{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":24,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":24,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"89b07d0daab9","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Law and Religion"}},"results":[{"id":"W3124715716","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2014.18","title":"ALEVIS UNDER LAW: THE POLITICS OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN TURKEY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Turkey's Politics and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; State (computer science); Human rights; Politics; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Turkish; International law; Sociology; Law and economics","authors":[{"name":"Elizabeth Shakman Hurd","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01275993663737355,"gpt":0.282625891764569,"spread":0.2698659551271954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003662419,0.0004060997,0.0003276987,0.0008125075,0.01119202,0.007747383,0.001181165,0.003810961,0.002534916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002352273,0.0002756865,0.0003240053,0.0008408392,0.01706417,0.002352518,0.004956769,0.003488927,0.0003090188],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01338213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005593847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02242338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02779362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973923,0.000999353,0.0001087865,0.0002755987,0.0003965753,0.0008274315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987771,0.0005250874,0.0002684742,0.0001044769,0.0001621305,0.0001626766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000169426,0.0001612222,0.01305533,0.0001923811,0.0000269637,0.008304371,0.1534986,0.0009993988,0.002301406,0.7840247,0.006442713,0.03082353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001163659,0.0003486667,0.05328261,0.0007708906,0.00007263077,0.002947456,0.4952068,0.002079202,0.002771296,0.07118396,0.3710346,0.0001855165],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8219001,0.001857535,0.0005277321,0.008342441,0.0001761641,0.00003360504,0.00002347603,0.00002227986,0.1671166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962579,0.0001397368,0.0000949735,0.0005230704,0.0000137213,0.000004903111,0.000006271724,0.000003760289,0.002955624],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02242338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0970946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143711301","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2014.26","title":"COPTS AND THE MILLET PARTNERSHIP: THE INTRA-COMMUNAL DYNAMICS BEHIND EGYPTIAN SECTARIANISM","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Sectarianism; Scholarship; Politics; Dynamics (music); Political science; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Paul Sedra","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009595350778706059,"gpt":0.2508278721558864,"spread":0.2412325213771804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00122345,0.00009066897,0.0000844536,0.0006782445,0.004792863,0.004634445,0.0003260411,0.0007080089,0.003607428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001510126,0.00009870049,0.00005034697,0.0009377067,0.01434037,0.001938835,0.003937221,0.001233716,0.0001330106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004436841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002357677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01113175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0227719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992858,0.0003580549,0.00001426713,0.00004747011,0.00008403617,0.0002104647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992155,0.0003220917,0.0001814654,0.0000605834,0.00008293769,0.0001374633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004607074,0.00002316819,0.006331855,0.00003309543,0.00000564051,0.0007730477,0.2481682,0.0001801951,0.0003537873,0.7304437,0.001518869,0.01212226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003144882,0.00006232897,0.03583612,0.0002319334,0.00001251862,0.0005561232,0.6787955,0.001295079,0.0007863849,0.1089855,0.1733773,0.00002974745],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8705243,0.000517862,0.0007372505,0.005650233,0.00001793631,0.00001063683,0.00001597234,0.000007608303,0.1225182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985789,0.00005082979,0.00002662885,0.00004326562,0.000002971478,0.000001317165,0.000001211593,0.00000104839,0.001293811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01113175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03219163,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210931790","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2021.79","title":"A Theory of a State? How Civil Law Ended Legal Pluralism in Modern Egypt","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University; University of Exeter","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Law; Lawmaking; Sharia; Sovereignty; Jurisprudence; Legal formalism; Political science; State (computer science); Islam; Comparative law; Legal research; Legal realism; Legal culture; Sociology; Philosophy; Private law; Black letter law; Theology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Samy Ayoub","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01403113546815337,"gpt":0.2516528177421173,"spread":0.2376216822739639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003496138,0.0002139975,0.0002961513,0.001911085,0.008836995,0.008233065,0.0009716979,0.002242198,0.004407675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003166375,0.0002461422,0.0003432017,0.001692902,0.05573188,0.007281777,0.004596213,0.003295044,0.0002714254],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01991915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006573435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0238131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02763226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983109,0.0008423862,0.00008545505,0.0002289602,0.0002210991,0.0003111632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984046,0.0006925566,0.0002203246,0.0002356583,0.0002754586,0.0001715023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002842043,0.000004866034,0.000138982,0.000007274374,0.000001254331,0.00004651732,0.01173533,0.0001140794,0.00002241873,0.9861854,0.0002375688,0.001503419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001439721,0.00001326886,0.0007941119,0.00008568209,0.000007012124,0.00007877093,0.0291209,0.000975572,0.0001650429,0.91219,0.05653983,0.00001542215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2807381,0.004535832,0.01226299,0.04168235,0.0001311845,0.00008145525,0.00007423775,0.00005391648,0.6604399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912225,0.0002819123,0.0007422737,0.0003710438,0.00002546099,0.00001429195,0.000009263978,0.000008598426,0.007324676],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0238131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1445242,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796185122","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2018.10","title":"JUDGING