{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":114,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":114,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"3bf340fea541","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Public Economics"}},"results":[{"id":"W3036225123","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104271","title":"The impact of COVID-19 on student experiences and expectations: Evidence from a survey","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":897,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Graduation (instrument); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Quarter (Canadian coin); Pandemic; Demographic economics; Internship; Economics; Psychology; Demography; Medicine; Economic growth; Sociology; Geography; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2169678493605035,"gpt":0.3660043568842698,"spread":0.1490365075237663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002253171,0.0001452319,0.0004984643,0.0001806685,0.0001278056,0.0002852135,0.0005842178,0.00006659951,0.0001562873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01085022,0.0001152146,0.0001844842,0.0001940553,0.0001430153,0.0007161316,0.00009261529,0.0002025476,0.00001880808],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004846308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005788579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000981636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001695788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982068,0.0001102609,0.001174434,0.0002340304,0.0000527791,0.0002216823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947606,0.002707475,0.001749003,0.0002344359,0.00008665254,0.0004618764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001694029,0.00008554132,0.9488184,0.000009878551,0.0003042206,0.000003369342,0.04198668,0.002029339,0.00001259895,0.002799691,0.00293968,0.0008412094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001899547,0.001514333,0.9549326,0.00003818095,0.0000145637,0.00001676612,0.02160724,0.005814844,0.00004701517,0.008703985,0.005026016,0.0003849067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856128,0.00519242,0.001024928,0.007569329,0.0002492004,0.0001238824,0.0001129868,0.000005789822,0.0001087267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963082,0.002679593,0.0001084442,0.0007084633,0.0001632764,0.00000613767,0.00000219173,0.00001271193,0.00001097495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02037944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025968556","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104346","title":"COVID-19, lockdowns and well-being: Evidence from Google Trends","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"COVID-19 epidemiological studies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":648,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Loneliness; Worry; Mental health; Regression discontinuity design; Sadness; Boredom; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Government (linguistics); Psychology; Demographic economics; Population; Bandwagon effect; Poverty; Demography; Environmental health; Medicine; Economics; Economic growth; Psychiatry; Social psychology; Anger; Sociology; Anxiety","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3736479897053827,"gpt":0.4073922482476328,"spread":0.03374425854225011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001706191,0.0001996124,0.0007496248,0.0001133682,0.0001345345,0.0001234841,0.0004483087,0.0001224911,0.0008058436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0316995,0.0001589153,0.0002093879,0.0001522307,0.0001355732,0.0004981968,0.0002972472,0.0003650295,0.00002140522],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003570547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002886818,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007132477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001032891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981103,0.0001954651,0.001011075,0.000285643,0.0001096625,0.0002878349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916845,0.006121885,0.0009506044,0.0002022029,0.00009185068,0.000948965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003476707,0.0003419283,0.4734955,0.0004150367,0.001427218,0.0001591358,0.00974113,0.0009041383,0.000231583,0.1014842,0.3809175,0.03053508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001813657,0.0006996738,0.01871445,0.00008019933,0.0002336106,0.0000712578,0.001051282,0.006016694,0.00007708903,0.4300271,0.5406381,0.0005768152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7039374,0.00150039,0.01182036,0.2806104,0.0002391558,0.00008719431,0.00001609216,0.00005441243,0.001734597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665353,0.002488022,0.01085522,0.01904112,0.0008923758,0.000003465818,0.000001673196,0.00002494374,0.0001578993],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.454781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9764569,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975101123","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.02.002","title":"Do dropouts drop out too soon? Wealth, health and happiness from compulsory schooling","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":585,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Drop out; Economics; Happiness; Incentive; Dropout (neural networks); School dropout; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1187508555839279,"gpt":0.3828501754017472,"spread":0.2640993198178193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003448802,0.00008506138,0.000255159,0.0001417437,0.0005540933,0.000216661,0.0001789008,0.00005718349,0.00006722091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004094433,0.00008062094,0.00006947448,0.00006257294,0.0001292336,0.0005003676,0.0000375847,0.000184007,0.00001299562],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003917403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001263097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001109361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004347125,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986421,0.0001185237,0.0006878882,0.0001215652,0.0001529298,0.0002769189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983362,0.0002716809,0.000572372,0.00006483479,0.0003884803,0.0003664341],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089235,0.0003842269,0.2006985,0.0000419081,0.0003719799,0.000005331203,0.09822411,0.0001365998,0.00004834222,0.6024664,0.05546859,0.04206472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009200063,0.0001871099,0.04744094,0.00008183775,0.00002000239,0.00001804666,0.1251548,0.000279913,0.00002826491,0.08906738,0.7363813,0.0004204153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9215738,0.002121949,0.002830131,0.0662339,0.002756721,0.0000679403,0.00001264407,0.000008915668,0.004393988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884967,0.001680596,0.002245487,0.003252044,0.00368391,7.767659e-7,0.000008262542,0.00000738309,0.0006248545],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6809127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4261693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3019713972","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104238","title":"Labor demand in the time of COVID-19: Evidence from vacancy postings and UI claims","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":450,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Unemployment; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Hospitality; Economics; Labour economics; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Law; Economic growth; Engineering; Political science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09821897463711056,"gpt":0.2788009067938406,"spread":0.18058193215673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002814387,0.0001514604,0.0006293809,0.0002716994,0.0000528594,0.0001531335,0.0006416771,0.000120385,0.0003113907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006319012,0.0001405667,0.0001167325,0.0002838599,0.00009138175,0.0009578508,0.0001087655,0.0003567473,0.00003816342],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002607333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004653009,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003495374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006855784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980196,0.00007573439,0.001346701,0.0002545747,0.00004512427,0.0002582484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964001,0.001310278,0.001636002,0.0002288082,0.0000620905,0.0003626988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001169177,0.00007496172,0.9702725,0.0001061826,0.0001358234,0.00002133499,0.01105391,0.000874562,0.0001410479,0.01075413,0.005360737,0.001087935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006816497,0.001174856,0.6585758,0.0002379029,0.00008852805,0.0001787948,0.002544875,0.03039831,0.0001698393,0.1376858,0.1610924,0.001036374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9171912,0.004391224,0.0009922398,0.07675266,0.0001313316,0.0001333135,0.0001470785,0.000005908316,0.0002550553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823686,0.002193222,0.0005538197,0.01457369,0.0002659527,0.000001883369,0.00000287081,0.0000174051,0.00002247712],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3116966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7564905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122538209","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.08.011","title":"Homophily, group size, and the diffusion of political information in social networks: Evidence from Twitter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":407,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Homophily; Politics; Social media; Group (periodic table); Diffusion; Social network (sociolinguistics); Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03949292155602875,"gpt":0.2896411079203866,"spread":0.2501481863643579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001966072,0.00005194427,0.0001902655,0.00006912973,0.00009563805,0.00008945454,0.0002219943,0.00009163508,0.00006118949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001723631,0.00003012865,0.00006076581,0.00005964041,0.00050369,0.001513796,0.00004363701,0.0001197197,0.000002903966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001241629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002175257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009178344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004207819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988882,0.0002048932,0.0005244935,0.00004151966,0.0001144385,0.0002264423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997417,0.001896841,0.0004051459,0.00006171264,0.0001035472,0.0001157787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001082198,0.0000343146,0.1999394,0.000008300151,0.00003046529,0.000001104029,0.01710149,0.000006536648,0.00002184559,0.768773,0.0009109595,0.01306442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00548959,0.0001517113,0.6750326,0.000329182,0.00005747128,0.000009944693,0.01611406,0.0006142631,0.00002313396,0.2670938,0.03479501,0.0002892472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9685016,0.00008013956,0.0003300934,0.0300437,0.0003023976,0.00006176715,0.00000439837,0.000001823463,0.0006740986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967563,0.00109181,0.00008997037,0.001052113,0.0009922514,0.000001327714,2.881685e-7,0.000002268629,0.00001367857],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5016792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2063471,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150630895","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.03.005","title":"Tax evasion and social interactions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":366,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Conformity; Economics; Tax evasion; Econometrics; Tobit model; Identification (biology); Evasion (ethics); Microeconomics; Instrumental variable; Welfare economics; Mathematical economics; Public economics; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09351688171091498,"gpt":0.2721516132344217,"spread":0.1786347315235067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009389385,0.0000668431,0.0002331838,0.0002688273,0.0001306104,0.00008998609,0.0001024497,0.000036913,0.0001522464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008523773,0.0000741797,0.00009031263,0.0000634738,0.00004442028,0.0004942359,0.00003763794,0.0001425367,0.00004574511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001250573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001860838,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008426558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009242787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991025,0.000005522139,0.0006376501,0.00009544128,0.00001279835,0.0001460677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988687,0.00004593621,0.0008983284,0.00005908143,0.00006567995,0.00006228694],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003430379,0.0001370711,0.2121939,0.00001781326,0.0002023099,0.000003727869,0.001504809,0.00001409121,0.00002174206,0.744952,0.009646027,0.03127217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005838733,0.00005564192,0.2496074,0.000004897573,0.000004685517,0.00005578743,0.001082658,0.0001225789,0.00001954811,0.03008076,0.718249,0.0001331592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9488798,0.0007990198,0.01119089,0.008824345,0.00116087,0.00004255705,0.00001980441,0.000008193048,0.0290745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973726,0.0003293215,0.0008212494,0.000365092,0.000453758,6.143367e-7,9.870726e-7,0.000007768653,0.0006486265],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7148712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3024961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049665839","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.03.002","title":"What