{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":69,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":69,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"43fd51bcb670","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching"}},"results":[{"id":"W2053173693","doi":"10.1002/tea.20363","title":"Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Career Development and Diversity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1058,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Competence (human resources); Identity (music); Science education; Physics education; Mathematics education; Psychology; Social psychology; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Zahra Hazari","is_ca":false},{"name":"Gerhard Sonnert","is_ca":false},{"name":"Philip M. Sadler","is_ca":false},{"name":"Marie‐Claire Shanahan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2459867115279199,"gpt":0.4954332371992698,"spread":0.2494465256713499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001475063,0.0002241886,0.0003650359,0.000988871,0.001577234,0.001919123,0.0003246837,0.0004572059,0.006330892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003057235,0.0002034627,0.0003351031,0.0006147845,0.0007492882,0.0008597899,0.001139221,0.0006389116,0.0006263112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003504389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004548717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002056028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003519115,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993367,0.0002228678,0.00003312913,0.00007288119,0.0001380024,0.0001965043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973267,0.0008684013,0.0006169432,0.00009337973,0.0002165907,0.0008779449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003530799,0.001123003,0.9594867,0.0000229731,0.00002873443,0.0003600867,0.02618052,0.00003855891,0.001948573,0.0006311928,0.0002541776,0.009572473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001183465,0.000618136,0.9527801,0.00002011905,0.00001299712,0.0002833345,0.04425002,0.0001744555,0.0004871271,0.0002316188,0.001115705,0.00001459939],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992213,0.00002597284,0.00003964334,0.00002486554,0.000003565985,0.000003894294,0.00002118394,8.025912e-7,0.0006587518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993761,0.00001748574,0.00002106328,0.00001541045,0.000002928608,0.000005947351,0.000014761,9.887939e-7,0.0005452269],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006330892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0211789,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058518083","doi":"10.1002/tea.20333","title":"PISA 2006: An assessment of scientific literacy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":313,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Government of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Mathematics education; Test (biology); Literacy; Psychology; Reading (process); Science education; Scale (ratio); Achievement test; Pedagogy; Medical education; Standardized test; Medicine; Political science; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Rodger W. Bybee","is_ca":false},{"name":"Barry Mccrae","is_ca":false},{"name":"Robert Laurie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2878043853163388,"gpt":0.6688702908396115,"spread":0.3810659055232727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003282005,0.0006779126,0.000758494,0.00538239,0.0008588741,0.001550767,0.0009144237,0.0006863915,0.009909955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01145906,0.0003649543,0.0008943651,0.002500189,0.0004431139,0.001516833,0.002541027,0.001711715,0.002972173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007207491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001846318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009302886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00121214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972751,0.0006095048,0.0004210589,0.000207211,0.001341235,0.00014595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936888,0.001093384,0.001344541,0.0004335616,0.002675354,0.0007645263],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001855302,0.004933325,0.4782403,0.0009024127,0.000268277,0.0007270617,0.002513362,0.003529196,0.006192514,0.004680921,0.08317205,0.4129853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002508345,0.002819843,0.9175895,0.0002833234,0.0001021365,0.001868792,0.001093116,0.006237099,0.007509622,0.003781798,0.05835827,0.0001056356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8228866,0.0009227064,0.01676896,0.001576078,0.0004165577,0.005186083,0.0206723,0.002038184,0.1295325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8819587,0.001486426,0.05239109,0.0004993058,0.0001494027,0.008773362,0.02103188,0.0002414269,0.03346835],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009909955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0331521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151170333","doi":"10.1002/tea.10071","title":"Theoretical perspectives on learning in an informal setting","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":227,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Constructivist teaching methods; Informal learning; Constructivism (international relations); Mathematics education; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Class (philosophy); Restructuring; Knowledge base; Concept map; Pedagogy; Teaching method; Epistemology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"David P. Anderson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Keith B. Lucas","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ian Ginns","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09026530449468509,"gpt":0.4106018060777642,"spread":0.3203365015830791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005478066,0.0008331616,0.0004075869,0.003773296,0.004735288,0.01053569,0.002448635,0.0030617,0.009681964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006388421,0.000300319,0.0006346321,0.002229133,0.03831448,0.01066053,0.006203162,0.003464851,0.0007660274],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006541202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002596863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003063906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001721644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916089,0.006284241,0.0002005337,0.0005295996,0.000777653,0.0005990823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889263,0.007806184,0.0008842744,0.0006444372,0.0006725656,0.001066183],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006492651,0.00003468162,0.0003996238,0.00008162499,0.000003629073,0.0002091883,0.02008314,0.0004466251,0.000041041,0.9755874,0.000417957,0.002688556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002759121,0.00004447887,0.0004314041,0.0003764984,0.000006473678,0.0002964355,0.04071965,0.002304573,0.0001098763,0.9122097,0.04345898,0.00001422307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1396682,0.008358249,0.1327455,0.03302563,0.0004928602,0.0003119076,0.0001909155,0.0001573924,0.6850494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823088,0.001646307,0.007070106,0.0008966889,0.0002152926,0.0002361128,0.00007199468,0.00002310055,0.00753156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01053569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04746002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042032395","doi":"10.1002/tea.10122","title":"Prevalence, function, and structure of photographs in high school biology textbooks","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":227,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Subject matter; Relation (database); Mathematics education; Function (biology); Interpretation (philosophy); Focus (optics); Subject (documents); Science education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Curriculum; Linguistics; Library science; Biology; Physics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Lilian Pozzer","is_ca":true},{"name":"Wolff‐Michael Roth","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1000818820844399,"gpt":0.4917033907251358,"spread":0.3916215086406959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002954795,0.0002227498,0.0003664793,0.005960182,0.0009122064,0.002794056,0.0005489921,0.0006009598,0.004801019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04687036,0.0003742579,0.0002226071,0.003311587,0.001382266,0.002391623,0.001956137,0.0005332467,0.0004488807],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001046632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005297501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001861827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002848461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957336,0.002105112,0.0005012387,0.0004408869,0.001034309,0.0001848299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.933221,0.04112891,0.01661347,0.002500938,0.005520978,0.001014744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005195176,0.0001829058,0.7211726,0.00161172,0.0001044813,0.001584733,0.1287075,0.0003120435,0.01051168,0.003872407,0.002337453,0.129083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001722791,0.0002148438,0.9219211,0.000581058,0.0001166138,0.002532067,0.05616101,0.0007724031,0.003582072,0.000986655,0.01306889,0.00004611132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892409,0.001316437,0.001319519,0.0002278329,0.00002928164,0.00003914988,0.0001733425,0.00003470661,0.007618889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974161,0.0005361516,0.0008675987,0.00002659614,0.00002022765,0.00001819491,0.0001285675,0.00001452001,0.0009719855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005960182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01606095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071318150","doi":"10.1002/tea.1031","title":"Learning science through technological design","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Mathematics education; Curriculum; Science, technology, society and environment education; Learning sciences; Computer science; Sociology; Educational technology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Wolff‐Michael Roth","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4950982318202393,"gpt":0.6152720530086239,"spread":0.1201738211883846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001600932,0.0003198982,0.0002067487,0.000737463,0.001243704,0.003056151,0.0007147762,0.0007066068,0.006512218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004660066,0.000196317,0.0003714382,0.000468586,0.002851212,0.002072585,0.002633164,0.001464317,0.0008116362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001205872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009590274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000577587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009512574,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979133,0.001378287,0.00007129941,0.0001456293,0.0003631084,0.0001283965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974489,0.001535275,0.0002537358,0.0004529115,0.0001327061,0.0001764707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001088089,0.001487635,0.02646252,0.0006370794,0.00005654763,0.0006403556,0.09665401,0.009082534,0.01149637,0.5147504,0.01292955,0.3256942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006649668,0.0008964433,0.01340127,0.0006129733,0.0000407529,0.001279532,0.02775481,0.0111786,0.01254617,0.3410486,0.5911203,0.00005411837],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6155258,0.0009917199,0.1264665,0.005552261,0.0001276064,0.0004584866,0.0001577106,0.0003933146,0.2503266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9351517,0.0007648321,0.0416326,0.000310056,0.0000291641,0.0001810898,0.0001216549,0.00003779442,0.02177105],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006512218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02178556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977215039","doi":"10.1002/tea.20419","title":"Globalizing students acting for the common good","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":194,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Consumerism; Science education; Sociology; Goods and services; Egalitarianism; Intangible good; Dualism; Consumption (sociology); Public relations; Environmental ethics; Economics; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Pedagogy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Larry Bencze","is_ca":true},{"name":"Lyn Carter","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.459982540797794,"gpt":0.5957294216075077,"spread":0.1357468808097138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004548546,0.0005123726,0.0005343986,0.001305799,0.007276418,0.01277433,0.00074335,0.003043622,0.0189402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003492158,0.0001770099,0.00047979,0.0008824373,0.02256758,0.007258615,0.009781677,0.005435745,0.002371967],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00308601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002869642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001722297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002643842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964857,0.001922154,0.0000697678,0.0004406281,0.0003875016,0.0006943338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965765,0.000828125,0.0004882386,0.00051624,0.0004179585,0.001172918],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003134912,0.00017264,0.0065086,0.0001423191,0.00002089934,0.0004200366,0.1543116,0.0003485017,0.0008429998,0.7747568,0.03008598,0.03235828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002627988,0.00009939457,0.003946615,0.000329608,0.00003079076,0.0002127197,0.1102215,0.0006148453,0.0009043271,0.2573997,0.626164,0.00005031051],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2603908,0.003294208,0.005765619,0.110604,0.001688251,0.0001043142,0.00007316156,0.0002405695,0.6178391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9556572,0.0008484139,0.0009129628,0.007218595,0.0001902522,0.0000248025,0.00002192637,0.00007140155,0.03505456],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0189402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06336129,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091496793","doi":"10.1002/tea.20169","title":"Student affect and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Situational ethics; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Chemistry; Chemistry