{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":18,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"ed6a2ec13713","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty"}},"results":[{"id":"W2054922874","doi":"10.1007/s11166-014-9186-z","title":"Take-up for genetic tests and ambiguity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Pennsylvania State University","keywords":"Ambiguity; Ambiguity aversion; Affect (linguistics); Economics; Test (biology); Value (mathematics); Expected utility hypothesis; Decision maker; Private information retrieval; Subjective expected utility; Ex-ante; Value of information; Outcome (game theory); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Biology; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07214745918230582,"gpt":0.3764352568517761,"spread":0.3042877976694703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003257637,0.0001038709,0.0003523099,0.000156335,0.0001728492,0.0002703386,0.0002637968,0.00006912475,0.00002671586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004539144,0.00006459209,0.000119151,0.0001056954,0.00009921305,0.0001563554,0.00005474954,0.0001478448,0.000005995033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001850155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004400346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003827688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008817426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985399,0.0001043553,0.0006632027,0.0002060845,0.0003343371,0.0001521517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964029,0.00219483,0.0006420643,0.0002016631,0.0003767127,0.0001817941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000895904,0.00001995409,0.0388983,0.000001416719,0.000004921673,0.000001900735,0.00015931,0.0003199539,0.00003420979,0.00008876369,0.003690839,0.9566908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001729295,0.0007386902,0.3676383,0.00003946892,0.00008666306,0.0001856778,0.000511982,0.01184735,0.00004067652,0.4471436,0.1698323,0.0002059376],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884865,0.0003451747,0.01012411,0.000264423,0.0006067721,0.00005793073,0.00001926352,0.000003900728,0.00009189318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922771,0.0002444461,0.006983374,0.0001421682,0.0002255388,8.257349e-7,2.381492e-7,0.00000615491,0.0001201415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9564849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5434107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992351052","doi":"10.1007/s11166-007-9023-8","title":"Predicted risk perception and risk-taking behavior: The case of impaired driving","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Risk perception; Perception; License; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0157210387467877,"gpt":0.3128706902129574,"spread":0.2971496514661697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004573967,0.00009646572,0.0001876275,0.0001322664,0.0008828072,0.00007185419,0.0001100195,0.0000805366,0.00009685973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007653189,0.00006297089,0.0001022022,0.0001731938,0.0003190991,0.0001932425,0.00004140954,0.0003418179,5.456251e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008378756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004200281,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0190043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02472146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985354,0.0004357815,0.0004281715,0.0001140668,0.0002811149,0.000205485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977624,0.000309096,0.001489764,0.0001032505,0.0001828052,0.0001526478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006520031,0.00005589048,0.5611502,0.000004745265,0.00003853344,0.000067377,0.03881561,0.0001194359,0.00006165528,0.0001900394,0.0002867728,0.3991445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005548364,0.0001318972,0.9118751,0.00003176061,0.0003528012,0.000108721,0.08211577,0.0005622299,0.000002993707,0.0003990113,0.003782997,0.00008182695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965672,0.0002318259,0.002192926,0.0001016254,0.0002182812,0.0001714609,0.00001493255,0.00001346732,0.0004882889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829282,0.01621969,0.00050438,0.00001718858,0.0002674279,0.000001213832,5.884664e-7,0.000005931153,0.00005537607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3990627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998069918","doi":"10.1007/s11166-009-9077-x","title":"Dirty money: Is there a wage premium for working in a pollution intensive industry?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensating differential; Wage; Economics; Value (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Labour economics; Differential (mechanical device); Work (physics); Risk premium; Efficiency wage; Wage share; Monetary economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05861902698601548,"gpt":0.233302596794906,"spread":0.1746835698088905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006022884,0.00008664092,0.0002677187,0.000125323,0.00005321929,0.0000279676,0.00006544821,0.0001309784,0.00004678497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001252688,0.00007950137,0.00008959225,0.00006157636,0.00002350519,0.0001653166,0.00001112506,0.0002657547,0.000004486199],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001675461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001070047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001089861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002575588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992231,0.00001319617,0.0004761775,0.0001310187,0.00002117368,0.0001352969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992639,0.00004100227,0.0005524938,0.00007054079,0.00002026476,0.00005175495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001984502,0.00008190073,0.9451017,0.000005223804,0.00004314018,0.000003012055,0.002760808,0.003736284,0.00002864518,0.005330236,0.001145043,0.04156557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00147072,0.0002276101,0.9279194,0.00005768467,0.00001433279,0.000009534157,0.001169991,0.00575286,0.00003675969,0.05778762,0.005423747,0.0001296994],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939526,0.002665143,0.001260726,0.001281317,0.0001298207,0.0001114085,0.00003192576,0.000002396402,0.0005646553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973139,0.001555811,0.0003735016,0.0005435583,0.0001173693,0.000001980038,0.000002094232,0.000005638988,0.0000861571],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05245738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3241972,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985070728","doi":"10.1007/s11166-010-9106-9","title":"Demand for health risk reductions: A cross-national comparison between the U.S. and Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Canada; University of Oregon; University of Alberta; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Preference; Marital status; Marginal utility; Demography; Economics; Perception; Demographic economics; Time preference; Revealed preference; Psychology; Socioeconomics; Econometrics; Sociology; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05145814475945512,"gpt":0.2785779358409071,"spread":0.2271197910814519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00155766,0.00006452392,0.0002234876,0.00004288613,0.0003354559,0.0000512173,0.000066097,0.00003772388,0.00002222912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002201114,0.00005154884,0.00004273151,0.00002312037,0.00008442453,0.0001157163,0.00001429294,0.0002366617,0.000001040231],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001074412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009511833,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06672453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07087146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999218,0.00001865079,0.000515842,0.0001070311,0.00003734959,0.0001031648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874,0.0002179163,0.0008763941,0.00005924385,0.0000288797,0.00007754654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001433198,0.00001275283,0.9886035,0.000004564306,0.0000370838,3.725488e-8,0.0002133123,0.00150611,5.599502e-7,0.00215841,0.002810339,0.004638958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000572553,0.00007132175,0.9357126,0.000003407167,0.00001224871,0.0000080765,0.0001448346,0.002301334,0.000003096919,0.02292186,0.03818792,0.00006078052],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946343,0.001401362,0.00161042,0.001485766,0.0003164033,0.0000967774,0.0003732493,0.000001297343,0.00008046185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973174,0.001454333,0.000756902,0.0001084757,0.0003116396,0.000003235627,0.000007266984,0.000005124226,0.00003567339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05289098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9460827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1810802980","doi":"10.1007/s11166-015-9216-5","title":"Probabilistic sophistication and reverse Bayesianism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Sophistication; Mathematical economics; Probabilistic logic; Subjective expected utility; Expected utility hypothesis; Representation (politics); Decision theory; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1156300611309073,"gpt":0.3726660967712283,"spread":0.257036035640321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003596331,0.00008381355,0.0002631106,0.0001556319,0.00008861188,0.0001892921,0.0001935136,0.00005805094,0.00002867024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006716296,0.00005278846,0.00005516193,0.0001348711,0.0001193218,0.0002450906,0.00005247675,0.0001658969,0.00001723068],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005008597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000430412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002118782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985586,0.0001268531,0.0006059044,0.0001711707,0.0004370334,0.0001003736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976128,0.0008216302,0.0006014557,0.0001848851,0.0005271632,0.000252092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002032379,0.00006588555,0.01571939,0.000002145593,0.000008152884,0.00002976823,0.001137655,0.0009788512,0.00001960548,0.001973422,0.01064147,0.9692204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008330443,0.000304236,0.01632658,0.00003025892,0.00006866053,0.0002683123,0.00160789,0.00508867,0.000005250458,0.9319203,0.0434205,0.0001262917],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995111,0.0003806066,0.00310183,0.0005396907,0.0003928468,0.0000487723,0.00001045228,0.000004308364,0.0004105067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962703,0.000171399,0.003265763,0.00007149257,0.0001266252,4.318335e-7,3.361787e-7,0.000004236849,0.00008942284],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9690941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8040518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996299332","doi":"10.1023/b:risk.0000009434.18807.bd","title":"A Simple