can be learned about peer effects using college roommates? Evidence from new survey data and students from disadvantaged backgrounds","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":348,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Peer effects; Disadvantaged; Variation (astronomy); Empirical evidence; Survey data collection; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Higher education; Peer review; Peer group; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Economics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1647452608605262,"gpt":0.3909116260147189,"spread":0.2261663651541927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004187558,0.0001615642,0.0003964758,0.0001070526,0.0003730818,0.002209297,0.00129253,0.0001335611,0.0001294027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001183932,0.0001568596,0.0000552959,0.0001700247,0.0001196558,0.007600863,0.0002735796,0.0003222021,0.00000646274],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003598593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06343727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2742228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979081,0.0004583584,0.000570299,0.0002932932,0.0004239625,0.0003460542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968132,0.001575883,0.0006753906,0.0003875238,0.0002083968,0.0003395826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004570351,0.00004130993,0.9913111,0.000004948677,0.00008148992,0.000007307807,0.001872675,0.00009812033,0.00005326594,0.00002901349,0.005252404,0.001202615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001240645,0.00005085749,0.9765298,0.0002131455,0.00007451651,0.00000450445,0.004951509,0.001096199,0.0000410914,0.001278007,0.0142509,0.0002687972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914292,0.002591146,0.00008177667,0.003745739,0.001732317,0.0001148145,0.0002388158,0.000009501802,0.00005670157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899644,0.005642331,0.0008524737,0.0003359236,0.002320925,5.704395e-7,0.0001037618,0.00001952454,0.0007600503],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2107855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078881662","doi":"10.1016/s0047-2727(00)00122-5","title":"Mortality decline and long-run economic growth","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":196,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Economics; Longevity; Human capital; Social security; Fertility; Overlapping generations model; Investment (military); Welfare; Growth model; Capital accumulation; Labour economics; Macroeconomics; Population; Economic growth; Biology; Market economy; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1096508846285828,"gpt":0.4344804778732137,"spread":0.324829593244631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003040744,0.0001641819,0.0005328626,0.0002080153,0.0002749676,0.00004819845,0.0003261173,0.0002192925,0.0005963517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003778644,0.0001538771,0.0001078527,0.000066861,0.00008045592,0.0007449336,0.0001881844,0.0006199253,0.0002620585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007904754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009987443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003424675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003753543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973977,0.0002713775,0.001497185,0.0001948996,0.00008501909,0.0005537862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971923,0.0004045669,0.00124911,0.0002488225,0.0003214663,0.0005837408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003656711,0.00003610937,0.9768453,0.00006016941,0.00006205534,0.00001919502,0.0001960338,0.00001292013,9.691927e-7,0.01068398,0.01084473,0.00120195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001444958,0.0001595159,0.8395151,0.0000572682,0.00003485558,0.0001717596,0.0007519227,0.0002852064,0.000003321288,0.01063506,0.146762,0.0001790483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761788,0.0007101201,0.000133278,0.01297382,0.00214606,0.0002079766,0.000027589,0.00002257594,0.00759975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896491,0.00512033,0.0005214003,0.002699104,0.001600999,0.000004423457,0.000005637187,0.00002602605,0.0003729856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1373302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6529633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968164432","doi":"10.1016/s0047-2727(00)00081-5","title":"Property tax limits, local fiscal behavior, and property values: evidence from Massachusetts under Proposition","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":171,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic Research Institute; University of British Columbia; Harvard University","keywords":"Property tax; California Proposition 13; Economics; Property value; Capitalization; Referendum; Revenue; Ad valorem tax; Proposition; Property (philosophy); Tax revenue; Public economics; Tax reform; Monetary economics; Demographic economics; Macroeconomics; Finance; Law; Political science; Real estate","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07724602955735825,"gpt":0.2397412711532568,"spread":0.1624952415958986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001899133,0.0002978789,0.0007596272,0.0003602144,0.0001886487,0.0005722526,0.0004751311,0.000269727,0.0004366843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002133282,0.0002287411,0.0002184652,0.00013712,0.0002220223,0.002442415,0.0001128874,0.000469588,0.0001443954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006427119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001763789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003280967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002925815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973337,0.00006986591,0.001560227,0.000502332,0.00005186388,0.0004819873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977282,0.0001279245,0.001280264,0.0003856141,0.0001157815,0.0003622393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003290967,0.0007220918,0.8550882,0.00005766131,0.0003735091,0.00006743344,0.0007794696,0.001141494,0.00008906215,0.005657911,0.00697477,0.1287193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007300999,0.002207431,0.4385317,0.0005889683,0.0003509107,0.001706044,0.001905106,0.08640462,0.0003386988,0.09357142,0.3637893,0.003304764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646196,0.00132915,0.01447632,0.009553895,0.001094584,0.0003372649,0.0000743159,0.0000323837,0.008482423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869194,0.007694098,0.00273385,0.0004644021,0.0006544904,0.00001551184,0.0000140594,0.0000616933,0.001442513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4165565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.932779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973718554","doi":"10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00169-4","title":"The retirement-consumption puzzle: a marital bargaining approach","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Economics; Consumption (sociology); Wife; Demographic economics; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Permanent income hypothesis; Panel data; Marital status; Labour economics; Sample (material); Life-cycle hypothesis; Demography; Econometrics; Population; Macroeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0645038979635905,"gpt":0.2791512958189237,"spread":0.2146473978553332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004569262,0.00009213125,0.0001613052,0.00009133447,0.000790078,0.0004889764,0.0003834217,0.000103247,0.00004186146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005965384,0.00007505585,0.0001209052,0.0001171279,0.0001974568,0.0005676032,0.00002417144,0.0002566456,0.000009328664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003180376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005313875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002277721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003395455,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985942,0.0002868028,0.0004761037,0.0001131008,0.000165979,0.0003637925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988375,0.0001620648,0.0004656119,0.000149107,0.0001941471,0.0001915598],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006290244,0.00006847657,0.208947,0.000004141245,0.00008518247,0.00000165647,0.003491548,0.0001019551,0.000005233278,0.7817375,0.001175303,0.004375685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00202713,0.0001618927,0.08137027,0.00001937283,0.00008997427,0.00008908559,0.1207132,0.002998411,0.000008216637,0.06031865,0.7315912,0.0006125454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8322071,0.0006584617,0.00268979,0.001389306,0.001478578,0.0001348459,0.000003885692,0.00001564018,0.1614224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931284,0.002566876,0.002950143,0.0001640907,0.0003489936,0.000002554222,0.000001634688,0.00001262402,0.0008247246],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7304159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6076721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012461273","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104161","title":"Temperature and temperament: Evidence from Twitter","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nonmarket forces; Construct (python library); Sentiment analysis; Economics; Econometrics; Value (mathematics); Suite; Willingness to pay; Social media; Goods and services; Geography; Statistics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Economy; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6421782445681378,"gpt":0.4253992196649341,"spread":0.2167790249032037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005651663,0.00004543617,0.0001140297,0.00003428895,0.0001395167,0.0003036055,0.0002328944,0.00006336206,0.0007809864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003330297,0.00004207822,0.00004195328,0.00005653737,0.00007478164,0.0006776061,0.00004505436,0.0001667259,0.00001809522],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007591146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001036429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009906738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003265494,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999438,0.000128397,0.0002188527,0.00006700838,0.00006121673,0.00008651839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992928,0.0001468928,0.0001930085,0.00007803407,0.00009522192,0.0001940791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001383875,0.0001595665,0.2973863,0.00004528671,0.0002120243,0.000009207184,0.4961407,0.00003331833,0.0136073,0.009789547,0.0505372,0.1319412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007672159,0.0001543761,0.0433834,0.0001098875,0.00003409588,0.000008315251,0.05465307,0.000388214,0.0000971244,0.002041551,0.8980882,0.0002745996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8567856,0.0006695577,0.00001460634,0.1412224,0.0001420789,0.00003413713,0.000004024762,0.000006247722,0.001121388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698697,0.02485158,0.0004553042,0.004022428,0.0007397155,6.234096e-7,0.000002313921,0.000004419044,0.00005391163],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8475509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8551253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126138030","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.07.004","title":"Born on the first of July: An (un)natural experiment in birth timing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Global Maternal and Child Health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural experiment; Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); Demography; Medicine; Economics; Demographic economics; History; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0489548630155349,"gpt":0.2731012162776423,"spread":0.2241463532621074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003987268,0.00007663837,0.0002535559,0.000122295,0.00005308208,0.00001141161,0.0001439572,0.00003647242,0.00006814782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003889667,0.00004785447,0.00007827756,0.00005608129,0.00004011579,0.0001526401,0.00002098242,0.0002471907,0.000007122727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001590008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001497608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003652236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003367232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991983,0.00002576084,0.0004573189,0.00007085735,0.00008640408,0.000161412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993189,0.00003691038,0.0003200728,0.0001354142,0.00006487391,0.0001238153],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001787286,0.003399923,0.9175796,0.0002500604,0.0004756467,0.0004663814,0.01017606,0.00066836,0.0008014592,0.03325222,0.01309167,0.01805134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003500388,0.001716779,0.9163131,0.000217251,0.0000196958,0.001592751,0.001190177,0.0009271839,0.003064169,0.0008338616,0.07045408,0.0001706281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850252,0.0002502986,0.000002469622,0.01298144,0.0002374884,0.00007160836,0.000002557119,0.000002975246,0.00142599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966801,0.0003913557,0.0002126906,0.002393071,0.0002466303,7.474767e-7,7.502804e-7,0.00000770013,0.00006696816],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0573624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1951449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010525253","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.10.007","title":"Getting the word out: Enforcement information dissemination and compliance behavior","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Taxpayer; Audit; Enforcement; Compliance (psychology); Business; Evasion (ethics); Accounting; Tax evasion; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09664380602149338,"gpt":0.2656505585783268,"spread":0.1690067525568334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005999761,0.00008397147,0.000212615,0.000149536,0.0002467744,0.0001301883,0.0001716322,0.00003267922,0.0000813544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001534547,0.00007447645,0.00006873608,0.00006466001,0.0000762722,0.001200261,0.00004795271,0.0001278547,0.00005780739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001109064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002366913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000729097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009865948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989688,0.000008570371,0.0007813898,0.00007465608,0.00002722318,0.0001392913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983239,0.00005233616,0.001351426,0.0001138208,0.0001024772,0.00005605758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000218495,0.0001248374,0.5329221,0.00003883752,0.0001639213,0.000002776628,0.009368517,0.0002243318,0.000008144777,0.370287,0.007857972,0.07897973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006273936,0.00007051727,0.6765155,0.00002208895,0.000009425726,0.0001071568,0.001557633,0.001686908,0.00001960079,0.005371924,0.3137987,0.0002132208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9667277,0.001099634,0.007062156,0.005570001,0.0008500473,0.0001765656,0.00002837944,0.00001163114,0.01847387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972336,0.001233284,0.0006255947,0.0003700281,0.0001320356,0.000009853705,0.000003816378,0.00000537339,0.000386357],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.364915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3037061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566788579","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.12.004","title":"Are women pawns in the political game? Evidence from elections to the Spanish Senate","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"NOMINATE; Nomination; Ballot; Politics; Competition (biology); Legislature; Representation (politics); Political science; Economics; Quality (philosophy); Political economy; Demographic economics; Law; Voting","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1287274203528409,"gpt":0.3527150439647672,"spread":0.2239876236119263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002226568,0.00004834329,0.00009950792,0.00007616435,0.0001866274,0.0002731706,0.0003669494,0.00004483069,0.00005604863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008708446,0.00002999386,0.00005679706,0.0001374374,0.00006912385,0.0005178044,0.00003061332,0.0002037579,0.00002289671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004034755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002424332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001678618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005456899,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987724,0.0003190832,0.0002626609,0.00006001783,0.000130144,0.0004556945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989551,0.0003605911,0.000218908,0.0001195534,0.00009123365,0.0002546305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008192155,0.0001720093,0.4647036,0.000002807702,0.00007034811,0.00000291127,0.1086148,0.000183179,0.00003290921,0.4199027,0.005159618,0.001146972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001625993,0.0000320986,0.5679035,0.00001631911,0.00001594821,0.00001919325,0.2583416,0.00006242043,0.00003922294,0.03517447,0.1381244,0.0001081657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8887067,0.00009461518,0.0001077537,0.1079378,0.0005744825,0.00007453879,0.000004459393,0.00000254084,0.002497131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954188,0.00009563482,0.00005056037,0.002603756,0.001699933,0.000005492077,2.167485e-7,0.000004093954,0.0001215479],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3847282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3045078,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770115237","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.11.004","title":"Does inducing informal firms to formalize make sense? Experimental evidence from Benin","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada; World Bank Group; Department for International Development, UK Government; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Economics; Microeconomics; Business; Base (topology); Industrial organization; Test (biology)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1102460734673837,"gpt":0.2854866633746332,"spread":0.1752405899072496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007541902,0.0001592211,0.0004782811,0.0002235413,0.0003915409,0.0007657873,0.0005923501,0.0000773426,0.0003746921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005852872,0.0001345203,0.0001819821,0.00004076517,0.00006476989,0.002372421,0.000278645,0.0001973094,0.0001990485],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001831346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005987013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001852683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002572793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984001,0.000008990969,0.001046804,0.0002063819,0.00003906382,0.0002986916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970261,0.00006456223,0.002171542,0.000444915,0.00008685271,0.0002060273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001028039,0.0001189579,0.9448289,0.00001566243,0.0003300099,0.00001368584,0.00580625,0.000320767,0.0001010094,0.03429882,0.002820339,0.01124283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001397072,0.0002620722,0.8024254,0.0001135502,0.000009715271,0.00003153294,0.002489525,0.0008145376,0.001678422,0.006815043,0.1834278,0.0005353075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825601,0.0006247817,0.001050158,0.005720981,0.002145938,0.00009423176,0.00006887798,0.000009881745,0.007725051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948263,0.0003718559,0.002866666,0.0006207833,0.0006718018,0.000006563917,0.00000176993,0.00001549073,0.0006187944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1806074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7384505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124126476","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.018","title":"Votes or money? Theory and evidence from the US Congress","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Interest group; Voting; Economics; Representation (politics); Simple (philosophy); Proportional representation; Group (periodic table); Microeconomics; Econometrics; Public economics; Political science; Law; Democracy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05835932403874412,"gpt":0.2432829135945132,"spread":0.184923589555769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003505305,0.0001765747,0.0005084684,0.0001568041,0.0001538728,0.0004233941,0.0007005429,0.0001626892,0.0004321439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00228239,0.0001327496,0.0001590822,0.00007667871,0.0002741364,0.001317737,0.000135034,0.0005749795,0.0001009878],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006058707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001032095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001314336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004129334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982988,0.00005389412,0.001063028,0.0002581901,0.00002057106,0.0003054829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965611,0.001546489,0.001228927,0.0003897905,0.00005168653,0.0002220451],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001377439,0.00005331466,0.3436494,0.00001195931,0.0002235219,0.000005315095,0.0005714443,0.00001469874,0.00004646026,0.6478491,0.00378167,0.003655292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008956146,0.0001292394,0.2164436,0.00003260691,0.00002306783,0.0001281639,0.0002203115,0.001225096,0.0001259509,0.7145266,0.0659301,0.0003196694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9824431,0.002227666,0.0002486648,0.008935095,0.001982934,0.00008896605,0.00009879632,0.000009109738,0.00396567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956151,0.0007273405,0.0005812009,0.001570981,0.001209572,0.000003594113,0.000001583142,0.00002492588,0.0002657489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1272058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5413373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061456865","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.014","title":"VCM or PPM? A comparison of the performance of two voluntary public goods mechanisms","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Public good; Efficiency; Economics; Turnover; Value (mathematics); Econometrics; Relative value; Point (geometry); Public economics; Microeconomics; Environmental economics; Statistics; Mathematics; Macroeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09093004096530903,"gpt":0.3539407540914203,"spread":0.2630107131261113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001402266,0.0001378456,0.0005341124,0.0001612137,0.0002908266,0.00008289307,0.0009162017,0.00008529986,0.0001239625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001198765,0.000104368,0.0002407384,0.000212333,0.0004759432,0.001041404,0.0002060835,0.0002446293,0.000004786814],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007258513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001119874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006471457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005339756,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998216,0.00009571844,0.001057205,0.0001304799,0.0001790793,0.0003215433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977092,0.00007806683,0.001618947,0.0002313664,0.0002103119,0.0001520818],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001020654,0.001156759,0.5148553,0.00004454353,0.0003609562,0.000001839429,0.01840257,0.0013871,0.002926599,0.4543214,0.0006176734,0.005823187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026713,0.009883677,0.1499389,0.000877385,0.0008722785,0.0002741731,0.3085527,0.00325521,0.27867,0.1508723,0.0665148,0.00357567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904604,0.0002344022,0.00005410856,0.004053585,0.0009705227,0.0001549938,0.00001276374,0.000007036779,0.00405217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966606,0.00030127,0.002618818,0.0001205173,0.0001596208,0.000003522604,7.369982e-7,0.00001436818,0.0001205004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3649164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4256001,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205007054","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104521","title":"Environmental regulations and international trade: A quantitative economic analysis of world pollution emissions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; Central University of Finance and Economics; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Economics; International trade; Productivity; Free trade; Production (economics); Trade barrier; Natural resource economics; Environmental pollution; International economics; Pollution; Environmental policy; Commercial policy; Porter hypothesis; Environmental regulation; Environmental protection; Environmental science; Macroeconomics; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04153359199885404,"gpt":0.2413275371094128,"spread":0.1997939451105588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007840949,0.0001615244,0.000697264,0.001260662,0.00007512658,0.00009412529,0.000259854,0.00009152314,0.001362765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001006435,0.0002066884,0.0003814815,0.0002145251,0.0001499843,0.0008305652,0.0001052145,0.0001696746,0.00001634146],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006761757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008583113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001882055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001648879,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978399,0.00004051002,0.001560516,0.0003293073,0.00002758475,0.0002021433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974539,0.000120339,0.001950715,0.0002798222,0.000008984789,0.0001862104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002183661,0.0002636261,0.3070051,0.000006653228,0.003457562,0.000003671515,0.0003910202,0.02958606,0.00028056,0.6570167,0.0004486604,0.001518584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001472153,0.00009204778,0.861387,0.00001387053,0.0003132627,0.00005740418,0.001022489,0.05085203,0.0003314671,0.02696465,0.05707372,0.000419962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9833225,0.00141277,0.001895737,0.006817907,0.0005713463,0.00005477371,0.000729319,0.000005241452,0.005190406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933122,0.00202716,0.003734067,0.0001562645,0.0001045126,0.00000278119,0.00006644023,0.00002166215,0.0005749126],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.630052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995501,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987149948","doi":"10.1016/s0047-2727(99)00118-8","title":"The value of genetic information in the life insurance market","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Adverse selection; Economics; Incentive; Ex-ante; Life insurance; Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Information asymmetry; Actuarial science; Private information retrieval; Selection (genetic algorithm); Value of information; Mathematical economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01462435018214754,"gpt":0.2477671423955498,"spread":0.2331427922134023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005678209,0.00006733073,0.0001499743,0.0001388902,0.0002300588,0.0002607167,0.0007692495,0.00004861849,0.0001195677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002599986,0.00004490267,0.0001189157,0.0002658073,0.000223833,0.0009931644,0.00001782943,0.000172286,0.000009369879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007025223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002513673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002807378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001027408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983145,0.0003929326,0.000788582,0.00005010518,0.0002344799,0.0002193767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987862,0.000217842,0.0006272338,0.0001888185,0.0001187869,0.00006107823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006019071,0.0001192199,0.6822585,0.00002166703,0.0001310632,0.000002149034,0.01082494,0.004116341,2.018103e-7,0.07526182,0.01058244,0.2166214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000225509,0.00002344698,0.7100518,0.000005909937,0.000006861183,0.000002085091,0.002779395,0.000361374,3.02287e-7,0.003841361,0.2826554,0.00004652637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9356277,0.0003403342,0.00003005031,0.005845611,0.000343901,0.0001665769,0.00000502588,0.000003253085,0.05763757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918636,0.007004422,0.0001605227,0.0006912933,0.0001838881,0.000004082249,3.548976e-7,0.000003430442,0.0000883734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.272073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2514097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062394221","doi":"10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00088-3","title":"Exogenous targeting instruments as a solution to group moral hazards","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Moral hazard; Economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Incentive","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07793790039166727,"gpt":0.3059436968522863,"spread":0.228005796460619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001186943,0.0001277001,0.0002898751,0.000206481,0.0004931754,0.0002745815,0.0003983224,0.00008593571,0.0004576422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001899364,0.0001410044,0.0001515251,0.0001201601,0.0001266822,0.001121073,0.0001252859,0.0001678424,0.0001906342],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001261663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001273087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008612364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985526,0.00009046086,0.0006201032,0.0001611787,0.0001313604,0.0004443251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989034,0.00002937282,0.0004851566,0.0001042525,0.0001225278,0.0003553224],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001213362,0.00207917,0.35483,0.00002200047,0.0006764457,0.00006386539,0.09771551,0.0002904197,0.004939067,0.1876794,0.05202875,0.299554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005523405,0.003351318,0.01259227,0.0001052343,0.000173549,0.0002221854,0.09212814,0.002014516,0.002321013,0.02288045,0.856274,0.00241393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9655149,0.0003206086,0.00003465467,0.006165974,0.001213531,0.0001440567,0.000005431532,0.00001816984,0.02658269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950079,0.0005951371,0.002813475,0.0005218373,0.0005827574,0.000006298078,0.000001199739,0.00001693445,0.0004544652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8042452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5749994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556374755","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.05.005","title":"Donor coordination in project funding: Evidence from a threshold public goods experiment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Queen's University; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca; University of Miami","keywords":"Public good; Popularity; Salient; Economics; Public economics; Microeconomics; Public finance; Business; Marketing; Political science; Macroeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.317671617904195,"gpt":0.4051847093581908,"spread":0.08751309145399583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003434264,0.0001653593,0.0004147622,0.0004283673,0.0001699081,0.0005763772,0.00063112,0.0001265635,0.00006558685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006663466,0.0001705359,0.0001306522,0.0002493963,0.0002147351,0.00331593,0.0001736593,0.0002457408,0.00001904239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003336679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001541678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00335252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007739797,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980509,0.0001951972,0.0008576408,0.0002456371,0.0002007215,0.0004499127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982961,0.0001713524,0.0007772621,0.0001848896,0.000231644,0.0003386847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009397557,0.0006205263,0.8806031,0.000005299176,0.0001363422,0.00001821701,0.05416377,0.00007182646,0.0006783327,0.0484468,0.009485773,0.005676006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01090543,0.002316199,0.03910537,0.0004517215,0.0001354846,0.00005375695,0.5266942,0.002284779,0.005409017,0.03486167,0.3751412,0.002641167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9756466,0.002009845,0.00003637742,0.01303747,0.001237537,0.0002698317,0.000006453853,0.00001885381,0.007737061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972401,0.0005282923,0.001305489,0.0001260413,0.0005214442,0.00002726675,0.000002839895,0.00001776755,0.0002307135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8414978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971626598","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.01.002","title":"Reassessment of the Tiebout model","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Tiebout model; Fiscal federalism; Economics; Normative; Federalism; Point (geometry); Public economics; State (computer science); Competition (biology); Government (linguistics); Macroeconomics; Neoclassical economics; Decentralization; Public good; Politics; Law; Political science; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1207281446785279,"gpt":0.2805408642623818,"spread":0.1598127195838539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007192144,0.00003150295,0.00008858954,0.00002252099,0.00006775583,0.00002374414,0.0002640985,0.00003686413,0.00007862841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006886959,0.00002235608,0.00007776287,0.00005642549,0.00007373295,0.0003906043,0.00002444141,0.00005412552,0.000001417334],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001561229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004697008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005942132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001518864,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994313,0.00004273593,0.0002710166,0.00003602435,0.0001169525,0.0001020462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992583,0.00001382303,0.0004948403,0.00008109595,0.00009917554,0.00005274396],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000875496,0.00009568569,0.07765767,0.000002678855,0.00002322828,2.349147e-7,0.003986651,0.000197782,0.000005833481,0.9056007,0.001858038,0.01056274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001782015,0.0002522113,0.4327688,0.00007780507,0.0001095229,0.000009774481,0.01167742,0.009142356,0.00112014,0.4126708,0.1299947,0.000394481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8797784,0.00004608461,0.005639781,0.001932473,0.0005573243,0.00006676052,0.000002812128,0.00000292779,0.1119734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998263,0.0004411482,0.0005966959,0.0001614483,0.00007506604,3.375931e-7,9.239382e-8,0.000002787948,0.0004594461],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4929299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09116543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273470132","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.10.002","title":"Compulsory voting, turnout, and government spending: Evidence from Austria","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Turnout; Voting; Demographic economics; Government (linguistics); Economics; Politics; Political science; Public economics; Political economy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1265094883889278,"gpt":0.336107705703497,"spread":0.2095982173145692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001403583,0.00005629791,0.0001624669,0.00002527266,0.000104368,0.0001449616,0.0001464197,0.00005680911,0.000259173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009113547,0.00003950017,0.00004919539,0.00003123027,0.0001005375,0.0006787499,0.00002678846,0.0000710665,0.00001654235],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004427803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001052949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008646642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001499519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990256,0.0001571452,0.0003808005,0.00008418759,0.000140567,0.0002117044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986276,0.0005873876,0.0004107225,0.00005846913,0.00005121006,0.0002646079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001306076,0.00002448563,0.9044189,0.000003278177,0.00003972968,0.000001801576,0.000796577,0.00000251387,0.0004331157,0.08064334,0.001246039,0.01237712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001497249,0.000406155,0.7392132,0.0005466684,0.00007736171,0.00001347004,0.001466368,0.0002607855,0.0007652616,0.02553834,0.2297686,0.0004465296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858775,0.0001843504,0.0006438991,0.01187789,0.0004990146,0.00004704884,0.000006187461,0.000004800262,0.0008592694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982352,0.0001413217,0.0001516911,0.00005717415,0.00100007,5.459833e-7,1.146411e-7,0.000004291507,0.0004096461],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2285225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2837762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995187414","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.07.001","title":"Public input competition","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Economics; Economic rent; Nash equilibrium; Investment (military); Microeconomics; Public investment; Economies of agglomeration; Simple (philosophy); Symmetric equilibrium; Public good; Game theory; Equilibrium selection; Repeated game","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06072870734590684,"gpt":0.2660668253238144,"spread":0.2053381179779076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000935451,0.00005076122,0.0001201432,0.00008859,0.0001651324,0.0002486033,0.000208987,0.00006631998,0.000176281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000262224,0.00005012129,0.00007560848,0.000137467,0.00008940089,0.001432578,0.00001663457,0.00009271764,0.0000325071],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006644825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006923692,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006120736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006812168,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991987,0.00004912831,0.0003248168,0.00006420739,0.0001581921,0.0002049796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991802,0.00002595183,0.0003956483,0.00006538409,0.0001748373,0.0001580066],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003053281,0.00007658549,0.009079223,0.000001658968,0.00001309814,0.000001982709,0.0006070359,0.0002252275,0.000006079073,0.9838626,0.0005745533,0.005548924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001096326,0.0001000959,0.008750618,0.00001702857,0.000009704365,0.0000139271,0.001690607,0.00003634324,0.00007760289,0.1008004,0.8872665,0.0001408253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8745795,0.0001399959,0.01930506,0.0497269,0.001248463,0.00008666544,0.000004110184,0.00002011108,0.05488917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996748,0.001383451,0.0005040581,0.0006686129,0.0005335856,5.709057e-7,0.000002321171,0.000005224641,0.0001542092],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8866919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2397288,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123693920","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.06.006","title":"Communication in multilateral bargaining","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cheap talk; Economic rent; Economics; Microeconomics; Bargaining power; Voting; Power (physics); Test (biology); Public economics; Law; Political science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06714544321384773,"gpt":0.3396332812284158,"spread":0.2724878380145681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00231124,0.00005659441,0.0001860285,0.0001433587,0.0001466259,0.0001194159,0.0003306428,0.00005233758,0.00004618598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001915908,0.00006142863,0.00005930537,0.00005172172,0.0001278323,0.0007656812,0.00006312577,0.0001499649,0.00001182774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000406058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000102108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004176874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003160135,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991053,0.0001707193,0.000441243,0.00006417133,0.00004079152,0.0001777466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999256,0.0001198965,0.0003622268,0.0001082918,0.00006515517,0.00008838992],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001567584,0.0001701805,0.6239356,0.000002196955,0.00003162013,0.000001259041,0.02381377,0.0002714759,0.0001323157,0.3226026,0.0003946378,0.02862863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008206541,0.0006543854,0.2774651,0.0001864881,0.00005155841,0.00003962905,0.1077248,0.00722219,0.001113754,0.1333484,0.46249,0.001497123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9501963,0.0001421115,0.00002778169,0.002527648,0.000215964,0.00004301597,5.843538e-7,0.000005768924,0.0468408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968698,0.0004571829,0.002275513,0.0001751606,0.0001277359,0.000001780444,6.754185e-7,0.000006762511,0.00008536236],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4620954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2504987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226226974","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104560","title":"Environmental