{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":66,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":66,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"a328f3bb62c2","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering"}},"results":[{"id":"W1963898649","doi":"10.1108/13552510610654510","title":"Human error in maintenance: a review","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Quality and Safety in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":194,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Human error; Listing (finance); Risk analysis (engineering); Human reliability; Originality; Order (exchange); Reliability (semiconductor); Human resources; Value (mathematics); Engineering; Reliability engineering; Computer science; Business; Management; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2390006783094809,"gpt":0.5429668015626707,"spread":0.3039661232531898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01856181,0.0007560846,0.006074607,0.000922853,0.0001595737,0.00001304027,0.000998622,0.0009911276,0.0001169301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004010007,0.00060581,0.001066357,0.001390016,0.00007042199,0.0002697172,0.0001669244,0.007617773,0.0000571117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002880831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001336957,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006577023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000782888,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9845884,0.003318307,0.009341265,0.0004814691,0.0007879624,0.001482549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923669,0.001890666,0.004191319,0.0007745835,0.0005044828,0.0002720151],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031118,0.0002272871,0.0004534799,0.8711112,0.0001108561,0.0007010627,0.001170452,0.0004387747,8.450916e-7,0.01053542,0.01985743,0.0953621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005309752,0.00004114047,0.000668837,0.3935566,0.00007565689,0.00005520381,0.0002800519,0.00001436101,1.128307e-8,0.0002259974,0.6041583,0.0003928035],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005953563,0.9935247,0.0002954754,0.002015865,0.001584074,0.001819784,0.00008054045,0.00004284806,0.0005771723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00007078863,0.9961793,0.0006852599,0.001078583,0.0008609151,0.0002015217,0.00003492534,0.0001119259,0.0007767644],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5843009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976084415","doi":"10.1108/eum0000000006007","title":"Optimizing a mine haul truck wheel motors’ condition monitoring program Use of proportional hazards modeling","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Truck; Engineering; Work (physics); Automotive engineering; Reliability engineering; Mechanical engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03870898229259323,"gpt":0.3373679380428266,"spread":0.2986589557502333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001179069,0.0002820324,0.0006116294,0.0005144062,0.00002462182,0.00005909245,0.0002413856,0.0001421293,0.00001016288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006650441,0.0002805644,0.0002090526,0.0004085269,0.00002839517,0.0008537836,0.00003556854,0.0006428312,5.550474e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003823499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004267296,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007303873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001037384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972891,0.00004632312,0.00155684,0.0001652695,0.0005182832,0.00042424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988374,0.0001495676,0.000338072,0.0002237114,0.0003295386,0.000121787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003708842,0.0001295961,0.01138041,0.0002850914,0.00006102939,0.00006373848,0.000321123,0.9701047,0.01406593,0.0001802071,0.00006595815,0.003305155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007018559,0.0001317473,0.01353212,0.001718318,0.00002482726,0.0001381735,0.0001296866,0.9752685,0.007350419,0.0001454362,0.0005054108,0.0003534784],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8410276,0.0002955974,0.1576974,0.00007753486,0.0003709342,0.000281374,0.000008619478,0.00021408,0.0000268548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8652929,0.0004238715,0.1339413,0.000007483676,0.0002233706,0.00004722531,0.000004330429,0.00005198896,0.00000755969],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02426533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052964535","doi":"10.1108/13552511111116268","title":"Mapping the dynamics of overall equipment effectiveness to enhance asset management practices","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Quality and Supply Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Overall equipment effectiveness; Originality; Asset (computer security); Function (biology); Risk analysis (engineering); Asset management; System dynamics; Investment (military); Operations management; Engineering; Business; Computer science; Qualitative research; Economics; Microeconomics; Production (economics); Finance; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04665165582430302,"gpt":0.2981400312505229,"spread":0.2514883754262199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006602106,0.000194275,0.0004165123,0.000448455,0.0000480009,0.00008222357,0.00062033,0.00004406003,0.00003407764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006523316,0.0001486093,0.000140848,0.0005748487,0.0000310074,0.0008797576,0.000288725,0.0003058652,0.00001166085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000205803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001274375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003725777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001043496,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979011,0.00008183758,0.0009784347,0.0001900716,0.00049701,0.0003515136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980064,0.0002381547,0.001224825,0.0003055961,0.0002034397,0.00002156645],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001170371,0.001080193,0.03479771,0.009711336,0.0008367979,0.0003058592,0.0044952,0.1113571,0.002348389,0.8141048,0.001236262,0.01855597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001997184,0.000162312,0.9063666,0.004650815,0.0001592246,0.00001981044,0.01329794,0.03331582,0.0008389617,0.01637317,0.02176906,0.001049064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7902781,0.00008109763,0.2024756,0.002279156,0.0008014568,0.0005452083,0.000002618284,0.00002519562,0.003511581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949856,0.0000400985,0.004112898,0.0005691638,0.0001725407,0.00002208995,0.000001676863,0.00001863648,0.00007728645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8715689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6060112,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089216888","doi":"10.1108/13552510210439784","title":"Robot systems reliability and safety: a review","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Robot Manipulation and Learning","field":"Engineering","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Robot; Reliability engineering; Engineering; System safety; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Artificial intelligence; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06281210737052899,"gpt":0.3224919000956903,"spread":0.2596797927251613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003009348,0.0004271542,0.002659687,0.0003334169,0.00002189606,0.00005109197,0.0002684929,0.000234112,0.00002329818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001046197,0.0003579568,0.0003793248,0.0004652064,0.00002045321,0.0002145361,0.00003608182,0.001452546,0.00001004852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005073086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003459402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006070927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.716007e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963536,0.0002471126,0.002526876,0.0002010819,0.0003196117,0.0003516845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983975,0.0004369235,0.0006014042,0.0003177508,0.0001038084,0.0001425699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002081652,0.00001299365,0.000006493781,0.1843472,0.00008712618,0.00004926875,0.00006913143,0.6425762,5.613263e-7,0.0002383618,0.000629223,0.1719813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001753738,0.00001548388,0.00005718312,0.1626536,0.0001244596,0.0003256735,0.00001462691,0.03027369,2.388489e-8,0.000003151238,0.8059978,0.0003588521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002900461,0.980345,0.01813233,0.00005337373,0.0008790921,0.0003811815,0.000002189623,0.00006855145,0.0001354399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001347439,0.9986519,0.0008105873,0.00001968645,0.0002108721,0.00001499754,0.000003317815,0.00007375861,0.00008020168],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8053687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084709039","doi":"10.1108/13552511111180186","title":"Diagnosis of rotor bearings using logical analysis of data","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Advanced machining processes and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretability; Rotor (electric); Bearing (navigation); Property (philosophy); Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Fault (geology); Data mining; Computer science; Condition monitoring; Field (mathematics); Rolling-element bearing; Machine learning; Reliability engineering; Vibration; Pattern recognition (psychology); Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1184359416446778,"gpt":0.3344910602180075,"spread":0.2160551185733297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008028098,0.0001120024,0.0005292459,0.0003911774,0.000007675299,0.000005081897,0.0003530433,0.00006060433,0.0000211588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004341365,0.0001019508,0.0001038062,0.000742826,0.00002381988,0.0004070982,0.00006183788,0.0002095439,8.276908e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005972411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001314735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005987497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001072351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986432,0.00001744972,0.0008904034,0.0001005818,0.0001853268,0.0001630733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991227,0.00012354,0.0003271212,0.0002475949,0.0001324001,0.00004662477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001839515,0.00004017093,0.02430421,0.0002192785,0.0002180108,0.000005501827,0.000586486,0.9722981,0.001014803,0.0002904794,0.000003214836,0.001001276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003177768,0.00004225901,0.06889612,0.0003813046,0.0002395367,0.000006033279,0.0002032438,0.9268811,0.002700178,0.0001055041,0.00005950641,0.0001674136],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4890179,0.0003617393,0.5104316,0.00000497161,0.00008978983,0.00003714423,0.00001579581,0.00001292287,0.00002809471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.883618,0.0003394303,0.1159969,0.00000441923,0.00002226733,0.0000011842,0.000003011459,0.00001374681,0.00000100427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3946001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4157434,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1878151390","doi":"10.1108/jqme-05-2013-0030","title":"Human factors engineering in aircraft maintenance: a review","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"International Civil Aviation Organization","funders":"","keywords":"Aviation; Aircraft maintenance; Engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Systems engineering; Aviation accident; Construction engineering; Transport engineering; Engineering management; Aeronautics; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2339590190193639,"gpt":0.5411481027209928,"spread":0.3071890837016289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01591536,0.000641214,0.004475533,0.001249377,0.0000937355,0.00001282924,0.0008551522,0.0006365022,0.00009031713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008160229,0.0004921736,0.0006343535,0.001481571,0.0000345839,0.0002997904,0.0001827109,0.006292359,0.00004799017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003672691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002389753,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001826245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000786404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902061,0.001171691,0.005644611,0.0003914103,0.00109732,0.001488872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941549,0.002133439,0.001860087,0.0005324754,0.0007442309,0.0005748785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007921501,0.0002727048,0.004225539,0.8388273,0.0001914067,0.0005713561,0.00128756,0.002449828,0.000001831366,0.003701329,0.01396119,0.1344308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008493674,0.00009092628,0.003767749,0.3060213,0.00004633265,0.00002932891,0.0001179937,0.00009852391,2.360345e-8,0.00003978223,0.6885403,0.0003983497],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002839353,0.9957235,0.0002694042,0.0003527266,0.001138736,0.001908287,0.00004767934,0.00003648089,0.0002392392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001978613,0.9979125,0.0005351924,0.0001584896,0.0005663044,0.0002012086,0.00003411826,0.0001076546,0.0002866214],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6745791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991651351","doi":"10.1108/13552510410526839","title":"Maintenance management – an AHP application for centralization/decentralization","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Decentralization; Process (computing); Process management; Organizational structure; Management science; Engineering; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Operations