{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":24,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":24,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"89b07d0daab9","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Law and Religion"}},"results":[{"id":"W3124715716","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2014.18","title":"ALEVIS UNDER LAW: THE POLITICS OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN TURKEY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Turkey's Politics and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; State (computer science); Human rights; Politics; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Turkish; International law; Sociology; Law and economics","authors":[{"name":"Elizabeth Shakman Hurd","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01275993663737355,"gpt":0.282625891764569,"spread":0.2698659551271954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001028555,0.00006722391,0.0001936165,0.00002790025,0.000240182,0.00004549683,0.0001659306,0.0001193433,0.000002519884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007140118,0.00004201028,0.0001152091,0.00007336889,0.0005416904,0.00007705801,0.00002511807,0.0002159872,9.50914e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004749003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008054002,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01985862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001071859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988958,0.0001739601,0.0003473402,0.00006419686,0.0003124752,0.0002062767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991655,0.0002588455,0.0002294364,0.0000986525,0.0001429141,0.0001046971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004676095,0.00002410023,0.0003342559,0.000008534615,0.00001137214,0.000002002345,0.005551541,0.000107991,0.00005417312,0.9907825,0.003091204,0.00002763558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007999786,0.0002072841,0.001165467,0.0001632242,0.00005468121,0.00002830069,0.003271636,0.0001577563,0.0001747807,0.5553065,0.4385239,0.0001464695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8521614,0.002967531,0.0001364124,0.01328473,0.0007082013,0.0001087275,0.000003684177,0.000008576488,0.1306207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944434,0.003194557,0.0001378682,0.001495233,0.0005033909,2.913742e-7,2.298267e-7,0.000005898445,0.0002192036],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.435476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866682,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143711301","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2014.26","title":"COPTS AND THE MILLET PARTNERSHIP: THE INTRA-COMMUNAL DYNAMICS BEHIND EGYPTIAN SECTARIANISM","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Sectarianism; Scholarship; Politics; Dynamics (music); Political science; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Paul Sedra","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009595350778706059,"gpt":0.2508278721558864,"spread":0.2412325213771804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001644324,0.00005986706,0.0001480924,0.00001617724,0.00123645,0.0000679093,0.0001456691,0.00006067115,0.000004630146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006410039,0.00002878437,0.00005910989,0.00002562862,0.001015235,0.00005215173,0.00003160688,0.0002486077,9.717716e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004059414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003298952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00210462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008949572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991593,0.0002854146,0.0001785043,0.00005195053,0.000198763,0.0001260816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993342,0.000315393,0.0001715951,0.00007436931,0.00006249233,0.00004197193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006785578,0.000008650022,0.000108411,0.000004153808,0.00003131548,0.000002476972,0.02935614,0.000001852318,0.000003512126,0.9601882,0.008496454,0.001731051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001157701,0.0001241371,0.0006534251,0.00004491791,0.00008212127,0.00005135822,0.005074883,0.0001624093,0.000002700158,0.05373098,0.9388299,0.00008547673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2599064,0.01410679,0.0003268072,0.1200662,0.002019992,0.0002762302,0.000002040614,0.00001522704,0.6032804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908947,0.006097637,0.00004699175,0.00189051,0.0005199767,6.571501e-7,2.089901e-7,0.000003901386,0.0005453685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9303334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95099,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210931790","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2021.79","title":"A Theory of a State? How Civil Law Ended Legal Pluralism in Modern Egypt","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University; University of Exeter","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Law; Lawmaking; Sharia; Sovereignty; Jurisprudence; Legal formalism; Political science; State (computer science); Islam; Comparative law; Legal research; Legal realism; Legal culture; Sociology; Philosophy; Private law; Black letter law; Theology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Samy Ayoub","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01403113546815337,"gpt":0.2516528177421173,"spread":0.2376216822739639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008977272,0.00005009806,0.0001785322,0.00005760931,0.0003665065,0.0000169731,0.0001005628,0.00002755799,0.00001138963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001681209,0.00004091987,0.00007168836,0.00006875119,0.0002549993,0.0001097414,0.00004654405,0.0001974202,1.223111e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001127374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008859006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003658169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007308747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990916,0.0002103471,0.0001930059,0.00006240357,0.0003152614,0.0001273532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995855,0.00006874701,0.0002129107,0.00004306854,0.00005757948,0.00003219634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001368167,0.00005140491,0.00005100772,0.000008449758,0.00002372793,0.00005700331,0.04441822,0.00004146717,0.000360335,0.9499438,0.004056412,0.0008513556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001074012,0.000319383,0.0001775575,0.00005171236,0.00002897133,0.00003983554,0.01255298,0.00002112697,0.00005589663,0.1824391,0.8031142,0.0001251736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7022781,0.01143791,0.00006725507,0.009110615,0.001184836,0.0001487664,0.000009855028,0.00001013943,0.2757525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962479,0.001634418,0.00002483275,0.0004710798,0.00009558493,0.000001386541,2.004892e-7,0.000004006318,0.001520615],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7990578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5530081,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796185122","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2018.10","title":"JUDGING