education; Concept learning; Mathematics education; Feeling; Science education; Conceptual change; Cognition; Class (philosophy); Social psychology; Epistemology; Communication","authors":[{"name":"Martina Nieswandt","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3036042136505663,"gpt":0.5717385533461283,"spread":0.268134339695562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009986402,0.0002073809,0.000267823,0.0004855991,0.0003564303,0.001434644,0.0001859802,0.0003447373,0.002692024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007285569,0.0001520181,0.000232542,0.0002347402,0.0004076982,0.0002836174,0.0005715357,0.0008076575,0.0003562604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003053364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001590271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009261364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001281181,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994382,0.0001733768,0.00003449702,0.00006808916,0.0002207425,0.00006499921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994877,0.00178691,0.001796587,0.000200894,0.0006395965,0.0006990823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003411377,0.001170607,0.9525874,0.00006351968,0.000109347,0.0001127486,0.007403458,0.0004524519,0.008388746,0.000346218,0.0004514946,0.02857298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005412875,0.000211643,0.9968091,0.000009051779,0.00001680847,0.00005385397,0.001255235,0.0003923823,0.0007184457,0.0001345809,0.0003840745,0.000009439536],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998921,0.00003235264,0.00007360573,0.00001651788,0.000002909442,0.000003974332,0.00001096148,0.000003551669,0.0009350859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993273,0.00004669061,0.00009143915,0.00001193361,0.000003137745,0.000006560147,0.00002638971,0.000001400614,0.0004852244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002692024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009005666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169310428","doi":"10.1002/tea.20008","title":"Scientists' views of science, models of writing, and science writing practices","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Scientific writing; Professional writing; Science education; Science communication; Ambiguity; Perception; Scientific literacy; Technical writing; Science, technology, society and environment education; Sociology; Nature of Science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Higher education; Political science; Engineering; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Larry D. Yore","is_ca":true},{"name":"Brian Hand","is_ca":false},{"name":"Marilyn K. Florence","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2310648360709079,"gpt":0.4966819380656629,"spread":0.265617101994755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02128862,0.0003681068,0.0004325397,0.005586729,0.008402674,0.01404382,0.001051747,0.00168402,0.001542214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06133306,0.0003459225,0.0003028665,0.002725006,0.01846869,0.003633816,0.003262772,0.00225114,0.0001945568],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01288274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01422868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07474282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06466067,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9819666,0.0104089,0.0008467684,0.0006106325,0.005179211,0.0009878491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.935364,0.04504715,0.008228431,0.001383914,0.007117752,0.002858795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005141182,0.00004757783,0.02120186,0.00006037941,0.00001156119,0.0001838698,0.9590606,0.0001970478,0.001233057,0.009815895,0.0002863198,0.007850406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002824772,0.0000744797,0.02574519,0.0001971026,0.00002522276,0.000227739,0.951056,0.000968572,0.0009446915,0.00907657,0.01160461,0.00005154563],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789826,0.0004408609,0.0009639126,0.002038368,0.00001760227,0.0000213868,0.00001308791,0.000009961584,0.01751228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988224,0.0002009576,0.000170424,0.00006884637,0.000006342464,0.000008831028,0.000007046473,0.000002801156,0.0007124363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9915974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1486155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147442928","doi":"10.1002/tea.1040","title":"Learning to teach science in urban schools","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Sociology; Teacher education; Professional development; Ethnography; Teaching method; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Kenneth Tobin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Wolff‐Michael Roth","is_ca":true},{"name":"Andrea Zimmermann","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09133853791712378,"gpt":0.4992691914125015,"spread":0.4079306534953778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00290494,0.0002710411,0.0003751332,0.001055858,0.01117671,0.00327081,0.0007399042,0.0008436068,0.006390703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00262099,0.0003621443,0.0002763839,0.0007615362,0.004695893,0.001711507,0.006132599,0.001331725,0.001000463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002616554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005758968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004721057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02295006,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997842,0.001137802,0.0000481789,0.0001658768,0.0001788176,0.0006274154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972938,0.0007104839,0.0003945362,0.0001446504,0.0001973677,0.001259148],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001873248,0.003951929,0.07866569,0.000453786,0.00002016806,0.001616787,0.7488866,0.001004985,0.003578673,0.02558591,0.0153348,0.1207132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001185206,0.001363098,0.04924874,0.0003488883,0.00002605255,0.000626354,0.7445659,0.0007774574,0.003720293,0.01295437,0.1862054,0.00004492686],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789835,0.0002305209,0.001106374,0.001751845,0.00002688348,0.00007452522,0.00001698818,0.00003062282,0.01777884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911487,0.0003202464,0.001842384,0.0002969941,0.00001495577,0.00005552071,0.00002823308,0.000007919616,0.006284917],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01117671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02137899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036352550","doi":"10.1002/tea.20060","title":"Developmental growth in students' concept of energy: Analysis of selected items from the TIMSS database","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Mathematics education; Test (biology); Rasch model; Psychology; Item response theory; Cognitive development; Energy (signal processing); Curriculum; Science education; Concept learning; Piaget's theory of cognitive development; Achievement test; Cognition; Item analysis; Classical test theory; Developmental psychology; Pedagogy; Psychometrics; Standardized test; Mathematics; Statistics","authors":[{"name":"Xiufeng Liu","is_ca":false},{"name":"Anne McKeough","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1563988933828027,"gpt":0.5295182645943851,"spread":0.3731193712115825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002197099,0.0002467708,0.0003135465,0.002585152,0.0002494451,0.0007379137,0.000503337,0.0003630624,0.001532981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01280832,0.0001553261,0.0003547188,0.001837347,0.0002263416,0.000525561,0.0008176924,0.0004805299,0.0005192836],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004572157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003865888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00280114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003069847,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991319,0.0002427312,0.000150892,0.00008874571,0.0003220697,0.00006371117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901134,0.004561826,0.002689381,0.0005713986,0.001617136,0.0004469349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001144562,0.0001014773,0.9837132,0.00002447733,0.00002285002,0.00005062923,0.0007654011,0.000256421,0.0004615926,0.0000796275,0.0002881172,0.01412183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003392123,0.0000618643,0.9974281,0.000005367423,0.000006095639,0.0000514736,0.0005261989,0.000996214,0.0004139771,0.00004759386,0.0004549451,0.00000490667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998702,0.00001850265,0.0001928749,0.00001763516,0.000002134029,0.00001549473,0.0007087887,0.00001097085,0.0003314617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974306,0.00002628337,0.0006610981,0.000005134192,0.000002171625,0.00006673091,0.001588021,0.000006816804,0.000213105],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00280114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01161951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969379996","doi":"10.1002/tea.20001","title":"Why educate “little scientists?” Examining the potential of practice‐based scientific literacy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Agency (philosophy); Curriculum; Science education; Literacy; Mathematics education; Work (physics); Process (computing); Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Computer science; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"D. Kevin O’Neill","is_ca":true},{"name":"Joseph L. Polman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2300005072014985,"gpt":0.5697090228606678,"spread":0.3397085156591693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03233774,0.0002623589,0.0004415403,0.002425934,0.002848968,0.009735359,0.001739838,0.002580552,0.002928727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1322597,0.0004184495,0.0003993804,0.001235843,0.01652598,0.008847706,0.009598376,0.004284138,0.00029593],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003082418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006250209,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001482237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002237797,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9714049,0.0213553,0.000700877,0.002122443,0.00276971,0.001646831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7195857,0.2292397,0.02863837,0.009446964,0.008723659,0.004365589],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002192508,0.001725528,0.2769,0.000659402,0.0001162444,0.0008065882,0.5385716,0.0004022629,0.002516792,0.06852865,0.001632607,0.1079211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001434224,0.001110313,0.2392009,0.002071519,0.0001834064,0.0009855964,0.5715895,0.004791914,0.006651659,0.142318,0.03081232,0.0001413416],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9692736,0.0004375677,0.004114482,0.01293966,0.0000289938,0.00006135804,0.00001027451,0.00001884492,0.01311524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981247,0.0001028855,0.0009830042,0.0004825151,0.000009081117,0.00004417196,0.000004563334,0.000004682527,0.0002443443],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.997151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1710204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117962730","doi":"10.1002/tea.20153","title":"Concept maps: Experiments on dynamic thinking","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Header; Focus (optics); Concept map; Task (project management); Mathematics education; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Natalia Derbentseva","is_ca":true},{"name":"Frank Safayeni","is_ca":true},{"name":"J. Cañas Alberto","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2020900081355763,"gpt":0.5848167688805302,"spread":0.3827267607449539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009208957,0.001088415,0.000635926,0.0008317628,0.0008958973,0.001773807,0.001556372,0.001164373,0.00664788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07727644,0.0008786299,0.0004853184,0.0009407633,0.002580746,0.003992824,0.003120136,0.002541566,0.0004761488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007839067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000803989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004183737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002373149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930622,0.004140098,0.0004009438,0.000884623,0.001150806,0.0003613153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7693543,0.2175186,0.004546048,0.004984174,0.002147897,0.001449111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03416596,0.05448667,0.02254141,0.007065163,0.0005920752,0.001539623,0.1489595,0.03236294,0.2411532,0.06905881,0.004685889,0.3833888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02476692,0.07597388,0.08843316,0.002273154,0.0009762598,0.001651408,0.03181368,0.146143,0.3491816,0.2315853,0.0459172,0.001284436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802406,0.0001238252,0.01412471,0.0001782837,0.00005609765,0.0009192042,0.00007875964,0.0001037972,0.004174732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684664,0.000144921,0.02758272,0.0001578776,0.00003839536,0.002489599,0.0001183303,0.00005583584,0.0009458982],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009208957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04870224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000334156","doi":"10.1002/tea.20030","title":"Coteaching: Creating resources for learning and learning to teach chemistry in urban high schools","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Mathematics education; Honor; Pedagogy; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Science education; Social studies; Teaching method; Psychology; Social science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Wolff‐Michael Roth","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kenneth Tobin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Cristobal Carambo","is_ca":false},{"name":"Chris