{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":14,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"c77e2a389396","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2067378780","doi":"10.1111/1467-9795.00113","title":"The <i>Dharma</i> of Ethics, the Ethics of <i>Dharma</i>: Quizzing the Ideals of Hinduism","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hinduism; Dharma; Epistemology; Morality; Presupposition; Sociology; Karma; Philosophy; Philosophy of religion; Religious studies; Environmental ethics; Theology; Buddhism","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1317703935224818,"gpt":0.3138062171701938,"spread":0.182035823647712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01499241,0.0002644736,0.000627261,0.00009806309,0.001405936,0.0000832169,0.001475884,0.0006405099,0.0002457704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004408857,0.0001273844,0.0005790832,0.0001203821,0.004345027,0.0001475276,0.0001551677,0.009507291,0.000009549345],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002114939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000349066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000253733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001988621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943364,0.002140624,0.001680185,0.0001509978,0.001343026,0.0003487668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741775,0.02030512,0.002721488,0.000604131,0.002112522,0.00007922262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001524184,0.0001032591,0.00007748081,0.0002390444,0.0003857923,0.000009176117,0.2451955,0.0001299734,0.0005720169,0.7068806,0.04600362,0.000251093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001181415,0.0008491387,0.00004967739,0.0009815886,0.0006592896,0.0002078652,0.02625972,0.0000884874,0.005505947,0.6086761,0.355203,0.0003377897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1150193,0.1006827,0.0001721563,0.686498,0.006661919,0.0007156724,0.0001349867,0.00004747799,0.09006775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504619,0.04094527,0.00006696599,0.007069606,0.001062077,0.000002474683,6.872576e-7,0.00003118921,0.0003598393],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8354426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538249942","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2006.00285.x","title":"“NOT ETHICS, NOT ETHICS ALONE, BUT THE HOLY”","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctification; Conflation; Appeal; Epistemology; Philosophy; Key (lock); Sociology; Theology; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1104425450499712,"gpt":0.3155200030905699,"spread":0.2050774580405987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01124885,0.0004468141,0.0007078456,0.0002565925,0.002291588,0.0008002783,0.00113873,0.001553608,0.0001023961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003619314,0.0003109157,0.0007093995,0.0001032904,0.002346582,0.0003503146,0.0001631317,0.01983244,0.0001683656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001252984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001488183,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003941167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003120892,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936286,0.001218256,0.001518589,0.0003435379,0.00266147,0.0006295824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889359,0.005761236,0.001297329,0.000670408,0.00313558,0.0001995539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002115987,0.0001470181,0.00002043433,0.0002346348,0.0001956081,0.0001984645,0.1546187,0.0001768428,0.00063286,0.7700518,0.07339051,0.0001215029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009250674,0.0003186369,0.00006434566,0.0003475409,0.0002824488,0.0003078082,0.004310664,0.00003146394,0.001045612,0.4034129,0.5884648,0.0004887576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07237649,0.009295766,0.0006831434,0.781109,0.01693149,0.0004977596,0.0002412248,0.0002441194,0.118621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9333351,0.007014658,0.0002833536,0.04205942,0.01127031,0.000004417361,0.00001297943,0.0000923421,0.00592743],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8609586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008172245","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2007.00322.x","title":"WHY RIGHTS? WHY ME?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Judaism; Function (biology); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0471973808575239,"gpt":0.3497418473697071,"spread":0.3025444665121832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005235161,0.0001035083,0.0002412693,0.0001397744,0.0005888532,0.00007265654,0.0003193367,0.0002809687,0.000009782348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001126526,0.00008023729,0.0001759921,0.0002480097,0.0003490998,0.0001617429,0.00003785704,0.001060413,0.00003080016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001032829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002617341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001390285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01255167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978754,0.0001861587,0.0004475598,0.00009701397,0.001016012,0.0003778815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976437,0.0007962432,0.0003912963,0.0001064351,0.0008328623,0.0002294243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001629839,0.0002301549,0.03038706,0.00006677448,0.0003919493,0.0009142992,0.1377787,0.00001264088,0.0003674477,0.2524131,0.5618436,0.01543125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003003388,0.0001088435,0.0002097804,0.00008768456,0.0000420955,0.0000517214,0.00730796,4.007121e-7,0.000199764,0.07399505,0.9175762,0.000120181],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.257026,0.08783993,0.03207858,0.1210449,0.01136543,0.0004256129,0.000006319361,0.0001758242,0.4900374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738535,0.007697473,0.00157737,0.01285693,0.002440428,4.288883e-7,2.496916e-7,0.00001535598,0.001558298],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7168275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7004127,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769194796","doi":"10.1111/jore.12193","title":"Introduction: Ethnography, Moral Theory, and Comparative Religious Ethics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Clair College","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Normative ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Information ethics; Focus (optics); Environmental ethics; Meta-ethics; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1477212296190261,"gpt":0.4458546034950578,"spread":0.2981333738760317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009662529,0.0001961233,0.0004476156,0.0001574063,0.00395374,0.0007067223,0.0006853808,0.0007966612,0.00003285748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007368059,0.0001717146,0.00036562,0.0001749346,0.00232019,0.0005061697,0.00009349681,0.004925036,0.00002739249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001189341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009106818,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001147346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008758922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962031,0.001480017,0.0006089816,0.0002350221,0.00112773,0.000345111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938432,0.002461546,0.001193456,0.000453852,0.001729615,0.0003183474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001901584,0.00008291816,0.001925479,0.0000297353,0.0002346249,0.00004335973,0.333759,0.00004157867,0.000114812,0.3414902,0.3215849,0.0005031816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000750465,0.0003447499,0.0009230108,0.0001758831,0.0001575248,0.0002381696,0.06091412,0.00001348135,0.0001867508,0.2045259,0.7314307,0.0003392636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2569147,0.01035084,0.002382546,0.6497112,0.01071304,0.000489518,0.00001359332,0.000147661,0.06927685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.911366,0.08073189,0.001229193,0.00264391,0.002772929,0.000002787826,0.000001016235,0.00001484055,0.001237433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6544513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122200547","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2008.00335.x","title":"THE DUTY TO FEED IN CASES OF ADVANCED DEMENTIA","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Dementia; Duty; Environmental ethics; Islam; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Pathology; Disease; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06417382808272866,"gpt":0.3974800658225469,"spread":0.3333062377398183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001369304,0.0001019655,0.000247662,0.0001210747,0.0001585786,0.000006070267,0.0002376426,0.0001378612,0.00001792138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003016709,0.00007147228,0.00009632955,0.0002000943,0.0001045577,0.00003771047,0.00003496435,0.0008020007,0.00001964012],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008186128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002631048,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004929549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009370072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982552,0.0002321257,0.0007206337,0.0001098569,0.0003975461,0.0002846521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981757,0.0007432745,0.0004829718,0.000224814,0.0002323891,0.0001407974],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01009443,0.003264984,0.2492065,0.0007484899,0.001270063,0.005985536,0.2392103,0.0009208655,0.01404971,0.02952862,0.409348,0.03637247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02260559,0.01869256,0.3958934,0.002537497,0.0004167064,0.01359044,0.04978449,0.00001121691,0.02022759,0.030681,0.444205,0.001354441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874572,0.004903438,0.00007317581,0.003533337,0.001376646,0.0001899254,0.000003751184,0.000005526491,0.002456971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891129,0.008267696,0.0005865867,0.001578885,0.00009424455,0.000004173894,6.105445e-7,0.00001323097,0.0003416958],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1894258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3484339,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110695140","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2012.00522.x","title":"DEFENDING NIEBUHR FROM HAUERWAS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Analogy; Idolatry; Natural law; Appeal; Judaism; Natural (archaeology); Torah; Theodicy; Christology; Theology; Religious studies; Law; Epistemology; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09965157573610114,"gpt":0.2966475142634984,"spread":0.1969959385273972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001016265,0.0001135552,0.000230681,0.00009800566,0.0002936381,0.00005280977,0.0002113389,0.0001842556,0.0006647086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002961664,0.00008753425,0.0001796569,0.00001863855,0.0002607862,0.0002574905,0.00003024616,0.001319367,0.0001613953],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002447032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007013568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008242765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006837113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989434,0.0001424363,0.0003594311,0.00006138452,0.0002633749,0.0002299352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983487,0.0008264206,0.0003597202,0.0001267109,0.0002064542,0.0001319