RELIGION AND JUDGES' RELIGIONS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Precept; Argument (complex analysis); Judicial opinion; Faith; Law; Political science; Religious freedom; Sociology; Epistemology; Economic freedom; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Howard Kislowicz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01593608438831546,"gpt":0.3056923283996676,"spread":0.2897562440113521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02196189,0.0001133569,0.0002846962,0.002700114,0.004112559,0.00559014,0.0006954153,0.00140013,0.003677756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1462957,0.0001490347,0.0001848665,0.001767679,0.01404099,0.002153383,0.002276384,0.002173172,0.0002655653],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005365036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004066658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04381913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09741945,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9823943,0.0102059,0.0007476744,0.0008573993,0.004135599,0.001659071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8382931,0.1091805,0.01998713,0.002854821,0.02296166,0.006722785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004599535,0.0003278412,0.5556232,0.0001717129,0.0001504072,0.001185996,0.0960912,0.001385788,0.002155304,0.2838362,0.01064117,0.0479713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001847096,0.0002973953,0.616266,0.000762696,0.0001744312,0.0004672541,0.1095319,0.005359282,0.002918985,0.2183236,0.04548377,0.0002299496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8583674,0.0004962605,0.002188842,0.009610746,0.0001691661,0.00005734533,0.00006199426,0.00001110012,0.1290371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990633,0.00005031967,0.0001706359,0.0002622854,0.00001900265,0.000004009736,0.000004997979,0.000001567675,0.0004237685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04381913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1161469,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122798071","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2019.12","title":"VARIETIES OF BURDEN IN RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATIONS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Expansive; Ratification; Burden of proof; Coercion (linguistics); Law; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Anna Su","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01171257262975332,"gpt":0.2899487815824551,"spread":0.2782362089527018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008730598,0.0003632213,0.0006762349,0.003894663,0.006165371,0.009322057,0.001828168,0.003750073,0.006541749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02400617,0.0004490142,0.0008454408,0.001898289,0.03460442,0.009735617,0.01013206,0.004713262,0.0005743242],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005158042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003505307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006409212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004855643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9867034,0.005319726,0.0008957877,0.0009980501,0.004423097,0.001659813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987071,0.005513702,0.001367755,0.002308113,0.003002394,0.0007369487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008506922,0.000007717504,0.0003705065,0.00001049168,0.000003287935,0.00005533504,0.00141307,0.00008709975,0.00008739196,0.996374,0.0002060319,0.001376599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002413771,0.00003684796,0.002533051,0.0001920653,0.00002307567,0.0002249098,0.00387674,0.001001376,0.0003475477,0.9746943,0.01701507,0.00003088723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2090795,0.001201236,0.04747352,0.01293335,0.0003579745,0.0001819008,0.0001700574,0.00008346251,0.728519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930514,0.0001497062,0.001932841,0.0005341059,0.00008193724,0.00005146146,0.00003177925,0.00001536334,0.004151397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009322057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04617238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575386710","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2016.36","title":"WHAT'S THE HARM IN POLYGAMY? MULTICULTURAL TOLERATION AND WOMEN'S EXPERIENCE OF PLURAL MARRIAGE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Constitutionality; Charter; Political science; Constitution; Freedom of religion; Duty; Toleration; Substantive due process; Due Process Clause; Jurisdiction; Sociology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Lisa Fishbayn Joffe","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02544161329025139,"gpt":0.3144498797414884,"spread":0.289008266451237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005265998,0.0004153126,0.0005623435,0.00117109,0.02703385,0.009906568,0.001141563,0.003555322,0.002366757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008555782,0.0003808387,0.0003691102,0.001116975,0.05112117,0.007788146,0.009827089,0.005060908,0.0001634197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003576114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003356137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02015237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02671107,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915041,0.006620398,0.0001255604,0.0002360403,0.0005487605,0.0009651551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965814,0.001659664,0.0004684093,0.000165397,0.0002239939,0.0009011586],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001223119,0.00001784916,0.001536707,0.00002479042,0.000004415564,0.0004218008,0.968551,0.00001196214,0.0001108962,0.0247457,0.0013397,0.003222781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005588819,0.00003583901,0.001470804,0.00008808642,0.000004619123,0.0006246063,0.96057,0.00003600248,0.00005613159,0.00703972,0.03005331,0.00001534137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7394054,0.01393539,0.0009827132,0.142326,0.001410572,0.00002784928,0.00002792212,0.00003094835,0.1018532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897633,0.001485528,0.0001168961,0.004659504,0.0002263817,0.00001151676,0.000004109937,0.00001043722,0.003722266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02703385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04007012,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586824842","doi":"10.1017/s0748081400000692","title":"Religion