{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":22,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":22,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"f25370ca5171","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W2052744333","doi":"10.1080/13572330801920887","title":"Parliamentary Opposition in Westminster Democracies: Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Veto; Political economy; Political science; Democracy; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"André Kaiser","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1049571655087344,"gpt":0.3529566985967887,"spread":0.2479995330880543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002247104,0.0001452001,0.0006282362,0.003893861,0.006593085,0.004404533,0.0006886721,0.0005984049,0.004019957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007363183,0.0003198674,0.0002865671,0.007256804,0.004569487,0.001206906,0.002626473,0.001425365,0.0002622903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03090878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0222064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9028072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9654768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963052,0.0004255012,0.0001750923,0.0002171565,0.001221922,0.001655146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944934,0.001111768,0.001808245,0.0001660182,0.001454548,0.0009661225],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008585884,0.0002403619,0.4714808,0.0004687603,0.0002250501,0.002220651,0.3740036,0.0008729679,0.002995362,0.08163593,0.006885854,0.05811216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003334985,0.00004461989,0.9045915,0.0001229206,0.00005083932,0.0001947282,0.0652777,0.0006153439,0.0004477642,0.001077082,0.02748894,0.00005526081],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9740353,0.0003807179,0.000054458,0.0005373291,0.000008519323,0.00002130212,0.00008008527,0.000005774542,0.02487656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994849,0.0002976887,0.000092042,0.0001080143,0.000004573224,0.00001691904,0.00007018298,0.000007963227,0.004553506],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09719282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2242599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071263895","doi":"10.1080/714003894","title":"Do Ideological Preferences Explain Parliamentary Behaviour? Evidence from Great Britain and Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Cohesion (chemistry); Parliament; Loyalty; Dissent; Spurious relationship; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Positive economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Social psychology; Politics; Economics; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Cindy D. Kam","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1755485272328969,"gpt":0.4024137154461031,"spread":0.2268651882132062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004286093,0.0004023885,0.001264722,0.002351349,0.005171262,0.002620931,0.001818731,0.0008146829,0.01034251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0181533,0.0004944345,0.0005519389,0.009646886,0.002771109,0.000839892,0.001816235,0.001351147,0.000772023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0258607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02813105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964716,0.0007816289,0.0001598864,0.0003851452,0.001009061,0.001192576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803112,0.006841872,0.002980345,0.0009439934,0.006439738,0.002482977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009531537,0.0002067166,0.8679972,0.0004620974,0.0005503969,0.0009350608,0.06440581,0.0006688795,0.0005144437,0.008336158,0.01537731,0.03959272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006707999,0.00003060267,0.9710811,0.0001729291,0.0001195473,0.00006460458,0.01913678,0.0003847896,0.0001062853,0.000407469,0.0083938,0.00003504951],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845254,0.00184388,0.0001061491,0.001704852,0.00002661189,0.0000308982,0.001441426,0.000005481294,0.01031529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949669,0.000822989,0.00009557904,0.0001595518,0.000008557144,0.00001345311,0.0009847804,0.000009771224,0.002938331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0258607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1876334,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328330448","doi":"10.1080/1357233042000306308","title":"Part 2: Discipline","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Sketch; Dissent; Cohesion (chemistry); Transaction cost; Action (physics); Database transaction; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Sam Depauw","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09451341602553234,"gpt":0.4079058538602078,"spread":0.3133924378346754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006847497,0.0006824053,0.0008399212,0.003828975,0.005240007,0.01100345,0.001654809,0.003632116,0.1075982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02496158,0.000423398,0.001243685,0.007228166,0.008702466,0.007312522,0.008025918,0.004908635,0.01895613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008898279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008137084,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004018434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003059515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9893292,0.003370097,0.0004749569,0.00159555,0.003178254,0.002051982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809046,0.006813332,0.002526772,0.002440943,0.003984739,0.003329615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008901742,0.0001153583,0.006024186,0.0004085935,0.00001806875,0.0002069389,0.006043102,0.0002706362,0.0002681966,0.7622406,0.1084401,0.1158752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004116577,0.0001155839,0.01140734,0.0009147773,0.00002082804,0.0007026431,0.004045567,0.000286854,0.000249028,0.2129887,0.7691982,0.00002920115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01140002,0.007960913,0.005254669,0.02286479,0.002765883,0.0001765327,0.0004255616,0.00009363974,0.949058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4999958,0.01347609,0.004060701,0.0183636,0.00667948,0.0007507199,0.0009642104,0.0003211509,0.4553883],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1075982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3599517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056802693","doi":"10.1080/714003922","title":"The