management; Business; Management; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01050868768868772,"gpt":0.2572392669741839,"spread":0.2467305792854962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001030339,0.0002108269,0.0003366678,0.0002377567,0.00003781224,0.00004474569,0.0002670385,0.0001069705,0.000003707557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001853156,0.0002095993,0.0001156245,0.0004392159,0.00002720689,0.0006902695,0.00001304296,0.000189181,0.000001828943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006684473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003158952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001198719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002591378,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980959,0.00002621629,0.0009880161,0.0001917355,0.0002543121,0.00044378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990841,0.00004370062,0.0002196516,0.0002531124,0.0002819032,0.0001174922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000427307,0.00007470023,0.0001963285,0.0003421833,0.00002511422,0.000004344399,0.000393272,0.9341992,0.001378261,0.06081655,0.0001189808,0.002408318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007744075,0.0002542982,0.01842633,0.00141272,0.00007398042,0.00007097976,0.001262485,0.9215443,0.003921045,0.02374586,0.02047074,0.001073147],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05077434,0.00009462921,0.9474365,0.0003313101,0.0005952375,0.0005320503,0.000009522789,0.0001036896,0.0001227183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9301597,0.0009770602,0.06843912,0.00009575595,0.0001495211,0.00006308523,0.0000330401,0.000055718,0.00002703964],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8793854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8547213,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070991662","doi":"10.1108/13552510310466927","title":"Hierarchical control of production and maintenance rates in manufacturing systems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; École de Technologie Supérieure; Polytechnique Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preventive maintenance; Optimal control; Production control; Limiting; Mathematical optimization; Production (economics); Reduction (mathematics); Control (management); Optimal maintenance; Stochastic control; Control theory (sociology); Production planning; Engineering; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Mathematics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009706710725806434,"gpt":0.2331118134261311,"spread":0.2234051027003247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002404055,0.0001790618,0.0005517806,0.0003121038,0.0000129617,0.00002208711,0.0001112848,0.000101501,0.000002426287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001614017,0.0001609755,0.00006686264,0.0002343916,0.00005431292,0.0003385956,0.000008836285,0.0004926807,3.370465e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002153521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002747598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001927898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001525644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980779,0.0001163796,0.001114618,0.0001514417,0.0002054215,0.0003342034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992527,0.0001959196,0.0002069939,0.0001584692,0.0001157112,0.00007024501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005020229,0.0000330939,0.004195142,0.00055957,0.00002034343,0.00001446494,0.0003416118,0.9851527,0.005144526,0.004191828,0.00002424908,0.0002722657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007033629,0.0003274596,0.1447982,0.008197197,0.00005031762,0.000703605,0.003048478,0.7964114,0.03241049,0.003634554,0.002066463,0.001318209],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8603343,0.001073575,0.1371482,0.0001838272,0.0008562765,0.0002559381,0.000003287485,0.00002686148,0.0001177634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961228,0.0007664372,0.002999377,0.00001001734,0.00005034366,0.000009733174,3.686033e-7,0.00002236242,0.00001853811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1887413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6564391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750424462","doi":"10.1108/jqme-06-2016-0028","title":"Bearing temperature monitoring of a Wind Turbine using physics-based model","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"SCADA; Bearing (navigation); Turbine; Control chart; ALARM; Wind power; Engineering; Wind speed; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Control engineering; Marine engineering; Mechanical engineering; Meteorology; Artificial intelligence; Aerospace engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.184480930953304,"gpt":0.4551174038056316,"spread":0.2706364728523277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003755741,0.0002095772,0.0007340923,0.0002481208,0.0001433708,0.0002069304,0.001097815,0.00009638477,0.000002363693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01498491,0.0001712819,0.0001768412,0.0002884733,0.000100174,0.001095127,0.0001315367,0.0007309749,7.403092e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002205398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001456659,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002043439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002098937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964747,0.00006049129,0.001530627,0.0002601627,0.001294589,0.0003793957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959931,0.0008923865,0.001536457,0.0006211622,0.0008198945,0.000137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005553217,0.0000333511,0.02302442,0.0000634091,0.0000113154,0.00002929823,0.0002515373,0.895592,0.07866967,0.0006633584,0.000002333649,0.001603822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001288196,0.0000581893,0.07789171,0.001711953,0.0000173516,0.00001528261,0.0005183572,0.8728505,0.02959034,0.01570145,0.00001616301,0.0003405476],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5897725,0.00009108146,0.4094488,0.00009338952,0.000512506,0.00004664565,0.000006516205,0.000006344844,0.0000222205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8789842,0.000007128991,0.1206033,0.000007803678,0.0003513616,7.043052e-7,9.814301e-8,0.00002079184,0.0000245757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2892117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041759495","doi":"10.1108/13552510810861923","title":"Optimal inspection and preventive maintenance policy for systems with self‐announcing and non‐self‐announcing failures","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Uniqueness; Preventive maintenance; Originality; Idle; Order (exchange); Computer science; Value (mathematics); Reliability engineering; Optimal maintenance; Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Mathematics; Economics; Business; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007945176398540704,"gpt":0.2233356510639563,"spread":0.2153904746654156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00144155,0.0003126373,0.000642398,0.0003645679,0.000117531,0.00007675142,0.0001363888,0.0001378908,3.751037e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004949161,0.0002687602,0.00008375431,0.000401925,0.00007293581,0.0007685058,0.0000303193,0.0004443868,2.875301e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000723983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001269342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001489667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000273945,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980035,0.00004711518,0.0008789912,0.0002557651,0.0002991582,0.0005155088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987537,0.0002198856,0.000286378,0.0001754354,0.0004258456,0.0001387148],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001241937,0.00004640128,0.002355796,0.001001119,0.0001209519,0.00003288531,0.004758735,0.9885747,0.001549067,0.001173321,0.0001509386,0.0001118822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003601588,0.0005340788,0.0407014,0.002381536,0.00006354064,0.001436887,0.003155535,0.9451885,0.0004926271,0.0001150175,0.001592306,0.0007369612],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7063717,0.0006161156,0.2918201,0.0002340498,0.0002972994,0.0004437316,0.000009718823,0.000148022,0.00005925369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9507684,0.00154142,0.04726613,0.00002264665,0.0002840585,0.00004003447,0.00000192429,0.00005196332,0.00002343961],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.244554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082731959","doi":"10.1108/13552511011048896","title":"Proportional hazards modeling of engine failures in military vehicles","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Covariate; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Markov model; Decision model; Diesel fuel; Hazard; Operations research; Markov chain; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Automotive engineering; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009135250757017778,"gpt":0.2393390671157068,"spread":0.2302038163586891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001891095,0.0001708843,0.0004471812,0.0003839574,0.00001062377,0.000008423162,0.000215742,0.00013769,0.00001262348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008672714,0.0001599877,0.0001237861,0.0003419837,0.00003961164,0.0003960011,0.00002100134,0.0008187862,6.120794e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001254821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006544204,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008275745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001669038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979755,0.00002821201,0.001271882,0.0001203378,0.0003038909,0.00030013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993048,0.0001011417,0.0001203282,0.0001834628,0.0002205072,0.00006972641],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003277813,0.00005068687,0.001783696,0.0002673485,0.00001493472,0.00001315738,0.0003955099,0.9729083,0.02241502,0.001209633,0.00002750886,0.0008813799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006108903,0.00003158387,0.009915088,0.0003732937,0.000005020971,0.00002762566,0.0002342884,0.986026,0.001613344,0.0008564592,0.0001295898,0.000176805],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9038422,0.0003403969,0.09476577,0.0002898949,0.0005537872,0.0001129304,0.000005699917,0.00003215254,0.0000572381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691837,0.0002393318,0.03042567,0.0000111709,0.0001020613,0.000006090698,0.00000235279,0.00002428164,0.000005346369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06534157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6524107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052776381","doi":"10.1108/13552510510601348","title":"Optimal design of series production lines with unreliable machines and finite buffers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms","field":"Engineering","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Series (stratigraphy); Production line; Optimal design; Heuristic; Computer science; Production (economics); Constraint (computer-aided design); Ant colony optimization algorithms; Ant colony; Engineering; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01571145522299699,"gpt":0.2395742402575183,"spread":0.2238627850345213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007036846,0.0001262744,0.0002675288,0.000174327,0.00001466127,0.00001789329,0.00007392368,0.00004610106,0.000006356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003642335,0.000103077,0.00002754013,0.0002245695,0.00002867015,0.0003546182,0.000007798945,0.0002134985,4.93315e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004817502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001806661,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003897354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002588285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991217,0.00002293048,0.0004729202,0.00007820313,0.0001490166,0.000155199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995057,0.0001048465,0.0001193535,0.00008460518,0.0001388483,0.00004665213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006919039,0.00001487134,0.0004327341,0.0001184046,0.00002719604,0.000003662178,0.0005222068,0.995973,0.002058018,0.00003360926,0.00003617294,0.0007109387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005300231,0.000106347,0.00151918,0.0004542777,0.00001374801,0.0001027846,0.0003371543,0.9903373,0.006274009,0.00001404733,0.0001383363,0.0001727647],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.36405,0.0007498601,0.63432,0.0004269978,0.0003055331,0.00007953103,0.000001926843,0.00004892766,0.00001714173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4726355,0.0004855283,0.5266063,0.000009962919,0.0001642328,0.000002779007,5.957277e-7,0.00002217483,0.00007290471],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1085855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4203358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909183615","doi":"10.1108/jqme-04-2017-0027","title":"A decision support tool for bi-objective risk-based maintenance scheduling of an LNG gas sweetening unit","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Scheduling (production processes); Engineering; Multi-objective optimization; Pareto principle; Reliability engineering; Schedule; Shutdown; Operations research; Computer science; Operations