Dalland","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04467232902993583,"gpt":0.4428388961379597,"spread":0.3981665671080239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001580671,0.0003198168,0.0003244399,0.000835175,0.006311768,0.002940002,0.001169593,0.0005515174,0.007727359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003015437,0.0002888592,0.000165079,0.0005559082,0.002725116,0.00168877,0.008073733,0.0008028387,0.0005506956],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001678105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004576207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006993019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02526558,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987483,0.0006624312,0.00002674664,0.0001846559,0.0001012046,0.0002766261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970934,0.0005146322,0.0002602236,0.0002131195,0.0001500213,0.001768606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005591555,0.004307599,0.1428407,0.0005819117,0.00003085371,0.0030952,0.4222902,0.001451447,0.01561207,0.02053752,0.009949431,0.378744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001529852,0.001992681,0.1748212,0.0004272139,0.00007425101,0.001024766,0.6579977,0.003223513,0.00817776,0.01439208,0.1375889,0.0001269207],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916458,0.00009599935,0.0008051553,0.000479515,0.00001160432,0.00004137134,0.0000115823,0.00003126308,0.006877761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957011,0.00007219264,0.001968636,0.00003957698,0.000003748405,0.00002365121,0.00001861079,0.000006370568,0.002165991],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007727359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02585059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151323772","doi":"10.1002/tea.10109","title":"The value of an emergent notion of authenticity: Examples from two student/teacher–scientist partnership programs","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Curriculum; General partnership; Science education; Value (mathematics); Property (philosophy); Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Face (sociological concept); Epistemology; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social science; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Jrène Rahm","is_ca":true},{"name":"Heather C. Miller","is_ca":false},{"name":"Laurel Hartley","is_ca":false},{"name":"John C. Moore","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3485302003447787,"gpt":0.5852288606081715,"spread":0.2366986602633928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008699669,0.0003335951,0.0004932755,0.001029157,0.01414404,0.005195901,0.002182685,0.002860511,0.003868505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01808631,0.0003415709,0.0005055168,0.001001724,0.008269611,0.004928757,0.01691347,0.004817798,0.0007500434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002328993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004125543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001876101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002978177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9875498,0.008807397,0.0002054296,0.0006066585,0.00144816,0.001382545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865423,0.005979151,0.0008680077,0.001450492,0.001095646,0.004064388],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004659519,0.004027086,0.01867293,0.0003029206,0.00004166031,0.00729498,0.648662,0.003003395,0.003667118,0.2220482,0.007257082,0.08455677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004029098,0.001790226,0.01347825,0.0002715751,0.00004559983,0.004435864,0.522418,0.01465764,0.01006619,0.1486774,0.2836086,0.0001478159],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9038424,0.0002037722,0.02536668,0.00650589,0.00010009,0.0003109615,0.0000342034,0.000126295,0.06350967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989922,0.0001073739,0.004828697,0.0002212089,0.00001546038,0.0002071419,0.0000280765,0.00003756277,0.004632543],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01414404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04600883,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050341665","doi":"10.1002/tea.20015","title":"Learning to write like a scientist: Coauthoring as an enculturation task","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Enculturation; Task (project management); Supervisor; Process (computing); Civility; Psychology; Writing process; Prewriting; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Sociology; Computer science; Cooperative learning; Teaching method; Political science; Management","authors":[{"name":"Marilyn K. Florence","is_ca":false},{"name":"Larry D. Yore","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1534310262692533,"gpt":0.5336386349651023,"spread":0.380207608695849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0419228,0.0008646201,0.0007276221,0.003814142,0.02245051,0.01041798,0.003958614,0.00489586,0.004395079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1238023,0.0006560342,0.000728404,0.001958498,0.008877537,0.00919624,0.009853568,0.003087526,0.001186971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002801806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004067467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000985841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00211896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9177011,0.06773708,0.002623365,0.003150807,0.006024597,0.002763171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7371151,0.1956251,0.02499072,0.01641867,0.01183397,0.01401637],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002758306,0.0009255544,0.03475558,0.0002948933,0.00005448282,0.01439349,0.833602,0.0009990775,0.004381633,0.01141618,0.003127932,0.09577335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001245377,0.0007469527,0.01147551,0.0004376048,0.00007129845,0.01455178,0.8683608,0.007983979,0.006791357,0.01770736,0.07157984,0.0001689532],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9612852,0.0004506726,0.01778518,0.004175426,0.0001391174,0.0001973784,0.00001506747,0.0001437442,0.01580827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873949,0.0001516289,0.0086118,0.0001925137,0.00008018586,0.00009335867,0.00001942105,0.00004294399,0.003413219],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9775495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2217116,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093446643","doi":"10.1002/tea.10111","title":"Encouraging and analyzing student questions in a large physics course: Meaningful patterns for instructors","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Quarter (Canadian coin); Conceptual change; Concept learning; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Psychology; Science education; Variance (accounting); Conceptual framework; Mathematics; Sociology; Statistics","authors":[{"name":"Kathleen Harper","is_ca":false},{"name":"Eugenia Etkina","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.165660979381818,"gpt":0.5721715363524832,"spread":0.4065105569706652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008141885,0.0004467008,0.0004459662,0.001880748,0.0009625931,0.001992717,0.001244254,0.001487238,0.001016969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1077383,0.0003419772,0.000303002,0.001559095,0.0009284026,0.001352768,0.001784064,0.001110961,0.0005969176],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007556921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006386689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008819948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002095452,"domain_scores_codex":[0.990244,0.006289903,0.0007182653,0.0009510798,0.001430044,0.0003667389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8716936,0.09569398,0.01519546,0.006443126,0.00818863,0.002785268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000520727,0.001297679,0.68128,0.0003859705,0.0001031017,0.0006159181,0.06357523,0.0009388907,0.03020028,0.0006334087,0.003592533,0.2168561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000551833,0.001052696,0.9316666,0.0001835058,0.00007518231,0.0009917381,0.03132058,0.0079146,0.01160778,0.003021129,0.01198918,0.0001218],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953592,0.00007992125,0.003241146,0.0001901043,0.000009165388,0.00009161801,0.0000722527,0.0001033356,0.0008533046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903178,0.00009688014,0.007815175,0.0001430056,0.00002530649,0.0001739426,0.0003622732,0.00004167256,0.001024045],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008141885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04305893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604565736","doi":"10.1002/tea.21396","title":"Toward a durable prevalence of scientific conceptions: Tracking the effects of two interfering misconceptions about buoyancy from preschoolers to science teachers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scientific misconceptions; Conceptual change; Task (project management); Science education; Psychology; Mathematics education; Concept learning; Tracking (education); Cognition; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Scientific literacy; Pedagogy; Sociology; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Patrice Potvin","is_ca":true},{"name":"Guillaume Cyr","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2339594008709526,"gpt":0.547832849953404,"spread":0.3138734490824514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003839794,0.0003698986,0.0005338368,0.001866878,0.0008438037,0.002585156,0.0006567983,0.0008895273,0.001812166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04771686,0.0005647662,0.0002616125,0.0004555847,0.001635377,0.001154252,0.002508783,0.001613304,0.0002269549],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008030969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007400453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005953513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00394158,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997597,0.0007463465,0.0001735102,0.0004532276,0.0007304841,0.0002993729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9508522,0.03046793,0.01085513,0.002353793,0.003442546,0.002028423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001149599,0.001037265,0.8855134,0.0001313206,0.00008809949,0.0003426955,0.06326463,0.0002028273,0.02619173,0.000340604,0.0001522676,0.02158565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001218461,0.0005013743,0.9822451,0.00002098741,0.00003462601,0.000217002,0.01181754,0.0005509708,0.00392921,0.0002538787,0.0003905969,0.000026436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995011,0.00002311142,0.0001263677,0.00001881359,9.239993e-7,0.000004618979,0.000009748473,0.00000634321,0.0003089595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994168,0.00002890759,0.0003134398,0.00001226439,0.000001600526,0.00001433841,0.00003368121,0.000004291218,0.0001746241],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005953513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020307,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153579845","doi":"10.1002/tea.10018","title":"Lessons on and from the dihybrid cross: An activity–theoretical study of learning in coteaching","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Psychology; Mathematics education; Subject matter; Subject (documents); Teaching method; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Curriculum; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Wolff‐Michael Roth","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kenneth Tobin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Andrea Zimmermann","is_ca":false},{"name":"Natasia Bryant","is_ca":false},{"name":"Charles G. Davis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2406407258679001,"gpt":0.5956801122643562,"spread":0.3550393863964562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006116667,0.000661565,0.000644566,0.001207482,0.008496552,0.00559357,0.001944166,0.001854689,0.004832211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01036041,0.0004759101,0.0002750213,0.0008509808,0.01137215,0.005421176,0.008051855,0.00398982,0.0004988479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002977079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001577174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005645489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01247418,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958901,0.00313738,0.0000678704,0.0003398304,0.0002247974,0.0003399474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927467,0.00479972,0.0004096089,0.0005698501,0.0003148554,0.001159351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007155874,0.0008143382,0.00576551,0.00007840191,0.000008301256,0.001070789,0.9511837,0.0002844474,0.001447975,0.02185275,0.001144501,0.01627779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003966023,0.000511573,0.009571006,0.0001934354,0.00001851838,0.0006591679,0.9312503,0.001536752,0.002015121,0.01459724,0.03956116,0.00004594744],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796703,0.0001448745,0.002878715,0.001144663,0.00002005395,0.00006020103,0.00001194041,0.00002012192,0.01604909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936296,0.000157732,0.001804637,0.0002168656,0.000005492685,0.00003928417,0.00001584871,0.00002006167,0.00411039],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008496552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03234845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086427025","doi":"10.1002/tea.20412","title":"A study of laughter in science lessons","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Laughter; Seriousness; Phenomenon; Solidarity; Dialectic; Psychology; Complicity; Science class; Boredom; Curriculum; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Science education; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Wolff‐Michael Roth","is_ca":true},{"name":"Stephen M. Ritchie","is_ca":false},{"name":"Peter Hudson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Victoria