Canadian Senate: Chamber of Sober Reflection or Loony Cousin Best Not Talked About","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Cousin; Constitution; Cynicism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Population; Impeachment; Quarter (Canadian coin); House of Representatives; Sociology; Parliament; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David Docherty","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1263043409639647,"gpt":0.3827845787053584,"spread":0.2564802377413937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006325546,0.0006249058,0.0006894463,0.001418815,0.04018223,0.01822012,0.002290612,0.009124189,0.01468641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01927616,0.0005718782,0.0004303158,0.002529205,0.02363317,0.004778387,0.00334894,0.01294686,0.002209391],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07654642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1727727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9741346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875616,"domain_scores_codex":[0.990719,0.001674524,0.0001779984,0.001245856,0.003339326,0.002843258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911624,0.001816081,0.0002168513,0.0004160374,0.004494404,0.001894239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002186678,0.00001088029,0.000814781,0.00005244893,0.00001014619,0.0001522724,0.006653567,0.00006948691,0.0002371816,0.2017616,0.7772895,0.01292629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003973762,0.000003061836,0.001087452,0.000145452,0.000008708139,0.00002916293,0.006201201,0.00004458646,0.0001115295,0.004715616,0.9876142,0.00003504855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005098518,0.02208832,0.0006946986,0.7488664,0.009108184,0.00004096754,0.0002839505,0.00008231175,0.2137367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2884328,0.01873236,0.001907094,0.3415898,0.00343217,0.00006175479,0.0002137863,0.0003173944,0.3453127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9234536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5553858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972474204","doi":"10.1080/1357233042000322319","title":"The executive and parliament in canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; Political science; Cabinet (room); Scrutiny; Public administration; Separation of powers; Law; Legitimacy; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Jonathan Malloy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03526958935511319,"gpt":0.3251219842500981,"spread":0.2898523948949849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002460556,0.0002144,0.0004854572,0.002064866,0.02130893,0.007562718,0.001210059,0.001829821,0.021314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009644477,0.0003178325,0.0002918755,0.004773031,0.005708783,0.001612294,0.002675442,0.003780271,0.001131751],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1698004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2584254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981013,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939777,0.0004915679,0.0001135771,0.000345328,0.001939947,0.003131839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911029,0.001032079,0.0005150079,0.0001400578,0.002932069,0.004277871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001409243,0.0001003273,0.0408364,0.0002859457,0.00004197315,0.0007758386,0.02322535,0.0005605738,0.0003396648,0.4993475,0.3402596,0.09408589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002989334,0.00002387279,0.1024995,0.0003432783,0.00002936846,0.0001360457,0.01437536,0.0003753983,0.0001878172,0.008629858,0.8733014,0.00006826158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.143347,0.02391127,0.0004795303,0.1478153,0.00189997,0.00007387914,0.001118563,0.0001094078,0.681245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8259633,0.008352204,0.0005267808,0.0170078,0.0003138154,0.00002948752,0.0004467167,0.00006537658,0.1472946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8301996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9629139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092100935","doi":"10.1080/13572330500158599","title":"Imposing a neo-liberal theory of representation on the Westminster model: A Canadian case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legitimacy; Representation (politics); Public administration; Obligation; Parliament; Democracy; Proportional representation; Ideology; Restructuring; Government (linguistics); Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David Pond","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09152225834305129,"gpt":0.3494550338847722,"spread":0.2579327755417209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004216551,0.0003460409,0.00049669,0.001698684,0.03241879,0.006719841,0.002038946,0.003354198,0.003753628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006309914,0.0003515946,0.000470964,0.004069755,0.01287635,0.002536128,0.002780809,0.003464867,0.0002819327],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1511565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1106402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960032,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993704,0.001270072,0.00007745234,0.0003457316,0.001595764,0.003006901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978858,0.0005801667,0.0001710483,0.0001514682,0.0007391308,0.0004724981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002412958,0.00001853512,0.002208756,0.00001611472,0.000004063387,0.0005465998,0.01808762,0.0005402214,0.00009126457,0.9670769,0.00605598,0.005329786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001865677,0.00008844752,0.02498285,0.0004137393,0.0001273325,0.00110963,0.1140403,0.01210772,0.0009222775,0.2125158,0.6332749,0.0002304815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3415078,0.00170861,0.00424516,0.03885504,0.0001436294,0.0001809642,0.0002318451,0.00003294153,0.613094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611666,0.0009362727,0.001406913,0.002074345,0.00002422083,0.00005200316,0.00003887621,0.00001414266,0.03428669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1511565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9845381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038486272","doi":"10.1080/1357233042000322346","title":"Japan: the prime minister and the Japanese Diet","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Politics; Political science; Lower house; Public administration; Norm (philosophy); Democracy; Prime (order theory); Political economy; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Mikitaka Masuyama","is_ca":false},{"name":"Benjamin Nyblade","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07974298120193073,"gpt":0.3973245224139821,"spread":0.3175815412120513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000801898,0.0001871898,0.0001985466,0.0005819022,0.003116088,0.003178026,0.000198156,0.0008868052,0.01209127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00098016,0.000183031,0.00007446947,0.00141654,0.001555684,0.00141542,0.001614314,0.00132861,0.001026311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002755348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002666625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02896688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09461921,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997249,0.00009141256,0.000009016204,0.00003102643,0.00003354107,0.0001100871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994579,0.00005196123,0.0000734826,0.00001177988,0.00008318336,0.0003217452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006014876,0.0002656492,0.09864503,0.001255228,0.00009285594,0.002508807,0.09133309,0.0001505826,0.001917217,0.2754837,0.3772727,0.1504735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003522337,0.00007633211,0.1016925,0.0004264197,0.00003788568,0.0003231691,0.04029795,0.00006490986,0.000129307,0.00958863,0.8472984,0.00002923062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3464937,0.04628605,0.0003561084,0.1880709,0.002278236,0.00002505522,0.0005060838,0.00003653961,0.4159474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8802994,0.02038773,0.0003842309,0.01218479,0.0007313979,0.00002183201,0.0002053181,0.00002312288,0.08576214],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02896688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05759656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967333694","doi":"10.1080/13572330500166642","title":"Forging a new political culture: Plenary behaviour in the scottish parliament","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Politics; Appeal; Political culture; Political science; Public administration; Political system; Devolution (biology); Law; Sociology; Adversarial system; Political economy; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Ailsa Henderson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06357643539640366,"gpt":0.3907655827019897,"spread":0.327189147305586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01312803,0.0003002194,0.0006022496,0.0023124,0.01169232,0.007149028,0.001071996,0.002430809,0.007108419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04711817,0.0005667115,0.0004764298,0.001385057,0.005345453,0.003091013,0.004778575,0.00310078,0.001506791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003629378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001861531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009149927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01981791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9821904,0.01165559,0.0005757554,0.0007196954,0.002961914,0.001896755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726118,0.01299928,0.005838228,0.001133477,0.002736596,0.004680465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002629134,0.0002016325,0.04945912,0.0001192383,0.00004515527,0.002254075,0.9008593,0.00007531706,0.005126273,0.004112395,0.006102576,0.031382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002799938,0.0005110932,0.160428,0.0002051854,0.00003058821,0.001847429,0.7399839,0.0006399206,0.001382753,0.001510184,0.09327719,0.0001557506],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.97742,0.0002586813,0.000469653,0.003463985,0.00007037164,0.00003401545,0.00002247609,0.00003859245,0.0182222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947994,0.0001505633,0.0002110417,0.0008996163,0.00006053733,0.00001860511,0.00002714344,0.00002093322,0.00381225],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01312803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0694285,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051958251","doi":"10.1080/13572330903302505","title":"Legislative Strengthening Meets Party Support in International Assistance: A Closer Relationship?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Democratization; Public administration; Civil society; Political science; Work (physics); Politics; Corporate governance; Democracy; Political economy; Public relations; Economics; Law; Management; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Peter