management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01225374358112222,"gpt":0.2668627407236958,"spread":0.2546089971425735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004072873,0.0003253854,0.0008374287,0.0004993154,0.00003878465,0.00004441928,0.0003965147,0.0001973122,0.00002073328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002620371,0.0003044392,0.0003102655,0.0005675013,0.00004447263,0.0007772167,0.00003007663,0.0006751497,0.000003164794],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003653857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001325674,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002655153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002364624,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969581,0.0000886795,0.001651836,0.000282074,0.000425002,0.0005943417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972751,0.0008741741,0.0006325942,0.000419235,0.0006727299,0.000126194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003766976,0.00006420398,0.004256915,0.0004820333,0.00004739651,0.000008719333,0.0004228597,0.9804552,0.008714498,0.0009268798,0.00001937981,0.004225286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003082848,0.0004598166,0.01307701,0.001644311,0.0000343566,0.0000269459,0.000619474,0.9727431,0.006518398,0.0009339245,0.0004189512,0.0004408415],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5483859,0.00005825234,0.4505475,0.00003381196,0.0005678795,0.0003022606,0.0000192084,0.00004456569,0.00004062662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8114685,0.0001226341,0.188191,0.0000294621,0.00008873932,0.00001696163,0.000006850405,0.00006109555,0.00001469802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2630826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077743873","doi":"10.1108/13552510310503222","title":"Adaptive model for vibration monitoring of rotating machinery subject to random deterioration","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Vibration; Kalman filter; Frequency domain; Control theory (sociology); Condition monitoring; Time domain; SIGNAL (programming language); Engineering; Fault (geology); Fault detection and isolation; State-space representation; Computer science; Control engineering; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Acoustics; Computer vision","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02936946893459161,"gpt":0.3187175025180836,"spread":0.2893480335834919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001884451,0.0001784676,0.0004519587,0.0003300612,0.00001848046,0.00002272964,0.0001395205,0.00007257725,0.000001138981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001544431,0.0001775115,0.000130347,0.0002480741,0.000007065436,0.0003533889,0.00001017125,0.0002510185,1.996871e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001878291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000301588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008415456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000991654,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983702,0.00005704515,0.001004693,0.0001085712,0.0002152555,0.0002441909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990247,0.0003606381,0.0002292501,0.0001307827,0.000186404,0.00006826172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007062112,0.00001847613,0.001793563,0.0001565477,0.00002037162,0.000001657649,0.0008783725,0.9076464,0.08749016,0.0005397513,0.000025181,0.00135896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009624277,0.0001052165,0.003465325,0.0005673902,0.00001134877,0.000007658386,0.0001516329,0.9291927,0.0648532,0.0004657171,0.00001690868,0.000200473],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4263316,0.00008155625,0.573132,0.00001980723,0.0001675927,0.0002073589,0.000004869437,0.00003798769,0.00001725772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.736729,0.00002866669,0.2630972,0.000009707432,0.00005931471,0.00004376049,6.086184e-7,0.00002934571,0.000002462005],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3103974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7238709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032050708","doi":"10.1108/13552510510601311","title":"Joint optimal periodic and conditional maintenance strategy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Erlang (programming language); Block (permutation group theory); Time horizon; Steady state (chemistry); Expected value; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01581329301950169,"gpt":0.2443258449649503,"spread":0.2285125519454486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001204653,0.000230019,0.0004607695,0.0002333463,0.00003320088,0.00006228011,0.0001557929,0.0001162851,0.00003993165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003625854,0.0002141807,0.000114733,0.0002140143,0.00008300423,0.0006392108,0.00002515896,0.0005628273,0.000005371101],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003276685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004772059,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006311226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001086009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980964,0.00003797333,0.001009686,0.0001622018,0.0002716124,0.0004221465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992551,0.00009526547,0.0001710486,0.0001559172,0.0001809664,0.0001416602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002584854,0.00003101482,0.0002330811,0.0001330672,0.00002544356,0.00002220942,0.0003799816,0.9881822,0.00344515,0.004816737,0.0005397819,0.002165466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002336539,0.0001668851,0.04167351,0.0007136069,0.00002140951,0.0005359107,0.0009734352,0.9420781,0.001646393,0.0009970693,0.008192812,0.000664282],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.746983,0.0009048271,0.2500498,0.001020924,0.0003743306,0.0001623647,0.00001666807,0.00008823234,0.0003998528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781936,0.0008019491,0.02058147,0.00009235215,0.0002271605,0.000008076304,0.000003818698,0.00003095595,0.00006066564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2312105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8734037,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994121331","doi":"10.1108/13552510310493738","title":"Availability modeling and optimization of reconfigurable manufacturing systems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Optimization and Packing Problems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"Control reconfiguration; Mathematical optimization; Integer programming; Linear programming; Computer science; Production (economics); Reliability engineering; Component (thermodynamics); Failure rate; Basis (linear algebra); Stochastic programming; Robust optimization; Engineering; Mathematics; Embedded system","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02289221077093223,"gpt":0.237647398735157,"spread":0.2147551879642248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001564567,0.0001207182,0.0003349784,0.0001812664,0.00001402299,0.00002818179,0.00007556009,0.00007234551,0.00001355403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002904594,0.0001180982,0.00004638084,0.0001304812,0.00001211962,0.000245391,0.000004447143,0.000238316,3.238997e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009541213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001693817,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001241509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000162703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986847,0.00005466,0.0008530773,0.00008377085,0.0001430162,0.0001807737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994736,0.00009016882,0.0001535674,0.0001161643,0.0001067409,0.00005971902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005433297,0.000009523174,0.0003135836,0.0004216817,0.00001648792,0.000001675079,0.000255058,0.9975483,0.000618784,0.0007104513,0.00000747559,0.00009156812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003810254,0.00001578279,0.0001254867,0.0003939647,0.00000574032,0.0000323563,0.0002232199,0.9967077,0.001792852,0.00006534222,0.0001296503,0.000126898],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2561338,0.0008669951,0.7417042,0.00002000893,0.0005070479,0.00009770117,0.000002311413,0.0000345447,0.00063335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786188,0.0004691844,0.02084817,0.000004743769,0.00002002237,0.000001879042,5.592597e-7,0.00001993591,0.00001668447],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7224851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4815904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031614523","doi":"10.1108/13552511311315968","title":"Risk based integrity modeling of offshore process components suffering stochastic degradation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Component (thermodynamics); Process (computing); Degradation (telecommunications); Gamma process; Computer science; Submarine pipeline; Bayesian probability; Stochastic process; Engineering; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02243970622894331,"gpt":0.254651612657843,"spread":0.2322119064288997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001379142,0.0002147266,0.000515295,0.0003121577,0.00002363254,0.00003095643,0.0002538805,0.0001243582,0.00001517875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001136455,0.0001972535,0.0001331128,0.0003603813,0.00003011996,0.0005988647,0.00001679218,0.0007654523,0.000001744132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002566988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004198926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001147692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000116275,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997883,0.00006457062,0.00123611,0.0001378961,0.0003558967,0.0003225024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986951,0.0001879219,0.0003186372,0.0002004829,0.0005028986,0.000094992],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000221596,0.00005002234,0.002090064,0.0004576737,0.00002434969,0.00000138248,0.0003886065,0.9933375,0.002955861,0.0001127857,0.000009691536,0.0005498638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006119759,0.00003492717,0.01027153,0.0007880916,0.00001354818,0.000006220323,0.0004115361,0.9865324,0.0005992063,0.0005333567,0.000003063846,0.0001940652],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.512657,0.00006086644,0.4868547,0.0000468037,0.0002004594,0.0001308651,0.000004122352,0.00003023596,0.00001490048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850879,0.00006620819,0.01473489,0.00001002593,0.00004782468,0.00001472585,0.000003877814,0.00003161264,0.000002975793],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4724308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8043764,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763991617","doi":"10.1108/jqme-06-2016-0023","title":"Maintenance strategies: Decision Making Grid vs Jack-Knife Diagram","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Downtime; Pareto analysis; Reliability engineering; Ranking (information retrieval); Predictive maintenance; Computer science; Preventive maintenance; Operations research; Scope (computer science); Pareto principle; Engineering; Operations management; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01223004537037403,"gpt":0.2785204771279729,"spread":0.2662904317575989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002425944,0.0003653229,0.0006900679,0.000391217,0.00006020626,0.0001430074,0.000517055,0.0002053265,0.00005581107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001495639,0.0003275337,0.0002115293,0.0006861648,0.0001222464,0.001031375,0.00005809994,0.0007601944,0.00002400173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000660764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001027387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001472146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005849901,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968376,0.00007041546,0.001573436,0.0002690701,0.0005017626,0.0007477411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981964,0.0003967064,0.0003296021,0.0004206675,0.000509041,0.000147568],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002103193,0.00006144468,0.0004848048,0.0002769311,0.00004915231,0.00006939726,0.001333746,0.9807679,0.001725745,0.003724501,0.002844024,0.008452049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003387237,0.0006764029,0.03125906,0.006502222,0.00004662142,0.0003896619,0.002704972,0.92585,0.001347793,0.009696919,0.01658759,0.001551529],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2431179,0.0002831755,0.7515908,0.000263273,0.00337322,0.0002037131,0.000007855933,0.0001541717,0.001005973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611223,0.0005767036,0.03731133,0.0001312582,0.0007543776,0.00001030762,0.000001822779,0.00006456564,0.00002734184],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7180045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999177,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000625936","doi":"10.1108/13552510510616478","title":"Fuzzy set‐valued and grey filtering statistical inferences on a system operating data","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Schedule; Reliability engineering; Fuzzy logic; Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy set; Failure rate; Function (biology); Operations research; Production (economics); Product (mathematics); Industrial engineering; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.040525353149743,"gpt":0.2963117320154809,"spread":0.2557863788657379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001889324,0.0001995211,0.0004264055,0.0001684397,0.00003569645,0.00009823575,0.0003047156,0.00008463663,0.00000563299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009683855,0.0001750984,0.00003363393,0.0001684126,0.00003240343,0.0006556805,0.00007173855,0.0004799776,0.000003073721],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002532223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002998406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001867015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002135703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982266,0.00006758772,0.0009206359,0.0001950083,0.0002630538,0.0003271137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990847,0.000268855,0.0001298056,0.0003066554,0.00009933312,0.0001106523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002255981,0.00001754558,0.0003396395,0.0004384149,0.00002730243,0.00002316495,0.0005717837,0.9820744,0.001133925,0.0112379,0.0001647742,0.003948587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006674097,0.00008675003,0.004085224,0.00129347,0.0000124298,0.00009240425,0.001052802,0.991669,0.000164891,0.00008741131,0.0005242884,0.0002638969],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5365821,0.0004054436,0.460574,0.000401851,0.000684105,0.0002193446,0.00006666213,0.0001484934,0.0009180538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9409643,0.0001744888,0.05858573,0.00003282374,0.0001989148,0.000004156458,0.000007615745,0.00002452614,0.000007436931],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4043822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7140304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094136778","doi":"10.1108/13552510010341207","title":"Joint