{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":34,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":34,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"351841ffced6","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Literacy Research"}},"results":[{"id":"W2467139089","doi":"10.1177/1086296x16658982","title":"Riding the Lines and Overwriting in the Margins","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Pleasure; Sociology; Embodied cognition; Pride; Aesthetics; Pedagogy; Media studies; Psychology; Art; Epistemology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1612307019149825,"gpt":0.4119013022360059,"spread":0.2506706003210233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004313658,0.0000552427,0.00009240166,0.0002072815,0.0003366772,0.0006478222,0.0002691396,0.000016403,0.0002861487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007691217,0.00002034391,0.0000401599,0.00007905633,0.0001934074,0.0008160042,0.00003676892,0.0003565776,0.00001182711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003414599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007815679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007490691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005170064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985604,0.0003817124,0.0003061997,0.00006900514,0.0004560289,0.0002266838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967921,0.002487103,0.0001017679,0.0001241023,0.000452886,0.00004204358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000524951,0.00007002695,0.01332632,0.00003898909,0.00001218727,0.00002333296,0.9172101,1.204082e-7,0.0001547421,0.0115162,0.01222344,0.04537207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000712029,0.0002172161,0.03061354,0.0009404945,0.00001000951,0.0001464324,0.2415399,0.00004803897,0.0001200309,0.01288688,0.7126597,0.0001057176],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9758886,0.001330108,0.000003368955,0.01956199,0.0003849288,0.00007657667,0.0000031501,0.000001835008,0.002749445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927111,0.0003668668,0.00002710847,0.000271341,0.004177419,0.000004585359,3.603552e-7,0.000006153864,0.002435019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7004362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6246964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518396513","doi":"10.1177/1086296x16665323","title":"The Matter of New Media Making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Sociology; Feeling; Dialectic; Literacy; Making-of; Digital media; Epistemology; Media studies; Pedagogy; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1716184469080358,"gpt":0.4162711903326787,"spread":0.2446527434246429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002007668,0.00006516412,0.0001380227,0.000241322,0.000223627,0.0003392134,0.0003866612,0.00002370453,0.003578254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005941262,0.00002843775,0.00009195237,0.00006620831,0.000251246,0.0007723895,0.00004492158,0.0002591576,0.0001934048],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004870459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000266738,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003817431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002400835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982266,0.0001938361,0.0005089806,0.00007238141,0.0007194424,0.0002787383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964397,0.001836976,0.0002422825,0.0002005384,0.001174643,0.0001058802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001685204,0.00006201755,0.006932151,0.0000375133,0.00003938334,0.000008304446,0.6215004,5.340316e-8,0.0001799473,0.005858628,0.2461971,0.119016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004429943,0.0001370762,0.007619357,0.0006157077,0.00001001875,0.00002838834,0.02109347,0.000002144075,0.000410283,0.02288654,0.9466843,0.00006974856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9706159,0.001987647,0.00002897471,0.01702102,0.002517708,0.00008603834,0.000007186889,0.000003839527,0.007731741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710749,0.0001742349,0.0001168811,0.0001345009,0.005381043,0.00000163643,4.968751e-7,0.00001150087,0.02310474],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7004871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894852105","doi":"10.1177/1086296x18803134","title":"Toward a Model of Global Meaning Making","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Global Education and Multiculturalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Sydney","keywords":"Sociology; Eclecticism; Indigenous; Meaning (existential); Reading (process); Racism; Decolonization; Critical theory; Cultural capital; Transformative learning; Epistemology; Citizenship; The Imaginary; Gender studies; Pedagogy; Social science; Politics; Political science; Psychology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.283465690213532,"gpt":0.5583878930108791,"spread":0.2749222027973471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002652082,0.00004532322,0.0001269835,0.00008388811,0.0002458842,0.0001452198,0.0003847299,0.00004944379,0.0001536363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002054681,0.0000345578,0.00007936516,0.0005315616,0.0003367702,0.0004816013,0.00005553936,0.0002091325,0.00001855766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002570979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006229107,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000422267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009401188,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979327,0.0003105507,0.0003285029,0.00007526875,0.001067205,0.0002857943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950547,0.0001072877,0.0001845607,0.00008165945,0.004423345,0.0001484579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002629175,0.0002919971,0.006147848,0.00005094112,0.0000683704,0.00002006896,0.7703757,0.00008647157,0.003203574,0.1675999,0.02733863,0.02455366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002680796,0.001153928,0.01308349,0.001922105,0.00006924657,0.0001602997,0.1967721,0.0128834,0.001689821,0.09312372,0.6758609,0.0006001504],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9066085,0.0002113831,0.0001774521,0.005776741,0.0005236744,0.00009159892,0.000004742252,0.000006395157,0.08659954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923944,0.00004222697,0.006181391,0.0001222711,0.0006257748,6.122776e-7,1.514639e-7,0.000002585329,0.0006305623],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6485223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2459793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106236178","doi":"10.1177/1086296x14534180","title":"From <i>Aquí</i> and <i>Allá</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Sight; Sociology; Literacy; Pedagogy; Curriculum; Class (philosophy); Reading (process); Identity (music); Mathematics education; Artifact (error); Psychology; Linguistics; Aesthetics; Computer science; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07527939574674813,"gpt":0.3732582856172483,"spread":0.2979788898705001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001926096,0.00009026135,0.0001985177,0.000268568,0.0002555634,0.0008189333,0.0002368682,0.00003617653,0.001028827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000392034,0.00006562661,0.00006366412,0.00006133867,0.000214491,0.001015728,0.00004918304,0.0005165305,0.00008897283],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003061754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009549974,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000256509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002434467,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982681,0.0003074206,0.0004175449,0.0001306264,0.0006012002,0.000275164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975266,0.0009642947,0.0001513786,0.0001814663,0.0009735647,0.0002027172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121411,0.0001702323,0.002946571,0.00005961994,0.00004268533,0.00001415193,0.8316981,3.244238e-7,0.0002269136,0.005691876,0.09328441,0.06574375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004887315,0.0002702695,0.001094293,0.0001694431,0.00001311022,0.00002074422,0.01727139,0.00007001972,0.0002037976,0.02255986,0.957743,0.00009531161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.984908,0.00145308,0.00002491616,0.002673703,0.001471421,0.00006226296,0.00001191417,0.00000790511,0.009386729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841405,0.0001550843,0.0003537195,0.0005061686,0.01028522,0.000002791782,0.000008478325,0.00001493852,0.004533147],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8644586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043304802","doi":"10.1177/1086296x20939559","title":"Dual-Language Books: Enhancing