Burnell","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07404214872354592,"gpt":0.4028326101522053,"spread":0.3287904614286594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0187546,0.0003912031,0.0006346279,0.003173714,0.003740154,0.0171385,0.001574237,0.005517549,0.03832278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04935246,0.00040404,0.0004509916,0.006574017,0.008790581,0.01747548,0.01031589,0.009992015,0.001809267],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004656699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005056773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001828887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002147636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9688019,0.0221132,0.0009417844,0.00172808,0.00335961,0.00305531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9505302,0.02973644,0.007727084,0.002037568,0.00606995,0.003898771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012082,0.0002587238,0.0100479,0.0007160938,0.00006937221,0.000229259,0.0231774,0.0002371979,0.000275993,0.869965,0.03161021,0.06329199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009070614,0.0002300195,0.03897,0.003808609,0.0001515852,0.0003529144,0.08290069,0.0005194442,0.001170885,0.1229069,0.7488152,0.00008295334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0739247,0.01919991,0.005720636,0.4137562,0.002681257,0.00007611726,0.000190416,0.00008259379,0.4843683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592426,0.006371935,0.001434509,0.01753137,0.00183835,0.0001115994,0.00009506907,0.0000552192,0.01331942],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03832278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1282024,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391772215","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2024.2313310","title":"Governments and parliaments in a state of emergency: what can we learn from the COVID-19 pandemic?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Socio-political and Technological Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); State of emergency; Political science; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; State (computer science); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Public administration; Virology; Medicine; Law; Computer science; Politics; Outbreak","authors":[{"name":"Francesco Bromo","is_ca":false},{"name":"Paolo Gambacciani","is_ca":false},{"name":"Marco Improta","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1630664570721894,"gpt":0.4247199404289856,"spread":0.2616534833567962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00409792,0.0001028515,0.0003790484,0.001108155,0.002534916,0.005107307,0.0005040281,0.001345689,0.004001527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0170575,0.0002203549,0.0002410767,0.001801169,0.006424924,0.007447551,0.002695071,0.002764835,0.0003678667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002400844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001968121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01317258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02867262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963952,0.001879437,0.0001253729,0.0003363125,0.0003379754,0.0009257202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850464,0.006971062,0.004636263,0.0008365845,0.0009750196,0.001534673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000268878,0.0002070011,0.5259191,0.0002413165,0.00008893927,0.001095957,0.3494255,0.0007685415,0.0006234764,0.06254927,0.005226665,0.05358531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008530916,0.00008649666,0.6172302,0.0002672627,0.00002123481,0.0003055979,0.3391531,0.0003634592,0.0002853866,0.01097478,0.03126055,0.00004341393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9624208,0.001246707,0.0004389831,0.01653965,0.00007869444,0.000008271512,0.00009462066,0.000005420055,0.01916685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981841,0.0004991424,0.00008054852,0.0005500696,0.00003716884,0.0000036095,0.00005409819,0.0000046397,0.0005864695],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01317258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02619177,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031419457","doi":"10.1080/1357233042000318891","title":"Still different after all these years? A comparison of female and male Canadian MPs in the twentieth century","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Women's College Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Politics; Convergence (economics); Political science; Period (music); Gender studies; Demographic economics; Sociology; Demography; Law; Economics; Economic growth","authors":[{"name":"Manon Tremblay","is_ca":true},{"name":"Linda Trimble","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0904739919859172,"gpt":0.3911107678644337,"spread":0.3006367758785165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001182903,0.0001947879,0.0003603445,0.002196866,0.01189545,0.004159429,0.0007777857,0.000719927,0.005777844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003165227,0.0002358899,0.0002497618,0.003405053,0.002778029,0.0009947427,0.001535057,0.001056295,0.000545606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03193917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03515334,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.974577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972276,0.0001605327,0.00002498827,0.0001290951,0.0007889941,0.001668772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986588,0.00008316871,0.0001493119,0.00002469035,0.0005234503,0.0005605491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004458247,0.00008120813,0.283776,0.0001224037,0.00005497401,0.0008549677,0.5607176,0.0001142249,0.002650105,0.02458595,0.01761887,0.108978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009138205,0.00005374905,0.5554225,0.00009479497,0.00002504937,0.0001970145,0.3406963,0.00006880275,0.0003053848,0.0002900143,0.1027953,0.00004185518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.955883,0.001200278,0.00006677912,0.003410347,0.00009275042,0.00001623375,0.0002965738,0.000006503313,0.03902763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856867,0.0009278528,0.00006068725,0.0006079099,0.00002400734,0.000007213028,0.0001265007,0.00001068846,0.01254847],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03193917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2317361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327844812","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2023.2190695","title":"Institutional change and partisanship in the Canadian Senate","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Liberal Party; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","authors":[{"name":"Michelle