taxes and productivity: Lessons from Canadian manufacturing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Policy Research Center, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Productivity; Economics; Revenue; Dividend; Tax revenue; Natural resource economics; Investment (military); Production (economics); Monetary economics; Public economics; Labour economics; Agricultural economics; Macroeconomics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0405431853224625,"gpt":0.1998510452036652,"spread":0.1593078598812027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005399909,0.0001415776,0.0004419886,0.0002760882,0.0001172086,0.0002274562,0.0001918341,0.0001084046,0.0003543794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001031258,0.0001759351,0.0001247567,0.0000329029,0.00007506261,0.0008344517,0.0000752526,0.0002494736,0.0000877605],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003867512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001527814,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002850832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01219257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99865,0.00001957882,0.0006908481,0.0002946643,0.00001416842,0.000330721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987794,0.00005411057,0.0005412311,0.0002280111,0.000009546842,0.0003877657],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002322553,0.0002886651,0.5305551,0.00003742798,0.0009562917,0.0001143072,0.0013598,0.0001134915,0.000151625,0.4065169,0.005220249,0.05466295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007969486,0.00004512348,0.3112383,0.00001012006,0.00001563714,0.000214235,0.0004202016,0.0002641335,0.002064322,0.4129601,0.2715836,0.0003872777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9678694,0.001638633,0.00007348,0.01574763,0.000618554,0.00003990175,0.0006486442,0.000003988393,0.01335974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975328,0.0004196477,0.0005246411,0.0005963027,0.0006353771,0.000001450696,0.00001412596,0.00002236914,0.0002532382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2663634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7174426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148021125","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.12.004","title":"Social preferences and voting: An exploration using a novel preference revealing mechanism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Voting; Referendum; Public good; Economics; Social preferences; Preference; Public economics; Microeconomics; Mechanism (biology); Social choice theory; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3398857465892074,"gpt":0.384970461663574,"spread":0.04508471507436651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00159417,0.000108694,0.0002427365,0.0001287423,0.000631164,0.000424665,0.0002674877,0.0001249687,0.00003116486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001382271,0.0001138281,0.00005464619,0.0000597451,0.000204695,0.003425009,0.00007606841,0.000273469,0.000001085454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001561866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003279749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003047289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004168571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989731,0.00006801345,0.0004739146,0.0001603513,0.00008968481,0.0002348828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886,0.00004803765,0.0006665056,0.00006512702,0.0001894218,0.0001708799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001660712,0.000177125,0.01497697,0.00000682143,0.00004949107,6.742545e-7,0.02747636,0.00002098583,0.0266965,0.92409,0.00001749036,0.006470944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00671922,0.001800029,0.01699243,0.0001632447,0.0004452284,0.0001946645,0.3743173,0.01234478,0.01895912,0.5440296,0.02045892,0.003575416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958658,0.00002581537,0.0008893811,0.001097271,0.0006351702,0.00009873087,0.000004917224,0.00001317226,0.001369752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881016,0.0000977559,0.01102138,0.00005146032,0.0006914571,0.00000272509,0.000001188844,0.00001136001,0.00002109296],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3800604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4854467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034033745","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.05.013","title":"Individual evolutionary learning, other-regarding preferences, and the voluntary contributions mechanism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Merge (version control); Mechanism (biology); Economics; Variety (cybernetics); Microeconomics; Econometrics; Variation (astronomy); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05174760641848807,"gpt":0.3072217643360041,"spread":0.255474157917516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003605382,0.0001005226,0.0002608811,0.0001002262,0.0008469714,0.0001792152,0.0002915654,0.00008571384,0.0001055752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003489222,0.00007832622,0.0001134726,0.00005955125,0.0005482738,0.001222894,0.0001424213,0.0003097291,0.00001040555],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003997267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002302759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005231563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003527852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987198,0.0003240662,0.00041313,0.00008699574,0.0001068153,0.0003492299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987978,0.0002754838,0.0005244532,0.00007289953,0.0001261953,0.00020321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002430027,0.00007357921,0.241575,0.000001595836,0.0001856587,3.054198e-7,0.01048223,0.00001014562,0.00001757828,0.7448944,0.001025902,0.00170931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008585907,0.0004118999,0.07669695,0.00005519588,0.0005000209,0.0001897351,0.1512379,0.0003151829,0.0004423557,0.1564898,0.604089,0.0009861037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820655,0.00336716,0.0001148738,0.005738773,0.0009076659,0.0001582789,0.00003077649,0.00001461232,0.00760235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971707,0.001234684,0.0004421658,0.0001855872,0.0007358147,0.000008761621,0.000002823815,0.000008888315,0.0002106155],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6030631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6514304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988622545","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.10.008","title":"Term limits and pork barrel politics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Welfare; Politics; Term (time); Democracy; Economics; Public economics; Value (mathematics); Voter registration; Business; Political economy; Political science; Voting; Market economy; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07109990861988423,"gpt":0.3287655305973464,"spread":0.2576656219774621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007682302,0.00005032162,0.0001388983,0.0000686538,0.0001587811,0.0001553768,0.0001018962,0.00007147058,0.0000289226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002992675,0.00004650122,0.00004848347,0.00005245151,0.0001081343,0.0004281593,0.000009197593,0.0001038786,0.000009109292],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002378324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004373053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006068751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001184965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992272,0.00005894662,0.0003284284,0.0000553793,0.00007303055,0.0002570258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992036,0.00007080132,0.0002085412,0.00005167303,0.0001185384,0.0003468724],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000152739,0.00003111373,0.04991275,0.000004978274,0.00001761712,0.00000210738,0.001043907,0.00001988959,0.00001942876,0.9472987,0.0001842513,0.001463745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002147364,0.000567738,0.2400958,0.00009870836,0.00007181765,0.0001028392,0.002443473,0.00004472828,0.0003080271,0.5060935,0.247527,0.000499047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9767681,0.0001275775,0.0001174956,0.01586047,0.000402888,0.00004140245,0.000002098703,0.00000611682,0.00667382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981501,0.00008251374,0.0002072991,0.0003035948,0.001011636,5.479326e-7,3.787427e-7,0.00000524412,0.0002387094],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4412052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1896265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064523287","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.09.001","title":"Disability policy and the labor market: Evidence from a natural experiment in Canada, 1998–2006","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Human Resources and Skills Development Canada; U.S. Social Security Administration","keywords":"Disability insurance; Earnings; Disability benefits; Natural experiment; Economics; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Medical model of disability; Difference in differences; Rest (music); Exploit; Propensity score matching; Labour economics; Social security; Medicine; Econometrics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1632815213924333,"gpt":0.3596938675309933,"spread":0.19641234613856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002375944,0.00009302075,0.0002437036,0.00003646268,0.0001373169,0.0001106023,0.0004085102,0.00003692664,0.0002067706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009820597,0.00006516886,0.00006988182,0.00009981547,0.0005509763,0.0005495091,0.0000750816,0.0001654474,0.000001015078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003103858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002726671,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9588496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9826289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984452,0.0004312966,0.0005321091,0.0001432284,0.0001738581,0.0002743569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987562,0.0005072952,0.0003159412,0.0001839212,0.00005646233,0.0001802149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001261652,0.00007746106,0.9706081,0.000005476277,0.00003828844,0.000001374311,0.01687004,0.000002427249,0.000003137754,0.007489718,0.0008027751,0.003975054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008485318,0.00003041186,0.9610873,0.00002999804,0.00001216087,0.000001510488,0.01922974,0.0001355225,0.00002852428,0.01014715,0.008322499,0.0001266209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.981241,0.001144374,0.000001380081,0.01389981,0.0004950491,0.0001701807,0.00001111629,0.000002421051,0.003034643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978044,0.001165543,0.0001057177,0.000465494,0.0003632635,0.00000680556,2.909624e-7,0.000004753661,0.00008374118],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02377928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.811648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W609222134","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.02.001","title":"Teacher performance pay: Experimental evidence from Pakistan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Global Affairs Canada; World Bank Group; Department for International Development; Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University; Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Ireland; Harvard University","keywords":"Receipt; Incentive; Cash; Test (biology); Government (linguistics); Medical education; Psychology; Mathematics education; Demographic economics; Economics; Medicine; Finance; Accounting","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1065130510265458,"gpt":0.3743335423388615,"spread":0.2678204913123157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001742714,0.00009244513,0.0001959548,0.00006243419,0.0009086455,0.0008965124,0.001049971,0.00008975857,0.0008583693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000410202,0.00007528969,0.0001044771,0.00002659252,0.0002121014,0.004671847,0.00007480869,0.0002927821,0.0000731383],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002867552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005335186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009308287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001468242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989921,0.00006904259,0.0003873801,0.0001212267,0.0001665587,0.0002636971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983819,0.0001064072,0.0008272713,0.0003277515,0.0001225423,0.0002341642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003855054,0.00006336161,0.9642272,0.000003153891,0.00004706614,0.000004012698,0.005438576,0.00001243139,0.0001320813,0.0005603258,0.005563126,0.02391012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007741697,0.0001799715,0.5540944,0.0001199311,0.000021938,0.000009511087,0.007593199,0.0004596205,0.001316542,0.0005678298,0.4345469,0.0003160078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802718,0.0006019508,0.00001841094,0.006827974,0.001344899,0.00004351157,0.000002787391,0.000008426568,0.01088026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923096,0.002158323,0.0003731859,0.0001911506,0.003589359,0.000001797223,5.214683e-7,0.000009114728,0.001366952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4289837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9398542,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077125535","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.07.005","title":"State fiscal institutions and empty-nest migration: Are Tiebout voters hobbled?