{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":39,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":39,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"cb235211cb08","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2094786392","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2007.05.004","title":"Weakened WARP and top-cycle choice rules","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Mathematics; Tournament; Transitive relation; Context (archaeology); Simple (philosophy); Finite set; Transitive closure; Set (abstract data type); Closure (psychology); Mathematical economics; Combinatorics; Axiom of choice; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Set theory; Economics; Geometry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02485431505866704,"gpt":0.2350153809267545,"spread":0.2101610658680874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003166475,0.0001248228,0.0005643929,0.0001746037,0.00005757375,0.00007653952,0.0002016101,0.0001056754,0.0002193121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004893316,0.0001225071,0.0001384213,0.00004521062,0.00007266529,0.0002455039,0.00004150335,0.0001867132,0.0002748111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006752398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000129835,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004917096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003261164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982867,0.00001161018,0.001293893,0.0001455897,0.00002300659,0.000239211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982507,0.0005030209,0.0008701247,0.0001740796,0.00003033292,0.0001717584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003751639,0.0001095496,0.00633445,0.00009068532,0.00008623148,0.000006500011,0.0005000842,0.00005160767,0.00002669825,0.9908493,0.000110116,0.001797301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009498604,0.0001561219,0.008050605,0.00008087517,0.00001791631,0.0002829338,0.0002933118,0.001727772,0.0002624483,0.9709283,0.01699253,0.0002573656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9641663,0.0005394077,0.01001428,0.0003751508,0.0003271268,0.00006888198,0.00001051032,0.00001021438,0.02448816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942139,0.00008728272,0.004735909,0.0001510697,0.0003655383,6.92946e-7,4.456544e-7,0.00002080337,0.0004243597],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03004763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4995693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541257362","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2016.01.003","title":"Volume of trade and dynamic network formation in two-sided economies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Pairwise comparison; Economics; Matching (statistics); Population; Shock (circulatory); Stability (learning theory); Microeconomics; Econometrics; Economy; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04488738288953534,"gpt":0.3321596460919777,"spread":0.2872722632024423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002513086,0.00006886581,0.0003731681,0.0001264121,0.00002450978,0.00004140901,0.0002666352,0.00003408293,0.0002084063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007536463,0.00004181143,0.00008547395,0.00007325901,0.0001225265,0.000521485,0.00003932595,0.00006794796,0.00005165225],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004830462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002672742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.642975e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001389803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983736,0.0000574435,0.001281963,0.00008810867,0.00008408348,0.0001148545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969276,0.001988343,0.0007956254,0.0001793541,0.00003756599,0.00007157489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002075983,0.0002432032,0.003597631,0.00004110508,0.00005421247,0.00000358132,0.001556521,0.006340779,0.001686973,0.8711748,0.001591449,0.1135021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005408436,0.00004300114,0.004253128,0.00006671409,0.000008591695,0.00008933187,0.000290792,0.01400363,0.0002670071,0.9799007,0.0004802079,0.00005608889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750841,0.00003422254,0.02050283,0.00284213,0.000038166,0.00007023454,0.000004243608,0.000002108909,0.001421969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957695,0.00006410528,0.003951425,0.00004822872,0.0000378091,0.000001776501,1.028678e-7,0.000004651471,0.000122429],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.113446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2281902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537982990","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2015.08.002","title":"Centralized allocation in multiple markets","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond","keywords":"Lexicographical order; Class (philosophy); Pareto efficiency; Pareto principle; Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematical economics; Object (grammar); Preference; Economics; Characterization (materials science); Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07626212296768375,"gpt":0.2415448193752957,"spread":0.165282696407612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003214357,0.00009588768,0.0005089106,0.0001837702,0.00001514133,0.00004627158,0.0002104362,0.00008199863,0.0001337552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001112025,0.00009798162,0.0001123284,0.00006990288,0.00003388164,0.0002587492,0.00002371597,0.0001496064,0.0003580959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001884688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003760683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000582459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004162025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983457,0.00003387025,0.001303103,0.0001122086,0.00002416219,0.000180981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986486,0.0002041914,0.0008001464,0.0001558318,0.00004056411,0.0001506079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002259188,0.0003877136,0.02514981,0.00009082265,0.0000690419,0.0000113803,0.001795868,0.001554348,0.00001572583,0.9693523,0.0007876047,0.0005594829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003165137,0.0001088758,0.004165788,0.0001037793,0.000007660681,0.000125889,0.000553037,0.02647438,0.0001192448,0.9550753,0.00986734,0.000233617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793952,0.0002608736,0.005169346,0.0005425674,0.0004458914,0.0001057628,0.000006804098,0.000007019926,0.01406658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965162,0.00004027749,0.002967988,0.00007429386,0.0001221428,0.000002229406,8.93344e-7,0.00001488735,0.0002611254],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02492003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4602718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140798861","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2023.102892","title":"Common assumption of rationality","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lexicographical order; Impossibility; Rationality; Iterated function; Type (biology); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Biology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2118599061366541,"gpt":0.4289026890235054,"spread":0.2170427828868513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005229001,0.00004582528,0.0002825228,0.0001370849,0.00003572151,0.00004050763,0.0003612633,0.00003800352,0.0005751331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001359189,0.00003283906,0.0001433885,0.0001939967,0.00007917873,0.0001897071,0.00004429278,0.00008533445,0.0006554952],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001922004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004312638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":1.826338e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.280474e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984754,0.00006988011,0.001087748,0.00006936086,0.0002278428,0.00006972496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965653,0.002232313,0.000744719,0.0002223198,0.0001726022,0.00006274699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003117214,0.0001316961,0.0007991924,0.00001321753,0.00002515937,9.997325e-7,0.0003022403,0.002954232,0.0007720315,0.9823744,0.003385416,0.009210284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001304504,0.00002791648,0.005127926,0.00000976528,0.000008910295,0.00001820423,0.0002563616,0.005483369,0.0009819461,0.9859766,0.001946629,0.00003189836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838956,0.000005146479,0.009706993,0.002078386,0.00007554449,0.0000456743,0.000009036113,0.000005651099,0.004177947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975749,0.00001367127,0.001866876,0.0000502649,0.00006373129,0.000001237563,8.323008e-7,0.00000359352,0.0004248972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01367928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8425282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101674550","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2007.12.003","title":"A limit theorem for systems of social interactions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Mathematical economics; Homogeneity (statistics); Limit (mathematics); Mathematics; Class (philosophy); Computer science; Economics; Mathematical analysis; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1394832372931899,"gpt":0.4100161867334114,"spread":0.2705329494402215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006154604,0.00006173088,0.0003597047,0.0001524299,0.00006908593,0.00006492287,0.000401202,0.00004527178,0.0001782856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001533153,0.00004314005,0.0002588712,0.0000947217,0.00009935757,0.0001714957,0.00002848555,0.0001034685,0.0000567448],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003709955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004564128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":1.566917e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001300481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982718,0.00003233898,0.001358456,0.00007860632,0.0001455375,0.000113282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936529,0.004694457,0.001088095,0.0001570505,0.00033185,0.0000755843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008245722,0.0001252296,0.00001457526,0.00001254018,0.00003110228,2.931953e-7,0.0005916485,0.0001559207,0.0003326987,0.9942245,0.0009547744,0.00347422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002886604,0.00007571095,0.0001576125,0.00001967834,0.00003244369,0.00008149157,0.00369044,0.002337615,0.0009679628,0.9760397,0.01625212,0.00005653885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6349123,0.0000132546,0.3519385,0.0007239601,0.000236268,0.0001348993,0.00001488107,0.000003336709,0.01202262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935787,0.000002109153,0.005542413,0.0000395787,0.0002503333,0.000002924498,2.141982e-7,0.00000667646,0.0005770631],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3586664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2133075,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472594781","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2017.02.003","title":"The