{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":7,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"6221f2a66b8b","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Private International Law"}},"results":[{"id":"W2260457615","doi":"10.1080/17536235.2007.11424315","title":"Canada and the US Contemplate Changes to Foreign-Judgment Enforcement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Conflict of laws; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Publishing; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Vaughan Black","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01676277159469853,"gpt":0.2894334117960995,"spread":0.272670640201401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001558314,0.00005334311,0.00009916452,0.00004584469,0.0001899227,0.00007244235,0.0002180253,0.00002189019,0.0001353579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007079974,0.00003559277,0.00003507701,0.00004671052,0.00009729868,0.00009699149,0.00004517731,0.00008504255,0.000001094097],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002615666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001262844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5112877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8649237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988983,0.00003148793,0.0002594923,0.00005506233,0.0006215352,0.0001340762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992986,0.000116118,0.0002073073,0.00004443447,0.0002196378,0.0001138494],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002042876,0.000009079742,0.000950015,0.000001162717,0.00006496583,0.00001703667,0.001306417,0.00002156951,0.0001059938,0.9934986,0.001259723,0.002561178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006589636,0.00005120697,0.001986771,0.00002526404,0.000009896225,0.0000117886,0.0003780672,0.00001518802,0.0004515104,0.00292834,0.993437,0.00004601535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6410604,0.0001431179,0.001511286,0.07495966,0.002280708,0.0003079601,0.00001041789,0.000007795256,0.2797186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932466,0.0001054336,0.0001131157,0.004813531,0.0006003032,0.000001504775,6.052246e-7,0.000003242052,0.00111572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4919667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949157537","doi":"10.1080/17441048.2019.1599773","title":"Understanding public policy limits to the enforceability of forum selection clauses after <i>Douez v Facebook</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Political science; Supreme court; Doctrine; Public policy; Law; Selection (genetic algorithm); Law and economics; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Liam W. Harris","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0513721871613127,"gpt":0.2725622366967432,"spread":0.2211900495354305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003825645,0.00009691468,0.0001398382,0.0003033776,0.00009020661,0.000257914,0.0003513698,0.00004176053,0.0006310097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001494302,0.00006944693,0.0001528277,0.0003204105,0.00004371841,0.001265115,0.0001095369,0.0001590587,0.0001378031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002681367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005670802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009706825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002580721,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988403,0.00001394689,0.0004180786,0.0001012183,0.0004590546,0.000167457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989414,0.00005284253,0.0004415798,0.000111371,0.0004303135,0.00002246565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001014684,0.00005650151,0.02050597,0.00001934414,0.00009018758,7.061032e-7,0.00002041624,0.0004741437,0.001888487,0.9741865,0.00232879,0.0003275349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004242485,0.00003372039,0.008222862,0.00006091523,0.00002286013,0.00001343726,0.0002247974,0.0008569969,0.0005197577,0.01201991,0.9775026,0.00009785558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3810703,0.00003345967,0.02138829,0.09778674,0.003336743,0.000736454,0.00001758863,0.00005593501,0.4955744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994822,0.000009930353,0.00007584677,0.003680618,0.0007634874,0.000006579313,0.00000255433,0.00001114467,0.0006278696],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9751738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6909114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202452705","doi":"10.1080/17441048.2021.1958482","title":"Characterisation and liberative prescription (the limitation of actions) in private international law – Canadian doctrine in the Eswatini courts (the phenomenon of dual cumulation)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Phenomenon; Law; Conflict of laws; Dual (grammatical number); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jan L. Neels","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03695464832603836,"gpt":0.3173801952557436,"spread":0.2804255469297052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001603324,0.00008756662,0.0001515881,0.0001809121,0.0001955568,0.0001288052,0.0002944919,0.00006323137,0.0001173306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002656387,0.0000608127,0.00006810171,0.0002440009,0.0002257424,0.0008185761,0.00003715035,0.0002568569,0.000001510233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002546945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001960529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01184981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0743838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998035,0.0003604866,0.0006927247,0.0001113792,0.0006757759,0.0001246612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981921,0.0003487828,0.000683429,0.0001050765,0.0006279547,0.00004271036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001012077,0.0001422415,0.01325058,0.000007179613,0.00009059535,0.00001045011,0.02629751,0.0006257242,0.004020795,0.952457,0.000042271,0.002954428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001738633,0.0001436662,0.6479487,0.0002417189,0.00005975132,0.00005867249,0.005520204,0.002022605,0.002258813,0.03943668,0.300384,0.0001865176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9562343,0.00005388598,0.000136274,0.03004355,0.0007076731,0.0002281144,0.00001760577,0.000002952439,0.01257565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984692,0.0002729005,0.0001817696,0.0004534839,0.0003601815,0.000008748683,0.00003608974,0.000005621245,0.000212023],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9130203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124982549","doi":"10.1080/17536235.2006.11424311","title":"The Evolution of the Extra-Territorial<i>Mareva</i>Injunction in Canada: Three Issues","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Stephen G. A. Pitel","is_ca":true},{"name":"Andrew