determination of the optimum target mean and variance of a process","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Taguchi methods; Variance (accounting); Process (computing); Reduction (mathematics); Function (biology); Quality (philosophy); Statistics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Value (mathematics); Joint (building); Computer science; Econometrics; Engineering; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06497288316638775,"gpt":0.3867093940887986,"spread":0.3217365109224108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003280398,0.00009296784,0.0003961431,0.0001264021,0.00002256735,0.00001965857,0.0003797281,0.00004303782,0.00002245227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007719096,0.0000597489,0.00006592959,0.0004883241,0.00008656998,0.0003824824,0.00003299711,0.000274778,3.818974e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004893737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004711015,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004763997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002408312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974917,0.000098431,0.00131307,0.0001311978,0.0008057203,0.0001598382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977822,0.0008045085,0.000714394,0.0001845222,0.000462221,0.00005210791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002278685,0.000157338,0.01025711,0.0005241186,0.00002207425,0.00002562446,0.008409787,0.8651882,0.01404713,0.004708319,0.00002495822,0.09640741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002575954,0.0003538184,0.3059337,0.003159053,0.00003189094,0.0001800677,0.004580589,0.431754,0.03801171,0.2122805,0.000544437,0.0005943031],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5945572,0.0001605798,0.4046945,0.0002438754,0.0001791976,0.00007173651,0.000006640265,0.000003179817,0.00008315794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.953623,0.0000243926,0.04624897,0.00001258374,0.00003788688,0.000001382602,3.79342e-8,0.000006250737,0.00004550852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4334342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9241036,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977513378","doi":"10.1108/13552511111157371","title":"Simulation‐based approach to joint production and preventive maintenance scheduling on a failure‐prone machine","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms","field":"Engineering","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preventive maintenance; Tardiness; Corrective maintenance; Scheduling (production processes); Production (economics); Maintenance actions; Operations research; Due date; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Proactive maintenance; Context (archaeology); Operations management; Job shop scheduling; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Business; Schedule; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03720795776466069,"gpt":0.2596485919597839,"spread":0.2224406341951232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001342682,0.0002164274,0.0003708918,0.00042081,0.00003178741,0.00002874215,0.0001307488,0.00007948666,0.000006118411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001729153,0.0001985528,0.00007837568,0.0004245983,0.00002122877,0.0002243586,0.00001856818,0.0004712225,0.000002687056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001885021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002165288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006687837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003262635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984621,0.00005193289,0.0007266228,0.0002041446,0.0002585873,0.0002965616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992161,0.0001068983,0.000163749,0.0001850679,0.0001923118,0.0001358448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005798482,0.00008055363,0.0001648219,0.0001338922,0.00002878148,0.00000524395,0.001235315,0.9964874,0.0007636936,0.0003863657,0.00001057864,0.0006453604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005670658,0.00008113766,0.003146308,0.0006646371,0.0000109781,0.00001260667,0.0003547489,0.9925751,0.002229964,0.00007323765,0.00003787491,0.0002463289],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1359786,0.0001134561,0.862889,0.000171493,0.0003995264,0.000224834,0.000003390883,0.00008328523,0.0001364148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6706087,0.00001143665,0.3291911,0.00004571643,0.00008795182,0.000009614952,0.000001042063,0.00002762812,0.00001680077],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5346301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8096749,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084602948","doi":"10.1108/13552511211265938","title":"A risk‐based approach to manage non‐repairable spare parts inventory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Forecasting Techniques and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Spare part; Unavailability; Downtime; Reliability engineering; Criticality; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Operations research; Process (computing); Operations management; Engineering; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1391941571290154,"gpt":0.3820506047357995,"spread":0.2428564476067842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01086911,0.0001314503,0.0003531452,0.0003861737,0.00004974,0.00006616798,0.0006027175,0.00006040443,0.000014953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003788861,0.0001010154,0.0001611303,0.0008326243,0.00002442016,0.0003154383,0.00007712057,0.0003695523,0.00001911126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001507875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002638701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004408386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000633092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975936,0.0001110816,0.001023244,0.0001733199,0.0007038341,0.0003949642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982225,0.0003995131,0.000511165,0.0004343017,0.0002028229,0.000229668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006677982,0.0005432738,0.07114127,0.00008023377,0.0000258205,0.00001066155,0.003517322,0.8863395,0.0005224444,0.009511995,0.02303066,0.005210054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001366757,0.0002379809,0.2241564,0.0008049928,0.00003892813,0.00007806902,0.003368497,0.5432574,0.001418769,0.008702215,0.2155634,0.001006558],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.301964,0.00007386546,0.6957861,0.0004515203,0.0002572523,0.000173356,0.000006806795,0.00003684455,0.0012502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8984262,0.000005664497,0.1010818,0.000170744,0.0001538375,0.00002010928,4.826397e-7,0.0000125476,0.0001285204],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5964622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4535894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027134703","doi":"10.1108/13552511111157362","title":"Production control of unreliable manufacturing systems producing defective items","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Supply Chain and Inventory Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université Laval; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Production (economics); Discrete event simulation; Reliability engineering; Control (management); Production line; Computer science; Exponential function; Intersection (aeronautics); Product (mathematics); Production manager; Industrial engineering; Event (particle physics); Productivity; Operations research; Engineering; Mathematics; Simulation; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03134266984122788,"gpt":0.2244148432162019,"spread":0.1930721733749741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002921449,0.0001627835,0.000421284,0.0005060023,0.0000304114,0.00004448765,0.0002205341,0.00004589275,0.00001870038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000705889,0.0001425306,0.0001152457,0.0002734895,0.00002545954,0.001012109,0.0000448514,0.0002498724,0.000005473875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001435174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001413983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005402039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001186212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982964,0.00002728709,0.0009030782,0.0001800686,0.0003087375,0.0002843931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986663,0.00004820088,0.0008097133,0.0002040092,0.0002562783,0.00001551021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008517561,0.0008081846,0.1025031,0.007930205,0.0005621915,0.0001302056,0.004325892,0.7984418,0.01894382,0.06076194,0.002175593,0.002565241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01206065,0.0004481493,0.7275857,0.0148802,0.0005771999,0.0001579878,0.02519576,0.1316958,0.03744965,0.008062316,0.03889799,0.002988589],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9627377,0.0003297556,0.03103781,0.0001931395,0.003635634,0.0004537314,9.38068e-7,0.00004293181,0.001568409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986651,0.00001775667,0.0003268573,0.00007032553,0.0008025787,0.00001100917,5.647684e-7,0.00002161919,0.00008418464],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.666746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5812228,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074693897","doi":"10.1108/13552510710829489","title":"A comparative study of heuristic algorithms to solve maintenance scheduling problem","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms","field":"Engineering","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Tabu search; Simulated annealing; Heuristics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Scheduling (production processes); Algorithm; Heuristic; Job shop scheduling; Metaheuristic; Schedule; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03140479321001383,"gpt":0.3116879667435652,"spread":0.2802831735335514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002897013,0.0002623602,0.0007855468,0.0005628331,0.00002779807,0.00002964657,0.0003313482,0.00008478454,0.00000600592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004679073,0.0002484112,0.0001104366,0.0008991979,0.00002448383,0.0001984931,0.00003888397,0.0006147497,0.000003721429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002715273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003678508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002528576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003972716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971603,0.00003442447,0.001651041,0.0001829379,0.0004678399,0.00050343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998501,0.0003238853,0.0003104179,0.0002213855,0.0004431382,0.000200167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006519366,0.0001885265,0.000655601,0.0001142328,0.00008228434,0.00005784232,0.007351704,0.9888835,0.00153593,0.0002597552,0.00003096023,0.0007744816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00439665,0.0008596292,0.02560387,0.001835505,0.00005389129,0.0001227406,0.02924561,0.9326885,0.003918902,0.0001964439,0.0001859999,0.0008923049],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.457622,0.000132636,0.5414482,0.00003805033,0.0004177974,0.0002072757,0.000002740268,0.00004654632,0.00008477567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7006919,0.00001718778,0.2991129,0.00002022811,0.0001138886,0.000005492156,5.360615e-7,0.00002766529,0.00001016692],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2430699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206390449","doi":"10.1108/jqme-10-2020-0109","title":"Models for maintenance planning and scheduling – a citation-based literature review and content analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Co-citation; Thematic analysis; Computer science; Exploratory analysis; Data science; Scheduling (production processes); Citation analysis; Operations research; Management science; Engineering; Operations management; Sociology; Social science; Qualitative research; Library science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0379132787457484,"gpt":0.2849896022973017,"spread":0.2470763235515533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001450052,0.0001945238,0.0006821058,0.0002842329,0.00003169142,0.0000764397,0.00008787223,0.00009382698,0.000001795956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00136871,0.0001788499,0.000168163,0.0007934219,0.00002728597,0.0004084138,0.00001585728,0.0003358973,5.947315e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001189519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003993224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000214941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005153854,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984619,0.00004796204,0.0008493764,0.0001948072,0.0001624584,0.0002834701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986216,0.0003515076,0.0001884877,0.0001585696,0.0005783127,0.0001015631],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002181958,0.00001419673,0.0005090552,0.003028546,0.000148578,0.0000265658,0.0003994944,0.9928714,0.0007932715,0.001707095,0.00005037802,0.0004296112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000871675,0.00002972337,0.002546537,0.006711257,0.0002304574,0.00004599958,0.0003596802,0.9880188,0.0001970168,0.0005932602,0.0001562812,0.0002393289],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04586285,0.06098612,0.8915734,0.001149266,0.0001473884,0.0002074274,0.0000207594,0.00003248131,0.00002031047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8279816,0.02234232,0.1488928,0.0005936594,0.00006285522,0.00003587967,0.00002142998,0.00003731501,0.00003214095],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7821187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7293286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022726105","doi":"10.1108/13552510810861932","title":"Optimal