{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":35,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":35,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"de68fc462177","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Pragmatics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2024002186","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(01)00060-1","title":"Repetitions as self-repair strategies in English and German conversations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"German; Linguistics; Demonstrative; Psychology; Verb; Repetition (rhetorical device); Pronoun; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Caroline L. Rieger","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01883008113298746,"gpt":0.2890146241682085,"spread":0.270184543035221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003138941,0.000464803,0.0004380702,0.001829991,0.001753966,0.006498122,0.0008682126,0.002079793,0.003140045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01853824,0.0006402389,0.0003002005,0.001164758,0.003213731,0.007247817,0.002200962,0.001163759,0.000375847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00155959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001154448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005538888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004402922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948274,0.003186368,0.0002724069,0.0005533788,0.0007163019,0.0004441412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792815,0.01640722,0.001832864,0.0008892083,0.0009908291,0.0005983629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001352746,0.0002019508,0.02247559,0.00052965,0.0000944645,0.001298055,0.8168676,0.001321192,0.02638779,0.08616429,0.0008128265,0.04249391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002678031,0.0008002454,0.1491368,0.0007356707,0.0005467566,0.004792392,0.7087792,0.02260076,0.02433283,0.05757866,0.03003084,0.000398053],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9642814,0.0009475437,0.005207744,0.0003107956,0.00002142629,0.00003556291,0.00008459261,0.0000934896,0.02901749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980829,0.00009102096,0.0007722919,0.00001846968,0.000006457687,0.00001329608,0.0000385926,0.00003502654,0.00094204],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006498122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01660055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573947339","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.009","title":"Loving a partner in a Foreign Language","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Feeling; Multiculturalism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Social psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Personality; Scale (ratio); Developmental psychology","authors":[{"name":"Jean‐Marc Dewaele","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lora Salomidou","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03411938343792474,"gpt":0.4481352301175898,"spread":0.4140158466796651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002341975,0.0002999422,0.0004229036,0.0004588278,0.009111824,0.006103822,0.000660932,0.001469535,0.006678791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007245923,0.0002341921,0.0001892572,0.0003318207,0.003671757,0.003277941,0.004482997,0.003854778,0.001012959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00140367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001690135,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006160517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009580818,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980141,0.001218581,0.0000424691,0.0001373331,0.0001865549,0.0004009308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955627,0.001650234,0.0005877856,0.0001982542,0.0003794445,0.001621663],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002942348,0.0003906897,0.02630488,0.00008698709,0.00002967087,0.006594172,0.921772,0.000100495,0.005306611,0.02324305,0.003283308,0.0125939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001848388,0.0001460196,0.008333686,0.00005972049,0.00002138403,0.00240091,0.9720663,0.0003286643,0.0005081846,0.002933046,0.01314222,0.00004121722],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9486766,0.000258829,0.0008766922,0.002766517,0.0001832438,0.00001129119,0.0000165781,0.00002358532,0.04718662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962499,0.00006272276,0.0001464826,0.0003352784,0.00001071898,0.000002561705,0.000007262957,0.00001042824,0.003174586],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009111824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0223428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007229764","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.005","title":"Acquisition of Relevance implicatures: A case against a Rationality-based account of conversational implicatures","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; McGill University","keywords":"Relevance (law); Rationality; Linguistics; Situated; Computer science; Relevance theory; Psychology; Cognitive science; Natural language processing; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Anna Verbuk","is_ca":true},{"name":"Thomas R. Shultz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01162429082116027,"gpt":0.3086297154305622,"spread":0.2970054246094019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01743274,0.0006049207,0.000684292,0.001443328,0.001492478,0.005189807,0.002550357,0.004265734,0.00553055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06503008,0.001364816,0.0008292996,0.0006329329,0.012574,0.01818021,0.006097412,0.007537243,0.0008708029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001596023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002601835,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002648348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001831586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9851462,0.006792301,0.000936273,0.002261572,0.003748515,0.001115188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9350548,0.04116313,0.004336657,0.01247489,0.00570968,0.00126081],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002960333,0.0001493202,0.01114429,0.0003004165,0.00009048813,0.001657607,0.05646328,0.001150201,0.01410391,0.8546242,0.002848639,0.05717167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001245816,0.00008633109,0.01227104,0.0001867492,0.0001370464,0.002739283,0.01003991,0.01051675,0.01182423,0.9270247,0.02488134,0.0001680242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.50384,0.001319501,0.2511624,0.04685418,0.0003340983,0.0001775796,0.0003997676,0.00100211,0.1949103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852375,0.0001447069,0.01151658,0.0007019906,0.0000791825,0.00003806947,0.00006591177,0.000200717,0.002015281],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01743274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0921942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977132548","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.011","title":"Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Conversation analysis; Psychology; Mandarin Chinese; Negotiation; Linguistics; Psychological intervention; Face negotiation theory; Face (sociological concept); Communication; Social psychology; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Xiaoting Li","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02563358935632088,"gpt":0.2738649656750811,"spread":0.2482313763187602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01224624,0.0008838678,0.0007264453,0.001033094,0.003283024,0.006251385,0.001663854,0.003818662,0.008237656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03812767,0.001008957,0.0004810704,0.0008929729,0.004318666,0.01223118,0.004711258,0.003453156,0.001428292],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001463418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001479814,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001780604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001206545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9842559,0.0123531,0.0005145522,0.000958326,0.00124841,0.0006697785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719772,0.02364265,0.00108696,0.001234927,0.001627987,0.0004302984],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001987658,0.0002477305,0.005204584,0.0005269668,0.000062761,0.001503194,0.2580945,0.001956137,0.05573741,0.5938598,0.002289265,0.07853004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004898938,0.001448822,0.01313698,0.0008762241,0.0004636076,0.00245499,0.14454,0.09454641,0.07625321,0.6044586,0.06097179,0.0003594823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6152411,0.0006578088,0.2495566,0.003764394,0.0002921924,0.0003463859,0.0001328912,0.0009270405,0.1290816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793362,0.00008840529,0.01708738,0.0001742135,0.00005857471,0.00007526588,0.00006896208,0.0001979804,0.002913056],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01224624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06476504,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766451116","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.011","title":"Multimodal artefacts and the texture of viewpoint","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Multimodality; Embodied cognition; Gesture; Linguistics; Multimodal interaction; Modalities; Texture (cosmology); Psychology; Metonymy; Relation (database); Field (mathematics); Frame (networking); Section (typography); Computer science; Metaphor; Cognitive science; Sociology; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Image (mathematics)","authors":[{"name":"Lieven