Caplan","is_ca":true},{"name":"Christopher Alcantara","is_ca":true},{"name":"Mathieu Turgeon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3941958185359105,"gpt":0.4417479409554658,"spread":0.04755212241955536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005237674,0.0002252872,0.0004763367,0.00221467,0.01593822,0.00391219,0.001610701,0.0008585578,0.007422862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01484723,0.000238082,0.0005240728,0.003776346,0.007198234,0.001040268,0.003853346,0.001676125,0.0004257746],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08657568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08625417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9837219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931877,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909657,0.001782805,0.0001514786,0.0006015858,0.001949064,0.004549332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892489,0.001307909,0.001414077,0.0006870854,0.004042394,0.003299558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008557655,0.0006013043,0.6853105,0.0002810457,0.0002787308,0.000705266,0.1359771,0.001766193,0.00206406,0.04237387,0.03181852,0.09796765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002472545,0.00007994424,0.8859256,0.0001415721,0.00004997966,0.00003379523,0.06365194,0.0003313603,0.0003409359,0.0008649888,0.04849033,0.00006477552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9235157,0.001189552,0.0002943391,0.00454135,0.000093685,0.000143449,0.0006607024,0.00002649451,0.06953481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951166,0.0002588731,0.00008343341,0.0003681624,0.00001276887,0.00002694807,0.0001391669,0.000008838462,0.003985328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9134243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6281534,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318541381","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2023.2171542","title":"Opposition parties in times of pandemics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Parliament; Legislature; Solidarity; Politics; Psychological intervention; Political science; Pandemic; Political economy; Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Law; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Lydia Laflamme","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jeanne Milot-Poulin","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jeanne Desrosiers","is_ca":true},{"name":"Cedrik Verreault","is_ca":true},{"name":"Carolane Fillion","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nicolas Patenaude","is_ca":true},{"name":"Marc André Bodet","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1671028629644999,"gpt":0.4461395572667425,"spread":0.2790366943022426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005427077,0.0001634896,0.0002843292,0.002121165,0.007398194,0.004850463,0.0006494565,0.001607744,0.008230763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01553074,0.0002319291,0.0001622697,0.002097825,0.006389668,0.00173545,0.003199498,0.001972036,0.00039744],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007997137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004962125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1163218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2436675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943479,0.00293435,0.00007705466,0.0002473014,0.0005642875,0.001829153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988846,0.005227625,0.00271258,0.0004450984,0.001145928,0.001622903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006091115,0.0002300949,0.2473174,0.0002829058,0.00006260307,0.002561301,0.5778729,0.0006265106,0.002166165,0.1003326,0.01442493,0.05351352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004263069,0.00008562239,0.3752993,0.0002656345,0.000026522,0.0003123153,0.4927462,0.0007911444,0.000640918,0.006105924,0.123627,0.00005678628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9091248,0.0003733804,0.0005508068,0.004613723,0.00007947589,0.00005058892,0.0001069039,0.00001401915,0.08508629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970977,0.00008225078,0.0000712826,0.0002783851,0.00002501734,0.00001886309,0.0000279454,0.000006055218,0.00239249],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1163218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2312894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251278139","doi":"10.1080/1357233042000322283","title":"The parliamentary activity of the head of government in ireland (1923–2000) in comparative perspective","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irish; Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Northern ireland; Accountability; Political science; Head (geology); Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Ethnology","authors":[{"name":"Robert Elgie","is_ca":false},{"name":"John Stapleton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07149466536706303,"gpt":0.3895151227998003,"spread":0.3180204574327373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003083453,0.0001301884,0.0003915779,0.007041039,0.002076812,0.003633068,0.0006747816,0.0007826706,0.003957066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007641964,0.0002227583,0.0002942112,0.01029992,0.002441486,0.002063589,0.001970047,0.001475387,0.0006967916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01793647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005550507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2827721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.576283,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972025,0.000440939,0.0001412536,0.0002191322,0.0004884438,0.001507776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946238,0.0009549001,0.001857734,0.0002072879,0.001515759,0.0008405233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001253659,0.000195997,0.546536,0.0009603614,0.000224209,0.00208421,0.2125421,0.001145813,0.001654673,0.03594366,0.03240399,0.1650553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005469984,0.00006112341,0.9081187,0.0001286863,0.00001895296,0.0002226961,0.02089191,0.00003987436,0.0002341453,0.000180376,0.07006337,0.00003458974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9044476,0.004467772,0.0001292471,0.001696998,0.000106534,0.00002182534,0.0011701,0.0000152503,0.08794481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893219,0.001517226,0.00009895256,0.0002427034,0.00007487353,0.00001602238,0.0007430344,0.00001540184,0.007969889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2827721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5622524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403129625","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2024.2411479","title":"Let's