disassembly sequencing strategy using constraint programming approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Manufacturing Process and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Maintainability; Computer science; Constraint programming; Process (computing); Linear programming; Engineering; Reliability engineering; Algorithm; Stochastic programming; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04998087028882556,"gpt":0.2713092925294812,"spread":0.2213284222406557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007599324,0.0002170569,0.0004094043,0.0002305718,0.00004747967,0.00004544185,0.0001887361,0.00009973965,0.000004379518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001284135,0.0002063588,0.0001084501,0.000263123,0.00004304067,0.000423708,0.00001878991,0.0004779731,4.764807e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004091845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008630782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001897362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001425002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983035,0.00002795126,0.000843276,0.0001330051,0.000278597,0.0004136097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994193,0.00005743245,0.0001871016,0.0001252514,0.0001027625,0.0001081771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009368416,0.00001979806,0.0002754773,0.0002776929,0.00002791547,0.00007023848,0.0009077406,0.9947289,0.002531355,0.0001986363,0.000006018807,0.0009468232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004938029,0.00003397993,0.001284806,0.0002766337,0.00001031997,0.000666268,0.000998239,0.9933004,0.002530013,0.00001508194,0.00009354182,0.000296884],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5482995,0.00018422,0.4511325,0.000006883823,0.0001432129,0.00006605417,0.000001164242,0.00005349364,0.0001129717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8812948,0.00009739889,0.1184314,0.000007233414,0.0001238224,0.000003404892,0.000001407571,0.00003359821,0.000006970509],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3329953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8415068,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083181974","doi":"10.1108/jqme-03-2020-0017","title":"Wind power system reliability and maintenance optimization considering turbine and wind uncertainty","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Power System Reliability and Maintenance","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Turbine; Wind power; Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Wind speed; Engineering; Renewable energy; Electric power system; Marine engineering; Power (physics); Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Electrical engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01262036075807065,"gpt":0.2224288675319833,"spread":0.2098085067739127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001994404,0.0003631212,0.000884099,0.0001498751,0.00004550274,0.00007843605,0.0002226646,0.0001736402,0.00000704543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001595026,0.0003304066,0.0001119232,0.0003614282,0.0001146114,0.0005248306,0.00008275732,0.0007074703,0.000001470285],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003786452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004806796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002484952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005494194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972751,0.0001125589,0.001413334,0.0003471519,0.0003273109,0.0005245487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985312,0.0003377407,0.0002874166,0.000265581,0.0002436457,0.0003344409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000895738,0.00001486674,0.001509415,0.001464754,0.00004261565,0.00005675297,0.001598802,0.9923289,0.001482539,0.001056805,0.0001914405,0.0001634838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002602764,0.0002134774,0.01088411,0.002556576,0.00003715085,0.0005097382,0.003398779,0.9742656,0.0002788686,0.000107706,0.004388464,0.0007567343],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.846999,0.001935091,0.1469764,0.001946086,0.00117333,0.0004320157,0.00002712544,0.0002201496,0.0002907486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918336,0.0003138536,0.007501008,0.0001483845,0.0001447433,0.000003402787,0.000001121477,0.00004617495,0.000007773501],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1448345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578655672","doi":"10.1108/jqme-02-2013-0006","title":"Reliability analysis of underground mining equipment using genetic algorithms","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Engineering; Automation; Genetic algorithm; Set (abstract data type); Productivity; Data mining; Computer science; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0224425929351243,"gpt":0.3181979007979365,"spread":0.2957553078628122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002606634,0.0002163065,0.0008349033,0.0007812449,0.0000151417,0.00002313293,0.0003042424,0.0001011014,0.00001032182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008555509,0.0002097127,0.0002817317,0.0009533218,0.00003277619,0.0001931724,0.00004413593,0.0003391863,2.212134e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004480352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002261941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009790953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002264114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997548,0.0001042499,0.00146386,0.000156171,0.0003925815,0.0003351477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985834,0.0004823126,0.0003409797,0.000333479,0.0001648332,0.00009497538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006732969,0.00004438709,0.01371257,0.0001942812,0.0002383815,0.000006661675,0.000319811,0.9762778,0.006880719,0.0001972013,0.00002519956,0.002096292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002821518,0.00005171941,0.1401491,0.0002891944,0.0001655111,0.000010246,0.0001291062,0.8566273,0.001752335,0.000196376,0.0001318894,0.0002149833],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5898256,0.0001379143,0.4097126,0.00002217328,0.0001641722,0.00005283845,0.000003069166,0.00004050733,0.00004119806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8532627,0.00008572566,0.1465334,0.0000177867,0.00006753128,0.00000351288,9.608949e-7,0.00002651405,0.000001979129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2634371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8551837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105647959","doi":"10.1108/jqme-12-2012-0047","title":"Risk-based maintenance and remaining life assessment for gas turbines","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Nalcor Energy (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Weibull distribution; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Preventive maintenance; Gas turbines; Risk assessment; Interval (graph theory); Risk management; Work (physics); Turbine; Operations research; Operations management; Computer science; Business; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02507879782168979,"gpt":0.2849343116025848,"spread":0.2598555137808949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003908409,0.0002539398,0.0005767094,0.0002487517,0.00003460744,0.00006180764,0.0001995204,0.0001235187,0.000002330481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004048458,0.0002268621,0.0001327748,0.0002784089,0.00004994398,0.0003858707,0.00002352123,0.0005024068,5.913187e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003992364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000143243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001719052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001567446,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979272,0.00007436292,0.001048062,0.0001900044,0.0002996972,0.0004606861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982949,0.0004477355,0.0003312213,0.0002182022,0.0004393664,0.000268544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009281281,0.00003052182,0.003558453,0.0002813929,0.00003403782,0.000009184087,0.0003507359,0.9914533,0.0004221183,0.001594443,0.0009191317,0.00125382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002961023,0.0001892388,0.009899398,0.0006435407,0.00002810664,0.00002735287,0.0007512593,0.9799896,0.0002230671,0.001916334,0.003004645,0.0003663602],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2525952,0.0005239084,0.7446368,0.0008509219,0.0008633524,0.0002780662,0.00001457128,0.00008556097,0.0001516102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86339,0.0003683214,0.1358286,0.0001187393,0.0001983235,0.00002726603,0.000003408119,0.00004785529,0.00001741212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6107948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9251168,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141504626","doi":"10.1108/13552510510601320","title":"To maintain or not to maintain? What should a risk‐averse decision maker do?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Risk aversion (psychology); Originality; Decision maker; Actuarial science; Computer science; Expected utility hypothesis; Economics; Monotone polygon; Component (thermodynamics); Value (mathematics); Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Econometrics; Engineering; Mathematics; Business; Mathematical economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02399852375832842,"gpt":0.3048529495930108,"spread":0.2808544258346823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004056426,0.0004249042,0.0007573708,0.0007094422,0.00005516209,0.0002330218,0.0005238914,0.0002179338,0.0001117552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003072043,0.0003607588,0.0002446601,0.0009666141,0.00002784241,0.00120847,0.0001049654,0.0009074401,0.00007680381],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001354635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006788368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002421086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001766122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963657,0.0001044242,0.001642158,0.0003498492,0.0006817118,0.0008561252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979085,0.0005490042,0.0002194583,0.0005277549,0.0003176988,0.0004775578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006589076,0.00006131674,0.0001630832,0.00008254725,0.00003818048,0.0000718761,0.001486562,0.961913,0.001149966,0.001455833,0.001425163,0.03149349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00773479,0.001291813,0.03440106,0.008862826,0.0001324782,0.0005770022,0.01548316,0.7722441,0.006751916,0.002853964,0.1462485,0.003418371],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3978455,0.0001238468,0.5979073,0.002544902,0.001015763,0.0004063183,0.0000132622,0.0001012806,0.00004180459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8203503,0.001292333,0.1762156,0.001466734,0.0004576575,0.00002744414,0.000001754809,0.00009448244,0.00009375106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4225048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298109637","doi":"10.1108/jqme-08-2014-0046","title":"An optimal production/maintenance strategy under lease contract with warranty periods","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Lease; Warranty; Production (economics); Maintenance actions; Originality; Present value; Order (exchange); Optimal maintenance; Operations research; Reliability engineering; Operations management; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Economics; Finance; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01393670944188923,"gpt":0.2540662062562128,"spread":0.2401294968143236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001538813,0.000319674,0.0005499528,0.0002199875,0.00004206615,0.00006670806,0.000305521,0.0001324478,0.00004697183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004358363,0.000207982,0.0001183124,0.0003419217,0.000114083,0.001462372,0.00001202224,0.00047357,0.000004678835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004713017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001061731,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001658348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003293171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977108,0.00008286615,0.000975925,0.0002752291,0.0003676502,0.0005874981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985833,0.0001260525,0.0002416744,0.0003900766,0.0004532458,0.0002056118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002718962,0.00008684137,0.0006703334,0.0001074605,0.00004872971,0.00004395,0.0003522692,0.9709452,0.02149259,0.001175704,0.0001034904,0.004701558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01454062,0.002588151,0.1997817,0.007947987,0.0001618429,0.002088618,0.004951009,0.7272096,0.03013569,0.00173556,0.00494139,0.003917862],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.581626,0.0001595107,0.4166778,0.0007225656,0.0004717118,0.0001611652,0.000007528797,0.00009007123,0.00008365448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880615,0.0004666406,0.01103006,0.00004697598,0.0002429814,0.00001408862,0.00000150689,0.00005509899,0.00008108732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4064355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8481259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589443969","doi":"10.1108/jqme-07-2015-0030","title":"Optimal