{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":18,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"5a69ba7db463","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Language and Politics"}},"results":[{"id":"W1967011589","doi":"10.1075/jlp.8.1.08gad","title":"Post-colonial identity in Greenland?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Essentialism; Conceptualization; Identity (music); Colonialism; Politics; Sociology; Independence (probability theory); Gender studies; Anthropology; Genealogy; Ethnology; Linguistics; Political science; Aesthetics; History; Philosophy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01443243737656367,"gpt":0.3522792731095509,"spread":0.3378468357329872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003381794,0.00004070861,0.0001196622,0.00007379922,0.0001281389,0.00002614331,0.00007759659,0.00004123734,0.00002151965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002225481,0.00003125861,0.00003660978,0.00007544657,0.00008928269,0.0001768125,0.00001086453,0.0001127631,0.000002131811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003426349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008367043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003409886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002947526,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994155,0.00006181564,0.0001605518,0.00003331481,0.0001546885,0.0001741405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996933,0.00005788553,0.00008175643,0.00003108705,0.00004753698,0.00008847484],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004944334,0.0001486704,0.03953562,0.00001581327,0.00004221032,0.0007424045,0.572589,0.000001149047,0.0001743457,0.3692671,0.003553602,0.01388062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001669781,0.0006864719,0.7745294,0.0001233075,0.00008215923,0.0001629847,0.09254883,0.000004628136,0.00008699435,0.07417875,0.05562829,0.0002984088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9668241,0.001068686,0.00001532854,0.0170998,0.0001029814,0.0000277915,0.00000352354,0.000003388098,0.01485442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963763,0.0003246679,0.0001518048,0.001407577,0.0008803793,7.254972e-8,1.264982e-7,0.000001593142,0.0008574497],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7349938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.515475,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033962552","doi":"10.1075/jlp.1.2.07le","title":"The concept of Europe in Le Monde’s editorials","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; European union; Elite; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Identity (music); Sociology; Resizing; Epistemology; Law; Politics; Aesthetics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0146497168935842,"gpt":0.3071981078737778,"spread":0.2925483909801936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008096998,0.00003232399,0.00009106618,0.00002096473,0.00009384885,0.00002157652,0.0001040945,0.00002321394,0.000008842349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001483688,0.00002187981,0.00002537835,0.00008237103,0.0001639337,0.00007136601,0.000007645551,0.00009750842,7.994734e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001057657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001830179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006887636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001161736,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991717,0.0002982758,0.0002172785,0.0000267738,0.0001600158,0.0001259855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999303,0.0002983712,0.0002037298,0.00005201226,0.00008730635,0.0000555558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004004727,0.00001901886,0.0005084258,0.000002583584,0.000005912929,0.00002612484,0.02532875,0.000002582903,0.0001867925,0.9660376,0.007531073,0.0003470764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003236826,0.00004532294,0.001425229,0.00002774666,0.000005473189,0.000007721371,0.01039121,2.438142e-7,0.002503014,0.002639822,0.9825893,0.00004121075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.814143,0.008740733,0.00002551228,0.001817859,0.002448117,0.00005972793,0.00001329732,0.000003528976,0.1727482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993562,0.0008644548,0.00004523891,0.0001942654,0.002016138,6.562753e-8,5.262137e-8,0.00000341454,0.003314408],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9750583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.177622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494353997","doi":"10.1075/jlp.15.1.01ves","title":"Language ideologies in social media","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Social media; Linguistics; Language ideology; Complaint; Media studies; Sociology; Backlash; Negativity effect; Political science; Psychology; Law; Politics; Social psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02634152782432109,"gpt":0.297312218848513,"spread":0.2709706910241919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002365702,0.000100049,0.0002726951,0.0001957004,0.00008526801,0.00005015001,0.0001216859,0.0000328922,0.0007028716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000328082,0.00005576564,0.00008860556,0.00002829463,0.0003214969,0.0001951511,0.00004696236,0.0001017198,0.000009903566],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002656371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002453282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007606763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008106102,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991784,0.00005166363,0.0003146403,0.00006848886,0.0001725099,0.0002142598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993344,0.0003022741,0.0001684349,0.00007278438,0.00007823956,0.00004386343],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001954361,0.00006805027,0.001385749,0.00003011209,0.0001597699,0.0007310782,0.6925477,2.172293e-7,0.0004864835,0.2739719,0.007189025,0.02341028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002172025,0.000173026,0.005287382,0.000287313,0.0002888983,0.0001073822,0.9263971,0.000001964258,0.001232995,0.01565653,0.04792929,0.000466077],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9682814,0.004304289,0.00001106352,0.001574007,0.0002589067,0.00002169876,0.00003571785,0.00001138862,0.02550153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99454,0.000150815,0.00006320441,0.0002448114,0.002653028,7.142945e-7,9.488206e-7,0.000009311812,0.002337214],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2583154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7695951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016356043","doi":"10.1075/jlp.12.3.02ivk","title":"Pragmatics meets ideology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Serbian; Linguistics; Ideology; Orthographic projection; Computer science; Alphabet; Bosnian; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Orthography; Politics; Political science; History; Artificial intelligence; Reading (process); Law; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01384982958399039,"gpt":0.2321469218633663,"spread":0.2182970922793759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001223333,0.00007933156,0.00018063,0.00009499882,0.0001118105,0.0001445535,0.00011233,0.00003715689,0.001422903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001522309,0.00006113443,0.00006119481,0.00001135876,0.0001514306,0.0001868938,0.00004411705,0.0001305737,0.00006115249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001541652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002665141,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008446664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001416228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993622,0.00003314134,0.0002530748,0.00004968331,0.0001311662,0.0001707894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985711,0.00008146627,0.0001816435,0.00008427032,0.0009712374,0.0001102636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000952092,0.0001890397,0.008895406,0.0002476091,0.0002476202,0.0003428491,0.520164,0.000001481161,0.00005716067,0.2641645,0.203816,0.00186476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002490329,0.0008129567,0.005284556,0.0002131893,0.0006934191,0.0001622649,0.5201209,0.0001822382,0.000718234,0.06395514,0.4045258,0.0008409729],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854306,0.001206795,0.00002328723,0.0002327331,0.003721836,0.0000504068,0.00001731472,0.00001025834,0.009306795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817452,0.00006293119,0.0003808704,0.0009509466,0.0127933,2.991393e-7,0.000002381745,0.000007754201,0.004056361],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2007098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481855666","doi":"10.1075/jlp.15.3.03rod","title":"The politics of office design","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporalities; Open plan; Politics; Framing (construction); Ideology; Semiotics; Sociology; Work (physics); Chronotope; Deregulation; Neoliberalism (international relations); Public relations; Political science; Political economy; Engineering; Management; Law; Art; Economics; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04311296411292006,"gpt":0.3085488723598984,"spread":0.2654359082469783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004832206,0.00004034958,0.00008819146,0.00001956498,0.0002221725,0.00002940112,0.0001154466,0.00004219417,0.00005595063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004014776,0.00001818145,0.0000345263,0.00004815153,0.0002108165,0.00006619113,0.00001557472,0.00005806603,0.000001525611],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004257965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000209673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000303076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004898354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993144,0.00008148684,0.0002101716,0.00002710613,0.0001910067,0.0001758888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990517,0.0004730033,0.0001596487,0.00004786061,0.0001660755,0.0001016575],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007021023,0.00009533512,0.004459173,0.00002898008,0.000227896,0.000117376,0.1025297,0.000002032652,0.003171947,0.4254991,0.3594975,0.1043007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003148322,0.0001139511,0.001245338,0.00008235149,0.00003094112,0.00003157603,0.03483527,6.649453e-7,0.003620314,0.003197548,0.9564455,0.00008168434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9582789,0.005017903,0.0007259533,0.02558758,0.0005097302,0.0001110987,0.00001456986,0.000008035693,0.009746257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9461087,0.0009272507,0.0004218252,0.0001786398,0.0007033905,2.253991e-7,9.085819e-8,0.000003703694,0.05165618],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.596948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1708793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108330218","doi":"10.1075/jlp.4.1.02gra","title":"The