Mergard","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4781167332552305,"gpt":0.6013513138150917,"spread":0.1232345805598612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001490314,0.0003838429,0.0008109531,0.001710448,0.003387582,0.002765382,0.001014861,0.001371311,0.00342463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01516262,0.0004288913,0.0002493238,0.0006994602,0.003083226,0.001159289,0.002836116,0.002052329,0.0007363359],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001158604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000548673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001578429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003422198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978653,0.001074478,0.00007164147,0.0002253563,0.0004967651,0.0002665596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908833,0.005267406,0.001418407,0.0006382049,0.0009080207,0.0008846633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002037735,0.0004489711,0.05539419,0.0002598783,0.00003476112,0.002936737,0.8852555,0.0001011221,0.02634609,0.001427596,0.001614635,0.02597677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003383919,0.0008915614,0.2245453,0.0003187121,0.00002916069,0.004453345,0.7280062,0.0009177386,0.007490932,0.001862314,0.03134627,0.0001045868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960489,0.0001168319,0.0007254893,0.0002251942,0.00002085601,0.00003039521,0.00002250318,0.00002327359,0.00278653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969116,0.0001190562,0.0004700934,0.0001314414,0.00002024132,0.00003529249,0.00003512648,0.00002039461,0.002256956],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00342463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01145655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768667567","doi":"10.1002/tea.21430","title":"The influence of instruction, prior knowledge, and values on climate change risk perception among undergraduates","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Perception; Psychology; Risk perception; Sample (material); Knowledge level; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Osman Akşit","is_ca":false},{"name":"Karen S. McNeal","is_ca":false},{"name":"Anne Gold","is_ca":false},{"name":"Julie C. Libarkin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sara Harris","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4700033148614056,"gpt":0.5695468158969711,"spread":0.09954350103556553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001526325,0.0002123839,0.0003068545,0.0008454545,0.0005924985,0.001645293,0.0003089693,0.0004800894,0.00326773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01018894,0.000231363,0.0003156574,0.0004190704,0.0005860466,0.0004106782,0.0007129184,0.0008679859,0.0003572329],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005312752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006020083,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006570387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009136864,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988497,0.0002917376,0.00007612577,0.0001114757,0.000449657,0.0002212843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895712,0.003867852,0.002316329,0.0003668087,0.001005721,0.002871975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001103436,0.001036909,0.9888231,0.00001029093,0.0000224963,0.00005714932,0.002910518,0.0000410969,0.0007935914,0.00004227068,0.00008911351,0.00606325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003872482,0.0002782313,0.9964224,0.000007864158,0.000009201581,0.00002937062,0.00262551,0.0001917799,0.0002370475,0.00003687016,0.0001521028,0.000005692587],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997219,0.000017115,0.00001318115,0.00001895705,0.000001706291,0.000002838287,0.000007683719,8.279997e-7,0.0002158746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997721,0.00001591465,0.00002463387,0.00001159766,0.000002355779,0.00000285743,0.00001408928,5.730665e-7,0.0001558196],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006570387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01306432,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1951617065","doi":"10.1002/tea.21105","title":"“We could think of things that could be science”: Girls' re‐figuring of science in an out‐of‐school‐time club","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Club; Science education; Sociology; Sociocultural evolution; Figuring; Conversation; Media studies; Pedagogy; Psychology; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Allison J. Gonsalves","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jrène Rahm","is_ca":true},{"name":"Alice Teles de Carvalho","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3456807385697034,"gpt":0.5584848036195793,"spread":0.2128040650498759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00715731,0.0007443236,0.0008173792,0.001563498,0.01429534,0.008695871,0.001944982,0.001957087,0.005331308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008269294,0.0006193851,0.0009064642,0.0007074461,0.0120997,0.004128614,0.009559512,0.005531745,0.000870122],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002373883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002001055,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005360949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008928013,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933532,0.004306396,0.0001579527,0.000632002,0.0005487051,0.001001668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931476,0.003113603,0.0006566861,0.0003454966,0.0005410466,0.002195607],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005188638,0.0001354899,0.006453384,0.00008131289,0.00001244619,0.001587898,0.9799926,0.00004171757,0.001790958,0.00322652,0.001173776,0.005452126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001399013,0.0001347692,0.004349642,0.0001295133,0.00001497438,0.0008593947,0.9446652,0.0001564932,0.001401083,0.001210729,0.04703315,0.00003103855],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9713061,0.0002567317,0.003129248,0.002996432,0.0002230971,0.0001295877,0.0001131456,0.0001001149,0.02174552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924508,0.0001774792,0.001098476,0.0004233723,0.00003781978,0.0001001437,0.00005135231,0.0001003094,0.005560156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9857047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03785193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067451132","doi":"10.1002/tea.20139","title":"Toward a new conception of conceptions: Interplay of talk, gestures, and structures in the setting","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Gesture; Semiotics; Dialectic; Pragmatics; Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Multimodality; Interpersonal communication; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Embodied cognition; Relation (database); Discourse analysis; Meaning-making; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Communication; Computer science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Damien Givry","is_ca":false},{"name":"Wolff‐Michael Roth","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07173442565241635,"gpt":0.4516413018848394,"spread":0.3799068762324231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01148393,0.001444058,0.001531029,0.00739344,0.006105251,0.02114064,0.004198257,0.00569994,0.003351361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007677163,0.001114256,0.00165947,0.003483186,0.1014518,0.04237134,0.008693684,0.01262902,0.000607832],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008787939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005401336,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005497217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003483032,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906908,0.00597146,0.0003389218,0.00136591,0.001020157,0.0006127528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922959,0.003624103,0.0007641036,0.00133666,0.0009388584,0.001040312],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001416221,0.00001222386,0.0003771056,0.00005032995,0.000005625777,0.00006109913,0.04695134,0.0002122001,0.0002590199,0.9489844,0.0002403623,0.002832133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002006122,0.00004698025,0.0009173786,0.0001456381,0.00001878254,0.0003830807,0.03015855,0.001681041,0.0002519087,0.9371125,0.02920727,0.00005678905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1465173,0.01583963,0.5119601,0.06400907,0.001257375,0.0003007004,0.0003125261,0.0007729698,0.2590304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9164377,0.001872374,0.075285,0.001302649,0.0002817364,0.0002793669,0.0001126917,0.0002142604,0.004214206],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02114064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06376129,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905924488","doi":"10.1002/tea.21088","title":"Science identity trajectories of latecomers to science in college","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Career Development and Diversity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Persistence (discontinuity); Science education; Construct (python library); Mathematics education; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Aesthetics; Engineering; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Phoebe Jackson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Gale Seiler","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1170077268937852,"gpt":0.4724725776818442,"spread":0.355464850788059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003545521,0.0002388218,0.0005979876,0.001970071,0.004600274,0.00509732,0.001077573,0.001025784,0.0034797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01391748,0.0002627073,0.0002778468,0.000961425,0.001696746,0.002426292,0.004630652,0.00250663,0.000538308],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001609349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002055563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01084988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01382603,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985811,0.0004749406,0.00006555051,0.0001744977,0.0002946396,0.0004092836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909294,0.001863695,0.001442705,0.0004842876,0.001862492,0.003417399],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002767815,0.00052141,0.2840686,0.00007682572,0.00001388503,0.001179655,0.6644942,0.0001138118,0.003351265,0.002361186,0.001012288,0.04253009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000092285,0.0003773726,0.182558,0.00007615801,0.000006590357,0.0003066245,0.8073017,0.0003617633,0.0008739627,0.0009570345,0.007122302,0.00004934982],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985211,0.00005266856,0.0002234258,0.0002292011,0.00001204859,0.00001551603,0.00001972997,0.000006128956,0.0009201776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981084,0.00006812676,0.000192372,0.00004461424,0.000005969496,0.00001582795,0.00004924581,0.000006302074,0.001509075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02157348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966380625","doi":"10.1002/tea.20406","title":"Science student role: Evidence of social structural norms specific to school science","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Alberta Advanced Education; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Psychology; Agency (philosophy); Sociocultural evolution; Dialectic; Mathematics education; Exploratory research; Consistency (knowledge bases); Qualitative research; Structure and agency; Identity (music); Pedagogy; Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Marie‐Claire Shanahan","is_ca":true},{"name":"Martina Nieswandt","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2398278654099277,"gpt":0.6175206301682914,"spread":0.3776927647583637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01244521,0.0001530829,0.0003703156,0.001843418,0.001996048,0.003221564,0.0009686688,0.0005682698,0.003224602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06575483,0.0002740167,0.0002504488,0.001076206,0.007466595,0.001290776,0.002979231,0.0008079604,0.0001569648],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001410802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002471089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004961875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005752965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9821101,0.01069286,0.001127526,0.001758,0.00349305,0.000818341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8327549,0.1058644,0.03570477,0.01015704,0.0109253,0.004593582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002246205,0.000518298,0.7413646,0.0001373693,0.00007660411,0.0001778319,0.2293792,0.000147488,0.00161324,0.007956696,0.0002413244,0.01816264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002646883,0.000274664,0.8286479,0.00008670284,0.00002914047,0.0001880556,0.163328,0.0007530994,0.0008299099,0.003805683,0.001995372,0.0000350281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942543,0.00004272349,0.0005242337,0.0002056328,0.00000698646,0.00001985508,0.0000170505,0.000004116531,0.004925049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999751,0.00001611529,0.0001057042,0.00001333398,0.000002362123,0.00001344247,0.000009608675,0.00000204191,0.00008623858],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01244521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06581736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988371629","doi":"10.1002/tea.20266","title":"Metacognitive engagement during field‐trip experiences: A case study of students in an amusement park physics program","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Mathematics education; Amusement; Argumentative; Cognitive dissonance; Curiosity; Think aloud protocol; Science education; Cognition; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Wendy Nielsen","is_ca":true},{"name":"Samson Madera Nashon","is_ca":true},{"name":"David P. Anderson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4184811433073895,"gpt":0.6302846631503787,"spread":0.2118035198429892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002460703,0.0007994918,0.0007721669,0.001949149,0.009264493,0.003900162,0.002484196,0.002682535,0.002431271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006107036,0.0007961008,0.0006326854,0.0009815211,0.004271281,0.00211387,0.004568269,0.003055534,0.0004870995],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002100378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001899951,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006080576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02014344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974949,0.001159427,0.00009193612,0.0003628511,0.0003168152,0.0005741609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956909,0.001600396,0.0005381898,0.0002839406,0.0003913723,0.001495226],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001457529,0.002417766,0.04478825,0.0001724491,0.0000443035,0.01465072,0.9107985,0.0003905429,0.003629697,0.0006924532,0.0009882719,0.02128129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003246306,0.001247274,0.04794572,0.0001017337,0.00003185946,0.007086965,0.9210215,0.001057649,0.002831641,0.0006974231,0.01785204,0.00009386746],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983076,0.00003396939,0.0003808898,0.0002300898,0.000006455753,0.00003228838,0.00001552935,0.00001134274,0.0009819897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979292,0.00008230516,0.0007074996,0.00008835025,0.000008079082,0.00003189116,0.00002209074,0.00001035076,0.001120136],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009264493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01523936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990175035","doi":"10.1002/tea.21067","title":"New