{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":26,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"09f3974acadd","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy"}},"results":[{"id":"W2115457200","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00206.x","title":"Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":336,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Publicity; Deliberation; Politics; Doors; Quality (philosophy); Citation; Neutrality; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Simone Chambers","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08810405537028261,"gpt":0.386122849723591,"spread":0.2980187943533084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004046127,0.0001272606,0.0004325974,0.0001077286,0.0003414571,0.00008660903,0.0003463233,0.0002180336,0.000031201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004426338,0.00008524742,0.0002515709,0.0001553519,0.002846573,0.0004898895,0.00006637108,0.0006463465,0.000005412844],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001470173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005004216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001050942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967575,0.0007823463,0.0009137425,0.0001253493,0.0009738782,0.0004471756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969521,0.001409056,0.0003604288,0.0001640425,0.0005954668,0.0005188759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001453272,0.0001336288,0.0001421275,0.00003334578,0.00003907473,0.000003391827,0.002428794,0.000005478013,0.00004157149,0.9969119,0.00002273923,0.00009259814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001986739,0.0001250722,0.002922323,0.0000509987,0.00004787299,0.000009972703,0.0003839341,0.000002746979,0.0001755889,0.9938064,0.0003911956,0.00009710853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4102329,0.0002941077,0.0008597056,0.4184818,0.0004543875,0.000252548,0.00002775896,0.0000210367,0.1693757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933294,0.0000397342,0.0003363558,0.004056358,0.002209014,0.000001339155,9.543437e-7,0.000008668932,0.00001817941],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5830965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016730913","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00314.x","title":"Live‐in Domestics, Seasonal Workers, and Others Hard to Locate on the Map of Democracy*","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Citation; Democracy; Political science; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Joseph H. Carens","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09047791347116682,"gpt":0.3278057112290845,"spread":0.2373277977579177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001189227,0.0001454697,0.0003435038,0.0001507827,0.0002754274,0.00002222111,0.0003672573,0.0001555956,0.00009308838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00218869,0.0001026767,0.0001501321,0.0001958476,0.001651467,0.0001329097,0.00005174604,0.0006892002,0.00006315902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000159042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003767733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002989004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001224573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975856,0.0003782287,0.0005150019,0.0001511189,0.0007837715,0.0005862639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968812,0.001848942,0.0001414143,0.0001544161,0.0002302033,0.0007437859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001212375,0.0001415031,0.006101336,0.00002130203,0.00002690234,0.0000692325,0.001921535,0.0000187676,0.00001414198,0.990319,0.001205376,0.00003972781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003404032,0.0003111348,0.01759688,0.0002071366,0.00002283007,0.00002137551,0.0006822222,0.00001075662,0.00005271724,0.9789677,0.001657724,0.0001291803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4497159,0.000182569,0.00007699103,0.5011173,0.000409307,0.0002006754,0.00002418233,0.00001180163,0.04826129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910935,0.00002703647,0.0003830801,0.007019803,0.001334504,0.000001292529,2.019291e-7,0.0000129609,0.0001276464],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5413775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6084899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583472199","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12034","title":"On Citizenship, States, and Markets","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Citation; Political science; Law; American political science; Political philosophy; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Ayelet Shachar","is_ca":true},{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03802008124738713,"gpt":0.3237438505211521,"spread":0.285723769273765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001809699,0.0001368946,0.0002982825,0.0001404569,0.0002896394,0.00006665003,0.000240485,0.0001844559,0.0001051131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004233242,0.000113861,0.0001322946,0.0001107472,0.001023224,0.0001310028,0.00003673708,0.0006518221,0.00004205102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001091212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001240396,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005523363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003518604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975338,0.0005753192,0.0004194046,0.0001431111,0.0007042223,0.0006241409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960305,0.00241282,0.0001273067,0.0001354728,0.000224739,0.001069145],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000691196,0.00005645219,0.0001116249,0.00002210522,0.00002205492,0.00001705042,0.0002789897,8.034494e-7,0.00000483923,0.9975191,0.001646466,0.0002514211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004167504,0.0003321671,0.001468017,0.00007839603,0.00002774283,0.00001477505,0.00008846133,0.00001456772,0.00002535056,0.9875711,0.009832962,0.0001297624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09582023,0.00009392686,0.0002499952,0.1391453,0.0007767029,0.00008056853,0.00001432404,0.00003073678,0.7637882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846168,0.00004080062,0.0001900363,0.01104477,0.00400033,6.464396e-7,6.343997e-7,0.00001356581,0.00009237957],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8887966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5067892,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546856543","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2011.00403.x","title":"Colonialism as Structural Injustice: Historical Responsibility and Contemporary Redress*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"New Caledonia Indigenous Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Redress; Colonialism; Politics; Sociology; Economic Justice; Political science; Media