{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":14,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"c77e2a389396","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2067378780","doi":"10.1111/1467-9795.00113","title":"The <i>Dharma</i> of Ethics, the Ethics of <i>Dharma</i>: Quizzing the Ideals of Hinduism","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hinduism; Dharma; Epistemology; Morality; Presupposition; Sociology; Karma; Philosophy; Philosophy of religion; Religious studies; Environmental ethics; Theology; Buddhism","authors":[{"name":"Arti Dhand","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1317703935224818,"gpt":0.3138062171701938,"spread":0.182035823647712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009941165,0.0002812312,0.0001436052,0.0004324261,0.004505984,0.004171649,0.0004492857,0.001657215,0.003095458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00177874,0.0001615264,0.0001111936,0.0004842431,0.01044113,0.002242369,0.001984106,0.002919883,0.001035144],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002841776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002618057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005555965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01108896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991502,0.0005135518,0.00002125723,0.00006499721,0.0001434367,0.0001066247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994261,0.000226838,0.00007289968,0.00006113192,0.00009794272,0.0001151417],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001843492,0.000009204753,0.0005033693,0.00006309593,0.00000284955,0.00008138027,0.008436919,0.00006192336,0.0002707199,0.9314275,0.03946714,0.01965746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008643614,0.00003736658,0.002314442,0.0002857191,0.000005346553,0.0004773025,0.006035335,0.0002467258,0.0006820807,0.264493,0.7253954,0.00001867046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04630397,0.06557354,0.01196795,0.1535283,0.004217068,0.00004308029,0.0001338703,0.00010716,0.7181251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8361133,0.01233251,0.006675649,0.02002127,0.001511713,0.00006616224,0.00007015048,0.00007724881,0.123132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005555965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02061856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538249942","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2006.00285.x","title":"“NOT ETHICS, NOT ETHICS ALONE, BUT THE HOLY”","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctification; Conflation; Appeal; Epistemology; Philosophy; Key (lock); Sociology; Theology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"John Caruana","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1104425450499712,"gpt":0.3155200030905699,"spread":0.2050774580405987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00369874,0.0003897398,0.0003270379,0.0008132491,0.002455712,0.005728652,0.0006394872,0.002214379,0.003510776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005661978,0.0001823066,0.0002426593,0.0008154569,0.03104963,0.007513447,0.002494711,0.005063372,0.0007145757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00326001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002520983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00186983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00153755,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950351,0.003627665,0.0001023005,0.0003345884,0.000700857,0.0001995106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958701,0.002085779,0.0004185917,0.0005344668,0.0008290416,0.0002621251],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007642759,0.000005962128,0.0001669438,0.00004527725,0.000005027678,0.00002952885,0.002462286,0.00007858194,0.0001146693,0.9821668,0.01091415,0.004003099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006200904,0.00001536994,0.0003923999,0.0002778546,0.000006360013,0.0001360457,0.003558874,0.0002793757,0.0002411442,0.795452,0.199625,0.000009225383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03264445,0.04030129,0.06745944,0.4087345,0.003447721,0.00004673377,0.0001212655,0.0001597712,0.4470849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9199861,0.007931811,0.007156656,0.02329247,0.00202064,0.00007822405,0.00006026905,0.00009388076,0.03937992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005728652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02365321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008172245","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2007.00322.x","title":"WHY RIGHTS? WHY ME?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Judaism; Function (biology); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Jonathan K. Crane","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0471973808575239,"gpt":0.3497418473697071,"spread":0.3025444665121832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003443481,0.0001775322,0.0001713159,0.0005042011,0.003678023,0.003756247,0.000344584,0.002470948,0.007274738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004466354,0.00009478746,0.0001355513,0.0003314397,0.01221788,0.00243964,0.001044692,0.002347568,0.001066526],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001912401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001468152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002604966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003333393,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982992,0.001067276,0.00003487322,0.0001319767,0.0002563407,0.0002104317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977959,0.001014085,0.0002756921,0.0001545599,0.0005342214,0.0002255567],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003068115,0.00003891481,0.003915092,0.00006554239,0.00001197391,0.0003141561,0.01938777,0.00004674188,0.0004648039,0.9221565,0.03583588,0.01773193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001735703,0.00005459313,0.005032776,0.000476592,0.00001764456,0.0007897205,0.03411601,0.0003757524,0.0009086247,0.4319529,0.5262312,0.00002685092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1487742,0.01405315,0.009234735,0.3946381,0.003542942,0.00004212438,0.0001150502,0.00007487315,0.4295247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516755,0.001997104,0.001272845,0.0190118,0.0005980963,0.00001247433,0.00002669018,0.00001925702,0.02538617],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007274738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02433646,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769194796","doi":"10.1111/jore.12193","title":"Introduction: Ethnography, Moral Theory, and Comparative Religious Ethics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Clair College","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Normative ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Information ethics; Focus (optics); Environmental ethics; Meta-ethics; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Bharat Ranganathan","is_ca":true},{"name":"David A. Clairmont","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1477212296190261,"gpt":0.4458546034950578,"spread":0.2981333738760317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006596184,0.0004800759,0.0004383392,0.00322605,0.004035792,0.005780512,0.000987043,0.003621056,0.01040756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01155874,0.0002236621,0.0003235679,0.002676164,0.01597968,0.00566055,0.003248396,0.004314616,0.0005959126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002568056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001754447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001974049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002697599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943447,0.004593551,0.000134696,0.0002440017,0.0005269512,0.0001560688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9708506,0.02580911,0.0007363212,0.001011542,0.00105558,0.0005367905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001789285,0.00003234431,0.001156389,0.0003931466,0.000008467197,0.00009597361,0.01643964,0.0002031889,0.0001106689,0.8790504,0.07654401,0.02594776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001408657,0.00004939186,0.002403694,0.002712422,0.00001096425,0.0003686103,0.02142693,0.0006478864,0.0002264996,0.3992388,0.5728732,0.00002757839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.02948428,0.1219237,0.05052561,0.4463358,0.03870501,0.0002264085,0.0003627595,0.0002457911,0.3121907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6509445,0.06742817,0.02961832,0.08394785,0.05544727,0.0009579845,0.000362935,0.0002501048,0.1110429],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01040756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03488433,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122200547","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2008.00335.x","title":"THE DUTY TO FEED IN CASES OF ADVANCED DEMENTIA","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Dementia; Duty; Environmental ethics; Islam; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Pathology; Disease; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Shabbir M.H. Alibhai","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06417382808272866,"gpt":0.3974800658225469,"spread":0.3333062377398183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00305548,0.0001604398,0.000226486,0.0006409792,0.003951654,0.001777497,0.0005873517,0.004675159,0.002367982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02070642,0.0001802199,0.0001820445,0.0004127385,0.007534944,0.001772548,0.002748996,0.004123209,0.0003348582],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001332635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001972652,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001183361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002329647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99737,0.001737943,0.000136258,0.00006126408,0.0002801363,0.0004144064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960489,0.001720209,0.001134521,0.0001243792,0.0002912979,0.0006807725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000264358,0.0005174297,0.04994091,0.0006956057,0.00003601468,0.3091547,0.2954773,0.0006828512,0.002625244,0.1674722,0.06610364,0.1070297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003936814,0.0003332267,0.01934598,0.002330615,0.00002487852,0.3865802,0.3001242,0.001101333,0.001134339,0.1089372,0.1799334,0.0001153232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6609245,0.01297193,0.004521152,0.178241,0.002600275,0.0001173902,0.00003362248,0.00003137058,0.1405588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871198,0.002403636,0.001001193,0.00652244,0.0003429349,0.00001685405,0.000006765278,0.000004601496,0.002581765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004675159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01615912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110695140","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2012.00522.x","title":"DEFENDING NIEBUHR FROM HAUERWAS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Analogy; Idolatry; Natural law; Appeal; Judaism; Natural (archaeology); Torah; Theodicy; Christology; Theology; Religious studies; Law; Epistemology; History","authors":[{"name":"David