Vandelanotte","is_ca":false},{"name":"Barbara Dancygier","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01980878843360596,"gpt":0.3183118507149902,"spread":0.2985030622813843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001524334,0.00034883,0.0003687983,0.001343402,0.001522372,0.007796768,0.0007149905,0.001361172,0.008918037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01613445,0.0005169755,0.0004493041,0.001101492,0.006434934,0.007444514,0.003500849,0.001592496,0.0005747766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006624499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000660018,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001184023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001223673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984872,0.000817463,0.00005095086,0.0001625475,0.0003376482,0.0001440412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994714,0.00319875,0.0004815705,0.0009071274,0.0003908263,0.0003077164],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005168414,0.00003428592,0.005230739,0.0003310243,0.00005589312,0.001049857,0.0777806,0.001285216,0.02400575,0.8400722,0.002785955,0.04685176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002755575,0.0003720247,0.03206603,0.0004567603,0.0001958504,0.002430909,0.05650677,0.009661974,0.005418974,0.8180083,0.07439689,0.0002099218],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5878635,0.002653567,0.1315046,0.005303678,0.0005694766,0.00006220621,0.0002789862,0.0003889436,0.2713751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905255,0.0002102864,0.006850319,0.00007856262,0.00004979311,0.0000141055,0.00004035112,0.0001129887,0.002118046],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008918037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02983385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062868280","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(03)00117-6","title":"Pragmatic functions of local diaphonic repetitions in conversation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Repetition (rhetorical device); Intonation (linguistics); Function (biology); Linguistics; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Speech act; Key (lock); Communication; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; History; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Laurent Perrin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Denise Deshaies","is_ca":true},{"name":"Claude Paradis","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02136171298046459,"gpt":0.3273320874846812,"spread":0.3059703745042167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00140635,0.0005112601,0.0004652953,0.0008294628,0.001082962,0.003284889,0.0005058352,0.0009661079,0.006468094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01210373,0.0006303041,0.0003406288,0.0003907236,0.001148758,0.003398277,0.001644303,0.0009205956,0.0008147656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004964285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003630918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001093815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001102673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985995,0.0006554176,0.00008822581,0.0002617117,0.0002516785,0.0001435764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951657,0.003289794,0.0002667189,0.0004975235,0.0005231214,0.0002571332],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003746754,0.0002384688,0.01852207,0.001167201,0.0001984518,0.00236651,0.07012952,0.002664888,0.6044238,0.1567357,0.001510065,0.1382966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009238869,0.002072714,0.4492499,0.000700659,0.001023526,0.01443519,0.071211,0.08479469,0.09597564,0.2522747,0.02662706,0.0007110449],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8776799,0.0006956101,0.0302454,0.0003592794,0.00006364033,0.00009796566,0.000188235,0.0005078063,0.09016225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960703,0.00005355127,0.00281582,0.00002654661,0.00002285316,0.00002633816,0.00004374517,0.0001073524,0.0008337177],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006468094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02163792,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161834173","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.013","title":"Slurring and common knowledge of ordinary language","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Utterance; Contempt; Linguistics; Sentence; Contradiction; Psychology; Meaning (existential); Competence (human resources); Emotive; Philosophy; Epistemology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Richard B. Vallee","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03050663867209077,"gpt":0.2922494981573361,"spread":0.2617428594852453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01455895,0.0004302041,0.00174914,0.003691957,0.004483589,0.01102785,0.002538462,0.00398179,0.005437075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0553799,0.0009447942,0.001373962,0.002705888,0.04561433,0.03172588,0.009377779,0.004888026,0.0004647999],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002811017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003803365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004816189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002776327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9834582,0.008147475,0.001850286,0.002820848,0.002522452,0.001200845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9349055,0.04252604,0.002292555,0.01493965,0.004328235,0.00100808],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025107,0.00001181473,0.0003283434,0.00003711749,0.00001153512,0.00009858196,0.008309321,0.0002992795,0.0001714264,0.986178,0.0003079319,0.004221422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007812157,0.000004802046,0.0001214146,0.00001809655,0.000007724354,0.00005217289,0.001235002,0.0005880463,0.0001145982,0.9958023,0.002037285,0.00001063329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3394672,0.003002518,0.3841708,0.02363968,0.0004448044,0.0001455669,0.000410683,0.0004179759,0.2483008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824766,0.0002439778,0.01436481,0.0003881284,0.000147857,0.00005259891,0.00009979291,0.00005314903,0.002173148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01455895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07699603,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971196298","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2009.04.009","title":"Subjects and topics in conversation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Utterance; Subject (documents); Conversation; Pronoun; Subject pronoun; Linguistics; Casual; Expression (computer science); Realization (probability); Conversation analysis; Psychology; Personal pronoun; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; World Wide Web","authors":[{"name":"Maite Taboada","is_ca":true},{"name":"Loreley Marie Wiesemann","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02984116434879302,"gpt":0.2813031788552792,"spread":0.2514620145064862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007209116,0.0006396631,0.0008136988,0.003867618,0.006704375,0.01947948,0.0008859421,0.003212947,0.009884045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01421516,0.0008998939,0.0005167223,0.004259456,0.01349258,0.02013737,0.005099056,0.003493556,0.001252936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003227199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002768018,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004699587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002955914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908314,0.007316275,0.0002869935,0.000490858,0.0006850899,0.0003892981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902099,0.007859839,0.0004469646,0.0004491468,0.0005626986,0.0004714384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007321888,0.00002744339,0.001674973,0.0001454168,0.00001431623,0.0002871226,0.1926256,0.0001080812,0.000788525,0.7919213,0.002538783,0.009795232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009586292,0.00008641063,0.004378514,0.0005425803,0.00008557212,0.0004940912,0.1953523,0.001569451,0.001113252,0.6296391,0.1665973,0.00004553551],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2024284,0.0159762,0.0745668,0.02761449,0.0008972771,0.000320417,0.0004874281,0.0003580327,0.6773511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736607,0.001879632,0.006302579,0.000475061,0.0002933271,0.0001500276,0.0001836831,0.0002334016,0.01682158],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01947948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03812593,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977700075","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00129-0","title":"Tough talk: Indirectness and gender in requests for information","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politeness; Psychology; Attunement; Interview; Conversation; Social psychology; Power (physics); Linguistics; Communication; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Marcia