Risk-Sharing Experiment","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission; York University","keywords":"Ex-ante; Exploit; Simple (philosophy); Economics; Test (biology); Microeconomics; Computer science; Actuarial science; Computer security; Macroeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02799752562350948,"gpt":0.3309313850388068,"spread":0.3029338594152973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000969957,0.0000836581,0.000197795,0.00005137116,0.0005506519,0.00006639679,0.000112479,0.0000416115,0.0001029834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002836635,0.00006982098,0.00008828112,0.00006471392,0.0001472265,0.0001625621,0.00003288126,0.0001709533,0.000003765038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001753899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006461383,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003328131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007115059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991283,0.0001374404,0.0002773836,0.0001077251,0.0001536857,0.0001954177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992478,0.000101202,0.0003662248,0.00007222871,0.00007212123,0.0001403896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009065431,0.0002050183,0.8801621,0.000003731155,0.0001018961,0.00002032857,0.06827125,0.0003441054,0.0007855587,0.03610903,0.00143561,0.01247074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005080534,0.001002818,0.04902463,0.00009860897,0.0003668668,0.00004715788,0.3876587,0.0001732935,0.009933326,0.11422,0.431298,0.001096079],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989744,0.002901423,0.00004346099,0.0000684984,0.0002554903,0.00006291318,0.000004982955,0.000007329489,0.00691189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948543,0.004326465,0.0005736439,0.00003531805,0.0001120917,0.000002200272,1.729906e-7,0.000005706309,0.00009012043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8311375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5031161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063996785","doi":"10.1007/s11166-005-5832-9","title":"Ranked Additive Utility Representations of Gambles: Old and New Axiomatizations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02759046979914521,"gpt":0.2509645478871633,"spread":0.2233740780880181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003953059,0.00006847416,0.0002773695,0.0001543862,0.00007849103,0.00002670986,0.00006015171,0.00003914908,0.0003151046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001521058,0.00006200923,0.00007083896,0.0001375848,0.00006540025,0.0002166231,0.00001570981,0.0001032445,0.000002653826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001693634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003086012,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006347956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001550943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991594,0.000008208112,0.0006027937,0.0001038932,0.00003829438,0.00008741012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988905,0.00008906212,0.0007308639,0.0001040882,0.00008886446,0.00009663424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001159283,0.0001500934,0.8629128,0.00003002836,0.0002405458,0.0000029761,0.005153651,0.009113321,0.000007447018,0.07245966,0.007096413,0.04271715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001543635,0.0001077616,0.8483998,0.0000506455,0.0000625614,0.00002576887,0.0007067193,0.0653214,0.00004897095,0.02569267,0.05787683,0.0001633076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853154,0.003527077,0.008153131,0.000557952,0.0001015634,0.00006301727,0.0002221368,0.000003306345,0.002056452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989854,0.008345915,0.001291344,0.00005050734,0.0001428127,4.709092e-7,0.000004891299,0.000004559002,0.0003054345],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05620808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3450174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028255406","doi":"10.1007/s11166-013-9171-y","title":"Does insurance fraud in automobile theft insurance fluctuate with the business cycle?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Automobile insurance; Insurance fraud; Business; Actuarial science; Business cycle; Property insurance; Casualty insurance; Insurance policy; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005628133296612484,"gpt":0.1823682187168911,"spread":0.1767400854202786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008103439,0.0001879428,0.0004873751,0.0001960214,0.0001705374,0.0001231102,0.0003107612,0.000071999,0.00006739791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001251877,0.00009477925,0.00008011411,0.0004773232,0.0001509127,0.0005299885,0.00004541827,0.0003933167,0.00004310142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005648153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002879298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002166985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005252344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986756,0.00003854309,0.0006652783,0.0002279244,0.00009152487,0.0003011304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985484,0.0001166743,0.0008592797,0.0002457325,0.0001688519,0.00006098545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001331776,0.00009659132,0.9373283,0.00003248325,0.00004651258,0.00001806246,0.001664246,0.007304245,0.000005586662,0.005911017,0.0004937651,0.04696606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00103518,0.00008230338,0.9518214,0.00006674035,0.000005861188,0.00000884974,0.0003607682,0.0006712206,0.000007182073,0.02522568,0.02053069,0.0001841216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933326,0.002221035,0.0009955449,0.00154682,0.0004021622,0.0002525143,0.0000549943,0.000009228299,0.001185078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921181,0.007019425,0.0002365759,0.0002560786,0.000182544,0.000022391,9.819308e-7,0.00001694003,0.0001470058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04678194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3864986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488103917","doi":"10.1023/a:1011132102314","title":"Ranked-Weighted