language of neofeudal corporatism and the war on Iraq","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Corporatism; Geopolitics; Postmodernism; Politics; Globalization; Capitalism; Vocabulary; Political economy; Political science; Sociology; Economic history; Linguistics; Law; History; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01025159480739297,"gpt":0.313290563787729,"spread":0.303038968980336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005397953,0.00003625603,0.00007610011,0.00003314772,0.0002290229,0.00003006493,0.00009300378,0.00003027216,0.00002357759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002464142,0.00001805753,0.00003917042,0.00003685574,0.0003251078,0.00006315246,0.00001232677,0.0001121777,0.000001877464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001778652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005787046,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005389436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001733566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999436,0.00007694707,0.0001713174,0.00002496153,0.0001953715,0.00009538283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992368,0.0004250055,0.000170994,0.00004927854,0.00007198598,0.00004595561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001654691,0.000008518244,0.0001727614,0.000001410175,0.00001707755,0.000004950612,0.04460782,0.000003596089,0.00001586876,0.9493312,0.0006643134,0.00515599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006736229,0.0007172879,0.01594499,0.0002424407,0.0002807976,0.0003705796,0.3090719,0.0009990393,0.001424439,0.2693479,0.3944367,0.0004276212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9009891,0.003110292,0.000027139,0.00474388,0.00006071204,0.00005127751,0.00001077873,0.00000209983,0.09100473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994171,0.000665864,0.0001150933,0.000531253,0.0008050913,3.125493e-7,3.378672e-7,0.000002673768,0.003708438],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6799833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1761482,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171041893","doi":"10.1075/jlp.10.3.07pel","title":"Language, rights and the language of language rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Language policy; Sociolinguistics; Sociology; Politics; Linguistics; Sociology of language; Epistemology; Political science; Comprehension approach; Language education; Law; Philosophy; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03395022828399977,"gpt":0.396845115637292,"spread":0.3628948873532922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008509058,0.0001270536,0.000300401,0.0001428399,0.0002467016,0.00004816654,0.0002418566,0.0001014842,0.0004693746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030246,0.00007726761,0.0001030298,0.0001331559,0.0005570479,0.0001462826,0.00003570508,0.000239698,0.000006903055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002411415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001425923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03911345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002614134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986327,0.0002959037,0.0003977996,0.00009616743,0.0002930913,0.0002842903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987648,0.0003376887,0.000347966,0.0001833772,0.0001251855,0.0002409853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004848549,0.00006524006,0.0002681961,0.00002954549,0.00004979287,0.00007678071,0.9321726,7.664372e-8,0.0002342708,0.06408197,0.000652151,0.002320886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005970943,0.0002950655,0.005253599,0.0002851212,0.000466958,0.0003374883,0.8916996,0.0000314288,0.01764709,0.01153123,0.06585289,0.0006285721],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9375947,0.004912243,0.000006907318,0.0004002902,0.0002553344,0.0001140071,0.00002168227,0.00001266544,0.05668221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989897,0.0001109371,0.0004781767,0.000538563,0.001128783,0.000001128403,0.000002149888,0.000009160312,0.007834137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06520074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9672852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383102274","doi":"10.1075/jlp.22126.mor","title":"“Hope dies – Action begins”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Vision; Action (physics); Nationalism; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Determinism; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.438425182919484,"gpt":0.5074250939270203,"spread":0.06899991100753627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003367543,0.00002602485,0.00005730272,0.00007945044,0.0001796206,0.00003787639,0.00006277573,0.00003180019,0.0001646263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001221191,0.00002229754,0.00002737647,0.0001012362,0.0000602292,0.0001068752,0.00001637663,0.00007140983,0.00002295439],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002630821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002636374,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002682923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005540194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996089,0.00006876213,0.00009605137,0.00002159001,0.0001112403,0.00009342545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996693,0.00008977386,0.00006852702,0.00005002313,0.00006098568,0.00006140543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