{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":22,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":22,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"f25370ca5171","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W2052744333","doi":"10.1080/13572330801920887","title":"Parliamentary Opposition in Westminster Democracies: Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Veto; Political economy; Political science; Democracy; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1049571655087344,"gpt":0.3529566985967887,"spread":0.2479995330880543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002731708,0.00007435268,0.0002472455,0.00003253156,0.0001924306,0.00001387601,0.00006468435,0.00002742688,0.00001398798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000225051,0.00005866886,0.00003036094,0.00008894953,0.0002502832,0.0003120479,0.00001912577,0.0001225711,9.656845e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003359011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003500108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.910408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989711,0.0001099635,0.0002923195,0.00007416642,0.0003369695,0.000215501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993364,0.0001800617,0.0002010891,0.00003041804,0.0001193895,0.0001326455],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004710879,0.00003670173,0.6293566,0.00001938556,0.0001770635,0.0004405382,0.06169516,0.00000792172,0.00003810504,0.004094269,0.3032555,0.0008316301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006790323,0.0001419245,0.7215626,0.00028887,0.00001616223,0.00005935422,0.009848925,8.533101e-7,0.00002170973,0.002400791,0.264849,0.0001308431],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819725,0.002307817,0.00000987452,0.01236316,0.0003042008,0.00008032894,0.000008618458,0.000001804493,0.002951674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886386,0.001015283,0.000103169,0.0002893264,0.000415393,8.155175e-7,1.187542e-7,0.000002445737,0.009534873],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09220597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2392447,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071263895","doi":"10.1080/714003894","title":"Do Ideological Preferences Explain Parliamentary Behaviour? Evidence from Great Britain and Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Cohesion (chemistry); Parliament; Loyalty; Dissent; Spurious relationship; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Positive economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Social psychology; Politics; Economics; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1755485272328969,"gpt":0.4024137154461031,"spread":0.2268651882132062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006837336,0.00009609193,0.0002982225,0.00002890967,0.0002777058,0.00004733596,0.0001076207,0.00004056899,0.00007995582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001047192,0.0000666941,0.00003936634,0.00008979263,0.000325104,0.0003893781,0.00003436969,0.0001475751,9.632249e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002391069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002273899,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8932001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9648354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983352,0.0004971798,0.0003564297,0.0001183005,0.0004537891,0.0002390802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980296,0.001248564,0.0002414453,0.00004728198,0.0002919422,0.0001411161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003268737,0.0000131365,0.984961,0.000003934589,0.00008402335,0.00005871361,0.009800062,0.000002561158,0.00002634194,0.0004788568,0.003130419,0.001408296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002915878,0.0004225461,0.9512278,0.000540958,0.00009530761,0.000009280731,0.02973711,0.000003509581,0.00005824265,0.01212902,0.005294658,0.0001899596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844044,0.008475848,0.00003156061,0.005946336,0.0002838285,0.00009702114,0.000007202846,0.000004886427,0.0007489122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980558,0.001020293,0.000114195,0.0001166692,0.0004795945,0.000004915221,3.201999e-7,0.000002646397,0.0002056195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07163525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2719707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328330448","doi":"10.1080/1357233042000306308","title":"Part 2: Discipline","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Sketch; Dissent; Cohesion (chemistry); Transaction cost; Action (physics); Database transaction; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09451341602553234,"gpt":0.4079058538602078,"spread":0.3133924378346754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001069693,0.00006139189,0.0002380229,0.00002381498,0.000275545,0.00001841346,0.00008638026,0.00002382872,0.00004265416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002858518,0.0000407216,0.00008978546,0.0001260367,0.0003330588,0.0002222716,0.00001426078,0.000106795,0.00001008348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001025263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001162039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001304039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005082457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988689,0.0002210164,0.0002860313,0.00005735506,0.0003593698,0.0002072934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989024,0.0003210392,0.0002989459,0.00004600686,0.00034407,0.00008753545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007076493,0.00004082104,0.008744433,0.000008546629,0.0001659006,0.00002018606,0.02993258,0.000003448359,0.00001535494,0.939392,0.02122275,0.0004468703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000182067,0.00006167183,0.003089749,0.00008865778,0.00001248392,0.000003490388,0.008196679,1.707029e-7,0.00003935987,0.02018514,0.9680814,0.00005919426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06741277,0.01783016,0.0005163791,0.01143,0.003079048,0.0001459579,0.000009510278,0.00001376412,0.8995624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840891,0.001055801,0.000250248,0.0001075824,0.0009094193,0.00000135309,2.110801e-8,0.000003632248,0.0135828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9468586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3422119,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056802693","doi":"10.1080/714003922","title":"The