studies; Law","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Lu","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0927420900013827,"gpt":0.3476166441489002,"spread":0.2548745541475175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001196211,0.0001535387,0.0004417963,0.0001464184,0.0005860048,0.00003297341,0.0002933302,0.0001639458,0.00009882484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002584668,0.0001282897,0.000142743,0.0001534034,0.001050604,0.0003092136,0.00009497846,0.0004514694,0.00001206642],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008920096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008290436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004841407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001316711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975029,0.0005205605,0.000628838,0.0001894334,0.0006390248,0.0005192261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997909,0.0005157801,0.0002855035,0.0001601771,0.0004678137,0.0006616878],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005882858,0.0001316736,0.007476852,0.00002525881,0.0000592801,0.0002447618,0.01767527,2.137567e-8,0.00004389462,0.9721996,0.001472295,0.00008277807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006706035,0.001141658,0.02596699,0.00004087555,0.00008263669,0.00009627645,0.001867755,5.897038e-7,0.00008766081,0.9592398,0.01059869,0.0002064932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7976156,0.001115436,0.000009152109,0.01702228,0.001201464,0.0002100569,0.00001177885,0.00003183001,0.1827823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965735,0.00002272088,0.0005575843,0.0008240739,0.001757572,0.000001723134,2.004028e-7,0.00001277402,0.0002498716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1989578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7318792,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002183418","doi":"10.1111/1467-9760.00124","title":"Constitutionalizing the Right to Secede","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Weinstock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04843481092712054,"gpt":0.3361267847735683,"spread":0.2876919738464478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005118099,0.00006839691,0.0001471508,0.00006182015,0.0008188651,0.00003875712,0.0002467397,0.00003892999,0.0002043877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007194545,0.00004202504,0.0001261388,0.0002301512,0.001027039,0.0001345911,0.0000389321,0.0001710738,0.0001042279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001481071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003319771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006301875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001533609,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998699,0.00009984944,0.0002697428,0.00006806988,0.0005438799,0.0003194347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989867,0.0002832963,0.00007213616,0.00005600862,0.0003039819,0.0002978272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000171729,0.00003502745,0.001134058,7.837704e-7,0.00002755688,0.00002930148,0.0002743232,0.000005478988,0.00001628948,0.9958051,0.002569523,0.00008538874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008444618,0.0000311623,0.001715566,0.00002479317,0.00001749578,0.00004365218,0.0003250339,2.590102e-7,0.00001062246,0.6465161,0.3511825,0.00004843251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01399421,0.0002928148,0.0006508737,0.2303885,0.0008421276,0.00007862045,0.000004762268,0.00001124262,0.7537369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873604,0.00003302389,0.0001201599,0.00678092,0.00560363,0.000001558376,1.516355e-7,0.000002325452,0.00009779579],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9733662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6298131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525843247","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00383.x","title":"Debate: Feasibility and Socialism*","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Socialism; Politics; Political philosophy; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Pablo Gilabert","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08277732688224,"gpt":0.3780833816609621,"spread":0.2953060547787221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001765066,0.0001279507,0.0003040463,0.00009593759,0.0004234549,0.00007814636,0.000302675,0.0003294569,0.0001597833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004009847,0.0001097911,0.0001810463,0.0001351998,0.002205424,0.0003633467,0.00005550143,0.001261516,0.00002236743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001038557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004385639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002318501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007170782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978508,0.0002669007,0.0004734394,0.0001501201,0.0006410991,0.0006176379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976305,0.0007534255,0.0001443763,0.0001532881,0.0004024633,0.0009159867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002467228,0.0001099984,0.001423218,0.0000174948,0.00001548091,0.00002451938,0.0007003954,3.192776e-8,0.0001553694,0.9971603,0.0002109033,0.0001576629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003334709,0.00009200682,0.004450758,0.00001543841,0.00003548875,0.00003357672,0.0001846722,0.000001593042,0.00008258044,0.9857249,0.008921956,0.0001235677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5133258,0.0001468088,0.00006539666,0.1748618,0.001655695,0.0001393939,0.00002143644,0.00003919433,0.3097444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898362,0.00002183492,0.0005385668,0.003661559,0.00588266,6.907284e-7,3.792635e-7,0.00001118986,0.00004691294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4765104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8125977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2577466458","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12111","title":"Public Reason and Reciprocity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Citation; Politics; Queen (butterfly); Economic