RELIGION AND JUDGES' RELIGIONS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Precept; Argument (complex analysis); Judicial opinion; Faith; Law; Political science; Religious freedom; Sociology; Epistemology; Economic freedom; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Howard Kislowicz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01593608438831546,"gpt":0.3056923283996676,"spread":0.2897562440113521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004695229,0.00007473585,0.0001540382,0.0000659628,0.0006952606,0.00006432201,0.00007965609,0.0000840397,0.000007955466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001098324,0.00005974448,0.00005132802,0.00009037516,0.001415661,0.0001903296,0.00002801183,0.0001435226,0.000005890469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004125079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000291756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001916141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003400235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991382,0.00008025714,0.0002549383,0.00009338516,0.0002438456,0.0001893125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999165,0.0001254946,0.0001912384,0.0000635577,0.0002479109,0.0002068056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001975402,0.00001122029,0.001039547,0.000004041387,0.00001115426,0.0000116294,0.0006676529,4.505512e-7,0.0001066513,0.9861467,0.0116999,0.000281304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002150407,0.0001966454,0.0002357396,0.00007577937,0.00003850889,0.0001596555,0.0002109208,0.000003177049,0.00007133574,0.02932302,0.9693751,0.00009512724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.340933,0.003387013,0.000525668,0.01132855,0.000788762,0.00008908919,0.000003163421,0.00002801181,0.6429168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870135,0.007797768,0.0007611377,0.002756386,0.001164042,3.529213e-7,4.458201e-7,0.000005291095,0.0005011343],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9576752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5347453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122798071","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2019.12","title":"VARIETIES OF BURDEN IN RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATIONS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Expansive; Ratification; Burden of proof; Coercion (linguistics); Law; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Anna Su","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01171257262975332,"gpt":0.2899487815824551,"spread":0.2782362089527018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002907999,0.00003359016,0.0001274571,0.00005190142,0.00006114705,0.00001299342,0.00007326459,0.00004732527,0.00001258092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003896025,0.00002710116,0.00003885804,0.00007004104,0.0002992971,0.0001098787,0.00001212256,0.00009253566,0.000002696322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002557825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003339305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005305565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002347486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994316,0.0000537864,0.0002218002,0.00003567629,0.0001750807,0.00008203815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995092,0.0001234339,0.00016482,0.00004186911,0.0001151069,0.00004560515],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001302754,0.00001202493,0.002698029,0.000005927852,0.000006048455,0.000002670919,0.001358832,0.00005597065,0.0001116121,0.9951434,0.0005232708,0.00006924303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004581051,0.0001756783,0.0009540439,0.0001237626,0.00002322236,0.00003251688,0.001790405,0.000006907247,0.00009488588,0.07736611,0.9188782,0.00009616125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5933512,0.001164796,0.00006013871,0.002932284,0.0002804943,0.0000588623,0.000002404096,0.000003403383,0.4021464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970672,0.001999373,0.0002024197,0.0002214492,0.0001291734,1.828004e-7,3.927692e-7,0.000001773536,0.0003780836],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9183549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8020462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575386710","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2016.36","title":"WHAT'S THE HARM IN POLYGAMY? MULTICULTURAL TOLERATION AND WOMEN'S EXPERIENCE OF PLURAL MARRIAGE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Constitutionality; Charter; Political science; Constitution; Freedom of religion; Duty; Toleration; Substantive due process; Due Process Clause; Jurisdiction; Sociology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Lisa Fishbayn Joffe","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02544161329025139,"gpt":0.3144498797414884,"spread":0.289008266451237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005442545,0.00004187213,0.00009534864,0.00002872534,0.0001606592,0.00008058924,0.00006137763,0.00005048416,0.00001522141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000149368,0.0000192799,0.00001917485,0.00005573472,0.0002088922,0.0007362762,0.00001335131,0.00007145229,3.991793e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003184814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002431693,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003000091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004212049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993198,0.0001255475,0.0002256244,0.00005174749,0.0001796214,0.00009766164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994913,0.0001926161,0.000152343,0.0000367635,0.00006861682,0.00005839555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003814425,0.0001001992,0.01076113,0.00002577572,0.00003145059,0.00003011838,0.7336453,0.000008001993,0.05507405,0.1769699,0.0005998946,0.0223728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009952392,0.001905083,0.08935066,0.002305534,0.00009790796,0.0002228402,0.6131661,0.0002429084,0.01558247,0.07516103,0.1910302,0.0009828984],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935107,0.0006907356,0.00001860339,0.004301816,0.0002722061,0.00006035836,2.911163e-7,0.000001751657,0.001143594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961706,0.00309039,0.00003090828,0.0001754725,0.0001224171,0.000001621564,7.901198e-8,0.00000155636,0.0004069483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1904303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1235677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586824842","doi":"10.1017/s0748081400000692","title":"Religion