001702098,0.00005412935,0.005639948,0.00005940081,0.00003607086,0.00004550281,0.8059986,0.000003543964,0.002738317,0.03504213,0.02165567,0.1287097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002157056,0.00005167353,0.01250567,0.0000425001,0.00002227584,0.00001655784,0.3134844,0.00002627949,0.00008715811,0.001800395,0.6716697,0.00007770108],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790117,0.0004252035,0.00000816643,0.005295505,0.0002135222,0.00002011315,0.000004532044,0.00001854288,0.01500277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820307,0.01366495,0.0000498743,0.0002929689,0.000751671,3.376348e-7,0.000004132727,0.000003313003,0.003202054],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.650014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1802543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382680232","doi":"10.1075/jlp.22125.vau","title":"ICT environmentalism and the sustainability game","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Conceptualization; Rhetoric; Information and Communications Technology; Rhetorical question; Politics; Public relations; Environmentalism; Political science; Sociology; Ecology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.142401090833312,"gpt":0.4302776146673712,"spread":0.2878765238340592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008443426,0.00002619053,0.0000632537,0.00002920352,0.0001679141,0.00003829202,0.00006806326,0.00002510465,0.00009194122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002066023,0.00001701166,0.00002512741,0.00005035156,0.0003363342,0.00005753809,0.00003500616,0.00007515066,0.000002932629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003762445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002139471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004595723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001085823,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995062,0.0001791589,0.00009976289,0.00002456779,0.0001007755,0.0000894802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995663,0.0002272077,0.00005800295,0.0000672363,0.00002680729,0.0000544137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000276051,0.00002576311,0.00628218,0.00003141815,0.00001704031,0.00001939263,0.882901,0.000001364685,0.00009207091,0.08520336,0.001440871,0.02395798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001037583,0.0000418493,0.04053206,0.00001881638,0.000040386,0.00003059223,0.6827356,0.00006611954,0.00001365369,0.02350262,0.2518967,0.00008406412],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.979946,0.0007765358,0.000004479095,0.01616717,0.00004629343,0.00004837483,0.000003899457,0.000005870756,0.003001336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897408,0.008533355,0.000009811642,0.0004124278,0.0002127665,5.862639e-7,0.000001527115,0.000002033579,0.001086682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2504558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1291477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052721092","doi":"10.1075/jlp.7.1.06sik","title":"Ballistic missile defense and articulation theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Articulation (sociology); Hegemony; Terrorism; Missile; Unilateralism; Missile defense; Ballistic missile; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Engineering; Aerospace engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03149874364386655,"gpt":0.3372270575892342,"spread":0.3057283139453676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004162262,0.00004929733,0.000109711,0.00003717817,0.0003795339,0.00001447837,0.00004486183,0.00009817114,0.0001327042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006652575,0.00003970189,0.00002986745,0.00003484933,0.0008449739,0.00009176317,0.00000862856,0.0001733146,0.000002833308],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000394189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001169014,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002865725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001019318,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993367,0.0001782068,0.0001465142,0.00004888439,0.0001534776,0.0001362416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993899,0.0002072964,0.0001153198,0.00004392807,0.0001047346,0.0001388085],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000281724,0.00005810579,0.009923759,0.00003272597,0.00004550418,0.0006014755,0.6017866,0.000004275576,0.0004554837,0.3802306,0.005915281,0.0009180122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002085848,0.0005522194,0.04711523,0.0002087257,0.0004812496,0.002469019,0.5472704,0.00006645084,0.0005240843,0.09232505,0.3061593,0.0007424032],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826126,0.006164996,0.0002506551,0.001406767,0.0002041744,0.00003241259,0.000003795702,0.000008253392,0.00931631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99534,0.0004412709,0.0004903138,0.0005489409,0.0005461515,1.414082e-7,5.514008e-7,0.000004295764,0.002628329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.300244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3113342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916387451","doi":"10.1075/jlp.14013.luk","title":"Varieties and effects of emotional content in public deliberation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Emotive; Framing (construction); Argumentative; Ballot; Narrative; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Psychology; Argumentation theory; CLARITY; Process (computing); Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Voting; Linguistics; Law; Engineering; History; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0125351522132924,"gpt":0.2059699510732384,"spread":0.193434798859946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001177095,0.00004593581,0.0001114313,0.0001373303,0.00002445378,0.00005561078,0.00003174421,0.00001772096,0.00004783439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000897981,0.00003628366,0.00001532301,0.00007077536,0.00002018162,0.0002818233,0.00004348961,0.00004134859,0.000002235932],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006455723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006491938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005520069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001433234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996094,0.000005360626,0.0001667864,0.00003681656,0.0001140202,0.00006769023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996639,0.00004821708,0.000134222,0.00002507017,0.0001222401,0.000006357566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001316696,0.00007431846,0.4518237,0.0008932275,0.00006814515,0.00001873055,0.0008999258,0.000006905185,0.0006603739,0.5426885,0.001369157,0.001483823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001891724,0.00007397911,0.969299,0.0001924385,0.00007960219,0.00001218689,0.002987646,0.0003421552,0.0002566599,0.01379518,0.0109108,0.0001586579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952689,0.001206331,0.0001200886,0.0007304593,0.0001183081,0.00005698038,4.357088e-7,0.000002438043,0.00249602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984224,0.00007459786,0.00009724189,0.0007527583,0.0002699032,2.335007e-7,0.000002602911,0.000003755503,0.0003765318],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5288934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1479605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754281940","doi":"10.1075/jlp.17008.sma","title":"Online negativity in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Negativity effect; Tone (literature); Adversary; Empirical evidence; Political science; Personality; Empirical research; Public relations; Social psychology; Advertising; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Linguistics; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02608884527467249,"gpt":0.3497679817756057,"spread":0.3236791365009332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001613297,0.00003882979,0.000126619,0.00002738647,0.0002140694,0.00004554861,0.0001515683,0.00003480757,0.00002506695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001062522,0.00003441696,0.00002131578,0.0000198202,0.0001196115,0.0001111148,0.00001684491,0.0001465508,3.320193e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001727783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001659398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.964919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9780481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999375,0.00006595295,0.0001463738,0.0000291881,0.0001882313,0.0001951996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993502,0.0001846096,0.0001690182,0.00007458958,0.00005753717,0.0001640381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007617923,0.00008205365,0.8184836,0.00002737942,0.0000264698,0.0008948668,0.1274198,9.272671e-7,0.000068544,0.03478074,0.002142501,0.01606554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001241934,0.00008159901,0.5017951,0.0001572441,0.0000541909,0.00003756972,0.348961,0.00001802218,0.0005646436,0.01065447,0.1361515,0.0002827273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917064,0.0002859547,0.00000124335,0.003429624,0.0005012265,0.00002150212,0.00001796101,0.000001128411,0.004034969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977179,0.0001476414,0.00008980928,0.0004390819,0.001309389,1.01773e-7,3.432586e-7,0.000002832084,0.0002929073],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3166885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2943701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035890857","doi":"10.1075/jlp.18030.ves","title":"Language ideological debates about linguistic landscapes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Signage; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Ethnic group; Linguistic landscape; Status quo; Sociology; Nationalism; Language ideology; Political science; Media studies; History; Law; Politics; Advertising; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04384175651882448,"gpt":0.4233923232069269,"spread":0.3795505666881024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002483166,0.00006714137,0.0001581558,0.000045358,0.000125206,0.00006196521,0.0001282929,0.00006475945,0.0003525476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002468311,0.00005173169,0.00005715482,0.00008660903,0.00008673477,0.00005043618,0.00001729843,0.000172108,0.0000145465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001525074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006740183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009727042,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992414,0.0001033112,0.0002265631,0.00006122793,0.0001694818,0.0001979986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999136,0.0002347058,0.0001318953,0.00004415531,0.000107014,0.0003462322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002711886,0.00005847315,0.006377078,0.00005202536,0.00003674284,0.0002154045,0.9488763,0.000004663669,0.000373416,0.03304165,0.002829771,0.008107365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00133313,0.0003654354,0.007473303,0.0001062081,0.0001424343,0.00009845891,0.2015728,0.0002046296,0.00131281,0.001474397,0.7855051,0.000411333],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9734936,0.003521412,0.00003200908,0.005287251,0.0002172501,0.00003964074,0.000008559437,0.00001896443,0.0173813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907732,0.0002233322,0.000394461,0.003967253,0.003837632,2.90198e-7,0.000001676815,0.000005553532,0.0007966256],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7826753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3860149,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406143571","doi":"10.1075/jlp.24126.mcc","title":"From