Justice; Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Lister","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1468394227665837,"gpt":0.3790521099979908,"spread":0.2322126872314071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001336269,0.00007614795,0.0002011956,0.00005391805,0.0009149468,0.000243721,0.000481765,0.0001024116,0.0000925647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008934948,0.00006216901,0.00009453393,0.00003279921,0.00175934,0.0009640855,0.00007631955,0.0002922476,0.0000207274],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008355852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001763399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001369128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005944843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985909,0.0001974538,0.0002702997,0.00009658965,0.0003677984,0.0004769801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981782,0.0002714703,0.0002101462,0.0002047409,0.0002569747,0.0008784588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001557361,0.00003720759,0.002630766,0.000006999282,0.00001072624,0.00001794987,0.0001501344,8.887257e-9,0.00001942806,0.9959334,0.00009511538,0.001082661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001947801,0.00008517296,0.01740018,0.00003869061,0.00001280088,0.000018446,0.00009691259,0.000001006432,0.00006563852,0.9626017,0.0194098,0.00007493544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1992214,0.0001226505,0.00005252277,0.0857854,0.0003441569,0.00004917005,0.000005451183,0.00001210894,0.7144071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963934,0.0000408336,0.0002290572,0.001175696,0.00201571,5.116715e-7,6.835061e-8,0.000004987254,0.0001396984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.797172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994132,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124854515","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2012.00419.x","title":"Tax Competition and Global Background Justice*","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; German; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Library science; Art history; Social science; History; Law; Art","authors":[{"name":"Peter Dietsch","is_ca":true},{"name":"Thomas Rixen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04558289261917025,"gpt":0.2765457456183039,"spread":0.2309628529991336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002247619,0.00009357218,0.0001535505,0.00007701092,0.00007967581,0.0001009281,0.00008148572,0.00003990903,0.0001566259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001045881,0.00007796416,0.00006001457,0.0001483382,0.0000844622,0.001216928,0.00004855447,0.000123226,0.0001519462],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004795241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001333187,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002044428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000165007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991672,0.00001049222,0.0002795892,0.00006181372,0.0002214681,0.0002594322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993516,0.00003285176,0.0003006074,0.00006248239,0.0001799562,0.00007252091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002212832,0.0000838968,0.01150899,0.00009513691,0.000008917136,0.000005558075,0.000003320431,9.463024e-7,0.00006177168,0.9868771,0.001142823,0.0001893859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001039504,0.00003937302,0.1794433,0.0001115022,0.0002278505,0.0001186326,0.0002178443,0.000159316,0.00002057366,0.7654003,0.05297891,0.0002428508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7984958,0.0003945863,0.001842459,0.0207928,0.00156326,0.00008830539,0.000009624459,0.0000316365,0.1767815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858744,0.000003557903,0.0002423432,0.005310221,0.008533798,4.119454e-7,0.000002224149,0.000006586472,0.00002642779],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2214768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3179286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565334147","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12093","title":"Immigration, Citizenship, and Consent: What is Wrong with Permanent Alienage?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Citation; Immigration; Law; Respondent; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Kieran Oberman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0521453708720397,"gpt":0.3249026986403992,"spread":0.2727573277683595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007357394,0.0001640381,0.0003101453,0.0001235577,0.0003308284,0.0001484243,0.0002158092,0.00017283,0.000120896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004567826,0.00009751412,0.0001221711,0.0001166909,0.001999342,0.000729902,0.0000404392,0.0003108069,0.00003785986],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001743258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003472803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006087033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001613699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976526,0.0002729817,0.0004596656,0.0001843437,0.0008014789,0.0006289322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971541,0.001152543,0.0001714134,0.0001511037,0.0004180364,0.0009528055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006600421,0.00004820907,0.0005312415,0.00003064001,0.00005274416,0.00005429453,0.001503875,6.381431e-8,0.00008140251,0.9965848,0.0007034406,0.0003432628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007244078,0.0002633839,0.001090286,0.0004270007,0.00006979672,0.00008704168,0.001063807,5.162553e-7,0.0002010074,0.991646,0.004247478,0.000179291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1155321,0.0008328494,0.0003774328,0.7180833,0.000522998,0.0001795133,0.00003102372,0.00003586277,0.1644049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868466,0.0005443823,0.0001385787,0.01014575,0.002004587,0.000001602548,4.661055e-7,0.00001491662,0.0003030691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8713146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.736666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792894343","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12156","title":"The Taking of Territory and the Wrongs of Colonialism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Politics; Miller; Art history; Classics; Media studies; History; Sociology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Margaret Moore","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04882915810236784,"gpt":0.3539527504512712,"spread":0.3051235923489034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002668365,0.0000875495,0.0003008634,0.00005244089,0.0005068206,0.00003172072,0.0004499848,0.0001324506,0.00002321217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003433713,0.00004691776,0.0001798477,0.0001109937,0.01148504,0.0001261987,0.00007457793,0.0004145869,0.000003050442],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005336076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002709841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006386665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003988337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977378,0.0005433711,0.0006116835,0.00007555043,0.0006474803,0.0003841544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960265,0.002605516,0.000466466,0.0001553761,0.0004942968,0.0002518139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001478818,0.00003630955,0.0001173187,0.00001891773,0.00003353277,0.000002129147,0.002204094,7.364823e-8,0.00005881788,0.9971015,0.0001607517,0.000118618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005720941,0.0002181693,0.00121216,0.00006348704,0.00006152255,0.000009224414,0.0005678629,0.000006732454,0.00024114,0.9886194,0.008374863,0.00005326934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1743053,0.001177884,0.000108572,0.392697,0.001796248,0.0002826052,0.00003185905,0.00001345988,0.4295871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942028,0.00003903808,0.00007016874,0.001357994,0.004291029,8.150383e-7,6.958064e-8,0.00000662853,0.00003145024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8198975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153726066","doi":"10.1111/1467-9760.00092","title":"“Two