10.1108/13673270910931125","title":"Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":218,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual capital; Reputation; Journal ranking; Promotion (chess); Knowledge management; Ranking (information retrieval); Citation; Originality; Public relations; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Social science; Qualitative research; Information retrieval","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02170953911808136,"gpt":0.27279261506466,"spread":0.2510830759465786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001461064,0.0003993026,0.0007434674,0.001453653,0.0002271046,0.0002061668,0.0007519589,0.0001268401,0.0003718896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100455,0.0003297399,0.000414742,0.001625188,0.0001213725,0.001246975,0.0004652234,0.0004244961,0.0002284243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001598186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000263049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005832186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001469129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997146,0.00003891905,0.001390113,0.00031438,0.0005983016,0.0005122967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980338,0.00007504893,0.00094847,0.0002513499,0.0006243293,0.00006697133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001302259,0.001660561,0.01489978,0.002678198,0.002863509,0.0003148971,0.005048056,0.0003578267,0.0002474968,0.1372375,0.1074042,0.7259857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01524296,0.002049091,0.2093931,0.007398342,0.009387316,0.0006276937,0.03289226,0.01422544,0.0007735818,0.08798736,0.6160226,0.004000164],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.578779,0.02458305,0.00253198,0.0004302513,0.001147317,0.0004282679,0.000002821223,0.00004973848,0.3920476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923072,0.003865311,0.0003817243,0.0003953915,0.001384193,0.00000344959,0.000003329074,0.00002116679,0.001638164],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7219855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050991272","doi":"10.1108/eum0000000005868","title":"The who, what and why of knowledge mapping","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Organizational learning; Intellectual capital; Knowledge value chain; Organizational memory; Process (computing); Computer science; Personal knowledge management; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02738309618947088,"gpt":0.2541308014971049,"spread":0.226747705307634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001306241,0.0002338755,0.0003842833,0.0005489989,0.0002968666,0.000477323,0.0006310242,0.00004810192,0.0001055659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001027427,0.0001645215,0.0002004609,0.0008073065,0.0001854739,0.001329781,0.000592415,0.0002169502,0.0001676583],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005461873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002329192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007387845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001369427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998349,0.00003847373,0.0007997394,0.0002086291,0.000270478,0.0003337503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997982,0.0002102089,0.0006351234,0.0002848276,0.0008537529,0.00003413001],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001612524,0.0004987392,0.009061107,0.0008504868,0.0004253752,0.0001010054,0.0009799211,0.00001074219,0.0001710453,0.1541282,0.03727715,0.796335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005200242,0.00004300541,0.008285907,0.001037032,0.0001258806,0.00002570458,0.004825641,0.0007441925,0.00009781941,0.004801627,0.9792918,0.0002013827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1138697,0.07632031,0.007776401,0.003111527,0.004874353,0.00068779,6.6837e-7,0.00005505999,0.7933041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722139,0.0156031,0.000194487,0.0003996471,0.002321996,0.00001082704,9.580928e-7,0.00003991276,0.009215136],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9420146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6708992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098532060","doi":"10.1108/13673271311315150","title":"Building knowledge: developing a knowledge‐based dynamic capabilities typology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Dynamic capabilities; Originality; Extant taxon; Fragmentation (computing); Resource (disambiguation); Data science; Qualitative research; Sociology; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01953225859427207,"gpt":0.2743946296124274,"spread":0.2548623710181553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001762218,0.0006292369,0.0008225273,0.002881242,0.0004413098,0.0005846445,0.001211431,0.0001758931,0.0006557002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000206648,0.0005655953,0.0003964305,0.002207846,0.0002286253,0.001320231,0.0008968203,0.000498038,0.00379465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006844954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000183273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000176813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012032,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963028,0.00009957813,0.001719089,0.0005534817,0.0004282679,0.0008968147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957035,0.0001721267,0.001084686,0.0005784109,0.002391028,0.00007027559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006027007,0.0009202495,0.0008478037,0.002420499,0.0004196443,0.0000399548,0.0004110585,0.00003903929,0.000219695,0.8753537,0.03872316,0.08054494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004056513,0.00012749,0.006541157,0.001071355,0.0004867231,0.00002470682,0.006352711,0.01569996,0.0001782571,0.03878473,0.9252994,0.001376978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02622346,0.002432948,0.01632943,0.002370366,0.005857124,0.001317827,0.000001202387,0.0002679832,0.9451997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767461,0.00004808083,0.01199762,0.001161495,0.001743798,0.0001294867,0.000009973001,0.0001121175,0.008051349],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9505226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160904960","doi":"10.1108/13673270810852458","title":"The effect of tacit knowledge on firm performance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Balanced scorecard; Knowledge management; Originality; Business; Sample (material); Value (mathematics); Metric (unit); Index (typography); Explicit knowledge; Measure (data warehouse); Computer science; Marketing; Psychology; Creativity; Data mining","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01395808444292325,"gpt":0.226933813213748,"spread":0.2129757287708247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001113868,0.0002356403,0.0004080311,0.0005497736,0.0004807445,0.0000699835,0.0006209879,0.00004692872,0.0001417159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008295409,0.0001344638,0.0003649149,0.0008046922,0.0001357916,0.0005376348,0.0002105834,0.0002556822,0.0009828602],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006400506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001702058,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004056926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009683376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984734,0.00003162768,0.0006550572,0.0001478884,0.0003913805,0.0003006263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985724,0.0001899208,0.0005653707,0.0002810415,0.0003700336,0.00002123286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004393928,0.001336489,0.07956347,0.004825398,0.002597433,0.000191588,0.002184877,0.001428016,0.0002118532,0.01657995,0.3938569,0.4928302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002357216,0.001540204,0.03315054,0.0005623309,0.0006406669,0.0000393317,0.0003534062,0.008367812,0.002395387,0.0001769979,0.9499562,0.0004598814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.71381,0.00154093,0.00003280826,0.0001010668,0.0008020255,0.0001633015,3.047228e-7,0.00001441462,0.2835352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989415,0.000933269,0.00001483353,0.00008185891,0.00114992,0.00000888247,0.000001514932,0.00002006751,0.008374669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5560994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999795,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362669242","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2022-0792","title":"The human capital management perspective on quiet quitting: recommendations for employees, managers, and national policymakers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"QUIET; Burnout; Business; Public relations; Human resource management; Human capital; Perspective (graphical); Value (mathematics); Psychology; Political science; Management; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05273482374607948,"gpt":0.405537287506806,"spread":0.3528024637607265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002499718,0.0001291039,0.0001477061,0.0004112286,0.001830766,0.0002221449,0.0003363131,0.00004151537,0.0000163352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009764858,0.0001049046,0.000146864,0.0004810877,0.0001648219,0.0001206547,0.0001290588,0.0001518411,0.00003605416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006234259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004988458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005852501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005350917,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984856,0.000146748,0.0003511491,0.0001940352,0.0004741701,0.0003483007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988743,0.0003436015,0.0002404895,0.0001216729,0.0003055818,0.0001143577],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002522165,0.0001273676,0.0002113666,0.00001979311,0.000200653,0.00001014633,0.009391001,0.00001034993,0.000001290923,0.7536249,0.218146,0.01823191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001073213,0.0002113904,0.006681085,0.000149646,0.000163473,0.000001778024,0.169654,0.000009628158,0.000004620313,0.02772427,0.7941364,0.0001904332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1115865,0.0007956015,0.0003030884,0.1007954,0.003626548,0.002561731,0.00004052306,0.000245595,0.780045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9189163,0.00135245,0.0009340982,0.0002437235,0.001000235,0.0001167158,0.000009843307,0.00003630692,0.07739035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8073297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2986065267","doi":"10.1108/jkm-12-2018-0776","title":"Transformational leadership and employee knowledge sharing: explore the mediating roles of psychological safety and team efficacy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Transformational leadership; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Psychology; Psychological safety; Transactional leadership; Structural equation modeling; Originality; Context (archaeology); Business; Social psychology; Computer science; Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09797560522189058,"gpt":0.3490932737812413,"spread":0.2511176685593507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00303685,0.0001753722,0.0003561023,0.0002679737,0.0003446539,0.0001141808,0.0005794829,0.00008188166,0.0001001954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001230101,0.0001230403,0.0001342484,0.0003380862,0.0002800134,0.0003748912,0.000251417,0.0002888958,0.00003122216],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007028723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002626757,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002299764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007203746,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981334,0.0002066717,0.0007003522,0.0002261323,0.0004062743,0.0003271836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988327,0.0003623059,0.0003245319,0.000176695,0.0001719516,0.0001318311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004794555,0.0009289877,0.14111,0.001179591,0.0007406594,0.00001216191,0.3098994,0.00006518658,0.00007540258,0.1892611,0.003416953,0.3528311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007640892,0.000834385,0.3649351,0.001388306,0.0006548293,0.00002045499,0.2262231,0.001296495,0.00007675029,0.0044213,0.3916764,0.000831991],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5843173,0.005327546,0.0002953168,0.001176824,0.0008183388,0.0007113849,0.000001639719,0.00003343655,0.4073182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948088,0.001398214,0.0002725424,0.0000447577,0.0003362095,0.000005251385,0.000001605984,0.00001369891,0.003118943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4104914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5017437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980887383","doi":"10.1108/13673271311315231","title":"Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2013 update","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual capital; Journal ranking; Citation; Ranking (information retrieval); Citation impact; Reputation; Originality; Knowledge management; Pace; Citation analysis; Computer science; Business; Sociology; Library science; Social science; Information retrieval","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01855700776200159,"gpt":0.2555728564973881,"spread":0.2370158487353865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001281225,0.0004449755,0.0007670128,0.001456226,0.0002432656,0.0003301353,0.0008691519,0.0001376044,0.001771808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008063858,0.0003582995,0.0004056551,0.001475758,0.0001792996,0.002073169,0.0009738753,0.0004673294,0.001531165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001568247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002551334,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004708813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004378321,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968976,0.00004939043,0.001513191,0.0003475405,0.0006061729,0.0005860841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975585,0.00008736817,0.001057923,0.0002914817,0.0009209839,0.00008372586],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005404241,0.001210276,0.02294737,0.004249712,0.004325785,0.0001362194,0.00368598,0.0003507153,0.000155228,0.05762831,0.491226,0.413544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009496293,0.0006629492,0.08815403,0.004375998,0.005898171,0.0003244255,0.03126781,0.02540393,0.0003097231,0.04623237,0.7848557,0.003018628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7473569,0.02910963,0.002494734,0.000714633,0.001639063,0.0007349569,0.000003699297,0.00005609341,0.2178903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877723,0.00783834,0.0004994723,0.0003340787,0.001295192,0.00001747246,0.000005283523,0.00003632958,0.00220148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4105254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225011412","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2021-0601","title":"Green talent management and employees’ innovative work behavior: the roles of artificial intelligence and transformational leadership","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Business and Economic Development","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Oxford Instruments (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Transformational leadership; Competitive advantage; Knowledge management; Structural equation modeling; Originality; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Work behavior; Business; Sustainability; Emotional intelligence; Psychology; Marketing; Creativity; Computer science; Engineering; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05401954798763566,"gpt":0.2399478940805622,"spread":0.1859283460929265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007453575,0.0001055483,0.0001469163,0.0001196772,0.0001948032,0.00002508281,0.0002533704,0.00001320995,0.0004622691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001750571,0.00008097049,0.00003442167,0.0003636023,0.0001674359,0.0001437166,0.0004639275,0.0001320869,0.000009663289],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001421091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000695761,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003941091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002379263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989331,0.00004116398,0.0004959632,0.0001259468,0.0002574447,0.0001463218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995924,0.00002251811,0.0002322637,0.00009266887,0.00001975818,0.00004042725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001182402,0.0004518354,0.01975716,0.00009993109,0.0001663593,0.00002510211,0.008677502,0.001280136,0.00001608163,0.007738908,0.001247226,0.9604215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000718266,0.0004174367,0.8638072,0.0001447722,0.0002572057,0.00008043223,0.05323403,0.0005214917,0.0002396066,0.004685352,0.07542386,0.0004703622],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787128,0.0007408781,0.00409522,0.001956188,0.0003912805,0.0006181987,0.00000642828,0.000007325316,0.01347171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980525,0.0001355733,0.001041121,0.00008919424,0.00002133865,0.00003697552,0.000001393047,0.000006874659,0.0006149804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9599512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5061522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992573885","doi":"10.1108/13673270710832181","title":"A systems‐based dynamic knowledge transfer capacity model","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge transfer; Absorptive capacity; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Knowledge base; Knowledge value chain; Originality; Systems thinking; Complex adaptive system; Dissemination; Management science; Organizational learning; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1696311885594081,"gpt":0.4042498183079086,"spread":0.2346186297485005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01497499,0.0003218983,0.0008639244,0.001999171,0.0002421697,0.0004158658,0.001558025,0.0001172869,0.0001047207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003744412,0.0002250738,0.0006202713,0.001488429,0.00008766029,0.000362133,0.0002035899,0.0003585764,0.0004303819],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001399657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003734451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001483783,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937071,0.0003295604,0.002865937,0.0004820381,0.002073236,0.0005421807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952996,0.001220211,0.0006227627,0.0008411882,0.001628532,0.0003877467],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001393302,0.003929063,0.002277179,0.0008600985,0.0008471922,0.001074927,0.008872212,0.1234877,0.001853979,0.3524899,0.1449653,0.3579491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002999088,0.0002794085,0.004934507,0.0006176477,0.0001513494,0.0001470055,0.003098608,0.759177,0.00006974681,0.01467005,0.2132995,0.0005560704],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0501841,0.003636881,0.8158888,0.00005948738,0.002431101,0.0003652877,0.00000611786,0.00002992007,0.1273984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841002,0.000008918065,0.004656633,0.0000503725,0.0002454169,0.00000492095,2.49135e-7,0.0000288423,0.01090442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9339162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9178243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148125661","doi":"10.1108/jkm-05-2013-0166","title":"Meta-analysis of scientometric research of knowledge management: discovering the identity of the discipline","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Scientometrics; Originality; Publication; Knowledge management; Productivity; Empirical research; Data science; Regional science; Library science; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1510580799882323,"gpt":0.3595108145514688,"spread":0.2084527345632365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005294027,0.0002478742,0.001114401,0.005828908,0.0003498978,0.0002292647,0.002229398,0.00004826708,0.001259781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001454184,0.000126129,0.002102365,0.02019228,0.0004363146,0.001549259,0.002346792,0.000324465,0.0001232002],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008298743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002179997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001739661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002675069,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961574,0.0001297913,0.001496645,0.0002678793,0.001545312,0.0004029396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954327,0.0002266752,0.001496127,0.0008152985,0.002001094,0.00002808633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003702424,0.006048671,0.03530408,0.01091309,0.5303686,0.00002009082,0.008354235,0.01072329,0.001362076,0.3192874,0.03969015,0.03755797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002292891,0.0003064417,0.3457957,0.0005252339,0.5196977,0.000004562682,0.02609744,0.04021508,0.002423008,0.01540185,0.04619563,0.001044531],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6787214,0.0095563,0.001558777,0.0008303658,0.0008566536,0.001155634,0.00001218794,0.00001372078,0.3072949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930091,0.0003151933,0.00009246558,0.00003907792,0.0002034937,0.00001922605,0.000003075753,0.00001861731,0.006299775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3142876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792157346","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2017-0359","title":"Strategic knowledge management and enterprise social media","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual capital; Knowledge management; Originality; Strategic management; Computer science; Business; Marketing; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02815283283741228,"gpt":0.2511055698298954,"spread":0.2229527369924831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007541747,0.0003048818,0.0004267502,0.001096361,0.0003728535,0.0003410045,0.0004964094,0.00007227556,0.0007664968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001533141,0.0002483772,0.0002446572,0.0007175185,0.0001956624,0.000792499,0.0005548721,0.0002149772,0.001415318],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007988441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001429532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003368174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007684329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982287,0.00002411374,0.000688173,0.0002789306,0.0003669823,0.0004131533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988113,0.00004120326,0.0004451384,0.0001879153,0.0004718703,0.00004259007],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001055294,0.002054554,0.002941079,0.00312721,0.003047601,0.0004046331,0.01084815,0.000006168012,0.0001201601,0.3814305,0.2266932,0.3682714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003933432,0.0002839005,0.01485066,0.0005595959,0.001915952,0.00004106666,0.02456432,0.003422546,0.0001328164,0.02812916,0.921014,0.001152598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.215639,0.001818981,0.0002630777,0.0002046845,0.00152647,0.0001911456,0.000001223145,0.00004446563,0.7803109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901006,0.0004583521,0.0002293487,0.0003021401,0.005296756,0.00000800366,0.000005295003,0.00003155431,0.003567967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.776743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897931383","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2018-0019","title":"The mediating role of supply chain collaboration