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"University of Michigan; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development","keywords":"Tiebout model; Economics; Discretion; State (computer science); Sorting; Monetary economics; Macroeconomics; Public good; Microeconomics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07235247446474803,"gpt":0.2984415555765588,"spread":0.2260890811118108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007109757,0.00008505631,0.0001987391,0.0001480507,0.0005276857,0.0002940359,0.0001491959,0.00005799616,0.00006405855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002252658,0.00007838845,0.00007487212,0.0001003845,0.0002566546,0.001232171,0.00002667426,0.0001406064,0.00001411464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002000047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003830151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001358782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02204725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991149,0.00007512325,0.0004056538,0.00009951924,0.000107798,0.0001970387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990088,0.0001104092,0.0004190724,0.00007114899,0.0001948884,0.0001956894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003800491,0.0002656746,0.74211,0.00001863856,0.0003090581,0.00001116373,0.04492056,0.001324339,0.000007750849,0.1098881,0.04686544,0.05424133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006551418,0.00005297023,0.05299409,0.00001546457,0.00002786155,0.00002094663,0.009121692,0.0003825698,0.000008384927,0.001998512,0.934546,0.0001763938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9284607,0.0006126493,0.0005842306,0.0581826,0.0005661806,0.00007337557,0.00001401472,0.00001600305,0.01149028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941427,0.002162471,0.0005364516,0.000567862,0.0009074287,0.000001886667,0.000001522077,0.000005406045,0.001674242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8876805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957978,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2471371869","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.011","title":"Bunching at the kink: Implications for spending responses to health insurance contracts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Economics; Context (archaeology); Incentive; Set (abstract data type); Object (grammar); Medicare Part D; Econometrics; Public economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Prescription drug; Medical prescription; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08456020567782002,"gpt":0.3494598422167804,"spread":0.2648996365389604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003946849,0.00007734375,0.0001974805,0.00009562274,0.0007874981,0.0001718279,0.0004422278,0.00005229603,0.00001714355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001408281,0.00005007516,0.0001107788,0.0001092984,0.00009237136,0.0004895308,0.00004131712,0.00008393443,0.000009117581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008208717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008511876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007999736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003577984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987811,0.0001703108,0.0004803175,0.0001208327,0.00007645292,0.0003709322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976345,0.001095568,0.0006016098,0.0001762352,0.0002063405,0.0002857597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006148791,0.0000494121,0.7028611,0.000004615244,0.00006180241,3.34528e-7,0.006637903,0.00007030265,0.0003745039,0.2267351,0.005397319,0.05774605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004547975,0.00008295862,0.7286435,0.00002073135,0.000004343732,0.00001166175,0.002614672,0.000008012428,0.000006718255,0.009283333,0.2587687,0.0001006014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8651333,0.000151444,0.00748762,0.1250871,0.0007281536,0.0002282543,0.00009794766,0.000008825807,0.001077272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938637,0.001097569,0.001442124,0.00188498,0.0005853217,0.000007474898,9.095169e-7,0.00001182628,0.001106088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2533714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6056879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164307923","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.11.006","title":"Reality versus propaganda in the formation of beliefs about privatization","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Priming (agriculture); Economics; Public opinion; Water industry; Scale (ratio); Business; Market economy; Public economics; Water supply; Political science; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2038218794296344,"gpt":0.3362856467028062,"spread":0.1324637672731718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002500408,0.00003428035,0.00009777254,0.00008777387,0.00006159515,0.00003479321,0.0002621141,0.00005101531,0.00003566578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005573214,0.00002533848,0.00003799577,0.0001066199,0.00009584521,0.0008759074,0.000009012467,0.00009657141,0.00000243358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003574531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003262206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00102078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991578,0.0001509917,0.0004378622,0.00003007121,0.0001021461,0.0001211086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990397,0.0001198463,0.0005482448,0.00008109041,0.0001622484,0.0000488652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005961647,0.0001355652,0.02394169,0.00003162312,0.00002081696,0.000002702402,0.1472819,0.0000530226,0.00001024361,0.8152962,0.0007375057,0.01242903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006567949,0.001253071,0.1748788,0.0001907756,0.00009454123,0.00004621475,0.09579813,0.0008083574,0.00295398,0.1419439,0.5749065,0.0005577957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9523141,0.00003610436,0.0001867007,0.001773592,0.0003859359,0.00009449785,0.000002725244,0.000002018636,0.04520435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989159,0.0004477871,0.0002590901,0.00009519268,0.0002619148,0.000001261923,0.000001420329,0.00000200443,0.00001544368],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6733524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1033273,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529583694","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.05.002","title":"Commitment and matching contributions to public goods","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Public good; Commit; Matching (statistics); Economics; Public goods game; Microeconomics; Focus (optics); Public economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05846319174969902,"gpt":0.3700809642747347,"spread":0.3116177725250358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003286696,0.00009839758,0.0002628398,0.0002304387,0.0004966957,0.0003465122,0.0002656546,0.00007082531,0.00004859896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002403968,0.0001027664,0.00008535616,0.0001053745,0.0001696647,0.0007926307,0.0001292837,0.0001652426,0.00001434275],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001150855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002584842,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004533475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987561,0.00006560326,0.0005682508,0.0001182644,0.00008370067,0.0004081048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986694,0.000168523,0.0003570062,0.00009845073,0.0001860552,0.0005205069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000213574,0.0002456096,0.1088974,0.00000330094,0.0001549771,0.000008882011,0.01061469,0.00001215543,0.0004051056,0.8542535,0.003062312,0.0223207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00183527,0.0004494853,0.03948853,0.00002637711,0.00005299274,0.00006801618,0.07760897,0.00001087242,0.0007446065,0.02969275,0.8494332,0.0005888736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.957381,0.0003640673,0.0009240502,0.02553905,0.0007209973,0.0001517871,0.0000195101,0.00001408081,0.01488543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624,0.0003589483,0.002172854,0.0006545832,0.0004012633,0.000002811041,0.00000115141,0.000009601791,0.0001588044],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8463709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4190691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921816017","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.01.005","title":"Higher pay, worse outcomes? The impact of mayoral wages on local government quality in Peru","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Local government; Bureaucracy; Economics; Government (linguistics); Quality (philosophy); Competition (biology); Labour economics; Affect (linguistics); Public economics; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04510646593086987,"gpt":0.3410351098934068,"spread":0.2959286439625369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002009533,0.00008541043,0.0002704823,0.00003368526,0.00004665711,0.00007626322,0.0002993548,0.00007370894,0.0005152407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001325482,0.0000480817,0.0002071757,0.0001068818,0.0001002094,0.0004784072,0.00003206931,0.0001706103,0.00001827643],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00140371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002783358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001035125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007244187,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986093,0.0001893697,0.0005427852,0.00008888634,0.0003452744,0.000224375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988523,0.0001796686,0.0006868937,0.0001468294,0.00005154121,0.00008277699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000536111,0.0001658094,0.9216794,0.000003125921,0.00003755209,8.578774e-7,0.0007899228,0.002096727,0.000003892828,0.0695321,0.0008111011,0.004825934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007015889,0.0001576619,0.980079,0.00001293069,0.000004904154,4.488921e-7,0.002366645,0.0001405507,0.0000147588,0.001674723,0.01476767,0.00007913652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.984713,0.00002448368,0.00008466241,0.005593789,0.0004755011,0.0001087827,0.00001104479,0.000002336181,0.008986363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998214,0.0002291154,0.00001752007,0.0002738227,0.0001031139,7.574503e-7,5.427472e-7,0.000005628532,0.001155514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06785738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5641525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010732054","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.02.001","title":"Breaking the cycle? The effect of education on welfare receipt among children of welfare recipients","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Graduation (instrument); Welfare; Endogeneity; Economics; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01069173452193154,"gpt":0.2649600069954881,"spread":0.2542682724735565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00545038,0.0001119561,0.0002564632,0.0001755569,0.0004400676,0.00008474297,0.0007049025,0.0001189609,0.00003606124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000470681,0.00006945262,0.0001923813,0.0002570535,0.0002560133,0.0003336535,0.00004182558,0.0002911799,0.00000126339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002471026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002304757,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006441493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001495917,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984731,0.0003009901,0.0006321222,0.0001099603,0.0002270849,0.0002567507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978405,0.000301422,0.001241273,0.0002497915,0.0002598396,0.0001072172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003498373,0.00008043645,0.9207368,0.00000765615,0.0001069564,2.200527e-7,0.004009296,0.0003000553,0.000003930583,0.02665979,0.0002064375,0.04785337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000293973,0.0001733034,0.9850395,0.00002906622,0.0000389822,0.000005754368,0.008681791,0.00003458112,0.00003286531,0.00051524,0.005079655,0.00007524477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9806754,0.00009832538,0.00004208224,0.005026246,0.001542419,0.0002161076,0.000009673831,0.000004896953,0.01238486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991065,0.0001973442,0.00005300393,0.00009723537,0.0004583369,0.000001481422,0.000003445786,0.00001249043,0.0000701218],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06430268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3384689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078397099","doi":"10.1016/s0047-2727(00)00135-3","title":"Population ethics and the existence of value functions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Axiom; Mathematical economics; Representation (politics); Population; Rank (graph theory); Value (mathematics); Mathematics; Economics; Pareto principle; Social choice theory; Order (exchange); Representation theorem; Statistics; Combinatorics; Sociology; Discrete mathematics; Law; Political science; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1245962179558769,"gpt":0.3449152057853072,"spread":0.2203189878294303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007395056,0.00003934072,0.0001555256,0.0000575757,0.0003578306,0.00008202571,0.0001586772,0.00008235438,0.0000472411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001696678,0.00002810801,0.00007690365,0.00008712375,0.000269153,0.0005270697,0.00002007962,0.0002744198,0.000001469076],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009496455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002389201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001486139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002027114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988952,0.0004400342,0.0003972249,0.00004893579,0.0001122161,0.0001063355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985601,0.0005633392,0.0005061605,0.00008265991,0.0002219878,0.00006570845],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002893494,0.00002889225,0.08619979,0.000005193502,0.00002568166,2.633647e-7,0.006356997,0.00007759848,0.000001274723,0.9036449,0.0002614424,0.003368999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002422206,0.0001692449,0.3249884,0.00003730033,0.00008538373,0.00005615705,0.03221494,0.001892302,0.000006342295,0.3395878,0.2983018,0.0002381257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9513358,0.0001586308,0.0007580381,0.0209032,0.0007282403,0.00005271118,0.000002805404,0.000003598286,0.02605699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969383,0.00152802,0.000219625,0.0004616402,0.0004102526,4.169219e-7,6.169281e-7,0.00000273836,0.0004384101],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5640572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.275218,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124027116","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.09.007","title":"Tiebout and redistribution in a model of residential and political choice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Tiebout model; Economics; Redistribution (election); Politics; Public economics; Neoclassical economics; Microeconomics; Public good; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04829213550473223,"gpt":0.2381704137034429,"spread":0.1898782781987106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008484991,0.00009892998,0.0004380393,0.0003647938,0.00003057587,0.00006707037,0.0001315451,0.0001191746,0.000006742147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003097911,0.0001176586,0.00007347322,0.00005937224,0.0001264995,0.000673263,0.000060977,0.0001904532,0.000003212245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002509416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009679636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000136072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009322373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998498,0.000009905877,0.001043906,0.0001618145,0.00001430922,0.0002720516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999024,0.00005198644,0.0006025566,0.0001089429,0.00002877797,0.0001837354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001601743,0.00004719717,0.041892,0.00002064562,0.00002350456,8.104448e-7,0.0001076776,0.0002826983,0.00001298417,0.9574259,0.00004385931,0.0001266988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001617921,0.00009003831,0.04090624,0.00001591721,0.000005290449,0.00004092722,0.00007227544,0.008211483,0.00008320749,0.9486092,0.0002287722,0.0001187771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829245,0.0003814264,0.001587592,0.004456509,0.0001366602,0.00005240224,0.00008096868,0.000002684053,0.01037727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989464,0.00009910996,0.0005908352,0.000164913,0.0001722613,0.000001070121,0.000002547079,0.00001009684,0.00001276136],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01602191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4797978,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051552702","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.06.008","title":"Providing global public goods under uncertainty","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Economics; Ex-ante; Welfare; Public economics; Homogeneous; Microeconomics; Risk aversion (psychology); Benchmark (surveying); Multiplier (economics); Global public good; Expected utility hypothesis; Macroeconomics; Financial economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1482373555656329,"gpt":0.280333700650004,"spread":0.1320963450843711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00258471,0.0002787173,0.0007731888,0.0004479155,0.0001838784,0.0005037225,0.0008533092,0.0003036507,0.001064193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005517513,0.0003195271,0.0004133628,0.0002526023,0.0001546251,0.00174555,0.0001736056,0.0006179896,0.000329584],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006797821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001151579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001083293,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970823,0.00002310189,0.001764276,0.0003692406,0.00003459883,0.0007264691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996733,0.0001143078,0.002023359,0.000483799,0.0001197833,0.0005258061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001429669,0.0001536452,0.09328115,0.00001885553,0.000173707,0.000003105049,0.0001270241,0.0003051055,0.00001871874,0.9004303,0.002059154,0.003414923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002041854,0.0001866179,0.01614819,0.00001151547,0.00002049129,0.0004315643,0.0005714667,0.006565439,0.00003272651,0.4807491,0.4924822,0.0007588269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9431843,0.0005425216,0.001400473,0.01877289,0.004039165,0.0001397139,0.0003207444,0.00003353912,0.03156662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938934,0.0008003564,0.002014734,0.001490732,0.001552113,0.000006700745,0.00001727459,0.00004292928,0.0001817693],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.490423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220829270","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104632","title":"Cash on the table? Imperfect take-up of tax incentives and firm investment behavior","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Economics; Taxable income; Investment (military); Monetary economics; Tax credit; Depreciation (economics); Tax reform; Sophistication; Stylized fact; Public economics; Business; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Accounting","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0391430331048379,"gpt":0.2157908216805965,"spread":0.1766477885757586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009697006,0.00008378483,0.0001637607,0.0001809424,0.0001915519,0.0001928886,0.0002209896,0.00001610874,0.0004856084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009827618,0.00006417878,0.00006132253,0.0001640296,0.00005163015,0.0006789502,0.0001670081,0.0001802107,0.000004458322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007706089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007637993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000471539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004955362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993098,0.00002559881,0.0003600203,0.000089369,0.00009996197,0.0001152497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984405,0.00005670406,0.001266752,0.0001131983,0.0001063479,0.00001649547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001867667,0.0008593844,0.3945357,0.0001093419,0.0002281096,0.00002661285,0.0005657712,0.001154583,0.00176227,0.5000243,0.07070357,0.02984363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002310962,0.0002167755,0.1813941,0.00003460866,0.0001181358,0.00005559421,0.004955348,0.003297002,0.0003425351,0.006870843,0.8000343,0.0003697832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931921,0.000109721,0.000008891979,0.003510599,0.0005074031,0.0001187152,0.00001116845,0.000004545648,0.002536863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997067,0.00005289316,0.00002190321,0.00218239,0.0002506386,0.00001024119,0.000003765346,0.000009708635,0.0004013964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7293307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5317072,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025351236","doi":"10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00185-2","title":"Competition and the reform of incentive schemes in the regulated sector","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique","keywords":"Incentive; Economics; Competition (biology); Public economics; Microeconomics; International economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1185805466421433,"gpt":0.3081580561817353,"spread":0.189577509539592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004431279,0.00003845628,0.0001458858,0.0001264655,0.00008007078,0.0001068793,0.0003858882,0.00002755179,0.0002746844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003213702,0.00001806793,0.00006048773,0.0002371307,0.0002556483,0.0004141371,0.00002956846,0.0001255151,0.000008439985],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004180249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001844612,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000391221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002203046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989974,0.000193091,0.0005678956,0.00006321024,0.0001186451,0.00005975967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983302,0.0005880651,0.0007212884,0.0001730071,0.0001624597,0.0000250015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002816807,0.00005269677,0.001076649,8.504429e-7,0.00001647408,2.222276e-7,0.001212531,0.00006662955,0.00002418714,0.9882024,0.0005298737,0.008789316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002805164,0.0001003037,0.02997194,0.00001906738,0.00001944573,0.0001748604,0.02610188,0.01206829,0.0004502102,0.8063742,0.1217993,0.0001153377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9772359,0.0001366831,0.0008945533,0.01670703,0.00007676565,0.00006598442,0.000003916621,0.000001241746,0.004877916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999265,0.0001717948,0.0001375335,0.0001952703,0.0000617697,0.000001570599,2.756244e-7,0.000001705748,0.0001650455],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1818282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3007601,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972615491","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.03.003","title":"Sorting and inequality in Canadian schools","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Sorting; Inequality; Endogeneity; Disadvantaged; Variance (accounting); Educational inequality; Instrumental variable; Test (biology); Demographic economics; Econometrics; Economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06132362592215047,"gpt":0.3338229325746079,"spread":0.2724993066524575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008128332,0.00003865707,0.0001116288,0.0002596319,0.0001299672,0.0001414344,0.0001436625,0.00006615405,0.00005025033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007942307,0.00003958778,0.00002571882,0.0001240554,0.00003654166,0.0009138793,0.00000984054,0.0002418758,0.000004966957],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004084604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001213628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1511803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9511298,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991293,0.00004451,0.00039219,0.00005255871,0.00005637947,0.0003250777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991038,0.00008470993,0.0002397147,0.00004781516,0.00007749471,0.0004465063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002523763,0.000004511899,0.9775211,0.000001641584,0.000003958997,0.000003613236,0.001075469,0.000006393071,0.000002004,0.008437518,0.0001736651,0.01276761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003364244,0.0000239474,0.8352042,0.00001529926,0.000002767767,0.00001041259,0.007539072,0.00005151746,0.0000127371,0.005239451,0.1514609,0.0001032154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9780518,0.0001300772,0.0000172747,0.006430289,0.0002439507,0.00002641711,7.869667e-7,0.000002067757,0.01509733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982446,0.0003070864,0.0002487357,0.0004836888,0.0006541957,1.640029e-7,2.255733e-7,0.000002905314,0.00005842083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7999495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.854472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990736050","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.08.003","title":"Welfare rankings from multivariate data, a nonparametric approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Social planner; Nonparametric statistics; Data envelopment analysis; Weighting; Economics; Welfare; Econometrics; Multivariate statistics; Incentive; Social Welfare; Measure (data warehouse); Public economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Statistics; Data mining","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08000601884022815,"gpt":0.31664299404618,"spread":0.2366369752059519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005350137,0.0001192269,0.0003526253,0.0002495543,0.0003789949,0.000466594,0.001508043,0.0002092685,0.000554918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002073827,0.0001072529,0.000132494,0.0002537546,0.0001701299,0.001946295,0.0001701751,0.0006356307,0.0000245954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001448377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005109858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004570007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002204534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983374,0.0002097479,0.0006723705,0.0002252878,0.0002147919,0.0003403925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978502,0.0002741356,0.0008508865,0.0004824839,0.0002601794,0.0002821333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001424756,0.001548094,0.1648872,0.00003476933,0.0007225532,0.00001606973,0.01820531,0.00007335419,0.0002291494,0.6690638,0.01502165,0.1300556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00142134,0.00004508208,0.04306338,0.000005290445,0.00005041367,0.00001073965,0.003676518,0.003929385,0.00001554611,0.01101453,0.9364514,0.0003163944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9485453,0.00007797711,0.002076612,0.006939496,0.00318829,0.000117905,0.0001257572,0.00002083956,0.03890776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848664,0.0001152958,0.0123481,0.000363032,0.002088856,0.00000101576,0.00002976818,0.00001385224,0.000173637],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9214298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6908514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022860187","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104243","title":"Relaxing