Concepts of Liberty” Through African Eyes","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Sacrifice; Economic Justice; Happiness; Negative liberty; Conscience; Sociology; Politics; Law; Face (sociological concept); CLARITY; Political freedom; Law and economics; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy; Democracy; Social science; Theology","authors":[{"name":"C. N. Siame","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04612343532145446,"gpt":0.3880059057040161,"spread":0.3418824703825616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007129303,0.0001529544,0.0004755819,0.0001988538,0.0002012835,0.00003331449,0.0004665332,0.0001213815,0.003522572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000581155,0.0001279832,0.0003750789,0.0007844795,0.001750215,0.000437124,0.00002598767,0.000385043,0.00008333205],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007724507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001539283,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001662897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002724278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973559,0.0004879457,0.0007260107,0.0001460733,0.0007294885,0.000554524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978953,0.0009155612,0.0001647094,0.0001837179,0.0003036061,0.0005371197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001483058,0.0002459263,0.00008540892,0.00001998136,0.00003989986,0.00003748046,0.0019527,0.000003343541,0.00006162353,0.9959007,0.0002117393,0.001292895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005200924,0.0003080347,0.00009783221,0.00008180311,0.00005396848,0.00001846159,0.0005051676,0.000001228673,0.0004110482,0.9376008,0.06026427,0.0001373171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06936702,0.0003819499,0.00004214227,0.02920562,0.0003093933,0.00009168267,0.00002510594,0.00002032208,0.9005567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935475,0.00005575894,0.0006366345,0.001906433,0.003546673,0.000001063058,6.518474e-7,0.00001505518,0.0002902463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9241804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234157206","doi":"10.1111/1467-9760.00091","title":"Pornographies","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Virtue; Autonomy; Paternalism; Democracy; Law; Sociology; Censorship; Legislation; Politics; Morality; Political science","authors":[{"name":"L. Green","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02482496454297656,"gpt":0.3132600199931451,"spread":0.2884350554501686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002753126,0.00006773687,0.0001638558,0.00009716179,0.0002253392,0.00002641835,0.0001959554,0.00005643236,0.001888642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001669486,0.00005753526,0.0001754764,0.0001831314,0.001505438,0.0001893001,0.000006506674,0.0001872701,0.00008236343],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006151202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006250842,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002420791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006000789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99875,0.0001110485,0.000292443,0.00005674785,0.0004274601,0.0003622598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990511,0.0001785321,0.00007424965,0.00006886799,0.0001687498,0.000458509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001396025,0.00005495686,0.0005979064,0.000002761219,0.00001668895,0.00002704615,0.00009404746,0.000001620697,0.000002232825,0.996546,0.002130993,0.0005117691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001203191,0.00007071176,0.0009609791,0.00001689564,0.0000201924,0.00003268109,0.0001541846,2.447761e-7,0.000006367162,0.3445639,0.6539845,0.00006904056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02966201,0.0001731941,0.00004005862,0.02820896,0.0002170559,0.00003034444,0.000009723122,0.00001453466,0.9416441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991784,0.0000664187,0.0004007982,0.003587808,0.002877782,3.459903e-7,4.118898e-7,0.000004565484,0.001277891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.962122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136636626","doi":"10.1111/1467-9760.00113","title":"Survey Article: Justifying the Truth and Reconciliation Commission","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Democracy; Human rights; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David Dyzenhaus","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0771066061886488,"gpt":0.2555387292190741,"spread":0.1784321230304253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004173071,0.00009954422,0.0001936249,0.00003897776,0.0002534869,0.00008410544,0.0001293458,0.00004147461,0.001022983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003460219,0.00005809172,0.00008261982,0.00003304935,0.0003393897,0.0002256745,0.00001487392,0.0002892652,0.00004582475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006016686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000356143,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001785647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001750206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988225,0.0001832629,0.0004328275,0.0000844765,0.0002337617,0.0002431761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986405,0.0007458667,0.00008141631,0.0001022622,0.0001464553,0.000283542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005370172,0.00006242431,0.0003128551,0.00001434425,0.00001546939,0.00000679151,0.000633169,0.00000137195,0.000002918406,0.9946035,0.0006547368,0.003638695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008955449,0.0005590571,0.02401596,0.0001004555,0.00009794396,0.00005497688,0.0003953562,0.001747111,0.00001334973,0.7313822,0.240458,0.0002799947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5379388,0.000637517,0.00005021951,0.0231879,0.001077602,0.0001054262,0.00007478026,0.000029258,0.4368985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956988,0.000011075,0.00001549717,0.001021712,0.001498631,6.674878e-7,0.000002117957,0.000008946803,0.001742609],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4577599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577460217","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12028","title":"Deliberative Voting: Clarifying Consent in a Consensus Process","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Directorate-General