{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":35,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":35,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"de68fc462177","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Pragmatics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2024002186","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(01)00060-1","title":"Repetitions as self-repair strategies in English and German conversations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"German; Linguistics; Demonstrative; Psychology; Verb; Repetition (rhetorical device); Pronoun; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01883008113298746,"gpt":0.2890146241682085,"spread":0.270184543035221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004701902,0.00009111005,0.0001706214,0.0001566588,0.0001510877,0.0002985769,0.0001224033,0.00003403795,0.0006880699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002384082,0.00007667145,0.00006138304,0.00004822633,0.0001557859,0.0008161921,0.00001766452,0.0002363437,0.00001068499],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003701801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002403889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002672571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005119224,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990314,0.0001596372,0.000465243,0.00005756249,0.0001749244,0.0001112275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988791,0.0002137278,0.0003188933,0.0002006378,0.000335615,0.00005205714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001878703,0.0001040703,0.0001835676,0.00003149822,0.00004912976,0.00001234067,0.1234531,0.00002497113,0.000008697971,0.8748381,0.001275429,0.00001725291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001102334,0.000190921,0.0009544843,0.0001851796,0.0001591602,0.0001303975,0.5950208,0.0001566376,0.00004596316,0.1381222,0.2636636,0.0002683007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5540887,0.0007865303,0.0001036579,0.0005857329,0.0003829369,0.0001396663,0.000008984196,0.00008280253,0.4438211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953258,0.0002698549,0.003542617,0.0001020113,0.00014182,0.000003729397,0.000002334449,0.00001044078,0.0006014152],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7367159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7533883,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573947339","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.009","title":"Loving a partner in a Foreign Language","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Feeling; Multiculturalism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Social psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Personality; Scale (ratio); Developmental psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03411938343792474,"gpt":0.4481352301175898,"spread":0.4140158466796651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005708238,0.00005825704,0.0001452456,0.00009698824,0.00008260769,0.00005162244,0.0002350574,0.00007784532,0.0001868833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002027097,0.0000442792,0.0000617257,0.00003033056,0.00003846479,0.0001608565,0.00002931326,0.0002785244,0.00004215691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003060449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002557117,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009547388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003227322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993072,0.00005269427,0.0003464715,0.00004362636,0.0001274353,0.0001226422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989673,0.0000997416,0.0006199869,0.0002345509,0.00003788109,0.00004050806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005697948,0.0002475546,0.8920904,0.00003404755,0.0001258905,0.0005624884,0.01749835,0.000198009,0.0001066831,0.0789882,0.002804609,0.007286789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004027459,0.0002872245,0.9403632,0.0003820008,0.0001600331,0.0004988394,0.01586891,0.008224371,0.00002733103,0.02667951,0.003153183,0.0003278902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8871577,0.0002967219,0.009100473,0.0005996347,0.0005521406,0.00008580027,0.000001184578,0.000005215931,0.1022011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933943,0.000009296907,0.003673982,0.00004527931,0.0001697367,0.000001036853,5.001614e-7,0.000008701386,0.002697227],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1062365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2046241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007229764","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.005","title":"Acquisition of Relevance implicatures: A case against a Rationality-based account of conversational implicatures","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; McGill University","keywords":"Relevance (law); Rationality; Linguistics; Situated; Computer science; Relevance theory; Psychology; Cognitive science; Natural language processing; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01162429082116027,"gpt":0.3086297154305622,"spread":0.2970054246094019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007429932,0.0001093788,0.0002798155,0.0001354248,0.00005264451,0.00001397322,0.0001674658,0.0001310841,0.0002884396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003542019,0.00009033877,0.0001419179,0.0001399331,0.0001014378,0.00008098577,0.00001905107,0.0004675823,0.000006361407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000292259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002535104,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006884928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009763713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985684,0.00007851974,0.0007821782,0.0001110867,0.0003397669,0.0001201091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973164,0.0005060214,0.001327021,0.0002136346,0.0005687645,0.00006818013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001955677,0.002900352,0.03349777,0.0008682535,0.001089163,0.000686916,0.01211068,0.001381801,0.6535695,0.2445034,0.0343457,0.01309081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009506784,0.001418021,0.8700373,0.000825743,0.0004115197,0.007860404,0.002618645,0.001178374,0.03076228,0.01453528,0.05995668,0.0008890003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945849,0.0001461318,0.002286431,0.001534534,0.0003860039,0.0001358201,0.00005365041,0.000007390079,0.0008651147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823765,0.000007970513,0.0168593,0.0004862678,0.0002101962,0.000003352504,0.00001629754,0.00001126655,0.00002886754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8365395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3683908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977132548","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.011","title":"Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Conversation analysis; Psychology; Mandarin Chinese; Negotiation; Linguistics; Psychological intervention; Face negotiation theory; Face (sociological concept); Communication; Social psychology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02563358935632088,"gpt":0.2738649656750811,"spread":0.2482313763187602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007462499,0.00005315175,0.0001251168,0.0001241645,0.00007636903,0.0001719951,0.0001008044,0.00001805211,0.0001174855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002113746,0.00004305017,0.00002785872,0.00001983778,0.00008682381,0.0003292557,0.00003212029,0.0001776626,0.000003723475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003277578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002433166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004181403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005602607,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992995,0.0001173294,0.0003668615,0.00003549507,0.0001154243,0.00006534768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992741,0.0001569946,0.0003302312,0.00009750625,0.0001147683,0.00002640604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001780089,0.00008260706,0.002107392,0.00007581768,0.00003824577,0.000005239554,0.2174616,0.0002855339,0.00009156415,0.7673907,0.0007307943,0.01171268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005574425,0.001322789,0.02247112,0.004574872,0.0003158318,0.0002861349,0.5708269,0.02984455,0.0003889694,0.1670062,0.1964902,0.0008979227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9537035,0.0004471249,0.00728471,0.002357649,0.0004285996,0.00008637639,0.000002208531,0.00001713048,0.03567268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966312,0.00004098248,0.002891063,0.00006154121,0.0001372433,9.810801e-7,0.000001174191,0.000005832811,0.0002299981],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6003845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1755535,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766451116","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.011","title":"Multimodal artefacts and the texture of viewpoint","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Multimodality; Embodied cognition; Gesture; Linguistics; Multimodal interaction; Modalities; Texture (cosmology); Psychology; Metonymy; Relation (database); Field (mathematics); Frame (networking); Section (typography); Computer science; Metaphor; Cognitive