Engagement and Language Awareness","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Alberta Centre for Child, Family and Community Research","keywords":"Literacy; Metalinguistics; Heritage language; Psychology; Pedagogy; Language Experience Approach; Native-language instruction; Reading (process); Metalinguistic awareness; First language; Competence (human resources); Mathematics education; Linguistics; Teaching method; Language education; Comprehension approach; Vocabulary development","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2253063436753653,"gpt":0.5868874041755676,"spread":0.3615810605002023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004269524,0.00006236735,0.0001466274,0.0001921965,0.0004085831,0.000300407,0.0002101341,0.00004138516,0.0006443931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003242776,0.00005304535,0.00004880018,0.0003398944,0.0001253406,0.0003361394,0.00007809644,0.0005611978,0.00002947809],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007023825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000715284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009728593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975433,0.0009589575,0.0003186081,0.0001128114,0.0007651146,0.0003011455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982733,0.000662261,0.0001202067,0.00008669467,0.0004475262,0.0004099803],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004241199,0.00004632824,0.001525471,0.00005756055,0.0000161777,0.00009508412,0.9367358,0.000001186188,0.008410408,0.0009935896,0.002426017,0.04964998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007782844,0.0002618202,0.003411243,0.0002174059,0.00001346677,0.00001958974,0.3794491,0.0001311571,0.008082817,0.0001793046,0.6072684,0.0001874461],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9776131,0.001991525,0.00003958587,0.0101134,0.0001683384,0.000117256,0.000003068657,0.00001099294,0.009942752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993574,0.0002750119,0.0004874633,0.0008223012,0.002046035,0.000002129726,8.779997e-7,0.000008405138,0.002783795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6048424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7055652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978455512","doi":"10.1207/s15548430jlr3601_3","title":"Perspectives on Struggling English Language Learners: Case Studies of Two Chinese-Canadian Children","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Psychology; Viewpoints; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Preference","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05245760158216439,"gpt":0.461100238757123,"spread":0.4086426371749586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002842979,0.0001742526,0.0004081134,0.001479745,0.0002129416,0.0001182573,0.0003509627,0.00006957405,0.0002661501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001486842,0.0001278683,0.0001563997,0.0006992794,0.000181781,0.0003161729,0.00005345851,0.001144964,0.00004297373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004261649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003288497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006154188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004982722,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974123,0.000464913,0.0006488903,0.0002637513,0.0006680709,0.0005421294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970375,0.0006481859,0.0002505396,0.0003362705,0.001415162,0.0003123499],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002786039,0.0003680957,0.05400253,0.0000349847,0.0007128393,0.007890324,0.9219691,0.0001786829,0.0001775384,0.001858726,0.0006487158,0.01187985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01096225,0.003798906,0.09383816,0.002210239,0.00008236233,0.01760749,0.8634113,0.00001358844,0.0007190952,0.003901093,0.002646383,0.0008091551],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877995,0.00626647,0.000004919546,0.0003989252,0.0004381054,0.0001628139,0.0000189024,0.00001025761,0.004900108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968806,0.0001385695,0.001145257,0.00004386759,0.0009492696,0.000005295713,0.000002957715,0.00002684627,0.000807367],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05855781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9303333,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010143454","doi":"10.1207/s15548430jlr3401_4","title":"Teaching Decoding Skills to Poor Readers in High School","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reading comprehension; Class (philosophy); Mathematics education; Test (biology); Reading (process); Control (management); Comprehension; Analysis of covariance; Word (group theory); Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07488036412231054,"gpt":0.4438072175624416,"spread":0.368926853440131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005836842,0.0001536815,0.0003471566,0.002037341,0.0001657823,0.000282278,0.0005865055,0.0001047171,0.00284338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00149942,0.000128362,0.00009912265,0.0007719382,0.00003920934,0.0005490088,0.00009891722,0.002007584,0.001166802],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003845522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006074917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000266752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004366614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960306,0.001006611,0.0009725426,0.0002902171,0.0009102981,0.0007897138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997601,0.001013694,0.0001792363,0.0003155519,0.0004069936,0.0004835617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004424827,0.001392498,0.1280272,0.00006672628,0.0001758474,0.002495693,0.1861897,0.00004829916,0.001635681,0.001557127,0.2035245,0.4744443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005597914,0.001684426,0.3149009,0.003210519,0.00002033158,0.001742408,0.01114367,0.0003346304,0.0005310184,0.00245811,0.6575455,0.0008305675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9762025,0.0005912279,0.0001373041,0.007738943,0.0007205397,0.0001994325,0.00000236548,0.0000127129,0.01439501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95938,0.00003946881,0.009979346,0.0007271848,0.0006276162,0.00001486668,0.000001032224,0.00003036702,0.02920016],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4736137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996109,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138095014","doi":"10.1177/1086296x12457167","title":"Measuring Situated Literacy Activity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Family literacy; Literacy; Situated; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Information literacy; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Empirical research; Mathematics education; Computer science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.215931896399272,"gpt":0.4836394933325129,"spread":0.2677075969332409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00846122,0.000195551,0.0003911629,0.001035935,0.0002383448,0.0003228611,0.0005346385,0.0001326934,0.001454627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005766193,0.0001537424,0.0001935572,0.0008818108,0.00008765681,0.001904411,0.0001354459,0.0015756,0.0007570174],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002636448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001439173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005111192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.085701e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951978,0.001383548,0.0007680554,0.0002206956,0.001326202,0.001103641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959601,0.001134108,0.0003557584,0.0004489866,0.001545573,0.0005554871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001437854,0.002264654,0.2246403,0.0001284024,0.0005496372,0.0004858721,0.1316394,0.000003827105,0.01597124,0.001317687,0.02751846,0.5940427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001671485,0.0004196209,0.5209183,0.0005243306,0.00002726977,0.001399208,0.000617707,0.00003232799,0.005011428,0.0004238518,0.4685976,0.0003569627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.978376,0.00280432,0.0002954621,0.0006831214,0.001723894,0.0001537476,0.000003665335,0.00002319782,0.01593664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855213,0.00005150929,0.001741661,0.00008192263,0.00168792,0.00001186742,0.000002121205,0.00003597336,0.01086577],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5936857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994582,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001446865","doi":"10.1177/1086296x19898003","title":"Introducing Offlineness: Theorizing (Digital) Literacy Engagements","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Sociology; Construct (python library); Digital