for Research and Innovation","keywords":"Voting; Citation; Politics; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Alfred Moore","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kieran C. O’Doherty","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1099690971823124,"gpt":0.3876499774734843,"spread":0.2776808802911719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001139352,0.0001768536,0.0004257878,0.0002385413,0.0002569466,0.00009981178,0.0003323804,0.000306021,0.0001824951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005156585,0.0001531056,0.0001804915,0.0003140948,0.001328709,0.0003313278,0.00003841618,0.001274576,0.00009664826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002983666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001011718,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009095697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007762256,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966916,0.0005723551,0.0008721513,0.0001797406,0.0007677463,0.0009163888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960961,0.001842708,0.0002424464,0.0001069504,0.0008050724,0.0009066724],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002581949,0.0001824955,0.001437577,0.00004823705,0.00002313553,0.00007554248,0.002498979,0.000009996546,0.0000329738,0.9953271,0.000283067,0.00005510289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005868616,0.0001361931,0.001713073,0.0001989419,0.0000217027,0.00003660934,0.002019617,0.00006125035,0.00009760754,0.9944332,0.0005105207,0.0001844239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3758787,0.0001997036,0.0001342526,0.2629448,0.0005791549,0.0004059196,0.000009205461,0.00004005708,0.3598082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919977,0.000007017828,0.000395322,0.005746275,0.001774361,0.000006228167,4.263443e-7,0.00001541998,0.0000572536],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.616119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6243464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212765476","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12267","title":"Critical‐level Sufficientarianism*","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Japan Securities Scholarship Foundation","keywords":"Geology","authors":[{"name":"Walter Bossert","is_ca":true},{"name":"Susumu Cato","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kohei Kamaga","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1205603853228497,"gpt":0.3883202821957024,"spread":0.2677598968728527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001231884,0.0001623986,0.0003995268,0.0001308628,0.0004765267,0.0001332123,0.0004189739,0.0002797089,0.0008054551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01312073,0.0001530453,0.0003868635,0.000360287,0.001517073,0.0004606806,0.00008594774,0.0009139919,0.0001440607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002754813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00143327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001452189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002366215,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963644,0.0005602887,0.0007173265,0.0002064295,0.001170923,0.0009806141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948899,0.001859352,0.0001171128,0.0002368128,0.001502744,0.00139408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001872446,0.000363138,0.0001005308,0.00003128737,0.000031052,0.0004246933,0.0006396211,0.000001082217,0.0001031908,0.9973318,0.0008683925,0.00008651073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003105771,0.0001178228,0.0005810295,0.00007815781,0.00007013927,0.0001019622,0.0007618588,0.000003232071,0.0005442764,0.9676757,0.02957918,0.0001760132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006108402,0.0003789034,0.001831149,0.3204008,0.002136092,0.00005963102,0.00005934544,0.00003690087,0.6689888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803746,0.00002378262,0.002055282,0.0116857,0.005548222,8.447868e-7,0.000001677848,0.00001796607,0.0002919432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9742662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387671359","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12313","title":"The challenge of policing minorities in a liberal society","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Normative; Politics; Political science; Neglect; Subject (documents); Law; Undue influence; Perception; Criminology; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Joseph Heath","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08309903948348975,"gpt":0.3630024420186653,"spread":0.2799034025351756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002191995,0.0001143804,0.0003199087,0.0001375736,0.0003380186,0.00003714002,0.000452331,0.0001911402,0.00001488036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001449342,0.00008306811,0.0003695936,0.0004714095,0.001486478,0.000226942,0.0000766427,0.0007114478,0.00001572977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001704743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003741219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006551264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009405486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972994,0.0003047015,0.0006976444,0.0001041332,0.0007765329,0.0008175301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970682,0.002009596,0.0001754023,0.0001483015,0.0002401234,0.00035837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002087766,0.00006250115,0.000519368,0.00004398832,0.00002705747,0.00001527345,0.00528234,0.000003281928,0.00001265152,0.9931509,0.0007364659,0.0001253056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002898231,0.0001254357,0.002883229,0.000107411,0.00001535128,0.000002825135,0.001971782,0.00002242057,0.00003353998,0.9923849,0.002076475,0.00008676866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1524996,0.0004614261,0.000008871382,0.477314,0.0008978384,0.0001579666,0.00002103592,0.00004432595,0.3685949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953955,0.000316542,0.00005202269,0.001102688,0.002928591,0.000001913182,3.66551e-7,0.00001148965,0.000190833],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8428959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.547699,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944706828","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12187","title":"Why Moral Reasoning Is Insufficient for Moral Progress","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Moral philosophy; Moral reasoning; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Library science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Agnes