Utilities and Qualitative Convolution","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1099767490026696,"gpt":0.4204663498269124,"spread":0.3104896008242428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00433034,0.0001106986,0.0003768495,0.0002504796,0.0001887778,0.0002069968,0.0001828341,0.00007274873,0.0001278651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001801183,0.00006860326,0.0001046738,0.0002034903,0.0002302381,0.0004004335,0.00004767672,0.0002161311,0.00001153462],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003681948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005722175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001394046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008306941,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980659,0.0003590953,0.0007846686,0.0001853084,0.0004587878,0.0001462459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959093,0.002616266,0.0006901652,0.0001467426,0.0004886781,0.0001488343],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006465075,0.00006405968,0.02966338,0.000001725964,0.00003153202,0.00003374272,0.01350687,0.0001003526,0.00003255211,0.001186904,0.002992084,0.9517403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00202938,0.0005139456,0.04675207,0.00006792225,0.00008890435,0.0004416422,0.06521048,0.004452981,0.00002476242,0.8078194,0.07235161,0.0002469202],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952695,0.00150528,0.001999767,0.0003615379,0.0003499893,0.00004129892,0.00002299722,0.000005704487,0.0004439275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971195,0.001624325,0.0008756726,0.00006430666,0.0001017959,4.227807e-7,5.62521e-7,0.000004300903,0.0002091197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9514934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.279756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775632528","doi":"10.1007/s11166-017-9267-x","title":"Baseline risk and marginal willingness to pay for health risk reduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Universiteit van Tilburg; Royal Society; Universiteit van Amsterdam; University of Central Florida; Yale University; University of Alberta; European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Baseline (sea); Willingness to pay; Actuarial science; Economics; Preference; Marginal value; Marginal utility; Contingent valuation; Heart disease; Econometric model; Medicine; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Internal medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05143877736211261,"gpt":0.2638360566676161,"spread":0.2123972793055035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002801011,0.0001057232,0.0003486153,0.00008663079,0.0005966338,0.000099549,0.0001024728,0.0000532608,0.00003144975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004068596,0.00009013247,0.00008219765,0.00001994723,0.00005384477,0.0002768673,0.00003209145,0.0001881133,0.000008259131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001137753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001992827,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00108049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009398808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989951,0.00003778924,0.0005696871,0.0002062014,0.00002962322,0.000161629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977911,0.00007670991,0.001771673,0.0001730555,0.00002574801,0.0001617316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002061335,0.00004344727,0.8708375,0.00001811556,0.00004629948,3.983563e-7,0.0006231522,0.003411798,0.000003167956,0.0009212284,0.001198177,0.1226906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00152688,0.0004300595,0.9287771,0.00002960942,0.00003590756,0.00001970868,0.0002590996,0.008627479,0.00001135476,0.02293982,0.03718716,0.0001558296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9586924,0.001524097,0.03712001,0.001572201,0.0005046511,0.0001614775,0.000362843,0.000002996363,0.00005935743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756486,0.01938877,0.004316444,0.00007992098,0.0004224996,0.000004503677,0.000005255878,0.00001134007,0.0001226607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1225348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4588885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526201865","doi":"10.1007/s11166-017-9264-0","title":"Learning-by-doing in an ambiguous environment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ambiguity; Ambiguity aversion; Expected utility hypothesis; Session (web analytics); Measure (data warehouse); Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Actuarial science; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematical economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05447298923000997,"gpt":0.366967090401454,"spread":0.312494101171444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00360211,0.0001020872,0.0003280801,0.0001613523,0.0003827419,0.0006493182,0.0006338208,0.0000692341,0.0001012992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001347147,0.00006863637,0.00009276199,0.00003652658,0.0001185126,0.0005832857,0.0001124653,0.0004019983,0.0000240839],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005681628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003354131,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003460546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001397263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998316,0.0001642853,0.0006673234,0.0002166897,0.0004726512,0.0001630417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979427,0.0002596025,0.001192289,0.0003698973,0.00007500661,0.0001604945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006793378,0.00005611431,0.1335334,2.63074e-7,0.000002355965,0.00003243983,0.0004583581,0.005604411,0.00009180916,0.000004670787,0.0002489535,0.8598993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002721157,0.001552818,0.7710925,0.00009677475,0.0000538022,0.0001602126,0.005723015,0.01064168,0.0001244565,0.05906568,0.148313,0.0004548983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985653,0.000235498,0.0005091819,0.0001741552,0.0002590998,0.00002844545,0.000006071157,0.000002501839,0.0002198135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984187,0.000693746,0.0006354394,0.00002691598,0.0000832398,3.478901e-7,3.489589e-7,0.000006049126,0.0001351873],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8594444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6261391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118335134","doi":"10.1007/s10797-006-6665-4","title":"Estimates of Own Lethal Risks and Anchoring Effects","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Anchoring; Cohort; Population; Psychology; Cohort effect; Actuarial science; Demography; Social psychology; Economics; Medicine; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06492304748172943,"gpt":0.3714043440293516,"spread":0.3064812965476221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002201396,0.0001142596,0.000446668,0.0002311762,0.0001113664,0.0001544419,0.0002094923,0.00007011055,0.00001878572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001662709,0.00007062165,0.0001141969,0.0001608484,0.0001347495,0.0002462281,0.00006749804,0.000206088,0.000002748667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002004784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003552396,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003457972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004691725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99843,0.00008778882,0.00075155,0.0001744779,0.0004135186,0.0001427013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960296,0.002593836,0.00087617,0.0001599365,0.0002427142,0.00009772831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008288697,0.00004853988,0.2720513,0.000005010724,0.000008880962,0.00003107669,0.0001391453,0.002238292,0.0004277062,0.0001230918,0.0009078568,0.7239362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001581687,0.0005590967,0.6213027,0.0001882782,0.0001373727,0.0002691295,0.0005106009,0.004547395,0.001821426,0.3638815,0.004967687,0.00023307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962755,0.001375635,0.001643574,0.00005996216,0.0003454363,0.00004011521,0.00001035695,0.000004066561,0.0002453374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957212,0.0002298546,0.003844903,0.000009609956,0.0001689862,3.193668e-7,2.433262e-7,0.000005425237,0.00001949218],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7237031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2879867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491755126","doi":"10.1023/a:1011149422763","title":"Lottery Decisions and Probability Weighting Function","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Argument (complex analysis); Mathematical economics; Function (biology); Weighting; Preference; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08839251925516983,"gpt":0.3476835833279564,"spread":0.2592910640727866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004726859,0.0001239352,0.0003635612,0.000262039,0.0002827513,0.0003295737,0.0002327666,0.00008580308,0.0001153024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004885095,0.00007504583,0.0001335009,0.0002905637,0.0001186847,0.0004716857,0.0000988325,0.000300641,0.00001496486],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004240514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006064219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004134611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009427116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978747,0.0001789398,0.0009608263,0.0002741374,0.0005399639,0.0001714009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955172,0.002819926,0.0007606969,0.00025559,0.0004406382,0.0002059613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002164709,0.00004690023,0.1530389,4.674691e-7,0.000006741807,0.00001532886,0.0001715895,0.0004238634,0.00003134847,0.00009507593,0.0009283766,0.8450249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000858822,0.0003840472,0.2629479,0.0000664184,0.00007765616,0.0005325566,0.001136703,0.002441121,0.000009013614,0.6670902,0.06427966,0.0001758759],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914906,0.00050583,0.00669592,0.0003823466,0.0005610356,0.00005526489,0.000007083172,0.000007503199,0.0002944357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966395,0.0008315846,0.002160573,0.00009947257,0.0001936256,5.503579e-7,3.106679e-7,0.000005680776,0.00006872614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8448491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5848267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264690108","doi":"10.1007/s11166-018-9294-2","title":"Dinner