in the Abortion Discourse in Singapore: A Case Study of the Relevance of Religious Arguments in Law-Making in Multi-Religious Democracies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in Asia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Torture; Human rights; Appeal; Law; Autonomy; Population; Political science; Birth control; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Family planning","authors":[{"name":"Seow Hon Tan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02115721688109104,"gpt":0.3464194949883225,"spread":0.3252622781072314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00313672,0.0001435759,0.0003815249,0.0002309748,0.0001450968,0.00004126666,0.0003569028,0.0001697942,6.815665e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003264442,0.00009590473,0.00007289015,0.0004504539,0.0004607294,0.0002751105,0.00006128274,0.0007078635,3.912039e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001789583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02253307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1887308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974315,0.0004867105,0.001203517,0.0001873348,0.0004286804,0.0002622285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983167,0.000388071,0.0009609023,0.0002069614,0.00009008557,0.00003725499],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002208869,0.001532926,0.6635972,0.00004810407,0.0000251849,0.001130512,0.3203632,0.0004856442,0.001154179,0.009983017,0.000275834,0.001183374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02347202,0.001519749,0.4031106,0.005765741,0.0002069686,0.002717807,0.4300984,0.0005164,0.001429538,0.1244069,0.005276544,0.001479293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962116,0.0006309513,0.00000374007,0.001279476,0.000491568,0.0005202789,7.930893e-7,0.000003645786,0.0008579792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970652,0.002393031,0.0002426577,0.0002254836,0.00004549412,0.000009100523,2.249699e-7,0.00001057339,0.000008210129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2604866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9839759,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281650871","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2022.16","title":"Saffron Suffrage: Buddhist Monks and Constitutional Politics in Cambodia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Cambodian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centre for Asia-Pacific Initiatives; National University of Singapore; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Buddhism; Constitution; Politics; Secular state; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Suffrage; Secularism; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin Lawrence","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01180530193386682,"gpt":0.2651618502207718,"spread":0.253356548286905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006181817,0.00004442025,0.0001141105,0.00004723166,0.0007515228,0.00002157268,0.00005155856,0.00004974226,0.00003010731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002932304,0.00004320974,0.00004653768,0.00006359864,0.00112525,0.0001058719,0.00002665682,0.0002670494,4.311299e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002231141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002272071,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009932355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000205917,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992671,0.0001255984,0.0001843569,0.00006437363,0.000239446,0.0001191353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996552,0.00006571908,0.0001038305,0.00003035601,0.00004032071,0.000104564],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001502886,0.00003150458,0.004341783,0.000005751996,0.000005171269,0.00005307053,0.006618942,0.00002759159,0.00004353531,0.9831608,0.005637704,0.00005912659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005087268,0.00009426966,0.001328925,0.00001785994,0.00001462066,0.0001229954,0.003274071,0.0000101878,0.000004121565,0.01219301,0.9823444,0.00008675909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9150818,0.005708726,0.00006271926,0.002969133,0.000825562,0.00008366306,0.00001383788,0.000007562882,0.07524701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969147,0.001470329,0.0000802361,0.0007759792,0.0001930961,8.856127e-7,9.172474e-7,0.000002078105,0.00056181],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9767067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5780181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118239658","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2020.52","title":"REASON-GIVING AND THE DUTY TO OBEY: PERSPECTIVES FROM CLASSICAL ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Duty; Islam; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Law; Virtue; Meaning (existential); Sharia; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Omar Farahat","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009431553668676443,"gpt":0.2907095307392636,"spread":0.2812779770705872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000343009,0.00004967077,0.0001412805,0.00001386604,0.0003959801,0.00008605201,0.000072589,0.00004233133,0.00001164239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002786811,0.00003118567,0.00005288989,0.00006486377,0.0009658437,0.00009981963,0.00003551584,0.0001523237,0.000001598082],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004022899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004097158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002503061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000968929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992563,0.000177351,0.0001430984,0.00008517369,0.0002285923,0.000109559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991482,0.0004566485,0.00008962151,0.00005083288,0.0001625271,0.00009219124],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003147851,0.00001182947,0.0003071834,0.000001311841,0.00001581178,0.00002341805,0.004493063,0.000001692736,0.0001068853,0.9937881,0.0009798013,0.0002394717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000587503,0.00006394951,0.00241352,0.0001512819,0.00006757437,0.0001245245,0.008853612,0.00001138576,0.00008839623,0.08699442,0.9005226,0.0001212326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7297181,0.01311732,0.0007586842,0.06997935,0.0004669919,0.00007907822,0.00001074212,0.000009969041,0.1858598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920953,0.004584556,0.0006429281,0.001436952,0.0006128154,3.783888e-7,1.943713e-7,0.000002256575,0.0006246383],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9067937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3783895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114692900","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2014.35","title":"CHRISTIAN