Tam","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07607932952111218,"gpt":0.3628314098750308,"spread":0.2867520803539186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001261903,0.0002035902,0.0004782559,0.0001841557,0.0003285183,0.0001177617,0.0005405641,0.0002925365,0.0002861354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001030504,0.0001754414,0.0004632762,0.0002507884,0.0009473129,0.0004595068,0.00006822654,0.0006730984,0.00007083575],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002876748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004650976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001229656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000348476,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967234,0.0002105953,0.0006715055,0.0002412726,0.001053396,0.001099857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973023,0.0005344863,0.0002667243,0.0002255126,0.0007074845,0.0009635179],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008219328,0.0002675337,0.002528114,0.00007554594,0.00004422236,0.00001339845,0.001158453,0.000003332123,0.000009575593,0.9933985,0.002288059,0.0001310914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008247988,0.0006874225,0.0007370502,0.0001575984,0.00006383624,0.00001499277,0.0004319736,0.0001313205,0.0001452167,0.9645436,0.03202419,0.0002379316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2679052,0.0005738139,0.0003778356,0.4228153,0.003224191,0.001021912,0.0001324757,0.00009627193,0.303853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776427,0.000005940544,0.001214142,0.01685107,0.004125588,0.000006060025,0.000001932286,0.00002652758,0.0001260898],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7097375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7154294,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324082223","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12292","title":"Contractualist alternatives to the veil of ignorance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Lister","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09037659743959713,"gpt":0.3952044371262243,"spread":0.3048278396866272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001806628,0.000112196,0.0003198791,0.0001620113,0.0002682119,0.00003820335,0.0006714124,0.0001082312,0.00005374074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004734717,0.00007663496,0.0002315733,0.0005114265,0.001034073,0.0002062744,0.00006632994,0.0004782825,0.0001363077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008957343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002774484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003185198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002469633,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973766,0.0003645255,0.0005799123,0.0001148336,0.0009647518,0.0005994163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967849,0.001756731,0.0001952559,0.0001818714,0.0004819346,0.0005992975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004197327,0.0000675283,0.0001150246,0.00001840847,0.00003585257,0.00002513555,0.003246449,0.00001765528,0.0000777989,0.9945572,0.001654666,0.0001422999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002455719,0.0001817678,0.002733214,0.00008138788,0.00002652422,0.000004879336,0.001190056,0.000008686508,0.0003196636,0.9694621,0.02564953,0.00009660368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1296695,0.0001695501,0.0002933817,0.6121539,0.001505488,0.0002428809,0.00009848909,0.00004949147,0.2558174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901401,0.00002922948,0.00006380444,0.005575302,0.004044413,0.000002227435,5.870036e-7,0.00001124701,0.0001331247],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8604706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5668241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933609258","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12066","title":"Interspecies Politics: Reply to <scp>H</scp>inchcliffe and <scp>L</scp>adwig","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Citation; Politics; Political philosophy; Classics; Law; Political science; History","authors":[{"name":"Sue Donaldson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Will Kymlicka","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07353927644882724,"gpt":0.2858447446771747,"spread":0.2123054682283474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001169724,0.0004161267,0.00078147,0.000491792,0.0002848737,0.000412148,0.0005753876,0.0001908295,0.00005844651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00871055,0.0003307486,0.0003432182,0.00009861492,0.001369304,0.0004809752,0.0003233399,0.001190972,0.0002265894],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002107334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002388766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008937213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008415474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963751,0.0002409067,0.00107652,0.0003701675,0.0009514306,0.000985816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933175,0.002511701,0.00034617,0.0004083221,0.001161519,0.002254718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000141468,0.0002168718,0.00004978171,0.00006767007,0.0001262205,0.0001117689,0.01123002,0.000001502047,0.0000320877,0.971571,0.01654727,0.00003160623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006224909,0.0008645023,0.00008003615,0.0001442456,0.0000751888,0.0001181568,0.004981322,0.000008395839,0.0001200878,0.7123353,0.2805767,0.00007356043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2505422,0.001046714,0.00008842915,0.0629851,0.002038081,0.0002233992,0.0001511927,0.00007902023,0.6828459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593198,0.00002567648,0.000188372,0.02643938,0.01205171,0.000004692359,0.000003706738,0.00006386471,0.00190281],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7087776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999145,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326125862","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00381.x","title":"Academic Boycotts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Politics; Library science; Law; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"David Rodin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michael