CBM policy with two sampling intervals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Weibull distribution; Condition-based maintenance; Reliability (semiconductor); Residual; Interval (graph theory); Sampling (signal processing); Importance sampling; Statistics; Hazard; Preventive maintenance; Sensitivity (control systems); Computer science; Engineering; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Monte Carlo method; Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02669276152611047,"gpt":0.3153177090883588,"spread":0.2886249475622483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001413779,0.000221455,0.0004817215,0.0002655985,0.00007169236,0.0001594847,0.0005047699,0.00007710065,0.000008100581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001234447,0.0001847102,0.0001228724,0.0001513504,0.00007008441,0.0007945489,0.00005019123,0.0005360364,0.000003410973],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003453944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006154597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005979432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002911787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983515,0.00002749462,0.0007863517,0.0001424112,0.0002617023,0.0004305534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988019,0.0001063919,0.0003300329,0.0004411228,0.0002017342,0.0001188247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005474278,0.00002124025,0.001096005,0.0001353331,0.00003987525,0.0000275344,0.0003904873,0.9917171,0.001802505,0.003431027,0.00004130287,0.001242856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007336508,0.0004643592,0.1154879,0.005394612,0.00006330746,0.0005762107,0.001041364,0.8528687,0.005288599,0.001567807,0.008285605,0.001624993],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5493807,0.0001185492,0.4485127,0.0006957931,0.0004851594,0.0001132087,0.000004339938,0.00006263074,0.0006269509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471051,0.0002221789,0.05222144,0.0000386312,0.0003178673,0.000005424988,8.284504e-7,0.00004146531,0.00004713273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3977243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7532265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091627054","doi":"10.1108/13552510010311336","title":"A report on robot reliability and safety in Canada: a survey of robot users","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Robot; Reliability (semiconductor); Engineering; Histogram; Computer science; Simulation; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07936753025696573,"gpt":0.4246766002934366,"spread":0.3453090700364709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01273158,0.0001134077,0.0005557232,0.0001589552,0.00005437388,0.000002062224,0.0001413647,0.00009258754,0.00008459598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006681835,0.00009661178,0.00003790219,0.0004143685,0.00002733504,0.000105487,0.00002426236,0.001180377,0.000001292585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001636415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003067822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7084337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7085317,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995928,0.0008036423,0.002114113,0.0001640045,0.0005180208,0.0004722303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956196,0.003163303,0.0004244659,0.0002309073,0.0003635583,0.0001981482],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001361434,0.00004657857,0.8676231,0.0004250782,0.000006452857,0.00008662084,0.00027044,0.127667,0.00001850973,0.00008808776,0.0001005129,0.002306233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009789853,0.00006952004,0.9939963,0.0008315932,0.000001175095,0.00001445347,0.0001741335,0.003449267,0.000003871087,0.00004019196,0.0003591471,0.00008139325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966421,0.0000920867,0.0003870941,0.002050608,0.0002504522,0.0003187722,0.00003128194,0.000003448521,0.0002241862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986163,0.000296864,0.0007780426,0.0001577342,0.0000422081,0.000008797253,0.000004444459,0.00001041109,0.00008518812],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1263732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7999263,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528964841","doi":"10.1108/jqme-11-2013-0074","title":"A nearly optimal inspection policy for a two-component series system","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Context (archaeology); Component (thermodynamics); Sequence (biology); Series (stratigraphy); Condition-based maintenance; Function (biology); Engineering; Preventive maintenance; Set (abstract data type); Total cost; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01992058964451253,"gpt":0.2705174799166515,"spread":0.250596890272139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00170119,0.0001847897,0.0004255378,0.0003272966,0.00002668787,0.00005769984,0.0001722653,0.00008428272,5.775519e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007648034,0.0001740938,0.0001373496,0.0003694671,0.00002816246,0.0006179694,0.00001812215,0.0002877589,0.000001919386],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001181684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009964041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006356534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001354022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983777,0.00003987804,0.0008616117,0.000120103,0.0002447596,0.0003559546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990859,0.00007851318,0.0001745646,0.0001662407,0.0003465352,0.0001482696],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001396636,0.00002322747,0.00008033482,0.0003108671,0.00002842595,0.000009995155,0.001092081,0.9845226,0.002118317,0.01111972,0.0002483945,0.0003063669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002889938,0.000270739,0.001462744,0.0007569852,0.00001864649,0.0003110492,0.003114126,0.9861125,0.001816853,0.0003680222,0.002499199,0.0003791775],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3441975,0.0002235953,0.6530856,0.0005361926,0.001253829,0.0002764358,0.000009402721,0.000216865,0.0002005369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629951,0.00004628184,0.03636224,0.00001850417,0.0004858862,0.0000264493,0.000002402486,0.00003770542,0.00002545004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6187976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7099341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070599978","doi":"10.1108/13552511111134619","title":"Reliability and availability analysis of a robot‐safety system","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Backup; Reliability engineering; Robot; Reliability (semiconductor); Process (computing); Engineering; System safety; Markov process; Mean time between failures; Markov chain; Markov model; Computer science; Simulation; Failure rate; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01636948021977462,"gpt":0.2268397633694203,"spread":0.2104702831496457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003510955,0.0001910525,0.0008729573,0.0004471794,0.00001682884,0.00001059908,0.0002037068,0.0001257317,0.00001776981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009287888,0.0001693729,0.0002386238,0.0009695005,0.00008116002,0.000335239,0.00003313715,0.0003507407,5.388284e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003451518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002721998,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009011228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003179954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975967,0.00009941659,0.001602686,0.0001797399,0.0002433608,0.0002780784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986635,0.0002392983,0.0003108447,0.0003619119,0.0003181486,0.0001062229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107375,0.00005915727,0.01450596,0.0008191143,0.0002470007,0.000007520014,0.001535162,0.9785743,0.001420812,0.00221719,0.000009576763,0.0004968118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005547553,0.00006795371,0.4378265,0.0003624143,0.0002191996,0.00001600757,0.0008775177,0.558949,0.0006709593,0.0001474631,0.00007103159,0.0002371447],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7389906,0.0002567293,0.25974,0.00002743486,0.000314846,0.0001491697,0.00001502071,0.00006156407,0.0004446193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769281,0.0002604811,0.02275583,0.000006616327,0.00002077748,0.000003992327,0.000001412498,0.00001666365,0.000006125773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4233206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6906825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968862017","doi":"10.1108/13552510510601339","title":"Artificial neural networks for reliability maximization under budget and weight constraints","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Artificial neural network; Mathematical optimization; Maximization; Computer science; Integer programming; Computation; Linear programming; Hopfield network; Power (physics); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01319647759558849,"gpt":0.2468744620875947,"spread":0.2336779844920062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001540989,0.0001863801,0.0003766653,0.0001421858,0.00003297908,0.00004385057,0.0001215772,0.00014008,0.00001052649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005919924,0.0001758016,0.0001024683,0.0001961377,0.00007934163,0.0004510398,0.00001611116,0.0003603465,4.108929e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002455767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001970817,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002781948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001327537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983176,0.00004208807,0.0009771734,0.0001569824,0.0001564913,0.000349651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991233,0.0002702438,0.0001584583,0.0001505475,0.000199441,0.00009800216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005684772,0.00002937154,0.0004291154,0.0001077989,0.00001516989,0.00000159997,0.0001576987,0.9871613,0.0004248934,0.002547743,0.0001246885,0.008943709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005438998,0.00004252628,0.0046703,0.0001051293,0.00001255701,0.00002949893,0.0001118865,0.9923964,0.0002515663,0.001126325,0.0005097114,0.0002002101],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2186526,0.0002295343,0.7792572,0.001000126,0.0005615971,0.0002078065,0.00000630872,0.00005122888,0.0000335604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711674,0.0002759605,0.02806909,0.00009750878,0.000337399,0.00001117316,0.000004463095,0.00002868142,0.000008367009],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7525148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7168982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020088934","doi":"10.1108/13552511111157399","title":"Maintenance/production planning with interactive feedback of product quality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Quality (philosophy); Product (mathematics); Control (management); Preventive maintenance; Maintenance actions; Point (geometry); Reliability engineering; Value (mathematics); Operations research; Computer science; Originality; Production planning; Optimal maintenance; Engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Economics; Mathematics; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02969990610627197,"gpt":0.2635196073782785,"spread":0.2338197012720065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002344782,0.0002892983,0.0007234443,0.0003428702,0.00002351644,0.0000168911,0.0002902847,0.0000932772,0.00001793358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001177863,0.0002377694,0.0001437678,0.0005684874,0.0001018104,0.0008303297,0.00002930588,0.0006835083,0.00000182482],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003366938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005647661,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006140822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001974208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973817,0.00009439876,0.001465056,0.0002505668,0.0003703026,0.0004379528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982446,0.0001280977,0.0005933815,0.0003684814,0.0005680937,0.00009727849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006926153,0.0001841606,0.008668237,0.0007685509,0.0001444344,0.00003181417,0.006176943,0.9689049,0.01103208,0.001500493,0.0002487545,0.001647033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007456719,0.001637869,0.7371537,0.01392446,0.0001895067,0.0008432834,0.01921734,0.07354379,0.1381604,0.003112916,0.001809387,0.002950612],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8543671,0.0003152853,0.1424548,0.0001449467,0.001199938,0.0002952056,0.000006305996,0.00008980052,0.001126594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734071,0.0002072237,0.02613362,0.00001654351,0.0001373773,0.00001046615,0.000001866676,0.00004492454,0.0000408809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8953611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9695957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002779342","doi":"10.1108/13552510710829498","title":"Availability analysis of a generalized maintainable three‐state device parallel system with human error and common‐cause failures","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Reliability engineering; Common cause failure; Human error; Computer science; Reliability (semiconductor); Failure mode and effects analysis; State (computer science); Markov chain; Engineering; Common cause and special cause; Distributed computing; Algorithm; Operations