PRACTICE AS THE FOUNDATION FOR MODERN POLITICAL THEOLOGY","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Orthodoxy; Politics; Archbishop; Sovereignty; Political theology; State (computer science); Dominion; Theology; Philosophy; Catholic theology; Religious studies; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Athanasios Giocas","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04127867305509867,"gpt":0.3990068253821988,"spread":0.3577281523271001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001060425,0.00003998255,0.00008327197,0.00001701694,0.0003736768,0.00008684091,0.00008325202,0.00007765023,0.000004550338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009935558,0.00002435297,0.00007712102,0.00003661547,0.0002315759,0.0002475506,0.000009456321,0.000143677,0.000008100605],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006582952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002047211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002452344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001489156,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992607,0.0001711559,0.0001816309,0.00004941122,0.0002042867,0.0001328435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986515,0.000513592,0.0001707657,0.00004826104,0.0004690911,0.0001468126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007068917,0.00002547097,0.00001670332,0.000001156571,0.00001890954,0.000001927717,0.008595422,0.000005396066,0.00001704116,0.9769293,0.01403429,0.0002837034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002451316,0.0001584907,0.000007925684,0.000008487476,0.00003532151,0.0001164182,0.007559355,0.00007320879,0.00001326324,0.3191335,0.6726198,0.00002914737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03461125,0.001433929,0.01355386,0.4191132,0.00229207,0.0003031691,0.000001032936,0.00002151445,0.52867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887602,0.0008968847,0.0004951382,0.008716919,0.0006799078,0.000002101217,5.989704e-7,0.000003691287,0.0004445509],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9541489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3707227,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318066208","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2022.57","title":"The Limits of Defining Identity in Religion-Gender Conflicts: A Response to Patrick Parkinson","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Identity (music); Sincerity; Faith; Transgender; Government (linguistics); Gender identity; Belief system; Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Gender studies; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Laura Portuondo","is_ca":false},{"name":"Claudia E. Haupt","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03900396709018261,"gpt":0.3529645084555882,"spread":0.3139605413654056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002241834,0.00005435161,0.000144848,0.0001142461,0.0003232769,0.00004450787,0.0001376029,0.00005946638,0.000001291998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007079602,0.00003805787,0.00006291201,0.000437722,0.0003268045,0.0001329995,0.00002788139,0.000131507,0.00000885095],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005464356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004225157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002390642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009056549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987396,0.0002702708,0.0003568919,0.00006807491,0.0003778143,0.0001873389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985464,0.000888514,0.0002138168,0.00006400609,0.000169429,0.0001178336],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003064832,0.00001317009,0.00267118,0.000005928504,0.0000116282,0.00003274378,0.003258081,0.00007540119,0.0002064604,0.9907255,0.002467131,0.0002263197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002549849,0.0001335254,0.007052143,0.00008284599,0.00001504788,0.00001472494,0.001080929,0.000004369256,0.00004847652,0.01067953,0.9805666,0.00006685269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9592636,0.001741489,0.00006470358,0.00543071,0.00037208,0.00008677693,0.000005993218,0.000009814396,0.03302487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924628,0.006367394,0.00009743069,0.0007056798,0.000098508,0.000001076573,3.730656e-7,0.00000355707,0.0002632373],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9800459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3613952,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283806312","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2022.18","title":"Neutralizing Secularism: Religious Antiliberalism and the Twentieth-Century Global Ecumenical Project","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Human rights; Prerogative; Alliance; Christianity; Law; Political science; Secular state; Religious studies; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Politics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Rabiat Akande","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0131576402063243,"gpt":0.3024597830857697,"spread":0.2893021428794453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009200465,0.00007352359,0.0001826011,0.00002251402,0.001012809,0.00008628101,0.0001386926,0.00004563842,0.000004861962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003628562,0.00004860245,0.0001057351,0.0001163502,0.001149577,0.0001061307,0.00008881566,0.0002774956,2.801486e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007579257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004550653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006266842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007178478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986275,0.000418306,0.0002683962,0.00009230976,0.0004073628,0.0001861194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994355,0.0001259108,0.0002136478,0.00006124529,0.00007053381,0.00009315266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001157649,0.0000200349,0.0002876261,0.000004105616,0.00002845459,0.00004312941,0.001757413,0.000009511285,0.000007631,0.9906983,0.006895714,0.0001322931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008101145,0.00009720481,0.0000587669,0.00001504478,0.00006615809,0.0005002717,0.001336424,0.000007985343,0.000002114771,0.02376174,0.9732674,0.00007673969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7247526,0.0390372,0.0001379762,0.0381195,0.002520132,0.0004941066,0.00003209078,0.00003811614,0.1948683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855796,0.01045357,0.0001655429,0.003409111,0.0002763866,0.000002016734,9.726493e-7,0.000003436299,0.0001094313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9669366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9473632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389396958","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2023.37","title":"Religious