consumption–investment decision of a prospect theory household: A two-period model","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Consumption (sociology); Loss aversion; Endowment effect; Portfolio; Endowment; Prospect theory; Asset (computer security); Autonomous consumption; Microeconomics; Investment (military); Value (mathematics); Expected utility hypothesis; Risk aversion (psychology); Public economics; Financial economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03510239654338768,"gpt":0.2636981760496703,"spread":0.2285957795062826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002010464,0.0001555454,0.0004550513,0.0001326073,0.0004386796,0.0005452562,0.0006776192,0.00004921057,0.00011565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009969763,0.00009968637,0.0003033955,0.00003824829,0.0002326323,0.0009211401,0.0002251681,0.000147094,0.00007286535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000622736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005717687,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004057385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001603433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984554,0.0000106025,0.0009962013,0.000132425,0.0002184086,0.0001869413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969923,0.0002223927,0.001986836,0.0005593435,0.0002135689,0.00002552988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002450742,0.0001785405,0.01262049,0.0001049662,0.00006296042,0.000006575382,0.00008335275,0.002188604,0.00008238784,0.9821398,0.0006312527,0.001656006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009375242,0.00002213425,0.005947005,0.0002156397,0.00022315,0.00001456382,0.00005336255,0.1194155,0.00007431283,0.871914,0.001034384,0.0001483369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929619,0.0001019572,0.002888277,0.0003198584,0.0001714192,0.000174178,0.000002779222,0.000008341418,0.003371226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908984,0.00008691249,0.008114425,0.0003297211,0.0003497838,0.000004672683,7.0728e-7,0.00002493977,0.0001904646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1172269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5257919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131258498","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2006.04.010","title":"Inter-temporal preference for flexibility and risky choice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Preference; Mathematical economics; Normative; Consistency (knowledge bases); Ex-ante; Representation (politics); Key (lock); Subjective expected utility; Time consistency; Econometrics; Economics; Revealed preference; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer science; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Actuarial science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2227079667466692,"gpt":0.4046448403129322,"spread":0.181936873566263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004029117,0.0001539103,0.0006462622,0.0001747003,0.00007985783,0.0004091416,0.0005903127,0.0001115279,0.0001881965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002927956,0.0001084827,0.0002603086,0.00007282127,0.0001466593,0.000521702,0.0001199654,0.000184298,0.00006056162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008540214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009226452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008544344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004051556,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973798,0.00004648181,0.001897869,0.0002876059,0.0001874022,0.0002008093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945844,0.003468842,0.001114726,0.0003798743,0.0002989856,0.0001531228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006565052,0.001426813,0.04205286,0.0000931004,0.00008061426,0.00001207919,0.0004318423,0.001587615,0.0001735885,0.05124149,0.0201359,0.8821076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005921132,0.0002060634,0.002844176,0.00003536375,0.00002783877,0.00007762848,0.0001314205,0.00873534,0.0001081805,0.9725361,0.01456833,0.0001373948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.963925,0.0000464472,0.03369939,0.0005060142,0.0003131969,0.0001449519,0.00002553738,0.000007762309,0.001331711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709014,0.000009232002,0.02841945,0.00008020574,0.0002397382,0.000003076337,7.831255e-7,0.00001284516,0.0003332349],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9212947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4423797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336900194","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2016.09.001","title":"Voting over selfishly optimal nonlinear income tax schedules with a minimum-utility constraint","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Condorcet method; Pairwise comparison; Microeconomics; Voting; Incentive compatibility; Income tax; Mathematical economics; Private information retrieval; Schedule; Incentive; Mathematical optimization; Econometrics; Mathematics; Public economics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02544947766472514,"gpt":0.224222456684761,"spread":0.1987729790200358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001434491,0.0002760525,0.001014349,0.0002359004,0.00008118656,0.0001098894,0.0004285469,0.0001793354,0.0006936112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004600768,0.0002044493,0.0002870648,0.00007336482,0.000335423,0.0006671352,0.00009617004,0.000286532,0.0003934562],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002243553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009938125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003727911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004833076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972324,0.00001927502,0.001919164,0.0003286226,0.00004273973,0.000457843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973561,0.0004590674,0.001505093,0.0003158222,0.00005926126,0.0003046762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002504345,0.0004008905,0.04210429,0.0001605531,0.0004334392,0.00002317455,0.0002808785,0.00008826991,0.00002961628,0.9544453,0.0003086991,0.001474476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006829222,0.0009352692,0.02341162,0.0005353647,0.00008073305,0.0006765294,0.0003183874,0.03211248,0.0006928889,0.9269243,0.006299581,0.001183579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9675561,0.00008320926,0.0185335,0.002054442,0.0001810314,0.0001364176,0.0002001559,0.00001766175,0.01123754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970503,0.0000247279,0.02860131,0.0002527315,0.0004744823,0.000003949808,9.417079e-7,0.00004174129,0.00009707705],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03202421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8337201,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028553491","doi":"10.1016/s0304-4068(99)00044-0","title":"A note on ordinally equivalent Pareto surfaces","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pareto principle; Corollary; Surface (topology); Transformation (genetics); Set (abstract data type); Monotone polygon; Preference; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Pure mathematics; Geometry; Chemistry; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03604073082717639,"gpt":0.2387891421753756,"spread":0.2027484113481992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001188967,0.0002096049,0.0008439281,0.0001462729,0.00006834415,0.0001137659,0.0004275712,0.0001235289,0.005966499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001182762,0.0002050723,0.0003553567,0.00005169724,0.00008289519,0.0003338953,0.00003526097,0.0002602213,0.002363566],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002057272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004533916,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004996743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002992658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977387,0.00001326975,0.001641966,0.0002463831,0.00003126005,0.0003283905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983644,0.0002389239,0.0008077612,0.0003474435,0.00003282901,0.0002086818],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001780269,0.0002511723,0.0002145002,0.00004170019,0.00011818,0.00001039686,0.0004111074,0.009804198,0.000004719296,0.9828854,0.0009525898,0.005128043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009897606,0.0004416649,0.0002853995,0.00006945686,0.00001864708,0.00009841828,0.00008057665,0.009571333,0.00008550776,0.9138709,0.07415836,0.0003300014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8733159,0.0002823269,0.002674736,0.001686938,0.0003471339,0.000115438,0.00005997003,0.00001378334,0.1215038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913883,0.0008935381,0.004067784,0.0005839439,0.0003067291,0.000003670332,0.000001438245,0.00004267838,0.002711906],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1187919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984132,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914842256","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.01.003","title":"Adaptive stochastic search","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Satisficing; Preference; Maximization; Mathematical