in the Abortion Discourse in Singapore: A Case Study of the Relevance of Religious Arguments in Law-Making in Multi-Religious Democracies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in Asia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Torture; Human rights; Appeal; Law; Autonomy; Population; Political science; Birth control; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Family planning","authors":[{"name":"Seow Hon Tan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02115721688109104,"gpt":0.3464194949883225,"spread":0.3252622781072314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009236389,0.0004572327,0.0006105083,0.00170298,0.02614944,0.007075437,0.001831224,0.005540711,0.004030923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01100548,0.0005138541,0.0006311424,0.002712768,0.01791079,0.004670424,0.008822786,0.008452825,0.0004238086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01484704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008881344,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07361989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1609155,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9891071,0.008435047,0.000342575,0.0003132832,0.0007522439,0.001049809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879984,0.007637527,0.001755779,0.0004041915,0.0006472762,0.001556913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001404994,0.00008529553,0.005726957,0.00006929507,0.000007600025,0.006609729,0.9732868,0.00003761411,0.0002580484,0.01021106,0.0007884648,0.002905122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001054452,0.00005396231,0.007543387,0.0001955656,0.00001442014,0.001396832,0.965415,0.0002155269,0.0002950861,0.001186249,0.02364858,0.00002484041],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601721,0.001339323,0.0002704657,0.01485948,0.00006086461,0.00005314146,0.0000268198,0.000006998011,0.02321084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944173,0.0006472067,0.0001794198,0.001227325,0.00002501473,0.00003187764,0.00001433183,0.000007937138,0.003449627],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07361989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1463827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281650871","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2022.16","title":"Saffron Suffrage: Buddhist Monks and Constitutional Politics in Cambodia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Cambodian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centre for Asia-Pacific Initiatives; National University of Singapore; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Buddhism; Constitution; Politics; Secular state; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Suffrage; Secularism; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin Lawrence","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01180530193386682,"gpt":0.2651618502207718,"spread":0.253356548286905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002463836,0.0001638102,0.0002200322,0.0008644661,0.00958869,0.004332718,0.0005073427,0.001385521,0.004900208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002266424,0.0002089759,0.00007591431,0.00121538,0.01893391,0.002270138,0.003034067,0.00231602,0.0001277743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007948241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003218596,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04123566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1009638,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989163,0.0005837146,0.00002522454,0.0001122644,0.00005460938,0.0003079244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984628,0.001103385,0.0001656227,0.00009478277,0.00005322229,0.0001203348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006024472,0.00002307143,0.01143187,0.0001792677,0.000009181725,0.001568266,0.7841876,0.00008901334,0.001441271,0.1862687,0.001693193,0.01304846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001241182,0.00004448821,0.04131284,0.00050287,0.00000915308,0.0002604236,0.8531151,0.0002081796,0.0006721413,0.0090785,0.09475856,0.00002529279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9365538,0.002064184,0.0002828959,0.006129862,0.00005614979,0.00002861827,0.00003981457,0.000005779111,0.05483897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980451,0.0001842693,0.0000425867,0.0002396664,0.000006464035,0.00000573507,0.000007263995,0.000001812034,0.001467132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04123566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08199126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118239658","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2020.52","title":"REASON-GIVING AND THE DUTY TO OBEY: PERSPECTIVES FROM CLASSICAL ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Duty; Islam; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Law; Virtue; Meaning (existential); Sharia; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Omar Farahat","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009431553668676443,"gpt":0.2907095307392636,"spread":0.2812779770705872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00976553,0.0003350306,0.0005392162,0.001986231,0.005046932,0.008190601,0.001586411,0.005505887,0.002377207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006009993,0.000308301,0.0004499639,0.001601827,0.06150248,0.006739315,0.003510321,0.006535116,0.0002743296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00696465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002608198,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004145706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002726204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930785,0.004964876,0.0001720117,0.0003364499,0.001043038,0.0004050506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906591,0.006973773,0.0005608805,0.0004911327,0.0008578628,0.0004573366],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002703832,0.000005517501,0.00002658119,0.000008723699,0.000001069819,0.00002384066,0.002477935,0.0001085386,0.000009802745,0.9965712,0.0002687577,0.0004954027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006806576,0.000006500004,0.0001092159,0.00005592898,0.000001812735,0.00003197584,0.001792884,0.0005691258,0.00001945078,0.9888747,0.008525363,0.00000636096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1017842,0.02508042,0.03225943,0.1240525,0.0008781716,0.00005435617,0.00007816563,0.00003884135,0.7157739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904187,0.001948864,0.001896554,0.002379077,0.0004325537,0.00001814947,0.000009427167,0.000008232919,0.002888365],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00976553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0516457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114692900","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2014.35","title":"CHRISTIAN