Freedom and Sacred Lands","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Framing (construction); Sovereignty; Injustice; Law; Adjudication; Self-determination; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Geography; Politics; Philosophy; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Sonia Sikka","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01307666262120584,"gpt":0.2983942196286296,"spread":0.2853175570074237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007933069,0.00004985079,0.0001225634,0.00008543651,0.001675462,0.00005038534,0.00006083604,0.00009400107,0.000002664204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005465922,0.00003339566,0.00003265674,0.0001261032,0.0001513533,0.0001074881,0.000001122395,0.0001099267,0.00000755608],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002829221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009439189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02623077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0824219,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992651,0.0000793153,0.0002065996,0.00006767357,0.0002028745,0.000178403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994649,0.0000848064,0.0001385324,0.00004589651,0.0001171686,0.0001486784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007255138,0.00006017539,0.002768822,0.00006329536,0.0000371063,0.00006642652,0.3686089,0.000006597101,0.00003857495,0.6062649,0.02154017,0.0004724678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002503736,0.000113907,0.0007015774,0.0000469602,0.00001512889,0.00004387902,0.001087145,0.000004314112,0.00001840079,0.01710568,0.9805555,0.00005716442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9150685,0.003008665,0.000008368428,0.001734762,0.001066492,0.00008752764,0.000001104115,0.0000239587,0.07900061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7473221,0.2498485,0.00009978481,0.0001067279,0.001015132,1.369265e-7,0.000001115029,0.000005346552,0.001601161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9590153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996242,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213823941","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2021.71","title":"Raising Indigenous Religious Freedom to a Higher Standard: Michael McNally's <i>Defend the Sacred</i> and the Canadian Legal and Legislative Landscapes - Defend the Sacred: Native American Religious Freedom beyond the First Amendment By Michael D. McNally. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020. Pp. 400. $99.95 (cloth); $26.95 (paper); $26.95 (digital). ISBN: 9780691190891.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legislature; Raising (metalworking); Religious freedom; Law; Freedom of religion; Political science; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Economic freedom; Engineering; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Shrubsole","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007495507239234957,"gpt":0.2311531714075012,"spread":0.2236576641682663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001261276,0.0004630554,0.0007043966,0.00004404708,0.004280759,0.0009927211,0.0007446583,0.0001882859,0.00000670609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001709602,0.0002584524,0.0002360071,0.0004972478,0.005274118,0.0004921775,0.0003118841,0.0009314962,0.000002436344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005287784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002416162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2427978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2710322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962608,0.0006085073,0.0006613176,0.0005236561,0.001120202,0.000825571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963546,0.001223192,0.0008125806,0.0004033789,0.0006335755,0.0005726056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001481584,0.0001246068,0.001111092,0.00003722906,0.001001828,0.0004912686,0.0399243,0.0003975981,0.0001068863,0.5775161,0.3769014,0.000906102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001395375,0.0003449538,0.000127312,0.0001282472,0.000284871,0.0003911527,0.005632365,0.00001825514,0.0000334821,0.002280369,0.9889926,0.0003709706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2791908,0.373152,0.0003756287,0.1789975,0.001979128,0.003420247,0.001969032,0.0001643555,0.1607513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8451098,0.1463265,0.0002141965,0.00662512,0.0008191469,0.000009135724,0.00001128474,0.00004772261,0.0008371682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6120912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999868,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2499919811","doi":"10.1017/s0748081400000813","title":"Reclaiming the Nation: Muslim Women and the Law in India. By Vrinda Narain. University of Toronto Press2008. Pp. 213. $52.00. ISBN: 0-802-09278-0.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Gender and Women's Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Sociology; Media studies; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Zayn R. Kassam","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007348899907242034,"gpt":0.2289151877379707,"spread":0.2215662878307287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001425758,0.00006779649,0.0001587268,0.0000136321,0.0006355441,0.00004957517,0.0001954279,0.0001065729,0.00003041806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002184178,0.00003789011,0.00004233595,0.00005608871,0.0005693571,0.0002699632,0.00003656223,0.0002601545,3.950144e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006294491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006805162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01005962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009698861,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990891,0.000205864,0.000184478,0.00008561923,0.0002777773,0.0001571534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993762,0.0001601737,0.0002119488,0.00008146195,0.0000864469,0.0000837675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003738157,0.000113755,0.0009744427,0.00003235793,0.00009024128,0.00002557738,0.5551396,0.000004164812,0.001011015,0.431285,0.008756758,0.002193303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031917,0.0002036455,0.003473176,0.00007060179,0.00003780398,0.00004553563,0.0753858,0.00002487562,0.0001955717,0.04235818,0.8748226,0.0001905518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9347898,0.002382231,0.000006430484,0.005161079,0.0003511755,0.0001540387,0.000002483513,0.000004656761,0.05714804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931663,0.005810168,0.00002418077,0.0003117772,0.0001422271,3.901968e-7,3.115755e-7,0.000003232047,0.0005414619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8660658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965325,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964385228","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2014.17","title":"THE