literacy; Literacy; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1354860676963117,"gpt":0.3922476850730654,"spread":0.2567616173767537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00260212,0.0001734736,0.0003230032,0.0005008865,0.0004840325,0.002940068,0.0005813094,0.00004156544,0.00173163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002312378,0.000133007,0.0001672961,0.0002711942,0.0001680711,0.004462937,0.000137697,0.00114703,0.0002726781],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009634384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002559467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002308637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001150878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968576,0.0004078385,0.0009020781,0.0002622845,0.001071937,0.0004981988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956744,0.0009290898,0.0003263848,0.0002612773,0.002457556,0.0003513043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002390284,0.0001961531,0.00202298,0.0002164973,0.00007966084,0.00006193195,0.8873445,0.000009069981,0.0001747446,0.002963852,0.02296564,0.08372592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008405871,0.000550647,0.000284565,0.0004579714,0.00002378085,0.00003113484,0.06800228,0.0005007953,0.0003412326,0.004775562,0.9239691,0.0002223201],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800844,0.001898355,0.0002185481,0.009330621,0.002279168,0.0002137257,0.00003222422,0.00002995777,0.005913033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797207,0.0001138898,0.000542077,0.0008720685,0.01553468,0.000005917355,0.00002246749,0.00003465775,0.003153516],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9010035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070973507","doi":"10.1080/10862960009548077","title":"Critical Issues: Researching Complexity","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rubric; Reading (process); Sociology; Enlightenment; Epistemology; Critical theory; Pedagogy; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2903594119367914,"gpt":0.6031508746028263,"spread":0.312791462666035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0131999,0.00005931319,0.0001617272,0.0002803334,0.001026474,0.0006767252,0.0005817279,0.00006160498,0.01471574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007089381,0.00005025413,0.00008043076,0.0006301635,0.001051471,0.0007171909,0.00004389585,0.001082085,0.0004110981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002058512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008229214,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002857842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001821473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945315,0.001969776,0.00043492,0.0001262999,0.002344591,0.0005928943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951836,0.002033779,0.00003016704,0.0001455519,0.002120823,0.0004860796],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001873829,0.0006838635,0.0027136,0.00005889079,0.00002863669,0.0001770307,0.1398472,0.000001159736,0.00009747226,0.5766734,0.05582238,0.2237089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001279479,0.00008955255,0.00271002,0.0001594083,0.000001861634,0.00001584357,0.004118141,0.00001223696,0.00003463232,0.2184838,0.7741852,0.00006139483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4843156,0.001483206,0.0001254042,0.2392186,0.0006315262,0.000201865,0.00000359607,0.00003216036,0.273988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630551,0.000758127,0.0129784,0.0006055183,0.001539335,0.000003264434,7.874332e-7,0.00001016603,0.02104936],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7183628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.986185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171373761","doi":"10.1080/10862960903583202","title":"Reading First in Florida: Five Years of Improvement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Disadvantaged; Psychology; Reading (process); Percentile; Standardized test; Academic achievement; Test (biology); Mathematics education; Cohort; Achievement test; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04912649518893713,"gpt":0.4411491277810037,"spread":0.3920226325920666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005839365,0.00003861743,0.0001349722,0.0003951529,0.0001298221,0.00009007049,0.0004027457,0.00006269756,0.0002587376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001318499,0.00003473353,0.00005706265,0.0005864199,0.0001321602,0.0006954704,0.00005085911,0.0009364001,0.00001784326],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008106001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003295259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001679097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001441235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982343,0.0001131197,0.0003664433,0.00007466081,0.0009196657,0.0002918099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984017,0.0005744979,0.0001484268,0.0001219839,0.0006333669,0.0001199954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004597765,0.0003003074,0.6294906,0.000128553,0.00004532217,0.0001808489,0.159428,0.00002842693,0.03183545,0.002887245,0.01193511,0.1632804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001560438,0.0008110772,0.4806608,0.0006171702,0.000008181194,0.00001431427,0.01017848,0.0001635805,0.005355639,0.003604752,0.4968229,0.00020271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942265,0.00007898205,0.0000013904,0.001365734,0.0004670644,0.00007628997,0.000001547044,0.00000166607,0.003780895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969162,0.0003689474,0.0003535788,0.00002481065,0.001175063,0.000002215006,2.304971e-7,0.000004439591,0.001154552],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4848878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4068244,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994405758","doi":"10.1177/1086296x10397870","title":"Warning","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Interpretation (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Consistency (knowledge bases); Metafiction; Pedagogy; Psychology; Mathematics education; Visual arts; Computer science; Literature; Art; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4224618600776389,"gpt":0.4256817879968252,"spread":0.003219927919186349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002065147,0.00006734747,0.0001368549,0.0004619973,0.0002559994,0.0003130361,0.0002819154,0.00002579997,0.006165355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003465389,0.00004799345,0.00008450785,0.00008197621,0.0001524923,0.001221883,0.00003362394,0.0005742008,0.0002277977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004696172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001646484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000112076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008419635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998459,0.0002085976,0.0004050083,0.0000831108,0.0005546641,0.0002896065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977433,0.0002604601,0.0001589504,0.0001434674,0.001544703,0.0001491109],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007437328,0.0001468556,0.002981363,0.0000332229,0.00002211878,0.00003493536,0.9560543,7.580948e-8,0.00002230878,0.004908951,0.01699959,0.0187219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004531801,0.0006180721,0.005052547,0.0002857455,0.00001565713,0.00008773708,0.1189403,0.00003231888,0.000506634,0.01575214,0.8581136,0.0001420082],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9540676,0.0008056748,0.00001318137,0.0003908508,0.001726269,0.00005606189,0.000001947816,0.00000818197,0.04293019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842319,0.00006491451,0.0004941082,0.00009908466,0.004015634,0.000002746396,0.000001829784,0.00001242953,0.0110773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8411141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947432,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096343226","doi":"10.1207/s15548430jlr3402_6","title":"Creating Commonplaces for Interpretation: Literary Anthropology and Literacy Education Research","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Literacy; Sociology; Literary criticism; Literary science; Literacy