Valentine","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01205228781245244,"gpt":0.2561349588652942,"spread":0.2440826710528418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008129079,0.00007068424,0.0001145712,0.00004162037,0.0002630398,0.00005199171,0.0006693516,0.00002449539,0.00003557737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002749187,0.00004248359,0.00009749391,0.0001195971,0.0002158606,0.0002441969,0.00006430996,0.000167592,0.00000213242],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001555318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005247918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8069992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9722891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981201,0.0001484873,0.0005484663,0.00007155871,0.0009820842,0.0001292874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986792,0.0001877652,0.0005135511,0.00008503911,0.0005122452,0.00002223616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004416317,0.0000280055,0.04853797,0.000001616357,0.00003586469,0.000003406106,0.00008266926,0.0001681803,0.0003315514,0.9445835,0.005943917,0.0002391392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002901977,0.00002295337,0.1886051,0.00008547312,0.00001011854,0.000004801074,0.0003361547,0.00003946335,0.0003907983,0.04888162,0.7612698,0.00006355374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5896155,0.002351411,0.0002692863,0.03545463,0.0249696,0.0002719363,0.00003076379,0.00001092224,0.3470259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959217,0.0001685011,0.00006291393,0.00007885903,0.002066377,0.000001300748,6.734797e-7,0.000005435413,0.001694291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8957019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4067102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890602623","doi":"10.1080/17441048.2018.1509498","title":"Assumed jurisdiction in Canada: identifying and interpreting presumptive connecting factors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Exclusive jurisdiction; Business; Project commissioning; Political science; Law; Public relations; Publishing; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Stephen G. A. Pitel","is_ca":false},{"name":"Vaughan Black","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02887300920327236,"gpt":0.3275674387100743,"spread":0.298694429506802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005204341,0.00005196122,0.0000928329,0.00006658801,0.0002050943,0.00009135824,0.0002151374,0.00002802189,0.00008071362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003051116,0.00004761788,0.00002745085,0.00007679339,0.00008376569,0.0004115379,0.00006356581,0.0001689064,0.000001442731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000623257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000243979,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5075402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8383648,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990954,0.00006036387,0.0003224248,0.00008334173,0.0003217429,0.0001167522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991819,0.0001776993,0.0003208712,0.00003746723,0.0002166856,0.0000654172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000719759,0.0000519856,0.2573197,0.000009057704,0.0001362816,0.00002064884,0.02465042,0.00006158179,0.004026149,0.7081711,0.0002868731,0.005194222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001433288,0.0001221876,0.3686711,0.0007374695,0.00005010138,0.00004188793,0.0263721,0.002049461,0.01179355,0.02846942,0.5597715,0.0004879959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764038,0.0000236684,0.0008289146,0.001835469,0.0007034173,0.00005588292,0.000005278763,0.000005402267,0.02013817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990008,0.00002660505,0.0004519408,0.000113851,0.0003399514,8.809373e-7,8.873536e-7,0.000004648399,0.00006040767],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6797016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4957392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234575015","doi":"10.1080/17536235.2007.11424324","title":"Enforcement of Foreign Non-Monetary Judgments in Canada (And Beyond)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Choice of law; Payment; Common law; Law and economics; Economics; Business; Conflict of laws; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Stephen G. A. Pitel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01311261677902139,"gpt":0.283167650151595,"spread":0.2700550333725736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006121057,0.00004204989,0.00009317744,0.00005867568,0.00004854063,0.00001406019,0.0002384029,0.00002056969,0.0001091936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003036227,0.00003775786,0.00002965314,0.00006775912,0.00005772699,0.0001650978,0.00004251934,0.00009518568,6.792183e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003570251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000286247,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6860995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.832544,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989608,0.0000118682,0.0004022567,0.00005041906,0.0004638449,0.0001108014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994226,0.00007263076,0.0002682826,0.00004324758,0.0001200006,0.00007331592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003036508,0.00004082537,0.03981191,0.000003660943,0.00003686284,0.00001678679,0.0005737563,0.0001549973,0.0004198623,0.9567937,0.0002199678,0.00189736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002374903,0.0001541535,0.2071566,0.0001830251,0.00003733371,0.00002461809,0.004885308,0.0004896268,0.009143536,0.1111593,0.6640632,0.0003283397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7758651,0.00003232247,0.0006442651,0.001248502,0.0003009364,0.00008015237,0.00001046147,0.000001088891,0.2218172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985045,0.00006581646,0.0007817303,0.0003452122,0.0001472115,6.903279e-7,0.000001862944,0.000002679928,0.0001502751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8456343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3159908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402064716","doi":"10.1080/17441048.2024.2377401","title":"The statutory assertion of exclusive jurisdiction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Statutory law; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Project commissioning; Law and economics; Business; Publishing; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Stephen G. A. Pitel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01248588161158732,"gpt":0.3256248912367632,"spread":0.3131390096251759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009899162,0.0000541688,0.00007615834,0.000098009,0.0002158419,0.0001618381,0.0003268885,0.00004866908,0.0001022002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001614925,0.00003836432,0.0001298674,0.0001005475,0.0001575371,0.0006486033,0.00002669853,0.0001682723,0.00001350481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001977097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000170544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000135022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001225086,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985254,0.00009763508,0.0004272174,0.00006637566,0.0007880677,0.00009529394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987847,0.0003050572,0.0003159133,0.00004948167,0.0005069545,0.00003793873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000462497,0.00002422544,0.0001796604,0.000004274873,0.00009816013,0.000008115173,0.0008440797,0.00006465708,0.002557245,0.9912124,0.0007096661,0.004251239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001206803,0.00005461404,0.00154186,0.0001113569,0.00001861971,0.00001065836,0.0002739573,0.0003105016,0.003042288,0.0834046,0.9110622,0.00004860318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4416049,0.001793121,0.01424537,0.03773597,0.02603139,0.0002969322,0.00004375384,0.00007802859,0.4781706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944339,0.0006339122,0.0002453061,0.0000933715,0.00118031,0.00000158136,0.000004061632,0.0000064687,0.003401029],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9103526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1660103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}