{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":6,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"f08ecee831c6","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Library Metadata"}},"results":[{"id":"W2789253917","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2018.1443698","title":"Open Metadata for Research Data Discovery in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Metadata","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of British Columbia; York University; Ontario Council of University Libraries; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Data discovery; Computer science; Data science; Reuse; Data management plan; Data curation; Research data; World Wide Web; Open data; Best practice; Open research; Data element; Linked data; Metadata repository; Data management; Database; Semantic Web; Engineering; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6762589410535437,"gpt":0.5244379087475245,"spread":0.1518210323060192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01400431,0.000153961,0.0004716971,0.0004331112,0.0004669631,0.0689137,0.09825505,0.00003100956,0.00001965499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007361839,0.0001192254,0.00004324171,0.0004284112,0.00009604825,0.7197832,0.0667804,0.0007081606,0.000002219812],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001162816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007403214,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3277601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.353491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954494,0.0007692177,0.000796102,0.0007397425,0.001616789,0.0006287892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858527,0.001860672,0.001004818,0.01089138,0.0001315369,0.0002588785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000331509,0.0002056187,0.008749963,0.000106776,0.0003850111,0.001294557,0.00001977496,0.00001599283,0.0001047786,0.2612883,0.7080519,0.0194458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001076303,0.0001142151,0.01486369,0.0001042697,0.0000251324,0.00003710146,0.0001365872,0.002772083,0.0004614952,0.004698176,0.9755265,0.0001844407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01487199,0.005656214,0.6375987,0.3072928,0.004093208,0.004107232,0.007411054,0.00003207245,0.01893674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2352493,0.01274414,0.6842716,0.002144723,0.00137436,0.00006478711,0.001425539,0.0001240194,0.06260154],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6508695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014021059","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2020.1742434","title":"Exploring Methods for Linked Data Model Evaluation in Practice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Metadata","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Ontology; Documentation; Context (archaeology); Metadata; Data science; Process (computing); Variety (cybernetics); Ambiguity; Linked data; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Semantic Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6985449576336179,"gpt":0.4703366936463967,"spread":0.2282082639872212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003549207,0.00009217011,0.0002755574,0.0001245295,0.00003146737,0.0003270686,0.002864429,0.00002620159,0.000004060344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004298684,0.00007329573,0.00005296252,0.0003672922,0.00001204199,0.04460934,0.000952678,0.0002101379,0.000001169911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009827298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003851599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001634512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.506401e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982459,0.0004675456,0.0005438426,0.0002655603,0.0003288384,0.000148321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974667,0.001186138,0.0004224143,0.0007355356,0.00009629187,0.00009284979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004784524,0.000229306,0.0002547708,0.0001054039,0.0003187794,0.00008222261,0.0032897,0.0146987,0.003442627,0.04399953,0.01793674,0.9151638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006143026,0.00007991871,0.0001986763,0.00002399121,0.00008793886,0.00002800394,0.0001954817,0.9571652,0.001241287,0.004978786,0.03529997,0.0000863865],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001290228,0.001866005,0.9636618,0.03237837,0.0003493533,0.0001663118,0.00000883921,0.00002776054,0.0002512816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01104809,0.000408323,0.9864987,0.001776407,0.0002226893,0.000005920014,0.00001539902,0.000008788544,0.00001569244],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9424666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9687532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280609400","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2022.2051979","title":"Numismatics & Bibliographic Description: How Rutgers University Libraries Described Coins with MODS","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Metadata","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Computer science; World Wide Web; Metadata repository; Interoperability; Resource Description and Access; Realia; Special collections; Cataloging; Meta Data Services; Controlled vocabulary; Library science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06207260552185907,"gpt":0.1738001835908003,"spread":0.1117275780689412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000118079,0.0001420159,0.000228991,0.001301822,0.0005060895,0.001330995,0.0006142078,0.000006817035,0.001256645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000442129,0.0001114619,0.0001612627,0.0005705776,0.0002780732,0.01298272,0.0002901532,0.000250845,0.000003969185],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001092553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001052179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000490177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001433165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988805,0.0001206059,0.0002202688,0.0001296238,0.0004847127,0.0001643096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992603,0.00007961493,0.0003062468,0.0002004575,0.00003275476,0.0001206024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004601865,0.0004207202,0.0006087935,0.00006757648,0.0007045512,0.0003255557,0.002208484,0.0002531091,0.00001647361,0.7274343,0.2668565,0.0006437871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005394561,0.000386318,0.0009702666,0.00003485288,0.0001547782,0.00009373457,0.002315911,0.00004793084,0.00002244914,0.03145417,0.9637904,0.0001896934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1698863,0.000944241,0.009726173,0.02895942,0.001742195,0.0005084742,0.003242841,0.0002510179,0.7847393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9505014,0.0002073155,0.006127479,0.0006862974,0.0003165547,0.000001690044,0.0003329408,0.00002887178,0.04179746],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7806151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792963435","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2018.1440922","title":"Disciplinary