D. Yudkin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1198252600593284,"gpt":0.2692686367836542,"spread":0.1494433767243258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003396179,0.0001193867,0.0001961404,0.0002272534,0.00008545371,0.00006719871,0.000341021,0.000140204,0.0007935498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007214491,0.00008397758,0.0001518515,0.000154249,0.0001056432,0.0007782105,0.00007662152,0.001117401,0.001013728],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001368712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002788487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003096796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001300444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988164,0.000007864797,0.0004181764,0.00009239343,0.0003227978,0.0003423488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992828,0.00006223216,0.0001935676,0.0001100373,0.0002944613,0.00005684534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007012112,0.00006868258,0.001887024,0.00004986068,0.00002022741,0.00003434235,0.00001166779,8.792125e-7,0.003617579,0.9865983,0.007147118,0.0004941736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000587535,0.00005439204,0.003946774,0.00006908754,0.00006402336,0.0001036159,0.00001901021,0.0002396276,0.0008353437,0.9002289,0.09364638,0.0002052923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6247123,0.0000502218,0.0001063933,0.02045199,0.002894411,0.00008344933,0.000001581375,0.00003344995,0.3516661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97574,0.000001779612,0.0000878225,0.01057766,0.01344626,5.228264e-7,0.000001001858,0.00001703277,0.000127903],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3515382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988064641","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2007.00286.x","title":"Norms, Motives and Radical Democracy: Habermas and the Problem of Motivation*","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Council of Canadian Academies","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Citation; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Munro","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03768252855494673,"gpt":0.3202706102286516,"spread":0.2825880816737048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003204972,0.000123441,0.0003677503,0.00012247,0.0003700909,0.00003666435,0.0002201806,0.0001805974,0.00001752353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002308112,0.00007860456,0.0001267367,0.0001737491,0.005521748,0.0003097621,0.00006698312,0.000618201,0.000001654052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006001676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001765234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001736827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001063979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977192,0.0003237982,0.0006829565,0.0001199941,0.0006608879,0.0004932206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952191,0.003531322,0.0002439912,0.00009315417,0.0003070294,0.0006054663],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001412772,0.00008041998,0.002882843,0.00004400474,0.00004216224,0.00001031552,0.001976339,3.753433e-7,0.00002401679,0.9944093,0.00004451543,0.0003444769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001052207,0.0001224204,0.01774709,0.00007122364,0.00005892495,0.00003251194,0.0004845853,0.000005044435,0.0001065736,0.9786908,0.001543611,0.00008502864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3318773,0.001134199,0.001427037,0.398209,0.000239742,0.0003843641,0.00001715117,0.0000243854,0.2666869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952132,0.00008305483,0.001167092,0.002070915,0.00142079,5.182789e-7,3.021646e-7,0.000008751052,0.00003544884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6633358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971846,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386738352","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12308","title":"Privacy, Publicity, and the Right to Be Forgotten","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Publicity; Right to be forgotten; Internet privacy; Right to privacy; The Right to Privacy; Political science; Computer science; Law; Data Protection Act 1998; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Hannah Carnegy-Arbuthnott","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05026906949199381,"gpt":0.3332678678424379,"spread":0.2829987983504442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002051251,0.00008589376,0.0002122285,0.0001965447,0.000471661,0.0001739779,0.000633696,0.00008257991,0.00005674269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004522408,0.00005456545,0.0001113953,0.0004517921,0.0004981499,0.0004546772,0.000392637,0.0003024021,0.00004835155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008367538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001272138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005164613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005729948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982489,0.0002888007,0.0003185436,0.0001171359,0.00059838,0.0004282365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985779,0.0004497979,0.0001048344,0.0001991931,0.0001863493,0.0004819247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005195165,0.00002639013,0.0002291949,0.000008491591,0.00001818423,0.00001133875,0.001589525,1.734664e-7,0.00001424487,0.9840537,0.01379248,0.0002042955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005744643,0.00008271175,0.002697299,0.00001435158,0.00002199884,0.00001591176,0.000349467,0.00001303559,0.00004569208,0.8910562,0.1050573,0.00007157196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1062561,0.00006635405,0.0002719391,0.8391932,0.0006266515,0.0002908647,0.00002331051,0.00005369163,0.05321789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911441,0.00004253231,0.0001519259,0.005961229,0.002590984,0.000004680431,0.000001340058,0.000007980942,0.00009523701],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.884888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5414072,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939881950","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12184","title":"Debate: In Defence of Fiscal Autonomy: A Reply to Risse and Meyer","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Autonomy; Politics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Peter Dietsch","is_ca":true},{"name":"Thomas Rixen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03834459464901945,"gpt":0.3369274046972666,"spread":0.2985828100482472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001286615,0.0001256199,0.0004613948,0.0002895679,0.0000664142,0.00002796705,0.0003075417,0.0001657538,0.0000971421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002021696,0.0001098107,0.0001329847,0.0003257499,0.0005181822,0.0002908375,0.00007992797,0.00052977,0.00003683526],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002317234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004151887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006191835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000275604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977684,0.0002471428,0.0006819826,0.0001804068,0.0005500417,0.0005720534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978259,0.0008919695,0.0001489369,0.00017226,0.0001846983,0.0007762685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007668671,0.0001100778,0.00769858,0.00003738348,0.00001896786,0.00002665085,0.002241697,0.000006295657,0.0001241735,0.9894804,0.00008886979,0.0000902281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004357659,0.0003506201,0.02494175,0.0001922327,0.0000320536,0.00001365367,0.0003879654,0.0000259369,0.0001617428,0.9679439,0.005363508,0.0001508869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7310113,0.0001233193,0.00003768838,0.115955,0.0003605236,0.000188049,0.00001581894,0.00001106699,0.1522972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914721,0.000009056926,0.0004763151,0.007396452,0.0005498345,0.000001316021,2.665645e-7,0.00001008391,0.00008459749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2604608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4477949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387079017","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12310","title":"The