science; Sociology; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Image (mathematics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01980878843360596,"gpt":0.3183118507149902,"spread":0.2985030622813843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008798468,0.00006742505,0.0002411192,0.0000365578,0.0001026636,0.00004358026,0.0002046261,0.00006357676,0.0001884252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004865681,0.00003529766,0.00009292539,0.00001701001,0.0001724296,0.0001031732,0.00002860942,0.0002230358,0.00001290463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000522193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001891427,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001814061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000106943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999213,0.0001313273,0.0003556352,0.00004615445,0.0001674892,0.00008642595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983898,0.0001794278,0.000986085,0.0002616184,0.0001400629,0.00004305425],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002894951,0.001494619,0.006565595,0.0006045905,0.0025433,0.0005115694,0.1396904,0.00002305916,0.005924326,0.2007307,0.02764135,0.6113756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04855765,0.00185314,0.5882375,0.001431612,0.002954554,0.004832272,0.03914518,0.002370761,0.005056117,0.2769664,0.02768334,0.0009114854],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560039,0.002541383,0.004545932,0.004260456,0.001214345,0.000225335,0.000008903294,0.000004921334,0.03119482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977812,0.000121193,0.001215703,0.0002741223,0.0002296423,0.000001191826,3.265426e-7,0.000006560169,0.0003700274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6104641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2063124,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062868280","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(03)00117-6","title":"Pragmatic functions of local diaphonic repetitions in conversation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Repetition (rhetorical device); Intonation (linguistics); Function (biology); Linguistics; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Speech act; Key (lock); Communication; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; History; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02136171298046459,"gpt":0.3273320874846812,"spread":0.3059703745042167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001250927,0.00007663068,0.0002536573,0.0003518203,0.00003062752,0.000008558498,0.0001296247,0.0001134419,0.001448966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004309344,0.00006913979,0.0000856793,0.0003681648,0.0001484012,0.00007635866,0.00001276139,0.0004259664,0.00007540485],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006765088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001980082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002614942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005907818,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998375,0.0003991666,0.0007440397,0.00007606771,0.0002207324,0.0001850107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985409,0.0004697461,0.0004720579,0.0002200127,0.0002261368,0.00007115379],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001252681,0.01488283,0.1210745,0.001461827,0.003130605,0.00101798,0.1799585,0.01109755,0.03848505,0.5126788,0.08967601,0.02528365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02474792,0.006939337,0.5807279,0.001478131,0.0008609965,0.005219235,0.1103869,0.004788191,0.009804576,0.2074822,0.04617351,0.001391143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9227232,0.000705562,0.05535276,0.0008155916,0.001351754,0.0002325383,0.00001412803,0.000006915152,0.01879756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978652,0.00006413258,0.001578046,0.00003786831,0.00003142325,0.000005850199,0.000002407883,0.000009906764,0.0004051408],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4596534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994639,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161834173","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.013","title":"Slurring and common knowledge of ordinary language","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Utterance; Contempt; Linguistics; Sentence; Contradiction; Psychology; Meaning (existential); Competence (human resources); Emotive; Philosophy; Epistemology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03050663867209077,"gpt":0.2922494981573361,"spread":0.2617428594852453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007956473,0.0000687081,0.000283226,0.0000708187,0.00006988056,0.00002689895,0.0001006231,0.00003758612,0.00004117809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001479573,0.0000522486,0.00006680604,0.00001492062,0.0002032037,0.0001188582,0.00003392892,0.0002228815,0.000004095706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007873095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002273234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002006327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001553898,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992987,0.0001143649,0.0003772507,0.00003792286,0.00008883839,0.0000829303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989305,0.0003446006,0.000416842,0.00009838357,0.0001661113,0.00004353259],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003605156,0.0003395424,0.001645093,0.001308648,0.0001977898,0.00001380712,0.2735688,0.00001709184,0.001685298,0.6903822,0.003548612,0.02725702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00399717,0.003296637,0.003887163,0.002256993,0.0009930697,0.0003959872,0.09684872,0.003828349,0.004216215,0.1663421,0.7130718,0.0008657174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9373376,0.001564381,0.0003941109,0.0002576162,0.0006539421,0.00004280252,0.000003532149,0.000007267676,0.05973878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969894,0.00005425158,0.001216243,0.0000790612,0.0006148476,2.552162e-7,5.35104e-7,0.00000940785,0.001036033],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7095233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2130636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971196298","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2009.04.009","title":"Subjects and topics in conversation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Utterance; Subject (documents); Conversation; Pronoun; Subject pronoun; Linguistics; Casual; Expression (computer science); Realization (probability); Conversation analysis; Psychology; Personal pronoun; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02984116434879302,"gpt":0.2813031788552792,"spread":0.2514620145064862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002327225,0.00004374645,0.0001046671,0.00007987308,0.00003480306,0.0001047666,0.00008671248,0.00001821677,0.0000937205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006423004,0.00003386632,0.00001952192,0.00001859071,0.0000494867,0.0002971377,0.0000081992,0.0001167098,0.000002469538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001823677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003537209,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008338139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001416346,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995166,0.000042278,0.0002539272,0.00002455882,0.0001064468,0.00005620812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995437,0.0000540164,0.0002077984,0.00008448084,0.00008854399,0.00002150457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002002388,0.0001332131,0.0009456564,0.00003919972,0.00002243205,0.00002348546,0.199562,0.00004168151,0.0001056133,0.7856444,0.001901148,0.01156125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005151873,0.001374242,0.06423774,0.0007486924,0.000191654,0.0002427364,0.3795584,0.002074019,0.0006969813,0.4006251,0.1443734,0.0007250873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9467444,0.0007553257,0.00011112,0.006423959,0.0001876569,0.00006819895,0.000001246674,0.000008272995,0.04569977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981886,0.000124919,0.0009292623,0.0002344294,0.0001793126,2.01056e-7,6.962801e-7,0.000002444835,0.0003401643],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3850192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1381028,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977700075","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00129-0","title":"Tough talk: Indirectness and gender in requests for information","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politeness; Psychology; Attunement; Interview; Conversation; Social psychology; Power (physics); Linguistics; Communication; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06441492989642562,"gpt":0.3170584595545581,"spread":0.2526435296581325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004521503,0.00006367281,0.0001387001,0.0001481715,0.00007222428,0.0002103758,0.0001249086,0.00002905061,0.0001011818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001334616,0.00004898712,0.00003051407,0.00003196657,0.00006134302,0.001280758,0.00002038177,0.0001153544,0.000003459193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002727427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000520474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000149571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002262175,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992778,0.00003991038,0.0004336124,0.00002509475,0.0001336707,0.00008993136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991448,0.0001289739,0.0003824261,0.0001048718,0.0002108845,0.00002802414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000993209,0.0001758131,0.001207749,0.0003294275,0.00009740919,0.00001914557,0.3482901,0.0001987695,0.00004148085,0.6249275,0.007467483,0.01714584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003317559,0.0003249433,0.005666778,0.0003331834,0.0001278373,0.0003956406,0.1419367,0.001531529,0.0001259508,0.2012455,0.644544,0.0004502991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9039374,0.0007827204,0.002072088,0.001418504,0.0003866866,0.0002864391,0.00001391948,0.00001959067,0.09108268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964243,0.0002135871,0.002679047,0.0001968137,0.000170243,0.000005231562,0.000005626388,0.000006187294,0.0002990054],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6370766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2028659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052453443","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.003","title":"Joint attention helps explain why children omit new referents","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; British Academy; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Demonstrative; Psychology; Joint attention; Linguistics; Realisation; Noun; Perspective (graphical); Deixis; Cognitive psychology; Maxim; Ostensive definition; Developmental psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03622710532896149,"gpt":0.3013719151544145,"spread":0.265144809825453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006012976,0.00012132,0.0002215695,0.0001549997,0.00004593437,0.00003138731,0.0001546049,0.00009668023,0.003442195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001201872,0.00009405353,0.0001156754,0.000107199,0.00001449528,0.0002860967,0.00003258259,0.0002267324,0.000445143],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004620171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004148308,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002374216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006074592,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987038,0.0001083286,0.0005566172,0.0000670789,0.0002882734,0.0002758875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990156,0.00003699104,0.0005294189,0.0001561943,0.0000650017,0.0001968246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001089685,0.0007464271,0.2128206,0.00002453116,0.0005844646,0.0000203341,0.01639389,0.000003328038,0.0006718587,0.003038082,0.7383727,0.02721488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005223302,0.000264176,0.9524786,0.0001932555,0.0002804991,0.000619719,0.004815663,0.000008043457,0.0003433465,0.002152252,0.03313665,0.0004845173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749938,0.001352273,0.007437416,0.001012679,0.002035622,0.0001458919,0.000002363719,0.00001914214,0.01300087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831969,0.00005899088,0.008984749,0.0008237917,0.001005319,0.000002039006,0.00001645689,0.00002860988,0.005883165],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.739658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946148733","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.005","title":"Sarcasm between siblings: Children's use of relationship information in processing ironic remarks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sarcasm; Psychology; Irony; Comprehension; Object (grammar); Attribution; Gaze; Literal and figurative language; Sibling; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02612608026635664,"gpt":0.301005433896603,"spread":0.2748793536302463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009237957,0.00008982139,0.0002634031,0.0004876399,0.0000255463,0.00004820738,0.0001208496,0.000137968,0.0001339404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004928606,0.00007566187,0.00007719482,0.0003412835,0.00002394139,0.001169699,0.00001615595,0.0004091847,0.0000518013],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005023036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000844286,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001650496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000464365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984142,0.0001506085,0.0009497815,0.00005599982,0.0002888193,0.0001405577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980459,0.0003133375,0.001229883,0.0001499156,0.0002191385,0.00004187996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001273039,0.0001827204,0.9387548,0.0002773215,0.0001161814,0.00000603783,0.01865469,0.000375873,0.0001039409,0.002131894,0.0005955723,0.03867365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001693358,0.0002191117,0.9902804,0.000505282,0.0001332484,0.00008730838,0.00251586,0.0003227984,0.0001021967,0.00366848,0.0003324333,0.0001394508],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926487,0.0002036473,0.004475088,0.0001102155,0.0001763942,0.0001932296,0.00000677796,0.000006896556,0.002179094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955767,0.00001458546,0.004103898,0.00007632459,0.0001010275,0.000001290188,0.00001940408,0.00000964566,0.00009706656],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05152566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3085402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966614013","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.002","title":"Figurative language development/acquisition research: Status and ways forward","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Literal and figurative language; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Metaphor; Embodied cognition; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Psycholinguistics; Language development; Reading (process); Cognition; Computer science; Developmental psychology; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04988368206069906,"gpt":0.3618918004989025,"spread":0.3120081184382035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001283697,0.00008996666,0.0002021084,0.0002297316,0.000071903,0.00005173299,0.00009680735,0.00008427382,0.001428662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001467313,0.00006880958,0.00004400905,0.0001627407,0.00004288449,0.0001981507,0.00003015418,0.0003520866,0.0003183014],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006095069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008672241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008885992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007505664,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985934,0.0002349226,0.0003938473,0.0001014586,0.0004106878,0.00026568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988666,0.0002989668,0.0002844393,0.0001294378,0.0003104364,0.0001101838],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001261918,0.00116923,0.01208008,0.0006348578,0.001429768,0.000731707,0.6684664,0.00001290145,0.03023419,0.05805394,0.03006412,0.1958609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01542649,0.00460069,0.2089136,0.001484605,0.0004540523,0.001483824,0.6055202,0.0002638074,0.03043304,0.05614701,0.07384563,0.001427094],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9689193,0.001125333,0.00251987,0.00009974928,0.0003773799,0.0001816611,0.000006501018,0.000009401031,0.02676078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928112,0.00005623683,0.005199302,0.0001456642,0.0001753946,0.000004495544,0.00001032202,0.0000149782,0.001582374],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1968335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102901208","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00201-1","title":"The interrogation as a type of dialogue","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Argumentation theory; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02958442364808472,"gpt":0.2958388677965046,"spread":0.2662544441484199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009080056,0.00003816405,0.00009155918,0.00004183029,0.00004480071,0.00004365736,0.0002419666,0.00002355027,0.000005051791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003901731,0.00002290176,0.0000433087,0.0001304178,0.0000120089,0.0002025208,0.00001651426,0.00006934274,0.00001077523],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002718265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001125924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003563095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000518585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991708,0.0001266456,0.0003885273,0.00003214235,0.0002229748,0.00005888414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988006,0.000164625,0.000623228,0.000142918,0.000241058,0.00002753305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003710433,0.0003328308,0.002360191,0.0001548712,0.0002180028,0.00002275663,0.02059804,0.00148084,0.01970817,0.9267308,0.008354746,0.02000171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008375735,0.007632005,0.03566535,0.0022577,0.0003253781,0.002728651,0.01109811,0.3237877,0.1344154,0.2039944,0.2683619,0.001357558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3832963,0.0003734608,0.6110126,0.0005906573,0.002220136,0.0001169251,2.691344e-7,0.000007470086,0.002382164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861286,0.00004033366,0.01363841,0.0000321213,0.0000426182,2.950845e-7,9.366683e-8,0.000002290105,0.0001152586],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7227363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09339065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999549733","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2019.11.002","title":"Metaphor