talk about something else: how cabinet members divert issue attention in answers to parliamentary questions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Political science; History; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Željko Poljak","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06753322322091648,"gpt":0.4168802095524323,"spread":0.3493469863315158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01914912,0.000218853,0.0005691729,0.002005751,0.005694942,0.005653582,0.0009160566,0.00153798,0.004668904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08464367,0.0004761074,0.000236719,0.001615763,0.004509337,0.004528275,0.004547227,0.001863155,0.0008986806],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002165792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002041071,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00723525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01096227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9701564,0.02455104,0.0005933232,0.001269,0.001786291,0.001643968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9460648,0.0416821,0.005368123,0.00170589,0.002905488,0.002273593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002897804,0.0001509759,0.08431391,0.0001805343,0.00003604669,0.0003153164,0.8526115,0.00009700313,0.00322446,0.00681283,0.001657971,0.05030969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003996288,0.000259403,0.1564085,0.000252401,0.00003852307,0.0003877667,0.7976765,0.0007858981,0.00102224,0.005192468,0.03787811,0.00005822171],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804357,0.0004619582,0.001324846,0.002078306,0.00003109594,0.00003649852,0.00002235804,0.00001647555,0.01559264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968353,0.0001825036,0.0006482025,0.0003340417,0.00001816175,0.00004421358,0.0000364868,0.00001777487,0.001883239],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01914912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1012714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384133609","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2023.2233207","title":"Conscientiousness of representatives and agreement with their party positions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Conscientiousness; Loyalty; Dissent; Political science; House of Representatives; Ideology; Unison; Social psychology; Personality; Big Five personality traits; Public relations; Law; Psychology; Extraversion and introversion; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Pirmin Bundi","is_ca":false},{"name":"Frédéric Varone","is_ca":false},{"name":"Peter John Loewen","is_ca":true},{"name":"Christian Breunig","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1234332985631977,"gpt":0.4344024705019436,"spread":0.3109691719387458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001907773,0.0001422783,0.0001967174,0.001356764,0.0008933022,0.0009588252,0.0002166919,0.000324059,0.003803106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01276208,0.000118728,0.0002195073,0.0007033964,0.0009170906,0.0004593144,0.0009271994,0.0006282851,0.0003968452],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003242757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003044728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002124927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003889731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985009,0.0005054072,0.0001191915,0.0001369192,0.0004604699,0.0002771057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825885,0.00454569,0.00873102,0.00110102,0.001031983,0.002001726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001090752,0.0001811258,0.9827711,0.0000194401,0.00004356572,0.0001499484,0.004391675,0.0001671619,0.001090564,0.0005126082,0.0002045495,0.01035909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003562709,0.0000460976,0.9973783,0.000006523407,0.000002848187,0.0000744504,0.001813484,0.000119784,0.00008593642,0.0001676579,0.0002960773,0.000005142351],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998225,0.00001508194,0.00007403801,0.00003336544,0.000002553068,0.000004857905,0.00001368537,0.000001953464,0.001629522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996086,0.000009668354,0.00004781003,0.000008108577,0.000004728681,0.000003846954,0.00003365627,6.836958e-7,0.0002829487],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003803106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01272267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028522308","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2012.673063","title":"A Bilingual Legislature? Question Period in Canada's House of Commons","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Commons; Legislature; Period (music); Sample (material); Institution; Norm (philosophy); Neuroscience of multilingualism; House of Representatives; Political science; Danish; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Linguistics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Scott