management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01860619051724609,"gpt":0.2728615545405123,"spread":0.2542553640232662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004107672,0.0002644302,0.000991635,0.0005931137,0.0000422942,0.00003692098,0.0002234279,0.0001156179,0.000005678316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001902262,0.0002187811,0.0001685401,0.001047438,0.00009376165,0.0003396726,0.00003380217,0.0004333781,3.05634e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000427436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002989392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005031192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002996336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973888,0.0000738639,0.001497282,0.000200502,0.0003713665,0.00046822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998509,0.0002309024,0.0004146799,0.0003396301,0.0003626238,0.0001431773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001663626,0.00004396799,0.0343556,0.0007933625,0.0005225957,0.00005368637,0.0006612332,0.9562614,0.001890753,0.005105959,0.000008964757,0.0001361434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00213505,0.0001959797,0.3436998,0.0008262109,0.0004257885,0.00007012251,0.001933217,0.6490245,0.0006704866,0.0003348973,0.0001549864,0.000529033],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.679459,0.0002112921,0.319947,0.0000551991,0.00006313782,0.0001602949,0.00000682398,0.00004663044,0.00005062963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790582,0.00006521767,0.02078175,0.00001525756,0.00002610682,0.00000652497,0.000003871031,0.00002990865,0.00001316322],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3093441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8921633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133729278","doi":"10.1108/jqme-03-2014-0013","title":"Age replacement policies for two-component systems with stochastic dependence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Université Laval; Cegep de Sainte Foy","funders":"","keywords":"Component (thermodynamics); Constant (computer programming); Reliability (semiconductor); Function (biology); Random variable; Stochastic modelling; Preventive maintenance; Domino effect; Probability density function; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Engineering; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02909560418926364,"gpt":0.2763367829980244,"spread":0.2472411788087608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001872918,0.000189749,0.0004331698,0.0001885983,0.00001838733,0.00005674361,0.0001987103,0.00005660437,8.31518e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005310439,0.0001543895,0.00007055834,0.0002059845,0.00002933208,0.0002892943,0.00001701849,0.0002626733,9.837252e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005583282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005641595,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006173253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002705807,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983439,0.00003458152,0.000782058,0.0001272573,0.0003427491,0.0003694694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990013,0.0001678111,0.0001878766,0.0002043133,0.0002921583,0.0001465172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001613404,0.00002639501,0.00008782479,0.0002161649,0.00003385985,0.0000149652,0.0008037526,0.9952804,0.0007978592,0.002308269,0.0001947273,0.00007437265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002891745,0.0003263862,0.0006552618,0.001069983,0.00002392568,0.0001582995,0.001820344,0.9913995,0.0002766029,0.0002732649,0.0007522753,0.0003524649],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1891283,0.0003427606,0.8091624,0.0001445786,0.0007564842,0.0003286026,0.000005747474,0.00005785204,0.00007336597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866623,0.00002990897,0.0130235,0.00002142269,0.0001507149,0.00003794294,0.000002393035,0.00003304999,0.00003881748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.797534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6295821,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147702352","doi":"10.1108/13552510810861914","title":"Ant colonies for structure optimisation in a failure prone series‐parallel production system","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Series (stratigraphy); Production line; Mathematical optimization; Series and parallel circuits; Ant colony optimization algorithms; Production (economics); Ant colony; Computer science; Constraint (computer-aided design); Line (geometry); Homogeneous; Algorithm; Mathematics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01708711748438737,"gpt":0.2395639069053787,"spread":0.2224767894209913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005782088,0.0001447592,0.0003247146,0.0001950556,0.0000284765,0.00001695149,0.0001014936,0.0000988497,0.000001837462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003233968,0.0001261683,0.00005593309,0.0002812097,0.00001405767,0.0003342287,0.000006814209,0.0002948326,2.609507e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003950896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003821702,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006279987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003515356,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987893,0.00002682205,0.0006747467,0.0001084408,0.0001753866,0.000225316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995015,0.00005285067,0.0001466121,0.00008968013,0.0001637648,0.00004555209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005734327,0.00001344165,0.0005973136,0.0003302048,0.00001719043,0.00001471156,0.001184626,0.993959,0.003388423,0.0002170764,0.00005730222,0.0001633671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001674934,0.0001115757,0.01263562,0.0009612825,0.00001185205,0.0007241607,0.002462078,0.9763741,0.004217581,0.0000507475,0.000386921,0.0003891589],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8408696,0.0002336134,0.1571485,0.0004416524,0.0008854973,0.0003167683,0.000009303265,0.0000897517,0.00000538007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.794773,0.00006297778,0.2048616,0.000005909545,0.0002406907,0.00001812216,0.000004841195,0.00001635834,0.00001651404],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04771316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5144995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086844373","doi":"10.1108/13552510510626990","title":"An application of the modulus maxima distribution in machinery condition monitoring","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Maxima; Fault (geology); Wavelet; Condition monitoring; Representation (politics); Vibration; EWMA chart; Wavelet transform; SIGNAL (programming language); Modulus; Engineering; Computer science; Algorithm; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Acoustics; Process (computing)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008761650576450982,"gpt":0.3049666085273124,"spread":0.2962049579508614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001084963,0.0001291982,0.0002620826,0.0001489355,0.00001184669,0.00001281854,0.0002717205,0.00007810091,0.000001849782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001978069,0.0001101037,0.0000769773,0.0003143266,0.00001711174,0.000381275,0.00001758415,0.0004452095,4.475549e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004650713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001115211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005704131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003880623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986456,0.00005403547,0.0007949125,0.00008692288,0.0002275438,0.0001909987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993989,0.0000683221,0.0001973371,0.0002240338,0.00007074256,0.00004064078],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001114317,0.00008077191,0.05016168,0.0001146067,0.000008379305,0.00000220197,0.0002168006,0.8780531,0.05989324,0.001140613,0.00004360067,0.01027382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004014214,0.00002546711,0.5107797,0.0003776279,0.000005536104,0.00001626665,0.00005859965,0.4402541,0.04723879,0.0003378373,0.0003553205,0.0001492843],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8594286,0.0001518448,0.139828,0.00017076,0.0002029385,0.0001301158,0.0000146652,0.00005107635,0.00002203159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960481,0.0000865614,0.003653478,0.000008814583,0.0001593677,0.0000193225,0.000004706938,0.00001853493,0.00000114615],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4606181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4489898,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978626708","doi":"10.1108/jqme-10-2012-0035","title":"Optimal lockout/tagout, preventive maintenance, human error and production policies of manufacturing systems with passive redundancy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Preventive maintenance; Reliability engineering; Corrective maintenance; Maintenance actions; Redundancy (engineering); Engineering; Markov chain; Production (economics); Operations research; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009276134657986743,"gpt":0.2403039230708744,"spread":0.2310277884128876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001276131,0.0002757172,0.0006715468,0.0003199549,0.00004580387,0.00004347829,0.000186001,0.0001092399,0.00000223718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003926138,0.0002263441,0.00009245997,0.0002317557,0.0001148828,0.0004846748,0.00003224057,0.0004585443,4.108714e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002392895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002570144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005495369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000202014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978989,0.00008935491,0.001073426,0.0002132282,0.0003148641,0.0004102114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987883,0.0001042845,0.0004760195,0.0002535203,0.0002794044,0.00009845125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006625594,0.00003767845,0.0006112062,0.0008990578,0.00006893871,0.000006368707,0.001235475,0.9906077,0.004393541,0.001470924,0.00009779562,0.0005050828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009434757,0.002431681,0.2014622,0.02211103,0.0003465303,0.001316481,0.016306,0.6405675,0.09574307,0.002042156,0.004893695,0.003344922],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8668077,0.0001942186,0.131804,0.0002072564,0.0004854035,0.0002879452,0.000005527005,0.00005293374,0.0001549978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924626,0.0002008818,0.006984149,0.000008502646,0.0001733598,0.00001593887,0.000002113775,0.00004357292,0.00010892],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3500402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9230046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996204213","doi":"10.1108/13552510110407087","title":"Genetic algorithms for reliability assessment of mining equipment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Genetic algorithm; Computer science; Algorithm; Engineering; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02228409987427662,"gpt":0.3076845387049573,"spread":0.2854004388306807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00203667,0.0002089988,0.0005805821,0.0002069507,0.00001518265,0.00001548411,0.000251595,0.0001059663,0.000009087364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009196403,0.0001938753,0.0002089197,0.0002645199,0.00003087053,0.0001137677,0.00002837239,0.0003213458,2.554415e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000317332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005547455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009675518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000427631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977733,0.00002810433,0.001357006,0.0001484306,0.0003030616,0.0003900524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984802,0.0006960832,0.0001986326,0.0002683539,0.0002451025,0.0001116549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001245285,0.00008041863,0.01474682,0.0005567544,0.00004250725,0.00001561973,0.0002027584,0.9790463,0.003257576,0.00029785,0.00009840851,0.001642537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001188148,0.0002043857,0.256989,0.000642291,0.00002820066,0.00003984672,0.0002155674,0.7373462,0.0007808423,0.0003165252,0.001914782,0.0003341166],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.624083,0.0003458422,0.3744202,0.00008167702,0.0007914138,0.0001665101,0.000008837849,0.00003238382,0.00007015776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8613717,0.000438518,0.1379751,0.000009494102,0.0001456585,0.00001810275,9.741256e-7,0.00003261571,0.00000779356],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2422422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7906006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336477249","doi":"10.1108/jqme-04-2014-0015","title":"Optimizing production while reducing machinery lockout/tagout circumvention possibilities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Reliability engineering; Order (exchange); Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Condition-based maintenance; Operations research; Engineering; Operations management; Business; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01590545762162145,"gpt":0.242239697124006,"spread":0.2263342395023846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002174432,0.000230283,0.0004337963,0.0003506277,0.0000358978,0.00004352539,0.0002022066,0.0001180395,0.00002340679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001306632,0.0001766475,0.0001752844,0.0003276143,0.00004787831,0.0009873747,0.00002520659,0.0003652216,0.000004578587],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006661939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004170435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000166477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008997416,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977963,0.00007441585,0.001180282,0.0002162655,0.0003091357,0.0004236127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989649,0.0001538891,0.0002543764,0.0002901698,0.0002446104,0.00009206526],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004131692,0.00003516312,0.0005458425,0.0002244184,0.00003064579,0.000009352537,0.001014084,0.9200518,0.07045773,0.0005609053,0.0002249016,0.006803893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01158234,0.0008765953,0.07475507,0.02972314,0.0002172992,0.001249589,0.00807091,0.7095935,0.1400601,0.01172611,0.007036502,0.005108859],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6481327,0.0004643608,0.3481472,0.0006993315,0.002039984,0.0001720096,0.000004996597,0.0001370437,0.0002023747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838412,0.0005821335,0.01493159,0.00001576038,0.0003588928,0.00001015397,0.000001561612,0.00004493108,0.0002137497],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3357086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7203478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793821770","doi":"10.1108/jqme-11-2016-0069","title":"Maintenance