PRACTICE AS THE FOUNDATION FOR MODERN POLITICAL THEOLOGY","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Orthodoxy; Politics; Archbishop; Sovereignty; Political theology; State (computer science); Dominion; Theology; Philosophy; Catholic theology; Religious studies; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Athanasios Giocas","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04127867305509867,"gpt":0.3990068253821988,"spread":0.3577281523271001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00551836,0.0003234047,0.0004003446,0.001529396,0.007534775,0.008801212,0.0008010421,0.003186731,0.005674023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004379988,0.0002502703,0.0002007062,0.001120459,0.04530536,0.005950553,0.003775462,0.00778805,0.0008032171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008089895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006018222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004306162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004344127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969074,0.001767066,0.00009683361,0.0003732284,0.0004323951,0.0004230882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973109,0.001402235,0.0001838891,0.0005134339,0.0002525804,0.0003369285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001374295,0.00000381556,0.00002770842,0.000009410213,4.341104e-7,0.000008461349,0.002192931,0.00003635339,0.0000161414,0.9948164,0.001285993,0.001601136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001058137,0.000011769,0.0001616015,0.0001600188,0.000001273297,0.00002825882,0.002016417,0.0001850863,0.00006348614,0.7712641,0.22609,0.000007401709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02837167,0.03758411,0.01018661,0.1086917,0.003144747,0.00006170434,0.0000589807,0.00008077404,0.8118197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9212803,0.009025584,0.0041446,0.007652671,0.00353807,0.0001091689,0.00003684553,0.0000776025,0.05413526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008801212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05869663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318066208","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2022.57","title":"The Limits of Defining Identity in Religion-Gender Conflicts: A Response to Patrick Parkinson","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Identity (music); Sincerity; Faith; Transgender; Government (linguistics); Gender identity; Belief system; Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Gender studies; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Laura Portuondo","is_ca":false},{"name":"Claudia E. Haupt","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03900396709018261,"gpt":0.3529645084555882,"spread":0.3139605413654056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03348812,0.000745443,0.001660608,0.001193962,0.0171095,0.01383015,0.004374353,0.04281002,0.002836856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05928052,0.0008898285,0.0008356045,0.001593502,0.06289044,0.02262485,0.01232551,0.06796897,0.000532876],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01154562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01221561,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0256573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02035734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9721441,0.01766025,0.0009712664,0.003193786,0.004401308,0.001629321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9093332,0.07792664,0.001713436,0.001467764,0.005719509,0.003839487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006444396,0.0000546136,0.0005759733,0.0001211681,0.00001535373,0.0008581916,0.03392822,0.0002666792,0.0001996567,0.5997034,0.3496282,0.01458414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009049062,0.00006544441,0.0007954712,0.0009778483,0.00002095598,0.00100438,0.04483981,0.0008730408,0.0006062392,0.3592563,0.591276,0.0001940151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001653644,0.002358703,0.000376985,0.9906693,0.001461461,0.000005447355,0.000007213696,0.000006430806,0.003460828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1265601,0.004681565,0.00151978,0.8552471,0.006356356,0.00007335518,0.00001195304,0.00006055969,0.005489219],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04281002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1771042,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283806312","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2022.18","title":"Neutralizing Secularism: Religious Antiliberalism and the Twentieth-Century Global Ecumenical Project","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Human rights; Prerogative; Alliance; Christianity; Law; Political science; Secular state; Religious studies; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Politics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Rabiat Akande","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0131576402063243,"gpt":0.3024597830857697,"spread":0.2893021428794453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00297485,0.00021369,0.0001717102,0.0008796062,0.004541337,0.005459057,0.0004348261,0.001843144,0.003659478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002206976,0.00009044911,0.0001014245,0.0006511307,0.02355199,0.003102614,0.00450442,0.002738214,0.0001506092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003385829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001562338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002923297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006821503,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988346,0.0006503597,0.00002567301,0.0000940826,0.0001046315,0.0002906753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989287,0.000550118,0.0001589911,0.0001191775,0.000119045,0.000123873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001459939,0.00002389765,0.001131423,0.00002733264,0.000003840399,0.000199068,0.03494263,0.00006427616,0.0002188293,0.9482214,0.002771719,0.01238103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003780375,0.0001219346,0.007599255,0.0005483264,0.00001385731,0.0002735094,0.08269858,0.0003716529,0.001267676,0.2693124,0.6377265,0.00002863208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4717423,0.01611601,0.002118138,0.07662102,0.0007976796,0.00002332158,0.00002270726,0.0000320166,0.4325268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872271,0.0010518,0.0002833562,0.003175564,0.000121513,0.00001081482,0.000004510267,0.000007782526,0.008117467],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005459057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02456599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389396958","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2023.37","title":"Religious