Macaulay","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06441492989642562,"gpt":0.3170584595545581,"spread":0.2526435296581325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0084869,0.0006195788,0.0006094429,0.001558906,0.00362909,0.009418014,0.00120302,0.003332203,0.0177359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063789,0.001038857,0.0004093311,0.00109891,0.005974663,0.01115576,0.00632001,0.004190782,0.001530012],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001249871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001299504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001326993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001129808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9884969,0.006994907,0.0005271942,0.0009958321,0.002182734,0.0008024685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9281448,0.0603404,0.004644192,0.002597763,0.002770892,0.001502026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001486252,0.0002066781,0.02604316,0.0007932321,0.0000906941,0.001733749,0.5882474,0.0004127967,0.02432463,0.3090575,0.004210737,0.04339315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000352912,0.0007445608,0.08082193,0.00137428,0.0004743622,0.006274218,0.4472991,0.008190849,0.0241216,0.3172077,0.112705,0.0004335182],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6726453,0.001108024,0.03397788,0.00788077,0.0002460998,0.0001512142,0.0003675921,0.0002530127,0.2833701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905621,0.0001405901,0.00238928,0.0003331838,0.000101192,0.00006572419,0.0000965396,0.000190484,0.006120904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0177359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05933249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052453443","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.003","title":"Joint attention helps explain why children omit new referents","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; British Academy; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Demonstrative; Psychology; Joint attention; Linguistics; Realisation; Noun; Perspective (graphical); Deixis; Cognitive psychology; Maxim; Ostensive definition; Developmental psychology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Barbora Skarabela","is_ca":false},{"name":"Shanley Allen","is_ca":false},{"name":"Thomas C. Scott‐Phillips","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03622710532896149,"gpt":0.3013719151544145,"spread":0.265144809825453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002519659,0.0009473189,0.0006619703,0.00115294,0.0006667741,0.003074854,0.001456412,0.002368215,0.01135551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01746496,0.001140598,0.0007260124,0.0006077703,0.001840068,0.006347845,0.002811039,0.002533128,0.001837721],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006834386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001173303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002430789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002319054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996635,0.0005547815,0.0002403055,0.001010732,0.001130381,0.0004287878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875306,0.006339941,0.00184482,0.002433419,0.001401813,0.0004493944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000922284,0.0004898484,0.235455,0.001516942,0.0004480584,0.01769744,0.04673212,0.002629732,0.2077787,0.2294672,0.01867563,0.2381871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003973976,0.0008867375,0.4240305,0.0007997799,0.001213487,0.03224504,0.02585107,0.02703452,0.12205,0.2881862,0.07689815,0.0004071672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8586325,0.001510412,0.05213221,0.0050975,0.0005607007,0.00007269876,0.0006037011,0.001454144,0.07993606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838288,0.000239415,0.009688895,0.0002944411,0.00006228395,0.00002363795,0.0002209144,0.0004313915,0.005210152],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01135551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03798801,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946148733","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.005","title":"Sarcasm between siblings: Children's use of relationship information in processing ironic remarks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sarcasm; Psychology; Irony; Comprehension; Object (grammar); Attribution; Gaze; Literal and figurative language; Sibling; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","authors":[{"name":"Juanita M. Whalen","is_ca":true},{"name":"Alison Doyle","is_ca":true},{"name":"Penny M. Pexman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02612608026635664,"gpt":0.301005433896603,"spread":0.2748793536302463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00222069,0.000394218,0.0003302654,0.0007410987,0.0006854335,0.001966676,0.0006160552,0.001448332,0.004694817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02999268,0.0007592895,0.0002892085,0.0003856518,0.001311049,0.00205057,0.001174437,0.002052993,0.0005190542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005510024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009071745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005245667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984434,0.0003889207,0.00009690598,0.0002475317,0.0006630119,0.0001602498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841247,0.008320431,0.00463212,0.0009165424,0.001198138,0.000808057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006209759,0.0008774689,0.5819649,0.0003784864,0.0001081098,0.01320052,0.2813647,0.0004816821,0.07539754,0.00451479,0.003216038,0.03787487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007745601,0.0003876755,0.8768435,0.0002381576,0.0001480514,0.01067546,0.09188876,0.001839618,0.009308317,0.003790905,0.004696382,0.0001058133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996086,0.000058314,0.000363432,0.000191785,0.00001146774,0.00001355396,0.00005414323,0.00002278073,0.003198491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976619,0.00007832088,0.00108696,0.00008472522,0.000005241096,0.00001921066,0.0001156102,0.00002342614,0.0009245118],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005245667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01570576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966614013","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.002","title":"Figurative language development/acquisition research: Status and ways forward","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Literal and figurative language; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Metaphor; Embodied cognition; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Psycholinguistics; Language development; Reading (process); Cognition; Computer science; Developmental psychology; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Herbert L. Colston","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04988368206069906,"gpt":0.3618918004989025,"spread":0.3120081184382035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04271677,0.001293391,0.003678895,0.005719411,0.003914069,0.02092509,0.004947206,0.009499221,0.01534185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03103901,0.001082011,0.0009784548,0.005758747,0.03764686,0.04380326,0.00868248,0.008856852,0.001781398],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004205917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01366885,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006078479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008691695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940968,0.002729858,0.0006077263,0.001173562,0.0008476342,0.0005444185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8994544,0.08012888,0.004565144,0.00537011,0.007589964,0.00289147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008362761,0.0009397973,0.01096054,0.007413233,0.0002099296,0.0005151384,0.01102139,0.0002577103,0.002347165,0.5029047,0.007613872,0.4549802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002072597,0.0007896146,0.01679121,0.01594267,0.0003223198,0.001299404,0.03702069,0.001329286,0.003066345,0.7657906,0.1571151,0.0003254465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.03202049,0.7843098,0.007499511,0.140404,0.002133326,0.00007079156,0.0002183826,0.0001185546,0.03322521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3235143,0.6325013,0.01894623,0.01439323,0.004951832,0.0002570459,0.0003085348,0.0001380269,0.004989496],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9572833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2259106,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102901208","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00201-1","title":"The interrogation as a type of dialogue","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Argumentation theory; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02958442364808472,"gpt":0.2958388677965046,"spread":0.2662544441484199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006517326,0.0007134397,0.0008530676,0.001780879,0.003275163,0.01041263,0.002649753,0.004893712,0.01445719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0275889,0.001076572,0.0009457709,0.002454373,0.01108718,0.02024993,0.006732443,0.004420957,0.002619962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000886515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009138388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006615464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004624852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9811615,0.01405507,0.0006500204,0.001374304,0.002182887,0.0005762817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810522,0.01246473,0.0008793955,0.003642898,0.001411574,0.000549306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007795855,0.00002573253,0.0002569711,0.0001633822,0.00002211418,0.0002936412,0.02039835,0.0002392814,0.002798383,0.9632531,0.003204386,0.009266663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009742047,0.0001216618,0.0006717738,0.000236324,0.00009268979,0.002276578,0.01248116,0.007711527,0.004302164,0.7973143,0.1745654,0.0001290212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04104637,0.001249193,0.5257716,0.01238796,0.001358894,0.0003632133,0.0005831813,0.001131967,0.4161077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8237876,0.0006703623,0.1196398,0.002487709,0.0008600737,0.0007674044,0.0004306005,0.0007065903,0.05064993],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01445719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04836416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999549733","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2019.11.002","title":"Metaphor