762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008380964,0.00009044543,0.002679355,0.00001795451,0.0001729947,0.00002657377,0.1282291,0.000007241608,0.00009927603,0.8211316,0.04700056,0.000461128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000324422,0.0001329393,0.0001598151,0.00009972527,0.000113861,0.00008585523,0.001501358,0.000001597082,0.0001971938,0.3389679,0.658269,0.0001462018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6689814,0.03332889,0.0003888886,0.01941585,0.01235625,0.00009635657,0.00004524779,0.00007146293,0.2653157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899514,0.001000023,0.0004228345,0.001922651,0.006046487,3.992443e-7,0.000002070398,0.00001545271,0.0006386931],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6112685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7278093,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064225785","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2008.00343.x","title":"THE UNIVERSALITY OF JEWISH ETHICS: A Rejoinder to Secularist Critics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Universality (dynamical systems); Judaism; Philosophy; Ideology; Modernity; Epistemology; Normative ethics; Religious studies; Theology; Politics; Law; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09279509995461234,"gpt":0.4100886417038225,"spread":0.3172935417492102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005242028,0.0000948705,0.0002339697,0.00007027933,0.001707513,0.00006916763,0.0004927,0.0005004291,0.00001038817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009658437,0.00007348829,0.0003558526,0.0003906718,0.0009049034,0.0001186688,0.00004716743,0.002929228,0.00001244269],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002285158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002419844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001675791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001285977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967763,0.0009041046,0.0005781461,0.0001003467,0.001384885,0.0002561807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928954,0.003454235,0.0004391395,0.0002272685,0.002744938,0.0002390726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000844913,0.0001334905,0.001733416,0.00003913874,0.0002056417,0.000122276,0.5235634,0.000246242,0.0002870457,0.1319481,0.3413332,0.0003034658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003370255,0.0002010708,0.0004289078,0.0001536841,0.00006319042,0.0001408953,0.05588487,0.00001372214,0.0002508688,0.03419833,0.9081625,0.0001649289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2857351,0.00556272,0.01216329,0.6210654,0.005356023,0.0005187297,0.0000197586,0.00008486073,0.06949414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489921,0.04230018,0.001364403,0.005800373,0.0003226681,8.068358e-7,3.189603e-7,0.00001206195,0.001207127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.663257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1838025725","doi":"10.1111/jore.12069","title":"<scp>S</scp>tout, <scp>R</scp>awls, and the Idea of Public Reason","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Public reason; Liberalism; Perception; Philosophy; Backlash; Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Democracy; Computer science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04020909399539437,"gpt":0.3366561900054626,"spread":0.2964470960100682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009776955,0.000173651,0.0004837869,0.0001441579,0.0008758687,0.0003197244,0.0006177478,0.0005407393,0.000005246656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04559596,0.0001208669,0.0004506849,0.0004474918,0.001240752,0.0003034548,0.00007615177,0.002067448,0.00001970258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001159364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007574326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001234393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005426682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957968,0.001514428,0.0007701883,0.0001717048,0.001324985,0.0004219066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812203,0.01557328,0.001201463,0.0002860666,0.001377769,0.0003411282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008966569,0.00009681792,0.002676245,0.00005209301,0.0002115073,0.000008788969,0.165675,0.00003515021,0.0001180515,0.2092884,0.6205053,0.001323718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009355324,0.0001420909,0.0003827447,0.0001322655,0.00009852507,0.00008979609,0.0478305,0.0001120873,0.00009330047,0.05059551,0.8995488,0.00003882735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.644215,0.01394157,0.003525702,0.08111396,0.003151565,0.0004509777,0.00001090802,0.00009474358,0.2534955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9205266,0.07086955,0.0005969651,0.002896728,0.000778633,0.000003347661,0.000001091314,0.00002348793,0.004303646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2790436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9624434,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362474822","doi":"10.1111/jore.12425","title":"Reflecting and Advancing the Transformation: Catholic Theological Ethics and the <i>Journal of Religious Ethics</i>, 1973–2023","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"Irish Research eLibrary","keywords":"Humanism; Essentialism; Sociology; Politics; Environmental ethics; Subject (documents); Consciousness; Power (physics); Normative ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07501231734533272,"gpt":0.40518828438125,"spread":0.3301759670359173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03933273,0.0001675173,0.000427776,0.0001436155,0.002608967,0.0001448686,0.0004802382,0.0005987904,0.0000043736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02156563,0.0000926496,0.0001881129,0.0005904212,0.004368142,0.000220412,0.00007713419,0.007893704,0.000003178972],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009520099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004315559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001117281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001048134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933851,0.003646942,0.0009455736,0.0001101939,0.001492256,0.0004198828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9695884,0.02763775,0.00101899,0.0001474818,0.001400485,0.0002068775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002158019,0.00001414145,0.0002282392,0.00007306375,0.00008543235,0.0000688855,0.4071921,0.0005980094,0.00006962478,0.5875422,0.003281952,0.0006305986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002089418,0.0005973207,0.0002065491,0.0006715255,0.000477344,0.003989649,0.1250918,0.0001297348,0.00008298902,0.2279084,0.6383728,0.0003824859],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3014105,0.02316231,0.006012041,0.6314997,0.002557709,0.0005163111,0.00002062633,0.0000810597,0.03473974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8574435,0.1341762,0.0005196089,0.006946512,0.0007576819,0.000001228107,5.256945e-7,0.00001106409,0.0001436972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6350908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990451843","doi":"10.1111/jore.12296","title":"Exploring New and Renewed Eco‐Spiritualities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Spiritualities; Environmental ethics; Spirituality; Indigenous; Protestantism; Sociology; Diplomacy; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Philosophy; Ecology; Religious studies; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2543818763575501,"gpt":0.3380179288531542,"spread":0.08363605249560407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001565414,0.00008028733,0.000244455,0.00007122117,0.0003235616,0.00009275891,0.0001545789,0.0001409379,0.00002399933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001184813,0.00007080188,0.00009215011,0.0001286336,0.0002078615,0.0002642997,0.00003773089,0.0005761777,0.00001580197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001224604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005654776,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004951376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002739152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986878,0.0001666889,0.0002815705,0.00008313345,0.0005727268,0.0002080887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986336,0.0006546225,0.0002209712,0.00006759529,0.000262466,0.0001607875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004657835,0.00002938223,0.01010495,0.00007188219,0.0001502354,0.00002571427,0.7443253,0.00003291642,0.0001104597,0.1317457,0.1066336,0.006723304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006945513,0.0002550146,0.001202783,0.0002221192,0.00004330087,0.00001146661,0.05181348,0.000001594617,0.00009433408,0.07950382,0.8659262,0.0002313365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8595935,0.03159004,0.00006507595,0.02419635,0.003622468,0.0001379766,0.000001111307,0.0000428659,0.08075064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8840357,0.1025379,0.001083986,0.001004989,0.001827318,9.775422e-7,1.562548e-7,0.00001410639,0.009494856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7592925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7485033,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122220381","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2009.00398.x","title":"AGREEING TO DISAGREE: Indigenous Pluralism from Human Rights to Bioethics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Indigenous; Pluralism (philosophy); Human rights; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy; Ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1280343517254336,"gpt":0.5240936369787939,"spread":0.3960592852533603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01846417,0.0003581055,0.0007996853,0.0004654592,0.003597303,0.00007144711,0.001272461,0.002257744,0.0001338953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02632657,0.0002867812,0.000224444,0.0006686491,0.0002829063,0.0002700981,0.0002426095,0.03223165,0.0006890842],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006253594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001385736,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005055228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004834373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99023,0.003518976,0.002161346,0.0004145163,0.002728784,0.0009464083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759024,0.01809585,0.001513295,0.0007866256,0.002370009,0.001331871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007918603,0.000506327,0.003101047,0.0002428892,0.0003292745,0.001734612,0.6472604,0.0003027655,0.008851987,0.09088266,0.24263,0.003366186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001572053,0.002046187,0.003415821,0.003561389,0.0002336619,0.00008334094,0.006458455,0.000005477601,0.0006157461,0.7440977,0.2372162,0.0006939528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6833275,0.0008670264,0.006608907,0.2935673,0.00419934,0.0009294632,0.00002722961,0.00012838,0.01034489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8726471,0.0005762047,0.01656649,0.1062336,0.003271216,0.000005897098,0.0000073552,0.00005180647,0.000640331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6532151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391145907","doi":"10.1111/jore.12467","title":"Why Gaps Matter—A Negative Hermeneutical Approach to the Reconciliation Process in the Diocese of British Columbia Based on the Example of Bishop Logan's “Sacred