on the relationship between information technology and innovation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Business; Enabling; Industrial organization; Knowledge management; Product (mathematics); Product innovation; Competition (biology); Competitive advantage; New product development; Sample (material); Supply chain management; Marketing; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01997972892887239,"gpt":0.2566039330395841,"spread":0.2366242041107117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002508568,0.0001298861,0.0001577934,0.002060138,0.0005396249,0.0002414137,0.0003314204,0.00006102285,0.00001032987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009930184,0.00008114646,0.00003154462,0.004626964,0.000164686,0.0007473622,0.0002181385,0.0001910469,0.00008929837],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006329756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002366087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001044166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000110143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99849,0.00003401626,0.0008970633,0.00008934728,0.0003279928,0.0001615914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966028,0.0002571997,0.001304666,0.0002119718,0.001616621,0.000006687664],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003105855,0.00002613436,0.03653289,0.00007027218,0.00005041187,2.289217e-7,0.0003370682,0.000001562734,0.00002561976,0.9197,0.00274302,0.04048177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001516591,0.000223023,0.1446595,0.0003285646,0.0001887301,0.000001743427,0.02654604,0.001725029,0.0006210158,0.1899951,0.6339082,0.0002864839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3995569,0.0002399388,0.001549109,0.01811153,0.001286806,0.001107413,0.000003479034,0.00006327045,0.5780815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981339,0.00001157807,0.0002135161,0.0003674566,0.0009113408,0.00001711055,0.0000100518,0.000009686363,0.0003253444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7297049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4150413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789063361","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2016-0457","title":"The effects of knowledge creation process on organizational performance using the BSC approach: the mediating role of intellectual capital","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual capital; Knowledge management; Balanced scorecard; Structural equation modeling; Organizational performance; Business; Competitive advantage; Extant taxon; Leverage (statistics); Knowledge sharing; Structural capital; Organizational learning; Process management; Computer science; Human capital; Marketing; Financial capital","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01013324563792766,"gpt":0.23172137348332,"spread":0.2215881278453923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001217625,0.0001998977,0.0002715632,0.0003282674,0.0007124097,0.000119172,0.0007556413,0.00004611932,0.00006862228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005912321,0.00009589338,0.0001618455,0.001276626,0.00033064,0.0004203146,0.0002441138,0.000234618,0.0000602188],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000621603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005693048,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008195978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001498549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983827,0.00005482757,0.0006742856,0.0001450499,0.0005051628,0.0002379225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970115,0.0004942598,0.0008851485,0.0002397116,0.001355607,0.00001374588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004010823,0.0066896,0.05159688,0.01725289,0.008611876,0.00001177797,0.3179264,0.01238577,0.009589026,0.1603177,0.02713553,0.3844717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003450159,0.001911629,0.01968445,0.002249641,0.003632196,0.00004423713,0.08891486,0.7776398,0.04781084,0.00660768,0.0468318,0.001222689],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9366125,0.001191566,0.0007501353,0.00009532693,0.0006128372,0.0003508152,6.656945e-7,0.00001020066,0.06037597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997364,0.0001703204,0.00005622969,0.00007362905,0.001874227,0.000008462956,0.000003853646,0.00002223341,0.0004269734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7652541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5479352,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085098328","doi":"10.1108/13673271011050120","title":"Are full and partial knowledge sharing the same?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Knowledge sharing; Psychology; Interpersonal communication; Situational ethics; Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Knowledge management; Originality; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03653689969233438,"gpt":0.3175679301266231,"spread":0.2810310304342887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003308959,0.0001977211,0.0002991534,0.0002984326,0.0008865347,0.0003851516,0.001014591,0.00009082067,0.0002316425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002453804,0.0001442877,0.0001719541,0.0004534232,0.0003282398,0.0003577136,0.0006881859,0.0005683147,0.0001513577],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008002092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004560438,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000136155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00250361,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982283,0.0001498294,0.0005319386,0.0002591739,0.0003724352,0.0004583758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984803,0.0001563328,0.0005291664,0.0003259303,0.00028222,0.0002261024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001257416,0.0007653918,0.04102205,0.0003537752,0.0007703846,0.0001671117,0.04582802,0.000008397836,0.0002249055,0.6317149,0.04331684,0.2357025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007456669,0.00005297633,0.01665078,0.0001392758,0.0002451519,0.000009644927,0.01368156,0.0003751816,0.00003657065,0.003257501,0.9645525,0.0002532168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2750395,0.002910441,0.0004858886,0.002604786,0.005172328,0.000532709,0.000001013252,0.00006951797,0.7131838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766757,0.0004335167,0.0003172323,0.0000887514,0.002332937,0.00001283557,3.038705e-7,0.00002296449,0.02011575],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9212356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6818597,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154262006","doi":"10.1108/13673271211238733","title":"Managing organizational memory with intergenerational knowledge transfer","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge transfer; Knowledge management; Tacit knowledge; Generalizability theory; Knowledge value chain; Context (archaeology); Explicit knowledge; Originality; Organizational learning; Empirical research; Computer science; Psychology; Creativity; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02289154383634641,"gpt":0.2835126527729726,"spread":0.2606211089366262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001925354,0.0002050985,0.0002666544,0.0005516339,0.0005053116,0.0001317675,0.0005102859,0.0000602387,0.0009908634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000379287,0.0001735296,0.0001311251,0.0007808661,0.0001386914,0.0008261572,0.0001407921,0.0002079267,0.0002606308],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003165641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001203635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003922446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001971198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980403,0.0002181199,0.0005194127,0.0001714805,0.0005465199,0.0005042364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988496,0.00007711827,0.0001402231,0.0001568558,0.0004983176,0.0002778583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001497733,0.001708671,0.02121412,0.0003210188,0.001332398,0.00004864702,0.06178183,0.0001546019,0.00008230862,0.8042492,0.03646989,0.07248761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002487854,0.0001813166,0.008266427,0.0004055958,0.0006789533,0.00002398757,0.02301201,0.0002802936,0.000394646,0.001809216,0.9617273,0.000732369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01870067,0.003211476,0.03066459,0.0007865711,0.002394713,0.0003447142,0.00000110723,0.00006092653,0.9438353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646562,0.0003864175,0.001752249,0.0000748704,0.002543965,0.00001037751,0.000004521855,0.00003523643,0.03053611],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9459556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282826187","doi":"10.1108/jkm-12-2021-0920","title":"The Great Resignation: the great knowledge exodus or the onset of the Great Knowledge Revolution?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Organizational learning; Knowledge value chain; Knowledge economy; Personal knowledge management; Human capital; Competitive advantage; Knowledge worker; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Economics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04600786100243058,"gpt":0.3153302455460807,"spread":0.2693223845436501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01068765,0.0004517881,0.0005532337,0.0003835387,0.008430726,0.0003995773,0.005070495,0.0001023027,0.001056973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006717811,0.0001938399,0.0007464265,0.002906976,0.001136177,0.0003663521,0.002858729,0.00104227,0.0001486564],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001178868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005722526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007138849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005047776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923924,0.003375525,0.001402814,0.0004647883,0.001497697,0.0008667543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947266,0.00164045,0.001212829,0.001344749,0.0009007839,0.0001745919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050283,0.000732097,0.004171869,0.0002309011,0.001332383,0.00006246113,0.04445526,0.0001785708,0.000008747638,0.1520482,0.6692687,0.127008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001038231,0.0002089241,0.007969675,0.0001935231,0.0006406332,0.00003054406,0.02082818,0.00038905,0.00002218673,0.003402019,0.9649847,0.0002923955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01337546,0.02897744,0.0003553533,0.02474214,0.01218279,0.003783872,0.00002772655,0.0001222208,0.916433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6112592,0.002297342,0.00005277965,0.0001572023,0.001610992,0.0001995171,0.000002706575,0.00005506155,0.3843652],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5978837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147698887","doi":"10.1108/13673271011059545","title":"Beyond the ba: managing enabling contexts in knowledge organizations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Originality; Computer science; Personal knowledge management; Context (archaeology); Knowledge value chain; Process (computing); Value (mathematics); Organizational