Novák","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09965157573610114,"gpt":0.2966475142634984,"spread":0.1969959385273972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004073079,0.0004158292,0.0004667139,0.0008034043,0.004087043,0.004337628,0.0008827918,0.003961358,0.004334322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008073061,0.0002868377,0.0002366125,0.0005104017,0.01556172,0.005543021,0.004586417,0.006298652,0.001013139],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004325955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002940808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008223538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01014701,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997218,0.00128934,0.00006652006,0.0004118032,0.0006422151,0.0003720875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982058,0.001112725,0.0000914699,0.0001915961,0.0002980563,0.0001002633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007202328,0.000003482818,0.00003091,0.000005313116,0.000001165483,0.0000234043,0.0005740544,0.00005094026,0.00003673466,0.9927236,0.004888885,0.001654212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000134684,0.00001463102,0.0001006035,0.00009919167,0.000004660772,0.00005661087,0.0007343034,0.0003952605,0.0003338979,0.7695292,0.2287008,0.00001743602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0457679,0.01114012,0.02413493,0.192595,0.005570454,0.00005772304,0.00008795336,0.0001747351,0.7204711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.872421,0.002226357,0.005550428,0.0324202,0.001279222,0.00009299386,0.000026925,0.00009416346,0.08588871],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008223538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03138715,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064225785","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2008.00343.x","title":"THE UNIVERSALITY OF JEWISH ETHICS: A Rejoinder to Secularist Critics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Universality (dynamical systems); Judaism; Philosophy; Ideology; Modernity; Epistemology; Normative ethics; Religious studies; Theology; Politics; Law; Physics","authors":[{"name":"David Novák","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09279509995461234,"gpt":0.4100886417038225,"spread":0.3172935417492102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02916069,0.0004340647,0.0009113486,0.001719598,0.006468554,0.008504051,0.002203022,0.01246836,0.0014864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02743661,0.0004883105,0.0006525802,0.0009135237,0.06669504,0.005971255,0.005418678,0.0152662,0.000264048],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006223053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003925563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007058068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.983717,0.009971957,0.0007224501,0.001109828,0.003417735,0.001060997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676445,0.02021257,0.001640547,0.003103579,0.006191813,0.001207072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002433289,0.00001534836,0.0006735527,0.00003429917,0.00001630461,0.0001512727,0.009472618,0.0001052399,0.0000848215,0.972966,0.01104038,0.005416021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000607839,0.00004266098,0.001473435,0.0003492913,0.00003588823,0.0002938599,0.007713331,0.001387206,0.0004723323,0.8520039,0.1361196,0.00004771861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09405419,0.009290007,0.01330926,0.7702966,0.004930757,0.00003298165,0.00003078573,0.0001794967,0.107876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9430638,0.0009846451,0.002359841,0.04249992,0.004105514,0.00003884391,0.00001002309,0.00007199316,0.006865407],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02916069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1542183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1838025725","doi":"10.1111/jore.12069","title":"<scp>S</scp>tout, <scp>R</scp>awls, and the Idea of Public Reason","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Public reason; Liberalism; Perception; Philosophy; Backlash; Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Democracy; Computer science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Phil Ryan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04020909399539437,"gpt":0.3366561900054626,"spread":0.2964470960100682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003312736,0.0001814461,0.0002661732,0.0008057419,0.007423754,0.008125996,0.0006100586,0.004762058,0.003986429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007077284,0.0002112181,0.0003080924,0.0008276385,0.03492302,0.005670927,0.002830611,0.006518277,0.0003976625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006644183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005769432,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01120384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966742,0.00206838,0.00007111355,0.0002582184,0.0006312758,0.0002967601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938361,0.004219837,0.0004720781,0.000392917,0.0006926534,0.0003863616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005657448,0.000007484844,0.00007828113,0.00001148811,0.000001308911,0.00003028244,0.00197949,0.00007689541,0.00002609362,0.9852527,0.0109698,0.00156056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009722053,0.00001208883,0.0003341137,0.0001678136,0.000003656439,0.00005967293,0.004741735,0.000447728,0.0001600716,0.8782043,0.1158457,0.00001331585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03629686,0.007458953,0.007696892,0.4947603,0.001851505,0.00002465401,0.00003988737,0.00004664591,0.4518244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9326314,0.00219288,0.001502019,0.0234094,0.0008335694,0.00003162058,0.00001494489,0.00004841021,0.03933578],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04820716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362474822","doi":"10.1111/jore.12425","title":"Reflecting and Advancing the Transformation: Catholic Theological Ethics and the <i>Journal of Religious Ethics</i>, 1973–2023","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"Irish Research eLibrary","keywords":"Humanism; Essentialism; Sociology; Politics; Environmental ethics; Subject (documents); Consciousness; Power (physics); Normative ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Linda