with Bayes: On the revision of risk beliefs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Bayes' theorem; Population; Social psychology; Risk perception; Actuarial science; Bayesian probability; Medicine; Environmental health; Economics; Computer science; Geography; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01507350770412553,"gpt":0.2872395212732116,"spread":0.2721660135690861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001976243,0.00005650094,0.0001385843,0.0000570617,0.0003978955,0.00004939819,0.0001275698,0.00003845142,0.0002186519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001366203,0.00002532879,0.00004562807,0.0001608991,0.0002717028,0.0001852932,0.00001067667,0.0001749178,0.000006028213],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002356144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009440621,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004533158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000329171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990258,0.0001907363,0.0002346793,0.00004136717,0.0003910881,0.0001163084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985701,0.0003965439,0.0005538256,0.00008976082,0.0002913541,0.00009835172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00130146,0.000152405,0.01873173,0.00001963623,0.0001190158,0.000003452874,0.3532193,0.0003603416,0.0000279381,0.04717286,0.08038068,0.4985112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002234367,0.002476291,0.08941294,0.0007440984,0.0001519967,0.00001661736,0.09274165,0.000466352,0.0004202113,0.008499035,0.8025656,0.0002708681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849471,0.000135062,0.0004621306,0.001388468,0.0001211497,0.00006292602,0.000009165972,0.000003991735,0.01286999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956161,0.003427465,0.0002021582,0.0002508297,0.0004000755,3.558491e-8,1.785801e-7,0.000002529016,0.000100675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7221849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3060331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154333424","doi":"10.1023/a:1015683401986","title":"Replacement Cost Endorsement and Opportunistic Fraud in Automobile Insurance","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Automobile insurance; Business; Insurance fraud; Actuarial science; Internet privacy; Computer security; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03433640269979697,"gpt":0.2347911233840333,"spread":0.2004547206842363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001991421,0.0002554723,0.001229579,0.0003785298,0.0001014069,0.0001545638,0.0002344339,0.0002613164,0.0002204717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002191305,0.000302211,0.0001697397,0.00007399461,0.0001485401,0.0001325496,0.0002060958,0.0007269874,0.00001359501],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003733931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006521721,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002114511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003874934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971128,0.00006549039,0.00196504,0.0004722064,0.00007085309,0.0003136359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965949,0.0001411249,0.002657828,0.0003161096,0.00006534214,0.0002247118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002929113,0.000374628,0.9255424,0.0004250754,0.0003569529,0.0001031695,0.003459644,0.006393423,0.000002051703,0.03015868,0.002997813,0.02989325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009501989,0.00105705,0.3363543,0.001513345,0.00012883,0.000204947,0.001497304,0.03613362,0.000009987664,0.3346686,0.276937,0.001992947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674274,0.01893281,0.000878754,0.0003319977,0.002500328,0.0006615403,0.001459186,0.00001302295,0.007794926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9519029,0.0471633,0.0001714376,0.0001049327,0.0004233996,0.00002277816,0.00001006861,0.00002368061,0.0001775607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.589188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899743006","doi":"10.1007/s11166-018-9291-5","title":"Reporting probabilistic expectations with dynamic uncertainty about possible distributions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Econometrics; Probability distribution; Counterfactual thinking; Bayes' theorem; Prior probability; Set (abstract data type); Probabilistic logic; Bayesian probability; Statistics; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Joint probability distribution; Computer science; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05329607838990369,"gpt":0.3793879351215523,"spread":0.3260918567316486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003533109,0.0001804822,0.0005261193,0.0002887934,0.000639315,0.0004610181,0.0004054992,0.00008337782,0.0001210418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01139079,0.0001060417,0.0001812963,0.0006437721,0.000450852,0.0003987307,0.00007326822,0.0003369453,0.00002538375],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001577949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003574116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001256843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001090218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996282,0.0001569082,0.002212244,0.0003573447,0.0007088565,0.0002826726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919462,0.001