Canadian Senate: Chamber of Sober Reflection or Loony Cousin Best Not Talked About","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Cousin; Constitution; Cynicism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Population; Impeachment; Quarter (Canadian coin); House of Representatives; Sociology; Parliament; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1263043409639647,"gpt":0.3827845787053584,"spread":0.2564802377413937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008946036,0.00009127484,0.0002800069,0.00004841034,0.0009940504,0.00004671956,0.0001139727,0.00005851782,0.00005442599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001411898,0.00005043908,0.0000935633,0.0002347769,0.0007009262,0.0002175837,0.00001789146,0.000192681,0.00001442595],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004463969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002607015,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2324085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8651862,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984668,0.0001967432,0.0004023816,0.00007742472,0.0005261566,0.0003304688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981524,0.000358856,0.0005074497,0.00007209239,0.0007712686,0.0001379229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004110331,0.000393201,0.01445115,0.000158853,0.002899008,0.0004463558,0.427215,0.00006407141,0.001114256,0.2896376,0.2388563,0.02435316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003743467,0.0001917374,0.007528189,0.0002661677,0.00003959543,0.00002054307,0.008004915,0.0000159405,0.0001973181,0.0008646091,0.9823714,0.000125189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2672849,0.02433698,0.00003081524,0.0558258,0.003847792,0.0005170831,0.00005716312,0.00001616587,0.6480833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9650223,0.002829837,0.00002818417,0.0001819978,0.0006762868,0.000002230234,2.781935e-8,0.000005621703,0.03125352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7435152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7727029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972474204","doi":"10.1080/1357233042000322319","title":"The executive and parliament in canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; Political science; Cabinet (room); Scrutiny; Public administration; Separation of powers; Law; Legitimacy; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03526958935511319,"gpt":0.3251219842500981,"spread":0.2898523948949849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000492556,0.00004219442,0.0001420139,0.000009671784,0.0002471655,0.00001563901,0.0000682226,0.000009037479,6.21238e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006234199,0.00002342815,0.00001880655,0.00006866366,0.0002518906,0.00009599167,0.00001991391,0.00009311765,2.187921e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009252863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008807326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9299742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992365,0.00008238871,0.0001953362,0.00003987117,0.0002802105,0.0001656917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992502,0.0003762231,0.0001728066,0.00002423996,0.0001278646,0.00004866815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000437769,0.00003008775,0.08035254,0.00001335971,0.0002825447,0.0001462596,0.1518249,0.00007463727,0.00001128969,0.7562327,0.006687767,0.004300105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000818042,0.0001103781,0.2251427,0.0003416076,0.00001172059,0.000006508951,0.1734862,8.552119e-7,0.0000398122,0.0528056,0.5471178,0.0001187937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8297189,0.04137268,0.00004639042,0.05806191,0.001173918,0.0002206358,0.000007423608,0.000002540543,0.06939562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963582,0.002955285,0.00002605264,0.0001147024,0.0001369251,0.000001450371,3.868486e-9,0.000001236804,0.0004061972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7034271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2419592,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092100935","doi":"10.1080/13572330500158599","title":"Imposing a neo-liberal theory of representation on the Westminster model: A Canadian case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legitimacy; Representation (politics); Public administration; Obligation; Parliament; Democracy; Proportional representation; Ideology; Restructuring; Government (linguistics); Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09152225834305129,"gpt":0.3494550338847722,"spread":0.2579327755417209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009872463,0.00005816051,0.0001655947,0.0003442977,0.0008392099,0.00005847262,0.0001073427,0.00002989526,0.00005585736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005093,0.00004624873,0.0001067837,0.0001725386,0.0006607081,0.0003391741,0.00001183513,0.0001654526,0.000003615057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008313135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009143942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2901686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.979523,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989982,0.0002691653,0.0002629883,0.00006468168,0.0002487728,0.000156151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988626,0.0003519795,0.0002921605,0.0000758637,0.0003167164,0.0001006354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009138495,0.00004219206,0.0004025805,0.00001025075,0.0004118785,0.0004448362,0.8140977,0.002161329,0.00005810093,0.106068,0.04887861,0.02733316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00146737,0.0005991945,0.002818191,0.0006068166,0.0003968539,0.0005104223,0.4188849,0.0007723235,0.000130439,0.05005887,0.5231789,0.0005757596],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6664256,0.007018231,0.0001615253,0.04431325,0.0007509891,0.0003489506,0.00003713109,0.000009773379,0.2809345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939313,0.0003996824,0.0001684379,0.0005603054,0.0003721533,0.000001672749,9.172216e-8,0.000005137301,0.004561219],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6893544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7145582,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038486272","doi":"10.1080/1357233042000322346","title":"Japan: the prime minister and the Japanese Diet","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Politics; Political science; Lower house; Public administration; Norm (philosophy); Democracy; Prime (order theory); Political economy; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07974298120193073,"gpt":0.3973245224139821,"spread":0.3175815412120513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001452732,0.00006327536,0.0002001625,0.00001716421,0.0005763879,0.00005103893,0.0001039101,0.000024157,0.000005562061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009457368,0.0000257254,0.00007145331,0.0001038492,0.001310745,0.0001595718,0.00002748113,0.0001375599,0.000003621988],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006047905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000610737,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001208898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002052714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988752,0.0003682733,0.0002538503,0.00004994237,0.0002906008,0.0001621055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986168,0.0007799259,0.000225617,0.00005637186,0.0002764017,0.00004484726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003119738,0.00004617463,0.009310502,0.00001657155,0.0005033331,0.000005834705,0.7182512,0.00001568749,0.00004250573,0.2687682,0.002133825,0.0005942368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008037148,0.002274321,0.136286,0.0006199571,0.000579496,0.00004703931,0.316729,0.000009761986,0.0002237453,0.2509305,0.2837336,0.0005293988],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7999101,0.008342652,0.00002565333,0.1649228,0.0006177742,0.0003110537,0.000001540088,0.000007181454,0.02586114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997708,0.0001572098,0.00001692616,0.000393639,0.0006737155,0.000004859626,2.902854e-8,0.000002742209,0.001042878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4015222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4829495,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967333694","doi":"10.1080/13572330500166642","title":"Forging a new political culture: Plenary behaviour in the scottish parliament","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Politics; Appeal; Political culture; Political science; Public administration; Political system; Devolution (biology); Law; Sociology; Adversarial system; Political economy; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06357643539640366,"gpt":0.3907655827019897,"spread":0.327189147305586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001075167,0.00009543585,0.0002718768,0.00003747519,0.0002409252,0.00005251886,0.000238006,0.00004154403,0.00001397984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000699373,0.00005551729,0.0001171149,0.0001616715,0.0002723373,0.0003712229,0.00003565361,0.0002731783,0.000006026656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003503408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002011235,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003872132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006871778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982038,0.0002652769,0.0004017396,0.00008781691,0.0006085378,0.0004328448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990988,0.0003174393,0.0002354442,0.00006449991,0.0001535451,0.0001302767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002104664,0.0001400383,0.04784571,0.00001057998,0.0001115628,0.0000776931,0.2000992,0.000007432137,0.000009983823,0.6853478,0.0634957,0.002833212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008118363,0.0002310353,0.08199687,0.0004311067,0.0000481315,0.00003529412,0.09974167,0.000003572238,0.00002502421,0.01733211,0.799166,0.0001773566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3749892,0.0483152,0.0005521038,0.256919,0.001564034,0.0008345204,0.00002608544,0.00003070941,0.3167691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937739,0.0004235012,0.0003862779,0.0009805032,0.002116392,0.000003261213,6.374186e-8,0.000003984447,0.002312115],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7356703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5853531,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051958251","doi":"10.1080/13572330903302505","title":"Legislative Strengthening Meets Party Support in International Assistance: A Closer Relationship?