{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":8,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"d28a58d27189","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Law and Courts"}},"results":[{"id":"W2335318655","doi":"10.1086/677057","title":"The Politics of Judicial Retirement in Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Supreme court; Kingdom; Political science; Test (biology); Law; Mandatory retirement; Demographic economics; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Tajuana D. Massie","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kirk A. Randazzo","is_ca":false},{"name":"Donald R. Songer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02627512220332856,"gpt":0.2725991933721596,"spread":0.246324071168831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00267443,0.0001017515,0.0003215711,0.001957661,0.01085421,0.004061204,0.0009293176,0.001123985,0.003557947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01139039,0.0001749924,0.0002046079,0.002920874,0.005280077,0.0006681,0.001875488,0.001583803,0.0001716177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07860672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05673881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9836512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9938962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955783,0.0005431307,0.00008148378,0.000250623,0.000819307,0.002727022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852048,0.002435571,0.001910823,0.0003527566,0.00523208,0.004863902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006372533,0.0001168953,0.646251,0.0001416102,0.0001059375,0.00193756,0.05293509,0.003347519,0.0009270575,0.1856314,0.04598168,0.06198703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004003654,0.00004639875,0.8398798,0.0003098371,0.00004270093,0.0002318013,0.06486572,0.001634372,0.0004786597,0.003975256,0.08837617,0.0001193417],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.950536,0.002309876,0.0002114543,0.01334376,0.00007474557,0.00001858878,0.0003914795,0.00001117009,0.03310298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968576,0.0003022696,0.00003357187,0.0003952063,0.000007658774,0.000001769107,0.00004178394,0.000002880157,0.002357326],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07860672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5703343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969192061","doi":"10.1086/674453","title":"Theorizing the Constitutional Revolution","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Subject (documents); Character (mathematics); Order (exchange); Political science; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Gary J. Jacobsohn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02012882934917559,"gpt":0.2805538170763119,"spread":0.2604249877271363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009139467,0.0002974354,0.0003954487,0.002925683,0.004447911,0.006948226,0.001666303,0.003895439,0.006473734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01058014,0.0002388162,0.0005232921,0.002110334,0.05919548,0.008462379,0.005399543,0.005270401,0.000462429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007297215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004209965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003741407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003000988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939601,0.004076201,0.0001155744,0.000560069,0.0007368412,0.0005512184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921779,0.005716882,0.0004498374,0.000851354,0.0004724062,0.0003317361],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[8.060783e-7,0.000001937726,0.00003400638,0.000004242299,5.266665e-7,0.000009841513,0.0004906347,0.0001052992,0.000006726059,0.9987392,0.0002667251,0.0003400264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073333,0.000004439019,0.00008618555,0.00003811611,0.000002884871,0.00001759791,0.000854507,0.0004665012,0.00003113573,0.9813796,0.01710903,0.000002810968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05695663,0.006097938,0.04255458,0.07008514,0.0006154853,0.00007620104,0.0001293947,0.00009993862,0.8233847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854615,0.001190256,0.003518861,0.002141184,0.0002673611,0.00007133217,0.00004763117,0.00002791895,0.00727397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009139467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05294526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000357133","doi":"10.1086/704740","title":"Advisors to Elites","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Legal advice; Politics; Public relations; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Economic Justice; Computer science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Sara C. Benesh","is_ca":false},{"name":"David Armstrong","is_ca":true},{"name":"Zachary