metaphors about culture: Implications for research in science teacher preparation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Sociology; Social science education; Ethnic group; Equity (law); Pedagogy; Social science; Epistemology; Psychology; Political science; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Gale Seiler","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5191058058577324,"gpt":0.6724275424104231,"spread":0.1533217365526908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04046656,0.00143314,0.002085342,0.008056754,0.01280604,0.01880965,0.005350922,0.006456463,0.006939644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04744897,0.0008197778,0.001471546,0.009351579,0.09309087,0.05124007,0.01211444,0.01507639,0.000615525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01266725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007476847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007576704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007667765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9596866,0.03645215,0.0005817388,0.0008962561,0.001292681,0.001090658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8689657,0.1174551,0.003699438,0.002925322,0.004218003,0.002736292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028262,0.00006818573,0.0004742684,0.0003824561,0.00001273071,0.0004605073,0.2057811,0.0002223481,0.00008020127,0.784564,0.001994142,0.005931774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002885635,0.00004075013,0.0006312588,0.001512445,0.00001938599,0.0003598333,0.4569764,0.0008804119,0.0001433406,0.5008282,0.03852255,0.00005651427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1583017,0.09441361,0.1045155,0.4486406,0.00757881,0.0006138479,0.0002710295,0.0001467824,0.1855181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9293176,0.02288122,0.02649432,0.01416629,0.001042044,0.001012966,0.00006223779,0.00009658204,0.004926774],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04046656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2140102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592094823","doi":"10.1002/tea.21235","title":"Experimental evidence of the superiority of the prevalence model of conceptual change over the classical models and repetition","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptual change; Repetition (rhetorical device); Cognition; Psychology; Teaching method; Mathematics education; Concept learning; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Patrice Potvin","is_ca":true},{"name":"Érik Sauriol","is_ca":true},{"name":"Martin Riopel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6733055901548778,"gpt":0.581618746847263,"spread":0.09168684330761478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01065197,0.0004997279,0.0005813465,0.0003796282,0.0005260886,0.001048057,0.001177269,0.0007161297,0.005166148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03684728,0.0006178401,0.0004153336,0.0001785316,0.001777189,0.001712339,0.001146168,0.001360577,0.0005027144],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003948594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005696779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004012279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004565124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909705,0.005036295,0.0005665967,0.001622611,0.001527345,0.0002767153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.947945,0.03797709,0.00579823,0.005812387,0.001186085,0.0012812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04618583,0.1621375,0.2117805,0.002942929,0.001109071,0.0007053247,0.04841881,0.00541867,0.2164624,0.02371214,0.002001026,0.2791258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00862774,0.2854981,0.565718,0.0003157283,0.0008835609,0.001805811,0.008061702,0.03039533,0.06212148,0.02382031,0.01231814,0.0004341286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930778,0.00007748374,0.004115857,0.00008065245,0.00002648837,0.0003945894,0.00002067765,0.00001733216,0.002189183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878611,0.0000811419,0.009848696,0.00006683971,0.00002825964,0.0008218153,0.00003830055,0.00001756087,0.00123639],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01065197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05633372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110214764","doi":"10.1002/tea.20025","title":"Impact of a school district's science reform effort on the achievement and attitudes of third‐ and fourth‐grade students","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Supervisor; Curriculum; Psychology; Science education; Student achievement; Perception; School district; Academic achievement; Pedagogy; Political science","authors":[{"name":"James A. Shymansky","is_ca":false},{"name":"Larry D. Yore","is_ca":true},{"name":"John O. Anderson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2154115090236793,"gpt":0.5773881491558533,"spread":0.3619766401321741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00167316,0.0002152255,0.0004089879,0.0007276371,0.001261675,0.001767678,0.0006434764,0.0004108648,0.003175898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004365527,0.0002369665,0.0004823973,0.0005521688,0.0007231812,0.0002747754,0.001543602,0.0009202579,0.0004793169],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001549521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002010009,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01706828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02738564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977622,0.0008737825,0.0001048561,0.0002257755,0.0005691459,0.0004641668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929569,0.001478139,0.001786676,0.0005376663,0.0008213656,0.002419238],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001052993,0.005242384,0.9579469,0.00007243011,0.0001768646,0.0001560196,0.00445486,0.0005311666,0.004897655,0.0002946294,0.000925548,0.02424841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002086567,0.001056909,0.9947926,0.000006582432,0.00003246609,0.00001569118,0.002407909,0.0001390849,0.0009195234,0.00001559086,0.0005850713,0.000007539178],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996858,0.00001356787,0.00001108491,0.00002623013,0.000002940226,0.000004247936,0.00001684506,0.000003217697,0.0002360352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995114,0.0000127915,0.0000314565,0.0000135539,0.000003119618,0.000008690063,0.00003141861,8.546834e-7,0.0003867633],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01706828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03393781,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010808139","doi":"10.1002/tea.20343","title":"Teaching about ethics through socioscientific issues in physics and chemistry: Teacher candidates' beliefs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Archetype; Subject (documents); Mathematics education; Science education; Chemistry; Teacher education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Computer science; Literature; Library science","authors":[{"name":"Sarah Elizabeth Barrett","is_ca":true},{"name":"Martina Nieswandt","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3037794294812641,"gpt":0.5836462905747329,"spread":0.2798668610934689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007744213,0.0002006664,0.0003573856,0.001163692,0.004867999,0.003955732,0.0007294105,0.001131099,0.003451906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01931731,0.0003682042,0.0002178003,0.0006432992,0.007204336,0.001722419,0.002517945,0.002165149,0.0003925682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002316605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003354312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002819138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003251171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932934,0.004424824,0.000245643,0.0002760077,0.0009741653,0.0007859691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774132,0.0140176,0.003659864,0.0006019637,0.001839299,0.002467919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008048844,0.0002327831,0.07380823,0.0001302776,0.00001015735,0.001360187,0.8991476,0.0001695886,0.002561545,0.009799619,0.0007961337,0.01190344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001506138,0.0002037512,0.01760077,0.0001487226,0.000009597607,0.0007683514,0.9655746,0.0007483569,0.001048598,0.001481251,0.01237365,0.00002732449],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936323,0.00007433781,0.001053556,0.001561819,0.00001487881,0.00001950195,0.00000462071,0.000005619777,0.003633347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989071,0.00004965632,0.0001169528,0.0000900247,0.000004981662,0.000008511512,0.000002217582,0.000002724251,0.0008178091],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007744213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04095578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112973645","doi":"10.1002/tea.20271","title":"Written extended‐response questions as classroom assessment tools for meaningful understanding of evolutionary theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Schematic; Evolutionary theory; Mathematics education; Descriptive research; Computer science; Concept learning; Psychology; Science education; Knowledge level; Epistemology; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Martina Nieswandt","is_ca":false},{"name":"Katherine Bellomo","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4041362163973832,"gpt":0.5753339453363949,"spread":0.1711977289390117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02014847,0.0006841179,0.0007860966,0.002063526,0.0007164518,0.002053069,0.001707545,0.001035701,0.009421077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1150875,0.0003899325,0.0003383379,0.001036957,0.002130606,0.003721461,0.002939908,0.001482087,0.001308387],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001223929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001008045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003707162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005303998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9759994,0.01931581,0.0009993248,0.001020023,0.001915922,0.0007495813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8345138,0.1407465,0.008219589,0.003289594,0.01128334,0.001947142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001613669,0.00467933,0.1013951,0.002804246,0.00008373858,0.002099816,0.5412709,0.00291862,0.03613491,0.007177837,0.005722356,0.2940995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005545901,0.005940702,0.1859105,0.003150284,0.0001139724,0.001769303,0.6751719,0.02454189,0.04441665,0.01593841,0.04204193,0.0004499464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817706,0.00006666746,0.01316569,0.0003668703,0.00003202967,0.0006558889,0.0001579832,0.0001011833,0.0036831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795893,0.00006674638,0.01725054,0.0001158897,0.000007594164,0.001107994,0.0001299679,0.00002938551,0.001702613],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02014847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1065566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976183541","doi":"10.1002/tea.10114","title":"Emergence, flexibility, and stabilization of language in a physics classroom","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); German; Phenomenon; Mathematics education; Science education; Teaching method; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Wolff‐Michael Roth","is_ca":true},{"name":"Reinders Duit","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2536883806218043,"gpt":0.5679914771303536,"spread":0.3143030965085493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002366372,0.000249875,0.0002825285,0.0009343619,0.001519167,0.003813351,0.0004328256,0.0006912539,0.001398967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008535037,0.0003125452,0.0001880738,0.0002856464,0.007602171,0.002264951,0.003963631,0.001427151,0.0001237167],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001188233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001175813,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009456434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001016939,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972205,0.001502196,0.0000979222,0.0003870113,0.000546778,0.000245649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994252,0.003733152,0.0009236401,0.0003763947,0.000235443,0.0004794479],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005797488,0.001628162,0.1059719,0.0002923621,0.00005697217,0.001561961,0.6186962,0.003808547,0.1181683,0.08034419,0.0008876296,0.06800402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004851669,0.003545264,0.3597934,0.0002870166,0.0001429706,0.001972973,0.3774883,0.02653511,0.06509735,0.1340311,0.03029049,0.0003309384],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967564,0.00002186924,0.0009077451,0.0001214186,0.00000191316,0.000006874968,0.000002444053,0.00001001441,0.002171335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993748,0.00001237314,0.0003750785,0.00001271034,8.703915e-7,0.00000922639,0.000003055072,0.000003688594,0.0002082993],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003813351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01251477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487557252","doi":"10.1002/tea.21153","title":"The synergistic effect of affective factors on student learning outcomes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Science Council","keywords":"Science education; Psychology; Mathematics education; Phenomenon; Environmental education; Student engagement; Identity (music); Nature of Science; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Brady Michael Jack","is_ca":false},{"name":"Huann‐shyang Lin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Larry