Piroth","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04572952364420851,"gpt":0.3578392605562827,"spread":0.3121097369120742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007134201,0.00009862513,0.0003674473,0.001610869,0.008771195,0.004804697,0.000727911,0.00111254,0.002957115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02118587,0.0002550796,0.0001941448,0.003030679,0.004516738,0.001506752,0.002122907,0.001364746,0.0002615145],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03309634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03020704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9315403,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939062,0.002180872,0.0002066025,0.000676647,0.001419817,0.001609887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977535,0.008502533,0.006013955,0.0005163102,0.004806938,0.002625291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004280789,0.0001781521,0.5058818,0.0001555053,0.00003046306,0.0005980556,0.4398785,0.0002200648,0.002451736,0.01632543,0.005616019,0.0282361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001857005,0.00006255898,0.7917374,0.0001190085,0.00001431625,0.000116072,0.1641612,0.0002558005,0.0008409116,0.0007052916,0.04192307,0.00004576829],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9810305,0.0004598718,0.0001432681,0.002363269,0.0000201524,0.0000410239,0.0002950019,0.000008555739,0.01563841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973606,0.0001138648,0.00009994837,0.00029428,0.000007415101,0.00001614424,0.0001036433,0.000005192159,0.001999026],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9669037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2691155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400873207","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2024.2381155","title":"Gender and legislative committees in Africa: a study of Rwanda and South Africa","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Gender studies; Economic growth; Geography; Public administration; Development economics; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Saaka Sulemana Saaka","is_ca":true},{"name":"Abiba Yayah","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1547811720692711,"gpt":0.389906272070032,"spread":0.2351251000007608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003265842,0.0002150142,0.0003932038,0.00187019,0.003591435,0.00164067,0.000381094,0.000477011,0.002365937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007359573,0.0004526497,0.000166318,0.002612339,0.001825144,0.001539445,0.001574415,0.0008017863,0.0002605118],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001739309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002049898,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03372281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09326766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978558,0.001176581,0.00008723129,0.0001448165,0.000171314,0.0005642386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953771,0.001853952,0.001769118,0.0001023231,0.000292959,0.0006045981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001190014,0.0001361496,0.300774,0.0001677921,0.00002248,0.0006338043,0.6756706,0.00003247999,0.002120883,0.001611193,0.0009514135,0.01776023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006420912,0.0001071017,0.5815815,0.0001656531,0.00001406653,0.0002522324,0.4072163,0.00005490325,0.0002352213,0.000101597,0.01025095,0.00001411962],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986149,0.0002379253,0.00003917227,0.0001542022,0.000004421129,0.0000111482,0.00002422539,5.768189e-7,0.0009134735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998771,0.0003379009,0.00007171081,0.00006992188,0.000007094578,0.00002639618,0.00002595267,0.000002620696,0.0006873918],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03372281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06705308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996965981","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2013.812356","title":"Legislative Dissent without Reprisal? An Alternative View of Speaker Selection","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Legislature; Opposition (politics); Popularity; Political science; Legislative intent; Selection (genetic algorithm); Public relations; Law; Politics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Zachary Spicer","is_ca":false},{"name":"John L. Nater","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07743213812032024,"gpt":0.3914000847078785,"spread":0.3139679465875583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01019409,0.0005776051,0.0005754777,0.002332688,0.003957647,0.00537427,0.001918631,0.00329386,0.01431126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0166315,0.0002475109,0.0008711618,0.001315201,0.01616384,0.00545834,0.003093684,0.00321366,0.001569734],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00299518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003138353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003417952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003031068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9839481,0.007997186,0.0003616021,0.002295977,0.003798138,0.001599003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913365,0.004893875,0.00117986,0.0008885048,0.00116294,0.0005382513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000830006,0.00006617498,0.003463618,0.00006870512,0.00002782034,0.000224826,0.01285451,0.0005077295,0.0006532575,0.9620842,0.001971009,0.0179952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001568968,0.0002614918,0.01184413,0.0001857782,0.00007231269,0.0008212505,0.01464792,0.005802675,0.001306636,0.8719233,0.09290277,0.00007480527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1358831,0.001591273,0.08166571,0.04874389,0.0008346236,0.0002423948,0.0001159096,0.0001247053,0.7307984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9597682,0.0003421628,0.006001191,0.003944071,0.0009094361,0.000173143,0.00003611852,0.00004292266,0.02878266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01431126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0539121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236327344","doi":"10.1080/13572330008420634","title":"Book reviews","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Matti Wiberg","is_ca":false},{"name":"Judith A. McKenzie","is_ca":true},{"name":"John C. Berg","is_ca":true},{"name":"Edward Page","is_ca":true},{"name":"Robin Kolodny","is_ca":true},{"name":"Sue Vandenbosch","is_ca":true},{"name":"N. D. J. Baldwin","is_ca":true},{"name":"Roger