Freedom and Sacred Lands","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Framing (construction); Sovereignty; Injustice; Law; Adjudication; Self-determination; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Geography; Politics; Philosophy; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Sonia Sikka","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01307666262120584,"gpt":0.2983942196286296,"spread":0.2853175570074237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008064336,0.00009758773,0.0001814273,0.0008050274,0.008992284,0.006882995,0.0006281162,0.001931638,0.0060533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001860803,0.0001344178,0.0001161764,0.0006839999,0.02572244,0.00110968,0.003369065,0.003704021,0.0002092425],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01329014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01473513,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5845182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8126404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990121,0.0002180643,0.00002594522,0.00006655723,0.0002497433,0.0004275595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987827,0.0003944498,0.0001196707,0.0001113368,0.0002647889,0.0003271111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007998905,0.00001303261,0.001738987,0.00001710226,0.000003770687,0.000244527,0.005368941,0.0001394645,0.0002046315,0.9844535,0.002994007,0.004814095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006688214,0.00004570418,0.02981314,0.0009712375,0.00003637772,0.0005101323,0.04244184,0.0008163981,0.001051515,0.4871751,0.4369707,0.0001009362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1326167,0.002424361,0.0008845963,0.02354342,0.0001199105,0.00003505489,0.00008442281,0.00001919507,0.8402724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697085,0.0003541739,0.0001422098,0.001676631,0.00002322942,0.000008561143,0.000014906,0.000003606956,0.02806822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5845182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8358573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213823941","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2021.71","title":"Raising Indigenous Religious Freedom to a Higher Standard: Michael McNally's <i>Defend the Sacred</i> and the Canadian Legal and Legislative Landscapes - Defend the Sacred: Native American Religious Freedom beyond the First Amendment By Michael D. McNally. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020. Pp. 400. $99.95 (cloth); $26.95 (paper); $26.95 (digital). ISBN: 9780691190891.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legislature; Raising (metalworking); Religious freedom; Law; Freedom of religion; Political science; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Economic freedom; Engineering; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Shrubsole","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007495507239234957,"gpt":0.2311531714075012,"spread":0.2236576641682663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001212188,0.0004114312,0.0001958419,0.0007683351,0.004368564,0.004265673,0.0009527725,0.001599675,0.01265466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001580864,0.0002482895,0.0001582187,0.001378065,0.005597235,0.005255538,0.001562243,0.002795738,0.001589489],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01143848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01495735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5064447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7833145,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995585,0.0001191748,0.000008873006,0.00004320283,0.0001981492,0.00007208919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994623,0.0001345924,0.00002721647,0.00002873125,0.0001361722,0.0002110223],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001105656,0.00001715285,0.0003679972,0.0001502068,0.000004030621,0.00006095317,0.005804629,0.00005268401,0.0001686858,0.07378023,0.8481265,0.07145587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002484998,0.000003047053,0.001546814,0.0003022176,0.000003100287,0.00004779133,0.004914671,0.0000379326,0.00007022339,0.01095743,0.9821046,0.000009738516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003081461,0.4869337,0.0005037605,0.4020478,0.006641353,0.00002114041,0.0001681182,0.00003978184,0.1005628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1678181,0.3508583,0.00270767,0.03894259,0.004676302,0.00004053135,0.0002486795,0.0001043869,0.4346034],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4935553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2499919811","doi":"10.1017/s0748081400000813","title":"Reclaiming the Nation: Muslim Women and the Law in India. By Vrinda Narain. University of Toronto Press2008. Pp. 213. $52.00. ISBN: 0-802-09278-0.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Gender and Women's Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Sociology; Media studies; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Zayn R. Kassam","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007348899907242034,"gpt":0.2289151877379707,"spread":0.2215662878307287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007302215,0.001196903,0.0004971957,0.001694427,0.00267356,0.003674139,0.001241655,0.002324182,0.01639228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001504292,0.0007184374,0.0002903822,0.003375148,0.004381255,0.003913102,0.002078847,0.002680897,0.004210153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004960696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005370676,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1026795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2121795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995643,0.000143454,0.00002905781,0.00004106626,0.0001362362,0.00008582836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992906,0.0002707606,0.0001156024,0.00004046348,0.0001233571,0.0001592415],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003641745,0.00002535752,0.001020961,0.001130309,0.00001956449,0.0003089487,0.0176816,0.0001165655,0.0002305413,0.03622102,0.8020912,0.1411174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007447592,0.00001764087,0.008717105,0.001998895,0.00001580339,0.000521533,0.01400324,0.0000840916,0.0001294078,0.00725083,0.9672298,0.00002412161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002356049,0.9003503,0.0001889346,0.04902289,0.004430959,0.0000168609,0.0002064947,0.00006461119,0.04336287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0841574,0.7393655,0.0007539371,0.005876315,0.003897146,0.00005536228,0.0004095669,0.00008362141,0.1654012],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1026795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2041636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964385228","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2014.17","title":"THE