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Democratization; Public administration; Civil society; Political science; Work (physics); Politics; Corporate governance; Democracy; Political economy; Public relations; Economics; Law; Management; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07404214872354592,"gpt":0.4028326101522053,"spread":0.3287904614286594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001582045,0.0001399624,0.0003049511,0.0003407143,0.0002919327,0.00006297524,0.0002791105,0.00006205398,0.0001314362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00203531,0.0001171142,0.0001234645,0.0003314159,0.0002139718,0.001102972,0.00003308883,0.0003517176,0.00001149416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004337943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002856366,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002264299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005865365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978703,0.0002218785,0.0006739878,0.0001472639,0.0008431923,0.0002433825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977244,0.0005923919,0.0006349917,0.00005353418,0.0009346441,0.00006003274],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002600869,0.0002293778,0.214737,0.000006009747,0.0005454863,0.0001816327,0.4039358,0.0001528669,0.00007534305,0.3583933,0.0158879,0.005595243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001803225,0.000306558,0.5393742,0.0004744665,0.00003875707,0.00001135715,0.04416598,0.00002981691,0.00009693785,0.09145284,0.3218447,0.0004011722],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1358714,0.001231158,0.000268383,0.05532679,0.002414971,0.0002319754,0.00001133703,0.00002791868,0.804616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896389,0.0005443607,0.0021998,0.0002141474,0.0005972981,0.00000320851,0.000002462269,0.00000548768,0.006794285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8537675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4775779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391772215","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2024.2313310","title":"Governments and parliaments in a state of emergency: what can we learn from the COVID-19 pandemic?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Socio-political and Technological Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); State of emergency; Political science; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; State (computer science); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Public administration; Virology; Medicine; Law; Computer science; Politics; Outbreak","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1630664570721894,"gpt":0.4247199404289856,"spread":0.2616534833567962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007223174,0.00008735776,0.0002745699,0.00003601623,0.0001628435,0.00004495932,0.0001560317,0.00004252565,0.00004854294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001590368,0.00004816256,0.0000686981,0.0002187898,0.0006616811,0.000277102,0.00009606027,0.0002574294,0.000001526996],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002432726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000865621,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002050851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004855279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987003,0.0002356288,0.000340654,0.0001117038,0.0004288276,0.0001828382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984789,0.001150602,0.0001627277,0.00004731771,0.00008402021,0.00007639945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004126178,0.00006608223,0.4920374,0.00004383721,0.0007020827,0.00006480821,0.4656787,0.000004167426,0.00007887568,0.007933979,0.001955347,0.03139345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000352631,0.0001821394,0.02260215,0.0003944569,0.00005765519,0.000001132405,0.3716174,0.000005351591,0.00003323283,0.5046807,0.09995658,0.0001165825],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8685444,0.08904493,0.00002584365,0.04082309,0.0005545064,0.0001242843,0.00002862736,0.00001729194,0.0008370022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8869858,0.1122007,0.00003831998,0.0001798704,0.0001093891,0.000003209175,1.207982e-7,0.000003276032,0.0004793161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4967467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3100286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031419457","doi":"10.1080/1357233042000318891","title":"Still different after all these years? A comparison of female and male Canadian MPs in the twentieth century","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Women's College Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Politics; Convergence (economics); Political science; Period (music); Gender studies; Demographic economics; Sociology; Demography; Law; Economics; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0904739919859172,"gpt":0.3911107678644337,"spread":0.3006367758785165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003744956,0.00005535298,0.0001839935,0.00009673062,0.00003451766,0.00002267744,0.00008870538,0.00002500199,0.000009874201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001034247,0.00003400456,0.00004789647,0.00008099338,0.0002489794,0.00008880324,0.0000198877,0.0001252512,4.965109e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001009119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001013684,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02416688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.206098,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991455,0.0001577102,0.0002184406,0.00005623504,0.000261786,0.000160342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994948,0.0001123885,0.0001676226,0.00004517853,0.0001217628,0.00005828416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001097983,0.00005188142,0.1972121,0.000008963679,0.00008074372,0.00001958518,0.8002419,0.00003073106,0.00001014398,0.002002775,0.00007852331,0.0002515826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003684391,0.00009400315,0.6806808,0.00006687095,0.00003006723,0.000003147033,0.3035653,0.00000175135,0.00002254189,0.00380158,0.01131336,0.0000521431],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895351,0.004882305,0.00000673842,0.002613124,0.0001958839,0.0001065043,0.000004989309,7.006382e-7,0.002654656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984647,0.001203675,0.00005719306,0.00007659037,0.00009345817,0.000002142737,1.844973e-7,0.000002406768,0.00009967283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4966766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9823313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327844812","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2023.2190695","title":"Institutional