341416,0.004290419,0.0004314145,0.00174715,0.0002433965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005749705,0.0002934466,0.08072618,0.000005910558,0.00007047782,0.0001224231,0.003421837,0.01199289,0.000115053,0.001110802,0.002522575,0.8990434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031253,0.003067012,0.2841996,0.0005690582,0.0005382505,0.002576443,0.03013606,0.06185028,0.0001014341,0.5953142,0.01750867,0.001013723],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843522,0.0001963454,0.01410643,0.0002846034,0.0004358623,0.0001059006,0.00008119494,0.00001678228,0.000420635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954505,0.00004874511,0.004143289,0.00002601239,0.0001856603,0.000003085276,0.000004742933,0.00001043323,0.0001275612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8980297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378416836","doi":"10.1007/s11166-023-09412-4","title":"Advantageous selection without moral hazard","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Swenson College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota Duluth; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Fondation du Risque; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Moral hazard; Context (archaeology); Actuarial science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Product (mathematics); Risk aversion (psychology); Morale hazard; Face (sociological concept); Economics; Hazard; Property (philosophy); Microeconomics; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk pool; Insurance policy; Computer science; Expected utility hypothesis; Key person insurance; Incentive; Financial economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01198596754021855,"gpt":0.2402538306882607,"spread":0.2282678631480421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000549219,0.0001266436,0.0002612444,0.0004386267,0.0001945704,0.0001518677,0.0001011467,0.00004724217,0.00007791782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001769556,0.00009839983,0.0001247539,0.0007224588,0.00003468215,0.0006694497,0.00004627928,0.0001906823,0.00006087799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002930397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000196217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002599369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002666044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999037,0.00001534561,0.0003481069,0.0001167182,0.0002885734,0.000194269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991811,0.00003828884,0.0003927643,0.00007282123,0.0002956327,0.0000194237],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001014822,0.00001791074,0.97892,0.00003003497,0.00001817169,0.00002589124,0.00005618064,0.003044473,0.0001359563,0.0006526886,0.007116193,0.00988098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001103247,0.000059657,0.8311936,0.00009752548,0.0003911774,0.00002720815,0.0003107195,0.07577316,0.00003745147,0.01124785,0.07946347,0.0002949152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986422,0.0001589763,0.00008305108,0.0001119029,0.0003583569,0.00005404947,0.000002069763,0.00005689217,0.0005324662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99779,0.0005002351,0.0001936982,0.0001627287,0.00112091,0.000001008038,0.000009010841,0.00001488069,0.0002075171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1477264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4012628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192529810","doi":"10.1007/s11166-006-9519-7","title":"Lottery qualities","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Certainty; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Prospect theory; Point (geometry); Test (biology); Decision theory; Key (lock); Economics; Computer science; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04168384935939519,"gpt":0.3524790080602633,"spread":0.3107951587008681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002260042,0.0000756927,0.0001579168,0.00008221365,0.00006009962,0.00002430921,0.00005239073,0.0000483562,0.0001650429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001312109,0.00005271579,0.00007945074,0.00004420161,0.00004541332,0.00004943729,0.000007519383,0.0001359815,0.00001349779],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001871714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001309705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001421901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004636789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99936,0.00008002624,0.0002529261,0.00007053484,0.0001120413,0.0001245213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994954,0.0001048936,0.0002105548,0.00008204571,0.00006112851,0.0000460079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002000772,0.0003031306,0.9608911,0.000003914869,0.00007657461,0.0001765966,0.001663619,0.000056424,0.00004646558,0.003483969,0.006970211,0.02612789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001638487,0.000186644,0.9799815,0.0000166166,0.0001362359,0.0002300021,0.001297422,0.00000243296,0.00003418211,0.006236254,0.01015484,0.00008533424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956729,0.001234384,0.0001106222,0.00007920294,0.0005161241,0.00002235945,0.00001481037,0.000007569416,0.002342016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983015,0.00007633684,0.0001392254,0.00003270633,0.0002476635,8.898166e-7,0.000001998646,0.000006417441,0.001193284],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02604255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2149688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}