Scully","is_ca":true},{"name":"Raia Prokhovnik","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.145154533585428,"gpt":0.4553254425105158,"spread":0.3101709089250878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007482786,0.001130922,0.001370755,0.003862989,0.001524962,0.007971205,0.00269996,0.002506577,0.5696975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004858948,0.0005077295,0.0009164625,0.005186792,0.0007758666,0.004592458,0.002479011,0.002701445,0.5209872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002236162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00395312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003380964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00570133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985161,0.0001589494,0.0000958503,0.000272109,0.0008364188,0.0001205195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997685,0.0004690675,0.0001280482,0.0002163431,0.001142954,0.000358577],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001212594,0.00002115673,0.00003829806,0.000450735,0.000003900293,0.00005017817,0.00005584917,0.00004174995,0.0001219723,0.003335134,0.907205,0.08866392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001933316,0.000003681631,0.000048457,0.00018765,0.000001677944,0.00006427719,0.00002802361,0.000007399335,0.00001879666,0.0005556325,0.9990801,0.000002471975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004628949,0.1103307,0.001983255,0.015532,0.0290952,0.0002452342,0.004954379,0.001245457,0.8361509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001873741,0.05336053,0.001552729,0.007075142,0.007479877,0.0001290882,0.004408351,0.0006673913,0.9234532],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5696975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6137743,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409493846","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2025.2488540","title":"Legislative influence in House of Commons committees in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Legislature; House of Representatives; Political science; Commons; Public administration; Law; Politics; Parliament","authors":[{"name":"Jocelyn McGrandle","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03078921293381114,"gpt":0.3508149797923369,"spread":0.3200257668585257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005756858,0.0001821763,0.0005283147,0.003421084,0.01741268,0.007002767,0.001736614,0.001270481,0.007669705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02265082,0.0004441915,0.0003454266,0.006485445,0.007236774,0.001746076,0.004471202,0.002245175,0.0004613738],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1364298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1929969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9839707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9878754,0.001811861,0.0002471195,0.001038723,0.004490233,0.004536706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777455,0.005452989,0.002973762,0.0006387096,0.007236479,0.005952474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003310498,0.000178928,0.2138476,0.0005539077,0.0001416561,0.001242101,0.2440443,0.001924993,0.002111787,0.2660128,0.1144425,0.1551685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003171605,0.00005647391,0.4924531,0.0005289672,0.00007870675,0.0001122946,0.071018,0.0007893417,0.0008096151,0.005072084,0.4289185,0.0001312941],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6581506,0.006433061,0.001345025,0.03082684,0.0004313857,0.0001957953,0.001550921,0.0001069702,0.3009594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809278,0.0008844073,0.0002421746,0.001316316,0.0000415522,0.00001867456,0.0001874245,0.00002755736,0.0163541],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8635702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9898722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366140343","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2023.2202089","title":"Why would a majority agree to adopting supermajority rules when they empower a minority? The institutional choice of the National Assembly of Korea","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Academy of Korean Studies","keywords":"Legislature; Lawmaking; Legislation; Newspaper; Sociology; Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Gyung‐Ho Jeong","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1697539402458573,"gpt":0.4220214127768845,"spread":0.2522674725310272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01474396,0.0001221012,0.000221963,0.0006911436,0.006369818,0.004888759,0.0007333198,0.001429214,0.003906795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02940807,0.0002460925,0.0002189367,0.0007358855,0.004975374,0.003267398,0.001909163,0.002357501,0.0006965014],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002848828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002556063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009196414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01397873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9891729,0.006161205,0.0004238983,0.00114142,0.001020613,0.00207998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858233,0.006554031,0.002659364,0.001070336,0.00235576,0.001537235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006103078,0.000353993,0.2254626,0.0003072475,0.0001402948,0.003191475,0.3793478,0.0005165886,0.008408356,0.2446731,0.02073901,0.1162491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007406685,0.0002112064,0.1404823,0.0003223534,0.00007102414,0.0005285949,0.6774768,0.001609469,0.002953055,0.02954539,0.1465631,0.0001626267],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9215614,0.0002085787,0.001615512,0.01935785,0.0001424062,0.00006030883,0.00005494168,0.00001377682,0.05698532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968334,0.00004743651,0.0001711689,0.001141722,0.00002208575,0.00001479192,0.00001040621,0.000006097422,0.001752931],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01474396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0779745,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}