and what is meant: Metaphorical content, what is said, and contextualism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Grice; Metaphor; Contextualism; Content (measure theory); Epistemology; Linguistics; Pragmatics; Psychology; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Chris Genovesi","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06092749645764313,"gpt":0.3133544094078879,"spread":0.2524269129502448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004166143,0.0004455536,0.0007537039,0.002078567,0.002462039,0.009511532,0.00107099,0.002639699,0.00445941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01585491,0.0005552639,0.0006067363,0.002346355,0.0207204,0.01585351,0.003618067,0.003401993,0.0003260675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001662391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001956207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001720378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001363068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960493,0.002685295,0.0001653712,0.000384677,0.0004905821,0.0002246696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914725,0.006368742,0.0006767811,0.000541836,0.0005282653,0.0004117651],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001296123,0.00007101184,0.001404554,0.0002883829,0.00003576934,0.000261074,0.04537939,0.0002312054,0.001245956,0.9391981,0.001123053,0.01063198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000592803,0.00004553009,0.003025718,0.0003066871,0.00005978953,0.0005144857,0.02627745,0.001340425,0.0004984573,0.95361,0.01420919,0.0000528104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.4539846,0.02768335,0.10865,0.0499262,0.001347631,0.0001212823,0.0003850487,0.0002204697,0.3576815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924165,0.0009406212,0.00531596,0.0004526497,0.0001057142,0.00003211125,0.0000378573,0.00004216824,0.0006563974],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009511532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02203292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106110953","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.013","title":"Editorials’ genre and media roles: Le Monde's editorials from 1999 to 2001","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Media studies; Sociology; Art","authors":[{"name":"Élisabeth Le","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03843885235218079,"gpt":0.2600542512134785,"spread":0.2216153988612977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008331605,0.0004862709,0.0004623371,0.01182696,0.004199013,0.01038329,0.001023719,0.002341573,0.007666469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0764442,0.000380039,0.0003960655,0.008524758,0.001585336,0.003292657,0.001873814,0.002502623,0.0009783729],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007256949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006353027,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02215897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0594833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991958,0.001873369,0.0008175259,0.0008490639,0.003583688,0.0009182859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9200863,0.03769856,0.01280681,0.001393191,0.0200361,0.007979124],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008579678,0.0001632722,0.02059335,0.001820258,0.0001085303,0.002062159,0.03108521,0.0002076091,0.001493052,0.01139315,0.7907748,0.1394406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002260013,0.00002544478,0.03670683,0.0006445704,0.00002520342,0.000260782,0.005441069,0.00005304934,0.0004301788,0.0003485729,0.95602,0.0000217333],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1739278,0.224653,0.000909725,0.2517094,0.1684118,0.0001074159,0.005134344,0.0003235519,0.174823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.719846,0.03784306,0.001092785,0.0167604,0.09841122,0.0001021143,0.001706464,0.0004354754,0.1238025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02215897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05265313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136892597","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.016","title":"Examination dialogue: An argumentation framework for critically questioning an expert opinion","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Expert opinion; Argumentative; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03496806484847136,"gpt":0.3467371194531408,"spread":0.3117690546046695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01757804,0.0009367151,0.0008176651,0.001908903,0.002884076,0.007946662,0.003066608,0.004146606,0.01094854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04732326,0.0007870774,0.001393318,0.001026835,0.005728,0.008376559,0.008199554,0.003469363,0.001135252],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001691082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00333503,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002847535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003174641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9840686,0.01329005,0.0005818045,0.0006037499,0.001151452,0.0003043591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9633461,0.03087993,0.001043311,0.001571719,0.002129209,0.001029704],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007565673,0.0001957721,0.001107633,0.000818491,0.0001188613,0.0009291295,0.02462509,0.01160611,0.004321421,0.8052385,0.01365739,0.1366251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002707825,0.0001683648,0.0007015589,0.0005250464,0.0002078854,0.0005290697,0.004961194,0.1493654,0.005500477,0.7119784,0.1256045,0.0001874161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005727736,0.0002228311,0.9806285,0.002567649,0.0001424255,0.0003316518,0.0001128908,0.0005144501,0.009751908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2870265,0.0001826205,0.7023066,0.0004563478,0.000116324,0.0006784353,0.0002846843,0.0002128772,0.008735757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01757804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09296262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000489864","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2008.11.002","title":"How do we know he is not talking about himself? Demonstrations in Science Classroom","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Conflation; Gesture; Focus (optics); Reflexive pronoun; Dialectic; Semiotics; Phenomenon; Cognitive science; Human body; Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics; Communication; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Lilian Pozzer‐Ardenghi","is_ca":true},{"name":"Wolff‐Michael Roth","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02028745383490928,"gpt":0.3139892696600401,"spread":0.2937018158251309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004142683,0.0005032073,0.0007361991,0.0004891502,0.003394344,0.002807363,0.001151802,0.004278235,0.007651524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03321058,0.0005446697,0.0003731359,0.0002961408,0.004981355,0.004879137,0.003990752,0.00681407,0.001203212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001273599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001411116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003580611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003649496,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993817,0.00400503,0.0002532672,0.0006325651,0.0008264938,0.0004656182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9562944,0.03560937,0.002024736,0.001601588,0.00177425,0.002695639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001192827,0.004418393,0.02837468,0.0009761944,0.000134576,0.009019106,0.7669729,0.002121256,0.04172269,0.07133518,0.02613515,0.04759714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009123658,0.004396108,0.07279593,0.001168794,0.0002366431,0.01325256,0.5839716,0.02137239,0.04083806,0.09357344,0.1668329,0.0006491623],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9711829,0.0002944893,0.003687785,0.005285504,0.0001845827,0.00005068812,0.00007345176,0.00017329,0.01906725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951605,0.000102084,0.002048085,0.0003040521,0.00002134061,0.00003950321,0.00003673833,0.00003985612,0.002247855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007651524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02559692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167659325","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.003","title":"What language processing can tell us about perspective taking: A reply to Bezuidenhout (2013)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Conversation; Comprehension; Sentence processing; Representation (politics); Computer science; Sentence; Linguistics; Cognitive science; Psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Sarah Brown‐Schmidt","is_ca":false},{"name":"Daphna