social awareness to authoritarian other","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Moral panic; Authoritarianism; Framing (construction); Democracy; Ideology; Politics; Legitimacy; Sociology; Critical discourse analysis; Political science; Political economy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02032257724883747,"gpt":0.3767423217216229,"spread":0.3564197444727854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003443689,0.00005913003,0.0001911641,0.0000748266,0.0004282537,0.00009007242,0.0001345308,0.00008986856,0.00008650337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002081719,0.00005395946,0.00007506214,0.0001197814,0.00007540989,0.00007801682,0.00001642578,0.0001219601,0.000004265571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006210842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003203776,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009561475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001981783,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992515,0.0001176394,0.000193013,0.00006180276,0.0001784234,0.0001975968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995068,0.0001311523,0.00007524458,0.00004666572,0.0001186487,0.0001214898],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004378416,0.0000658674,0.005829404,0.0000172712,0.0001380625,0.00007510694,0.5296922,6.067114e-7,0.000440026,0.4262075,0.01508311,0.02240706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007681384,0.00004856521,0.006391976,0.00007605336,0.0001317603,0.00000114947,0.2324346,0.000003532803,0.000150737,0.03069956,0.7291222,0.0001717199],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9284988,0.001293219,0.0007800933,0.01046104,0.001042616,0.00008285631,0.0000463773,0.00001429896,0.05778067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902358,0.00001849803,0.0001767096,0.001723485,0.003845388,6.469152e-7,6.07615e-7,0.000004791411,0.003994084],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.714039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997034,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076475960","doi":"10.1075/jlp.13.2.07jak","title":"Denotational boundary disputes in political discourse","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Field (mathematics); Focus (optics); Politics; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Law; History; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01843458698000942,"gpt":0.2889060372825641,"spread":0.2704714503025547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001223768,0.00006104214,0.0001451537,0.0000835565,0.00008943208,0.00005928965,0.00005191726,0.00002038569,0.0000622411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002196564,0.00004399737,0.00003396754,0.000007581254,0.0003087304,0.00005245502,0.00002094143,0.0001172333,0.000002777952],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001312749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003127275,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001076965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001889584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994483,0.00002657619,0.000213029,0.00004401494,0.00008963335,0.0001784739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995521,0.0001893916,0.00007019559,0.00004231926,0.00007930488,0.00006674592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000350846,0.0000347681,0.005602829,0.00001460169,0.00001970009,0.00005876899,0.01913685,1.682727e-7,0.000003348109,0.9741103,0.0003301321,0.000685019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00267954,0.0008587974,0.04764497,0.0002639137,0.0002461099,0.0004100491,0.08654888,0.0002797842,0.0001472452,0.4069461,0.4534188,0.0005558261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719292,0.0007702576,0.00002739822,0.001590181,0.0004017654,0.00001677512,0.00001907102,0.00000356399,0.02524178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964567,0.00001310128,0.0001327724,0.000683515,0.001997603,3.503311e-7,0.000002098335,0.000005105545,0.0007087266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5671642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1794161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999362386","doi":"10.1075/jlp.9.2.05pan","title":"Governing ‘others’","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Safeguarding; Power (physics); Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Liberalism; Intervention (counseling); Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Politics; Law; Gender