D. Yore","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02417867988641118,"gpt":0.4265226025004368,"spread":0.4023439226140256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002297935,0.0002396201,0.0003883516,0.0006585132,0.0005002441,0.00201338,0.0003214332,0.0003569494,0.004523656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01272094,0.00009220159,0.0004705761,0.0004810347,0.0003459301,0.0005126193,0.001407135,0.00074529,0.0004485184],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003574559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005959305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001375052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002302724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978591,0.0008849303,0.0001430313,0.0002236271,0.0005948134,0.000294606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855422,0.007946681,0.002258047,0.0006561592,0.001117783,0.002479128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005461005,0.001483101,0.9452736,0.00008115665,0.0003224587,0.0001121983,0.0008519928,0.0006934481,0.002259454,0.0002641255,0.0002438923,0.04786853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007853468,0.0003618532,0.9970854,0.00001380909,0.00006929725,0.00002762244,0.0005681922,0.0006660513,0.0006315376,0.0002300267,0.000328431,0.000009965827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976421,0.00008020255,0.0003035864,0.00007701125,0.000007773492,0.00001269182,0.00005285576,0.00000995862,0.001813937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994414,0.00002804501,0.0001243101,0.00001209259,0.000005081907,0.00000770615,0.00004435806,0.00000235728,0.0003345614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004523656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01513314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091134906","doi":"10.1002/tea.20160","title":"Proliferation of inscriptions and transformations among preservice science teachers engaged in authentic science","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Science education; Psychology; Observational study; Nature of Science; Pedagogy; Chemistry; Sociology; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Eddie Lunsford","is_ca":false},{"name":"Claudia T. Melear","is_ca":false},{"name":"Wolff‐Michael Roth","is_ca":true},{"name":"Matthew Perkins Coppola","is_ca":false},{"name":"Leslie G. Hickok","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1898448581960635,"gpt":0.5316515786277104,"spread":0.3418067204316469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004154066,0.0002646493,0.0004209914,0.002026327,0.002359369,0.004637123,0.001167711,0.001212607,0.002684977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02489058,0.0006675826,0.0002975556,0.000638511,0.004028736,0.001624239,0.004267675,0.001994441,0.0004203876],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009612197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00125036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001843337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00295263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958048,0.001774409,0.0002454498,0.0005446003,0.001287582,0.0003430762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780273,0.009542544,0.006102142,0.002467137,0.002166094,0.001694811],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000176826,0.000565013,0.1910487,0.0001405359,0.00002596947,0.001135238,0.7365394,0.0001295882,0.01955287,0.001674488,0.0004902434,0.04852123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004496318,0.0007811571,0.2493418,0.0002259086,0.00004079928,0.002411742,0.7168056,0.001135564,0.006913584,0.002558478,0.01963584,0.0001045708],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983643,0.00006799906,0.0004032061,0.00008119406,0.000004003462,0.00001101225,0.000004613761,0.00000862821,0.001054901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978763,0.0001063746,0.0005823871,0.00002879139,0.000004558928,0.00001394001,0.00001952732,0.000007379996,0.001360884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004637123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02196908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163486026","doi":"10.1002/tea.21695","title":"“Anybody can do science if they're brave enough”: Understanding the role of science capital in science majors' identity trajectories into and through postsecondary science","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Career Development and Diversity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Identity (music); Outreach; Science communication; Science, technology, society and environment education; Social science education; Sociology; Outline of social science; Capital (architecture); Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Allison J. Gonsalves","is_ca":true},{"name":"Alexandre Cavalcante","is_ca":true},{"name":"Emily Diane Sprowls","is_ca":true},{"name":"Hailey Iacono","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07774665484752874,"gpt":0.4145097926961916,"spread":0.3367631378486629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005840739,0.0002780458,0.0003305029,0.001156407,0.00686848,0.007972287,0.001221149,0.001008031,0.003554216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01046898,0.0002612536,0.0002814863,0.0008393211,0.01085915,0.007330258,0.008040069,0.002864864,0.0003514572],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003725048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004966025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009579691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01716054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996979,0.001565501,0.00007041526,0.0002655529,0.0004651522,0.0006544419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925729,0.002718298,0.001441875,0.0004248935,0.0006174847,0.002224453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007402024,0.0001626654,0.05007639,0.0000620026,0.00001351693,0.0004124384,0.9119681,0.0001126958,0.001056823,0.01610469,0.001167567,0.01878915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005799968,0.00007982136,0.02703462,0.00008171684,0.000008316743,0.0001615742,0.9511949,0.0003357245,0.0005330239,0.006252612,0.0142853,0.00002667695],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991787,0.0001559365,0.001013578,0.001662324,0.00002054945,0.00001114148,0.00001875431,0.000007104639,0.00532357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988509,0.0001141679,0.0002081988,0.0001372557,0.000004168714,0.000009749891,0.00001833243,0.000004529829,0.0006527092],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9931315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03088909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280642105","doi":"10.1002/tea.21778","title":"Gender representation and academic achievement among <scp>STEM‐interested</scp> students in college <scp>STEM</scp> courses","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Career Development and Diversity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Raikes Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Representation (politics); Mathematics education; Psychology; Academic achievement; Gender gap; Women in science; Mathematics; Sociology; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas A. Bowman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Christine Logel","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jennifer LaCosse","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lindsay Jarratt","is_ca":false},{"name":"Elizabeth A. Canning","is_ca":false},{"name":"Katherine T. U. Emerson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mary C. Murphy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1934201498925908,"gpt":0.4656698606519581,"spread":0.2722497107593673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007449538,0.0001185102,0.0002205683,0.0008902691,0.0007160679,0.0009442641,0.0002635872,0.0002620888,0.002736279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003660793,0.0001072452,0.0001766515,0.0005786825,0.0005051481,0.0005933337,0.00103001,0.0004296112,0.0004456369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002987945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000371534,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00518537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01016887,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995591,0.00009562521,0.00002879273,0.00007346355,0.0001104437,0.0001325475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980495,0.0003193073,0.0007429116,0.00006626268,0.0001481433,0.0006739483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004740199,0.00006899797,0.9945968,0.00000437029,0.00001278076,0.00003692041,0.001348179,0.00002079956,0.0002429359,0.000108871,0.0001448252,0.003367025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002215655,0.00007192754,0.9965917,0.000005915997,0.000004459097,0.00007838309,0.002732053,0.0001029952,0.00008261198,0.00008151905,0.0002430483,0.000003076068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995474,0.00002830527,0.00001629559,0.00003745086,0.000002646399,0.00000147389,0.0000248394,7.358442e-7,0.0003408926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997116,0.00001962636,0.000006847226,0.00001541677,0.00000383828,0.000001266394,0.00002540327,7.559838e-7,0.0002152013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00518537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01031035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018277211","doi":"10.1002/tea.10030","title":"Structural characteristics of university engineering students' conceptions of energy*","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Paragraph; Mathematics education; Energy (signal processing); Curriculum; Psychology; Science education; Pedagogy; Mathematics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Xiufeng Liu","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jazlin Ebenezer","is_ca":true},{"name":"Duncan M. Fraser","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1868312501713779,"gpt":0.4896802766956428,"spread":0.3028490265242649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004594444,0.0002448467,0.0003132423,0.002291244,0.0008654997,0.004379198,0.0006441274,0.0007351608,0.002013564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02680607,0.0003059384,0.0003562305,0.001255629,0.002678516,0.001920359,0.002160398,0.001324774,0.0002187237],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00114883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000836722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006097665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005293246,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963517,0.001895434,0.0002828025,0.0002473597,0.0009880404,0.000234613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752815,0.01592862,0.003927399,0.001154491,0.002645076,0.001062881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002513335,0.0002304592,0.225872,0.0002877957,0.00006855662,0.0005134392,0.7002063,0.001146587,0.01136331,0.01898677,0.0006366949,0.04043674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005541408,0.000502425,0.194792,0.0003540418,0.00006010239,0.001200926,0.750856,0.005876,0.005822907,0.02053557,0.01976445,0.0001802694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948214,0.00006529487,0.002458026,0.0001659651,0.000004494721,0.00001738692,0.00002516362,0.00001332513,0.002428862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991269,0.0000387838,0.0004096122,0.00001424882,0.00000149586,0.0000156538,0.00002950113,0.000004227283,0.0003595851],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004594444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02429801,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989412404","doi":"10.1002/tea.20259","title":"Representations of scientists in Canadian high school and college textbooks","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Perceptions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Mathematics education; Semiotics; Sample (material); Sociology; Domain (mathematical analysis); Psychology; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Chemistry; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Michiel van Eijck","is_ca":false},{"name":"Wolff‐Michael Roth","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2033052818111842,"gpt":0.5371441528203745,"spread":0.3338388710091903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002831744,0.0003270476,0.0004172149,0.007417036,0.004322533,0.005699642,0.001215101,0.0009032544,0.002970493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02114753,0.0002296378,0.000204742,0.007523342,0.005658575,0.001238267,0.00293734,0.0009552175,0.0001579443],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01829685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01673251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.712844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7601009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971583,0.0004991809,0.0001418675,0.0002251412,0.001630003,0.0003456482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987336,0.004399007,0.00268176,0.0005062915,0.003693272,0.001383635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001110513,0.00007208269,0.1863015,0.0002482033,0.00003068661,0.0006044453,0.7612544,0.0002273249,0.003785303,0.006916748,0.002098787,0.03834959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002361271,0.00008459287,0.3684031,0.0002473954,0.00004339817,0.0004534319,0.5723743,0.0005794153,0.001135486,0.001730936,0.0548222,0.0001022222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906752,0.0002747467,0.0002411746,0.0002934903,0.00001095325,0.00002635598,0.0001471723,0.000009992322,0.008321061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975458,0.0003027906,0.0002431464,0.00006307073,0.000004407304,0.000009376226,0.0001622636,0.000005087751,0.001664146],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5776943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324169338","doi":"10.1002/tea.21318","title":"Visualizing biological data in museums: Visitor learning with an interactive tree of life exhibit","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Animal and Plant Science Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Visitor pattern; Gesture; Tree (set theory); Visualization; Baseline (sea); Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Michael Horn","is_ca":true},{"name":"Brenda Phillips","is_ca":false},{"name":"E. Margaret Evans","is_ca":false},{"name":"Florian Block","is_ca":false},{"name":"Judy Diamond","is_ca":false},{"name":"Chia