Heller","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01925868949409141,"gpt":0.3296967399345969,"spread":0.3104380504405054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01473702,0.000981812,0.00246804,0.00185687,0.004998275,0.008484449,0.004535645,0.0264818,0.008380231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05059366,0.0008399028,0.001179998,0.002949002,0.02782563,0.02805595,0.007864241,0.0370132,0.004631518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002868481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004052944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007585069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006791823,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959571,0.001537377,0.0002425299,0.001023722,0.000982946,0.0002563395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9448304,0.04407256,0.001762965,0.002459022,0.005615654,0.00125939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003175109,0.00009068081,0.001671785,0.0007287746,0.0001640812,0.0005592837,0.03130111,0.0003422991,0.0005469373,0.4381504,0.4852532,0.04087409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001061432,0.00002475633,0.001456772,0.0009695206,0.00006395721,0.0006585795,0.009453607,0.0004569685,0.0005129607,0.7536621,0.232494,0.000140612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.00114914,0.01239805,0.001615188,0.9793997,0.002646947,0.000003696063,0.0000686042,0.00002031647,0.0026982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09920894,0.01983592,0.003837515,0.8431668,0.02844475,0.00008772572,0.0001422918,0.0001903241,0.005085685],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0264818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07793766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894927725","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2018.09.006","title":"Tag-naxon? (Tag-Right?) in instructional talk: Opening or blocking learning opportunities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Blocking (statistics); Psychology; Computer science; Computer network","authors":[{"name":"Amir Michalovich","is_ca":true},{"name":"Hadar Netz","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.115557976066533,"gpt":0.3249616286163154,"spread":0.2094036525497824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005461144,0.0004908997,0.0005145785,0.0005271587,0.002440035,0.004472542,0.001100852,0.003078083,0.04462387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01843504,0.0005486358,0.000356784,0.0002878683,0.003299418,0.01159605,0.006187859,0.003234421,0.01690421],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007122864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001357316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008427636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001045921,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961157,0.002223828,0.0002155804,0.0004469705,0.0005811279,0.0004168332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867498,0.008506678,0.0007263792,0.001709424,0.001105123,0.001202565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003221753,0.0004723174,0.008832563,0.0008345584,0.00003344203,0.0006811568,0.0745433,0.0004165929,0.02730789,0.584828,0.05887867,0.2399497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003053239,0.0007851484,0.007534276,0.001320048,0.0001633854,0.001230169,0.05067236,0.01054027,0.03899888,0.193883,0.6943305,0.0002366246],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1648338,0.0009287407,0.1291767,0.01606161,0.003155448,0.0002329397,0.0004564976,0.00542114,0.6797332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8828126,0.0003476861,0.03594225,0.002684669,0.0004079032,0.0004019272,0.0002935174,0.002318209,0.07479125],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04462387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1492817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008398116","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(03)00051-1","title":"Evaluative metadiscursive comments and face-work in conversational discourse","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Psychology; Construct (python library); Face (sociological concept); Affect (linguistics); Linguistics; Conversation analysis; Discourse analysis; Social psychology; Communication; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Troy Heisler","is_ca":true},{"name":"Diane Vincent","is_ca":true},{"name":"Annie Bergeron","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04574994219080977,"gpt":0.3229865131530607,"spread":0.277236570962251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0107681,0.0007459,0.0005650567,0.002161747,0.00637389,0.008076163,0.001668454,0.003653263,0.01023003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07616737,0.0007345529,0.0003387788,0.001713315,0.00739944,0.01473725,0.006494725,0.003586038,0.001351538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002541255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001462252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001680815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001759551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9780725,0.01715129,0.0005095677,0.001240166,0.002299882,0.0007267044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8970175,0.08724184,0.003544179,0.004398381,0.006639024,0.001159054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008897968,0.0001637068,0.005653959,0.0006198213,0.00003183389,0.001128945,0.5775055,0.0008039088,0.01042169,0.343765,0.005830559,0.05318527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001670737,0.0003206518,0.01058437,0.0009313999,0.0001139696,0.001667312,0.4549188,0.03083673,0.02637075,0.3464582,0.1273874,0.0002433206],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5527726,0.0009766939,0.2140089,0.0132382,0.0005944707,0.0003754991,0.0006553596,0.00106306,0.2163153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829654,0.00008322865,0.009907886,0.0002022816,0.0001427242,0.0001291467,0.0001230889,0.0002334668,0.006212819],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0107681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05694783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088331110","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.003","title":"Up north there: Discourse-pragmatic deixis in Northern Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistic Variation and Morphology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deixis; Locative case; Linguistics; Value (mathematics); French; Pragmatics; Sociology; Geography; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Sali A. Tagliamonte","is_ca":true},{"name":"Bridget L. Jankowski","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03333601547341808,"gpt":0.3141568156044611,"spread":0.280820800131043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001338146,0.000280543,0.000508627,0.0009569998,0.01173734,0.004285658,0.0008238786,0.0007137981,0.006221741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004692999,0.0003373708,0.0001887105,0.002512105,0.004575078,0.001711717,0.003368306,0.001446194,0.0003214871],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04561524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04157995,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9745567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985797,0.0003231142,0.00007028323,0.0002586371,0.0003027522,0.0004656072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969453,0.0009989571,0.0004398804,0.0002170065,0.0009552186,0.0004435871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002106453,0.00002898366,0.03372836,0.000152584,0.00002455602,0.001518367,0.9044143,0.0001938578,0.004399667,0.03041109,0.003701885,0.0212158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001700271,0.0000262579,0.1835642,0.0001314606,0.00003521606,0.000441078,0.709303,0.0003795131,0.001040924,0.002951483,0.1020469,0.00006297766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9110941,0.0005056362,0.0006490658,0.002447996,0.00004051083,0.00004440906,0.0003840094,0.00003259703,0.08480161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858984,0.0001598492,0.0003079943,0.00008559319,0.000004360071,0.00001565252,0.00006932103,0.00003366296,0.01342529],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04561524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3309633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381804677","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2023.05.012","title":"Small talk across Englishes: A focus on Namibia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistic Variation and Morphology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Varieties of English; Pragmatics; Linguistics; Irish; English language; Variety (cybernetics); Focus (optics); World Englishes; Sociology; American English; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Klaus P. Schneider","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lise Schrøder","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05622451884697995,"gpt":0.3553825334995373,"spread":0.2991580146525574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004475683,0.0003829538,0.0004256711,0.0009355569,0.004504472,0.001666045,0.0003207472,0.0004556817,0.003498096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008481648,0.0001823501,0.0001460168,0.001718996,0.001791243,0.001731958,0.001877241,0.0005699337,0.0002350056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002621981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001083503,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04958282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1262383,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996438,0.0001489141,0.00001308893,0.00004949142,0.00002580978,0.0001188203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997231,0.0001467177,0.00005010396,0.00001160502,0.00003039014,0.00003805269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003332855,0.00006233286,0.03361198,0.0005377856,0.00002266573,0.004413784,0.8983418,0.00005509518,0.01922318,0.009218716,0.0003723665,0.03380696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008494437,0.00008798655,0.1429484,0.0003121108,0.00003071836,0.002273425,0.8285611,0.0001038501,0.001953134,0.0007481021,0.02294825,0.00002441926],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812099,0.001299659,0.0002704571,0.0003404601,0.00001265816,0.00001468586,0.00005862033,0.000002606868,0.01679099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801,0.0006234338,0.0001374938,0.000061937,0.000006336628,0.00001496093,0.00002662952,0.000005377611,0.001113825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04958282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09858841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317933678","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2023.01.007","title":"Socio-pragmatic