change and partisanship in the Canadian Senate","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Liberal Party; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3941958185359105,"gpt":0.4417479409554658,"spread":0.04755212241955536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001056563,0.00003101456,0.00007067472,0.0001318453,0.0004417484,0.00003121261,0.00005664583,0.00001773546,0.000002824032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003123143,0.00001912068,0.00001953087,0.0002382898,0.0002912201,0.0001448161,0.0000103887,0.00009128699,0.000003500074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000771946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001902341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04920383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6407306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993433,0.0001597431,0.0001068793,0.00003627146,0.0002157027,0.0001380705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996188,0.0001333659,0.0000594951,0.00002013592,0.0001240541,0.00004413741],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000294126,0.000007643727,0.08474109,0.000008682009,0.00006005141,0.0001033586,0.785738,0.00002004625,0.000006048828,0.1249096,0.003366825,0.001035771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002168491,0.0000350396,0.6566034,0.00005586359,0.00001271645,0.00001000218,0.2340758,0.00002080742,0.000007749287,0.03916871,0.06972777,0.00006533528],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.802484,0.00363825,0.000003345037,0.1128321,0.0007804765,0.0002165157,0.000006906622,0.000004969342,0.08003344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981107,0.001063231,0.00001020836,0.0002272473,0.0003375527,0.000002904744,1.92547e-7,0.000001078122,0.0002468909],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5915267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9571276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318541381","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2023.2171542","title":"Opposition parties in times of pandemics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Parliament; Legislature; Solidarity; Politics; Psychological intervention; Political science; Pandemic; Political economy; Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1671028629644999,"gpt":0.4461395572667425,"spread":0.2790366943022426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001096692,0.00004156601,0.0002133759,0.0001108281,0.00008260306,0.00000730178,0.00004934311,0.00002968215,0.000009182668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008268749,0.00003159704,0.00005053448,0.0003329842,0.000198391,0.000193679,0.00001298287,0.00007595176,0.000004090335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006525889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006487082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005268666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001991317,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989914,0.0002317193,0.0003486694,0.00003763438,0.0002421982,0.0001483497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998962,0.000429747,0.0002345358,0.0000256429,0.0003154892,0.00003258133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008893861,0.00008755615,0.55909,0.0001081953,0.0002854443,0.00002164973,0.2169048,0.0004177754,0.001344242,0.2088378,0.01014809,0.002665511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001665637,0.001410715,0.4577462,0.001705896,0.0001314218,0.000003983694,0.120114,0.0002399006,0.003377667,0.3803977,0.03276721,0.0004395873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804782,0.001124635,0.00002141906,0.004281682,0.0003381635,0.00008939923,0.000002752896,0.0000104454,0.01365336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988571,0.0002892008,0.0000281395,0.00001679178,0.0002116908,0.000002269787,2.197853e-7,0.000002263165,0.0005922826],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1715599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.128849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251278139","doi":"10.1080/1357233042000322283","title":"The parliamentary activity of the head of government in ireland (1923–2000) in comparative perspective","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irish; Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Northern ireland; Accountability; Political science; Head (geology); Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Ethnology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07149466536706303,"gpt":0.3895151227998003,"spread":0.3180204574327373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009620325,0.00008362797,0.0003916851,0.00001867857,0.0001618851,0.000007706813,0.0001947005,0.00002707365,0.000001783962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005642807,0.00004311123,0.0001073477,0.0002422904,0.0009208811,0.0001824193,0.00005703434,0.0002304448,2.882385e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001513157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002375416,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03113038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1424331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982882,0.0003739642,0.0003938621,0.00007695419,0.000676776,0.0001902703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983237,0.0007087218,0.0006783302,0.00007381541,0.0001862499,0.0000291286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