learning; Sociology; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01339700540254721,"gpt":0.2995906099375076,"spread":0.2861936045349603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003929269,0.0001990984,0.0003020987,0.0007714672,0.000785962,0.0003112501,0.001183986,0.00008958579,0.0003719607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003758601,0.0001566419,0.0001366781,0.001921614,0.0002212396,0.0004858376,0.0004371531,0.0006603563,0.0002237871],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001952301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001458258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002947745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006842173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978864,0.000261098,0.0007135775,0.000234512,0.0003952206,0.0005092399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983735,0.0002622374,0.0003319322,0.0003245705,0.0005510761,0.0001566897],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002443771,0.0006016633,0.0115035,0.0001302959,0.0002624856,0.0001014294,0.05082908,0.00004381756,0.0001513901,0.7569569,0.01769513,0.1616999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001438915,0.00004689282,0.009981971,0.000196866,0.0002131128,0.00000670806,0.02556824,0.0003957162,0.00007254013,0.01537873,0.9463235,0.0003768454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03269956,0.002279417,0.001143836,0.002657187,0.004321979,0.0005541616,6.267854e-7,0.00005281331,0.9562904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742327,0.0006323873,0.0004778018,0.0001145562,0.001263229,0.00001213476,0.000001152286,0.00003076906,0.02323522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9415332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6387672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525271897","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2015-0385","title":"Knowledge transfer in knowledge-intensive organizations: the crucial role of improvisation in transferring and protecting knowledge","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Knowledge management; Knowledge transfer; Knowledge value chain; Procedural knowledge; Organizational learning; Personal knowledge management; Originality; Computer science; Storytelling; Knowledge integration; Context (archaeology); Body of knowledge; Knowledge engineering; Psychology; Social psychology; Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01191054085361424,"gpt":0.2254026542207776,"spread":0.2134921133671634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001763771,0.0003240205,0.0005274811,0.001298786,0.0002454826,0.0001074781,0.0004692371,0.00008710778,0.00008507873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005114788,0.000214026,0.0001123625,0.002142533,0.000142399,0.0009050639,0.0003629802,0.0002629376,0.00005421898],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002067218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006721699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004130498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002173028,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977455,0.0001052108,0.001169361,0.0003338042,0.0002464974,0.0003996869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979302,0.000233076,0.0003047205,0.0001963834,0.001308163,0.00002745602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006684235,0.002979699,0.1630156,0.004809725,0.0009317593,0.00004996659,0.03695865,0.0001341589,0.008783118,0.2714714,0.003048337,0.5071491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02488552,0.0005013429,0.6339299,0.00964577,0.001583064,0.00003572266,0.07246568,0.007951898,0.006159803,0.03464431,0.2055323,0.0026647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7899641,0.02140211,0.01770726,0.003935288,0.00224927,0.004381221,0.000006275972,0.0001339992,0.1602205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785,0.0005203674,0.00009987888,0.00006525629,0.0007270178,0.00003815631,0.000001715435,0.00005039692,0.000647189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5044844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8727727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084887014","doi":"10.1108/jkm-04-2020-0319","title":"Open innovation for sustainability through creating shared value-role of knowledge management system, openness and organizational structure","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Knowledge management; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Open innovation; Value (mathematics); Business; Sustainability; Knowledge sharing; Creating shared value; Context (archaeology); Organizational learning; Computer science; Public relations; Corporate social responsibility; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01539999902010464,"gpt":0.2579529003396087,"spread":0.242552901319504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001106926,0.0003617506,0.0006614382,0.0003771546,0.0003428145,0.0004595528,0.001162624,0.00009797697,0.00009440145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003605567,0.0003364244,0.0001055063,0.001867574,0.0001328087,0.00208435,0.002685036,0.0001754874,0.000008311768],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006064267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007006965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002333199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007696559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973158,0.00005886401,0.001342067,0.0005084918,0.0004157414,0.0003590833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965145,0.000089095,0.001290084,0.000333287,0.001734935,0.0000381161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005512359,0.0007289639,0.03210511,0.02511014,0.0005635992,0.00002183455,0.002039785,0.001058454,0.0003339689,0.9224437,0.002129347,0.01291389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02240771,0.0006552297,0.2932091,0.003283934,0.003678589,0.00004922831,0.173322,0.02424401,0.00188416,0.1954685,0.2788493,0.002948348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8043621,0.002053369,0.03354933,0.005391902,0.001479245,0.01346321,0.0000912805,0.0001893197,0.1394203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914581,0.00001470066,0.007128638,0.000279053,0.0006745222,0.00005849385,0.00006377123,0.00006372873,0.0002589651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7269752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597920650","doi":"10.1108/jkm-03-2016-0113","title":"Knowledge management, problem solving and performance in top Italian firms","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Knowledge management; Originality; Context (archaeology); Extant taxon; Empirical research; Computer science; Test (biology); Value (mathematics); Empirical evidence; Organizational learning; Creativity; Management science; Economics; Mathematics; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02068249572487808,"gpt":0.2508747555013092,"spread":0.2301922597764312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001143281,0.0003084627,0.0004596622,0.001160534,0.0005862241,0.000791837,0.0008951893,0.00007068108,0.0001596163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003251973,0.0002570236,0.0001796597,0.0004206279,0.0001170834,0.002552593,0.0009567015,0.0002903556,0.0004331143],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000984845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001369647,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001993829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001490504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981674,0.00001434019,0.000744698,0.0003096146,0.0002895449,0.0004744012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985174,0.00002182484,0.0007260698,0.0004430575,0.0002520759,0.00003956489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005017993,0.001213948,0.3303351,0.008135206,0.001066736,0.000444585,0.002837808,0.0001093075,0.00003899719,0.05652166,0.02454212,0.5742528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004157188,0.0002461054,0.4789077,0.002515964,0.0008299717,0.00004019863,0.005158484,0.01196745,0.00007895007,0.00397229,0.4909447,0.001180938],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3609409,0.001132637,0.00006812599,0.0002684862,0.0005349059,0.0002580299,4.104448e-7,0.00002035339,0.6367761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868599,0.001235118,0.0004701773,0.0001389785,0.0008884309,0.00001346447,0.000002531317,0.00003046186,0.01036095],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6264151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138884011","doi":"10.1108/jkm-11-2019-0611","title":"Frogs in boiling water: a moderated-mediation model of exploitative leadership, fear of negative evaluation and knowledge hiding behaviors","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Moderated mediation; Originality; Mediation; Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1257061749568071,"gpt":0.3633230738198376,"spread":0.2376168988630306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003914388,0.0001638535,0.00044104,0.0006804622,0.0001539481,0.00005638952,0.0002247921,0.00008628672,0.0000461526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003384046,0.0001520332,0.000124155,0.0005695156,0.0001446882,0.0005936279,0.000207029,0.0002089231,0.000004959851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003612441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002786655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000793057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974282,0.0005954087,0.0008568982,0.0002377434,0.0005732538,0.0003085404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979213,0.0001614525,0.0004526333,0.0001283303,0.00124494,0.0000913043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000261149,0.001687548,0.00904458,0.001298323,0.0006290162,0.00003285308,0.8321779,0.01406669,0.00871226,0.02420055,0.0004018732,0.1074872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007785497,0.0003365463,0.004493756,0.002563153,0.001294953,0.000002346182,0.575282,0.3411781,0.04090651,0.02492124,0.0004770969,0.0007587593],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9403133,0.002936718,0.003043204,0.0002469599,0.0004364638,0.0005582548,0.000002391258,0.00001296676,0.05244971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958335,0.0005844898,0.002066721,0.000007020111,0.00009642889,0.00001792849,0.000004311614,0.00001619951,0.001373391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3271114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6199732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126507733","doi":"10.1108/jkm-09-2020-0721","title":"Knowledge assets, capabilities and performance measurement systems: a resource orchestration theory approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Orchestration; Structural equation modeling; Computer science; Originality; Resource (disambiguation); Bridge (graph theory); Control (management); Business; Process management; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0341845846978993,"gpt":0.223035292122703,"spread":0.1888507074248037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002862425,0.0002518831,0.000416248,0.0005197418,0.0002648518,0.0004242867,0.0002676175,0.00006926166,0.00007830627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001275994,0.0002028622,0.0001709533,0.0006665154,0.00008636837,0.0009632147,0.0002516804,0.0002516663,0.0001061636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001699868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007104735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005722573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001487337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981212,0.00009170594,0.0006996912,0.0002668278,0.0005221472,0.0002984261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980903,0.00005702263,0.0004011549,0.000256421,0.001161095,0.00003406186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001580565,0.004831486,0.02197258,0.03661713,0.004836638,0.0002223803,0.01204178,0.002996604,0.0007221014,0.5387794,0.1027595,0.2726398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00286032,0.0003485651,0.02229892,0.001834252,0.002345718,0.0002258053,0.04460129,0.04624976,0.0004563113,0.003395977,0.874055,0.001328093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3451208,0.02083864,0.003038884,0.000176343,0.0007562191,0.0003514726,0.000001157487,0.00005229264,0.6296641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993179,0.00043324,0.0002105232,0.0001092777,0.001219706,0.00001896758,0.000008511392,0.00002421242,0.00479662],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7712955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8272479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977446819","doi":"10.1108/13673270510629945","title":"Explaining