and setup planning in manufacturing systems under uncertainties","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Production (economics); Computer science; Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation; Mathematical optimization; Paper machine; Optimal control; Industrial engineering; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02216699823816487,"gpt":0.2706588533501471,"spread":0.2484918551119822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001213957,0.0001911017,0.0003977861,0.0003838953,0.00002590775,0.00006996067,0.000160778,0.00009887302,0.000004726812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000192105,0.0001781751,0.00004521714,0.0002277245,0.00004888157,0.0002820409,0.00002537338,0.000467286,0.000001882721],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002462464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001992167,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003611008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001280705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984496,0.00004009062,0.000784787,0.0001331702,0.0002093249,0.000383012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999404,0.00015717,0.0001339291,0.0001293397,0.00008820791,0.00008732262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001839392,0.000007848747,0.001572611,0.0001430259,0.00002098619,0.0000367678,0.001109902,0.9958146,0.0002919637,0.000577028,0.00005413441,0.0003527728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001204855,0.00005725012,0.03058746,0.001962134,0.000007210852,0.0001683785,0.004279361,0.9596673,0.0009438465,0.0002411291,0.0004928882,0.0003881673],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.801426,0.001198807,0.1956674,0.0001428924,0.001244334,0.00008288144,0.000002615978,0.00007069748,0.0001644091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857404,0.0001681444,0.01372281,0.00004284865,0.0002492299,0.000003812868,6.529777e-7,0.0000318131,0.00004024604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1843144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7265769,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886613520","doi":"10.1108/jqme-04-2016-0017","title":"Remaining useful life estimation of metropolitan train wheels considering measurement error","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Railway Engineering and Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metropolitan area; Engineering; Prognostics; Estimation; Reliability engineering; Profiling (computer programming); Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04800241438323642,"gpt":0.2843186362590008,"spread":0.2363162218757644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003178975,0.0002634199,0.0006541889,0.0005107342,0.00002603255,0.00002866918,0.0002438838,0.0001168021,0.00001049555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002463358,0.0002665508,0.0001615719,0.0004394242,0.00006492121,0.0003183403,0.00002316652,0.0004599318,0.000002260156],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000768429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008235889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002244549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000274747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973259,0.00005348428,0.001440107,0.0001408879,0.0005870014,0.000452647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987558,0.0001835023,0.0002795433,0.0002595428,0.0003440739,0.0001775823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002350125,0.00002290428,0.000399115,0.0003620034,0.0000971605,0.00001296542,0.001138581,0.9830813,0.01194713,0.002080539,0.0000981845,0.0007366368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009555562,0.0001531951,0.01089104,0.001347968,0.00002974195,0.00006199043,0.001125719,0.9793335,0.005047444,0.0004036404,0.0002607421,0.0003894289],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5140086,0.0003946858,0.4843088,0.0000925878,0.0007902048,0.00008280374,0.000008029675,0.00009159987,0.0002226225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578279,0.00004021514,0.04186051,0.00002177824,0.0001865718,0.000003531457,9.895008e-7,0.00005408086,0.000004455678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4438192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943418631","doi":"10.1108/jqme-05-2018-0041","title":"Non-linear threshold algorithm based solution for the redundancy allocation problem considering multiple redundancy strategies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Mathematical optimization; Simulated annealing; Computer science; Triple modular redundancy; Particle swarm optimization; Computational complexity theory; Algorithm; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01871479499429573,"gpt":0.260481790760731,"spread":0.2417669957664352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001874802,0.0002364291,0.0004092903,0.000172159,0.0000597363,0.00008130496,0.0002601256,0.000132236,0.000007216414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000312079,0.000192248,0.0001793658,0.0002945352,0.00004224468,0.0006676987,0.00001965383,0.0004735689,0.000003070253],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003215819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001235689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002570723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002461366,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980817,0.00002474502,0.001005485,0.0001842335,0.0002735075,0.0004302708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986122,0.0004392987,0.0002602202,0.000295316,0.0003303451,0.00006264604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004508389,0.00003598322,0.0003100262,0.0004587412,0.000036485,0.000002025528,0.0004009282,0.986562,0.009011503,0.0008238344,0.0001417895,0.002171669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001540541,0.00008349323,0.001559169,0.0006651834,0.00001690473,0.00001336038,0.0006117851,0.992027,0.001683429,0.0005467697,0.001013078,0.0002392389],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04997143,0.0003936106,0.947005,0.0006525925,0.001058403,0.0007370779,0.000008306338,0.00007835266,0.00009523055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8544315,0.0002051066,0.1450131,0.00004308549,0.000171412,0.00005316602,0.000007041249,0.00004710671,0.00002850016],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7839648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914242382","doi":"10.1108/jqme-07-2017-0051","title":"Comparative study on logical analysis of data (LAD), artificial neural networks (ANN), and proportional hazards model (PHM) for maintenance prognostics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Prognostics; Turbofan; Artificial neural network; Engineering; Residual; Reliability engineering; Data set; Set (abstract data type); Condition-based maintenance; Statistical model; Data mining; Computer science; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0855465146043742,"gpt":0.3852205382658218,"spread":0.2996740236614476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00206636,0.0002640999,0.001042201,0.0004207559,0.00001997921,0.00003589089,0.0004509066,0.0001013447,0.000003801629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005113269,0.0002211341,0.0001521669,0.0005119573,0.00004483064,0.0003083503,0.00009373893,0.0005575955,2.165319e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001201858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002970732,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007529725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003961234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975848,0.00006537902,0.001312028,0.000280205,0.0004100858,0.0003474705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983293,0.0005648633,0.0003662452,0.0003992387,0.0002571113,0.00008324267],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001571548,0.0002847479,0.01815348,0.0000985083,0.0003853246,0.000009293972,0.0003774459,0.9782674,0.0005142064,0.001100396,0.000188058,0.0004640362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005100305,0.0003316502,0.06606027,0.0001471776,0.0001601589,0.000005256529,0.0002516815,0.9319785,0.000146621,0.0001685541,0.00002192547,0.0002182064],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6939197,0.00008411428,0.3050995,0.0000795581,0.0001281423,0.0005450908,0.00008919311,0.00004151591,0.00001314814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988087,0.00002718747,0.01169197,0.00003171899,0.00007969018,0.00003070592,0.00002285024,0.0000250385,0.000003808392],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2941673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9017586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033331083","doi":"10.1108/13552510710735122","title":"Using GenRel for reliability assessment of mining equipment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Belt Conveyor Systems Engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Genetic algorithm; Data mining; Computer science; Engineering; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05294910300467261,"gpt":0.3515660812594888,"spread":0.2986169782548163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006562742,0.0002486453,0.0007242773,0.0004354347,0.00001791124,0.00001636492,0.0002781222,0.0001312606,0.000004187071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005947243,0.0002547749,0.0002264824,0.0003600546,0.00002304305,0.0002554619,0.00003300303,0.0003854087,1.592376e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007819711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000724995,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001585042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008813334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968738,0.00003007119,0.002003873,0.0001512078,0.0003914504,0.0005496264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983768,0.0005892699,0.0003647413,0.000271948,0.0002680443,0.0001291859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002021336,0.00003066019,0.004420658,0.00105826,0.00006302603,0.00001451753,0.0005063181,0.888369,0.1039886,0.0008894007,0.00002443528,0.0006149903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001806588,0.0001262414,0.05355189,0.001669958,0.00003925019,0.0000950165,0.001314816,0.9244,0.01577261,0.00007344838,0.000611943,0.0005382345],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4967804,0.0002077335,0.5018588,0.00001253298,0.0008813058,0.0001471475,0.000004116787,0.00003323707,0.00007472954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8307557,0.00001706679,0.1689901,0.00000647028,0.0001711306,0.000005154367,5.844998e-7,0.00004848766,0.000005257569],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3339753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002768319","doi":"10.1108/13552510910997715","title":"Feasibility study of using statistical process control to optimize quality assurance in radiotherapy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Centre d'expertise et de recherche en infrastructures urbaines","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assurance; Statistical process control; Control chart; Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Process (computing); Head and neck; Control (management); Radiation therapy; Medicine; Medical physics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Surgery","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02742654696187762,"gpt":0.3865070156989061,"spread":0.3590804687370284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002409377,0.000199384,0.000873283,0.0001985309,0.00001643464,0.00001675861,0.0002672067,0.00004144789,0.00001794467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002765737,0.0001823398,0.00008663469,0.0003833981,0.00002392193,0.000253215,0.000007314723,0.0004260795,5.190592e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003039124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008040325,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000141984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009459729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974675,0.0002389234,0.001423903,0.0002099056,0.0003394659,0.0003202618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985932,0.0003567891,0.0005126826,0.0002431331,0.000200484,0.00009375095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006532963,0.001211709,0.2754036,0.00005280205,0.00004892295,0.00001224396,0.002130962,0.7024832,0.01446149,0.001239402,0.000005088834,0.002297333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01047825,0.001041682,0.9345532,0.0006733753,0.00001845624,0.000008714189,0.00231788,0.04594615,0.001564104,0.002745938,0.00002987759,0.0006223813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5054266,0.00004418755,0.4941038,0.00007530346,0.00003730338,0.0002894923,0.00001024665,0.00000735249,0.000005664874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8886451,0.000005300263,0.1111966,0.0000533385,0.00007656332,0.000006725883,2.950507e-7,0.00001430753,0.000001766381],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6591496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7435602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}