003572994,0.0005072927,0.2633552,0.00002401854,0.0004545229,0.00001222557,0.5612283,0.0004674562,0.0004144591,0.1723526,0.0003247545,0.0005018967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001101661,0.0002316687,0.7893685,0.0005699198,0.00001535647,0.000001242496,0.1876303,0.000002156184,0.001058093,0.01676487,0.003185619,0.00007062388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744111,0.003615174,0.00001123045,0.006701728,0.0002452467,0.0002078441,0.00002067202,7.084193e-7,0.01478625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990095,0.00063478,0.00002282454,0.00002623219,0.000081324,0.000003439012,6.36671e-9,0.000002026415,0.0002199002],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5260134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9753214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403129625","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2024.2411479","title":"Let's talk about something else: how cabinet members divert issue attention in answers to parliamentary questions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Political science; History; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06753322322091648,"gpt":0.4168802095524323,"spread":0.3493469863315158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001291696,0.0001071198,0.0002772254,0.0002324435,0.0002641007,0.0001332495,0.00009400191,0.00004896926,0.00005209307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007323144,0.00008531646,0.0001018394,0.000493728,0.0001751481,0.0007580771,0.00003001364,0.0002440052,0.00001304711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005073467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009966682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01090658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02747704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983965,0.0003839223,0.0003498345,0.0001315198,0.0004474115,0.0002908606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990514,0.0003828156,0.0001232662,0.00004857002,0.0002696111,0.0001243679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001305874,0.0002988182,0.1698733,0.000515133,0.001992888,0.00049079,0.5918395,0.00152699,0.005161863,0.06574879,0.1224241,0.03999725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008250342,0.001046768,0.11069,0.004295449,0.0002960796,0.00001352833,0.1366474,0.0002309298,0.0002606215,0.01350034,0.7314923,0.0007016214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.847838,0.01260352,0.0006407775,0.1273113,0.003735571,0.0004939007,0.00001928028,0.00004851719,0.007309181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958003,0.0002853048,0.0002316295,0.0002116919,0.0009691329,0.0000115458,7.499144e-7,0.00000760595,0.002482043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6090682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384133609","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2023.2233207","title":"Conscientiousness of representatives and agreement with their party positions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Conscientiousness; Loyalty; Dissent; Political science; House of Representatives; Ideology; Unison; Social psychology; Personality; Big Five personality traits; Public relations; Law; Psychology; Extraversion and introversion; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1234332985631977,"gpt":0.4344024705019436,"spread":0.3109691719387458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007037211,0.00004879922,0.0001954887,0.00007609772,0.0002582918,0.00001563505,0.00004244155,0.00001390889,0.000009351785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002860093,0.00002929471,0.00003483693,0.000315124,0.0007023157,0.0001804154,0.00001936492,0.00005202873,0.000001160144],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002636369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006121374,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003441598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001658529,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991016,0.000226953,0.0002311844,0.00005921174,0.0002481735,0.0001328353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986617,0.0004629912,0.0002510301,0.00003673152,0.0005354494,0.00005210601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001115574,0.00013693,0.420528,0.0001082232,0.001106052,0.00002410355,0.4221025,0.0001086176,0.002622671,0.1457598,0.005996109,0.001395435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001837542,0.002024215,0.5824251,0.001006993,0.0002096318,0.00001148387,0.3315395,0.00004628572,0.004313376,0.06381909,0.01243275,0.000334063],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863166,0.0007267076,0.0001492427,0.0049614,0.0001457717,0.0001297055,0.000009813015,0.000007419235,0.007553347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989442,0.0001433286,0.00005956234,0.0000143503,0.00009396399,0.000003809015,2.879668e-7,0.000001962232,0.0007385591],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1618971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2587712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028522308","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2012.673063","title":"A Bilingual Legislature? Question Period in Canada's House of Commons","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Commons; Legislature; Period (music); Sample (material); Institution; Norm (philosophy); Neuroscience of multilingualism; House of Representatives; Political