Wallander","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03423613159496956,"gpt":0.3016998921379778,"spread":0.2674637605430082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006884495,0.0002299193,0.0004756611,0.00240857,0.003305646,0.003502613,0.0006004202,0.002070256,0.02131405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1057256,0.0001757117,0.0001664738,0.001814273,0.003040391,0.001966921,0.002056921,0.002635047,0.0014072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003287096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002819458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01593766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02379514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9907063,0.00493451,0.0003190033,0.0007331379,0.00125161,0.002055487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8577814,0.08698788,0.02810154,0.004817378,0.007849906,0.01446186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00123713,0.001066766,0.5341,0.0006167156,0.0002392225,0.001614488,0.02291007,0.003061668,0.001367645,0.1056217,0.05820358,0.2699611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004987851,0.0007961768,0.63675,0.001113043,0.0003347578,0.0006860104,0.04598399,0.008749852,0.002253446,0.1508508,0.1518454,0.0001377663],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.821481,0.001743714,0.002164933,0.03273518,0.0002395339,0.00007437728,0.0002327579,0.000101552,0.141227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943233,0.000243874,0.0002225954,0.001174776,0.0001504944,0.000009110383,0.00002135973,0.000008331028,0.003846147],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02131405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07130259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030363845","doi":"10.1086/673873","title":"Rehabilitating the Declaratory Theory of the Common Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legislation","authors":[{"name":"Brian Zamulinski","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02214349315025743,"gpt":0.2970554508928305,"spread":0.274911957742573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01413366,0.0004409115,0.0007790843,0.001458254,0.005568845,0.01010504,0.003106271,0.007928886,0.01032689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02500906,0.0004091115,0.0008876278,0.0008675006,0.0341782,0.0113941,0.007499872,0.009439806,0.001305627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007642882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007873652,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007367039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006632803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9886269,0.005029292,0.0005164449,0.001786714,0.00281986,0.001220732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854843,0.006019309,0.001190461,0.003608137,0.002957431,0.0007404359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002459462,0.000003598351,0.00004191971,0.000003564388,8.929898e-7,0.0000232188,0.0002857943,0.0001269286,0.00001742659,0.9984633,0.0005593915,0.0004715457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001088159,0.000008679935,0.00007563237,0.00003231224,0.000004571284,0.00003643845,0.0003664662,0.001811804,0.0001045019,0.9878604,0.009679637,0.000008761889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0530696,0.0009077715,0.1159878,0.08286067,0.001305167,0.0001241955,0.0001108148,0.00016461,0.7454692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716741,0.0002186886,0.007914943,0.003438757,0.0003196755,0.00007944075,0.00004149689,0.00004290844,0.01626997],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01413366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07474685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217106214","doi":"10.1086/716786","title":"Giving Succor to Extremism?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Free speech; Political science; Politics; Violent extremism; Law; Human rights; Speech act; Law and economics; Terrorism; Sociology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Stephan Stohler","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02902656697894096,"gpt":0.3060229546238744,"spread":0.2769963876449334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009246824,0.0001936927,0.0003977205,0.001620387,0.00368752,0.004130771,0.0008233971,0.003478117,0.009429277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09207582,0.0001824986,0.0002814906,0.0008110822,0.008038338,0.002487508,0.001909924,0.004636266,0.0008714595],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001097688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001136351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001945587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004212385,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9907854,0.005177139,0.0005114545,0.0007412705,0.001196325,0.001588468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9292501,0.04187462,0.01313527,0.004112475,0.004933891,0.00669358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000678403,0.000459249,0.370111,0.0004895066,0.0003288678,0.008035112,0.03845102,0.001061044,0.002325085,0.412334,0.03595334,0.1297735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001377204,0.0005989711,0.2277659,0.001741915,0.0003399107,0.008911482,0.0614701,0.002838858,0.003519043,0.5608344,0.1316447,0.000197102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7369277,0.002613441,0.005098803,0.09116337,0.0007290837,0.00004694138,0.0001123581,0.00004852901,0.1632596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954746,0.0002674531,0.0001227874,0.002435589,0.0002640116,0.000005283097,0.00001388887,0.000006205952,0.001410045],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009429277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04890245,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154912574","doi":"10.1086/714576","title":"The Emerging Authority of Magistrate Judges within US District Courts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Magistrate; Adjudication; Political science; Law; Discretion; Supreme court; Delegation; Hierarchy","authors":[{"name":"Christina L. Boyd","is_ca":false},{"name":"Tracey E. George","is_ca":false},{"name":"Albert