optimization; Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1082013021968553,"gpt":0.2259863795796958,"spread":0.1177850773828405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001000812,0.0001128362,0.0004994277,0.0001435876,0.00002595274,0.0000384957,0.0002205142,0.00007911187,0.003392685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005247652,0.0001185535,0.0001856137,0.00003638819,0.00004874485,0.0003516225,0.00005113977,0.0001916078,0.007065039],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002518691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002580136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002369976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.566181e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986289,0.00000943566,0.0009865314,0.0001603573,0.00002734934,0.0001873872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989595,0.0001359116,0.0005839528,0.0001936604,0.00001654289,0.0001104653],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006550524,0.0002499473,0.01174501,0.00004756736,0.0001941915,0.000002205064,0.0006481046,0.03839898,0.00002648159,0.9473357,0.0002926808,0.0009936055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002424588,0.0007388163,0.01915571,0.00007862705,0.00002973551,0.0001589309,0.001005505,0.125302,0.0001534553,0.8493621,0.001075246,0.0005152589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9488072,0.0001857616,0.02892387,0.0003015521,0.0003137879,0.0001428186,0.00001550604,0.0000049306,0.02130459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949018,0.00005319829,0.003943838,0.0001401308,0.0001124573,0.00000177816,0.000001184067,0.00002197071,0.0008235849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09797359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981095392","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.10.001","title":"Bidding collusion without passive updating","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Collusion; Bidding; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Bayesian game; Path (computing); Class (philosophy); Mechanism design; Complete information; Private information retrieval; Economics; Computer science; Game theory; Repeated game; Artificial intelligence; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05688723105829518,"gpt":0.3543620036625234,"spread":0.2974747726042282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002397961,0.00007507928,0.0003340403,0.0001362106,0.00008651517,0.0001367698,0.0004270284,0.00005281642,0.002570513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001290284,0.00005143676,0.0001482977,0.0001406011,0.00004750904,0.0003814033,0.00008144455,0.0001590854,0.00175341],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005384454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006549216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":1.010614e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.2051e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984578,0.00005285803,0.001020183,0.0001283336,0.0002309583,0.0001098225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970382,0.001324161,0.001079551,0.0002603244,0.0001913261,0.0001064724],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006807848,0.0001498877,0.001664453,0.00001450298,0.00004796057,0.000002147574,0.0007472046,0.004675841,0.001568501,0.9623949,0.001882592,0.02678394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003766369,0.00006924152,0.000305085,0.00004222832,0.00001490562,0.0001504113,0.002826529,0.01661732,0.001120017,0.9690502,0.00932616,0.0001013133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9402622,0.000006454447,0.03928349,0.001127645,0.0002458553,0.00009772961,0.000002596455,0.000006120654,0.01896789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875573,0.000007631191,0.01066952,0.0001777614,0.0001456061,0.000001334826,1.844118e-7,0.000008221201,0.001432447],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04729507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993299296","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2013.04.003","title":"On refutability of the Nash bargaining solution","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining problem; Economics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Subgame; Nash equilibrium; Epsilon-equilibrium; Best response","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0281640373950389,"gpt":0.2695596349600903,"spread":0.2413955975650514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001335387,0.00006345398,0.000218922,0.00003167323,0.0001288535,0.00003741225,0.0002973994,0.00008348071,0.0002055439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008736175,0.00004274079,0.0001535269,0.00006129276,0.0002084071,0.0001728619,0.00003447379,0.0001775832,0.00003066987],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001518921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001806472,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002750049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002471807,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990146,0.00009538901,0.0005202873,0.00006443626,0.0001494053,0.0001558372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987693,0.0004057252,0.0004274653,0.0001576422,0.0001518527,0.00008801516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000141674,0.0002623884,0.004582769,0.00003841276,0.00005076142,3.328672e-7,0.009549177,0.000814113,0.0002084128,0.9809785,0.0007502853,0.002750687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002456961,0.00008009165,0.01384069,0.0000564117,0.00002247602,0.00000438075,0.006391901,0.005141601,0.00006104392,0.9737415,0.0003284558,0.000085743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9688973,0.00001204714,0.001570865,0.001142039,0.0002713006,0.0001117454,0.00000183263,0.000004002391,0.0279889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972352,0.00004027491,0.002302252,0.0001752241,0.0001114762,0.000001124176,8.096004e-8,0.000005833911,0.000128483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02833799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2250562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989193531","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2012.06.002","title":"Price and quality decisions under network effects","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Incentive; Economics; Microeconomics; Monopoly; Marginal cost; Optimism","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04432110272637056,"gpt":0.2480693837622292,"spread":0.2037482810358587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001122895,0.0001077444,0.0003375158,0.0000644985,0.00006312909,0.0003802361,0.0001264825,0.00005835079,0.00007614943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003486988,0.00008387832,0.0001030717,0.00004756993,0.00003668728,0.003857344,0.0001167099,0.0001164458,0.0001996873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003450581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001180094,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000202735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002834481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990487,0.000001351739,0.0005805472,0.0000666583,0.00005080765,0.0002520063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987835,0.000513128,0.0005002711,0.0001084372,0.00003987737,0.00005473779],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000363899,0.0001198413,0.002544141,0.0001019629,0.00005374824,6.848291e-7,0.00002024526,0.0004885625,0.000003612072,0.9916793,0.0008603518,0.004091168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005507275,0.00001632703,0.01817813,0.0000892678,0.00005790902,0.00003742874,0.0002330605,0.001830284,0.000006252868,0.9689868,0.009811951,0.0002018687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672124,0.0001100805,0.004190361,0.0001804407,0.0003935428,0.00006631609,3.29044e-7,0.000008344736,0.02783822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937684,0.00004076721,0.003153899,0.001393936,0.001573876,9.305999e-7,7.019095e-7,0.00001606107,0.00005142002],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0277868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3666625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2929275403","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.03.006","title":"Consensus in social networks: Revisited","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Mathematical economics; Social network (sociolinguistics); Bayesian network; Permissive; Bayesian probability; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01114082460979583,"gpt":0.2607648283290045,"spread":0.2496240037192087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003614904,0.0000733261,0.0003312726,0.00004592605,0.00002477626,0.00003763246,0.0001196322,0.00004289193,0.0005371211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000106647,0.00006721676,0.0001363144,0.00005287598,0.00002994168,0.00006229785,0.00002460076,0.0002008556,0.00006670185],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003844535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004887128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001916958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.281157e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991958,0.00002144464,0.0005431228,0.00006370466,0.00004279597,0.0001331463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993635,0.0001410482,0.0003314147,0.00006718342,0.00004820234,0.00004869103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002936771,0.0001423307,0.0253805,0.0000255906,0.00006673218,0.000002209704,0.0002958564,0.004536376,0.00001591188,0.9668303,0.0004694996,0.002205311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002371415,0.0001226893,0.008908536,0.0002053388,0.0000350301,0.00001478143,0.001312954,0.1526156,0.00001834685,0.8308674,0.003130379,0.0003974727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808937,0.00001537028,0.001397837,0.0003727899,0.0001362641,0.00007411667,0.000004857378,0.000001801121,0.0171033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987316,0.000006556835,0.0006979435,0.0000783733,0.0003464362,5.982095e-7,0.000001023687,0.00000799624,0.0001295026],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1480793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046426498","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2013.11.005","title":"The geometry of revealed preference","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Preference relation; Dimension (graph theory); Space (punctuation); Relation (database); Irrational number; Revealed preference; Mathematics; Consumption (sociology); Set (abstract data type); Binary relation; Mathematical economics; Finite set; Pure mathematics; Geometry; Econometrics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematical analysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05799301617180113,"gpt":0.3126736697711902,"spread":0.254680653599389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009986104,0.00007136314,0.0002909178,0.00004221253,0.000185668,0.00007552561,0.0004064869,0.00005286039,0.0003164919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004202635,0.00004858902,0.0001279612,0.00004934341,0.0004115473,0.0002833532,0.00006912265,0.0001237378,0.000096147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001348321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001035943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005371535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003437883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99891,0.00004588066,0.0007107769,0.00006101024,0.00009353508,0.0001788543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984186,0.0005887906,0.0006105771,0.0001327768,0.0001469586,0.0001023085],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004811283,0.0004228042,0.007403465,0.00005787602,0.0002256331,0.000002325484,0.01186743,0.00003518965,0.001034934,0.9560065,0.005821006,0.01707471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009213437,0.0003962529,0.007826915,0.0001538408,0.00008995221,0.0000249898,0.0363207,0.0002427737,0.003170709,0.9392684,0.01120754,0.0003765545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9678996,0.0002288626,0.00004865363,0.001755593,0.0001873181,0.0001528287,0.000001421245,0.00000389733,0.02972187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956603,0.0008438795,0.002723612,0.0000494443,0.00009989319,0.000006323009,6.409888e-8,0.000007328038,0.0006091511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02911272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3465365,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110703196","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2014.08.005","title":"A characterization of exact non-atomic market games","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Characterization (materials science); Mathematics; Banach space; Pure mathematics; Countable set; Discrete mathematics; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01564100168352522,"gpt":0.2033828813028923,"spread":0.1877418796193671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002595575,0.0001214709,0.0007719976,0.0002003865,0.00002499754,0.00004109555,0.0002608885,0.0000945851,0.0006051172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003754925,0.0001198434,0.0002164917,0.000058686,0.00005566804,0.0002432439,0.00002967455,0.0001339087,0.0001734558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005351784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001988759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001222155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.179376e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981,0.00003102645,0.001560559,0.0001256584,0.00002493456,0.0001577667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974383,0.0002316038,0.001967319,0.0002272976,0.00004592261,0.00008951785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001317061,0.0003290455,0.006327026,0.0005069081,0.0002091448,0.000001629533,0.0009760162,0.00006968363,0.002432508,0.9869094,0.0002982099,0.00180875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002121486,0.0005207922,0.01785134,0.0004443821,0.00005145492,0.0002006918,0.0001771226,0.06140801,0.005095475,0.8981737,0.01343087,0.0005245957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9538758,0.00002549245,0.02647946,0.0001820548,0.0003189142,0.00008367177,0.00001948343,0.0000055421,0.01900959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979181,0.00005263753,0.001186706,0.00007145088,0.0002190981,0.000001741838,0.000001330468,0.00002191161,0.0005270439],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0887356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6625609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910907529","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.10.003","title":"The consumption–investment decision of a prospect theory household: A two-period model with an endogenous second period reference level","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Period (music); Economics; Consumption (sociology); Investment (military); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09615015839859035,"gpt":0.2428035848785735,"spread":0.1466534264799831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002564732,0.0002604238,0.0009302534,0.0001826447,0.0001500378,0.0002169238,0.0006012097,0.0001217318,0.0006262205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001275904,0.0001980611,0.0002104106,0.00005186115,0.0002210031,0.0005201632,0.00008615164,0.0003271163,0.0002036683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002645859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002013413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000258754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003512746,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975069,0.00003336396,0.001719174,0.0003184794,0.00006308544,0.0003589636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970232,0.0003795638,0.001647658,0.0006702701,0.00008249514,0.0001968453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009496334,0.0004179749,0.002925433,0.0001414148,0.0002595873,0.000008067558,0.001725978,0.01254249,0.0000922085,0.978703,0.00005220869,0.002182001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003086176,0.0008768844,0.0008168346,0.0001353169,0.00005307291,0.0006715028,0.0006203302,0.07733282,0.0002266899,0.9141848,0.001495755,0.0004997901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9589084,0.0002343453,0.00902977,0.00008762313,0.0001762345,0.000338629,0.0001154887,0.00001161095,0.03109795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718586,0.0003489436,0.02708886,0.000131034,0.00006495801,0.00001014963,0.000002422408,0.00005927457,0.0004358185],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06479034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8076698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284991771","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2022.102742","title":"Insurance with heterogeneous preferences","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Actua; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Risk aversion (psychology); Economics; Monopolistic competition; Actuarial science; Expected utility hypothesis; Insurance premium; Piecewise linear function; Insurance policy; Auto insurance risk selection; Econometrics; Piecewise; Microeconomics; Key person insurance; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02670822810801702,"gpt":0.2027981503344224,"spread":0.1760899222264054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007290696,0.0001197614,0.0004955948,0.0001627858,0.000135174,0.00005022646,0.0003809197,0.00002832561,0.0007726114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004063948,0.0001127185,0.000139601,0.0001077172,0.00004996901,0.0002048776,0.0000882924,0.0002402417,0.0001117845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001358247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003482039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004165534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000267322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986771,0.00001229661,0.0008975792,0.0001592585,0.0000509898,0.000202827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986985,0.00005302625,0.0009516953,0.0001985839,0.00003099152,0.00006715251],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003302795,0.0006830569,0.02594464,0.000107908,0.0002820013,0.00008038228,0.001108052,0.02808644,0.0000032857,0.9362383,0.000790203,0.006345455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001584174,0.001382027,0.008580883,0.00003278891,0.00002052905,0.0004524387,0.0003802398,0.002061554,0.00006924581,0.8936566,0.09131381,0.0004657441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746334,0.0006298997,0.004556049,0.0003797461,0.0003039557,0.0001274548,0.00006126707,0.000008712328,0.01929954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968355,0.000237682,0.002272883,0.0002706026,0.00009282464,0.00001599385,0.000001020598,0.00001933352,0.0002541125],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09052361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8459553,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393537273","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2024.102980","title":"The reciprocity set","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Reciprocal; Distributive justice; Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Distributive property; Computer science; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Economic Justice; Mathematics; Social psychology; Psychology; Pure mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06116704158976148,"gpt":0.3670777470063868,"spread":0.3059107054166253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001729809,0.00007017711,0.0001850843,0.00003388271,0.000335091,0.0003111912,0.0002868429,0.00005057596,0.0001252935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002398698,0.00004674098,0.0001608359,0.00004714669,0.0003150521,0.0002709814,0.00005172471,0.0001839518,0.0001796599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003122055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001813989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001178987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006546907,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991481,0.00004056325,0.0004745179,0.00007442626,0.00008169519,0.0001807298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989517,0.000673506,0.0001415828,0.00008899927,0.00004620201,0.00009796067],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001441637,0.00003453093,0.00009711504,0.00001629288,0.00008330319,0.000008965034,0.009280773,0.000008999335,0.00003471277,0.9738002,0.006630464,0.009990226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001404444,0.00008725676,0.00004193646,0.0000805892,0.00004952378,0.00004155529,0.01453523,0.0004034409,0.0003698082,0.6265627,0.3575319,0.0001556547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.870999,0.002437969,0.0002591171,0.01506238,0.001759148,0.0001690596,0.000006397697,0.00003652234,0.1092704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922639,0.003026142,0.001895153,0.0001469696,0.0006956566,0.000005897028,1.801398e-7,0.00001851526,0.001947579],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3509014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3000824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981826574","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2010.05.004","title":"Options and efficiency in spaces of bounded claims","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Stochastic processes and financial applications","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bounded function; Separable space; Space (punctuation); Injective function; Mathematics; Duality (order theory); Mathematical economics; Norm (philosophy); State space; Pure mathematics; Function (biology); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Statistics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01904268718101828,"gpt":0.2309925896962708,"spread":0.2119499025152525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005861393,0.00007000711,0.0003806608,0.00017772,0.00002932717,0.00003295986,0.0001597064,0.00007677438,0.00006784107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002428449,0.0000705209,0.00006819882,0.00009930141,0.0001167044,0.0001321932,0.00003053429,0.0001982824,0.00002342373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001980172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003747034,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006473039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001464393,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989027,0.000001298823,0.000867401,0.0001008104,0.00001586314,0.0001118971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990375,0.0001331187,0.0006046241,0.0001237618,0.00003635463,0.00006463414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006185366,0.0001327402,0.0007385298,0.00003071212,0.000007323152,3.838999e-7,0.0001842896,0.00002756988,0.0000694522,0.998458,0.000006461085,0.0003382989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003296052,0.0000574926,0.003495587,0.0000167754,0.000004892132,0.00003663279,0.00007531638,0.003419851,0.00006279624,0.9917267,0.0006993736,0.00007495817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8752875,0.000263466,0.1202212,0.0006529285,0.0001237211,0.00007776073,0.00001717415,0.000002413189,0.003353735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976823,0.0001391793,0.02291412,0.0000284009,0.00006131517,0.000004002425,3.093031e-7,0.0000080155,0.00002171399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1015354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2875759,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003353436","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2020.01.005","title":"Acyclicity, anonymity, and prefilters","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Anonymity; Pareto principle; Mathematical economics; Social choice theory; Pareto efficiency; Population; Class (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Property (philosophy); Finite set; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05804514265662339,"gpt":0.216264277127635,"spread":0.1582191344710116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009382738,0.000108369,0.0005661696,0.00006948868,0.0000352638,0.00008241385,0.0002008203,0.0000702969,0.0002246368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004368871,0.0001071665,0.0001306137,0.00004641197,0.00006424922,0.0002396744,0.00007284534,0.0001819696,0.0002505311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002984056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001218321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001116792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.497717e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986786,0.00001631545,0.0009967801,0.0001411997,0.00001890431,0.000148263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987475,0.0001743653,0.0007545333,0.00009579642,0.00001923676,0.0002086015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006723499,0.00009577504,0.006128975,0.0002367579,0.0001372858,0.000009230289,0.001368532,0.0001153527,0.00006728891,0.9902365,0.000772992,0.0007641059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001449487,0.0004289477,0.00174632,0.00008125281,0.00002837954,0.0002603068,0.000366429,0.01145199,0.0003106103,0.971639,0.01188426,0.0003529567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9699885,0.0002766434,0.01003434,0.003401946,0.0001632634,0.00008451999,0.00001605241,0.00001156331,0.01602321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965531,0.00009067875,0.002298241,0.0007088972,0.0002483655,8.557355e-7,2.807457e-7,0.00001685582,0.00008268385],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02656468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4370123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994622582","doi":"10.1016/s0304-4068(01)00060-x","title":"Rank-dependent preferences without ranking axioms","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical economics; Weighting; Rank (graph theory); Dual (grammatical number); Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Outcome (game theory); Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematics; Axiomatic system; Property (philosophy); Computer science; Decision theory; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1646279754761701,"gpt":0.3913393237749928,"spread":0.2267113482988227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006095198,0.0002277423,0.0009670762,0.0004172075,0.0001225429,0.0006837117,0.001397019,0.0001537828,0.002165664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002403258,0.0001533251,0.0004215789,0.0001885084,0.0001347514,0.0008171327,0.0001658547,0.000366501,0.0009818341],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000125876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001630164,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002687975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001143677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99604,0.0001042121,0.002567468,0.000329665,0.0006326429,0.0003259714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952081,0.001946124,0.001646308,0.0005577355,0.0003521529,0.0002895967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000510342,0.0006620673,0.008892913,0.00001329818,0.0001228633,0.0001149101,0.001196213,0.003466454,0.0001541894,0.01220844,0.001322692,0.9713356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001042923,0.0002122656,0.0007260292,0.00009115093,0.0000605175,0.001136814,0.001045779,0.006195404,0.0001685499,0.9823877,0.00666998,0.0002629407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9655909,0.00007839949,0.02225492,0.0007737049,0.0008228963,0.000107698,0.000004943168,0.00001489298,0.01035168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920705,0.0001496847,0.006657138,0.0002072272,0.000305475,0.000001934809,3.018283e-7,0.00002182886,0.0005859171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9710727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124610736","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.02.002","title":"Bargaining with learning","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Complete information; Imperfect; Simple (philosophy)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05566783136835925,"gpt":0.3295521214434817,"spread":0.2738842900751224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002390718,0.00005661154,0.0002488265,0.00009422677,0.00005231083,0.0001021777,0.0003013974,0.00003121592,0.001905037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006348988,0.00003444833,0.00008345918,0.0001029329,0.00004434746,0.0002872967,0.00002919157,0.0001953767,0.00162945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002283091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005020521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":4.432039e-8,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.922123e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989877,0.00004179287,0.0006107441,0.00009394567,0.0001783754,0.00008739978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977639,0.001226849,0.0006164759,0.0001743959,0.0001348538,0.0000835224],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000808678,0.00007622761,0.002741292,0.000004423499,0.00004358057,0.000002446375,0.0006342663,0.02536469,0.0001638011,0.9577153,0.0003402471,0.01283291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003798358,0.00019712,0.0003135763,0.00002498736,0.00001219884,0.0002792537,0.002946109,0.007806167,0.0003215137,0.9696975,0.01793457,0.00008710691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8776622,0.00000847408,0.07054169,0.0005162577,0.00006120274,0.00004679602,3.835612e-7,0.000005667013,0.05115734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889688,0.000004660888,0.00833941,0.00009627644,0.00007321632,6.84911e-7,7.505172e-8,0.000006856027,0.002510055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1113066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366490424","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2023.102847","title":"Level-<mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\" id=\"d1e208\" altimg=\"si394.svg\"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math> predatory trading","year":2023,"lang":"lv","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Predation; Arbitrage; Volatility (finance); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Biology; Economics; Ecology; Financial economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04334318530934053,"gpt":0.2411329660429397,"spread":0.1977897807335992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002468321,0.000512292,0.0009024826,0.000397249,0.0004383457,0.0007125563,0.0008941068,0.0007234961,0.0004168149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000839178,0.0006320538,0.0009014176,0.0002936033,0.0004159487,0.001235488,0.000373736,0.0009115193,0.00320062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001121545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004718678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004130318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002461573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954704,0.00004762253,0.002728173,0.0006157773,0.000216996,0.0009209993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954819,0.0007353472,0.002561094,0.0007208108,0.00006545614,0.0004353934],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001647181,0.0002916807,0.00004698102,0.0008500855,0.0005033239,0.0001346863,0.000804116,0.0007663936,0.00002897427,0.9929317,0.002566904,0.0009104853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001157658,0.00075079,0.0008904245,0.0006579403,0.0002160607,0.000303918,0.00101173,0.8505763,0.0002735851,0.1303546,0.01311321,0.0006938036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846731,0.0007641426,0.000692709,0.00105787,0.002158756,0.00009780368,0.0005370821,0.00005158862,0.009966942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897233,0.003890406,0.003423205,0.000691885,0.001447556,0.00004947347,0.00006590928,0.0001998206,0.0005084792],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8625771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904656709","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2018.11.002","title":"The finite horizon, undiscounted, durable goods monopoly problem with finitely many consumers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Monopoly; Discounting; Durable good; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Horizon; Nash