education; Anthropology; Epistemology; Literature; Pedagogy; Linguistics; Philosophy; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1482457870707859,"gpt":0.5530657375316138,"spread":0.4048199504608279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01032312,0.0000827249,0.0002002439,0.0007730983,0.001513143,0.0009473593,0.0003871962,0.0001008305,0.0009850851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005868891,0.00007321602,0.00006213324,0.0007551329,0.0008571637,0.001165284,0.0000803615,0.0007975705,0.000023765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002404533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006388926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008688836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001183714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957268,0.00192472,0.0005713875,0.0001951396,0.001074909,0.0005070117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892443,0.005562752,0.0001308017,0.0001438993,0.004615217,0.0003030279],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001133713,0.0004875693,0.005893965,0.0001177553,0.00002648479,0.000007481241,0.4048793,2.086168e-7,0.00006808202,0.0477518,0.0247054,0.5159486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045055,0.0005447631,0.002194234,0.0008699222,0.000008482694,0.00005680415,0.0348006,0.0004741971,0.00009102494,0.1432588,0.8171043,0.0001462464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8014173,0.0220751,0.0008962062,0.1129867,0.002062768,0.0009841599,0.000007623233,0.00003233062,0.0595378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748511,0.001509902,0.01328414,0.0004313426,0.001186514,0.00003935117,0.000003416086,0.00001271031,0.008681532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7923989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139313182","doi":"10.1207/s15548430jlr3501_3","title":"At Play on the Borders of the Diegetic: Story Boundaries and Narrative Interpretation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Interpretation (philosophy); Variety (cybernetics); Notice; Visual arts; Aesthetics; Event (particle physics); Literature; Fictional universe; Phenomenon; Sociology; History; Media studies; Art; Linguistics; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09452934573702101,"gpt":0.5019507715516945,"spread":0.4074214258146736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003838539,0.00005483214,0.0001105312,0.0001066025,0.001547721,0.00005968474,0.0001492219,0.00004585065,0.0001285423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003429795,0.00002677471,0.00004439747,0.000181853,0.0004005339,0.0002022846,0.00003922906,0.0009611041,0.00001182317],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002020553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006283636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001757994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001741339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970276,0.001911307,0.0003178707,0.00006944306,0.0004852753,0.0001884763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956856,0.003069566,0.0002772661,0.000146914,0.0007625243,0.0000581273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008338065,0.0001767349,0.02744779,0.000171821,0.00008001595,0.000002282689,0.8521645,0.00002473543,0.0007038282,0.01726242,0.09109876,0.01003332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005848309,0.0007024533,0.03891832,0.00156445,0.00001343651,0.00001354098,0.0932839,0.00006947721,0.0008879416,0.01382681,0.8500406,0.00009428179],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796646,0.0007552156,0.00002196024,0.007273646,0.0007039458,0.0002033113,0.00000243099,0.000001750313,0.01137316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938282,0.00005519035,0.00003856413,0.0002307335,0.00008317568,0.000007400575,4.050077e-7,0.000006914081,0.005749364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7589418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211155351","doi":"10.1177/1086296x221076436","title":"Student-Generated Questions in Literacy Education and Assessment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Psychology; Literacy; Comprehension; Multilevel model; Grade level; Mathematics education; Quality (philosophy); Pedagogy; Linguistics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09354785950552523,"gpt":0.5629030605721215,"spread":0.4693552010665962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007350653,0.00004602866,0.0001048352,0.0005590792,0.0007673751,0.0004028865,0.0002604083,0.0000225893,0.000686983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005062513,0.0000444283,0.00002555908,0.0008799729,0.00009420977,0.0004481767,0.0001045032,0.000845895,0.000003511271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006831947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002898893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002472129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002479681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962723,0.001795544,0.0003760165,0.0001089347,0.001212842,0.0002343333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982204,0.0004405596,0.0000806922,0.00007936079,0.00100813,0.0001708864],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004440517,0.003564213,0.2312549,0.00003195655,0.00003056001,0.00005331052,0.3100354,0.00002117544,0.0003697342,0.1898265,0.00934006,0.2554278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003394017,0.0001686225,0.2108966,0.0001123088,0.000004319982,0.00002844668,0.04023558,0.00003615726,0.000009054724,0.02722385,0.720849,0.00009658631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9635144,0.001260364,0.0000218906,0.02409237,0.0007542147,0.0001646492,0.000001572664,0.000005590464,0.01018487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898779,0.0003838928,0.004668224,0.0004171309,0.0002675985,0.00003781548,0.000003282765,0.000005110525,0.004338986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.711509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7521982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188131395","doi":"10.1177/1086296x211031262","title":"Global Literacies Research Diversity: A Manifesto for Change","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Global Education and Multiculturalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Indigenous; Interrogation; Literacy; Globalization; Sociology; Diversity (politics); Dominance (genetics); Educational research; Gender studies; Social science; Political science; Pedagogy; Anthropology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4799196919295405,"gpt":0.602370602254926,"spread":0.1224509103253855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007653086,0.00007347699,0.0001795004,0.0002533657,0.001863084,0.0007370033,0.0005947241,0.00009850095,0.0002943659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006412336,0.00006203832,0.0001628411,0.001573554,0.0003401916,0.001098479,0.000391031,0.0004511859,0.00004116251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006205694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008502051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001542465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005406689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952629,0.001435588,0.0003125261,0.0001856828,0.002115144,0.0006881134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837886,0.000927244,0.0001015248,0.000168493,0.01460965,0.0004044583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003411172,0.0007554158,0.01858381,0.0001471989,0.0001006891,0.0004993463,0.6310635,0.000001054372,0.00024897,0.06444905,0.24719,0.03661983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004296004,0.0001210955,0.01183097,0.0001385195,0.000007465774,0.00005899457,0.04110938,0.000007013469,0.0000393954,0.005866482,0.9403174,0.00007371916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8897678,0.004878362,0.00001651123,0.08309221,0.001950594,0.0006250545,0.00006465991,0.00001741038,0.01958741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833264,0.0007138455,0.001714329,0.0003937725,0.00232514,0.00001766133,0.000005959464,0.000005789284,0.01149714],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6931273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1882583343","doi":"10.1080/10862960701331944","title":"Letters, Imagined Communities, and Literate Identities: Perspectives from Rural Ugandan Women","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Reading (process); Sociocultural evolution; Ethnography; Sociology; Identity (music); Situated; Personhood; Gender studies; Meaning (existential); Pedagogy; Psychology; Anthropology; Aesthetics; Linguistics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04485433456968108,"gpt":0.3606487985761045,"spread":0.3157944640064235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003173502,0.0001569255,0.0002888457,0.0007579974,0.0005534097,0.002049841,0.0003646553,0.00003603786,0.001654585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001612386,0.0001252078,0.0000795946,0.0001199751,0.0006080004,0.002473227,0.00009097705,0.0008296249,0.00002400945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002574531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001310432,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009562308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008776626,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976291,0.0003549679,0.0006156007,0.0001148277,0.0007275422,0.0005579686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967319,0.001085894,0.0002162393,0.0002406478,0.001458634,0.0002667279],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002776673,0.0001341274,0.005599553,0.0000472888,0.00007914445,0.00005036352,0.9821729,1.048533e-7,0.0004364361,0.001383832,0.00631173,0.003506831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008531164,0.0002577585,0.006972214,0.0003013086,0.00001329241,0.00005721853,0.9244601,0.00001152981,0.0001303881,0.008065447,0.05870929,0.0001683772],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913018,0.004461774,0.00002184422,0.00150198,0.0009985678,0.0001030019,0.00004241053,0.00001390737,0.00155471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906609,0.0004580613,0.0002071986,0.0003427168,0.004824615,0.000005220283,0.00002707337,0.0000234212,0.003450765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05771286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999258,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210853299","doi":"10.1177/1086296x221076431","title":"Leading Literate Lives: Afghan Refugee Children in a First-Asylum Country","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Ethnography; Literacy; Reading (process); Afghan; Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03613378154286592,"gpt":0.4296844835535661,"spread":0.3935507020107002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006120126,0.00008330974,0.0002097585,0.0007118443,0.00152097,0.0004474465,0.0007268393,0.00003937368,0.0009661946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004935418,0.00006821991,0.0000923945,0.001338458,0.0002570019,0.0007893738,0.0001246003,0.001005438,0.0000180866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003174125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006060711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001037304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006024925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964525,0.0009210668,0.0005029248,0.0001680078,0.001435784,0.0005197152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987144,0.0003652855,0.0001960902,0.0001396342,0.000377201,0.0002074002],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000422108,0.001149921,0.1880845,0.00004456986,0.00006750441,0.0002474444,0.7474835,0.0001557947,0.0002836104,0.009489744,0.02348863,0.02908265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000473567,0.000310358,0.01406997,0.0001605105,0.000002800688,0.00005288717,0.05555029,0.00002222663,0.00002427971,0.0008634169,0.9283417,0.0001279712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843405,0.002998876,0.000001409167,0.005784843,0.0005756235,0.0001525183,0.000007091422,0.000007149604,0.006131922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909925,0.0009776399,0.0001704155,0.0002862113,0.0006933147,0.00001696938,0.0000032334,0.000009708467,0.006849933],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9048531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999471,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388830929","doi":"10.1177/1086296x231215326","title":"Reading Rhetorically: Discussing the Ethics of Narrative Form","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Rhetorical question; Narratology; Reading (process); Narrative criticism; Narrative inquiry; Sociology; Pedagogy; Narrative network; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.372637943649505,"gpt":0.6150995211894381,"spread":0.2424615775399331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01413735,0.00005838966,0.0001770135,0.0003335832,0.001089834,0.00005283488,0.0003087525,0.0001085414,0.00006688254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005820852,0.00003079779,0.00008147216,0.001029544,0.0001169056,0.0004411264,0.00009812789,0.002709927,0.00007949267],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002292695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009259742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004518153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002944463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966503,0.001232461,0.0006712425,0.00008288945,0.0009729577,0.0003901225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900639,0.007289635,0.0003697679,0.0001814171,0.001980822,0.0001144776],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002331016,0.0001112995,0.01393026,0.0003845175,0.00005676369,0.00001482814,0.8761488,0.00002702253,0.001075185,0.00533296,0.07025143,0.03243379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007797905,0.0007346428,0.03804899,0.004763715,0.00002142708,0.00002226629,0.2779267,0.0007449538,0.0003903513,0.06943763,0.6069438,0.0001857383],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9414192,0.0002358442,0.0002590927,0.04030308,0.00172307,0.0002679959,0.00000548298,0.00001896749,0.01576725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865119,0.0002276994,0.0002275704,0.0000972954,0.0008634718,0.000007794825,0.000003008509,0.00001392483,0.01204732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5982222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588890239","doi":"10.1177/1086296x16686279","title":"Interrupting and Disrupting Literacy Research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Learning Partnership","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5469483983849375,"gpt":0.7368898550725346,"spread":0.1899414566875971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02611776,0.00008541346,0.0002066952,0.0007577769,0.004111138,0.003668436,0.001095009,0.00009430168,0.000299888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02612935,0.00007190998,0.00008124768,0.0003361356,0.001024407,0.001934621,0.0003677027,0.001664333,0.00004787788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001835916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008746798,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002770822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001135531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950896,0.001785604,0.0005378234,0.0001934817,0.001645118,0.0007483561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924504,0.002505355,0.0003650837,0.0004025947,0.003763692,0.0005129034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009887199,0.0001215825,0.03966248,0.00006281229,0.00002095504,0.0000668373,0.3750172,3.226669e-7,0.000586085,0.008105786,0.002384485,0.5738726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005802528,0.0002064243,0.03839934,0.0008208796,0.00000489936,0.00005169741,0.02816349,0.0002174067,0.0001824675,0.005593969,0.9256269,0.0001522582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9165933,0.0007705039,0.000008088076,0.01381914,0.0004835006,0.0001471798,0.000001913881,0.0000069497,0.06816948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822865,0.0006023636,0.00123513,0.00007671807,0.003194013,0.000003571629,4.081317e-7,0.00001375731,0.01258757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9232424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229368359","doi":"10.1177/1086296x221098068","title":"Private Readerly Experiences of Presence: Why They Matter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Set (abstract data type); Mandate; Point (geometry); Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09661324500492427,"gpt":0.3823237369909209,"spread":0.2857104919859966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002257001,0.00008622882,0.0002054473,0.0005009249,0.0004785051,0.0003477246,0.0006112718,0.00001840358,0.01423094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000206606,0.0000631618,0.0001052448,0.0001296075,0.0002544879,0.001119233,0.0001320193,0.0006427116,0.00002742673],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006413742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001998631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001364559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004505458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997081,0.0005467552,0.0006065497,0.0001300787,0.001321065,0.0003144818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997875,0.0005555959,0.000313688,0.0002352359,0.0009126145,0.0001078419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001301207,0.0002029826,0.002321611,0.00006078376,0.00002213783,0.00001537379,0.9312777,0.000002896372,0.0001027704,0.001297948,0.06296916,0.001596523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002351515,0.0005539291,0.000645922,0.00009775224,0.000006630482,0.00004973483,0.6170238,0.00002270879,0.0003219403,0.005421979,0.3755381,0.0000823672],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909647,0.000802186,0.000003020457,0.001953326,0.001861109,0.000125416,0.00001070453,0.000004253553,0.004275269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