VIRTUES OF LAW IN THE POLITICS OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Agnosticism; Politics; Virtue; Law; Normative; Sociology; Religious freedom; Political science; Ambiguity; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin L. Berger","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0116785446656985,"gpt":0.2851194748262653,"spread":0.2734409301605668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001082994,0.00004724703,0.0001478864,0.00002192548,0.0002816893,0.00002141322,0.0001992955,0.00005006614,7.801899e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001397101,0.00002443908,0.00007031144,0.00006059415,0.001896791,0.00005598434,0.00001438719,0.0001274318,3.849806e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001700256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001961305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01032842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001109117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989541,0.0002267895,0.0003372046,0.00003740189,0.0003152843,0.0001292264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986895,0.0007207379,0.0002968966,0.00008317216,0.0001617425,0.00004792932],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001143385,0.00001922228,0.0002946757,0.000005235985,0.000007777472,0.000001657428,0.00138342,0.00001395117,0.00003729129,0.9972785,0.0008725696,0.00007430097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001989634,0.0001938141,0.0001849986,0.00006818432,0.0000256332,0.00002409185,0.0009639099,0.000005314831,0.0001045364,0.1770515,0.8211351,0.00004400981],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2521537,0.004916437,0.0002320569,0.01142979,0.0005503067,0.0001174907,0.000008117762,0.000004635583,0.7305874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958532,0.00275943,0.0001232928,0.0008589529,0.0003079855,2.707797e-7,1.77071e-7,0.000002158888,0.00009447102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8202625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384131537","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2023.17","title":"The Changing Terrain of Religious Freedom. Edited by Heather J. Sharkey and Jeffrey Edward Green. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2021. Pp. 288. $55.00 (cloth); $55.00 (paper); $55.00 (digital). ISBN: 9780812253375.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrain; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Geography; Cartography; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Blair Major","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01025223061279019,"gpt":0.240972103596223,"spread":0.2307198729834328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008441437,0.0002105233,0.0004471938,0.0001101006,0.0007982061,0.00009511638,0.0003792137,0.0002039566,0.00003983378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001154418,0.0001638762,0.0001930322,0.0003734502,0.00181211,0.0004491849,0.0001412085,0.0003176073,0.000008697736],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007737337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003886531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009902469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004540719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979796,0.0001714203,0.0005135351,0.0002251289,0.0006463568,0.0004639265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981672,0.0004484147,0.0005865801,0.0001869567,0.0003497196,0.0002611784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005207876,0.0001931667,0.001253961,0.0001330688,0.000391851,0.0001368929,0.008407346,0.00009781685,0.001555432,0.2500634,0.736159,0.001087249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007532772,0.000157038,0.0001121784,0.0002220066,0.00008452642,0.0000553692,0.002986,0.00008280457,0.00005484276,0.00280419,0.9924752,0.000212599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3512493,0.1590997,0.0009469147,0.1078102,0.004404677,0.001944017,0.001840723,0.0002713333,0.3724331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9395463,0.05677279,0.00008470278,0.0003229736,0.0008641843,7.829937e-7,0.00001544861,0.00002187572,0.002370876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5882971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966907,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403303691","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2024.15","title":"Leaving Iberia: Islamic Law and Christian Conquest in North West Africa. By Jocelyn Hendrickson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2021. Pp. 432. $50.00 (cloth). ISBN: 9780674248205.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"CONQUEST; Islam; History; Ancient history; Sharia; Theology; Philosophy; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Maya Shatzmiller","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008621365003364995,"gpt":0.2195869784837041,"spread":0.2109656134803391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004106896,0.0001538654,0.0003228282,0.00006883212,0.0005919862,0.0001387186,0.0001503798,0.0001389702,0.00001763879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001673319,0.0001379897,0.0000750055,0.0001584542,0.0005424037,0.0003534418,0.00007549339,0.0003946586,0.000009518058],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002527237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001267566,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04893603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01850633,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987635,0.0001300866,0.000303703,0.0002276811,0.0002816034,0.0002934505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994451,0.0001132608,0.0001695543,0.00008125104,0.00009623216,0.00009453916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009660272,0.00007148676,0.0004658624,0.0001136485,0.0001097081,0.0005457966,0.01122975,0.000005770791,0.000173379,0.2375629,0.7491868,0.0004383067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004030468,0.0001142845,0.0006944418,0.0001706495,0.00006506625,0.0000336633,0.001491414,0.0000177327,0.000005949153,0.0002340173,0.9966025,0.0001672063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1317499,0.306125,0.00007126248,0.006107501,0.003499922,0.0004194103,0.0001634771,0.00007541941,0.551788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.847046,0.1466301,0.0000665591,0.0002837386,0.0005457043,6.331218e-7,0.000004711725,0.00001644088,0.005406133],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.715296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994034,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376587561","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2023.8","title":"The Laws of Hammurabi: At the Confluence of Royal and Scribal Traditions. By Pamela Barmash. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. Pp. 336. $99.00 (cloth); $97.99 (digital). ISBN: 9780197525401.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Confluence; History; Art; Computer science; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Dwight Newman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02817415212740661,"gpt":0.2213194287273582,"spread":0.1931452765999516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004401995,0.0001202188,0.0002173049,0.00002399248,0.0007285286,0.0001376529,0.0001927478,0.0000832265,0.00002478123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003007407,0.00007256628,0.0001084547,0.00004557109,0.001170195,0.000299063,0.00004730084,0.000287244,0.000001560944],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002313595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004671956,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003472907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002081549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989566,0.00008238811,0.0004025801,0.000122557,0.0002821527,0.0001537542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987434,0.0003260105,0.000436026,0.0001572993,0.0002652458,0.00007208136],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004990253,0.0001127498,0.0002725558,0.000211883,0.0001971898,0.00001778359,0.01195969,0.00009967641,0.0006469047,0.5377434,0.446125,0.002114163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005224203,0.0001961451,0.0002764954,0.0001048826,0.00009012247,0.0000265456,0.003381973,0.0001335843,0.0004291394,0.003734556,0.9910066,0.00009754011],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8433428,0.03229023,0.00004283467,0.01253804,0.001137542,0.0004557567,0.0006868938,0.00004846379,0.1094574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9281122,0.06124944,0.000007795057,0.0001714739,0.0002366352,8.886074e-7,0.00002645356,0.00001258764,0.01018252],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5448816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5603327,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396241044","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2023.45","title":"Moses Mendelssohn and the Jewish Questions of Modern Natural Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Toleration; Judaism; Natural law; Enlightenment; Haskalah; Natural (archaeology); Law; Modernity; Philosophy; Religious studies; Classics; History; Theology; Political science; Jewish studies","authors":[{"name":"Meirav Jones","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0227630601117135,"gpt":0.2560675960117049,"spread":0.2333045358999914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001730782,0.00007216128,0.000167726,0.00002555472,0.0001439264,0.0001160327,0.00005438807,0.00003094977,0.0000180881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001201314,0.00003442976,0.0001000804,0.00001358398,0.0006175717,0.0001509504,0.00002517775,0.0002178052,0.000001224033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006307391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009305047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001041742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003986204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993953,0.00005104266,0.0002579715,0.00006290316,0.0001439331,0.00008880927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995686,0.0001923804,0.00006060876,0.00004809344,0.00007434603,0.00005598783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006187732,0.00002281303,0.000001183035,0.00005079317,0.00005896641,0.000009243578,0.001432926,0.00000130564,0.0000349713,0.9969075,0.0006766008,0.0007417785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002979095,0.00007424279,0.000004059806,0.0001796982,0.00007873659,0.00008104793,0.00003164848,0.0002166612,0.00005705353,0.7552377,0.2436993,0.00004195009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1382479,0.3670447,0.00009481869,0.06523242,0.004419914,0.000284844,0.00008261016,0.00006081924,0.424532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947875,0.00279493,0.00002006767,0.00106857,0.0008124937,6.333817e-7,9.594696e-7,0.000005817404,0.0005089965],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8565397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2275469,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244537214","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2013.14","title":"JLR volume 29 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Heidelberg; Macalester College; Pepperdine University; Fordham University; St Mary's University; Boston College; Georgetown University; University of Pennsylvania; Valparaiso University; Carleton College; Yale University; University of Toronto; Emory University","keywords":"Front cover; Volume (thermodynamics); Cover (algebra); Front (military); Computer science; Action (physics); Engineering; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01286248564453893,"gpt":0.191560537319944,"spread":0.1786980516754051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003924472,0.00006475746,0.0002499795,0.0000639991,0.00008153428,0.00007415285,0.00005505088,0.00004286755,0.001872153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001277082,0.00005600256,0.00005065805,0.00001480666,0.00008265739,0.0001725071,0.00003930936,0.00006773825,0.006311023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001604478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002443166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008800754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001677302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994237,0.000005604749,0.0003259972,0.000122798,0.00001908513,0.000102744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995705,0.00001622424,0.0002611782,0.00007132069,0.00002008483,0.0000606845],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002427975,0.00002326555,0.02406287,0.00002305817,0.0000582083,0.000002818988,0.0005212897,0.00001667256,0.000007887083,0.04728922,0.9276872,0.0002832506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003764715,0.00005884261,0.004555912,0.0000154357,0.000008241609,0.00002409997,0.00003410383,0.0002058622,0.000008113812,0.006952338,0.987682,0.00007862321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1192795,0.005444371,0.0005199636,0.001997888,0.002355984,0.00004960293,0.00002261371,0.000004606024,0.8703255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8065062,0.00278339,0.0004011479,0.002414825,0.0004062897,6.108187e-7,7.047722e-7,0.000009522871,0.1874773],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6872267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280633424","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2022.20","title":"Faith or Fraud: Fortune-Telling, Spirituality, and the Law. By Jeremy Patrick. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2020. Pp. 280. $89.95 (cloth); $32.95 (paper); $32.95 (digital). ISBN: 9780774863322.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Law; Spirituality; Political science; Sociology; Theology; Religious studies; Law and economics; Philosophy; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Michael Camp","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01317822927239892,"gpt":0.1941930232163944,"spread":0.1810147939439955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000641991,0.0001378756,0.0004692918,0.00001419646,0.001142911,0.0002463339,0.0003136054,0.00006464091,0.0005172415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002077154,0.0001209733,0.0001514737,0.00005948414,0.001422533,0.0006877237,0.000139817,0.0003986388,0.000001479275],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005400475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009502147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03865471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05226353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983428,0.0000883947,0.0004801498,0.00023041,0.0006176715,0.000240542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988388,0.0001077854,0.0005257411,0.0001549782,0.0001926535,0.0001800292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003067696,0.0001415015,0.0001368052,0.00007547365,0.00006181832,0.0001370155,0.004310752,0.000005760422,0.00004142875,0.005057466,0.9881778,0.001547454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002334107,0.000717105,0.00002286183,0.0001278584,0.0001338892,0.0002097236,0.005761597,0.00004214526,0.00000400196,0.002078933,0.9883993,0.0001685369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5520787,0.2616304,0.0000645753,0.004867924,0.004582191,0.001265023,0.001025268,0.00009606742,0.1743898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8174264,0.1435742,0.00006627352,0.003653979,0.0008964309,0.000002145254,0.00001763033,0.0000337171,0.03432922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2653477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.967747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253394476","doi":"10.1017/s0748081400003921","title":"On the Pope, Cartoons, and Apostates: Shari‘a 2006","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Historical and Linguistic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Apostasy; Islam; Sharia; Law; Aside; Doctrine; Afghan; Legal doctrine; Political science; Perspective (graphical); History; Literature; Art","authors":[{"name":"Anver M. Emon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01984051205346609,"gpt":0.2986637809359884,"spread":0.2788232688825223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007664431,0.00003822807,0.00008410078,0.00001970763,0.0004699528,0.00002372317,0.00004519817,0.00003326124,0.000005809135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003762442,0.00001971002,0.00002522814,0.0000482215,0.0001779237,0.0000212434,0.00001063472,0.0001062292,0.0000019748],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002442855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001738238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001399584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003300169,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995119,0.00003149801,0.0001400773,0.00004301154,0.000173771,0.00009975094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993273,0.0004115528,0.00008162412,0.00002585194,0.00008584953,0.00006781361],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000500919,0.00002556484,0.0005311129,0.000004702184,0.00001684925,0.000034917,0.008544534,5.346215e-7,0.00002328149,0.9507398,0.03870282,0.001325797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001192904,0.0001270718,0.0005050073,0.00004036887,0.00001649735,0.00000698674,0.0007900464,6.067704e-7,0.00001621837,0.03076092,0.9675756,0.0000413948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2899317,0.01229532,0.0001140165,0.01388545,0.001409199,0.0001114498,0.000002656528,0.00001208797,0.6822381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940293,0.00314427,0.00004235439,0.001178405,0.0004800435,1.387746e-7,5.098123e-8,0.000002063762,0.001123407],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9288728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3614545,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587299222","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2015.37","title":"Biblical Narrative and the Formation of Rabbinic Law. By Jane L. Kanarek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Pp. 212. $90.00 (cloth). ISBN: 9781107047815.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"King's University College; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Chaya Halberstam","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01950195735623689,"gpt":0.2262574341896247,"spread":0.2067554768333878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004080937,0.0001119037,0.0002897274,0.00007409029,0.0003055413,0.0001092589,0.0001008347,0.00006457084,0.000008062651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002620298,0.00006707577,0.00008900405,0.00006315416,0.0006289569,0.000606514,0.00005825207,0.0002009133,0.000001863145],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003590178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002166514,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003254549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001798075,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990488,0.0001275372,0.0003610121,0.00009408186,0.0002466459,0.0001219398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998895,0.00009516595,0.000397603,0.00007536353,0.0004359035,0.0001009026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004701255,0.00003220679,0.000007834926,0.00002345967,0.00004733852,0.000002107048,0.004879266,0.000001642646,0.00002502606,0.4474301,0.5469797,0.0001011893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002222898,0.000602313,0.00003751633,0.00008408753,0.00008856796,0.00004385556,0.004409344,0.000384559,0.000191566,0.0005735624,0.9912574,0.0001043302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3643694,0.1198081,0.0006573068,0.02294411,0.00143705,0.0007859057,0.0001810208,0.00004558391,0.4897715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975088,0.02232551,0.00001717897,0.001173093,0.0002462383,7.625661e-7,0.000007512756,0.000007496978,0.001134195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6107186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4919926,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}