Yoon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02561682390776235,"gpt":0.3060011933420924,"spread":0.28038436943433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008552971,0.0000708634,0.0002574221,0.002779267,0.003735093,0.004370579,0.001094729,0.0008521667,0.00348081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03086601,0.0002091031,0.0001612909,0.001974538,0.002616328,0.001385764,0.002404518,0.001446811,0.0003581904],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005470162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003340715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05210817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1762592,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934535,0.002348809,0.000263726,0.001038058,0.00139017,0.001505812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.973605,0.009714814,0.006351514,0.001338609,0.005888153,0.003101981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002292884,0.00009345778,0.8170338,0.00009261074,0.00007381284,0.0004613641,0.05067806,0.000715782,0.002563884,0.06749647,0.005997967,0.05456346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001342905,0.00006694639,0.9540207,0.0001129776,0.00003623624,0.0001075837,0.02403765,0.0008346043,0.0007461436,0.006868529,0.01311627,0.00003887299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9783724,0.0006975457,0.0008263487,0.00202638,0.00001745461,0.00001448604,0.0001268047,0.0000101395,0.01790843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991365,0.00005869308,0.00007335649,0.0001165031,0.00001184685,0.00000198847,0.00002184114,0.000001290954,0.0005781151],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05210817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1036097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4353075517","doi":"10.1017/jlc.2022.18","title":"Dignity Disputed","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Notre Dame","keywords":"Dignity; Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Vision; Law; Meaning (existential); Constitutionalism; Value (mathematics); Constitution; Political science; Sociology; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Connor M. Ewing","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03030208408132806,"gpt":0.3291823626288801,"spread":0.298880278547552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008160481,0.0003194749,0.0006475303,0.001036775,0.006886421,0.007812858,0.002202209,0.01333444,0.01088255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01697755,0.0003782852,0.0005652878,0.0006923876,0.01949754,0.005769503,0.008560055,0.01135268,0.001398806],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006862907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009069687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00983292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9910207,0.002207136,0.0006728504,0.002039735,0.002558994,0.001500548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959238,0.001916579,0.0002757796,0.0006283997,0.0008782673,0.0003771855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001820439,0.00001300792,0.0002654812,0.00002382993,0.000006409116,0.0003882935,0.002493777,0.00006866585,0.000313702,0.9857792,0.005278488,0.005351033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004166978,0.00008452093,0.0008874616,0.0005650471,0.00004287861,0.0009999232,0.003685002,0.0004457235,0.001613396,0.5713091,0.4202606,0.00006465796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05792448,0.00424978,0.0113345,0.07985099,0.003182715,0.0001627149,0.00029054,0.00007546955,0.8429289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8875702,0.001064432,0.001946501,0.0364571,0.001030673,0.0001502479,0.0001515827,0.00004096686,0.07158837],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01333444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04979414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406623865","doi":"10.1017/jlc.2024.29","title":"The Demand for Insurance: Incorporating the Severity of Losing Office into the Insurance Model of Judicial Independence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Actuarial science; Business; Statistics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Brad Epperly","is_ca":true},{"name":"Yuleng Zeng","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02252910343475681,"gpt":0.2373339436505603,"spread":0.2148048402158035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003022133,0.0004983642,0.001246645,0.001485222,0.000925997,0.004188152,0.002424204,0.003600541,0.01207648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01215411,0.0008909552,0.001095628,0.001326253,0.002730586,0.003279929,0.002080152,0.003256263,0.0007799318],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003545763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001734064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01413494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01081086,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998525,0.0004845385,0.00006479381,0.0002199938,0.0002004448,0.0005053369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858333,0.009427098,0.002113329,0.0006147527,0.0006317589,0.001379641],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002356297,0.0006969761,0.03456827,0.00008505025,0.0001229669,0.0006958909,0.0004885832,0.4408064,0.0008921809,0.5092381,0.003821743,0.008348162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006212129,0.000105586,0.007516283,0.00003147271,0.00005741018,0.00012192,0.0004253233,0.7775871,0.0001514295,0.2125063,0.001377985,0.00005706782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.842202,0.0006514369,0.1030274,0.01202118,0.000113156,0.00009544945,0.001125595,0.0001460195,0.0406177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957391,0.0001393685,0.0008719143,0.00009154587,0.00006841779,0.00001332181,0.00008007032,0.00001133232,0.002984973],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01413494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04039991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}