{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":4,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"c09c2ab7b23a","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Media Law"}},"results":[{"id":"W3132745438","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2021.1884947","title":"The ‘right to be forgotten’ beyond the EU: an analysis of wider G20 regulatory action and potential next steps","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Media Law","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Enforcement; Convention; Data Protection Act 1998; Right to be forgotten; Political science; Phenomenon; General Data Protection Regulation; Legislation; The Internet; Action (physics); Business; International trade; Law and economics; Internet privacy; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"David Erdos","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02934749734128902,"gpt":0.3057488496996275,"spread":0.2764013523583385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001838509,0.00006461177,0.0001848744,0.0000807847,0.0006813135,0.0001730104,0.0003316506,0.00007679574,0.00007191689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000701427,0.00003819865,0.0001261254,0.000458433,0.0002704446,0.0006409318,0.00008783922,0.0002022825,7.527743e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005506688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001536827,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005638064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02538768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983427,0.0004314778,0.0003038626,0.0001063613,0.0006640153,0.0001515636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987009,0.0002994888,0.0002874933,0.0002512641,0.0003096499,0.0001511599],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001565856,0.001101054,0.01359739,0.0001036234,0.005571165,0.000282815,0.1751014,0.0004777661,0.06604434,0.5094677,0.06163644,0.1650505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001277215,0.0003597602,0.1589872,0.00004573007,0.002977981,0.00008266087,0.07024052,0.0004663772,0.01139995,0.04884559,0.7049425,0.000374504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9626033,0.0007198855,0.0002839195,0.03458952,0.001122779,0.00009904728,0.00001270888,0.000006115792,0.0005627534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975446,0.0005879272,0.0002028434,0.0008832054,0.0007162347,0.000001563819,0.000004154345,0.000004654247,0.00005474119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6433061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393142157","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2024.2326278","title":"States' positive obligation to create a favourable environment for participation in public debate: a principle in search of a practical effect?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Media Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Katie Pentney","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03402967509623426,"gpt":0.3747592636142815,"spread":0.3407295885180472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002775971,0.00006138624,0.0001791125,0.0002384808,0.00005060014,0.0000871128,0.00008768216,0.00005487215,0.0000825068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001169748,0.0000538855,0.0000375258,0.0005812093,0.00008888989,0.000549825,0.00001898118,0.0001690725,0.00001041501],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003976086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000301365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002967712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002425447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998332,0.0003954927,0.0004121266,0.000108198,0.0005266758,0.0002255641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983218,0.001260836,0.0001044585,0.00005162352,0.000108654,0.0001526187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000627365,0.0009321127,0.02058216,0.0002210359,0.0001147302,0.0001972537,0.1023865,0.004119726,0.007070411,0.8558694,0.0004607474,0.007418532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0133319,0.006383698,0.3582903,0.003704243,0.0004779168,0.00008721265,0.01299603,0.01860193,0.1626651,0.02812184,0.3939235,0.001416431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9555594,0.00006819039,0.002126718,0.04101518,0.0001892192,0.0006164241,0.000009954269,0.000008772049,0.0004061552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975522,0.00005322438,0.002145556,0.00008117643,0.0000915837,0.00002275358,0.000005566876,0.00001090614,0.0000370492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8277476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2197387,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411106413","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2025.2491806","title":"Defining the boundaries of journalism and news publishers: implications of the Online Safety Act 2023 for the public interest and media freedom","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Media Law","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Journalism; Freedom of the press; News media; Public interest; Political science; Public relations; Media studies; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Beatriz Kira","is_ca":false},{"name":"Judith Townend","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03984848846960129,"gpt":0.3267947865136303,"spread":0.286946298044029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002154229,0.00007007257,0.0001992162,0.00007640728,0.0008411669,0.0004938317,0.0005563598,0.0000753879,0.00003785153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006317032,0.00003181018,0.0001085976,0.0002961582,0.001773516,0.000615476,0.0001060696,0.0002659467,1.133297e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002949828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005189588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004656666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03219471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987182,0.0002129959,0.0005341785,0.00006787031,0.0003340869,0.0001326427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948512,0.003658231,0.0007163535,0.0001794329,0.0005144023,0.00008032587],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000553681,0.00004238286,0.002502538,0.00001474224,0.00007713746,1.479154e-7,0.008055554,0.000002802966,0.0001896827,0.9209974,0.05150471,0.01655753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001239771,0.00005103235,0.04863252,0.00031804,0.0001528345,0.00001404488,0.04237463,0.00007909823,0.0001115223,0.07875396,0.8281927,0.00007982687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1166733,0.01420416,0.001617862,0.8528428,0.005068337,0.0005843944,0.0001417983,0.0000112384,0.008856132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969243,0.001080404,0.0008221687,0.0007545596,0.0003329093,0.000003643301,0.000002380463,0.000004691987,0.00007494027],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.880251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9854652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389485004","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2023.2288395","title":"<i>Hansman v Neufeld</i> : The Supreme Court of Canada protects counterspeech under anti-SLAPP law, but is it even defamatory?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Media Law","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Supreme court; Law; Meaning (existential); Harm; Political science; Reputation; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Hilary Young","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03361363183975289,"gpt":0.2871075647385827,"spread":0.2534939328988298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001542734,0.000107247,0.000260726,0.00005938302,0.0003834204,0.00006406913,0.0005137952,0.000104533,0.0002562854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002862613,0.00007282583,0.0001078787,0.0003031775,0.0003572536,0.0002738452,0.00004423645,0.0002722968,0.00001547803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001426011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001148626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1506105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5571237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973347,0.0002255336,0.0004644103,0.0001061099,0.001567397,0.0003019084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982816,0.0004644326,0.000459971,0.0001832627,0.000416613,0.0001941114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006852505,0.00005873353,0.0002435522,0.00005371021,0.00008979643,0.0001113872,0.02130878,0.0001494922,0.01055075,0.07844925,0.8887003,0.0002156965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001854281,0.0001284003,0.002357488,0.0006047361,0.00008669819,0.00005943395,0.06358339,0.0002418557,0.02417617,0.01835912,0.8881544,0.0003939755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7567357,0.0004244292,0.0001190112,0.1645574,0.004779345,0.0006976742,0.00006342858,0.00005599722,0.07256701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951324,0.0001344054,0.00008820284,0.003373689,0.0004716822,0.000003779004,0.000001399451,0.00001231051,0.0007820768],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4065132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8550456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}