and what is meant: Metaphorical content, what is said, and contextualism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Grice; Metaphor; Contextualism; Content (measure theory); Epistemology; Linguistics; Pragmatics; Psychology; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06092749645764313,"gpt":0.3133544094078879,"spread":0.2524269129502448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007357482,0.000246771,0.0007185027,0.0001290984,0.00009221741,0.0006189339,0.0001866733,0.0001739178,0.0008923179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001997397,0.0001832139,0.0002062545,0.0001867006,0.0001349513,0.00171067,0.00006508069,0.0004494587,0.00005690108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002008621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002925763,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001671068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004641288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978825,0.0003068613,0.0008494435,0.0002491717,0.0004455409,0.000266483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980875,0.0003571302,0.0006704804,0.0001921229,0.0003182887,0.0003745157],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001291705,0.0007027905,0.0006983213,0.0004590389,0.005302247,0.001097358,0.3677801,5.531264e-7,0.008173777,0.01522605,0.05948074,0.5397874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01619437,0.003693267,0.003530153,0.001119765,0.006342351,0.00460012,0.7603264,0.0007939019,0.01167531,0.0172527,0.172885,0.001586715],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7651616,0.1996428,0.00452022,0.02681831,0.002063117,0.0004682029,0.00004011076,0.00003605148,0.001249515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9254818,0.03753623,0.002978941,0.03256689,0.0007159996,0.000008423466,0.00000553875,0.00005761269,0.0006485425],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5382006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9770254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106110953","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.013","title":"Editorials’ genre and media roles: Le Monde's editorials from 1999 to 2001","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Media studies; Sociology; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03843885235218079,"gpt":0.2600542512134785,"spread":0.2216153988612977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005204576,0.0001452547,0.0004596201,0.0001474857,0.000253253,0.0001799609,0.000194624,0.00006944905,0.0004925292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001371607,0.000110624,0.0001243275,0.00003674404,0.00009708868,0.0001787295,0.00004880611,0.0001730364,0.00003269157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002633959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001877794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003884248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003593518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998394,0.00006019091,0.0006863941,0.0001055699,0.0005653788,0.0001885093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981346,0.0004244663,0.000481732,0.0001614319,0.0005579837,0.0002398489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003365587,0.0001489874,0.0001801497,0.00001334657,0.000252723,0.00008577336,0.03048882,0.00007584858,0.0002871851,0.01126965,0.9569507,0.0002131501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007404303,0.0001357713,0.0001088173,0.00008703141,0.0003560153,0.00001219565,0.008751619,0.0001370948,0.0002499041,0.01396452,0.9752208,0.0002357773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.6744817,0.007801799,0.001939727,0.005643929,0.2754659,0.0004116611,0.0005759871,0.00006951638,0.03360971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3728893,0.001091164,0.0042202,0.0002781816,0.6205531,0.000002459184,0.00001369082,0.00003360337,0.0009183795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3450872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5392849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136892597","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.016","title":"Examination dialogue: An argumentation framework for critically questioning an expert opinion","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Expert opinion; Argumentative; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03496806484847136,"gpt":0.3467371194531408,"spread":0.3117690546046695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001203586,0.00008905445,0.0001468083,0.0001298275,0.0001319853,0.0002727664,0.0002647366,0.00008681703,0.000004854262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000387918,0.00008085614,0.00005085458,0.0001119919,0.00001224472,0.00191168,0.00001546726,0.000100267,0.000001928701],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007096243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004930384,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001587223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008010682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985766,0.0002151897,0.0005994566,0.0001202748,0.0003564614,0.0001319769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984453,0.0002429758,0.0005247823,0.0001810649,0.0005303548,0.00007554612],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001820365,0.0007209591,0.0006411978,0.0001056601,0.00002190899,0.000006261542,0.005703164,0.003662676,0.009993616,0.918393,0.0009837191,0.05974964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001375418,0.001524696,0.03773376,0.0005640367,0.00002336493,0.0001267646,0.0007421948,0.7850525,0.005353861,0.1654648,0.001639494,0.0003990966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03296421,0.0000981816,0.9650453,0.0004598767,0.00118172,0.0001735708,0.000001304314,0.00002746543,0.00004838278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5067753,0.00001592816,0.4923702,0.0001007228,0.000706534,0.000006228139,0.00001233892,0.000006607504,0.000006214224],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7813898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3297218,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000489864","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2008.11.002","title":"How do we know he is not talking about himself? Demonstrations in Science Classroom","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Conflation; Gesture; Focus (optics); Reflexive pronoun; Dialectic; Semiotics; Phenomenon; Cognitive science; Human body; Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics; Communication; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02028745383490928,"gpt":0.3139892696600401,"spread":0.2937018158251309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001018855,0.0001211283,0.0002341893,0.0004068821,0.0001287733,0.0002348731,0.0003058881,0.00009984618,0.0001953492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002775725,0.00009856353,0.0001012167,0.000585613,0.0001129194,0.0005245343,0.00001453438,0.0004230701,0.00002973454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007738044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000161462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003372202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001758128,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984637,0.0001061217,0.0005263205,0.0001406869,0.0004799462,0.0002832495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987705,0.0001154309,0.0005288368,0.0002089863,0.0002668356,0.000109382],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001107139,0.001143633,0.002823239,0.00005306607,0.0001281521,0.0004170087,0.03722849,0.00003717155,0.0289941,0.04322543,0.0104399,0.8753991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01623858,0.004871013,0.2924924,0.005159536,0.001552104,0.007601198,0.1169705,0.005136004,0.03699728,0.3653596,0.1446378,0.002984009],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.909103,0.007218687,0.0303109,0.02684228,0.001950466,0.0003426693,0.00001615083,0.00003744816,0.02417834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876052,0.0004496383,0.01014901,0.0007354695,0.0003041015,0.00000182438,6.086804e-7,0.000008646076,0.0007455419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8724151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4019304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167659325","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.003","title":"What language processing can tell us about perspective taking: A reply to Bezuidenhout (2013)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Conversation; Comprehension; Sentence processing; Representation (politics); Computer science; Sentence; Linguistics; Cognitive science; Psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01925868949409141,"gpt":0.3296967399345969,"spread":0.3104380504405054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005747168,0.0001893447,0.0003755978,0.0002597885,0.0000953935,0.0003774473,0.0002831103,0.000104962,0.001727051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004672549,0.000147913,0.0001410179,0.0002680977,0.00004609145,0.0006314037,0.00003769708,0.0004057967,0.0003221562],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001730647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000123983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007846552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001322545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982536,0.0001447052,0.000655394,0.0001959952,0.0004135571,0.0003367513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975819,0.00009847411,0.0009682875,0.000287226,0.0008429392,0.0002211963],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002561049,0.000898168,0.002004048,0.0002139006,0.0006539194,0.0008606448,0.7927902,0.00004984028,0.006164342,0.001662621,0.0681998,0.1262464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002983558,0.001400027,0.0452638,0.001802291,0.0007010123,0.002936486,0.9207051,0.0003364776,0.002732223,0.006329913,0.01379966,0.001009446],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730906,0.006303617,0.002195027,0.003198822,0.001448189,0.0004076116,0.000004256377,0.00003799613,0.01331384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870579,0.00009064248,0.004546452,0.004339283,0.0009357011,0.00002006567,0.000002036831,0.0000450465,0.002962908],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1279149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894927725","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2018.09.006","title":"Tag-naxon? (Tag-Right?) in instructional talk: Opening or blocking learning opportunities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Blocking (statistics); Psychology; Computer science; Computer network","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.115557976066533,"gpt":0.3249616286163154,"spread":0.2094036525497824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008409385,0.0001605816,0.0003170035,0.0003331015,0.0004290186,0.0004907813,0.000445148,0.00005379572,0.00462629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002644393,0.0001160926,0.0000825689,0.00007592511,0.000428739,0.00103059,0.0001135919,0.0005551162,0.00002160105],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007607923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003093644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005518694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001073192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998226,0.0001975959,0.0008441558,0.00008813361,0.0004229456,0.0002212036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980876,0.0002566898,0.0008741355,0.0002053787,0.0005020662,0.00007410481],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000250945,0.0003501436,0.00134922,0.0001963829,0.0003745072,0.0004484154,0.1885021,0.0007009812,0.000370961,0.7824845,0.006177092,0.01879468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001786982,0.0007087905,0.0005499563,0.00106339,0.0001226894,0.0009698183,0.3640471,0.00201655,0.0004303275,0.01271414,0.6150461,0.0005440949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8447295,0.0003763463,0.0003820617,0.001449232,0.001057751,0.0001416987,0.000007785869,0.00004483548,0.1518108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861272,0.0001146168,0.006050909,0.0001576024,0.001335346,0.000003663094,0.000005107348,0.00002649864,0.00617906],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7697704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008398116","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(03)00051-1","title":"Evaluative metadiscursive comments and face-work in conversational discourse","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Psychology; Construct (python library); Face (sociological concept); Affect (linguistics); Linguistics; Conversation analysis; Discourse analysis; Social psychology; Communication; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04574994219080977,"gpt":0.3229865131530607,"spread":0.277236570962251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006898669,0.00009263679,0.0002456853,0.0001455936,0.00008693385,0.0001064523,0.00007311528,0.00002127151,0.0008571819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004577001,0.00006680402,0.00007443376,0.00004321528,0.0001523004,0.0001629286,0.00001186009,0.0001441142,0.000007316259],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003904111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008374811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001141459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005868142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989771,0.0001255197,0.0004172479,0.00006196017,0.0003069322,0.0001112842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990128,0.0001843436,0.0003963172,0.00006902248,0.0002712465,0.0000662374],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003566436,0.0003064924,0.006115818,0.0000262277,0.0004523476,0.00003223016,0.07528402,0.0004925804,0.000004108475,0.9118562,0.005075484,0.0003188681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008813393,0.0007192147,0.007698804,0.0007686735,0.003288673,0.00005978774,0.4529689,0.004960173,0.0002063944,0.3088679,0.2105352,0.00111285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8536403,0.003057172,0.003826476,0.007832724,0.001882893,0.0004633592,0.00006114045,0.00001020044,0.1292257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974971,0.00006696862,0.00121186,0.0002303405,0.0002359461,0.000001352885,0.000002988304,0.00000730005,0.0007461642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6029882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9385541,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088331110","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.003","title":"Up north there: Discourse-pragmatic deixis in Northern Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistic Variation and Morphology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deixis; Locative case; Linguistics; Value (mathematics); French; Pragmatics; Sociology; Geography; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03333601547341808,"gpt":0.3141568156044611,"spread":0.280820800131043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007825291,0.00008664432,0.0002638877,0.00006616115,0.00009955576,0.00005159767,0.0003000798,0.00007113553,0.0003552471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002362356,0.00007145101,0.00008155264,0.0002219343,0.00008521185,0.000128589,0.0000251359,0.0003415599,0.00005056187],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002208226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00100279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003323197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6046551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984856,0.0002411184,0.0005800273,0.00007699172,0.0004169447,0.0001992993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987655,0.0002143729,0.0005383317,0.00008473564,0.0002100448,0.0001869704],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005368318,0.0001811061,0.6142967,0.00004294318,0.00008663666,0.0002361542,0.3556834,0.0005915666,0.00002077744,0.02234897,0.003353797,0.003104216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007653338,0.001136367,0.3993244,0.0003886621,0.0005099124,0.0001102881,0.09698182,0.001465231,0.00003225041,0.02668143,0.4645541,0.001162152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9641536,0.00006424433,0.003810309,0.01511496,0.001175977,0.000172755,0.000002494089,0.00001571971,0.0154899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952456,0.00002466229,0.002902017,0.0007809895,0.0005165904,0.000001143836,0.000001427308,0.00001005562,0.0005174642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6013319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5023702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381804677","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2023.05.012","title":"Small talk across Englishes: A focus on Namibia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistic Variation and Morphology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Varieties of English; Pragmatics; Linguistics; Irish; English language; Variety (cybernetics); Focus (optics); World Englishes; Sociology; American English; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05622451884697995,"gpt":0.3553825334995373,"spread":0.2991580146525574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002160611,0.00005976874,0.0001614737,0.00008418816,0.0002172615,0.00007881277,0.0002260515,0.00009258752,0.000127886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007203969,0.00005011195,0.00008168161,0.0002817657,0.00007419266,0.00005684884,0.00002815012,0.000199244,0.0001035692],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007223063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001912964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009014484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000469906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988312,0.000170605,0.0003594769,0.00006017504,0.0003483485,0.0002302536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986073,0.0005191754,0.0003643863,0.00009151,0.0003024827,0.0001151008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001120032,0.0004463535,0.002585794,0.00006926485,0.0002227148,0.001250111,0.3875116,0.0006637297,0.0004690732,0.5050066,0.07269124,0.02897153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002127948,0.0006076366,0.00574399,0.0001857319,0.00008307881,0.00006803976,0.05564471,0.0006905707,0.0003058437,0.09361944,0.8405699,0.0003530802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.891461,0.00005056704,0.0034253,0.0133392,0.006806275,0.0002363204,0.00001690384,0.0001292708,0.08453523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935552,0.00008520375,0.002424437,0.0003926307,0.001346471,0.000001283674,9.384644e-7,0.00001001571,0.002183759],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7678787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8624344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317933678","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2023.01.007","title":"Socio-pragmatic