906653,0.00003604189,0.000125792,0.0002652821,0.001499393,0.0000405052,0.000004865234,0.00001316508,0.007349685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3142539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612045435","doi":"10.1177/1086296x16637169","title":"Editorial","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04610934764478022,"gpt":0.4893775575471271,"spread":0.4432682099023468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05576225,0.001207239,0.002881303,0.00744311,0.0008260692,0.004217212,0.006295648,0.003712265,0.002661807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07070339,0.0008306872,0.001820911,0.002683564,0.001490833,0.004448995,0.001564122,0.02180264,0.02259162],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004595332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0153217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006409771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002041945,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9484574,0.008950215,0.005052535,0.001117833,0.03303789,0.00338417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8957609,0.03032603,0.004680483,0.001885551,0.06527667,0.002070371],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01211617,0.0008602016,0.0001753676,0.0005664732,0.0009700499,0.001037289,0.001170561,8.177015e-7,0.008261715,0.00009158684,0.9669515,0.007798227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006844732,0.00394584,0.00004086709,0.009540197,0.0001875392,0.000174574,0.00007191052,0.000003242361,0.0003691568,0.002232016,0.9758018,0.0007881699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009983226,0.00388203,0.00001277795,0.0008610515,0.9884511,0.0006363696,0.001898629,0.00003242101,0.003227253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007060065,0.004469453,0.0003443791,0.00000645739,0.980301,0.00001967873,0.00005885134,0.0007022106,0.01339195],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05269646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994144,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381512536","doi":"10.1177/1086296x231178513","title":"Theorizing Literacies as Affective Flows: Attuning to the Otherwise Possibilities of Hip-Hop's “In-the-Red Frequencies”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Critical Race Theory in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Sociology; Privilege (computing); Literacy; Oppression; Posthumanism; Hegemony; Aesthetics; Politics; Critical literacy; Humanism; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09831042212335046,"gpt":0.5176913601135695,"spread":0.4193809379902191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02762255,0.0001074874,0.000239186,0.0007020319,0.0006372851,0.0004812414,0.00118127,0.00006821732,0.0002271982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02010419,0.00006606722,0.000146979,0.002675623,0.0006346864,0.0007424349,0.0001093642,0.0008238564,0.00008487127],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003263141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005871378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007212696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000417199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926047,0.00421044,0.0005778284,0.0001729597,0.00180765,0.0006263829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837326,0.01417095,0.0001569759,0.0003651925,0.00142239,0.0001518989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001766609,0.000120642,0.0007978947,0.00003984502,0.00002022321,0.00003032267,0.8603618,0.00008732652,0.003799114,0.1227048,0.0008991981,0.01096225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001898731,0.0003901445,0.003042007,0.0004958541,0.00000911694,0.00001742368,0.6075602,0.00005573585,0.0005414051,0.3714285,0.01617494,0.00009472043],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9499617,0.0004183031,0.00002877283,0.04020704,0.0004051709,0.0004271391,0.000006186422,0.00001360489,0.008532064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968402,0.0001041876,0.0003347755,0.0001929057,0.0007961182,0.00002589622,7.677079e-7,0.00001483529,0.001690311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2528015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9881499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225152770","doi":"10.1177/1086296x221096671","title":"<i>Éclosions</i> in Literacy Research: Rereading Brandt and Clinton’s “Limits of the Local”","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Dichotomy; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Critical literacy; Extension (predicate logic); Media studies; Political science; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Philosophy; Art; Visual arts; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2205947550451991,"gpt":0.4477736965969484,"spread":0.2271789415517493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01138138,0.0001245573,0.0003198417,0.00126609,0.001076632,0.0005043718,0.0007302092,0.00004260885,0.0009970793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001203571,0.00008552307,0.000133461,0.0006766819,0.0006619825,0.001153411,0.0003789506,0.002394469,0.00000813693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002691246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005367949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004972002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000837405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939821,0.002326409,0.0009997312,0.0002268569,0.00190784,0.0005570095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944038,0.002756026,0.0003103543,0.0003870772,0.001962211,0.0001805168],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005475115,0.0005676738,0.02147899,0.0002332483,0.00003250218,0.00005285013,0.9136658,0.00001554159,0.0003876576,0.005926837,0.02171231,0.03537909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001871925,0.001108582,0.01245281,0.001340393,0.00002136989,0.0002060182,0.1706828,0.0004496972,0.0009139803,0.02400425,0.7867058,0.0002424039],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878395,0.003334077,0.000003078239,0.004180335,0.001172054,0.0002913111,0.000027594,0.000004362922,0.003147658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929561,0.0003784325,0.00006711082,0.0002191519,0.001116558,0.00002780537,0.000005114821,0.00002289508,0.005206827],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7649935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393316087","doi":"10.1177/1086296x241244682","title":"Temporal Seeing as Visual Literacy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Literacy; Visual literacy; Reading (process); Mathematics education; Cognitive psychology; Pedagogy; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09541842921386917,"gpt":0.4697115846663101,"spread":0.374293155452441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002988611,0.0001636668,0.0002614117,0.001180353,0.0003855236,0.00393587,0.0003611683,0.00005923404,0.004619127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000445297,0.0001198122,0.0002164747,0.0002904318,0.0002043915,0.003626219,0.00007328243,0.001200605,0.0008353714],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001628412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000690055,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001875585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008407068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969343,0.0003524424,0.0007849209,0.0002262577,0.001185566,0.000516532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966674,0.0009482973,0.0001368768,0.0001919987,0.001775948,0.0002794177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001352063,0.000237801,0.00117347,0.000365683,0.00009181444,0.000515059,0.8459917,8.084625e-7,0.0001079676,0.008325604,0.0506197,0.09243516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002438157,0.0005565928,0.0002550497,0.001076747,0.00001998923,0.0002451552,0.02357623,0.0005288338,0.0001772354,0.00950222,0.9636604,0.0001576879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9723004,0.008886543,0.00002208018,0.002870383,0.005179815,0.0001374996,0.00001041287,0.00004056163,0.01055236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559704,0.0001793928,0.0002178718,0.0002281273,0.01242377,0.000007804908,0.00001808694,0.0000379435,0.0309166],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9130408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220847939","doi":"10.1177/1086296x221076610","title":"Categorization in Literacy Contexts: The Short-Term and Long-Term Effects of Labeling Students and Their