Shen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2970235394814559,"gpt":0.5375220269685731,"spread":0.2404984874871172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002463186,0.0005582282,0.0004177797,0.0006353826,0.0008644357,0.002629537,0.001257335,0.0008250456,0.005009277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007461866,0.0003243601,0.0007444663,0.0003888651,0.0009648734,0.001591623,0.003465523,0.0007890392,0.0007932959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004649635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004539862,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001035987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002836375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977863,0.00145424,0.00005871245,0.00023214,0.000200753,0.0002677783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946733,0.002943503,0.0006782089,0.0004598993,0.0001934315,0.001051641],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001116917,0.004538334,0.5055339,0.001127379,0.0003686787,0.003511857,0.2704387,0.002749964,0.02506728,0.001506323,0.00703111,0.1770095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002622097,0.009110767,0.5272443,0.000670814,0.0004043696,0.005139118,0.3668649,0.01170394,0.01120956,0.003307072,0.06375385,0.0003290338],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949831,0.00008153678,0.00224248,0.0001255539,0.000004815786,0.00005102232,0.00005901524,0.00009650402,0.002355892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892742,0.0001594292,0.009043369,0.00006998351,0.00001115344,0.0001050323,0.0001447245,0.0000231439,0.00116894],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005009277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01675767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122607195","doi":"10.1002/tea.20422","title":"Cultural diversity in science education through <i>Novelization</i>: Against the <i>Epicization</i> of science and cultural centralization","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Sociology; Science education; Unitary state; Cultural diversity; Face (sociological concept); Globalization; Epistemology; Social science; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Psychology; Anthropology; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Michiel van Eijck","is_ca":false},{"name":"Wolff‐Michael Roth","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2730437705535902,"gpt":0.5127122237696398,"spread":0.2396684532160496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01369609,0.0005319362,0.0004584285,0.001446634,0.01060636,0.01329779,0.001322355,0.002035303,0.003294383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106818,0.0003103083,0.0004817188,0.0009526699,0.06122157,0.01272321,0.01403602,0.004580228,0.0002653717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003717807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002887193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008538959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001156147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.990575,0.007533611,0.0001892375,0.0004659304,0.0007341434,0.0005020219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872217,0.008342521,0.001369472,0.001720219,0.0007491321,0.0005969421],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005703487,0.00007955469,0.001161048,0.0001434024,0.00001056342,0.0003930414,0.4100769,0.0003324304,0.001060479,0.5709355,0.002057066,0.01369301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005910837,0.0001488492,0.001668972,0.0005521528,0.00003445056,0.001488346,0.3552495,0.001859592,0.003746916,0.4191224,0.2159965,0.00007316751],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5533533,0.003204289,0.05212084,0.04597373,0.0008619367,0.0001603708,0.00003328592,0.0001820589,0.3441102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921136,0.0003737761,0.003295286,0.0006828483,0.00007030986,0.00003635423,0.000006743431,0.00002968621,0.003391465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01369609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0724327,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030525854","doi":"10.1002/tea.20332","title":"Scientific literacy and contexts in PISA 2006 science","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Assessment and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Government of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Science education; Popular science; Literacy; Library science; Citation; Mathematics education; Sociology; Computer science; Pedagogy; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Rodger W. Bybee","is_ca":false},{"name":"Peter J. Fensham","is_ca":false},{"name":"Robert Laurie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1456606794854489,"gpt":0.5959413946273923,"spread":0.4502807151419433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003976324,0.0001444969,0.0003434347,0.002904381,0.005276681,0.006872377,0.0004657377,0.0008466443,0.004856657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01815593,0.0002483136,0.0002011953,0.003111118,0.00392827,0.004028781,0.01002234,0.002799159,0.000418654],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004553515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004621906,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008679932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01887366,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968439,0.001346684,0.0001868057,0.000336298,0.0006506564,0.0006356521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884784,0.004484835,0.002570144,0.0003531043,0.001514688,0.002598962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001797992,0.001070726,0.4678202,0.0001766768,0.00002396714,0.001152239,0.419413,0.0002489489,0.000909085,0.02861227,0.004217862,0.07617521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000132563,0.0001831682,0.6648054,0.0001803157,0.00001038232,0.000389875,0.2927641,0.000311655,0.0005536149,0.007062731,0.03368009,0.00004535481],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.955028,0.0002325673,0.0002023889,0.003279976,0.00002446906,0.00003022739,0.00009371795,0.00001207809,0.04109658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974958,0.0001243575,0.00009964745,0.0002011333,0.00001204945,0.00004314156,0.00006966777,0.00000457063,0.001949495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008679932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0330382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988888717","doi":"10.1002/tea.20245","title":"The writing on the wall: Classroom context, curriculum implementation, and student learning in integrated, community‐based science projects","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Diverse Educational Innovations Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Framing (construction); Discipline; Mathematics education; Context (archaeology); Pedagogy; Integrated curriculum; Science education; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Grady Venville","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rachel Sheffield","is_ca":false},{"name":"Léonie J. Rennie","is_ca":false},{"name":"John Wallace","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1745288448804819,"gpt":0.4777921908135513,"spread":0.3032633459330694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006392635,0.0002889991,0.0004664635,0.0006496509,0.002162806,0.006046777,0.001106636,0.000846924,0.003384378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0375084,0.0003471892,0.000246608,0.0005147461,0.001999159,0.00152657,0.004091212,0.001932884,0.0003799449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001117249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001955806,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009178804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001956296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914487,0.005921918,0.0002605665,0.0006465213,0.00113663,0.0005855621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794443,0.01083865,0.003935476,0.00126931,0.001354014,0.003158262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001109516,0.02359087,0.3843784,0.0005529484,0.0002433629,0.001829161,0.2028631,0.004403634,0.02102832,0.009550534,0.003807369,0.3466429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003157731,0.006586174,0.7081591,0.0005244224,0.0002083437,0.0006702602,0.2312397,0.00643339,0.01391208,0.01155907,0.02019391,0.000197824],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972818,0.00002844497,0.0005298326,0.0000963586,0.000006360032,0.00002764153,0.000003299302,0.000009354198,0.002017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984358,0.0000299066,0.0007829807,0.0000291542,0.000004048568,0.00003341496,0.000009371759,0.000005561385,0.0006697604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006392635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03380793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895256255","doi":"10.1002/tea.21467","title":"Individual and collective agencies in China's curriculum reform: A case of physics teachers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Agency (philosophy); Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Context (archaeology); Negotiation; Professional development; Sociology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Guopeng Fu","is_ca":true},{"name":"Anthony Clarke","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2382011090146312,"gpt":0.5218439405786254,"spread":0.2836428315639942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005348259,0.0003623494,0.0005577028,0.001770773,0.02376982,0.004711676,0.001622548,0.003110096,0.003123373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006665903,0.0005329283,0.0004950921,0.001835525,0.01500179,0.003210029,0.006478904,0.003216298,0.000252031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01722751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01233937,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.107183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1366789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923083,0.004028285,0.000217842,0.0005600986,0.00082745,0.002057965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959038,0.0014787,0.0006644174,0.0003491419,0.0002888271,0.001315198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003834964,0.0001921181,0.01913904,0.00005432244,0.00001188442,0.007828861,0.9435943,0.0004973921,0.000884299,0.01709882,0.001205268,0.009455376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000310226,0.0000763256,0.01421076,0.00005661979,0.00001993626,0.0006277049,0.9469255,0.00136472,0.0005135797,0.002173583,0.03396833,0.00003204108],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.98772,0.00008554901,0.0007790407,0.002736139,0.00001955861,0.00004920244,0.000007383128,0.00001323885,0.008589892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997024,0.00004960021,0.0002868698,0.000119648,0.000008224223,0.00002283204,0.000004459815,0.000004428714,0.002480028],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.107183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2131183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526461237","doi":"10.1002/tea.21141","title":"Reframing research on informal teaching and learning in science: Comments and commentary at the heart of a new vision for the field","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Cognitive reframing; Sociology; Science education; Epistemology; Grounded theory; Learning sciences; Learning theory; Field (mathematics); Pedagogy; Diversity (politics); Educational research; Experiential learning; Psychology; Social science; Qualitative research; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Jrène Rahm","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2089336004512339,"gpt":0.6004201044970175,"spread":0.3914865040457837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05977199,0.002039089,0.00215048,0.003078744,0.02016253,0.01463581,0.009335428,0.04102994,0.002748759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2393811,0.0009855748,0.002418515,0.003386563,0.03632006,0.01872439,0.01159049,0.06710743,0.001321949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02393726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02408078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02598815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03033457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9159224,0.0553031,0.004677297,0.004639391,0.01469132,0.004766429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5844483,0.3432608,0.009884725,0.004983179,0.04864152,0.00878158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001146145,0.00003738848,0.0002248737,0.001404193,0.00003637247,0.002638147,0.2122826,0.0001737417,0.0008587837,0.02400914,0.7465019,0.01171828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002496952,0.00004498626,0.0003633759,0.003805838,0.00003542142,0.0008156131,0.1343317,0.0003326635,0.0004633982,0.01151703,0.8481064,0.0001585373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001567981,0.00391866,0.0006966816,0.9417644,0.05052245,0.00003581436,0.00002635666,0.00003556132,0.001432043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04786503,0.006237852,0.002214856,0.8707595,0.06595477,0.0004193627,0.00004436558,0.0003257383,0.00617862],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.940228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3161083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147458616","doi":"10.1002/tea.20352","title":"To be or not to be? Discursive resources for (Dis‐)identifying with science‐related careers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Performative utterance; Science education; Discourse analysis; Pedagogy; Sociology; Discursive psychology; Psychology; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Pei‐Ling Hsu","is_ca":true},{"name":"Wolff‐Michael Roth","is_ca":true},{"name":"Anne Marshall","is_ca":true},{"name":"Francis