equilibrium; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01540717331565566,"gpt":0.204786577977549,"spread":0.1893794046618934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007513466,0.0002057711,0.0003766374,0.0001208789,0.0002708152,0.001570762,0.0004381965,0.00006953598,0.0001771441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001337554,0.0001243563,0.0001346339,0.0001128898,0.0003117871,0.003384871,0.0001020971,0.0002062666,0.0006951215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006812445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007903432,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001212491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006868049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985571,0.000001503432,0.0008334045,0.0001461561,0.0001026708,0.0003591778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983369,0.0002718013,0.000938032,0.0002358624,0.0001724314,0.0000450036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005049139,0.0002001251,0.0008445575,0.0001799623,0.0003676446,0.00001620177,0.00008485976,0.0005568198,0.000009742707,0.9812744,0.005635617,0.01032521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001778536,0.0004495063,0.000209793,0.0002369962,0.000191062,0.0001581643,0.002599917,0.02850322,0.00007237749,0.8204831,0.1447569,0.0005604194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8615653,0.00004036009,0.002368324,0.001161814,0.0003477196,0.0001861826,0.000003501046,0.00002250787,0.1343043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946486,0.00008488813,0.002650519,0.0008000372,0.001032114,0.000005556155,0.000002793169,0.00005429026,0.0007211986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1607912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281629502","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2022.102728","title":"General competing mechanism games with strategy-proof punishment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Microeconomics; Economics; Mechanism design; Mathematical economics; Complete information; Profit (economics); Monopoly; Ex-ante; Class (philosophy); Incentive; Mechanism (biology); Incentive compatibility; Private information retrieval; Strategic dominance; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07034911560487102,"gpt":0.3248506729709161,"spread":0.2545015573660451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033676,0.00008823608,0.0003043629,0.0001174192,0.000252327,0.000142919,0.0005747784,0.00002111498,0.003022671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001576702,0.00006059514,0.0001190176,0.0001387815,0.00006531959,0.0001998965,0.0001282878,0.0002521107,0.00005203712],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008376082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001085865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":3.14059e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.133304e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983411,0.0001122491,0.0008924607,0.0001448897,0.0003771792,0.0001320892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980795,0.0005551223,0.0008821115,0.000250674,0.00011619,0.0001163642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004892271,0.0001719298,0.00002504322,0.000003282262,0.00003488457,0.000006016287,0.0003521424,0.02982182,0.0001501706,0.9643576,0.000546741,0.004481512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003038925,0.0002421085,0.00003002083,0.000005174616,0.00001731568,0.000513078,0.00497538,0.0127299,0.0009717206,0.9741104,0.006013451,0.00008760634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.892698,0.0000172928,0.0975251,0.002278881,0.0001190393,0.0001131132,0.00001042896,0.00000728977,0.007230853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858679,0.000004121247,0.01256765,0.0002429281,0.0001217446,0.00001153929,5.267486e-7,0.00001001094,0.001173618],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09316987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394008684","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2024.102983","title":"Smallest quasi-transitive extensions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Advanced Algebra and Logic","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Transitive closure; Extension (predicate logic); Closure (psychology); Mathematics; Context (archaeology); Operator (biology); Property (philosophy); Path (computing); Mathematical economics; Pure mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Epistemology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01851085344329724,"gpt":0.2488456460451468,"spread":0.2303347926018496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003476979,0.0000906049,0.000237741,0.00009135266,0.00003722319,0.0001390151,0.0003691932,0.00004441544,0.00006883743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007501487,0.0000661982,0.0001649163,0.00008225611,0.00004121453,0.0004049918,0.00005630613,0.0002125537,0.0001557693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004625029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000986524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":1.073797e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.805109e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999217,0.00001644314,0.0004304723,0.0001240176,0.0000686304,0.0001434377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991521,0.0004048212,0.00009823636,0.0001694835,0.00005378248,0.0001215432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003073183,0.0000591748,0.000001501156,0.00002619444,0.00003161881,0.0001191115,0.0004174371,0.0002722461,0.00009419656,0.9869159,0.0002236503,0.01183585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012238,0.0001557173,0.00004184992,0.0001181524,0.00001641397,0.001053023,0.00008945799,0.08583152,0.0002131839,0.910096,0.002155469,0.0001068449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04775184,0.0003635771,0.9453529,0.003008254,0.0004032628,0.00004016057,0.000001206816,0.00003096238,0.003047903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8676936,0.0001616732,0.1314353,0.0003710945,0.0001913369,0.000001071579,1.418959e-7,0.000009936667,0.0001358659],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8199418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2699484,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767914980","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2017.09.004","title":"Sticky prices in a dynamic network economy: A family of counterexamples","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Discrete mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0406645709782539,"gpt":0.2466573278964295,"spread":0.2059927569181756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001863008,0.0001915068,0.001218646,0.0001902069,0.00009065218,0.0001773883,0.0008335864,0.0001330612,0.0002134732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000291803,0.0002022119,0.0002802193,0.00002863319,0.0002016794,0.000705917,0.000150127,0.0002291018,0.00007741465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002043692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008767901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003248841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005068629,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972048,0.000008015269,0.002210637,0.0002292849,0.00001818092,0.0003290811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955664,0.0002648643,0.003410919,0.0005874093,0.00005118799,0.0001191852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007089115,0.0001334141,0.004226581,0.0001151637,0.0001236373,0.000005203358,0.0003613443,0.003102751,0.000004543591,0.99121,0.0001252168,0.0005212139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001048633,0.000127493,0.007369463,0.0001321486,0.00001520141,0.00002840975,0.0002050904,0.02178441,0.00001040512,0.9643448,0.004713758,0.0002201747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9404254,0.0009494462,0.01297393,0.0005353009,0.0004582811,0.0001625066,0.00005914122,0.000004870144,0.04443112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902517,0.0006934556,0.008609307,0.0001185522,0.0001583301,0.00000459417,0.000001072937,0.00003085742,0.0001320975],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04982633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8245963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407319896","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103096","title":"Pareto efficiency and financial fairness under limited expected loss constraint","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université Laval","keywords":"Pareto principle; Economics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Microeconomics; Pareto optimal; Pareto efficiency; Multi-objective optimization; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Operations management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02029017661486997,"gpt":0.2203485810169114,"spread":0.2000584044020414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008421492,0.0001906739,0.0008209894,0.0002814271,0.00008890051,0.0001169188,0.0002786066,0.0001638953,0.000236854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003743657,0.0001963537,0.0001807194,0.0001001332,0.0002512491,0.0002448529,0.00009501666,0.0002419935,0.000049863],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001602569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001151064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003881703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003863627,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979347,0.00001344377,0.001502254,0.0002533389,0.00001891471,0.0002773348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985472,0.0002872558,0.0007240417,0.0002427268,0.00006264839,0.0001361187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004358738,0.0001199245,0.0006749757,0.00005747241,0.00006882221,0.000004652388,0.0002931488,0.0006390114,0.000004765015,0.9973384,0.0002090863,0.0005461471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001194867,0.00009270327,0.001011022,0.00007647437,0.00002320699,0.00008427671,0.0004768485,0.004990965,0.00007522217,0.9884754,0.003264944,0.0002340176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8586845,0.000757974,0.1237841,0.001755755,0.0005391697,0.0001401163,0.00004492066,0.00001448353,0.01427901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967061,0.0003570177,0.001961245,0.0005121863,0.0001232686,0.000004580833,0.000001370792,0.00001709598,0.0003170881],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1380216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.800707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387497916","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2023.102909","title":"A dual approach to agency problems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Mathematical optimization; Constraint (computer-aided design); Uniqueness; Principal–agent problem; Convex optimization; Regular polygon; Simple (philosophy); Agency (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06479482765627677,"gpt":0.2323121892705191,"spread":0.1675173616142424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002381821,0.0001822943,0.001059379,0.0004953973,0.00008860989,0.0001546936,0.0004388207,0.0001556525,0.0002337642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003278598,0.0002220541,0.0003654248,0.0002669361,0.00008182329,0.0003541918,0.0001162574,0.0002173745,0.004802719],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002133642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000563201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001404992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000031375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969104,0.00001622033,0.002260718,0.0003175396,0.00004324911,0.0004519009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980215,0.0001317934,0.001093838,0.000346475,0.00005478181,0.0003515461],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002199416,0.0002463586,0.0008359565,0.0001653647,0.0001751664,0.000007434564,0.002182128,0.00368122,0.00001327846,0.9845768,0.007441361,0.0006528947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007480938,0.0001903716,0.001153515,0.00005463885,0.00001531228,0.00012618,0.0002827579,0.01018945,0.00002285509,0.9598581,0.02697547,0.0003832811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6984243,0.0002588069,0.01584135,0.001594325,0.001511205,0.0005494538,0.00009343767,0.00007153832,0.2816556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917812,0.0003311402,0.004816425,0.0004358596,0.00115942,0.00002965652,0.000005848097,0.00007886855,0.001361573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2933569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067563274","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2011.07.006","title":"Cardinal versus ordinal criteria in choice under risk with disconnected utility ranges","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Irrational number; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematics; Range (aeronautics); Subjective expected utility; Outcome (game theory); Certainty; Expected value; Preference; Function (biology); Econometrics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.28101133384067,"gpt":0.4006125456551103,"spread":0.1196012118144403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003814197,0.0002265003,0.0009010648,0.0003543176,0.00007735048,0.0002449165,0.0008386258,0.0001298039,0.001809531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002538905,0.000147394,0.0002718524,0.0002339499,0.0002104149,0.0007253569,0.0001201127,0.0004439185,0.0001525029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001472133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001654736,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002956617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001865934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971166,0.00017895,0.001715286,0.0003490192,0.0003309425,0.0003091939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950343,0.002776633,0.001140592,0.0005415963,0.0002617062,0.0002451809],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02272162,0.006538264,0.1241631,0.00007634786,0.0008193676,0.0006104299,0.006517441,0.002538129,0.00009857306,0.01850136,0.005090123,0.8123252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006564253,0.001965387,0.1557764,0.0001749792,0.0002578977,0.000511391,0.003909972,0.01283616,0.0002088329,0.8149099,0.002236146,0.0006487154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897085,0.00002589105,0.003100307,0.0002096809,0.0006197969,0.0001234378,0.00002056296,0.0000120947,0.006179693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818767,0.00002101648,0.01786998,0.00003731084,0.0001333327,0.000003286164,4.137122e-7,0.00001916013,0.00003874286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8116766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410119623","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103132","title":"Return expectations across the wealth distribution","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"Renmin University of China","keywords":"Economics; Distribution (mathematics); Distribution of wealth; Econometrics; Wealth distribution; Financial economics; Mathematics; Inequality; Mathematical analysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04898626035842912,"gpt":0.2788538856412152,"spread":0.229867625282786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001236062,0.0001273802,0.0004894006,0.00007836671,0.0001888706,0.0001293895,0.0003736313,0.0000920739,0.000258737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042425,0.0001042168,0.0002621183,0.00009561751,0.0001074261,0.0003081889,0.00005327367,0.0002690756,0.0003153234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002341153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004374761,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001127459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000627533,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981628,0.00001701463,0.001377872,0.0001411521,0.00001687144,0.0002842652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983954,0.000308939,0.0008791129,0.0003005632,0.00002312791,0.00009288407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005902455,0.00018257,0.002678924,0.00007282961,0.0002377612,0.000002175982,0.00217021,0.002067171,0.000003278087,0.9766705,0.01449344,0.001362099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008519875,0.00008695731,0.003526224,0.00005158957,0.00002549526,0.0000743911,0.001467891,0.039906,0.0000914625,0.9076025,0.04611331,0.0002021791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9421567,0.000743627,0.03289171,0.0115808,0.000687397,0.0001637768,0.0002375537,0.00001138156,0.011527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973909,0.0002269473,0.0006970193,0.0006480704,0.0001987738,0.000004910522,0.000006475656,0.00001055989,0.0008163942],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06906801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4249837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411868961","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103152","title":"Revealed preference axioms for endogenous consideration set formation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Mathematical economics; Revealed preference; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4683025243735864,"gpt":0.4363493097020796,"spread":0.03195321467150675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005362588,0.0001311873,0.0005744356,0.0004331519,0.0001313992,0.0005216458,0.0005716271,0.000103404,0.0002789665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01295073,0.00009634199,0.0002374714,0.0001617757,0.00005242783,0.0008028313,0.00008744893,0.0001400089,0.00009278173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001344233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001989717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":3.591512e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003871112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968601,0.0001080114,0.002326089,0.0001913539,0.0003290793,0.0001853848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918454,0.00567737,0.001235356,0.0003752312,0.0007696339,0.00009703301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001180357,0.0005608757,0.000220425,0.0003845285,0.0002548925,0.00003232506,0.005812529,0.006502712,0.008702674,0.6998709,0.03978831,0.2366895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001116979,0.0001014059,0.0001233239,0.000123489,0.00003531589,0.000211717,0.0007477822,0.1056056,0.002616308,0.8847431,0.004464083,0.0001108418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3433444,0.00004821969,0.6518118,0.001246039,0.0004752666,0.000335294,0.0000200648,0.000008056481,0.002710868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9376063,0.00002266259,0.06138571,0.0004582593,0.0001037522,0.0000104681,0.000001596396,0.000009049489,0.0004022568],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5942618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402254436","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2026.103246","title":"Equity Auctions with Bidder Moral Hazard","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Moral hazard; Common value auction; Equity (law); Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Incentive; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05095001067397433,"gpt":0.2561915318031489,"spread":0.2052415211291746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003771051,0.0002288771,0.0005376744,0.0001706007,0.0000395329,0.0004914727,0.0003615368,0.0001420614,0.0001890907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003927174,0.0001737708,0.0002354175,0.00009583824,0.00007214549,0.0004023664,0.0005953959,0.0007416283,0.0004370684],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001178737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000181059,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006956725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002707711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99883,0.000002376288,0.0006566377,0.0001744834,0.0001428323,0.0001936286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986758,0.00002921246,0.0008694352,0.0002495262,0.000153967,0.00002209763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002383401,0.0005607976,0.002920661,0.008955816,0.00107182,0.000360414,0.0001297698,0.06264096,0.00001368854,0.7650729,0.1469349,0.01110001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003050387,0.0000209971,0.00119889,0.0008646711,0.0003361824,0.00007937183,0.00003524142,0.02009309,0.000007530404,0.9579268,0.01883103,0.0003011363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9339061,0.0004100396,0.007604774,0.00573405,0.002287711,0.0002541034,0.00003350255,0.00007333684,0.04969642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988538,0.0002509638,0.00432675,0.000883165,0.004774295,0.000012341,0.000005746821,0.00009478482,0.00111401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1928539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7086167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416958545","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103209","title":"The pipeline externalities problem","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Shapley value; Pipeline (software); Shadow price; Core (optical fiber); Transferable utility; Cooperative game theory; Externality; Set (abstract data type); Production (economics); Bellman