Epistemic Dimensions of Civil Disobedience","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil disobedience; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Alexander Bryan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06907300815863618,"gpt":0.3595381662792654,"spread":0.2904651581206292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002171286,0.0001083264,0.000276716,0.0001286024,0.0006666217,0.00003399363,0.0006108401,0.0001402191,0.00002764854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005292436,0.00006353555,0.0002806492,0.0005548147,0.002365272,0.0002011263,0.00009911599,0.0005656492,0.00008137733],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000405355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001288213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004874221,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971251,0.0003623201,0.0006762705,0.0001116868,0.0009796718,0.0007449482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952696,0.003245554,0.0002365778,0.0002135338,0.0004245644,0.0006101574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001937181,0.00004722355,0.0002417748,0.00001889443,0.00002211195,0.00001872003,0.0006855595,0.000003464773,0.00008518993,0.9976092,0.001176805,0.00007170135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001556952,0.0001183123,0.001231381,0.00007676031,0.00003003783,0.000007844919,0.0006671472,0.00001377011,0.00007497091,0.9859676,0.01157567,0.00008086105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06687491,0.0005462339,0.00009443312,0.5429507,0.002516919,0.0002256826,0.00004856745,0.00008682116,0.3866557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968782,0.0002549309,0.00003044377,0.0008309486,0.001779626,0.000001614203,4.642575e-7,0.00001040662,0.0002133416],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9300033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8714945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387004773","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12311","title":"Debate: Political Authority, Functionalism, and the Problem of Annexation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law and economics; Jurisdiction; Law; Annexation; State (computer science); Political science; Democracy; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Order (exchange); Sociology; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Arthur Hill","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06938441978727689,"gpt":0.3530540322368549,"spread":0.283669612449578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003154316,0.0001305801,0.0003775129,0.0001998513,0.0003833888,0.00005297934,0.0002973575,0.0002231234,0.00004845527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002176052,0.00008823337,0.0002297109,0.0004534048,0.003158622,0.0002971011,0.00009139159,0.0006106062,0.00002748059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001136694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003646448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004472029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000761089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967538,0.0006646015,0.0007065195,0.0001394377,0.001014298,0.0007214156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962648,0.002153257,0.0002150428,0.0001284839,0.0005642567,0.0006741242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001115651,0.0000664488,0.0002472959,0.00005685901,0.00004381964,0.00001231659,0.00078424,0.000002520696,0.00001074834,0.9979762,0.0005914781,0.00009653447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008134905,0.0001323927,0.002904031,0.00006093003,0.00007840738,0.00002599947,0.0006329063,0.00004080405,0.00003480285,0.9907047,0.004476506,0.0000950201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03752779,0.0002064632,0.0003267885,0.6324007,0.0007621441,0.0003145799,0.00005296116,0.00007155381,0.328337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943816,0.00003195099,0.0002519209,0.00221661,0.002958837,0.000003353766,0.0000022722,0.00001223165,0.0001412359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9568538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995542,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154545283","doi":"10.1111/1467-9760.00126","title":"Survey Article: The Perils of Value‐Ladenness in Politics, Science and Philosophy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Citation; Politics; Political philosophy; Philosophy of science; Library science; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Law","authors":[{"name":"David Zimmerman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06009875666684186,"gpt":0.2673050642115024,"spread":0.2072063075446605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002928174,0.0001168736,0.0004136269,0.0004130535,0.0001496744,0.00004801637,0.0004184779,0.0000644938,0.00006733902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001709357,0.00009868888,0.00009239673,0.0004560944,0.001605469,0.0005338818,0.00008178979,0.0002934988,0.00002767097],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001848631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001366079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001960907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007064124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982176,0.00006308276,0.00102099,0.0001888588,0.0000894859,0.0004199141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986503,0.0002958404,0.0003675254,0.0002500849,0.000189366,0.0002468895],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002280577,0.0001153153,0.07413448,0.00001336497,0.0000146486,0.000006874098,0.0001231132,0.00002590416,0.00002440958,0.9254779,0.00001354869,0.00002766791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004332989,0.00009932736,0.2060637,0.00003079625,0.000005204515,0.00007120373,0.00005106907,0.0002343026,0.0001037673,0.7923164,0.0004966542,0.00009430702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9321038,0.0007990777,0.000114629,0.00798801,0.0003772704,0.00008462286,0.0000788221,0.000003682833,0.05845015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986049,0.00006355524,0.00007085819,0.0007946984,0.0004354276,0.000001216251,4.900455e-7,0.000009039898,0.00001979968],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1331615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5915417,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}