Hogan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07501231734533272,"gpt":0.40518828438125,"spread":0.3301759670359173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005188578,0.0001485813,0.0001561636,0.0006221564,0.01092524,0.006848654,0.000465684,0.00293632,0.002133462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00569095,0.0001704973,0.0001451309,0.0007862314,0.03848847,0.002752044,0.003898019,0.005614198,0.0002119346],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01532353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01358452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03793621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06009211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995382,0.003352709,0.0000797653,0.0001413303,0.0005273595,0.0005168104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979023,0.001137825,0.0001698833,0.0001160999,0.0002699207,0.0004039962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001043598,0.0000194358,0.00047505,0.00002182899,0.000001735378,0.0001947713,0.04929844,0.00009247212,0.0001110641,0.9248123,0.0178965,0.007065899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001874058,0.00001911431,0.003035319,0.0002695812,0.00000407148,0.0002495284,0.07648842,0.0004422616,0.0004397759,0.2148129,0.7041981,0.00002229227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09884311,0.01371129,0.002592163,0.3519926,0.002205633,0.0000508164,0.00002069714,0.00002805602,0.5305557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955948,0.001739576,0.0007341563,0.01337774,0.0004658356,0.0000193763,0.000006898234,0.00002904542,0.02767932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9993778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1111805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990451843","doi":"10.1111/jore.12296","title":"Exploring New and Renewed Eco‐Spiritualities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Spiritualities; Environmental ethics; Spirituality; Indigenous; Protestantism; Sociology; Diplomacy; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Philosophy; Ecology; Religious studies; Law","authors":[{"name":"Sarah Stewart‐Kroeker","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2543818763575501,"gpt":0.3380179288531542,"spread":0.08363605249560407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00196844,0.0003431392,0.0003245683,0.001089695,0.005969365,0.00682222,0.0004972395,0.001881209,0.004197767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001057296,0.00009191831,0.0002311172,0.0008511348,0.02692791,0.004168259,0.002986406,0.002257343,0.0002734879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005178369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002837036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005723399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01765897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987774,0.0008825567,0.00001828594,0.00006354418,0.0001135497,0.0001444616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988558,0.0006643789,0.00009370941,0.00007167006,0.0001480849,0.0001662339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001720215,0.00003998185,0.001320859,0.0002067657,0.00001008639,0.0005802573,0.1888585,0.000137536,0.0004386408,0.7653838,0.007607042,0.03539934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007659465,0.00004802809,0.003580784,0.0007021947,0.000009072292,0.0007375097,0.2124978,0.0002036126,0.0003960592,0.129795,0.6520028,0.0000195785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2102748,0.09640804,0.008513696,0.117061,0.001764398,0.00004553934,0.00006076039,0.00006403924,0.5658078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9536522,0.01457268,0.001851112,0.005174938,0.0004716175,0.00002782377,0.00001802246,0.00002827773,0.02420349],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00682222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03757185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122220381","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2009.00398.x","title":"AGREEING TO DISAGREE: Indigenous Pluralism from Human Rights to Bioethics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Indigenous; Pluralism (philosophy); Human rights; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy; Ecology; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Chris Durante","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1280343517254336,"gpt":0.5240936369787939,"spread":0.3960592852533603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05455803,0.0002577851,0.0006690702,0.001327744,0.01200006,0.01027151,0.002322075,0.006332764,0.002837007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05471299,0.0003688046,0.0005770788,0.001067136,0.0964324,0.0118043,0.01594106,0.01182508,0.0002355658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005905904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008108321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006260933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005851453,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9300919,0.05605532,0.001312911,0.002290744,0.008113576,0.002135615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.948089,0.03995476,0.002743701,0.00302939,0.003666908,0.002516329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001817598,0.00001839543,0.0003611155,0.00005052049,0.00001168944,0.0003832922,0.06931262,0.0001834753,0.0001485917,0.9222996,0.002528886,0.004683715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001724706,0.00001597942,0.000518402,0.0002106406,0.000008507823,0.000174978,0.03150081,0.000689414,0.0001933087,0.9379502,0.02869612,0.00002437031],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1420277,0.004794742,0.03768464,0.5007992,0.00254809,0.0001139,0.00002452906,0.00003757729,0.3119696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750711,0.0007480325,0.003874999,0.0158466,0.00067467,0.00005201399,0.000008346346,0.00001622493,0.003707952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05455803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2885339,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391145907","doi":"10.1111/jore.12467","title":"Why Gaps Matter—A Negative Hermeneutical Approach to the Reconciliation Process in the Diocese of British Columbia Based on the Example of Bishop Logan's “Sacred Journey”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Archaeology; History","authors":[{"name":"Edda