Literacies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Literacy; Categorization; Psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09290683550672207,"gpt":0.5457878983125898,"spread":0.4528810628058677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004706471,0.00008681548,0.0002090115,0.0004708185,0.0005875104,0.0004552079,0.0004325655,0.00003542636,0.00005859899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001027818,0.00006010923,0.00004381468,0.0006295109,0.0002494678,0.0005840791,0.0002151911,0.0006221185,4.723604e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001121345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002687512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002746956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005415089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966334,0.0016556,0.0004857252,0.0001301991,0.0008221708,0.0002729374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968986,0.002044342,0.000187625,0.0001294142,0.0006095152,0.0001304887],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008980717,0.0002021395,0.4826966,0.0001123487,0.00002161428,0.00001847391,0.4333657,0.000002700273,0.001282323,0.000569095,0.00003334504,0.08160591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001429008,0.00053629,0.9631612,0.0006451738,0.00001701969,0.00006269893,0.02083743,0.0001063535,0.0007617759,0.001382956,0.01087087,0.0001892141],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922221,0.005833236,0.000008009908,0.001192623,0.0002613148,0.0003219976,0.000004874148,0.00000311339,0.0001527558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974815,0.001458137,0.00002527178,0.00011666,0.0002581566,0.00001435749,0.000002626663,0.000008494948,0.0006347488],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4804646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4518714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325451834","doi":"10.1177/1086296x15620873","title":"Advancing Our Literacy Practices With Sophisticated Theoretical and Methodological Tools","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3812759841615375,"gpt":0.5998192217552004,"spread":0.218543237593663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02359274,0.00008607151,0.0002377791,0.0002192981,0.0003443603,0.0008540238,0.000320578,0.00008246424,0.0001115351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04554012,0.00005538632,0.00003432079,0.0005109013,0.0005282401,0.001197299,0.0000808506,0.0008540201,0.00001858843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001740635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001209397,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002001712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002777736,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941994,0.00325829,0.000409191,0.0001730853,0.001510692,0.0004493409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906899,0.005028377,0.0002598636,0.0001189213,0.003197712,0.0007051864],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001024344,0.0005026835,0.01251738,0.00006004633,0.00006844913,0.0003603708,0.08851187,0.000001869062,0.0001948896,0.8286085,0.00471679,0.06343285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001290426,0.001734274,0.004759987,0.0006390986,0.00004675393,0.0004083853,0.05828903,0.00009802492,0.0001753851,0.5302705,0.4019706,0.0003175642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7257223,0.001485116,0.00586441,0.2394837,0.0006422657,0.0003889742,0.0000026257,0.00004024181,0.02637035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8973094,0.000197105,0.1009733,0.0004802161,0.0005469438,0.000004661526,8.118218e-7,0.000007720774,0.0004799298],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3972538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9624997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2569601954","doi":"10.1177/1086296x16675714","title":"Literacy “Turns”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Literacy; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1359540183720546,"gpt":0.4268125200561785,"spread":0.2908585016841239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002526934,0.0001358139,0.0002491264,0.0007466069,0.0002526104,0.0009212053,0.0004875814,0.00004968943,0.006208334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008509714,0.00007415619,0.0001700192,0.0001421071,0.0002879327,0.003052642,0.0000634425,0.0005028657,0.0005685079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001398203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003037956,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004021702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009779873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972053,0.000368964,0.0007256988,0.0001721919,0.001018251,0.0005096432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947359,0.001215575,0.0002695707,0.0003087838,0.003186618,0.0002835399],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002230719,0.0003078154,0.002838434,0.0001038955,0.0000583669,0.00007979302,0.744027,8.194019e-8,0.0003813242,0.01027493,0.07266565,0.1690396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006841689,0.0003668298,0.001393902,0.0005609585,0.00001069067,0.00007920713,0.007909723,0.000005180452,0.0003051212,0.01567099,0.9728823,0.000130959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9742091,0.002396818,0.00004151164,0.007575998,0.003487148,0.0001363247,0.00002097034,0.0000187582,0.01211334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9509753,0.0003614039,0.0002755314,0.0002530054,0.009595585,0.000006759568,0.00000304352,0.00002412317,0.03850525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9002166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947001,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616008473","doi":"10.1177/1086296x17706790","title":"Literacy Research in Uncertain Times","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Learning Partnership","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Literacy; Mathematics education; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3389089256586574,"gpt":0.6369528463668515,"spread":0.298043920708194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03310835,0.00008621689,0.0002395929,0.0008091597,0.003279649,0.001301085,0.001552495,0.00008713753,0.0005916519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008626049,0.00006899139,0.0001033622,0.0007128016,0.001292726,0.0019498,0.0002737009,0.001487529,0.0001343434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001051454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001214075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000117131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932548,0.003053963,0.0004965916,0.0001944819,0.002247012,0.0007531378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991871,0.003452549,0.0002435669,0.000393768,0.003796101,0.0002430317],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005138833,0.001181197,0.2349994,0.0001103575,0.00009116476,0.0006044574,0.2569273,0.00000859693,0.000239522,0.354295,0.04347929,0.1075498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005985796,0.0002624326,0.07204121,0.0008964424,0.000004141346,0.00002044448,0.03018199,0.00001886449,0.00007459097,0.3492841,0.546457,0.00016018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8060958,0.003004519,0.000002564814,0.03511096,0.0006201415,0.000228822,0.000003572957,0.000005362551,0.1549283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803743,0.001290117,0.0004314597,0.00004194942,0.001841065,0.0000139759,6.237365e-7,0.000008976773,0.01599749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5029777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254652524","doi":"10.1207/s15548430jlr3403_6","title":"Book Review","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Mathematics education; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1799128003600174,"gpt":0.5044358625708032,"spread":0.3245230622107858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006921747,0.0001140538,0.0003872443,0.0006946722,0.0000972392,0.0001733781,0.0007088508,0.00004450536,0.05320573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001923996,0.00008419792,0.0002314413,0.001184589,0.0001262564,0.001416682,0.0001022991,0.001448435,0.03413859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002129101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006064436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001808412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.952967e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950408,0.001098347,0.0008919942,0.0001449427,0.002257517,0.0005664541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955813,0.0005758028,0.0003347295,0.0004364158,0.002707459,0.0003643407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003688565,0.000177991,0.0001896554,0.0003680284,0.00003183169,0.0003524158,0.0003059842,4.760024e-7,0.0007935055,0.00002295711,0.9908857,0.006834603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004091623,0.0002860722,0.0002062005,0.004145957,0.00001485807,0.0008364507,0.000008399034,0.00009587948,0.0002073076,0.0000724019,0.9936365,0.00008075526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001674774,0.9714418,0.000004021219,0.01030483,0.0001061303,0.0002125262,0.00000410776,0.00002700685,0.01622482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02106741,0.7342987,0.002103239,0.02538472,0.003120693,0.00002362876,0.000002391838,0.000648041,0.2133511],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2371431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9666134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416943947","doi":"10.1177/1086296x251401121","title":"Reading