the intentions to share and reuse knowledge in the context of IT service operations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Object Research Systems (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Reuse; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge value chain; Computer science; Service (business); Personal knowledge management; Context (archaeology); Body of knowledge; Originality; Business; Organizational learning; Marketing; Engineering; Qualitative research; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06193504452374096,"gpt":0.3487312126555949,"spread":0.2867961681318539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00418768,0.0001260916,0.0002154798,0.0003714293,0.0005205676,0.000186793,0.00125218,0.00003815494,0.00009645322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003009053,0.00008199929,0.00009309115,0.0009659835,0.00008877083,0.0003621185,0.0005243889,0.0002272424,0.00006714648],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000129495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006576104,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005901613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03525078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982172,0.0004268185,0.0006025858,0.0001486782,0.0003495839,0.0002551833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987239,0.0002921192,0.0001479603,0.0003251719,0.0004255091,0.00008530561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006107558,0.0007246603,0.001765826,0.0001710338,0.0002650196,0.00001585072,0.6209472,0.0002881126,0.00005116844,0.1897685,0.07200492,0.1139366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006121259,0.00006599312,0.004841593,0.000386659,0.0001189994,0.000002671545,0.3234295,0.0007032641,0.00001637988,0.0001775258,0.6695184,0.000126847],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1369938,0.003308655,0.0006675137,0.06850137,0.0007553977,0.001296032,0.000004835729,0.00002278245,0.7884496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944268,0.0003794711,0.0006169918,0.0009149579,0.0003896084,0.00003393082,8.770672e-7,0.000009831049,0.00322752],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.857433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9823534,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155973496","doi":"10.1108/13673270710752090","title":"The moderating role of human capital management practices on employee capabilities","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Structural equation modeling; Human resource management; Job satisfaction; Knowledge management; Psychology; Human capital; Originality; Business; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02050094257113728,"gpt":0.272772721523782,"spread":0.2522717789526447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00239915,0.0002334768,0.0003226594,0.0006684448,0.0005488165,0.0002775713,0.0005981821,0.00004481173,0.0001133165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009629676,0.0001552996,0.0002903175,0.0004902858,0.0001120278,0.0008104097,0.0002858004,0.0002556217,0.000136143],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009294897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009834745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000496508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002739129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978275,0.00002364257,0.0009660397,0.0001913952,0.0006075336,0.0003839237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974837,0.0001833547,0.001514804,0.0003062143,0.0004879508,0.00002391941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001028592,0.001388433,0.01623007,0.001981515,0.002666686,0.0001428282,0.005631404,0.000892931,0.0008880347,0.8048283,0.01301914,0.151302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005224012,0.001923056,0.07974127,0.001884094,0.003911772,0.00004305243,0.2780851,0.00593801,0.006531402,0.1345595,0.4799124,0.002246353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6468455,0.0008401189,0.0001132026,0.0001337426,0.0003560207,0.0001904482,3.791646e-7,0.00001684054,0.3515037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995102,0.0001462653,0.0001604291,0.000166937,0.001074529,0.000006771418,0.000002274664,0.00002391822,0.003316876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6702689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6332933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085429409","doi":"10.1108/13673271011032337","title":"Research paradigms of contemporary knowledge management studies: 1998‐2007","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Personal knowledge management; Originality; Body of knowledge; Citation; Knowledge value chain; Citation analysis; Computer science; Field (mathematics); Organizational learning; Data science; Sociology; Qualitative research; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1541108771949564,"gpt":0.4486904056073984,"spread":0.294579528412442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01361972,0.0003445238,0.0008071226,0.001884427,0.0007952306,0.000162786,0.001914782,0.0001695557,0.0001738471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002489603,0.000308367,0.0004148743,0.001852647,0.0009898702,0.0005675299,0.001182898,0.001004416,0.0005183942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003527809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002184279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002136943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005712314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950073,0.0007294085,0.001494571,0.0004673332,0.001400047,0.000901298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963964,0.0005833934,0.0007101402,0.0006781682,0.001251181,0.0003807263],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001892255,0.001839049,0.003557509,0.001629801,0.002546142,0.0003546874,0.03281697,0.000005555397,0.00007156088,0.6578772,0.213783,0.08532935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001509813,0.000217487,0.00160701,0.0005984277,0.0002165987,0.000003383251,0.06771846,0.00003490196,0.00009894405,0.005075291,0.9226042,0.0003154546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0231007,0.01042948,0.000166249,0.0003981898,0.00555538,0.0009965688,0.000002110898,0.000056822,0.9592945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9395293,0.0041066,0.001567421,0.00003242413,0.001712049,0.00004309225,0.000001894494,0.00004641198,0.05296078],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9164286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902430595","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2017-0358","title":"Organizational knowledge retention and knowledge loss","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge value chain; Organizational learning; Personal knowledge management; Explicit knowledge; Knowledge transfer; Body of knowledge; Procedural knowledge; Computer science; Domain knowledge; Knowledge engineering; Knowledge integration; Knowledge survey; Agency (philosophy); Knowledge economy; Knowledge sharing; Psychology; Formative assessment; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03021805277474477,"gpt":0.3117506316888492,"spread":0.2815325789141044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002874335,0.0002506684,0.0003652083,0.0007468774,0.0009222183,0.0002458831,0.0006479846,0.0001256837,0.0005809424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002144712,0.0002393297,0.0001534559,0.001195933,0.0006335498,0.0005284553,0.000545047,0.0002324857,0.0007232358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003203704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001941608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007340218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000527261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976564,0.000362593,0.0007289872,0.0003390446,0.0004186899,0.0004943084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997621,0.0001242313,0.0003918087,0.0002394593,0.001327918,0.0002955853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001104802,0.00109176,0.01604137,0.0004268623,0.0007073935,0.00006463605,0.04570395,8.73734e-7,0.00008841575,0.7600485,0.05979514,0.1159206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001645264,0.0002771972,0.01026278,0.0003838426,0.0003641409,0.00001599664,0.006865128,0.0002280403,0.0001231021,0.01182431,0.9675627,0.000447526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03650783,0.004244972,0.002151156,0.0005431795,0.003234102,0.0003982284,0.00000155218,0.00008374354,0.9528353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9422927,0.001185276,0.001102918,0.00003914169,0.003303611,0.000006596156,0.000002966333,0.00003766839,0.05202905],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9077675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9759582,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176073091","doi":"10.1108/jkm-07-2020-0530","title":"The influence mechanism of rewards on knowledge sharing behaviors in virtual communities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Tacit knowledge; Virtual community; Explicit knowledge; Virtual organization; Context (archaeology); Incentive; Originality; Computer science; Psychology; The Internet; Social psychology; World Wide Web; Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03377566367717989,"gpt":0.3256513832503308,"spread":0.2918757195731509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003820296,0.0001882316,0.0003704969,0.0004679376,0.0006143129,0.0001832704,0.001292833,0.00008043987,0.00006879142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001726386,0.0001568636,0.0002083574,0.0008681602,0.0002403778,0.0003058374,0.0008030594,0.0004475244,0.00004155952],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003528015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001628197,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007211866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005339933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974926,0.0004765491,0.0008756162,0.0001732144,0.0005563644,0.0004256825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980804,0.0003752499,0.0004166546,0.0004364567,0.0005820204,0.0001092188],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007114155,0.0007874575,0.005952285,0.0001288363,0.0002127091,0.0001245372,0.05109524,0.0002386358,0.00007885305,0.9015322,0.0009503987,0.03882766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005014692,0.001061701,0.04803323,0.005097958,0.0006933854,0.00001471933,0.5395461,0.001006449,0.002148847,0.03437265,0.3617438,0.001266445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5831044,0.001655692,0.0001564876,0.0003286042,0.001433301,0.0002795242,0.000001273639,0.00002322857,0.4130175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835844,0.001878714,0.000102988,0.00003086636,0.0001798201,0.00001318942,8.976091e-7,0.00001887347,0.01419026],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8671596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6396712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076239839","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2014-0220","title":"Citation classics published in knowledge management journals. Part I: articles and their characteristics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Normative; Originality; Value (mathematics); Citation analysis; Maturity (psychological); Sociology; Performative utterance; Library science; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Social science; Computer science; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08429222483228879,"gpt":0.3240416567415362,"spread":0.2397494319092474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006615709,0.0002813465,0.0005106113,0.001293403,0.0002814371,0.0006920997,0.0006491989,0.000107139,0.0000901774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002874419,0.0002421568,0.0001433958,0.001274201,0.0001851855,0.001093897,0.0004645825,0.0003732924,0.00007828476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005170799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001094913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007080795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003993813,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969282,0.0004720674,0.001149229,0.0003124846,0.0005559417,0.0005821146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978848,0.0001374323,0.0006154219,0.0002626584,0.0006482363,0.0004514322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002112968,0.001371202,0.02939185,0.0004475859,0.0006377036,0.0002502164,0.0729752,0.00001536781,0.00001151933,0.1542275,0.05197505,0.6884855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003273045,0.0002079029,0.03487763,0.0008776673,0.0002451534,0.000009087803,0.08468095,0.0007893666,0.00002243953,0.01683951,0.8576477,0.0005295916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.133714,0.007197995,0.002009169,0.002028289,0.003781168,0.0008494842,0.000003039319,0.00007419263,0.8503427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847738,0.003058643,0.0008390099,0.00007469541,0.0009859761,0.00002079358,0.000003192211,0.00003131751,0.01021264],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8510598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9874868,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099755860","doi":"10.1108/13673270510629954","title":"Powerful public sector knowledge management: a school district example","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Originality; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Literacy; Data collection; Sociology; Public relations; Pedagogy; Political science; Computer science; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04765527884549008,"gpt":0.3069723016439578,"spread":0.2593170227984677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003569878,0.0004567814,0.0006143643,0.00155606,0.0008169678,0.0006848363,0.001934818,0.0001502502,0.002171935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001605049,0.0004377478,0.0005081429,0.001940469,0.0002257582,0.001331242,0.0008928818,0.0005075542,0.003092741],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00121561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001912962,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002365653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009333823,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956237,0.0004573934,0.001243768,0.0005484351,0.0009737769,0.001152928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972224,0.0001566351,0.0006504267,0.0006148471,0.0005833398,0.0007723455],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008293772,0.002006718,0.004088554,0.0004637336,0.0014702,0.000199146,0.009332765,0.00001496759,0.00001278638,0.3980195,0.2032956,0.3810131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001750344,0.0001032221,0.004211546,0.0002132234,0.0003465989,0.00000604201,0.008486578,0.00009599265,0.00001849281,0.0009341132,0.983344,0.0004898538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007882123,0.005547911,0.002567857,0.001206296,0.002157536,0.0008169984,0.000002924027,0.0001663183,0.979652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.860894,0.002171538,0.00277692,0.0001397826,0.003073867,0.00003078161,0.000005926941,0.00006738331,0.1308398],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8530119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3019770203","doi":"10.1108/jkm-02-2020-0081","title":"Big data for small and medium-sized enterprises (SME): a knowledge management model","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Big Data and Business Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Big data; Computer science; Data science; Knowledge management; Conceptual model; Small and medium-sized enterprises; Context (archaeology); Business intelligence; Exploit; Business; Data mining; Database","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2042581756848079,"gpt":0.3195073242493034,"spread":0.1152491485644954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001034648,0.0004215729,0.0006122107,0.0005615848,0.0002182756,0.0004818565,0.002111048,0.0000876135,0.00005082259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001552112,0.0003549538,0.0001747519,0.000683712,0.0001096407,0.001223404,0.003148999,0.000235225,0.0001374188],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000510979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005393128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003650596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000416664,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997494,0.0000213928,0.0009940254,0.0006499773,0.0003608291,0.000479721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979423,0.00008448769,0.0006724171,0.000724404,0.0004813354,0.00009508715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001374318,0.001379776,0.001175578,0.01122375,0.001478379,0.0001615194,0.0005378617,0.0002359911,0.0001846677,0.03380712,0.3541791,0.594262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002886598,0.0000686627,0.0008809651,0.0005717396,0.00128011,0.00001037425,0.0009778403,0.06548657,0.00005314558,0.002370067,0.9248695,0.000544436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008428437,0.01191412,0.7209363,0.01316907,0.007092431,0.003505909,0.0001730257,0.0003201197,0.2344606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9470499,0.004052269,0.02860796,0.004544036,0.01060649,0.0001106867,0.0002595872,0.0002066859,0.004562382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9386215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091559507","doi":"10.1108/13673271311300840","title":"The intellectual core and impact of the knowledge management academic discipline","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Originality; Knowledge management; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Body of knowledge; Citation; Computer science; Library science; Social science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03977071915238604,"gpt":0.3549424763980571,"spread":0.3151717572456711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002479897,0.0002568022,0.0003553033,0.00031956,0.0009970909,0.0001936029,0.001559385,0.0000903511,0.0001800823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000217048,0.0001382376,0.0003831704,0.0009160993,0.0006153827,0.0003418866,0.001456226,0.0004818531,0.0001204681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003323744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008108954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002892089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002268626,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975415,0.000285762,0.0008627812,0.0002306665,0.0005399713,0.0005392699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979958,0.0004631352,0.0005696585,0.0003942488,0.0003840255,0.0001931502],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000129849,0.0005510203,0.01994997,0.0004426579,0.002360244,0.0000138731,0.05352971,0.00004127193,0.00006787149,0.1959203,0.1579196,0.5690737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003173399,0.000549832,0.2351676,0.001391159,0.001274942,0.00001391046,0.08964154,0.001833599,0.00006420065,0.02439896,0.6416298,0.0008610734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2975353,0.0116894,0.0003213449,0.001302502,0.002044076,0.001675466,0.000001885927,0.00003663584,0.6853933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542663,0.006084,0.000123021,0.00001951639,0.0004654395,0.0000270267,4.32e-7,0.00002294458,0.0389913],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6567309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7668918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150457675","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2014-0252","title":"What matters for knowledge sharing in collectivistic cultures? Empirical evidence from China","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Collectivism; Knowledge sharing; Context (archaeology); Knowledge value chain; Business; Empirical research; Incentive; Empirical evidence; Personal knowledge management; Psychology; Marketing; Organizational learning; Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07996289898124358,"gpt":0.3811656214161254,"spread":0.3012027224348818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003679348,0.0002601479,0.0005254669,0.0006266253,0.0004387698,0.0006553232,0.001149837,0.000106105,0.0001115344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007199081,0.0002375484,0.000273677,0.0008208751,0.0001218799,0.001177198,0.0004196113,0.0002992185,0.00009513114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006589391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007854624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005133414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002371562,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974338,0.0003411999,0.0007919892,0.0004384109,0.0004215172,0.0005731087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980746,0.0007697472,0.0003888872,0.0002952648,0.0002557244,0.0002157836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009466473,0.002812769,0.09207521,0.001856681,0.001379143,0.000158516,0.3028099,0.0005443994,0.0002069469,0.05526877,0.3078802,0.2340608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004437562,0.0004876849,0.08450976,0.006677848,0.0006620832,0.000003421657,0.02562552,0.009168899,0.0001051382,0.02417166,0.8430766,0.001073863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3728276,0.02324059,0.0841851,0.01790367,0.02268449,0.00495747,0.0000061701,0.0002753814,0.4739195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739555,0.001476775,0.002297624,0.000182238,0.001674819,0.00006402882,0.000002423379,0.00003949314,0.02030718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6011278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9686944,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499713345","doi":"10.1108/jkm-11-2014-0469","title":"Understanding “disengagement from knowledge sharing”: engagement theory versus adaptive cost theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Disengagement theory; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.355349396297244,"gpt":0.3756608377060894,"spread":0.02031144140884539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01637773,0.0004918203,0.0006627389,0.0009093334,0.001055801,0.0004418983,0.001790919,0.0001554893,0.0007061838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005441452,0.0004633432,0.0004136735,0.0009248269,0.0003834535,0.0007991589,0.001413107,0.0007570949,0.0006356644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003364154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003118455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002518917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004731797,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941018,0.002100726,0.001109334,0.0006187126,0.00114309,0.0009263027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961894,0.001163785,0.0007344884,0.000602429,0.0005817614,0.0007280977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001407873,0.0007379477,0.0006384286,0.00005866802,0.002208252,0.0001465176,0.05896217,0.0001275621,0.000003172655,0.8824365,0.02072665,0.03254626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00877736,0.0005596161,0.0005975185,0.0005931826,0.001888433,0.000001389463,0.3667304,0.0006032264,0.00003778217,0.1889414,0.430324,0.0009457444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003134832,0.004285702,0.06197764,0.000256653,0.007570683,0.001110484,0.000007211968,0.0001462648,0.9215105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715375,0.0007462941,0.00179304,0.00007356683,0.002189648,0.00005572495,0.000009411315,0.00007918615,0.02351561],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9684027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171108411","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2014-0256","title":"Interorganisational