household liquidity constraints through social security","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Social security; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Market liquidity; Cash; Quarter (Canadian coin); Labour economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Public economics; Demographic economics; Finance; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07641395909109056,"gpt":0.2345264465984158,"spread":0.1581124875073253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009000472,0.0001862895,0.000477135,0.0001673013,0.0002320049,0.0005461791,0.0004311083,0.0001136021,0.0005513381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004743258,0.0001878457,0.0003542133,0.0003339689,0.0001246311,0.003717763,0.00019374,0.0003668927,0.0000796754],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001056322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001249362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003671228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003800937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984004,0.00002452973,0.0008781721,0.0002121304,0.0001817123,0.000303024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980712,0.00004184455,0.001391637,0.0001186746,0.0003345768,0.00004205865],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000201844,0.0003515116,0.6419459,0.0002765775,0.0002839107,0.0001046208,0.001785393,0.0003757915,0.0002413834,0.241736,0.1090166,0.003680479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003497018,0.0001163788,0.06331092,0.00008266992,0.000505171,0.00003643973,0.001519473,0.01085601,0.0001433949,0.03899269,0.8797691,0.001170704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850344,0.0000603931,0.0002083542,0.008136411,0.0005141001,0.00007578662,0.000008620666,0.0000407604,0.00592115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882925,0.00005168086,0.0003502499,0.00596176,0.005288699,8.316799e-7,0.00001151275,0.0000280415,0.00001477549],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7707525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7660124,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142067364","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.12.002","title":"How to make the metropolitan area work? Neither big government, nor laissez-faire","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Metropolitan area; Jurisdiction; Productivity; Economics; Competition (biology); Welfare; Work (physics); Distribution (mathematics); Tax competition; Economies of agglomeration; Local government; Government (linguistics); Public economics; Business; Economic geography; Market economy; Tax reform; Ad valorem tax; Economic growth; Public administration","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07833383085499372,"gpt":0.2698815774672144,"spread":0.1915477466122207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001539123,0.00009670899,0.0001818315,0.00003985927,0.0001663521,0.0005986672,0.0004718461,0.00007144953,0.00004243795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000770957,0.00006852345,0.0001045662,0.000266139,0.00009470375,0.0005321438,0.00005560662,0.000123195,0.00001811514],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001867106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003753825,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001225307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002379722,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987413,0.0001061068,0.0002994717,0.0001089668,0.0004248869,0.0003193018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987856,0.00007247131,0.0004511984,0.0001656251,0.0001632989,0.0003618558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001177269,0.0002212332,0.3238357,0.000004442096,0.000174901,0.00001069666,0.006430623,0.0002605758,0.00001014871,0.4170606,0.1576266,0.09424685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003558412,0.00008477713,0.006265458,0.000009343096,0.0000159339,0.00000318156,0.02278724,0.00002774799,0.0000286523,0.002732258,0.9675807,0.000108802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7594405,0.000311257,0.006562185,0.1572119,0.002283355,0.0002429632,0.00002184296,0.00001778276,0.07390827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889812,0.0002369346,0.0002850408,0.001747732,0.001058718,0.000002610763,6.279624e-7,0.00001299487,0.007674144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8099542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5772962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002333310","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.12.007","title":"Honor among tax havens","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tax haven; Economics; Tax avoidance; Indirect tax; Ad valorem tax; Value-added tax; Tax reform; State income tax; Double taxation; International taxation; International economics; Public economics; Monetary economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02372710891909346,"gpt":0.190839870628263,"spread":0.1671127617091696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000844723,0.00008358047,0.0001774121,0.0002406624,0.00007122973,0.0004700912,0.000235734,0.00003878777,0.000283051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002440065,0.00007652617,0.00009803829,0.0001092023,0.0000359739,0.001974541,0.0000516824,0.0001286653,0.0001662913],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004219421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003808949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002459558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002047279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993075,0.000008562646,0.0003957787,0.0000830168,0.00005734703,0.0001478406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983146,0.00002727636,0.001300357,0.0001202515,0.000212012,0.00002556045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002214751,0.0001390928,0.5481139,0.00005761584,0.00007326343,0.000006052604,0.00004239923,0.001011115,0.0001297207,0.3319319,0.05663661,0.06183622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006253564,0.00001329958,0.1034424,0.00001485123,0.00001687225,0.000007705619,0.00009696036,0.01189496,0.00002138819,0.01357782,0.8701309,0.0001574824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9604328,0.00001293958,0.002296768,0.004872177,0.0007794258,0.0000369841,7.251159e-7,0.00001604517,0.03155209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946559,0.00001441513,0.0002737597,0.001685306,0.002460676,7.746152e-7,0.000002389759,0.00001325298,0.0008935171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8134943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039944335","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.10.002","title":"Presidential coattails versus the median voter: Senator selection in US elections","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Economics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Voter model; Econometrics; Political science; Statistics; Law; Politics; Mathematics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0558941974438774,"gpt":0.3321004152906255,"spread":0.276206217846748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002068975,0.00005373352,0.0001314549,0.000118861,0.0002277284,0.0001972162,0.0001632915,0.00008260812,0.00008906763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008096817,0.00004306616,0.00006906912,0.0001773115,0.00007907511,0.0004902628,0.00000938602,0.0002025797,0.00001562707],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003597505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003570757,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004724099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1499377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987321,0.0004215515,0.0003948,0.00006828852,0.0001128362,0.0002704259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990557,0.0003266027,0.0002675244,0.00005067776,0.0001425476,0.0001569383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001062935,0.0001667436,0.3593982,0.00001200325,0.0001276349,0.000001365531,0.003159664,0.001071275,0.0002790884,0.6190224,0.007619624,0.009035752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003672541,0.001022966,0.3395098,0.00004134699,0.0001110835,0.00003238935,0.001799145,0.008850944,0.0006161962,0.09294387,0.5508755,0.0005242382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9726244,0.00001180349,0.0003731092,0.0220671,0.001334603,0.00008446039,8.542801e-7,0.000007915271,0.003495703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978833,0.00001741037,0.0000344608,0.0001044332,0.001760246,0.000003713328,4.298081e-7,0.000005390983,0.0001906267],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5432559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8655737,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581166862","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104187","title":"Are changes of organizational form costly? Income shifting and business entry responses to taxes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Economics; Labour economics; Differential (mechanical device); Offset (computer science); Income tax; Business; Public economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04601897063835788,"gpt":0.2187259230985905,"spread":0.1727069524602326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003619485,0.00008437825,0.0002115686,0.0002340746,0.00006344738,0.00020894,0.0001519856,0.00003179861,0.0001131031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001296223,0.00008014663,0.00002971827,0.0004112856,0.00002451007,0.0009773005,0.0001274401,0.00007418058,0.00001126206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002576193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006171936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006884814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008709452,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993589,0.000007840003,0.0003588924,0.00009298095,0.00007791926,0.0001034824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997821,0.00005176613,0.001465154,0.00005533169,0.0005683903,0.00003834662],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001175707,0.00004078885,0.9739636,0.0002164371,0.00004737909,0.000005999468,0.0001761964,0.0001426247,0.0003861532,0.01877957,0.00260371,0.003519971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001051154,0.00003541671,0.8740888,0.0001215448,0.00003495019,0.00001512335,0.001388627,0.001627207,0.0001809657,0.002324545,0.1188735,0.0002581681],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.969503,0.0000770566,0.0003644474,0.02934016,0.0001738221,0.00006135392,0.00001136512,0.00001332552,0.000455458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935259,0.00006311505,0.0004695416,0.004818274,0.001049523,7.586739e-7,0.000003350207,0.00001386112,0.00005565316],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1162698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3268285,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053821251","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.07.007","title":"Tax competition with heterogeneous firms","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economics; Competition (biology); Tax competition; Microeconomics; Industrial organization; International economics; Public economics; Ad valorem tax; Tax reform","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02137910733658938,"gpt":0.2455685706513243,"spread":0.2241894633147349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004246869,0.00004448679,0.00009852472,0.00004022975,0.0001075819,0.0001200884,0.0001281346,0.00003995724,0.0002325794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003439764,0.00003747338,0.00004326208,0.00006058375,0.00005913239,0.0007143673,0.000007748076,0.00005835476,0.00001895347],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002613458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001771941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002828674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001404321,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999422,0.00003717508,0.0002193737,0.00005333128,0.0001210663,0.0001471257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994191,0.0000215391,0.0003173724,0.00005103596,0.00009134243,0.00009963299],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001213222,0.0005350353,0.1340621,0.000012029,0.0001627476,0.00002251795,0.004629916,0.02283593,0.0000321316,0.6592303,0.007298583,0.1710574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005263154,0.0001286351,0.002861807,0.00001142521,0.00001027484,0.00002778315,0.0005676409,0.0004798573,0.0001216621,0.001299933,0.9938681,0.0000965667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759043,0.00008234382,0.004649584,0.007462246,0.0002027574,0.00005106214,0.000003411341,0.000007802509,0.01163642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969691,0.00075837,0.0007748601,0.0004869369,0.000582829,5.178977e-7,0.000001297833,0.000004826202,0.0004212317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9865695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2546582,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}