variation in request refusals in Cameroon French","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Formality; Pragmatics; Variation (astronomy); Sociocultural evolution; Linguistics; Realisation; Relation (database); Psychology; Sociolinguistics; Contextualization; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Bernard Mulo Farenkia","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0429309864969017,"gpt":0.3139261259824292,"spread":0.2709951394855275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009242998,0.0002956148,0.0003165395,0.002114264,0.002566173,0.00352984,0.0005058829,0.001186667,0.006031318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03775813,0.0003259997,0.0001523225,0.002098841,0.002905891,0.001804815,0.001344836,0.001152319,0.0004398121],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00886299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003688706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1055556,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9894265,0.007699681,0.0003163617,0.0007476691,0.0007254703,0.001084371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9645408,0.02716727,0.002612724,0.0007878927,0.004248079,0.0006430795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001376529,0.000252821,0.2267088,0.0003420627,0.00009977944,0.004593027,0.6412408,0.001739279,0.01264374,0.04549254,0.00407528,0.06143539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009715875,0.0002289184,0.6004714,0.0003144031,0.00008548608,0.002053203,0.3269458,0.004716998,0.002981397,0.005784344,0.05607563,0.0002450895],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872264,0.0003948613,0.0007651076,0.0009901553,0.00001926593,0.00003245869,0.0001264745,0.00001845976,0.01042676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992011,0.00004541651,0.0001670727,0.00005335382,0.000003709639,0.0000092993,0.00002206042,0.000009570696,0.0004884076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.16145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3210205,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086756136","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.011","title":"Centering and noun phrase realization in Kaqchikel Mayan","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Noun phrase; Realization (probability); Linguistics; Noun; Nominalization; Phrase; Determiner phrase; Psychology; Philosophy; Natural language processing; Computer science; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Nancy Hedberg","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03128620189074253,"gpt":0.4635785005962958,"spread":0.4322922987055532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001847014,0.0003100972,0.0004766465,0.0007281385,0.004870171,0.003255481,0.0007466734,0.000692746,0.009828074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002419828,0.0003751325,0.0002995886,0.001300192,0.003820609,0.00534921,0.002049219,0.001939851,0.001061057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004019852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003613159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02123877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03197176,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988229,0.0005230263,0.00007437585,0.0001730336,0.0001904824,0.0002160931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988598,0.0004276853,0.00009655968,0.0001614617,0.0003945013,0.00006006349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000873509,0.00001892226,0.0005918871,0.00003476163,0.000005791494,0.0001860911,0.01238946,0.0001835917,0.001029163,0.9736989,0.001467195,0.01030683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103649,0.0001168203,0.00836618,0.0001159935,0.00009952571,0.0006804673,0.03217421,0.009315155,0.006766744,0.7378244,0.2042509,0.0001860068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3558221,0.001104171,0.03786409,0.005786947,0.0002261508,0.0001188258,0.0003153634,0.0002931645,0.5984692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784942,0.0001366245,0.003738787,0.0001263491,0.00002506587,0.00002026892,0.00007547023,0.00005703924,0.01732614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02123877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04223031,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184137896","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.019","title":"Logical Form – Not logical enough for logic, not linguistic enough for linguistics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Sentence; Generative grammar; Utterance; Logical form; Computer science; Atomic sentence; Logical consequence; Representation (politics); Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Patrick Duffley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04775607042432032,"gpt":0.3388839354651275,"spread":0.2911278650408071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009250669,0.0008377084,0.001693399,0.001813301,0.003824736,0.008215865,0.001986985,0.004898857,0.009513738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02759336,0.001354045,0.001302453,0.001112554,0.02339933,0.03832918,0.004878884,0.008458427,0.004226802],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001868434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002486939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00104638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007270174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908792,0.004098753,0.001016873,0.001693194,0.001875877,0.0004360417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796543,0.01000868,0.001165408,0.00446673,0.003792166,0.0009127297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003125575,0.00001715911,0.0002419666,0.0001221839,0.00001593558,0.00005680584,0.0005320068,0.00009273808,0.0003868196,0.9849406,0.00664695,0.006915621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001120195,0.000008720946,0.00006563198,0.00003980454,0.000009571821,0.0001229126,0.0002057693,0.000320116,0.0002247817,0.9849128,0.01406851,0.00001019349],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03297678,0.01202488,0.4950365,0.2423888,0.009196655,0.0001505656,0.0009919509,0.001261861,0.205972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7706782,0.003786118,0.1641644,0.02676142,0.006279237,0.0003145832,0.0008604709,0.001360134,0.02579546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009513738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04892284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210794128","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.007","title":"Book review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Guangxiang Liu","is_ca":false},{"name":"Albert W. Li","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01652834766124383,"gpt":0.3107019587252859,"spread":0.2941736110640421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008903196,0.0005581199,0.0007293785,0.002987284,0.001375732,0.003953013,0.0010595,0.002336444,0.3690091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004988154,0.0003492208,0.0004320284,0.002777971,0.0008479975,0.002332185,0.001341588,0.002713051,0.2927006],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00213624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003543475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004556066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01273538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991426,0.00009114733,0.00002403107,0.0000828601,0.0005908007,0.00006851757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972632,0.000450277,0.0001094323,0.0002116088,0.001487374,0.0004781004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003523518,0.000004878111,0.00001541931,0.00004274557,9.216345e-7,0.00001326542,0.000007890344,0.00001294717,0.00003192833,0.00168915,0.9678447,0.03033271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001821128,0.000002417407,0.00005519841,0.0000537679,0.000001017048,0.00002787227,0.00001136984,0.0000104892,0.00001557355,0.0006707614,0.9991482,0.000001558096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004080009,0.06481502,0.001334625,0.05685366,0.06684667,0.0001180656,0.001010224,0.0006333601,0.8079804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001348482,0.01183111,0.0003465198,0.006149602,0.007005893,0.00003368704,0.000354435,0.0001496931,0.9727806],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6309909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.900032,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410033196","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.04.006","title":"The effect of online methods on epistemic inference and scalar implicature","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Implicature; Inference; Scalar (mathematics); Epistemology; Psychology; Pragmatics; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Alan Bale","is_ca":true},{"name":"Maho