partnerships and knowledge sharing: the perspective of non-profit organisations (NPOs)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge sharing; General partnership; Knowledge management; Business; Social media; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Originality; Sociology; Qualitative research; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0533475639819519,"gpt":0.3344772969259764,"spread":0.2811297329440245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003195358,0.0001671216,0.0002920997,0.0003551504,0.0005472876,0.0001433809,0.0007735243,0.0000611611,0.0001924417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003255672,0.0001282256,0.0001374082,0.0005262839,0.0003529066,0.0002882789,0.0004882624,0.0002374917,0.00006375748],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003629273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001312385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000209135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005131001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983054,0.0002476067,0.0005580832,0.0002300052,0.0003806247,0.0002782129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982488,0.0002694325,0.0004273178,0.0002501908,0.000671756,0.0001325213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002563654,0.0001320707,0.009913675,0.0001030837,0.0003353542,0.000002367889,0.05981787,0.000005172874,0.00006004714,0.9170168,0.004877728,0.007710163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003387093,0.0005696826,0.07131487,0.0006963476,0.0012179,0.00001170263,0.2699467,0.003203024,0.0005437457,0.09148359,0.5568167,0.0008086275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0837265,0.001046328,0.005576493,0.004318521,0.001112834,0.0005690838,0.000001330461,0.00003463184,0.9036143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877061,0.0001646631,0.0005057695,0.0000438323,0.0006685454,0.000007972346,7.609728e-7,0.000018728,0.01088369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9039795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5228887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249464209","doi":"10.1108/jkm-11-2016-0490","title":"Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2017 update","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Citation; Intellectual capital; Knowledge management; Journal ranking; Originality; Impact factor; Computer science; Business; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Information retrieval; Social science; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03424158503358937,"gpt":0.297022467744272,"spread":0.2627808827106826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001892599,0.0004305496,0.0008002414,0.00111853,0.0007525501,0.0006103441,0.001597013,0.0001393483,0.0004057531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002053008,0.0003558431,0.0004397532,0.0005237273,0.0002959877,0.002201798,0.001624674,0.0004746115,0.0004563024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001447902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003205744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002048847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006447402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971303,0.00003747946,0.001315857,0.0003639551,0.00060574,0.0005466596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966998,0.0000639573,0.001890474,0.0005597746,0.0007110776,0.00007496687],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001737248,0.00145391,0.06448122,0.00584221,0.006450497,0.0006643164,0.004696244,0.0002044893,0.0001294587,0.1318572,0.2412719,0.5412112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01044352,0.0005102971,0.1785224,0.005252644,0.006748746,0.0003643542,0.01516537,0.01035793,0.000315187,0.03236259,0.7374064,0.002550559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5329537,0.02005706,0.001822952,0.0005128719,0.002332947,0.0004412051,0.000006348526,0.0000382997,0.4418346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877442,0.007720733,0.0003316752,0.0001698642,0.001685475,0.000006701736,0.000003848011,0.00003131676,0.002306164],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5386606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961448545","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2018-0007","title":"Knowledge sabotage as an extreme form of counterproductive knowledge behavior: conceptualization, typology, and empirical demonstration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Originality; Conceptualization; Public relations; Critical Incident Technique; Business; Value (mathematics); Interpersonal communication; Knowledge management; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Marketing; Political science; Computer science; Creativity; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05832151686181911,"gpt":0.3747423233515909,"spread":0.3164208064897718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002270764,0.0002836609,0.0005683677,0.0006160309,0.000323875,0.0001213801,0.0006094767,0.0001733328,0.0004303937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001363082,0.0002701275,0.0001682477,0.0007026535,0.000519522,0.0009887897,0.0003022555,0.0002650424,0.000173113],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003031564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002695801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000229361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000877902,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973164,0.000451862,0.0009565122,0.0004287114,0.0004106951,0.0004358232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997627,0.0001508378,0.0006363675,0.000343649,0.0009944943,0.0002476142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003256261,0.003668868,0.2052456,0.0006636273,0.000721209,0.00004268634,0.1964257,0.000007648418,0.0004635119,0.479479,0.01094632,0.1020102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007156609,0.002951057,0.1230745,0.0009522839,0.001988927,0.00005498131,0.2203391,0.001240849,0.0007270969,0.0155529,0.6242591,0.001702656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5346572,0.003045673,0.0006351985,0.0001571363,0.001802923,0.0009164629,0.000003458536,0.00004430419,0.4587377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852231,0.00062499,0.0005219211,0.00003456248,0.0005498792,0.00001885897,0.000007423659,0.00003121537,0.01298807],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6133127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894971745","doi":"10.1108/jkm-07-2017-0260","title":"Unpacking knowledge management practices in China: do institution, national and organizational culture matter?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualization; Knowledge management; Organizational culture; Context (archaeology); Personal knowledge management; Organizational learning; Originality; Business; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Qualitative research; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02612971301695749,"gpt":0.3409997847433902,"spread":0.3148700717264327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002652067,0.000227139,0.0002803592,0.0009041101,0.0006789415,0.0003717547,0.0005784575,0.00009499494,0.0005510125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002116798,0.0002114513,0.00007802722,0.001363625,0.0003059871,0.0009540936,0.0004734845,0.0002536927,0.0004805459],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005261439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000127362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001110252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005031564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976781,0.0002499925,0.0006706423,0.000342389,0.0006712174,0.0003876842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981635,0.00006079495,0.0007100514,0.000148874,0.0007666714,0.0001500888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007798781,0.0008610428,0.05319175,0.0004497905,0.0005264832,0.00008451195,0.03920265,0.00001783648,0.00001257915,0.8194625,0.06545219,0.02066065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001935959,0.0001091117,0.1056499,0.0006943509,0.0002130871,0.00001614343,0.01684808,0.0001709386,0.00002000795,0.01138806,0.8625103,0.0004441399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01787571,0.00218979,0.0008139228,0.0007525518,0.001328425,0.0004237856,0.000001505572,0.00003346792,0.9765809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724167,0.001279164,0.002150404,0.0001012618,0.001475209,0.00001185597,0.000003431141,0.00002217108,0.02253981],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.954541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8622733,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082283342","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2020-0416","title":"Knowledge sabotage as an extreme form of counterproductive knowledge behavior: the role of narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and competitiveness","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Machiavellianism; Psychopathy; Dark triad; Narcissism; Psychology; Social psychology; Big Five personality traits; Personality; Emotional intelligence; Originality; Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04518674989956612,"gpt":0.3399804737385538,"spread":0.2947937238389877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001248288,0.0003831752,0.0008466318,0.0002779106,0.0001361779,0.00003367893,0.0009319282,0.0001528779,0.0008405095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002394043,0.0002914408,0.0003054531,0.0004796105,0.0005326555,0.0002070896,0.0002224309,0.0004962058,0.00008491915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006344876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008283741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001593028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005823419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970439,0.0005553356,0.00115395,0.0005299783,0.0003045311,0.0004123196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975991,0.0001622147,0.0008563691,0.00053542,0.0005460529,0.0003008396],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003909409,0.01261777,0.03452488,0.001013019,0.002339996,0.0002002626,0.2847719,0.000002760873,0.005788887,0.1973849,0.004846858,0.4525994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00703214,0.005686581,0.4031318,0.0005918221,0.001492072,0.0004731957,0.06853577,0.0001602334,0.001309453,0.005506104,0.5052058,0.0008750024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.736548,0.0221998,0.0006248046,0.0008914058,0.002067296,0.0009089657,0.0001008144,0.00002894856,0.23663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970964,0.0003647545,0.0003298513,0.0002117111,0.0005709958,0.00003307826,0.0000062495,0.00005234401,0.001334572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5003589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999537,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971263290","doi":"10.1108/jkm-12-2018-0734","title":"Are we in this together? Knowledge hiding in teams, collective prosocial motivation and leader-member exchange","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Psychology; Originality; Social psychology; Social exchange theory; Value (mathematics); Knowledge sharing; Field (mathematics); Knowledge management; Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06572621867375857,"gpt":0.3243064483256606,"spread":0.2585802296519021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002958976,0.000215122,0.0004842639,0.001110854,0.0002115201,0.0001377575,0.0003677822,0.0001375809,0.0003015602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002050652,0.0002118007,0.0001291084,0.001259232,0.00009565661,0.0005587675,0.0002985002,0.0003883633,0.00009929545],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001306869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001241986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004572603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004573318,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977258,0.0004520808,0.000655475,0.0003165223,0.0003768253,0.000473286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988011,0.0002109436,0.0005389166,0.0001357222,0.0002074818,0.0001058592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002105637,0.001335382,0.6101684,0.00205738,0.0002894326,0.0001274561,0.2519555,0.00003179187,0.00005466353,0.01613831,0.02821126,0.08941977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009293565,0.000366591,0.3128725,0.006722758,0.0002443558,0.000004547867,0.2174208,0.0008593402,0.0001121575,0.007721701,0.4431381,0.001243568],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2886155,0.005782962,0.00004439261,0.001048107,0.001151305,0.001200808,8.927571e-7,0.00002805355,0.702128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9310036,0.001449543,0.0001523472,0.00003809065,0.0004846842,0.00003093357,6.055985e-7,0.0000259655,0.06681419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6423882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8636981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966353786","doi":"10.1108/jkm-05-2013-0183","title":"The quasi-moderating role of organizational culture in the relationship between rewards and knowledge shared and gained","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Organizational learning; Originality; Organizational culture; Knowledge value chain; Bridge (graph theory); Value (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Knowledge transfer; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02987038917237334,"gpt":0.309088362142232,"spread":0.2792179729698586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00475326,0.0001161004,0.0002065748,0.0001767419,0.0007793707,0.0002199116,0.000426497,0.00006099787,0.000008262296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001065823,0.00007337649,0.0000507648,0.0005298238,0.0001659535,0.0002211076,0.0001998328,0.0002251271,0.0000047433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006382437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004730645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009447097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005423837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982443,0.000591223,0.0005039072,0.0001373661,0.0003192849,0.0002039172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982195,0.001027802,0.000302068,0.0001379649,0.0002491806,0.0000634879],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001701146,0.0001131541,0.3874264,0.0001127323,0.00008891595,0.000001561379,0.07663398,0.000004649718,0.000007769869,0.504572,0.002342177,0.02867965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001570367,0.0002071844,0.6769658,0.0004522091,0.000253419,0.000003063481,0.06796383,0.001423685,0.00001191556,0.06967703,0.1811868,0.0002847248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3253833,0.01240711,0.002635002,0.003771617,0.0005160755,0.001032228,0.000004047238,0.00003555615,0.6542151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966888,0.000247295,0.0003899105,0.00001927001,0.0004353651,0.000005430823,0.000002090468,0.000009604558,0.002202261],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6713055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5994368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492209886","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2015-0394","title":"Negotiate, reciprocate, or cooperate? The impact of exchange modes on inter-employee knowledge sharing","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge sharing; Social exchange theory; Negotiation; Knowledge management; Value (mathematics); Reciprocal; Affect (linguistics); Knowledge value chain; Business; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Originality; Organizational learning; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0782807598293501,"gpt":0.3719554055005187,"spread":0.2936746456711686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003071116,0.0003314155,0.00053754,0.0006451338,0.0004430292,0.0001710485,0.001671168,0.0000988274,0.0007887303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003115491,0.0001592275,0.0004483447,0.0009422387,0.0002887854,0.0005458164,0.0006891048,0.0002480231,0.0002830943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006484952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001647542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007030277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008000489,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973332,0.000357302,0.0009067067,0.0003411528,0.0004460964,0.0006155743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976901,0.0003769473,0.0005713988,0.0004952471,0.0006533915,0.0002129232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002831092,0.002953332,0.0314744,0.0008607614,0.00399292,0.0001861892,0.06228209,0.0001909032,0.0006579891,0.08493006,0.1613135,0.6483268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02516263,0.008601927,0.06717864,0.01481596,0.002051314,0.0000412129,0.04498165,0.001638044,0.003403426,0.01306029,0.8154848,0.003580104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2141645,0.001762285,0.001501187,0.0006126158,0.00143683,0.0008960319,0.000005686107,0.00007530351,0.7795455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9265158,0.001644918,0.0000817033,0.00002406553,0.0007771781,0.00002405572,5.354216e-7,0.00004037563,0.07089142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7123512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8636044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160168127","doi":"10.1108/jkm-12-2013-0494","title":"Knowledge-centered culture and knowledge sharing: the moderator role of trust propensity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Originality; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Association (psychology); Business; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03604670583397745,"gpt":0.2923635970994431,"spread":0.2563168912654656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003703352,0.0003035175,0.0005970547,0.0003555453,0.0007792129,0.0002680487,0.00125962,0.0001260972,0.00007478273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002172377,0.0002131641,0.0002624277,0.0006279941,0.0003794473,0.0004143823,0.0009949307,0.0003858242,0.00007134782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001829265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001020979,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001981509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005980801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973937,0.0004670722,0.0008388744,0.0003684016,0.0004292383,0.0005027326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978781,0.0001238922,0.0005880289,0.000437482,0.0007183934,0.0002541209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002776358,0.002131374,0.02493998,0.001043854,0.001234826,0.00001597616,0.1492934,0.00002964633,0.0003700849,0.5710038,0.02688817,0.2227712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001772447,0.0002487555,0.006993921,0.0004644211,0.0004600782,0.000005439125,0.01793993,0.00313469,0.0002679195,0.006146741,0.9621792,0.0003865017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1158832,0.008437585,0.0005749033,0.0003200348,0.001117246,0.0008351221,0.000001794856,0.00004961063,0.8727805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674839,0.0008163631,0.0003258901,0.00003363395,0.0009019392,0.00001560999,0.000001137419,0.00002980362,0.03039174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.935291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8692579,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997808463","doi":"10.1108/13673270210450432","title":"A knowledge management reference model","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Computer science; Construct (python library); Structuring; Blueprint; Conceptual model; Reference model; Process management; Management science; Business; Software engineering; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06991347479793608,"gpt":0.2719553419461936,"spread":0.2020418671482576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008137432,0.0004607303,0.0005544029,0.001339527,0.0002580809,0.0003208725,0.001276968,0.00009404599,0.001062334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003982749,0.0004074041,0.0003563865,0.001160951,0.000112955,0.001108556,0.0009291161,0.0004137654,0.006500466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001539511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002642224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003531436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972826,0.00003264804,0.001087507,0.0004632015,0.00051502,0.0006190607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978096,0.00005765713,0.0006514612,0.0005541315,0.0008542553,0.00007291136],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009277256,0.002068112,0.0004731654,0.001344077,0.0005083781,0.000351932,0.0004845832,0.0003334389,0.00005885975,0.6198692,0.1338248,0.2405907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001353959,0.0000693176,0.0007331318,0.0007111034,0.0004781092,0.00002725434,0.001113932,0.04970044,0.00006888428,0.008717323,0.9363645,0.0006620295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00352934,0.004222702,0.008865464,0.0002890265,0.001270695,0.0004042769,0.000001613387,0.00009798638,0.9813189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454893,0.00131266,0.0022032,0.0004609716,0.001611779,0.00003360436,0.000003233721,0.00006729739,0.0488179],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998508,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119509660","doi":"10.1108/jkm-09-2020-0683","title":"Team reflexivity and employee innovative behavior: the mediating role of knowledge sharing and moderating role of leadership","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Originality; Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Multilevel model; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Creativity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08035040993085969,"gpt":0.3496532550977481,"spread":0.2693028451668885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003412355,0.0001948893,0.0004675239,0.0003041178,0.0004713934,0.0001299678,0.0004459168,0.00008283821,0.00002488044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005775549,0.0001630838,0.0001069682,0.0008485937,0.0003207428,0.0003901499,0.0008150278,0.0003461138,0.000002302396],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001163165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001405174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003576138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007836134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997761,0.0003098246,0.0008392307,0.0002777937,0.0004317966,0.0003803533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978541,0.0002627918,0.0006768898,0.0002324741,0.0008360894,0.0001376782],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006067005,0.0006520731,0.3798355,0.0008089306,0.0006649923,0.00002427373,0.1788584,0.0000237825,0.004573492,0.1152811,0.0005275156,0.3186894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003187487,0.0004666596,0.1583323,0.002016142,0.001334212,0.00002130391,0.7732209,0.003942195,0.01330037,0.01582168,0.02736894,0.0009877566],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7153326,0.01254159,0.0001225433,0.0002684389,0.0002856256,0.0003711672,0.000002552301,0.00002031019,0.2710551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966634,0.0004714402,0.0008721701,0.00002231287,0.0002851966,0.00001211371,0.00000130354,0.00001984215,0.001652236],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5943626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6650363,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}