and Equity in Teacher Education: An Exploratory Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Critical Race Theory in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University; University of British Columbia; University of Saskatchewan; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Equity (law); Reading (process); Exploratory research; Nexus (standard); Qualitative research; Educational equity; Teacher education; Higher education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.154039214356151,"gpt":0.6227238681979511,"spread":0.4686846538418001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01615866,0.00004313502,0.0001166184,0.0005854769,0.0002758157,0.0003227038,0.0002971361,0.00004195891,0.0001226039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004362289,0.00004014447,0.00001709555,0.0007695234,0.0002141797,0.001155341,0.00009259123,0.00057529,0.00000428149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004197274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001736875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001758939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004879234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964274,0.002309585,0.0003125593,0.0001148292,0.0005987042,0.0002369515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979174,0.0008547531,0.00005150161,0.000139883,0.0008775839,0.0001589106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001268934,0.003154798,0.1187196,0.00003321531,0.000009466126,0.00001383104,0.536255,7.996667e-7,0.0003558764,0.0704307,0.0009759056,0.2699239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003098998,0.0002599317,0.06427497,0.0002679494,0.000007862107,0.000002762683,0.7897574,0.0000120466,0.00003390192,0.128185,0.01682081,0.00006747994],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9737116,0.0004075315,0.0000119147,0.005308748,0.0003435928,0.0001891232,1.700715e-7,0.000003989975,0.02002329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963063,0.00006733305,0.0001659714,0.00006463844,0.0004346024,0.00001077698,1.831401e-7,0.000003731272,0.002946476],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2698564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408646447","doi":"10.1177/1086296x251318428","title":"Running Around in the Story: Un/Raveling Compositions of Narrative Play","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Narrative; Posthuman; Embodied cognition; Composition (language); Literacy; Sociology; Narrative inquiry; Story telling; Storytelling; Aesthetics; Dynamics (music); Psychology; Literature; Art; Epistemology; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09329834820966375,"gpt":0.4232288439977775,"spread":0.3299304957881137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003273865,0.00006899973,0.0001755233,0.0006947807,0.0004833075,0.0003422797,0.0003185099,0.00002677355,0.0002204794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002653798,0.00004500539,0.00007315103,0.0002397031,0.0002087689,0.0006178555,0.00002794184,0.0008334474,0.000004661687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008681371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003084838,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009086293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003403545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982396,0.0005242273,0.0004571592,0.00008039024,0.0004966176,0.0002020512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972658,0.001308165,0.0001712866,0.0001408056,0.001075961,0.00003804104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007506889,0.0001938311,0.001752276,0.00005398669,0.00003558477,0.00001183663,0.979233,0.00001544728,0.000132614,0.01175735,0.00454107,0.00219799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006883396,0.0002745192,0.007903351,0.001103411,0.00002029263,0.00001982578,0.9065639,0.0002236118,0.0003365374,0.01192176,0.07086079,0.0000836983],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889646,0.001296947,0.00002750449,0.004330576,0.0006793395,0.0001196299,0.000005699669,0.000002205423,0.004573569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973814,0.00004351872,0.0001705784,0.0001933703,0.0008956774,0.00000686531,0.00000586457,0.000005058955,0.001297656],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07266907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3717259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318169672","doi":"10.1177/1086296x16631231","title":"Editorial","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Mathematics education; Sociology; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09368543806935327,"gpt":0.5119418338962373,"spread":0.418256395826884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09284132,0.001212196,0.003161171,0.007525266,0.0006425699,0.005531553,0.006314678,0.003906997,0.0009512079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1035236,0.001018356,0.001448535,0.004133724,0.001269384,0.004271763,0.001722935,0.03224728,0.01505601],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006434275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03147809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001809954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004355812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9356651,0.01010379,0.005026224,0.001040202,0.04507455,0.003090128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8561223,0.0154079,0.004392135,0.00178127,0.1192883,0.003008044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01346557,0.001254879,0.0001296926,0.0005920627,0.0008954174,0.001359479,0.003235274,0.000011881,0.001278921,0.00003938328,0.9751042,0.002633295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006953759,0.005566036,0.00001864624,0.004263239,0.0002535527,0.0002348018,0.0002995915,0.00002377137,0.00008871844,0.002266925,0.9792334,0.0007975043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.001519258,0.007507971,0.000003480925,0.0004318379,0.9843296,0.0006738483,0.001352988,0.00003316812,0.004147875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006081944,0.001951262,0.0005956563,0.000006154829,0.9879549,0.00001667877,0.0001847331,0.0006953909,0.007987097],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0795428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341200525","doi":"10.1177/1086296x15619257","title":"Advancing the Field of Literacy Studies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Field (mathematics); Mathematics education; Psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2092205465604983,"gpt":0.5081244356853201,"spread":0.2989038891248217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004373095,0.0001010957,0.000277256,0.0003769775,0.0002431744,0.0003585093,0.0004217989,0.00002913103,0.0003046301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004153285,0.00005663548,0.0001185837,0.0001612529,0.000248279,0.00152472,0.00009182535,0.0006150882,0.000029353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008603746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003474097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009426062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002071811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997548,0.0003974657,0.0006972126,0.0001030666,0.0009291593,0.0003250746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909758,0.003001458,0.0003288451,0.0002643887,0.005270728,0.000158767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001498539,0.0001229739,0.001750848,0.0001117072,0.000073458,0.0000160428,0.8621635,0.000002976622,0.00002306682,0.001737943,0.110786,0.02306164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005389308,0.0009257073,0.0003674412,0.0006270218,0.00002746265,0.00004235559,0.2607044,0.00005589738,0.0006371245,0.01577005,0.720199,0.0001045186],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9695842,0.01356261,0.00001399061,0.01024307,0.002690261,0.0001348747,0.000004795201,0.000006221075,0.003759996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888483,0.0004558505,0.0003260516,0.000516755,0.004462407,0.00000620379,0.000001727746,0.00001246285,0.005370258],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.609413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.497217,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}