Takahashi","is_ca":false},{"name":"Miguel Mejia","is_ca":false},{"name":"David Barner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01885457153728866,"gpt":0.4612427903061239,"spread":0.4423882187688353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02834466,0.000947675,0.0006541353,0.0009180938,0.0005823297,0.003222395,0.001375487,0.002142098,0.007027853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2635329,0.0009804051,0.0009775851,0.0004614312,0.002934166,0.009231822,0.004592222,0.002445296,0.0006306785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006984893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005738091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005788104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004247506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.961267,0.02755935,0.00274208,0.003409842,0.004234521,0.0007872001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4298896,0.5101177,0.02657106,0.02615979,0.00504512,0.002216685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03023069,0.005618047,0.1697464,0.004995394,0.001435796,0.001256197,0.02898591,0.005250076,0.165451,0.01226177,0.001332505,0.5734363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002085668,0.02692726,0.6112109,0.002890133,0.00232668,0.00471533,0.01137872,0.03653449,0.1967806,0.07813047,0.02612869,0.0008910591],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9572425,0.00128522,0.02884544,0.0008465566,0.000106782,0.0002663814,0.0001853441,0.0004465147,0.0107752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729444,0.0003201649,0.02502573,0.0002355353,0.00007440241,0.0002681399,0.0001079157,0.0001851093,0.0008387355],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02834466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1499027,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414714768","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.09.006","title":"Toward a granular analysis of the discourse marker ti: in Tunisian Arabic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Situated; Discourse analysis; Meaning (existential); Arabic; Relevance (law); Discourse marker","authors":[{"name":"Mohamed Jlassi","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.022449762857013,"gpt":0.3454440320696199,"spread":0.3229942692126069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001645912,0.0005275659,0.0003589806,0.004989007,0.001929657,0.004854647,0.0006044674,0.0007354152,0.003885154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005935468,0.0002850961,0.0002639868,0.003525693,0.001731454,0.003814284,0.002857405,0.0009774584,0.0009608645],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00188979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002262232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01628638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01487319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990516,0.0004047536,0.0001072998,0.0001975179,0.0001507143,0.00008810622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996695,0.001427632,0.0005425858,0.0002724876,0.0009083482,0.0001539034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001426867,0.0001920769,0.04891034,0.001985098,0.0001399385,0.002042412,0.2032259,0.003408124,0.1271034,0.2056003,0.01094525,0.3950204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104855,0.00038476,0.1509478,0.001842508,0.0003876293,0.001774338,0.3265968,0.08897708,0.05835362,0.1150613,0.2553,0.0002693395],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7102192,0.002279096,0.2284913,0.003591832,0.0002953128,0.0008236509,0.005185948,0.001891938,0.0472217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282583,0.0002833681,0.06672368,0.0001065256,0.00004898159,0.0001826839,0.001071039,0.000203953,0.00312152],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01628638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03238314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416527252","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.10.008","title":"Responding to new information with negative discourse particles nein/nee/nö in German talk-in-interaction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Conversation; German; Embodied cognition; Function (biology); Conversation analysis","authors":[{"name":"Alexandra Gubina","is_ca":false},{"name":"Emma Betz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02390624323499581,"gpt":0.3426760640337922,"spread":0.3187698207987965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002414306,0.0005457115,0.0003034758,0.0007585558,0.002571227,0.003122922,0.0004763692,0.001104948,0.001710535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005516165,0.0003181157,0.0001951491,0.0004883622,0.006385164,0.004766969,0.003054513,0.00147048,0.0004076714],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001612196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004311724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001743118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002750363,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959387,0.002939818,0.0001140175,0.0002913234,0.0004530474,0.0002631627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962609,0.002813265,0.0003926157,0.0001904534,0.000174649,0.0001680037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004718223,0.00006843094,0.00844319,0.0003358016,0.00004156111,0.001958559,0.8250382,0.0008550898,0.04936665,0.09088606,0.001485956,0.02104869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008394328,0.0003939642,0.02929095,0.0002754389,0.0001314767,0.002447011,0.7634033,0.008312514,0.03121251,0.03276822,0.1314418,0.0002389215],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.956194,0.0003022269,0.0127878,0.0008776315,0.00007076601,0.00002615186,0.00005831844,0.00009388322,0.02958914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973645,0.00005065645,0.0009321528,0.0000669552,0.000008962113,0.00001146538,0.00002893687,0.00003030566,0.001506029],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003122922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01276821,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408392965","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.02.007","title":"How to investigate implicit pragmatic phenomena in corpora","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Szegedi Tudományegyetem; Mount Allison University; Magyar Tudományos Akadémia","keywords":"Psychology; Linguistics; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Katalin Nagy C.","is_ca":false},{"name":"Enikő Németh Т.","is_ca":false},{"name":"Zsuzsanna Németh","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01963106529511746,"gpt":0.3026480574936785,"spread":0.283016992198561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04434749,0.001026626,0.002137033,0.009861964,0.005409999,0.01312405,0.003737268,0.003147816,0.01283682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1891052,0.002509071,0.00157075,0.01472584,0.006241004,0.02161037,0.007064982,0.0044343,0.006298831],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002200533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006133742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002339989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002184627,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9277541,0.04062192,0.009381892,0.008616549,0.01271424,0.0009112479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7912744,0.1264815,0.007745878,0.04882305,0.02405686,0.001618352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003945359,0.0004326976,0.01059578,0.01173854,0.0005101074,0.002732316,0.04305011,0.00339404,0.02683837,0.2981921,0.07741627,0.5247051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000309563,0.0001697525,0.01120246,0.005424228,0.0003694546,0.001939919,0.01720606,0.01121334,0.0212305,0.2204378,0.7101374,0.0003595375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0307577,0.006268182,0.8861449,0.009634131,0.002137651,0.005751452,0.01859964,0.004367589,0.03633872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08042984,0.002506053,0.8814018,0.001076705,0.0005809811,0.0102933,0.01728754,0.001994387,0.00442938],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04434749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2345348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069733889","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(02)80012-1","title":"Ist Deutsch noch internationale Wissenschaftssprache? Englisch auch für die Lehre an den deutschsprachigen Hochschulen","year":2002,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistic Education and Pedagogy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Humanities","authors":[{"name":"William F. Mackey","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08390721047989252,"gpt":0.3387318760185297,"spread":0.2548246655386372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01109247,0.0004743774,0.0006818505,0.001858843,0.007956679,0.02251604,0.0005775831,0.0064971,0.01341287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01024605,0.0004146069,0.0003556747,0.002936036,0.01621641,0.02804645,0.00825806,0.008101049,0.00256708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004602458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008546338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005854299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006379776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918631,0.003855536,0.000534314,0.0009300671,0.001324409,0.001492594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994759,0.002232493,0.0005944768,0.0005323243,0.000817397,0.001064301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001944628,0.00001717017,0.0004933249,0.00005716042,0.000008820199,0.0001403414,0.006374475,0.00004571426,0.0001506839,0.9638876,0.01365158,0.01515383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001495583,0.00002362997,0.002109811,0.0005733814,0.00002908271,0.0004233902,0.02835269,0.0001871155,0.0003995121,0.4555791,0.5122717,0.00003563126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03088348,0.04950836,0.009738005,0.5365604,0.005108745,0.00001696694,0.0001250716,0.0001053154,0.3679536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.888486,0.02217181,0.005060697,0.0334304,0.001685713,0.00006448879,0.0001701148,0.0002089584,0.0487217],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.977484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05866331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413246018","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.013","title":"Putting