Wolff","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1043374456284988,"gpt":0.3055058466439625,"spread":0.2011684010154637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009575715,0.0005629939,0.0005259928,0.002215683,0.04150856,0.01529333,0.002756399,0.004731835,0.00276877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01447389,0.0004102566,0.0001875367,0.001863901,0.07112665,0.005882449,0.008309698,0.008036308,0.0002983763],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04118809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03412664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4014169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5432458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9856536,0.01040798,0.0001915923,0.0006286105,0.001721183,0.001397052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903197,0.006003949,0.0004876042,0.0006714094,0.001668056,0.0008493589],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002759762,0.00002221006,0.0005231624,0.0000685617,0.000003735544,0.0008572497,0.6693868,0.0001646533,0.0005438903,0.3124375,0.00616558,0.0097991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009153961,0.0000210155,0.0009596271,0.0004090433,0.000009681307,0.0005034206,0.7038586,0.0006378561,0.0007839766,0.05281764,0.2399294,0.0000606237],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3239015,0.005536074,0.02055298,0.08840765,0.001092496,0.0001979926,0.00006033642,0.0001775361,0.5600734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733496,0.0004766689,0.002353763,0.001800007,0.00003691857,0.00004869938,0.00001337878,0.0000737684,0.02184716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5985831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7981607,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524391143","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2011.00497.x","title":"THE LASH IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD<sup>1</sup>: Torture and Citizenry in Medieval Muslim Jurisprudence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Torture; SWORD; Jurisprudence; Law; Compromise; Citizenship; Human rights; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Rumee Ahmed","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04037615668242445,"gpt":0.3060179072922681,"spread":0.2656417506098437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007649377,0.0001592532,0.0003095371,0.0007586643,0.01205599,0.006036345,0.0005052641,0.003610976,0.001589966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004454102,0.0002503839,0.000150634,0.0004379483,0.06059448,0.003984135,0.003391209,0.006348148,0.0001500908],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00322866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001568228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009075037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01462511,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959585,0.003172338,0.0001091254,0.0002442313,0.0002571727,0.0002585969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955273,0.003201665,0.0003162168,0.0002639783,0.0004194124,0.0002713255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002295695,0.00002166632,0.00106045,0.00002338333,0.000004673916,0.0002339664,0.1945643,0.00007322567,0.0003052545,0.7996152,0.001876377,0.00219864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003681986,0.0001585495,0.007707804,0.0004711976,0.00002101,0.0009451975,0.3260522,0.00133449,0.001162722,0.4959832,0.1660327,0.00009410741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5812477,0.005908107,0.004371658,0.1387288,0.001047574,0.00003054462,0.0000270305,0.00003066023,0.2686078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953848,0.0001878265,0.0001253161,0.002185224,0.0001001895,0.000003106662,0.000001109539,0.000005172265,0.002007352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01205599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04045427,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131224649","doi":"10.1111/0384-9694.00040","title":"Comment by Arvind Sharma","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Human rights; Relativism; Focus (optics); Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Arvind Sharma","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06492396884393113,"gpt":0.38119351158696,"spread":0.3162695427430288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007467825,0.001433418,0.002185333,0.001396081,0.007328948,0.006798147,0.005677422,0.04623811,0.01952497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05208275,0.001121753,0.002474502,0.001868536,0.004042827,0.007024832,0.004462849,0.05876371,0.02091056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006217532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01187648,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02857405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03163823,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930963,0.001018309,0.0006331358,0.001411253,0.002988319,0.0008526594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823867,0.007820494,0.001261792,0.0006070505,0.005822116,0.00210195],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000078282,0.00000268881,0.00002719204,0.00001824327,0.000002242039,0.00004342293,0.00003730525,0.00000512137,0.00001676416,0.0003514297,0.9988565,0.0006313574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002768471,0.00001350142,0.0006006848,0.000191273,0.00001460192,0.000140285,0.0004738733,0.00004479855,0.000136271,0.001257462,0.9970572,0.00004233715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001033432,0.001469064,0.00003385494,0.9544843,0.04124293,0.00001601343,0.0001325999,0.00003754419,0.002480358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006498572,0.0004380707,0.00003216066,0.9828652,0.008055221,0.00002890715,0.00002698971,0.00002509399,0.007878424],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04623811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06531751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}