science; Danish; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Linguistics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04572952364420851,"gpt":0.3578392605562827,"spread":0.3121097369120742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00118095,0.00008325502,0.0003827669,0.00005477747,0.0001135999,0.000007965762,0.0001215728,0.00003729959,0.00000579493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001835887,0.00006209747,0.00006735264,0.0001918209,0.0002598783,0.0003076959,0.00002840962,0.0002138573,6.677199e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007238101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001480814,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8603159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9835061,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983878,0.0003133284,0.0004451459,0.00005354244,0.0004877296,0.0003124882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986341,0.0003781376,0.0004984866,0.0000589654,0.0003223667,0.0001079428],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004138468,0.0001066832,0.7000632,0.00003831041,0.0001667318,0.00002958306,0.1296835,0.00002153889,0.00006298006,0.1652586,0.003565325,0.0009621889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007486595,0.0001619295,0.6888748,0.0007254966,0.0000450823,0.00001833557,0.06351458,0.00000400955,0.000152371,0.002335172,0.2431766,0.000242951],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9578839,0.01683056,0.00002949006,0.004465587,0.001487761,0.0001273653,0.00001411485,0.000005961988,0.01915527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986197,0.0002966751,0.0001264479,0.00004300176,0.0005631498,0.000001105575,4.279636e-8,0.000005643105,0.0003442602],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2396112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2626901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400873207","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2024.2381155","title":"Gender and legislative committees in Africa: a study of Rwanda and South Africa","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Gender studies; Economic growth; Geography; Public administration; Development economics; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1547811720692711,"gpt":0.389906272070032,"spread":0.2351251000007608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001015564,0.0001010585,0.0003357349,0.0002520297,0.0001820483,0.00005821643,0.00006715315,0.00003388922,0.000004977097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003046737,0.00007157728,0.00004386595,0.0002947851,0.0004588079,0.000264524,0.00007419525,0.000197006,3.961899e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000484758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001064226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001778349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004486737,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986032,0.0003352322,0.0003693938,0.0001354836,0.0003762559,0.0001803904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988675,0.0005477084,0.0001981639,0.0000484761,0.0002828362,0.00005533845],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001742196,0.00008312095,0.02563092,0.00003704465,0.0003966675,0.00003276818,0.9663562,0.0000117151,0.00002232631,0.006571177,0.0004238043,0.0004168842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006142546,0.00038744,0.05571405,0.000108744,0.00008728781,0.000003246666,0.9237078,0.00002716313,0.00000987996,0.01397132,0.005277589,0.00009117072],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8743294,0.03934864,0.00009630448,0.001087423,0.0003972875,0.0003498083,0.000009983086,0.000009401437,0.08437169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982025,0.0008890018,0.0001203241,0.000005216334,0.0001478174,0.000003605138,5.530147e-8,0.000005716797,0.0006257495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1238731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2918837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996965981","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2013.812356","title":"Legislative Dissent without Reprisal? An Alternative View of Speaker Selection","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Legislature; Opposition (politics); Popularity; Political science; Legislative intent; Selection (genetic algorithm); Public relations; Law; Politics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07743213812032024,"gpt":0.3914000847078785,"spread":0.3139679465875583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008956307,0.0001789092,0.0006123409,0.0001340142,0.0006050656,0.00003532077,0.0001999166,0.00004710826,0.0001047056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009838403,0.0001275329,0.000174111,0.0003823819,0.00164577,0.001140834,0.00007168413,0.0002356312,0.00001665182],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002008877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002235753,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004577069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003408287,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977582,0.0004347237,0.0006379849,0.0001847627,0.0007263912,0.0002579351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957764,0.0003527231,0.0009561722,0.0000767869,0.002735432,0.0001024775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002372497,0.0006242692,0.1875684,0.0000440348,0.0042387,0.00002310196,0.5556937,0.0002228444,0.001348346,0.2239866,0.005490328,0.02052251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002016072,0.002349177,0.2580187,0.001293836,0.0004906717,0.00003515214,0.3801268,0.00007711523,0.00188792,0.2555182,0.09724963,0.000936677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6812211,0.01433442,0.002514796,0.01089641,0.002030976,0.00103762,0.00001444793,0.00004858776,0.2879016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940214,0.003225042,0.0009588257,0.00008039556,0.000969448,0.0000127454,3.530415e-7,0.000007567925,0.0007242667],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3128002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6919189,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236327344","doi":"10.1080/13572330008420634","title":"Book