Guenette","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1686942795964126,"gpt":0.4646931946023418,"spread":0.2959989150059292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02408052,0.0006965711,0.0004652117,0.00495899,0.01233098,0.009644226,0.00189231,0.002310495,0.002715412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05736159,0.0005527217,0.0004589368,0.002129345,0.02307916,0.009832761,0.008092888,0.003310792,0.0004946176],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004047789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004814107,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003153918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003818637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9708284,0.0246909,0.0007458922,0.0007380348,0.001978438,0.001018296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9416792,0.04370804,0.005608337,0.002872371,0.003955294,0.002176787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003890183,0.00002487847,0.003982562,0.00009578327,0.000005625926,0.0003587164,0.9478754,0.00005661722,0.001022588,0.0377549,0.0006434864,0.008140604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006701502,0.00001910369,0.002050624,0.0002874273,0.000009331394,0.0003012833,0.9607891,0.000507843,0.0007204776,0.01502587,0.02025899,0.00002335661],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8768998,0.001581834,0.0258023,0.02076896,0.0002151025,0.0001322508,0.00007508064,0.00009091916,0.0744338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952241,0.0002748273,0.002869049,0.0002201953,0.0000237308,0.00004371493,0.00002427975,0.00002860406,0.001291632],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9876691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1273515,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897423990","doi":"10.1002/tea.21523","title":"Evaluating the effects of analogy enriched text on the learning of science: The importance of learning indexes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Education and Early Childhood Development","funders":"Sixth Framework Programme; European Commission","keywords":"Analogy; Conceptual change; Reading (process); Concept learning; Psychology; Test (biology); Mathematics education; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Stella Vosniadou","is_ca":false},{"name":"Irini Skopeliti","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2132627396254807,"gpt":0.5610157559815953,"spread":0.3477530163561146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004230818,0.0006042401,0.0007522434,0.0008842128,0.0002464905,0.001342922,0.0005576488,0.000656208,0.003234075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0537829,0.0002412317,0.0005303583,0.0005383265,0.00065268,0.001534998,0.001237182,0.000780073,0.0002566162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003734635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001869363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002999436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957374,0.002041088,0.0005801206,0.0004083025,0.001095476,0.0001375414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8850041,0.1003996,0.007835434,0.002507331,0.002496461,0.001757028],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.05751979,0.03564311,0.1433417,0.005194696,0.001009979,0.0008422782,0.01366594,0.005068313,0.2242873,0.001756763,0.0006506729,0.5110195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002369044,0.08731827,0.7152547,0.0004622346,0.002169118,0.0003984366,0.00334973,0.0102677,0.1712471,0.003450018,0.003499562,0.0002142109],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978047,0.00008092776,0.0008807958,0.00002227361,0.00001180842,0.0001219296,0.00002142916,0.0000198858,0.001036287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940481,0.0001102353,0.005047179,0.00002261465,0.00001861082,0.0002480877,0.00004718646,0.00001257541,0.0004452837],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004230818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02237493,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328888181","doi":"10.1002/tea.21319","title":"Exemplification in science instruction: Teaching and learning through examples","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Exemplification; Argumentation theory; Scientific literacy; Mathematics education; Conceptual change; Science education; Concept learning; Psychology; Generalization; Reading (process); Nature of Science; Computer science; Pedagogy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Alandeom W. Oliveira","is_ca":false},{"name":"Adam O. Brown","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1883873598368767,"gpt":0.515397402302112,"spread":0.3270100424652353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004282731,0.0003962007,0.0003617285,0.0008812395,0.001089601,0.002840498,0.001389122,0.001348755,0.002493131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02248489,0.0002765903,0.0003351315,0.0006296461,0.003711551,0.003463478,0.003709985,0.001461623,0.0004179312],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000672264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008908751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004103649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006726339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994325,0.004310722,0.0001256074,0.0003125294,0.0007287666,0.0001973668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863955,0.01113642,0.0008590891,0.0008815909,0.0003651328,0.0003622762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000412978,0.001732253,0.02164842,0.002089836,0.00006730349,0.00238148,0.2101824,0.00423115,0.02417395,0.09053809,0.004012579,0.6385295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000307806,0.003853837,0.06050302,0.006522345,0.0002462611,0.01481635,0.1885314,0.02472496,0.05782231,0.3311659,0.3111171,0.0003887555],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8339667,0.004137578,0.108476,0.002755656,0.0001202108,0.000342665,0.00004098483,0.0002119886,0.04994817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9074461,0.002109983,0.08708911,0.0002059405,0.00003734443,0.0001941874,0.00004367506,0.00004260916,0.00283104],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004282731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02264953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096609684","doi":"10.1002/tea.21158","title":"Science language<i>Wanted Alive</i>: Through the dialectical/dialogical lens of Vygotsky and the Bakhtin circle","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Sociocultural evolution; Dialectic; Epistemology; Relation (database); Framing (construction); Sociology; Premise; Science education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Wolff‐Michael Roth","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1487915842090199,"gpt":0.5328279719277582,"spread":0.3840363877187383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00827479,0.0005687249,0.0005409592,0.002412415,0.00847147,0.01286854,0.001408057,0.003708829,0.002626805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006381792,0.0003508558,0.0004949737,0.00146813,0.05935133,0.01305846,0.006890046,0.006699242,0.0003989063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008685185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005612476,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004093979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002486647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906424,0.007828539,0.0001435672,0.0005818345,0.0004958871,0.0003078016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992343,0.00594312,0.0004803459,0.0004626653,0.0004149069,0.0003558912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009141194,0.00001102965,0.0001027498,0.00003165151,0.0000025034,0.00005108482,0.031418,0.0001410312,0.0001405959,0.9658163,0.0005928079,0.00168304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001858374,0.000021257,0.0002698898,0.0001867945,0.000007392452,0.0001085534,0.03601842,0.001298742,0.0003951917,0.9043273,0.05732678,0.0000211462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1502349,0.02281174,0.1815357,0.1539659,0.001486594,0.0002309023,0.000150061,0.0003373704,0.4892468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839531,0.001327046,0.009199666,0.001279871,0.0001347366,0.000145734,0.00001424854,0.00005385301,0.00389175],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9915285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06301576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768850143","doi":"10.1002/tea.21425","title":"The contribution of science‐rich resources to public science interest","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"TheMuseum","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Psychology; Diversity (politics); Metropolitan area; Demographics; Perception; Cognition; Social psychology; Demography; Sociology; Geography; Mathematics education","authors":[{"name":"John H. Falk","is_ca":false},{"name":"Scott Pattison","is_ca":false},{"name":"David D. Meier","is_ca":false},{"name":"David Bibas","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kathleen Livingston","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7513706013868204,"gpt":0.6362287240479799,"spread":0.1151418773388405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001148799,0.000169678,0.0001932128,0.0008123473,0.0005801547,0.001589222,0.0004605605,0.0004210401,0.006030757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0118475,0.0001935351,0.0003910169,0.0008198489,0.0007767788,0.0007655994,0.001641506,0.0008476077,0.0002652485],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006082089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000777129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007626015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01131908,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990024,0.0004529782,0.00005756961,0.000138392,0.0001830534,0.0001656809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785769,0.01112194,0.005926301,0.001117569,0.0009683429,0.002288854],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003363382,0.0001373467,0.9954934,0.00001134724,0.00003360887,0.00006088266,0.0005940293,0.00006871363,0.00009743709,0.0003871325,0.00009745494,0.002984908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002754615,0.00003241246,0.997551,0.00001200392,0.00002321089,0.00007798507,0.001234324,0.000236176,0.00009511673,0.0002223657,0.0005092191,0.000003365829],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967801,0.00009087494,0.00009236942,0.0001900496,0.000003015721,0.000008466772,0.0001170079,0.000003078745,0.002715195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995988,0.00004728056,0.00006775837,0.0000147395,0.000004332387,0.000003890388,0.00005255672,0.000001101724,0.0002095939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007626015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02017492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973562194","doi":"10.1002/tea.20275","title":"Natural pedagogical conversations in high school students' internship","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Internship; Conversation; Natural (archaeology); Psychology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Science education; Medical education; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Pei‐Ling Hsu","is_ca":true},{"name":"Wolff‐Michael Roth","is_ca":true},{"name":"Asit Mazumder","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3304474416214984,"gpt":0.6241920804576232,"spread":0.2937446388361248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004986711,0.000423425,0.000518986,0.001606884,0.004281241,0.00395471,0.001389417,0.001792356,0.003425027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01726861,0.0004893871,0.0002918872,0.0007348729,0.002999755,0.001621969,0.007065434,0.00223568,0.0006620664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001435913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008819783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001458236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002524326,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941765,0.003905477,0.0002183044,0.0005198521,0.0006160078,0.0005638083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796888,0.0132053,0.002266979,0.0008718382,0.000942262,0.003024802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003823569,0.0007331782,0.1135049,0.000189849,0.00004792311,0.001238426,0.8452519,0.0003333712,0.007055224,0.002300475,0.001148759,0.02781369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003556152,0.0005550807,0.1294453,0.0001430933,0.00003272701,0.0007310018,0.8378749,0.001652339,0.003350928,0.001920033,0.02416028,0.00009889746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974352,0.00005957632,0.0007093818,0.0001314058,0.0000102609,0.00002052004,0.00002220757,0.00002581795,0.001585752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990242,0.00003471539,0.0003839975,0.00005392034,0.000007737426,0.00002946512,0.00002697078,0.000009434653,0.000429608],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004986711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02637261,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148398013","doi":"10.1002/tea.21078","title":"Interpreting Student Views of Learning Experiences in a Contextualized Science Discourse in Kenya","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Kenya; Pedagogy; Science education; Mathematics education; Kali; Sociology; Nature of Science; Psychology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Samson Madera Nashon","is_ca":true},{"name":"David P. Anderson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2354410166032056,"gpt":0.6104382556159458,"spread":0.3749972390127402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005010572,0.0005702875,0.0005988126,0.001732315,0.009887723,0.005747644,0.0009191915,0.002000659,0.002671603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005831133,0.0005021608,0.0002308921,0.001824204,0.0116281,0.004336144,0.004631399,0.002511127,0.0003393282],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005089097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003272748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01126826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02208857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963613,0.002371312,0.000165857,0.0002278441,0.0003832342,0.0004904242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955017,0.003105182,0.0006407373,0.0001240892,0.0003109805,0.0003174169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000158979,0.00001746148,0.001929309,0.00003870469,0.00000204934,0.00051897,0.9943359,0.0000313519,0.0009704608,0.0009359968,0.00008243931,0.001121319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002576694,0.00002121069,0.001697189,0.00008612156,0.000003566257,0.0001513148,0.9930321,0.00006780019,0.0004134683,0.0002665863,0.004246393,0.00001165455],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941327,0.0002516858,0.0003590081,0.0007390538,0.00001403072,0.00002840864,0.00002126301,0.000003910524,0.004449968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984837,0.0003038445,0.0001864776,0.0001129931,0.000004208028,0.00002111953,0.00001199039,0.00000479224,0.0008708804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01126826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03692418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}