negotiation on a ‘principal-ed’ footing: A corpus-informed discourse analysis of person deixis in diplomatic debates","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Deixis; Negotiation; Principal (computer security); Linguistics; Discourse analysis; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Lisa McEntee-Atalianis","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rachelle Vessey","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03805956976609867,"gpt":0.3377791611832958,"spread":0.2997195914171972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006290126,0.0004076726,0.0004758478,0.005140265,0.0054412,0.007206696,0.00111547,0.001343672,0.003022413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01473371,0.000468108,0.0002870281,0.007229194,0.008128425,0.007759986,0.004249072,0.002374402,0.000320142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00530309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002364732,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0147669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0214833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994766,0.003774362,0.0001865923,0.0004369796,0.0005631203,0.0002729371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846368,0.0133135,0.0006389339,0.0005984226,0.0006287546,0.0001836341],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001893298,0.00005767435,0.005087876,0.0003126001,0.00001742072,0.000715776,0.8928019,0.0004659154,0.004097403,0.06466089,0.001575104,0.03001809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004393603,0.00005481407,0.02039291,0.0008063113,0.00003841393,0.0005529277,0.8076944,0.00509264,0.00688212,0.02612423,0.132239,0.00007834109],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9107772,0.002224303,0.02361213,0.002398745,0.0001563505,0.0002929227,0.001400459,0.0001046302,0.05903313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830331,0.0006666218,0.01117043,0.0001399832,0.00003159922,0.0002480416,0.0009262855,0.0001103355,0.003673536],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0147669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03847677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376881511","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2023.05.001","title":"Book review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogative; Utterance; Conversation; Sentence; Linguistics; Position (finance); Psychology; Expression (computer science); Conversation analysis; Turn-taking; Computer science; Philosophy; Business; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Arthur Sullivan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05087849212681871,"gpt":0.3283859582954197,"spread":0.277507466168601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008753876,0.0004655342,0.0006828738,0.0029604,0.0007959313,0.003848658,0.001364735,0.00201565,0.3240635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005531657,0.0002833631,0.0003534214,0.00325253,0.000592418,0.002203569,0.00137609,0.002280124,0.2791834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001449505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003124849,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00305696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008030501,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992085,0.00008150169,0.00003108288,0.00008403519,0.0005229075,0.00007197213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969596,0.0005179507,0.0001398552,0.0001740332,0.001694523,0.0005141144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004450188,0.000005568165,0.00001779417,0.0001277193,0.000001423973,0.00001721978,0.000009757151,0.00001553016,0.00004256298,0.001395224,0.9443616,0.05400123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001466292,0.000001929242,0.00003745461,0.0001088434,0.000001088385,0.00003368127,0.000008572099,0.000004113982,0.0000108898,0.0002816792,0.9995091,0.000001191511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003618037,0.2418216,0.001612309,0.05439268,0.08800363,0.0001597508,0.001818958,0.0006230391,0.6112062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001670088,0.08924741,0.0007620281,0.01461338,0.01723495,0.0000768126,0.001151679,0.0002019653,0.8750418],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3240635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9641413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414272901","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.010","title":"Negotiating truth and relevance: A new typology of English rising declaratives","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia Graduate School; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Negotiation; Typology; Politeness; Relation (database); Relevance (law); Evidentiality; Variation (astronomy); Narrative; Relevance theory","authors":[{"name":"Johannes Heim","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02256017017833487,"gpt":0.2723912746338605,"spread":0.2498311044555256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004672878,0.0004708935,0.0004588958,0.001931273,0.00286459,0.006127007,0.001340211,0.001122297,0.00278361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009710448,0.0004859443,0.0005283925,0.001442066,0.007630928,0.01058215,0.005014534,0.003007365,0.0004652891],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00159283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001074152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002752919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002405857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950097,0.002912095,0.0003209749,0.0005347655,0.000853886,0.0003686537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917664,0.005041922,0.0008632299,0.001129348,0.0009075446,0.000291704],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008156153,0.00003355173,0.006835672,0.0001491325,0.00001645821,0.000971103,0.352504,0.000360824,0.005931932,0.6127455,0.0007848423,0.01958536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009533935,0.0003144571,0.02603585,0.0005979208,0.000133845,0.006573006,0.2492205,0.01510734,0.008309061,0.3929012,0.3004666,0.000244877],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5545884,0.00210646,0.2301998,0.003664133,0.0001940628,0.0003012904,0.0003931019,0.0003845943,0.2081682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816092,0.0002409367,0.01335105,0.0002197066,0.00006502918,0.00008442943,0.0001216152,0.0001260683,0.004182037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006127007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02471286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320401858","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2023.01.011","title":"Book review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Demonstrative; Linguistics; Epistemology; Intuition; Philosophy of language; Stalemate; Philosophy of mind; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Cognitive science; Metaphysics","authors":[{"name":"Robert J. Stainton","is_ca":true},{"name":"Arthur Sullivan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03596340550001283,"gpt":0.2820554642824509,"spread":0.2460920587824381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008391636,0.0004600087,0.0006543978,0.002578911,0.0008148743,0.003889544,0.001279392,0.001974798,0.3276504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005275325,0.0002687587,0.000351807,0.002610278,0.0005755051,0.002427998,0.001380299,0.00234837,0.3002314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001263728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002549021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002397766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006395786,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993136,0.00006634224,0.00002871056,0.00008921316,0.0004371449,0.00006496197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971186,0.0004725908,0.0001185138,0.0001748639,0.001573633,0.0005417561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004313253,0.000004822803,0.00001846547,0.00008687551,0.000001295872,0.00001563908,0.000009233349,0.00001483655,0.00004198186,0.001852022,0.9452174,0.05273311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001268062,0.000001684809,0.00003735962,0.00007739978,9.330668e-7,0.00003154203,0.000008026087,0.000004924578,0.00001152246,0.0003812549,0.9994428,0.000001275164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004187823,0.1921176,0.002239863,0.06843237,0.1085367,0.0001338556,0.002104424,0.0007800999,0.6252363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00170036,0.06021626,0.0008765614,0.01586759,0.01924983,0.00005911172,0.001172217,0.000249837,0.9006082],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3276504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9590251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}