variation in request refusals in Cameroon French","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Formality; Pragmatics; Variation (astronomy); Sociocultural evolution; Linguistics; Realisation; Relation (database); Psychology; Sociolinguistics; Contextualization; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0429309864969017,"gpt":0.3139261259824292,"spread":0.2709951394855275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001784933,0.0001167098,0.0003104586,0.000498906,0.000080553,0.0001916489,0.0003397366,0.00006066293,0.0004267172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004808305,0.00009630407,0.00006407062,0.0002084316,0.00008942397,0.0006326953,0.00005032657,0.0003887021,0.0000949432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001349217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001552951,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002547305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002653252,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998113,0.0003052369,0.0009611155,0.00007447667,0.0003504572,0.0001957642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983694,0.0004422702,0.0006957423,0.0002724825,0.0001808426,0.00003924373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002122304,0.0004669146,0.002852757,0.0003692394,0.0001060647,0.0001825293,0.5853308,0.00163946,0.0008251914,0.3914368,0.01420709,0.002561874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004855732,0.0005717319,0.09298102,0.002764212,0.0001968358,0.00009912148,0.399992,0.008534512,0.0001074929,0.4530485,0.03578523,0.001063558],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587538,0.0004387356,0.0001073849,0.004007588,0.0005824339,0.0002215536,0.00001375081,0.00004973873,0.03582499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971138,0.0002268194,0.001185239,0.0001034524,0.0002630432,0.00000843934,0.00001090922,0.00001906566,0.001069193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1853388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4672254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086756136","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.011","title":"Centering and noun phrase realization in Kaqchikel Mayan","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Noun phrase; Realization (probability); Linguistics; Noun; Nominalization; Phrase; Determiner phrase; Psychology; Philosophy; Natural language processing; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03128620189074253,"gpt":0.4635785005962958,"spread":0.4322922987055532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007836776,0.00003326917,0.00007463826,0.0000991129,0.00008052114,0.0000524949,0.00007416104,0.00004274232,0.00008361202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009046369,0.00003008418,0.00001614734,0.0000993319,0.00004743055,0.0001494882,0.000008418879,0.0001620961,0.000002320039],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000224967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001648925,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003480237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002301172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994431,0.00006227895,0.0002363783,0.00002958728,0.0001433824,0.00008531693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995329,0.00005960042,0.0001969466,0.00004313073,0.00007839561,0.00008902243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004359133,0.0005316734,0.1137822,0.0001463807,0.00002576857,0.00002377434,0.5497195,0.00007102415,0.00920375,0.2177784,0.002966009,0.1057079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002567557,0.000138823,0.1357751,0.0004027689,0.00005567815,0.0001147081,0.05305595,0.003247835,0.0006349132,0.02061598,0.7829183,0.0004723709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857633,0.00002284387,0.0002364124,0.00181029,0.0006081876,0.00004684899,7.587009e-7,0.000003919642,0.01150743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960942,0.0001482018,0.002933664,0.000177106,0.0004024757,2.815037e-7,3.714605e-7,0.000003586129,0.0002400757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7799523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1284108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184137896","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.019","title":"Logical Form – Not logical enough for logic, not linguistic enough for linguistics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Sentence; Generative grammar; Utterance; Logical form; Computer science; Atomic sentence; Logical consequence; Representation (politics); Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04775607042432032,"gpt":0.3388839354651275,"spread":0.2911278650408071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00139695,0.0002827384,0.0006640177,0.0001253575,0.0002275547,0.0003885622,0.00129218,0.0002875354,0.00001334848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03095631,0.0002106679,0.0003801674,0.0002826575,0.00008027571,0.0001789079,0.0003093493,0.0005545308,0.000003603763],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001469071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004416201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.462105e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002044703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973245,0.00007962454,0.001146872,0.0003321891,0.0006129692,0.0005038579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930643,0.002032861,0.0009904341,0.0004520906,0.003264267,0.0001960071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001498631,0.0004943135,0.00000970203,0.000551057,0.00009553324,0.0004753953,0.001241605,0.00007865695,0.003738105,0.9717259,0.005279371,0.0161605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001491725,0.001667301,0.00001895857,0.0003537748,0.0001830061,0.000762972,0.00006891302,0.03329661,0.06725121,0.7588485,0.1354641,0.0005928384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.000331797,0.001376382,0.9927517,0.003130268,0.001536428,0.0003435329,0.00002672286,0.0001329584,0.0003701858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.176924,0.00007618281,0.8192633,0.001908821,0.001603427,0.00001470019,0.000007087191,0.00002206459,0.0001804446],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2128773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9772063,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210794128","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.007","title":"Book review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01652834766124383,"gpt":0.3107019587252859,"spread":0.2941736110640421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001004921,0.00008536995,0.0003696155,0.00005362884,0.00002714594,0.00002987606,0.0001688481,0.00003084256,0.004488233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001795444,0.00006810611,0.0001808335,0.0002647306,0.00002121283,0.0002750737,0.00003970096,0.0002797147,0.001202965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007621975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003157226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.479429e-8,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.052626e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983357,0.0001850032,0.0007729048,0.00004962226,0.0005238404,0.0001329947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979255,0.0001226677,0.0008675294,0.0002306697,0.0007373461,0.0001163229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002932549,0.00008057298,0.00002315288,0.0007076972,0.0000633374,0.0003770437,0.00005489073,0.00001100738,0.001576011,0.0001454204,0.9963027,0.0006552592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000275646,0.00003988924,0.00007457401,0.003850844,0.0002165273,0.002373444,0.00003133381,0.00004309537,0.001629897,0.0003194606,0.9910688,0.00007644394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004185347,0.9859544,0.000980085,0.006396972,0.0003150372,0.00007339483,0.000005468651,0.0000131745,0.005842934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001131184,0.7224989,0.1089276,0.1430127,0.001644625,0.000003853763,0.000009504526,0.0002558771,0.02251583],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2634555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410033196","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.04.006","title":"The effect of online methods on epistemic inference and scalar implicature","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Implicature; Inference; Scalar (mathematics); Epistemology; Psychology; Pragmatics; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01885457153728866,"gpt":0.4612427903061239,"spread":0.4423882187688353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001238099,0.00007851893,0.0002339877,0.00005498006,0.00006832569,0.00002373513,0.0002100034,0.00008241899,0.00001204125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009696061,0.00004113832,0.0000640047,0.0001153948,0.0001127286,0.00002643399,0.00002989297,0.0003002532,0.000001156928],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002102901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006157109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006977806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003522174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989387,0.000397912,0.0004153583,0.00005864609,0.00009214217,0.00009725752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945702,0.004706248,0.0004106277,0.0001813981,0.0001044793,0.00002704968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001068486,0.0004374375,0.08268855,0.0009768873,0.001200514,0.00001661493,0.002070752,0.0002168808,0.00486395,0.5852494,0.03840933,0.2828013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001735819,0.003646078,0.8396098,0.0009394502,0.0003706055,0.0002934223,0.005078468,0.0001502076,0.002899265,0.1199835,0.02507167,0.0002216916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9765112,0.004541978,0.002653594,0.00982065,0.0009680636,0.0001322019,0.000006066198,0.00000512859,0.005361118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902772,0.0003906373,0.008479071,0.0001447162,0.00009535721,0.000003885289,0.000001012002,0.000005153307,0.0006029387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7569213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1677572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414714768","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.09.006","title":"Toward a granular analysis of the discourse marker ti: in Tunisian Arabic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Situated; Discourse analysis; Meaning (existential); Arabic; Relevance (law); Discourse marker","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.022449762857013,"gpt":0.3454440320696199,"spread":0.3229942692126069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001147474,0.00005664007,0.0003100004,0.0001264996,0.0001609165,0.00002513957,0.0002779912,0.00004887037,0.00003124082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001782193,0.00003168013,0.0002449309,0.0009830389,0.000255216,0.00005674092,0.00004147501,0.000158529,4.544415e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009326312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001580141,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003235501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001513347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988078,0.0002328841,0.0004291171,0.00004395953,0.0003673867,0.0001188749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990828,0.0002269086,0.0003452727,0.00008529129,0.0002291966,0.00003050201],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003398857,0.0002806559,0.6328354,0.0000871542,0.002222224,0.00002628654,0.1715537,0.000518447,0.00003543967,0.186035,0.00311694,0.003254665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007683638,0.00004508484,0.7750198,0.0004621643,0.003654582,0.000001125969,0.1525473,0.0008641007,0.00002857958,0.04702849,0.01937905,0.0002014142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.94783,0.0007606385,0.0009775277,0.01414157,0.0006980335,0.0001549829,0.000005180634,0.000004275805,0.03542782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979907,0.0002678241,0.0004852081,0.0001058562,0.00006722828,6.929188e-7,1.691052e-7,0.000001611069,0.001080754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1421843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.213358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416527252","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.10.008","title":"Responding to new information with negative discourse particles nein/nee/nö in German talk-in-interaction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Conversation; German; Embodied cognition; Function (biology); Conversation analysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02390624323499581,"gpt":0.3426760640337922,"spread":0.3187698207987965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004071794,0.0001045051,0.0002041913,0.0008805633,0.0000746415,0.0003517351,0.0002087266,0.00002583105,0.0001208771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002081419,0.00007720119,0.0000378652,0.0002704589,0.00006017268,0.00218111,0.00004087795,0.0002696005,0.0000149612],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001417807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002023853,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001996628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003619728,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988561,0.000104338,0.0006354475,0.00004899109,0.0002125001,0.0001426595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989378,0.0002308249,0.00044069,0.0001816571,0.0001558158,0.00005316935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005948278,0.0002136886,0.0009639472,0.00009667681,0.00009766534,0.00003261001,0.4224729,0.005213963,0.0002708765,0.548228,0.005750799,0.01606401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004559759,0.0006887941,0.008794677,0.004070986,0.0001643172,0.00006284883,0.8160878,0.002992031,0.002190232,0.0390645,0.1207434,0.0005806503],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634491,0.00007062945,0.002375503,0.005509721,0.0003116013,0.0002156513,0.000003942276,0.00001346041,0.02805036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954426,0.00001777683,0.002725172,0.0003143106,0.0001235057,0.000005106805,0.000002392714,0.000006687491,0.001362463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5091636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3391789,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408392965","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.02.007","title":"How to investigate implicit pragmatic phenomena in corpora","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Szegedi Tudományegyetem; Mount Allison University; Magyar Tudományos Akadémia","keywords":"Psychology; Linguistics; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01963106529511746,"gpt":0.3026480574936785,"spread":0.283016992198561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009376659,0.0001465337,0.0003926965,0.0005253494,0.00003632314,0.00009388791,0.0002704148,0.000094738,0.0001314714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005938467,0.0001197458,0.00009152118,0.0006113067,0.00003734971,0.0001674434,0.00004151529,0.0003427858,0.00005707568],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008827224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001126303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001593243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003673234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984707,0.0002286431,0.0006841981,0.0001256171,0.0002381516,0.0002526816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998682,0.0002208853,0.0005282876,0.0002524955,0.0001815718,0.000134736],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008968052,0.003064006,0.01666895,0.001679807,0.001945482,0.001697879,0.09121657,0.0004132657,0.03184762,0.4769363,0.1357816,0.2378517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01752786,0.00289268,0.1158215,0.004298595,0.001509681,0.001259084,0.09112768,0.001170884,0.00494061,0.6578215,0.09969212,0.001937773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9175908,0.0009367093,0.02972635,0.008076299,0.001730337,0.0005299819,0.00001098878,0.0000271349,0.04137138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829202,0.00002411562,0.008468282,0.003281942,0.0003599819,0.00002169109,0.000003655312,0.00002291307,0.0048972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2359139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.488309,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069733889","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(02)80012-1","title":"Ist Deutsch noch internationale Wissenschaftssprache? Englisch auch für die Lehre an den deutschsprachigen Hochschulen","year":2002,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistic Education and Pedagogy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Humanities","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08390721047989252,"gpt":0.3387318760185297,"spread":0.2548246655386372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001540273,0.0005298668,0.0008107094,0.0005014378,0.0007554801,0.001095667,0.0009821957,0.0002793043,0.01270049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002704268,0.0004721193,0.0003838527,0.0001122828,0.0003179518,0.0009031543,0.0001284069,0.001342105,0.001193179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002074355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000396379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001327081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000404159,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953388,0.0005007077,0.002076842,0.0003367009,0.001160949,0.0005860187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993287,0.0009569149,0.002191618,0.0005962496,0.002398214,0.0005699677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002745303,0.006493212,0.006423126,0.001002684,0.003757298,0.0008168566,0.4192037,0.0003753951,0.0001553182,0.3841074,0.160888,0.01650248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001178364,0.0007114643,0.0006108439,0.0004617828,0.001082439,0.0002328707,0.02248116,0.00505382,0.00008387533,0.002090581,0.9653525,0.0006603272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6262578,0.07550023,0.002761967,0.0280232,0.04526488,0.001350543,0.0006377152,0.0001979451,0.2200057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9163625,0.00437535,0.00827192,0.001202082,0.02887337,0.00000873658,0.00007034231,0.0001451915,0.04069053],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8044645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413246018","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.013","title":"Putting