Journey”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Archaeology; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1043374456284988,"gpt":0.3055058466439625,"spread":0.2011684010154637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002981555,0.00008835003,0.0002539758,0.00006242263,0.0002797764,0.0003225032,0.000599271,0.00007584003,0.00004634604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005205615,0.00005562661,0.0001287706,0.0002140038,0.0003355917,0.00008729952,0.00004194957,0.001049718,0.000003569323],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004795764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002216512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00464886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01048596,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979068,0.0006035004,0.0006063055,0.0001082929,0.0006442286,0.0001308905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960462,0.002576865,0.0003525779,0.0002915447,0.0007052994,0.00002748812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001023036,0.0003107401,0.0005284105,0.0003128803,0.0001686224,0.000008829792,0.36676,0.0009098259,0.000008530365,0.01078613,0.6191429,0.0009608736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001313188,0.00143961,0.003693138,0.003122267,0.0003605116,0.000170564,0.253164,0.003824966,0.00008959203,0.06950443,0.6628463,0.0004714793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7894959,0.007356266,0.0008198807,0.1319243,0.001023671,0.001231623,0.0001300039,0.00003123656,0.06798718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992235,0.001471746,0.00005899761,0.005603707,0.0001759807,0.00002383639,0.000001409513,0.00001263195,0.0004166919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2027391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7027716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524391143","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2011.00497.x","title":"THE LASH IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD<sup>1</sup>: Torture and Citizenry in Medieval Muslim Jurisprudence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Torture; SWORD; Jurisprudence; Law; Compromise; Citizenship; Human rights; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04037615668242445,"gpt":0.3060179072922681,"spread":0.2656417506098437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004972125,0.0001229176,0.0002207545,0.00006116093,0.001296723,0.00006333419,0.0005611407,0.0002868086,0.00002072963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001051138,0.00006718313,0.0001262805,0.0001922568,0.001164806,0.00008566932,0.00009033269,0.001656466,0.000006220339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001339532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005292496,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001467482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006514634,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978213,0.0004646119,0.0003945126,0.0001293213,0.0008540907,0.0003362055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977297,0.001340436,0.0003222423,0.000180002,0.0003432263,0.00008438132],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000654228,0.00002368756,0.00296762,0.00001273124,0.00006035333,0.00006806164,0.8743833,0.000002901238,0.00000401358,0.01359339,0.1066779,0.002140614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004907187,0.000203842,0.005769221,0.0001887887,0.00008248058,0.00005742073,0.1414922,0.00002606098,0.00001303969,0.03966178,0.8117909,0.0002235363],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7700143,0.04453427,0.00004185349,0.1107585,0.002755926,0.000365632,0.000006076013,0.00002827369,0.07149518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8979543,0.09644442,0.0001264951,0.002918377,0.0007905596,0.000002639404,6.68847e-8,0.00001270778,0.001750372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7328911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131224649","doi":"10.1111/0384-9694.00040","title":"Comment by Arvind Sharma","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Human rights; Relativism; Focus (optics); Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06492396884393113,"gpt":0.38119351158696,"spread":0.3162695427430288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003519067,0.00009323223,0.0001981805,0.00004482494,0.0004611005,0.00007791073,0.0004027736,0.0004168419,0.0004453555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00104508,0.00008149,0.0001465792,0.0001452483,0.0004874773,0.0001447841,0.00001733167,0.002199011,0.0001187024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009459254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000534826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004453571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042736,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976754,0.0004852305,0.0004112139,0.00008762728,0.0009969691,0.0003436036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978834,0.001165063,0.0001639202,0.0001160798,0.0003037553,0.0003677542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008097757,0.0001825496,0.0001229958,0.00002661888,0.00006043536,0.00006965228,0.03414793,0.00002511983,0.0000465283,0.3482331,0.6130363,0.003967706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002197607,0.00009347782,0.000007987402,0.0000480432,0.0000215183,0.00001385405,0.0004236531,0.000003684623,0.00007994739,0.2261336,0.7728705,0.0000839763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02237005,0.002258867,0.0001258141,0.6730231,0.0006123052,0.00008972971,0.00001572215,0.00003244291,0.301472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9323367,0.01775887,0.0003464815,0.0475429,0.0009958227,6.565523e-7,0.000001089438,0.00001244997,0.001005005],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9099667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.955373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}