Metadata in Libraries: A Case Study Applying the ISO 19115-North American Profile (NAP) for Describing Historical Topographic Maps","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Metadata","topic":"Geographic Information Systems Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ontario Council of University Libraries","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Computer science; World Wide Web; Georeference; Geographic information system; Transformative learning; Digital library; Data science; Library science; Geography; Cartography; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1410108094743861,"gpt":0.3408181410261293,"spread":0.1998073315517432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003180022,0.000249637,0.0007621439,0.0005464377,0.003345546,0.002300653,0.002307001,0.00005226639,0.00001403099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007864563,0.0001664184,0.0002984654,0.0009672535,0.0005971151,0.02197747,0.0009350718,0.0004791488,0.000001485219],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008229408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000384163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004648167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006705654,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965659,0.0005464391,0.001280654,0.000279438,0.0008197951,0.0005077109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957718,0.0007435161,0.00213039,0.001019622,0.0001383456,0.0001963153],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002684893,0.0004909625,0.9062767,0.00008218044,0.0007591172,0.001302289,0.05364114,0.0000112283,0.000002426041,0.005911605,0.01729461,0.01395924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002255637,0.0009284712,0.1272331,0.0001755008,0.0005533106,0.0006584369,0.5200044,0.00008364965,0.00000735431,0.001988342,0.3453901,0.0007216791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789425,0.002004643,0.001271275,0.01011352,0.001636973,0.003729046,0.0002300039,0.00007140182,0.00200064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931113,0.0002192474,0.004356252,0.0001294979,0.0006162796,0.0002666388,0.00001724378,0.000027677,0.0012559],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7790436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413413541","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2025.2547151","title":"Inching Forward in the Face of Hegemonic Factors: Examining Metadata Contradictions Across University Indigenous Collections","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Metadata","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Indigenous; Hegemony; Face (sociological concept); Computer science; World Wide Web; Library science; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Social science; Ecology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04989293875553429,"gpt":0.2344546412820279,"spread":0.1845617025264936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002860005,0.0001078912,0.0002606598,0.0003576337,0.000467553,0.0005987813,0.000710114,0.00001289687,0.00004770446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003342867,0.00007435497,0.0001275432,0.0003043808,0.00017363,0.006639596,0.0001762545,0.0002504759,6.849265e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002095282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001308318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001076907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001324642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989825,0.0001422976,0.000398789,0.0001088015,0.0002089209,0.0001586156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989935,0.0004718806,0.000270366,0.000202763,0.00002565564,0.000035806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002049122,0.00105017,0.004113263,0.0001265725,0.00176872,0.0001194475,0.05914693,0.0003801719,0.00002856425,0.9112747,0.01801656,0.003770011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001157952,0.0003671676,0.07246229,0.0002412876,0.000377347,0.00002385261,0.09991917,0.00005462773,0.0001202174,0.02359463,0.8014674,0.0002141157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8697233,0.0004112388,0.002864879,0.001339772,0.0005500873,0.0003057141,0.002049611,0.00002390861,0.1227315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830208,0.0001232765,0.0001619264,0.000158808,0.00007268376,7.431015e-7,0.00008544194,0.000006094297,0.01637025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8876801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5774062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386207778","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2023.2251857","title":"From Uncontrolled Keywords to FAST? Attempting Metadata Reconciliation for a Canadian Research Data Aggregator","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Metadata","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Discoverability; Computer science; World Wide Web; Workflow; Subject (documents); Metadata repository; News aggregator; Service (business); Brainstorming; Information retrieval; Database","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4394956808097427,"gpt":0.4561766238239289,"spread":0.01668094301418621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01569072,0.0002123888,0.0005398961,0.002183005,0.0004278281,0.01298478,0.01743144,0.00007848187,0.00008253157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01242698,0.0001811708,0.0001081207,0.003392389,0.00004306277,0.2345672,0.006720659,0.0006410098,0.0001036767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001199442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002281118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008351291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005705931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994114,0.001191852,0.001023824,0.0009391221,0.001789019,0.0009422305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989439,0.003979544,0.0006240039,0.004638733,0.0003667993,0.0009519038],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002053833,0.00004188542,0.0004118153,0.00003982207,0.0005823343,0.0003197309,0.0001757178,0.00007062285,0.00034892,0.006763101,0.9443644,0.04667624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009889754,0.000196683,0.0007862966,0.0001077966,0.00005691904,0.000009723741,0.000345276,0.01800166,0.0002693738,0.00179678,0.9772425,0.0001980631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01689518,0.005627492,0.5879551,0.3680091,0.003727098,0.003525503,0.012324,0.0003023005,0.001634261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02142762,0.008637944,0.8910838,0.008814497,0.006653739,0.0001832531,0.01011285,0.000237213,0.05284902],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3591945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}