reviews","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.145154533585428,"gpt":0.4553254425105158,"spread":0.3101709089250878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009453271,0.00005418176,0.0002618176,0.00002815434,0.0002211075,0.00001642691,0.00006897293,0.00002336145,0.0009523544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005477185,0.00003617,0.00009434651,0.0001170686,0.0001901391,0.0003031902,0.000004482755,0.00009259758,0.00009486735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007767657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004911971,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002274396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004013592,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988492,0.0003615136,0.0003621654,0.00004485603,0.0002181699,0.0001641049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992882,0.0001768182,0.0001905565,0.00003908013,0.0002340001,0.00007135574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004687326,0.00007674361,0.007543369,0.00004524906,0.0002406641,0.00001660591,0.08323824,0.00001109716,0.00007362331,0.02388832,0.8465713,0.03824786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008937548,0.00009540327,0.001307744,0.0001021112,0.00001666634,0.000001105288,0.000456931,5.004845e-7,0.0000152193,0.002126445,0.9957444,0.00004407391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04494997,0.4322432,0.00008151717,0.03564715,0.001088866,0.0004729245,0.000002418451,0.00002450895,0.4854894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8840807,0.02299635,0.0001924966,0.002002846,0.00260218,0.0000073071,1.207432e-7,0.000006942003,0.08811107],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8391307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409493846","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2025.2488540","title":"Legislative influence in House of Commons committees in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Legislature; House of Representatives; Political science; Commons; Public administration; Law; Politics; Parliament","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03078921293381114,"gpt":0.3508149797923369,"spread":0.3200257668585257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008294033,0.00009774368,0.0005511181,0.0001354111,0.00009705286,0.00001034667,0.0002483831,0.00003413199,0.000002971801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002371065,0.00007888782,0.00005604042,0.0005738785,0.0004570947,0.0003083167,0.00006346071,0.0002817829,3.491111e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001053137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001921676,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9590999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981949,0.0003745982,0.000672775,0.00008519667,0.0004046039,0.0002679022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975842,0.001373336,0.0004785246,0.00007918315,0.0004362022,0.00004855143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003149802,0.00005064089,0.860711,0.00003721017,0.0001169999,0.00004579806,0.04611878,0.0002514661,0.00002210161,0.08972236,0.00248967,0.0004025146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006414829,0.00005434857,0.9150735,0.001152251,0.00001134052,6.922536e-7,0.02948619,0.000006213689,0.00007451725,0.008484734,0.04491043,0.0001042675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9248331,0.00470143,0.00001891024,0.006996075,0.0003465012,0.0001550026,0.00001555539,0.000003321744,0.06293008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987383,0.000501787,0.00004847036,0.0001584113,0.00004503603,0.000003200661,2.455607e-8,0.000003442554,0.0005013174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08123762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3408971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366140343","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2023.2202089","title":"Why would a majority agree to adopting supermajority rules when they empower a minority? The institutional choice of the National Assembly of Korea","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Academy of Korean Studies","keywords":"Legislature; Lawmaking; Legislation; Newspaper; Sociology; Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1697539402458573,"gpt":0.4220214127768845,"spread":0.2522674725310272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00227099,0.0001018025,0.0003034298,0.00009310409,0.0006108653,0.00002589232,0.0003135655,0.00007653643,0.00001132453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005748368,0.00005568629,0.0001833375,0.0004360331,0.0005129969,0.0003091561,0.000111999,0.0003117318,0.000003812406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001684547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003193264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007351671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01697044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974618,0.0005084731,0.0005538071,0.00009624836,0.001142868,0.000236822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962558,0.001323058,0.0004529336,0.0000793573,0.00182358,0.00006528608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001010994,0.0002335349,0.5419371,0.0001647903,0.0009730731,0.000004938038,0.1536211,0.0004819707,0.002356604,0.2702138,0.02933626,0.0005757962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004538152,0.0002067429,0.8986961,0.0003923502,0.00009874828,0.000003440162,0.007719109,0.00003737847,0.0003956327,0.03226578,0.05956182,0.0001690872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9590195,0.0003468792,0.0000471768,0.02895574,0.0006055551,0.0002576359,0.00005191985,0.00000867533,0.01070686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984714,0.00002079153,0.0001292365,0.0003145012,0.0007408736,0.000005881289,5.186486e-7,0.000003341174,0.0003134912],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.356759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}