negotiation on a ‘principal-ed’ footing: A corpus-informed discourse analysis of person deixis in diplomatic debates","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Deixis; Negotiation; Principal (computer security); Linguistics; Discourse analysis; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03805956976609867,"gpt":0.3377791611832958,"spread":0.2997195914171972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007663749,0.0001559253,0.0005475777,0.001071666,0.0001321981,0.0001934298,0.0003736469,0.00004897776,0.0001719172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008478312,0.0001194391,0.0002435811,0.000384085,0.0001446539,0.0004343931,0.00004624011,0.000264337,0.000004329414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001385919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001979298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009134294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001467858,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981371,0.000155431,0.001062849,0.00008441978,0.000380636,0.0001795287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969894,0.0008885964,0.0014506,0.0003229049,0.0003063264,0.00004220999],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001410112,0.001099876,0.02656179,0.0009108186,0.003586641,0.00002402618,0.4552886,0.01947918,0.0003119403,0.480725,0.001117574,0.0107535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003644318,0.0007551591,0.06646066,0.004837922,0.00617475,0.00001479336,0.7943838,0.1007461,0.001076634,0.01954463,0.001634975,0.0007262105],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.971781,0.0004239066,0.001010909,0.001067874,0.0001775029,0.0001757075,0.00001044178,0.00001627023,0.02533645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972281,0.00006982335,0.002090755,0.0000972117,0.000061915,0.00000533339,0.000009632249,0.0000105234,0.0004266586],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4611804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4870586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376881511","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2023.05.001","title":"Book review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogative; Utterance; Conversation; Sentence; Linguistics; Position (finance); Psychology; Expression (computer science); Conversation analysis; Turn-taking; Computer science; Philosophy; Business; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05087849212681871,"gpt":0.3283859582954197,"spread":0.277507466168601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005619553,0.00006599965,0.0001984722,0.00008430047,0.00009487374,0.000102662,0.0002957099,0.00001451359,0.004769667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001611977,0.00004563047,0.00009581745,0.00005499122,0.00008125736,0.000343601,0.00004125623,0.0001621656,0.0003645929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001462624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006737067,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001920021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008735512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990973,0.00007577743,0.0004509566,0.00003118271,0.0002468989,0.00009784282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989394,0.0001396557,0.0004275737,0.000231457,0.0002227376,0.00003915448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000120555,0.00001957738,0.000002110679,0.0002877437,0.00003346186,0.00001439392,0.00622573,0.000004384277,0.000006102224,0.0472496,0.9454383,0.0007173443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001012781,0.0000336073,0.00001571272,0.0008688399,0.00005679068,0.00002272425,0.004614652,0.00002398853,0.000009504432,0.002328277,0.9918662,0.00005839518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001782688,0.6471323,0.0001394816,0.04386291,0.00126788,0.0002970629,0.00001862583,0.0001428149,0.3053562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03880054,0.6283905,0.003102185,0.07607246,0.004554573,0.00002642735,0.00004350701,0.000140656,0.2488692],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05648705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414272901","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.010","title":"Negotiating truth and relevance: A new typology of English rising declaratives","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia Graduate School; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Negotiation; Typology; Politeness; Relation (database); Relevance (law); Evidentiality; Variation (astronomy); Narrative; Relevance theory","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02256017017833487,"gpt":0.2723912746338605,"spread":0.2498311044555256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004045679,0.0000812689,0.0002809541,0.0001540422,0.00009376692,0.00009118766,0.00008681411,0.00004425084,0.00004851852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01329653,0.00006917471,0.00004351083,0.00003939387,0.00009785366,0.0001483724,0.00002838378,0.0001699321,6.233059e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002279857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001460203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005040906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005209208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990134,0.00007377485,0.0006160931,0.00006005865,0.0001391584,0.00009748997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972034,0.001159265,0.0007813699,0.00008224553,0.0007396017,0.00003419493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002408929,0.00003707469,0.0006349681,0.0001205116,0.0001135309,0.000002683721,0.09586214,0.0001195334,0.00005643706,0.9008945,0.0005958258,0.001538668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002509807,0.0005169017,0.002047852,0.001553562,0.0006961739,0.00002193339,0.1274451,0.007835516,0.0008753953,0.8296596,0.02652072,0.0003174062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8815251,0.002817637,0.04299239,0.005472011,0.01359629,0.0002642203,0.0000126364,0.00003692954,0.0532828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982244,0.00008219797,0.01569521,0.00005858185,0.001497915,2.589799e-7,6.069311e-7,0.000008093913,0.0004131094],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1007189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950149,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320401858","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2023.01.011","title":"Book review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Demonstrative; Linguistics; Epistemology; Intuition; Philosophy of language; Stalemate; Philosophy of mind; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Cognitive science; Metaphysics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03596340550001283,"gpt":0.2820554642824509,"spread":0.2460920587824381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007549974,0.00006959071,0.0002253109,0.0001062628,0.00008010645,0.0000669873,0.0001361619,0.00001922014,0.002801113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001463235,0.00005399129,0.00009435654,0.0000466584,0.00003427884,0.0001371803,0.00002146192,0.0001253012,0.000429105],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002490422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005064262,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005370185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008491984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989338,0.00004601992,0.0005658396,0.00004123129,0.0003034414,0.0001096721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987456,0.0001809346,0.0005472882,0.0001154699,0.0003674994,0.00004326871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002514806,0.00002850395,0.00001080881,0.0007559484,0.00005912593,0.00003709694,0.008874626,0.000009394596,0.000007726133,0.1044166,0.8849455,0.0008521971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001581223,0.00006013489,0.00004515893,0.001517629,0.0001434402,0.00002717339,0.0008309747,0.0003970718,0.00001421418,0.03316389,0.9635612,0.00008102995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004916109,0.2058216,0.004248107,0.6653479,0.02382346,0.001068832,0.00005159281,0.0003807264,0.09434169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1463096,0.3483316,0.01976094,0.1802998,0.06383548,0.00003513002,0.00009811777,0.0004761097,0.2408531],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4850481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981105,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}