equation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06407532836068425,"gpt":0.372199913233345,"spread":0.3081245848726608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00510651,0.00006307045,0.0002311019,0.00007858131,0.0001484933,0.0002882704,0.0008452403,0.00003181045,0.0002012007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001713142,0.00003217898,0.0001535839,0.0001177358,0.0001533995,0.0001458793,0.0000794732,0.0001440627,0.000195435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002761686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009258277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.021185e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001630704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984517,0.00006568515,0.001131588,0.0000805259,0.0001596417,0.0001108452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947876,0.004136241,0.0004953714,0.0003154851,0.0002085827,0.00005670049],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002042538,0.00003807441,0.00003065238,0.000003775402,0.00001486736,4.370829e-7,0.0001137274,0.0001676572,0.00001957903,0.9635223,0.007256899,0.02881166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001184046,0.0000130795,0.00005268204,0.00002057916,0.00001097567,0.00002613993,0.0007093652,0.001903743,0.0002338061,0.9055493,0.09133282,0.00002911101],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4570949,0.0004282342,0.314844,0.04004276,0.0004835306,0.0002336704,0.000007154219,0.00001399189,0.1868518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9405518,0.0001714151,0.0128942,0.0008393461,0.0002429306,0.000008794883,1.180089e-7,0.000008791655,0.04528266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4834569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2779799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963124583","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.07.002","title":"Choice on the simplex domain","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Rationalizability; Axiom; Monotonic function; Mathematics; Simplex; Preference; Axiom of choice; Choice function; Mathematical economics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Revealed preference; Combinatorics; Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Econometrics; Nash equilibrium; Statistics; Set theory","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0392807111881346,"gpt":0.226416320050177,"spread":0.1871356088620424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002624068,0.0001210336,0.0005144822,0.0001008049,0.00004843739,0.00008128778,0.0004127782,0.00007579816,0.001969934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004046877,0.00008753626,0.0002350623,0.00005689129,0.00004504212,0.0001397627,0.00003440012,0.0002645255,0.00441543],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008327595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001704007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000149809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.160716e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998562,0.00003089815,0.001050764,0.0001322111,0.00002900579,0.0001950915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997565,0.001014957,0.000984835,0.0003330479,0.00002370295,0.00007843749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000183153,0.00006640517,0.0009975227,0.00003052517,0.00005723702,9.441721e-7,0.0002384584,0.0002135433,0.000009922294,0.9976142,0.0006578385,0.00009510915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004749602,0.0001705228,0.0006622399,0.00006012594,0.000004926494,0.00004816836,0.0002533906,0.001156922,0.00005899906,0.9288117,0.06815921,0.0001388902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9142863,0.00006573141,0.0007843543,0.002164884,0.0004464966,0.0001384584,0.00001060756,0.000006583979,0.08209659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972522,0.00001494976,0.0004774435,0.0006915767,0.0002791882,0.000002026936,2.889998e-7,0.00002122835,0.001261143],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08296587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416757703","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103205","title":"Optimal contracts under general mixed constraints: Continuity, structure, and applications","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Schedule; Budget constraint; Constraint (computer-aided design); Class (philosophy); Adverse selection; Optimal control; Selection (genetic algorithm); Principal (computer security); Quality (philosophy)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03630517424639317,"gpt":0.3428790306051539,"spread":0.3065738563587607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00143265,0.0001065206,0.0003994178,0.000172027,0.0001271874,0.0002278352,0.0003930531,0.00009086721,0.0004499784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007461012,0.00008003948,0.000114589,0.0001511515,0.0004301441,0.000231843,0.00008032702,0.0002003641,0.00003871665],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003966943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001281742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.045834e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001443373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998412,0.00006145474,0.001074194,0.0001748201,0.0001463792,0.0001312031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970318,0.001514615,0.0007962568,0.0002606279,0.0002583894,0.0001383086],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001732378,0.00006010412,0.00007310128,0.000004494287,0.00004801635,4.644607e-7,0.00003915681,0.001397324,0.0002229613,0.9771591,0.0007028178,0.02027513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004933855,0.00001950699,0.001371521,0.00001200886,0.00004055843,0.0001398473,0.0006121069,0.001540125,0.0009252541,0.9835731,0.0111931,0.00007943861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5447564,0.00006246859,0.4468451,0.001586722,0.0001199829,0.0001741142,0.00002978164,0.000007294869,0.006418174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819675,0.00002647898,0.01652784,0.0005076154,0.0001417682,0.000007049099,8.721562e-7,0.00000589509,0.0008149931],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4372111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4926948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414482117","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103181","title":"Prudence and higher-order risk attitudes in the rank-dependent utility model","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Actua; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Weighting; Prudence; Generality; Stochastic dominance; Consistency (knowledge bases); Differentiable function; Expected utility hypothesis; Probability measure; Function (biology); Monotonic function","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1213356421432071,"gpt":0.4065820069671549,"spread":0.2852463648239478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008699981,0.0001437309,0.0005542457,0.0002392814,0.00009956686,0.0004472,0.001052001,0.0001078654,0.000158879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002496962,0.00008341336,0.0001535513,0.0001934834,0.000172903,0.0004027802,0.0001807387,0.0004272547,0.00004462791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000729406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000164884,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004713038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003263797,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974977,0.0001487858,0.001595392,0.0002613166,0.0003120826,0.0001846693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952536,0.003312241,0.0006788183,0.0004970175,0.0001777231,0.00008066409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004871665,0.001813045,0.06245964,0.00006417913,0.0001180804,0.00005147038,0.002121061,0.0272835,0.00002966904,0.1168033,0.005171866,0.783597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004997876,0.00004089091,0.01583478,0.00005583493,0.00003517207,0.00003981378,0.0003335211,0.05135192,0.00001198039,0.9309202,0.0007834941,0.00009262923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775593,0.0001482554,0.01557077,0.00221766,0.0002452803,0.0001214611,0.000009242923,0.000004000521,0.004124073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911938,0.000184041,0.007914367,0.0004089757,0.0000347676,0.000002638264,8.736802e-8,0.000005689732,0.0002556157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8141168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.431236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3054332779","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2021.102617","title":"Distance-based social index numbers: A unifying approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Fractionalization; Parameterized complexity; Index (typography); Inequality; Partition (number theory); Econometrics; Class (philosophy); Population; Mathematics; Social class; Point (geometry); Diversity (politics); Mathematical economics; Economics; Computer science; Sociology; Demography; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence; Ethnic group","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07275073042216591,"gpt":0.3258526927196353,"spread":0.2531019622974694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003308247,0.0002460071,0.001009186,0.0001027092,0.0003290187,0.0004989707,0.000707253,0.0005629695,0.0003744624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007141114,0.0002350868,0.0006968601,0.00009278094,0.0003442645,0.0002625726,0.0002074645,0.001137468,0.00001026963],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009045843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001964779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001043834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001301166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973337,0.0003340858,0.001300689,0.0002526822,0.0003984511,0.0003803974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973482,0.0003944365,0.001458977,0.0002552321,0.0003161653,0.00022693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003237184,0.002894114,0.003404798,0.003819069,0.0009691561,0.00007728098,0.09195264,0.005694729,0.000005646956,0.8821729,0.004084307,0.004601677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002863152,0.0001096343,0.001222177,0.001342307,0.0005260112,0.00003834811,0.07983657,0.03145716,0.00004360522,0.8535988,0.02711816,0.001844103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.561842,0.0002427577,0.2395391,0.004332556,0.002134487,0.0004736639,0.00004216475,0.00005129838,0.191342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830166,0.0001410303,0.01415976,0.0004509025,0.0019449,0.000007188522,0.000009165666,0.0000337599,0.0002366641],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4211747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9586562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}