VIRTUES OF LAW IN THE POLITICS OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Agnosticism; Politics; Virtue; Law; Normative; Sociology; Religious freedom; Political science; Ambiguity; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin L. Berger","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0116785446656985,"gpt":0.2851194748262653,"spread":0.2734409301605668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007964982,0.0001298751,0.0002904825,0.001267219,0.007469359,0.01072864,0.000650743,0.002300674,0.002727203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009782564,0.0002760468,0.000267082,0.0006240954,0.09373714,0.004533465,0.00402399,0.003336631,0.0002213375],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008423056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006385268,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02080926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02367714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934745,0.004513272,0.0001353262,0.0003243818,0.0008690466,0.0006834216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922559,0.004735786,0.0006255337,0.0008174673,0.000848089,0.0007171581],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003521842,0.000004150334,0.0002736794,0.000003855965,0.000001060786,0.00001495298,0.00153653,0.00008200997,0.00006484411,0.9972114,0.0002014284,0.0006025452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000157242,0.0000112243,0.001436323,0.00003782685,0.000004703034,0.00003642115,0.00354971,0.0006493135,0.0001717095,0.9777829,0.01629291,0.00001126835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2123417,0.001303762,0.02035196,0.05943636,0.0001946336,0.00004379049,0.00004161711,0.00006795533,0.7062182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978445,0.00005527857,0.0003999655,0.0003583215,0.00001993165,0.000006277658,0.000002242092,0.000004719854,0.001308852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02080926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06111389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384131537","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2023.17","title":"The Changing Terrain of Religious Freedom. Edited by Heather J. Sharkey and Jeffrey Edward Green. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2021. Pp. 288. $55.00 (cloth); $55.00 (paper); $55.00 (digital). ISBN: 9780812253375.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrain; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Geography; Cartography; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Blair Major","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01025223061279019,"gpt":0.240972103596223,"spread":0.2307198729834328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005874212,0.0009070465,0.0005497589,0.001170116,0.00133823,0.002785691,0.0006046284,0.001233624,0.02144769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001463448,0.0007404396,0.0003612429,0.001717767,0.003037415,0.003090174,0.001663117,0.002497227,0.006055489],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002213857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00259263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01335934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04069079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996816,0.0001376203,0.00001692712,0.00003479048,0.00008979144,0.00003938318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995207,0.0001888629,0.00008567994,0.00003613297,0.00008140253,0.0000873575],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002737292,0.00001958457,0.0005005171,0.0005535046,0.00001365553,0.0001040918,0.002119311,0.0001509916,0.0002020752,0.03660564,0.8120756,0.1476277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008179304,0.000009596404,0.003314488,0.001433444,0.000007135076,0.000289928,0.00201372,0.00006410755,0.00007987382,0.03216565,0.9606008,0.00001311759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001642888,0.8918931,0.0005058315,0.03413183,0.004032399,0.00001304113,0.0003879183,0.00005026102,0.06734269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07175944,0.769743,0.003110613,0.00798351,0.003855261,0.00006398705,0.0005906944,0.000153342,0.1427402],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02144769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07174969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403303691","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2024.15","title":"Leaving Iberia: Islamic Law and Christian Conquest in North West Africa. By Jocelyn Hendrickson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2021. Pp. 432. $50.00 (cloth). ISBN: 9780674248205.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"CONQUEST; Islam; History; Ancient history; Sharia; Theology; Philosophy; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Maya Shatzmiller","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008621365003364995,"gpt":0.2195869784837041,"spread":0.2109656134803391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009217185,0.00145124,0.000589254,0.001798179,0.002662172,0.003413235,0.0007563478,0.001939919,0.01117779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001056437,0.0004864645,0.0002260105,0.002845723,0.003371397,0.005556832,0.001845171,0.002074958,0.001467477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004457334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00298775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04344305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1009595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999782,0.00009903897,0.00001123356,0.00002422423,0.00002903306,0.00005440781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997526,0.0000819882,0.00006383227,0.000009761419,0.0000281634,0.00006360937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002634092,0.0001303844,0.003609282,0.00255271,0.00005406343,0.001405145,0.04636215,0.0004765438,0.0007726645,0.05427528,0.4735845,0.4165139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002074198,0.00003640672,0.02307989,0.005847321,0.00002503431,0.0007504408,0.03934252,0.0001608268,0.0002729132,0.01353334,0.9169004,0.00003014299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.003406796,0.9692496,0.00003458254,0.01505843,0.00161175,0.000006240943,0.00004379311,0.000006456417,0.01058229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1084738,0.821356,0.0003405425,0.003021539,0.002588928,0.00003524672,0.0001276826,0.00002740169,0.06402893],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04344305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08638036,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376587561","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2023.8","title":"The Laws of Hammurabi: At the Confluence of Royal and Scribal Traditions. By Pamela Barmash. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. Pp. 336. $99.00 (cloth); $97.99 (digital). ISBN: 9780197525401.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Confluence; History; Art; Computer science; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Dwight Newman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02817415212740661,"gpt":0.2213194287273582,"spread":0.1931452765999516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001797878,0.0005663478,0.0004133313,0.001421262,0.004918691,0.004039687,0.0009436175,0.002489482,0.01681074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004583718,0.0006223563,0.0002094836,0.001736785,0.007143019,0.004520114,0.002011676,0.00288055,0.003937296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003471957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005353045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07643495,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990715,0.0004150113,0.00005855821,0.00007363402,0.0002230002,0.0001583272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991272,0.0004087893,0.0001347545,0.00005276239,0.0001703811,0.0001060941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007750391,0.00004506988,0.0007891712,0.0009712916,0.00002131599,0.0004897245,0.04375137,0.0001318723,0.000476535,0.2722083,0.4717198,0.209318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007755863,0.00001643517,0.003061803,0.001389206,0.00001040343,0.0003145407,0.009841813,0.00007894958,0.0002069581,0.0264861,0.9585664,0.00001964472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.009702227,0.7200038,0.0009426325,0.1298186,0.006444612,0.00003117353,0.0001969311,0.00008314962,0.1327768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3468239,0.325617,0.00492725,0.01511013,0.00362954,0.0001272745,0.0002619157,0.0002608192,0.3032422],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.027681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05623752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396241044","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2023.45","title":"Moses Mendelssohn and the Jewish Questions of Modern Natural Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Toleration; Judaism; Natural law; Enlightenment; Haskalah; Natural (archaeology); Law; Modernity; Philosophy; Religious studies; Classics; History; Theology; Political science; Jewish studies","authors":[{"name":"Meirav Jones","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0227630601117135,"gpt":0.2560675960117049,"spread":0.2333045358999914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002324886,0.0001432403,0.0001658227,0.0009517731,0.003640294,0.002371162,0.000379532,0.001765905,0.002213325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001862739,0.0001069561,0.0001377003,0.0005128747,0.01776886,0.002294521,0.001169242,0.00163655,0.0001757343],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004510929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001516606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007847446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01215695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992297,0.0004417482,0.00001751009,0.00006789503,0.0001470123,0.00009623004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990441,0.0005600119,0.0001100515,0.00007106056,0.0001480826,0.00006665376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009387896,0.0000127162,0.000271113,0.00000906103,0.000002085673,0.00006418284,0.00246868,0.00007296434,0.00006645025,0.9910233,0.00315746,0.002842571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001995838,0.00002655865,0.002207376,0.0001499179,0.000004849428,0.0001466468,0.003678918,0.0003995513,0.0002475252,0.8377005,0.1554025,0.00001576684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2665705,0.03988486,0.004151166,0.1910065,0.001335522,0.00001376616,0.0000691873,0.00004677872,0.4969218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804433,0.002552761,0.0006203947,0.003870602,0.000564543,0.000007305276,0.000007577126,0.000006413487,0.01192722],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007847446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03272921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244537214","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2013.14","title":"JLR volume 29 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Heidelberg; Macalester College; Pepperdine University; Fordham University; St Mary's University; Boston College; Georgetown University; University of Pennsylvania; Valparaiso University; Carleton College; Yale University; University of Toronto; Emory University","keywords":"Front cover; Volume (thermodynamics); Cover (algebra); Front (military); Computer science; Action (physics); Engineering; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01286248564453893,"gpt":0.191560537319944,"spread":0.1786980516754051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001372649,0.0007816215,0.0007824867,0.002451989,0.00144308,0.006733002,0.001043849,0.002851634,0.8003964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003433576,0.0003357547,0.000745367,0.001089275,0.0007497672,0.0016232,0.002318611,0.002322958,0.7779635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001794293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00201281,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002061206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003841334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99871,0.00009765093,0.00005455314,0.000195031,0.0008000372,0.0001427598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973279,0.0003228764,0.0001108444,0.000355449,0.001090225,0.0007927033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002319091,0.00005222813,0.0001661742,0.0001024777,0.000003959679,0.00006513547,0.00001815148,0.00002824704,0.0003940632,0.001515605,0.9593555,0.03827526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008314381,0.00001561518,0.0006054645,0.00009782223,0.000002576093,0.00007355763,0.00002980722,0.00004614229,0.0002005513,0.0004161512,0.9984994,0.00000471295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000988929,0.002820275,0.0005598906,0.01144895,0.01750847,0.0001034148,0.002364024,0.002363102,0.9618429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00277346,0.0009780357,0.0002822781,0.002404606,0.00399306,0.00002294718,0.0009111398,0.0004608701,0.9881737],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1996036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2847102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280633424","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2022.20","title":"Faith or Fraud: Fortune-Telling, Spirituality, and the Law. By Jeremy Patrick. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2020. Pp. 280. $89.95 (cloth); $32.95 (paper); $32.95 (digital). ISBN: 9780774863322.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Law; Spirituality; Political science; Sociology; Theology; Religious studies; Law and economics; Philosophy; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Michael Camp","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01317822927239892,"gpt":0.1941930232163944,"spread":0.1810147939439955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001058219,0.001659506,0.0009635277,0.001887944,0.002035858,0.005489457,0.001134587,0.00336639,0.08642466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002694465,0.000953608,0.0003790733,0.004558565,0.002621348,0.005394734,0.00230266,0.004619651,0.04323791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004535544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006180207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08831388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.254137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992226,0.0001765041,0.00004696626,0.00007785411,0.0003712877,0.000104797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998441,0.0005156242,0.0001615537,0.00006528779,0.0003808064,0.0004358457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001428962,0.000007464422,0.00009028277,0.0003225107,0.000003787412,0.00003973267,0.0003824538,0.00003232844,0.00007401542,0.00161767,0.9365472,0.0608682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003803013,0.00000604803,0.0007537421,0.001030971,0.000003742147,0.0001754066,0.001173875,0.000024835,0.00003492616,0.001632982,0.9951496,0.00001006244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003434395,0.9078009,0.0002418402,0.03726565,0.004845493,0.00002132514,0.0002201455,0.00008659899,0.0491745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00772194,0.5403206,0.0008179058,0.009152565,0.002430746,0.00004300446,0.000296251,0.0001485352,0.4390684],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08831388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2891193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253394476","doi":"10.1017/s0748081400003921","title":"On the Pope, Cartoons, and Apostates: Shari‘a 2006","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Historical and Linguistic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Apostasy; Islam; Sharia; Law; Aside; Doctrine; Afghan; Legal doctrine; Political science; Perspective (graphical); History; Literature; Art","authors":[{"name":"Anver M. Emon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01984051205346609,"gpt":0.2986637809359884,"spread":0.2788232688825223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001642233,0.0004135731,0.000218833,0.0007228477,0.01459682,0.004007843,0.0006077436,0.002112745,0.003839543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002434935,0.0003290655,0.0001385864,0.001262516,0.009998394,0.00278521,0.003892675,0.004836058,0.000541108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003173052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002423298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009185011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02478759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991521,0.0003275987,0.00001775275,0.00008594019,0.0002380569,0.0001785965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991395,0.0003769517,0.0001486316,0.00006661691,0.000112677,0.000155541],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001055531,0.00008313496,0.003128632,0.0002422848,0.00001001797,0.00265672,0.6513327,0.00007390327,0.001278115,0.2271009,0.06981375,0.04417434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008639871,0.00005532754,0.009476202,0.0003871721,0.000004863405,0.0005857777,0.1846704,0.00008562834,0.0005659988,0.005134985,0.7989963,0.0000287254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.4509698,0.01120799,0.0009370249,0.04663038,0.002708747,0.00005427355,0.0001646586,0.00005918583,0.4872679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.921748,0.004292149,0.0004325088,0.006954745,0.0008648303,0.00002489606,0.00006321693,0.00005085173,0.0655688],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01459682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02302223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587299222","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2015.37","title":"Biblical Narrative and the Formation of Rabbinic Law. By Jane L. Kanarek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Pp. 212. $90.00 (cloth). ISBN: 9781107047815.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"King's University College; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Chaya Halberstam","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01950195735623689,"gpt":0.2262574341896247,"spread":0.2067554768333878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00160159,0.0005803434,0.0004991091,0.002880046,0.002853199,0.005258759,0.0008834461,0.002386354,0.01330471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004920261,0.0006037062,0.0002028099,0.004131199,0.01173113,0.01019965,0.002222858,0.003096657,0.002623314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005819915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003506986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01716898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0291247,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992293,0.0004282442,0.00004954323,0.00006234967,0.0001616751,0.00006892744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998759,0.0007076019,0.0002249013,0.00008804253,0.0001561749,0.00006426407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003458689,0.00002699653,0.0002163626,0.0006509303,0.00001367333,0.0001368277,0.01588047,0.0001813784,0.0001367461,0.6311541,0.2536867,0.09788129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001562347,0.000009078643,0.001996004,0.001652998,0.000008381357,0.0002408556,0.006589849,0.0001706408,0.0001468918,0.2647219,0.7244236,0.00002416653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001997419,0.8294602,0.0008600965,0.06479912,0.0007701988,0.00001497553,0.0001234201,0.0000544092,0.1019202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3047945,0.5295486,0.002596891,0.007991058,0.002695818,0.00010189,0.0002372667,0.0002004536,0.1518334],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01716898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0445087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}