studies; Psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01391013881821421,"gpt":0.3214612007687062,"spread":0.3075510619504919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001448239,0.00003634148,0.000112693,0.00005111876,0.00002302987,0.000006307538,0.00002714265,0.00004749133,0.00003946809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004239703,0.00002443372,0.00002761598,0.00002948647,0.00004888811,0.00003333954,0.000008962352,0.0003143579,0.00000329709],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007644631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005689992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001688674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001642331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996443,0.000005049498,0.0001243872,0.00003783999,0.00008301809,0.0001054297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999643,0.00002957357,0.00008655734,0.0000911144,0.00006085858,0.00008894774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000260477,0.000357973,0.3487265,0.0007345411,0.0002615172,0.002723823,0.02039142,4.884456e-7,0.3840375,0.06337348,0.01219483,0.1669375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004174886,0.002386892,0.2382434,0.0002818722,0.0002936429,0.01893536,0.02036993,0.00002530332,0.1035968,0.005967044,0.6054016,0.0003233271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920445,0.001143241,0.00002517775,0.002032934,0.0001604459,0.00002712213,0.000001685878,0.00001009279,0.004554822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957521,0.00008250782,0.00235672,0.000494673,0.000675291,1.421138e-7,2.832569e-7,0.000004906252,0.0006333513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5932067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1365746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031147083","doi":"10.1075/jlp.13.1.10kow","title":"Erreygers & Jacobs, (eds.), 2005. Language, Communication and the Economy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01388851791186122,"gpt":0.2390347605108863,"spread":0.2251462425990251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005580924,0.00009083378,0.0001990932,0.00007265456,0.0002699133,0.0002490924,0.000170453,0.00003323169,0.0002550781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001168032,0.00006081975,0.0000671631,0.00001026931,0.0004009373,0.00015475,0.0000705132,0.0001877413,0.00001278948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000148481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001953278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001151493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001069936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999336,0.0001176318,0.0002343782,0.00006084371,0.00009446759,0.0001566622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989465,0.0002491447,0.0002109384,0.0001845861,0.0003165611,0.00009219864],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006038538,0.0000719229,0.001829478,0.000131938,0.0001970221,0.0000198256,0.5601084,0.000002198583,0.00000623027,0.362719,0.07196464,0.002888876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002707934,0.00006857439,0.0004095289,0.00008761149,0.0003557447,0.00003243233,0.1489379,0.0001069069,0.00004351194,0.01879688,0.8281784,0.0002745042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9446194,0.01582097,0.00007162894,0.0007495179,0.001559403,0.00009607246,0.00003606541,0.00001646531,0.03703045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859771,0.0005714276,0.0001639628,0.001405211,0.006731709,4.676459e-7,0.000009420678,0.000009230806,0.005131514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7562138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2792926,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416647151","doi":"10.1075/jlp.24257.cat","title":"“We are workers, we are not slaves”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Embodied cognition; Negotiation; Ideology; Work (physics); Domestic work","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0137685521872841,"gpt":0.3202166545902886,"spread":0.3064481024030045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002460954,0.00005858955,0.0001391388,0.00009421302,0.0001598388,0.00008075316,0.0001058286,0.00007455069,0.00009136883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001904042,0.00004794135,0.00005696329,0.000148287,0.00007571889,0.00008794446,0.00001486149,0.0001590374,0.000003026111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004576372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001585551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001683191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002193245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993295,0.00008445311,0.0001953847,0.0000507357,0.0001776683,0.0001622326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994107,0.0001072766,0.0001898801,0.00006598995,0.000111563,0.0001146205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006113627,0.0002018812,0.07114407,0.0002029689,0.0002040224,0.0004819978,0.4282177,0.00003622003,0.0002245355,0.3761034,0.1059068,0.01721527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000476147,0.00003414324,0.005343078,0.0004184637,0.0000713405,0.00001155892,0.3595327,0.00007504818,0.0001157536,0.003145979,0.6306376,0.0001381712],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9426941,0.004964996,0.0002465503,0.03845814,0.000503373,0.00005831203,0.00002982526,0.00001498974,0.01302975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656494,0.002002015,0.0002782069,0.002114249,0.0005550585,2.890102e-7,8.015256e-7,0.000004220534,0.02939574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5247308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1954992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}